WEBVTT - Introducing: The UFO Show

0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>To walk second Students Turing Snow pushas t Minor Snow.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Oh oh, what is this show we

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 2>have here?

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:23.639
<v Speaker 3>It's a new intro. Friday is upon us. You know,

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 3>last year we did a show called The tues Cruise

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 3>conveniently on a Tuesday today, though, Dan, As we've been

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 3>teasing all throughout the long, cold, dark off season. That

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 3>was amid the coronavirus in this pandemic and uncertainty. We

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 3>always had this in the back of.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Our minds, Dan, Yeah, that's true.

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 3>What about a space themed college football show each and

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 3>every week? How does that work for you? Oh?

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean it's been working for me since we

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>discussed it in probably January, we think. So plotting this

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:00.959
<v Speaker 1>out for a while, I actually remember hitching you on

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>a transition from twos Cruise to whatever. I mean we're

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>calling it UFO. But I think what we're gonna do

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is change with the U stands for because we didn't

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 1>come up with anything that we really loved.

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 3>What does the season Friday.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Or Football Friday? I think Friday, Yeah, because we have

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the twos, so let's also go with the Friday Yeah.

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 3>So Friday Orbit yeah is where we're going with the

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 3>F and the oh. It is, of course Week two,

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 3>but week one really for the Power five teams that

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 3>are going to be playing this weekend. So what is

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 3>the you gonna stand for this week?

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say underway. I'm going to say underway because

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>it's the only real chance. Well, I guess maybe before

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the SEC and Big twelve teams play conference games. But

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say right now, because the season is

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>underway and is continuing to get underway. It feels like

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the right move to say it's the underway Friday Orbit

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's also the start of the UFO. Right, I

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>think that's good.

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if there's a better space or cosmic

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 3>themed words starting with a you that doesn't need to

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 3>be that we could do right. It doesn't matter because

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.399
<v Speaker 3>it's our show. We can do whatever we want. We're

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.679
<v Speaker 3>excited to have our our bawlers here as we get

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 3>ready for this new season, and again, whatever format it

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 3>takes on, I am tie that guy over there in

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 3>beautiful Chicagoland is the one and only Dan Rubenstein. Don't

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 3>forget to subscribe to the show. Anywhere you get a podcast,

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 3>you can find our fine show called The soliverbal We

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 3>will be broadcasting three count them, three days per week.

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Now that the season is finally here, you can go

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 3>on out, as always to solidverbal dot com and find

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 3>all of our old stuff. If you want to know

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 3>more about what we do, Who's Dan, Who's Tie? What

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 3>are they all about? You can go on out to

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 3>the website. While you're out there, you can sign up

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 3>for the newsletter. We got a lot of fun stuff

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 3>that we're readying an announcement for I'm going to want

0:02:57.800 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 3>to make sure that you sign up and be among

0:02:59.919 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 3>the first to receive that announcement. Also, follow along on

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 3>social media Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, We've got a subreddit. A

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 3>lot of fun stuff going down right now as we

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 3>build into this brand new season.

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Daniel.

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and as you are listening to this now, this

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>UFO show. The newsletter of intent is in the mailboxes

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of people who have already subscribed. And it's a pretty

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>fun one, I think, right it's I got some updates

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>from our end, and I know a podcast.

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 3>I know a guy.

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I got a.

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.839
<v Speaker 3>Sneak pink and oh yeah, it's good. It's not bad,

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 3>it's good.

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I like to hear that. Also I'm very excited to

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>use the word unctious as a U word ahead of

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Friday Orbit at some point this year. I don't know

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>when it's going to be, but that's in the Quiver's

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a vocabulary. Unkempt is wonderful. Yeah, So we've got a

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>lot planned here what we're doing today though, So the

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>UFO show each week is going to be a very

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>specific I know, we did three different segments on the

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>two's cruse last year. We're going to be a little

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>bit more specific and do one big segment and then

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>add on a weekly Q and A to the UFO

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps sip in some libations time. My working title for

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that is the Bruine, but it's not finalized. It's not finalized.

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>So I really wanted to focus and drill down today

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:27.119
<v Speaker 1>like the movie Armaged and drilling on a celestial body.

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Right, you know they you know that, you know, the

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 3>true asteroids of no gravity.

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Why did JJ Abrams lie to us?

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 3>It's an operative question. Yeah. By the way, the reason

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 3>for the space theme we should point out for those

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 3>who don't know, is I've got something of a fascination

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 3>with the Cosmos. Yeah, and I think that's what launched

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 3>this whole thing. Two's cruse just rhymed. This is more

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 3>of a pet project for me, so to the extent

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 3>that I can be, I'm very excited to in part

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 3>some just weird sp themed things on you. There will

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 3>be a quiz at the end of this show. I

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 3>don't know if I've prepared for that, but I've prepared

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 3>five questions that we're gonna ask you, just to we

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.919
<v Speaker 3>hope to educate not only you, but all the rebawlers

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 3>out there on outer space as we're going on this

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 3>on this voyage.

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was gonna say good transition type because it's

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>time to talk college football, and I wanted to drill

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.479
<v Speaker 1>down on what we usually call group of five teams,

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>but because of the cancelation of the Mountain West and

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the MAC, it's more of a group of three this

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 1>season with the Sun Belt Conference USA and Portupuesto, the AAC,

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the American Athletic Conference. So I want to drill down

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>on things like matchups, teams, games, mobility upwards or downwards,

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and just where your mind is as it relates to

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>group of three as an idea. The group of three

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>has an idea with now a group of three Power

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>three teams existing as well.

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it doesn't roll off the tongue the way it

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 3>used to.

