1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,639 Speaker 1: In his New York Times interview on Wednesday, Donald Trump 2 00:00:02,640 --> 00:00:06,480 Speaker 1: broke rather dramatically from his Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Trump 3 00:00:06,559 --> 00:00:10,240 Speaker 1: said that he had he known Sessions would refuse himself 4 00:00:10,240 --> 00:00:13,080 Speaker 1: from the investigation into Russian meddling in the election, the 5 00:00:13,119 --> 00:00:16,520 Speaker 1: president would have chosen someone else for the post. Trump 6 00:00:16,520 --> 00:00:19,760 Speaker 1: blames sessions recusal for the appointment of Special counsel Robert Mueller. 7 00:00:20,040 --> 00:00:22,680 Speaker 1: According to a new Bloomberg story, Mueller is now conducting 8 00:00:22,680 --> 00:00:25,759 Speaker 1: a wide ranging probe into some of the President's business 9 00:00:25,760 --> 00:00:28,840 Speaker 1: dealings and those of his associates. With us to talk 10 00:00:28,880 --> 00:00:32,080 Speaker 1: about this fast changing subject is Leah Lippman. She's a 11 00:00:32,159 --> 00:00:35,600 Speaker 1: law professor at the University of California, Irvine. Leah, thanks 12 00:00:35,640 --> 00:00:39,760 Speaker 1: for being with us. UM. Let's start with Jeff Sessions today, 13 00:00:39,840 --> 00:00:42,240 Speaker 1: he said he wasn't going to resign, notwithstanding with the 14 00:00:42,479 --> 00:00:46,440 Speaker 1: President said in the President's apparent lack of confidence in him. 15 00:00:46,640 --> 00:00:50,839 Speaker 1: Is he in an untenable position now? I think he's 16 00:00:50,840 --> 00:00:53,440 Speaker 1: certainly in a difficult situation. You know, he no longer 17 00:00:53,479 --> 00:00:56,520 Speaker 1: has the public support from the White House. UM. He's 18 00:00:56,600 --> 00:01:00,720 Speaker 1: also received some criticism from former d Og officials for 19 00:01:00,920 --> 00:01:05,600 Speaker 1: his failure to defend the department independence from the president. Um, 20 00:01:05,680 --> 00:01:08,720 Speaker 1: when the president has made the marks, including this one, 21 00:01:08,880 --> 00:01:11,840 Speaker 1: that the department for his own purposes instead of as 22 00:01:11,880 --> 00:01:14,960 Speaker 1: a justice that his mission identifies. Leah, is it this 23 00:01:15,120 --> 00:01:19,000 Speaker 1: different from a different an attorney general under a different 24 00:01:19,400 --> 00:01:23,160 Speaker 1: kind of president? Because Donald Trump doesn't seem to be 25 00:01:23,240 --> 00:01:28,960 Speaker 1: particularly concerned or involved about the issues that Jeff Sessions 26 00:01:29,160 --> 00:01:32,120 Speaker 1: is concerned about. He seems to be going off on 27 00:01:32,160 --> 00:01:36,880 Speaker 1: his own. UM. Yeah, so it might be UM, but 28 00:01:36,959 --> 00:01:39,640 Speaker 1: that it tells might raise additional problems for the president. 29 00:01:39,680 --> 00:01:42,240 Speaker 1: You know, Jeff Sessions had done UM a lot in 30 00:01:42,280 --> 00:01:46,960 Speaker 1: his tenure already, the Department launching the new guidelines about 31 00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:50,000 Speaker 1: these the civil formiture proceedings just this test week. But 32 00:01:50,080 --> 00:01:52,640 Speaker 1: the stuff that the presidency is most interested in is 33 00:01:52,800 --> 00:01:57,560 Speaker 1: Jeff sessions ability to control the Russia related investigation. And 34 00:01:57,640 --> 00:02:01,360 Speaker 1: that raises some problems for the admitted sustration because, for 35 00:02:01,480 --> 00:02:05,640 Speaker 1: one thing, it substantiates some of the UM allegations that 36 00:02:05,720 --> 00:02:08,840 Speaker 1: have come out thus far that