WEBVTT - TechStuff Predicts 2018

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Get in text with technology with tech Stuff from stuff

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I am your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>over at how Stuff Works, and I like technology, except

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 1>at this time of the year. It's the time of

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the year when I stick my neck out, get ready

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>for my head to get chopped off, and predict what's

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen in the following twelve months of tech I'm

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>recording this episode on December seventeen, so technically there's still

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>half a month of December left to go, but I'm

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 1>looking ahead at This is the the last episode I

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>believe of tech Stuff to publish in the year twenty seventeen,

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>so when you hear the next one will be celebrating

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a new year. But first, let's before that all happens,

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>let's let's kind of take some guesses. Um and and

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I decided this year to make some more specific prediction

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>rather than the really general ones I tend to go with,

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>because not only do I think you guys deserve more

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>specific predictions, but it's also way easier to figure out

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>if they came true or not. Here's the here's the

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>secret folks. After I make these episodes and they go live,

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and a year passes, and it comes time for me

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to look and evaluate how well I predicted things. I

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>have to do all that research. I have to figure out, well,

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>did what I said, did it happened, Did it happen

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the way I thought it would, did it happen a

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>different way? That requires a huge amount of research. And

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the more general the prediction is, the harder it is

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to nail down whether or not it happened. But if

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I make very specific predictions, then I have a much

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>better chance of knowing right away if I'm right or wrong. So,

0:01:53.240 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>for example, if I predict that in you and McGregor

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>becomes the CEO of Google, I'm gonna know by December. Now,

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of course, the challenge there is to make predictions that

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>are not patently ridiculous, because that's just wasting your time

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want to do that. So here's hoping

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>that some of these predictions are interesting and that they

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 1>are verifiable or falsifiable at the end of the year.

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Those are Michaels. So with that being said, let us

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:36.399
<v Speaker 1>go to prediction number one, which is that VR headsets

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>like Oculus rift HTC, Vibe and others will have another

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:45.679
<v Speaker 1>lackluster year. We're not going to see a spike in sales.

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>By the end of VR will not have made any

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 1>real progress in home markets, and will likely see several

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>products discontinued, although the Vibe and the Rift may survive

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>just because they have larger corporate sans behind them. So

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>in other words, I expect when I look at the

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>analyst reports in December, that there won't be any months

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>where VR headsets suddenly make incredible sales. We'll probably see

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>some of those prices come down, and we'll probably see

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the prices of the various computers that you need in

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>order to run VR at a decent clip, we'll see

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>those prices come down too, But I don't know it's

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>going to come down enough to make this a common

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.839
<v Speaker 1>household technology. And we're also starting to see a lot

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>more development on the VR space with software, with experiences

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that you can have that will help. I don't think

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be enough. So I think by this

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>time we're gonna be looking at a pretty similar situation

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>as far as virtual reality is concerned. I find that

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>sad I would love to see VR takeoff. I just

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like it's quite catching on. I think we

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>might be past the point where it could really hook

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in to the general consumer market. Prediction number two. Microsoft

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>mixed reality headsets, being the relatively new toy on the market,

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>will get some initial buzz in the early part ofen

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>but will largely suffer essentially the same fate as virtual

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 1>reality headsets. And I think a R augmented reality has

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>incredible potential to do really big business. I just don't

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>think is going to be the year where it happens,

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>so I don't expect big sales numbers now. Augmented reality,

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in case you've forgotten, is the technology in which we

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>are able to overlay or augment our experience of reality

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>with some sort of digital information. Typically, we're looking at

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 1>the world through a screen, so we're getting like a

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>live video feed of our surroundings through a screen, and

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>on that screen we can overlay digital information and us

0:04:57.839 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>augment our experience. But there are a lot of other

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>variations on this, like things that are ad audible as

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>opposed to visual, that sort of stuff. I just don't

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>think that the mixed reality headsets are going to be

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a huge consumer uh piece of technology. Either. We might

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>see it being used in industrial or business related endeavors,

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it's going to become the hot

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>new consumer product. I don't think you're gonna go home,

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>put on your mixed reality headset and then do some computing.

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I could be wrong about that. It all depends on

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>how the technology is positioned and how it's marketed, but

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I would be surprised if mixed reality really takes off

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in the consumer space. Prediction number three, We're gonna see

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>autonomous car service rolled out for real z s, not

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>just as a limited test case, in at least one

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>market in the United States, before the end of now.

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>This is similar to a prediction I made for seventeen

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>where I said that Uber was going to try and

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>do a truly autonomous test system in a major US

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>market where there'd be no driver in the driver's seat.

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It would truly be an autonomous car with no human

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>operator there to step in line. But that did not happen.