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>No, no, it does not. So you have a name

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>for this segment, right.

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 3>This is the group of three Voyager Dan. This is

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 3>in honor of the famed NASA Voyager one and two

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 3>missions that are currently still in operation to some extent

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 3>exploring interstellar space. So they have left the Solar system, right,

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 3>they have clearly ascended to bigger and better things. They're

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.799
<v Speaker 3>out there farther than any other man made object, exploring

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 3>the great unknown of the cosmos. And it's quite thematic.

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Now as we talk about teams in the Group of three,

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 3>what we are essentially looking for is teams that we

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 3>think are going to separate themselves, whether in terms of

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 3>intrigue or ceiling from what we perceive the class of

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 3>the Group of three to be. So essentially, which of

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 3>those teams is going to rise above and really make

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 3>a name for themselves in this weird season.

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm very happy that you did not make a I

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Gasparilla Bowl or Boca Ratone Bowl or Motor

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>City Bowl reference to interstellar space being quite far away,

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>perhaps from the top of college football tie. That's where

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>my mind went. And you are better than I. So

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>here we are.

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Here we are. So when we look around the group

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 3>of three, Daniel, are there any teams that jump out

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 3>at you? You know, I'll throw a few out there

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 3>that I think are in the conversation to be that

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 3>cream of the group of three. Crop Cincinnati, we know

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 3>about their defense UCF, we know about their national championship.

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Of course, Houston has been there, wasn't last year, and

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Deeric King won't be there this year either. But SMU

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 3>had a pretty good campaign under Sunny Dyke's Memphis now

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 3>moving on with a new coach after Mike Norvel went

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:04.679
<v Speaker 3>south to Tallahassee. There's Fau in the post Lane Kiffin era.

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 3>There's app State in the post Eli Drinkwitz era. We've

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 3>got the Louisiana team that we talked a little bit

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 3>about on our preview a few nights ago. Anybody else

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 3>maybe that I am missing, But those are just a

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 3>few of the teams that I think bubble up when

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 3>we start thinking about, all right, who's really going to

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 3>rise above?

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean we've seen it from Navy, you know,

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a recent group of five to three whatever team, But

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>We didn't see it.

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Against Port No Factoid, not against BYU.

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Not against BOYU. But we saw it out of Navy

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>as recently as last year, Malcolm Perry. We've seen it

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>from teams and I don't know how we want to

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, Army was there, not a group of three

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>specific team because they're in an FBS independent team. Tulane

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>has had some moments. I'm interested to see from this

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>group because really we're talking about the American, the top

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of the American or the top or the middle, top, middle,

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>upper class, whatever, and a couple of teams from Conference

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>USA and the Sun Belt where there seems to be

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>at least from the American a bit of a talent

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 1>or at least depth drop off. I think we start

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>at that top, though, we start at the top of

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the American in terms of intrigue because it is it's

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati's defense. It's how balanced UCF has been, and we

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>saw UCF really proved that last year, even though Stanford

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that good. How Dylan Gabriel absolutely shellacked almost one

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>man bandit. I mean it was a balanced offensive attack,

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>But how good Dylan Gabriel was as a freshman against

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a team like Stanford, and it didn't perform against Pitt obviously,

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.199
<v Speaker 1>but we see the potential of a team like UCF

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:40.959
<v Speaker 1>for SMU Cincinnati. I mean, it was all sort of

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>highlighted with that SMU Memphis game, which I think was

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a fifty four to forty eight primetime Saturday night game

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>last year. So just all sorts of offensive fireworks. So

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>what the American has to me, especially at the top,

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.599
<v Speaker 1>is it's sort of the archetypes of an entertaining, interesting

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 1>power conference and that you have defense powerhouses and interesting quarterbacks.

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Not even necessarily at the top, but just in the

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>conference in general. You know, I have a crush on

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Holton Baylor's at East Carolina. So it's really interesting in

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the depth of fascination to me the American. Yeah, I mean,

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing.

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 3>When you look at a team like a Cincinnati, I

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 3>think they're my answer here. By the way, if you

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 3>do have an answer and you just want to throw

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 3>it out there, we're going to play the sound.

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 1>Oh I like that.

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm going to communicate it. But okay, that's communicating

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 3>with the voyager satellite. Yeah, not a lot of people

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 3>know I'm just making this up.

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>No, no, No, that's good, Tyle. Let's sell it.

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 3>That's it. That's the signal. HM, we can hear it.

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 3>But Cincinnati to me is very intriguing because they bring

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 3>back ten starters from a defense that was already very,

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 3>very good. And I remember previewing some Cincinnati games last year,

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 3>even in the run up to the twenty nineteen season,

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 3>we looked at this team and it was like, h

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Luke Fickle's building something there might not be the most exciting,

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 3>but we know the defense is going to be rock solid.

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, he's a defensive minded coach, and we know

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 3>he's got some other guys that he is trying to

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 3>build around to take that offense to another level as well. Well.

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 3>The defense is back now, ten starters are back, and

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 3>so that in and of itself is very exciting. But

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 3>I've had a thing for Desmond Ridder ever since he

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 3>took over that quarterback position and was a little banged

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 3>up down the stretch, a little bang down the stretch

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 3>last year. But it's just he's always had the feel

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 3>to me like they have not fully tapped his potential

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 3>and when they can't, they can crack that code. He

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 3>does bring a dimension to the offense that would make

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 3>them more dangerous.

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately, that is not completing passes down for you.

