Speaker 1: Joe Biden has not been good. I know, I know,
Speaker 1: stop the presses. That's breaking news. Joe Biden has not
Speaker 1: been good, and I mean really, really really not good.
Speaker 1: And no I'm not just talking about his physical and
Speaker 1: mental limitations. Clearly we are dealing with an elderly individual
Speaker 1: who's not doing well. Let's set that aside. This is
Speaker 1: not what the show is about tonight. It has been
Speaker 1: disaster after disaster after disaster since this guy took office.
Speaker 1: And that's not just me some far right winger saying that, look,
Speaker 1: did you see in the recent poll numbers. Independence are
Speaker 1: saying that the country is looking on in horror at
Speaker 1: how bad this presidency has been. And it has been really, really,
Speaker 1: really bad. And in a really short amount of time,
Speaker 1: my word, imagine a few more years of this. So
Speaker 1: what is as big as disaster? We thought we should
Speaker 1: do a show on Let's go through them, let's rank them.
Speaker 1: I'll pick a winner, and my heart tells me this
Speaker 1: one might win. But we got a bunch of great
Speaker 1: guests on tonight, and I'm gonna let them all make
Speaker 1: their case. And when I say, my heart tells me
Speaker 1: this one might might. When let's start with Afghanistan. This
Speaker 1: is not something I can let go. On top of
Speaker 1: the international embarrassment, our allies are mad at us, our
Speaker 1: enemies think where weak and pathetic. On top of all that,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is directly responsible for the death of thirteen
Speaker 1: of our warriors. There's not a second way to look
Speaker 1: at this. There's not a second way. We got thirteen
Speaker 1: of our warriors killed. We gave up Bogram without evacuating
Speaker 1: our civilians, and then scrambled like a bunch of amateurs
Speaker 1: and said, oh, I'll just do from the airport. Well,
Speaker 1: you can't promptly secure an airport. And we got thirteen
Speaker 1: of our guys dead. And then and then, in response
Speaker 1: to thirteen of our guys being killed by Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: idiotic policies, we then turned around and incinerated a family
Speaker 1: of ten. And I can't let this go either, because
Speaker 1: human life matters. Have you seen the pictures of that
Speaker 1: family of ten. I'm not going to put them up
Speaker 1: for you, but have you seen the pictures? There were
Speaker 1: adorable little kids in there. We drone striked an AID worker.
Speaker 1: And not only did the Biden administration drone strike an
Speaker 1: AID worker in response to our people being blown up.
Speaker 1: They initially leaked that they had hit isis remember that.
Speaker 1: I know they don't want you to remember that, but
Speaker 1: I remember that. Well. What isis targets taken out. It
Speaker 1: was an AID worker who worked with us in a
Speaker 1: bunch of little kids. So, like I said, if we're
Speaker 1: going on my heart, I say that one might win.
Speaker 1: But I mean Joe Biden thinks it was a big success.
Speaker 1: No nation, no nation has ever done anything like it
Speaker 1: in all the history. The only the United States had
Speaker 1: the capacity and the will and the ability to do it,
Speaker 1: and we did it today. The extraordinary success of this
Speaker 1: mission was due to the incredible skill, bravely and selfless
Speaker 1: courage of the that's the president sounding like we just
Speaker 1: did something great. I'll tell you what. And look he
Speaker 1: lied as General's told him, hold on to Bogram, what
Speaker 1: are you talking about? Would do this right? He didn't?
Speaker 1: Then lied about that, and thirteen of our guys are killed,
Speaker 1: plus the ten we incinerated over there. But that's not
Speaker 1: the only scandal, you see. Joe Biden may have lied
Speaker 1: about Afghanistan, but dang, if he didn't tell the truth
Speaker 1: about the border, what I would do as president? As
Speaker 1: several more things. Because things have changed. I would, in
Speaker 1: fact make sure that there is we immediately surge to
Speaker 1: the border. All those people are seeking asylum. They deserve
Speaker 1: to be heard. That's who we are. Where a nation says,
Speaker 1: if you want to flee and you're freeing oppression, you
Speaker 1: should come. Once again, we don't watch when other world
Speaker 1: leaders speak. We don't. You don't, I don't. I talk
Speaker 1: politics for a living, an hour of TV every day,
Speaker 1: three hours of radio every single day. I couldn't tell
Speaker 1: you what Vladimir Putin's voice is. I mean, I've heard it,
Speaker 1: but I couldn't pick it out of nothing. I don't
Speaker 1: listen when he speaks. I don't care, and pain Merkel, McCrone,
Speaker 1: any of I don't know. They all know what the
Speaker 1: president says. The world watches, and they were all watching
Speaker 1: when the president said that during the debates, and so
Speaker 1: the second he got sworn in, they did exactly lee
Speaker 1: what he told them to do, and they surged the border.
Speaker 1: We are now a million already. We don't know the numbers.
Speaker 1: They're hiding them from us. A million illegal was pouring in.
Speaker 1: You remember, just recently it was fourteen thousand Haitians amassed
Speaker 1: on our border, and we let them into. And now
Speaker 1: we're already getting word from places in Central America that, ah, hey, guys,
Speaker 1: guess what, Since you let those fourteen thousand in, there
Speaker 1: are a lot more coming. There's already another gigantic caravan
Speaker 1: on the way. And there's simply not another way to
Speaker 1: look at the border situation than it being an intentional
Speaker 1: destruction of our country. There's no possible explanation for flooding
Speaker 1: a sovereign nation with illegal immigrants with no love or
Speaker 1: loyalty to this nation. And remember, this is the same
Speaker 1: illustration who says things to you about coronavirus all the time.
