WEBVTT - Browns finally win, Darnold's movement, Start em and Sit em, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app, and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess d Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy Best

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. Do To To Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do do it

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>do Yeah. This is the Fantasy Fast Friends Forever here

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network alongside Frankie Stample. I

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>am Greg Susman. Frank what's going on? Man? Absolutely nothing

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>is going on. Greg. I'm gonna be honest with you.

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>So Frankie walks in here as he always does. Um,

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:25.119
<v Speaker 1>I hopingly admit that I'm grouty today. Definitely, let's appreciate

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that he walks in at ten am and don't really,

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Frank and I have a nice better in the morning.

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, you know, it's pretty pretty good Banterer. Today

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a little Bitffericus, there's no cart And so

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>I was up here at ten when Frank walked in

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and then Frank did uh last board even into the hour? Um,

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>so I'm back. Then it staries down to work. So

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>then eleven am he comes downstairs like he would walk

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in normally. And since that moment in eleven am, what

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you just saw where I asked Frank what was going

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>on is the first words we have spoken to each

0:01:56.160 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>other all day. Breaks upset, You're not wrong, pretty upset me.

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I have a pretty good reason to be. I don't agree.

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you tell the people we're upset about and

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>then we'll find out. And you have a good reason

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to me. Well, if you watch yesterday and you listen

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to our betting advice, that's the one good takeaway from

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>last night. Right, we're right, We're right on it, right on.

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>It's crushed it now the curl thing immediately now, the

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and noon was thing. I was right on that, uh now,

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>David and joking like five yards, Um, what else nail

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Landry? I had the Browns and I had the

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>under and you nailed the Browns and the under the

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>only one you would have gotten wrong? Was the noon law.

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I got the Jets in the over incorrect um. But

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that's fine because I would have hit all the props,

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't bet anything. So that's the good news. Frank, What

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>are you upset about that you haven't spoken to me

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>until this spray moment um. Well, the results of the

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>game was not ideal. Obviously, the Jets blew a fourteen

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>point lead. We all saw that, and you're following my

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>twitter feed last night. That was pretty much a lock

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Once they were up fourteen. Tyrod Taylor comes

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>out of the game, Baker Mayfield comes in, and it's

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>at that point all the momentum is shifting and Baker

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield makes his debut. Obviously electric. You have the whole

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>crowd behind you, have the whole city behind you, all

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of one light behind you. Dilly dilly, everyone excited Baker

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield coming in the game, momentum shift everything, defense craps

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the bed, and it was pretty much his story from

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>there on out. So that's what your said about, Yeah,

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>why aren't you talking to me? I didn't I didn't

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>do anything wrong. Well, I mean, there are other reasons.

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I woke up this morning I was told I had

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to do something. I had no idea how I had

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to do today. To be fair, you weren't told that.

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>You asked me like, hey, I don't want to do this.

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I know it's coming, and I'm like, yep, I didn't

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>tell you. You knew you were going to do it.

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to prepare for stuff, Greg, but you knew

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you were going to do it. No, I didn't know that.

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Come on, what did you think? I told me earlier

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in the week. Hey, Frank, you're doing the vandel videos

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>on Friday where you have to preview every single time?

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>He said, I I graciously said I would take half. Sure.

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Now you say yes, Well, now I didn't prepare all right,

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>So you can be mad at yourself. I'm not man,

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm never mad man. I'll make it work, It'll be fun,

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it's all good. All Wow. I am very upset. Now

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you did you bench? Carlos Hide? Is that way you know?

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I started Carlos side on your advice? Actually, there you go.

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I just found out birthday great Dave, Carlos Hide and

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 1>Brown's crazy man. His child was born on his birthday. Unbelievable.

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Good for him, good for him? Indeed, Um, I just

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>spent an asharance at MetLife Stadium, and I didn't know. Uh,

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that's that's your biggest problem. I mean, I kind of

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to go. Maybe he's playing two nights. I

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>don't really know more more on the Jets and Browns. Um,

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that was pretty much a lock to happen once once

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield came in, they came in ran their own

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>version of the Philly Special two point conversion. UM. I

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 1>said this on the Frenzy with Friends early on the

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>difference between teams that are learning how to win and

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>teams that know how to win. Our the teams that

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>know how to win put the game away. When you're

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>up fourteen. You don't just run the ball and throw

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.359
<v Speaker 1>screen passes to Quincy New move behind the line of

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>scrimmage for the next three quarters. And then when you're

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>down four seventeen, then there's a sense of urgency with

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>two minutes left where you need to put the ball

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in the hands of your rookie quarterback and Sam Donald

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to go out on the road against a strong defense

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Cleveland Browns, to go out there and try

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and win a game. That's that's just not it's not

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>winning football, and that's why the Jets out of the

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Jets um and shout out to the Browns. They actually,

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>um did something they haven't been able to do in

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>six d and thirty days. Whatever it was, six hundred

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and thirty five days. I believe this number. Listen, so

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I know you have this whole speech yesterday when I

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>picked the Jets to win or to come of the

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.039
<v Speaker 1>sprite and picking win, um that everyone was kind of

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>forgetting how good they look just two weeks ago that ultimately, um,

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>they had to let down game against Miami. And I

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>thought it against Cleveland where everybody was picking the Browns,

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that the Jets will come out and win. And let's

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>be clear, they just would have won if Tarrod Taylor

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>staying in this game, because he was a mess against

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>him the entire time. Unfortunately, I thought Jeremy Bates was

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>way too conservative last night, not letting Sam Donald really

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>do anything. And I read a lot about how everything

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>was kind of east west and nothing was just down

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the field and letting Sam Donald a b a quarterback.

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>What impressed me about Donald was just his ability to move.

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>And I said this with Corey a couple of hours

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>ago that the most frustrating thing about being a Giants fan,

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and specifically being a Nieli Manning fan. He said he

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>can't move anymore. And in today's NFL, nobody's an offensive line,

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>not the Jets, not the Browns, not the Giants, of

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks, not anybody. Nobody has a good offensive line.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>But it's your quarterbacks ability to create that will make

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.119
<v Speaker 1>a team good or make it team bad. Sam Donald

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>last night was able to escape a lot. And yeah,

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>he proved on multiple occasions. He's still a rookie and

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>he's still learning. But nothing happened last night Frank that

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting here and I'm like, oh man, this guy sucks.

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Right like that, that didn't happen. He was able to

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>break away, being able to move, and while he made

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>some throws that were very, very poor and he was

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit indecisive, I still look at someone to grow on.

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>The coaching has to be better. When Hugh Jetson out

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>coaches you, that's a problem. But I don't think anyone

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>thow On. I hope you didn't think that the Jets

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>are going to the playoffs or anything like that, or

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>they're even finishing over five hundred to me, this is

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>still a team is gonna wins five six games and

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>this that what happened last night didn't change that at

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>all for me. I did think coming into the year

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that they were the second best team in the division.

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, maybe I was just sipping the

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>kool aid. Maybe maybe they could be, Maybe they could be.