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I do think we're gonna see at least a limited

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>rollout of autonomous car service in one market in the US,

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>not as a test, but as this is our service

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>moving forward in this market by the end of That's

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a not that bold of a prediction, I would argue,

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>because we've seen some of this in prototype stages throughout.

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>Uber was operating some autonomous vehicle services in Pittsburgh, in Arizona,

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco, but all of those were with a

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>human operator in the car as well. UM I think

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 1>that before is over, some one, maybe not Uber, but

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>someone will be operating a truly autonomous car service in

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>a major market. I don't know that it will be

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a huge success, but I think it will happen, So

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that will be something to look out for. Prediction number four, Congress,

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it's going to give the nod to Disney and twenty

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>first century Fox and say yes, Disney, you can acquire

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty one century Fox. This will take several months, but

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it will happen. Disney will then end up being the

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:39.559
<v Speaker 1>six owner of Hulu because they already owned thirty percent

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>of Hulu and Fox owns another thirty percent of Hulu.

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>But they're also going to go ahead and develop their

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>own streaming service on top of their majority ownership of Hulu.

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>So the landscape of two thousand eighteen December two thousand

0:07:56.240 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>eighteen will be that the massive entertainment into Street will

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>be more under Disney's belt than ever before. Disney will

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>control all those assets that Century Fox had that were

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>related to entertainment. Twenty first Century Fox of the company

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Murdocks Company will still have some of Fox's properties under it,

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>but a large portion of that goes to Disney. It

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>means lots of different things. It means that we could

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>potentially see lots of those uh those Fox owned or

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Fox licensed properties from Marvel make their way into Disney's

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Marvel movies. That would include The Fantastic Four and The

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>X Men and Deadpool and characters like that. But on

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a bigger scale, it means all sorts of things. It

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>means an impact to streaming services. It means that we're

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>going to see increasingly more of our entertainment come from

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a decreasing number of major studios, which isn't necessarily a

0:08:54.440 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>good thing. We also will see that Star Wars New Hope,

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>which was in perpetuity given to twenty first Century Fox,

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>will now join all of its brothers and sisters of

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the Star Wars properties under Disney, which means potentially we

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:21.599
<v Speaker 1>could get a digitally remastered version of the cinematic releases

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of the original trilogy. In other words, before the special editions,

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we could get a fully cleaned up version of those movies,

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>because Disney will own all of them. Before Fox had

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the agreement that they owned the rights to a New

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Hope and Us, there was very little hope that we

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>were ever going to get that cinematic release, the one

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>where Han shot first, or actually Han shot period um.

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>That one we now could potentially get. That's a big one.

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're going to get in, but I

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>think it could happen. Prediction number five. After numerous heated discussions,

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Congress will overturn the FCC's decision in December to reverse

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the decision classifying broadband Internet as a public utility. That

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>one was made back in. This is gonna be the

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>result of lots of lawsuits and arguments in Congress. I

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>think ultimately Congress is going to take a look at

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.839
<v Speaker 1>the ground swell of support in the United States among

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>citizens to maintain that neutrality, to keep those rules in place. Uh,

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and we'll say, hey, we can't really risk going against

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the will of the people without putting ourselves in danger.

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Right now, if you are in Congress, you're probably looking

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 1>at your position as being on shaky ground at best,

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>because things are very tumultuous in United States politics, and

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>as a result, even if you don't necessarily side with

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the net neutrality argument, your constituency might and that would

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>mean that you have a vested interest in making sure

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that you kind of support it so that you don't

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>have an angry mob of constituents at home who then

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>will vote your butt out of office the next time

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a vote comes around. That might be an overly optimistic

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>view of what is going to happen. But I suspect

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.719
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to see this decision from the f

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>c C blocked in some way in and again. It

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 1>may come from the courts, or it may come from Congress,

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think we're going to get through with

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>those new considerations in place. Um. The FCC argues, by

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the way, that net neutrality will still be a thing,

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just it won't be an official regulation. The government

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 1>won't be enforcing net neutrality, but the internet service providers

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>will maintain net new trality out of self interest. That

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>might possibly be true if in the United States we

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>had a true free market with internet service providers. If

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you had multiple choices for an I s P within

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>your market, then you could argue, all right, well, net

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>neutrality isn't protected. But if one company decides to act

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in a way that is contrary to net neutrality, I

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>could just stop my service with them and go to

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a competitor. But that's not the way it works in

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Most regions in the US that have

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>broadband access have at most two I s p s

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to choose from, and most of them only have one.