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I'm wrong about that, right, Okay, but I've always

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 3>had this thing for Desmond Ridder, and if Cincinnati can

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.839
<v Speaker 3>bolt on a better offense than they've had, that makes

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 3>them a very dangerous opponent. You know, take this year

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 3>out of it, and who knows who's playing whom on

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 3>which week's given circumstances surrounding the coronavirus. But Cincinnati is

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 3>absolutely positively one of those teams in normal circumstances where

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 3>they're playing a Power five school. That's that's a score

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm watching for on the extra size supersized bottom line

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 3>on ESPN.

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>They were supposed to play in Nebraska this season, and

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you exactly penciled in a Nebraska win. So I don't

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>know how much faith you actually have in Cincinnati. That's right,

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Ty calling you out as a group of three fraud No,

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you penciled in Nebraska win and then you I guess

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>like Nebraska to improve this season. But yeah, I might

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.239
<v Speaker 1>pick is Memphis just because the addition of Mike McIntyre

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.839
<v Speaker 1>on that defense is interesting to me, because if there

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>was that week link last year it was, and then

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>they had to win some shootouts. They had to win

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>some shootouts to get by Ultimately, you know, Penn State

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>takes them down in the bowl game and they gave

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 1>up a lot offense to Penn State. So I'm interested

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to see what Ryan Silverfield and taking over for Mike

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Norvell but retaining Brady White under center, and that offense

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>should even without Kenny Gainwell, who they lost to opting

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>out of the season for public health concerns. I'm interested

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to see what kind of momentum they can keep in

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty with the schedule that they have, and if

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 1>they're able to in the way that Mike McIntyre improved

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Ole Missus dreadful defense, if he can work similar miracles,

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>but similar improvements into the Tiger defense, that suddenly becomes

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a more interesting complete team on the level of what

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>UCF ceiling has been these past few years.

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 3>So I'm looking at our friend Bill Connolly's sp Plus rankings,

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 3>and again this is not coronavirus adjusted. He's got in there.

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Memphis at number twenty five, okay, number twenty five, with

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 3>a projected win total of seven point four games. They

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 3>play ten as a lot of schools will be As

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 3>I look through this schedule, I honestly don't know you

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 3>know who outside Cincinnati. I feel good about beating Memphis.

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 3>I think Memphis is gonna be very good for many

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 3>of the reasons. In Cincinnati, there at Cincinnati Nippert Stadium,

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 3>the Nippert Stadium, but I feel pretty good about that

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 3>over if you were to set it at seven and

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 3>a half. I don't know what Vegas has it at currently,

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 3>but the only two on here that really jump out

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 3>at me as being perhaps surefire losses if you want

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 3>to go that far, would be Cincinnati and UCF. And

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:46.239
<v Speaker 3>even that might be a stretch to say surefire.

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, it's definitely a stretch to say sure fire.

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>But the thing that I'm concerned about with Memphis actually

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is the schedule, just because of how loaded up on

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the back end it is. As I read here, I

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>have at SMU, you see Temple, which Temple loses a bunch,

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>especially on defense, but a rod carry defense should still

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>be pretty formidable. At Cincinnati, then it's USF, which it's

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>year one of Jeff Scott Navy on the road in

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Tulane on the road. This is a quality, quality stretch

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to finish out a good chunk of the season. That's rough, TI,

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that's rough, week after week after week. They have a

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>bye between Navy and Tulane. But still, I man, that's

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a murderer's row.

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 3>It is for sure one team that we have not

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 3>thrown out, by the way, for anyone wondering, Cincinnati is

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 3>thirty fourth on Bill's sp plus rankings, and again not

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 3>coronavirus adjusted. Ohio State and Penn State and Wisconsin and

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 3>some Pac twelve teams are still in there, but thirty

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 3>fourth is where they ranked relative to some of the

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 3>other teams here. Bill has them at I think around

0:15:55.840 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 3>the same. Yeah, seven point one out of ten games. Okay,

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 3>so commit that to memory. The team that we have

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 3>not mentioned yet, which some may find surprising, as ucfure

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 3>UCF is the highest ranked team in this sp plus ranking.

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 3>They play nine games this year because they're Week one

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 3>game against Florida International was postponed, so nine as of now,

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 3>he's got them at a seven point one average win total.

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 3>I am assuming one of those games is either Cincinnati

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 3>or Memphis. The other could be Georgia Tech, although I

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:46.359
<v Speaker 3>don't know how great I feel about Tech beating UCF.

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Interesting schedule though they're at Georgia Tech, they are at Memphis,

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 3>they are at Houston, and they're home later in the

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 3>year against Cincinnati. So again within the context of the

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 3>group of five, knee group of three, three road games,

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 3>including that one against Georgia Tech, is not the easiest

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 3>slate for them.

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I would go as far as saying this is abo tie.

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>This is American bangers only even at a Tech game,

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it's ECU, which is not a full banger. It's a

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>half banger. But that offense could be pretty dangerous because

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>again my crush on Hold Naylor's is very well known

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>by now. But Tulsa is better than what their record

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>showed last year, a lot of close losses, and I

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to be improved this year. And then

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>at Memphis, Tulane, at Houston, Temple, Cincinnati, and then they

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>finish at USF, which is again year one, but still

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>there is no obvious pseudo bye week to me, which

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. I like this tie. I like entertaining week

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>to week, we're getting at least one or two super

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>interesting American matchups.

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Tulane is an interesting name as well, for sure. Willi

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Fritz has done a really good job over the last

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 3>two years, back to back Bowl wins. I think for

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 3>the first time in program history. It should be a

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 3>pretty good defense. And if you look at this again

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the UCS schedule, they've got Tulane in

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 3>a sandwich spot there, they're on the road at a

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 3>Memphis team that'll be a big game for them. The

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.719
<v Speaker 3>following week, they're on the road against Houston. Now Houston

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 3>wasn't great last year, but Houston's dangerous, if only because

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Dana Holgerson's there and he knows how to generally build

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 3>an offense.

