Speaker 1: Well we have coming.
Speaker 2: To your city.
Speaker 3: Saying you a conscious cell will be desired, jellan and
Speaker 3: if you want a little banging, ye.
Speaker 4: I come alonge.
Speaker 2: These guys are crushing us. The Democratic brand is toxic
Speaker 2: right now. It's one thing to make noise, but you
Speaker 2: also have to make sense. It sounds all very good.
Speaker 2: But but Governor, you were the poster boy for a
Speaker 2: lot of this stuff. Do you agree that the democratic
Speaker 2: brand is toxic?
Speaker 5: I do agree that the democratic the Democratic Party brand
Speaker 5: is really problematic.
Speaker 6: Well, this is a revolution, and I think it might
Speaker 6: be that it might be the biggest revolution government since
Speaker 6: the original revolution.
Speaker 2: Freedom is that in style?
Speaker 7: Welcome to the revolution.
Speaker 4: Coming.
Speaker 3: To your city, going the.
Speaker 2: Way against aus and saying you a conscious zell.
Speaker 8: The new Sean Hennity Show more me I'm the scenes.
Speaker 7: Information on freaking news and more bold inspired solutions for America.
Speaker 7: Stay right here for our final news round up and
Speaker 7: information overload.
Speaker 6: All right, news round up and information overload. Our toll free.
Speaker 6: Our number is eight hundred and nine to four one Sean.
Speaker 6: If you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 6: So the only thing, the only power, if you will,
Speaker 6: the left has to stop the mandate that Donald Trump
Speaker 6: got in the last election is well, they lost electorally,
Speaker 6: so they what they can't get done that way, what
Speaker 6: they can't get done legislatively because they don't have control
Speaker 6: of the House or Senate, they go racing to the
Speaker 6: courts and they look and they do a little judge shopping.
Speaker 6: They find the right radical leftist activist judge or jurist,
Speaker 6: and they try to stop the president's agenda that way.
Speaker 6: Now President Trump has experienced more of this. Frankly, it's
Speaker 6: it's an extension of lawfare and weaponization as far as
Speaker 6: I'm concerned, and we have talked at length about how
Speaker 6: to stop it. We're going to get into more details
Speaker 6: here in a second. This morning, jd Vance, the Vice President,
Speaker 6: was on Fox and Friends, and here's what he said
Speaker 6: about this.
Speaker 5: Well, there are a lot of things that we can do,
Speaker 5: not just appeals. We can limit the jurisdiction of certain courts.
Speaker 5: Even when certain courts make a ruling say that you're
Speaker 5: not allowed to deport a person for a certain reason,
Speaker 5: we can still deport that person for another reason. So
Speaker 5: it's not like deportations have stopped. But yes, the radical
Speaker 5: courts are a problem. But Our view here is we
Speaker 5: knew we were going to have this fight. We were
Speaker 5: prepared for it. We're going to litigate it all the
Speaker 5: way to the Supreme Court. We think that we're going
Speaker 5: to win, and when we do win, that will end
Speaker 5: this question permanently.
Speaker 2: Think about this.
Speaker 5: The Democrats, they're spending so many resources fighting the deportation
Speaker 5: of gang members. You have to ask where are their priorities?
Speaker 5: But we knew they were going to do this. We're
Speaker 5: prepared for it, Lawrence, and we're going to fight all
Speaker 5: the way to the top of the courts.
Speaker 6: When you think about it, I mean party now the
Speaker 6: champions the right rights of men to play women's sports.
Speaker 6: They're the party that puts the rights of illegals over
Speaker 6: the safety of Americans. I mean Jamie Raskin demanding going
Speaker 6: as far as to demand that the return of these
Speaker 6: illegal alien gang members, Trendy Ragua gang members that were
Speaker 6: sent to Al Salvador. I'm fine with that plan, under
Speaker 6: two conditions that they have to live under his roof
Speaker 6: in his house with him, and they have to have
Speaker 6: ankle bracelets on in case they try to escape his house.
Speaker 1: Listen, I call on them to demand that the Trump
Speaker 1: administration comply with all judicial orders while appealing whichever one's
Speaker 1: they want to appeal, and to demand the return of
Speaker 1: people unlawfully taken to El Salvador on that so called
Speaker 1: plane full of gang bangers.
Speaker 6: Yeah, let's bring back to Trende or Ragua gang bangers.
Speaker 6: Let's bring them back into the country and let them
Speaker 6: move straight into Jamie Raskin's apartment or home or wherever
Speaker 6: the hell he lives.
Speaker 2: That's a brilliant idea.
Speaker 6: Now on that particular issue that deals with the Alien
Speaker 6: Enemies Act, there are other ways you can depor people,
Speaker 6: and the administration is now implementing them as we speak.
