WEBVTT - Judging Sam: Opening Statements

0:00:15.316 --> 0:00:15.796
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin.

0:00:18.516 --> 0:00:21.476
<v Speaker 2>Hey there, it's Michael Lewis. Before we get to this episode,

0:00:21.596 --> 0:00:23.116
<v Speaker 2>I want to let you know that you can listen

0:00:23.116 --> 0:00:26.316
<v Speaker 2>to each episode of Judging Sam The Trial of Sam

0:00:26.356 --> 0:00:30.516
<v Speaker 2>Bankman Freed ad free by becoming a Pushkin Plus subscriber,

0:00:30.996 --> 0:00:34.076
<v Speaker 2>and with your subscription you'll also get exclusive access to

0:00:34.156 --> 0:00:38.676
<v Speaker 2>ad free and early bingeable podcasts like Paul McCartney's new podcast,

0:00:38.836 --> 0:00:43.636
<v Speaker 2>McCartney A Life and Lyrics, Malcolm Gladwell's revisionist history, The

0:00:43.676 --> 0:00:47.516
<v Speaker 2>Happiness Lab from Doctor Lorie Santos, and tons of other

0:00:47.596 --> 0:00:51.116
<v Speaker 2>top shows from Pushkin. Sign up an Apple Podcasts or

0:00:51.116 --> 0:00:52.916
<v Speaker 2>at Pushkin, dot fm.

0:00:52.556 --> 0:00:53.516
<v Speaker 3>Slash Plus.

0:00:55.556 --> 0:00:58.676
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Judging Sam The Trial of Sam Bankman Freed.

0:00:58.996 --> 0:01:02.596
<v Speaker 2>I'm Michael Lewis. Bankman Freed was worth tens of billions

0:01:02.596 --> 0:01:06.636
<v Speaker 2>of dollars before FTX his cryptocurrency exchange came apart at

0:01:06.636 --> 0:01:09.556
<v Speaker 2>the scenes, and now he's being tried for financial crimes.

0:01:09.596 --> 0:01:11.196
<v Speaker 2>They could send him to prison for the rest of

0:01:11.236 --> 0:01:12.836
<v Speaker 2>his life.

0:01:14.636 --> 0:01:17.556
<v Speaker 3>It's Thursday, October fifth, and in the studio this evening

0:01:17.676 --> 0:01:20.996
<v Speaker 3>we have our reporter Lydia, Jean Cott, and Rebecca Mermelstein,

0:01:21.156 --> 0:01:24.356
<v Speaker 3>who's a partner at the law firm ol Melvanie and Myers.

0:01:24.676 --> 0:01:27.316
<v Speaker 3>I'm Jacob Weisberg, the co founder of Pushkin, standing in

0:01:27.356 --> 0:01:30.436
<v Speaker 3>for Michael Lewis. We're recording this after the third day

0:01:30.476 --> 0:01:33.676
<v Speaker 3>of Sam bankman Fried's trial, and a lot has happened

0:01:33.716 --> 0:01:37.436
<v Speaker 3>in three days. We're through the jury selection, the opening statements,

0:01:37.476 --> 0:01:40.796
<v Speaker 3>and the first witnesses. So LJ, I'm going to turn

0:01:40.796 --> 0:01:43.596
<v Speaker 3>to you first. You've been getting to the courthouse very

0:01:43.636 --> 0:01:46.476
<v Speaker 3>early in the morning and lining up with the other reporters.

0:01:46.796 --> 0:01:47.836
<v Speaker 3>What's the scene there.

0:01:47.716 --> 0:01:52.796
<v Speaker 1>Been, Like, it's actually really fun. You know, reporters were

0:01:52.796 --> 0:01:55.716
<v Speaker 1>all interested in each other, so everyone's kind of chattying

0:01:55.756 --> 0:01:58.876
<v Speaker 1>and asking each other questions. And yeah, we get there

0:01:58.876 --> 0:02:01.076
<v Speaker 1>at six am and the doy is usually open at eight,

0:02:01.156 --> 0:02:04.396
<v Speaker 1>so it's about two hours, so people take turns running

0:02:04.396 --> 0:02:07.596
<v Speaker 1>to get coffee and bagels. One thing that's funny is

0:02:07.596 --> 0:02:10.596
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of crypto reporters and they kind of

0:02:10.596 --> 0:02:13.076
<v Speaker 1>think that this might be the last big story in crypto,

0:02:13.236 --> 0:02:17.076
<v Speaker 1>so they're kind of covering their own funeral in a way.

0:02:17.276 --> 0:02:19.236
<v Speaker 3>I haven't thought of it that way. That's really interesting.

0:02:19.596 --> 0:02:22.476
<v Speaker 3>So I read the opening statements, which happened on Wednesday,

0:02:22.556 --> 0:02:25.396
<v Speaker 3>right after the jury selection, but I know that's not

0:02:25.556 --> 0:02:29.276
<v Speaker 3>the same as seeing them delivered. How did they sound

0:02:29.316 --> 0:02:29.996
<v Speaker 3>in the courthouse.

0:02:30.236 --> 0:02:34.036
<v Speaker 1>The prosecution was very bombastic, I would say, in the

0:02:34.076 --> 0:02:37.236
<v Speaker 1>way that they delivered their opening statements. Rebecca and your

0:02:37.236 --> 0:02:39.436
<v Speaker 1>Bengo card. In a previous episode, you said that they

0:02:39.476 --> 0:02:41.636
<v Speaker 1>would use the word lies, and they used the word

0:02:41.716 --> 0:02:44.276
<v Speaker 1>lies a lot, and they hit it. They talked about

0:02:44.276 --> 0:02:47.716
<v Speaker 1>how Sam led to FTX customers, he lied to investors,

0:02:47.756 --> 0:02:51.276
<v Speaker 1>he lied to lenders. At some point the prosecutor actually

0:02:51.316 --> 0:02:55.716
<v Speaker 1>pointed at Sam and he said, this man stole billions

0:02:55.716 --> 0:02:58.596
<v Speaker 1>of dollars from thousands of people. So I feel like

0:02:58.636 --> 0:03:01.876
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to use simple sentences, you know, subject verb,

0:03:02.476 --> 0:03:04.476
<v Speaker 1>and they were trying to say, this is not a

0:03:04.516 --> 0:03:08.156
<v Speaker 1>complicated case. This is simple. This man lied and he stole.

