WEBVTT - Short Stuff: Friends of Dorothy

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Hey, and welcome to the Short Stuff. I'm Josh, and

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>there's Chuck and there's Jerry, and this is short Stuff,

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the Slang edition. That's right. And while we are not

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>friends of Dorothy, we are friends of friends of Dorothy. Yeah. Well,

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>put man. I wanted to say, hey, we're friends of

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>Dorothy because it seems like it could mean that you're

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>just uh endorsed the l g t b Q community.

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's not what it means. No, it doesn't. It

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>means you're straight up member of the l g b

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>t Q community. That's right. Um. And it's slang, like

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I said, it doesn't. It doesn't have any direct meaning,

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>or does it. We're going to find out, um. But

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the whole reason that you would have slang kind of

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a coded phrase for being gay is just part of

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the shameful past of how gay people were treated in

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in Europe and America up until very recently, of course,

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and so there was code that they would use amongst

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>themselves so they wouldn't uh you know, all men are

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>bad things could happen if if word was out about them,

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>so shamefully they did need code. But like you said

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in this article that you put together Um, let's move

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>on to the more fun stuff, which is where this

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:25.479
<v Speaker 1>came from? Right, Who is Dorothy? Who is Dorothy? That's

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the great question, And actually it's never really been answered,

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to tell you the truth. Um. Supposedly the whole uh

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that that that phrase friend of Dorothy to mean a

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>gay person has been around since the World War two era,

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>says the Pride website. Okay, it's a legit source. But

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>then we head on over to the Wizard of Oz

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>fan blog friends of Dorothy and they say it doesn't

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>appear in any gay slang books or academic reviews of

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>gay slang in the twentieth century, which is really weird

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>because it definitely did exist. It wasn't you know, it

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just me and people I knew using that, like,

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it was widespread. And exactly how old it is really

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of matters, doesn't it. Well, Yeah, because we're gonna

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.679
<v Speaker 1>talk about some Dorothy candidates. Uh, I feel like we

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.119
<v Speaker 1>should probably talk about these first three and then take

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>our break and get to the man, the big whammy.

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>You know what, you know, exactly what you're doing. I

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that the first Dorothy we're going to talk about

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and there's some legitimacy here for sure, because it was

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a socialite named Dorothy King in twentieth century London, early

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>twenties century London. Uh. And Dorothy King, very early on

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in London was a friend of the gay community, especially

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>gay men. She would have these big parties. Uh. And

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>apparently they would use friend of Dorothy or friend of

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Mrs King uh to refer to themselves as slang to

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>get them in these parties or just to talk about them. Yeah.

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>The fact that there's also a friend of Mrs King

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>meaning the same thing a gay man in the early

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, mid twenties century, that really supports the possibility

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that she was the original Dorothy I agree. Okay, the

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>next one is Dorothy Parker. She's also a great contender.

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>She's coming out of not just New York, but also

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles and the ninet thirties and then later on

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>in the sixties. Those are the two times that she

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>really had a huge impact and was kind of almost

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>an icon in the gay community because, like Dorothy King,

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>she surrounded herselves with gay people at a time when

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>gay people were very much persecuted. Um. And she was

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>also a huge ardent supporter of the civil rights movement

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. Yeah, I did not know about her sixties. Comeback, Um,

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I know all about the thirties Dorothy Parker was kind of, uh,

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of into researching that for a little while quite

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago, but did not know about the sixties.

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>L A version doesn't surprise me. Pretty cool because I

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>can see her then, uh, sitting around a mid century

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>modern pool doing the same thing she was rocking in

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the thirties in New York. Yes, but she married a

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>man who was openly bisexual. He referred to himself as

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>quote queer, as a billy goat, so she was. She

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>was very much in the running as a possible Dorothy yes. Um.

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>And then lastly, the third of the first three Dorothy's

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>was a woman named Dorothy Dean. She was an African

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>American socialite in New York, and she was very much

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:32.679
<v Speaker 1>in the orbit of the gay community, especially through Andy

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Warhol in his gang. And was not like, um, you know,

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>she right exactly sounding She's kind of like hung out

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>with Warhol every once a while, like she was part

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of Warhol's inner circles, would appear in as films, like

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>she was a bit of amused for him and then

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>also as if her cool cred in the art community

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and gay community couldn't get any better. She was a

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>door I guess a doorman is what they would have

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>called her in the um un liberated early sixties. Yeah,

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to be cool back then, you could

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>work the door at one of two places, either CBGB

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>or Max's Kansas City. And she worked the door at

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Maxus Kansas City, which was a music club and and

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>barn hang out of the coolest of the cool in

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>the sixties and seventies. Yes, so she knew everybody, and

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>she also had a lot of gay friends too, So

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it's entirely possible that she was the Dorothy that we

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>spoke of. She couldn't have been the Dorothy if this

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>This phrase has been around since World War Two. But

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the one of the things that I figured out about this,

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 1>chuck is that, um, it could have been any of

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>these Dorothys. All these Dorothys could have could you could

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>You could use that phrase and it would still hold

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>water um at different times depending on the context too.

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like any of these are wrong necessarily.