the president is requesting 37 00:02:08,919 --> 00:02:13,160 Speaker 1: owes the perginal loyalty from officials to serve under him. Um. 38 00:02:13,200 --> 00:02:15,840 Speaker 1: You know he's complained about Jeff Sessions is that he 39 00:02:15,880 --> 00:02:18,840 Speaker 1: didn't disclose to the president that he would have recused 40 00:02:19,120 --> 00:02:21,040 Speaker 1: and if he had disclosed at the president would have 41 00:02:21,120 --> 00:02:23,000 Speaker 1: hired someone else who would be more loyal to the 42 00:02:23,040 --> 00:02:26,959 Speaker 1: president with respect of the Russia related investigation, um So, 43 00:02:27,040 --> 00:02:31,520 Speaker 1: I think that the President's single minded focused on Jeff 44 00:02:31,560 --> 00:02:34,800 Speaker 1: Session's role as it relates to the President's own interests, 45 00:02:35,400 --> 00:02:39,639 Speaker 1: um is not a great look for the administration. Leah, 46 00:02:39,680 --> 00:02:43,000 Speaker 1: can you just remind us why Jeff Sessions recused himself 47 00:02:43,000 --> 00:02:45,400 Speaker 1: from the Russian investigation in the first place, and in 48 00:02:45,440 --> 00:02:47,440 Speaker 1: your mind, did he have a whole lot of choice 49 00:02:47,440 --> 00:02:51,440 Speaker 1: in doing that? Sure, um So, Jeff Sessions procused himself 50 00:02:51,480 --> 00:02:54,399 Speaker 1: in the Russia related investigations because after he was confirmed, 51 00:02:54,400 --> 00:02:56,320 Speaker 1: it came out that he had failed to disclose some 52 00:02:56,440 --> 00:03:01,160 Speaker 1: meetings he had had um with Russian officials, and because 53 00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:04,840 Speaker 1: its undisclosed contact with Russian officials were potentially relevant to 54 00:03:05,000 --> 00:03:10,400 Speaker 1: the investigation into the Trump campaign and Trump affiliates links 55 00:03:10,440 --> 00:03:13,360 Speaker 1: to connections with Russia, he had to refuse himself from 56 00:03:13,360 --> 00:03:16,639 Speaker 1: a position in which he controlled that investigation. To my mind, 57 00:03:16,680 --> 00:03:20,640 Speaker 1: he did not have much choice in his decision to 58 00:03:20,800 --> 00:03:24,639 Speaker 1: recuse so, and this again creates a problem for the president, 59 00:03:24,680 --> 00:03:28,240 Speaker 1: and that the president is essentially criticizing just Sessions for 60 00:03:28,720 --> 00:03:33,560 Speaker 1: following the law. Um leah Um. The President told The 61 00:03:33,600 --> 00:03:37,640 Speaker 1: New York Times yesterday that Robert Mueller digging into matters 62 00:03:37,680 --> 00:03:41,320 Speaker 1: beyond Russia would be out of bounds. He did not 63 00:03:41,520 --> 00:03:45,240 Speaker 1: say whether or not he would attempt to fire him 64 00:03:45,280 --> 00:03:48,920 Speaker 1: if he tried that. If he went down that route, 65 00:03:49,480 --> 00:03:54,600 Speaker 1: would that be a very big mistake or even a 66 00:03:54,680 --> 00:03:59,400 Speaker 1: small mistake. UM. So it's difficult to know exactly, UM, 67 00:03:59,520 --> 00:04:03,320 Speaker 1: what line the President would draw with respect to Robert Mueller. 68 00:04:03,440 --> 00:04:06,600 Speaker 1: You know, many of his affiliates are already speaking publicly 69 00:04:06,680 --> 00:04:11,600 Speaker 1: about concerns that they have with the Mueller investigation, including UM, 70 00:04:12,040 --> 00:04:16,920 Speaker 1: his very appointment as well as his staff, UM and whatnot. 