WEBVTT - The Real Killer Season 3: Ep. 10, Please Accept My Prayers

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:05.519
<v Speaker 1>A warning. This episode contains depictions of violence and conversations

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>about suicide that may be disturbing and triggering for some listeners.

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>If you are struggling with suicidal thoughts, please fast forward

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to the end of this episode to find out where

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>help is available.

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:25.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm confident that our team knows more about the murder

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 2>of Anastasia Whipples Fugen and the prosecution of Byron Case

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 2>than anybody, which sometimes scares me to think how quickly

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Byron was convicted and how little work anybody did before

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 2>they sent them to prison forever.

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Are the other people who also know this case fine

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>with leaving it done and decided, or will their minds

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>change after hearing what Byron's legal team says they've uncovered.

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Leah Rothman. This is the Real Killer, Episode ten,

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Please accept my prayers. In the spring of twenty twenty three,

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Byron Case's legal team reaches out to doctor Thomas Young,

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the medical examiner who conducted the autopsy just hours after

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Anastasia's body was discovered in Lincoln Cemetery. Here's Nicole Gordon,

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>one of Byron's attorneys.

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 3>We wrote to doctor Young. We talked to him briefly

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 3>and planned to meet him. We sent him the investigation

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 3>that we'd done so far or that part in the process,

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 3>and scheduled meeting with him. He comes into the room,

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 3>he sits down, and we said, well, what did you think?

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 3>And the first thing that doctor Young said that everything

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 3>that Kelly said after two thousand was a lie. Her

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 3>story cannot be true. And he was insisted on that.

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 3>I was the first thing out of his mouth about

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 3>this case.

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>On May tenth, twenty twenty three, doctor Young writes an affidavit.

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.239
<v Speaker 1>We hired an actor to read some of what he wrote.

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.079
<v Speaker 4>I was neither deposed nor called as a witness to

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 4>trial regarding my autopsy of Miss Whippleshugen. Doctor Chase Blanchard

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 4>testified in deposition and a trial based on my autopsy report.

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 4>Doctor blanche was not present at the autopsy of Miss Whippleshugen.

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's Byron's attorney, Sean O'Brien.

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 5>Doctor Chase Blanchard had just graduated from medical school, did

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 5>not have much experience as a medical examiner, but they

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 5>substituted her for doctor Young. They did that before depositions

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 5>were taken, and they said to judge Otwell, well, doctor

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 5>Young's out of town. We have to use doctor Blanchard. Well,

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 5>he would not have been out of town for that

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 5>whole period of pre trial discovery and the trial, and

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 5>in fact he doesn't remember it when we talked to

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 5>him being out of town or unavailable. But they used

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 5>doctor Blanchard to testify in lieu of doctor Young, and

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 5>doctor Blanchard's testimony generally was supportive of what Kelly moffittt said.

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Back to Dr Young's affidavit.

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 4>Based on my review and my direct observation at autopsy,

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 4>it's my opinion to a reasonable degree of medical certainty

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 4>that Miss Moffatt's story and implicating Byron Case is not

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 4>consistent with the physical evidence. Ms Moffatt claimed that Byron

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Case shot Miss Whipplesfugen from five feet away.

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 6>This is impossible.

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 4>Any assertion that the contact gunshot wound in Miss Whipplesfugen's

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 4>face is a wound from five feet away is false

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 4>and not consistent with the evidence. Abes her of the

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 4>mis Wibbleshugen had a contact gunshot wound to the tip

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 4>of her nose. This means that the gun used on

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 4>Miss Whibbleshugen was touching her nose when it was fired.

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 4>I know this to be true because, in addition to

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 4>whether wound characteristics typical for a contact gunshot wound I

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 4>found through a dissecting microscope, gunpowder particles and soft tissues

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 4>in the wound track beneath her skin. Ms Moffett also

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 4>described Miss Whipplefhugen's body being blown backwards by the gunshot.

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 4>This is also not possible. A gunshot would not push

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 4>her body backward, but instead rapidly perforate her head. Without

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 4>such a push, a person being blown backwards by a

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 4>gunshot is entirely Hollywood style fiction. The physical evidence also

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 4>does not support a claim that a shotgun was used

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 4>to kill Miss Wibbleshugen. The bullet fragment I recovered also

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 4>was not consistent with a shotgun.

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 1>Slug, which is different than what doctor Chase Blanchard said

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 1>on the stand. She testified that the gun used could

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>have been a rifle, a high powered handgun, or a shotgun,

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>but she said if it were a shotgun, quote, there

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>was a fragment found in the back, and that's consistent

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>with a shotgun slug. Doctor Blanchard is referring to the

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>bullet fragment found matted in Anastasia's hair. Here's Sean again.

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 5>And and that's the same ammunition that Justin used to

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 5>kill himself with. And so they actually argued to the jury,

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't that be a coincidence? But doctor Young said this

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 5>was not a deer slug. I mean, and frankly, I've

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 5>done deer slug homicides. I could have told you this

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 5>was not a deer slug.

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, you just look at the crime scene. I mean,

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the photos from the scenes, justin what happened to Justin.

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 5>With half his head is missing.

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's versus Anastasia. I mean, they don't even

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anything about ballistics or any I can

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>tell just as a layman that these are not the

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>same type of thing.

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 5>It's not at all the same. I mean, it's an

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 5>unrifled chunk a lead that comes out at high velocity

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 5>that's typically blunt, and it just you know, those, frankly,

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 5>are the worst crime scene photographs I've ever had the view.

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I agree, I think it's one of the worst things

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen.

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and it is Justin's Yeah, this was not that.

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 5>This was not that.

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>So doctor Young concludes his affidavit by saying, had he

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>been called to testify at Byron case's trial, he would

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>have answered consistently with his affidavit. Among the many questions

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I sent to Prosecutor Teresa Craon was why didn't they

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>call doctor Young to testify? I also asked what she

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>thought about doctor Young's APFA David Remember. Her office issued

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the following statement quote, the office has decided that until

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>all litigation is complete on this matter, it isn't a

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>pro for a potential witness I e. Teresa to participate.

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>But there might be a small hiccup when it comes

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to doctor Young. To Byron's current legal team, and in

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>his affidavit, doctor Young says the way Kelly said Byron

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>shot Anastasia is not consistent with the physical evidence. But

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>doctor Young is interviewed for the twenty sixteen MTV show

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Unlocking the Truth, which looked at cases of possible wrongful convictions,

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Byron's being one of them. There, doctor Young says something

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>very different, Kevin Maffin is.

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 6>A witness the King.

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 7>Later on everything she says fitstiavis.

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Unlocking the Truth is hosted by Ryan Ferguson, who was

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>wrongfully convicted of a two thousand and one murder in Columbia, Missouri.

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>He spent almost ten years in prison for the crime.

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Ryan Ferguson was convicted largely based on

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>false eyewitness testimony. Okay, back to doctor Young talking with

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Ryan about Kelly.

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 6>But there's a witness account in this case. She describes

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 6>a rifle.

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 7>Witnesses have been highly suspect in many cases.

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 6>You don't pass judgment.

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 7>On a witness accountanteam or what they have to say

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 7>and compare.

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 6>It to the evidence. It's called thinking dirty.

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 7>Thinking dirty doesn't work no matter what kind of character

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 7>this person is.

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 6>You put that all aside and you look at the

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 6>content of what they're saying.

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 7>Witnesses observe things. The fact that there's something that is

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 7>observed makes it a fact.

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 6>Could they be lying? Maybe you test.

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 7>It with the evidence, but that's still a fact. It's

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 7>like a jigsaw puzzle. You know, you got a piece,

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 7>you got a context here, you put the piece in.

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 6>It'll fit or it doesn't fit.

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>As you can imagine, doctor Jung's assessment of eyewitness testimony

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:03.199
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sit too well with Ryan. Doctor Young is then

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>asked what in Kelly's testimony is consistent with his medical findings.

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 7>She mentions that as she's sitting in the backseat, Byron

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 7>gets the keys out of.

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 6>The ignition, opens the trunk, pulls out.

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 7>She says, I think it's a Honting rival and he

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 7>puts the thing in her face.

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 6>And fires it. All of that fips.

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Does that fit the physical evidence? Again? Kelly said Byron

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>was five feet or more away from Anastasia when he

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>shot her, So how does that fit his medical findings

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of it being a contact wound? Doctor Young continues.

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 7>Past events are so complex. If somebody basically gives a

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 7>past event account and everything lines up with evidence, that's remarkable.

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 6>Somebody to just simply make.

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 7>Up a witness account, align account and have everything line

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 7>up with the evidence like that. They have to be

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 7>aligned TVs to do that.

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I asked Byron's investigator, Quinn O'Brien what she makes of

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>doctor Young's MTV interview and how it's in complete contradiction

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to his affidavit seven years later.

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it is, And I think what happened was that

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 8>the MTV people didn't give him the same things that

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 8>we gave him. I think MTV gave him his old report,

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 8>and based on his old report, he discussed these things.

