WEBVTT - Block's Bullish Nature, Disney's Succession Plans

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 2>From Marhart where Innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 2>Valley NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:18.639
<v Speaker 3>Hyde and Ed loved Love.

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Live from London and San Francisco.

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up close your eyes and

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 5>by Why Muddy Waters founder Carson Block is bullish on

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 5>big tech.

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 6>Plus the future at Disney's Kingdom. Details on the company's

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 6>new leadership moves and CEO succession plans.

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 5>Plus we'll hear from the Taiwanese premiere on the country's

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 5>thriving chip business. But first quick check on these markets,

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 5>which are perhaps taking a slight pause ahead of some weeks.

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 5>I focus in on crypto ed we're down by more

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 5>than two percent there. We've actually seen more than two

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 5>billion flow into ETFs. Of course, at Byspot Bitcoin, for example,

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 5>we were near seventy thousand dollars. We're just pulling back

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 5>slightly as risk sentiment changes ahead of all important earnings week,

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 5>all important election in the next coming two weeks. But

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 5>we focus in on crypto just to show us what

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 5>risk sentiment's released showing us today.

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 7>But you looking at the micros, Yeah.

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 6>There's a few tech stocks that we're following throughout the show.

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 6>Disney has named former Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman as

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 6>its new chair of the board and promising to name

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 6>a new CEO early twenty twenty six.

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 7>Will bring you the details.

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 6>Microsoft has some new AI agents it's taking on salesforce.

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.119
<v Speaker 6>We go to our correspondent on that and look at

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 6>the US listed shares of Taiwan. Semikinducts are actually continuing

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 6>to gain momentum. We have a very important interview with

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 6>Taiwan's premiere where we talk about the golden jewel of

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 6>their industry, but also some of their energy needs. The

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 6>broader context of what's happening in Semikindum is for that nation.

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 7>You don't want to miss it. Halfway through the.

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 4>Program, Carrot, we don't.

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, we returned to the macro picture because earlier today

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 5>Muddy Waters Capital founder Carson Block joined Bloomberg Television and

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 5>he oftened this pretty bullish advice on the Magnificent seven.

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 8>There's a debate as to what really drives when you

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 8>talk about the US market, especially the S and P

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 8>five hundred or the mag seven. I'm in the camp that,

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 8>although I haven't I don't have the facility with math

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 8>to really try to prove this out. But I'm in

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 8>the camp that believes of what drives that index are flows.

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 8>And so at the end of every month, US workers,

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 8>you know a lot of them, their paychecks go into

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 8>their four one case, which are retirement funds, and there's

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 8>a robo bid for the stocks. And what happens is

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 8>you reduce the effective supply of stock because you're taking

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 8>out the active owners of stocks that will decide, Hey,

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 8>at this part, I'm a seller at a lower price,

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 8>I'm a buyer, and you're replacing that with a holder

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 8>that will never sell unless and until it has outflows

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 8>because people are drawing down the retirement accounts. So, according

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 8>to that view, as long as the labor market is

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 8>reasonably strong in the US, which it is, you're not

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 8>going to see outflows. You're just going to continue to

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 8>see inflows, especially in those you know, in the most

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 8>heavily weighted names in the the S and P five hundred.

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 9>So I have in the past few.

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 8>Years, I have looked back on my career as an

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 8>activist short seller and you know, kind of done the

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 8>math and felt like well, you know, I probably could

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 8>have just been levered long the S and P five hundred,

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 8>deferred my taxes and gone through a lot less BS

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 8>and being more or less the same possession financially. So yeah,

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 8>I mean that that does make the market more fragile,

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 8>But there's a FED put.

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 9>There's always a FED put. You know.

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 8>Does there come a point in time when the system

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 8>breaks and the FED can't fix it? Theoretically yes, in

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 8>our lifetimes. I don't know. So I think for now

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 8>it probably just pays not the thing too much, just

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 8>close your eyes and buy you know, probably MAG seven.

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 5>Muddy Water's Capital founder Carson Block. There, let's bring in

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 5>another take, Semashar, chief Global Strategist, that principal asset management

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 5>are many that you're talking to feeling you should just

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 5>close your eyes and buy back mag seven.

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 10>Still here, Well, Hi, Carol, I think there is that

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 10>continued demand for MAG seven, And I agree with a

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 10>lot with what was just said, and that the environment

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 10>is it's almost a sweet spot for US equates. You've

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 10>got the fair put, you've got generally a strong economy.

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 10>There's a couple of risks out there, but they're actually

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 10>more near to him risk, something that we wouldn't necessarily

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 10>expect them to have a sustained impat on the market.

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 10>So from that perspective, yes, the US still looks really

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 10>attractive and the MAG seven rather than just being a

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 10>short term play, I think a lot of people, including ourselves,

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 10>are looking at that MAX seven as something which is

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 10>going to deliver.

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Not just for this year, but you know, it's more

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 3>of a.

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 10>Strategic as allocation play that we want to continue to

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 10>have exposure to those.

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Having said that.

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 10>In a positive environment for your sequities, with rates coming

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 10>down and growth still.

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Fairly solid, you should see a broadening out.