Speaker 1: They're very, very worried about coronavirus, coronavirus this, and coronavirus that.
Speaker 1: And yet even they're having to admit the level of
Speaker 1: disease with these illegal immigrants coming into the country. It's
Speaker 1: twenty percent, it's higher. We've got tuberculosis outbreaks, measles outbreaks.
Speaker 1: It's really really bad. But that's Afghanistan, that's the border.
Speaker 1: Those things are critical, and they may be winners. Both
Speaker 1: of those, maybe winners. As far as Joe Biden's biggest
Speaker 1: blunders go, the economy, though that's the one you're feeling
Speaker 1: at the moment. I know you are, because I am
Speaker 1: was filled up my truck last night with gas and
Speaker 1: I'm just sitting That took me a second and then
Speaker 1: it popped in. Oh. That's why that final number when
Speaker 1: you're thinking, okay, ouch, that hurt. You're seeing it all
Speaker 1: over the place. Joe Biden walks into office. First thing,
Speaker 1: oil and gas lees is gone, Keystone pipeline gone, gas prices.
Speaker 1: Now through the roof you're seeing the massive printing of money,
Speaker 1: unemployment benefits, paying people not to work. And not only
Speaker 1: is the debt problem bad, they're trying to pass a
Speaker 1: gigantic bill in claiming the debt means nothing. We talk
Speaker 1: about price tags. It is zero price tag on the
Speaker 1: debt we're paying. We're going to pay for everything we spend.
Speaker 1: So they say it's not you know, people understandably. Well,
Speaker 1: you know it started off at six trillion, Now it's
Speaker 1: three point five trillion. Now it goes they're going to
Speaker 1: be two point nine, it's going to be zero zero.
Speaker 1: Because in that plan that I put forward, and I
Speaker 1: said from the outset, I said, I'm running to change
Speaker 1: the dynamic of how the economy grows. I'm tired to
Speaker 1: trickle down. The trillionaires and billionaires are doing very very well.
Speaker 1: Never mind the disgusting communist class warfare thing there, and
Speaker 1: never mind the three point five trillion dollar bill. When
Speaker 1: he says paid for, how sick is it? What he's
Speaker 1: talking about is it's paid for, because I'm going to
Speaker 1: bleed the American taxpayer drive for three point five trillion
Speaker 1: dollars to pay for all my goodies. And remember that
Speaker 1: great Thomas Soul what he had to say about trickle
Speaker 1: down economics. There is a non existent theory that is
Speaker 1: constantly being attacked. Some years ago in my newspaper column,
Speaker 1: I challenged anybody to cite any economists out tide of
Speaker 1: an insane asylum who had ever made that argument. Nobody
Speaker 1: ever ever came up with a single person. When I
Speaker 1: put this out and I went out nationally sending click
Speaker 1: gated column, various people wrote to me and said, well,
Speaker 1: so and so said that, So and so said it,
Speaker 1: Find me the person who said it. I don't want
Speaker 1: to hear how A said that. B said find me
Speaker 1: B and show me where he said it. And that
Speaker 1: was years ago. Not one example has been offered, man,
Speaker 1: I love that guy. I love that guy. How great
Speaker 1: is that? So it's a laundry list of problems for
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. We're gonna We're gonna tackle wall in tonight.
Speaker 1: We'll see who the winner is, who is what is
Speaker 1: the worst thing he's done. It's gonna be a great
Speaker 1: show for you. Coming up next, Drew Burkewist, our first
Speaker 1: contestant talking about Afghanistan. Hang on joining me now, former
Speaker 1: counter terrorism agent and current host of This is My
Speaker 1: Show with Drew Burkewist. Drew Burkewist, Drew, it's tough to
Speaker 1: sort out Joe Biden's worst disasters. You say it's Afghanistan.
Speaker 1: I don't know that I can argue with, but make
Speaker 1: your case, sir, Well, thanks for having me, Jesse, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean it is. Look, there's a lot to compete
Speaker 1: with here, but I think that Afghanistan is on a
Speaker 1: number of levels right first and foremost, this was something
Speaker 1: that I know we wanted to get out of, but
Speaker 1: as we've talked about even on your show, the way
Speaker 1: that it was done was so epically bad that none
Speaker 1: of us who've spent exhaustive time in that country could
Speaker 1: have ever come up with a scenario that looked this bad.
Speaker 1: So I think I think it's a multitude of things.
Speaker 1: But first and foremost, you've abandoned and betrayed twenty years,
Speaker 1: two decades worth of warfighters who in some cases gave
Speaker 1: it all, but all of us and our families who've
Speaker 1: put so much into that. To spit in the face
Speaker 1: of those people that were tasked by this government by
Speaker 1: now him running this government and the way that they
Speaker 1: did it was horrible. So you've done that. You've disenfranchised
Speaker 1: and disenchanted a lot of Americans and a lot of
Speaker 1: families who just support our war fighters in the veteran
Speaker 1: and intel community. So that's a big issue. But also
Speaker 1: what you've shown is you've shown weakness in an aptitude,
Speaker 1: and it's killing our relationships around the world. We've got
Speaker 1: allies who are talking openly as well as behind our backs,
Speaker 1: talking about what happened to America, what happened to this
Speaker 1: country that we could rely on and lean on, who
Speaker 1: has essentially said, now we're just going to hand the
Speaker 1: keys to a terrorist organization, not just one, but several.
