WEBVTT - Almost Cannibals

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Stuff to Blow your Mind, a production of I

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, are you welcome to

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow your Mind? My name is Robert Lamb

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Joe McCormick. And no, you're beating around the bush.

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>It looks like cannibalism is on the roster for today.

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>That's right, And I just want to remind everybody that

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to be talking about a hannibal lecter.

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>This is not a show about like modern cannibalism among humans.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>This is not the Dahmer cast exactly. This is mostly

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>going to deal with animals, and towards the end of

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the episode, we are going to discuss some some of

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the questions surrounding cannibalism among ancient humans. But again, if

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it don't worry, We're not going to be talking about

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>like like true crime cannibalism here. That's your thing. There's

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>plenty of that out there, you know where to find it,

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that's right. So we we've frequently discussed predation on the show,

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and we've of course discussed cannibalism as well. You know,

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.919
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about how it factors into any given organism, organisms, life,

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it's predator or prey, as well as its role

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>in human evolution. And I think we've also tried. I mean,

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>obviously it can be fun to talk about, especially grizzly

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 1>predatory practices in the wild, especially among like invertebrates, But

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we tried to do our best to

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>dispel predator hatred, right. We We did a whole episode

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a while back about why predators are so beneficial for

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>ecology and even for for human civilization. Absolutely, and you

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>can't look at predators just as the villain of any

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>given peace, no matter how dramatic the music and a

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>given nature documentary might be. That's something I found watching

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>just so many nature documentaries with my son, is that

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>earlier on he would get a little wigged out by

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>scenes of predation or pending predation because they just have

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>such overly dramatic music and they're really playing into the

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>idea that the predator is the villain. Yeah, but I'm

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to say that he is. He's really gotten

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>out of that. It's very rare now that at age

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>he just turned seven. Uh, it's very rare that he'll

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>be wigged out by predation scene. In fact, there will

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>be scenes where say, like some young lions or ripping

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>apart of water buffalo or something, and I'll be a

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>little wigged out. I'm like, this is getting kind of bloody,

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, you sure you wanna finish watching this scene.

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>He's like, oh, yeah, it's cool that they're hungry. No, no,

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>he's not. He's not bloodthirsty for it. But he he

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>has he's already has his appreciation that. Yeah, those those

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.399
<v Speaker 1>animals are hungry. They need to eat. This is how

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>they eat. This is part of the natural order of things. Yeah,

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that's really cool. I mean it's it's a hard thing

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to appreciate because of course, within a human context, if

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you see like one human chasing after another human trying

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to hurt him, we know that's morally bad. That's something

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>to to oppose. When you see a predator chasing prey, Yeah,

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 1>the prey is fighting for its life, but the predators

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>also fighting for its life. It's just obeying its instinct.

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>That's part of what it does. And if if the

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.679
<v Speaker 1>predator doesn't get some prey, it too will die. Yeah,

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a wrong move on the on the part of a

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>predator giving chase could lead to its death as well.

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Via via starvation, if it were to say, in draw leg.

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>But of course, one of the strangest forms of predation

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and one that often seems to even when you see

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it among animals, even when you know better. One that

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I think still strikes many people as a kind of

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>taboo or a kind of violation is when predation is

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>turned inward on one's own kind, when it turns into cannibalism. Yeah,

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and we've and we've again we've discussed cannibalism on the

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>show before, especially sexual cannibalism, I think more recently, Yeah,

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>we did a whole episode on sexual cannibalism, especially as

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>it appears like among arachnids, in which there are some

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>fascinating behaviors. It's far more complex and interesting than just

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>like well, male spider mates with a female spider and

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>then the female eats the male. They're all kinds of

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>economic energy dynamics going on different behavioral adaptations to that,

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to that kind of world. It's a really truly complex

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and interesting subject. Yeah, And I think economics is the

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>way I always try and and and focus on it,

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, just thinking of just the the economy of uh,

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>turning sunlight into flesh, which is basically what happens with

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the food chain. And so you're going to reach a

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>point where even another member of your own species is energy.

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And what are you to do if you are, say

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a scorpion or something. I mean, especially with the with

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the scorpion, which is you know, UM tends to be

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a solitary organism. Uh, you know you're not going to

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 1>let that energy just go to waste because you have

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>some sort of you know, heightened scorpion morality or you know,

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>our ethical system in play. No, you're gonna you're gonna

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>show down on some cannibal meat. Well, no, again, animals

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>are not humans. We with human brains can appreciate reasons

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that one should not eat one's own kind. Yeah, but

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>if in the rest of the animal animal world cannibalism

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>is widespread. So I today's episode, you know a lot

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of what we're gonna deal with this this idea of

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>almost cannibals, which is something I started thinking about while

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I was vacationing in Belize. I was out there with

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the family, snorkeling, and I was slipping through a guide

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>book for Caribbean organisms um aquatic organisms, and I came

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>across a couple of entries for the head shield slug. Okay,

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of like a it looks sort of

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 1>like a hammerhead slug. Yeah, it looks like a hammer

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>head sea slug. They're also known as bubble snails um

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and and these are members of the clade um Cephalospidia,

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and the these names head shield slugs bubble snails. The

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>name refers to their common head shield, as is a

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>broad head that's used for burrowing in the sand and

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it helps to keep the sand out of their mantle cavities.

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And most have have shells, but some species have have

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to have a reduced shell and some have what's known

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>as a like a bubble shell. Now I never got

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to actually see one while snorkeling, but the two entries

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>in the book, I got my my mind working because

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>there was leech head shield slug, which was this beautiful

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>dark blue indigo creature with bright yellow stripes. This is

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the counterintuitive things about nature, is that clearly

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the most beautiful types of animal in the

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>entire world or sea slugs. Yeah, yeah, absolutely, uh. But

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>then there was another one. There was the mysterious head

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>shield slug. That's what it's called that was in in

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>this in this book, and this may have been an

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>older book. There may be updated names for some of

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>these now, but this one looked had the color of

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>just rotting vegetation swearing camo. And as for their diets,

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the book listed that the mysterious head shield slug feeds

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>on other sea slugs, especially the the lettuce sea slug. Okay,

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>fair enough, right, there are a lot of sea slugs

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>out there, and there's a lot of competition in aquatic environments. Um,

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're dealing with a very large subclass of

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the gastropod of family here. But the leech head shield

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>slug its diet was listed as other head shields, So

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>it's getting even closer to home, right, Yeah, so it's

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>not cannibalism. You know, they're not the same species. Uh,

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>they're in the same family, but I suppose, you know,

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the name that that gives me pause. The

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>fact that they're both classified as headshield slugs. Well, that

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>is a kind of interesting question to say, Like, Okay,

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>we know cannibalism happens pretty often in the wild, and

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll discuss the conditions and just a minute here, there

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>are some limitations that are imposed by genetics, by the

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>energy economy, and by epidemiology on on how far you

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>can go with practicing cannibalism as a lifestyle as an animal.

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh So they these limitations are in place. Some of

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>those limitations might not be in place if you're preying

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>on something that's a lot like you, but is not

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly you. Right, So, yeah, that's something we're going to

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about here. You know, what are some examples of

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>um near cannibalism, Like what are some of the more

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>closely related prey predator relationships out there in the animal world?

0:07:57.880 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And then what does that say about us? What does

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that say about the way that humans think about cannibalism?

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>In a weird way, this episode topic even got me

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking about some of the strange economic dynamics of digital media.

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I promise that's not as boring as it sounds. We'll

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>come back to that later. I don't know, digital media cannibalism.

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>That sounds pretty exciting and probably just like spot on

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and just a fact of life. So let's refresh a

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit about cannibalism. So, to eat one's own species

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is to commit an act of cannibalism. Now, sometimes especially

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into a few cases later on. Sometimes this

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 1>word we the word cannibalism is used for things that

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>are not quite cannibalism. But that's where we get into

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that gray area of near cannibalism. Yeah, and it's sometimes

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>said with the derogatory context, but I mean again, it's

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>something that like, obviously, if you kill and eat your

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>next door neighbor, that's a bad thing. But animals this

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is just sometimes an adaptation that animals have, that's right.

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>And there are many different varieties and classifications we've discussed.

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Somebody's done the show before. Sexual anibalism for instance, which

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>like you said, can be can be, you know, rather complex.

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not just a situation of well I made it

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>with him, I guess now I'll consume his flesh. A

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of times it depends on, for example, what the

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 1>male brings to the table in the sexual encounter. There

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>are some species of spider where if a male shows

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>up with a food gift for the female, for example,

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>he can he can be more likely to avoid being

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>cannibalized after mating, whereas if he shows up and just

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>wants to mate and doesn't bring her anything to snack on.

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:32.839
<v Speaker 1>He's more likely to be cannibalized. And this sort of

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, right, like or is he is he contributing

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>additional food resources to the development of the offspring? Right?

