WEBVTT - Ukraine, Markets, And The Supply Chain

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market crows, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Matt, we are so

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 1>fortunate for our next guest here to help us with context.

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Here um one of our all time favorites as we

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>think about these geopolitical military issues around the world. James Travitas,

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Admiral the United States Navies retired adam all the US

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Navies in the U S Navy thirty seven years, served

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>as a fifteen commander in US European Command and NATO's

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>sixteen Supreme Allied Commander. In your, Admiral, thank you so

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us Right now, we just heard from

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>President Zelenski's chief of staff taking a very very hard

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>line about how far the people of Ukraine will take

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>this fight to Russia. What is your view of what

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing on the ground. Well, first of all, what

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>we are learning is that the center of gravity in

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this fight is not the Russian army and it's not

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>really the Ukrainian military arms. The center of gravity is

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the spirit, the will of these Ukrainians. It's become remarkable

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>and it's personified by President Zelinski. And I agree with you.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I caught the tail end of the interview. The chief

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of staff does a great job channeling his boss, who

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is marching around the world doing these inspirational speeches at

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>every major parliament and congress in the world. Um so

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a great deal to admire on the Ukrainian side

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of this. In terms of his comments about negotiation, Hey,

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>it's Bloomberg right. We're a business network. We know how

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you negotiate, and you negotiate in two ways. One is

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you been as much positive of momentum for your side

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>as you possibly can. At number two, you start with

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a hardline position, recognizing you're going to have to negotiated

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>in from that. And I think both those are true

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in this case. In terms of the Russian response, Admiral,

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen UM more and more destructive weapons used. There

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of criticism when the hypersonic missiles UM

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>were put into action, but isn't that to be expected,

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>as uh war rages on this long. Of course, they

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>expected to march in and you know, be greeted much

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:39.679
<v Speaker 1>the way Hitler's troops were greeted when they um completed

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 1>on Schlis of Austria. That didn't happen, So they're going

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to use bigger force. Indeed, they were expecting bouquets of

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>flowers and bottles of vodka, and what they got were

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>bottles of gas lead with rags, stuff to the top

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Molotov cocktails. UM. It has been extraordinary to watch the

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>fit alire of Russian intelligence and the isolation of Vladimir

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Putin personally, who clearly had no clue what this was

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>going to look like, and his people, uh failed miserably

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>at least thus far. So Plan A, you're exactly right,

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>was unchlus. It was sweep across the country, blitz creeb,

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of fighting, find Zalinsky sued him and

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>put a public government in Kiev that was planned in UM.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 1>That is over. Plan B, you're also correct, is kind

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of looking like fifteenth century siege warfare. Bring all your

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>cannons around the city and just pounded to dirt, terrorized

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the population, and UM at the end of the day,

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>then you can gain strength for negotiations. That's what Putin's

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>doing on his side of the coin. None of this

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is unexpected in the way that worth typically unfold but

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>has got But Admiral concern is that Plan C is

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a biological weapon and possibly tactical nukes. It certainly is

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a deep concern, and you saw it addressed yesterday by

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>President Biden and the heads of NATO. UM. And so

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>what are we doing about it? We are send Putent

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>signals that if he crosses that kind of weapon of

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>mass destruction line, there will be serious consequences. What I

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>suspect would happen. That's what would finally lead NATO to

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>put a doe flies on up. That's very risky, very

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>potential confrontation between ducle ron pounds. But we've got to

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>tell Putin that if he does that, if he uses

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 1>a tactical nuke of biologic a chemical weapon, UM, he

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>will face the full might of the alliance. UM boy,

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>I hope we don't go there, because it is a

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>potential for real miscalculation at a higher level conflict. Admiral

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I got to ask about not a day goes by

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in this conflict when I'm not reminded of your novel.