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 10>I think there's opportunities in other parts of the market

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 10>which maybe are not as expensive. I haven't really seen

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 10>even some of that catch up trade post COVID, so

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 10>I think there's opportunities everywhere, But sadly MAX seven does

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 10>deserve to continue to have that place in a portfolio.

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 6>Seemac Carson's core idea is that the market, particularly those

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 6>Max seven stocks, will be supported because retirement money is

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 6>kind of on autopilot, right It just comes in and

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 6>that supports the index level.

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 7>How does that impact your job if you're.

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 6>Really genuinely interested in the technology sector as an investor.

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 3>So I think he's right in there.

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 10>There is always going to be that play, you know,

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 10>that continued stream into the MAX seven. Remember also so

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 10>that the MAC seven because of because of that cash levels,

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 10>because they're considered a bit of a safety defensive play

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 10>almost on the US and kind of in the US market,

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 10>that it's almost some of that like a continuous stream

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 10>of where some are considered it's going to be fairly

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 10>consistent throughout and to his point, until it isn't, it

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 10>will continue to attract flows. So I think that that

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 10>does come into the thesis, and we have seen that

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 10>play out over the last couple of years when things

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 10>get a little bit tough, MAC seven almost becomes our

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 10>safety traits.

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 3>So I think that still holds.

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 10>It's just that there's probably going to be other opportunities

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 10>that also retund investors should probably be considering outside of

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 10>just the MAC seven.

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 6>This week kind of starts earning season in earnest for technology.

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 6>How important is this quarter of all quarters, especially given

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 6>that we have now seen the FED move in reducing rates.

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 10>So I think I'm going to every quarter is going

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 10>to be more important than the last in terms of

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 10>whether it's going to maintain the randy going forward.

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 3>For take obviously everyone is. You know, the eyes on

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 3>the tech sector are probably.

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 10>Increasing with each earning season because the expectations in consideration

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 10>of the fact that valuations are quite frothy, that there's

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 10>always those eyes can say are they going to continue to deliver?

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 10>Can they deliver on those very lofty expectations that investors have,

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 10>So we do need to see that continued delivery. But

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 10>actually I still think that Look, let's say we work

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 10>together at disappointing quarter where you see a slight pullback

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 10>in their performance relative to expectations. It doesn't necessarily sound

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 10>the death now, it's just probably a bit of a

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 10>a recalibration of expectations back to something which is a

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 10>little bit more realistic. But then as we look at

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 10>over a couple of quarters in years, I think investors

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 10>will still believe that mag seven, particularly with the AI narrative, have.

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Still got something to deliver.

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 5>I want to go exactly there, Seema, and we turn

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.679
<v Speaker 5>to our great control room to bring up what's happening

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 5>within video with the like of Palo Alto Networks as well,

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 5>but more broadly in video of course, the AI trade

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 5>up to a new record high. It's see though other

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 5>key cybersecurity names like Palo Alto Networks also on the

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 5>higher side today and a new record high too.

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 4>How important is the.

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 5>Nvidia, the chip sector, the AI trade to keep on

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 5>leading these sorts of gains.

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 3>They are important. I do think they're reducing in importance though.

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 10>Because of you know, this fairly strong constructive econmic backdrop

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 10>that we have, But we do feel some continued enthusiasm

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 10>about obviously about invidiot about AI generally and other sectors

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 10>are the companies that can continue to benefit from AI?

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 10>And you just have to look at chips and just say,

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 10>look at the ones which are related to AI and

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 10>the ones which are not AI related. And you can

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 10>see the quantum verification coming through in the market. So

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 10>there's a clear favorite with regards to that narrative, and

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 10>investors are focusing on where can AI play a really

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 10>strong part. There's the first I guess the first generation

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 10>like Nvidia, But what are the other next companies that

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:54.599
<v Speaker 10>could stand to benefit from this this new theme that

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 10>is playing out in the market.

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 5>See when we love talking to you because you can

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 5>go cross asset too and David and the team of

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 5>at Goldman Sachs go cross asset again today for US

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 5>as well, because on the flip side of what Carson

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 5>Block is saying, they're saying, actually, look, the S and

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 5>P five hundred cannot keep up the rate of returns

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:11.599
<v Speaker 5>that were used to. In fact, we're only going to

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 5>an annuallyze three percent return in the future, for example,

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 5>because they're gonna go to bonds, We're going to go

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 5>to other assets. Are you seeing investors wanting to go

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 5>there out of equities?

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 10>So cerdly from an aster allocation perspective, we do think

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 10>that this is also the time to have exposure to

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 10>fixed income. You know, if you want to go safety,

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 10>then you should be long duration. But to get that

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 10>pick up in terms of yield income kind of play

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 10>over the US the strength of the US economy, then

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 10>credit is your place to be.

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 3>So, but I think there's a lot of opportunities out there.

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 10>Specifically with regards to the three percent return going forward.

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 10>I think that it is true that you're not likely

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 10>to see the same kind of returns that we've enjoyed for.

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 3>The last ten to fifteen years.

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 10>A lot of that narrative was driven by the fact

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 10>that the Third had and other central banks around the

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 10>world had kept rates really, really low, which we're not

0:09:57.880 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 10>anticipating going forward.

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 3>We see where it cut's.