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And then there are other examples like matrophagi where babies uh,

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>where the offspring consume the mother um. You know, they're

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>they're examples where um of a mother organism will consume

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the young. And a lot of these cases of cannibalism

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in the while, they're they're going to be influenced by uh,

0:09:55.800 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, economic um uh resource uh deprivation issues like

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>are those offspring going to survive? Is something threatening them?

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Should then the energy of those uh of the offering

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>be uh brought back into the host or into the

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>mother organism. Yeah, Now, I detect among the literature in

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in zoology and behavioral ecology and all that that there

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>there's been a shift in consciousness about cannibalism over the

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>previous decades where I think it used to be more

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>common for scientists to believe that cannibalism would was something

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>animals would only do under extreme scenarios, like if they

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>were in a starvation scenario, you know, just like the

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>absolute limits of survival, and that has increasingly it's increasingly

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>become clear that that's not the case. Though animals don't,

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're not usually going to practice cannibalism as

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>some kind of primary mode of living. There are actually

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a pretty wide range of scenarios in which cannibalism occurs,

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're we're documenting more and more of those scenarios

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>all the time. It's not always just star ovation at

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the very edge of survival and the peaks of stress. Yeah.

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's one of these things that is, you know,

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>we're learning as ubiquitous in the natural world. It it

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>offers some really key advantages, though there are some downsides.

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>It remains highly popular without ever becoming like the thing

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>right like you made your species might engage in cannibalism

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>for a number of different reasons, but you were not

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>going to become an obligate cannibal like that is where

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the system would collapse. Yeah, and I think there are

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>some reasons that that's sort of impossible. I'll talk about

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 1>that in just a minute. It reminds me a lot

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of some things I've heard about the band Primus. I've

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>heard stuff, but okay, well I'm going with you. I'm

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>not saying that the members of Primus are cannibals, but

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>rather um, I think it was less Claypool himself, who

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>at one point pointed out that like they were in

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a good place popularity wise, like they like they never

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>completely went out of fashion, but at the same time,

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>like they never just really blew up. Like I feel

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>like most people, Uh, if you asked them, they might say, oh, yeah,

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Primus is cool. I did Primus. I myself have enjoyed

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 1>a prime Primus in concert before, but I would I

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>would never say Primus is necessarily my favorite band. Uh. Likewise, cannibalism,

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>It's okay, I'm with you. I see what you're saying. Yeah,

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, they're Primus has long been By the way,

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.679
<v Speaker 1>my candidate for what I joke about is like the

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>least sexy or least romantic possible music. So if you're

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to like figure out what to put on for

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a Valentine's Day dinner or something like that, so you

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>could go with like your Marvin Gay or you know,

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>your classic romantic options, and at the other end of

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum you've got Primus. Yeah. For me, Primus is

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>more like driving around music, you know it nothing will

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>scribe if you if you were thirsting for primus, nothing

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>else will do. But then there are plenty of other

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>cases where it probably is not going to be the

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>ideal soundtrack for life. But anyway back back to canalism,

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>So yes, there it can be especially useful in certain

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.839
<v Speaker 1>ecological situations. Uh and and there are a lot of

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>key benefits to the individual. On the other hand, it

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>can impact community dynamics. But the exact shape and scope

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of a species cannibalism it varies greatly. Yeah, exactly. Um So,

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>so there are these obvious, like you're talking about, economic

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>and evolutionary limits on what forms cannibalism can take, even

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 1>though it can to each individual animal that practices that

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>give all kinds of benefits. One example would be that

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, when one species regularly eats another species, it

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>is common that the prey species is in some way

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>more vulnerable, it's smaller or weaker, definitely more numerous than

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the predator species. You can't make a diet out of

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>eating mostly or entirely animals that are say as good

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>at killing you in self defense as you are at

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>killing them in predation or the economics of acquisition. Just

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>don't work out, right, You're not gonna go chasing down

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>something that's got all the same muscles and teeth and

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>claws and all that as you. Right, you have to

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of an advantage, either a direct biological

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>advantage or some sort of behavioral advantage such as pack

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>hunting or something like that. But but even in those

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>cases it can be exceedingly risky. And and think again,

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>how I mean, I think we sometimes because we have

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>medical care, we uh downplay the risks to an animal

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in the wild of a mirror like you know, leg

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>injury or something like that, which can be fatal to

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>an animal in the wild, while you know, you can

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>just go to the hospital and get fixed up. So

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>if adults of a species focus on other similarly sized

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>adults of the same species, hunting probably becomes too dangerous

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to sustain as a regular practice. Also, a species cannot

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>make a diet out of eating mostly or entirely animals

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that are less numerous than itself, because it's going to

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>run out of food and starve, or it's gonna have

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to switch to a different food source. If an animal

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>were to eat primarily or entirely members of its own species, Uh,

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>there would immediately be a couple of problems. And number one,

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you would have to think, if it's a sexually reproducing species,

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>this behavior is probably going to interfere with mating and

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>lead to depletion of mates. Probably more importantly, the species

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>couldn't survive. It would sort of eat itself to extinction.

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Like if every member of the species needed to eat

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>one other member of the species every month in order

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to not starve to death. Your best case scenario is

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>having the number of individuals every month. Now, maybe you

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>think you could replace those through rapid reproduction, but where

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>does the energy to create and grow those new bodies

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>come from unless you're eating even more of your own kind.

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>So it seems kind of I was trying to find

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>an example of something that comes close, but it seems

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to me you can't really have something like an obligate

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>cannibal species, something that only eats its own kind. That

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>seems like an an absurdity. So you have that fact,

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>but then you also have the fact that we do

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>observe lots of in species cannibalistic behavior in the wild

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in the wild, and we know that this can only

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>take place in sort of limb did conditions and scenarios,

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and we're discovering more and more of those types of

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>scenarios all the time. Here's a common one we know.

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>You can't just eat members of your own species for

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>your entire diet and have every member of your species

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>do this for your entire life, for the species would

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>cease to exist. But within certain phases of life, cannibalism

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>can be a primary strategy. Consider the larval stage of

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>many amphibians. Uh you have like cannibal morph larvae of

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>tiger salamanders. We talked about those in our episode on

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>salamanders with Mark Mandica. Or think about the cannibalistic tadpoles

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of toad species like the spadefoot toad. And this is

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>where the biggest tadpoles in a small body of water

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>will eat the smaller ones to survive and grow even bigger.

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like a letting letting the strongest of

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the of the litter absorb the energy of all the others. Now,

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously this kind of strategy can't be continued for the

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>amphibians entire life cycle, but it can work in a

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>phase of the life cycle because the other energy inputs

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>into that phase. Another great example from another episode we

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>had with a with a guest was thinking about intra

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>uterine cannibalism in some sharks species, like we talked about

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>with Mara Hart, where some unborn sharks will swim over

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and eat their siblings or half siblings before they even

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>leave their mother's uterus. Do we talk about cannibalism with

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>all of our guests? I don't know. It does seem

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to come up a good fit, but maybe we do.

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we brought either of these up, did we.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess they were just an innate part

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of the cut, the conversation and the expertise of the guests.

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we just invite creepy guests. They're not creepy. Maybe

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>we're creepy. We're talking about cannibalism right now. We're definitely creepy.

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>So while cannibalism can't be the entire diet of a species,

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 1>it can be an important supplemental part of a diet,

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>especially in scenarios of environmental stress, and it can even

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>reduce competition when times are tough. One example here is

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that cannibalism, according to what I've read, it's much more

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>common if you live life in the water. Oh, yes, definitely. Yeah,

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're wet, you're probably involved in cannibalism in some way.