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And I was telling Paul earlier, I think you know,

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of a fictional entertaining work, it's up there

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>with anything that Jack Carr or or Lee Child has

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>ever written. But um, the problem with your book is

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's so realistic, and it's ringing true truer and

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>truer as days go by. Here, how much of a

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>problem is China? And what what do you think President

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>She is thinking and doing here? Yeah, novel in the

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Next World War, of course, has about a potential war

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>between the US and China, And I agree with you,

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in front of us ought to act as

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a real cautionary tale because if you think this is

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>destructive picture of war between US and China, what President

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>She is trying to do is kind of keep the

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>ball on the middle of the fairway. He doesn't want

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 1>to completely align his nation with Russia, partly because he

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>thinks Russia is looking weaker by the minute and it's

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>looking like a losing bet to do so. On the

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>other hand, doesn't want to align with the West and

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>fall in completely on these sanctions because he objects to

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a great deal of how Russia and China, in his view,

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>are treated by the way, so he'll try and play

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the ball down the middle of the field. He will violate.

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I suspect some of the sanctions, perhaps about oil and gas,

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 1>will allow Russian banks that come off the Swift system

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>to go on his SIPs system, a kind of binib

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>version of the Swift system. He'll say some generally supportive things,

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>but on the other hand, he's given humanitarian aid to Ukraine,

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>he has spoken against invading other sovereign countries. Um. He

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>is also finally watching Taiwan and thinking how does this

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>play with my calculus? I think, interestingly, Matt, it makes

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>him less enthusiastic about an attack on Taiwan because he's

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>watching what happened to Russia not going so well. All Right,

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we're speaking with James Travitas, Admiral United States Navy, and

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>most importantly for this conversation, and I think NATO's sixteen

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>supreme Allied Commander in Europe certainly has the you know,

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>informed opinion. Admiral, if you were advising President Biden right

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>now today, what would you tell him about what we

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>should do, what NATO should do over the coming days

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and weeks, and maybe months. First, I'd say it's gone

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>as well as could be expected at this point. The

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>unity of the NATO alliance has been quite extraordinary. Continue

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to encourage the Germans to increase their defense spending, which

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>they've done. Move NATO troops to the borders. The thing

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I would say to do that we're not doing. I

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>would say, Mr President, We've got to look again at

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>giving the Ukrainians tactical aircraft Big twenty nine and others.

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's give them the tools to implement a dough fly's

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's a big advantage for Russia. It's a whole

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in our strategy. Beyond that single point, I think we're

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>doing a reasonably good job. I wonder what you think about, UM,

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East in this scenario, Uh, you know, because

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this White House has snubbed Crown Prince Mohammed been Salmon

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>for understandable reasons. His humanitarian record and Yemen is not good,

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and he allegedly dismembered a journalist. UM. On the other hand,

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, Saudi Arabia is so important strategically for the

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>US as far as I understand it. What's your thought?

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I agree with your assessment, and we um if we're

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>going to make up Russian oil and gas in the markets,

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>which we want to do because we don't want to

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>see inflationary pressures jump even more. We have got to

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>get not just the Saudis, but the Gulf States. You

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a guitar, et cetera. UM, that is where you have

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>for capacity. Um. Last thought on the Middle East, by

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the way, I think the events of this war in

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine have elevated the chances of a deal with Iran.

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And we could go back and forth on whether that's

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a good deal or a bad deal, but it would

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly also add capacity into the hydrocarbon marketplaces. I think

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that puts upward pressure on concluding the deal. I would

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>say that is probably in the realm of that deal

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>will occur, sanctions will come off of the Iran and

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Iran will rejoin global energy markets. How do you think,

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Admiral we judge how does history judge? Angelomericle and kind

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of the German appeasement of Putin, because I remember when

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the US was over there begging them to put in

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>l en G terminals, and they didn't want to hear

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it because they were so excited about Nordstream too. UM.

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And believe me, I was part of that whole effort.

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>As Supreme elect's manner, I would talk to Chncellor Merkel

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>constantly about not only that but also defense spending. We

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>got nowhere. Vladimir Putin in four weeks has managed to

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>close those arguments and now Germany has going to the

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>right place. But Angela Merkel was chancellor for sixteen years,

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>elected four times. She has a very strong record overall.