Speaker 6: But that's only one example of judge shopping. That's one
Speaker 6: example of judicial activism. The constitution is clear. There have
Speaker 6: been four presidents that have used the Alien Enemies Act,
Speaker 6: and there was a nineteen forty eight Supreme Court ruling
Speaker 6: that upheld the president's authority to depoor people that he
Speaker 6: deems to be illegal aliens. And by the way, Trende
Speaker 6: Iragua is now designated a terrorist organization, So if you
Speaker 6: remember that gang, you should be deported immediately. So the
Speaker 6: president has every right to do so. The interesting part
Speaker 6: of the decision is the Court was very clear that
Speaker 6: it is not subject to judicial review. They upheld the
Speaker 6: authority and the constitutional rights of the president, the constitutional
Speaker 6: duties of the president to enforce such actions as the
Speaker 6: commander in chief. Now, there are other issues that have
Speaker 6: come up, legal issues. One op ed by the way,
Speaker 6: and the Wall Street Journal by Dan Huff was going
Speaker 6: to join us here in a second pointed out something
Speaker 6: we brought up the other day and the Wall Street
Speaker 6: Journal brought up the other day. And in the case
Speaker 6: of Judge Boseberg's deportation order and dozens of similar injunctions,
Speaker 6: he points out they're legally invalid because they failed to
Speaker 6: impose what is a mandatory bond, mandatory not subjective it anyway,
Speaker 6: mandatory bond required under Rule sixty five C of the
Speaker 6: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Without the bond, those rulings
Speaker 6: are likely not legally enforceable, which is the interpretation of
Speaker 6: Pam Bondi and others. Anyway, Dan Huff, former White House attorney,
Speaker 6: joins us. Now, sir, how are you Tom?
Speaker 4: Great?
Speaker 6: All right, let's talk about law fair, Let's talk about
Speaker 6: the injunctions. Let's talk about the lower courts, and let's
Speaker 6: talk about rule sixty five.
Speaker 9: See, well, you know it's interesting, I guess here you
Speaker 9: talk about let's get all these trender Awogua, you know,
Speaker 9: criminal alien gang members and put them in Jamie Askin's home.
Speaker 9: And what you're really saying is, let's see let either
Speaker 9: have some skin in the game, or let's see how
Speaker 9: you behave when the when the you have to suffer
Speaker 9: the consequences of the things you say. And that's really
Speaker 9: what rule sixty five is all about. It's making sure
Speaker 9: that plaintiff seeking culminary in junctions have skin in the game.
Speaker 9: And specifically, if they want to block defendant from taking action,
Speaker 9: if they want to block the government from taking action,
Speaker 9: they want to block it up front before a full trial,
Speaker 9: then those plaintiffs have to post bond to compensate the
Speaker 9: defendant for any costs or damages that result from being
Speaker 9: wrongfully enjoyed. So in the Boseburg case, you're telling you're
Speaker 9: telling the government turn around the planes, put these people
Speaker 9: in prison, hold them there at cost. Well, if you
Speaker 9: want to do that, then the people who want that
Speaker 9: to be done should have to pay for it. In case,
Speaker 9: as is highly likely, the Supreme Court says that the
Speaker 9: government had every right to do that sighting, among other things,
Speaker 9: case that you brought up. And because that isn't happening
Speaker 9: because Judge Bozburg did not require that, that injunction is invalid.
Speaker 9: Actually a temporary restraining order is invalid, and the government
Speaker 9: was not required to comply.
Speaker 6: Let's still let's talk about specifically what the bond refers to.
Speaker 6: Because if you're causing this action and forcing people to
Speaker 6: pay money, and ultimately it is overturned, what does that
Speaker 6: mean for the people that bring this core proceeding.
Speaker 4: So the way it's.
Speaker 9: Supposed to work is is they're supposed to put up
Speaker 9: bond up front. They're supposed to put up the money
Speaker 9: to pay those costs, and when they lose, that money
Speaker 9: goes to the injured party here the government. So let's
Speaker 9: say the cost of turning around that plane is you know,
Speaker 9: twenty thousand dollars and holding them and it comes to
Speaker 9: you know, a couple million dollars. They have to put
Speaker 9: that bond up the front, and if it's later overturned,
Speaker 9: they lose that money. Which is why this bond requirement
Speaker 9: is so important, because the basic idea is to deter
Speaker 9: frivolous litigation. You won't bring those cases if you know
Speaker 9: you could lose all that money ter on when your
Speaker 9: preliminary junction gets overturned on appeal, even if you have
Speaker 9: a sympathetic judge down below, and that winds up deterring
Speaker 9: this frivolous litigation and preventing these types of things from
Speaker 9: even starting, you know, to begin with, it's.