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're one and two now, and the Dolphins

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>are in a very very good position to get off

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to three and oh with the Oakland Raiders coming from

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast coming east for one PM game against

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a Miami Dolphins team that looks very good right now

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>on both fronts, both defensively and offensively, it looks like

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins are gonna be three and O. I thought

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>there was a legit chance to the Jets could win

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight games this year because they have what

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought to be a defense in place. UM. I

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>was excited about Sam Donald coming in looked okay in

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the preseason. I wasn't overhyping him. I thought some people

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>were a little too excited about his preseason. He didn't

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>really show much. UM I do agree with you in

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the way that he's able to get out of the

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>pocket and make plays with his legs and keep his

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>eyes down the field. But so there's a lot of

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>mistakes here and you have to expect that with a

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>rookie quarterback. I mean throwing into double or triple coverage

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>off your back foot when there's nothing there. Like he

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 1>needs to learn how to just throw the ball away

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>or you know, take a sack when there's nothing there.

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>You can't just throw the ball towards you know, um,

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>double coverage when there's absolutely nothing there, especially with the

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>game on the line. So we saw that for fantasy purposes.

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you play in a super flex league,

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's gonna be a lot of people bidding

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>on Baker Mayfield. And rightfully so, he looked, he looked poised,

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>He had anticipation on his throws. Uh, he went through

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple reads throughout the night. Uh. He he likes Sam

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Donalds can get out of the pocket and keep his

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>eyes down the field. He didn't turn the ball over

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot in college either, and we saw that last night.

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>He took care of the football. He didn't you know,

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 1>throw into your too much like tight coverage or anything.

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought he looked apart as the first overall picks

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>seventeen for one yards, and I think having him as

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback ultimately just raises the value of everybody around him,

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it be Charles Landry, David and Joke who still

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>needs to be more involved. But Carlos Hyde looked great one,

0:09:57.840 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>so I didn't I don't disagree with any of that.

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:04.079
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield took this offensive a completely new level last night,

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and there's there's no arguing that. There's no disputing that.

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>And everyone today is talking about at Joeku, Callaway, Landry,

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's value up, and that's fair. But I want to

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:15.599
<v Speaker 1>remind you, Frank, he as a Jets fan, and I

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know why I'm propping up the Jets fans today,

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>but the just fan stifle Tyrod Taylor. Their defense look

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>amazing in that first half of Tyrod Taylor right, like,

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>it was incredible, And a lot of that to me

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>is game planning, right. They game lab for Tyrod Taylor,

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and they destroyed him. They absolutely destroyed him. And when

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you have a totally different quarterback come off the bench,

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it's different, and there's a lot there's a huge difference

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, to starting at quarterback and having a

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>defense prepared for you all week than coming in in

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>relief and being that spark plug. Well, Baker Mayfield be

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>able to do what he did last night going forward,

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not nearly as sure as I think a lot

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of people are. I mean, it's not a walk again.

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>He is still a rookie, but he is in the

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>right position with Todd Haley as his offensive core nator.

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:03.839
<v Speaker 1>We know what his history is with the teams like

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Steelers. He get the most out of his weapons.

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think you're time. Your window to to buy

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Jervis Landry Low has closed because fifteen targets last night

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>eight four, one oh three, he looked to be the

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>apple of Baker Mayfield. I um, he's He's gonna be

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>his go to guy. And I said that earlier in

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the week when we did trade special, I mentioned Jarvis Landry. Um.

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I just think based on the targets it I liked

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>him as a Bylow. I don't think people realized what

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>he was getting himself into after the Josh Gordon trade,

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So I liked Jervis Landry moving forward. Obviously, Carlos Hyde

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>just continues to dominate touches for this team like he

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is not going away anytime soon. I just bring up

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield because anytime a quarterback, a starting quarterback becomes

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>available or super flex purposes, I think we have to

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>be aware of that. Now, is he the starting quarterback?

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Jackson refused to name a quarterback? Okay, so people

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>are shaming that too today, Frank, And that's bothering the

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>half out of me that people say it like that,

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Like what do you want Hugh Jackson to do? Be like, yeah,

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of course Bakers are a starter. I mean that's a

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>super d bag move to Tyrod Taylor, who is your

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>starting quarterback, who literally got a concussion, So you want

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>to due that's concussed immediately after the game, immediately in

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the press conference following it to find out find out

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>he loses his job. Now, so what do you want?

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course he is, what do you want you to say?

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 1>You he said absolutely did nothing wrong, he said, it's

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>fine whatever. But people are killing him tonight, like use

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a moron. No he's not. I mean that it's just

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a popular thing to do to kill Hugh Jackson. And

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's fine, but what he did last night in

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 1>that particular answer is ridiculous. That he gets killed for that,

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna evaluate her options. Of course, that's exactly what's

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna do. And he's gonna watch the tape. Bs. Fine,

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna go to the facility next week. Is gonna

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>talk to Tyron and be like, hey, we're making a change.

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>We're going to Baker and that's it, and that's fine.

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>The fact that he will kill Hugh Jackson that yesterday

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>really really he bothered me. That was like the first

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>thing I saw my Twitter timeline. Want when I will

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>will go up this morning? Please? It was ridiculous. I

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>mean everything obviously. I mean it's pandemonium. The Browns winning

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a game. We knew that this was a good team.

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>They could have been to win. Oh coming into tonight,

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>well last night they're not a bad team. Yeah, okay,

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>any they also Cleveland the Jets or props a crushing

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it by the way, No, that's pretty much it. Uh,

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>but all Powell verse Isaiah corll Is, it's more of

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the same pretty much at SLIT. I think once they

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>get inside the red zone, it's a lot of Isaiah

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.599
<v Speaker 1>crow Well uh and Baal Powell is there between the

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>twenties guy and he's going to be the guy who

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>catches passes out of the backfield. It's gonna be frustrating

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>unless someone gets hurt here. They're pretty much just flex

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.680
<v Speaker 1>options weekend and week out. Isaiah Roll was on my

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>bench in multiple leagues, and I don't think you can

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>be mad at yourself for that. I knew he was

0:13:57.720 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 1>going to score a touch of this, but like, if

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 1>he finished the night thirty yards and a touchdown, you're

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>not killing yourself for him getting nine points on your bench.

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>The fact that he gets thirty yards and two touchdowns,

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Hide, it was awesome last night. He rushed for

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine yards, he had two touchdowns, and it's clearly

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 1>trusted around the goal like him two opportunities to score.

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>He really looked good. It didn't matter who's a quarterback

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Tyra Teyler Baker Mayfield certainly more holds open note when

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a throat of the passing game. But he really

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>really looked good last night. He's now scored in each

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of the first three weeks of the season. And I

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>was a Carlos Hide guy. You were actually Carlos Hide

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>guy coming into this year. Uh. Certain people believe, Hey,

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubs, the running back you want to own, and

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe he will be the second half of the year.

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But let's not think that Carlos Hides. Frank Gore here,

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the thirty five year old running back to the

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>prime of his career, had the best season of his

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>career last year, remained healthy, he's back at home in Ohio.

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot to like with Carlos Hide.

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Where do you value him going forward? Frank, he is

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a solid RB two for me, especially with workloads like

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the past the first three weeks of the season,

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty two carries in week one, sixteen carries in week two,

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and then last night he had twenty three carries and

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>additional two receptions. He's not gonna do much in the

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>passing game. He's better in standard leagues because, uh, he's

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>dominating these touches. He's gonna get yards on the ground,

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and once they get down near the goal line or

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone, he is clearly their go to guy.

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I think what we were anticipating with Chub was if

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>something were to happen where this team falls out of favor,

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>or you know, they want to see what they have

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>for the future, then they'll go to Chubb. But this team,

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying they're gonna win ten games, but they

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>might be competitive, you know, towards the end of the season.

