Speaker 1: Our two Sean Hannity Show eight hundred and nine four
Speaker 1: one saw number if you want to be a part.
Speaker 2: Of the program.
Speaker 1: Well, the President warned democrats he will use the Insurrection
Speaker 1: Act to counter ICE resistance. You know, you see what's
Speaker 1: happening now. ICE agents are are literally there's a bounty
Speaker 1: on their heads. You have governors saying, oh, they can't
Speaker 1: wear a mask and signing that into law. You see
Speaker 1: fences that have had to be constructed to protect ICE
Speaker 1: from all of these insane protesters and crazy left wing radicals.
Speaker 1: You know, you have Democrats wanting to tear them down.
Speaker 1: So the President is saying, okay, we've we've got to
Speaker 1: protect ICE agents number one, number two. What are you
Speaker 1: going to do when you have four thousand, you know,
Speaker 1: dead people in Illinois because JB. Pritzker doesn't want law
Speaker 1: and order, safety, security, and to protect the people of
Speaker 1: a city. You know, at at some point does your
Speaker 1: do you want want your federal government to step in
Speaker 1: and protect your your safety, your security, your kids safety,
Speaker 1: your kid security. Look what the President has been able
Speaker 1: to do in DC. Look what he's now been able
Speaker 1: to do in Memphis. Dramatic turnarounds when you actually police
Speaker 1: areas you keep people safe and secure and alive. Anyway,
Speaker 1: here's the president dealing with it over the weekend, and
Speaker 1: don't forget it.
Speaker 3: And I haven't used it, but don't forget I can
Speaker 3: use the Insurrection Act. Fifty percent of the presidents almost
Speaker 3: have used that, and that's unquestioned.
Speaker 4: How I choose not to.
Speaker 3: I'd rather do this, but I'm met constantly by fake politicians,
Speaker 3: politicians that think that you know, it's not like a
Speaker 3: part of the radical left movement to have safety. These
Speaker 3: cities have to be safe. Are cities that are democrats
Speaker 3: run exclusively just about are unsafe cities? They're a disaster.
Speaker 1: What do you do? What do you want? You want
Speaker 1: law and order? Do you want safety and security? Do
Speaker 1: you agree with me that it's a prerequisite for any
Speaker 1: American to even contemplate the idea of pursuing happiness. Anyway,
Speaker 1: Here to weigh in on this and other issues, Greg Jarrett,
Speaker 1: Fox News Legal Analysts, Number one New York Times bestselling
Speaker 1: author Ris Cooper is with US legal commentator, co chair
Speaker 1: of the Black Leadership Network Project twenty one, author of
Speaker 1: put Y'all Back in Chains, Biden Policies, harms Blacks.
Speaker 2: Welcome both of you.
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett at you know, well, let's first talk about
Speaker 1: the history of the Insurrection Act and the president, you know,
Speaker 1: claiming the fifty percent of presidents have invoked it in
Speaker 1: the past, and historically how it's been used, and at
Speaker 1: what point if cities, you know, go along with the
Speaker 1: fund dismantled nobail laws and sending the social workers and
Speaker 1: they're not going to keep people safe and secure, you know,
Speaker 1: when does it become the responsibility of the federal government.
Speaker 5: To do so?
Speaker 6: The answer is now. You know, Liberals predictably shout our
Speaker 6: outrage that Trump might invoke the Insurrection Act. I think
Speaker 6: they're historically ignorant. Sixteen different presidents throughout history have used
Speaker 6: it to quell violence, more recently the first President Bush,
Speaker 6: than before him, Ronald Reaganland and Johnson Kennedy Eisenhower. That
Speaker 6: it dates all the way back to George Washington and
Speaker 6: Adams and Jefferson, and the list goes on and on.