Speaker 1: In fact, we're going to give them more weapon, more weapons,
Speaker 1: more territory, more money, more power, and authority than they've
Speaker 1: ever had before, and we're going to legitimize them on
Speaker 1: top and claim that we have leveragement. In fact, we don't,
Speaker 1: because if we did, and we could, certainly, we would
Speaker 1: have done something, and we would have done it all
Speaker 1: different than this. So it's it's killing us there, and
Speaker 1: then on top of it, it's making us our partners
Speaker 1: both abroad and here at home less safe. True, Why
Speaker 1: why is this happening? Because this seems like this is
Speaker 1: part two of the Obama presidency where he came in
Speaker 1: and he pretty much gave the proverbial middle finger to
Speaker 1: all of our allies and extended a hand to all
Speaker 1: of our enemies. Why what am I missing? Well, look,
Speaker 1: it's Bidi's the Obama administration. The one thing that I
Speaker 1: saw just perpetuate over his eight years, and I served
Speaker 1: under all eight of his years overseas, mostly in Afghanistan,
Speaker 1: some in Iraq. And the difference with him versus so
Speaker 1: many other leaders that we've had in our country. We look,
Speaker 1: we've had some good ones, we've had some bad ones.
Speaker 1: Is that administration and we're seeing it now in what
Speaker 1: a lot of would call his third term with Joe
Speaker 1: Biden is they are ashamed of America. They always set
Speaker 1: up these deals that they say are in the best
Speaker 1: interest of our people, our country back home, when in
Speaker 1: fact we see that its case and point. You don't
Speaker 1: have to look hard or far to see every time
Speaker 1: that we get screwed in these deals, other people, usually
Speaker 1: nefarious actors, come out on top. Look at Iran under Obama,
Speaker 1: look at so many other places under Obama, and now
Speaker 1: you see everyone here too, And it's because they're ashamed
Speaker 1: of America. They don't actually love America. They'll say, oh,
Speaker 1: we love our troops, and God bless the troops, and
Speaker 1: God blessed this country, but it's a country that all
Speaker 1: their policies time and time again show they are trying
Speaker 1: to destroy. So we can say this was a blunder
Speaker 1: in it was, and we can say this shouldn't have happened,
Speaker 1: and it shouldn't have, but it all seems to be
Speaker 1: very purposeful based on these people and their track records. Drew,
Speaker 1: You've talked about this before on the show, but a
Speaker 1: lot of people they don't understand fully. To be honest,
Speaker 1: I don't understand fully Pakistan. Why is Pakistan so intimately
Speaker 1: connected to Afghanistan. Why is Pakistan so important and why
Speaker 1: are they nutso? Well, they're very nutso, and we're nutso
Speaker 1: for giving them so much money, billions over such a
Speaker 1: long period of time, and we've given that money to
Speaker 1: a power that we're trying to say, hey, there and
Speaker 1: there are Look, there's good people everywhere, right, and there's
Speaker 1: some good people in the Pakistani government. But what we're
Speaker 1: trying to do is keep the peace there with the
Speaker 1: region with as volatile as it is of course, with
Speaker 1: them in India and Kashmir, we've got, you know, if
Speaker 1: Afghanistan where we've been heavily involved for decades upon decades
Speaker 1: now we've got Iran on the other side of that,
Speaker 1: so it's a volatile region. We want to keep the
Speaker 1: peace there, We want to keep them in check. But
Speaker 1: the problem is is we never ever really have. They've
Speaker 1: just used and abused us. We've given them tons of
Speaker 1: money which they've turned around and given to Hakani and
Speaker 1: other nefarious actors to then go literally kill us. We're
Speaker 1: literally paying them to cut us out at the knees
Speaker 1: in Afghanistan and kill our service members and our allies.
Speaker 1: So it's made no sense. But We've always been scared
Speaker 1: to call them out on the carpet and say, you
Speaker 1: know what, We're just going to stop doing this until
Speaker 1: you stop doing what you're doing. And as a result,
Speaker 1: we have lost. They've won now, the Taliban, the Hakani Network,
Speaker 1: al Kaya iss K, and probably a dozen other groups
Speaker 1: have all won in this process. China's won in this process.
Speaker 1: But the one thing that remains true is that America lost. Okay,
Speaker 1: why when it comes to Pakistan, why have they been
Speaker 1: able to abuse us so badly? I mean, there is
Speaker 1: nobody who are all the people setting the policy aware
Speaker 1: they're being abused? But what are we scared of if
Speaker 1: we tell Pakistan nope, no more until you start acting, right,
Speaker 1: what are we scared of? Well, I don't know if
Speaker 1: it's because they're a nuclear power, you know, and we're
Speaker 1: scared that they're going to leverage that and say, okay, well,
Speaker 1: big brother America is not watching us, which you know, again,
Speaker 1: we're watching them, but we're not doing anything. So are
Speaker 1: we really watching them? Is the question at hand? But
Speaker 1: I don't, you know, there's that and again the instability
Speaker 1: that they sew in the region. I think we want
Speaker 1: to feel as though and policymakers want to feel as though, hey,
Speaker 1: we're doing something to keep them happy, keep them on
Speaker 1: our side. They do give us stuff in return, whether
Speaker 1: it's you know, airspace, whether it's access to this, whether
Speaker 1: it's our embassies and different operations in the region, what
Speaker 1: have you. But again we lose every time. And yes,
Speaker 1: the policymakers know about this. Yes, leadership at the different
Speaker 1: agencies know about this. They can see I mean the
Speaker 1: amount of reporting that just I know of and was
Speaker 1: a part of, which is just a pin prick, you know,
Speaker 1: being one person who served over there, that documents in channels,
Speaker 1: in official channels, what they're doing with this money, how
Speaker 1: this is going, how they how they've used and abused us,
Speaker 1: used and abused our funds and resources. It's it's absolutely insane.