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And if that's the case, I think we're just gonna

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of Carlos Hide until he breaks down

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>or gets injured, because he does have an injury history.

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>He's a solid RB two. Though I'm top running back easily.

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I think so too. I think the two thinkers there.

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>The offense, as you said, potentially does get better. I

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>like Carlos Hide as well. Let's take a break here.

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, all the fantasy best friends forever,

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>we look to the rest a week three start sits.

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell of those phone lads, I'll take your calls

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>right now when we come back. Eight four eight four,

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>three six seven nine. Daily Rodo dot Com learned from

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the game's best DFS players. We don't just give you

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>premier advice. We play every day, all major sports, all

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>year round. We never stopped industry leading DBS tools and

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>custom projections, and now the Daily Rodo dot Com Optimizer

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in minutes building optimized line up for cast games and turneys.

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Learned from the game's best DFS players joined Daily Rodo

0:16:42.120 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com today, m Pie Well well, well, well, back

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>with you fantasy best friends forever here in the Fantasy

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio network. Frank doesn't make you feel better, I

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Well, it's helping a little bit. If you

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>enjoy playing Daly Fantasy sports but are sick of dealing

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>with professionals using algorithms to select hundreds of lineups entries,

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>try to propit builder tool over at my Bookie dot

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>a G. For you're having to create multiple lives of

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>ditch the hassle of dealing with late scratches and avoid

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>experts winning ninety percent of the money next to the

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>players that you want without salary caps. You sign up

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>new account and use the promo code F fan T

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>s why you can elect an option to receive a

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent deposit bonus with a rollover requirement. No more

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the late lineup scratches, no experts to compete against,

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 1>just you and the prop that you choose. Go to

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>my Bookie dot a G. The promo code is F

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and T s hy choose the matchups using the props

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>builder tool and that's my Bookie dot a G. The

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>proble code is F and T S. Why alright, Frank,

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the latest news and notes as we look to Sunday,

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>j H I Darren Sprowles will do not practice at

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>all this week that includes today. It certainly looks like

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Corey Clement I got to own on Sunday for Philly. Yeah,

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and he got it done last week to scored a

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in that game. Looks like they're gonna be using

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>him on the ground as well as the receiver out

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of the backfield. Wendell Smallwood probably that next guy up

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>who you know gets worked in. But I think Doug

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Peterson has a lot of trust in Corey Clement. So

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.719
<v Speaker 1>with everything that's happening, I had j Ji ranked as

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>my nineteenth ring back. So basically, Corey Clement is going

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to slot right in and take his spot. He's gonna

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>be a top twenty running back this week against the

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Colts defense, which is not very good. Yeah, I like

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I like Corey Clement quite a bit this week. Is

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>there any loving any other guys like Wendell small Wood

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>or anything else in Philly? No, I mean Wendell Smallwood.

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get worked in. He'll probably get his I

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Six to eight touches something like that. But

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Corey Clement gets a big workload here, something

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>like fifteen plus touches in a good matchup against the Colts,

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>like we mentioned, so uh not even in flex discussion.

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a lot of running backs, um,

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other running backs that you can use

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>in the flex over a Wendel Smallwood, guys like Philip Lindsay,

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Dian Lewis, uh, Jamal Williams, James White, any of the

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Patriots guys going up against the Detroit Lions. I don't

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>think there's one stare for Smallwood alright. The other running

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>back situation that I know we're looking at, Frank, I

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen anything on this yet, but Dalvin Cook did

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 1>not practice Wednesday or Thursday. His availability this week huge

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>for DFS players, huge your fantasy owners as well as

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>we look to see if he's in or out this weekend,

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>which means a lot of time of course. Phila Tavia's right, Yeah,

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>again for DFS purposes especially I think DFS this week.

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I know you spoke to Jim about this, and normally

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to really start the running back position. You'd

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>like to pay up, especially in cash games. But I

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>think regardless of you play cash or GPP this week,

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be so much value to be had at

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>other positions because you can just slid in running backs

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 1>like Giovanni Bernard, like Corey Clement, like Latavius Murray. If

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook doesn't go, especially going up against the Buffalo Bills.

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Bills since they've lost Marcel Darius have not been able

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to stop the run whatsoever, and that's gonna be the

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>same case this week. The Vikings are favored by seventeen points.

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Do they cover that spread? I'm not so sure, but

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they will be winning by a lot in

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>this game, whether Dalvin Cook plays or not. I think

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Latavius Murray gets run this week if Dalvin Cook plays,

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Murray's in the flex discussion. If Dalvin Cook is out,

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Lettavius Murray is a high end r B two low

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>nd RB one totally agree. I just looked at Courtney

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Cromins Twitter pitch. She's a Vikings reporter over for ESPN,

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and Dalvin Cook doing rehab work all week long, that

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>includes today doing a lot of stuff. On this side.

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>There is the speculation that that hamstring injury is to

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the same leg as the A C L was. Will

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>see if he was limited or deemed out at practice,

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see what his injury status is, probably in

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of hours from now. So of course you're

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna hold off making your dfens ladus until Sunday. But

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the latest on Dalvin cook. Um. Let's go to

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.479
<v Speaker 1>the phone lines. Frankie, I want to start with Jeremy

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in New York eight four four eight four three six

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>seven nine. What's up, Jeremy? Hey, what's up, Bens? I

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>love the show. I got a couple of start to

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>sick questions for you. Brady, Brady Mahomes Holmes is my

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>number one quarterback this weekend. I'm gonna continue to rank

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>him that way until we see something different from him.

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>So I go with Mahomes as well. I had a

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 1>similar question, not with Brady, Frankie, I was my question

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>was actually Mahomes or Big Band Big Ben Monday Night

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>against the Bucks A very good matchup. You say Mahomes

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the number one guys, I guess that's the answer. Yeah.

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I still do like Ben Roethlisberger a lot too. I

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>don't care that he's on the road. I know road

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>big Ben is like a thing. It's a real thing.

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>But against Tampa Bay, they are getting Brent Grimes back,

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>That's what it seems to be back in their secondary,

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>so they're not going to be as beat up as

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 1>they were before. But I still think that the way

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to target that team is through the air. So I

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>like Ben Roethlisberger as a top five quarterback this week.

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>But again, Patrick Mahomes is still my number one. All right,

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. More calls A four four, eight, four, three, six,

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>eight seven nine Frey. Let me throw this out at you,

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>um or any start questions that you particularly have for yourself. Well,

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I was debating put putting Isaiah Roil in my lineup

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>last night, but seems like you should have asked this

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>question yesterday. Yeah, but I still don't regret it yet.

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what happens on Sunday, obviously, But um, I

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>have a team where I have Mike Evans as my

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver one, and then I have a whole hosts

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>posh of like lowan wide receiver to high end wide

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>receiver three type guys, and that includes Chris Hogan, Sammy Watkins,

0:22:54.359 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Ellen Cole, Chris Godwin, and he Stills um, Mike Williams.

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Who I mean, he isn't really there yet, but yeah,

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>basically I have three spots for Chris Hogan, Heiling Cole,

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Watkins, Chris Godwin Stills. All right, so let's take

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it one by one, all right. I'm locking a Healing

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Cole in there. I really like Helan Cole. I think

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a good match It's a good matchup for him.