0:03:09.236 --> 0:03:11.356
<v Speaker 3>Rebecca, how was the rest of your Bengo card. I

0:03:11.356 --> 0:03:15.676
<v Speaker 3>think there was victims, greed, stole, and then defense would

0:03:15.756 --> 0:03:18.956
<v Speaker 3>use the word complexity a lot. Did that much a matchup?

0:03:18.956 --> 0:03:19.356
<v Speaker 3>Pretty well?

0:03:19.356 --> 0:03:21.556
<v Speaker 4>I did better on the government Bengo card than the

0:03:21.556 --> 0:03:24.316
<v Speaker 4>defense bingo card. Actually, I think on the lies, the victims,

0:03:24.316 --> 0:03:27.476
<v Speaker 4>the greed, I got it. On the defense one, I'm

0:03:27.516 --> 0:03:29.196
<v Speaker 4>not sure I heard as much complexity as I thought

0:03:29.196 --> 0:03:29.716
<v Speaker 4>I was going to.

0:03:30.676 --> 0:03:33.996
<v Speaker 3>I will say just reading it that the prosecution opening

0:03:34.076 --> 0:03:37.596
<v Speaker 3>statement was very strong and vivid, and I lost the

0:03:37.636 --> 0:03:40.396
<v Speaker 3>threat a little bit a few times. Reading the defense statement,

0:03:40.396 --> 0:03:43.036
<v Speaker 3>it was honestly, it read just a little boring.

0:03:43.156 --> 0:03:44.796
<v Speaker 1>Exactly I was actually going to say that, and I

0:03:44.836 --> 0:03:48.396
<v Speaker 1>was like, arguably, you could say maybe confusing, which maybe

0:03:48.436 --> 0:03:52.076
<v Speaker 1>was actually a strategy. And as opposed to the prosecution,

0:03:52.196 --> 0:03:55.236
<v Speaker 1>the defense lawyer he was a lot more seft spoken.

0:03:55.396 --> 0:03:57.556
<v Speaker 1>I think he kind of seemed fatherly. I think I

0:03:57.596 --> 0:03:59.196
<v Speaker 1>read somewhere that it was kind of like he was

0:03:59.276 --> 0:04:01.796
<v Speaker 1>we were children and it was story time. Like I

0:04:01.876 --> 0:04:04.636
<v Speaker 1>did see wonder nodding off, but I think he was

0:04:04.716 --> 0:04:07.156
<v Speaker 1>kind of trying to tell an opposite story. He kept

0:04:07.156 --> 0:04:09.436
<v Speaker 1>saying like Sam is not a villain. I think he

0:04:09.516 --> 0:04:14.996
<v Speaker 1>was saying like, this is not this bombastic, dramatic thing. Actually,

0:04:14.996 --> 0:04:18.356
<v Speaker 1>like let's be mature here. There's nothing really to see.

0:04:18.436 --> 0:04:20.636
<v Speaker 1>This is just a young guy, a math nerd, who

0:04:20.836 --> 0:04:23.196
<v Speaker 1>started this company and it didn't work out.

0:04:23.316 --> 0:04:23.836
<v Speaker 3>Basically.

0:04:24.156 --> 0:04:25.996
<v Speaker 1>The one metaphor that really stood out to me was

0:04:26.036 --> 0:04:27.756
<v Speaker 1>how he talked about a whole lot of startups. You're

0:04:27.916 --> 0:04:30.196
<v Speaker 1>flying a plane as you're building it. That was the

0:04:30.196 --> 0:04:32.116
<v Speaker 1>thing that I pulled out as to what happened here.

0:04:32.436 --> 0:04:35.196
<v Speaker 1>And they were moving too fast and they crashed, But

0:04:35.716 --> 0:04:37.116
<v Speaker 1>no one meant to do anything.

0:04:36.796 --> 0:04:41.276
<v Speaker 3>Bad mistakes, not lies and fraud. Rebecca, what surprised you?

0:04:41.356 --> 0:04:44.876
<v Speaker 3>Were there any obvious mistakes or any wins in the

0:04:45.036 --> 0:04:46.996
<v Speaker 3>opening statements and the first witnesses.

0:04:47.516 --> 0:04:50.596
<v Speaker 4>I think the thing that surprised me the most about

0:04:50.636 --> 0:04:56.356
<v Speaker 4>the defense opening is that he didn't call the cooperators liars.

0:04:56.676 --> 0:05:00.436
<v Speaker 4>And that's interesting because there's a lot of cooperators. I

0:05:00.516 --> 0:05:03.196
<v Speaker 4>had anticipated you'd get a defense opening that called them

0:05:03.236 --> 0:05:06.116
<v Speaker 4>liars and talked about why they were lying. This was

0:05:06.156 --> 0:05:09.596
<v Speaker 4>a little softer than that. Subtly so, I think because

0:05:10.116 --> 0:05:15.516
<v Speaker 4>Defense counsel did say that the cooperators were motivated by

0:05:15.596 --> 0:05:18.196
<v Speaker 4>needing to say what the government wanted to hear, but

0:05:18.276 --> 0:05:20.276
<v Speaker 4>he didn't go that far, to go all the way

0:05:20.316 --> 0:05:23.836
<v Speaker 4>to lies. And he talked about the fact that hindsight

0:05:23.916 --> 0:05:25.556
<v Speaker 4>is twenty twenty, which I think is going to be

0:05:25.596 --> 0:05:29.796
<v Speaker 4>a defense theme here, and that the cooperators were viewing

0:05:29.956 --> 0:05:34.596
<v Speaker 4>statements with that hindsight, that they were interpreting ambiguous statements

0:05:34.676 --> 0:05:37.516
<v Speaker 4>in light of what the government wanted to hear and

0:05:37.556 --> 0:05:40.196
<v Speaker 4>so there's an effort, it seems to me so far

0:05:40.436 --> 0:05:43.596
<v Speaker 4>could change strategies as the trial unfolds to thread a needle,

0:05:43.636 --> 0:05:47.116
<v Speaker 4>which is, you don't have to think these cooperators are

0:05:47.276 --> 0:05:50.796
<v Speaker 4>lying under oath to think they're wrong. They could be mistaken,

0:05:51.436 --> 0:05:53.756
<v Speaker 4>they could be reading too much into things, and it

0:05:53.796 --> 0:05:56.396
<v Speaker 4>gives you a little daylight where you can say, these

0:05:56.436 --> 0:05:59.796
<v Speaker 4>four people may be telling the truth as they believe it,

0:06:00.116 --> 0:06:02.236
<v Speaker 4>but they're wrong. And we'll see whether or not that

0:06:02.316 --> 0:06:03.996
<v Speaker 4>strategy stays true throughout the whole trial.