Speaker 6: The Act is therefore a reason to be used by
Speaker 6: a president when warranted. It is not a pretty chin
Speaker 6: it all to be admired behind glass on a shelf,
Speaker 6: and Chicago, you know, is a perfect example of where
Speaker 6: the Insurrection Act should be evoked. The Guard troops are
Speaker 6: desperately needed. The mostly gang directed violence dictimizing horribly the
Speaker 6: African American community. You gave the number there shooting, stabbings, murders,
Speaker 6: other violent crimes. They're staggering in numbers, and city law
Speaker 6: enforcement is either unable or unwilling to protect those innocent civilians,
Speaker 6: and both the Mayor Pritzker and Governor Pritzker and the
Speaker 6: Mayor Johnson seem far more interested in preserving lawlessness and
Speaker 6: disorder only because they hate Donald Trump, who demands the
Speaker 6: opposite law and order. So far, the President has used
Speaker 6: his authority in places like California and Oregon, and in
Speaker 6: Chicago under a specific federal statute. But I think it's time,
Speaker 6: given the resistance of district court judges and Pritzker and Johnson,
Speaker 6: it's time to utilize the in Direction Act, which gives
Speaker 6: him much broader authority than the federal statute that he's
Speaker 6: been using.
Speaker 1: Let's get your take, Horace Cooper. I agree with Greg's
Speaker 1: analysis completely. It is heartbreaking that I can I can
Speaker 1: leave this show on a Friday and kind of with
Speaker 1: pinpoint accuracy predict how many people are going to be shot.
Speaker 1: How many likely shot and killed in Chicago that coming weekend.
Speaker 7: So I agree with Greg and here let's make sure
Speaker 7: we understand what is happening. Say in the city of
Speaker 7: Chicago isn't an accident. It's actually the active policy of
Speaker 7: the local government to engage in a series of restrictions
Speaker 7: or limits on the use of police force, the use
Speaker 7: of prosecutions, and it puts the lives of those citizens
Speaker 7: of the United States who happened to live in the
Speaker 7: area in jeopardy. That means that when they want to
Speaker 7: exercise their constitutionally protected rights, they are likely at risk
Speaker 7: not just of injury, not just of serious injury, but
Speaker 7: even of death. And by the way, our founders, particularly
Speaker 7: the Federalist Party, thought that the President of the United
Speaker 7: States had an inherent power to protect when a circumstance
Speaker 7: like this was to occur. In Federalists Number seventy four,
Speaker 7: actually Hamilton says that when you see the kind of
Speaker 7: wanton mayhem that is threatening the citizens, that the president
Speaker 7: should have the authority to intervene. The Insurrection Act was
Speaker 7: pushed by Thomas Jefferson and his party because even though
Speaker 7: the criteria had been met for the terms of what
Speaker 7: the federalists saw. He wanted the added protection when Congress
Speaker 7: acts It's okay, it's great in fact, but it doesn't
Speaker 7: actually take away from the inherent authority that a president has.
Speaker 7: The communities that you talk about within ten or fifteen
Speaker 7: or twenty minutes of this program ending whose lives are
Speaker 7: going to be put in jeopardy, are even lost. Those
Speaker 7: people have a right to expect that the president will
Speaker 7: step in and protect them.
Speaker 1: If the government doesn't have as its number one, as
Speaker 1: its number one goal to keep people safe and secure,
Speaker 1: what is then there for the purpose of government. You know,
Speaker 1: there's a great line by Thomas Pain in Common Sense
Speaker 1: seventeen seventy.
Speaker 2: Six, Greg Jarrett.
Speaker 1: You know where the guy and dictates of one's conscience
Speaker 1: irresistibly obeyed, there'd be no need for any lawgiver. There
Speaker 1: wouldn't be a need for government. Then it talks about
Speaker 1: that not being the case, why laws are instituted by men.
Speaker 1: But rights we believe, well, we believe that rights come
Speaker 1: from God, not from government. However, government's role first and
Speaker 1: foremost has got to be to keep its citizen resafe.