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm locking in Healing Cole. I'm going to lock in

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Watkins as well. Is in the matchuck in San

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Francisco highest scoring game on the board. Uh. I really

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:29.479
<v Speaker 1>like Sammy Watkins, especially after when he did last week.

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>So I'm locking him in there, Which leaves Chris Hogan,

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Chris Godwin, who else? And he Stills and Kenny Stills.

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm so Hogan plays in Detroit on Sunday Night. Might

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 1>be without Darius Slayer. Might be with that Darius Slay

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>were the other matchups Tampa. Tampa gets Pittsburgh Wow god

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Win on Monday Night. Joe Hayden expected to return for

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers as well, and who does god play? Who

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>does and he Stills plays the Raiders? Readers don't sleep

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>on Rashaan Melvin. He's actually played very well in the secondary.

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>For that, it seems like we're both leading the same

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>way here. I probably, yeah, that's who I have in

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>there right now. I'm very bullish on both Keeling Cole

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and Sammy Watkins as well. I have those guys. I

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>think I have Keeling Cole as a high end wide

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>receiver three this week, he's inside my top thirty. And

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>then I have Sammy Watkins is a low end wide

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>receiver to just based on his usage that we saw

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>last week and the fact that he's going up against

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco forty Niners. Yeah, they have Richard Sherman,

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>but there. I mean, Andy Reid is creative with his

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. He moves them all around the field, and

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I really like the usage that we saw to Sammy

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Watkins last week, So I'm excited about that matchup. The

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Titans secondary is interesting for the Jaguars receivers because they

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>were expected to be much improved this year. A lot

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of people like a Dory Jackson in that secondary, and

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>then they signed Malcolm Butler. But to this point, the

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Titans are allowing the second most fantasy points to wide receivers.

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>They allowed over two hundred yards receiving, at least sixteen

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 1>receptions per game and at least two touchdowns per game

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers in both games against the Dolphins. In

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Texans, they've allowed at least fifty four point

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>eight PPR Fantasy points to wide receivers in both games

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to collective wide receiver groups. So, I think you gotta

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>like Clan cold. I think you have a little bit

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>low to be honest with you, and I have to

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>go in your rankings. I don't have Luve right now,

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>but I really like Healing Cole a lot this week.

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 1>I think he eats that I have ranked just ahead

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of him. Include Actually I have more than I thought

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I have at thirty one. Okay, I know this is

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>in PPR for standard. I have Keelan Cole at twenty nine,

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 1>just ahead of him. I have Will Fuller, Sammy Watkins,

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Allen Robinson, Brandon Cooks, and then Cooper cup I think

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the Cooks one's interesting. Cooks and Robinson that's kind of

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>just like a respect factor for what they've done so

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>far this year. In terms of Brandy Coleman too man

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>his efficiency for Brandon Cooks has been great plays for

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the number one offense in the NFL right now, and

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>then Allen Robinson just getting targeted a ton, but does

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>have that tough matchup against Patrick Peterson and the Cardinals secondaries.

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you had to choose, would you use Keelan

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Cole over both Allen Robinson and Brandon Cooks this week?

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>So I would. It's tough because it's not like Healan

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Cole is dominating target. I think I would use him

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>over I think i'd use him over Cooks, but not

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>over Robinson, even though even with Patrick Peterson that's the

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.719
<v Speaker 1>scary part, but he's just targeted so old secondaries. I mean,

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>even for Brandon Cooks. If you gets chattered by Casey Hayward,

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's let me ask you about the rams here, because

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the situation I'm in. And I know

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:47.479
<v Speaker 1>they've talked about this a lot on our program um.

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>But for me, I gotta start two of these three guys,

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods, Cooper Cup, and Chris Hogan. I have Cup

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and Hogan ranked the highest. That's who I have. That's

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>who have in right now. I have. I have Woods

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>on the bench because there's always a chance that Robert

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Woods gets one of you know, both perimeter corners for

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles are actually very good. They have Trevor Williams

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and they have Casey Hayward. So regardless, UM, we've seen

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:19.199
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods is pretty much their outside receiver who actually

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>is getting targeted down the field. He leads a team

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>in air yard. So I thought that was really interesting

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>so far to start the season. But it seems like

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be a great matchup for Robert

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Woods regardless. I think he's still like a low end

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three. But I like Chris Hogan um and

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup more so this week. Alright, So there you go.

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Those are ours start and sick questions gonna be. Let's

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>get to yours at eight four or four eight four, three,

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.360
<v Speaker 1>six seven nine. Let's go to Joey Minnesota. Let's going on, Joey.

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a Joey Hey? Joey? Alright, we dropped.

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Let's try mel in Springfield. What's up? Mel Hey? How

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you doing one? Uh? I got a quick story for you,

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and I got a flex question for you. So I'm in.

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm INNA ten team PPR Deep Fantasy League and with

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 1>my number twenty overall pick. I picked James Conner. I

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Everyone thought I was crazy until now, okay,

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>and then everyone you know. I've been getting a lot

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of office for him and my My flex question is

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>carry on Johnson or Rex Burkhead. Carry on Johnson rex

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Burke had played each other Sunday Night football mat tresure

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>versus Bill Belichick. Carry on Johnson Rex berkeheads two guys

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you like Frank who need? Who got? I have Rex

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Burkhead ranked inside my top thirty this week at running back.

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a high in flex option, even a

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>borderline low En RB two, just because of that match

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>up right against the Detroit Lions, even absolutely shredded on

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the ground this year, allowing five points six yards per carry.

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>They have allowed three hundred fifty nine rushing yards. That's

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the most in the NFL, and they just got torn

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>apart by Matt Breeds. So I think Rex Burkhead and

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>both Sony Michelle are very very sneaky plays this week

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>as high in flexes. I don't think the game flow

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>here really works out well for Carrie on Johnson either.

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the Lions will be trailing in this game

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>against the Patriots, and if that happens, that lends itself

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>more to Theo Riddick beyond the field. I probably lean

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Rex Burkhead, And I know it was weird usage last

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>week in the first and the fourth that people are

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>expecting a Sonny Michelle um break out a bit this weekend,

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and wouldn't be surprised in prime time for Bill Belis

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to be like, here's my new toy. Here's our first

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>round pick. I'm also gonna be surprised for them to

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>be like, here's our new toy, Rex Burkhead. Sure you

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>know we're both score against the uh Against the Detroit Lions,

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>they're there. The way to attack them is running the ball.

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and they still have Tom Brady too. But

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I highlighted last week that without Helodi Nada on the

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Lions last year when he went down, they've just

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely been treaded by running backs in the second half

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>last year. In the first two games this year, the

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>way to defeat and really run all over the Detroit

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>lines is with your running backs. And that's the way

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>they're still here, all right. Eight four four eight four

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>three six eight seven nine. I go back to my

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>question here Frank, on my team that's really struggling. As

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>owen two, I have to start two of these guys.

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh this is that team. When you asked me about yesterday,

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>can I start Jordan Wilkins against the Eagles defense? You

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't know, he said, no. So I currently have Brandon

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Marshall and Geronimo Allison as my flexus. Oh my goodness, gracious,

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know what to do. You have Mercy

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>on your fantasy team. Greg, We're you gonna do some

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>crazy trade where you you gave away Antonio Brown and

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:58.959
<v Speaker 1>got like three really good players in return. Uh? He said, no, Oh,

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>so you're one of those guys. You're like, I'm calling

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in you know what? No, no this trade? No? No, no,

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>no no. Well did he accepting it or you're just

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking about offering you It was not the conversation. Frank

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>was like, I'm going to offer this trade. Frank, what

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>do you think is if fair? Like it's good for me?

