1 00:00:00,280 --> 00:00:02,480 Speaker 1: Hey, it's Bridget. So when I'm not making There Are 2 00:00:02,480 --> 00:00:04,559 Speaker 1: No Girls on the Internet, I'm also the host of 3 00:00:04,600 --> 00:00:07,840 Speaker 1: a podcast called Beef, where we're serving up the juiciest 4 00:00:07,920 --> 00:00:10,880 Speaker 1: historical rivalries that you've never heard of. And I'm so 5 00:00:10,960 --> 00:00:13,960 Speaker 1: pleased to share that Beef is a finalist for three 6 00:00:14,200 --> 00:00:16,960 Speaker 1: Signal Awards. So could you do me a huge favor 7 00:00:17,000 --> 00:00:20,360 Speaker 1: and vote for Beef to win Best Writing, Best Emerging Podcast, 8 00:00:20,400 --> 00:00:25,040 Speaker 1: and Best Host. Just go to Ncpodcasts dot com slash Signal. 9 00:00:25,160 --> 00:00:28,360 Speaker 1: Voting is open until October fifth. Thank you so much. 10 00:00:28,400 --> 00:00:33,159 Speaker 1: It really means a lot. 11 00:00:34,159 --> 00:00:35,280 Speaker 2: There Are No Girls on the Internet. 12 00:00:35,280 --> 00:00:42,760 Speaker 1: As a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative, I'm Bridget 13 00:00:42,760 --> 00:00:44,879 Speaker 1: Todd and this is there Are No Girls on the Internet. 14 00:00:47,560 --> 00:00:50,120 Speaker 1: I am here with my producer, Joey. Joey, thank you 15 00:00:50,159 --> 00:00:51,080 Speaker 1: so much for joining us. 16 00:00:51,120 --> 00:00:53,519 Speaker 3: Welcome back, Hey, Bridget, thanks for having me. 17 00:00:54,120 --> 00:00:56,480 Speaker 1: So I think we should just get right into it 18 00:00:56,520 --> 00:01:00,640 Speaker 1: because everybody on Twitter is talking about Linda Yakarino's performance 19 00:01:00,680 --> 00:01:04,640 Speaker 1: at the Big Tech conference Code. Oh my gosh, have 20 00:01:04,760 --> 00:01:08,280 Speaker 1: you seen or heard anything about this? I have not, 21 00:01:08,760 --> 00:01:11,119 Speaker 1: So usually we do a segment about like, oh, what's 22 00:01:11,160 --> 00:01:14,440 Speaker 1: Elon Musk done? Now what's Elon up to? This is 23 00:01:14,480 --> 00:01:18,640 Speaker 1: really what's Linda Yakarino up to? So Linda Yakarino for 24 00:01:18,680 --> 00:01:22,400 Speaker 1: folks who don't know, was named as the new CEO 25 00:01:22,520 --> 00:01:23,679 Speaker 1: of Twitter a while ago. 26 00:01:23,959 --> 00:01:26,240 Speaker 2: I would say, it kind of seems like. 27 00:01:27,880 --> 00:01:32,920 Speaker 1: Linda is not as publicly involved as you might expect 28 00:01:32,959 --> 00:01:35,520 Speaker 1: a CEO to be, Like it seems like Elon Musk 29 00:01:35,520 --> 00:01:37,520 Speaker 1: will say something and she like a B and now 30 00:01:37,560 --> 00:01:40,399 Speaker 1: it's a big change and she won't even like acknowledge 31 00:01:40,400 --> 00:01:42,520 Speaker 1: it or anything like that. So like the vibe has 32 00:01:42,520 --> 00:01:44,360 Speaker 1: been like is she really in charge? Is she really 33 00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:47,640 Speaker 1: the CEO? When she came on board, she definitely was 34 00:01:47,680 --> 00:01:51,000 Speaker 1: getting that treatment where she was talking about how she 35 00:01:51,120 --> 00:01:54,200 Speaker 1: really loves a challenge, like she's the person that you 36 00:01:54,240 --> 00:01:56,040 Speaker 1: call when you want someone who was like really going 37 00:01:56,120 --> 00:01:58,280 Speaker 1: to turn a ship around, And she was using a 38 00:01:58,320 --> 00:02:02,280 Speaker 1: lot of language that I I really quickly recognize as 39 00:02:02,480 --> 00:02:05,480 Speaker 1: setting up a woman to come in and clean up 40 00:02:05,520 --> 00:02:08,520 Speaker 1: the mess of a male CEO, a male leader. Like 41 00:02:08,639 --> 00:02:10,480 Speaker 1: I heard a lot of like this is someone who 42 00:02:10,520 --> 00:02:13,360 Speaker 1: really wants to be seen as someone who was really 43 00:02:13,400 --> 00:02:15,200 Speaker 1: like capable and going to come in and do a 44 00:02:15,200 --> 00:02:15,880 Speaker 1: good job. 45 00:02:16,080 --> 00:02:18,079 Speaker 2: While her performance at a tech conference. 46 00:02:18,120 --> 00:02:21,519 Speaker 1: Code did not go well and is not really doing 47 00:02:21,560 --> 00:02:23,440 Speaker 1: a good job of aligning with what I think is 48 00:02:23,480 --> 00:02:28,120 Speaker 1: her like public myth making around herself. So first, Kara 49 00:02:28,200 --> 00:02:31,320 Speaker 1: Swisher interviewed Joel Roth, former head of trust and Safety 50 00:02:31,320 --> 00:02:34,519 Speaker 1: at Twitter. Roth is someone who I've seen talked about 51 00:02:34,560 --> 00:02:37,240 Speaker 1: in some ways that I would say or not exactly accurate. 52 00:02:37,360 --> 00:02:39,800 Speaker 1: You might remember that Roth was working at Twitter in 53 00:02:39,840 --> 00:02:42,640 Speaker 1: the pre Elon Musk days and then stuck around once 54 00:02:42,800 --> 00:02:46,639 Speaker 1: Elon Musk took over. I've seen him described as a whistleblower, 55 00:02:46,880 --> 00:02:50,600 Speaker 1: but I really pushed back against that framing because when 56 00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:54,280 Speaker 1: Elon Musk took over Twitter, he was fine to go 57 00:02:54,320 --> 00:02:57,240 Speaker 1: along with all the practices that Elon Musk was putting forth. 58 00:02:57,440 --> 00:02:59,960 Speaker 1: There are other folks who left Twitter when Elon Musk 59 00:03:00,080 --> 00:03:03,480 Speaker 1: took over, who I would say, like were actual genuine 60 00:03:03,480 --> 00:03:07,040 Speaker 1: whistleblowers who were blowing the whistle on Twitter's internal practices 61 00:03:07,320 --> 00:03:09,920 Speaker 1: once Elon must took over. I would not put Yoel 62 00:03:10,080 --> 00:03:12,800 Speaker 1: Roth in that camp. You'll might remember that Joel Roth 63 00:03:12,919 --> 00:03:17,640 Speaker 1: was like on board until Musk very publicly turned on him. 64 00:03:18,120 --> 00:03:21,880 Speaker 1: Musk kind of publicly insinuated that Roth, who is openly gay, 65 00:03:22,160 --> 00:03:25,760 Speaker 1: is a sexual threat to children. And after this happened, 66 00:03:25,960 --> 00:03:28,800 Speaker 1: Roth and his family had to flee their home for 67 00:03:28,880 --> 00:03:32,840 Speaker 1: their own safety. So I will say this, had that 68 00:03:33,000 --> 00:03:35,800 Speaker 1: been me, had Elon Musk taken over my company and 69 00:03:35,840 --> 00:03:39,840 Speaker 1: then publicly smeared me as a threat to children, and 70 00:03:39,880 --> 00:03:42,080 Speaker 1: that I had to leave my home and I was 71 00:03:42,120 --> 00:03:45,600 Speaker 1: invited on a big platform to talk about Twitter, I 72 00:03:45,600 --> 00:03:47,880 Speaker 1: can just imagine what I would have said, like it 73 00:03:47,920 --> 00:03:49,680 Speaker 1: would have come up, I probably would have had a 74 00:03:49,680 --> 00:03:53,800 Speaker 1: lot to say. However, Roth really just kept it professional. 75 00:03:53,800 --> 00:03:55,920 Speaker 1: He talked about how there had been a rise and 76 00:03:55,960 --> 00:03:58,640 Speaker 1: hate speech on Twitter since Elon must took over, saying 77 00:03:58,960 --> 00:04:02,200 Speaker 1: by any measure, it is worse except by Twitter's own measure, 78 00:04:02,360 --> 00:04:04,440 Speaker 1: which is basically what we've all been saying all along. 79 00:04:05,120 --> 00:04:09,080 Speaker 1: So even though Roth just stuck to like clear stats 80 00:04:09,120 --> 00:04:12,640 Speaker 1: about Twitter, like talking about the platform, Linda Yakarino seemed 81 00:04:13,200 --> 00:04:16,880 Speaker 1: very rattled by him being there. Linda was interviewed right 82 00:04:17,000 --> 00:04:20,600 Speaker 1: after Roth, and to be honest, just came off really 83 00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:23,640 Speaker 1: unprepared and it didn't do a ton to you know, 84 00:04:23,800 --> 00:04:26,800 Speaker 1: address concerns that like Elon Musk is still running the 85 00:04:26,800 --> 00:04:29,479 Speaker 1: show and like you know, running Twitter off of his 86 00:04:29,560 --> 00:04:31,000 Speaker 1: whims without really consulting her. 87 00:04:31,680 --> 00:04:32,880 Speaker 2: Listen for yourself. 88 00:04:33,760 --> 00:04:37,560 Speaker 4: Elon Musk just announced a new monthly fee for users. Yeap, 89 00:04:38,200 --> 00:04:39,760 Speaker 4: And my question for you is do you want to 90 00:04:39,760 --> 00:04:42,520 Speaker 4: start charging all users of X as he said? And 91 00:04:42,560 --> 00:04:43,800 Speaker 4: how many users do you think. 92 00:04:43,640 --> 00:04:47,600 Speaker 2: You will lose as a result? Could you repeat? 93 00:04:48,360 --> 00:04:52,599 Speaker 4: Elon Musk announced You're moving to an entirely subscription based service. Yeah, 94 00:04:52,600 --> 00:04:53,200 Speaker 4: nothing free. 95 00:04:53,320 --> 00:04:54,640 Speaker 2: I'm about using X. 96 00:04:55,560 --> 00:04:57,919 Speaker 1: Do you say we were moving to it specifically or 97 00:04:58,000 --> 00:04:59,000 Speaker 1: is thinking about it? 98 00:04:59,440 --> 00:05:02,560 Speaker 4: He said, that's plan? Yeah, So did he consult you 99 00:05:02,600 --> 00:05:03,520 Speaker 4: before he announced that? 100 00:05:03,880 --> 00:05:05,400 Speaker 2: We talk about everything? 101 00:05:07,279 --> 00:05:12,400 Speaker 5: Marn I guess she sounds very PR trained. Sounds like 102 00:05:12,560 --> 00:05:16,680 Speaker 5: the like if I were the PR person for Twitter, 103 00:05:16,880 --> 00:05:19,120 Speaker 5: slash X whatever you want to call it right now, 104 00:05:19,240 --> 00:05:22,560 Speaker 5: I would be like, yeah, let's let's you know, do 105 00:05:22,640 --> 00:05:24,240 Speaker 5: you say it or is it just like an idea 106 00:05:24,400 --> 00:05:26,160 Speaker 5: that's out there or thinking about it? 107 00:05:26,240 --> 00:05:29,400 Speaker 3: Like I Yeah, that's so PR speak. 108 00:05:29,680 --> 00:05:33,400 Speaker 1: So Jakarino then tried to give some big, impressive number 109 00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:36,480 Speaker 1: about how advertisers were returning to the platform, but then 110 00:05:36,520 --> 00:05:39,880 Speaker 1: those numbers were refuted by external analysis. Then, when asked 111 00:05:39,880 --> 00:05:42,520 Speaker 1: about the current rise and anti Semitic content on Twitter, 112 00:05:42,560 --> 00:05:46,680 Speaker 1: including from her boss, Elon Musk. According to Business insiders 113 00:05:46,760 --> 00:05:50,520 Speaker 1: ben Bergman, she apparently looked down at her watch and said, 114 00:05:50,720 --> 00:05:53,279 Speaker 1: I need to leave to catch a flight. And that's 115 00:05:53,360 --> 00:05:58,960 Speaker 1: just like I can't imagine a more awkward thing to say, like, uh, 116 00:05:59,400 --> 00:06:00,320 Speaker 1: I think someone's. 117 00:06:00,040 --> 00:06:01,520 Speaker 2: Calling me in the other room. I gotta go. 118 00:06:01,800 --> 00:06:02,000 Speaker 3: Yeah. 119 00:06:02,080 --> 00:06:05,680 Speaker 5: No, that's like like, oh, look at my wrist, I 120 00:06:05,720 --> 00:06:06,120 Speaker 5: gotta go. 121 00:06:06,360 --> 00:06:08,680 Speaker 3: That is real. 122 00:06:09,600 --> 00:06:09,800 Speaker 2: Yeah. 123 00:06:09,880 --> 00:06:12,800 Speaker 1: So of all the things that you could say, I 124 00:06:12,800 --> 00:06:15,400 Speaker 1: feel like that's the most awkward, Like you know that emoji, 125 00:06:16,200 --> 00:06:19,119 Speaker 1: that awkward emoji that has the curly mouth. That's just like, oh, 126 00:06:19,320 --> 00:06:21,880 Speaker 1: that was basically everybody's face in the audience because it 127 00:06:21,960 --> 00:06:24,640 Speaker 1: was so awkward. People have described this as like a 128 00:06:24,680 --> 00:06:27,840 Speaker 1: scene from Arrested Development because that's how awkward it was. Now, 129 00:06:28,839 --> 00:06:30,760 Speaker 1: I think this is really just an instance of like 130 00:06:31,520 --> 00:06:33,640 Speaker 1: you work for a company, you have you have fired 131 00:06:33,880 --> 00:06:37,160 Speaker 1: or let go most, if not all, of your camm staff. 132 00:06:37,360 --> 00:06:39,080 Speaker 1: The person who like is at the very top of 133 00:06:39,120 --> 00:06:41,719 Speaker 1: the company, the owner Elon Musk, is someone who is 134 00:06:41,800 --> 00:06:44,200 Speaker 1: very erratic. I think that like, this is what you 135 00:06:44,240 --> 00:06:47,120 Speaker 1: get when all of those conditions are met. And so 136 00:06:47,400 --> 00:06:51,440 Speaker 1: some folks, some like pretty big name tech folks, accused 137 00:06:51,520 --> 00:06:54,159 Speaker 1: tech journalist Kara Swisher, you know, the organizer of the 138 00:06:54,160 --> 00:06:58,479 Speaker 1: conference of sandbagging Yakarbino by booking Roth as a surprise guest. 