Speaker 6: Almost the version of loser pays. You bring a lawsuit,
Speaker 6: you lose, then you should pay the attorney's fees for
Speaker 6: the people that were involved. I think that would result
Speaker 6: in far less litigation, far fewer lawsuits. I know, maybe
Speaker 6: attorneys groups don't like the idea of it.
Speaker 2: I like it a lot.
Speaker 6: I know European countries often use that strategy. I think
Speaker 6: it's a good law personally, it gets rid of frivolous lawsuits.
Speaker 2: I like the idea.
Speaker 9: Yeah, and I think that that's a very good analogy.
Speaker 9: And what's important to remember too, is that it's not
Speaker 9: as if you can't bring a lawsuit without a preliminary junction.
Speaker 9: If you really think you've been wrong, you can go
Speaker 9: bring that lawsuit and have it completely litigated on the
Speaker 9: marriage and never seek a preliminary junction. Preliminary jention is
Speaker 9: pre trial, it's before the full hearing on the marriage.
Speaker 9: So go you litigate it out. If you can't afford
Speaker 9: the injunction, you simply don't afford the bond. You simply
Speaker 9: don't seek the injunction. So the court doors are not
Speaker 9: being slammed on anyone. And I think that's really important
Speaker 9: to remember. It's just a question of whether we're going
Speaker 9: to let activists score quick upfront victories without having to
Speaker 9: prove their case, and the bond helps say no. And
Speaker 9: if you really want to bring your case, go bring it.
Speaker 9: And if you can't afford the bond, that's fine, you
Speaker 9: just won't get a preliminary injunction. You'll have to go
Speaker 9: through the ordinary process. So it's really completely fair here.
Speaker 9: And one other point that things are really important or
Speaker 9: remember is that we're not in this situation by accident. Okay,
Speaker 9: it's starting in the eighties, there were a lot of
Speaker 9: you articles where you had activists saying, we want to
Speaker 9: use the courts to achieve our agenda, to impose our ideology.
Speaker 9: And the problem we're going to face is these bonds,
Speaker 9: we're not going to be able to pay these bonds.
Speaker 9: If we want to stop the construction of an airport,
Speaker 9: if we want to stop the government from halting welfare payments,
Speaker 9: we're going to have to post the enormous bass that
Speaker 9: we may lose and we can't afford it, and it'll
Speaker 9: kill us. So we've got to figure out a way
Speaker 9: to sideline these bond requirements. And sort of systematically, they
Speaker 9: started going to sympathetic judges and getting decisions that tried
Speaker 9: to minimize or reinterpret the bond requirement to say that
Speaker 9: they didn't need to follow it. But it's all wise,
Speaker 9: Like if you read the requirement, it's crystal clear, the
Speaker 9: history is crystal clear, it's mandatory. It must be done.
Speaker 6: Okay, So this process, and by the way, to the
Speaker 6: credit of the Trump administration, they identified the legal law
Speaker 6: ramp and this March eleventh memorandum directing the Department of
Speaker 6: Justice to demand bonds in future and junction cases. I
Speaker 6: think it should be retroactive because the rule has been
Speaker 6: in place. Personally, so I would I would I would
Speaker 6: argue that that decision should be rendered unenforceable. And I
Speaker 6: think that's Pam Bondi's take on it as well. But
Speaker 6: moving forward, I think the long term solution is going
Speaker 6: to be legislation.
Speaker 9: Now.
Speaker 6: Chuck Grassley is introducing legislation in the Senate. In the House,
Speaker 6: him Jordan and others are working on legislation there that
Speaker 6: would prevent these lower court judges for usurping the power
Speaker 6: of a duly elected President of the United States and
Speaker 6: his agenda. I think that's a better long term solution.
Speaker 6: Do you not agree?
Speaker 9: Well, I think it's a very important solution because there's
Speaker 9: a real intuition behind that right, judges should not be
Speaker 9: one judge. One lower court judge should not be able
Speaker 9: to set a rule for the entire nation. And what
Speaker 9: those bills that you referenced do is they say that
Speaker 9: a judge can issue a decision that binds the parties
Speaker 9: before him or her, it doesn't go beyond that. And
Speaker 9: that sort of is a very sort of fair way
Speaker 9: of handling it. My concern with these approaches are that
Speaker 9: it's just going to be very hard to pass them.