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>It just happens a lot more in aquatic environments. For example,

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.959
<v Speaker 1>when fish are foraging for food, one type of energy

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>source they will often come across is little sphere ules

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of lipids and energetic materials floating in the water. Other

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>fish eggs. Uh. These fill the waters of the ocean

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>by the bazillions, and this will include some eggs of

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>their own species, which they basically just eat discriminately along

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>with the other eggs. We recently did the episode on

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the Christmas Island crabs. Oh, yeah, where they just stuff

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the crabble are right into their mouths. Yeah, I mean,

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>how do you know if it's your own offspring. Chances

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>are it's not. There's so many out there, it's probably

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.199
<v Speaker 1>somebody else's. Also, I think I accidentally said that they

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>will eat them discriminately. Obviously they eat them indiscriminately, is

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. Fish don't discriminate. But yeah, it works

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>out because fish produce a lot of eggs. Under the

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary assumption that most of the eggs, many of the

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>eggs at least, will not survive and the eggs of

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 1>one's own species are only a supplemental part of the

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>adult fishes diet, not the whole thing for the whole species,

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 1>which again would be a problem. But the phenomenon of

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>adults eating young of their own species actually happens in

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.479
<v Speaker 1>many scenarios outside the water too. Obviously, it would make

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>no sense for animals to have instincts to kill and

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 1>eat all of their own young, but there is some

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>selective strategic snacking of this kind. Like often rodent mothers

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>will eat some of their own litters, especially those that

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>are sickly or don't seem like they're gonna thrive. Male

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>carnivores like lions, will sometimes eat the cubs sired by

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>another male, and this tends to increase the female lions

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>receptivity to mating and the pride. Yeah, this is seen

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>in bears as well, for sure. Oh yeah, definitely. And

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>then there are some really strange cases that were observing

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 1>again more and more all the time, even with animals

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>once thought to be herbivores engaging in occasional cannibalism. Here's

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>when I came across hip pose what hundred percent herbivores right, Well,

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that this one one I always assumed. I mean you

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>hear to hear about like the vast amount of vegetation

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that a given hippo needs to consume, and that is

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>their primary diet. They mostly are herbivores, but occasionally they'll

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>just be versatile. So we used to think there are

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a hundred percent herbivores. They're mostly herbivores, except now it's

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>been observed that sometimes they'll kill and eat an impula,

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>or even sometimes they will eat a fellow hippopotamus. Well,

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>they are ferocious. I mean, we can't take that away

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>from them. So there are just more and more examples

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>all the time that science is documenting about ways that

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>animals will occasionally or opportunistically or even in some controlled ways,

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>regularly engage in direct in species cannibalism. Yeah. I was

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>reading the amazingly titled two thousand tin paper Cannibals in Space,

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the Coevolution of Cannibalism and Dispersal in spatially structured Populations

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>and U. And in this the authors point out that

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the propensity for cannibalism, you know, it's going to vary

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>considerably among even closely related species. And then a lot

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of questions remain concerning exactly what drives variation and the

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>evolution of cannibalism across and even within a species, and

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the can and the same can be said for the

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary consequences of cannibalism. Yeah, a lot about cannibalism remains

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>an open question. There's still a ton we don't know.

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think one thing that is emerging is what

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>we're getting some good ideas of what the major downsides

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to cannibalism are, like, what are the limitations that are

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>imposed on it as a practice, And so I want

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to mention I think three major ones that there may

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 1>be other ones, but these are three major ones. One is,

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're practicing cannibalism, you could end up eating animals

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>closely related to you. And given the self preserving tendencies

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of genes and evolution, there's going to be a selection

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>pressure against this. Genes will tend to come about and

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>become prevalent within the species that say don't eat each

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>other if you have this gene. Also, as we mentioned

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>are here, it's a risky to try to kill and

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>need an animal that has ald the same equipment you do,

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>the teeth, the muscles, the fighting abilities, it's easier to

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>go after weaker prey, and there's usually some kind of

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 1>weaker prey out there. But there are ways around both

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of these. I mean, for one thing, you can try

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>to avoid eating animals you're closely related to, even if

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you're eating your own species, by evolving ways of detecting relatedness.

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.479
<v Speaker 1>So maybe you know there's some gene that allows you

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to recognize who is your from your immediate family and

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.199
<v Speaker 1>not eat them. I actually have an example of this.

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll come back to that later. Okay. Another thing you

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>can get around is that animals with cannibalistic tendencies can

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>get around the problem of fighting uh something, fighting something

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>just as big and dangerous as as you are by

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>eating smaller, weaker con specifics. And this can take the

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>form of sexual cannibalism, like in some spiders like the

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>red back spider, where there's a huge difference in size

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:53.479
<v Speaker 1>between the males and females and it works out just

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 1>fine for the females to eat the males after mating,

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>or this can happen with adults preying on larvae or

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>smaller juveniles of their own species. But finally, one last

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>big problem with cannibalism, and we'll come back to this.

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>When you eat your own kind, you put yourself at

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 1>risk of catching diseases and parasites. You're more likely to

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>consume or otherwise expose yourself to something bad that can

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 1>infect your species. If you're eating animals that are already

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of your own same species, Yeah, you're basically diving into

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 1>a swimming pool of this other individual's potential viruses and illnesses.

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>You're you're diving into a swimming pool marked bio hazard. Yeah.

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 1>So there's always a cost benefit calculation going on. And

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying obviously that the animals are doing this

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>calculation consciously in their heads, but somehow this calculation is

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>being worked out. There benefits to cannibalism, there's an obvious

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 1>energy advantage, and there are all these downsides, And so

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the circumstances and and the specific traits of each individual

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>species are going to interact to determine when cannibal is

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>m is actually appropriate. Alright, Well, on that note, we're

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 1>going to take a quick break, but when we come back,

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna continue exploring this topic. And we're going to

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>kick off by discussing this idea of near cannibalism a

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit more than thank you. All right, we're back.

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>So we were just talking about the limitations, Uh, well,

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 1>all of the examples we see of cannibalism in the

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>natural world, true cannibalism where members of one animal species

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>are eating members of the same animal species. Uh. And

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>then limitations on wind cannibalism can be practiced, and what

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>what might hold it hold it at bay from becoming

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>too prevalent. But there are probably examples of animals doing

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>something that is not quite cannibalism, but where they're eating

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>something that's kind of close to them. Yeah, And so

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I started looking around for answers on this, and one

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that that did come up when I was looking

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>for near cannibalism and um and you know, scholars, scholarly

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:59.199
<v Speaker 1>works and academic papers, I ended up running across it

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in some myth papers on myth and medieval histories. And

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I found this rather telling, not so much about like

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the animal kingdom, but about like

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>why I'm fascinated with it, Why this idea of near

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>cannibalism is perhaps even a little more interesting than interesting

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to me compared to apps absolute cannibalism. So For instance,

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:26.959
<v Speaker 1>there are medieval accounts of the Danes roasting animal flesh

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>to eat alongside, like right next to heaped the heaped

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.439
<v Speaker 1>human dead from a battle, so like feasting on the

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>battle grounds with their slain enemies around them, almost sort

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of suggesting a mental connection. Uh yeah, And of course,

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>again these are accounts of the Danes probably you know,

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>with it with the idea of portraying them as being

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in the state of of near cannibalism, Like look at that,

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>they're just cooking their meat right next to the bodies

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of the dead. They're just there's just one misstep away

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>from going full cannibals. Romans would never do anything like that.

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that come up came up with was the

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>myth of like Cayan, which we recently discussed, and there's

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>an act of near cannibalism cannibalism there as well, where

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the flesh of a human is offered up to the

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>god Zeus to say, like, hey, Zeus, do you want

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to eat some human flesh? Like they're trying to trick Zeus. Uh. Now,

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>granted Zeus humans a god, but sort of yeah, I

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>mean it seems like species enough, like if if if

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>the gods of Greek mythology can mate with humans. It

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>seems like that they should be like biologically close enough

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that eating us would be a cannibalism, right right. And

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of course you know the gods, especially the Greek gods,

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>they were down for any number of horrible acts. They

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>would turn into an animal to mate with a human,

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. But I guess the thing is

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that they probably are not going to look kindly on

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>being tricked into doing anything vile that they didn't want

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to do. No, And of course when Zeus was almost

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>tricked into eating human flesh, he retaliated. By their different

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>tellings of the story, sometimes he retaliates by just like

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 1>killing a bunch of people. Sometimes he retaliates by turning

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the king who tried to trick him into a were wolf,

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>has pointed out by seed down him in the Good,

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bad, and the Ugly portrayals of Vikings in the

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Fragmentary Animals of Ireland, near cannibalism and near paganism were

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>considered the apotheosis of the evil. Yeah, you see this

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>in many ancient sources. It's like cannibalism is sort of

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 1>held out as it's it's the archetype of barbarism. You know,

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like the ultimate act that in itself in an

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 1>iconic way shows that somebody is not civilized and not good.

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>And there's something as he's pointing out her, there's something

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>tantalizing about like that that that moment before cannibalism, that

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>or that moment before paganism, like that slip that decline

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 1>into this barbarous nature. Uh, the idea that, oh, they're

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>not cannibals now, but I bet they'll be cannibals tomorrow

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>because look what they're doing right now. And of course, uh,

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in the animal king um, all these species we're you know,

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at cannibalism is already in the blueprint, like

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it's already part of the of the of the act.

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>But there is there's something about about about that to

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the the human mind, I think, you know, because we

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>can't help to think of of of all of these

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>changes taking place not against the the in in the

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.199
<v Speaker 1>time scale of evolutionary history, but we think about it

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 1>within the terms of lifespan and the choices that we make.

