WEBVTT - Zuckerberg Recruits for New Meta AGI Group 

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is a

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>live from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>York and Eva Low in Sentrancisco.

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Mark Zuckerberg personally assembling a super intelligence team to help

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Meta hit artificial general intelligence.

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 4>Plus.

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 5>Apple expands its relationship with Open AI and introduces a

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 5>new software redesign called liquid Glass. We'll recap WWDC.

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 3>And we speak with the ULA CEO about the spat

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 3>between Elon Musk and Donald Trump and what it means

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 3>for the space industry.

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 5>But first we check out what's happening in the markets,

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 5>some cautious trading. We've got big bond sales, fifty eight

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars, a three year debt coming due. We keep

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 5>an eye on what the yields are doing, but we

0:00:57.680 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 5>also keep an eye on what's happening in London, China.

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 5>The talks continue. We're cleaning onto games up about a

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 5>tenth of a percent. Remember the S and P near

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 5>a record high ed. What are you looking at?

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Our top story and that is Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 3>assembling this super intelligence team. Bloomberg Reporting citing sources that

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 3>he wants fifty people. He wants them sitting close to

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 3>him at HQ all to go after Agi and in

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Meta's case, the stock kind of up with the focus

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 3>of the markets on trade talks right now. But this

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 3>is very much Caro founder mode activated.

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 5>Let's tick in on the founder mode. Brnimbos kert Wagner

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 5>joins us now, who helped break down this story, and

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 5>it feels as Oh, Mark Zuckerberg is rallying his troops,

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 5>has got his own personal WhatsApp for this well party,

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 5>he calls it.

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 6>We've been told that he's essentially more involved in recruiting

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 6>for this team than he has ever been at the

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 6>company in more than twenty years. This is something that

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 6>has you know, he's had a fire lit under him

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 6>back in April when their Lama four model was released

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 6>and quite frankly disappointed people, right, not only disappointed experts

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 6>outside the company who are reviewing the model, but disappointed

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 6>people internally. And we're told that Zuckerberg at that time

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 6>really said, Okay, I need to be heavily involved. I

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 6>need to go out and recruit these people myself to

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 6>get the absolute best talent and that is what he

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 6>has spent his last two months doing, literally hosting people

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 6>at his homes in Palo Alto and like Tahoe to

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 6>try and close these deals and sign these these AI

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 6>experts and scientists.

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.239
<v Speaker 3>I've been hearing for a while that Meta is offering

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 3>like salaries of two million dollars plus to a lot

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 3>of engineering talent. But Mark Zuckerberg is doing the phone

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 3>calls right. The question now is what is the motivation,

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, Meta versus the rest of the field.

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to the pursuit of Agi.

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, everyone's going after Agi.

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 6>And the way it was described to me by someone

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 6>the other day is, look, you know, it doesn't matter

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 6>if you're the third person, the third company to get

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 6>to AGI. It only matters if you're first.

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 6>Not only is that going to be a feather in

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 6>your cap for future recruiting for you know, kind of

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 6>the symbolism of being the first company to get there,

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 6>but it's also going to give you a massive head start,

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 6>as you know, for your products. So if Meta is

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 6>to get their first Meta AI's chatbot is going to

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 6>be more widely adopted, their ray banglasses will be more

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 6>widely adopted.

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 7>So the idea of getting to AGI is.

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 6>A massive race because of all of these other implications.

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 6>And that's one of the reasons that Zuckerberg, who is

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 6>super super competitive by the way, that's why he's putting

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 6>himself at the forefront of this effort.

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 7>At Meta right now, chez.

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 5>Been winning nineteen percent if you're looking at the competitive

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 5>street code. But what about Scale AI and the investment there,

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 5>how does it fit in?

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So, as we reported over the weekend, a multi

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 6>billion dollar investment is expected to go into Scale AI.

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 7>I think there's sort of two parts to this one.

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 6>There's the investment in what SCALEI is doing as a business,

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 6>the tech. Also the sort of relationships that they've developed

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 6>with with the government and having clients like that, I

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 6>think is something that's appealing to Meta, who has not

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 6>historically been in that bitline of business. But I think

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 6>there's also a recruiting element to this story. Right Alex Wang,

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:13.119
<v Speaker 6>the CEO of Scale AI, is expected to join this

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 6>new super intelligence team that we reported about last night.

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 6>I believe there are other Scale AI employees who were

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 6>probably contribute to this team as well, So there's sort

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 6>of a sharing of talent as well that I think

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 6>is a part of this expected deal which I imagine

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 6>we may hear about sometime in the very near future.

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Kurt, when Zuckerberg is inviting these engineers into his homes

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 3>like in Lake Tahoe, What is his pitch? What a

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 3>source is saying that he thinks Meta is doing well?

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 3>What Meta has an advantage in over the rest of

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 3>the field.

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 7>He's leaning quite heavily into Meta's resources.

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 6>You know, he's from what we've heard, he's talked about

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 6>the cash flow at the company, the strong advertising business,

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 6>and the fact that they have the tens of billions

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 6>of dollars on hand to go pursue these very spense

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 6>of AI improvements.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 6>A lot of the other companies aired as you know,

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 6>they're about raising money. They're out fundraising constantly to try

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 6>and get that cash flow in the building. Meta already

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 6>has that. So here's out saying, look, we have the resources.

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 6>I'm giving you the runway to do all of this stuff.

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 6>You know, come work for me where you will never

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 6>want for anything, essentially, right, So a big part of

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 6>the push is Meta as a financial behemoth here, who

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 6>can actually get this thing done?

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Behemoth. I wish we had more time to discuss that.

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Bloombo's Kurt Wagner, thank you very much. Sticking with AI,

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Apple introduced AI powered features at its Developers conference, including

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 3>an expanded relationship with open Ai, but a new software

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 3>redesign called liquid Glass, with a transparent menu and a

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 3>glassy look.