Speaker 1: So someone's making out somewhere on our side. Who it
Speaker 1: is and why it is is tbd. But everyone is aware,
Speaker 1: and yet we continue to play the same dangerous game. True,
Speaker 1: can you explain what Afghanistan is going to look like
Speaker 1: or at least make a prediction on what it's going
Speaker 1: to look like? In Okay, let's call it five years.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's a year, maybe it's a month. Clearly Taliban.
Speaker 1: They're going to be fighting with the Northern Alliance, but
Speaker 1: that's not going very well. But then when they're all
Speaker 1: done with that, you still have a bunch of tribes
Speaker 1: that are not exactly going to sign up. You have
Speaker 1: isis you have al Kaeda. What does this place look
Speaker 1: like in five years? Well, I think it's going to
Speaker 1: look tribal like it always has. Right, this has always
Speaker 1: been a very tribal country. It's always been a country
Speaker 1: with conflict. So you're going to continue to see that.
Speaker 1: It's just going to escalate because again, you're not going
Speaker 1: to have a government that can bring stability. And that's
Speaker 1: not to say that Afghanistan's been the poster child for
Speaker 1: stability over the years. It obviously hasn't been. But you're
Speaker 1: going to have all these tribes. You're gonna have in fighting,
Speaker 1: which we're already seeing. You're seeing the Hakani Taliban fight
Speaker 1: the Taliban who's in cobble in quote quote in power.
Speaker 1: You're seeing the Kandahari Taliban who's upset with the way
Speaker 1: that the Hakani's and some of the folks in Kabbal
Speaker 1: are doing business. So they're they're fractured and splintered right there.
Speaker 1: Yet they still have the same goal of going after
Speaker 1: the West, you know, instilling Sharia law and all all
Speaker 1: of this, which is happening and going on now. But
Speaker 1: it's going to be lots of infighting. It's going to
Speaker 1: be lots of battling. And I think you're going to
Speaker 1: see some some quote unquote progress, you know, on infrastructure
Speaker 1: and stuff like that, because China is going to get
Speaker 1: in there. They already are involved indirectly through Pakistan, somewhat
Speaker 1: directly through Kabble, and their goal, of course is to
Speaker 1: protect their border to the north. Their goal is to
Speaker 1: get you know, the lithium and to get the rare
Speaker 1: earth minerals out of there. And what's going to be
Speaker 1: interesting to see is whether it's all out chaos, just
Speaker 1: war and a huge safe paven for terror, which again
Speaker 1: it already is right now, or whether the Chinese come
Speaker 1: in and other outside countries and say you've got to
Speaker 1: slow down on that a little bit, You've got to
Speaker 1: keep some of this in check. We're not. We don't
Speaker 1: expect you to keep it all in check, because we
Speaker 1: want to be safe and we want to get what
Speaker 1: we want out and maintain some credibility. But the bottom
Speaker 1: line is as chaos is what you're going to see,
Speaker 1: violence is what you're going to see. The videos that
Speaker 1: I see from people on the ground already on a
Speaker 1: daily basis are shocking and disturbing, and I think we
Speaker 1: can expect a lot more of that in the years
Speaker 1: to come. Drew, is China going to be the one
Speaker 1: running things in that place for real? Or are they
Speaker 1: just going to kind of suck out of there whatever
Speaker 1: they can as far as minerals and things goes, I
Speaker 1: think it's more of the ladder. I think that it's
Speaker 1: going to appear they're going to try to be hey,
Speaker 1: we're someone who can come in, you can count on us,
Speaker 1: We're going to help you. But really what it is
Speaker 1: is what they do all over the globe. They go in,
Speaker 1: they abuse people, get what they need in return, and
Speaker 1: back out again. I don't think they're going to care
Speaker 1: about tamping down on extremism too much in the region
Speaker 1: other than the parts where they are with the efforts
Speaker 1: that they're doing again extracting these minerals getting what they
Speaker 1: need out of it. Sure, maybe they'll do some infrastructure
Speaker 1: and return, but it's not going to be like Hey,
Speaker 1: we're going to come in and nor should anyone. We're
Speaker 1: going to come in and nation build. We're going to
Speaker 1: come in and help govern like we did for the
Speaker 1: last two decades. It's not gonna look like that, but
Speaker 1: they are, make no doubt about it. They're going to
Speaker 1: get out of that country what they want out of it,
Speaker 1: and they're going to try to make us bad look
Speaker 1: bad along the way. Drew, thank you so much, my man.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me. All Right, we'll be bad. Who's
Speaker 1: the winner the look? That's a long list of scandals
Speaker 1: and disasters for Joe Biden, But I've got to say
Speaker 1: I like Charles Marino's subject here because I think he
Speaker 1: might end up being the winner in the clubhouse. He
Speaker 1: is the former Homeland Security Department advisor and former Secret
Speaker 1: Service special agent. Gosh that school. I wish I could
Speaker 1: call myself a special agent, Charles. What's Joe Biden's worst disaster? Jesse,
Speaker 1: hands down, it is the border. It is the most
Speaker 1: immediate threat to our national security, and it's going to
Speaker 1: impact everything. It's going to impact local communities, it's going
Speaker 1: to impact the economy in terms of having to support
Speaker 1: all of these migrants that are being let into the country.