Speaker 9: Even that bill that was supposed to that mister Isiser
Speaker 9: Representative Isa introduced to do just that was supposed to
Speaker 9: be voted on the House this week and it got
Speaker 9: sidetracked because the House had to go out of session
Speaker 9: for a totally unrelated reason, and I think that just
Speaker 9: speaks to the difficulty of a legislative solution. But ultimately, yes,
Speaker 9: that would be a very good way to do it.
Speaker 9: The advantage of the injunction bonds that I'm bringing up
Speaker 9: is that it sort of nearly requires people to enforce
Speaker 9: the law as is without having to pass something new.
Speaker 6: Well said, I really do appreciate your analysis, your expertise,
Speaker 6: Dan Huff, Thank you for being with us. We really
Speaker 6: appreciate it.
Speaker 9: Thank you for having me.
Speaker 6: Eight hundred nine four one, Shawn our number if you
Speaker 6: want to be a part of the program. We're going
Speaker 6: to hit the phones when we get back. All right,
Speaker 6: to our busy phones we go. Eight hundred ninety four
Speaker 6: one Shawn is a number we have. Jim in San Antonio.
Speaker 6: God Bless Texas. Jim, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 9: Hey?
Speaker 8: God Bless Texas and I'm honored. Thanks for taking a call, Sean,
Speaker 8: and pats off to your outstanding call screener Katie. She
Speaker 8: does an excellent job.
Speaker 6: Why why does everybody suck up to Katie and to Linda.
Speaker 6: It's very annoying.
Speaker 8: They earned it. Your bread and butter right there. So
Speaker 8: treat them well, give big raising to send them on
Speaker 8: nice vacations. They didn't ask me to say that either.
Speaker 2: Oh man, man, what's on your mind today?
Speaker 9: Hey?
Speaker 8: I wanted to I just sound off on Donald Trump
Speaker 8: inviting Bill Mahr to the White House whatever day it was,
Speaker 8: And I got to say, I'm no real fan of
Speaker 8: Bill Maher.
Speaker 4: I was.
Speaker 8: I was when I first turned in with his new rules,
Speaker 8: and then then I listened to him for years and
Speaker 8: just route him off as a leftist nut job. And
Speaker 8: then he started to get a little more you know,
Speaker 8: fair and impartial the last year or two. But I
Speaker 8: think it was an awesome gesture and Olive grants that
Speaker 8: Donald Trump had him in the White House, had the
Speaker 8: enemy inside there, because you know, the best way to
Speaker 8: keep track of your enemy is to keep him close
Speaker 8: to the vest. And I think winning Bill Maher over
Speaker 8: at least neutralizing him was good for him. He I'll
Speaker 8: tell you, I'm a young Republican in the Reagan era.
Speaker 8: My first vote ever was for Ronald Reagan three weeks
Speaker 8: after my eighteenth birthday in nineteen eighty and Reagan changed
Speaker 8: this country much as Donald Trump is doing Trump, I
Speaker 8: think is even doing better. But one thing Trump will
Speaker 8: do is he will fight at the drop of the hat.
Speaker 8: He's a New York fighter. He was raised and born
Speaker 8: that way. That's what people love about him. But he's
Speaker 8: got to understand when he's the president, he's got to
Speaker 8: be able to after those olive branches. And Ronald Reagan
Speaker 8: did a great job of that. He was the master
Speaker 8: at recent across the island, going out with Tip O'Neil
Speaker 8: for lunch every week, and you know, and making friends
Speaker 8: of his enemies. And I think Donald Trump has master
Speaker 8: Dad and should continue to do so. You know, he
Speaker 8: brought Joe Blow and Mika into the Marlago I think
Speaker 8: it was last year, and I think that was a
Speaker 8: good thing. I can't stand neither of those two. They
Speaker 8: left this nut job. They lie, they distort the truth.
Speaker 8: They've been nothing but bashing Trump for years. But him
Speaker 8: bringing them in shows he's the bigger man. He's a
Speaker 8: bigger than man and big enough to be president. And
Speaker 8: he's doing an excellent job, and I just I commend
Speaker 8: him for it. I think he should keep doing it,
Speaker 8: keep inviting them in, win them over with love, don't
Speaker 8: don't you don't have to beat him up in the
Speaker 8: rank with Hey, just win them over and show them
Speaker 8: what you're doing well. Is showing your success? Does that help?
Speaker 2: I think it helps a lot.
Speaker 6: And let me tell you something, there are differences in
Speaker 6: style with Reagan and Trump. I think at the end
Speaker 6: of the day, as successful as Ronald Reagan was, and
Speaker 6: he was successful, the Trump agenda is the most transformational.