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 2>Bloombo's Mark gum And has.

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 3>All the details in our discussion of Apple WWDC. We

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 3>say that liquid Glass is the most significant design overhaul

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 3>for an OS interface ever.

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 2>What did you make of it? And what do we

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 2>need to know?

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So the significance of this interface change is how

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 8>broad it is.

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 7>Right, It's available.

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 8>On all of Apple's devices. This is the first time

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 8>they're doing a user interface revamp across all the devices.

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 8>And it's also interesting because it sets the stage for

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 8>future Apple devices. Right in terms of hardware, the Apple

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 8>devices are going to get more of glassy, Right. You're

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 8>going to see curve glass edges on the twentieth anniversary

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 8>iPhone in two years. So having an olive glass interface

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 8>with a lot of transparency sets the stage for that.

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 8>And so from that standpoint, it's great. I've been using

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 8>the new UI on all of my devices since yesterday

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 8>when the betas came out, and I think it's really great,

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 8>and I think it's also going to improve dramatically between

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 8>now in September when it's all released. And so if

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 8>you're a developer and you have an extra phone or

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 8>you want to take a little bit of a risk,

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 8>I would encourage anyone to try out the new look.

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 5>So that's cool. But why then, unless like Angelo Zino

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 5>saying this whole event was a dud, why is there

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:06.679
<v Speaker 5>such a deafening silence around Siri?

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 8>For example, Mark Well, because Wall Street basically cares about

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 8>buzzwords because buzzwords are wike at the share price moving

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 8>in either direction. And you didn't hear a whole lot

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 8>as we anticipated and talked about in advance about AI

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 8>or Siri. Apple is essentially taking an AI gap year

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 8>at the worst possible time. They're not promising any new

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 8>AI features right now. I don't anticipate that they're going

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.239
<v Speaker 8>to start doing so again until June of twenty twenty six.

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 8>Apple Intelligence obviously was a flop. They're doing their best

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 8>to try to show people that they are here too

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 8>with AI without going too far and making these promises.

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 8>What they have done is partnered with Chat GPT and

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 8>a few more features, so you can take a screenshot

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 8>now and chat, GPT can analyze what's on your screen.

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 8>Of course you could have done that with the app already,

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 8>but this is a bit of a shortcut. And then

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 8>they have new developer tools that happened to third party lms,

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 8>including JGBT. But yeah, to be clear, as we've been

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 8>talking about the fact that Apple is nowhere near any

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 8>of its competition in AI is a massive failure on

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 8>all levels.

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 3>The stock fell one point two percent yesterday Monday. It's

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 3>now up around one point two percent, so we've kind

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 3>of balanced out the trading in this Market's more to

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 3>do with trade talks than I guess anything idiosyncratic. I

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 3>found that probably the most significant piece of news relevance

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 3>WWDC to be that access for third party developers to

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 3>on device llms, because you think about the app store

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 3>that we have today and the ecosystem across operating systems.

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 3>The whole point of WWDC mark is the developers right

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 3>explain that piece of news and why the developer community

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 3>cheered it.

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 8>So the foundation models that are available for Apple's own

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 8>AI features are now available to third party developers, so

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 8>there are frameworks and software tools now for developers to

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 8>build their own AI Features'll be making it easier than

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 8>ever for developers, and by the way, there's millions of

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 8>them on the Apple platforms to develop AI futures for

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 8>their own apps. But just a step back in terms

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 8>of the features themselves, right, Most consumers who use these

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 8>devices just want them to be better, want them to

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 8>be easier, and so Apple went after the core competencies.

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 7>If you look at the.

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 8>Three apps that were revamped and improved yesterday, the three

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 8>were Safari, Phone and Camera, which are probably the most

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 8>used apps on most people's iPhones.

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 7>And then two additional apps that.

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 8>Got a little bit of love were Photos and Messages,

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 8>which probably rand out the top five. They weren't as

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 8>significant as the first three. So Apple made major improvements

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 8>to the apps that people are using every day. For

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 8>iPad users, the new iPad operating system finally makes the

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 8>iPad like a computer, right, and so that is a

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 8>huge feature that people, including myself, have been asking for

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 8>for years. So there's a lot of us in the

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 8>Apple community who are actually pretty thrilled with the improvements

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 8>that were made. But taking a step back still, this

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 8>is focusing on these os franchises that have been around

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 8>for decades rather than pushing us into these next generation

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 8>in our faces based around AI. So you have to

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 8>juggle both. Apple's doing a great job managing the current,

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 8>but we've not seen a lot that's giving us confidence

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 8>about the future.

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's Mark German, We thank you so much on the

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 5>Apple round up. Meanwhile, let's just look at what Alphabet,

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 5>the parent company of Google, is up to in terms

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 5>of it stop climbing following a report from Reuters that

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 5>it has signed a deal to provide cloud services to

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 5>open Ai. Open Ai will use the additional computing capacity

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 5>for training and running its models. Both companies declining to

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 5>comment Reuters it's a game of front of.

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 3>Me zed okay, coming up, Trade talks resume in London

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.839
<v Speaker 3>between the United States and China. We're going to have

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 3>the latest details next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 9>We are doing well with chin China's not easy.

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 4>We want to open up China, and if we don't

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 4>open up China, maybe we won't do anything.

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 9>But we want to open up China.

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 4>It'll be a great thing for China, a great thing

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 4>for the rest of the world.

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 3>That was President Trump commenting after the first day of

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 3>trade talks between the US and China in London, and

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 3>day two is now underway. Bloomberg's Amory Horden joins US

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 3>from London. Amh what do we need to know?