Speaker 6: Absolutely, and I agree with Horace it is the inherent
Speaker 6: power of the Constitution to protect the nation. That means
Speaker 6: it's citizens. And look, there are three advantages to invoking
Speaker 6: the Insurrection Act. First of all, it's the primary exception
Speaker 6: to the Passikma Tatis Act, which restricts the role of
Speaker 6: the military and civilian law enforcement. Second, under the Insurrection Act,
Speaker 6: the Guard troops can take a far more active role
Speaker 6: in law enforcement where, for example, in Chicago, you know
Speaker 6: the violent crime is just out of control read section
Speaker 6: two fifty three of the Act. The Guard would not
Speaker 6: be limited to protecting ice. They would be empowered to
Speaker 6: protect the civilian population and re establishing law and order
Speaker 6: where there is unusual widespread violence. And Third, and finally,
Speaker 6: the President under the Insurrection Act has greater latitude, making
Speaker 6: it more difficult for these rogue federal District Court judges
Speaker 6: to try to overrule him. And I understand the term
Speaker 6: insurrection is not precisely defined, but the Supreme Court did
Speaker 6: it in the seminal case of Martin versus Mott. They
Speaker 6: affirmed the president's exclusive authority to decide if conditions for
Speaker 6: invoking the Insurrection Act or met. In other words, judges
Speaker 6: butt out, you have no role in this to countermand
Speaker 6: the President. So I think it's going to come to this.
Speaker 6: I think the President likely will invoke the Insurrection Act,
Speaker 6: particularly in Chicago, but other cities as well.
Speaker 1: Big Break more with Fox News. Leglano's best selling author
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett. Also were with Project twenty one's Horrace Cooper,
Speaker 1: also a best selling author. We'll get to your calls
Speaker 1: coming up as well. Eight hundred nine four one Sean,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 1: right We continue now with Greig Jarrett and Horrace Cooper
Speaker 1: are with us. You know, Horrace, we've discussed this a
Speaker 1: lot over the years. You know, a lot of the
Speaker 1: violence that we see a lot, the worst schools are
Speaker 1: often in predominantly minority areas. The worst policing and the
Speaker 1: most violence predominantly minority areas. These areas have been run
Speaker 1: by Democrats for decades and decades and decades. They have
Speaker 1: failed their constituents miserably. I think we saw in the
Speaker 1: last election, you know, the dam might be breaking, and
Speaker 1: I think maybe the stranglehold politically that the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: has had with minority communities is breaking because they have
Speaker 1: failed people so spectacularly. And Donald Trump is actively courting
Speaker 1: people in predominantly dominated areas and saying, you know, how's
Speaker 1: it working out, how's your school system working out, how's
Speaker 1: law and order working out in your city, your town?
Speaker 2: And I think it's going to be.
Speaker 1: A successful message because I think it's just I think
Speaker 1: every single person wants the same thing we all want,
Speaker 1: you know, saved communities, good schools for our kids, a
Speaker 1: nice neighborhood, a nice car to drive, and an opportunity
Speaker 1: to climb the ladder to success.
Speaker 7: Shock shock shock. Doing what's right by the American people
Speaker 7: could actually redound to the president. Well, the opposite of
Speaker 7: that is also true, doing what's wrong for the American people,
Speaker 7: like many of these local governments and governors are doing
Speaker 7: in these communities. It's important it is a stint that
Speaker 7: the president actually have the ability to do this what
Speaker 7: I am troubled by, and again I agree with Greg
Speaker 7: about the presidents the South there, but I am troubled
Speaker 7: by federal courts in America believing that they are the
Speaker 7: best measure of whether or not our rights are being protected.
Speaker 7: In many instances, when you're talking about something as critical
Speaker 7: as whether or not the violence level has reached such
Speaker 7: a level of danger and has become so widespread that
Speaker 7: the president needs to intervene. That's not actually something that
Speaker 7: federal courts are confidently able to assess. Oh and by
Speaker 7: the way, when they get it wrong, more American lives
Speaker 7: are jeopardized. This is why this type of responsibility our
Speaker 7: founders would have thought were quintessentially something that the executive
Speaker 7: power should do and lie.
Speaker 2: But Harris, I don't get this. I mean, under JB.
Speaker 1: Fritzkow, four thousand people murdered, they got five times the
Speaker 1: murder homicide rate in Illinois than they do in Chicago
Speaker 1: than they do in New York City. Now, at some point,
Speaker 1: you know, he's more mad at Donald Trump than he
Speaker 1: is at all the people getting shot and shot and killed.