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 8>But we gave him Kelley mo off its transcript and deposition,

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 8>We gave him the prosecutor's closing, and we gave him

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 8>a few other documents. And with more information and with

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 8>more context, doctor Young was able to come to a

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 8>better decision. More information means a more accurate assessment. Right,

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 8>Your expert is only as good as what you give them.

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 8>I don't think he had the information that he needed

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 8>to make a good assessment, because yeah, we saw that

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 8>MTV thing too and went, huh, what's that about? You know,

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 8>then when we gave him his report, we also gave

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 8>him these other things, and he said, in context, here's

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 8>how I came to my decision, Like I looked at

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 8>Kelley Moffitt's testimony, and I looked at like, is what

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 8>Kelly's saying? Is that true? According to what the evidence

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 8>is showing me. He said that the gun was pressed

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 8>up against the tip of Anastasia's nose. It could not

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 8>have even been an inch away. It could not at

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 8>all have been like, you know, a foot away or

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 8>five feet away. It was.

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Young declined my invitation to be interviewed. In episode eight,

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I shared that I emailed doctor Young asking why he

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 1>wrote in his autopsy report that Anastagia's corneas were clear,

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>hoping to learn more about her time of death. He

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 1>never responded to that question. I email him again to

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>see what he has to say about his MTV interview

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and how it's very different from his twenty twenty three

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>out of David, but he hasn't responded. So Byron's legal

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>team feels good having doctor Young's affidavit in their pocket

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and they are just getting started. Turns out, Horton Lance,

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Byron's trial attorney, has a lot to say too, again

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>not to me. Although he initially said he might agree

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to an interview. He asked me to call him back

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.839
<v Speaker 1>in a few weeks, which I did several times. He

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>never returned to any of my calls, but in his

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>July third, twenty twenty three affidavit he doesn't hold back.

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>We hired another actor to read from Horton Lance's affidavit.

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Here are some of what he said.

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 9>When I was assigned to Byron's case, very little work

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 9>had been done due to the high case load of

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 9>the public defender. Byron wanted a speedy trial because he

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 9>was certain of his innocence and was held in pre

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 9>trialed attention in the Jackson County Jail. These circumstances gave

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 9>me less than six months to prepare for trial.

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.959
<v Speaker 1>Horton goes on to talk about his process for receiving discovery,

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>how he maintained his files, and then he says this.

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 9>I remember reading the state's response to my request for

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 9>the criminal records of the state's witnesses. Their April third,

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 9>two thousand and two response was that no witnesses had

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 9>a felony or misdemeanor conviction. I am certain that I

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 9>was never informed of Kelley Moffatt's criminal conviction. I have

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:28.839
<v Speaker 9>since reviewed the documents related to Ms Moffatt's April third,

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 9>two thousand and one conviction of a Class A misdemeanor

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 9>in Cooper County, Missouri. I was completely unaware that Miss

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 9>Moffatt was on probation at the time of her March eighth,

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 9>two thousand and two deposition. I would have used Miss

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 9>Moffatt's criminal record and contacts with law enforcement to impeach

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 9>her had the state disclosed that information, especially given the

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 9>timing of her arrest and prosecution to when she gave

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:59.559
<v Speaker 9>her September two thousand statements implicating Byron. In her deposition,

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 9>Kelly stated that she had never pled guilty to or

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 9>been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor in state or

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 9>federal court. The deposition was under oath, which means that

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 9>miss Moffatt committed perjury by denying she pled guilty to

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 9>a misdemeanor in state court. Had I known Kelly Moffatt

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 9>lied under oath, I would have moved to exclude her

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 9>testimony entirely, and if that was not successful, I would

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 9>have cross examined her about having lied under oath. Kelly

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 9>Moffatt was essential to the state's case. A first set

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 9>of interviews by police cleared Byron of any involvement in

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 9>Anastasia's death and corroborated Byron's persistent assertions of innocence. Then

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 9>she changed her story to claim that she saw Justin

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 9>Bruten kill Anastasia, until she changed her story again to

0:14:55.400 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 9>accuse Byron. There was no evidence whatsoever implicating Byron in

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 9>Anastasia's death. Without her testimony, the state could not have

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 9>gotten the case to a jury.

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>He goes on to say.

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 9>Whether Anastasia got out of Justin's car that night was

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 9>a significant point of contention at trial. If she got

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 9>out of the car at Truman Rode and I four

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 9>thirty five, then Byron is innocent and he would have

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 9>a corroborated alibi. An independent witness, mechanic Don Rand, saw

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 9>Anastasia get out of the car and walk across the

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 9>parking lot of the service station where he worked on

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 9>Truman Road near I four thirty five. Despite this, the

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 9>prosecutors argued that Byron lied about Anastasia getting out of

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 9>the car. Kelly Moffatt's testimony was the only evidence supporting

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 9>that argument. Accepting Miss Moffatt's story and ignoring Rand's testimony,

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 9>the state argued that Byron pressured Miss Moffatt into giving

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 9>the police a false story.

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Horton Lands then goes on to write about meeting Byron's attorney,

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Brian Russell and being shown some emails Anastasia's dad sent

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to Sergeant Kilgore. Horton paraphrases the emails.

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 9>When meeting with mister Russell at his office, I was

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 9>shown several emails between Robert Whitbulls Fugen and the lead investigator,

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 9>Sergeant Gary Kilgore. This was the first time I'd seen

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 9>these emails, and several of them contained evidence that Anastasia

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 9>Whitbulls Fugen returned home after being picked up at Dairy Queen,

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 9>but before her death. Specifically, I never saw a January second,

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 9>nineteen ninety eight email about Anastasia's genes being found in

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 9>a dryer or Anastasia's underwear being found soaking in a

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 9>sink in her home. I also do not recall seeing

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 9>a January eleventh, nineteen ninety eight email about Anastasia's father

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 9>finding her purse at the family home, which included a

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 9>photograph of the purse. I also do not recall seeing

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 9>a January twenty two, nineteen ninety eight email that mentioned

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 9>witnesses seeing a young woman use a payphone. Because I

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 9>did not have these emails, it never occurred to me

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 9>that Anastasia went home before she died. If evidence demonstrating

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 9>that Anastasia went home before she died had been produced

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 9>to me, I would have used that to effectively cross

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 9>examine Kelly Moffatt and corroborate Byron's innocent account of what

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 9>he did that evening. It is now my understanding that

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 9>mister Whitbull's Fugen and Sergeant Kilgore exchanged over one one

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 9>hundred and forty emails related to the investigation. Less than

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 9>ten of those emails were produced to me by the

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 9>Jackson County Prosecutor before trial, none of which indicated that

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 9>Anastasia returned home. If I had those emails and the

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 9>photograph of the purse that mister whitbulls Fugen sent to

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.719
<v Speaker 9>the Jackson County Sheriff, I would have used them to

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 9>examine Don Wright, the Dairy Queen employee who saw Anastasia

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 9>in the hours before her death. Miss Wright provided Anastasia

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 9>with an emergency tampon when Anastasia's period began in the

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 9>Dairy Queen. I would have asked miss Wright if it

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 9>was likely that Anastasia had soiled her underwear and jeans

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 9>when she began her period at Dairy Queen. I would

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 9>have asked her to confirm that she told investigators that

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 9>Anastasia was wearing light colored blue jeans and sandals with

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 9>socks at the Dairy Queen. I also would have asked

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 9>miss Wright if the purse in the photograph that mister

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 9>Whitbull's Fugen email to Detective Kilgore resembled the purse she

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 9>saw Anastasia carrying. I would have used the emails to

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 9>show that the clothing and purse were in the Whitbulls

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 9>Fugen home, which meant that Anastasia returned there after leaving

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 9>Dairy Queen and before her death. When Anastasia's clothes were

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 9>examined by Robert Frank Booth of the KCPD Crime Lab,

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 9>he reported the black jeans and underwear had no blood

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 9>on them and that Anastasia had a clean sanitary pad,

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 9>not a tampon. I could have used this to cross

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 9>examine Miss Moffatt to further highlight that Anastasia went home,

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 9>disproving Miss Moffatt's story. I would have reconsidered my decision

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 9>not to call Sergeant Kilgore and or mister Whitbulls Fugen,

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 9>so that I could prove that Anastasia did in fact

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 9>get out of the car, call someone on the telephone,

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 9>and go home after leaving the Dairy Queen and Mount

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 9>Washington Cemetery. Mister Russell also played for me a recorded

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 9>phone interview of mister Whitball's Fugen taken on January twenty second,

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 9>nineteen ninety eight, by Sergeant Kilgore. This recording was not

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 9>produced to me before trial. In that recording, mister Whitball's

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 9>fugen states that he spoke with a father daughter couple

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 9>at a Phillips sixty six gas station on Truman Road

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.959
<v Speaker 9>and I four thirty five that saw a girl matching

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 9>Anastasia's description used the nearby payphones just before dark. The

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 9>corresponding report of his interaction was produced to me before trial,

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 9>attached as Exhibit F. However, that report does not state

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 9>the interview was recorded, nor does it include mister Whitball's

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 9>fugen's statement regarding these two additional witnesses. Had I known

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 9>that two others claimed to have seen Anastasia use the payphones,

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 9>I would have attempted to find them to corroborate that

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 9>Anastasia got out of the car as don Rand justin Bruton,

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 9>Ms Moffatt and Byron said, I recalled Teresa Crayon telling

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 9>me via telephone that she would not be calling Sergeant

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 9>Kilgore a trial. Miss Crayon said that the relationship between

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 9>Sergeant Kilgore and one of the families involved, either of

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 9>the Moffitts or the Whitball's fugens, had grown contentious. Miss

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 9>Crayon asked if I'd like her to make Sergeant Kilgore

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 9>available to me or subpoena's service or testimony. I declined.