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But she'll look back. I hope she would look back

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and say I made a mistake there. Nord Street two

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>was a mistake. Trust in Russia in any capacity was

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a mistake. I think Germany gets yeah, and not raising

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>defense spending. I remember when I lived over there for

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>years as well. There military was practicing with broomsticks because

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have enough rifles. They had one working sub

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and like you know, twenty five working tanks. Um, it's

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to be an easy you know, just like

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>getting l n G over there. It's not gonna happen

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>overnight or this year, next year, the year after building

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>their army back is going to take a decade. I

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think it'll take a decade because there is a

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>reasonable base inside the German military. In my experience having

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>commanded those troops in combat. But you're absolutely correct that

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it does not turn on a dime. So where do

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I score it. I think it's a three to five

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>year project, and they made a great down payment on

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it by effectively doubling their defense budget. UM. Think of

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it this way. It's kind of like when Carter was

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>defeated and Ronald Reagan came in. It took us three

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to five years to get the U. S. Military back

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>where it needed to be. That's what I think we're

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 1>going to see in Germany. Admiral, just lastly here thirty seconds.

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you think President Putin ever resorts to nuclear and

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>or chemical weapons? I think not nuclear. He recognizes the

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>immense downside of that in every dimension. I think it's

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>possible he would attempt something with chemical weapons, try and

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 1>blame it on the Ukrainians and further terrorize the population

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine. He is a dark figure and I would

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>not put it past him. Adamal Sevidiz, thank you so

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. We've got a couple of extra

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>minutes with you, which we really appreciate. We really love

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>getting your perspective here, given your experiences in Europe and

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>with our military and NATO. They have a federal reserve

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 1>that's taken a very hawkish pivot, and City Group was

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>out this morning with an economics piece talking about multiple

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty basis point rate increases from this federal reserve over

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the next several months, getting even more hawkish. But there's

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 1>still some people that say, despite all that, the feed

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is behind the curve? Is that a thing? We'll joining

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>us right now? Is Matt Winkler, Editor in Chief Emeritus

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, the founder of Bloomberg News. He joins us

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>here in our Bloomberg Interactive studio. He ain't phoning it

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in from some of New Jersey. He is here, Matt,

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us here. Is the facts still behind

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the curve? They seem pretty aggressive to me. And by

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, we've heard people say this now, Matt, almost

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>every day. It's become um, it's become rope to say

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the Fed is behind the curve. Well, that's that's really

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the point, which is that you have this massive group

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>think uh with everyone if you like, led by Larry Summers,

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>probably the most prominent saying the FETE is behind the curb,

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and uh, there are a handful of people very smart

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>people like Brad DeLong Is, an economist at Berkeley who

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>recently asked the question somewhat rhetorically, Um, okay, if the

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>FETE is behind the curb, then who are who are

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the people who are the authorities who are supposed to

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>be directing us? And the evidence is there is nothing

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>out there other than the bond market, which in fact

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>shows that the FETE actually is not behind the curve.

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 1>The FETE is following in its data driven way what

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the bond market is telling it. And so to assert

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that the FETE is, you know, behind the curve, is

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to assert that the bond market, which as you know,

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is thirty trillion dollars and millions of people, is meaningless.

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 1>And of course it isn't meaningless because that's where people

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>have their reputations and everything that they have at stake

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>is on the line. And you're historically a bondman. Um

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>wrote about bonds for the Journal before you came and

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>created Bloomberg News. And at least as at least once

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I've heard you mentioned Nick from The Great Gats He

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>was he a bond trader as well? Uh yeah, he was,

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh very much so. I was gonna I was

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask, so, so, what's the data that the bond

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>market provides us with um to help us decide, you know,

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>how how far behind the curve or or with um

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the picture the FED is what inflation is expected to be? Like,

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess the break evens are the best way to

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>look at this. So what the bond market does is

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a huge bazaar, a global bazaar, and in that bazaar,

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you have every kind of point of view, every kind

0:14:54.520 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of activity that's possible, and it's all UH cataloged by

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>price and yield. And the bond market shows you every day,

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>going back in time to the present, what expectations are.