0:06:04.396 --> 0:06:06.756
<v Speaker 3>So that's a defense strategy. What would you say about

0:06:06.916 --> 0:06:09.036
<v Speaker 3>prosecution strategy so far?

0:06:09.356 --> 0:06:11.876
<v Speaker 4>I think it's pretty as expected. I would say the

0:06:12.316 --> 0:06:16.236
<v Speaker 4>opening had the same structure you always see in government openings,

0:06:16.276 --> 0:06:19.156
<v Speaker 4>what we would call the grab, that kind of early

0:06:19.556 --> 0:06:23.956
<v Speaker 4>and initial description of things, then a narrative about what

0:06:24.036 --> 0:06:27.796
<v Speaker 4>happened here, and ending with a description of how the

0:06:27.796 --> 0:06:30.796
<v Speaker 4>government is going to prove its case, what kind of witnesses,

0:06:31.116 --> 0:06:34.476
<v Speaker 4>what kind of evidence, even the point as I think

0:06:34.476 --> 0:06:37.876
<v Speaker 4>prosecutors would call it that Lydia Jean referred to very

0:06:37.916 --> 0:06:42.556
<v Speaker 4>traditional for a government prosecutor to during the opening point

0:06:42.956 --> 0:06:46.196
<v Speaker 4>with an extended dramatic point at a defendant, look at

0:06:46.196 --> 0:06:48.836
<v Speaker 4>the defendant. It's really a way of signaling to a

0:06:48.956 --> 0:06:51.596
<v Speaker 4>jury that you're going to ask to convict someone and

0:06:51.676 --> 0:06:53.996
<v Speaker 4>send them to jail for a long time, that you

0:06:54.036 --> 0:06:56.236
<v Speaker 4>are asking them to do that hard thing of sitting

0:06:56.276 --> 0:06:59.236
<v Speaker 4>in judgment, and that you yourself are buying into that,

0:06:59.236 --> 0:07:01.236
<v Speaker 4>that you believe it and they should believe it. So

0:07:01.476 --> 0:07:05.356
<v Speaker 4>not surprised by any of that couple little, I would say,

0:07:06.396 --> 0:07:11.556
<v Speaker 4>nuanced points that were made. The government trying to lay

0:07:11.556 --> 0:07:15.396
<v Speaker 4>a foundation to undermine what it predicts the defense might

0:07:15.476 --> 0:07:19.436
<v Speaker 4>be without being defensive. Always hard to know exactly what

0:07:19.476 --> 0:07:21.516
<v Speaker 4>the defense is going to be, so they may or

0:07:21.556 --> 0:07:24.116
<v Speaker 4>may not be getting it right. A couple of examples.

0:07:24.796 --> 0:07:28.876
<v Speaker 4>At what point the government said that FTX was not

0:07:28.956 --> 0:07:32.036
<v Speaker 4>a bank, it was an exchange and so it can't

0:07:32.116 --> 0:07:36.156
<v Speaker 4>borrow or spend customer money. We know from pre trial

0:07:36.196 --> 0:07:39.276
<v Speaker 4>briefing that one argument the defense was trying to make

0:07:39.396 --> 0:07:42.036
<v Speaker 4>is look, your money in your bank account at JP

0:07:42.116 --> 0:07:45.196
<v Speaker 4>Morgan Chase is in fact being used by the bank

0:07:45.236 --> 0:07:47.716
<v Speaker 4>for its own purposes, and that's not illegal. It's totally fine,

0:07:48.276 --> 0:07:50.636
<v Speaker 4>and so it was reasonable for that to be done here.

0:07:51.116 --> 0:07:53.476
<v Speaker 4>I think that reference by the government was an effort

0:07:53.516 --> 0:07:55.956
<v Speaker 4>to make sure that if the defense went there, the

0:07:56.036 --> 0:07:59.036
<v Speaker 4>jury had heard from them first, that's not the same thing.

0:07:59.156 --> 0:08:01.716
<v Speaker 4>That's not what happened here. And you heard that in

0:08:01.756 --> 0:08:05.276
<v Speaker 4>a couple of places, a reference that the government puts

0:08:05.276 --> 0:08:08.036
<v Speaker 4>in there to make sure that if the defense says it,

0:08:08.396 --> 0:08:11.196
<v Speaker 4>the jury doesn't think, well, wait a minute, that's new information.

0:08:11.316 --> 0:08:13.156
<v Speaker 4>You say, oh, yeah, right, I sort of heard something

0:08:13.196 --> 0:08:17.436
<v Speaker 4>about that. So a couple other examples, you heard reference

0:08:17.476 --> 0:08:20.916
<v Speaker 4>to the fact that FTX had a program by which

0:08:20.996 --> 0:08:25.196
<v Speaker 4>customers could lend out their cryptocurrency to other people. I

0:08:25.196 --> 0:08:27.396
<v Speaker 4>think that's that same foundation if there's going to be

0:08:27.396 --> 0:08:29.836
<v Speaker 4>a defense that this was fine, and people lend each

0:08:29.876 --> 0:08:31.876
<v Speaker 4>other things all the time, and he was just borrowing.