71 00:04:16,960 --> 00:04:20,680 Speaker 1: If the President ultimately makes the decision to fire Robert 72 00:04:20,760 --> 00:04:25,080 Speaker 1: Mueller or attempt to find an official below him who 73 00:04:25,120 --> 00:04:30,200 Speaker 1: would do so, that that would raise real problems. UM. 74 00:04:30,320 --> 00:04:33,120 Speaker 1: The current regulations only allow the Attorney General or in 75 00:04:33,160 --> 00:04:35,400 Speaker 1: this case coecutly the Attorney General Rod Roseen Games and 76 00:04:35,480 --> 00:04:38,960 Speaker 1: suspessitions as were too, to fire UM the Special Council 77 00:04:39,240 --> 00:04:42,320 Speaker 1: once they've been appointed. So if the President tried to 78 00:04:42,400 --> 00:04:46,480 Speaker 1: fire Mueller outside of the legal process, that would see 79 00:04:46,640 --> 00:04:48,840 Speaker 1: up an instance in which the president is acting a 80 00:04:48,920 --> 00:04:51,599 Speaker 1: legal league and Congress would have to decide what to 81 00:04:51,640 --> 00:04:54,599 Speaker 1: do about that. If instead the President went the route 82 00:04:54,640 --> 00:04:57,640 Speaker 1: of trying to find an official like Rod Rosenstein or 83 00:04:57,680 --> 00:04:59,880 Speaker 1: someone who would sub in for Rod Rosenscheine to fire 84 00:05:00,040 --> 00:05:04,640 Speaker 1: Mueller instead of himself doing it, that would take us 85 00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:10,360 Speaker 1: back to some of the concerns that were part of 86 00:05:10,360 --> 00:05:13,960 Speaker 1: the Saturday night massacre that eventually contributed to in free 87 00:05:14,320 --> 00:05:18,560 Speaker 1: public and congressional scrutiny on President nixent lye, we only 88 00:05:18,600 --> 00:05:20,160 Speaker 1: have about a minute left, but I would like to 89 00:05:20,160 --> 00:05:23,160 Speaker 1: get your reaction to the Bloomberg story today about the 90 00:05:23,200 --> 00:05:26,480 Speaker 1: broad broadening of the Muller probe, or at least the 91 00:05:26,480 --> 00:05:29,240 Speaker 1: fact that he is now conducting a pretty wide inquiry 92 00:05:29,279 --> 00:05:33,560 Speaker 1: into some of Donald Trump's business dealings, at least with 93 00:05:33,640 --> 00:05:36,520 Speaker 1: regard to Russia. What what What's your your take on 94 00:05:36,560 --> 00:05:39,320 Speaker 1: that story? So, I guess I found it both significant 95 00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:41,880 Speaker 1: but also not surprising. It's not that surprising that the 96 00:05:41,920 --> 00:05:45,760 Speaker 1: investigation would look to some of the Trump businesses connections 97 00:05:45,760 --> 00:05:47,800 Speaker 1: with Russia, because to the extent that they're looking for 98 00:05:47,839 --> 00:05:51,880 Speaker 1: the Trump Canapians connection with Russia's than any financial dealings 99 00:05:51,880 --> 00:05:54,719 Speaker 1: and leverage that the Russian government might have of those 100 00:05:54,760 --> 00:05:57,840 Speaker 1: officials is very much relevant to their investigation because it 101 00:05:57,960 --> 00:06:01,960 Speaker 1: explains potential notives for the funnies feeling. But it was 102 00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:05,640 Speaker 1: also very significant because, as I think you previous best mentioned, 103 00:06:05,760 --> 00:06:08,600 Speaker 1: it does greatly expand the scope of the potential materials 104 00:06:08,640 --> 00:06:11,800 Speaker 1: that might be relevant to the Special Council's investigation. Okay, 105 00:06:11,839 --> 00:06:14,480 Speaker 1: I want to thank our guest, Leah Littman. She is 106 00:06:14,520 --> 00:06:18,040 Speaker 1: a law professor at the University of California, Irvine. Talking about, 107 00:06:18,360 --> 00:06:21,359 Speaker 1: among other things, Donald Trump's comments that he wished she 108 00:06:21,360 --> 00:06:24,560 Speaker 1: had appointed somebody else other than Jeff Sessions to be 109 00:06:24,760 --> 00:06:25,680 Speaker 1: Attorney General,