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 10>Well, you need to know is at the moment there

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 10>is no update. We still see both delegations having another

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 10>day of trade talks. They did have a break around

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 10>two o'clock local time. They have been back at the

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 10>negotiating table inside Lancaster House. We were waiting to hear

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 10>for potentially any breakouts in terms of the United States

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 10>getting what they want, which is an advanced pace of

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 10>rare earth and magnets, and the Chinese side getting a

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 10>bit of an easing of export controls, which is what

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 10>Kevin Hassett, the NEC director had said. At the moment,

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 10>talk are still ongoing, but there is really a time

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.599
<v Speaker 10>clock to this because Treasury Secretary Scott Besson has to

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 10>be back on Capitol Hill tomorrow he is testifying in

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 10>front of the House Ways and Means Committee, So they

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 10>really are in a time crunch to wrap up these negotiations.

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 5>Talking of timing, Amory an interestingly timed piece in the

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 5>People's Daily over in China the front page Huawei found

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 5>us saying, look, these restrictions on us, then I'll say about.

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 10>Right, And that's what a lot of people were talking about,

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 10>remember during Deep Seek. And this is something that the

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 10>Nvidia CEO, Jensen Wang had said to me when I

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 10>caught up with him briefly before he had that meeting

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 10>a month or so ago with Donald Trump in the

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 10>Oval Office, the President of the United States. Obviously they

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 10>likely were probably going to talk about their chip controls.

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 10>And he told ed recently that China has become quite

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 10>formidable and that China is neck and neck really with

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 10>the United States. They are not far behind. And that's

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 10>really what the Huawei founder was saying in this local daily.

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 10>It is really notable that in these talks in London,

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 10>very different than the talks four weeks ago in Geneva,

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 10>that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnik is here.

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 5>It means that those chips.

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 10>Potentially those export controls are on the table.

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 5>I'm Marie Hoden doing amazing work in London. We really

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 5>appreciate it. Look, let's just check in on how Chinese

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 5>stocks have reacted to all of this. They have been volatile.

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 5>We've been higher early in trade, but at the beginning

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 5>it really was down and down. We remain in the

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 5>red once again. This is the trade talks that we

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 5>say have been resuming. You're seeing Golden Dragon index and

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 5>as that golden draggoning an index off by three tenths

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 5>of a percent as we speak, Ali Baba off by

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 5>eight tenths. JD off by more than a percentage point.

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 5>Tiffany Wade is here on place to say, senior portfolio

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 5>manager at Columbia thread Needle Investments manages a cool six

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and twenty one billion dollars in assets. Tiffany,

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 5>how much is riding on these days of talks? How

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 5>much do you think ultimately does make a decision for

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 5>you within your portfolio.

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think we've seen the market react really well

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 11>over the last couple of weeks to certainly a reduction,

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 11>and some of the terriffs are China and other companies

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.319
<v Speaker 11>countries as well. This would be very critical, I think,

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 11>especially for the tech sector, especially talking about export restrictions.

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 11>There are certainly parts of the tech sector, like Nvidia

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 11>most recently the electronic design automation companies that have been

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 11>very hurt by export restrictions in tariffs. So for certain

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 11>pockets of the market, I think this would be very

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 11>impactful to see some of these trade negotiations play out.

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Tiffany, how much of a risk premium is the president

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 3>when you look at any corner of the technology market

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 3>and you say, I am going to bet on a

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 3>company that this president has recently spoken favorably about or

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 3>not favorably about, as the case may be, and talking

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 3>of course about the volatility that he brings to any

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 3>trade negotiation, Yeah, I think.

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 11>It creates a lot of pause when you're thinking about

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 11>companies that may be in focus from the president. Companies

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 11>that have been talked about are sectors that have been

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 11>talked about recently. But the worry as an investor is

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 11>what will happen next that we haven't planned for or

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 11>that we didn't see coming. So I think that, you know,

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 11>companies that have been spoken about, have been targeted, are

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 11>reflecting a bit of a risk premium, and you see

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 11>this in a lot of the tech companies that are trading,

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 11>you know, at discounts to where they were trading over

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 11>the last couple of years, certainly relative to their own multiples,

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 11>but also relative to the index as well, so I

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 11>think that's reflected in some of the stocks. But again,

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 11>the concern is what happens next because it's hard to predict.

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 5>Boy does Tim Cook want to know what happens next

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 5>as well? And his own salt trading below usual multiples.

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 5>They've been in the eye this storm. When it comes

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 5>to the supply chain side of things, what do you

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 5>make of the desire to make companies ultimately build a

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 5>US perhaps be less profitable. Does that make them as

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 5>appetizing as an investment?

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 11>It certainly doesn't. It hurts the profit margins, as you mentioned.

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 11>I think it'll be interesting to see how all of

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 11>this plays out because it takes multiple years to build

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 11>a factory here. It probably takes longer than you know

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 11>President Trump is going to.

0:15:57.880 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 12>Be in office.

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 11>So the announcement we've seen from companies building here, you know,

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 11>maybe some of them make sense economically, maybe some of

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 11>them are paying lip service.

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 12>To the administration. But it'll see.

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 11>It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. But

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 11>it's it's interesting that Apple specifically has has been a

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 11>little bit more defiant.

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 5>More defined, but perhaps more distracted. Is what people worry

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 5>about the fact that they are not playing catch up

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 5>to this AI game is people had hope with WWDC.

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 5>What did you make the event?

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I thought the event was a little bit disappointing

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 11>for Apple. We were expecting to hear more exciting updates

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 11>around Apple intelligence, around AI, maybe around AI being incorporated

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 11>into Siri, and instead I think we saw more updates

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 11>on improving the user interface, more features on existing applications.

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 11>You know, the applications that maybe incorporate the most AI

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 11>would be their updates on visual intelligence or live translation,

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 11>but those also feel like they're playing a little bit

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 11>of catch up versus applications that are already in the

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 11>market from other providers.

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 3>And my Bloomberg terminal, Apple seems to be the top

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 3>holding in the Columbia Large Growth funds, so let me

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 3>know if that's right. But I think like so far

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 3>this year, Apple has been trading on trade risk, right

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 3>on tariff risk, And when we were like literally in

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 3>the car on the way to APPLEWWDC, we're asking ourselves,

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 3>has this name started trading on that AI concern yet

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 3>or not.