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Returning quarterback as well.

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in between, granted it's homecoming, but in between, you've

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 3>got a two lane team that I don't know if

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 3>plucky is the right word, but they play good defense.

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:56.479
<v Speaker 3>They will again this year, and you know, it seems

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 3>like Willi Fritz is building something with that program. So

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 3>the green Wave perhaps washing over Spectrum Stadium in Orlando.

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>New quarterback, interesting talent on offense, really intriguing front, and

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the way it's been these past couple of years,

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>as you've mentioned, and their offensive coordinator Will Hall is

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>creative and super well regarded. I remember he interviewed and

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 1>almost got allegedly the Oregon offensive coordinator job. So he

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>is being looked at as a potential bigger job type candidate.

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>And so for what they have to replace now in

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Justin McMillan at quarterback, they're in a good spot that

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>they have the momentum, they have the recruiting momentum. This

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is I like the Green Wave. They are plucky. Might

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:41.719
<v Speaker 1>be right, but I think they're ascending in terms of

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what we'd categorize as a team that's ascending. It'd be

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>hard to argue against Tulane right now.

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 3>The one wild card for me, and I'm going to

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 3>need some help from you, and we're exactly to place

0:19:52.720 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 3>them is SMU. I did not realize that Shane Shell

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 3>was getting legit NFL hype going into the twenty twenty

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 3>season his senior campaign. I just I don't know why

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:12.239
<v Speaker 3>I didn't realize that. Perhaps it's still a little too

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 3>fresh in my mind that he left Texas, and I

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 3>don't know, I don't know if it's out of sight,

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 3>out of mind, but Shane Baschelle threw for thirty four

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns last year in an air raid system, but a

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 3>thirty four to ten touchdown to interception ratio through for

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 3>almost four thousand yards. Anytime you've got a guy like

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 3>that going up against generally defenses that are a bit porous,

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 3>that's a competitive advantage. They've also got a really good

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 3>receiver in Reggie Roberson, coming back love Reggie Roberson. Last year,

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 3>their top target on the receiving corps had one hundred

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 3>and sixty six targets and one hundred and eleven catches.

0:20:56.160 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Reggie robersony Proche, that's right, James Proche. Reggie Roberson didn't

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 3>quite get there. He was only at sixty four targets,

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 3>but as the leading returning receiver, you can bet that

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 3>he's going to see a lie and share of those

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 3>looks from Shaggy Shane bschell. I have no idea, no

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 3>idea what kind of defense Sunny Dix is trying to build.

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 3>But whenever you've got that tandem on offense that you

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 3>know you can at least start with, that's very promising.

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Oh, they're going to be maybe the most entertaining

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>team because of what their defense has allowed and what

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>their offense does to other defense is week to week

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>SMU I think just like last year and they beat

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>up on a not so great first half of their schedule.

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>All apologies to TC in the Iron Skillet, that was

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a very close game though. We're going to see a

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of that with We see a lot of forty

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>one thirty eights with SMU. Once again, I don't have

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a ton of faith in their defense taking a step forward.

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>But the reason we're seeing Shane Baschelle get interest from

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the next level is one, I don't know. There are

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty two backup jobs in the NFL every year, right

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 1>there are thirty. He's got a film and phill If

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>he's a fifth round pick, they're not going to be

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>paying him a lot of money, so sure, absolutely, Yeah,

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:11.239
<v Speaker 1>there's interesting talent where you remember Sonny Dyke's also was

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 1>instrumental and developing Jared Goff. So his reputation as a

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.239
<v Speaker 1>quarterback developer during his career is it precedes him. So

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I get it. He also kind of got a raw

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>deal with the offense and the offensive coordinator he had

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>at Texas when he was there. Certainly much better now,

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, two three years removed from the Seane Michelle era.

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>But I get it. He's He's a decent enough quarterback

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that can run a successful system successfully. Are there any other.

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Teams that you would like to discuss here?

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Houston's interesting to me because of Dana Holgerson's plan to

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>red shirt and tank last year that didn't fully work

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 1>out because the best player he tried to do that

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>with and Derek King decided to transfer to Miami. Yeah,

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>with SMU's offensive coordinator Aht Lashly. So No, It's still

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me because the level of transfers Houston has

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>gotten there and what Dana Holgerson's track record is. He's

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>working with guys he's coached with before. So I just

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about the long term at Houston, just because

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the report's about the culture and the interaction between Dana

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Holgerson and the players there. Last season hopefully with something

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.439
<v Speaker 1>that blew over and they worked past everything, but it

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a promising start for Dana Holgerson at Houston, it seems,

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and now their biggest benefactor was at Tilman. Fertita doesn't

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>have any money, No, doesn't have any money, ty, So

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens. We'll see what happens with Houston.

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm rooting for it because there are what six seven

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>legitimately decent to very good teams at the top of

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the American. So I'm actually more inclined to watch the

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>top of the American and then probably a good chunk

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of the top of the ACC this year. How about that.

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 3>I think that's fair. And maybe we can get into

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 3>little bit my weird working theory that if one of

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 3>those group of three teams is going to qualify for

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 3>the playoff, this is the year.

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Yeah, I would say non zero and usually it's zero.

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm not saying it's a great chance, but I'm saying,

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 3>in a ready odd year, what will be odder than

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 3>a team like Cincinnati.