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I like, yeah, it's good for you. Well, he said no,

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>ask me about so we were having a discussion. The

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>offer last week was he asked for Odell Beckham Jr.

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>And gave up Davante Adams and Chris Thompson. And you

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>said no before last week. You had us no to

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that um in a week, so I had countered that

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>with Odell Beckham for Adam Feeling. God, this sounds really

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>bad now. Adam Feeling, Chris Thompson and Carlos High three

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>for one. I think I threw in Jordan Wimkins. Well,

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I've I've heard of I've heard of Frank trade offers before.

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>How are you gonna hear three players? I'll give you

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham with the Eli Manning led offense behind that

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. Yeah, so that didn't working out. I feel

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>bad now, it's too much to give up it. Yeah,

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you probably should have taken Adams and Chris Thompson. But

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I will say the fact that you didn't do it,

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean we there is concerned with Aaron Rodgers right now, definitely,

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and this passing attack. I could have gotten feeling instead

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of Adams. I'm sure you would have given me that

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>feeling and Chris Thompson for Odell. I mean, it looks

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>bad right now because Odell hasn't done anything and Adam

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Feeling just went off. But I mean by season's end,

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. I mean there's there's a lot to play out,

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>but I think that is something that you have to explore.

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>You have to give up one of your best players

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to get depth back because you don't want to be

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>starting Brandon Marshall and Geronimolson as your flex plays. Every

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>You have Marketing Ham coming back on that team soon,

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>don't you? And four that's not do it? I help you.

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Eight four four eight four three six eight Sevenine, that's

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna Drew in Arkansas. That's of Drew. I was going,

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>all guys, not much man, Hey, I got a wide

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>receiver to Uh started to sit in a flick starting

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>fit question. Uh should I keep all Day as rod

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 1>receiver too? Or plugging Corey Davis or Chris Hogan instead? Kenny, Yeah, Kenny, okay, okay?

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And then flex one and there to have Alex Collins

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>in the flex. But I also have a Clement in

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the schell available on a bench, and I was saying

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>about rolling. What's Clement? I see if the Giant is out,

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Giant does look to be out for me, it's going

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:41.479
<v Speaker 1>to be between Collins and comment at that spot. Frankie,

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the Collins guy, what do you think? Yeah, if if

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a Giant is indeed ruled out. Um, I would use

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Corey Clement over Alex Collins just because I think he's

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the main guy. I don't think Windel small

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Wood is gonna eat into his production all that much.

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>This team, again, they trust Corey Clement, and as much

0:33:57.440 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>as I like Alex Collins, he's a solid to low

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>end RB two. This week in that matchup against the

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Denver Broncos, he still has to contend with Buck Allen

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>for touches, especially down near the goal line. So if

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 1>a g I and Darrence Prowls are both out, I'll

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>take Clement. If a GYS in there, I would use

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Alex con I agree with that. You're gonna have to

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>wait until win those small and just breaks everything reason

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>one's hearts this weekend. Yeah, I'm looking at when the

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>time of these games start, just to see if it's

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 1>possible for him to know, because that could be a

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>tricky situation. You'll know, you'll know, j g I pretty immediately.

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>That's one o'clock games, So yeah, you'll know if I mean,

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>if you ruled out today, for all we now that's true. UM,

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:39.839
<v Speaker 1>And then the Denver and Baltimore games also one o'clock start, Yes,

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>so you'll know if a's out. Then one more question. Uh,

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>silly for me to start o j Howard and Mike

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Evans and the on the same team. It depends who

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>your other tining options. I had Jared Kirk, but I

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 1>just dropped him. Actually, but I could probably go back

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and pick you brought back up. I would start with

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Howard against the Steel there's no problem. Yeah, I think

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that's I think that's close. I would lean. I would

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>lean greed could really because I think you sa safer

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.359
<v Speaker 1>bet to get targets. But I don't mind it. It's close.

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 1>If you want to roll with both bucks, I don't

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>think you and you give me a dude on Monday night, Yes, please, absolutely,

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you gotta dude eight four four eight four three six seven.

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Now we need to take your questions. We'll give it

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:31.839
<v Speaker 1>our our picks, our survivor pick, and now we'll lave

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 1>up the week. Here Fantasy best Friends, forever, Fantasis. What's

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>your There's the only one in place to listen to

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the best fantasy advice, and that's the Fantasy Sports Radio Network.

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 1>By downloading the F and T s Y Radio Network app,

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you'll be blessed with having the top fantasy experts right

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>in your pocket. You'll get award winning and entertaining programs

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>like The Road to Experts, Let's Cock a Dood Will

0:35:55.160 --> 0:36:00.720
<v Speaker 1>do It, Fantasy Best Friends Forever, Carton and Friends, Yeah Party,

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and so much more. You feel what I'm saying, Download

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the F and T s Y Sports Radio Network app

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>now and take the most trusted fantasy experts with you

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>wherever you go. Fantasy Factor is the only d f

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.319
<v Speaker 1>S site with exclusively single entry contest is a fun

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and recreational play with smaller leaves and flattter prize pools.

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>They have made free promos like Survivors, Rull Squares and

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 1>marsh Bandness Bracket contests set up today when you have

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:44.879
<v Speaker 1>a Fantasy Factor dot Com and that's Fantasy Factor dot

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Com seeking a Fantasy Factor Frank, It's time locking our

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Survivor Pick of the Week sponsored by us. I mean

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it should be Survivor picks every single week. Technically is

0:36:56.520 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 1>probably sponsored by Fantasy Factor. The red ages read yeah,

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 1>so that makes sense, all right? See Greg and Fraser

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Pick of the Week sponsored by Fantasy Factor dot Com.

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Then read the read over. Theoretically, I'm not going to

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>do that. So Frank, who you got this week? I

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to continue to roll with. Just play

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the team against the Buffalo Bills, right. I think this

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>week for Vikings makes a lot of sense. I will

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:25.320
<v Speaker 1>say it doesn't really matter to me if Marcus Mariota

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 1>plays or not. I think the Jaguars are also an

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>option here. You might want to save them for later

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:32.319
<v Speaker 1>on in the year. Well. US divisional matchups can sometimes

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 1>be a little weird, so I think the Vikings are

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the one that you're locking in. But i'd also look

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:39.760
<v Speaker 1>at the Jaguars. Uh yeah, I'm I'm locking on the Vikings.

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not thinking twice year. I almost did it last

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>week with Houston against Tennessee. The divisional games I really

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>do try to stay away from. I know I picked

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the Rams last week against Arizona. UM, so I divisual

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 1>games are always just weird to me. When you have Minnesota,

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>arguably one of the best teams in football against arguably

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:58.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst at home, tough conditions for Josh Allen,

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Um this is an easy one. Don't overthinking. Just take

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings. Yes, sir, we've We've used the rates I

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 1>used the Ravens in Week one that was our Bills matchup,

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and then we had the Rams last week against the Cardinals.