139 00:06:58,680 --> 00:07:01,800 Speaker 1: But this is not really what happened. Swisher confirmed that 140 00:07:01,839 --> 00:07:04,880 Speaker 1: Yacharino knew that Roth would be speaking, and was even 141 00:07:04,920 --> 00:07:07,120 Speaker 1: given the option to pick whether she wanted to speak 142 00:07:07,160 --> 00:07:09,840 Speaker 1: before him or after him, and that apparently Twitter like 143 00:07:10,000 --> 00:07:11,800 Speaker 1: decided that they wanted to have the last words. So 144 00:07:11,800 --> 00:07:14,400 Speaker 1: it's not like this was a total surprise. According to 145 00:07:15,280 --> 00:07:18,920 Speaker 1: Kara Swisher, she texted Linda Yakarino personally and she had 146 00:07:18,960 --> 00:07:21,560 Speaker 1: about twelve hours notice that, like, hey, this person's going 147 00:07:21,640 --> 00:07:22,360 Speaker 1: to be speaking too. 148 00:07:22,840 --> 00:07:25,640 Speaker 3: Yeah, like how how you were describing Roth before? 149 00:07:26,160 --> 00:07:30,480 Speaker 5: And this isn't like a dig on him, I'm sure whatever, 150 00:07:31,480 --> 00:07:34,920 Speaker 5: but it seems like he's like the most like mild, 151 00:07:35,120 --> 00:07:38,840 Speaker 5: sort of like center of the field person you could 152 00:07:38,920 --> 00:07:41,160 Speaker 5: ask to talk about this, because again it sounds like, yeah, 153 00:07:41,200 --> 00:07:42,800 Speaker 5: he didn't leave. He was sort of like I'm just 154 00:07:42,800 --> 00:07:45,000 Speaker 5: going to keep doing my job and see what happens. 155 00:07:45,200 --> 00:07:49,120 Speaker 5: And yeah, if you have a marginalized identity, you will 156 00:07:49,120 --> 00:07:52,400 Speaker 5: be targeted for that, regardless of how you know much 157 00:07:52,400 --> 00:07:54,840 Speaker 5: of a team player you are, and again, this is 158 00:07:54,880 --> 00:07:56,200 Speaker 5: like a good example of that. 159 00:07:56,360 --> 00:07:59,120 Speaker 3: But yeah, it sounds like he's sort of you don't 160 00:07:59,120 --> 00:08:01,120 Speaker 3: really know what's strict and he could go with this, 161 00:08:01,280 --> 00:08:03,119 Speaker 3: and yeah. 162 00:08:02,520 --> 00:08:03,880 Speaker 2: That's a good way to describe him. 163 00:08:03,960 --> 00:08:07,760 Speaker 1: And honestly, to me, like I said, if Elon Musk 164 00:08:07,760 --> 00:08:10,960 Speaker 1: had targeted me for my identity and put my kids 165 00:08:11,000 --> 00:08:13,320 Speaker 1: at risk, you can believe that when I got on 166 00:08:13,360 --> 00:08:16,600 Speaker 1: a stage, I wouldn't be talking about the platform stats, right, So, 167 00:08:16,680 --> 00:08:18,320 Speaker 1: like part of me is like, well, this is like 168 00:08:18,880 --> 00:08:22,600 Speaker 1: a testament to the fact that Roth is not going personal, 169 00:08:23,200 --> 00:08:25,480 Speaker 1: that he's just like sticking to the SATs. I completely 170 00:08:25,520 --> 00:08:28,800 Speaker 1: agree with your assessment of who he is in this situation. 171 00:08:29,280 --> 00:08:30,800 Speaker 2: And I was pretty. 172 00:08:30,520 --> 00:08:34,200 Speaker 1: Surprised to see a lot of big names in tech media, 173 00:08:34,480 --> 00:08:38,319 Speaker 1: people like Jason Kalakhanis from the All In podcast, which 174 00:08:38,360 --> 00:08:41,000 Speaker 1: is like a like probably the number one tech podcast 175 00:08:41,000 --> 00:08:42,440 Speaker 1: in the world, like every fucking week. 176 00:08:42,600 --> 00:08:44,440 Speaker 2: I have no problem with that, but like, it is 177 00:08:44,480 --> 00:08:44,880 Speaker 2: what it is. 178 00:08:45,240 --> 00:08:48,200 Speaker 1: And a business reporter at Axios they were on Twitter 179 00:08:48,240 --> 00:08:52,200 Speaker 1: saying like, oh, Linda Yacarno got sandbagged by Kara Swisher. 180 00:08:52,240 --> 00:08:55,600 Speaker 1: This is so unprofessional and Kara Swisher is never gonna 181 00:08:55,600 --> 00:08:58,560 Speaker 1: be able to book high profile tech leaders for this conference, 182 00:08:58,600 --> 00:09:00,760 Speaker 1: and like, this conference is really gonna be not as 183 00:09:00,760 --> 00:09:03,560 Speaker 1: big of a deal if this is how they're gonna 184 00:09:03,600 --> 00:09:05,240 Speaker 1: treat their their high profile guests. 185 00:09:05,559 --> 00:09:09,160 Speaker 2: And I really need to like push. 186 00:09:08,960 --> 00:09:14,680 Speaker 1: Back on that framing because you know, I think it 187 00:09:14,720 --> 00:09:17,160 Speaker 1: really it's one of those situations where it's like, wow, 188 00:09:17,280 --> 00:09:21,880 Speaker 1: you all have so little integrity as tech tech leaders 189 00:09:21,920 --> 00:09:24,600 Speaker 1: and journalists people are supposed to be informing the public. 190 00:09:24,840 --> 00:09:27,280 Speaker 1: You could not be making it clearer that what you 191 00:09:27,320 --> 00:09:31,360 Speaker 1: actually care about, what you actually value, is access. This 192 00:09:31,440 --> 00:09:34,120 Speaker 1: is something that Paris Marks, the host of Tech will 193 00:09:34,120 --> 00:09:36,600 Speaker 1: not save us. That podcast speaks to quite a bit, 194 00:09:36,640 --> 00:09:39,400 Speaker 1: which is like, these people could not have made it 195 00:09:39,400 --> 00:09:43,359 Speaker 1: any clearer that they don't care about holding tech leaders accountable. 196 00:09:43,520 --> 00:09:45,760 Speaker 1: They don't care about asking the kinds of questions that 197 00:09:45,800 --> 00:09:48,800 Speaker 1: are actually going to help us the public understand what's 198 00:09:48,840 --> 00:09:51,520 Speaker 1: going on. What they care about is access. And it's 199 00:09:51,520 --> 00:09:55,080 Speaker 1: not a journalist's job to make Linda Yakarino look good. 200 00:09:55,480 --> 00:09:59,680 Speaker 1: It's not a journalist's job to you know, play nice 201 00:09:59,679 --> 00:10:02,640 Speaker 1: with Dyacarino or any other tech leader and like make 202 00:10:02,679 --> 00:10:05,000 Speaker 1: them feel comfortable and make them look good and give 203 00:10:05,040 --> 00:10:07,400 Speaker 1: them like like they're not in pr they're journalists, And 204 00:10:07,440 --> 00:10:11,120 Speaker 1: so I was really surprised how quickly these journalists revealed 205 00:10:11,160 --> 00:10:14,079 Speaker 1: that they don't care about that, that all they care 206 00:10:14,080 --> 00:10:16,319 Speaker 1: about is like, Ooh, is this really gonna like hurt 207 00:10:16,400 --> 00:10:19,679 Speaker 1: Karras Swisher's ability to book big guests h And that 208 00:10:19,960 --> 00:10:24,160 Speaker 1: I found that to be really telling. You know, Linda 209 00:10:24,200 --> 00:10:27,640 Speaker 1: Yacarino is running one of the most important tech platforms 210 00:10:27,679 --> 00:10:30,360 Speaker 1: in the world. It's not any journalist's job to make 211 00:10:30,360 --> 00:10:32,679 Speaker 1: her look good. It's a journalist's job to ask her 212 00:10:32,800 --> 00:10:35,040 Speaker 1: questions that are going to be clarifying for us the public, 213 00:10:35,200 --> 00:10:36,839 Speaker 1: and to hold her accountable for the things that she 214 00:10:36,880 --> 00:10:38,079 Speaker 1: says and the things that she does. 215 00:10:38,480 --> 00:10:42,760 Speaker 5: Right, And even if it wasn't Linda Yakarino herself, like 216 00:10:42,840 --> 00:10:46,000 Speaker 5: she's the CEO of a company that's owned by Elon 217 00:10:46,120 --> 00:10:52,080 Speaker 5: Musk who has used that platform to spewges straight up 218 00:10:52,200 --> 00:10:55,920 Speaker 5: Nazi shit and yeah, apparently target a gay man in 219 00:10:55,960 --> 00:10:58,960 Speaker 5: a way that is very much rooted in homophobia. 220 00:10:59,640 --> 00:11:00,920 Speaker 3: Like it, it totally makes sense. 221 00:11:00,920 --> 00:11:03,840 Speaker 5: It's so weird to see like how accountability is like 222 00:11:04,040 --> 00:11:08,840 Speaker 5: framed because yeah, like you said, this seems like a 223 00:11:08,880 --> 00:11:11,560 Speaker 5: situation where she needs to be held accountable for what's 224 00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:14,320 Speaker 5: happening at her company, for what's happening in the name 225 00:11:14,360 --> 00:11:15,120 Speaker 5: of her company. 226 00:11:15,320 --> 00:11:19,880 Speaker 3: And yeah, like asking the most basic questions is apparently 227 00:11:19,920 --> 00:11:20,480 Speaker 3: too much. 228 00:11:21,440 --> 00:11:25,960 Speaker 5: I don't know, poor Linda Yakarino, her and her you know, 229 00:11:26,160 --> 00:11:31,760 Speaker 5: billion dollar company, so sad they're being bullied by mean journalists. 230 00:11:34,360 --> 00:11:38,320 Speaker 1: I almost see like a little bit of like sexism here, 231 00:11:38,360 --> 00:11:39,959 Speaker 1: Like I think it's I think it's I think it's 232 00:11:39,960 --> 00:11:43,720 Speaker 1: important to like not I try really heard when I'm 233 00:11:43,720 --> 00:11:45,560 Speaker 1: talking about Linda Yacarino to make sure that I'm not 234 00:11:45,640 --> 00:11:47,960 Speaker 1: trafficking in some sort of like internalized misogyny. 235 00:11:48,120 --> 00:11:49,640 Speaker 2: But the way that people are talking. 236 00:11:49,360 --> 00:11:52,120 Speaker 1: About her, it almost swings back around and it's like, 237 00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:55,160 Speaker 1: we're not talking about your best friend giving you a 238 00:11:55,200 --> 00:11:57,000 Speaker 1: heads up that your ex might be at the party 239 00:11:57,000 --> 00:11:59,120 Speaker 1: they're planning. This is somebody who is running one of 240 00:11:59,160 --> 00:12:01,240 Speaker 1: the most powerful thing EO of one of the most 241 00:12:01,240 --> 00:12:04,360 Speaker 1: powerful tech companies in the world. Where's this idea coming 242 00:12:04,360 --> 00:12:08,160 Speaker 1: from that she can't handle it if one of her 243 00:12:08,800 --> 00:12:12,560 Speaker 1: if a former staffer is there presenting his perspective as 244 00:12:12,600 --> 00:12:15,960 Speaker 1: a former staffer, it almost seems like insulting to her. 245 00:12:16,400 --> 00:12:21,040 Speaker 1: This assumption that like she needs more notice than other 246 00:12:21,400 --> 00:12:24,079 Speaker 1: tech CEOs that have gone to this conference that somebody's 247 00:12:24,160 --> 00:12:26,200 Speaker 1: being added to the lineup, and that if Joel Roth 248 00:12:26,360 --> 00:12:28,840 Speaker 1: got up there and spoke his piece about what he 249 00:12:28,960 --> 00:12:32,040 Speaker 1: saw at Twitter, that that's going to somehow rattle her. 250 00:12:32,320 --> 00:12:34,760 Speaker 1: It almost feels like like a weird kind of like 251 00:12:35,240 --> 00:12:37,680 Speaker 1: a weird assumption that I just I don't know where. 252 00:12:37,520 --> 00:12:38,280 Speaker 2: It's coming from. 253 00:12:38,440 --> 00:12:40,800 Speaker 1: And I don't see a lot of other tech leaders 254 00:12:40,920 --> 00:12:44,240 Speaker 1: getting these same kinds of like assumptions that they they 255 00:12:44,240 --> 00:12:46,840 Speaker 1: will fall they will simply fall apart if they are 256 00:12:46,880 --> 00:12:50,199 Speaker 1: asked to speak after somebody who has presented an alternative 257 00:12:50,400 --> 00:12:52,839 Speaker 1: perspective than their own. I thought to her whole thing, 258 00:12:52,880 --> 00:12:54,800 Speaker 1: she's been saying this whole time that Twitter is this 259 00:12:54,880 --> 00:12:57,679 Speaker 1: place where, oh, you need to be able to listen 260 00:12:57,679 --> 00:12:59,640 Speaker 1: when someone's got an opposing view, like you shouldn't. You 261 00:12:59,640 --> 00:13:02,000 Speaker 1: should run away from it when someone's got a different opinion. 262 00:13:02,200 --> 00:13:04,360 Speaker 1: But yet here are all these people saying, oh, well, 263 00:13:04,400 --> 00:13:07,640 Speaker 1: Linda Yakarino shouldn't have to listen to somebody's opposing opinion, 264 00:13:07,840 --> 00:13:10,240 Speaker 1: and if she does so, it is it is reasonable 265 00:13:10,280 --> 00:13:12,120 Speaker 1: for her to completely fall apart and shit the bed. 266 00:13:12,320 --> 00:13:13,880 Speaker 1: I have a lot of questions about it. 267 00:13:14,120 --> 00:13:18,040 Speaker 5: Yeah, a big part of feminism is being able to 268 00:13:18,160 --> 00:13:21,439 Speaker 5: acknowledge when women mess up too, and women are benefiting 269 00:13:21,480 --> 00:13:26,680 Speaker 5: from like, you know, classism, anti Semitism, general sort of 270 00:13:27,320 --> 00:13:33,200 Speaker 5: fascist tendencies, you know, in this case, and yeah, like 271 00:13:33,440 --> 00:13:37,680 Speaker 5: Linda Yacharino took this job knowing who Elon Musk was 272 00:13:37,760 --> 00:13:39,800 Speaker 5: and knowing what this company had kind. 273 00:13:39,720 --> 00:13:41,560 Speaker 3: Of positioned itself as at that point. 