Speaker 1: Let's look at the numbers. One point five million encounters
Speaker 1: so far this year. Let's bring that up to two
Speaker 1: million conservatively if you include the getaways. The amount of
Speaker 1: stress that this is going to put on our local
Speaker 1: communities in terms of public safety, health and medical, you
Speaker 1: name its, schooling. I mean, it's just unbelievable. And then
Speaker 1: again back to our national security, the big question is
Speaker 1: who are these people that were letting in? Who are
Speaker 1: these people Charles? Because look, when you when you talk
Speaker 1: to these border patrol guys, which obviously is something you
Speaker 1: do often, my buddies tell me it's not it's not
Speaker 1: just haiting, you know, it's it's not it's not Guatemala.
Speaker 1: It's it's it's all over the world. They're coming through there,
Speaker 1: and I mean all over the world, and nobody seems
Speaker 1: to be able to assess who these people are because
Speaker 1: there are ones who do want to get caught, and
Speaker 1: then there are ones who very much do not, and
Speaker 1: there's a lot of those getting through too. Yeah, the
Speaker 1: numbers are at thirty percent again conservatively, are coming from
Speaker 1: around the world. That means that they're coming from locations
Speaker 1: not including Mexico and Central America. We've seen this with Haiti.
Speaker 1: They've relocated to Latin America, Central America years ago, and
Speaker 1: now the word is out there's no deterrent for our borders.
Speaker 1: The words out it's open borders. Now is the time
Speaker 1: to come. So you have, for in the example of Haiti,
Speaker 1: you have these migrants that have relocated years ago now
Speaker 1: making their try to get into the United States, and
Speaker 1: because there's no deterrent, it is not going to stop.
Speaker 1: So if we look at from day one of this administration,
Speaker 1: how this country has been threatened most immediately, it is
Speaker 1: most certainly, hands down the border crisis. Charles, the Haiti thing,
Speaker 1: I think, Look, there's been so many disasters and scandals
Speaker 1: that we don't have time to dwell enough on each one.
Speaker 1: But it really is staggering to me that fourteen thousand
Speaker 1: people can amass on the border of a nation and
Speaker 1: we just let them in. So of course there's going
Speaker 1: to be another one we already have where there's twenty
Speaker 1: thousand more coming. Why wouldn't they the last fourteen thousand
Speaker 1: just waltzed into the country. What this is not sustainable?
Speaker 1: Where are we putting these people? By the way, Yeah,
Speaker 1: we're sneaking them into communities around the country, unbeknownst to
Speaker 1: elected officials and local citizens in those communities, which is
Speaker 1: disingenuous and dangerous at most. But what we have here
Speaker 1: is we have an overall failure of policy with no
Speaker 1: overarching strategy from day one. And what this has caused
Speaker 1: is it's placed the citizens here in this tree in danger,
Speaker 1: and it's also endangered those people that are making this
Speaker 1: dangerous trek. Let's not forget the humanitarian crisis. What happens
Speaker 1: during this journey. We're talking about rapes of women, abuse
Speaker 1: of children, people dying. They're coming through very dangerous terrain.
Speaker 1: And all of the money, by the way, based on
Speaker 1: our policies, is funding the cartels. They have made billions
Speaker 1: of dollars since this crisis has begun, based on our policies.
Speaker 1: So here we are supporting a transnational criminal organization who's
Speaker 1: sneaking people into our country for purposes. We just don't know, Charles,
Speaker 1: how am I supposed to take this as anything other
Speaker 1: than intentional, I mean, a failure of policy. You call it.
Speaker 1: This looks intentional. I mean you have to intentionally screw
Speaker 1: up this bad to let this many people inside your borders. No,
Speaker 1: it is intentional. I mean, let's look at how the
Speaker 1: administration is turning on CBP based on their acts down
Speaker 1: in Del Rio. Listen, it's not like they don't like
Speaker 1: the just the optics of what they saw you with
Speaker 1: the CBP officers on horses. They just don't like the
Speaker 1: optics of the border being enforced at all. So this
Speaker 1: is purposeful for what reason, I don't know. There are
Speaker 1: some guesses about it. Maybe to turn the electoral map
Speaker 1: upside down, possibly, but this is nothing good for our
Speaker 1: national security. This is the way we got beat pre
Speaker 1: nine to eleven. We got beat through our immigration and
Speaker 1: visa programs, and we're setting ourselves up for failure. Shortly
Speaker 1: after the twentieth anniversary of September eleventh, Charles, can you
Speaker 1: give me before we get to the economic stuff, which
Speaker 1: I'll get to in a second, can you give me
Speaker 1: some window into the life of say one of these Haitians.
Speaker 1: All Right, that they get in here, they get turned loose, snderstand.
Speaker 1: Oftentimes they get taken to a charity of some kind
Speaker 1: and then dropped at a hotel or something, and then
Speaker 1: of course they disperse. Most likely they're going to find
Speaker 1: some Haitian community here and do what they can get
Speaker 1: jobs apparently, yeah, they can get jobs. They're in here
Speaker 1: while they're awaiting. They're given a notice to appear, which
Speaker 1: the majority of which, as we know, never show up
Speaker 1: for their immigration hearings. So they're here for the long haul.