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>But anyway back back to just like purely the the

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>animal world here I did can run across a study

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that points at a possible case of cannibal fueled speciation,

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>because I think that's something to interest to think of,

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's like if I'm if if one if within

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a species, members of that species are deciding to just

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>go full cannibal like they're like, oh, I can just

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>eat my own species all the time. If that were

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to happen, could that conceivably lead to a speciation event

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>where the cannibals become their own species. Oh yeah, that's

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>an interesting question. And so this this study I found

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand seventeen study, and I should stress that

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>this is an unrefereed preprint in bio archive, so caveats

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>on not going through peer review, right. But in it,

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the author's point to cannibalism in South American um annual

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>killie fish that's austro lebias as a possible speciation event.

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So they're they're they're presenting what they refer to as

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>an alternate hypothesis for giant dwarf speciation where where some

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of these uh we're basically the chilly fish here have

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 1>evolved in sympathy without geographic separation by character displacement and

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>cannibalism but in this day, the authors are discussing cannibalism

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>in South American annual killie fish, and the idea here

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is that it could it could be a speciation event

0:29:56.360 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>going on here, that that accounts for giant dwarf speciation,

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>So basically bigger, bigger killy fish versus a smaller chilly fish,

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and cannibalism could play a role in that right right there,

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>That that could be what's what's pushing this species into

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>two species based on the size of the individuals. Yeah,

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting if I am understanding their argument correctly. Okay, Now,

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.959
<v Speaker 1>there's one thing that I had been thinking about as

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a potential case of near cannibalism, which we've already sort

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of discussed in a previous episode called Strange Milk. So

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I won't linger on it too long. This has come

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>up before, but I just wanted to remind us of

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>one form of feeding that could be seen as analogous

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to cannibalism, but without the element of lethal predation, and

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that is found in various systems where an adult animal

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>feeds its offspring with some part of its own body. Ah. Yes,

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>so this is not predation. The offspring does not necessarily

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 1>kill and eat the adult, but it could be considered

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a form of alternative cannibalism, as if I could like

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>off one of my arms and feed it to my kids. Interesting,

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and the great example here is the type of amphibian

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>known as Sicilians. Now it's not spelled like from Sicily.

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>It's c A E C I L I A N.

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Sicilians are amphibians. They're kind of like frogs and salamanders,

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>but they've got no legs. They look like a cross

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>between a snake and a worm, like a like a

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>wet earth snake. They tend to live underground, so we

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>rarely see them, and if you do see one, you

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>might mistake it for some kind of gigantic worm. Yes,

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I remember we we talked about about the about the

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Sicilians with Mark Pendina. Oh yeah. And one of the

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:40.959
<v Speaker 1>things we talked about with the Sicilians and the strange

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Mailk episode was that after the mother of a Sicilian

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>species called a boo Langarula titan us gives birth, she

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>turns her outer skin into a nutrient rich secretion for

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>her offspring, and then the young gross special teeth. I've

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>seen these referred to as shaped a slotted spoon so

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that they grow special teeth, uh quote, which they used

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to peel and eat the outer layer of their mother's

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>modified skin. And that's a quote from a two thousand

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>six paper in Nature. So basically, the mother turns her

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>skin into like this cheese like substance, and then the

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>juvenile worm like creatures chew off their mother's skin. They

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>peel her like a like a vegetable. This is interesting.

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>This is it's very it's consensual. It's it's not just

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a situation where the young eat the mother, but the

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>mother is mother said is essentially saying, here, take of

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>this specially prepared skin and eat it in remembrance of me. Yes,

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>take of my body and take of my skin. I mean.

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>It seems to combine multiple elements of the Texas Chainsaw

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Massacre together at once, but somehow without the massacre. So

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>there's the peeling of skin, peeling the skin off, and

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a form of near cannibalism, but without the elements of predation.

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>The the the willing adults says, try my skin. It's good,

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and they do. That's what we aid for the the

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to to reboot the Texas Chainsaw Massacre franchise is we

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>need to we need to take the mascre at mascre

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>at just have everything else happening consentually, and ultimately that's

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:14.479
<v Speaker 1>going to be more terrifying. I think it's just about

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a consensual human barbecue cook from from Texas. Yeah, you know,

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I've had that thought with a few different horror films

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that have come out where you know, they're there, you know,

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>people behind them are sometimes pushing the boundaries and they're like,

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's all about like horrible things being done to people.

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm and I'm thinking, you know, the creators here

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously they think that this is that this is horrible,

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and this is a terrifying vision of of life. But

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>but what if what if it what if everyone was

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>engaging in it willingly, like you know, then it would

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>put an entirely different spin, and arguably a more thought

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>provoking and even terrifying spin. I feel like that's often

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>what black mirror is. Black mirror is often like a

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>what would otherwise be like a horror movie or a

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>horror show, except most of the time the people who

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>are the victims of whatever is happening in the episode

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>get involved consensually. Yeah, because it's technology because the technology exactly. Like,

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:16.240
<v Speaker 1>for instance, if you had a Friday the Thirteenth film

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>where all of the young people went off to camp

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 1>and the thing that they all really hoped for, that

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the thing they desired most of all, was to be

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>massacred by the mass killer that runs the woods. You

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>know that that would fulfill some sort of deep desire

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in them, some desire for I don't know, like teenage

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 1>martyrdom or something like that. Ultimately, like that that that

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>gets me thinking a lot more. There's a sort of

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>almost element of that in Hell Raiser. I guess people

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>are looking for trouble messing around with a puzzle box.

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>They should know better than Yeah, And of course that

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>would make sense. Clive Barker, especially in the younger Clive Barker,

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he did engage in a lot of a

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>lot more subversive treatment of these things. Well, speaking of

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Clive Barker, okay, on that. You know, I thought of

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Clive Barker already earlier in this episode when there were

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times where you just said flesh and

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I was like, you kind of can't do that without

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 1>saying it in the Doug Bradley voice. Yeah, obviously, we're

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>big fans of some of the hell Raizor films, and

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and I definitely hold up some of Barker's work,

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>especially his books of blood short stories. There's some some

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>really good short stories in those collections. Yeah, I've always

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 1>meant to read them, might never have yet. But we

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:32.760
<v Speaker 1>should get back to near cannibalism. Well, let's bring things

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>around to the human realm, or at least the you know,

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the the ancient human realm. So let's talk about humans

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and Neanderthals. So evidence has been presented and sometimes dismissed

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>regarding regarding cannibalism among both ancient humans. Though it gets

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of complicated because we're talking about ancient humans, but

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>technically you call these modern humans. They're they're ancient from

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 1>our standpoint, but they are evolutionarily modern humans. So uh,

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>at anyway that there's there's their arguments and evidence for

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>both these ancient modern humans and the indertal is engaging

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in cannibalism. And as we've discussed on the show before,

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the evidence that scientists look for when they're talking about that,

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for signs of processing on the bones. In

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 1>other words, it's not enough that a human or a

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 1>neandertal skull was caved in by heavy object, But are

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>there signs of the bodies having been systematically or ritually

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 1>stripped of meat or marrow for the purposes of consumption?

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And uh so, so that's one of the things they

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>look for. And as Bill Shoot points out in his

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>his excellent book Cannibalism, archaeologists generally want to match this

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of evidence up with similar damage on the bones

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:52.879
<v Speaker 1>of game animals from the same site, so that way

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 1>they can say, look, this is what these people were

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 1>doing to the bones of animals that were clearly praise

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a prey species, and here's what was done to the

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 1>bones of other members of the species. And then you

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>have more of a direct comparison to make here, so

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 1>that you can say, this looks like this was cannibalism.

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>That all makes sense. There's some pretty convincing there's some

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 1>pretty convincing evidence that Neanderthals engaged in cannibalism, at least

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>survival cannibalism. And Shoot points out in his book that

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the near Neanderthal species Homo antecessor quote, may have simply

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>considered others of their kind to be food, and he

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 1>pointed out. You know that again, this is hardly out

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of step with the rest of the animal kingdom. Cannibalism

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>is ubiquitous, so it's not surprising that Neanderthals or Neanderthal ancestor,

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>or that Homo sapiens engaged in this practice. But what

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.360
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting us the most for this episode is the

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:49.280
<v Speaker 1>question of near cannibalism. Right, whether ancient modern humans considered

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Neanderthal's prey or vice versa, how much uh consumption of this,

0:37:56.000 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 1>of this this other man like creature was going on, this,

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 1>how much near cannibalism was happening. So for starters, we

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 1>have some competing theories, but for the most part, we

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly what happened to the Neanderthal. They obviously

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>they went extinct, and we know that they likely transition

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:18.319
<v Speaker 1>from Homo antecessor to Homo Neanderthal plenis about about a

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty thousand years ago, and then they went

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>extinct thirty thousand years ago, So that's kind of the

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:27.239
<v Speaker 1>the period of their existence as far as we understand it.