274 00:13:41,679 --> 00:13:44,240 Speaker 5: So it's sort of like, I don't know, it feels 275 00:13:44,320 --> 00:13:47,080 Speaker 5: like we're falling back into the whole like Girl Boss era, 276 00:13:47,200 --> 00:13:51,400 Speaker 5: where it's like it's okay if she does bad stuff 277 00:13:51,440 --> 00:13:55,400 Speaker 5: because she's she's doing it as a woman, and it 278 00:13:55,400 --> 00:13:58,599 Speaker 5: doesn't matter that other women are going to get brutalized 279 00:13:58,640 --> 00:14:02,200 Speaker 5: by the content that is produced by this company or whatever. 280 00:14:03,000 --> 00:14:06,480 Speaker 5: It's weird. It is a very weird thing to be watching. 281 00:14:06,760 --> 00:14:09,000 Speaker 1: It reminds me of this meme I see often that 282 00:14:09,040 --> 00:14:12,640 Speaker 1: I think about all the time. It's not exactly like, well, 283 00:14:12,640 --> 00:14:15,120 Speaker 1: whatever the meme is, I don't support all women. Some 284 00:14:15,160 --> 00:14:17,920 Speaker 1: of you bitches are very dumb. And I always think 285 00:14:17,920 --> 00:14:21,400 Speaker 1: about that of like, yeah, like this is she shot 286 00:14:21,480 --> 00:14:24,040 Speaker 1: the bed out there, and it really matters. It doesn't 287 00:14:24,080 --> 00:14:26,960 Speaker 1: just matter from like a business perspective, it matters for 288 00:14:27,040 --> 00:14:29,240 Speaker 1: all of us, like to put this in context. This 289 00:14:29,360 --> 00:14:31,880 Speaker 1: comes just days after a new study from the European 290 00:14:31,960 --> 00:14:35,040 Speaker 1: Union that said that Twitter is the number one biggest 291 00:14:35,040 --> 00:14:38,320 Speaker 1: source of disinformation when compared to other social media platforms, 292 00:14:38,360 --> 00:14:41,920 Speaker 1: with Spain, Poland, and Slovakia deemed as countries with the 293 00:14:41,960 --> 00:14:42,720 Speaker 1: highest risks. 294 00:14:42,920 --> 00:14:44,440 Speaker 2: The EUS Values. 295 00:14:44,120 --> 00:14:48,320 Speaker 1: And Transparency Commissioner Via Yorova warned Elon Musk, saying, you 296 00:14:48,440 --> 00:14:50,600 Speaker 1: have to comply with the hard law. We'll be watching 297 00:14:50,640 --> 00:14:53,360 Speaker 1: what you're doing. And what did he do in response, Well, 298 00:14:53,520 --> 00:14:57,640 Speaker 1: Elon Musk cut Twitter's election integrity and disinformation team despite 299 00:14:57,640 --> 00:15:00,560 Speaker 1: pledging that he would not do that, and removed the 300 00:15:00,600 --> 00:15:04,120 Speaker 1: election disinformation reporting tool even though we're like, what a 301 00:15:04,120 --> 00:15:06,080 Speaker 1: couple hundred days out of an election here in the 302 00:15:06,160 --> 00:15:09,840 Speaker 1: United States, and so this stuff really matters, like how 303 00:15:09,960 --> 00:15:13,400 Speaker 1: this platform is run really makes really matters to people. 304 00:15:14,160 --> 00:15:17,240 Speaker 1: On Friday, the day that this podcast comes out, Twitter's 305 00:15:17,280 --> 00:15:20,240 Speaker 1: new privacy policy goes into effect, which allows Twitter to 306 00:15:20,280 --> 00:15:23,680 Speaker 1: take a lot more data from us, including our employment information, 307 00:15:23,800 --> 00:15:27,320 Speaker 1: our job information, maybe read our DMS, our biometric data, 308 00:15:27,640 --> 00:15:29,880 Speaker 1: and of course use all of that data that they 309 00:15:29,880 --> 00:15:31,680 Speaker 1: take from us to train their AI, and a whole 310 00:15:31,680 --> 00:15:32,120 Speaker 1: lot more. 311 00:15:32,280 --> 00:15:33,080 Speaker 2: All of this. 312 00:15:33,240 --> 00:15:37,480 Speaker 1: After Twitter's former head of security turned actual whistleblower went 313 00:15:37,520 --> 00:15:39,960 Speaker 1: before the Senate and testified that Twitter is misleading the 314 00:15:39,960 --> 00:15:44,600 Speaker 1: public about the platform's extreme and egregious security deficiencies. So 315 00:15:45,200 --> 00:15:48,120 Speaker 1: all of this is to say that it really matters 316 00:15:48,160 --> 00:15:50,640 Speaker 1: how Twitter is being run, not just because it's this 317 00:15:50,760 --> 00:15:54,040 Speaker 1: big company, but because it really matters for global election 318 00:15:54,160 --> 00:15:57,600 Speaker 1: integrity and for our own personal security. So this is 319 00:15:57,640 --> 00:16:00,440 Speaker 1: not a business story. This is not a story about 320 00:16:00,480 --> 00:16:02,640 Speaker 1: like it's Kara Swisher gonna be able to get big 321 00:16:02,680 --> 00:16:05,480 Speaker 1: important guests on her show, where well, the CODE conference 322 00:16:05,480 --> 00:16:07,680 Speaker 1: continue to be really big and important. It's not a 323 00:16:07,720 --> 00:16:10,720 Speaker 1: story about whether or not this journalist was like nice 324 00:16:10,720 --> 00:16:14,720 Speaker 1: to Linda Yakarino. Our global democracy is at risk and 325 00:16:14,880 --> 00:16:18,640 Speaker 1: these people are just talking about like whether or not 326 00:16:18,960 --> 00:16:20,800 Speaker 1: CODE is going to be able to book guests is 327 00:16:20,800 --> 00:16:24,000 Speaker 1: because the journalist asked her about it. Like the conversation 328 00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:26,960 Speaker 1: is so deeply unserious, and I feel like we are 329 00:16:27,000 --> 00:16:31,960 Speaker 1: watching tech journalists fail us in real time and be 330 00:16:32,160 --> 00:16:34,240 Speaker 1: really public and open about it, Like they don't even 331 00:16:34,320 --> 00:16:37,720 Speaker 1: have the good sense to not publicly go out and 332 00:16:37,760 --> 00:16:40,240 Speaker 1: say like Oh, the most important thing is access, And 333 00:16:40,280 --> 00:16:43,400 Speaker 1: because they asked Linda Yacarino hard questions, they're blowing that 334 00:16:43,520 --> 00:16:45,960 Speaker 1: access the most important thing that matters to me as 335 00:16:45,960 --> 00:16:48,720 Speaker 1: a tech journalist, Like it is so deeply unserious and 336 00:16:48,760 --> 00:16:51,000 Speaker 1: they're putting us all at risk and not even having 337 00:16:51,000 --> 00:16:53,960 Speaker 1: the good sense to like not say that publicly voluntarily. 338 00:16:54,800 --> 00:16:58,880 Speaker 5: Yeah, I think coming from within the journalism industry in 339 00:16:58,920 --> 00:17:03,000 Speaker 5: particular and like having that perspective, this is really interesting 340 00:17:03,080 --> 00:17:05,200 Speaker 5: because it kind of reminds me of like, and you 341 00:17:05,560 --> 00:17:07,840 Speaker 5: mentioned the election, which this doesn't directly have to do 342 00:17:07,880 --> 00:17:10,119 Speaker 5: with the election, but you know, again Twitter is going 343 00:17:10,200 --> 00:17:13,080 Speaker 5: to be a big platform for that. This reminds me 344 00:17:13,160 --> 00:17:15,480 Speaker 5: of back in twenty sixteen when Trump was elected and 345 00:17:15,520 --> 00:17:18,159 Speaker 5: there was sort of this like conversation I think within 346 00:17:18,760 --> 00:17:22,720 Speaker 5: the journalism industry and within newsrooms about like what's the 347 00:17:22,800 --> 00:17:27,119 Speaker 5: media's responsibility and you know, what's the difference between holding 348 00:17:27,119 --> 00:17:30,960 Speaker 5: people accountable and like getting both sides or like hearing 349 00:17:30,960 --> 00:17:34,359 Speaker 5: all the sides, And like this this seems like we're 350 00:17:34,600 --> 00:17:37,399 Speaker 5: falling back into that idea of like getting all the 351 00:17:37,480 --> 00:17:40,800 Speaker 5: sides and hearing letting everybody just speak their mind without 352 00:17:41,760 --> 00:17:44,960 Speaker 5: question is more important than like actually holding people accountable 353 00:17:45,000 --> 00:17:48,760 Speaker 5: and actually asking people the hard questions about like their 354 00:17:48,800 --> 00:17:53,760 Speaker 5: actual policies that are going to affect people. Yeah, that's 355 00:17:54,240 --> 00:17:57,120 Speaker 5: concerning to me too. And again, like this doesn't directly 356 00:17:57,160 --> 00:17:58,679 Speaker 5: have to do with the election, but Twitter is going 357 00:17:58,720 --> 00:18:00,480 Speaker 5: to be a big platform when it comes to relection. 358 00:18:00,680 --> 00:18:03,240 Speaker 5: And are we going to see that sort of cycle 359 00:18:03,280 --> 00:18:06,800 Speaker 5: again where people are just like, yeah, we're gonna just 360 00:18:06,800 --> 00:18:09,879 Speaker 5: hear all the sides and not hold anybody accountable because 361 00:18:09,920 --> 00:18:10,720 Speaker 5: that never ends. 362 00:18:10,760 --> 00:18:14,440 Speaker 1: Well, yeah, I worry that folks in media have not 363 00:18:14,600 --> 00:18:20,760 Speaker 1: really learned a lot of hard truths, So we will see. 364 00:18:21,920 --> 00:18:36,760 Speaker 1: Let's take a quick break at our back, so we 365 00:18:36,840 --> 00:18:39,680 Speaker 1: have a little update for you. Last week during our newscast, 366 00:18:39,720 --> 00:18:43,080 Speaker 1: we told you that Andrew Tates MLM scam app called 367 00:18:43,119 --> 00:18:46,280 Speaker 1: The Real World formerly called Hustler's University, was taken off 368 00:18:46,280 --> 00:18:49,679 Speaker 1: of Google's play Store for being a predatory pyramid scheme 369 00:18:50,040 --> 00:18:53,239 Speaker 1: that charged subscribers fifty dollars a month and offered them 370 00:18:53,240 --> 00:18:56,000 Speaker 1: the chance to make millions through these like very scammy 371 00:18:56,040 --> 00:19:00,520 Speaker 1: sounding courses on things like copywriting, cryptocurrency, and also prompted 372 00:19:00,600 --> 00:19:03,760 Speaker 1: users to share Andrew Tate's content on social media. At 373 00:19:03,800 --> 00:19:06,400 Speaker 1: the time of publishing our episode, the app was still 374 00:19:06,440 --> 00:19:09,800 Speaker 1: available on Apple's app store well right after our episode 375 00:19:09,800 --> 00:19:12,879 Speaker 1: went live. On Friday of last week, Apple joined Google 376 00:19:13,160 --> 00:19:16,959 Speaker 1: in taking Tit's app down from the app store. Thank you, Apple. 377 00:19:17,240 --> 00:19:20,280 Speaker 1: Tits people say that they are appealing both of these decisions, 378 00:19:20,560 --> 00:19:23,000 Speaker 1: but for now, it is good news that that tit 379 00:19:23,080 --> 00:19:26,040 Speaker 1: is being cut from this income stream that just really 380 00:19:26,080 --> 00:19:27,840 Speaker 1: just takes advantage of young people. 381 00:19:28,920 --> 00:19:29,720 Speaker 3: Yeah. 382 00:19:30,200 --> 00:19:33,520 Speaker 5: First of all, adding on to last week's kind of 383 00:19:33,520 --> 00:19:35,880 Speaker 5: discussion of this, to be the third person now on 384 00:19:35,880 --> 00:19:39,119 Speaker 5: this podcast to say, I don't know why copywriting is 385 00:19:39,160 --> 00:19:40,400 Speaker 5: listed in there, because. 386 00:19:43,240 --> 00:19:46,000 Speaker 3: Oh I got experience with that. You do not make 387 00:19:46,880 --> 00:19:47,800 Speaker 3: billions of time. 388 00:19:48,200 --> 00:19:48,520 Speaker 2: Yeah. 389 00:19:48,800 --> 00:19:52,480 Speaker 1: Listener Sarah said the same thing as I like, what 390 00:19:52,640 --> 00:19:55,520 Speaker 1: is going on with copywriting? People don't make millions and 391 00:19:55,560 --> 00:19:58,879 Speaker 1: millions of dollars from copywriting and him promising people that 392 00:19:58,880 --> 00:20:01,320 Speaker 1: they're going to make that is truly a wild claim 393 00:20:01,480 --> 00:20:02,560 Speaker 1: to be making on his app. 394 00:20:03,240 --> 00:20:03,680 Speaker 2: Yeah. 395 00:20:04,080 --> 00:20:07,720 Speaker 5: I think generally media, if a company is telling you that, 396 00:20:07,800 --> 00:20:09,639 Speaker 5: like a media related job is going to make you 397 00:20:09,640 --> 00:20:14,520 Speaker 5: a lot of money, that's probably not true. 398 00:20:13,560 --> 00:20:14,280 Speaker 2: A rule of thumb. 