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>That's why it's so valuable. And what you just referred

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to as what we call break even. If you want

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to know what is the expectation of inflation, for example,

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty years out, the bond market can show you that

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>what is the expectation of inflation ten years out and

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>five years out? UH, That is the measure that you

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>referred to called break even, and the break even rates

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>show sure enough, UH, people who are buying and selling

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>securities every day into the future expect inflation to surge

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>robustly over the next two years. But at some point

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>over the next eight years, uh, that will change and

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>there will be a precipitous decline in the expectation of inflation.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's why the bond market is so useful and

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>valuable because the FED, in its activity, can use the

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>bond market as a way to keep the economy stable. Actually,

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>how reliable are I mean, I'm looking at the break

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>evens I type I l B on the Bloomberg TERMAO,

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the two year break even, and I

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>see it's almost five percent. I then here from people

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>like Michael McKee who covers economics for us, that that's

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>hardly likely considering we're going to be moving off of

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>base effects at that point. So this isn't saying it's

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be five percent two years out right. So

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>what what is valuable about the bond market is people

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>are literally taking their wherewithal their assets, and they're making

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>bets about where things are today, where they're going to

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>be five years from now, where they're going to be

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty years from now, and that's all reflected in price

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and yield, And of course it could change. The point

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>here is that and it will change the point here

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is that the FED is not behind the curve. If

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>what it's doing today is following what the data shows

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 1>us from the bond market, the FETE is simply doing

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>what's appropriate. And the argument, if you will, against the

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>people who are asserting that the FETE is behind the

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>curve is okay, Well, if it's not the bond market

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>where all this data exists, what is it and nobody

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>can say what it is? And as Brad DeLong has suggested,

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 1>what is it? The bond market is a bunch of

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>weirdos now and the bond vigilantes don't count. I mean,

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>no one is asserting that, so, uh, you can't have

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>it both ways. Um. This is why the criticism of

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the FED seems to be unfounded, because there's no evidence

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to suggest that there's an alternative for what the FET

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>is doing. As I mentioned earlier, Matt City came out

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>so research report this morning talking about, you know, multiple

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty basis point rate hikes this year going into next year.

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Is there a risk that this FED gets too aggressive

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and does in fact push us into a recession and

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the interest of trying to cool inflation, Well, there are

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>plenty of people who would suggest that and are suggesting that.

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, UM, again, if you look at the

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>market right now, what might be surprising to people is

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>why is the stock market seemingly becalmed UH in the

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>face of it And if you look at something else

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that is worth paying a lot of attention to. The

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Financial Conditions Measure Index. Yeah, very valuable tool. If

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we were suddenly de anchored, and if we had, you know,

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the FED had lost its way, you would expect financial

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>markets to be turbulent, and you would expect great volatility.

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>But in fact, the Financial Conditions Index shows us we're

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>not too far from the average, the thirty year average,

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit below it UM, and that kind

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of suggests that UM investors worldwide, even with the invasion

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of creating Ukraine and Mr Putin's war against it and

0:18:54.840 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the sanctions against him, the market is relatively stable. So

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in equities, the dumb money, so to speak, has have

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>recovered UM with strength. We were down fourteen percent from

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>UM the beginning of the year, just a couple of

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. Now we're only down five percent as the

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>SMP comes back. Yeah, I mean, look, there's always a

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>problem when you try to impose what happened before now

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>on what is happening today and what what people are

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>looking at is this period in the seventies when interest

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>rates went up, you know, fifteen percentage points between ninete

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>and you know, that was just a very different time

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>in place. And Matt, thanks so much for joining us

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Matt Winkler, Editor,

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Chief Emeritus and Bloomberg News. He did not get the

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Friday casual memo. He's in a sharp navy blue suit

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>with the bow tie. He and Tom Keaney can't break

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>them of that habit. Jonathan Webb CEO and founder of

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>app Harvest. That's a public traded company a p p

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>u H building some of the largest greenhouses, combining conventional

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>cultural techniques with today's technology to grow non gmo chemical

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>free produce. Jonathan, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.679
<v Speaker 1>I would love to get your view here of the

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>supply chain and the challenges that companies across so many

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>industries are dealing with it. How are you seeing it

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in your business? Yeah? So uh, We're growing fruits and

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>vegetables and the controlled environment year round with far less

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>land and far less water and using technology. And I

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>think the general theme right now is it's it's it's

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a it's a great time for us to rethink and

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>reimagine American agriculture and reinvest in farming across the US.