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you only have one choice, there's nowhere else

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to go. So the argument that the free market will

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>maintain net neutrality to me seems disingenuous because there's not

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>really a free market in the I s P business

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. So I suspect that ultimately this

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>is gonna get overturned. Prediction number six. By the end

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand eighteen, the percentage of cord cutters in

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the US will be such that will see thirty million

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>people cutting the cord. Total. Now, in seventeen, that number

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was at twenty two point two million. We had twenty

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>two point two million chord cutters by seventeen. That's not

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>throughout the year, but in total that was up from

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>sixteen point seven million in twenty sixteen. So I think

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that trend is not just going to continue. I think

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna pick up a little more speed. So it

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:45.719
<v Speaker 1>they gained a little bit more than five and a

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>half million cord cutters in twenty seventeen, I think we're

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna go closer to seven point eight million in eighteen.

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>So that's gonna knock us up to thirty million total.

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Thirty million people who have cut the chord and they

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>no longer subscribe to traditional cable or satellite television. They

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>will they might subscribe to a virtual subscription on a

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>smart TV or a console or some other solution, but

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>they will abandon the traditional satellite or cable option. That's

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>my prediction for cutting the chord, and that the never chords.

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Those are people who are of adult age who have

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>never paid for traditional cable or satellite. That number is

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>going to go up to just because you're gonna have

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>more people reach the age of eighteen who still have

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>never done that and don't have any plans to do it,

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>So that number is going to keep going up too,

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>just as a result of younger generations reaching the age

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of maturity and not having ever bought a cable or

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>satellite package for television. But we're also going to see

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>more and more households that have been doing that cut

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>those ties, and that, as a result, is also going

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to have massive applications across the entertainment industry because you're

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna see advertising react as a result of that. If

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you have fewer people watching your ads, then those ads

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>have less value and that's going to have this ripple

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>effect throughout the industry and it will be really interesting

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to see where things go from there. I don't think

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be massively disruptive by the end of

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to continue this trend of disruption that

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I imagine we'll see hit its peak and maybe another

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>four or five years and uh, at that point, who

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>knows what will come next, but I think the landscape

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>will be drastically different. Well, I've got a lot more

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>predictions about ten coming up, but first let's take a

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>quick break to thank our sponsor. All Right, we're up

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to prediction number seven. There will be at least one

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and probably more than one security breaches on the scale

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Equifax breach. In because while we pay a

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of lip service towards security. It's way easier to

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about being secure than to actually take the steps

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and make sure we are are doing it. And plus

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we're human beings and we're wacky you, So this, I

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>think is a gimme. I would be shocked if we

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>get through without another massive security breach making the news.

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>It maybe that it's a breach that a company tries

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to cover up. That seems to be the m O

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of companies. It never works out well

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for them. It always eventually will find its way to

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the public, and then it's way worse at that point.

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Equifax is a great example. The The initial UH vulnerability

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>was found in March. The earliest evidence of an attack

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>was found in May, and no one talked about until September,

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and by more than a hundred and thirty million accounts

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>had been breached and accessed and potentially all that personal

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>data is now compromised. So I suspect we're gonna see

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>something along those lines again. Don't know who will be

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the target, could be anybody, don't know what vulnerability they'll use,

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:23.959
<v Speaker 1>could be anything, but just from the fact that no

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>one ever seems to really get their head around how

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to practice good security tells me that this is going

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to happen. In the case with Equifax, the company was

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>even aware of the vulnerability before the first attack apparently happened,

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>but failed to act to solve that. Despite the fact

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>that the company has a policy of fixing such problems

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>within forty eight hours of discovering them. That just didn't happen.

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>With the Equifax data breach, I suspect we're going to

0:17:55.200 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>see something along those lines. I'd rather not. I I

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 1>have been personally affected by some of these. The Yahoo breach,

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the Equifax breach. It's all gonna happen again, though. Uh,

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>just because there's no such thing as a perfect secure system,

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and there's way too many examples of companies that just

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>don't take the right steps to address vulnerabilities once they

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 1>are found. They drag their feet because fixing problems is

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>expensive and it takes time and it takes energy away

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>from doing business. But if you don't do it, the

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>amount you're going to have to spend in order to

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>correct the problems that will happen will dwarf anything you

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>would have spent just fixing the problem in the first place.

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.479
<v Speaker 1>So I would love to be proven wrong on this,

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 1>hopefully December, I'll say, wow, we got through without any

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.239
<v Speaker 1>major breaches. I would love to be proven wrong. I

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>just don't think it's gonna happen. Prediction number eight. Apple

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>next iPhone, which I'm betting will not have a number

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>associated with it. So it's not going to be the

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 1>iPhone eleven. It will be called something else, maybe just

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone It will be an incremental upgrade to iPhone ten.