399 00:20:14,840 --> 00:20:17,959 Speaker 5: Yeah, No, I that's good to hear. I feel like 400 00:20:18,080 --> 00:20:22,119 Speaker 5: this whole Entwtate saga. This is this is one of 401 00:20:22,119 --> 00:20:24,840 Speaker 5: those things where it's like this whole thing that's going 402 00:20:24,840 --> 00:20:27,399 Speaker 5: out the Andrew Tait has felt very big and like 403 00:20:28,080 --> 00:20:31,000 Speaker 5: very difficult to address, and it's like there's just so much, 404 00:20:31,000 --> 00:20:32,879 Speaker 5: so much harm he's causing that this is like an 405 00:20:32,960 --> 00:20:36,400 Speaker 5: example of like how any sort of action is good. 406 00:20:36,600 --> 00:20:38,480 Speaker 5: And I think, I don't know, I think it's it's 407 00:20:38,480 --> 00:20:40,919 Speaker 5: easy to get sort of caught up in all of 408 00:20:40,920 --> 00:20:42,679 Speaker 5: the bad stuff that's coming out of this, but it 409 00:20:42,720 --> 00:20:45,520 Speaker 5: is it's good to hear one when good things happened 410 00:20:45,640 --> 00:20:50,800 Speaker 5: because because of you know, people's advocacy and people trying 411 00:20:50,840 --> 00:20:52,200 Speaker 5: to combat this stuff. 412 00:20:52,600 --> 00:20:55,160 Speaker 1: Yeah, I take my w's where I can get them, 413 00:20:55,240 --> 00:20:57,720 Speaker 1: even the small ones. And if folks are interested to 414 00:20:57,720 --> 00:21:02,040 Speaker 1: hear more about Taate and the sort of ecosystem of 415 00:21:02,240 --> 00:21:05,480 Speaker 1: manosphere grifters that have popped up around him, folks like 416 00:21:06,000 --> 00:21:10,280 Speaker 1: just pearly Things and Sneako all of your mixed bag 417 00:21:10,480 --> 00:21:15,119 Speaker 1: of misogynistic right wing extremist online grifters. Check out our 418 00:21:15,160 --> 00:21:17,080 Speaker 1: episode of their No Girls on the Internet that came 419 00:21:17,080 --> 00:21:20,119 Speaker 1: out this week with Justin Horowitz and extremism researcher at 420 00:21:20,160 --> 00:21:22,840 Speaker 1: Media Matters. He breaks down all of it. So if 421 00:21:22,840 --> 00:21:25,240 Speaker 1: folks want to know more about Tate, what he's doing, 422 00:21:25,280 --> 00:21:26,960 Speaker 1: and the impact that it has on all of us, 423 00:21:27,000 --> 00:21:30,520 Speaker 1: definitely check out this week's episode. So over in Texas, 424 00:21:31,000 --> 00:21:33,800 Speaker 1: yelp the review website that is mostly known for I 425 00:21:33,800 --> 00:21:37,520 Speaker 1: guess like reviewing restaurants and coffee shops. While Yelp is 426 00:21:37,560 --> 00:21:40,920 Speaker 1: preemptively suing Texas to ensure that the site can continue 427 00:21:41,000 --> 00:21:44,320 Speaker 1: to tell users that crisis pregnancy centers also known as 428 00:21:44,359 --> 00:21:48,320 Speaker 1: CPCs listed on their site do not provide abortions or 429 00:21:48,359 --> 00:21:51,840 Speaker 1: abortion referrals. So if you're unfamiliar with a crisis pregnancy center, 430 00:21:52,040 --> 00:21:56,639 Speaker 1: according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, always 431 00:21:56,640 --> 00:21:59,320 Speaker 1: have trouble saying, that word CPC is a term used 432 00:21:59,320 --> 00:22:01,959 Speaker 1: to refer to a certain facilities that represent themselves as 433 00:22:02,040 --> 00:22:06,000 Speaker 1: legitimate reproductive healthcare clinics providing care for pregnant people, but 434 00:22:06,359 --> 00:22:09,800 Speaker 1: actually aim to dissuade people from accessing certain types of 435 00:22:09,840 --> 00:22:15,520 Speaker 1: reproductive care, including abortion care and even contraceptives' options. So currently, 436 00:22:16,080 --> 00:22:19,800 Speaker 1: Yelp puts a label on crisis pregnancy centers that reads, quote, 437 00:22:20,000 --> 00:22:23,480 Speaker 1: this is a crisis pregnancy center. Crisis pregnancy centers do 438 00:22:23,560 --> 00:22:26,960 Speaker 1: not offer abortions or referrals to abortion providers. This is 439 00:22:27,080 --> 00:22:30,919 Speaker 1: just like fact based information. That is just like a fact. 440 00:22:30,960 --> 00:22:33,760 Speaker 1: I don't think that any CPC would object to that 441 00:22:33,760 --> 00:22:36,400 Speaker 1: that they do not offer abortions or referrals for abortions. 442 00:22:36,400 --> 00:22:38,600 Speaker 1: That its just like a true fact about their services. 443 00:22:38,880 --> 00:22:42,400 Speaker 1: But YELP suspects that Texas is going to sue them 444 00:22:42,680 --> 00:22:45,119 Speaker 1: to prevent them from applying this label, so they are 445 00:22:45,160 --> 00:22:49,000 Speaker 1: preemptively suing Texas first. According to CNN, in a complaint 446 00:22:49,000 --> 00:22:51,840 Speaker 1: filed Wednesday in San Francisco federal court, YELP said it 447 00:22:51,840 --> 00:22:55,240 Speaker 1: as suing the Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton preemptively to 448 00:22:55,280 --> 00:22:57,880 Speaker 1: head off a lawsuit it anticipates from his office as 449 00:22:57,880 --> 00:23:00,400 Speaker 1: soon as Friday that may seek to borrow YELP from 450 00:23:00,400 --> 00:23:03,400 Speaker 1: applying its label to crisis pregnancy centers. If the name 451 00:23:04,040 --> 00:23:07,800 Speaker 1: Attorney General Ken Paxton of Texas sounds familiar to you, 452 00:23:08,480 --> 00:23:11,359 Speaker 1: that is because he just got finished facing a very 453 00:23:11,400 --> 00:23:15,400 Speaker 1: serious impeachment threat from his own party for corruption. 454 00:23:15,720 --> 00:23:17,080 Speaker 2: Now he wasn't impeached. 455 00:23:17,680 --> 00:23:20,639 Speaker 1: That he won that battle, but he's still facing a 456 00:23:20,680 --> 00:23:24,720 Speaker 1: felony fraud case and an FBI investigation for securities fraud. 457 00:23:24,760 --> 00:23:26,920 Speaker 2: So, Ken Paxton has a lot going on. 458 00:23:27,200 --> 00:23:30,399 Speaker 1: Like, you know, if I were Ken Paxson, I'd probably 459 00:23:30,480 --> 00:23:32,520 Speaker 1: focused on that, but this is what he's doing instead. 460 00:23:32,840 --> 00:23:36,640 Speaker 5: Yeah, that's so crazy, Like just from hearing you explain 461 00:23:36,720 --> 00:23:40,600 Speaker 5: that they're not doing anything illegal. In fact, they're just yeah, 462 00:23:40,640 --> 00:23:43,520 Speaker 5: like they're just explaining what the service is, which is 463 00:23:43,840 --> 00:23:46,879 Speaker 5: what you're supposed to do if you're a service and 464 00:23:46,960 --> 00:23:50,800 Speaker 5: you want to get business. But you know, it's almost 465 00:23:50,840 --> 00:23:52,919 Speaker 5: like they don't want us to know that they don't 466 00:23:53,240 --> 00:23:55,919 Speaker 5: have abortions and they actually do other things. 467 00:23:56,560 --> 00:23:57,040 Speaker 3: Crazy. 468 00:23:57,760 --> 00:24:02,439 Speaker 5: I thought false advertising was illegal, apparently not in this case. 469 00:24:03,080 --> 00:24:05,600 Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, So what's interesting about what you just said 470 00:24:05,680 --> 00:24:09,840 Speaker 1: is that back in February, Paxton went after yelp for 471 00:24:10,040 --> 00:24:13,640 Speaker 1: putting a different label on crisis pregnancy centers. Their initial 472 00:24:13,720 --> 00:24:18,320 Speaker 1: label described crisis pregnancy centers as quote typically providing limited 473 00:24:18,359 --> 00:24:22,640 Speaker 1: medical services and may not have licensed medical professionals on site, 474 00:24:22,720 --> 00:24:26,080 Speaker 1: which is also true, but Paxton objected to that back 475 00:24:26,119 --> 00:24:29,679 Speaker 1: in February, and so when yelp changed their label to 476 00:24:29,720 --> 00:24:32,520 Speaker 1: read what I've read before about how crisis pregnancy centers 477 00:24:32,760 --> 00:24:36,840 Speaker 1: do not offer abortions or referral for abortions Paxton himself 478 00:24:37,119 --> 00:24:41,159 Speaker 1: commended that disclosure as quote accurate in a press release 479 00:24:41,200 --> 00:24:44,080 Speaker 1: that reads, YELP has agreed to remove its misleading label 480 00:24:44,119 --> 00:24:47,600 Speaker 1: of crisis pregnancy centers and replace it with an accurate description. 481 00:24:47,920 --> 00:24:51,879 Speaker 1: So just as you said, right that, like Paxton himself said, 482 00:24:51,960 --> 00:24:55,040 Speaker 1: oh well this new label, this label is accurate, but 483 00:24:55,200 --> 00:24:58,159 Speaker 1: now he is still coming after YELP for this label 484 00:24:58,200 --> 00:25:01,560 Speaker 1: that he himself in February said was accurate and was fine. 485 00:25:01,800 --> 00:25:04,560 Speaker 1: So the way that crisis pregnancy centers work is that 486 00:25:04,600 --> 00:25:08,600 Speaker 1: they really, they really take advantage of like scammy SEO 487 00:25:08,720 --> 00:25:11,919 Speaker 1: practices to prey on people, many of whom are in 488 00:25:12,040 --> 00:25:16,760 Speaker 1: desperate situations, to confuse them with inaccurate information. Crisis pregnancy 489 00:25:16,760 --> 00:25:19,800 Speaker 1: centers their whole mission is to basically waste the time 490 00:25:19,840 --> 00:25:22,840 Speaker 1: of somebody who was pregnant, to create an intentional. 491 00:25:22,359 --> 00:25:24,679 Speaker 2: Delay that will delay them in getting. 492 00:25:24,400 --> 00:25:27,159 Speaker 1: An abortion, in an attempt to trigger term restrictions that 493 00:25:27,200 --> 00:25:30,840 Speaker 1: will prevent them from getting abortion care altogether. So yelp's 494 00:25:30,880 --> 00:25:33,960 Speaker 1: lawsuit is asking the court to affirm that it's labeling 495 00:25:33,960 --> 00:25:36,719 Speaker 1: of crisis pregnancy centers was not misleading and that it 496 00:25:36,720 --> 00:25:40,120 Speaker 1: was an exercise of constitutionally protected speech. It is also 497 00:25:40,240 --> 00:25:42,480 Speaker 1: asking the court to block Texas from suing over the 498 00:25:42,520 --> 00:25:45,399 Speaker 1: labels in the future, and I think, yeah, it's just 499 00:25:45,440 --> 00:25:48,600 Speaker 1: another example of the ways that like abortion is a 500 00:25:48,640 --> 00:25:51,080 Speaker 1: tech issue, and that if you are trying to talk 501 00:25:51,080 --> 00:25:53,560 Speaker 1: about technology but you're you're doing so in a way 502 00:25:53,600 --> 00:25:56,000 Speaker 1: that does not talk about abortion care, then you're not 503 00:25:56,040 --> 00:25:58,960 Speaker 1: fully talking about technology because abortion is a tech issue. 504 00:25:59,080 --> 00:26:01,959 Speaker 1: You know, tech company should really be in the business 505 00:26:01,960 --> 00:26:04,840 Speaker 1: of providing accurate information about people's health, and a lot 506 00:26:04,880 --> 00:26:07,280 Speaker 1: of times we know that they don't. So in this case, 507 00:26:07,400 --> 00:26:10,400 Speaker 1: when yelp is actually trying to help people get accurate 508 00:26:10,440 --> 00:26:14,120 Speaker 1: information about you know, crisis pregnancy centers, it's really sad 509 00:26:14,119 --> 00:26:17,439 Speaker 1: that states like Texas are stepping in to prevent them 510 00:26:17,440 --> 00:26:18,000 Speaker 1: from doing that. 511 00:26:18,520 --> 00:26:21,000 Speaker 5: Yeah, and again it's like it's not like Yelp is 512 00:26:21,040 --> 00:26:24,480 Speaker 5: doing anything that's illegal. I use Google Maps all the 513 00:26:24,520 --> 00:26:28,720 Speaker 5: time because like I never know where I am. But 514 00:26:29,200 --> 00:26:31,159 Speaker 5: I mean one thing that like I rely on a 515 00:26:31,200 --> 00:26:34,200 Speaker 5: lot is like the descriptions of places that I'm going 516 00:26:34,240 --> 00:26:37,000 Speaker 5: to matching the place that I'm actually going to, And 517 00:26:37,040 --> 00:26:39,399 Speaker 5: it is really frustrating when they don't. You shouldn't be 518 00:26:39,440 --> 00:26:42,000 Speaker 5: hiding under the guys of medical care if that's not 519 00:26:42,160 --> 00:26:42,959 Speaker 5: what you're doing. 520 00:26:43,400 --> 00:26:47,160 Speaker 3: But yeah, I hate yeah, wow, it's it's scary. 521 00:26:47,320 --> 00:26:51,280 Speaker 5: Everything that's happening in Texas with this is terrifying. And 522 00:26:51,320 --> 00:26:55,200 Speaker 5: again all the support to like abortion activists, reproductive rights 523 00:26:55,480 --> 00:27:01,000 Speaker 5: activists in Texas, you guys are like, I admire the 524 00:27:01,000 --> 00:27:03,480 Speaker 5: work he all are doing so much, so important. 