0:08:32.476 --> 0:08:35.876
<v Speaker 4>The government preemptively said that program existed, that's not what

0:08:35.996 --> 0:08:39.796
<v Speaker 4>happened here. Another kind of flip of a fact that

0:08:39.876 --> 0:08:44.676
<v Speaker 4>was interesting is the government described Sam Bankman Freed's charitable

0:08:44.716 --> 0:08:48.556
<v Speaker 4>giving as self promotional, that he did it to boost

0:08:48.556 --> 0:08:52.876
<v Speaker 4>his own image as a way to gain access to

0:08:52.956 --> 0:08:55.756
<v Speaker 4>look good. And the same with the story about the

0:08:55.916 --> 0:08:59.596
<v Speaker 4>cover up. They talked about how in advance, in a

0:08:59.676 --> 0:09:03.676
<v Speaker 4>very nefarious and intentional way, the government says he was

0:09:03.756 --> 0:09:08.876
<v Speaker 4>already laying the foundation of his defense, for example, by

0:09:08.916 --> 0:09:12.276
<v Speaker 4>acting like he wasn't in charge of Alameda when he was,

0:09:12.596 --> 0:09:17.116
<v Speaker 4>by backdating contracts, by forcing people to communicate over encrypted

0:09:17.156 --> 0:09:21.356
<v Speaker 4>apps so that communications wouldn't exist anymore, and they specifically

0:09:21.356 --> 0:09:23.876
<v Speaker 4>said that as part of that cover up, he tried

0:09:23.876 --> 0:09:27.596
<v Speaker 4>to point to the terms of service as justifying what

0:09:27.716 --> 0:09:29.996
<v Speaker 4>happened here, and in fact, his lawyer did do that

0:09:30.036 --> 0:09:32.116
<v Speaker 4>in his opening he put up the terms of service

0:09:32.156 --> 0:09:33.636
<v Speaker 4>and said we're going to talk more about this. But

0:09:33.756 --> 0:09:36.676
<v Speaker 4>he was allowed to do it. So not a surprise,

0:09:36.756 --> 0:09:38.956
<v Speaker 4>I think, but certainly an indication of what the government

0:09:38.996 --> 0:09:40.116
<v Speaker 4>thought the defense was going to be.

0:09:41.276 --> 0:09:43.036
<v Speaker 3>We'll be back after the break to talk about the

0:09:43.036 --> 0:09:50.836
<v Speaker 3>witness testimony. We're back, and I want to hear both

0:09:50.876 --> 0:09:53.636
<v Speaker 3>of your thoughts about the witness testimony. We've heard so far.

0:09:54.156 --> 0:09:58.076
<v Speaker 3>The prosecutors have started calling their witnesses. The first was

0:09:58.116 --> 0:10:01.116
<v Speaker 3>a French commodity trader who lost a lot of money

0:10:01.116 --> 0:10:05.476
<v Speaker 3>on FPX. So I guess, LJ. How French was he

0:10:05.556 --> 0:10:07.116
<v Speaker 3>and why not an American victim?

0:10:09.316 --> 0:10:12.076
<v Speaker 1>I would say he seemed quite French, but he does

0:10:12.156 --> 0:10:16.516
<v Speaker 1>live in London now, And you know, people did we

0:10:16.596 --> 0:10:19.716
<v Speaker 1>did wonder why he was the victim that was chosen,

0:10:20.196 --> 0:10:25.116
<v Speaker 1>because he wasn't necessarily the most sympathetic victim. As you know,

0:10:25.196 --> 0:10:28.476
<v Speaker 1>a commodities trader who lives in London. He did lose

0:10:28.516 --> 0:10:31.356
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money on FTX, and he had screenshots

0:10:31.396 --> 0:10:34.676
<v Speaker 1>to show how he put money in the account. He

0:10:34.796 --> 0:10:38.516
<v Speaker 1>showed how his money was there, and he talked about

0:10:38.516 --> 0:10:41.156
<v Speaker 1>how he thought it was safe and how the reason

0:10:41.236 --> 0:10:44.836
<v Speaker 1>he invested in FTX was because he believed that his

0:10:44.916 --> 0:10:48.116
<v Speaker 1>customer deposits would be safe there. But you know, Rebecca,

0:10:48.316 --> 0:10:51.316
<v Speaker 1>in our last conversation, you talked about how a victim

0:10:51.356 --> 0:10:54.436
<v Speaker 1>would be you know, we should expect to hear from victims,

0:10:54.516 --> 0:10:57.516
<v Speaker 1>and you mentioned a grandmother in Topeka, and I just

0:10:57.596 --> 0:11:01.556
<v Speaker 1>kept thinking that this French commodities trader living in London

0:11:02.276 --> 0:11:03.836
<v Speaker 1>is no grandmother in Topeka.

0:11:04.436 --> 0:11:07.236
<v Speaker 4>They of course, will have spoken to many many victims,

0:11:07.396 --> 0:11:11.036
<v Speaker 4>both as part of their own infration gathering and frankly,

0:11:11.116 --> 0:11:13.436
<v Speaker 4>to find one who's going to be a good witness.

0:11:13.876 --> 0:11:16.196
<v Speaker 4>So it's interesting because I think LG is right, not

0:11:16.436 --> 0:11:19.276
<v Speaker 4>the little old lady in Topeka that you might have

0:11:19.476 --> 0:11:22.476
<v Speaker 4>guessed would come forward, but I do think someone like

0:11:22.556 --> 0:11:25.876
<v Speaker 4>this witness satisfies a couple of requirements that the grandmother

0:11:25.916 --> 0:11:29.636
<v Speaker 4>from Topeka maybe doesn't. First of all, you need someone

0:11:29.836 --> 0:11:32.836
<v Speaker 4>or you want someone who's not just going to say

0:11:32.996 --> 0:11:36.036
<v Speaker 4>I invested in FTX and I lost money, so I

0:11:36.076 --> 0:11:39.116
<v Speaker 4>am a victim and there are real victims here. You

0:11:39.316 --> 0:11:41.876
<v Speaker 4>also want someone who's going to be able to say

0:11:42.076 --> 0:11:46.036
<v Speaker 4>I was paying attention. It mattered to me what Sam

0:11:46.076 --> 0:11:50.516
<v Speaker 4>Bankman Freed said. I listened to him, I read the

0:11:50.556 --> 0:11:53.996
<v Speaker 4>documents that were provided before I invested. I followed what

0:11:54.076 --> 0:11:58.116
<v Speaker 4>he said publicly about the safety of my investments. I

0:11:58.316 --> 0:12:02.836
<v Speaker 4>used the app that showed where my assets were and

0:12:02.876 --> 0:12:06.676
<v Speaker 4>what I had. So someone who wasn't as conscientious of

0:12:06.756 --> 0:12:09.916
<v Speaker 4>an investor isn't as good of a witness that purpose,

0:12:10.396 --> 0:12:12.156
<v Speaker 4>because you're not going to be able to show through

0:12:12.196 --> 0:12:15.356
<v Speaker 4>them that these laws matter and that people relied on them.