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 9>I believed at the time that Miss Crayon was doing

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 9>me a favor by not calling the lead investigator to

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 9>testify in this case. I was also one aware of

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 9>the full extent of communications between mister Whitball's FUGEN and

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 9>state's witness Kelly Moffatt. If I had known mister Whitball's

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 9>fugen's level of involvement in the investigation into his daughter's death,

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:27.959
<v Speaker 9>I would have considered calling him as a witness for

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 9>the defense. Knowing what I know now about mister Whitball's

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 9>fugen's involvement in the investigation, his contact with other testifying witnesses,

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 9>and his frequent contact with Sergeant Kilgore, I would have

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 9>accepted Miss Crayon's offer to help place Sergeant Kilgore under

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.919
<v Speaker 9>subpoena to testify for the defense. At a minimum, I

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 9>would have deposed him. Miss Crayon also told me that

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 9>doctor Thomas Young, the medical examiner who conducted the autopsy

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 9>of Anastasia, was not available for trial, and the doctor

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 9>Chase Blanchard, who was not present for the autopsy would

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 9>be testifying in doctor Young's place. I took Miss Grayon

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 9>at her word and did not inquire with doctor Young

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 9>about his availability. I have reviewed his affidavit of May tenth,

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 9>twenty twenty three, where he opines that Kelly Moffatt's description

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 9>of the shooting is wholly inconsistent with his autopsy findings.

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 9>It would have been important for the jury to know

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 9>that doctor Young's autopsy definitively established that the barrel of

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 9>the gun that caused Anastasia's death was physically touching her

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 9>nose when it fired, and that it is impossible that

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 9>the gun was fired from three to five feet away,

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 9>as Miss Moffatt testified. Had I known that would have

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 9>been his testimony, I would not have consented to doctor

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 9>Blanchard testifying in his place and would have called for

0:22:53.880 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 9>doctor Young in Byron's defense. I remember Byron's trial steadfastly

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:07.199
<v Speaker 9>maintained his innocence throughout and following the trial proceedings. I

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 9>remember Kelly Moffittt's testimony a trial. I recall her being emotionless,

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 9>almost bored when answering questions the prosecutor's assertion in closing

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 9>that Ms. Moffatt was emotional during her testimony rings false

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 9>to me.

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Then Horton talks about the June fifth should or shouldn't

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>record a call between Kelly and Byron.

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 9>I remember the state using a transcript to a company

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 9>the recordings of two phone calls between Kelly Moffatt and Byron.

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 9>I do not recall where the transcripts came from. I assumed,

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 9>without scrutiny that the transcripts were accurate. The recorded conversations

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 9>were difficult to hear at times, and I believe we

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 9>relied heavily on the transcripts to determine what was said

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 9>on the tapes. I have since listened to the clear

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 9>audio of the June five, two thousand recording, and it

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 9>is apparent that Byron tells Miss Moffatt quote we should

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 9>talk about this, not quote we shouldn't talk about this

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 9>as the state and transcript represented as strengthens the argument

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 9>I made to the judge that the transcript, the recording,

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 9>and the conversation should not have been admitted because the

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 9>foundation for a tacit admission is not satisfied. In my opinion,

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 9>the false transcript was damning to the defense because the

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 9>prosecutor used it as a tacit admission and also suggested

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 9>in closing argument that Byron steered the conversation away from

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 9>the subject by talking about Loose Park. In fact, Byron

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 9>was giving Kelly Moffatt directions of where to meet to

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 9>discuss the matter. Further, I felt at the time that

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 9>the state could not lay a proper foundation for the

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 9>statement as a tacit admission, and I argued accordingly. The

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 9>better audio makes this argument even stronger.

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why Horton Lance doesn't want to talk

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 1>with me. Maybe it's as symbol as he's just busy,

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>he's an overworked public defender with not a moment to spare,

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>or maybe he doesn't want to answer questions about what

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>he did or didn't do while representing Byron, because it

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>seems even with everything that he wrote in his affidavit,

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>there may also have been some missteps or missed opportunities

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>on his part that he'd rather leave in the past.

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.360
<v Speaker 1>As Byron's legal team is racking up affid davits, they

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>decide to approach Judge Charles Atwell, the judge who presided

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>over Byron's trial. Here's Byron's attorney Sean O'Brien.

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 5>I could say I met Judge at Well forty six

0:25:56.400 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 5>years ago. He's been a prosecutor, he's been a defense lawyer,

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 5>he's been an assistant US attorney, and he went back

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 5>to being a defense lawyer, and that's what he was

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 5>when he became a trial judge. Loads of integrity, a

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 5>good trial judge, good lawyer, highly ethical.

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And Byron's lawyers play the June fifth should or shouldn't tapes,

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the lesser quality one and the seemingly clearer one to

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>see what Judge Atwell hears and what he remembers from trial.

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Here's Byron's attorney, Brian Russell.

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 2>And we could tell by the trial transcript or pre

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 2>trial transcript he put a lot of thought and effort

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 2>into deciding whether to admit these tapes. And he's a

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 2>good judge both by reputation and you know, you can

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 2>tell he has a conscience. But yeah, so once we

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 2>kind of were confident that there is a should and

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't and the transcript was an error, and we had

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 2>multiple copies of the tape, we wanted to see if

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Judge at Well could remember which version of the tape

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 2>we had sounded more like what was at trial, and

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 2>so we played it for him. Had a bluetooth speaker

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 2>that was higher quality, and we played the low quality

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 2>tape for him first, and he asked if he could

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 2>read the transcript while he was leader while he was listening,

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 2>and I respectfully, your honor, and he was he's a

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 2>retired judge now he does mediations and things like that,

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 2>so there's no conflict with the pro he's a witness

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 2>at this point. So we played it for him. He

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 2>asked if he could see the transcript, and I was like, judge,

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 2>just if you could just listen to it for now

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 2>and then and then you can have a transcript after

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 2>you've listened to him. He's like, okay, that's fine, and

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 2>so he listens to the first version and then he

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 2>was like, I mean, that sounds kind of like what

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 2>it was at trial. And then he listens to the

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 2>second one and he's like, yeah, no, the first, the

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 2>lower quality one is what I remember it sounding like

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 2>a trial. And then he listened to the second tape

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 2>and he's listening to it and I'll never forget he's

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 2>listening to the higher quality version and he's he's, you know,

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 2>leaning his ear in and he goes, well, he says,

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 2>we should talk about this. Well, what did the transcript say?

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 2>And I handed him the transcript and he looked at

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 2>it and his face just sunk and he just said,

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 2>this is that is troubling. And he doesn't know, just

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 2>like we don't know. We don't know how this came about.

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 2>We just know that it did can't come about, and

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 2>that Byron. That was half of the evidence they used

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 2>to convict Byron.

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>On July eighteenth, twenty twenty three, Judge Charles Atwell writes

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>an afpid David about the June fifth tapes and more.

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>We hired another actor to read from Judge Atwell's apphad David.

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Here are some of what he wrote.

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 10>One of the major pre trial issues in this case

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 10>was the admissibility of a June five tooth thousand and

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 10>one phone call between the state's sole witness, Kelly Moffatt,

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 10>and the defendant, mister Case. Mister Horton Lance represented mister

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 10>Case and objected to the admission of the tape into

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 10>evidence on the basis that the tape was not relevant

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 10>and was not sufficiently accurate and reliable. For my consideration

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 10>of this issue. The State provided me with a copy

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 10>of a tape of the June five telephone call and

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 10>a purported transcript of the tape. The state represented at

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 10>the April nineteen, two thousand and two pre trial hearing

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 10>that many parts of the tape were inaudible and the

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 10>transcripts don't try to put forth anything that you can't

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 10>hear on the tapes. With the aid of the transcript,

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 10>at the April twenty five, two thousand and two pre

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 10>trial conference, I noted Ms Moffatt's voice is very clear

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 10>and distinct. Mister Case's voice is not as clear, is

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 10>much softer and harder to understand. Although I was able

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 10>with the aid of the transcript, I was able to

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 10>understand what he said. I believed the transcript was accurate.

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 10>The transcript represents that mister Case twice said to Miss Moffatt,

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 10>we shouldn't talk about this. I ruled that the tape

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 10>would be admissible as a tacit admission, assuming a proper

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 10>foundation could be laid, including a chain of custody, and

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 10>that the tape was not altered. The State said that

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 10>the tape I listened to had been altered by a

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 10>company in Springfield, Missouri, in an attempt to make it

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 10>easier to hear the state represented to me that the

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 10>alteration really didn't help, and we were left with the

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 10>same thing we had before. They weren't able to enhance them.