Speaker 6: And if we help him be successful by putting pressure
Speaker 6: on congressmen and senators, et cetera, I'm telling you this
Speaker 6: country is going to be on the right track and
Speaker 6: it's going to help our children, our grandchildren, future generations,
Speaker 6: and I think it's just going to be a boom
Speaker 6: for the entire country. Anyway, I appreciate the call eight
Speaker 6: hundred and nine foot one Sean, if you want to
Speaker 6: be a part of the program. By the way, if
Speaker 6: there's one thing you own that should be made in America,
Speaker 6: don't you think it should be the American flag. Do
Speaker 6: not buy a flag made in China or elsewhere. Now,
Speaker 6: every Allegiance flag is hands sown by craftsmen and women
Speaker 6: in Charleston, South Carolina. Every single component from the white
Speaker 6: ash flagpole to the spinners and mounts. They were all
Speaker 6: sourced right here in America. I just got mine and
Speaker 6: you're gonna love yours. When you buy an American flag,
Speaker 6: you're supporting American jobs. You're supporting an American business. This business,
Speaker 6: the American Dream, started by three friends in their garage.
Speaker 6: It's simple. Get your full American flag. All right, quick
Speaker 6: break right back. We'll continue more of your calls straight ahead,
Speaker 6: eight hundred nine to pot one Shawn as we continue,
Speaker 6: Hi twenty five now till the top of the hour.
Speaker 6: Eight hundred nine. Pot one Shawn is our number. If
Speaker 6: you want to be a part of the program, don't
Speaker 6: forget our Tesla contest. Win a free Tesla. You get
Speaker 6: to register every day if you know the word of
Speaker 6: the day that we give out on the program, and
Speaker 6: today's word is reciprocal. Just go to Hannity dot com,
Speaker 6: click on the Tesla Tesla contest icon. It'll take you
Speaker 6: to the contest page. You put in the word of
Speaker 6: the day, reciprocal, and you will have a chance to win.
Speaker 6: This continues through April the eleventh. You can register once
Speaker 6: a day every day, and then you get to pick,
Speaker 6: if you're the winner, the Tesla of your choice. Ali
Speaker 6: Dwyer and her three sons. They lost their hero. His
Speaker 6: name was Stephen. He was serving our country in the
Speaker 6: US Army and anyway it was his calling in life.
Speaker 6: He was flying a helicopter that was his passion in life. Now, sadly,
Speaker 6: Stephen died in a Blackhawk helicopter and a crash over
Speaker 6: the Mediterranean. And thanks to friends like you, the Tunnel
Speaker 6: to Towers Foundation was able to help this family with
Speaker 6: a mortgage free home, helping to give them the security,
Speaker 6: the hope that they need in their darkest hours. Tunnel
Speaker 6: to Towers provides mortgage free homes for families of our
Speaker 6: country's fallen heroes. They built specially adapted smart homes to
Speaker 6: catastrophically injured heroes. The foundation is also committed to eradicating
Speaker 6: homelessness among our veterans and helping our nation to keep
Speaker 6: its vout and never forget. Nine to eleven oh one.
Speaker 6: Please help this great mission continue. Join us here at
Speaker 6: Team Hannity if you can commit to eleven dollars a month,
Speaker 6: every month, this great work continued. Everybody listening to my voice,
Speaker 6: please go to their website, the letter T, the number two,
Speaker 6: the letter T dot org, the letter T, the number
Speaker 6: two the letter T dot org for the Tunnel to
Speaker 6: Towers Foundation, President Trump announcing tariffs, and in a second
Speaker 6: an unlikely ally listen.
Speaker 10: April second, twenty twenty five will forever be remembered as
Speaker 10: today American industry was reborn, the day America's destiny was reclaimed,
Speaker 10: and the day that we began to make America wealthy again.
Speaker 10: For decades, our country has been looted, pillaged, raped, and
Speaker 10: plundered by nations near and far, both friend and foe alike.
Speaker 10: American steel workers or a workers, farmers, and skilled craftsmen,
Speaker 10: we have a lot of them here with us today.
Speaker 10: They really suffered gravely. They watched in anguish as foreign
Speaker 10: leaders have stolen our jobs. Foreign cheaters have ransacked our factories,
Speaker 10: and foreign scavengers have torn apart our once beautiful American dream.
Speaker 10: Our country and its taxpayers have been ripped off for
Speaker 10: more than fifty years. But it is not going to
Speaker 10: happen anymore.
Speaker 2: It's not going to happen.
Speaker 10: This is one of the most important days, in my opinion,
Speaker 10: in American history. It's our declaration of economic independence. For years,
Speaker 10: hard working American citizens were forced to sit on the
Speaker 10: sidelines as other nations got rich and powerful, much of
Speaker 10: it at our expense. But now it's our turn to
Speaker 10: prosper and in so doing, use trillions and trillions of
Speaker 10: dollars to reduce our taxes and pay down our national debt,
Speaker 10: and it'll all happen very quickly. If you want you're
Speaker 10: teriffraied to be zero, then you build your product right
Speaker 10: here in America, because there is no tariffy if you build.