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 11>I think we've seen that a little bit around the

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 11>WWSDC event, and we certainly saw that after the event

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 11>yesterday where people were a little bit disappointed that there

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 11>wasn't a big AI announcement coming out of the keynote presentation.

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 11>So I think we're seeing that a little bit. But Apple,

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 11>like a lot of big tech companies, I think, are

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 11>still trying to figure out their strategy around AI and

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 11>are putting a lot of money behind it.

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Tiffany, you set yourself up for this by saying the

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 3>big question is what happened happens next for the technology sector?

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 2>What happens next?

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 11>I think we're still very positive on the tech sector

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 11>for the rest of the year. There's a lot of

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 11>good tail wins for the sector. Obviously, tariffs and next

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 11>four restrictions could come out of field for the rest

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 11>of the year, but there's a lot of good tailwinds

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 11>for earnings growth, including AI investment that continues to be

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 11>very strong across multiple parts of the market. If we

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 11>look at earnings growth expectations for the rest of the

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 11>year or for the full year, the tech sector is

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 11>still expected to grow much faster than the rest of

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 11>the market. And as I mentioned before, a lot of

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 11>the valuations across certain subgroups of tech look very attractive

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 11>versus their history.

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 12>So we're still very positive on the sector.

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Are you positive on the commitment of capital coming from

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 5>these companies? Look at what Mount Zuckerbug's doing, devoting his

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 5>own time, his own dining table, but also shape quantities

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 5>of cash to make sure that he tries to win agis.

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 4>Isn't it?

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 12>Yeah? Absolutely? And he's not alone.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 11>Microsoft, Apple, Alphabet, Amazon are all making huge investments into AI,

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 11>and I think that has a great knock on effect

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 11>for parts of the semiconductor equipment, parts of software, other

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 11>parts of the economy, including industrials that all feed into

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 11>that AI infrastructure.

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Tiffany wade Be of fread Needo Investments, thank you very much.

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 5>Uber and Wave. They are set to plan their first

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 5>trial run of fully autonomous vehicles in London. It is

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 5>a move that could pay the way for commercial robotaxi

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 5>services in the United Kingdom. Let's get on what this

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 5>really means with Andrew Grant of Bloomberg NEF and really

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 5>your focus and analysis here is what London means for

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 5>the growth story of robotaxes. More broadly, why is it

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 5>difficult to trial run there?

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 13>Well, I mean, let me start by saying that London

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.360
<v Speaker 13>is a big market for Uber. They often cited as

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 13>one of their five most important cities globally and the

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 13>earnings calls and their reports. So this is a big

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 13>development that they are working with their partners to start

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 13>deploying to planning to deploy robotaxes in London. But these

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 13>types of streets are different from where we've seen the

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 13>majority of robotaxes in the past, places like Phoenix, Arizona

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 13>in Austin, Texas, where you have varying weather conditions, roads

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 13>that haven't been around for nearly as long as some

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 13>of the London streets which have their own quirks.

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 3>You lead our coverage of mobility right at BNF, and

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 3>you know that in any robotaxi setup, you have the

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 3>self driving tech, hardware, software, somebody owns the vehicle, somebody

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 3>operates the ride hailing app, and somebody manages the fleet.

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at this announcement from Uber and Wave and

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a few names and pieces missing.

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly.

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 13>In a robotaxi service, it really does take a village.

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 13>You need different parts of this value chain that are

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 13>going to contribute different skill sets and different capital requirements

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 13>and different payoff periods. So if you are looking at

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 13>what is essentially a partnership here between two tech companies

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 13>Wave and Uber that mostly work with software, there's a

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 13>few other players that need to manage the hardware and

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 13>manage the on the ground operations. So as you mentioned,

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 13>that will be things like people like Company that will

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 13>actually end up owning the vehicle. And in the past,

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 13>Uber's been a bit hesitant to own and operate large

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 13>fleets of vehicles, but they have shown that they are

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 13>willing to take over some of the operational aspects with

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 13>some of their partnerships, for instance, their partnership with Weimo

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 13>in Austin, some of their partnership with with we Ride

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 13>which is underway in the United Arab Emirates, where they're

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 13>taking over some of the fleet operating aspects. But you

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 13>did right there, we're missing kind of who's going to

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 13>own these fleets, who they're going to work with on

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 13>the charging side, if they are electric vehicles, which they

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 13>do seem likely to be at this stage, and all

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 13>the other details around maintenance and repair of these vehicles

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 13>as they function as robotaxis.

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 5>Andrew Grant, a Bloomberg ne ef these on ability coverage.

0:21:52.640 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 5>We really appreciate it. Welcome actively Medtech and Caroline Hyder.

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 2>New York and I Meed love Low in San Francisco.

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.239
<v Speaker 3>When I look at technology markets right now, it's kind

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 3>of the mag seven, those big megacap tech names that

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 3>are driving the narrative. Part of that is because investors

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 3>keeping YEM trade talks in London. But there are some

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 3>iliosyncretic items, some news items. We talked earlier about the

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 3>reports of open Ai looking to Alphabet and Google for

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 3>more cloud capacity.

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 5>Sign called liquid Glass. We'll recap WWDC and.

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 3>We speak with the ULA CEO about the spat between

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk and Donald Trump and what it means for

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 3>the space industry.

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 5>But first we check out what's happening in the markets,

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:39.959
<v Speaker 5>some cautious trading. We've got big bond sales, fifty eight

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars, a three year debt coming due. We keep

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 5>an eye on what the yields are doing, but we

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 5>also keep an eye on what's happening in London, China, US.

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 5>The talks continue. We're cleaning onto games up about a

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 5>tenth of a percent. Remember the S and P near

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 5>a record highed.