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>They all went, I agree, But there is one that's

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>actually the winner. That's right, And we'll introduce this winner,

0:05:58.360 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'll bet you know who it is, right if

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to this and stop? Okay, Chuck, it's time for the

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>big reveal. Who is Dorothy? For reels somewhere over the rainbow,

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>keep going, I'm not familiar. I don't know the rest

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of the words. Something cries, there's way up, high way up. Hi,

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>So who cries? Didn't want to cry? No, I think

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you've misheard it. I think you're right. Uh, we're talking

0:06:54.720 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>about Dorothy Gail, the character in L. Frank Baum's Wizard

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>of Oz book series. Um. And there's a few big

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>time reasons for this, one really big time reason. But

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the movie Wizard of Oz is special in the l

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>g tb Q community because, Um, Dorothy kind of comes

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>out in her own way and undergoes this transformation from

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a very um, sort of boring, black and white world

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to a brilliant, colorful, rainbow filled world. Yeah, and that's

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>just if you're reading the book. She also in the book,

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>um be friends and in Companies, three men, none of

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>whom are traditionally masculine or manly. And there's even a

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>part in the book well not the Wizard of Oz.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>But one of the other books Um from the Oz series,

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>where um another character tells her Dorothy, you have some

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>queer friends, and she says the queerness doesn't matter so

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>long as they're friends. I don't know about that part,

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>because that's not what queer meant. No. But but the

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>point is this is whether it meant no, They certainly

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't mean queer as in gay. They just meant strange, unusual.

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's I think we're queer applied to gay people,

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>especially in the mid mid twentieth century. That's where it

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>came from. It men, you're you're weird, you're off, or whatever,

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and Dorothy saying it doesn't matter how they're off. It

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't even matter that they're off. It just matters that

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>they're friends. And I think if you felt alienated, especially

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>if you fell alienated because you were gay, uh, that

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>something like that would have resonated with you. And I

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's why a lot of gay people it's

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>very it's easy to stereotype at this point because there's

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>probably a lot of gay people who can't stand Wizard

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of Oz, but there's a lot of gay people who

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>do love with Wizard of Oz. That's right. And one

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.319
<v Speaker 1>of the big reasons why is because the star of

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Wizard of Oz it was none other than Judy Garland,

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>who is top three gay icon. Maybe. I mean a

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of arguments for number one, but I would say

0:08:56.480 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely top three. Who are the other two? Oh? Well,

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you know Lon Cheney Jr. I would Well, I don't

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>know that that would be tough because you could throw

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Share in there. You could throw Barber Strice in in there, Madonna,

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>who Liberaci, Oh, Libarraci of course. Um so maybe it

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>might be one of those things where the top three

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is like a list of ten people. Yeah, I think

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>because we just had so much trouble even narrowing it

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>down to top three, she might be the number one

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>then maybe, But it's not for us to say anyway.

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, no, it's not. You're right, but Judy Garland.

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Garland is certainly a gay icon. Uh. There have been,

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, everything from her her funeral, which was attended

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>by more people than Rudolph Valentino, Uh, to her. I

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>mean Rufus Wainwright did an entire tour where Rufus sings

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Judy Garland. Yeah, yeah, and her her funeral that day

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of her funeral was this that later that night was

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the Stonewall Riot, and a lot of people were like, well,

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Judy Garland's death kicked off the Stonewall riots with kick,

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>which kicked off the air of civil rights for gay people. Um,

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's apparently been refuted by some people, but other

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>people said, no, that that definitely had something to do

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>with that. It was a factor, man. I mean, if

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you're at a boiling point and then one of your

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>icons and spiritual leaders dies, that'll send you And if

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you're at a bar drinking and you're sad about that,

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that could definitely be the straw that breaks the camel's back. Yeah.

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>And if you're sad about it and everyone with you

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>at that bar is sad about the exact same thing,

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 1>that sends a camaraderie and collect suness. Yeah, I could

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>definitely translate into that. And there was also um like

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 1>it's really kind of difficult to to under state like

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the impact in the the what an icon she was?

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>But I saw did I say understate? Yeah? I didn't didn't.

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>It's difficult to overstate it because, um, but I saw

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it like really summarized well by this one quote. Some

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>some writer was describing a bio of her that was

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>first put on as a stage play but was later

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>produced into Judy starring Renee's elwigger Um. The stage play

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>was called End of the Rainbow, but the this writer

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>said that it was explaining the End of the Rainbow

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>was like a gay version of the Passion of the Christ.

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Very he clearly kind of gets across, like what an

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>icon she is and was in the in the gay community. Yeah,

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna end up with my final verdict being Dorothy

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>could be a combination of all these Dorothy's and could

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>have been any one of them, two different people at

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>different times. So the last thing about this chuck is

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 1>the slang has actually gone the way of the dinosaur,

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>which is good because that suggests that gay people don't

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>feel the need to encode their gayness nearly as much anymore,

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>if at all, in a lot of places, which is wonderful.

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>But before that happened, Right before that happened, in the

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>late eighties, there was a an actual witch hunt to

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>root out gay people well in the military that was

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>spearheaded by Navy Intelligence Services and Army intelligence and it

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>was terrible and shameful and They wasted hundreds of millions

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of dollars doing this because an admiral vice admiral named

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Joseph S. Donald flipped out at the idea that they

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>were gay men in the military apparently he'd never noticed,

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and wasted all this money doing this. But the one

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>good thing that came out of this was this amazing

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>story that I think you should tell everybody. Well, they

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and then I say that with quotes around it

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 1>got ahold of the friends of Dorothy um usage and

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>they thought there was a real Dorothy that was providing

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>uh quarter for gay men in the military, and what

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>uh where it was. This was sympathetic to their cause

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and aiding and abetting them. And so they spent a

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of money of your tax dollars trying to chase

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>down who Dorothy was because these friends of hers were

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>serving in the middlets Are and they wanted to get

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>her to inform on them. They didn't never find her, though, Huh,

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that seems like a made up story. It's so great,

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it does. I saw it in multiple sources though, so

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's actually real, including the l A Times. Uh.

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's it, everybody. That's it for friends of Dorothy.

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Now you can say hey, I'm a friend of a

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>friend of Dorothy, and people say, what does that mean.

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>You say, let me tell you. That's right okay, which

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of course means short stuff. Is that stuff you should know?

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Is a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.