0:12:15.916 --> 0:12:19.436
<v Speaker 3>LJ the jurors. And you also heard from a college

0:12:19.476 --> 0:12:23.516
<v Speaker 3>friend of Sam Bankman Fried who said he quit when

0:12:23.516 --> 0:12:26.236
<v Speaker 3>he didn't like what was going on there. And from

0:12:26.316 --> 0:12:30.876
<v Speaker 3>Gary Wang, who was described by Michael Lewis in Going

0:12:30.916 --> 0:12:35.716
<v Speaker 3>Infinite is a famously silent chief technology officer. What were

0:12:35.756 --> 0:12:37.036
<v Speaker 3>all those witnesses.

0:12:36.636 --> 0:12:40.476
<v Speaker 1>Like, Yeah, so Adam Adda, who was Sam's friend in

0:12:40.596 --> 0:12:44.116
<v Speaker 1>college who worked at both Alameda and FTX. I thought

0:12:44.156 --> 0:12:47.476
<v Speaker 1>he was a very compelling witness. He was very fourthright,

0:12:48.196 --> 0:12:51.756
<v Speaker 1>he was an engineer. He seemed very precise in everything

0:12:51.796 --> 0:12:52.396
<v Speaker 1>that he said.

0:12:53.116 --> 0:12:56.236
<v Speaker 3>Well, there was this exchange I read about on a

0:12:56.276 --> 0:12:58.836
<v Speaker 3>paddle tennis court. Why were they doing business there? It

0:12:58.916 --> 0:13:00.156
<v Speaker 3>sounds very Bahamas.

0:13:01.116 --> 0:13:05.076
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So what happened was that Adam became aware that

0:13:05.156 --> 0:13:10.156
<v Speaker 1>Alameda had eight billion dollars worth of fti X customer money,

0:13:10.676 --> 0:13:14.396
<v Speaker 1>and he was worried about Alameda being able to pay

0:13:14.436 --> 0:13:18.236
<v Speaker 1>back that money to FTX customers, because eight billion dollars

0:13:18.396 --> 0:13:20.636
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of money. And he talked about how

0:13:20.676 --> 0:13:23.556
<v Speaker 1>he told Sam he was worried, and he asked Sam

0:13:23.636 --> 0:13:26.316
<v Speaker 1>if it was a problem, and he recounted Sam saying

0:13:26.356 --> 0:13:29.436
<v Speaker 1>to him, quote, we were a bulletproof last year. I'm

0:13:29.476 --> 0:13:33.476
<v Speaker 1>not sure if we're bulletproof this year. And he asked

0:13:33.516 --> 0:13:37.596
<v Speaker 1>Sam how long until we're bulletproof again? And Sam said

0:13:37.836 --> 0:13:40.596
<v Speaker 1>six months to three years. And this was just a

0:13:40.596 --> 0:13:43.316
<v Speaker 1>few months before FTX filed for bankruptcy.

0:13:44.556 --> 0:13:47.996
<v Speaker 3>So that's a damaging bit. And how about this Gary Wang,

0:13:48.156 --> 0:13:48.756
<v Speaker 3>what was he like?

0:13:49.236 --> 0:13:51.236
<v Speaker 1>It was a really huge deal. When he entered the courtroom,

0:13:51.236 --> 0:13:53.796
<v Speaker 1>everyone's been really excited to hear from him, in part

0:13:53.836 --> 0:13:57.676
<v Speaker 1>because he's along with Sam the founder of FTX and Alameda,

0:13:58.076 --> 0:14:01.436
<v Speaker 1>and also he has a reputation for never speaking. Michael

0:14:01.476 --> 0:14:03.956
<v Speaker 1>talked about how he wasn't able to interview him because

0:14:03.996 --> 0:14:07.236
<v Speaker 1>he didn't say anything at all. I read like his

0:14:07.356 --> 0:14:09.996
<v Speaker 1>high school did a story about him, you know, when

0:14:09.996 --> 0:14:12.716
<v Speaker 1>all of this came out and they interviewed his teachers,

0:14:12.756 --> 0:14:16.036
<v Speaker 1>and there just weren't very many people who had really

0:14:16.076 --> 0:14:18.156
<v Speaker 1>remembered or could say that much about him, because he's

0:14:18.156 --> 0:14:21.036
<v Speaker 1>known for being really, really quiet. But it was interesting

0:14:21.036 --> 0:14:23.516
<v Speaker 1>when he took the stand because he actually had a

0:14:23.556 --> 0:14:26.836
<v Speaker 1>lot to say. He spoke really fast. The judge and

0:14:26.916 --> 0:14:29.596
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutor told them to slow down, and the rest

0:14:29.596 --> 0:14:32.556
<v Speaker 1>of Friday is going to be dedicated to his testimony.

0:14:32.636 --> 0:14:38.196
<v Speaker 1>He you know, pled guilty to financial crimes and specifically

0:14:38.276 --> 0:14:42.036
<v Speaker 1>he said, quote, we gave Alameda special privileges to withdraw

0:14:42.076 --> 0:14:44.556
<v Speaker 1>an unlimited amount of funds and lied about it to

0:14:44.596 --> 0:14:47.396
<v Speaker 1>the public. I should say that we can't bring electronics

0:14:47.396 --> 0:14:49.116
<v Speaker 1>in the courtroom, so this is based on my notes,

0:14:49.196 --> 0:14:52.676
<v Speaker 1>but he said something like that, and the prosecution asked

0:14:52.716 --> 0:14:55.596
<v Speaker 1>him at whose direction did he act, and he said SAMs.