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.320
<v Speaker 1>One hypothesis is that that's out there is that humans

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:34.959
<v Speaker 1>in the Neanderthals interbred and that they simply became us,

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>or at least they became those of us with some

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>portion of Neanderthal DNA and uh, and there is there

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is DNA evidence to support this, and then there but

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:47.800
<v Speaker 1>there's some that to take issue with leaning too heavily

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 1>on this idea. Apparently, paleo anthropologist Ian Tattersall, who Shoot

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 1>interviews in the Cannibalism book Um this guy, is a

0:38:56.719 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 1>critic of the idea, and he argues that quote structurally, anatomically,

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 1>and presumably behaviorally too, Neanderthals and modern humans were very,

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:07.919
<v Speaker 1>very different, and he says that while a certain amount

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of genetic exchange definitely took place, he doesn't think that

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>they were absorbed into our population through inter breeding alone. Now, interestingly,

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Tattersall points out that modern humans and Neandertals managed to

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>share the Near East for a long time, but this

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 1>was before we became creatures of symbolism, as Shoot puts it, quote,

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>an advanced symbolism driven species. These new humans at least

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:40.240
<v Speaker 1>outcompeted the Neanderthals for resources, and it's reasonable to expect

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:42.399
<v Speaker 1>that they did a bit more than that. Right when

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you look at at certainly the way humans have have

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>treated other groups of humans, um, you know throughout history. Now,

0:39:51.960 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 1>some researchers have argued in support of of of predation

0:39:56.719 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and cannibalism that that Homo sapiens uh hunted and consumed

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Neanderthal meat. But there's currently no clear fossil evidence that

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 1>this occurred. So it might seem uh like something that

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they would have done. We can, we can point to

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:16.800
<v Speaker 1>aspects of human nature and and uh in humanity's historical

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 1>treatment of others, but when it comes down to the

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>hard fossil evidence of it, when it comes down to

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 1>looking at bones and looking for signs of processing, uh,

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just not there. Again, we have clear evidence of

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>cannibalism in either group of Homo sapiens eating Homo sapiens

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and neandertals eating the ander dolls, but uh, if it occurred,

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't have any evidence of actual intragenous cannibalism between

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the inder dolls and Homo sapiens. That's interesting. That being said,

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I think if if you were to present me with

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the time machine and make me place money on the

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 1>on on the the chances that humans in Neanderdals, I

0:40:55.840 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 1>would personally um want to place my back on humans

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 1>eating neander DoLS. Well, i'd say it's probably because humans

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:08.280
<v Speaker 1>will eat anything. That's true. If something existed, humans probably aided.

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I bet generally a safe bet. Now, let's back up

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>out of the human realm here, and I want to

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 1>come back to something you said earlier about how a

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 1>particular cannibalizing species might make sure that it's not cannibalizing

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>its own young Oh yeah, or or members of its

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 1>own near family. Because then you the closer relative within

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:31.719
<v Speaker 1>your own species is the more genes you probably share

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 1>with them, which makes it more likely that some of

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 1>those genes would would discourage you from eating other carriers.

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 1>And so I found a recent article that deals with this.

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Max Plank Society article titled a Peptide against Cannibalism from

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>April of twenty nineteen. The researchers noted that nematodes in

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the genus pristianchas we're all all about some cannibalism because

0:41:57.840 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>their favorite food is worm lark. So how do you

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 1>keep from consuming your own offspring? Well, the answer, they

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 1>said is that they carry a quote small highly variable

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:11.839
<v Speaker 1>protein on their surfaces. So what they do is they

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>experimented by offering adult worms of different uh of different

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>species again within this genus. Uh, they gave them their

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:25.240
<v Speaker 1>own larva to potentially eat larva of a closely related

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:29.880
<v Speaker 1>species or larva of a related line within their own species.

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>And in all cases they avoided their own larva but

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:37.280
<v Speaker 1>tore into everything else, so they were they were totally

0:42:37.280 --> 0:42:39.919
<v Speaker 1>fine for eating another species. It's closely related to them

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that near cannibalism. They were also readily engaging in an

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>absolute cannibalism. But uh, this peptide was at least aiding

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in their identification of their own offspring and preventing them

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>from eating uh those uh those larva. They identified this

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>particular gene, which they called self one, as playing a

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>key role in distinguishing self from non self. However, it

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:09.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like it's the only factor in the decision

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to attack or not. And this is ultimately one of

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 1>those areas where more research is going to be needed.

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:17.760
<v Speaker 1>But it does give us some idea of the kinds

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:20.879
<v Speaker 1>of of mechanisms that are in place, that kind of

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 1>fail safes that are in place to keep cannibalism from

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:28.480
<v Speaker 1>just decimating a species. Yeah, and it's really interesting trying

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to work out exactly when and how those could controls

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 1>fall into place. All Right, we need to take a

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:39.919
<v Speaker 1>quick break, but we'll be right back. Alright, we're back now.

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about something related to what you

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>were just saying, especially when it comes to praying on

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the larva of your own species or related species. Uh,

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:52.719
<v Speaker 1>this is a case of true cannibalism, but with interesting features.

0:43:53.280 --> 0:43:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about the cane toad or Ranilla marina.

0:43:57.200 --> 0:44:00.760
<v Speaker 1>So the cane toad has an almost beaut to fully

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:04.279
<v Speaker 1>horribly ironic history in Australia. I'm sure, I'm sure all

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 1>of our Australian listeners are pulling their hair out right

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 1>now because if you if you read Australian writers talk

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>about the cane toad, they there's I don't want to

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:18.799
<v Speaker 1>over generalize, but there is very often utter revulsion just

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea that they want to beat all these things

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to death with a sock full of quarters. Now, we

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:28.799
<v Speaker 1>we don't encourage wanton violence against wild animals, but there's

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:32.879
<v Speaker 1>a reason behind this. So in the nineteen thirties, Australia

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:36.880
<v Speaker 1>had a problem protecting sugar cane crops from populations of

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:40.479
<v Speaker 1>a pest known as the cane beetle, and in order

0:44:40.520 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to control beetle populations in sugarcane agriculture, they introduced a

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:49.160
<v Speaker 1>South American toad. I think this was a nive. It

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:52.440
<v Speaker 1>was the cane toad. They brought it to Australia because

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:54.719
<v Speaker 1>it was believed that this toad would eat up the

0:44:54.719 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 1>beetles that were getting to their crops. And this turned

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:01.360
<v Speaker 1>out to be a horrible idea. Uh. The cane toad

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 1>became a kind of breakout character, right, It's like the

0:45:04.040 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 1>fawns circle, you know. It's like it took on a

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:10.960
<v Speaker 1>life of its own for the continent of Australia. It

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:14.240
<v Speaker 1>did eat some cane beetles, but it also became extremely

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 1>numerous and ate all kinds of other insects, and its

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 1>populations in Australia just exploded. So it's another case of

0:45:21.400 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 1>an already unbalanced environmental situation due to agricultural activities and

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 1>then they intentionally introduce an invasive species and things go

0:45:31.680 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>out of whack. Very bad idea. And what's worse, the

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>native marsupial and reptile predators of Australia, like crocodiles and

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:43.400
<v Speaker 1>like coals that might have been expected to control and

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 1>exploding toad population by eating the toads were totally unprepared

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:52.360
<v Speaker 1>because the cane toad produces toxins that kill the predators

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that eat them, So since the cane toad was out

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of its native range, the predators had no resistance to

0:45:58.080 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 1>these toxins and no one stinctual avoidance of the cane toads.

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:06.799
<v Speaker 1>So simply introducing these like poison candy toads into the

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem was devastating to some predator populations. But this threat

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to predators doesn't apply only to the marsupials and the

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:19.560
<v Speaker 1>reptiles like crocodiles that might eat the adult cane toads.

0:46:19.600 --> 0:46:23.320
<v Speaker 1>It would also apply to perhaps smaller predators that tried

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to eat the cane toads also poisonous eggs. The eggs

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:29.719
<v Speaker 1>have similar poisons. So I was reading a New York

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Times article from two thousand eleven about research on cane toads.