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 10>Returning to that incredibly easy Montreal policy of zero bunjeet expansion.

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 10>So it does mean that the mass is a little

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 10>bit more onerous for equities, but it's still a compelling proposition.

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 3>It's just that in this environment, there are.

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 10>Opportunities across I think across all of risk assets, and

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 10>it makes sense for investors to have their diversification because

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 10>it actually continues to.

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Deliver at this point.

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 6>Semashar, chief Global Strategist at Principal Asset Management, thank you

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 6>very much.

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 7>The new chairman of Disney's board.

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 6>Today, the company announced James Gorman will take on the

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 6>role of chairman in twenty twenty five, while also announcing

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 6>that a new CEO will be revealed in early twenty

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 6>twenty six. Bloomberg's Felix Jellette joins us and look. James Gorman,

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 6>former Morgan Stanley CEO, has been leading this succession chase

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 6>since August. But why is he now taking on the

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 6>additional responsibility of being chairman if Disney's Bullard overrule.

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 11>Well, I think Disney's been telegraphing this for a while,

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 11>and Gorman's.

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 12>The new face of the board.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 11>He's got a strong track record in terms of succession.

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 11>Succession is the number one issue in Disney's future.

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 12>Who's going to replace Bob Iger.

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 11>He doesn't have the same baggage that his predecessor did

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 11>in terms of you know, what went wrong in you know,

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 11>the previous Disney succession plans.

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 12>So I think this makes a lot of sense.

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 11>In terms of just elevating him and giving him formal role.

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 11>In terms of making this next choice.

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 5>Mark Parker retires James Gorman to the helm from a

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 5>board level, take us back to the CEO, and who

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 5>are the names in the running here internally and maybe

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 5>even externally.

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean, I think at this point it's you know,

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 11>the four direct reports to Iiger, the head of Parks,

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 11>the head of TV, the head of movies, and the

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 11>head of ESPN, and you know everyone the kremlinologists at Disney.

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 11>Everyone's very eager watching all of this, speculating about you know,

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 11>who's up who's down. I think the company's done a

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 11>pretty good job at this point of keeping its cards

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 11>close to its vest if there is.

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 12>A leading candidate.

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 11>At this point, it really hasn't gotten out and so

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 11>I don't think this move changes that at all.

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 6>We're gonna have to wait a few weeks until Disney

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 6>has earnings. But based on post Netflix, how is Disney

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 6>doing right now?

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 12>I mean, Disney's had a good last year.

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 11>When you think about the recent Emmy's probably the strongest

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 11>Emmy performance in the company's history. On the TV front,

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 11>you know, winning with Showgun The Bear Inside Out Too

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 11>delivered hugely for the company. After a bunch of stumbles

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 11>on the film side, you know, the parks have been

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 11>a little bit more mixed. And in terms of ESPN's future,

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 11>still dealing with the transition to direct to consumer.

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 12>There's a lot of open questions.

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 11>Still about the company's future, but you have to say

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 11>it's been a little bit better, especially on the entertainment side.

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 7>Bloombergs Felix to let out in New York City. Thank

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 7>you so much, Carol.

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 4>What you're looking at, I'm looking at Microsoft.

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 5>It's actually down today, but it's ramping up its AI

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 5>rollout ed launching a new set of guess What AI

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 5>tools designed to send emails, managed records, are the business

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 5>related tasks for more.

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:11.079
<v Speaker 4>We've been in Bloomberg's Brody.

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.719
<v Speaker 5>Ford who must be getting a little bit sick of

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 5>AI agent's autonomous agents Agent force.

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 4>It is competitive.

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 13>Everybody wants to have an agent now, you know. It

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 13>seemed like for a year and a half everybody was

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 13>building a co pilot, even if they didn't call it that, right,

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 13>every software company had a little box on the side

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 13>that I could, you know, ask hey, could you draft

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 13>me this email? Or you know, what's the six biggest

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 13>cities in Germany? But I think what a lot of

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 13>software companies have found is that, you know, users, sometimes

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 13>it's not natural to go ahead and think about, oh

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 13>what should I ask this agent, ask this copilot? And

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 13>so now a lot of companies are leading into this

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 13>agent's idea, which is we're going to have you know,

0:13:54.880 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 13>ten tasks that are pretty easily replaceable by AI, and

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 13>we're going to have it run largely by itself and

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 13>do that in the background.

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 6>This puts Microsoft in competition with Salesforce, and if you're

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 6>on X you will have seen Salesforce CEO Mark Benioff

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 6>talk a lot recently about Microsoft's AI tools. Just explain

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 6>how they're in competition.

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 13>Brady, Yeah, so this is the segment of Microsoft which

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 13>competes with Salesforce and some other SaaS companies. You know,

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 13>it's all about CRMs, supply chain management, things like that.

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 13>And they both want to have the hat of we

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 13>are leading AI in the SaaS field, right, because most

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 13>SaaS companies have somewhat struggled to really have a good

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 13>coherent AI strategy that is currently making money, and so

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 13>each of them want to kind of lead it forward.

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 13>Benioff has always, you know, done a good job getting

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 13>pressed by, you know, throwing shots at competitors, and this

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 13>is certainly in that tradition.

