WEBVTT - Confederate Monument Removal Faces Legal Hurdles (Audio)

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>The deadly violence in Charlottesville over the proposed removal of

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee has ramped

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>up a debate over Confederate monuments that has been underway

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>since Dylan Rufe killed nine Blacks in a Charleston church.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:18.639
<v Speaker 1>In some public officials are trying to prevent future violence

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>over Confederate symbols, so under the cover of darkness for

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>instant a statue of Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>was removed from Baltimore's Wyman Park. But it's not quite

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>so easy in other states, where there are laws in

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>place banning the removal of the monuments or make it

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to do so. Alabama has such a law,

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and its Attorney general is suing the city of Birmingham

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>after the mayor ordered a Confederate monument to be covered

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to send a message to white supremacist. Mayor William Bell

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 1>says he's not against leaving the statue there, but he

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>wants to put it in some context. How can we

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.319
<v Speaker 1>tell the full story of what the Confederates represented, so

0:00:56.360 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that if the monument is maintained there, that people will

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>know what the full impact of what it represents joining

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>me is Alfred Brophy, professor at the University of Alabama

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Law School. Alfred, how many states about are there that

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>have laws protecting Confederate monuments and how do those laws vary?

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>About six of them. They started with South Carolina back

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand when there was a movement to take

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the Confederate flag off the dome of the capital in

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina. South Carolina sort of got that started. Then

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Georgia followed shortly, and now we've got North Carolina which

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>passed one about a year and a half ago. Tennessee, UM, Virginia, Alabama. UM,

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that's so. And and what they do is they say,

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>UM that you cannot remove a monument, and it's largely

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to UM. Oftentimes they're defined as sort of war monuments

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>UM from public property without either the permission of the

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>legislature or the state historical commission. There's their minor variances

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>between those, but that's that's essentially the the You know,

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>if it's on public property and it's a memorial, you

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>need the permission of a state agency to remove it.

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So in a study in the Southern Poverty Law Center

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>identified about Confederate place names and other symbols in public

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>spaces across the nation. They're also symbols marking graves in cemeteries.

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Explain the debate briefly of leaving them there and removing them. Sure,

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>so the case for removing them is that um, you know,

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>particularly Confederate monuments in public spaces, UM are reminders of

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the era of white supremacy. Their their monuments to white supremacy.

0:02:56.200 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>They honor um, Confederate um, the fight for to maintain

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in slavery, and they should be removed. The case against

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>removing them is they're sort of part of the landscape.

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>They're reminders of the past. They're part of our history,

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and we shouldn't be taking them down, but we should

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>be perhaps adding some context. As Birmingham's mayor was suggesting, now,

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>what's the best way to do this. The mayor of

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Dallas is forming a task force to discuss the city's monuments.

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Some governors want to move ahead to to do something,

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>but they don't have the authority. For example, Virginia's governor,

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>what's the best way to approach this? So if if

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it's you're in one of these states that has a

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>history of Monument Preservation Act you're gonna either have to

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>go through the state agency in charge of this or

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the legislature to get it repealed, or you know, people

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>might take action independently and just you know, hope that

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>this isn't challenged by the state. A g um that's

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>happened in North Carolina where some building a building was

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>renamed about a year ago on public property and nobody

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>ever challenged it. So, you know, sort of it's a

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>technical violation of North Carolina's monument law, but nobody cares,

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>or the people who can challenge it, you know, don't care. Um.

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I think these things should be you know, largely local decisions.

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>The people in the community who have to live with

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the monuments, I think, you know, should be in charge

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of deciding what they do. I personally think it's generally

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a bad idea to take monuments down. I think they're

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, important lessons and markers about our history. But UM,

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 1>I understand completely the idea that um, you know, for

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>many there are there, uh, you know, a sore spot,

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and the I think the local community by and large

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>should make that decision. It's a it's a question for

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>many more of morality than of law. What about moving

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:55.119
<v Speaker 1>them to a museum or some kind of museum setting. Sure,

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of people who say we should contextualize

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>UM also say, you know, the extent that we move these,

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you should move it to a museum. A lot of

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>times they get moved to cemeteries quite frankly, which you're

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>usually private property. UM. The UM. I think it's a

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>good idea to keep them up in place, because that

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>gives you a sense of the what the landscape originally was.

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>It shows you that once there were people in charge

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>who you know, thought it was a good idea to

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>memorialize the era of slavery and civil war or fought

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to protect slavery. UM. But I think monuments, I think

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>museum moving to museums or you know, a good halfway

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>point rather than just take it down. You know, you

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>can try and and you know, preserve that memory and

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the context. UM. And certainly if you're gonna leave monuments

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>up or move them to museums, you need a lot

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of contextualization right to to UM tell people why these

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>monuments were put up, why they were moved, what then

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>meant at the time, what they mean today. Those sorts

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of things. Something that stands out to me is that

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is the state of Mississippi's flag, which has the Confederate

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>emblem on it. Has there been an uproar about that

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>in anyway? There there has been you I'm sure you

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>followed them, you know, controversy over the removal of the

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Confederate flag battle flag from the South Carolina's first state

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>House and then the state House grounds. I think that

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>flags present a somewhat different issue from monuments. Monuments, once

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>they're put up, um, you know, sort of will be

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>will be there for a long time. Flags if you

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>don't put a new flag up on a regular basis,

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the flag um wears out. And so, you know, Confederate

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>symbols on flags, most of which I think we're added,

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you know during the Civil rights here in a sort

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of response to the Civil rights movement, are a much

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>easier case to take them down into to alter them.

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 1>They don't have the same historical basis um that that

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>some of these older Confederate monuments have. In about thirty seconds,

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>this is tough. But does it strike you as uh

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>strange that this is coming up so many years after

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the Civil War. Yeah, it's interesting, it's fascinating why this

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is coming up at this moment, I think it's UM,

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, yet another front on the culture wars about

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>how we think about American history. Obviously a lot of

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>this was also inspired by the tragedy the of his

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>shooting in Charleston, UM and then sort of that. I

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:32.119
<v Speaker 1>think one event dramatically changed how the public was thinking

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>about UM, Confederate flags and Confederate symbols. Well, thank you

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. I hope you'll join us again. That's

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Professor Alfred Brophy. He is at the University of Alabama

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>School of Law.