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's not gonna be some sort of massive evolution

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>of the iPhone ten. Now, Johnny, i'ves Sir Johnny Eyes

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>has once again taken the helm of design over at Apple.

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>He's personally involved. However, I don't think his influence is

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>likely going to be seen that much in the products

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that come out next year. I don't think that's going

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to really be a major component for another generation or so,

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 1>because it takes more than a year of work to

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>produce these products. So the next iPhone, the iPhone whatever

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it will be called, but I don't think it will

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>be called the iPhone eleven, is already well in the

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>development stage at this point. It's got to be because

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>by the time September rolls around, it has to be

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>ready to go to manufacturing plants and be produced in

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>large numbers. That means that it already has to be

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>well along the development cycle. That being, and since Johnny

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I've just came back over into the design section and

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>got really hands on with everything, I think that means

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>we will not see a direct evidence of his involvement

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of his influence, at least not beyond what we see

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in Apple products in general. Uh, this next generation is

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>going to take another generation before that happens. Prediction number nine.

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna see a rise in cord cutting, which will

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>have a big effect on advertising, but we'll also see

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a rise in ad blocking online. We're gonna see more

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>and more people installing ad blockers and developing ad blockers.

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>This is going to encourage more sites to use ad

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>blocker detectors. If you've we use an ad blocker and

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you've gone to one of those sites, you've probably seen

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a pop up up here and saying, hey, we see

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you're using an ad blocker. Please don't do that. If

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to look at our stuff, white list our

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>sites so that we can make money. Sometimes you can't

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>even view the original content until you have white listed them.

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Or pause your ad blocker, whatever it may be. This

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>is likely going to inspire more people to file lawsuits

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>against such practices. There's an argument going on that says

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a violation of privacy for a web page or

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a website to look into what your browser has in

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>order to serve you up this information of Oh, I

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>see your using an ad blocker. They said, well, that's

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a violation of privacy because you're staring at what I'm

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 1>using on my computer and I didn't give you permission

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 1>to do that. This is still unraveling as I record

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, so we're probably gonna see that continue in.

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be a big mess, and this is going

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to bring the question everyone is worried about closer to

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:07.959
<v Speaker 1>the foreground. It's going to bring this question up that

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>people are going to have to grapple with, which is

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 1>how do you make money creating content on the Internet

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>in a way that does not alienate your customers. I

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 1>have a vested interest in this question. This podcast is

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>ad supported. Without those ads, there's no revenue. Without revenue,

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>we I don't get paid, we don't have a space

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to record in, we don't have money to host these podcasts.

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>These podcasts stop getting recorded, the company goes away. That's

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 1>our source of revenue. So we want to be able

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to do this. I love my job, I love doing

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>what I do, but I can't just do it for free.

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't get paid in songs and sandwiches. I can't

0:22:56.560 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>pay my rent with any sort of good will from

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you listeners. I need I need cash money you. It's

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>a hard knock life out there, So we as creators

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>have a responsibility to come up with ways that allow

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:19.160
<v Speaker 1>us to make money uh off of our ideas and

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>do it in such a way that is not too

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>intrusive or irritating or otherwise off putting. That's our responsibility.

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>It's also the responsibility of the advertisers to come up

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>with methods that are effective, that give you the information

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you need to act upon those advertisements so that this

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>whole cycle works. If it doesn't, then obviously something's broken

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and eventually the system collapses. Well, this is true across

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the entire web. It's not just podcasts, but on regular websites.

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>And I look, I'm a web user. I find ads

0:23:56.320 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>really really irritating as well. I was using a browser

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to look at content the other day, I did not

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>have an ad blocker in place. I'm reading an article.

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 1>A paragraph and a half down into the article, I

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>get an enormous full screen overlay of an ad playing music,

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>completely obscuring the article I was trying to read. That

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>is obnoxious. Nobody wants that, And it's that sort of

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:29.239
<v Speaker 1>stuff that continues the argument, Hey, I want to use

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>an ad blocker because otherwise my experience is terrible. That's

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a valid argument to make. But on the other hand,

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have the ads, you can't pay to

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>have that content, you can't create the content. You're not

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it for free. So we're gonna see this

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>really kind of become a battleground in this This is

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the the lead. We got to sit down

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and fix this because it's broken right now and nobody

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is coming out a winner. We want to have something

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that is giving value to our customers, is giving value

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.959
<v Speaker 1>to the advertisers, and that allows us to make the

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff we want to make. I don't have the answer

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to what that is. By the way, I am a

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>lowly content creator. I know what I hate. I hate

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I hate really obnoxious ads. I don't hate all ads.