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:37.240
<v Speaker 1>The articles by Natalie Angier, but the the article tells

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:40.279
<v Speaker 1>the story of a scientist named Dr Richard Shine, a

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 1>biologist at the University of Sydney in Australia, who began

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to notice years back that cane toad eggs were being

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:50.839
<v Speaker 1>depleted by something, and at first he assumed that some

0:46:51.000 --> 0:46:54.719
<v Speaker 1>predator was at risk of mass poisoning by eating these

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:59.400
<v Speaker 1>killer toad eggs uh to quote from the article. Follow up,

0:46:59.440 --> 0:47:03.280
<v Speaker 1>field Stead soon revealed the identity of the caviar thieves

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to the researchers astonishment. Dr Shine said it was cane

0:47:07.200 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 1>toads themselves, or rather their tadpoles, which would swim over

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to each fresh batch of vanilla eggs and quote desperately

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:20.040
<v Speaker 1>consume every slick black sphere that they could find. And

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>then a two thousand eleven study in the journal Animal

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Behavior found that not only do cane toads cannibalize eggs

0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 1>from their own species, they strongly prefer them. When given

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the option to eat cane toad eggs or other food

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:37.600
<v Speaker 1>sources like similar eggs from another amphibian species, the cane

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 1>toads went right for the delicious cane toad eggs. And

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 1>this was just the cane toads that did this, It

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't other uh frogs amphibian species. Now, remember that while

0:47:48.080 --> 0:47:52.320
<v Speaker 1>lots of species practice cannibalism under some circumstances, no species

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 1>is exclusively obligately cannibalistic like that would make no sense.

0:47:57.120 --> 0:47:59.759
<v Speaker 1>But what if you're kind of edging in that direction

0:47:59.840 --> 0:48:02.880
<v Speaker 1>by at least in one stage of life, preferring to

0:48:02.960 --> 0:48:06.760
<v Speaker 1>eat your own kind over other forms of prey. Yeah,

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely in that near well, we're definitely in that

0:48:10.520 --> 0:48:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that zone where it's cannibalism. But is it potentially becoming

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 1>something else? Now? You would think since this is tadpoles

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:19.359
<v Speaker 1>eating eggs of the same species, you think maybe once

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:22.759
<v Speaker 1>you metamorphos into an adult cane toad, you'd get past this,

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:26.239
<v Speaker 1>uh this problem? Right? The answer is no. Studies have

0:48:26.440 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 1>also shown that that like midsize adult cane toads like

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:34.239
<v Speaker 1>to eat smaller, younger cane toads. They even have like

0:48:34.360 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 1>deceptive lure tactics where they will wiggle the toes of

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:41.920
<v Speaker 1>their back feet in water to attract smaller conspecifics and

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 1>then just literally swallow them whole. So I've, as we've discussed,

0:48:45.680 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of occasional opportunistic cannibalism in the animal world.

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:52.320
<v Speaker 1>But what causes the cane toads to go so hard

0:48:52.480 --> 0:48:55.799
<v Speaker 1>after their own species? Why do cane toads prey on

0:48:55.920 --> 0:48:59.799
<v Speaker 1>other cane toads so aggressively, and the researchers here in

0:49:00.040 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 1>this paper i mentioned hypothesize several answers with regard to

0:49:03.120 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the campbalization of eggs by by cane tode tadpoles. Number One,

0:49:07.680 --> 0:49:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it eliminates rivals who you're probably not related to, and

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:13.760
<v Speaker 1>this has to do with the specifics of the timing

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of ovipositing and mating by cane toads. Obviously, it doesn't

0:49:20.000 --> 0:49:22.960
<v Speaker 1>make evolutionary sense to eat your own brothers and sisters,

0:49:22.960 --> 0:49:26.080
<v Speaker 1>but due to the timing of cane toade reproduction, if

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you're a cane toad tadpole and there are eggs in

0:49:29.080 --> 0:49:31.239
<v Speaker 1>the pond with you, you can be pretty sure they

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:34.840
<v Speaker 1>belong to some other family of cane toad's. Number two,

0:49:34.960 --> 0:49:38.400
<v Speaker 1>eating the eggs speeds up the maturation of tadpoles. Obviously

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it's free energy. And three, the resource is abundant since

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it's poisonous and other potential predators can't eat it, but

0:49:46.760 --> 0:49:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you can, since cane toads are immune to their own poison,

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:52.920
<v Speaker 1>so they're kind of like the de facto specialized predator

0:49:53.080 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of their own young. It's it's like when you know

0:49:56.280 --> 0:49:58.799
<v Speaker 1>somebody orders something for lunch, and there's one thing out

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on the buffet that you're the only person in the

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:04.480
<v Speaker 1>office that likes. So it's all for you. Enjoy this

0:50:04.560 --> 0:50:09.000
<v Speaker 1>braised red cabbage robbers. And there's a quote from from

0:50:09.120 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Dr Shine in that Times article where he says, quote,

0:50:12.800 --> 0:50:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a tropical animal that was relocated to

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the driest places on Earth. Cannibalism is one

0:50:19.040 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of those clever tricks that makes it such a superb

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 1>colonizer and a survival machine. Talking about the cane toad um. Now,

0:50:26.680 --> 0:50:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of course this does come with some of the regular

0:50:28.960 --> 0:50:31.720
<v Speaker 1>downsides of cannibalism, like it came across the two thousand

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:35.319
<v Speaker 1>eleven paper with a pretty great title. Also, Richard Chin

0:50:35.480 --> 0:50:37.480
<v Speaker 1>was one of the authors on this quote. You are

0:50:37.520 --> 0:50:41.799
<v Speaker 1>what you eat parasite transferring cannibalistic cane tod So you know,

0:50:41.920 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 1>do cane toad's risk infection and paras parasitization by eating

0:50:46.200 --> 0:50:48.719
<v Speaker 1>their own The answer is, oh yes. When a cane

0:50:48.719 --> 0:50:51.440
<v Speaker 1>toad eats another cane toad and infected with, for example,

0:50:51.520 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 1>nematode lung worms. This study found that the cannibal toad

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:58.880
<v Speaker 1>can end up with viable lung worms in its own body,

0:50:58.960 --> 0:51:03.480
<v Speaker 1>so they are paying this cost for their cannibalism behaviors.

0:51:03.560 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 1>And nevertheless, I was reading in another context that cane

0:51:06.239 --> 0:51:11.160
<v Speaker 1>toads are so aggressively cannibalistic that that cane toad juice

0:51:11.280 --> 0:51:14.279
<v Speaker 1>from the poison glands of an adult cane toad is

0:51:14.320 --> 0:51:17.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the best imaginable baits for a trap for

0:51:17.800 --> 0:51:21.279
<v Speaker 1>catching cane tone tadpoles. Okay, I think it's a cane

0:51:21.280 --> 0:51:25.359
<v Speaker 1>tone cane toad tadpoles. That's a tongue twister. Uh So

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it smells like eggs, right, because they have these same

0:51:28.800 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>chemicals and poisons, And it's an ingenious method for removing

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the tadpoles of this invasive species from a water source

0:51:36.600 --> 0:51:40.480
<v Speaker 1>without harming other creatures. Like the cannibalistic tadpoles are attracted

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to it in swarms because of course they want to

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:45.760
<v Speaker 1>eat the eggs of their own kind, and other animals

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:47.759
<v Speaker 1>are not really attracted to it at all. So you

0:51:47.760 --> 0:51:50.319
<v Speaker 1>can put traps out with this and catch thousands of

0:51:50.360 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>cane toad tadpoles and almost nothing else. But I think

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it seems like this species in Australia in particular favors cannibalisms.

0:52:00.080 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Aggressively because it's a tough physical environment, like they need

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to reproduce in water, and yet it's a relatively dry landscape.

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>And yet at the same time, there's an abundance of

0:52:10.680 --> 0:52:14.719
<v Speaker 1>their own species due to a lack of adapted predators. Interesting,

0:52:14.760 --> 0:52:17.320
<v Speaker 1>So I feel like one of the crazy things about

0:52:17.360 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 1>this is that a lot of what they're observing here

0:52:19.920 --> 0:52:22.239
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's nothing you would observe, at least on

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this scale in their natural habitat, Like they're the cane

0:52:27.960 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 1>todes of Australia have this kind of bloated and and

0:52:32.160 --> 0:52:36.520
<v Speaker 1>an natural space in the ecosystem that has yet to

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:40.879
<v Speaker 1>be uh, you know, sort of recalibrated by other factors. Yeah.

0:52:41.000 --> 0:52:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Now I don't know what they're what they're cannibalistic tendencies

0:52:44.960 --> 0:52:48.320
<v Speaker 1>are like within their native range, it might be something equivalent,

0:52:48.360 --> 0:52:51.040
<v Speaker 1>but but this seemed to be focused on the ones

0:52:51.080 --> 0:52:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that are in Australia, So I'm not sure how prevalent

0:52:54.360 --> 0:52:56.319
<v Speaker 1>this would be in the species as they live in

0:52:56.360 --> 0:52:59.399
<v Speaker 1>South America. It's like, if you know, if cannibals took

0:52:59.400 --> 0:53:02.160
<v Speaker 1>over a date care, like and you observed it on

0:53:02.200 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 1>like the first day of activities, you know, it's like

0:53:04.719 --> 0:53:07.879
<v Speaker 1>everything is going to be crazy that first day. Hopefully

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 1>by day three or four things would have have settled

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:14.840
<v Speaker 1>down and or the police had shown up, etcetera. Uh.