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 10>At trial, mister Lance renewed his objections to the quality

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 10>of the tape and to its relevance, that the conversation

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 10>did not reflect a tacit admission by mister Case. I

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 10>overruled those objections. The jury was provided with the transcript

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 10>to read as I listened to the tape. The trial

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 10>transcript reflects that I orally instructed the jury as follows.

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 10>The sole purpose for these transcripts is to aid you

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 10>in listening to what's on the tape. The transcripts themselves

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 10>are not evidence. They're only given to you to aid

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 10>you to listen to what is on the tape. The

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 10>tape is the evidence. If you feel that there is

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 10>a conflict between the tape and the transcript, you should

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 10>rely upon your memory of what the tape said. During deliberations,

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 10>the very first thing the jury asked for was the

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 10>June five tape and the transcript. Mister Lance objected again repeatedly.

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 10>I allowed the jury to listen to the tape with

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 10>the transcripts again. During deliberations, I was asked by mister

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 10>Case's current counsel, Brian Russell and Sean O'Brien to listen

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 10>to two digital versions of the June five, two thousand

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 10>and one tape without the aid of a transcript. The

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 10>first version was very hard to hear and sounded very

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 10>much like what I remember the tape sounding like at

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 10>mister Case's trial. The second version of the tape was

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 10>somewhat clearer. I listened to that recording without the aid

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 10>of a transcript, and while mister Case's voice was still soft,

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 10>I was able to understand him. In response to Miss

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 10>Moffatt's question asking why mister Case killed Anastasia Whitbol's fugen,

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 10>mister Case clearly answers twice we should talk about this.

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 10>Having listened to both tapes, it is apparent to me

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 10>the transcript provided by the state as it relates to

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 10>what mister k said was not a fair and accurate

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 10>representation of the June five, two thousand and one phone call.

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 10>I recognize that an inaccurate transcript creates the risk that

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 10>the jury could be unfairly influenced I do not know

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 10>whether the tape presented to me a trial was of

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 10>lesser quality, or whether the device used to play the

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 10>tape created distortion. If a clearer version of the June

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:07.239
<v Speaker 10>five recording was available at trial, that version was not

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 10>presented to me. If I had known a trial that

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 10>the audio could be played more clearly, I would have

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 10>insisted on listening to the tape in the clearest version

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 10>possible before making any ruling.

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Judge Outwell goes on to write about learning of Kelly's

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>previous conviction.

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 10>Mister Case's current council also showed me the state's discovery

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 10>responses from April three to two thousand and two, where

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 10>the state claims to have no information at this time

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 10>with respect to any felony or misdemeanor convictions which the

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 10>state's witnesses may have. Mister Case's current council also showed

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 10>me that miss Moffatt was in fact convicted of a

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 10>Class A misdemeanor in Cooper County, Missouri, on April three,

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 10>two thousand and one, where she was sentenced to forty

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 10>eight hours of shock time and two years probation, with

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 10>the suspended execution of thirty days in jail. Mister Case's

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 10>current council also showed me Kelly Moffatt's deposition transcript from

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.839
<v Speaker 10>March eight, two thousand and two, where she denied having

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 10>any falony or misdemeanor convictions in state or federal court,

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 10>or having any arrests. Mister Case had the right to

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 10>impeach Miss Moffatt with this prior conviction. The defense also

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 10>could have used Miss Moffatt's active probation status as evidence

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 10>of interest, bias, or prejudice in favor of the state.

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 10>In the affidavit, mister Land said that his motion for

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 10>the criminal records of the state's witnesses was answered with

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 10>the assertion that no such records exist.

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Judge Otwell goes on to say that mister Case's conviction

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>was affirmed by the Missouri Court of Appeals. When he

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>read the two thousand and four opinion, he said he

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>believed there were important constitutional issues that were raised that

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>he had not considered at the time of the admission

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of the tape recording at TRU. These issues were considered

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>by the appellate court and did not result in a reversal.

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I write a Judge at Well, hoping he would speak

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 1>with me, but he never responds interestingly enough. Evelyn Case,

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Byron's mother says back in twenty twenty two, Judge Atwell

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 1>wrote her here she is talking about that.

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 11>I would run into the judge. He doesn't live far

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 11>from here. Actually, I would run into him at the

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 11>grocery store and I corner him with my cart and

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 11>I said, Judge, yet, well, cap, you got a minute.

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.800
<v Speaker 11>I was always polite, and I just told him, I says,

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:43.280
<v Speaker 11>Byron didn't do this, and.

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 1>He didn't really know what to say.

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 7>But that was.

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:54.439
<v Speaker 11>The start of me. I wasn't hounding him, No, I wasn't.

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:57.879
<v Speaker 11>I was very, very, very polite. But I would send

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 11>him things like the book or the flyers, just to

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 11>show him that we are busy with this. And then

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 11>one day he sent me a letter, the judge, and

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 11>I was so elated.

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 1>What does it say right here? You want to read

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it for me?

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:14.719
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:20.399
<v Speaker 11>You want me read it? Yeah, it's a good one.

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.879
<v Speaker 11>That came in twenty two March twenty third, twenty twenty two.

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 11>Dear miss Case, Over the years, I have seen you

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 11>on occasion, oftentimes at some MIP events. That's the Midwest

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 11>Innocent Project, and I went for every one of them,

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 11>you pay one hundred and twenty five dollars. And the

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 11>first time I saw him there with his wife, I

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 11>was like. I went up to him and I says,

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 11>what are you doing here? And his wife looked at

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 11>me very scared because you know, but I was like,

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 11>this is the innocent project, what are you doing here. Also,

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 11>over the course of years, I received correspondence from you

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 11>and from others who I believe to be friends or acquaintances.

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 11>I have decided it is time to write you back.

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:07.280
<v Speaker 11>I think I simply cannot imagine the pain a parent

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 11>must feel if there is a son or a daughter

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 11>in prison for a crime they did not commit. I

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 11>know that you steadfastly believe in your son's innocence. As

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 11>we all know, I was a trial judge to preside

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 11>over your son's case and impose the sentence. Over my career,

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:30.399
<v Speaker 11>I have been involved or touched several cases involving there's

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 11>some mistakes in here too, involving the issue of innocence.

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 11>I have done so both as a prosecutor and as

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 11>a defense lawyer. Providing innocence after conviction can be very

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 11>difficult and very frustrating for the innocent who are seeking relief.

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 11>I have long ago recognized that your son could be innocent.

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 11>I remember how he was taken back when the wordict

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 11>was read in the court room. So know that you

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 11>have continually been his champion, believing totally in his innocence.

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 11>As a retired judicial officer, I cannot and should be

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 11>directly involved in Byron's case. Candidly, I am not fully

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 11>aware of what has transpired since his conviction. However, please

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.800
<v Speaker 11>accept my prayers for you and him. I would encourage

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 11>you to continue to seek any relief that is possible

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:34.120
<v Speaker 11>on behalf of your son. If there are any lawyers involved,

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:36.959
<v Speaker 11>I am happy to talk with them and give them

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:41.919
<v Speaker 11>my insight yours very truly. Charles e Edwell, that meant

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 11>so much to me because I thought, oh, I did

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.359
<v Speaker 11>so much. I send him the books, I send them

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 11>letters and kind of always just things about the progress,

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:57.439
<v Speaker 11>if it was progress or whatever, or.

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Something new or whatever. That's kind of a big deal.

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that was a big deal to me. You know,

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 11>I have three brothers and one brother. It's the same thing,

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 11>you know, family. You don't know why people turn out

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 11>like this. But he said it was falsified. Like, what what?

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>That's right? One of Evelyn's brothers wondered if the Judge

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Atwell letter is a fake? Is it? I reach out

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 1>to Judge at Well again to ask if he in

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>fact wrote that letter to Evelyn, and he responds with quote,

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I would need to see the letter. I immediately send

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it to him. No response. I write him again, Still nothing.

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to post a photo of the letter on

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the Real Killer Podcast Instagram page. Does it look real

0:39:51.160 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to you? Byron's legal team now has affidavits from the

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 1>medical examiner, the defense attorney, and the judge. Here's attorney

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Brian Russell.

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 2>So one of the things that always bothered me about

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 2>this case was, you know, Kelly says, Byron got a

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 2>gun out of the trunk. I can't tell you what

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:31.240
<v Speaker 2>it looks like. It's just a gun. And he walks

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 2>over to her from five feet away and lifts it

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 2>to his shoulder and shoots her in the face and

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 2>then she's blown backwards. But when you look at the

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 2>autopsy photos, and you know, bullets they passed through you, right,

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:49.840
<v Speaker 2>they passed through, Especially a high powered bullet, it doesn't

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:52.800
<v Speaker 2>typically lodge in your body. If it's a rifle bullet.