Speaker 1: And as long as the administration doesn't make their removal
Speaker 1: a priority, ie, if they're here and don't commit crimes,
Speaker 1: they're never going to be removed by ICE. So ICE
Speaker 1: has been significantly limited in what they could do by
Speaker 1: the administration. So nobody's getting deported. You know that overarching
Speaker 1: number two million people, only three percent are being deported
Speaker 1: under Title forty two, which is only a CDC mechanism.
Speaker 1: So imagine if we didn't have a pandemic right now, Jesse,
Speaker 1: nobody would be getting removed. Fellas explain what Title forty
Speaker 1: two is again, Yeah, so Title forty two is what
Speaker 1: was implemented by the CDC to help owner the spread
Speaker 1: from outside the United States of COVID nineteen. And what
Speaker 1: we're seeing at is we're not seeing Title forty two
Speaker 1: being applied consistently by the administration. The most that are
Speaker 1: being impacted by Title forty two are single adult mails.
Speaker 1: But if you come in as part of a family
Speaker 1: package and they're not even testing for COVID nineteen, None
Speaker 1: of those Haitian migrants that came into Del Rio were
Speaker 1: tested for COVID protocols. And that's based on the word
Speaker 1: of the Secretary of Homeland Security. So they've put that
Speaker 1: title forty two. They've put the pandemic on the back burner.
Speaker 1: They're only using it really in a few cases, three
Speaker 1: percent of the cases for single mails, and they're turning
Speaker 1: them around. So the single mails, what are they doing
Speaker 1: If CBP is surging to areas like Del Rio, they're
Speaker 1: beating the system by going further down on the border
Speaker 1: where there are no resources there to stop them. All right, Charles,
Speaker 1: you brought it up earlier. People don't talk enough about
Speaker 1: the economic impact of flooding your country with illegal immigrants.
Speaker 1: Would you elaborate on that please, So the left will
Speaker 1: argue that listen to migrants that we're letting into the
Speaker 1: country while they're awaiting their illegal immigration hearings, that they're
Speaker 1: spending money in communities that is in no way going
Speaker 1: to offset the amount of money that the government is
Speaker 1: going to spend through schooling, through healthcare, you name it,
Speaker 1: through emergency services, through social services, through things like welfare,
Speaker 1: food stamps. Right, and they're also let's forget, they're not forget.
Speaker 1: They're also sending the majority of money that they earn
Speaker 1: outside of the United States, the family that have remained
Speaker 1: in places like Mexico and Central America. So the money
Speaker 1: that they make is not flooding the economy as some
Speaker 1: would lead us to believe, and we are spending far
Speaker 1: more than we are taking in Charles, people don't talk
Speaker 1: enough about the impact of schools and hospitals. These hospitals,
Speaker 1: especially hospitals along the border. I used to witness it.
Speaker 1: I used to live down there. The ers would be
Speaker 1: full because illegals simply use the ars as their family doctor.
Speaker 1: And then people don't talk about the burden on these
Speaker 1: hospitals who don't get paid. That's right, No, that's right.
Speaker 1: I mean emergency rooms become the de facto primary care
Speaker 1: physicians for these illegal migrants, and we pay the bill
Speaker 1: for that. They have no healthcare. They usually don't have
Speaker 1: enough money to cover even showing up one hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty dollars fee or more to even be seen before
Speaker 1: you get diagnosed. So this just puts a big stream
Speaker 1: on our communities here, and let's talk about policing. You know,
Speaker 1: we're also going to see a rise in local crime.
Speaker 1: We're going to see additional stress on law enforcement agencies.
Speaker 1: That many of the big cities that these people are
Speaker 1: going to go to are also trying to defund their
Speaker 1: police departments at the same time while they're dealing with
Speaker 1: the immigration search and one consistent factor, Jesse, they're all Democrats,
Speaker 1: Charles Marino, Charles, thank you so much, but man, I
Speaker 1: appreciate it. All right. Thanks, good to see you, Jesse.
Speaker 1: We have the great Carol Roth. Next, she has her
Speaker 1: own scandal she thinks is number one. Hang on, there's
Speaker 1: been a lot of disasters during the past eight nine months.
Speaker 1: I know the disaster number one happens to be in
Speaker 1: the White House, and there seems to be some disagreement
Speaker 1: on the right over exactly which is his biggest disaster.
Speaker 1: So joining me now, obviously she's well known on this show,
Speaker 1: author of the War on Small Business. My friend Carol
Speaker 1: Roth joins me. Carol, what is Joe Biden's biggest disaster
Speaker 1: in your opinion? So obviously it's always all about the
Speaker 1: money and Joe Biden is the biggest economic disaster that
Speaker 1: we have seen in a very long time. Now, I
Speaker 1: am a fair individual, Jesse, if nothing else, I think
Speaker 1: you would agree with that. So he did walk in
Speaker 1: to a bad situation, and he had this opportunity to
Speaker 1: turn things around because the vaccine was coming out, people's
Speaker 1: bank accounts were doing pretty well, there were a ton
Speaker 1: of jobs available. And what does this genius do. He
Speaker 1: doubles down on bad policy amidst all of this. The
Speaker 1: first thing that they do is the American Rescue Plan,
Speaker 1: almost two trillion dollars in additional spending going to cronies,
Speaker 1: throwing out Biden bucks. So he can say he gave
Speaker 1: you back your own money, but most people don't realize that.