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Well, the good news for probably the team with the

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>best shot in UCF, just because they have built thanks

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to the win over Auburn and what was it the

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Peach Bowl a couple of years ago. They have the

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>cachet built, right, they have the cachet. They've said, okay,

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>we've gone toe to toe with a top level SEC

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>team and beating them on a neutral field. Now, I know,

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously everybody's going to say to defend Auburn when they

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>were motivated whatever but still we're talking about even they

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>held strong against LSU until LSU pulled away near the

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the game in their bowl game against the Tigers.

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is with UCF is they also get

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Georgia ten early. They get a Power five team, a

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>great one, No, sir or madam, absolutely not. But they

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>do have an opportunity if UCF goes out and beats

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Tech thirty eight to three, and say, I don't

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>know a pretty good ACC team. A Louisville beats Georgia

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Tech twenty eight to seventeen. At least that's a data

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 1>point that becomes a little bit interesting if we're evaluating

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 1>UCF on the national level, a little bit interesting.

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 3>It's another data point. And I think that's a fair yeah,

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 3>a fair statement.

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>We don't have much this year, No, we don't do,

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>not have much.

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 3>We got to take what we can get.

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's something.

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, who is your answer then? Who separates themselves from

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 3>that field?

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>It's the teams with the quarterbacks I trust, and so

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 1>it's basically Memphis and UCF. Okay, Neil and Gabriel healthy

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and that is best. And I trust Brady White, I do,

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but I at least need an okay defense, and I

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>think I trust Memphis defense more than SMU's defense. So

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>with look, I like SMU because they returned Sunny Dike's

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 1>and I doubt you know, I don't love the Memphis schedule,

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and I don't love having a new head coach, but

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I just I've seen Memphis win some squeaker shootouts and

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>play pretty well against Penn State last year, whereas I'm

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 1>just not there with SMU.

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 3>All right, I'm going to go Cincinnati. Cincinnati was my

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 3>initial reaas like Cincinnati a lot. I like them a lot.

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 3>I like their coach, Luke Fickle, I like their defense.

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Anytime you bring ten guys back, I'm one of the

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 3>things I'm very interested in. And I don't know if

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 3>we talked about this much on the preview, but my

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 3>guess is that one of the observations after the twenty

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty year is going to be the weird little odd

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 3>roster tweaks or schemes or just something logistical that served

0:26:56.640 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 3>as a competitive advantage for some programs. I think it

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 3>goes without saying that a team like a note, like

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 3>a Notre Dame, let's sew them out there. Notre Dame

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 3>brings a lot back not only a quarterback with them book,

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 3>but along the lines, both lines. They're going to win

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 3>the trenches against most of the teams that they play,

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 3>with the exception of Clemson probably, But having that veteran

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 3>leadership at such a fundamental level in your starting roster,

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 3>I think is imperative. It's always imperative, but I think now,

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 3>given state of affairs, it's even going to have greater effect.

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 3>What other things now more than what other things are

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 3>going to rise to that level. What other things Wi'll

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 3>be talking about come January or come February, I don't

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 3>know the answer to that. I do think though, that

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 3>experience for right now, given what we know, is going

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 3>to be huge. It's going to have an outsized impact,

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 3>especially when you've got a unit of ten guys that

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 3>have already played together on defense the way these guys

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 3>for Cincinnati have. So from my mind, I think that

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 3>goes a much much longer way than it would even

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 3>under normal circumstances.

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I think starting the season well is going to be

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>even more important because if a team starts one in three,

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>one and four, given the sort of unusual circumstances and

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>shortened schedule, it could be kind of easy to see

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>teams and players letting up and saying, what are we doing?

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Why are we even playing? Like that kind of thing

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting to me come late October. You know,

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>if a team starts poorly, I think the ability to

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 1>bounce back becomes very different. This year, I think experience

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is quite important. And culture, I mean it's one of

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>those terms that we use that's vague, but just how

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>well a job the coaching staff has done in terms

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of getting players to buy into systems and to buy

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>into each other given the extraordinary or extraordinarily strange circumstances

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of the season. So that's where a team like Cincinnati,

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>with you know, Luke Fickle has been there. He has

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>built up depth. He's recruited extremely well, by the way,

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>with a team like Cincinnati, maybe more than most of

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the other teams we're talking about, because as you remember,

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati was in the Big East. They were a power

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>quote power six team, and now they're not, even though

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the American is essentially a power six if there is

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be a power six, and so Cincinnati is

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the big losers. But on the other hand,

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're a high level three star, mid level three

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>star who's promising and gets like low level big ten

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>attention in a world in which you can in a

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>world in a world in which you can get attention

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty much, if you're playing FBS football and you are excellent,

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you develop into something excellent. If you are an amazing

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>right tackle at Cincinnati, an amazing edddresser at Cincinnati, NFL

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is gonna find you. You're gonna be on national TV

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Whereas if you're playing at I don't know,

0:29:56.640 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Purdue or Indiana in an non twenty nineteen Indiana type

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>year where you're going five and seven and you just

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to lose. I kind of think you

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>just go to Cincinnati, right if you're from Ohio, you're

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>from the Ohio area. Yeah, you want to win, and

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to be discovered, and you want to play

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in a really good defense, especially given.

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 3>It's a it's a really good it's a good place

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 3>to be. Yeah, my answer is Cincinnati's all okay? And

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 3>your answer is what UCF or Memphis?

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'll probably take UF Hi you see up in Memphis,

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, you see Do.

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 3>You want me to play that again? Or are we

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 3>good with two.

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you're good. I sounded wonderful.

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Though, thank you, thank you. I pulled that off YouTube.

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Where do we want to go next? Here on our

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 3>underway in the football orbit Friday orbit?