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>It's uh, you we clearly see what's been happening over

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the last year or two years with COVID and then

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>now obviously you know the the very unfortunate events playing

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>out in Ukraine. But but there's there's no reason why

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>here in the US we're importing two thirds of our

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:59.239
<v Speaker 1>fruits and vegetables. That's just unacceptable. We're, uh, you know,

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the largest land rich, water rich regions in

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the world, and yet we're importing two thirds of our

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>fruits and vegetables. And uh, you know, we can we

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>can change that dramatically and pretty quickly overnight by using

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>technology and creating a new innovative business models to grow

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>here here at home in the US. And I have

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to say, I am married to a one from Spain,

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>from Valencia, so she is constantly unhappy about the produce

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 1>in this country. Really because where she's from, you just

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>walk down the street and pick up tomatoes and oranges

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>off the ground next to your neighbor's field, you know. So,

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>but how local can we make this um production? Jonathan, Yeah,

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean hyperlocal, very local to two cities, to two

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>regions all across the US. So we at app Harvest

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>will have about eight million square feet operating by the

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. We'll be growing strawberries, leafy greens,

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.199
<v Speaker 1>a variety of tomatoes. But our focus is bringing that

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 1>fruit and vegetable production back to the US that's been

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>uh pushed south of the border. Uh. And yeah, Matt,

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean many of the European countries, especially the Netherlands

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>really being kind of the world leader and in high

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>tech agriculture, Spain has a pretty good robust agriculture system

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that that's utilizing technology. But uh, you know, again reshaping

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 1>what farming looks like. We we you know, we we

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>have the opportunity to grow much more nutritious, higher quality stuff. Uh.

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And do that with with a lot less land and

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot less water. Uh. And and that's you know,

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that's bringing technology to farming. Where the last big technological

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>revolution in American farming is when the when the tractor

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>was introduced. My concern is the concern is Jonathan that

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>your hand, Yeah, The concern is that you displace American

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>family farmers, who I mean, frankly have been displaced already

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>but still managed to hang on somehow. How do you

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>how do you work around that? Well, I mean, Matt,

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>they've already we've already lost that. Two thirds of our

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:04.360
<v Speaker 1>fruit and vegetables are imported into the US every year.

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, four billion pounds of tomatoes alone are imported.

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Why are we not growing that in the US. Why

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>are we not getting small farmers technology where you're using

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>led lights, hydroponic growing less water, thirty thirty plus, uh,

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 1>getting thirty times yield per acre. Uh, We've we've had

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of meetings in DC over the last few weeks. Uh.

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Food resiliency has become a very high focus at the

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>U s d A. But on the right side and

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>left side of the aisle. And you know, if we

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in the US want to take this seriously, you know,

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 1>there needs to be some policy around it. You look

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>at you know, look at what renewable energy was in

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the US fifteen years ago. It was boutique, it was nascent,

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>non existent, and now you know, every state has large portfolios.

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Look at electric vehicles. You know, you've got to put

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>policy in place that incentivizes the private sector to lead.

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and we we do think that's gonna happen

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>with c E A can Gold Environment agriculture is really

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a third wave of sustainable infrastructure in the US. First

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>it was renewables, then it was evs, you know, and

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>now it's is c A controlled environment agriculture. And you know,

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty hopeful that uh, you know, we'll see some

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>policy in this new farm bill. Well, we'll see uh,

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>some policy come out of both sides of the aisle

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of the next year or two to really give technology

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to farmers and and let them innovate and build a

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>more resilient food system here in the US. Jonathan, really

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>fascinating stuff. Thanks for coming on and sharing some thoughts

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that we'll have you back on to get an update here.

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Web, CEO and founder of app Harvest Boy, We've had,

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 1>as I said, a great slate of guests here today.

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>When we finish off our two hours here with another

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a list in my opinion, Lizzie Saunders, chief investment strategists

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>at Charles Schwab. You know, liz An I kind of

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>grew up in the business with the adage don't fight

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the FED. So now I see the Fed, you know,

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>raising race. City is out with a report this morning

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about multiple fifty basis point rate hikes throughout the year.

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you do in that kind of environment? By

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, I didn't just grow up in that era.