0:14:56.916 --> 0:14:58.996
<v Speaker 3>So, Rebecca, the burden of proof, it's, of course on

0:14:59.156 --> 0:15:02.516
<v Speaker 3>the prosecution. Do you think at this point, after day three,

0:15:02.636 --> 0:15:05.156
<v Speaker 3>they're getting what they need from the witnesses to prove

0:15:05.156 --> 0:15:05.636
<v Speaker 3>their case.

0:15:05.996 --> 0:15:08.556
<v Speaker 4>That's a hard question to answer from this distance. I

0:15:08.556 --> 0:15:10.556
<v Speaker 4>would say it sounds like it's going very well for

0:15:10.596 --> 0:15:13.236
<v Speaker 4>the government so far, but really too soon to say

0:15:13.716 --> 0:15:16.996
<v Speaker 4>where it's going. I think it's important to recognize that

0:15:17.996 --> 0:15:22.716
<v Speaker 4>in America generally prosecutors win almost all the time, prosecutors

0:15:22.756 --> 0:15:24.796
<v Speaker 4>in the Southern District of New York, I would guess

0:15:24.836 --> 0:15:27.716
<v Speaker 4>more so even than average. So even if you didn't

0:15:27.756 --> 0:15:29.516
<v Speaker 4>know anything about the case from the get go, the

0:15:29.556 --> 0:15:33.116
<v Speaker 4>odds are always stacked pretty heavily against a defendant, even

0:15:33.156 --> 0:15:35.316
<v Speaker 4>with the presumption of innocence, And the proof here does

0:15:35.356 --> 0:15:37.076
<v Speaker 4>seem like it's going to be very strong.

0:15:37.756 --> 0:15:40.836
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca, I actually have a question for you. Like in court,

0:15:41.036 --> 0:15:46.156
<v Speaker 1>the defense lawyers keep making objections that get overruled, and

0:15:46.876 --> 0:15:50.436
<v Speaker 1>when they're doing cross the prosecution makes a lot of

0:15:50.436 --> 0:15:53.476
<v Speaker 1>objections that are sustained. A lot of times the judge

0:15:53.476 --> 0:15:56.276
<v Speaker 1>has called out the defense lawyers, he's brought them to

0:15:56.396 --> 0:15:59.996
<v Speaker 1>side panels like it feels like the defense is having

0:15:59.996 --> 0:16:02.716
<v Speaker 1>a really hard time and they're always in trouble, And

0:16:02.916 --> 0:16:05.156
<v Speaker 1>is that normal? Is that usually how it feels or

0:16:05.476 --> 0:16:06.556
<v Speaker 1>is that of no?

0:16:07.356 --> 0:16:09.876
<v Speaker 4>I don't know that there's a normal. Different judges have

0:16:09.916 --> 0:16:13.956
<v Speaker 4>different practices about objections. Different judges give more leeway or

0:16:14.076 --> 0:16:16.876
<v Speaker 4>enforce the rules of evidence more strictly, So it really

0:16:16.916 --> 0:16:20.596
<v Speaker 4>is case by case and judge by judge. I do

0:16:20.636 --> 0:16:23.356
<v Speaker 4>think one thing to keep in mind about the optics

0:16:23.396 --> 0:16:26.316
<v Speaker 4>of that whole dynamic, or a few things. The first

0:16:26.436 --> 0:16:29.796
<v Speaker 4>is that the defense has an incentive sometimes to object

0:16:30.076 --> 0:16:32.636
<v Speaker 4>even when they don't actually think they're going to win.

0:16:32.756 --> 0:16:35.276
<v Speaker 4>They already know this judge doesn't agree with them because

0:16:35.316 --> 0:16:39.476
<v Speaker 4>they are preserving the record for appeal. They if Sam

0:16:39.516 --> 0:16:42.396
<v Speaker 4>Bankminfried gets convicted, we'll obviously bring this case to the

0:16:42.396 --> 0:16:45.596
<v Speaker 4>Second Circuit and they'll say the judge made legal mistakes.

0:16:45.636 --> 0:16:47.716
<v Speaker 4>He let things in he shouldn't have, he kept things

0:16:47.756 --> 0:16:50.436
<v Speaker 4>out he shouldn't have, and that prejudiced our case so

0:16:50.516 --> 0:16:53.596
<v Speaker 4>badly that we need to do over. There is no

0:16:54.316 --> 0:16:57.636
<v Speaker 4>appeal from an acquittal for the government. If he's found

0:16:57.676 --> 0:17:00.516
<v Speaker 4>not guilty, then double jeopardy attaches and that's the end

0:17:00.596 --> 0:17:03.436
<v Speaker 4>of the road. So the government doesn't have really any

0:17:03.476 --> 0:17:06.836
<v Speaker 4>interest in preserving its record in that way because it

0:17:06.876 --> 0:17:09.996
<v Speaker 4>doesn't really matter for academic purposes. So that's number one.

0:17:10.476 --> 0:17:14.396
<v Speaker 4>Number two is that I think by and large, defense

0:17:14.436 --> 0:17:16.116
<v Speaker 4>layers try to get away with a little bit more

0:17:16.116 --> 0:17:19.036
<v Speaker 4>in the courtroom than government lawyers do, and so it's

0:17:19.116 --> 0:17:21.876
<v Speaker 4>not uncommon for the defense to always be trying to

0:17:21.876 --> 0:17:25.356
<v Speaker 4>push the envelope sneak something in, and so not necessarily

0:17:25.396 --> 0:17:28.156
<v Speaker 4>that surprising to me that you're going to see more

0:17:28.196 --> 0:17:31.756
<v Speaker 4>objections being sustained on the government's side. I think Judge

0:17:31.796 --> 0:17:35.356
<v Speaker 4>Kaplan is also a little bit government friendly and strict

0:17:35.356 --> 0:17:38.276
<v Speaker 4>about the rules of evidence. So again not that surprising

0:17:38.316 --> 0:17:41.556
<v Speaker 4>to me, but interesting to hear what your perception is,

0:17:41.556 --> 0:17:43.796
<v Speaker 4>because of course juries get told all the time, and

0:17:43.876 --> 0:17:46.596
<v Speaker 4>Judge Kaplan told this jury, my job is to just

0:17:46.676 --> 0:17:48.876
<v Speaker 4>rule on these things. You shouldn't read anything into it.