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me? Uh, we can just talk about Willie Taggert

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>if you want Fau we can.

0:30:58.600 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know what I'm gonna talk about because somehow

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to bring this to Bruce Bouchie.

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Tie, Bruce Bochi in his size eight head.

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly why, Tie. I don't know. If you've looked

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>at a picture of new app State coach Sean Clark,

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>former app State offensive coordinator and offensive line coach, Okay,

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>he might need to fall under that category of special

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>ordering hats size of Jupiter. It's like an abnormal canalope. Okay,

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is where Sean Clark is, which I respect that as

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody with a pretty large dome. So app State is

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>very very interesting to me, especially with how they've been

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>able to just continue excellence no matter who's the coach.

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>If it's Scott Sadderfield, if it's Eli Drinkwitz, now if

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it's Sean Clark, I expect very little to change. They

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>still have talent on defense they're still going to run

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball. We saw what they did. I think they

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>The Sunbelt Championship game has exclusively, exclusively been Louisiana in

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>app State. I'm just fascinated by that level of consistency.

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>So even like on a one week bowl schedule, if

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>APP State were playing Memphis or SMU or Cincinnati, it's

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to me. APP State has distanced themselves pretty much

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>from the entire conference. So I just want to tip

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>my cap to the Mountaineers. They're just amazing.

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 3>And you want to talk about Sean Clark's hat size.

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know if you've had time to google

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>since I brought it up, but if you haven't in

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>your listening, if you haven't, and your tie hilden Brandt,

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I would do.

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 3>So let's take a look here. Oh yeah, that's a

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 3>big dome. That is a big r. Yeah there's a

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 3>little bit of Brett Beilima in that dome. But yeah,

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 3>little Bert, that's a big head. Okay, we're gonna have

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 3>to find out an official hat size there and see

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 3>if we can see if they make a soliverable dad

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 3>hat big enough that we could send to the app

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 3>State program and Louisiana.

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Obviously the rage and cagns with what they were able

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to do last year interesting to me for sure.

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 3>There any players, coaches, staff member besides Sean Clark and

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 3>his dome besides Sean Clark and is in his dome.

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 3>But you know, one of the requests that we got

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 3>here in the build up to the season was that

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 3>we should focus more on the Group of three because

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 3>we only got a Power three. Group of three is

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 3>hopefully going to take advantage of this safely and in

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 3>a healthy way to highlight what they do well as

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 3>a conference and some of their some of their players

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned Shane Michelle, Desmond Ritter, who maybe I should

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 3>or shouldn't be as high on as I am. Are

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 3>any of any other names maybe outside of Dylan Gabriel,

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 3>who I think you mentioned, that really rise when you

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 3>start thinking about the.

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>The group of three specifically, I mean Zach Thomas has

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>been under center or taking shotgun snaps for app State

0:33:56.680 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>for a while now, and that that is interesting to me.

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I like a lot of guys on Louisiana's offense.

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Obviously Levi I got Levi. One name Levi is uh

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 1>is somebody I like a lot watching, especially because he's

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a lefty. I mentioned a Holton Naylor's I don't know.

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I think up front for the the Tulane Green Wave,

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's Patrick Johnson. He's been there forever. That's

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's just if you're if you happen to be

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 1>watching American football, that you should zero in on.

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.760
<v Speaker 3>No, it's a shame that we can't use Kenny Gainwell

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 3>for Memphis, but he's opted out. Yeah, given circumstances, he's

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 3>poised I think to be a draft pick a really

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 3>productive campaign. Another guy from Cincinnati. I'm not just gonna

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 3>list off all of Cincinnati's players, I promise, even though

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 3>I could along the line, but a mod Gardner. Yeah,

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 3>in their secondary, I think is is really on his

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 3>way up. Had three interceptions last year in his very

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 3>first season. Scored on two of the interceptions. So he's

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 3>an electric player that they've got out there at cornerback

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 3>who just adds another dimension to this defense.

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I was going to shout out Laane Hatcher, who

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 1>may have had the most productive season as a freshman

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for Arkansas State. Now, obviously the Red Wolves have already

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>played and lost a game against Memphis. But Laane Hatcher

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:24.319
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to me. When you're able to come in

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>as a freshman and show yourself to be ready to

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>roll on the FBS level, no matter the position, but

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:34.279
<v Speaker 1>especially quarterback, that excites me. That gets me going. And

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Layne Hatcher with how efficient he was as a freshman,

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of unheard of. I just I like that

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot. There are a couple coaches who were playing

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in that coaching carousel together, and Will Healey and Mike Houston.

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Mike Houston and East Carolina came over from James Madison.

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about a national championship winning coach time. And

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 1>then with what Will Heally was able to do at

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>previous stops on the FCS level, now coming into Charlotte

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>takes them to a bowl almost unexpectedly. You know, those

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>are just ascending programs, especially Charlotte that I just have

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>my eye on, Tie, I just have my eye on.

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:09.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm a little disappointed, Dan that you didn't mention Demonte Cosey.

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, so am I But there's only so

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:15.800
<v Speaker 1>many players I can name on Memphis because.

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 3>One hundred and twenty three targets last year as a

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:22.360
<v Speaker 3>junior nine touchdowns, almost thirteen hundred yards. He's going to

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 3>be Brady White's primary target again. Looking for big things there.

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, do you want to talk about specific matchups? I

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>have a list here, gimme him. I wrote down a

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 1>list here of some specific matchups. Just as you're looking

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:38.359
<v Speaker 1>over your season and you're saying, well, there's no real

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>good I don't know SEC game this week. There's no

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>real good Big twelve game this week. Saturday, October third,

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is that rematch of Memphis SMU that I mentioned, And

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that's at SMU this season.