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I for thirteen my first thirteen years I worked for

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the late Great Marty's wife. Very good phrase. So um

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I I you know, lived and breathed it. Yes, um.

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I think when you look at a day like today

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>where you saw a weakness kick in at the point

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>where yield started to pick up, and then you know,

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:35.479
<v Speaker 1>added to the concern as you mentioned the City report

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>saying we would get a series of fifty basis points hikes,

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of adjustments of what the terminal rate is.

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a recipe, especially in the aftermath of

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>a pretty sharp rally that may have uh sent a

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>certain technical levels to overball conditions that might have kicked

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in some of the quant based strategies and and al

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 1>goes and the selling starts to pick back up. So

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not surprising to me at all. One of the

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I think most valuable things, um Lisianne about Schwab is

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the knowledge you have from your huge investor base. And

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much assets under management you have,

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>but I know it's trillions of dollars trillion, it's amazing,

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>eight trillions dollars. What can you glean then from your clients,

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing, what's what's their mood right now? Well,

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's such a large client base, it spans this

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>spectrum of not just retail investors, but advisors. You know,

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>are as that are on our platform even among the

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>retail investors, everything from short term day traders to long

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>term advised investors. And I really think it depends on

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:45.439
<v Speaker 1>risk tolerance, time arise, and whether you are just trading

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>on your own, whether you are taking a more disciplined approach,

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe connected to an advisor or consultant. And what we

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>are finding in this more volatile period with it, which

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is consistent with other periods of volatility, is that the

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>more longer term investors that have a plan, they've got

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a strategic asset allocation, they're doing regular rebalancing, they tend

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to ride through periods like this with a bit more

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>sense of calm. It's it's some of the shorter term,

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>more trading oriented folks. In some cases they look at

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>volatility as advantageous from a trading perspective. But that's where

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you tend to see a little bit more of the

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>extremes of at times, you know, panic and greeds. It

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>really depends on what type of investor you're talking about.

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Haylzen Matt and I've been noticing that we've been hearing

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot more about recession in the last couple of weeks.

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Is that something you think is on our horizon? I

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>think anytime you move from extremely loose monetary policy to

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>tighter monetary policy when you already have flower growth expected,

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>you have to dust off the recession playbook, recession checklist,

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, including the yield curve. Yes, that tends to

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:01.880
<v Speaker 1>is not the end all be all. The tense three

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>month has been considered the more reliable recession indicator, but

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this flattening of the yield curve occur slowly

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>down the spectrum of maturities. And maybe the potential inversion

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 1>of the tents two doesn't signal a coming in version

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:21.959
<v Speaker 1>in the tense three months, But if the set is aggressive,

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>as they're suggesting, they might need to be. I think

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that that's somewhat inevitable. Um. So, I think it's prettymature

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to make a recession call right now. The labor market

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>is very strong. But should we start to look at

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>what the typical indicators are that start to signal problems? Um? Yeah, absolutely.

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about alternative assets, Luzianne, I mean, um,

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I would think of the sixty portfolio as pretty standard

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>for a Schwab investor. As you point out, obviously you

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>have such a huge pool investors that you run the gamut.

0:28:56.400 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>But are are more and more people holding UM commodities

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that previously wouldn't have Are people getting into digital assets

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in a way that you see like substantial growth? Yeah.

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that there is sort of a broader swap

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of asset classes that are available to individual investors, even

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>at a relatively low portfolio size, and I think that

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>will continue to be democratized access to all sorts of alternatives,

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>some of which you mentioned even in areas eventually like

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>private equity and venture. So I think the individual does

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>have an opportunity to take a little bit more of

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>an endowment type approach and not limit themselves to just

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the typical stocks, bonds, cash and in this environment where

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>on the bond side you've seen, you know, the worst

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>start in history. I think there is a focus on

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>where else can I get diversification, especially in a high

0:29:56.000 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>inflation environment. Commodities being um, you know, a perfect apple

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of that. Hey, Lizianne, thank you so much for joining us.

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Always appreciate getting your thoughts and perspective. Liz Anne Saunders,

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>chief investment strategist at Charles Schwab. Thanks for listening to

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three.

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Put on Fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.