Speaker 1: And I'm like, you know, where are your priorities here?
Speaker 7: That's what I meant by this isn't an accident, This
Speaker 7: isn't just a little chaos getting out of control. This
Speaker 7: is the intentional policy to say to people who live
Speaker 7: in these communities, you will not have the rights, you
Speaker 7: will not have the privileges, you will not have the
Speaker 7: freedom that other communities are taking for granted. That's why
Speaker 7: the president should invoke the Insurrection Act to make sure
Speaker 7: that he can put a stop to it. If Governor
Speaker 7: Pritzker wants to stand in the way, then he's going
Speaker 7: to be like we thought with President Eisenhower. If you do,
Speaker 7: you'll be arrested. If those who help you attempt, they'll
Speaker 7: be arrested.
Speaker 2: To all the people deserve to be safe. Last word,
Speaker 2: Greg Yard.
Speaker 6: You know some of these federal district court judges are
Speaker 6: contorting the law and trying to stop Trump by substituting
Speaker 6: their own subjective judgment as to whether it's merited, Horse
Speaker 6: is right. Those judges are not competent, they're not equipped
Speaker 6: to do that. They don't have the full facts, they're
Speaker 6: not commander in chief. Those judges think they're super presidents
Speaker 6: who can counterman anything Trump does, and in doing so,
Speaker 6: they're ignoring what the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal said
Speaker 6: recently uphol Trump's use for the guard in LA that
Speaker 6: a judge must always give a great level of deference
Speaker 6: to the president when he decides that troops are necessary.
Speaker 6: So I think the president the law is on the
Speaker 6: President's side on this, all right, Harras.
Speaker 1: Cooper, Greg Jarrett, thank you both. Appreciate you both. Eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine four one showing us on number if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. You know,
Speaker 1: it was a great New York post. Look, I think
Speaker 1: it's a FATA complete. I hope I'm wrong. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying to give up hope in any way. Uh, but
Speaker 1: it looks like New York is going to embrace mister
Speaker 1: I can't condemn global Entifada Zorn Marxist Kami Mamdani. New
Speaker 1: York Posts rightly pointed out something in this weekend, and
Speaker 1: that is there the Democrat's biggest, biggest problem isn't just
Speaker 1: Mamdani and socialists. And I don't care if it's the
Speaker 1: no Kings protest this weekend.
Speaker 2: You know, Stephen A.
Speaker 1: Smith, you see decide, said these crowds, I'm like, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's basically a Kamala Harris rally. H And I'm like,
Speaker 1: the left has that base, that's not the problem. And
Speaker 1: the rest of the headline goes it's the moderates who
Speaker 1: cave to them. And Hakeem Jeffries has indicated he's probably
Speaker 1: going to endorse Mmdani this week. I would imagine Chucky
Speaker 1: Schumer is going to end up endorsing Mamdannie as well, anyway,
Speaker 1: so he goes to this this mosque is a report
Speaker 1: about this mom His name is wa Wahaj. You know,
Speaker 1: Mamdanni has absolutely you know, no problem at all howling
Speaker 1: around with this guy, you know, and putting it up
Speaker 1: on social media, and then when I asked about it
Speaker 1: this weekends remained silent. One question why I was with
Speaker 1: him this weekend. FBI agents, recording to Foxnews dot com,
Speaker 1: you know, are absolutely apoplectic that this is all happening.
Speaker 1: New York Post wrote an editorial, what huborist zorromm Donnie
Speaker 1: is so convinced he has the mayor's race in the bag.