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 2>It goes through, it goes through you. All the damage

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 2>that's done is the shockwave from the bullet and the energy,

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 2>but most of the energy keeps going with that bullet

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 2>far far away. And so if he shoots her while

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 2>she's standing up, if there is a bullet fragment left,

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be somewhere inside her skull, and there

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 2>are you can when you look at the X ray

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 2>there are little tiny fragments inside of her skull, but

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 2>there's a sizeable bullet fragment found on the other side

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 2>of the exit wound matted in her hair. And it

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 2>always bothered me because if a bullet has enough force

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:35.359
<v Speaker 2>to go through your skull, I just don't understand how

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 2>your hair could stop it unless something was behind your

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 2>hair to stop it. And so when we got the

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 2>bullet and looked at it, you know, no one had

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 2>ever analyzed it other than the crime lab initially to

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 2>see if they could identify what type of bullet it was.

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 2>And it's just a lead fragment. There's no jacket, or

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:55.400
<v Speaker 2>no jacket was found in the scene or anywhere around it.

0:41:56.480 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 2>That kind of helps in some ways narrow down what

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:04.360
<v Speaker 2>type of bullet this might have been. It clearly rules

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 2>out a shotgun.

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 9>No.

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the fact that she still had a head,

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 2>as gruesome as that is, tells you this wasn't a shotgun.

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:14.799
<v Speaker 2>And so, you know, trying to figure out what type

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 2>of bullet this might have been, the crime lab could

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 2>never figure it out. They still can't figure it out today.

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I posted photos of the bullet fragment on Instagram.

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 2>So like half of the bullet that went through her

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 2>head is found lodged in her hair. And so we

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 2>turned that over to the crime lab with all of

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 2>these pictures and asked them several questions, and one of

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:39.800
<v Speaker 2>those questions was isn't more like, based on the physical evidence,

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 2>is it more likely than Anastasia was standing up or

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 2>laying down when she was shot? And they gave us

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 2>a report. And this is the Kansas City Regional Crime Lab,

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 2>not some other you know yahoos that we hired to

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 2>say whatever we want. And they said, I'm going to read.

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:00.760
<v Speaker 1>From the Kansas City Police Crime Labs No. November eighth,

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three blood Stain Pattern Analysis Report, which was

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:09.240
<v Speaker 1>written by Nicole Blackwell, the blood Stain Pattern Analysis technical

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 1>leader like Brian mentioned for the crime labs examination. They

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>sent the crime scene photos. They also shared the autopsy report,

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 1>cranial X rays and other reports and more. Nicole Blackwell

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 1>does note at the beginning of her report that the

0:43:25.520 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 1>images provided were of relatively low resolution. She writes there

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:35.719
<v Speaker 1>are limitations surrounding the examination of bloodstains from only photographic evidence.

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 1>Despite that, here is some of her opinion quote, there

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is no bloodstain evidence to suggest that Anastasia Whitwell's fugen

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 1>was upright after bloodshed commenced. Therefore, the evidence and my

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:54.640
<v Speaker 1>observations below provide more support that she was shot while

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>lying on the ground than in an upright position. She

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>goes on to write, quote, there are no blood stains

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>on or around her body that indicated any movement after

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>bloodshed began. No dripstains or flow patterns were observed on

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Anastasia's clothing or face that would indicate an upright position,

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 1>or any position other than the one in which she

0:44:18.600 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 1>was found, which was on her back. The fanning of

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Anastasia's hair above her head does not support that she

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 1>quote must have been standing when the gunshot was received.

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:33.680
<v Speaker 1>That last part about Anastasia must have been standing. Blackwell

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is quoting from a senior criminalist initial report back from

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 1>around the time of the murder. Blackwell goes on to

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 1>say her hair position and the gunshot could be completely

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:48.720
<v Speaker 1>unrelated events. Here's Byron's investigator. Quinno'brien.

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 8>The blood splatter analyst said that gravity works in a

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:59.439
<v Speaker 8>certain way and that it is very possible, if not likely,

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 8>that Anna's Stasia was laying down when she was shot.

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 8>There's no blood on her shirt and if she had

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 8>been upright gravity, according to the expert, gravity would have

0:45:08.920 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 8>pulled at least some of that blood down at some

0:45:11.880 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 8>point even before she fell down, but there's no blood

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:16.120
<v Speaker 8>on her shirt.

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:20.240
<v Speaker 1>It also makes you wonder if the ground stopped the bullet.

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I have wondered that because especially if it's sort of smashed.

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and it does look smashed, and.

0:45:28.480 --> 0:45:31.759
<v Speaker 1>If she were standing, then what it potentially would have

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 1>just passed through?

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 8>Right, And doctor Young says that what we're doing now

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:38.479
<v Speaker 8>is part of the Sherlock effect. Doctor Young, he talks

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 8>about the Sherlock effects and how too many people get

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:44.439
<v Speaker 8>wrapped up and that like armshair detective kind of thing

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:50.760
<v Speaker 8>where they make theories and you know that it's just theories,

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:55.920
<v Speaker 8>he said. The big test is is the testifying witnesses

0:45:56.320 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 8>testimony possible or is their story possible given the evidence

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:02.359
<v Speaker 8>in front of us.

0:46:02.640 --> 0:46:03.200
<v Speaker 6>This is fun.

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:07.320
<v Speaker 12>It's fun to like pose it and think about these things,

0:46:07.800 --> 0:46:10.400
<v Speaker 12>especially when you're removed from it, like we are like

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:13.320
<v Speaker 12>just the mechanics of things and the physics and the science.

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 8>But first this is a real person. Yeah, And I know,

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:19.319
<v Speaker 8>and I always get away from that sometimes, like not always, and.

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Actually yeah, also trying to you know, figure out Yeah.

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>By the way, doctor Jung wrote a book called The

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Sherlock Effect, How Forensic doctors and investigators Disastrously reason like

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:36.959
<v Speaker 1>the Great Detective. In it, he examines the Sherlock home

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:40.520
<v Speaker 1>style of reasoning, why it doesn't work, and how it

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:45.319
<v Speaker 1>can and does lead to wrongful convictions. So how much

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of this case has become about the Sherlock effect and

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 1>how much of it is about hard, cold evidence. I

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:56.360
<v Speaker 1>asked Brian Russell what the blood stain analysis report means

0:46:56.880 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of Kelly's story and the actual evidence.

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:04.080
<v Speaker 2>It's just one more thing that blows her story completely

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:07.320
<v Speaker 2>out of the water. I mean, I don't know why

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:09.719
<v Speaker 2>she made this up. I don't know who helped her

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 2>make this up, but it is so clear that her

0:47:12.120 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 2>story is made up.

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder, though, if Anastasia had been lying down

0:47:18.640 --> 0:47:21.440
<v Speaker 1>when she was shot, then how was a piece of

0:47:21.480 --> 0:47:25.840
<v Speaker 1>her skull found up to two feet away. Back to

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:29.759
<v Speaker 1>Nicole Blackwell's report, she also gives an opinion about the

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 1>tire marks and car parts found at the scene. She writes, quote,

0:47:34.600 --> 0:47:37.879
<v Speaker 1>no physical evidence has been provided that can position both

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle and Anastasia's body in the same place and time.

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:45.280
<v Speaker 1>So basically the tire marks, car paint, and headlight glass

0:47:45.560 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 1>could have been left there at a different time, altogether

0:47:48.680 --> 0:47:55.040
<v Speaker 1>completely unrelated to Anastasia's murder. Blackwell concludes her report with quote,

0:47:55.600 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 1>no opinion can be rendered regarding the exclusion of the

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 1>possible of suicide. There is no bloodstain evidence that can

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:08.920
<v Speaker 1>either support or refute a homicide or suicide claim. It

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is reasonable that a contact gunshot wound to the face

0:48:12.000 --> 0:48:16.279
<v Speaker 1>may be carried out by oneself or another person. No

0:48:16.400 --> 0:48:19.279
<v Speaker 1>gun was recovered from the scene. This in and of

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:23.040
<v Speaker 1>itself does not support or refute that Anastasia committed suicide.

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>A gun was removed from this scene, regardless of if

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it was ruled a homicide or a suicide. By the way,

0:48:31.760 --> 0:48:36.160
<v Speaker 1>no testing was performed on Anastasia's hands for trace metals.

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:40.759
<v Speaker 1>A few months before Nicole Blackwell's report came out, the

0:48:40.800 --> 0:48:44.080
<v Speaker 1>team sent the actual bullet fragment to the Kansas City

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Police Crime Lab for the purpose of examining for the

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:51.799
<v Speaker 1>presence of apparent soil. On August twenty eighth, twenty twenty three,

0:48:52.200 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the trace report, written by Chief Criminalist Patrick Jones, comes out.

0:48:57.000 --> 0:48:59.960
<v Speaker 1>While no apparent soil was detected on the bullet fragm

0:49:00.840 --> 0:49:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Brian and the team are stunned by what is observed.

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Blue fibers were found and she was not wearing anything

0:49:10.760 --> 0:49:15.120
<v Speaker 2>that was blue. There's a few different explanations and theories

0:49:15.160 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 2>that we have for that, some of them innocent, some

0:49:19.719 --> 0:49:20.920
<v Speaker 2>of them maybe not so innocent.