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Some ads I find either entertaining or helpful. A lot

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of ads that are based on my browsing behavior I

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of like because I end up seeing stuff

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that I'm interested in but I might not have ever

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>known about. So those I actually enjoy. But uh, and

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I have. I've clicked on those ads and bought stuff

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that way. But you've got to be really careful how

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you do that too, because obviously if you do too

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>much of that, it becomes kind of creepy, right. It

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>feels like someone spying on you and getting to know

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>everything you like, and that doesn't feel great either. So

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.959
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely some sort of line we need to figure

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:07.880
<v Speaker 1>out to follow as an industry and hopefully come out

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>with a solution that works for everybody, because otherwise we're

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>just going to continuously have this battle where people create

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>different types of ad blockers just to ignore ads entirely,

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately that's going to lead to an entire industry

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>crumbling in on itself because it can't support itself anymore.

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>The advertisers will pull out because they're saying, no one's

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing our ads in the first place, and then no

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>money comes in, and then without money, you can't run

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>a business, or so I'm told. I don't know. I

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>still buy everything on the barter system. Three walking birds

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Wooden Nickel. I say, prediction number ten. We're

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>heading toward a subscription service crash and which will see

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 1>such a saturation in the market for subscription based entertainment services.

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about stuff like Netflix and Hulu and Amazon

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Video and all the others that are coming out. There

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>will be a general backlash, and I think we'll get

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>through before all of this kind of shakes out, but

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>things will start to heat up towards the end of

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>with more consumers getting disenchanted with how many different competing

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>services there are and what they're expected to do in

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 1>order to get all the content they want. So by

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of I expect there's gonna be all these

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>different articles about here's the list of services I have

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe to if I want to be able to

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>watch the things I would be able to see if

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I still use pay TV, right, because that was the

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that was the beauty of this Originally, everyone was thinking, Hey,

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>when we get to this world, I'll be able to

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to just the things I want. I won't be

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>subscribing to a cable package where I get four dred channels,

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of which I will watch three, and on those three channels,

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm maybe watching five shows total, So I'm paying all

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>this money for five shows. Wouldn't it be great if

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I had a service where I could just pay for

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 1>those five shows and not anything else and save money

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and frustration. Except what we're getting is all these different

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 1>subscription services that sort of approximate that pay TV model

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>with massive gaps in every single service. Every service has

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>gaps that other services kind of fill in, and then

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you think, well, for me to get the experience I

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>want to have to subscribe to eight different services, I'm

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>not saving any money, and it's just frustrating as a consumer.

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I think by the end of we're going to see

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 1>that frustration build to a high point. And in twenty nineteen,

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I would argue we're gonna start seeing some of those

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>subscription services phase out because people will just start to

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>object with their wallets. Prediction number eleven. By the end

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of eighteen, we will reach the point in America where

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>more retail dollars will be spent online than in physical

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>brick and mortar stores. So there's gonna be the act

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>foul tipping point where online revenues overall are going to

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>be higher than traditional stores. Now we haven't hit that

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>point yet, but will be that tipping point, and there

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>will be no going back after we hit that. Now,

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that does not mean I suspect we'll see tons of

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>real places shut down in ten. We're gonna see some.

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>We've already seen several stores kind of go belly up

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>over the last few years. That's going to continue in

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen, but I don't think it's going to be massive.

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is where we see the general

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>stores just turning upside down throughout the course of the year.

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>The trend will continue, but it will be I think

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>another decade before this effect really starts to impact stores

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in a way that causes massive closures, which obviously leads

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to lots of other problems. You have entire towns or

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>city centers that will be essentially vacant because the stores

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that would have occupied those spaces will no longer have

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the revenues to support themselves. They'll they'll go bankrupt, they'll

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>go out of business, and so further down the road,

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have this issue with what do we do

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>with all that that real estate? What happens to all

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>those spaces? I mean, we may be getting all of

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>our stuff online, what happens to those physical locations that

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>used to have stores in them? And I'm sure we'll

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>come up with different solutions to that problem. I'm sure

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>different cities will try different approaches. Some may reclaim that

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>real estate and turn it into something else, whether it's residential,

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>They may re zone to residential neighborhoods, they may turn

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>them into public spaces. Um maybe you we'll just see

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of Pok restaurants opening up everywhere, which

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally cool with. I love Pok. So now that's

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the way things are going. If I can't walk three

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>blocks without running into fifteen Pok places, hey fine by me.

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Prediction number twelve. Google will start to roll out WiFi

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>based internet services to some cities, similar to how it

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 1>rolled out fiber, but with the goal of having faster deployment.