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 7>Bndke's Brady Ford on all things Microsoft AI Agent, Thank

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 7>you very much. Up here on Bloomberg Technology.

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 6>Details on Russia's major hack on the nation of Georgia

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:08.479
<v Speaker 6>ahead of that country's upcoming elections.

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 7>Important reporting coming up next. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 6>Okay, it's time for talking tech and first up, Process

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 6>says it's e commerce divisions expected to surge more than

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 6>nine hundred and fifty percent this fiscal year. Adjusted earnings

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 6>before interesting taxes will be four hundred million dollars in

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 6>the twelve months ending in March. The company's new CEO

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 6>for Britzy Obilisi may the announcement earlier today and will

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 6>join Bloomberg's London Tech summit tomorrow. Plus, Looman Technologies and

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 6>Meta have announced a partnership in support of Meta's AI ambitions.

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 6>The agreement will provide dedicated interconnection for Meta's infrastructure that

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 6>the company says will be crucial for future AI development.

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 6>And Russia has been operating a multi year hacking campaign

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 6>targeting the nation of Georgia. That's according to documents and

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 6>technical reports seen by Bloomberg News. The comprehensive espionage attack

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 6>focused on Georgia's Foreign Ministry, finance ministry, Central Bank, and

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 6>key energy and telecommunications providers and carry.

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 7>Let's get a lot more on that story, such.

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 4>A significant report. We go to Bloomberg's Alberto.

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 5>Nadali, who really was leading the charge here along with colleagues. Alberto,

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 5>just how how is Russia managing to hack on such

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 5>a significant degree.

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think the thing to understand about Russia in

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 14>terms of countries like Georgia was that it targets them

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 14>with disinformation and then it puts great efforts into these

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 14>hacks and looking for vulnerabilities within critical infrastructure, looking for

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 14>vulnerabilities within government ministries, and spent a lot of time

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 14>doing that, and that allows.

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 9>Them eventually to.

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 14>Enter these systems undetected and for years to gather information

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 14>and very seriously and worryingly here put them in a

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 14>position also to commit potential acts of sabotage.

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 6>The headline is severe, right, Russia targeting a nation state

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 6>with these hacks. But how serious were they Alberta and

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 6>what was their impact?

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 14>I think the key point is the severity of these hacks,

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 14>because we're not talking about things like denials of service

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 14>that take a website down for a couple of hours.

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 14>There were two main aspects to this operation. The first

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 14>was gathering intelligence, so they were able to gather information

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 14>such as the emails of government officials, the emails of

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 14>employees working in key companies, So they were able to

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 14>put themselves in a position that, had they wanted to

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 14>and had the need arisen, let's say, they would have

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 14>been able to sabotage key bits of the country's critical infrastructure,

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 14>such as arts of the energy grid, telecommunications or railways,

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 14>oil terminals and things like that.

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 6>Severe in your reporting, did you get a sense of

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 6>what Russia's goal was here, what its motivation in doing

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 6>this was.

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 14>So on the one hand, it's gathering information. So for example,

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 14>if you look specifically at the hack of the Foreign Ministry,

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 14>they were targeting and gathering information about key Georgian embassies

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 14>in places like the European Union, countries in the Baltics,

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 14>so countries that and areas that Russia has an interest

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 14>in and is looking at. And the second strategic objective,

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 14>let's call it, is to put itself in a position

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 14>that if politics in the country, if Georgia goes in

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 14>a direction that Russia does not like, it, then has

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 14>the ability to take things are set further and commit

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 14>these acts of sabotage, such as targeting electricity grids or

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 14>telecommunications systems. And it's a pattern. For example, we've seen

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 14>elsewhere they've done similar in the past in Ukraine.

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 6>But this was deep reporting, right, this was investigation through documents.

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 7>But did Russia, through.

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 6>Any official channels, have anything to say any comment about

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 6>the reports.

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:43.239
<v Speaker 14>Usually what happened is we ask for comment and they

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 14>never reply. And then after a while you will see

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 14>in a press conference or in a statement of Ministia

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 14>Foreign affairs or some other government department will refer to

0:19:55.320 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 14>stories in Western media, and so that's where we might

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 14>I'd expect there to be a reaction in the coming days.

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 6>And equally, this is contemporaneous, right. The elections in Georgia

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 6>are this week, I believe. So, you know, we talked

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 6>about the severity and the impact. But will this nation

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 6>be able to proceed, you know, with its democratic process

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 6>kind of free of any interference in that sense.

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 14>I think the elections obviously will take place. What tends

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 14>to happen if if you look, for example, of the

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 14>elections that took place this week and nearby and in Moldova,

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 14>there were reports of Russia paying people to vote in

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 14>a certain way, intense campaigns of disinformation, and so you

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 14>will have a similar environment in which these elections take place,

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 14>and then depending on the results of the votes, you'll

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 14>see what happens next.

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 6>This was a reporting you did with our colleague Ryan Gallagha.

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 6>You know, without giving it away, what happens next? Where

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 6>does your reporting take you?