Speaker 2: Your plant, your product in America.
Speaker 10: To all of the foreign presidents, prime ministers, kings, queen's ambassadors,
Speaker 10: and everyone else who will soon be calling to ask
Speaker 10: for exemptions from these tariffs, I say, terminate your own tariffs,
Speaker 10: drop your barriers, don't manipulate your currencies. They manipulate their
Speaker 10: currencies like nobody can even believe, which is a bad,
Speaker 10: bad thing and very.
Speaker 2: Devastating to us.
Speaker 10: And start buying tens of billions of dollars of American.
Speaker 2: Goods now, believe it or not.
Speaker 6: We found a clip of Nancy Pelosi in the nineties
Speaker 6: talking about tariffs and a trade deficit, and listen to
Speaker 6: what she had to say about tariffs and a trade deficit.
Speaker 6: It's a little long, but I think it's worth playing
Speaker 6: because he sounds an awful lot like Donald Trump.
Speaker 11: Listen, how far does China have to go, how much
Speaker 11: more repression, how big a trade deficit and loss of
Speaker 11: jobs for the American worker, and how much more dangerous
Speaker 11: proliferation has to exist before members of this House of
Speaker 11: Representatives will say I will not endorse the status quo.
Speaker 11: As I mentioned, it's about jobs, proliferation, and human rights.
Speaker 11: And there are those who say we shouldn't link human
Speaker 11: rights in trade and proliferation and trade. I disagree. But
Speaker 11: if we just want to take up this issue on
Speaker 11: the basis of economics alone, indeed, China should not receive
Speaker 11: Most Favored Nation status for several reasons that I'd like
Speaker 11: to go into now. I'd like to call the attention
Speaker 11: of our colleagues to this chart on the status quo
Speaker 11: that the business community is asking each and every one
Speaker 11: of you, to, each and every one of us to
Speaker 11: endorse today. Right now, we have a thirty four billion
Speaker 11: dollar trade deficit with China the nineteen ninety five figure.
Speaker 11: It will be over forty billion dollars for nineteen ninety six.
Speaker 11: Since the Tenement Square massacre, this figure has increased one
Speaker 11: thousand percent from three and a half billion then to
Speaker 11: about thirty four billion dollars now. In terms of tariffs,
Speaker 11: I'd think it's interesting to note that the average MFN
Speaker 11: tariff on Chinese goods coming into the United States is
Speaker 11: two percent, whereas the average Chinese to MFF tariff on
Speaker 11: US goods going into China is thirty five percent. Is
Speaker 11: that reciprocal on exports? China only allows certain industries into
Speaker 11: China of US industries into China, and therefore only two
Speaker 11: percent of US exports are allowed into China. On the
Speaker 11: other hand, the US allows China to flood our markets
Speaker 11: with thirty a third of their exports, and that'll probably
Speaker 11: go over forty percent. And it's limitless because we have
Speaker 11: not placed any restriction in terms of jobs. This is
Speaker 11: the biggest and cruelest hoax of all. Not only do
Speaker 11: we not have market access, not only do they have
Speaker 11: prohibitive tariffs, not only are our exports not let in
Speaker 11: very specifically, but China benefits with at least at least
Speaker 11: ten million jobs from US China trade. The President, in
Speaker 11: his statement requesting this special waiver, said that it China
Speaker 11: trade supports one hundred and seventy thousand jobs in the
Speaker 11: United States one hundred and seventy thousand jobs, whereas our
Speaker 11: imports from China support ten million jobs at least. The
Speaker 11: fact is that that US China trade is a job loser,
Speaker 11: and one of the reasons that it is is because
Speaker 11: in order well first, let me just make another point,
Speaker 11: and that is that our colleagues on the other side
Speaker 11: of this issue will say the trade with China, exports
Speaker 11: to China have increased three times in the last ten years.
Speaker 11: They have, but they failed to mention that exports imports
Speaker 11: from China have increased eleven times, thereby leading to this
Speaker 11: huge trade deficit. The other issue, in addition, if intellectual
Speaker 11: property is a two billion dollar three billion dollar loss,
Speaker 11: technology transfer is in the hundreds of billions of dollars.