Speaker 1: He's happily embracing the most extremist elements of his coalition,
Speaker 1: talking about you know, a visit uh, you know to
Speaker 1: at Paqua the bedsty mosque where Imam Wahaj was the
Speaker 1: you know where. The candidate then posted and publicized all
Speaker 1: of this on X again. He was indicted unindicted co
Speaker 1: conspirator in the Trade Center bombing and testified in support
Speaker 1: of Shake ab del Rachman, the infamous blind Shake, if
Speaker 1: you recall that case. He denies his links to terrorism,
Speaker 1: but none of this is sufficient to steer, Mom Donnie away, No,
Speaker 1: not at all. He's just he's just digging in deeper. Now,
Speaker 1: Andrew Cuomo is warning while socialism could mean the death
Speaker 1: of New York, h of New York. Well, then I
Speaker 1: read that he took ten days off on the campaign
Speaker 1: trail since what Labor Day? You know, and uh, you know,
Speaker 1: and then you have these these polls are meaningless by
Speaker 1: the way you keep saying, oh, it's close, you know,
Speaker 1: if it's one on one Andrew Cuomo versus Mom Donnie's
Speaker 1: within four points, I'm like, well, that's meaningless because Curtis
Speaker 1: Lee was not getting out of the race. He said
Speaker 1: it again and again and again, even claimed that he
Speaker 1: was offered ten million dollars to get out of the race.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's there's so much on on this guy,
Speaker 1: and you know, and the and you know, the quotes
Speaker 1: attributed to Wahaj. You have to wonder why anybody would
Speaker 1: ever want to associate with this.
Speaker 8: Uh.
Speaker 2: Let me play for you.
Speaker 1: Uh, this is zoron Marxist COMMI Mom Donnie saying that
Speaker 1: the mom you know that he met with previous mayors,
Speaker 1: and he says the only reason it's a national issue
Speaker 1: is because of his faith.
Speaker 9: The saming Mom met with Mayor Blueberg, met with Mayor Deblasio,
Speaker 9: campaigned alongside Eric Adams, and the only time it became
Speaker 9: an issue of national attention was when I met with him.
Speaker 9: And that's because of the fact of my faith and
Speaker 9: because I'm on the precipice of winning this selection.
Speaker 1: And then, by the way, the mom controversial mom endorsed
Speaker 1: Mom Dannie.
Speaker 10: For Mayor's your brother coming to make a recommendation.
Speaker 2: You know, we have one of the most.
Speaker 10: Important elections coming up soon, and that is the may
Speaker 10: of New York City, and you have to meet. New
Speaker 10: York City is one of the most important cities in.
Speaker 4: The whole world.
Speaker 10: In Hamdulah, we want to make sure we make the
Speaker 10: right decision. Last blessed us. We have a very very,
Speaker 10: very very good candidate. His name is Aha Man Nanny.
Speaker 10: You must have heard him by now. And he's not
Speaker 10: a novice, he's not knows a state legislator, and he's
Speaker 10: running for may of New York City with a lot
Speaker 10: of other folks. Our recommendation, my recommendations and many many
Speaker 10: leaders that I know, Muslims and non Muslims are recommending
Speaker 10: that we vote for this young man.
Speaker 1: Let's uh, we have some tape of this this mom
Speaker 1: from over the years.
Speaker 11: Let's play it to you.
Speaker 10: I'm going to defend this country. You know this country is.
Speaker 6: It's a garbage can, filthy, silty, sick every day they
Speaker 6: We'll go to school.
Speaker 8: And then put American flash and try these little babies,
Speaker 8: babies our pleasure, legions to the flags of the United
Speaker 8: States of America.
Speaker 5: Is going to republic for which stands?
Speaker 1: Okay, let's get to our phones. Dominic is in Queens,
Speaker 1: New York. What's up, Dominic? How are you?
Speaker 5: Oh my god? I was just listening to what you
Speaker 5: had playing in it. It makes it's making me sick.
Speaker 5: It's ridiculous, man, it's ridiculous. Why aren't we pushing Sliver?
Speaker 5: We need to push sleew. I mean, I don't care
Speaker 5: about him taking away Listen.
Speaker 1: I I've had him on radio TV repeatedly. I had
Speaker 1: him on radio and TV last week. I'm not not
Speaker 1: giving him airtime. We're giving him a lot of air cover.
Speaker 5: Everybody needs to do this panning everybody. It's just ridiculous. Hey,
Speaker 5: Trump couldn't do it right. He can't.
Speaker 12: And look what happened. Look what happened even the third time.
Speaker 12: Even the third time he ran, the Republicans didn't want Trump.
Speaker 12: And why because he rows up the base. The hell
Speaker 12: with the base, the hell with all of that. Curtis,
Speaker 12: Curtis got to get in.