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 14>We report a lot. We keep reporting on what Russia

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 14>does in the world in terms of these so called

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 14>hybrid campaigns or the use of this information and hacking,

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 14>and you know, non military methods to try and achieve

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.719
<v Speaker 14>its goals, and then you know, in the case of Ukraine,

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 14>obviously military methods. And so we're saying on this beat

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 14>because obviously Georgia is not the only country that Russia

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 14>is targeting.

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 5>Alberta Nadelli, we thank you extraordinary reporting.

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 4>Go read it.

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to Luemat Technology. I'm Caroline Hyde in London

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 5>and ed.

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 7>Ardlo in San Francisco. Bring us some markets.

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 5>Character, yeah, because they're under pressure from a macro perspective,

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 5>But there are some single names you want to shine

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 5>a light on that are doing rather well. But we're

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 5>off by some six tenser percent on the Nasdaq one

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 5>hundred actually coming to session lows at the moment. We

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 5>are worried about big earnings on deck. We've got Tesla

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 5>for example, later this week. We're also anticipating a very

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 5>close election in the United States. What does that mean

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:16.640
<v Speaker 5>for the future of big tech, anti trusting crypto Move

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 5>on and have a look at some of the individual

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 5>names as the market kind of waits and watches. Disney

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 5>under pressure even as they announce look new chairman of

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 5>the board not completely unsurprisingly James Gorman comes to the

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 5>Helm starting in twenty twenty five and promises a new

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 5>CEO will be delivered by the start of at least

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 5>early on in twenty twenty six, palallel to networks and

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 5>a new record high only just look, we're clinging on

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 5>to gains, but it is at a record in video

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 5>two one point seven percent higher. Interesting that the week

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 5>after this we get most of its customers giving us earnings.

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 5>Think Alphabet, Think Microsoft, think Meta. What will that say

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 5>for the ongoing demand for its chip set?

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 7>Okay.

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 6>Sticking with semiconductors, Taiwan's economy has seen massive growth, thanks

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 6>in part to chip manufacturing. Still, premier Sho Jong Thai

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 6>says the country can't just solely rely on its high

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 6>tech industries. He sat down with Bloomberg editor in chief

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 6>emeritus Matt Winkler check this out.

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 15>Say, Taiwan's economic resiliency comes from the partnership we have

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 15>with friendly countries. Domestically, we have a strong, vertically integrated

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 15>supply chain. This is why we believe Taiwan can play

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 15>a crucial role in the democratic supply chain. We are

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 15>heavily reliant on high tech industries, especially in the rapidly

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 15>developing semiconductor sector. However, for Taiwan's economy to achieve comprehensive growth,

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 15>we cannot rely solely on high tech industries. That's why

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 15>we proposed a dual axis transformation for small and medium

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 15>sized enterprises. We aim to help our traditional industries and

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 15>small to medium sized enterprises enter the AI era. We

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 15>will use government resources to assist them in adopting AI

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 15>applications and integrating with this industry, allowing Taiwan's economy to

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 15>grow comprehensively.

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.959
<v Speaker 2>So, mister premire, the US is going to have an

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 2>election at presidential election, It's just weeks away or were

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 2>President Trump previously said that Taiwan took chip business from

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.719
<v Speaker 2>the US and asked Taiwan to pay protection fees. And

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 2>do you think Taiwan should continue to allow semiconductor manufacturers

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 2>to like TSMC, to build factories overseas.

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 15>Taiwan also needs to rely on advanced countries for new

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 15>technologies in materials and equipment. I often say that the

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 15>government has a responsibility to Taiwan's industries and Taiwan has

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 15>a responsibility to the world.

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Mister Trump also said Taiwan should increase military spending to

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 2>ten percent of gross domestic product, and I wonder if

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 2>that's possible.

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 15>In your view Taiwan in Taiwan has a very large

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 15>neighbor with significant ambitions toward it, so Taiwan must take

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 15>responsibility for safeguarding our sovereignty and national security. In next

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 15>year's Central government budget, we have allocated more than six

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 15>hundred and forty billion Taiwan dollars for defense. This will

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 15>bring our defense spending to approximately two point four to

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.880
<v Speaker 15>two point six percent of GDP. While we cannot allocate

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 15>ten percent of GDP to defense in one go, we

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 15>have increased the budget compared to the past. We also

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 15>hope that through Taiwan's efforts, the world will recognize Taiwan's

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 15>determination and provide greater support. What we're maintaining is not

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 15>only Taiwan's security, but also the peace and stability of

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 15>the entire Indo Pacific region.

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned artificial intelligence earlier in this discussion, and given

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 2>the importance of AI and how fast it is expanding,

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 2>there is a debate about electricity supply and I'm just

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 2>wondering do you think sort of new nuclear power technology

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 2>is something an option, say for Taiwan that you could consider.

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 15>We know that many other countries are actively developing various

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 15>forms of nuclear energy. Currently, we expect that Taiwan will

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 15>have no issues with power supply for industries before twenty thirty.

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.880
<v Speaker 15>Our nuclear power plants are being decommissioned and operations are stopping.

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 15>This is because we need to prepare for future nuclear

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 15>technology developments and to respond to any potential legal changes

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 15>in Taiwan. When we take the next step forward and

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 15>reconsider the existing nuclear power plants, we will need sufficient manpower.