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Because here in Atlanta, Google Fiber has been a thing

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>on the way for like four years. They still haven't

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>laid fiber in my neighborhood, and to be fair, they've

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>backed off on a lot of the places where they

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>said they were going to deploy, but Atlanta was one

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of those where they had already made the commitment and

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>just hasn't rolled out very quickly. It's not entirely the

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>company's fault. They've encountered resistance everywhere you turn. So I

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna try and switch to a wireless approach,

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a gig a bit wireless approach, um. But I imagine

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>there're still going to encounter some similar issues, mostly involving

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>where they can set up transmitter towers, because that's a

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>big thing, even in Atlanta. Now you've you'll see different

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>areas in Atlanta opposing the construction of a new cell tower,

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>for example. Um. But I don't think it's going to

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>be nearly as tough as it was to get clearance

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>for stuff like utility whole access. That was a crazy

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>battle Google had to fight over and over and over again,

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.479
<v Speaker 1>and largely did so I think as a way of

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>setting a precedent for other companies. I don't think Google's

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>intention was to really become a massive Internet service provider

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>across multiple cities in the United States. I think it

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>was more about, let's set some rules that other companies

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>can follow in the future to make this a more

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>competitive space. It just hasn't really happened because, as it

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>turns out, if you want to be an I s

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 1>P you need a whole lot of money to get

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>into that game, and most companies just don't have that

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of capital. So it ends up being the game

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of a few major UH companies in most regions. If

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you're lucky, you have a few. Most of us only

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>have one or maybe two. All right, I've got a

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>few more predictions, but before I jump into those, let's

0:32:53.000 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break and thank our sponsor. Prediction number thirteen.

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>By the end of automation will have eliminated more jobs

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>than it creates. Now, that's not necessarily the endgame. I

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>do think automation is going to create more jobs along

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the way, and maybe ultimately we'll see things even out

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>or even see automation create more jobs than it displaces.

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think, in which I view as the short

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>term of this journey, we're going to be hard strapped

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to make more jobs than it displaces. I think it's

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be pretty bleak for a lot of people, and

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>not just in the blue collar industries. I think in

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the white color industries. We're gonna see a lot of

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of bots and AI programs and algorithms replace what traditionally

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>would go to people, you know, like human people being things.

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be out of a job. It's gonna

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>be rough. It is not good, uh, at least not

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in the short term, especially not for those people. It

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>might be good for the companies and that it could

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>help them cut some of their costs and thus improve profits.

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>But while that's good for a very few people, it's

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>bad for a whole bunch of others. So I don't

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>want that to happen. I'd like to be proven wrong

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>on this one, but I suspect, at least in the

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 1>short term, that's what's going to be. Like Now, maybe

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>we will find creative ways to make new jobs for

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>those people and find ways to train them for those

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>new jobs. That seems to be like the optimist approach

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to this view of the future, the idea that robots

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and other forms of automation we'll just take over jobs

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that are difficult, deadly, dangerous, or dull, and we humans

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>will be freed up to do wonderful other jobs that

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 1>are much more rewarding and less dangerous and less um

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, less mind numbingly dull. But we have to

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>create those jobs, and we have to figure out how

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 1>to make sure people can do those jobs. If it's

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>someone who was doing menial labor and they suddenly are

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 1>being put into a position that is asking much more

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of them, we have to be sure that we give

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 1>them the tools they need in order to do that job,

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>which includes training and education. I'm not convinced that we

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>have put those those uh pieces in place. I think

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>we're doing the automation before we've got the tools to

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 1>help people affected by the automation to do something else,

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and it feels very reactionary to me. So maybe I'm

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a pessimist in that sense. Maybe there actually are far

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 1>more tools than I'm giving it credit for. But I

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 1>feel a lot of empathy for people who are displaced,

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's through automation or some other corporate maneuver, and

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I often feel that any sort of solution that we

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.720
<v Speaker 1>create for those folks tends to come after a big

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 1>wave has already affected a bunch of people, and that

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>just means that people are suffering during that time. I

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:12.919
<v Speaker 1>hate that, uh, But then I'm very squishy person less

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.359
<v Speaker 1>squishy than I was a year ago, but that's due

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to weight loss prediction number fourteen. The trend that started,

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I would argue, really got started in of women stepping

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>forward to reveal how they had been mistreated, abused, or worse,

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 1>will sadly continue in now. I say sadly not to

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 1>suggest that these women shouldn't come forward. They absolutely should. Rather,

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I say sadly because I suspect the problems women have

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>experienced are deeply ingrained in our society in general and

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the tech world in particular. So I expect we're going

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to see a dozen or more major stories about harassment

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>or worse in the technosphere in twenty eighteen. Now. My

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>hope is that through these stories, we can shake things

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>out to make a better environment for everyone moving forward.