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 3>What are you looking at our top story, and that

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 3>is Meta CEO Mark zuckerberb assembling this super intelligence team.

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg reporting citing sources that he wants fifty people, he

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 3>wants them sitting close to him at HQ, all to

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 3>go after AGI. And in Meta's case, the stock kind

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 3>of up with the focus of the markets on trade

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 3>talks right now. But this is very much Caro founder

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 3>mode activated.

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.479
<v Speaker 5>Let's tick in on the founder mode. Primos kert Wagner

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 5>joins us now, who helped break down this story, and

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 5>it feels as oh, Mark Zuckerberg is rallying his troops,

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 5>has got his own personal WhatsApp for this well party,

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:29.719
<v Speaker 5>he calls it.

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 7>That's right.

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 6>We've been told that he's essentially more involved in recruiting

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 6>for this team than he has ever been at the

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 6>company in more than twenty years. This is something that

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 6>has you know, he's had a fire lit under him

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 6>back in April when their LAMAFOV model was released and

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 6>quite frankly disappointed people, right, not only disappointed experts outside

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 6>the company who are reviewing the model, but disappointed people internally.

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 6>And we're told that Zuckerberg at that time really said, Okay,

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 6>I need to be heavily involved. I need to go

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 6>out and recruit these people myself to get the absolute

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 6>best talent. And that is what he has spent his

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 6>last two months doing, literally hosting people at his homes

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 6>in Palo Alto and like Tahoe to try and close

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.959
<v Speaker 6>these deals and sign these these AI experts and scientists.

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 3>I've been hearing for a while that Meta is offering

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 3>like salaries of two million dollars plus to a lot

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 3>of engineering talent. But Mark Zuckerberg is doing the phone

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 3>calls right. The question now is what is the motivation

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, Meta versus the rest of the field when

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 3>it comes to the pursuit of Agi.

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, everyone's going after Agi.

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 6>And the way it was described to me by someone

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 6>the other day is, look, you know, it doesn't matter

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 6>if you're the third person, the third company to get

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 6>to Agi. It only matters if you're first.

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 6>Not only is that going to be a feather in

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.959
<v Speaker 6>your cap for future recruiting for you know, kind of

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 6>the symbolism of being the first company to get there,

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 6>but it's also going.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 7>To give you a massive head start, as you know,

0:24:58.960 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 7>for your products.

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 6>If Meta is to get their first Meta AI's chatbot

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 6>is going to be more widely adopted. Their ray ban

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 6>glasses will be more widely adopted. So the idea of

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 6>getting to AGI is a massive race because of all

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 6>of these other implications. And that's one of the reasons

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 6>that Zuckerberg, who is super super competitive by the way,

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 6>that's why he's putting himself at the forefront of this effort.

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 7>At Meta right now, chez.

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 5>Been winning nineteen percent if you're looking at the competitive

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 5>street code. But what about Scale AI and the investment there,

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 5>how does it fit in?

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So, as we reported over the weekend, a multi

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 6>billion dollar investment is expected to go into Scale AI.

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 7>I think there's sort of two parts to this one.

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 6>There's the investment in what SCALEAI is doing as a business,

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 6>the tech. Also the sort of relationships that they've developed

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 6>with with the government and having clients like that, I

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 6>think is something that's appealing to Meta, who has not

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 6>historically been in that bitline of business. But I think

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 6>there's also a recruiting element to this story. Right Alex Wang,

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 6>the CEO of Scale AI, is expected to join this

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 6>new super intelligence team that we reported about last night.

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 6>I believe there are other Scale AI employees who were

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 6>probably contribute to this team as well. So there's sort

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 6>of a sharing of talent as well that I think

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 6>is a part of this expected deal, which I imagine

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 6>we may hear about sometime in the very near future.

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Kurt, when Zuckerberg is inviting these engineers into his homes

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 3>like in Lake Tahoe, what is his pitch? What a

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.719
<v Speaker 3>source is saying that he thinks Meta is doing well?

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 3>What Meta has an advantage in over the rest of

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 3>the field.

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 7>He's leaning quite heavily into Meta's resources.

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 6>You know, he's from what we've heard, he's talked about

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 6>the cash flow at the company, the strong advertising business,

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 6>and the fact that they have the tens of billions

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 6>of dollars on hand to go pursue these very expensive

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 6>AI improvements. Right, a lot of the other companies, and

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 6>as you know, they're about raising money. They're out fundraising

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 6>constantly to try and get that cash flow in the building.

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 6>Meta already has that. So he's out saying, look, we

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 6>have the resources. I'm giving you the runway to do

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 6>all of this stuff. You know, come work for me

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 6>where you will never want for anything, essentially, Right, So

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 6>a big part of the push is meta as a

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 6>financial behemoth here, who can actually get this thing done?

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Behemoth? I wish we had more time to discuss that.

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Bloombo's Kirk Wagner, thank you very much. Sticking with AI,

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 3>Apple introduced AI powered features at its Developers conference, including

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 3>an expanded relationship with open Ai, but a new software

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 3>redesign called liquid Glass, with a transparent menu and a

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 3>glassy look. Bloombo's Mark Gunman has all the details in

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 3>our discussion of Apple WWDC. We say that liquid Glass

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 3>is the most significant design overhaul for an OS interface ever.

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 2>What did you make of it? And what do we

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 2>need to know?

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:54.120
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So the significance of this interface change is how

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 8>broad it is. Right, it's available on all of Apple's devices.

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.959
<v Speaker 8>This is the first time user interface revamp across all

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 8>the devices. And it's also interesting because it sets the

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:08.360
<v Speaker 8>stage for future Apple devices. Right in terms of hardware,

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 8>the Apple devices are going to get more of glassy.

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 8>You're going to see curve glass edges on the twentieth

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.959
<v Speaker 8>anniversary iPhone in two years. So having an old glass

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 8>interface with a lot of transparency sets the stage for that.