525 00:27:03,760 --> 00:27:06,960 Speaker 1: Absolutely, Like, if you've got some spare coin and you're 526 00:27:07,000 --> 00:27:09,159 Speaker 1: looking for a good home for it, donate to an 527 00:27:09,200 --> 00:27:12,920 Speaker 1: abortion fund because Lord knows they're doing important work and 528 00:27:12,960 --> 00:27:15,560 Speaker 1: they could use it. And I think this thing in Texas, 529 00:27:15,640 --> 00:27:18,840 Speaker 1: I really think that Paxton is just trying to do 530 00:27:18,880 --> 00:27:23,159 Speaker 1: a stunt to take away from his corruption investigation. I 531 00:27:23,200 --> 00:27:26,600 Speaker 1: think that, like he is newly back from almost being 532 00:27:27,040 --> 00:27:29,840 Speaker 1: impeached by his own party, and I think that he 533 00:27:29,960 --> 00:27:33,080 Speaker 1: is just like looking for some big, grand standing stunt. 534 00:27:33,320 --> 00:27:37,000 Speaker 1: And he already confirmed that the way that yelp is 535 00:27:37,040 --> 00:27:39,160 Speaker 1: describing CPCs is accurate. 536 00:27:39,320 --> 00:27:41,359 Speaker 2: So it's like we're visiting this now. It just seems 537 00:27:41,400 --> 00:27:41,919 Speaker 2: like a stunt. 538 00:27:41,960 --> 00:27:43,440 Speaker 1: And I think it just goes back to the idea 539 00:27:43,440 --> 00:27:45,600 Speaker 1: that a lot of these extremists, they don't have a 540 00:27:45,600 --> 00:27:49,320 Speaker 1: lot to offer their citizens other than stunts and grandstanding. 541 00:27:49,400 --> 00:27:50,840 Speaker 1: And I think that's exactly what this is. 542 00:27:51,520 --> 00:27:56,119 Speaker 5: Yeah, it's almost like the backlash against free productive rights 543 00:27:56,200 --> 00:27:59,680 Speaker 5: and trans people and all of this is just a 544 00:28:00,680 --> 00:28:02,240 Speaker 5: time to get more votes. 545 00:28:02,400 --> 00:28:02,960 Speaker 3: But you know. 546 00:28:05,080 --> 00:28:08,280 Speaker 1: So, folks might be familiar with Wirecutter. The New York 547 00:28:08,320 --> 00:28:10,760 Speaker 1: Times is Vertical, where they rate and review tech gadgets. 548 00:28:11,600 --> 00:28:15,880 Speaker 1: Wirecutter had been giving whyse the security camera system positive 549 00:28:15,920 --> 00:28:18,480 Speaker 1: reviews for six years, but all of that changed this 550 00:28:18,520 --> 00:28:22,480 Speaker 1: week because Wirecutter announced that they were pulling their recommendations 551 00:28:22,520 --> 00:28:26,679 Speaker 1: for whys from all their site's guides. Why Well because 552 00:28:26,760 --> 00:28:30,159 Speaker 1: Wirecutter explains that on September eighth, The Verge reported an 553 00:28:30,240 --> 00:28:33,160 Speaker 1: incident in which WYSE customers were able to access live 554 00:28:33,280 --> 00:28:37,240 Speaker 1: video from other users cameras through the WYSE web portal. 555 00:28:37,600 --> 00:28:41,000 Speaker 1: When Wirecutter reached out to WYS for details, a representative 556 00:28:41,080 --> 00:28:44,240 Speaker 1: characterized the incident as small in scope, saying they believe 557 00:28:44,320 --> 00:28:47,600 Speaker 1: no more than ten users were affected. So that's not great. Like, 558 00:28:47,880 --> 00:28:50,600 Speaker 1: even if it's only ten people strangers being able to 559 00:28:50,640 --> 00:28:53,440 Speaker 1: access your security camera and see what you're doing, it's 560 00:28:53,480 --> 00:28:57,320 Speaker 1: like pretty bad. But here's the kicker. Other than one 561 00:28:57,440 --> 00:29:01,560 Speaker 1: post on its user to user online forum Wise Communities 562 00:29:01,680 --> 00:29:04,320 Speaker 1: and Communications to those that they say were affected. The 563 00:29:04,360 --> 00:29:07,520 Speaker 1: company has not reached out to Wise customers, nor has 564 00:29:07,520 --> 00:29:12,000 Speaker 1: it provided meaningful details about the incident wirecutter rights. We 565 00:29:12,040 --> 00:29:15,240 Speaker 1: believe Wise is acting irresponsibly to its customers. As such, 566 00:29:15,320 --> 00:29:18,440 Speaker 1: we've made the difficult but unavoidable decision to revoke our 567 00:29:18,480 --> 00:29:22,120 Speaker 1: recommendation of all Wise cameras until the company implements meaningful 568 00:29:22,200 --> 00:29:25,960 Speaker 1: changes to its security and privacy procedures. The concern is 569 00:29:26,000 --> 00:29:28,600 Speaker 1: not that Wise had a security incident. Just about every 570 00:29:28,640 --> 00:29:30,640 Speaker 1: company or organization in the world we're probably at the 571 00:29:30,680 --> 00:29:32,600 Speaker 1: deal with some sort of security trip up, as we've 572 00:29:32,600 --> 00:29:35,480 Speaker 1: seen with big banks, the military, Las Vegas, casinos, schools, 573 00:29:35,520 --> 00:29:38,080 Speaker 1: and even Chick fil A. The greater issue is how 574 00:29:38,160 --> 00:29:41,160 Speaker 1: this company responds to a crisis. With this incident and 575 00:29:41,240 --> 00:29:43,280 Speaker 1: others in the past, it is clear that Wise has 576 00:29:43,320 --> 00:29:46,600 Speaker 1: failed to develop the sorts of robust procedures that adequately 577 00:29:46,640 --> 00:29:49,400 Speaker 1: protect its customers the way they deserve. 578 00:29:50,440 --> 00:29:50,800 Speaker 2: Damn. 579 00:29:51,920 --> 00:29:53,400 Speaker 3: Yeah, that's scary. 580 00:29:53,920 --> 00:29:57,840 Speaker 5: Yeah, I feel like security cameras, cameras in general, that's 581 00:29:57,880 --> 00:30:01,680 Speaker 5: just such a sensitive issue. It's like any like, if 582 00:30:01,680 --> 00:30:06,440 Speaker 5: there's any break of that privacy, that should be notified 583 00:30:06,480 --> 00:30:11,200 Speaker 5: to people that have the cameras that you sell exactly. 584 00:30:11,440 --> 00:30:14,000 Speaker 2: So I need to make this really clear. This is 585 00:30:14,200 --> 00:30:15,720 Speaker 2: very unusual. Right. 586 00:30:15,760 --> 00:30:18,840 Speaker 1: We talk about a lot of companies who behave in 587 00:30:18,880 --> 00:30:22,080 Speaker 1: ways that are irresponsible, but this is irresponsible even by 588 00:30:22,160 --> 00:30:26,560 Speaker 1: like irresponsible company standards. Wirecutters spoke to other folks in 589 00:30:26,600 --> 00:30:29,640 Speaker 1: the privacy space, including Gen cult Writer, program director at 590 00:30:29,640 --> 00:30:32,440 Speaker 1: Mozilla's Privacy not included, whose work we've talked about on 591 00:30:32,440 --> 00:30:34,480 Speaker 1: a show before. All of the folks they spoke to 592 00:30:34,560 --> 00:30:38,280 Speaker 1: agree that it is completely unusual and unacceptable that Whyse 593 00:30:38,680 --> 00:30:41,400 Speaker 1: did not reach out to their customer base proactively and 594 00:30:41,560 --> 00:30:44,040 Speaker 1: never said anything about how they are planning to prevent 595 00:30:44,160 --> 00:30:47,120 Speaker 1: these issues in the future. And this is not even 596 00:30:47,120 --> 00:30:49,479 Speaker 1: the first time that Wise has had issues like this. 597 00:30:49,920 --> 00:30:53,000 Speaker 1: In March twenty twenty two, a bit Defender study showed 598 00:30:53,040 --> 00:30:56,560 Speaker 1: that WYSE took nearly three years to fully address specific 599 00:30:56,640 --> 00:31:00,520 Speaker 1: vulnerabilities that affected all three models of Wise cameras. Eventually, 600 00:31:00,560 --> 00:31:03,320 Speaker 1: they did alert customers and told them that they're you know, 601 00:31:03,600 --> 00:31:06,920 Speaker 1: their security like that model of security camera was no 602 00:31:07,000 --> 00:31:09,160 Speaker 1: longer safe and that they should not be using them, 603 00:31:09,200 --> 00:31:10,960 Speaker 1: and that they did keep using them, they were doing 604 00:31:11,000 --> 00:31:14,440 Speaker 1: so like at their own risk. So like you were saying, Joey, 605 00:31:14,680 --> 00:31:18,160 Speaker 1: I would pretty much never advocate for someone putting an 606 00:31:18,160 --> 00:31:21,120 Speaker 1: additional camera in their home that they didn't need. But 607 00:31:21,600 --> 00:31:25,440 Speaker 1: when you do, like that is a trust relationship, as 608 00:31:25,440 --> 00:31:28,640 Speaker 1: you were saying, that you're entering into with the company, right, 609 00:31:28,680 --> 00:31:31,200 Speaker 1: you need to know that if that trust is broken, 610 00:31:31,680 --> 00:31:33,600 Speaker 1: that the company is going to handle it in a 611 00:31:33,640 --> 00:31:36,240 Speaker 1: way that is responsible. Like that's the only way that 612 00:31:36,760 --> 00:31:39,560 Speaker 1: having a camera in your house makes any sense at all, 613 00:31:39,640 --> 00:31:41,760 Speaker 1: is that the company is like acting in a way 614 00:31:41,760 --> 00:31:44,720 Speaker 1: that really makes it clear that they understand that that 615 00:31:44,720 --> 00:31:47,800 Speaker 1: that you're putting their your trust in them. As wier 616 00:31:47,880 --> 00:31:51,720 Speaker 1: Cutter points out, the fundamental relationship between smart home companies 617 00:31:51,760 --> 00:31:54,640 Speaker 1: and their customers is founded on trust. No company can 618 00:31:54,680 --> 00:31:57,200 Speaker 1: guarantee safety and security but one hundred percent of the time, 619 00:31:57,480 --> 00:31:59,920 Speaker 1: but customers need to be confident that those who make 620 00:32:00,040 --> 00:32:03,400 Speaker 1: and sell these products, especially security devices, are worthy of 621 00:32:03,440 --> 00:32:06,280 Speaker 1: their trust. Why is its inability to meet these basic 622 00:32:06,320 --> 00:32:09,760 Speaker 1: standards puts its customers and its devices at risk and 623 00:32:09,880 --> 00:32:13,400 Speaker 1: also cast doubt on the smart home industry as a whole. 624 00:32:13,520 --> 00:32:17,200 Speaker 1: So Wirecutter actually listed out some specific steps that Wise 625 00:32:17,200 --> 00:32:19,440 Speaker 1: would need to take in order for them to consider, 626 00:32:19,800 --> 00:32:22,760 Speaker 1: like reconsider looking at their products in the future. It's 627 00:32:22,760 --> 00:32:25,840 Speaker 1: like very basic stuff, honestly, like reaching out to all 628 00:32:25,840 --> 00:32:28,320 Speaker 1: customers proactively if there is a breach and describing the 629 00:32:28,360 --> 00:32:31,080 Speaker 1: issue in detail, including what steps are being taken to 630 00:32:31,120 --> 00:32:33,240 Speaker 1: prevent it from happening. Again, Like to me, it sounds 631 00:32:33,240 --> 00:32:36,240 Speaker 1: like very basic stuff. And I also think that it 632 00:32:36,320 --> 00:32:39,720 Speaker 1: is a pretty big step for an outlet that like 633 00:32:39,840 --> 00:32:43,480 Speaker 1: Wirecutter that most folks probably know for like Gadget Reviews, 634 00:32:43,520 --> 00:32:46,760 Speaker 1: to take this kind of action, And honestly, maybe it 635 00:32:46,800 --> 00:32:49,680 Speaker 1: should be more commonplace, Like even if you're mostly a 636 00:32:49,720 --> 00:32:53,480 Speaker 1: review outlet, it is still sort of service oriented tech 637 00:32:53,560 --> 00:32:57,320 Speaker 1: journalism for regular people to inform their purchasing decision making, right, 638 00:32:57,360 --> 00:32:59,760 Speaker 1: And so I think it's nice to see an outlet 639 00:33:00,000 --> 00:33:03,720 Speaker 1: making that responsibility seriously and using that as as a 640 00:33:03,760 --> 00:33:06,840 Speaker 1: way to advocate for a tech company just being accountable 641 00:33:06,840 --> 00:33:08,960 Speaker 1: to the people who are buying them buying their stuff. 642 00:33:09,680 --> 00:33:14,320 Speaker 5: Yeah, uh rare wind for the New York Times. 643 00:33:13,960 --> 00:33:20,120 Speaker 3: I guess Times Property Bridget. Did you ever watch. 644 00:33:21,800 --> 00:33:24,480 Speaker 5: There was the like Disney Channel movie that I watched 645 00:33:24,600 --> 00:33:26,480 Speaker 5: I was a kid that was called like smart Home. 646 00:33:26,600 --> 00:33:30,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, smart House. You know, I watched Smart House as 647 00:33:30,520 --> 00:33:31,600 Speaker 2: the word smart Home. 648 00:33:31,720 --> 00:33:33,520 Speaker 3: But I was like, I think that's why. 649 00:33:33,720 --> 00:33:36,120 Speaker 5: Now I think I'm realizing now because I've always been 650 00:33:36,120 --> 00:33:39,280 Speaker 5: somebody that, like, even with like computer cameras, have been 651 00:33:39,400 --> 00:33:43,240 Speaker 5: very like anxious about and I know most about it whatever, I. 652 00:33:44,800 --> 00:33:45,920 Speaker 3: In theory it's safe. 653 00:33:45,920 --> 00:33:47,800 Speaker 5: But yeah, I think I think that's how it started. 