0:49:22.360 --> 0:49:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Can you give me sort of an overview of.

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:29.959
<v Speaker 2>Sure, Depending on what type of gun this was, there

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 2>are some bullets that could be packed packed with having

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:40.279
<v Speaker 2>a you know, like an antique type rifle or handgun.

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:43.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, I shouldn't call it a rifle, so like

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:47.719
<v Speaker 2>civil war type guns. There was something called there's something

0:49:47.760 --> 0:49:51.120
<v Speaker 2>called wadding that is like a little piece of cloth.

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 2>That is, you pour the gunpowder in, then you put

0:49:54.040 --> 0:49:56.279
<v Speaker 2>this piece of piece of cloth in, then you put

0:49:56.320 --> 0:49:59.160
<v Speaker 2>the bullet in, and so that could have been hit,

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Speaker 2>you know. But also Anastasia's bed sheets were blue, so

0:50:05.239 --> 0:50:07.600
<v Speaker 2>there could have been some at some point maybe she

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 2>had had blue fibers in her hair that the bullet

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:14.880
<v Speaker 2>picked up when it after it went through her skull.

0:50:15.160 --> 0:50:18.680
<v Speaker 2>There's yeah, we had that. That's still an open question

0:50:18.800 --> 0:50:23.120
<v Speaker 2>in our investigation is where a blue fiber came from.

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:25.360
<v Speaker 1>That's here's Quinn again.

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 8>The Kansas City Crime Lab has infinite patients with us,

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:33.960
<v Speaker 8>like non scientific idiots, you know, asking questions like what

0:50:34.120 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 8>kind of fiber is it? What does this mean? It's like, well,

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:39.279
<v Speaker 8>it looks you know, it's a fiber, which means it's

0:50:39.320 --> 0:50:42.520
<v Speaker 8>fiber us and it's blue. But you know, you'd have

0:50:42.560 --> 0:50:45.280
<v Speaker 8>to have it tested to know if it was paper

0:50:45.640 --> 0:50:50.320
<v Speaker 8>or wood, pulp or fabric or and it would still

0:50:50.360 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 8>not be super decisive because it's so small. And when

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:57.800
<v Speaker 8>the police went to the house to look at the house,

0:50:58.000 --> 0:51:01.080
<v Speaker 8>when they found a taser just sitting on I don't

0:51:01.120 --> 0:51:03.399
<v Speaker 8>know what to make of that. All I have are

0:51:03.600 --> 0:51:07.680
<v Speaker 8>like theories and my imagination. But yeah, that's what makes

0:51:07.680 --> 0:51:10.200
<v Speaker 8>this part of the story so hard. There are still

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:13.880
<v Speaker 8>a couple of things that I don't know about. Damn.

0:51:13.880 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 8>Those bed sheets are blue, and there's a taser on them,

0:51:16.760 --> 0:51:20.160
<v Speaker 8>and there's a blue fiber on that lead fragment, and

0:51:20.400 --> 0:51:21.560
<v Speaker 8>I don't know what to do with that.

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I don't have any police reports or photos that

0:51:25.200 --> 0:51:28.839
<v Speaker 1>show Anastasia's bed sheets were blue, so this is not

0:51:28.920 --> 0:51:32.400
<v Speaker 1>yet confirmed. All I have is a case related memo

0:51:32.800 --> 0:51:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that says Sergeant Kilgore did, in fact have Anastasia's linens.

0:51:37.719 --> 0:51:40.760
<v Speaker 1>There's no mention of what color they are, and there's

0:51:40.800 --> 0:51:43.480
<v Speaker 1>no mention of Anastasia's bed sheets in any of the

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 1>evidence logs I have. Quinn and the others are looking

0:51:47.040 --> 0:51:50.960
<v Speaker 1>through their files for documentation that proves Anastasia's bed linens

0:51:50.960 --> 0:51:55.160
<v Speaker 1>were blue. But since we don't have that, is this

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the perfect example of the Sherlock effect without any evidence

0:51:59.600 --> 0:52:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of what the blue fibers actually are. Isn't this pure

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:06.719
<v Speaker 1>speculation that Anastasia's bed sheets are somehow tied to the

0:52:06.719 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>blue fibers on the bullet and ultimately her murder. The

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:23.799
<v Speaker 1>last affidavit we are going to talk about in this

0:52:23.960 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 1>episode was written by a friend of Kelly's. Her name

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is Angie Giannino. She and Kelly were close friends starting

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:38.359
<v Speaker 1>around nineteen ninety nine. Two thousand, Angie was driving when

0:52:38.400 --> 0:52:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Kelly threw that bottle of alcohol out of the car

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:44.719
<v Speaker 1>window in Cooper County, which resulted in both of them

0:52:44.719 --> 0:52:48.840
<v Speaker 1>getting arrested. Remember, Kelly was charged with littering. There was

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a warrant out for her arrest. She eventually pled guilty

0:52:52.480 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and was given two years probation and forty eight hours

0:52:55.640 --> 0:52:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of shock time in jail. Anyway, on February twenty second,

0:53:00.200 --> 0:53:04.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three, Angie writes an affi David. Besides discussing

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the days she and Kelly got arrested, she also talks

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:10.919
<v Speaker 1>about how she was at Kelly's house for the June

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:15.040
<v Speaker 1>fifth recorded phone call with Byron. I'm going to read

0:53:15.040 --> 0:53:18.719
<v Speaker 1>what she wrote about that quote. I was present on

0:53:18.840 --> 0:53:21.879
<v Speaker 1>June five, two thousand and one, when Kelly Moffatt called

0:53:21.880 --> 0:53:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Byron Case on behalf of the Jackson County Prosecutor's office

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in an attempt to have Byron Case confess to the

0:53:28.640 --> 0:53:33.080
<v Speaker 1>murder of Anastasia Whitpolsfugen. When I arrived at Kelly's house

0:53:33.080 --> 0:53:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the day of the phone call. A woman I assumed

0:53:36.280 --> 0:53:40.239
<v Speaker 1>was law enforcement was already there. Kelly told me she

0:53:40.320 --> 0:53:43.640
<v Speaker 1>needed me to come over for emotional support. Kelly had

0:53:43.680 --> 0:53:46.759
<v Speaker 1>been drinking heavily and drank up until the phone call.

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I did not hear the actual conversation Kelly had with Byron.

0:53:51.600 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I assumed the woman who was present for the call

0:53:54.080 --> 0:53:57.239
<v Speaker 1>was law enforcement, even though she was not in a uniform.

0:53:57.840 --> 0:53:59.959
<v Speaker 1>I do not remember the name of that female officer.

0:54:00.719 --> 0:54:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure the officer told me her name, but I

0:54:02.880 --> 0:54:05.960
<v Speaker 1>don't remember what it was. This person was not part

0:54:06.000 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of Kelly's family, and I assume this woman listening in

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:11.960
<v Speaker 1>on Kelly's call was law enforcement. Kelly was in a

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:14.560
<v Speaker 1>chair by the sliding glass door while I was there.

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I sat on the couch. I believe the woman was standing.

0:54:20.239 --> 0:54:25.120
<v Speaker 1>So who is this woman? Angie is describing. Quinn and

0:54:25.160 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the rest of Byron's legal team think they know.

0:54:29.120 --> 0:54:32.040
<v Speaker 8>The very first prosecutor who was looking into this case,

0:54:32.040 --> 0:54:35.359
<v Speaker 8>who was assigned to this case, was Amy mcgallan. Even

0:54:35.400 --> 0:54:39.279
<v Speaker 8>with Kelly's statement, They're like, this just isn't enough. There's

0:54:39.320 --> 0:54:42.520
<v Speaker 8>not enough here. We don't think we have what we

0:54:42.600 --> 0:54:46.160
<v Speaker 8>need to get a conviction for Byron case. They need

0:54:46.200 --> 0:54:49.160
<v Speaker 8>a confession. They know that they need a confession, and

0:54:49.200 --> 0:54:53.520
<v Speaker 8>so Kelly volunteers to get that confession for them. Months

0:54:53.640 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 8>go by, months go by, nothing, There's no call to Byron.

0:55:00.200 --> 0:55:03.839
<v Speaker 8>Kelly hasn't been able to reach Byron. They haven't talked.

0:55:04.080 --> 0:55:07.560
<v Speaker 8>It's not clear that Kelly is even trying at this point.

0:55:08.000 --> 0:55:10.360
<v Speaker 8>And that's when she gets picked up on the warrant

0:55:10.800 --> 0:55:14.960
<v Speaker 8>down in Boonville in Cooper County. Now, the problem that

0:55:15.000 --> 0:55:17.080
<v Speaker 8>I have with some of this is that she gets

0:55:17.080 --> 0:55:19.640
<v Speaker 8>Byron on the phone. Kelly gets Byron on the phone twice.