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 8>And so from that standpoint, it's great I've been using

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:28.640
<v Speaker 8>the new UI on all of my devices since yesterday

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 8>when the betas came out, and I think it's really great,

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 8>and I think it's also going to improve dramatically between

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 8>now in September when it's all released, and so if

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 8>you're a developer and you have an extra phone or

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 8>you want to take a little bit of a risk,

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 8>I would encourage anyone to try out the new look.

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 5>So that's cool. But why then analysts like Angelo Zino

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 5>saying this whole event was a dud? Why is there

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 5>such a deafening silence around Siri? For example, Mark.

0:28:55.080 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 8>Well because Wall Street basically cares about buzzwords because buzzwords

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 8>are wok at the share price moving in either direction.

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 8>And you didn't hear a whole lot as we anticipated

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 8>and talked about in advance about AI or Siri. Apple

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 8>is essentially taking an AI gap year at the worst

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 8>possible time. They're not promising any new AI features right now.

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 8>I don't anticipate that they're going to start doing so

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 8>again until June of twenty twenty six. Apple Intelligence obviously

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 8>was a flop. They're doing their best to try to

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 8>show people that they are here too, with AI without

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 8>going too far and making these promises. What they have

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 8>done is partnered with chat GPT in a few more features,

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 8>so you can take a screenshot now and chat GPT

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 8>can analyze what's on your screen. Of course you could

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 8>have done that with the app already, but this is

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 8>a bit of a shortcut. And then they have new

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 8>developer tools that tap into third party lms, including jet

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 8>GBT but yet to be clear. As we've been talking

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 8>about the fact that Apple is nowhere near any of

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 8>its competition in AI is a massive failure on all levels.

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 3>The stock fell one point two percent yesterday Monday. It's

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 3>now up around one point two percent, so we've kind

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 3>of balanced out the trading in this market's more to

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 3>do with trade talks than I guess anything idiosyncratic. I

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 3>found probably the most significant piece of news relevance WWDC

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 3>to be that access for third party developers to on

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 3>device lllms, because you think about the app store that

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 3>we have today and the ecosystem across operating systems. The

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 3>whole point of WWDC mark is the developers right explain

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 3>that piece of news and why the developer community cheered it.

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 8>So the foundation models that are available for Apple's own

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 8>AI features are now available to third party developers, so

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 8>there are frameworks and software tools now for developers to

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 8>build their own AI features. So this will be making

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 8>it easier than ever for developers. By the way, there's

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 8>millions of them on the Apple platforms to develop AI

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 8>futures for their own apps. But just to step back

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 8>in terms of the features themselves, right, most consumers who

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 8>use these devices just want them to be better, want

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 8>them to be easier, and so Apple went after the

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 8>core competencies. If you look at the three apps that

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 8>were revamped and improved yesterday, the three were Safari, Phone

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 8>and Camera, which are probably the most used apps on

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 8>most people's iPhones. And then two additional apps that got

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 8>a little bit of love were Photos and Messages, which

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 8>probably rund out the top five. They weren't as significant

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 8>as the first three. So Apple made major improvements to

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:29.719
<v Speaker 8>the apps that people are using every day. For iPad users,

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 8>the new iPad operating system finally makes the iPad like

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:36.719
<v Speaker 8>a computer, right, and so that is a huge feature

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 8>that people, including myself, have been asking for for years.

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 8>So there's a lot of us in the Apple community

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 8>who are actually pretty thrilled with the improvements that were made, but.

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 7>Taking a step back still.

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 8>This is focusing on these OS franchises that have been

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 8>around for decades rather than pushing us into these next

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 8>generation in our faces based around AI.

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 7>So you have to juggle both.

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 8>Apple's doing a great job managing the currents, but we've

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.719
<v Speaker 8>not seen a lot that's giving us confidence about the future.

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's Mark German, We thank you so much on the

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 5>Apple round up. Meanwhile, let's just look at what Alphabet,

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 5>the parent company of Google, is up to in terms

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 5>of its stock climbing. Following a report from Reuters, then

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 5>it has signed a deal to provide cloud services to

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 5>open Ai. Open Ai will use the additional computing capacity

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 5>for training and running its models. Both companies declining to

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 5>comment Reuters. It's a game of front of me zed okay.

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, Trade talks resume in London between the United

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 3>States and China. We're going to have the latest details next.

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 9>We are doing well with China. China is not easy.

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 4>We want to open up China, and if we don't

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 4>open up China, maybe we won't do anything.

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 9>But we want to open up China.

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 4>It'll be a great thing for China, a great thing

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 4>for the rest of the world.

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Trump commenting after the first day of trade talks between

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 3>the US and China in London, and day two is

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 3>now underway. Bloomberg's Amory Horden joins US from London.

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Amh what do we need to know?

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, what you need to know is, at the moment,

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 5>there is no update.

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 10>We still see both delegations having another day of trade talks.

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 10>They did have a break around two o'clock local time.

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 10>They have been back at the negotiating table inside Lancaster House.

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 10>We were waiting to hear for potentially any breakouts in

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 10>terms of the United States getting what they want, which

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 10>is an advanced pace of rare earths and magnets, and

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 10>the Chinese side getting a bit of an easing of

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 10>export controls, which is what Kevin Hassett, the NEC director

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 10>had said. At the moment, talks are still ongoing, but

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 10>there is really a time clock to this because Treasury

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 10>Secretary Scott Bessett has to be back on Capitol Hill

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 10>tomorrow he is testifying in front of the House Ways

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 10>and Means Committee, So they really are in a time

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 10>crunch to wrap up these negotiations.

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 5>Talking of timing amory an interestingly timed piece in the

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 5>People's Daily over in China, the front page, Huawei found

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:12.879
<v Speaker 5>us saying, look, these restrictions on us, then I'll say.