Speaker 11: If you want to sell to China your products into China,
Speaker 11: the Chinese insists that you open a factory there. They
Speaker 11: take misappropriate your technology, open factories of their own, and
Speaker 11: then say to you, now we want to see your
Speaker 11: plan for export. That's as simply as I can say
Speaker 11: it briefly, But the fact is this isn't about products
Speaker 11: made in America. The Chinese want American products that are
Speaker 11: made in China, and the most serious of these transfers
Speaker 11: of technology are in the airline industry where Boeing tail sections,
Speaker 11: the tail sections of the Boeing seven thirty sevens were
Speaker 11: mostly made in Wichita, Kansas. Now they are made in
Speaker 11: shen Province, where workers make fifty dollars a month, and
Speaker 11: they had the transfer of the technology and the transfer
Speaker 11: of the jobs has taken place General Motors for they're
Speaker 11: all fighting to get in to build factories there so
Speaker 11: they can make parts there. They want MFN so they
Speaker 11: can get those parts back into the United States. So
Speaker 11: we are exporting not low tech jobs and textile jobs.
Speaker 11: We're exporting our technology. Now, if you take a country
Speaker 11: the size of China, with the cheap, the very cheap
Speaker 11: and in some instances slave labor, the lack of market access,
Speaker 11: the rip off of our intellectual property, the transfer of technology,
Speaker 11: a country that is not willing to play by the
Speaker 11: rules in any respect in this trade relationship, you have
Speaker 11: a serious threat not only to our relationship, but to
Speaker 11: the industrialized world. And if there's one message that I
Speaker 11: want our colleagues to understand today and our constituents, is
Speaker 11: that on this day, your member of Congress could have
Speaker 11: drawn the line, just say to the President of the
Speaker 11: United States, do something about this US China trade relationship.
Speaker 11: That is a job loser for the United States. And
Speaker 11: this brings us to the point that others have said, well,
Speaker 11: we can't isolate China. Do you think for one minute
Speaker 11: that with ten million jobs at least and thirty five
Speaker 11: billion and be over forty billion dollars this year in
Speaker 11: a trade surplus, all those billions of dollars in circlus
Speaker 11: that the Chinese are going to walk away? Where are
Speaker 11: they going to take thirty five to forty percent of
Speaker 11: their exports? Who's going to buy them? This is what
Speaker 11: sustains the regime, the funding.
Speaker 9: And the jobs.
Speaker 11: They can't have those people out of work. They have
Speaker 11: to be at work exporting to the United States.
Speaker 6: It just reminds you of how radicalized this party has become. Anyway,
Speaker 6: eight hundred and nine foot one, Sean, if you want
Speaker 6: to be a part of the program, let's say hi
Speaker 6: to Jim my Free State of Florida. Jim, how are
Speaker 6: you glad you called?
Speaker 4: Hey? Sean, It's a pleasure to talk to you. Listen
Speaker 4: about this tarif thing. I thought he was going to
Speaker 4: do it reciprocally, which means even for even, but it
Speaker 4: seems like he's doing fifty percent mostly. I think you
Speaker 4: should just do the full one percent of what they're trying.
Speaker 4: You know, did they charge us, we charge them?
Speaker 2: He's doing that that way now.
Speaker 6: I think what he's doing is leaving open the door
Speaker 6: if you want to end this, if you want free
Speaker 6: and fair trade, our door is open. And we already
Speaker 6: see movement today. I mean, I mean this is now
Speaker 6: for car companies in particular. It is opening the door.
Speaker 6: If ninety four percent of vehicles in in some place
Speaker 6: like Japan, for example, are our Japanese cars, why aren't
Speaker 6: ninety four percent of American vehicles American cars? I mean,
Speaker 6: I've always felt that way. But you know, however, Toyota,
Speaker 6: you know other companies that from overseas, if they have
Speaker 6: if they manufacture their cars here, that's that's fine, but
Speaker 6: something's got to be done. I mean, it's just so
Speaker 6: unfair to our workers, our manufacturing capability. It weakens our economy.
Speaker 6: When you have a country like Germany that has a
Speaker 6: ten percent tariff and then a twenty percent value added tax,
Speaker 6: which is a national sales tax. It makes an American
Speaker 6: car in Germany cost prohibitive. Well, that's not a level
Speaker 6: playing field.
Speaker 4: Like Trump said, he's been talking about this since back
Speaker 4: in the eighties when he was on Oprah. He commented
Speaker 4: about it.
Speaker 2: He absolutely did, and he was right then and he's
Speaker 2: right now.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 6: Anyway, my friend, appreciate the call. You're right out of money.
Speaker 6: Let's say hi to Larry and Wisconsin. Larry, how are
Speaker 6: you glad.
Speaker 2: You called hello? Sean?
Speaker 4: He I was listening to your conversation with I think
Speaker 4: it was Bill O'Reilly about the Wisconsin Supreme Court thing,
Speaker 4: and towards the end, Bill said, hey, I think Wisconsin's
Speaker 4: going blue.