Speaker 1: So that puts a lot of additional money and pressure
Speaker 1: on prices in the economy. He tended the unemployment benefit
Speaker 1: situation that was set to expire last March, increased or
Speaker 1: excuse me, extended the unemployment bonuses that incremental three hundred
Speaker 1: dollars on top of traditional unemployment to keep people out
Speaker 1: of the workforce. And the outcome of all of this
Speaker 1: is the stuff that we're paying for every day. We
Speaker 1: don't have enough people to fill the jobs in the
Speaker 1: labor market. There are almost eleven million jobs unfilled. The
Speaker 1: supply chains entirely messed up. There's an increase in prices,
Speaker 1: so people are paying more and getting less, and for
Speaker 1: the poor and for the middle class, inflation is a
Speaker 1: tax that nobody talks about. On top of that, think
Speaker 1: about things like gas prices going up. Well, this genius
Speaker 1: in the White House came in. What's the first things
Speaker 1: that he does. He canceled leases on cancels oil and
Speaker 1: gas pleases. Side that we're not going to continue to
Speaker 1: build a pipeline. And the worst part is that the
Speaker 1: scariest financial policies are yet to come, trillions and trillions
Speaker 1: of additional dollars that are moving us further away from
Speaker 1: pre markets towards socialism. So that is the biggest blunder.
Speaker 1: We're going to get to the future in a moment.
Speaker 1: But you said he inherited a bad situation. We don't
Speaker 1: pull punches on this show. What is the bad situation
Speaker 1: specifically he inherited it and why did he inherit it?
Speaker 1: So from the last administration, Congress, and the Federal Reserve
Speaker 1: twenty twenty saw the most historic transfer of wealth from
Speaker 1: main streets to Wall Street in history. It shut down
Speaker 1: smaller businesses and let that revenue go to bigger businesses.
Speaker 1: It pumped trillions of dollars into the market to prop
Speaker 1: up big businesses. It allowed were interest rased to stay
Speaker 1: artificially depressed, and so if you were a retiree or saver,
Speaker 1: you were earning next to nothing on your money. But
Speaker 1: big companies were able to borrow cheaply and go out
Speaker 1: and compete not only with other businesses in the market,
Speaker 1: but with individuals to purchase homes and the like. And
Speaker 1: this was all the roots of creating not only this
Speaker 1: wealth transfer, but the pressure that is coming out in inflation.
Speaker 1: So you know he did inherit that that happened before
Speaker 1: he walked in. But again he could have stopped it.
Speaker 1: He could have said, okay, well now we're going to
Speaker 1: return to normal, but chose not to do that. All right, Carol,
Speaker 1: Since as long as you're sitting here scaring the pants
Speaker 1: off of everybody what's coming? You mentioned what's coming? Because
Speaker 1: it ain't great right now? What's coming? So we have
Speaker 1: trillions in trillions of additional spending that we are being
Speaker 1: told is quote unquote paid for. Of course, none of
Speaker 1: this is paid for. They're making the assumptions that they
Speaker 1: will be able to raise taxes and that that won't
Speaker 1: have economic impacts. They're doing things like tricks in terms
Speaker 1: of timing. So they're saying this is the ten year costs,
Speaker 1: but they're phasing in a program maybe a few years later,
Speaker 1: or bringing some of it on later, or only doing
Speaker 1: it for two years and then you're gonna have to
Speaker 1: vote for it for the other eight years. So they're
Speaker 1: doing all kinds of tricks. And these are all things
Speaker 1: that encourage big government and big special interests and take
Speaker 1: away the economic freedom from the individual and will make
Speaker 1: it more difficult for individuals to create and hold onto wealth.
Speaker 1: And so that is what's coming. Obviously we're already seeing
Speaker 1: the effects, as I said, in inflation in terms of taxes.
Speaker 1: They want to double down, they want to spend more,
Speaker 1: they want human in the way that they see fit,
Speaker 1: and the way that they see fit is going to
Speaker 1: benefit the people who are inside of the club and
Speaker 1: not the average American, even though they sell it the
Speaker 1: other way. Carol, inflation, I know we talked about this
Speaker 1: a lot, but shooting I got it from my wife yesterday,
Speaker 1: got back from that, she got back to the grocery stores.
Speaker 1: It's like, well, I don't understand. Why is everything costing
Speaker 1: so much more and you think that's going to continue
Speaker 1: to get worse. Why what does that have to do
Speaker 1: with interest rates? Right? So basically there's this all this
Speaker 1: interconnection in terms of the money that has been printed
Speaker 1: and the money that has been transferred from the government
Speaker 1: I would have nowhere into people's pockets, or this is
Speaker 1: money that they're making up that is a future debt
Speaker 1: that we have to pay, and putting all of this
Speaker 1: money into the system, chasing the same amount of goods
Speaker 1: and services, or in our case, sometimes fewer goods and
Speaker 1: services because again we have these supply chain problems, so
Speaker 1: people can't manufacture the same level of goods or have
Speaker 1: the same number of people working to have the same output.