654 00:33:47,800 --> 00:33:49,920 Speaker 5: I think it was because of that movie, which this 655 00:33:50,080 --> 00:33:53,680 Speaker 5: just goes to prove that Disney Channel was right apparently, 656 00:33:54,520 --> 00:33:56,280 Speaker 5: But yeah. 657 00:33:56,240 --> 00:33:58,080 Speaker 3: No, that's that's so scary though. 658 00:33:58,240 --> 00:34:02,400 Speaker 5: I've never had a security camera like that in a 659 00:34:02,440 --> 00:34:04,040 Speaker 5: place that I've lived, but I know, like I had 660 00:34:04,120 --> 00:34:06,280 Speaker 5: friends growing up that like had that in their houses, 661 00:34:06,360 --> 00:34:11,319 Speaker 5: and that's scary. That is that's really scary what could 662 00:34:11,320 --> 00:34:11,880 Speaker 5: happen with that? 663 00:34:12,520 --> 00:34:12,880 Speaker 2: Yeah? 664 00:34:12,920 --> 00:34:17,640 Speaker 1: So first of all, like Disney Channel continue, Disney Channel 665 00:34:17,680 --> 00:34:21,200 Speaker 1: originals continue from like that two thousands continue to be prophetic, 666 00:34:21,280 --> 00:34:23,600 Speaker 1: like it is written. Yeah, maybe that's maybe that's our 667 00:34:23,760 --> 00:34:28,120 Speaker 1: origin story of paranoia around certain technology. 668 00:34:28,600 --> 00:34:29,359 Speaker 3: I think it is. 669 00:34:29,440 --> 00:34:31,880 Speaker 5: I think I'm connecting the dots now. I'm like, that's 670 00:34:31,960 --> 00:34:32,800 Speaker 5: that's how it starts. 671 00:34:32,880 --> 00:34:36,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, And it's funny because like I'm not like like 672 00:34:36,280 --> 00:34:40,520 Speaker 1: for my life having things like a Google Home or 673 00:34:40,600 --> 00:34:42,680 Speaker 1: like a security camera. It doesn't make sense for my 674 00:34:42,920 --> 00:34:46,359 Speaker 1: life personally, But I get that people's security needs might 675 00:34:46,400 --> 00:34:49,400 Speaker 1: be different. Like my parents have I actually don't know 676 00:34:49,440 --> 00:34:51,879 Speaker 1: what they use, but they have cameras in every room 677 00:34:51,920 --> 00:34:55,680 Speaker 1: in their house because my dad is disabled and sometimes 678 00:34:55,719 --> 00:34:58,399 Speaker 1: has like bad falls, and so it's like a way 679 00:34:58,400 --> 00:35:00,799 Speaker 1: to be like, oh, well, if I'm downstairs, I want 680 00:35:00,800 --> 00:35:02,480 Speaker 1: to be able to see if my mom is downstairs, 681 00:35:02,520 --> 00:35:03,640 Speaker 1: she wants to be able to be able to see 682 00:35:03,640 --> 00:35:05,560 Speaker 1: what my dad is doing, and vice versa. Because they're 683 00:35:05,600 --> 00:35:07,279 Speaker 1: older folks who live in a big house, and so 684 00:35:07,760 --> 00:35:12,880 Speaker 1: I'm not you know, if having devices that have cameras 685 00:35:12,920 --> 00:35:16,320 Speaker 1: in them in your life makes sense for your lifestyle, 686 00:35:17,040 --> 00:35:19,680 Speaker 1: like that, do what you gotta do. As wirecutter, I 687 00:35:19,680 --> 00:35:22,279 Speaker 1: think rightly points out, you should be able to do 688 00:35:22,320 --> 00:35:23,960 Speaker 1: that and trust that you are going to get the 689 00:35:24,000 --> 00:35:26,799 Speaker 1: information that you need to be able to be, you know, 690 00:35:26,920 --> 00:35:29,680 Speaker 1: deciding how you what role you want this technology to 691 00:35:29,680 --> 00:35:31,800 Speaker 1: play in your life. And I feel like what wise 692 00:35:31,960 --> 00:35:35,000 Speaker 1: is not being a good actor to allow consumers to 693 00:35:35,040 --> 00:35:35,600 Speaker 1: really do that. 694 00:35:40,400 --> 00:35:40,560 Speaker 5: More. 695 00:35:40,560 --> 00:35:53,680 Speaker 1: After a quick break, let's get right back into it. 696 00:35:55,440 --> 00:35:57,600 Speaker 1: So we've talked a little bit before about the threats 697 00:35:57,600 --> 00:36:01,600 Speaker 1: that deep fakes pose digitally re images of people, often 698 00:36:01,640 --> 00:36:04,560 Speaker 1: depicting them in sexual situations or meant to be used 699 00:36:04,560 --> 00:36:07,880 Speaker 1: for political deception. Now, new legislation is trying to combat 700 00:36:07,920 --> 00:36:11,200 Speaker 1: the harm posed by deep fakes. Representative Evet Clark, who 701 00:36:11,200 --> 00:36:14,359 Speaker 1: represents parts of Brooklyn, introduced new legislation in the House 702 00:36:14,400 --> 00:36:17,320 Speaker 1: that is meant to curb the harm of deep fakes, saying, 703 00:36:17,400 --> 00:36:19,080 Speaker 1: this bill is meant to take us into the twenty 704 00:36:19,080 --> 00:36:21,880 Speaker 1: first century and establish a baseline so we can discern 705 00:36:21,960 --> 00:36:24,200 Speaker 1: who is intended to harm us. Clark said that the 706 00:36:24,200 --> 00:36:28,640 Speaker 1: Deep Fakes Accountability Act would provide prosecutors, regulators, and particularly 707 00:36:28,719 --> 00:36:33,000 Speaker 1: victims with resources like detection technology that Clark believes they 708 00:36:33,040 --> 00:36:35,720 Speaker 1: need to stand up against the threat of nefarious deep fakes. 709 00:36:36,040 --> 00:36:39,040 Speaker 1: This bill would require all creators of deep fakes to 710 00:36:39,120 --> 00:36:43,080 Speaker 1: include content credentials, which means the origins and entire history 711 00:36:43,080 --> 00:36:45,280 Speaker 1: of a piece of content, including how it was captured 712 00:36:45,320 --> 00:36:48,600 Speaker 1: and how it's been changed. Under this legislation, online platforms 713 00:36:48,640 --> 00:36:51,680 Speaker 1: that host generative AI content would also be required to 714 00:36:51,680 --> 00:36:55,760 Speaker 1: display the origins of that content. Under this legislation, users 715 00:36:55,800 --> 00:36:58,719 Speaker 1: who failed to label malicious deep thakes would face a 716 00:36:58,800 --> 00:37:02,359 Speaker 1: criminal penalty include in prison time and fines. So this 717 00:37:02,440 --> 00:37:06,520 Speaker 1: category woulden compass deep fakes related to sexual content, criminal content, 718 00:37:06,840 --> 00:37:10,080 Speaker 1: incitement of violence, and foreign interference in elections. Now I've 719 00:37:10,120 --> 00:37:13,000 Speaker 1: looked into this legislation a little bit, it does seem 720 00:37:13,040 --> 00:37:16,640 Speaker 1: like there is some potential concern that the scope might 721 00:37:16,680 --> 00:37:19,359 Speaker 1: be a bit too narrow because it really focuses on 722 00:37:19,920 --> 00:37:25,320 Speaker 1: like people, So like deep fakes that depict images of people, 723 00:37:25,840 --> 00:37:29,440 Speaker 1: but what about malna deep fake does not depict a person, 724 00:37:29,520 --> 00:37:33,520 Speaker 1: Like recently faked AI generated images of the Pentagon on 725 00:37:33,600 --> 00:37:36,520 Speaker 1: fire went viral and caused a disruption where I live 726 00:37:36,560 --> 00:37:39,080 Speaker 1: here in DC, And so I have read that there 727 00:37:39,160 --> 00:37:42,319 Speaker 1: is concern that this legislation is too narrow and that 728 00:37:42,360 --> 00:37:46,440 Speaker 1: it does not account for those kinds of deep fakes 729 00:37:46,440 --> 00:37:48,640 Speaker 1: that are that do not depict a specific person. 730 00:37:49,520 --> 00:37:49,759 Speaker 3: Yeah. 731 00:37:49,800 --> 00:37:53,400 Speaker 5: That also, it concerns me that they're being very liberal 732 00:37:53,440 --> 00:37:57,680 Speaker 5: with like sexual content because and like, I don't know, 733 00:37:57,760 --> 00:38:00,640 Speaker 5: this might be a little bit more extreme of a take, 734 00:38:00,680 --> 00:38:03,960 Speaker 5: but I feel like if you're making AI content of 735 00:38:04,000 --> 00:38:09,080 Speaker 5: somebody that's like sexual without their permission, that's bad, that 736 00:38:09,239 --> 00:38:13,480 Speaker 5: is wrong. I don't think that should be allowed, like period. 737 00:38:13,920 --> 00:38:16,080 Speaker 5: So I don't know, it feels sort of like concerning 738 00:38:16,160 --> 00:38:18,399 Speaker 5: that they're sort of like you have to label. 739 00:38:18,120 --> 00:38:20,160 Speaker 3: This, but it can still exist. 740 00:38:21,239 --> 00:38:25,239 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's another I mean, like I just knowing what 741 00:38:25,320 --> 00:38:29,839 Speaker 1: I know about you know, the way that platforms will 742 00:38:29,880 --> 00:38:33,640 Speaker 1: sometimes add like oh this is misinformation or like get 743 00:38:33,640 --> 00:38:36,239 Speaker 1: the realist story. Like if you ever scroll Facebook and 744 00:38:36,280 --> 00:38:38,880 Speaker 1: it's like, oh, this post has been shown to be misleading. 745 00:38:39,600 --> 00:38:42,840 Speaker 1: Those are great, and I like think that platform should 746 00:38:42,840 --> 00:38:45,719 Speaker 1: be doing that, But if I'm being honest, there is 747 00:38:45,760 --> 00:38:48,239 Speaker 1: a lot of research that suggests that people are not 748 00:38:48,400 --> 00:38:51,319 Speaker 1: really like looking at those because social media platforms move 749 00:38:51,360 --> 00:38:53,520 Speaker 1: so quickly that people are not always clicking in to 750 00:38:53,520 --> 00:38:55,680 Speaker 1: be like, oh this is here's. 751 00:38:55,440 --> 00:38:56,279 Speaker 2: Some context for this. 752 00:38:56,400 --> 00:38:59,800 Speaker 1: And so I'm concerned that the way that the Internet 753 00:38:59,840 --> 00:39:02,440 Speaker 1: moves moves, the speed at which the Internet moves, I 754 00:39:02,480 --> 00:39:04,960 Speaker 1: think it's possible that deep fakes could travel in a 755 00:39:05,000 --> 00:39:08,680 Speaker 1: way because people are not necessarily looking at the context 756 00:39:08,760 --> 00:39:10,759 Speaker 1: or looking at the label because of the speed at 757 00:39:10,760 --> 00:39:13,319 Speaker 1: which social media platforms tend to move. And so it 758 00:39:13,400 --> 00:39:17,040 Speaker 1: is concerning, Like I think that something needs to be 759 00:39:17,120 --> 00:39:20,400 Speaker 1: done about the threat of deep fakes, Like I already know. 760 00:39:20,520 --> 00:39:22,399 Speaker 1: I'm sure we've talked about this on the show that 761 00:39:22,880 --> 00:39:25,719 Speaker 1: deep fakes have the potential to really disrupt our democracy, 762 00:39:25,719 --> 00:39:28,440 Speaker 1: and it's definitely going to be people who are traditionally 763 00:39:28,440 --> 00:39:35,479 Speaker 1: marginalized who are disproportionately facing that realities, like you know, women, LGBTQ, folks, 764 00:39:35,520 --> 00:39:36,200 Speaker 1: people of color. 765 00:39:37,320 --> 00:39:39,720 Speaker 2: That's just a reality. And so, like I do think. 766 00:39:39,600 --> 00:39:42,319 Speaker 1: Something needs to be done, it's also kind of hard 767 00:39:42,320 --> 00:39:45,759 Speaker 1: to believe that right now there is no national legislation 768 00:39:45,920 --> 00:39:50,040 Speaker 1: specifically addressing deep fakes or the deceptive uses of generative AI. 769 00:39:50,520 --> 00:39:54,359 Speaker 1: Earlier this month, technology executives did have a closed door 770 00:39:54,400 --> 00:39:58,120 Speaker 1: meeting with senators to discuss potential government regulation, But right 771 00:39:58,160 --> 00:40:02,640 Speaker 1: now there is no national regulation of this. And I 772 00:40:02,680 --> 00:40:05,280 Speaker 1: do want to say that this legislation is being introduced 773 00:40:05,280 --> 00:40:08,040 Speaker 1: by Representative Clark, and Clark is somebody that had actually 774 00:40:08,040 --> 00:40:08,560 Speaker 1: been really. 775 00:40:08,480 --> 00:40:09,279 Speaker 2: Keeping my eye on. 776 00:40:09,719 --> 00:40:12,839 Speaker 1: Y'all might recall that during the TikTok hearings, we talked 777 00:40:12,880 --> 00:40:14,600 Speaker 1: a lot about some of the stuff that came up 778 00:40:14,600 --> 00:40:17,640 Speaker 1: from lawmakers, the questions that they asked. Clark had some 779 00:40:17,800 --> 00:40:23,080 Speaker 1: legitimately very good questions about whether TikTok's moderation policies were 780 00:40:23,120 --> 00:40:25,840 Speaker 1: biased toward black and brown creators, and whether the platform 781 00:40:25,880 --> 00:40:28,879 Speaker 1: was suppressing abortion content. I remember like she was someone whole. 