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 15>So even though our plants are being decommissioned, the personnel

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 15>must not be dispersed. They must remain to address new

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 15>technologies or solve current issues.

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 7>That was Taiwan Premier Cho Jung Thai.

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, in Pennsylvania, Ed Governor Josh Shapiro expressed concern over

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk's and to give money to voters suggesting law

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 5>enforcement reviews. This follows Musk's announcement to donate one million

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 5>dollars daily to a random registered voter supporting his super

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:13.120
<v Speaker 5>Pax petition on free speech and gun rights. Just take

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 5>a listen to this from NBC's Meet the Press.

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 13>I think it's something that law enforcement could take a

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 13>look at.

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 12>I'm not the attorney general anymore. At Pennsylvania, I'm the governor.

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 12>But it does raise some serious questions.

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's Kurt Wagner joins us now, who covers all things

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 5>Elon but covers all things X as well, and just

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 5>how does this dovetail into what you're seeing on his

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 5>social media platform right now?

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I mean he's using X as a very pro

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 16>Trump megaphone right now. Actually opened the aptis yesterday and

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 16>on my four U feed right which is the feed

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 16>that's supposed to be tailored recommendations for you, eleven of

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 16>the first fifteen posts that I saw were from Elon himself,

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 16>and all of them were, you know, supporting Trump, pushing

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 16>Trump's Republican or conservative agenda. I mean, he's very much

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 16>taken this this social network and feels to me like

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 16>he's using it to really hammer home his own personal

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 16>politics in this fight to help.

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 9>Trump win the election in a couple of weeks.

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 7>The activity is notable.

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 6>I also point out Vice President Harris has two accounts

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 6>on X right, her official vice presidential account and then

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:26.959
<v Speaker 6>her I guess we would call it personal campaign account.

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 6>And she also posts daily and regularly, and that appears

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 6>in my timeline, maybe not as much as Musk's posts appear,

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 6>But I guess the point that we would point make

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 6>is that it's the content and the commentary. It's very

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 6>similar to what one might find on truth Social Cut.

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 16>I kind of jokingly called ex truth Social two point

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 16>zero a few weeks ago in a newsletter that I wrote,

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 16>because it feels very much like you are seeing President

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 16>Trump's message hammered home repeatedly, you know, either through Elon,

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 16>through Trump himself, through other supporters.

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 9>You're right ed.

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 16>I also have seen a lot of posts from Kamala

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 16>Harris and others. It feels like my feed is almost

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 16>one hundred percent US politics focused right now. It's interesting

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 16>because back in you know, Twitter one point no days,

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 16>they used to say, well, this is obviously an important

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 16>news cycle. It's important thing for the service, but it's

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 16>not the only thing. Right You would still see a basketball, baseball, sports,

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 16>you would see culture, music, things like that. It feels

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 16>to me like they've dial up the algorithm to really

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 16>make the election front and center for every user, and

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 16>I'm certainly noticing it every time I open the app

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 16>these days?

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 4>Does that matter long term?

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 5>For Grock for example, it's AI chatbot and indeed, more broadly,

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 5>what we end up wanting our social media platforms.

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 16>For Yeah, it's been interesting to see X's approach here

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 16>to the election compared to say Meta and what they're

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 16>doing with Instagram and Facebook. Right, So, on the Meta side,

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 16>they're basically saying, hey, we're trying to we're leaning away

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 16>from the election. If you're talking about the election, we're

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 16>not going to recommend that post to people outside of

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 16>your network, whereas X is doing the exact opposite, And

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 16>it's just going to be interesting to see long term,

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 16>you know, does this burn people out?

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 12>Or is this what people want?

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 16>Do they want to go and see election twenty four

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 16>to seven information, in which case maybe X is making.

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 9>The right choice, or is Meta right?

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 16>Is Mark Zuckerberg right right that people don't want this

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 16>stuff thrown in their face twenty four to seven through

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 16>sixty five, So we'll kind of see. I think, you know,

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 16>for me personally, it feels a little overkill. It feels

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 16>a little bit like burnout to me over on X.

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 16>But you know, that's the decision Elon has made, and

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 16>again interesting comparison this election cycle to have a meta

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 16>and Mark Zuckerberg going in a very different direction in

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 16>terms of how much they want to prioritize election content.

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 5>Particularly after the election too. Co Agner, thank you so

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 5>much on that key story. Meanwhile, coming up talking VC

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 5>Ziko who Zapati joins us next in our VC spotlight

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 5>as the AI focused business raises money.

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 17>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 7>Okay.

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 6>AI powered procurement software startup ZIP is changing the way

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 6>companies obtain the supplies they need to operate and recently

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 6>announced it's laid this round one hundred and ninety million

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 6>dollars Series D in funding.

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 7>Here with more.

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 6>Zip co founder and CEO, Jewel Zipade, Welcome to the program. Actually,

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 6>the backstory is really interesting and it's worth getting right

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 6>to it.

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 7>Used to work at Airbnb and you.

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 6>Had a specific job and you were basically like, this

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 6>isn't working. So you went with some friends and colleagues

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 6>and designed something better and were like, you know what,

0:31:59.040 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 6>let's just.

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 7>Start a company that does this. That's pretty fair, right.

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 12>No, that's absolutely fair.