Speaker 1: That creates price inflation, and it's done in one of
Speaker 1: two ways. It's either direct price inflation, so you're paying
Speaker 1: more for the same thing, where they do something called
Speaker 1: shrink inflation, where you're buying a box of cereal and
Speaker 1: it looks the same, but when you open it up,
Speaker 1: like only half the box is filled, and then you
Speaker 1: look at the outside and you realize, oh, they've actually
Speaker 1: cut the amount that's in the box, So you're still
Speaker 1: getting less with the amount of dollars that you have.
Speaker 1: And again that's attacks on the poor in the middle
Speaker 1: class because they're the ones who are spending. The asset
Speaker 1: value or the prices of assets keep going up in value.
Speaker 1: So if you're somebody who is an investor who has
Speaker 1: access to cheap debt for investing and has a lot
Speaker 1: of hard assets and it's going to continue to buy assets,
Speaker 1: those are going to increase in value value, so you're
Speaker 1: not having the same level of bad outcomes. Even though
Speaker 1: this does impact everyone, it just impacts them in a
Speaker 1: different way. So rich people are going to get richer
Speaker 1: during an economic downturn, and poor and middle class people
Speaker 1: are going to see their standard of living lowerd Do
Speaker 1: I have that about rights. Absolutely. As I said, this
Speaker 1: is all about central plannings about being in the club.
Speaker 1: If you are in the club, but who's in the club.
Speaker 1: The people in the power circle, the people who have money,
Speaker 1: they are going to end up making out very well
Speaker 1: and the people who aren't will not. And unfortunately that
Speaker 1: is not economic freedom. That is not the American dream,
Speaker 1: and they are just absolutely killing it. Carol. Are there
Speaker 1: people in Washington, d C? Anybody, anybody who seems to
Speaker 1: understand finances? I mean, there certainly are a handful of people,
Speaker 1: but they are few and far between. And unfortunately, everybody's
Speaker 1: coming at this as sort of a party, you know,
Speaker 1: a partisan matter. Europe, I just got my guy in charge,
Speaker 1: If I just got my gallon charges, who's going to
Speaker 1: fix it? But this really is a systemic issue. We
Speaker 1: have seen an explosion in spending and the types of
Speaker 1: things that have been shifted to the government purview over
Speaker 1: the last you know, several decades, and so it's not
Speaker 1: something that's going to be fixed just by getting one
Speaker 1: person in there. The system is rotten and the system
Speaker 1: needs to be overhaulmed. How do we overhaul it? It
Speaker 1: doesn't seem possible right about now. I'm following yearly Jesse.
Speaker 1: You're supposed to have the answers to this, right you
Speaker 1: start pull the valganization, you know, maybe you get to
Speaker 1: the point where you have a Convention of the States
Speaker 1: and they say we need to take back, you know,
Speaker 1: some of our purview. I think the first thing people
Speaker 1: educated about the Federal Reserve, who has been a huge
Speaker 1: piece of this because not only, as I said, are
Speaker 1: they disrupting risk in the market and facilitating this transfer,
Speaker 1: but they're enabling the bad government spending. When the government overspends, right,
Speaker 1: who do they think is going to be there to
Speaker 1: go out in the market and buy the debt that
Speaker 1: they issue. It's not like other countries have all this money.
Speaker 1: It's not like, you know, the investors are like clamoring
Speaker 1: to get their hands done US government bond. The Federal
Speaker 1: Reserve has been in the market buying them. They're monetizing
Speaker 1: the debt. So if we got rid of that problem,
Speaker 1: maybe put some pressure that could start it. But this
Speaker 1: is a huge, huge issue, and unfortunately, once weak go
Speaker 1: over that cliff, there's no coming back. So we've got
Speaker 1: to stop it now. Roth, Thank you so much. What
Speaker 1: did I win? You want? You want? Yes? She did good, Carol,
Speaker 1: she did good to please you and win. And maybe
Speaker 1: can I get like a balloon out of it or
Speaker 1: something you killed it. We'll get you a balloon with
Speaker 1: my face on it, Carol'll be the best gift ever. Perfect.
Speaker 1: Thank you, all right, we'll be back. Well, that was
Speaker 1: a whole lot of blunder. I mean, that's a lot
Speaker 1: of blunder to squeeze in your first nine months as president,
Speaker 1: but somehow Joe Biden has pulled it off. So what
Speaker 1: is the winner? I told you the very beginning of
Speaker 1: the show, my heart would say Afghanistan. I understand, I'm
Speaker 1: very very biased there. I can't get those thirteen warriors
Speaker 1: out of my mind that they're dead. They're dead because
Speaker 1: of Joe Biden. So I want to say Afghanistan. But
Speaker 1: the real truth is the biggest blunder is the one
Speaker 1: we can't even feel fully yet. The biggest blunder is
Speaker 1: the economy. It's the economy. And I know that's not
Speaker 1: the sexy one, right. It's easy to talk about the
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants in Afghanistan and all that, but you've never
Speaker 1: been part of a crashed economy. I've never been part
Speaker 1: of a crashed economy. I don't know. I can't tell
Speaker 1: you what it's like. I only know what I read
Speaker 1: about in the history books. I watch documentaries about it,
Speaker 1: and the way people describe how their entire life changed scary.
Speaker 1: And we're heading there, and we're heading there really, really,
Speaker 1: really fast, and the Biden administration seems to want to
Speaker 1: get us there tomorrow. So the biggest blunder right now
Speaker 1: is Joe Biden's economy. And I hope I don't turn
Speaker 1: out to be right, but when does that ever happen?
Speaker 1: All Right, it's been a great special. I'll see you,