0:17:49.036 --> 0:17:51.436
<v Speaker 4>I'm not on any side, but of course common sense

0:17:51.476 --> 0:17:53.596
<v Speaker 4>tells you the jurors are paying very close attention to

0:17:53.596 --> 0:17:55.996
<v Speaker 4>what the judge does, and it does affect people's opinions.

0:17:56.676 --> 0:17:58.996
<v Speaker 3>Rebecca, I know this is a ridiculous question. We're three

0:17:59.036 --> 0:18:01.196
<v Speaker 3>days in, but based on what you know so far,

0:18:01.356 --> 0:18:02.036
<v Speaker 3>who's winning.

0:18:02.636 --> 0:18:05.996
<v Speaker 4>Look, I think what you have so far is a

0:18:06.316 --> 0:18:10.396
<v Speaker 4>compelling government presentation, that the defense tried to poke some

0:18:10.476 --> 0:18:14.716
<v Speaker 4>holes in raise some questions, and they're opening that things

0:18:14.756 --> 0:18:17.556
<v Speaker 4>are more complicated than the government has suggested. That there

0:18:17.556 --> 0:18:21.076
<v Speaker 4>are explanations, but so far we haven't heard any of them.

0:18:21.556 --> 0:18:23.956
<v Speaker 4>Part of that is that because there's a burden of proof,

0:18:23.956 --> 0:18:26.236
<v Speaker 4>the government goes first, so they're going to present all

0:18:26.276 --> 0:18:28.436
<v Speaker 4>their evidence. The defense may not present any, of course,

0:18:28.476 --> 0:18:31.916
<v Speaker 4>that they will see what they do. But not surprising

0:18:31.916 --> 0:18:34.436
<v Speaker 4>that the government seems like it's ahead at this stage

0:18:34.436 --> 0:18:37.116
<v Speaker 4>of things. But I do think this is a very

0:18:37.156 --> 0:18:39.516
<v Speaker 4>hard battle for Sam Bankman freed because you have someone

0:18:40.036 --> 0:18:43.236
<v Speaker 4>like the second witness, his friend. That person didn't admit

0:18:43.316 --> 0:18:45.836
<v Speaker 4>to any wrongdoing, He hasn't pled guilty at any crimes.

0:18:45.876 --> 0:18:50.076
<v Speaker 4>He doesn't have the same kind of incentive as cooperators

0:18:50.076 --> 0:18:53.076
<v Speaker 4>maybe do. And what he says is, look, I believed

0:18:53.076 --> 0:18:55.756
<v Speaker 4>in this, and then I found out this really terrible

0:18:55.796 --> 0:18:57.836
<v Speaker 4>thing that Sam Bankman Freed knew, and it was so

0:18:57.996 --> 0:19:00.116
<v Speaker 4>obvious to me that this was a problem I left

0:19:00.196 --> 0:19:04.356
<v Speaker 4>my job. Really raises questions about how Sam Bankman Freed

0:19:04.396 --> 0:19:06.796
<v Speaker 4>can say that he didn't know that, or he didn't

0:19:06.796 --> 0:19:10.196
<v Speaker 4>appreciate it, or wasn't obvious to him. Not good for him,

0:19:10.276 --> 0:19:12.436
<v Speaker 4>I would say, if I had to bet at this

0:19:12.596 --> 0:19:16.836
<v Speaker 4>very early stage, I think I think the government's probably pretty.

0:19:16.556 --> 0:19:20.436
<v Speaker 3>Far out ahead. Rebecca and LJ, thank you both so much.

0:19:20.596 --> 0:19:23.076
<v Speaker 3>We'll be back after the break with one last thing.

0:19:30.196 --> 0:19:32.876
<v Speaker 3>We're back with one last thing, so LJ give us

0:19:32.876 --> 0:19:35.076
<v Speaker 3>some of the color. How weird is it.

0:19:35.076 --> 0:19:36.436
<v Speaker 4>There in the courtroom.

0:19:37.196 --> 0:19:39.356
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's a lot of things that are weird. One

0:19:39.356 --> 0:19:41.476
<v Speaker 1>thing that's weird is it's a space where no one

0:19:41.476 --> 0:19:45.596
<v Speaker 1>has any electronics and everyone has notebooks and their writing,

0:19:45.716 --> 0:19:47.716
<v Speaker 1>and it kind of feels like being back in I

0:19:47.756 --> 0:19:50.476
<v Speaker 1>don't know, middle school, pre everyone having a cell phone,

0:19:50.516 --> 0:19:52.956
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we're checking in with each other and

0:19:52.956 --> 0:19:55.076
<v Speaker 1>making sure that we wrote down the right thing. And

0:19:55.116 --> 0:19:57.276
<v Speaker 1>I even saw one journalist who said that they saw

0:19:57.396 --> 0:20:00.276
<v Speaker 1>Sam Megmanfreed's parents taking notes, sharing a legal pad and

0:20:00.276 --> 0:20:03.636
<v Speaker 1>taking notes as things were happening. So everyone's writing furiously

0:20:03.716 --> 0:20:05.956
<v Speaker 1>and no one's checking their phones. So that's one thing

0:20:05.956 --> 0:20:06.516
<v Speaker 1>that's different.

0:20:07.556 --> 0:20:10.156
<v Speaker 3>Why is that whether you're in in the courtroom, I

0:20:10.196 --> 0:20:12.516
<v Speaker 3>understand no cameras in the courtroom. But why can't you

0:20:12.636 --> 0:20:15.636
<v Speaker 3>be recording it or taking notes electronically.

0:20:15.676 --> 0:20:17.356
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea. Just when you go into the

0:20:17.396 --> 0:20:19.076
<v Speaker 1>courtroom you have to give up I guess maybe it's

0:20:19.116 --> 0:20:21.916
<v Speaker 1>just to make sure that no one records sneaks a

0:20:22.036 --> 0:20:24.436
<v Speaker 1>phone in, so when you enter the courthouse you have

0:20:24.476 --> 0:20:28.036
<v Speaker 1>to go through security. And Judge Coplin is famously particularly

0:20:28.076 --> 0:20:31.476
<v Speaker 1>strict about electronics. There's that's kind of something that he's

0:20:31.476 --> 0:20:34.076
<v Speaker 1>known for. He doesn't even have an email address.