Speaker 5: This is ridiculous.
Speaker 1: We are I got a note from sid Rosenberg asking me,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't know. I think I think maybe
Speaker 1: I'm gonna have to move towards Clomar. I said, I'm
Speaker 1: not moving towards Clomo home does not. I just thought,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't really He's not as extreme as
Speaker 1: mum Nanni. But you know he brought no bail law
Speaker 1: to New York, New York State. You know it was
Speaker 1: his his COVID. You know, handling was a disaster. I
Speaker 1: see absolutely no hope for New York City. You look,
Speaker 1: Linda hates this. I'm I'm not feeling good about it.
Speaker 1: I'm just you want me to be Pollyannish and say,
Speaker 1: oh this, I'm being realistic about every race. If you're
Speaker 1: a Republican in New Jersey, you have a really good shot.
Speaker 1: If you're a Republican in the Commonwealth of Virginia win
Speaker 1: some seers, you have a really good shot it's it's
Speaker 1: you know, take it seriously, galvanize your vote is gonna
Speaker 1: matter New York City. Nowhere near is is optimistic, just
Speaker 1: the opposite.
Speaker 2: I'm pessimistic.
Speaker 8: Now.
Speaker 1: I can be a fake and a pony and a fraud,
Speaker 1: and I'm not going to do that to you.
Speaker 2: I owe it to you to tell you the truth
Speaker 2: we got.
Speaker 5: I know we're in bizarro world, like you'll say, but
Speaker 5: it's it's just it's infuriating, it's it's just it is.
Speaker 1: Listen, then get everybody in New York City to wake
Speaker 1: the hell up because it's going to be a disaster
Speaker 1: that I can promise you that is the net result
Speaker 1: of this.
Speaker 2: It's no good.
Speaker 1: Only good that may come out of it is Kathy
Speaker 1: Hulkle forty seven percent of independence a whole goal. Support
Speaker 1: of Mom Donnie uh would likely cause them to vote
Speaker 1: for Elie Dephonic.
Speaker 5: Yeah. Yeah, well, you know, we roll the dice, which
Speaker 5: will Curtis out there and just keep pushing them. That's it.
Speaker 1: I'm supporting him. Let me be very clear. I am
Speaker 1: supporting him. I think he'd be Rudy Giuliani two point oh.
Speaker 1: I actually saw Rudy this weekend and he agreed with
Speaker 1: me anyway, I appreciate it, Dominic. Good luck man. I
Speaker 1: quick break right back to our phones. Here's our toll
Speaker 1: free number. It's eight hundred and nine to four one, Sean.
Speaker 1: If you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 1: this Monday.
Speaker 8: Final Hour around us is next. You do not want
Speaker 8: to miss it, and stay tuned for the final hour
Speaker 8: free for all on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 2: Let's get back to our busy phones.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn. If you want
Speaker 1: to join us, go to Bill in New Jersey? Bill,
Speaker 1: how are you glad.
Speaker 4: You called John? How are you doing today?
Speaker 5: Actually?
Speaker 1: I read this report on Fox News today and it
Speaker 1: was I think it was in the New York Post
Speaker 1: today as well. Passaic Democrats voted against putting cameras early voting,
Speaker 1: I guess starting in New Jersey. And they are against
Speaker 1: putting cameras in the rooms where the ballots are, or
Speaker 1: cameras outside the room. Why wouldn't democrats, I mean both
Speaker 1: Democrats and Republicans have complained about election results. Why wouldn't
Speaker 1: you put election integrity measures in place that benefit both parties?
Speaker 1: And that's simple, you know, voter ID signature, verification, gain
Speaker 1: the custody controls. Put those cameras as soon as they
Speaker 1: are for the minute they get into building, cameras the
Speaker 1: whole time so nobody can go in there and play
Speaker 1: with mail in ballots, updated voter roles. Partisan observers are
Speaker 1: observing vote counts all day long, vote counting all night long.
Speaker 1: Why don't Why would Democrats be against that? Considering they
Speaker 1: complain bitterly when they lose.