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like the teams that you really do

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:14.280
<v Speaker 1>want to pick on are going to be the Bills

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Cardinals. I will not that this week with

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago Bears, though, because Cardinals are I believe their

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>home in that game, um and they've just been absolutely destroyed,

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>so I think they bounced back a little bit. This

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:28.919
<v Speaker 1>we no reason played with some pride. It was gonna

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 1>be tough. Is when we ultimately lose Survivor and then

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 1>we have to continue picks on the show. That's gonna

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be their frustrating. I just locked in my pick,

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:39.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, one play one player by the way in DFS.

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely love this week, and I want to know

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 1>where he is in your rankings, Frankie, That is Will

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 1>Fuller of Houston generous. Jenkins would will be most likely

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:49.839
<v Speaker 1>matched up with DeAndre Hopkins on one side of the field,

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 1>which leaves will Fuller against Giants third quarterback b W

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 1>Webb because Eli Apple, who has actually had a nice

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 1>opening the season, he's out with a groin injury. Will

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Fuller has scored an unbelievable amount of touchdowns with Shawn

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Watson the quarterback, the Giant secondary, certainly Vernibal. I really

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 1>like will Fuller a lot this week. Yeah, I like

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that call. When did the Eli Apple news get announced?

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Was that something today? So he did practice all week,

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>he heard himself in the second half of last week's game,

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and then the Giants released their practice report and announced

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>he is out on Sunday. Alright, So yeah, that definitely

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:22.920
<v Speaker 1>does push will Fuller up. I had ranked him as

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 1>if Eli Apple was going to play this week, because

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, he was playing lights out, so Genara

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Schenkins and um and Eli Apple on the perimeter there,

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I was a little bit worried. So I'm gonna go

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 1>ahead and move Sammy Watkins up a little bit here.

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:39.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna move ahead of Brandon will Fuller. Okay, I'm

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna pull. I'm gonna put will Fuller ahead of Brandon

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Cooks and Allen Robinson. I like that call. I like

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>him as a high end wide receiver three. I haven't

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:49.440
<v Speaker 1>thought it in as wide receiver twenty six. I like

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>this usage a lot last week as well, and I

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>brought up this concept on the other day with Mike Blewett,

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the concept of buying a player high, right, which seems weird,

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>but if you trust that a player is going to

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>be this good and the fantasy owner who has him

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't think that this production is sustainable for a guy

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:11.799
<v Speaker 1>like Will Fuller or even Kenny Golladay. I was gonna

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>bring up, Greg, what do you think of the idea

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of buying a player high, because I kind of like

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that idea right now. With Will Fuller. I like his

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 1>usage a lot. He was a fishing last week, called

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 1>eight of nine targets over a hundred yards in a touchdown.

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I like him a lot in this offense. Yeah, I

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 1>mean his role as offense is absolutely secure. I think

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just really really hard to do it though, knowing

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and we talked a lot about this earlier in the week.

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>We're talking like Tyler Boyds in the world and the

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:37.720
<v Speaker 1>John Brown's in the world. Um, when there's this mega's

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>star on the other side of the right, like DeAndre

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins is always gonna be option one. As good as

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Will Fuller is and as good as the Shaw Watson

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't getting him the ball. It's just scary trying to

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:50.399
<v Speaker 1>predict this week's a week production um all the time.

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's just a little bit harder in my estimation.

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So I don't necessarily I hate buying guys high man

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>like Kenny Golladay. Another example, like how much better is

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it getting for Galaday? Like I don't know, I don't

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 1>what are you saying buying high Like what do you

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:07.839
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable giving up? The thing is, so say, say

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>you value Kenny Golladay as a top twenty four wide

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>receiver rest of season, which is very high. Say he

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is the Marvin Jones from last year, like where we

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 1>had Marvin Jones ranked for this season? Right, Kenny Golladay

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 1>has stepped into that role. What if the Kenny Golladay

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 1>owner doesn't believe that, it doesn't value him that way

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:27.800
<v Speaker 1>right like through the first couple of weeks. So I

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's if they're worried about Marvin Jones

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>taking over or something like that. So I understand what.

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I understand what you're saying. But I've realized in fantasy

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like nobody knows how good of a player. A

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 1>good or batta player is better than the player that

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:42.800
<v Speaker 1>owns him. And I completely understand that you're recognizing I

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>want to sell high on Kenny Golladay. I I want

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:46.919
<v Speaker 1>to just get rid of it now before Marvin Jones

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>steps up something like that. I get it, but more

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 1>likely than not, and you maybe right, but more likely

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>than not, in my opinion, they're gonna be like, oh

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>my god, this guy uses a potential because you're watching

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 1>surely the red zone, you're watching Kenny Golladay highlight right

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 1>like you're seeing every play you got makes and you're

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing him dominating. And to me, it's much more likely

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that they have the opinion while like I gotta steal

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in the eleventh round, Kenny Yalladay, he's going to step up.

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 1>You want to pay me, You want to pay me

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a healthy price for Kenny Yalladay. He's yours. But I'm

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 1>not going to just sell him off. Essentially, how do

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:23.479
<v Speaker 1>we not know and you said this about um will

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Fuller playing alongside DeAndre Hopkins, who is absolutely a star.

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:30.880
<v Speaker 1>How do we know that will Fuller is not a

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:33.319
<v Speaker 1>star with DeShawn Watson as his quarterback. I don't think

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that we don't know that. I agree with that, but

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance he can be a top twenty four

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:39.360
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. Like, if you have Brandon Cooks right now

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>through the first two weeks, and you know that there

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 1>are more matchups coming up where he's going to see

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 1>top cornerback coverage, you go out there and send the

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 1>offer Brandon Cooks for Will Fuller right now. I think

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it's I think it's a good talking point, very interesting,

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. Maybe if you trust that Will Fuller is

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:57.320
<v Speaker 1>going to get this target share and you you know

0:42:57.480 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>DeShawn Watson's a gun slinger, You're just gonna throw it.

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think in a lot of state and he's

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:04.880
<v Speaker 1>not gonna see top cornerback coverage because Hopkins is. I

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 1>think I'm doing that. I think I'm trying to get

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Will Fuller and trying to trying to shop Brandon Cooks.

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Right now. I think it's pretty even. I think it's

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty even. I do, like I mean

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>on this Will Fuller thing. Now, Will Fuller thing, Yeah cool?

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Four four, four, three, six, eight seven. Nins have a

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:25.240
<v Speaker 1>phone lines and hit up Steve in Denver. What's up, Stevie,

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Steve crap? Steve you you are unbelievable. Did you trade?

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Did you try to trade? Demarrius Thomas right now for

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Will Fuller, if someone's just still viewing it like based

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 1>on like where they were drafted. Oh, obviously, you know

0:43:40.320 --> 0:43:42.799
<v Speaker 1>Damarius Thomas was the fourth or fifth round pick. Will

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Fuller war in a little bit later in draft. He

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>was banged up before the season. I think that's a

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 1>trade I would do too. I don't know if I

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:53.719
<v Speaker 1>do that, dude, Damarius Thomas for Will Fuller. Damarius got

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in double digit targets in both of his first two games.

0:43:56.680 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Score a touch you ont on one of them. Obviously.

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Last weekends Oglan, it wasn't good. Five dropped the ball

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot. What if Case Keenum loses confidence in him.

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Sanders seems like the go to guys, which we

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Keenum as well. Not disagreeing, they're both like they they're

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:14.239
<v Speaker 1>both the two top options in their respective offenses. Like

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Fuller is the second option and his I'm not saying

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 1>to Mary Thomas is the second. It's probably like one

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>A and one B with Emmanuel Sanders. When I trust

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to Shawn Watson throwing the ball more so than I

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:29.440
<v Speaker 1>do Case Keenum, probably, Oh my god, I can do it.