0:53:14.920 --> 0:53:17.359
<v Speaker 1>And of course before that, before the cannibals took over

0:53:17.360 --> 0:53:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the daycare, you would not have this um, this out

0:53:20.520 --> 0:53:23.919
<v Speaker 1>of balance scenario in which to observe how things would

0:53:23.960 --> 0:53:28.000
<v Speaker 1>take place. That's a beautiful analogy. Wrout. Before we wrap up,

0:53:28.000 --> 0:53:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to mention just one more type of predation

0:53:30.880 --> 0:53:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that we might consider a kind of close analogy to cannibalism,

0:53:34.480 --> 0:53:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and that is when you kill and eat an animal

0:53:37.280 --> 0:53:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that is not the same species as you, So it's

0:53:39.680 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 1>not cannibalism, but which makes a living the same way

0:53:43.320 --> 0:53:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you do, maybe does the same job as you. And

0:53:46.560 --> 0:53:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this brings us to a biological concept and as intra

0:53:49.480 --> 0:53:53.719
<v Speaker 1>guild predation, in the words of entomologists j Rosenheim and

0:53:53.800 --> 0:53:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Jason Harmon into intra guild predation occurs quote when two

0:53:58.120 --> 0:54:03.560
<v Speaker 1>consumers that share a resource and which therefore are potential competitors,

0:54:04.040 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 1>also engage in predator prey interactions with each other. So

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got two different species competing for the same resource.

0:54:11.960 --> 0:54:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Like how at different times. Maybe Elmer Fudd and Yosemite

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Sam are both trying to go hunting for bugs Bunny.

0:54:18.520 --> 0:54:24.600
<v Speaker 1>But what if instead Elmer Fudd kills and eats Yosemite Sam. See,

0:54:24.640 --> 0:54:28.759
<v Speaker 1>this solves two survival problems at the same time. It

0:54:28.840 --> 0:54:31.799
<v Speaker 1>provides an immediate meal. You get to eat Yosemite Sam,

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and there's energy in that. But it also reduces future

0:54:35.600 --> 0:54:38.680
<v Speaker 1>competition for the webbit. Right, all right, it's a it's

0:54:38.680 --> 0:54:42.839
<v Speaker 1>a basic Freddy versus Jason scenario. Right, Yeah, that's pretty good.

0:54:43.160 --> 0:54:45.520
<v Speaker 1>So the benefits of this kind of thing are obvious,

0:54:45.520 --> 0:54:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and there are a couple of versions here. There is

0:54:48.360 --> 0:54:52.120
<v Speaker 1>asymmetrical inter guild predation, and this occurs when two species

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:54.759
<v Speaker 1>compete for the same prey resources and one of those

0:54:54.760 --> 0:54:58.520
<v Speaker 1>two species also kills and eats the other. And then

0:54:58.560 --> 0:55:01.000
<v Speaker 1>there's what you might guess, the other half of that,

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the other side of that coin, symmetrical intriguild predation. It's

0:55:04.960 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 1>when two species are in competition and they also both

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:11.680
<v Speaker 1>kill and eat one another. If one predator is regularly

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:13.759
<v Speaker 1>bigger than the other or something. This kind of two

0:55:13.840 --> 0:55:17.960
<v Speaker 1>way mutual predation can often cross the lines of life phases,

0:55:18.040 --> 0:55:21.239
<v Speaker 1>where say one predator adults of one predator prey on

0:55:21.280 --> 0:55:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the juveniles of the other predator. Okay, So with asymmetrical

0:55:25.239 --> 0:55:29.000
<v Speaker 1>um intriguild predation, there's always going to be probably a

0:55:29.000 --> 0:55:32.040
<v Speaker 1>clear winner, yeah, Like the the larger of the two

0:55:32.040 --> 0:55:34.120
<v Speaker 1>competing species is going to be the one that eats

0:55:34.120 --> 0:55:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the smaller. But in symmetrical interguild predation, it could go

0:55:37.280 --> 0:55:41.799
<v Speaker 1>either way depending on body size, phase of life, or

0:55:41.800 --> 0:55:45.319
<v Speaker 1>other factors of superiority exactly. And so this type of

0:55:45.320 --> 0:55:48.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff often happens in insects and arthropods that share the

0:55:48.760 --> 0:55:51.960
<v Speaker 1>same prey, like in some centipedes, but it also occurs

0:55:51.960 --> 0:55:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in large mammalian carnivores like canids and fields. They often

0:55:55.600 --> 0:55:58.600
<v Speaker 1>prey on one another when they're competing for the same

0:55:58.719 --> 0:56:02.759
<v Speaker 1>food resources, for example lions and wolves, or coyotes and

0:56:02.840 --> 0:56:07.480
<v Speaker 1>foxes or bobcats. According to a n paper in the

0:56:07.520 --> 0:56:13.440
<v Speaker 1>American Naturalists by by Palomari's and Caro uh quote, interspecific

0:56:13.520 --> 0:56:16.880
<v Speaker 1>killing among mammalian carnivores is common in nature and accounts

0:56:16.920 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for up to sixty eight percent of known mortalities in

0:56:20.120 --> 0:56:25.080
<v Speaker 1>some species. So there's some carnivorous predatory mammals for which

0:56:25.120 --> 0:56:27.920
<v Speaker 1>more than two thirds of their deaths are caused by

0:56:28.000 --> 0:56:33.000
<v Speaker 1>other predatory mammals. And because inter guild predation accomplishes two

0:56:33.040 --> 0:56:36.600
<v Speaker 1>different goals at the same time, inter guild predation can

0:56:36.640 --> 0:56:39.680
<v Speaker 1>be extremely useful as the survival adaptation. It's a very

0:56:39.719 --> 0:56:42.640
<v Speaker 1>efficient way to do things. Of course, since members of

0:56:42.719 --> 0:56:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the same species are often in competition for the same resources,

0:56:46.040 --> 0:56:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the same advantages that apply to inter guild predation often

0:56:49.040 --> 0:56:52.920
<v Speaker 1>apply to straight up cannibalism. Right because you know you,

0:56:52.920 --> 0:56:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you and the other one of your species you're you're

0:56:55.160 --> 0:56:58.560
<v Speaker 1>probably also in competition. But straight up cannibalism is more

0:56:58.600 --> 0:57:00.600
<v Speaker 1>likely to come with the other downs sides, such as

0:57:00.640 --> 0:57:03.640
<v Speaker 1>reducing the gene pool of your own species, making making

0:57:03.680 --> 0:57:07.200
<v Speaker 1>more difficult, exposing you to more parasites and diseases, and

0:57:07.239 --> 0:57:09.000
<v Speaker 1>so forth. Now you said you were going to bring

0:57:09.040 --> 0:57:11.719
<v Speaker 1>all this back to social media. No that I was.

0:57:11.840 --> 0:57:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about this and I started to think

0:57:14.960 --> 0:57:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that I see parallels between the strategy of intra guild

0:57:18.600 --> 0:57:22.520
<v Speaker 1>predation and some types of business strategies, especially like in

0:57:22.680 --> 0:57:26.120
<v Speaker 1>digital media where we work. So why don't you think

0:57:26.120 --> 0:57:30.120
<v Speaker 1>about this example? What did Facebook due to the rest

0:57:30.160 --> 0:57:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of the web? Like digital media companies are in competition

0:57:34.920 --> 0:57:37.400
<v Speaker 1>for audience. You can almost think about audience as their

0:57:37.400 --> 0:57:40.400
<v Speaker 1>prey in a way. They make money when more people

0:57:40.520 --> 0:57:44.680
<v Speaker 1>spend more time on their side or their platform. Facebook

0:57:44.760 --> 0:57:48.800
<v Speaker 1>was a digital media company in competition for users attention

0:57:48.880 --> 0:57:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and time, and their competitors were the other places where

0:57:52.720 --> 0:57:56.000
<v Speaker 1>people might spend their time on digital devices, other websites,

0:57:56.080 --> 0:58:00.840
<v Speaker 1>other apps, other platforms. So it seems to me Facebook said,

0:58:00.920 --> 0:58:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, instead of just competing with these other media platforms,

0:58:04.200 --> 0:58:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I will eat them. And that's sort of what it did.

0:58:07.000 --> 0:58:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Right So now instead of just going to your blog

0:58:11.200 --> 0:58:14.680
<v Speaker 1>or homepage or whatever, people would go to your Facebook

0:58:14.720 --> 0:58:18.520
<v Speaker 1>page or just follow you on Facebook or rely on

0:58:18.560 --> 0:58:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Facebook to keep people updated on what you're doing, whether

0:58:22.080 --> 0:58:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you're a person or a business or a content provider.