Speaker 2: And I'm like, no, no, no.
Speaker 8: No, we're not.
Speaker 9: We voted for President Trump.
Speaker 8: There's plenty of US here, plenty of US ready and willing.
Speaker 6: And well, it's still considered a swing state. I don't
Speaker 6: think you can make any judgments based on the race
Speaker 6: for the Supreme Court. As I had pointed out, as
Speaker 6: much as I would have preferred the conservative to win,
Speaker 6: and we had him on the program before the election,
Speaker 6: both radio and TV, as much as I would have
Speaker 6: preferred that it didn't happen, and as much as I
Speaker 6: you know, understand. Look, it came down to me one issue,
Speaker 6: and you were in Wisconsin, you were probably watching the ads.
Speaker 6: But he supported a law in the eighteen hundreds on abortion.
Speaker 6: He made a number of comments, and that law does
Speaker 6: not make exceptions even for rape incest to the mother's life.
Speaker 6: To me, that makes any candidate unelectable. Did you see
Speaker 6: a lot of abortion ads in the state of Wisconsin
Speaker 6: and the lead up to Tuesday's vote.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and a lot of nonsense about you know who,
Speaker 4: let who go as far as criminals, and yeah, I
Speaker 4: don't even pay attention to them to tell you the truth.
Speaker 9: But yeah, I mean I think you're.
Speaker 2: Dead on right about the abortion thing. And that's what
Speaker 2: a lot of people voted for.
Speaker 6: Yeah, yep, Yeah, I mean I think that's a big issue. Look,
Speaker 6: my personal views on abortion are one thing. Do I
Speaker 6: think my views are the same?
Speaker 1: Was?
Speaker 2: Where the country is? I do not.
Speaker 6: I think probably the country is at twelve to fifteen weeks.
Speaker 6: I mean, looking out at how it's playing out in
Speaker 6: states like Mississippi, I mean, fifteen weeks seems to be
Speaker 6: a consensus number or belief in terms of a woman's
Speaker 6: right determinated pregnancy.
Speaker 2: Do I like it?
Speaker 4: No.
Speaker 6: I mean Bill Clinton famously said legal rare, and I
Speaker 6: would add the word early. With the abortion pill decision
Speaker 6: in the Supreme Court, it pretty much is codified the
Speaker 6: first trimester abortion availability using the pill versus you know,
Speaker 6: the old methods of getting an abortion. So I think
Speaker 6: in that sense, it's a point in terms of the
Speaker 6: first trimester, and the states will make their respective laws.
Speaker 2: It's going to be up to the states.
Speaker 6: However, that's where that became an issue in the Supreme
Speaker 6: Court race that you just dealt with on Tuesday. But
Speaker 6: I think it's an untenable political position for anyone to
Speaker 6: be and if you're on record against exceptions for rape
Speaker 6: incess mother's life, I don't think you can win. When
Speaker 6: Doug Mastriano ran again, ran again, Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania,
Speaker 6: I mean, that was his position, and he lost by
Speaker 6: the largest percentage of any gubernatorial candidate in the Commonwealth
Speaker 6: of Pennsylvania to a non incumbent since the nineteen forties.
Speaker 6: That's how big an issue was in the state. It
Speaker 6: became a big issue I think in Wisconsin in this race,
Speaker 6: it in my view, in many ways made it unwinnable
Speaker 6: talking about Brad Schimmel in this case. Anyway, my friend,
Speaker 6: I appreciate your call. And the twenty six percent of
Speaker 6: voters that want voter ID in Wisconsin that was huge.
Speaker 6: The two congressional seats in my state of Florida, that
Speaker 6: was huge.
Speaker 2: Also.
Speaker 6: Anybody that's spinning it any other way is just flat
Speaker 6: out lying to you. Eight hundred nine to four to one,
Speaker 6: Shawn our number. If you want to be a part
Speaker 6: of the program. Right that's going to wrap things up
Speaker 6: for today. We have a busy show. Tonight's sat in
Speaker 6: DVR nine Eastern Hannity on Fox, Victor Davis Hansen, David Asman,
Speaker 6: Lindsey Graham. What he's doing is the single most important
Speaker 6: thing the US Senate will do this year. And he'll
Speaker 6: explain why it's so important and why we may need
Speaker 6: you to call your congressman and your senators. Anyway, Tom Holman,
Speaker 6: Joe Kancha, stephen A. Smith, We go at it again
Speaker 6: tonight nine Eastern City You DVR Hannity on Fox. We'll
Speaker 6: see you tonight back here tomorrow. Thank you for making
Speaker 6: this show possible.