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 18>So my co founder Lu and I were both engineering

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 18>and product leaders at Airbnb, and we had to go

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 18>through this confusing procurement process of if we need to

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 18>buy something in the business, what are all the approvals

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 18>that are required right between budget and legal and IT

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 18>and security and all the different teams.

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 12>And that's what we solved.

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 18>We started ZIP to solve for it by providing one

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 18>front door for any employee.

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 12>In the business to request a purchase.

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 5>I'm really interested that your AI powered what form is

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 5>this generative AI?

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 4>More broad AI?

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 5>Because you're serving open AI for example, so you built

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 5>upon their.

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 4>Large language model. How does that all go?

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 5>What you building that they can't internally for their own

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 5>process procurement.

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, that's a great that's a great question. It's absolutely

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 18>generative AI. And if you think about the procurement process

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 18>as a whole, right, we have access to so much

0:32:55.600 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 18>relatively unstructured data right when employees at organization are are

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 18>buying things. There are millions of contracts invoices, order form,

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 18>so much data that's available, and we can take AI

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 18>and actually apply it in a really, really practical way,

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 18>which is what we do for our enterprise customers today

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 18>to do everything from helping pars invoices to reading msas

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 18>and contracts for risks and the like.

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 5>You're with the money hiring engineering talent, R and D talent,

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 5>you're setting up an AI lab. And I go back

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 5>to really what is underlying all of this? Are you

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 5>building your own large aguage models to be able to

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 5>do this? Are you're looking to develop that more with

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 5>these tools that you want to build an AI lab?

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 12>That's a great question.

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 18>So we absolutely are using these funds to invest and

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 18>create an AI lab and really double click on if

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 18>you know, like I sort of said, like the data

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 18>that we have access to as part of procurement and

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 18>really think about how do we best apply it in

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 18>a practical way. And so there's there's more that we'll

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 18>have to share there in the coming.

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 7>Months, and so which LM me using.

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 18>So we today largely use the open EI models.

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 6>I broke my own rule, which is I always start

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 6>on what's newest and fresh. But I wanted the backstory

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 6>because it was probably two years ago that you and

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 6>I first met. So in that time you've raised a

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 6>lot of money, you have a decent valuation more than

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 6>two billion, But have you built a business in that time?

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 6>Have you managed to take this product and technology and

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 6>actually sell it to other businesses and enterprises who in

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 6>turn are using it themselves.

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, of course, we've been really privileged to work with

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 18>some of the largest enterprises in the world, companies like

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 18>Discover Financial, Snowflake, Prudential, Coinbase, and many others. And even

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:53.280
<v Speaker 18>as an example, Discover Financial has saved over three thousand

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 18>different business approvals that they've realized they don't need anymore,

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 18>or Snowflake has over three hundred and five million dollars

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 18>of ZIP supported savings logged. What we find is that

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 18>procurement is actually the second largest area of spend for

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 18>any business in.

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 7>The world after payroll.

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 18>Right, it's trillions of dollars in the world that you know,

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 18>employees of companies are buying, you know, for office supply,

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:21.320
<v Speaker 18>software and the like, and so there's so much opportunity.

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.479
<v Speaker 6>And for you yourselves building on top of open Ai,

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.240
<v Speaker 6>what's that been like? You know, in the news cycle,

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 6>it's pretty chaotic when it comes to open ai.

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 7>But as a customer or partner, what was it like

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 7>for you?

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 18>I'd have to say it's been it's been great and

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 18>the feedback that we've we've received from customers has been

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 18>really positive. As an example, Coinbase has saved thousands and

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 18>thousands of hours with ZIP processing, you know, hundreds of

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 18>thousands of invoices in a much more automated way.

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:51.399
<v Speaker 5>ZIP co founder and CEO Jules Zabade, thanks for coming

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 5>on here.

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 6>Perplexity the AI company trying to build a search product

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 6>that rivals Googles in early talks to raise funding from

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 6>investors at evaluation of roughly nine billion dollars. That's according

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:14.359
<v Speaker 6>to a Bloomberg source. Bloomberg Sharen Gafari broke the news

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 6>and joins us with the latest. So what do we

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:18.479
<v Speaker 6>know about the round? This is a name that's coming

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:19.359
<v Speaker 6>up a lot at the moment.

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 7>Sharene That's right.

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it is a reflection of how much there

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is interest in continuing to invest in.

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 19>This AI wave, this AI bubble.

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 1>We've seen open Ai recently close a mega round, and

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>now I think there seems to be continued interest in

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:36.839
<v Speaker 1>getting in on that. Perplexity is very popular with people

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:38.720
<v Speaker 1>who are looking to use AI for search.

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 7>Let's just talk.

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 5>About the moat that it's built, or if there is

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 5>indeed a mote, because many have felt that this is

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 5>clear competitive threat to Google, but Google can equally perhaps

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 5>take it on itself, that's right.

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean Perplexity really had the head start in using

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the most cutting edge AI to kind of make a

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>standalone app where you.

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 19>Can instead of googling something, you can search.

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>For it and at all your research and all your

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 1>answers right there and kind of one neat product.

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 19>So I think they had a head start with that.