0:55:20.040 --> 0:55:24.200
<v Speaker 8>The second time, it's documented that a lieutenant, a female

0:55:24.200 --> 0:55:27.840
<v Speaker 8>lieutenant from the Jackson County Sheriff's Department, is there. The

0:55:27.880 --> 0:55:31.640
<v Speaker 8>first time, there's no documentation of anyone being there except

0:55:31.640 --> 0:55:34.239
<v Speaker 8>Angie g Andino, and we know Angie was there because

0:55:34.239 --> 0:55:37.080
<v Speaker 8>we can hear Angie talking in the background before the

0:55:37.080 --> 0:55:40.839
<v Speaker 8>call starts. There are no other documented members of law

0:55:40.920 --> 0:55:45.239
<v Speaker 8>enforcement who are women on this case except for Amy

0:55:45.360 --> 0:55:48.279
<v Speaker 8>McGowan and the lieutenant who's there for the second call.

0:55:48.760 --> 0:55:51.560
<v Speaker 8>So we have pretty good reason to believe that Amy

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:55.880
<v Speaker 8>McGowan was there. Pressuring Kelly into making this call. We thought,

0:55:55.920 --> 0:55:59.200
<v Speaker 8>for a minute, Wait a second, what if Angie's confused

0:55:59.239 --> 0:56:02.160
<v Speaker 8>and she's remembered the deputy that was there. Well, first

0:56:02.160 --> 0:56:05.320
<v Speaker 8>of all, we think the deputy was uniformed. And second,

0:56:05.480 --> 0:56:09.279
<v Speaker 8>that night, Angie's voice isn't on the tape. She's not there.

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:12.040
<v Speaker 8>Her voice shows up at the beginning of the June

0:56:12.040 --> 0:56:15.640
<v Speaker 8>fifth call when Kelly is testifying on the stand. Kelly says,

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:18.440
<v Speaker 8>that voice belongs to my friend Angie.

0:56:18.760 --> 0:56:23.240
<v Speaker 1>What difference would it make if Amy McGowan were there

0:56:24.000 --> 0:56:26.240
<v Speaker 1>or not? I mean, like, why would that matter.

0:56:26.520 --> 0:56:30.480
<v Speaker 8>I'm not sure that Kelly Moffatt would have made these

0:56:30.520 --> 0:56:34.240
<v Speaker 8>phone calls if it weren't for the pressure of Amy McGowan,

0:56:34.760 --> 0:56:38.040
<v Speaker 8>or if it weren't for the pressure of a potential

0:56:39.120 --> 0:56:43.240
<v Speaker 8>deal or a potential charge over her head. I don't

0:56:43.480 --> 0:56:49.560
<v Speaker 8>think that Amy McGowan was being honest when she told

0:56:49.600 --> 0:56:54.479
<v Speaker 8>her colleagues that there's no you know, no other deal

0:56:54.520 --> 0:56:57.880
<v Speaker 8>with Kelly. You know, Kelly was offered immunity for her testimony.

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:03.279
<v Speaker 8>I think there were other coercive measures taken to to

0:57:03.360 --> 0:57:08.279
<v Speaker 8>get Kelly's testimony. I think Kelly was a vulnerable young

0:57:08.320 --> 0:57:11.720
<v Speaker 8>woman and an addict who was doing things in service

0:57:11.719 --> 0:57:14.600
<v Speaker 8>to her addiction. We know Kelly had contact with law

0:57:14.680 --> 0:57:18.120
<v Speaker 8>enforcement and that the prosecution didn't disclose that, and it

0:57:18.200 --> 0:57:21.520
<v Speaker 8>might not seem like a big deal, you know, it's like, oh,

0:57:21.520 --> 0:57:23.240
<v Speaker 8>it's maybe like, you know, a night in jail, two

0:57:23.320 --> 0:57:26.840
<v Speaker 8>nights in jail, it's just a misdemeanor charge. Well, you

0:57:27.000 --> 0:57:30.880
<v Speaker 8>try spending seventy two hours in a cell detoxing from

0:57:30.920 --> 0:57:34.400
<v Speaker 8>whatever drugs you're on. It's not pleasant. You know, she

0:57:34.480 --> 0:57:38.000
<v Speaker 8>could be facing more time because at this point she's

0:57:38.000 --> 0:57:41.640
<v Speaker 8>got drugs on her. You know, she's she's looking for drugs.

0:57:42.040 --> 0:57:45.960
<v Speaker 8>There's no doubt in my mind that there is more

0:57:46.120 --> 0:57:50.120
<v Speaker 8>to Kelly's story of being picked up on that warrant

0:57:50.120 --> 0:57:54.360
<v Speaker 8>and taken back down to Boonville in Cooper County. What

0:57:54.400 --> 0:57:55.920
<v Speaker 8>it is, I don't know. I don't know if the

0:57:56.000 --> 0:57:58.040
<v Speaker 8>rumors are right that she was caught with even more

0:57:58.120 --> 0:58:02.800
<v Speaker 8>drugs and then taken down to Cooper County because she

0:58:02.880 --> 0:58:06.720
<v Speaker 8>had that warrant. I don't know if the prosecutor called

0:58:06.760 --> 0:58:09.720
<v Speaker 8>and said, hey, this person isn't cooperating with us. She

0:58:09.840 --> 0:58:13.000
<v Speaker 8>won't get the guy we think is the purp on

0:58:13.080 --> 0:58:15.240
<v Speaker 8>the phone, and we need her to get on the

0:58:15.600 --> 0:58:18.320
<v Speaker 8>you know, get on the horn and get this guy's confession.

0:58:18.800 --> 0:58:21.960
<v Speaker 8>She's not doing it. Let's let her know that she

0:58:22.080 --> 0:58:25.080
<v Speaker 8>needs to be doing this. You know, I just I

0:58:25.120 --> 0:58:27.400
<v Speaker 8>would not put it past to Amy McGowan to be

0:58:27.640 --> 0:58:31.320
<v Speaker 8>that kind of threatening and coercive. I freed people that

0:58:31.360 --> 0:58:33.280
<v Speaker 8>Amy McGowan has put in prison before.

0:58:34.280 --> 0:58:35.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't.

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:39.280
<v Speaker 8>I'm not putting it past her to have really pressured

0:58:39.760 --> 0:58:44.120
<v Speaker 8>Kelly into calling Byron and trying to get that confession,

0:58:44.360 --> 0:58:46.720
<v Speaker 8>or pressured Kelly into testifying this way.

0:58:46.840 --> 0:58:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these are some big, big allegations. We have

0:58:53.840 --> 0:58:57.240
<v Speaker 1>no idea if Amy McGowan was even there, let alone

0:58:57.280 --> 0:59:01.080
<v Speaker 1>pressuring Kelly to make the call. It is fair to

0:59:01.080 --> 0:59:04.480
<v Speaker 1>say that Amy McGowan has been accused of some prescatorial

0:59:04.560 --> 0:59:09.400
<v Speaker 1>misconduct during her career. Though. In twenty nineteen, Ricky Kidd,

0:59:09.480 --> 0:59:13.520
<v Speaker 1>who both Quinn and Sean O'Brien represented, was released from

0:59:13.520 --> 0:59:17.040
<v Speaker 1>prison after spending twenty three years behind bars for a

0:59:17.120 --> 0:59:21.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety six double murder. It seems Amy McGowan withheld

0:59:21.960 --> 0:59:25.640
<v Speaker 1>evidence of an alternate suspect in his case. Once that

0:59:25.720 --> 0:59:29.280
<v Speaker 1>came out, other evidence that pointed to Ricky's innocence surfaced,

0:59:30.600 --> 0:59:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the state's Office of Chief Disciplinary Council asked for Amy

0:59:34.400 --> 0:59:38.000
<v Speaker 1>McGowan's law license to be suspended. In October of twenty

0:59:38.040 --> 0:59:41.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, the Missouri Supreme Court said there wasn't enough

0:59:41.320 --> 0:59:45.840
<v Speaker 1>evidence to support taking that action. She has since retired.

0:59:46.480 --> 0:59:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I asked Brian why Amy McGowan didn't stay on Byron's case.

0:59:50.880 --> 0:59:54.200
<v Speaker 2>We don't know why Amy McGowan didn't take this case

0:59:54.240 --> 0:59:57.080
<v Speaker 2>to trial, or why we know that she filed it.

0:59:57.680 --> 1:00:00.760
<v Speaker 2>We know that she was Kelly Moffatt's point of contact

1:00:00.800 --> 1:00:04.400
<v Speaker 2>while the investigation was still going on. We know that

1:00:05.560 --> 1:00:08.920
<v Speaker 2>she knew about the tape being made before Sergeant Kilgore

1:00:09.000 --> 1:00:13.760
<v Speaker 2>knew about the tape being made. And so there's probably

1:00:13.840 --> 1:00:17.600
<v Speaker 2>an innocent explanation for why she didn't try this case.