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>In other words, I'm not sad about people getting called

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>out on bad behavior. I think it's necessary. I think

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we have to have this reckoning, as some people call it,

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 1>so that we can get rid of some rotten foundation

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and build a better future for everybody. And I'll go

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 1>further with this argument. I think it's important because it

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>means for very long time, and women know this, and

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 1>minorities know this people who are like me, who are

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>straight white males. It's it's easy to ignore this. There

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>are voices that have gone unheard for way too long,

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and those voices have value, and they can make contributions

0:37:54.840 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>that can change our world in phenomenal, meaningful ways if

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:05.839
<v Speaker 1>we listen to them. But we haven't traditionally, with a

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:09.439
<v Speaker 1>few major exceptions, and I would love to see those

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 1>exceptions just become the rule so that we as a

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>whole benefit. It's not just women are doing better in

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the in technology, or minorities are are more represented in

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>various fields. It's we all get to benefit from the

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>genius that various people possess, regardless of their gender, or

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:37.800
<v Speaker 1>sexual orientation, or ethnicity or any of those other things.

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Because ultimately, the way I view the past, where we

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>have not listened to people very much, we being my

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>fellow straight white male dudes, uh, means that we missed

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 1>out on a ton of stuff that we could have

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>really used. Um well, we there's no telling how many

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 1>amazing ideas were never are brought forward because no one

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 1>was listening. I want to see that change. That means

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that in the short term, we're going to have a

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:11.359
<v Speaker 1>really Rocky Rocky Road and not the ice cream. We're

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna have lots of major upsets, and I think it's

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 1>necessary for us to get to where we need to be. Um,

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna be pretty, but it's going to be necessary.

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Prediction number fifteen. Star Citizen, the video game that has

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 1>been in development since two twelve, will not emerge from

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 1>beta in it seems like it's the safest bet ever,

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>so if you don't If you're not familiar with Star Citizen,

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it is a game that started going under development in

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven. A kickstarter in two thousand twelve raised

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a good amount of money, and since then the total

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>amount of money raised to develop this game is somewhere

0:39:54.719 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 1>around a hundred and seventy million dollars a team. The

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>game still hasn't come out. It's still in alpha various

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>stages of the game or in alpha. Because there's no

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 1>full game in alpha that's available at all, there are

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 1>various parts of the game available in alpha. The game

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>itself is supposed to be a persistent science fiction game

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 1>where you can have your own spaceship. You can actually

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 1>purchase spaceships with real money. You can spend real world

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 1>money to buy a spaceship in the game. Different spaceships

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>cost different amounts, and then you can tool around space.

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>And there's all this other stuff that will potentially be

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in the final game, but because there is no final

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 1>game yet, we haven't actually seen it happen. There's been

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 1>some really cool stuff incorporated into the alpha, like a

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 1>real time facial capture technology that allows you to have, uh,

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>your character have the same facial expressions you have. Your

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>webcam picks up your facial expressions and transmits them to

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 1>your character's face, which I understand is a supremely creepy

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 1>thing to see in person, but it's kind of a

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>cool technology, but it's it's one part of an overall

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 1>game that doesn't really exist yet. I say that by

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eight teen's end, it still will not be

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 1>out of beta. In fact, I'll be amazed if it's

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:21.760
<v Speaker 1>in beta and not just still in various stages of alpha.

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:24.919
<v Speaker 1>But there's no way I think that that game comes

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 1>out in which is unfortunate for people who have been

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:31.319
<v Speaker 1>waiting for so long. Prediction number sixteen. There will be

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin value crash in two thousand eighteen, but the

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency will recover at least to the point where it

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 1>returns to at least ten thousand dollars per bitcoin. It

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>hit that in November two thousand seventeen. It's skyrocketed and

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:49.399
<v Speaker 1>then dipped in value, and it's fluctuated quite a bit

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 1>since November two thousand seventeen. Sometimes in two thousand eighteen,

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I think this value is going to drop significantly, talking

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:59.800
<v Speaker 1>like down to five thousand dollars per coin or less.

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's going to recover and grow back

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 1>to at least ten thousand, maybe eleven thousand dollars per

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 1>coin by the end of two thousand eighteen, maybe more

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:12.720
<v Speaker 1>than that. But I do think there's gonna be uh

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:15.719
<v Speaker 1>what they call a market correction or what other people

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>would call a massive crash and value. Uh that's just

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 1>my prediction. Now, by the end of two thousand eighteen,

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:25.359
<v Speaker 1>it may turn out that there was no crash at

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 1>all and the bitcoin value just kept going up. That's

0:42:28.120 --> 0:42:31.839
<v Speaker 1>why I'm making this prediction specific, so that way, at

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, I can take a look

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 1>at the value of bitcoin and I can say, oh,

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I got it right, or no, I got it totally wrong.