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you'd do it, man, this is actually amazing.

0:44:35.840 --> 0:44:38.960
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing to do with football, you have anything to

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:41.800
<v Speaker 1>do with wolf Full at last? God damn it, tweet

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 1>just came across my timeline. I'm really, I'm really in

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 1>on this, like wolf full of You're you're buying it? Man,

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna share with me or you're just gonna I

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:54.239
<v Speaker 1>don't think you're gonna care. Probably not, especially if it's

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 1>something to do with like Ed Sheeran close to be

0:44:57.239 --> 0:45:01.240
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, Matthew's man with a three man band.

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of three man band, I was hanging out with

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Michael Floria last night? How was that? How did he not? Really? No?

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 1>He did? He said that, Um, he texted you earlier

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:15.839
<v Speaker 1>in the week and tried to get you to come

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:20.320
<v Speaker 1>out last night. Medo mediocre. I don't know that. It

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:24.759
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like a strong push. You weren't gonna come. Of

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>course I stayed till the end of the game. I

0:45:27.120 --> 0:45:30.439
<v Speaker 1>stay that. I stay. Speaking of which, what about my point? First?

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Are you were you gonna get to it? You know?

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Of course I need to get to it. Now. You

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 1>have to wait because I'm going to go off on

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:40.239
<v Speaker 1>a tangent. Here we're in a bar, in New York

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 1>bar is channing Baker, Baker, Baker, Baker, Baker. I have

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns fans heckling me because I'm decked out from

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:53.239
<v Speaker 1>head to toe in New York Jets gear. We're in

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 1>New York. I'm getting heckled by Baker Makefield fans and

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland brown fans in a bar in New York. Doesn't

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that seem a little ridiculous to you? It's absurd? Absolutely, Yeah,

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of course it is. That the Jets are playing. The

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Jets are playing. We are Jenny Baker Fair. If Baker

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield was facing any other team, I would have been

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>channing Baker as well. So your pathetic as well. I mean,

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the first over roll pick. He came in like.

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>It's an awesome storyline. The Browns haven't won a game.

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:27.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of the Jets haters. You remember a

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, Frankie, we were singing that whole thing,

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the Poopil Poo Poo the Jets. We were singing this

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>song um before or the Vandel Hurry up Tavy. I

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 1>was going nuts with that. Isn't him right? Do you

0:46:42.000 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 1>know how much I hate that song? That was the

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:45.239
<v Speaker 1>point of it. Yeah, I think you said that your

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 1>mom really likes that, like every Jewish mom loves that song.

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Correct because they don't pronounce the word remember, because remember exactly.

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I know I listened to you when you talk the

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty first night of September. Sure, do you know what that?

0:47:01.239 --> 0:47:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh gosh, I'm looking around like all over my my

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:07.320
<v Speaker 1>laptop to find the date? Would you like to sing it?

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Would you like to sing? What? Today? Is? Great? So

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I got a tweet that came on my timeline. They

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't even know how much I hate it, and it

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:17.000
<v Speaker 1>literally says, do you remember with the Apple calendar and

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>today's date is all? I mean, that's not so bad

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the twenty first day of Septembers your mom and sing it? Well?

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:34.160
<v Speaker 1>So I texted my mom, I knew that was coming.

0:47:35.320 --> 0:47:49.359
<v Speaker 1>That was a lot night. Give me Yeah, it's coming singing,

0:47:49.600 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 1>texted my mom, proud you remember the twenty first night

0:47:56.560 --> 0:48:02.200
<v Speaker 1>up September. There you go. Every Jewish mother's fantasy at

0:48:02.239 --> 0:48:05.359
<v Speaker 1>a wedding When that song comes on, it's like one

0:48:05.360 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 1>more call before you start off. Eight four four A

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 1>four three six seven nine. Our picks are coming up

0:48:09.719 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in just two minutes from now, Gavin Flora or a

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 1>final call and this week thanks you guys. A quick

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:22.880
<v Speaker 1>question um kind of a tough question. I think PPR

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>my flex um my Tweather receivers are Hilton and Adams,

0:48:27.040 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>so I can't bench them my Flex, Sanders or Holiday

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:35.400
<v Speaker 1>m H. I think this is a good one to

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Greggy because Emmanuel Sanders is expected to they They're going

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:45.800
<v Speaker 1>up against Baltimore, so tough. I think it is. I

0:48:45.840 --> 0:48:49.480
<v Speaker 1>don't random Carr has been used as a shadow cover

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a corner to start the season. The thing is, I

0:48:51.719 --> 0:48:53.760
<v Speaker 1>just don't know if he's going to be shadowing Emmanuel

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Sanders or Marius Thomas. I have these guys back to

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>back in my rankings. I'll go with Emmanuel Sanders just

0:49:01.520 --> 0:49:04.359
<v Speaker 1>because there's one less mouth to feed. In Denver, it's

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>really just him and da Marius Thomas. And in Detroit

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you have Golden Tate, you have Marvin Jones, you have

0:49:09.440 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Golladay. But it is a good question, and it's

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:14.359
<v Speaker 1>very very close. I have Emmanuel Sanders ranked once spot higher.

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Greg I also believe Emmanuel Say. I would start Emmanuel

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Sanders over Kenny Golladay. I know he plays Sunday night.

0:49:20.400 --> 0:49:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I know there's this love affair with Golladay at the moment,

0:49:22.719 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I get it. It's tough for me to mention right

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>now with the number one wide receiver is in Denver

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:29.839
<v Speaker 1>and that's Immanuel Sanders. So I agree with you, Frank,

0:49:29.880 --> 0:49:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with Manny Sanders. Yeah, I do. I like

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:35.040
<v Speaker 1>both a lot. To the matchup for the Lions, I'm

0:49:35.080 --> 0:49:37.959
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Patriots. The Patriots just allowed six

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:42.239
<v Speaker 1>team receptions two hundred and forty five yards and three touchdowns.

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Because the Jaguars wide receivers. I get Stafford and and

0:49:46.600 --> 0:49:49.040
<v Speaker 1>this group of wide receivers that has looked absolutely dominant.

0:49:49.920 --> 0:49:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I just trust Emmanuel Sanders a little bit more about it,

0:49:52.160 --> 0:49:53.719
<v Speaker 1>But I do like Golladay a lot. That's gonna do

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>it for us. On the YouTube stream today, the Fantasy

0:49:55.640 --> 0:49:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Football Frenzy, one more hour of it comes your way next.

0:49:58.560 --> 0:50:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Chris Vancher, Jim Day, and a Fantasy executive Corey Parson

0:50:01.360 --> 0:50:03.600
<v Speaker 1>will have you there. Of course you're listening to the

0:50:03.680 --> 0:50:06.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast or on the radio. We'll go over another five

0:50:06.239 --> 0:50:09.719
<v Speaker 1>minutes and make our picks for the week. Also give

0:50:09.800 --> 0:50:13.160
<v Speaker 1>us like five stars, leave a comment. We appreciate all

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 1>your support day in, day out, weekend and week out.

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:19.920
<v Speaker 1>We we love you and we appreciate all of your support. Frankie.