782 00:40:28,880 --> 00:40:32,480 Speaker 1: I was like, Oh, she's like asking very substantive questions 783 00:40:32,719 --> 00:40:34,960 Speaker 1: that clearly reflect her constituents in a way that I 784 00:40:35,000 --> 00:40:39,120 Speaker 1: thought was like very refreshing. She was also working to 785 00:40:39,200 --> 00:40:42,759 Speaker 1: regulate AI before doing so was cool way back when. 786 00:40:42,760 --> 00:40:45,840 Speaker 1: In twenty nineteen, she worked with Senators Wided and Corey 787 00:40:45,840 --> 00:40:49,320 Speaker 1: Booker to introduce the Algorithmic Accountability Act, a bill that 788 00:40:49,360 --> 00:40:53,000 Speaker 1: would require companies to conduct impact and privacy assessments when 789 00:40:53,000 --> 00:40:55,879 Speaker 1: they use automated decision making tools. And so we will 790 00:40:55,880 --> 00:40:58,880 Speaker 1: definitely keep an eye on this legislation, how it moves, 791 00:40:59,320 --> 00:41:01,719 Speaker 1: what happens with it. But yeah, it's sort of hard 792 00:41:01,760 --> 00:41:07,239 Speaker 1: to believe that there is no national legislation addressing the 793 00:41:07,280 --> 00:41:11,640 Speaker 1: threat of deep fakes or deceptive uses of AI. And yeah, 794 00:41:11,640 --> 00:41:13,160 Speaker 1: it's it's I will keep an eye on it. 795 00:41:13,880 --> 00:41:16,880 Speaker 5: Yeah, it It definitely feels like there should be I 796 00:41:16,880 --> 00:41:21,319 Speaker 5: feel like that should be covered under like libel or 797 00:41:21,400 --> 00:41:22,120 Speaker 5: something too. 798 00:41:22,200 --> 00:41:25,240 Speaker 3: Where it's like and again, I'm I'm not a lawyer. 799 00:41:25,400 --> 00:41:29,480 Speaker 5: I haven't looked at the concrete laws that exists around this, 800 00:41:29,719 --> 00:41:32,319 Speaker 5: but it feels like an image and an image is 801 00:41:32,520 --> 00:41:36,239 Speaker 5: like impact on somebody's reputation that should have the same 802 00:41:36,280 --> 00:41:39,200 Speaker 5: impact as like something that's spoken about somebody. 803 00:41:39,520 --> 00:41:42,160 Speaker 3: But yeah, like it's it's good. 804 00:41:41,960 --> 00:41:44,359 Speaker 5: To hear that somebody is doing something about this, and 805 00:41:44,440 --> 00:41:48,440 Speaker 5: somebody who it seems like has a history of actually 806 00:41:48,480 --> 00:41:51,960 Speaker 5: addressing tech issues and not just you know, selling out 807 00:41:52,000 --> 00:41:55,799 Speaker 5: to the sort of Heritage Foundation version of what the 808 00:41:55,800 --> 00:41:56,640 Speaker 5: Internet should be. 809 00:41:56,760 --> 00:42:00,640 Speaker 3: That's a refreshing take for once. But and again, like, this. 810 00:42:00,560 --> 00:42:04,960 Speaker 5: Is a very narrow legislation, but it's a step in 811 00:42:04,960 --> 00:42:07,120 Speaker 5: the right direction, and I guess that's good to hear. 812 00:42:07,760 --> 00:42:09,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, And to your point that you were making earlier, 813 00:42:10,000 --> 00:42:11,960 Speaker 1: I think this is a situation that really shows that 814 00:42:12,040 --> 00:42:17,040 Speaker 1: sometimes our technology progresses quicker than our laws can keep up. 815 00:42:17,200 --> 00:42:20,400 Speaker 1: And so I'm interested to see if we get to 816 00:42:20,440 --> 00:42:23,799 Speaker 1: a place where our laws actually can be somewhat more 817 00:42:23,840 --> 00:42:26,600 Speaker 1: aligned with the realities of the technology that we're that's 818 00:42:26,640 --> 00:42:30,880 Speaker 1: facing us today. Okay, so important question for you, Joey. 819 00:42:31,440 --> 00:42:34,080 Speaker 1: Did you go for First of all, are you a Swifty? 820 00:42:34,080 --> 00:42:35,080 Speaker 1: Are you into Taylor Swift? 821 00:42:36,040 --> 00:42:37,120 Speaker 3: I love Taylor Swift. 822 00:42:37,160 --> 00:42:40,120 Speaker 2: Oh my god, We've never talked about this, so I 823 00:42:40,440 --> 00:42:40,919 Speaker 2: wasn't sure. 824 00:42:41,400 --> 00:42:43,400 Speaker 5: I did go to the Airs tour. I went to 825 00:42:43,480 --> 00:42:47,200 Speaker 5: the Chicago one of the Chicago shows. She played the Lakes, 826 00:42:47,440 --> 00:42:51,600 Speaker 5: and I wish you would for those of you that are. 827 00:42:51,600 --> 00:42:54,080 Speaker 3: Wondering, the two of you that are wondering. 828 00:42:54,719 --> 00:42:59,560 Speaker 5: But it was a great show. Not being said the 829 00:43:00,040 --> 00:43:02,319 Speaker 5: it's a lot of stress leading up to it. So 830 00:43:02,400 --> 00:43:04,920 Speaker 5: I'm sure you're gonna get into some of that. 831 00:43:05,239 --> 00:43:07,520 Speaker 2: Yes, so I think. I so I'm not as swifty. 832 00:43:07,600 --> 00:43:11,480 Speaker 1: I am an aspiring swifty like I if I'm being honest, 833 00:43:11,480 --> 00:43:14,600 Speaker 1: I probably other than the big hits that everybody knows, 834 00:43:14,600 --> 00:43:15,839 Speaker 1: I probably could not name a. 835 00:43:15,800 --> 00:43:16,600 Speaker 2: Taylor Swift song. 836 00:43:16,880 --> 00:43:19,239 Speaker 1: But I want to be a swifty If there are 837 00:43:19,280 --> 00:43:22,160 Speaker 1: folks like someone send me a playlist, someone tell me 838 00:43:22,160 --> 00:43:26,320 Speaker 1: what to get into. I feel like jealousy. I wish 839 00:43:26,360 --> 00:43:28,280 Speaker 1: I was. I want to be part of the community. 840 00:43:28,400 --> 00:43:34,320 Speaker 5: I'll send you a playlist like Okay, yeah, I respect 841 00:43:34,320 --> 00:43:37,480 Speaker 5: Taylor Swift a lot, and I I want in. 842 00:43:37,760 --> 00:43:39,160 Speaker 2: I just don't know where to start. 843 00:43:39,760 --> 00:43:42,160 Speaker 1: So, as you were saying, like if anybody who tried 844 00:43:42,160 --> 00:43:44,440 Speaker 1: to go to Taylor Swift's eras toward the summer or 845 00:43:44,840 --> 00:43:46,920 Speaker 1: Beyonce's renaissance toward the summer, I didn't make it to 846 00:43:46,960 --> 00:43:47,359 Speaker 1: either of them. 847 00:43:47,400 --> 00:43:48,719 Speaker 2: So like Boomy, I. 848 00:43:48,719 --> 00:43:49,760 Speaker 3: Didn't make it to Renaissance. 849 00:43:49,800 --> 00:43:51,600 Speaker 5: I really didn't want to go to Renaissance and I 850 00:43:51,600 --> 00:43:55,480 Speaker 5: could not get a ticket Soli. 851 00:43:54,440 --> 00:43:57,520 Speaker 3: Yeah, glass half at least I kind of situation. 852 00:43:59,000 --> 00:44:02,160 Speaker 1: My brother went with his wife, and there was a 853 00:44:02,160 --> 00:44:05,000 Speaker 1: time where I was like, well, certainly, like he's gonna 854 00:44:05,000 --> 00:44:07,920 Speaker 1: ask me to go. He's gonna be like, Bridget, you 855 00:44:08,040 --> 00:44:09,680 Speaker 1: should go to Beyonce, take my ticket. 856 00:44:09,760 --> 00:44:11,319 Speaker 2: And I was like waiting by the phone and the 857 00:44:11,320 --> 00:44:12,080 Speaker 2: call never came. 858 00:44:12,280 --> 00:44:12,480 Speaker 3: Fell. 859 00:44:12,680 --> 00:44:14,719 Speaker 2: Yeah, I did, heart breaking. 860 00:44:15,440 --> 00:44:17,560 Speaker 1: It was heartbreaking, But I'll get him next time. So 861 00:44:17,800 --> 00:44:20,520 Speaker 1: if anybody went to either of those big summer concert 862 00:44:20,640 --> 00:44:24,320 Speaker 1: tours Taylor Swift, Beyonce, y'all probably know already that the 863 00:44:24,880 --> 00:44:29,239 Speaker 1: ticket buying process was plagued with predatory online ticket sale 864 00:44:29,280 --> 00:44:33,600 Speaker 1: platforms and resellers. It is so hard and expensive to 865 00:44:33,600 --> 00:44:36,000 Speaker 1: get tickets that they actually end up selling out really 866 00:44:36,040 --> 00:44:39,279 Speaker 1: quickly and then wind up on ticket reseller sites for 867 00:44:39,520 --> 00:44:42,960 Speaker 1: thousands of dollars. And now the IRS is getting involved 868 00:44:42,960 --> 00:44:46,400 Speaker 1: because they're putting more scrutiny on ticket resellers. 869 00:44:46,640 --> 00:44:48,000 Speaker 2: So I actually did not know this. 870 00:44:48,760 --> 00:44:51,839 Speaker 1: How it has worked before is that ticket websites had 871 00:44:51,840 --> 00:44:54,279 Speaker 1: to send ten ninety nine forms to anybody who made 872 00:44:54,280 --> 00:44:56,839 Speaker 1: more than twenty thousand dollars through two hundred or more 873 00:44:56,880 --> 00:45:00,759 Speaker 1: ticket sale transactions in a year, and now that law 874 00:45:00,800 --> 00:45:03,719 Speaker 1: has been updated as part of the American Rescue Plan Act, 875 00:45:03,719 --> 00:45:06,839 Speaker 1: which lowers that amount from twenty thousand dollars to six 876 00:45:06,960 --> 00:45:10,280 Speaker 1: hundred dollars regardless of the number of sales, and sellers 877 00:45:10,280 --> 00:45:12,440 Speaker 1: will only need to pay taxes on the profit that 878 00:45:12,480 --> 00:45:14,960 Speaker 1: they make. This is all part of Biden's plan to 879 00:45:15,080 --> 00:45:17,960 Speaker 1: pump the brakes on the out of control antics of 880 00:45:18,000 --> 00:45:21,400 Speaker 1: ticket resellers, to crack down on predatory practices. 881 00:45:20,920 --> 00:45:25,200 Speaker 2: Like tacking on hidden fees at checkout, which everybody hates. 882 00:45:25,280 --> 00:45:28,399 Speaker 1: It's like it's like, you'll buy tickets and then it's like, okay, 883 00:45:28,440 --> 00:45:31,280 Speaker 1: the tickets are fifty dollars and a twenty dollars fuck 884 00:45:31,320 --> 00:45:33,400 Speaker 1: you fee, so now it's seventy dollars. And then oh 885 00:45:33,480 --> 00:45:35,080 Speaker 1: you use the internet. O, now it's one hundred dollars. 886 00:45:35,160 --> 00:45:38,400 Speaker 1: Like it completely adds up. It's so predatory. 887 00:45:38,920 --> 00:45:43,120 Speaker 5: Yeah, the Swifties are powerful. I will say I feel 888 00:45:43,200 --> 00:45:47,719 Speaker 5: like the past couple months of show the Swifties are powerful. 889 00:45:48,360 --> 00:45:51,719 Speaker 1: That is one hundred percent correct. You know, when you 890 00:45:51,800 --> 00:45:53,719 Speaker 1: look at the average prices of some of these big 891 00:45:53,760 --> 00:45:56,880 Speaker 1: concerts this summer, it is clear that like something is wrong. 892 00:45:57,239 --> 00:45:59,520 Speaker 1: The Wall Street Journal reports at the average price for 893 00:45:59,560 --> 00:46:03,799 Speaker 1: a swift Era's tour was one ninety five dollars and 894 00:46:03,840 --> 00:46:08,120 Speaker 1: for Beyonce's Renaissance tour four hundred dollars. Now, stub Hub 895 00:46:08,200 --> 00:46:11,760 Speaker 1: did say that like this might be partly due to COVID, 896 00:46:11,800 --> 00:46:15,000 Speaker 1: because the live event industry is like still bouncing back 897 00:46:15,040 --> 00:46:18,480 Speaker 1: after like COVID shutdowns. I can't confirm or deny the 898 00:46:18,920 --> 00:46:21,440 Speaker 1: truth behind that. That's what they're saying. And as you 899 00:46:21,480 --> 00:46:24,839 Speaker 1: were saying, Joe, we really do have Swifties and they're 900 00:46:24,920 --> 00:46:28,680 Speaker 1: organizing and advocating to thank for this. After the Ara's tour, 901 00:46:28,920 --> 00:46:32,080 Speaker 1: Swifties reported not being able to buy Taylor's swift tickets 902 00:46:32,120 --> 00:46:34,640 Speaker 1: and then the site shut down. When it came back up, 903 00:46:34,719 --> 00:46:37,360 Speaker 1: tickets were sold out, but they were being listed for 904 00:46:37,560 --> 00:46:42,040 Speaker 1: exorbitant prices by ticket resellers. In a federal hearing, Ticketmaster 905 00:46:42,200 --> 00:46:45,560 Speaker 1: blamed bots for this, and then later Ticketmasters shut down 906 00:46:45,560 --> 00:46:48,279 Speaker 1: ticket sales in France for the Aras tour, and so 907 00:46:49,280 --> 00:46:53,040 Speaker 1: I guess Swifties were loud. They advocated that this was 908 00:46:53,080 --> 00:46:55,920 Speaker 1: not okay. They wanted change, they wanted to reform, And 909 00:46:56,000 --> 00:46:58,680 Speaker 1: I guess the moral of the story here is, don't 910 00:46:58,760 --> 00:47:01,080 Speaker 1: mess with the Swifties because, as they have the Biden 911 00:47:01,080 --> 00:47:04,360 Speaker 1: administration's ear, when the Swifties are upset about something, the 912 00:47:04,360 --> 00:47:05,959 Speaker 1: Biden administration takes action. 913 00:47:06,120 --> 00:47:07,320 Speaker 2: Do not mess with the Swifties. 914 00:47:07,920 --> 00:47:12,000 Speaker 5: Yeah, okay, going back to the COVID point real quick, please, 915 00:47:12,160 --> 00:47:15,840 Speaker 5: that makes me real mad, because Okay, it's twenty twenty 916 00:47:15,880 --> 00:47:18,479 Speaker 5: three now, this tour has been twenty twenty three. 