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, it's okay.

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:55.280
<v Speaker 1>We've got the Mountaineers of app State and Louisiana October seventh.

0:36:55.800 --> 0:37:01.240
<v Speaker 1>That's in Moon tie UCF Memphis in Memphis October seventeenth.

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>You know UAB the last time they lost at home

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:09.879
<v Speaker 1>tie twenty seventeen for Orald Different World. Yeah, Houly Casch.

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>So they're they're on the road against Louisiana text so

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 1>at least Tech gets them at home. Memphis Cincinnati is Halloween.

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>That is a Halloween or tie and game on Arkansas. Yeah,

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Arkansas State at the Rageingcaguns of Louisiana on November seventh

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 1>and then Western Kentucky, who we actually talked about on

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>our preview show a little bit as being dangerous, and

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned why do you hear like a giant lawnmower

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>or something outside of my way?

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 3>We had this issue with your recording last time with

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:39.720
<v Speaker 3>a giant machine.

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, there is some sort of machine. Maybe the

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>timing has worked out, but they're at FAU on the

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>seventh of November. So and then Cincinnati Use, which we've

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 1>mentioned before, November twenty First, okay, pretty good, not bad, not.

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Bad, Dan, are you ready for some space trivia?

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>What are we calling it? Is this?

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Hmm Jetpard Trivial per space space.

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:07.839
<v Speaker 1>I like that too. Let's do Jeopard Deep Space.

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Five questions you can answer along at home if you

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 3>want to. After this, we'll let to fine people go.

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 3>We're going to continue bolting on goofy segments here. That's

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 3>what we do, Dan, what is the hottest planet in

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 3>the Solar System?

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>The hottest planet is actually Venus, I think because of

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the cloud cover, even though Mercury is closer to the Sun.

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 3>You are correct one for one, because I remember.

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I had a planetary place Matt growing up.

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Tie.

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 1>So my my space facts they're okay, they're okay, all.

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:45.839
<v Speaker 3>Right, one for one. All right, what is the name

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:46.839
<v Speaker 3>of the North Star?

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I know the I think the effect is called the

0:38:55.760 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Aurora borealis. That's perfect. But oh, it's okay. That's the fact.

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>That's not the name of the star.

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:04.879
<v Speaker 3>That's the effect that the North Pole. I don't think

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 3>it's got much to do with.

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, right, the colors, okay, the North Star, Dog Star,

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:16.919
<v Speaker 1>dog Star, No, it's Polaris, Polaris. Okay, dog Star knows.

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Keanu reeves his old band. Yes, was just a guess.

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to Keano.

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 3>One out of tude.

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>All right. Next, here we go, Here we go.

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 3>There is a tough one, Dan. The distance across the

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 3>United States is around twenty nine hundred miles see to

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 3>Shining Sea. Twenty hundred miles. Is that greater than or

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 3>less than the diameter of Pluto?

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:45.760
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Less than, it is greater than Actually.

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>It's greater solo. Pluto's diameter is less than that of

0:39:57.200 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States.

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Again, from seat a shining seat, around twenty nine hundred miles.

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Pluto's diameter is around fourteen hundred and fifteen hundred miles.

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:09.879
<v Speaker 3>According to the New hotazons spacecraft.

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a dwarf star. Is that what it's called? Our

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a dwarf planet.

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 3>It's not even really a planet. Depends you talk. If

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 3>you're talking to Neil de Gresson.

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's it's called a dwarf planet, alleg I

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 1>believe categorized as such. I believe.

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Next question, which planet has the biggest ocean.

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>In the Sour System? We're talking about a water ocean.

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Which planet has the biggest ocean?

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm just going to guess Jupiter. Jupiter is correct,

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a big one tie. That must mean it has

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a big ocean. What is the ocean filled with?

0:40:55.040 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Though metallic hydrogen? It is twenty five thous miles deep,

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 3>which is coincidentally enough, the same as the diameter of Earth.

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, yeah, there's You look at the surface of Jupiter.

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Tie elite elite happenings. Hasn't there been a Was it

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:19.959
<v Speaker 1>a hurricane that's been like going for the Big Red Spot?

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I got a ton of d time. Yeah, the Big

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Red Spot is a hurricane that's been happening for god

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 1>knows how long.

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:27.240
<v Speaker 3>That's correct.

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so all right, he's one am I now two

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of four.

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 3>You are two of four.

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>That is correct. I'm already happy with this result. All right,

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:42.319
<v Speaker 1>final question.

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, are you ready? I'm ready, Daniel. Which planet is

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 3>bigger Venus or Mars?

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at my blaze man air in terms of

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 1>what measurement in terms of diameter? Okay, Mars?

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Ooh, I'm sorry. The answer is Venus.

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that true? Venus is? How much bigger is Venus

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 1>than Mars?

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Venus is sizeably bigger than Mars, much bigger than Wow,

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 3>almost twice as big as Mars. And Earth is just

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:25.919
<v Speaker 3>a shade bigger than Venus. They're around the same size.

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm gonna take your word for it. Is What

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is it that you would say fascinates you most about space?

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it the discovery of new universes, galaxies, dimensions, whatever,

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:43.400
<v Speaker 1>black holes, novas that are what star is exploding? Is

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it events? Is it discoveries? Is it spacecraft? Is it

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>all of the above? Which is non answer? What is

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:52.239
<v Speaker 1>it that if you see a news story involving this

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:55.479
<v Speaker 1>with space, you're clicking and you're diving in.