1:00:17.640 --> 1:00:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's because she was too busy preparing for Richard

1:00:20.760 --> 1:00:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Buckley's case, which happened a couple months after this, which

1:00:26.360 --> 1:00:29.360
<v Speaker 2>was another wrongful conviction of hers, where she helped conceal

1:00:29.720 --> 1:00:32.520
<v Speaker 2>exculpatory evidence. After she left Jackson County, she went to

1:00:32.560 --> 1:00:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Douglas County, Kansas, and there's at least three other wrongful

1:00:36.800 --> 1:00:39.840
<v Speaker 2>convictions over there. As clear she has a pattern of

1:00:39.880 --> 1:00:44.200
<v Speaker 2>not taking her ethical duties as an attorney seriously. And

1:00:44.320 --> 1:00:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that's because, you know, what's the saying,

1:00:47.880 --> 1:00:50.520
<v Speaker 2>be careful when you go chasing monsters unless you become

1:00:50.560 --> 1:00:53.440
<v Speaker 2>one yourself. I don't know if that's I don't know

1:00:53.440 --> 1:00:56.320
<v Speaker 2>if that explains it, or if she just doesn't care,

1:00:56.640 --> 1:01:00.800
<v Speaker 2>or or she just has several missunderstandings.

1:01:02.200 --> 1:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Moffatt's friend Angie Giannino, never positively identified Amy McGowan

1:01:08.120 --> 1:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>as the female plane closed officer at Kelly's house on

1:01:11.560 --> 1:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>June fifth. I try to speak with Amy McGowan, but

1:01:14.960 --> 1:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>am unsuccessful at finding a working email or phone number

1:01:18.440 --> 1:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>for her. So I FedEx a letter to where I

1:01:21.480 --> 1:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>believe she might live, asking if she'd be willing to

1:01:24.560 --> 1:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>speak with me, but she never responds. I'm not even

1:01:28.400 --> 1:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>sure she got it. I am able to find the

1:01:31.720 --> 1:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>uniformed officer who was there for the second recorded phone

1:01:34.960 --> 1:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>call between Kelly and Byron. She's no longer working in

1:01:38.120 --> 1:01:40.439
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement, so I'm not going to reveal her name,

1:01:41.000 --> 1:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>but via Facebook Messenger, she wrote, quote, I really do

1:01:44.720 --> 1:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>not recall this case. I doubt I'd be much assistance,

1:01:48.840 --> 1:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>So then I offered to send her her reports to

1:01:51.080 --> 1:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>refresh her memory. She said she wasn't interested, but she

1:01:54.080 --> 1:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>wishes me the best with my work. I then write

1:01:57.120 --> 1:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>her one last question, asking quote, around that time in

1:02:01.000 --> 1:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>your career, would you wear a uniform on a regular basis?

1:02:05.560 --> 1:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>She never responds to that. So maybe the unknown woman

1:02:10.040 --> 1:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Angie described seeing on June fifth was Amy McGowan, or

1:02:15.040 --> 1:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe she was this former officer, although when this officer

1:02:19.720 --> 1:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>was present, she wrote a report about it, and I

1:02:23.200 --> 1:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>don't have any police reports from this officer saying she

1:02:26.920 --> 1:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>was there on June fifth. Before I get back to

1:02:33.360 --> 1:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Angie Ginino, I want to let you know that this season,

1:02:36.800 --> 1:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in our three seasons, the story

1:02:40.880 --> 1:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>is still unfolding. As the episodes are dropping, new discoveries

1:02:44.960 --> 1:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>are being made, and new interviews are taking place as

1:02:48.520 --> 1:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we speak, which brings me to Kelly. She's been listening

1:02:52.960 --> 1:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast and emailing me to share some of

1:02:55.720 --> 1:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>her feelings about what she's hearing. As you can imagine,

1:02:59.720 --> 1:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>there has been a range of emotions. After episode six,

1:03:04.880 --> 1:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Kelly writes, quote, I'd like to set some things straight

1:03:08.320 --> 1:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and also get the message out there for people to

1:03:10.880 --> 1:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>not quit fighting for genuine, wrongful convictions because of people

1:03:14.600 --> 1:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>like Byron. But I need honesty from you before I

1:03:18.160 --> 1:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable doing So what is your angle on all this?

1:03:23.600 --> 1:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>She goes on to write, quote, I need you to

1:03:26.200 --> 1:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>tell me exactly what your conclusion is going to be

1:03:28.800 --> 1:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>about Byron's claims of innocence. I will absolutely not be

1:03:32.840 --> 1:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>involved in anything that paints him as innocent or even

1:03:35.840 --> 1:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>hints at it. He's not innocent, and he knows it

1:03:39.080 --> 1:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and is taking valuable resources and time away from those

1:03:42.160 --> 1:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>who are. I need your complete honesty and will get

1:03:45.680 --> 1:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer involved so you can't suddenly spin it after

1:03:48.640 --> 1:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>getting the interview. So I respond to Kelly saying, I'm

1:03:53.280 --> 1:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>proud of the journalistic work we are doing the season,

1:03:56.120 --> 1:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>which is not advocacy journalism. We make no determination on

1:04:00.480 --> 1:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Byron's guilt or innocence, and I suggest Kelly listened to

1:04:04.920 --> 1:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>all of the episodes before making her decision on whether

1:04:07.720 --> 1:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to sit down for an interview or not. Then, after

1:04:11.840 --> 1:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>episode eight drops, Kelly writes again asking me to forward

1:04:15.280 --> 1:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>her contact info to Byron's legal team because quote, they

1:04:19.920 --> 1:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>have so much information wrong that it is absolutely ridiculous

1:04:24.040 --> 1:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's what they are basing all their theories on.

1:04:27.200 --> 1:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>It's insane how much they have wrong. Per Kelly's request,

1:04:32.160 --> 1:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I forward her contact info to Byron's team. I hope

1:04:36.720 --> 1:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Kelly agrees to talk with me. I'll keep you posted, Okay.

1:04:41.640 --> 1:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Back to Angie Giannino, who said a lot in her affidavit,

1:04:46.520 --> 1:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>she also says a lot to me. Since this happened

1:04:50.920 --> 1:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>more than two decades ago, there are some details that

1:04:54.000 --> 1:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>are a bit fuzzy for Angie, but she can very

1:04:57.680 --> 1:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>clearly recall one day in particular, when Kelly made a

1:05:01.360 --> 1:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>devastating and shocking confession before ever coming forward to police.

1:05:10.200 --> 1:05:14.480
<v Speaker 13>And she's bawling and freaking out, and I was like,

1:05:14.800 --> 1:05:17.560
<v Speaker 13>my friend gives them a lot of pain.

1:05:18.600 --> 1:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>What did Kelly tell you?

1:05:19.760 --> 1:05:26.120
<v Speaker 13>Oh my god, she told me that she witnessed Byron

1:05:27.360 --> 1:05:31.720
<v Speaker 13>murder Anastasia.

1:05:37.080 --> 1:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Next time on the Real Killer.

1:05:40.320 --> 1:05:42.760
<v Speaker 13>It just felt like a very dark horse, Like I

1:05:42.800 --> 1:05:44.439
<v Speaker 13>just felt a very dark energy in the home.

1:05:45.560 --> 1:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Two friends, two stories.

1:05:48.600 --> 1:05:52.840
<v Speaker 9>My friend's really about the least violent person I ever knew,

1:05:53.120 --> 1:05:56.080
<v Speaker 9>So the idea that he'd be involved.

1:05:55.720 --> 1:05:59.400
<v Speaker 6>With let alone, like, you know, the primary actor in

1:05:59.480 --> 1:06:02.080
<v Speaker 6>such a place, because it didn't seem believable to.

1:06:02.040 --> 1:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Me, who is telling the truth? Did Byron ask you

1:06:06.880 --> 1:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to live for him to be an alibi? The views

1:06:13.200 --> 1:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and opinions expressed in this podcast are solely those of

1:06:16.800 --> 1:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the individuals participating in the podcast. If you or someone

1:06:21.560 --> 1:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you know is experiencing suicidal thoughts or a crisis, please

1:06:25.960 --> 1:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>no help is available. Call or text nine to eight eight,

1:06:30.760 --> 1:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>or chat online at the Suicide and Crisis Lifelines website

1:06:34.920 --> 1:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>at nine eight eight lifeline dot org. To see photos, maps,

1:06:39.600 --> 1:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and documents related to this season's story, follow The Real

1:06:43.040 --> 1:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Killer Podcast on Instagram and at TRK podcast on TikTok.

1:06:51.520 --> 1:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>The Real Killer is a production of AYR Media and iHeartMedia,

1:06:56.280 --> 1:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>hosted by me Leah Rothman, Executive producer Leah Rothman and

1:07:01.120 --> 1:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Elisa Rosen for AYR Media. Written by Leah Rothman, editing

1:07:06.880 --> 1:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and sound design by Cameron Taggy, mixed and mastered by

1:07:11.320 --> 1:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Taggi, Production coordinator Andy Levine, Audio engineer Justin Longerbeam

1:07:18.600 --> 1:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>studio engineer Graham Gibson. Legal council for AYR Media. Jonny

1:07:24.640 --> 1:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Douglas Voice acting by Brad Avenue, Tom Virtue, David Teitelbaum

1:07:32.160 --> 1:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Executive producer for iHeartMedia. Maya Howard