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Prediction number seventeen. We're gonna see a big, serious push

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in podcasting in two thousand eighteen. It's really going to

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>become a massively major form of media in twenty eighteen.

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:58.400
<v Speaker 1>This is fueled from huge successes like S Town and

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the serial series, as well as some of the old

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 1>standards that have been around for years, like Cough stuff

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:07.799
<v Speaker 1>you should know Cough. Expect to see a flood of

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 1>new shows. Some of them are gonna be limited series

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>with a set number of episodes, stuff like Cereal and

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>S Town, where it's a season you get maybe six

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>or eight or ten or twelve episodes and that's it.

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Others are going to be more open ended, and we'll

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 1>publish until people stop listening or the host decided to

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 1>do something else. But we're gonna see more development of

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:29.720
<v Speaker 1>programming in this space, similar to what you might see

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in television or radio. That's gonna be a big, big

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:39.360
<v Speaker 1>thing in and U. That's kind of insider baseball. I think,

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, I got one last prediction. I thought I

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>had seventeen, but I have eighteen. Final prediction is we're

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna have more bots, either voice activated assistants or having

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 1>those voice activated assistants incorporated into more technologies. We're gonna

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 1>have more automated customer service representatives and other implementations of bots.

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Just more bots that we interact with on a on

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 1>a social level, whether that's through some sort of exchange

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 1>where we're trying to buy something or get some customer

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>service or whatever, or we're trying to interact with it

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 1>in order to control the technology around us, whatever it

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:19.920
<v Speaker 1>may be. We're gonna see a whole lot more of

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that in two thousand eighteen. We're gonna see a growth

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:24.360
<v Speaker 1>in the use of bots as a point of service.

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a real area of development. If you

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:30.640
<v Speaker 1>are in computer science and you're looking at different areas

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that you might want to explore, working to create better,

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 1>more adept, more useful bots. That's a growth industry right now.

0:44:42.120 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's gonna be a growth industry

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for more than maybe five or ten years, but for

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>right now, it's really a valuable space. And that's it.

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Those are my eighteen predictions for two thousand eighteen. Hey,

0:44:55.680 --> 0:44:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that worked out and didn't plan on. That just happened.

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.960
<v Speaker 1>So a year from now I will revisit these and

0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 1>see if I was you know, on target or if

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I was way off base. And I'm sure there are

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be things that happen in eighteen that will

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>dwarf all of these predictions. It's going and it's going

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to seem obvious in hindsight. I'm gonna say, why didn't

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I predict that Elon Musk would turn into a light

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 1>being from Alpha Centauri and rule us from his base

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 1>on the Moon. I don't. It was so obvious that

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 1>might happen, but I didn't predict it. Here. If it

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 1>does happen, I'm totally calling that a prediction, by the way,

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 1>because that would be amazing. I look forward to two

0:45:39.040 --> 0:45:42.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand eighteen with you, guys. Thank you so much for

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:45.759
<v Speaker 1>being with me on this journey through two thousand seventeen.

0:45:46.280 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope that we continue to explore technology together in

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 1>all its forms, and I welcome you to write to

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 1>me let me know what you would like me to cover.

0:45:56.640 --> 0:46:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's a particular technology that interests you that you

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>want me to talk about, or maybe there's a company

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you've always wanted to know the inside story about, or

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a person that you think is instrumental in technology that

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 1>I should profile. Maybe there's someone you would like to

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 1>be a guest on the show. I would love to

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. Email me the address for our website. Well,

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:26.120
<v Speaker 1>website our podcast is tech Stuff at how stuffworks dot com.

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 1>You can contact me on Facebook or Twitter. The handle

0:46:29.120 --> 0:46:31.759
<v Speaker 1>of both of those is tech stuff hs W. We

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>also have an Instagram account. Follow that give us some

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:38.960
<v Speaker 1>love over there. And remember I record on Wednesdays and Fridays,

0:46:39.040 --> 0:46:42.879
<v Speaker 1>and I live stream my recording sessions. You can check

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:46.239
<v Speaker 1>that out at twitch dot tv slash tech Stuff. Just

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 1>pop over there. You'll see where the schedule is. When

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I record on Wednesdays and Fridays, you can join the

0:46:51.480 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 1>chat room and you can watch as I stumble my

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 1>way through the world of technology. And that's it. Happy

0:46:59.760 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 1>New Year. I'll see you guys in two thousand eighteen

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:12.360
<v Speaker 1>really soon. For more on this and thousands of other topics,

0:47:12.600 --> 0:47:23.719
<v Speaker 1>is a how staff works dot com