0:20:34.876 --> 0:20:36.796
<v Speaker 3>Really yeah, well that's probably yeah, Like.

0:20:36.716 --> 0:20:39.196
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't compline listed on his website. And when I

0:20:39.236 --> 0:20:40.916
<v Speaker 1>asked what the best way is to reach him directly,

0:20:40.996 --> 0:20:42.276
<v Speaker 1>I was told to write a letter.

0:20:43.676 --> 0:20:45.876
<v Speaker 3>Which will which he will answer after the trial's over.

0:20:46.316 --> 0:20:49.796
<v Speaker 3>And you know, Michael Lewis's name keeps coming up. I

0:20:49.836 --> 0:20:52.076
<v Speaker 3>mean in the jury selection they asked of the juris

0:20:52.116 --> 0:20:55.076
<v Speaker 3>had seen it sixty minutes appearance, and you know, it

0:20:55.116 --> 0:20:57.916
<v Speaker 3>feels he's on trial too, in a funny way, or

0:20:57.956 --> 0:20:58.876
<v Speaker 3>he's in the middle of it.

0:20:59.076 --> 0:21:01.556
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. I've seen three copies of Going Infinite

0:21:01.636 --> 0:21:05.036
<v Speaker 1>in the courtroom and things. You know. Adam Yadida, one

0:21:05.036 --> 0:21:08.636
<v Speaker 1>of the witnesses, was in Michael's book and afterwards, there

0:21:08.636 --> 0:21:10.596
<v Speaker 1>are a report is going through trying to look out

0:21:10.596 --> 0:21:12.476
<v Speaker 1>what Michael said he said versus what was said in

0:21:12.476 --> 0:21:15.996
<v Speaker 1>the testimony. So people have the book, people are reading

0:21:16.036 --> 0:21:19.116
<v Speaker 1>it literally in the courtroom during short breaks.

0:21:19.676 --> 0:21:21.956
<v Speaker 3>The jurors have to have to reach a verdict so

0:21:21.956 --> 0:21:22.676
<v Speaker 3>they can read it.

0:21:23.476 --> 0:21:26.316
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, and yeah. And then the other thing that's

0:21:26.356 --> 0:21:29.476
<v Speaker 1>weird about the courtroom is, you know, the lawyers sometimes

0:21:29.476 --> 0:21:32.676
<v Speaker 1>talked to the judge and the jurors aren't supposed to

0:21:32.716 --> 0:21:35.556
<v Speaker 1>hear it, and they have these speakers that just this

0:21:35.676 --> 0:21:38.036
<v Speaker 1>white noise comes out of and it's really jarring when

0:21:38.036 --> 0:21:40.516
<v Speaker 1>it first happens, but it's actually pretty effective. I have

0:21:40.556 --> 0:21:42.556
<v Speaker 1>no idea what they're saying in the side panels.

0:21:42.916 --> 0:21:45.396
<v Speaker 3>Well, thank you so much, and judging. Sam will be

0:21:45.396 --> 0:21:47.676
<v Speaker 3>back in your feet on Monday morning with a week

0:21:47.836 --> 0:21:50.196
<v Speaker 3>one recap from Michael Lewis himself.

0:21:51.276 --> 0:21:53.436
<v Speaker 1>All week I've been checking in with Michael Lewis after

0:21:53.476 --> 0:21:57.676
<v Speaker 1>the trial and updating him on what's been going on

0:21:57.756 --> 0:21:59.996
<v Speaker 1>in court. I saw Sam in real life and the

0:22:00.036 --> 0:22:02.116
<v Speaker 1>court artist said that it was much more fun to

0:22:02.196 --> 0:22:06.556
<v Speaker 1>draw his hair before he got his haircuts.

0:22:06.636 --> 0:22:10.316
<v Speaker 2>Drawing is so weird. Doesn't look like him.

0:22:10.436 --> 0:22:12.276
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree, it doesn't. I feel like he has

0:22:12.276 --> 0:22:14.676
<v Speaker 1>like an impish quality that none of the photos capture.

0:22:14.956 --> 0:22:17.516
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, nothing, It's funny. It's a very good point, like

0:22:17.996 --> 0:22:20.116
<v Speaker 2>since then the pictures all make him look like Richard

0:22:20.156 --> 0:22:22.676
<v Speaker 2>the Third, like dark villain.

0:22:23.516 --> 0:22:26.116
<v Speaker 1>On our next episode, Michael and I sit down and

0:22:26.156 --> 0:22:27.476
<v Speaker 1>make sense of this crazy week.

0:22:28.916 --> 0:22:32.236
<v Speaker 2>Lvia Gencott is our court reporter. Katherine Girardeau and Nisha

0:22:32.316 --> 0:22:36.196
<v Speaker 2>Venken produced this show. Sophie Crane is our editor. Our

0:22:36.316 --> 0:22:39.636
<v Speaker 2>music was composed by Matthias Bossi and John Evans of

0:22:39.716 --> 0:22:44.116
<v Speaker 2>stell Wagon's Symphonette. Judging Sam is a production of Pushkin Industries.

0:22:44.556 --> 0:22:47.036
<v Speaker 2>Got a question or comment for me? There's a website

0:22:47.036 --> 0:22:54.076
<v Speaker 2>for that atr podcast dot com. That's atr podcast dot com.

0:22:54.356 --> 0:22:57.436
<v Speaker 2>To find more Pushkin podcasts, listen on the iHeartRadio app,

0:22:57.596 --> 0:23:01.796
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your podcasts. If

0:23:01.796 --> 0:23:05.156
<v Speaker 2>you'd like to access bonus episodes and listen ad free,

0:23:05.476 --> 0:23:07.876
<v Speaker 2>don't forget to sign up for a Pushkin Plus subscription

0:23:08.236 --> 0:23:11.396
<v Speaker 2>at pushkin dot m FM, slash plus. We're on our

0:23:11.436 --> 0:23:13.276
<v Speaker 2>Apple show page.