0:42:55.960 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Anything about new means of propulsion?

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh, this is a big matter.

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:05.880
<v Speaker 3>It's there's a there are several Google alerts set up, right,

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 3>not gonna lie, this is so good a Google alert

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:16.840
<v Speaker 3>coming in about an impossible engine or something of that. Ilk. Yeah,

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm in baby.

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So in the way that some people have sporting events

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that are bucket lists, like I gotta get to the

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Kentucky Derby, got to get to the dayton of five hundred.

0:43:27.719 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I got to get to Wimbledon, or I have to

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I want to stay in one of those tropical hotels

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:37.279
<v Speaker 1>that's like on a pier, right, the room is on

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a pier overlooking the water. Would it be accurate to

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:44.920
<v Speaker 1>say you have a bucket list experience of like a

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:53.840
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes tour of jpl NO in California.

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Because I want to understand what the hell is going on?

0:43:55.600 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, you could just ask it's just an AMA, a

0:43:57.840 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 1>private AMA for you at JABS.

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:01.279
<v Speaker 3>But I wouldn't. I wouldn't know what task. I would

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:04.839
<v Speaker 3>honestly not know what task. And it's not from being starstruck.

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 3>It's just from being dumb struck in a sense, I

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:12.480
<v Speaker 3>don't know the right questions to ask. I enjoy the

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 3>confines of my office chair seeing a Google alert come

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 3>in and feeling like somebody has unlocked the keys to

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 3>the future.

0:44:22.480 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>What about going to Hawaii for the giant telescope at

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the top of Mona Kea.

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:32.840
<v Speaker 3>We have folks who are very familiar with that telescope

0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 3>who listen to this podcast.

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that true?

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:38.839
<v Speaker 3>It's one hundred percent true. Who I'll tell you after

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:43.400
<v Speaker 3>the show. WHOA do you have a telescope in? I

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 3>believe the solid verbal as a whole has a telescope in?

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Would you take advantage of that in a new world.

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:53.760
<v Speaker 3>In a new world where you can actually interact with people, yes.

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Or you can interact with people like you would fly

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to Hawaii. Let's say you found yourself in Hawaii for

0:44:58.239 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a wedding.

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 3>If I found myself to make it, I would consider it. Yes,

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:05.239
<v Speaker 3>absolutely interesting.

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So the telescope, the TWINKEC telescopes in Hawaii more

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:12.280
<v Speaker 1>attractive to you than JPL.

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 3>I would say, so. Yes, I think that's interesting.

0:45:15.160 --> 0:45:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I think we got to make this happen. Well,

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 1>look twenty twenty one.

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Twenty twenty one, twenty twenty eight.

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, thirteen thousand, six hundred feet above sea level. If

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you can get there, we will be moderately entertaining. About

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:33.239
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty ones. How about that?

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 3>All right? So, look, this is a work in progress,

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 3>much the way the Twos Cruise was a year ago. Dan,

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Right now, we've got an intro in a couple funny sounds.

0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:44.719
<v Speaker 3>But if you're listening at home and wondering where is

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:46.719
<v Speaker 3>this going to go next, you maybe don't even want

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:49.480
<v Speaker 3>to ask that question. Because we got real weird with

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 3>the twos crews. We made shirts. Will have to come

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 3>up with something UFO themed this year. This was our

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 3>underway Friday Orbit.

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:03.280
<v Speaker 1>We need more you words. We want people to submit

0:46:03.920 --> 0:46:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you words that might make sense over the course of

0:46:06.160 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the season. I am going to jam unctious in there

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 1>one way or the other, but otherwise I'm open.

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:14.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, that guy over there is my good

0:46:14.600 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 3>friend Dan Rubinstein. My name I am Ty Hilton Brand.

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:19.839
<v Speaker 3>Our email address is solve verbal at gmail dot com.

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:22.799
<v Speaker 3>If you like the show, please go on out subscribe,

0:46:22.800 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Please go out and leave us a five star review. Again,

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:29.359
<v Speaker 3>not required, but very much appreciated. Don't forget to call

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 3>in as you are watching all of the action this

0:46:33.160 --> 0:46:35.799
<v Speaker 3>coming Saturday. Four O eight verbal one. That's four eight

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:38.319
<v Speaker 3>eight three seven two two five one that's a reverbline.

0:46:38.640 --> 0:46:41.320
<v Speaker 3>Our boy, Ryan's going to cut up your voice messages.

0:46:41.360 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 3>We're going to play them on our Sunday recap show.

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:48.839
<v Speaker 3>Do tune in to that show. We will go through

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 3>all of the activity from week two as it were,

0:46:53.480 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 3>as we now embark upon voyage upon this college football

0:46:58.040 --> 0:46:58.879
<v Speaker 3>season in twenty twenty.

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Dan, Yeah, we got football tomorrow. We have a college

0:47:03.000 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 1>football Saturday tomorrow if you're listening to this on Friday,

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and then we got football. We might have Levi Lewis

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 1>shredding Iowa State. I don't know. We got something.

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 3>We got something, all right, for that guy over there,

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 3>my good friend Dan Rubinstein, for myself, Tie Hilton Brand,

0:47:17.600 --> 0:47:20.239
<v Speaker 3>thanks again for stopping on by, for downloading the show,

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 3>for giving us your ear for the better part of

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:25.399
<v Speaker 3>an hour. We will be back on Sunday to talk

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:29.280
<v Speaker 3>about all the action that was in this new college

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:34.279
<v Speaker 3>football season. In the meantime, stay safe, stay healthy, and

0:47:34.320 --> 0:47:35.480
<v Speaker 3>by all means stay solid.

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Peace.