0:58:24.880 --> 0:58:27.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think the analogy holds that Facebook functions like

0:58:27.840 --> 0:58:32.760
<v Speaker 1>an asymmetrical intriguild predator. Here it gets double benefits both

0:58:32.760 --> 0:58:35.120
<v Speaker 1>by getting a direct meal off of you, like it

0:58:35.160 --> 0:58:38.000
<v Speaker 1>gets the traffic that you would be getting elsewhere that

0:58:38.040 --> 0:58:41.760
<v Speaker 1>gets just subsumed into its diet of traffic, and it

0:58:41.840 --> 0:58:45.600
<v Speaker 1>reduces competition in the future by training people evermore to

0:58:45.720 --> 0:58:48.520
<v Speaker 1>just go directly to Facebook instead of to other sites.

0:58:48.560 --> 0:58:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And apps, And it makes me wonder if there are

0:58:51.080 --> 0:58:54.320
<v Speaker 1>other examples in the business world where there is something

0:58:54.360 --> 0:58:58.160
<v Speaker 1>like intriguild predation going on, where where one business gets

0:58:58.320 --> 0:59:03.280
<v Speaker 1>double benefits out of assuming or subsuming another one. Yeah,

0:59:03.480 --> 0:59:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you may have something. You may have a

0:59:05.560 --> 0:59:08.160
<v Speaker 1>point there. I mean, also, it's very easy to imagine

0:59:08.240 --> 0:59:11.400
<v Speaker 1>any of these large media companies as kind of a

0:59:11.440 --> 0:59:16.200
<v Speaker 1>bloated cannibal king feasting and blood soaked on a on

0:59:16.240 --> 0:59:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a pyramid of bones of its competitors. Uh, and the

0:59:19.560 --> 0:59:22.760
<v Speaker 1>attentions of its clients. I couldn't put it any better

0:59:22.800 --> 0:59:26.280
<v Speaker 1>than that, Robert, But but I feel like we're kind

0:59:26.320 --> 0:59:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of given normal predators, a normal cannibals a bad name

0:59:29.840 --> 0:59:33.760
<v Speaker 1>by associating them with with that kind of ghastly you know,

0:59:33.920 --> 0:59:38.560
<v Speaker 1>very uh, you know, human centric image. That's true. Normal animals,

0:59:38.640 --> 0:59:42.040
<v Speaker 1>even the ones that sometimes practice cannibalism, are not. Corporations

0:59:42.520 --> 0:59:45.800
<v Speaker 1>don't decide that hippos are bad now just because occasionally

0:59:45.840 --> 0:59:49.480
<v Speaker 1>hippos will eat another hippo, They're still they're hippos. They're animals,

0:59:49.520 --> 0:59:52.200
<v Speaker 1>they're they're living within an ecology, and they're doing what

0:59:52.240 --> 0:59:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they have to do to survive. Yeah, I mean, it's

0:59:54.040 --> 0:59:56.160
<v Speaker 1>like with mice and hamsters and so forth. You know,

0:59:56.240 --> 0:59:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like you can if you get one as a

0:59:57.800 --> 1:00:01.200
<v Speaker 1>pet and you in your you end up tricking yourself

1:00:01.320 --> 1:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>or falling into this idea of thinking them it's like

1:00:03.360 --> 1:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>tiny furry people and you're a little furry friend that

1:00:06.200 --> 1:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>lives in this box and scurries around. And then but

1:00:09.520 --> 1:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>then if you're going to become horrified when they engage

1:00:12.240 --> 1:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in something in humans such as cannibalizing their young, uh,

1:00:16.120 --> 1:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's I mean, you should take that as a

1:00:18.400 --> 1:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>learning lesson. You know that this is ah, these are

1:00:21.200 --> 1:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the perils of of anthropomorphizing, uh, the animal world and

1:00:25.440 --> 1:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>then then the wild world and the natural order of things.

1:00:29.600 --> 1:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>But really, cannibalism is simply ubiquitous and it is going

1:00:33.120 --> 1:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to be practiced by um, you know, most of these

1:00:36.360 --> 1:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>organisms at one point or another. Totally exactly right. Though

1:00:40.400 --> 1:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to make clear also I'm not implying that

1:00:42.680 --> 1:00:45.919
<v Speaker 1>the inverse excuse supplies where you can you can take

1:00:46.000 --> 1:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that logic and apply it back to human institutions like

1:00:48.960 --> 1:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>people and like corporations and all that, because come on,

1:00:51.600 --> 1:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>they got people in them. People out oft know better.

1:00:53.600 --> 1:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>And also we are not condoning human cannibalism, right, that's

1:00:57.800 --> 1:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. Yeah, I think you're just talking about

1:00:59.360 --> 1:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the digital media, but neither one neither actually eat killing

1:01:02.840 --> 1:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and eating other humans, nor doing stuff that's akin to

1:01:05.560 --> 1:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>cannibalism in metaphorical way right now, Survival cannibalism, that's that's

1:01:10.920 --> 1:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a different scenario. If somebody's already dead and you've got

1:01:13.920 --> 1:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>nothing else to live on. Maybe maybe, But then again,

1:01:18.360 --> 1:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>like that's that's a decision you're going to have to

1:01:21.200 --> 1:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>make in those dire situations. We can't make it for you.

1:01:24.400 --> 1:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>It would be you know, it would just be rude

1:01:27.080 --> 1:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of me to rule on that. I do not know

1:01:28.640 --> 1:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the particulars of your survival cannibalism. So if you are

1:01:32.280 --> 1:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in a survival cannibalism situation right now while listening to

1:01:35.280 --> 1:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, I cast no judgment. Eat your earbuds. If

1:01:40.080 --> 1:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that that's what you should do, well, maybe if you

1:01:42.280 --> 1:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>chew on the earbuds a little, it can distract you. Right,

1:01:44.400 --> 1:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like sucking on a button if you're thirsty, right,

1:01:47.080 --> 1:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the I don't know if that actually works, but that's

1:01:49.320 --> 1:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the old wives tale, right. This has been a lot

1:01:51.560 --> 1:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of fun, Robert, Yeah, another page in the book of Cannibalism. Uh. Likewise,

1:01:57.800 --> 1:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of these topics, there's so much more

1:01:59.400 --> 1:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>we could discuss, and cannibalism will probably come back around

1:02:02.120 --> 1:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to cannibalism again, either generally or you know, regarding a

1:02:06.160 --> 1:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>specific organism at some point in the future. Uh. Also,

1:02:10.160 --> 1:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to stress again that Bill shoot book Cannibalism

1:02:13.880 --> 1:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>is excellent. Do pick it up. You wrote another one

1:02:16.400 --> 1:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>on vampires dealing with vampiric organisms, and that too is

1:02:22.120 --> 1:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>an excellent read. So either of those books are wonderful

1:02:24.640 --> 1:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>if you want to, like I guess you know, slightly

1:02:27.360 --> 1:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>uh slightly ghastly um biological read, They're they're great books.

1:02:32.280 --> 1:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, if you want to check out more

1:02:33.920 --> 1:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Stuff to Blow your Mind, heading over to

1:02:35.960 --> 1:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. That's where you'll

1:02:37.600 --> 1:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>find them. That's where you find links, oute of social accounts.

1:02:39.720 --> 1:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>That's where you will find a tab for our store

1:02:42.160 --> 1:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>where you can buy some merchandise. But if you want

1:02:44.320 --> 1:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to help the show out, the best thing you can

1:02:45.960 --> 1:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>do is to rate and review us wherever you have

1:02:48.520 --> 1:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the power to do so, and subscribe. Subscribe to Stuff

1:02:51.200 --> 1:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind subscribe to Invention as well. Uh,

1:02:54.240 --> 1:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the other show that Joe and I do. It

1:02:55.960 --> 1:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is an invention by invention, look at human techno history. Recently,

1:03:00.720 --> 1:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we've been spending a lot of time talking about photography

1:03:03.080 --> 1:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and now we're getting into the realm of motion pictures,

1:03:05.880 --> 1:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>but in exactly the opposite direction. I've just had in

1:03:08.480 --> 1:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>mind a very ancient invention that I want to go

1:03:10.920 --> 1:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>back too soon. So so just keep that in mind

1:03:14.360 --> 1:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>as a tease ancient superweapons. Yeah, absolutely huge, Thanks as

1:03:19.720 --> 1:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>always to our excellent audio producers Alex Williams and Tory Harrison.

1:03:24.280 --> 1:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to get in touch with us

1:03:25.880 --> 1:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

1:03:28.560 --> 1:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a topic for the future, for just to say hello,

1:03:31.080 --> 1:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

1:03:34.800 --> 1:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is

1:03:46.240 --> 1:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a production of iHeart Radio's How Stuff Works. For more

1:03:48.640 --> 1:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app,

1:03:51.200 --> 1:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

1:03:56.280 --> 1:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Bid good by Press four part first par