Speaker 4: Well, I can tell you why, okay. And it's called
Speaker 4: the Families Working Party or the Work in Families Party.
Speaker 4: I forget exactly how they say it, but what they
Speaker 4: are is they're a communist party that took over the
Speaker 4: Democratic Party. And that's why everybody is line step in
Speaker 4: the row because communists can't steal an election if there's verification,
Speaker 4: it's impossible. And that communist party took over a Democratic party.
Speaker 4: And we know that now, I mean there's no doubt
Speaker 4: because everybody that's part of that is just happened to
Speaker 4: be everybody that they're running at this point. And you know,
Speaker 4: I think that it's up to you, and you know,
Speaker 4: because you know, obviously you helped Trump win that election
Speaker 4: by getting out the truth but the more Democrats know
Speaker 4: about working party, right, the better chance we have of
Speaker 4: fixing it, you know, because we can't have communists take over.
Speaker 4: And it's obvious, it's obvious what they are. I mean,
Speaker 4: it's like every communist people.
Speaker 1: People are gonna hate me for saying this, but I'm
Speaker 1: going to say it anyway because it's true, and we're
Speaker 1: all about just simply telling the truth on this program.
Speaker 2: I am telling you it's horrible for New York.
Speaker 1: City is likely about to happen to it. It's great
Speaker 1: for the Republican Party nationally. It's great for Republicans nationally.
Speaker 1: That's it because because people are going to look at
Speaker 1: this and say, uh uh no, thanks, not happening, you know,
Speaker 1: tending the socialists, reimagine the police, no bail, defund decriminalize everything.
Speaker 1: I mean, if they're going to watch this unfold and
Speaker 1: they're going to realize and this is an unmitigated disaster,
Speaker 1: and that's only going to help, you know, reaffirm people's
Speaker 1: values and validate who they you know, the things that
Speaker 1: they believe in, because you're going to see in real
Speaker 1: time these policies fail and fail spectacularly as they will.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, first, thing the communists do when they take
Speaker 4: over the empty the prisons out to cause anarchy. You know.
Speaker 4: The second thing they do is they kill everybody that's
Speaker 4: against them. You know, there's forests out in eastern Europe
Speaker 4: where you have indentations in the ground for miles in
Speaker 4: every direction from fifteen million buried Christians that were against
Speaker 4: them when they took over. And everybody fails to remember,
Speaker 4: this is not a democracy, This is a constitutional republic.
Speaker 4: A democracy, we would have already had these communists take over,
Speaker 4: you know. But you know, the constitutional republic is the
Speaker 4: only thing that's been protecting us and people like you
Speaker 4: getting out the word of what's really going on.
Speaker 1: What do you think democrats want to pack the courts?
Speaker 1: Why do you think Democrats, if they get in power,
Speaker 1: they want DC statehood, Puerto Rico statehood. Why do you
Speaker 1: think they want to eliminate the electoral college all because
Speaker 1: they want power in perpetuity. Why do you think they
Speaker 1: want the New Green Deal? Because they control then every
Speaker 1: aspect of your life. Anyway, I appreciate good call, Bill
Speaker 1: New Jersey. You have a real shop, by the way,
Speaker 1: but Chidarelli, that's real that I can tell you. But
Speaker 1: everyone in New Jersey. This is your opportunities, maybe your
Speaker 1: last opportunity. Actually it may be not that I want
Speaker 1: to sound fatalistic. Haven't heard Linda yell at me for
Speaker 1: telling the truth. You know, I'm telling the truth.
Speaker 8: You know that I think that the truth is whatever
Speaker 8: we want it to be.
Speaker 2: And I wanted to be Curtis Leewa and I'm all
Speaker 2: in on Curtis.
Speaker 1: Oh, the truth is I want to I'm president. That's
Speaker 1: the truth. That's whatever I want it to be.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 1: The truth is a multi multi multi billionaire.
Speaker 2: The truth does I own the free state of Florida?
Speaker 2: I mean you very well, may. I mean, I'm not
Speaker 2: arguing these points. You know what I'm saying. Just because
Speaker 2: you think it doesn't make it so. I'm self