917 00:47:19,239 --> 00:47:22,879 Speaker 3: The COVID pandemic is not over. It hasn't been over. 918 00:47:23,400 --> 00:47:27,239 Speaker 5: That being said, concerts have been open since twenty twenty one. 919 00:47:27,600 --> 00:47:30,560 Speaker 5: Like I remember, I had some gets to go to 920 00:47:30,600 --> 00:47:33,400 Speaker 5: the Green Day Fall Up Boy Weezer show in twenty 921 00:47:33,440 --> 00:47:36,600 Speaker 5: twenty one, and I decided not to go because I 922 00:47:36,640 --> 00:47:37,640 Speaker 5: was worried about COVID. 923 00:47:37,680 --> 00:47:39,760 Speaker 3: But I remember that concert still happened. 924 00:47:39,800 --> 00:47:43,239 Speaker 5: So concerts have been happening for two years now and 925 00:47:43,360 --> 00:47:44,440 Speaker 5: have been happening at. 926 00:47:44,320 --> 00:47:46,640 Speaker 3: These big stadiums with these big artists. 927 00:47:46,880 --> 00:47:49,520 Speaker 5: So I think we're past the point where we can 928 00:47:49,600 --> 00:47:55,319 Speaker 5: use COVID as the excuse for that. But yeah, no, 929 00:47:56,160 --> 00:47:59,239 Speaker 5: I remember living through all of this trying to get 930 00:47:59,239 --> 00:47:59,640 Speaker 5: back to I. 931 00:48:01,040 --> 00:48:02,080 Speaker 2: So I was on. 932 00:48:03,719 --> 00:48:07,080 Speaker 5: All day, like literally spent twenty four hours straight like 933 00:48:07,200 --> 00:48:09,200 Speaker 5: trying to get tickets could not. 934 00:48:10,640 --> 00:48:13,480 Speaker 3: Ended up like somebody I knew was able to get tickets. 935 00:48:13,480 --> 00:48:15,799 Speaker 3: So I was able to go through that, but it 936 00:48:15,920 --> 00:48:17,640 Speaker 3: was insane, and. 937 00:48:19,360 --> 00:48:23,479 Speaker 5: I gotta say even uh, most recently, like I tried 938 00:48:23,520 --> 00:48:29,840 Speaker 5: getting Boy Genius tickets in New York and it wasn't 939 00:48:29,960 --> 00:48:33,239 Speaker 5: as bad as Taylor Swift, but they also slipped out 940 00:48:33,280 --> 00:48:34,960 Speaker 5: right away. It was also a whole weird thing with 941 00:48:35,040 --> 00:48:38,840 Speaker 5: Ticketmaster disclaimer. I am going to the show on Monday. 942 00:48:38,840 --> 00:48:40,320 Speaker 5: I was able to get show. I was able to 943 00:48:40,320 --> 00:48:44,360 Speaker 5: get tickets last minute, but the day of when the 944 00:48:44,400 --> 00:48:48,600 Speaker 5: tickets went on sale, like, it was a nightmare. And yeah, 945 00:48:48,640 --> 00:48:50,359 Speaker 5: they're a big band too, but they're not as big 946 00:48:50,400 --> 00:48:52,799 Speaker 5: as Taylor Swift or Beyonce. So it is just it 947 00:48:52,880 --> 00:48:56,320 Speaker 5: is messed up right now. Ild something is being done. 948 00:48:57,080 --> 00:48:59,959 Speaker 5: The Swifties are very powerful, the Bare Harve is very power. 949 00:49:01,520 --> 00:49:02,120 Speaker 3: Yeah. 950 00:49:02,200 --> 00:49:04,640 Speaker 1: So I actually have a theory that kind of speaks 951 00:49:04,640 --> 00:49:06,719 Speaker 1: to your point. It's not tech related. This is just 952 00:49:06,760 --> 00:49:10,040 Speaker 1: I have no evidence. I have a theory that I 953 00:49:10,040 --> 00:49:13,239 Speaker 1: guess it's a little tech related. My theory is that 954 00:49:14,040 --> 00:49:17,719 Speaker 1: the rise of social media has completely changed what it 955 00:49:17,800 --> 00:49:20,640 Speaker 1: means to go to a concert. And it used to 956 00:49:20,719 --> 00:49:25,160 Speaker 1: be that if you liked a musician or a live act, 957 00:49:25,560 --> 00:49:27,080 Speaker 1: you went to see their concert because it's like I 958 00:49:27,120 --> 00:49:31,000 Speaker 1: gotta I love whoever, I gotta go see them. I 959 00:49:31,040 --> 00:49:34,200 Speaker 1: think that the rise of social media has turned concerts 960 00:49:34,239 --> 00:49:38,120 Speaker 1: from just an experience to like a luxury event right 961 00:49:38,160 --> 00:49:41,560 Speaker 1: where people want to go not even necessarily because they 962 00:49:41,640 --> 00:49:45,080 Speaker 1: like love the band, but because it's like they want 963 00:49:45,280 --> 00:49:48,120 Speaker 1: to flex for the grand that they were there. And 964 00:49:48,160 --> 00:49:50,880 Speaker 1: so I think that like before you were just competing 965 00:49:50,960 --> 00:49:54,520 Speaker 1: with people who were like fans of whoever, now you're 966 00:49:54,520 --> 00:49:57,319 Speaker 1: competing with everybody, because going to a concert is just like, 967 00:49:57,719 --> 00:50:01,040 Speaker 1: you know, a thing to do, and that is making 968 00:50:01,040 --> 00:50:06,480 Speaker 1: it this like luxury experience with these frankly like absurd 969 00:50:06,600 --> 00:50:09,600 Speaker 1: price tags, like the price of concerts has like I 970 00:50:09,840 --> 00:50:12,000 Speaker 1: don't don't ask me to back us up with backs, 971 00:50:12,000 --> 00:50:12,560 Speaker 1: because I cannot. 972 00:50:12,560 --> 00:50:13,319 Speaker 2: I've not looked into it. 973 00:50:13,320 --> 00:50:16,120 Speaker 1: I'm just like somebitting this this theory off the dome. 974 00:50:16,239 --> 00:50:19,240 Speaker 1: But like the I think the price, in my estimation, 975 00:50:19,280 --> 00:50:21,240 Speaker 1: the price has gone up, and I think it's because 976 00:50:21,880 --> 00:50:25,239 Speaker 1: people are seeing it as a luxury item and a 977 00:50:25,320 --> 00:50:28,279 Speaker 1: luxury experience. And whereas it used to be like you 978 00:50:28,520 --> 00:50:30,160 Speaker 1: want you just wanted to go see the show. Now 979 00:50:30,200 --> 00:50:34,080 Speaker 1: it's like, oh, well do you want the backstage or 980 00:50:34,120 --> 00:50:36,160 Speaker 1: like this experience or like that experience? 981 00:50:36,239 --> 00:50:38,640 Speaker 2: And like live. 982 00:50:38,560 --> 00:50:40,600 Speaker 1: Events places, No, they can attack on a bunch of 983 00:50:40,600 --> 00:50:42,319 Speaker 1: fees because people are already seeing this. 984 00:50:42,360 --> 00:50:44,680 Speaker 2: It's like a luxury experience. You know. Does that make sense? 985 00:50:44,719 --> 00:50:45,120 Speaker 2: I don't know. 986 00:50:45,960 --> 00:50:50,400 Speaker 3: No, I totally agree, And again I don't have any evidence. 987 00:50:49,960 --> 00:50:52,839 Speaker 5: To back it up, just my own experience, but yeah, 988 00:50:53,000 --> 00:50:55,759 Speaker 5: Like I think my comparison here is Boy Genius, which 989 00:50:55,800 --> 00:50:58,640 Speaker 5: is still a very popular band, and especially like now 990 00:50:58,760 --> 00:51:01,800 Speaker 5: histort of blown up with their new they are nowhere 991 00:51:01,800 --> 00:51:04,120 Speaker 5: near like Taylor Swift and the fact that I had 992 00:51:04,160 --> 00:51:06,360 Speaker 5: like just as hard as time, just as hard of 993 00:51:06,400 --> 00:51:08,360 Speaker 5: a time getting tickets for them as I did it 994 00:51:08,440 --> 00:51:09,480 Speaker 5: was Taylor Swift. 995 00:51:10,320 --> 00:51:13,960 Speaker 3: Like it's gotten ridiculous. I love me. I know we've 996 00:51:13,960 --> 00:51:16,840 Speaker 3: talked about this. I love music. I'm a big music person. 997 00:51:16,880 --> 00:51:18,479 Speaker 5: But that being said, like I feel like I don't 998 00:51:18,480 --> 00:51:20,759 Speaker 5: go to a lot of concerts now because it's just 999 00:51:20,800 --> 00:51:24,440 Speaker 5: so hard to get tickets. And I think Cosier was 1000 00:51:24,480 --> 00:51:26,279 Speaker 5: like the most recent ones. I remember he was like 1001 00:51:26,360 --> 00:51:28,799 Speaker 5: he put out his tickets for his tour, and I 1002 00:51:28,840 --> 00:51:30,920 Speaker 5: was like, I'm not even gonna bother, Like there's no 1003 00:51:30,960 --> 00:51:33,480 Speaker 5: way I'm getting those tickets, Like I might. 1004 00:51:33,400 --> 00:51:36,000 Speaker 3: As well just sleep in that day when. 1005 00:51:35,800 --> 00:51:38,680 Speaker 5: They go on sale at eight am, which is early 1006 00:51:38,760 --> 00:51:44,560 Speaker 5: for me. But yeah, it's it's concert tickets have gotten ridiculous. 1007 00:51:44,120 --> 00:51:46,160 Speaker 3: And it is not fun. 1008 00:51:46,800 --> 00:51:50,480 Speaker 1: Hopefully the Swifties can help us out with this and organize. 1009 00:51:50,480 --> 00:51:53,200 Speaker 1: I know they are a very powerful unified for us, 1010 00:51:53,239 --> 00:51:55,680 Speaker 1: as is Taylor Swift. I don't know if y'all saw 1011 00:51:55,760 --> 00:51:59,720 Speaker 1: but Taylor Swift. On Tuesday, she posted a short Instagram 1012 00:51:59,719 --> 00:52:02,800 Speaker 1: post to her two hundred and seventy two million followers 1013 00:52:02,880 --> 00:52:06,120 Speaker 1: asking them to get registered to vote, and according to 1014 00:52:06,400 --> 00:52:10,440 Speaker 1: vote dot org, the nonpartisan voter registration nonprofit, they got 1015 00:52:10,600 --> 00:52:15,120 Speaker 1: more than thirty five thousand new registrations And yeah, so 1016 00:52:15,200 --> 00:52:17,840 Speaker 1: she she had a They had a twenty three percent 1017 00:52:17,960 --> 00:52:21,799 Speaker 1: jump over voter registration Day last year because of the 1018 00:52:21,840 --> 00:52:25,520 Speaker 1: power of Taylor Swift. So when Taylor Swift speaks, people listen. 1019 00:52:25,920 --> 00:52:29,759 Speaker 1: When the Swifties speaks, Joe Biden listens. We gotta think 1020 00:52:29,800 --> 00:52:32,000 Speaker 1: of like what else we want the Swifties to advocate 1021 00:52:32,040 --> 00:52:35,280 Speaker 1: for and be like we need universal healthcare swifties. 1022 00:52:34,880 --> 00:52:35,359 Speaker 2: Get on it. 1023 00:52:37,000 --> 00:52:41,879 Speaker 5: I do think that fandom and is the rallying sort 1024 00:52:41,880 --> 00:52:43,080 Speaker 5: of force of the future. 1025 00:52:43,160 --> 00:52:43,719 Speaker 3: Apparently. 1026 00:52:45,760 --> 00:52:50,319 Speaker 5: Contemporary political situation that I find fascinating is that whole 1027 00:52:50,320 --> 00:52:53,560 Speaker 5: thing when all the K pop stands were like managed 1028 00:52:53,600 --> 00:52:57,120 Speaker 5: to mess up the Trump speech that it was supposed 1029 00:52:57,120 --> 00:53:00,280 Speaker 5: to happen in like twenty twenty. I think or canzing 1030 00:53:00,360 --> 00:53:05,439 Speaker 5: young people through the power of fandom being obsessed with. 1031 00:53:05,320 --> 00:53:06,919 Speaker 3: A particular celebrity thought. 1032 00:53:06,920 --> 00:53:09,840 Speaker 5: It is so powerful and I'm so glad that that 1033 00:53:10,080 --> 00:53:11,440 Speaker 5: energy is being used. 1034 00:53:11,200 --> 00:53:15,080 Speaker 3: For good right now. And yeah, we'll see what happens 1035 00:53:15,280 --> 00:53:15,960 Speaker 3: in the future. 1036 00:53:16,840 --> 00:53:19,600 Speaker 2: We love it, Joey, Thank you for being here. A 1037 00:53:19,640 --> 00:53:22,400 Speaker 2: pleasure as always, of course, and as. 1038 00:53:22,280 --> 00:53:24,560 Speaker 1: Always, listeners, thanks for hanging out with us. If you 1039 00:53:24,600 --> 00:53:27,480 Speaker 1: want more and free content, check out our Patreon at 1040 00:53:27,520 --> 00:53:29,640 Speaker 1: patreon dot com, slash Tangody and we will. 1041 00:53:29,480 --> 00:53:30,279 Speaker 2: See you real soon. 1042 00:53:33,360 --> 00:53:35,480 Speaker 1: If you're looking for ways to support the show, check 1043 00:53:35,480 --> 00:53:38,080 Speaker 1: out our mark store at tenggody dot com slash Store. 1044 00:53:39,280 --> 00:53:41,279 Speaker 1: Got a story about an interesting thing in tech, or 1045 00:53:41,400 --> 00:53:43,239 Speaker 1: just want to say hi, You can reach us at 1046 00:53:43,280 --> 00:53:46,000 Speaker 1: Hello at tegody dot com. You can also find transcripts 1047 00:53:46,000 --> 00:53:48,440 Speaker 1: for today's episode at tengody dot com. There Are No 1048 00:53:48,520 --> 00:53:50,560 Speaker 1: Girls on the Internet was created by me Bridget Todd. 1049 00:53:50,960 --> 00:53:54,160 Speaker 1: It's a production of iHeartRadio and Unboss Creative, edited by 1050 00:53:54,200 --> 00:53:58,280 Speaker 1: Joey pat Jonathan Strickland is our executive producer. Tari Harrison 1051 00:53:58,360 --> 00:54:01,120 Speaker 1: is our producer and sound engineer. Michael Amado is our 1052 00:54:01,160 --> 00:54:04,200 Speaker 1: contributing producer. I'm your host, Bridget Todd. If you want 1053 00:54:04,200 --> 00:54:06,640 Speaker 1: to help us grow, rate and review us on Apple Podcasts. 1054 00:54:07,400 --> 00:54:10,200 Speaker 1: For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, check out the iHeartRadio app, 1055 00:54:10,239 --> 00:54:16,520 Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.