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 10>Bad, right, And that's what a lot of people were

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 10>talking about, remember during Deep Seek. And this is something

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 10>that the Nvidia CEO, Jensen Wang had said to me

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 10>when I caught up with him briefly before he had

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 10>that meeting a month or so ago with Donald Trump

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 10>in the Oval Office, the President.

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 5>Of the United States.

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 10>Obviously they likely were probably going to talk about their

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 10>chip controls. And he told ed recently that China has

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 10>become quite formidable and that China is neck and neck

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 10>rearly with the United States. They are not far behind.

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 10>And that's really what the Huawei founder was saying in

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:47.399
<v Speaker 10>this local daily. It is really notable that in these

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:50.399
<v Speaker 10>talks in London, very different than the talks four weeks

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 10>ago in Geneva, that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnik is here.

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 10>It means that those chips, potentially those export controls are

0:34:58.360 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 10>on the table.

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 5>Iri and doing amazing work in London. We really appreciate it.

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 5>Look let's just check in on how Chinese stocks have

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 5>reacted to all of this. They have been volatile. We've

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 5>been higher early in trade, but at the beginning it

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:11.839
<v Speaker 5>really was down and down. We remain in the red

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 5>once again. This is the trade talks that we say

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:17.399
<v Speaker 5>have been resuming. You're seeing Golden Dragon index and as

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 5>that golden dragging an index off by three tenths of

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 5>a percent as we speak, Ali Baba off by eight tenths.

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:25.280
<v Speaker 5>JD off by more than a percentage point. Tiffany Wade

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 5>is here when place to say, senior portfolio manager at

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 5>Columbia thread Needle Investments Manages is a cool six one

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:32.399
<v Speaker 5>hundred and twenty one billion dollars in assets. Tiffany, how

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 5>much is riding on these days of talks? How much

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 5>do you think ultimately does make a decision for you

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 5>within your portfolio.

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think we've seen the market react really well

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 11>over the last couple of weeks to certainly a reduction

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 11>in some of the tariffs on China and other companies

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 11>countries as well. This would be very critical, I think,

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 11>especially for the tech sector, especially talking about export restrictions.

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 11>There are certainly parts of the text actor like Nvidia

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 11>most recently the electronic design automation companies that have been

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 11>very hurt by export restrictions in tariffs. So for certain

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:05.319
<v Speaker 11>pockets of the market, I think this would be very

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 11>impactful to see some of these trade negotiations play out.

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Tiffany, how much of a risk premium is the president

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 3>when you look at any corner of the technology market

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 3>and you say, I am going to bet on a

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 3>company that this president has recently spoken favorably about or

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 3>not favorably about, as the case may be, and talking

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:29.879
<v Speaker 3>of course about the volatility that he brings to any

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 3>trade negotiation.

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think it creates a lot of pause when

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 11>you're thinking about companies that may be in focus from

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 11>the president. Companies that have been talked about are sectors

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 11>that have been talked about recently. But you know, the

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 11>worry as an investor is what will happen next that

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 11>we haven't planned for or that we didn't see coming.

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 11>So I think that, you know, companies that have been

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 11>spoken about, have been targeted, are reflecting a bit of

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 11>a risk premium, and you see this in a lot

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 11>of the tech companies that are trading, you know, at

0:36:58.120 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 11>discounts to where they were trading over the last couple

0:36:59.960 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 11>of years, certainly relative to their own multiples, but also

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 11>relative to the index as well. So I think that's

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 11>reflected in some of the stocks. But again, the concern

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:11.280
<v Speaker 11>is what happens next, because it's hard to predict.

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 5>Boy does Tim Cook want to know what happens next

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:17.839
<v Speaker 5>as well? And his own stop trading below usual multiples.

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 5>They've been in the eye this storm. When it comes

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 5>to the supply chain side of things, what do you

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 5>make of the desire to make companies ultimately build a

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 5>US perhaps be less profitable. Does that make them as

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 5>appetizing as an investment.

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 12>It certainly doesn't. It hurts the profit margins.

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 11>As you mentioned, I think it'll be interesting to see

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 11>how all of this plays out because it takes multiple

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 11>years to build a factory here. It probably takes longer

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 11>than you know, President Trump is going to be in office.

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 11>So do the announcement we've seen from companies building here.

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 11>You know, maybe some of them make sense economically, maybe

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 11>some of them are paying lip service to the administration,

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 11>but it'll see. It'll be interesting to see how this

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 11>plays out. But it's it's interesting that Apple specifically has

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.840
<v Speaker 11>has been a lot little bit more defiant.

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 5>More defined, but also perhaps more distracted. Is what people

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:07.839
<v Speaker 5>worry about, the fact that they are not playing catch

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 5>up to this AI game as people had hoped with WWDC.

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:11.320
<v Speaker 5>What did you make the event?

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I thought the event was a little bit disappointing

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:17.760
<v Speaker 11>for Apple. We were expecting to hear more exciting updates

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 11>around Apple Intelligence, around AI, maybe around AI being incorporated

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 11>into Siri, and instead I think we saw more updates

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:29.720
<v Speaker 11>on improving the user interface, more features on existing applications.

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 11>You know, the applications that maybe incorporate the most AI

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.360
<v Speaker 11>would be their updates on visual intelligence or live translation.

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 11>But those also feel like they're playing a little bit

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 11>of catch up versus applications that are already in the

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 11>market from other providers.

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 3>And my Bloomberg terminal, Apple seems to be the top

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:47.839
<v Speaker 3>holding in the Columbia large cap growth funds, so let

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 3>me know if that's right. But I think like so

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 3>far this year, Apple has been trading on trade risk,

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 3>right on tariff risk, and when we were like literally

0:38:57.120 --> 0:38:59.879
<v Speaker 3>in the car on the way to Apple WWDC, we're

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 3>losing ourselves. Has this name started trading on that AI

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 3>concern yet or not.