0:50:19.960 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Five minutes ago is Friday. Then it's time to do

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 1>our picks, our favorite three picks of the week. I

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:28.120
<v Speaker 1>was two and one last week you were oh and three.

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe that's correct. I keep trying, probably keep track

0:50:31.640 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of all of these, right, keep track inside of a

0:50:35.120 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 1>little notepading now as well. No, just keep track of

0:50:39.080 --> 0:50:41.040
<v Speaker 1>mind to see how much money. By the end of

0:50:41.080 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the season, I've lost our gain, my net gainer loss.

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 1>So keeping track of you want to keep tracking my Okay,

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:56.320
<v Speaker 1>so I'm all right. Week week two, Greg, frank So

0:50:56.560 --> 0:51:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I was two and one, you were owing three. We

0:51:00.200 --> 0:51:02.359
<v Speaker 1>do this in week one. I don't know if we did.

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember if we did. Well. I'll just give

0:51:04.680 --> 0:51:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you the picks that I actually bet on that week,

0:51:07.280 --> 0:51:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and I went I went to in one, but I

0:51:10.160 --> 0:51:14.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't probably mention those if the Falcons on Thursday night

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:16.839
<v Speaker 1>and then I had the Browns cover in the tie.

0:51:17.080 --> 0:51:23.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I don't starting week two because you went

0:51:23.280 --> 0:51:26.239
<v Speaker 1>to one and I went Sorry, you know, but I

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:27.880
<v Speaker 1>went to in one and one, and you're going to

0:51:27.960 --> 0:51:30.480
<v Speaker 1>completely gloss over it is what it is, all right,

0:51:31.800 --> 0:51:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm wait, I'm putting this. Come on, you're so calment.

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Come on, come on, Greggy's picks. I'm putting the spreadsheet together.

0:51:39.760 --> 0:51:42.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm not handicapper, Greg. This is not working, he's telling

0:51:42.440 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>me February first night. Right, No, it's the twenty first night, September. Alright,

0:51:48.680 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>let's steal it, all right, get before I get some

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:53.879
<v Speaker 1>music for this, please, I want some like serious music,

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:59.520
<v Speaker 1>serious how serious? I don't know, like for like wants

0:51:59.560 --> 0:52:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a million near type of stuff. All Right,

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want that. I don't. I don't. I don't

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:04.799
<v Speaker 1>need you. As you just play earth Wind and Fire there,

0:52:04.840 --> 0:52:07.840
<v Speaker 1>we'd be happy. You can just place the temporary and

0:52:07.880 --> 0:52:09.959
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. Yeah, you know you just put that away.

0:52:09.960 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 1>A little bit underneath is underneath bed. Alright, first pig,

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about it all week. I'm gonna lock

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:17.399
<v Speaker 1>it in. I like the Redskins plus three at home

0:52:17.520 --> 0:52:21.400
<v Speaker 1>against Green Bay. I think Aaron Rodgers um certainly beat up.

0:52:21.600 --> 0:52:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Redskins defense has actually been pretty solid. I know we

0:52:24.719 --> 0:52:27.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted a really good last week, not so much. I

0:52:27.320 --> 0:52:31.239
<v Speaker 1>really liked them plus three this week at home Jeopardy, Dude,

0:52:31.320 --> 0:52:36.000
<v Speaker 1>come on plus three against Green Bay. He just put

0:52:36.040 --> 0:52:38.799
<v Speaker 1>September on. You don't even you have the cojones if

0:52:38.840 --> 0:52:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you were throwing some shekels down Greggy. Redskins money line, Yeah,

0:52:42.960 --> 0:52:46.799
<v Speaker 1>they would a chance that Aaron Rodgers doesn't play this week.

0:52:47.200 --> 0:52:50.320
<v Speaker 1>That's not true. He'll play. Um alright, So I like

0:52:50.640 --> 0:52:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I like the Eagle. Sorry, I like the Redskins plus three.

0:52:54.560 --> 0:52:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm also going to take this week what's tough one,

0:53:00.680 --> 0:53:04.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm going there. I like the Steelers plus one and

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a half, minus one and a half on the road

0:53:06.600 --> 0:53:09.120
<v Speaker 1>on Monday Night. I think they put there get they

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:11.640
<v Speaker 1>think they get their ske together, and then they get

0:53:11.640 --> 0:53:13.960
<v Speaker 1>their s together on Monday Night football. So I like

0:53:14.080 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers and then give me the give me the

0:53:17.120 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Raiders plus three in Miami. I just don't know how

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:24.200
<v Speaker 1>good Miami is. Oakland could have won last week in Denver.

0:53:24.400 --> 0:53:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Tough place to play. I think they're getting there. They're

0:53:26.200 --> 0:53:28.600
<v Speaker 1>asked together as well. I like Oakland plus three, so

0:53:28.680 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna giving Oakland Washington and Pittsburgh. I'm surprised you

0:53:32.760 --> 0:53:34.919
<v Speaker 1>didn't go with this one. Greggy. They've been your team

0:53:34.960 --> 0:53:37.719
<v Speaker 1>before the year. They've been your team week in the

0:53:37.760 --> 0:53:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs Chiefs minus six and a half. M they just

0:53:41.400 --> 0:53:43.160
<v Speaker 1>need to win by a touchdown. I think that's certainly

0:53:43.239 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 1>doable against the San Francisco forty Niners. I don't think

0:53:46.680 --> 0:53:48.880
<v Speaker 1>their defense is very good before the Niners. That is well,

0:53:48.880 --> 0:53:50.759
<v Speaker 1>actually neither defense is very good. But I have a

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:52.719
<v Speaker 1>lot more trust in the Chief's offense right now than

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I do. I will also take the Battle of Los

0:53:57.520 --> 0:54:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Angeles the Chargers Argers bro at plus seven and a half.

0:54:01.719 --> 0:54:04.279
<v Speaker 1>I think it's perfect. You're getting that that touchdown there,

0:54:04.560 --> 0:54:07.680
<v Speaker 1>uh the seven points, even if it's garbage time. I

0:54:07.760 --> 0:54:10.279
<v Speaker 1>could see them getting the back door cover here, uh,

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:15.000
<v Speaker 1>scoring late to make this a I don't know, type

0:54:15.040 --> 0:54:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of game something like that. So I like the Chargers

0:54:17.880 --> 0:54:21.160
<v Speaker 1>at plus seven and a half. I'm torn here. I

0:54:21.200 --> 0:54:23.560
<v Speaker 1>could go against you and take the Dolphins because I

0:54:23.880 --> 0:54:26.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the minus three. I'll take the Seahawks.

0:54:26.480 --> 0:54:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I bet against the Cowboys last week. I know Corey

0:54:28.440 --> 0:54:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is probably gonna kill me for this, but must win

0:54:30.640 --> 0:54:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Game four the Seahawks at home in Seattle minus two.

0:54:33.600 --> 0:54:35.040
<v Speaker 1>They just need to win by a field goal. I'll

0:54:35.040 --> 0:54:38.640
<v Speaker 1>take Seattle there. You gos are done for the week.

0:54:38.760 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Good luck to you. We appreciate your support and listen

0:54:41.600 --> 0:54:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy football friends. You a day. Parson Ventra, He's up next.

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:48.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back to the hurry up later on. Thank

0:54:48.160 --> 0:54:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you so much for listening. We'll do it all again

0:54:49.560 --> 0:54:50.760
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, we hope.