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I think, of course, Google is also increasingly integrating AI

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 1>into their answers, but I've talked to a lot of

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 1>folks who are starting to even stop using Google and

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 1>use Perplexity.

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:17.479
<v Speaker 19>So I will say it's very popular with.

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Certain kind of early adopters I would say in AI,

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's reflected in this investor interest.

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:27.240
<v Speaker 6>So perplex you want to raise five hundred million dollars

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 6>according to our reporting, but the valuation is a pretty

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 6>big jump from where it last raised money.

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 7>Do we know who wants to get in on this?

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 6>You know, I have in the back of my mind

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Speaker 6>that open AI doesn't want its investors looking elsewhere.

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 19>Right, I think we're still reporting that out.

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 1>But one thing I will say is that Perplexity has

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>been increasingly trying to get into sort of enterprise search

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 1>things like financial search.

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 19>You know, searching through customer data.

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's going to be an increasing focus

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 1>and potentially something that investors are looking at.

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 7>Bloomberg sureing Gafari another great piece of reporting. Thanks so much, Caro,

0:37:59.680 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 7>what you got.

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 5>I've got to turn on attention to Apple now because

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 5>it's new iPad that's designed specifically with AI and mind

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 5>is being broken down by Mark German, who has more.

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 5>It was power on this weekend, very well read throughout.

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 5>Just tell us what's new when it comes to the iPad.

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:21.320
<v Speaker 20>So earlier last week, Apple announced the new iPad Mini.

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 20>It's the first update to that product in about three years.

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:27.839
<v Speaker 9>And this epipemy doesn't have a lot of new functionality.

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 20>Food they did is they upped the memory and they

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 20>up the processor to match last year's iPhone.

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:34.240
<v Speaker 9>And why is that important?

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 20>Because that allows it to support Apple Intelligence. Now, as

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 20>we talked about a few times now, Apple Intelligence, at

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:43.839
<v Speaker 20>least the first few iterations not that impressive, right, You're

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 20>missing some of the more whizbane features like generative AI

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:50.800
<v Speaker 20>created emojis, but you do get things like notification summaries.

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 20>Now this is launching next week. I don't find the

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 20>AI features that impressive. But Apple does have a secret

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 20>advantage once the AI starts working, once they either build

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 20>or acquire or pay their way into successful AI features,

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 20>This new iPad mine shows the company's ability to rapidly

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 20>add support for new features across this ecosystem in a

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 20>way that really isn't matched by Google, Samsung, or any

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 20>other provider. So while it's a small update, it's indicative

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 20>of the larger overall ability that the company has to

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 20>bring features downline very quickly.

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 6>And it makes the iPad minis price point interesting because

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, from a process as standpoint, it's the same

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 6>as this right iPhone fifteen Pro. They both have a

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 6>seventeen and they're kind of double dipping a little bit.

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 6>I mean you just talked about that secret strategy or

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:40.320
<v Speaker 6>secret advantage.

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:41.959
<v Speaker 7>Go a little bit further on that mark.

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 20>Yeah, Well, this processor is the same processor as last year.

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 20>It's a chip they no longer make other than for

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 20>this product, right, and so they had a lot of

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 20>leftover components from production of the iPhone fifteen Pro.

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 9>There's a process called binning, which essentially means.

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:02.879
<v Speaker 20>Processors that we some of their components during the production process. Right,

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 20>So the fifteen pro version of the A seventeen chip

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 20>has six.

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:10.240
<v Speaker 9>CPU cores are the minion processing cores in the chip.

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 9>The ones in this new ipaid many.

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 20>Have five processing cores, which essentially means these.

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 9>Have been bin or they've lost the core during production.

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:21.240
<v Speaker 20>So I'm not saying that these are the bad ones

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 20>that they threw away. But what I am saying it's

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 20>about a little bit of a stripped down version of

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 20>last year's processor, something that's been recycled here and from

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 20>an operational standpoint, it's a big win for Apple, especially

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 20>for margins.

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 5>So on a new iPad mini, am I going to

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 5>be able to design my latest Nikes? Briefly, Mark, you've

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 5>been writing about Tim Cook's other key role right now,

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Well to.

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 20>Do the new iPad many does support the new Apple

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 20>pencil pro I should add that, right, but the previous

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 20>ones and support older Apple pencils, and you certainly could

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:52.360
<v Speaker 20>draw your Nikes there. I thought this story was interesting

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:54.319
<v Speaker 20>because I think a lot of people don't realize that

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 20>Tim Cook has a bit of a side gig, and

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 20>that's being the lead independent director of Nike. Nike has

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 20>been going through its tumultuous period and obviously as a

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 20>board member, Tim Cook.

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 9>Has been helping out. He helped bring on their new CEO,

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 9>Elliott Hill. That hire has all the hallmarks of.

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 20>A Tim Cook higher and so we'll see what happens

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 20>tonight you over the next six months with the new leadership.

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 4>Mark German, you're busy as always. We appreciate it. Now,

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 4>that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 6>Ed absolutely jam packed recap on the pod. You know

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 6>where to find the pod online on Apple, Spotify, iHeart

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:29.800
<v Speaker 6>and of course on the Bloomberg platforms from London and

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 6>San Francisco.

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 7>This is Bloomberg Technology