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 11>I think we've seen that a little bit around the

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 11>WWSDC event, and we certainly saw that after the event yesterday,

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 11>where people were a little bit disappointed that there wasn't

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 11>a big AI announcement coming out of the keynote presentation.

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 12>So I think we're seeing that a little bit.

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:22.399
<v Speaker 11>But Apple, like a lot of big tech companies, I think,

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:24.800
<v Speaker 11>are still trying to figure out their strategy around AI

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 11>and are putting a lot of money behind it.

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Tiffany, you set yourself up for this by saying the

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 3>big question is what happens next for the technology sector?

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 2>What happens next?

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 11>I think we're still very positive on the tech sector

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 11>for the rest of the year. There's a lot of

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 11>good tailwinds for the sector. Obviously, tariffs and nextpoor restrictions

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 11>could come out of left field for the rest of

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 11>the year, but there's a lot of good tailwinds for

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 11>earnings growth, including AI investment that continues to be very

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:56.799
<v Speaker 11>strong across multiple parts of the market. If we look

0:39:56.800 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 11>at earnings growth expectations for the rest of the year

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 11>or for the full year, the tech sector is still

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 11>expected to grow much faster than the rest of the market,

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 11>and as I mentioned before, a lot of the valuations

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:11.240
<v Speaker 11>across certain subgroups of tech look very attractive versus their history.

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:12.840
<v Speaker 11>So we're still very positive on the sector.

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 5>Are you positive on the commitment of capital coming from

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 5>these companies? Look at what mort Zuckerberg's doing devoting his

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 5>own time, his own dining table, but also share quantities

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 5>of cash to make sure that he tries to win agis.

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 12>Isn't it? Yeah? Absolutely? And he's not alone.

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 11>Microsoft to Apple, Alphabet, Amazon are all making huge investments

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 11>into AI, and I think that has a great knock

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 11>on effect for parts of the semiconductor equipment, parts of software,

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:42.280
<v Speaker 11>other parts of the economy, including industrials that all feed

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:43.919
<v Speaker 11>into that AI infrastructure.

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Tiffany Wade of Columbia Freadnido Investments, Thank you very much.

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:56.920
<v Speaker 5>Uber and Wave. They are set to plan their first

0:40:56.960 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 5>trial run of fully autonomous vehicles in London. Move that

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 5>could pay the way for commercial robotaxi services in the

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 5>United Kingdom. Let's get on what this really means with

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 5>Andrew Grant of Bloomberg NEF and really your focus and

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:13.280
<v Speaker 5>analysis here is what London means for the growth story

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:16.359
<v Speaker 5>of robotaxis More broadly, Why is it difficult to trial

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:16.759
<v Speaker 5>run that.

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:21.320
<v Speaker 13>I mean, let me start by saying that London is

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 13>a big market for Uber. They often cited as one

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:26.760
<v Speaker 13>of their five most important cities globally and the earnings

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:30.280
<v Speaker 13>calls and their reports. So this is a big development

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:33.320
<v Speaker 13>that they are working with their partners to start deploying

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 13>or to planning to deploy robotaxis in London. But these

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 13>types of streets are different from where we've seen the

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 13>majority of robotaxis in the past, places like Phoenix, Arizona,

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 13>in Austin, Texas, where you have varying weather conditions, roads

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 13>that haven't been around for nearly as long as some

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 13>of the London streets which have their own quirks.

0:41:56.560 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 3>You lead our coverage of mobility right at BNF, and

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 3>you know that in any robotaxi setup, you have the

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 3>self driving tech, hardware, software, somebody owns the vehicle, somebody

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 3>operates the ride hailing app, and somebody manages the fleet.

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at this announcement from Uber and Wave and

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:15.280
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a few names and pieces missing.

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, exactly, in a robotaxi service, it really does take

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 13>a village. You need different parts of this value chain

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 13>that are going to contribute different skill sets and different

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:30.359
<v Speaker 13>capital requirements and different payoff periods. So if you are

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:33.359
<v Speaker 13>looking at what is essentially a partnership here between two

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 13>take companies Wave and Uber that mostly work with software,

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:40.320
<v Speaker 13>there's a few other players that need to manage the

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:43.879
<v Speaker 13>hardware and manage the on the ground operations. So as

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 13>you mentioned, that will be things like people like a

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:48.840
<v Speaker 13>company that will actually end up owning the vehicle. And

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 13>in the past, Uber's been a bit hesitant to own

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 13>and operate large fleets of vehicles, but they have shown

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 13>that they are willing to take over some of the

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:02.319
<v Speaker 13>operational aspects with some of their partnerships, for instance, their

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:06.880
<v Speaker 13>partnership with Waimo in Austin, some of their partnership with

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 13>will we Ride, which is underway in the United Arab Emirates,

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 13>where they're taking over some of the fleet operating aspects.

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:17.400
<v Speaker 13>But you did right there, we're missing kind of who's

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 13>going to own these fleets, who they're going to work

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 13>with on the charging side, if they are electric vehicles,

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 13>which they do seem likely to be at the stage,

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:30.840
<v Speaker 13>and all the other details around maintenance and repair of

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 13>these vehicles as they function as robotaxis.

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:38.840
<v Speaker 5>Andrew Grant, a Bloomberg nef these on ability coverage, we

0:43:38.920 --> 0:43:41.720
<v Speaker 5>really appreciate it. Now's the breaking news for you because

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:45.320
<v Speaker 5>talks are ongoing in London and according to US official

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 5>US and China trade talks will continue. We're going to

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 5>bring you any details of what is being discussed at

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 5>the moment. Amory Horden has been outside of course Lancaster

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 5>and been thinking about how these talks are evolving, what

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 5>ultimately it means ed for the focus on semiconductors in particular.

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 5>What's we got coming up?

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, we're going to be joined by Tory Bruno, United

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Launch Aliance CEO to discuss the outlook for the space

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 3>business in the midst of Trump and Elon's spat.

0:44:13.400 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech