Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center.
Speaker 2: Jack Armstrong is Joe, Katty arm.
Speaker 3: Strong and Jettie And no, he is Armstrong and Yetty
Speaker 3: I think kind of lies about me. Okay, I never
Speaker 3: said I wanted Liz Cheney to be shot in the face. Okay,
Speaker 3: just said I wanted her to go hunting with her dad.
Speaker 2: All right, bing bang bing bing bing.
Speaker 4: Guys impersonation is so good on Saturday. Lie, But yeah,
Speaker 4: we covered that last hour. No, he didn't say he
Speaker 4: wants Liz Chaney to be shot in the face. Every
Speaker 4: media outlet portrayed it that way, though, yep, and uh.
Speaker 1: It completely abandoned any pretense of fairness.
Speaker 4: I already covered it. I can't go back. But Margaret
Speaker 4: Brennan saying to Marco Rubio, I just played a clip.
Speaker 4: He said, you played a part of the clip. And
Speaker 4: so my question, does she know that or not know
Speaker 4: that that? She only played that, She took it out
Speaker 4: of context. Did her producers bring it to her? And
Speaker 4: she just has such a bad assumption about Trump that she.
Speaker 2: Ran with it.
Speaker 1: I honestly don't know, And I'm really intrigued by the question.
Speaker 1: It's like I've never had like a kink, or I'm
Speaker 1: turned on by I don't know, like vinyl or something,
Speaker 1: or I want my own iman to dress like a
Speaker 1: squirrel or something. I crossing bloans under her feet. Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 1: So it's difficult for me to to understand it in
Speaker 1: the same way that the idea that I would be
Speaker 1: so partisan that I couldn't recognize when I was just
Speaker 1: spinning the crap out of something. I can't picture being
Speaker 1: in the headspace when I'm advocating for a conservative value
Speaker 1: or against the progressives of the postmodern Neil Merxs maniacs.
Speaker 1: I know I'm doing that. I'm fully cognizant of what
Speaker 1: I'm doing.
Speaker 2: So I don't know.
Speaker 1: Could it be that she and her ilk are so
Speaker 1: whipped up in their ideological fervor they don't even know
Speaker 1: how crazy they become.
Speaker 2: I suppose it's almost got to be. I think I
Speaker 2: don't know.
Speaker 4: Anyway, here's a little more of the guy who does
Speaker 4: Trump on Saturday Night Live.
Speaker 2: It's him at at one of his rallies. Is what
Speaker 2: it's supposed to be? Where the hell am I this place? Reeks?
Speaker 2: I don't want to be here?
Speaker 1: With you.
Speaker 2: People.
Speaker 3: Come on, I'm out of gas. I'm running on fumes here, folks.
Speaker 3: You can see it right. The cracks are showing. I'm exhausted,
Speaker 3: I'm babbling, I'm doing crazy things with the microphone, the load.
Speaker 3: Get me out of here and making stop. The last
Speaker 3: time I hated a mic this much, I tried to.
Speaker 2: Have him killed. Bench who cares?
Speaker 5: Care?
Speaker 2: Nobody cares.
Speaker 1: So that was that his rallies go on so long
Speaker 1: nobody cares by the end, I don't know.
Speaker 4: So I just saw a quote from Nancy Pelosi. She
Speaker 4: says that Trump's brain has degenerated so much he can't
Speaker 4: serve another term. And so anyway, so that's a portrayal
Speaker 4: from SNLM the left on that. Here's what she seems
Speaker 4: to be America's leading senility experts among politicians.
Speaker 2: Then that's a good one.
Speaker 4: So here is a profile in cowardice profile courage a
Speaker 4: famous phrase from a book that John F. Kennedy won
Speaker 4: the Pulitzer Prize for back when he was running for
Speaker 4: president in sixty even though he didn't write it. But
Speaker 4: it was a whole bunch of different politicians stepped stepped
Speaker 4: out there, and you know it took a risk by
Speaker 4: taking a position or voting a certain way against their
Speaker 4: party or whatever, a profile and courage. This is the
Speaker 4: opposite from Kamala Harris on Prop thirty six in California,
Speaker 4: where she is still a.
Speaker 2: Citizen Prop forty seven.
Speaker 4: I don't know if we just have enough morons in California,
Speaker 4: or you got duped by the warning or whatever, but anyway,
Speaker 4: Prop forty seven allowed you go out and raw steal
Speaker 4: like one thousand dollars worth of stuff and it's still
Speaker 4: a misdemeanor.
Speaker 2: And what happened in California.
Speaker 4: You ended up with Walgreens closing on every block in
Speaker 4: San Francisco as they rob the shelves bear and you
Speaker 4: don't get prosecuted for it.
Speaker 1: It's just smash and grabs everywhere. Union Square has gone
Speaker 1: from one of the great shopping districts in the world
Speaker 1: too empty or you know, mostly empty.
Speaker 4: Every shore I go to, everything is locked up behind glass.
Speaker 2: They're locking up my toothpaste.
Speaker 4: You want to get toothpaste, you want to get deodorant,
Speaker 4: you want to get anything you want to buy. It's
Speaker 4: locked up because they get robbed blind because you can
Speaker 4: steal one thousand dollars with stuff. So now we got
Speaker 4: Prop thirty six unbelievably popular, pulling it like seventy five percent.
Speaker 4: It's gonna pass. Where we go back to Hey, it's
Speaker 4: a crime again to steal. Okay, cool Kamala Harris is
Speaker 4: asked about that and won't take a position.
Speaker 2: Listen to this, Madam Vice President.
Speaker 5: Have you returned the ballot to California and how did
Speaker 5: you vote on Prop thirty six? So I have my
Speaker 5: ballot is on its way to California, and I'm going
Speaker 5: to trust the system that it will arrive there. And
Speaker 5: I am not going to talk about the vote on
Speaker 5: that because I honestly it's the Sunday before the election,
Speaker 5: and I don't intend to create an endorsement one way
Speaker 5: or another around it.
Speaker 2: But I did vote. You've got to be kidding me.
Speaker 4: You won't take a stance on You were the freaking
Speaker 4: Kamala of the cop in San Francisco, you were the
Speaker 4: attorney general of the state, and you will not take
Speaker 4: a stand on something that three quarters of Californians are
Speaker 4: in favor of. That is that is the weakest move
Speaker 4: by a major presidential candidate I can ever remember taking
Speaker 4: a stance on that. I mean, I just she is
Speaker 4: so vapid, she has no opinions or something. I don't
Speaker 4: know if she's dumb or weak or afraid or a combination.
Speaker 2: Of those three. How can you not just.
Speaker 1: Say absolutely, I'm with the people of California who in
Speaker 1: overwhelming numbers they tell me, or in favor of this. Yeah,
Speaker 1: she is either two the things you listed to even
Speaker 1: go for an easy pander right, or she is so
Speaker 1: afraid of offending her super progressive, neo Marxist left flank,
Speaker 1: the George gasconewing of the Democratic Party.
Speaker 2: That's all I can think of.
Speaker 4: I think she's just a I better not person unless
Speaker 4: she's been specifically coached by her campaign managers on what
Speaker 4: to say. I just better I better stay out of trouble.
Speaker 4: Here I say something I might get in trouble. I mean,
Speaker 4: that's that's incredible. What kind of weak tea was that?
Speaker 4: It's this Sunday before the election. So no, no, no,
Speaker 4: that's the opposite of what people do when they're running
Speaker 4: for office. You take positions on issues, including right up to.
Speaker 2: The moment people will vote. Yeah, that's what you do.
Speaker 2: That's the whole thing I feel like I'm watching the
Speaker 2: first act.
Speaker 1: Of a movie where some candidate is a Manchurian candidate
Speaker 1: appointed by the party, and they tell her, Look, you
Speaker 1: don't have any opinions, you don't have any beliefs. We
Speaker 1: tell you what to think, we tell you what to say.
Speaker 1: And in the movie then you know about midway through
Speaker 1: the candidate with recognize injustice and see the downtrodden, and
Speaker 1: he'd or she would rebel against the party and start
Speaker 1: expressing their opinions.
Speaker 2: That have to fight for what's right.
Speaker 1: But in the Kamala Harris story, Nope, she just through
Speaker 1: the whole movie says that's right. I have no opinions.
Speaker 1: You tell me what to say, I'll say that's fine.
Speaker 1: She never fights back. She's a puppet.
Speaker 2: What's your position on Prop? Thirty six?
Speaker 4: So I have my ballot, it's on its way to California,
Speaker 4: and I'm gonna trust the system that it will arrive there.
Speaker 4: And I'm not gonna talk about the vote on that
Speaker 4: because honestly, it's the Sunday before the election. Like that
Speaker 4: makes sense, And I don't intend to create an endorsement
Speaker 4: one way or the other.
Speaker 2: Around it nonsense.
Speaker 4: I if she gets elected president with that.
Speaker 2: That is a highly troubling situation. Wildly.
Speaker 1: I have my ballot is the new I grew up
Speaker 1: in a middle class family.
Speaker 4: So my guess would be what you said about offending
Speaker 4: the left wing. I know people personally because I've heard
Speaker 4: them say this. Look, they've locked up the soap, the shampoo,
Speaker 4: it's all the essentials that people need that they can't afford.
Speaker 4: That's what they've locked up in the stores. But shaking
Speaker 4: their head about how awful that is that these people
Speaker 4: that are being screwed by our evil capitalist system or
Speaker 4: whatever are stealing the essentials that you need to live.
Speaker 2: And so the stores are locking.
Speaker 1: Mailers are preventing them from looting their justice back or something.
Speaker 2: Wow, you folks are out there, I know, woo.
Speaker 1: Name the other society, just any time in history, any
Speaker 1: region of the globe.
Speaker 2: I'll give you a whole big.
Speaker 1: Blue marble and all of human history to point to
Speaker 1: the society that allowed that. I'm waiting drop me a
Speaker 1: line when you come off. That's the crazies on the left.
Speaker 1: I suppose we could talk about the crazies on the
Speaker 1: right and Penda eyes. Oh lord, yeah, this is a thing.
Speaker 2: Maybe we'll have to get to that later this hour.
Speaker 1: Not to be confused with hungry eyes or Betty Davis
Speaker 1: eyes fans of the music of the nineties.
Speaker 2: Anyway, you know what, I just.
Speaker 1: I don't know why when we get into that sort
Speaker 1: of Quanani way out there thinking on the right, it
Speaker 1: just exhausts me so much.
Speaker 2: You know why. Yeah, we'll have to talk about that.
Speaker 1: As if we don't have enough work combating the lunatics
Speaker 1: who would turn us into the Soviet Union. Now I
Speaker 1: got a tend you know, do housekeeping over on this
Speaker 1: side of the aisle. Who has the time.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Michael, it's another kind of eyes. I can always
Speaker 2: tell by realtor eyes. Realtor eyes. She got them realtor eyes. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: she got them.
Speaker 4: Pandais if I mean, if it were true, and I
Speaker 4: don't think it is, it would be awful. But among
Speaker 4: other things we've got coming up, Stay tuned by Kamala.
Speaker 2: Javi Harris dis sweat.
Speaker 6: Kamala swore an oath, But Kamala created crisis after crisis.
Speaker 6: Our troops murdered, an open border clime in our streets,
Speaker 6: innocence murdered by illegals. Why skyrocketing costs Americans abandoned during disasters,
Speaker 6: and we're on the brink of World War three, of
Speaker 6: broken oaths and a broken America. Kamala can't be trusted
Speaker 6: in the Oval office. Vote for President Trump and save America,
Speaker 6: Make America. Adygan Ink is responsible for the content of
Speaker 6: this advertising.
Speaker 4: So that's a pretty good ad, pretty pointed ad, and
Speaker 4: a good slot the end of a Sunday night NFL game,
Speaker 4: which is the most watched show in America. And Trump
Speaker 4: got that for free because Kamala was on Saturday Night Live.
Speaker 4: And the FCC Commissioner came out and said, we have
Speaker 4: equal time rules in this country, and you had Kamala
Speaker 4: on Satday Live, you didn't have Trump on, so you
Speaker 4: got to give Trump something. So they had him that
Speaker 4: and another a couple other things to even it out.
Speaker 4: I think he came out on the winning end of
Speaker 4: that in terms of exposure.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think the Kamala appearance on Saturday Night Live
Speaker 1: was just preaching to the choir.
Speaker 2: So you got that. So what are panda eyes? Do
Speaker 2: you remember?
Speaker 4: Twenty sixteen, That's when the whole Pizzagate thing was going on,
Speaker 4: right that they were Hillary Clinton was involved in running
Speaker 4: child sex trafficking rings out of pizza places.
Speaker 2: Is that what? That at least one pizza place in DC.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, which led to one nut job guy showing
Speaker 4: up at the pizza place and shooting it up.
Speaker 2: He'll shooting into the ceiling anyway, Luckily you know what.
Speaker 2: He was hurt. But yeah, that's the whole QAnon thing.
Speaker 4: So the current one is a qnon behind the panda's
Speaker 4: or is it a different thing.
Speaker 2: I don't know exactly.
Speaker 1: The actual QAnon guy who started it more or less
Speaker 1: fest up, but it's it's now a whole subculture.
Speaker 4: So the story is that they're and the way these
Speaker 4: things take off is there are grains of truth in
Speaker 4: all aspects, most of the aspects of a story.
Speaker 2: For instance, I've said many times the best scams are
Speaker 2: eighty percent true.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I don't know what since this is a scam
Speaker 4: because you don't get anything out of it, You don't
Speaker 4: make money off of ida.
Speaker 1: No, it's it's a it's a scam of continued clicks
Speaker 1: and attention.
Speaker 2: Run by the people who profit from it.
Speaker 4: There are gazillions of illegal that have come across the border.
Speaker 4: There are tons of kids that have come across the
Speaker 4: border that nobody's really sure where they are. The Democratic
Speaker 4: Party is soft on sexualizing children. I mean, so there
Speaker 4: are you know, there's lots of different elements to these stories,
Speaker 4: but the Panda I's story is being portrayed online and
Speaker 4: I was alerted to this yesterday and then I spent
Speaker 4: way too much time on Twitter going through the gazillions
Speaker 4: and probably millions of tweets and Instagram posts and tiktoks
Speaker 4: about this is that all these kids were brought across
Speaker 4: the border with the help of the Democratic Party, working
Speaker 4: with the cartels to have them trafficked for sexual abuse
Speaker 4: because the Democratic Party is into raping children. I mean,
Speaker 4: I'm cynical about politicians, but I ain't that cynical. And
Speaker 4: when you sodomize a little girl or a little boy,
Speaker 4: it breaks the blood vessels around their eyes and their
Speaker 4: eyes are dark. It looks like they've got two black eyes,
Speaker 4: and that is what they call panda eye. So that's
Speaker 4: evidence that the kid has been horribly raped. Their eyes
Speaker 4: now look that way, and p did He's involved, and
Speaker 4: j LO is involved. That's why j Lo spoke at
Speaker 4: the Kamala Harris rally the other day to try to
Speaker 4: help with Kamelt winning so that the jig won't be
Speaker 4: up on the whole sex trafficking children raping them. So
Speaker 4: they have panda ice thing. And here's the icing on
Speaker 4: the cake. Jill Biden dressed in the panda outfit on
Speaker 4: Halloween last week was a wink and a nod to
Speaker 4: wear on your side for the whole raping children thing.
Speaker 4: You believe, Joe Biden, and you're so cynical about politics,
Speaker 4: you believes crazy. You believe Jill Biden's involving involved in
Speaker 4: raping little children.
Speaker 1: And then signals her enthusiasm for the idea to her
Speaker 1: co lunatics by wearing a panda costume on Halloween, and
Speaker 1: virtually every panda in popular culture has been cited as
Speaker 1: proof that dot dot dot right.
Speaker 2: I don't like human.
Speaker 1: Beings in general as a species. I've made that clear.
Speaker 1: Or my least favorite species mosquitoes veggedamount at least mosquitoes
Speaker 1: feed frogs.
Speaker 4: When I hear stuff like that, I mean, I remember
Speaker 4: I was listening to a podcast a while back about
Speaker 4: AI and the.
Speaker 2: Death of truth. This is from a former Google guy.
Speaker 4: I really worry that that could happen, that we could
Speaker 4: just end up in a spot where there's endless, not
Speaker 4: to the extent of pandais I suppose, although maybe just
Speaker 4: just everything's crap and nobody believes anything, and everybody has
Speaker 4: their own sources, and it's just it's just a giant
Speaker 4: wash of noise, and I don't know how we function
Speaker 4: as a society. It might be the end of mankind
Speaker 4: being able to form societies.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 1: I think it's significant that that was the very goal
Speaker 1: that the Soviet Union then the Russians had was not
Speaker 1: to you know, the media would have you believe that
Speaker 1: the Russian disinformation is about electing Trump or whatever nefarious
Speaker 1: right wing ye purpose, but actually it's trying to eliminate
Speaker 1: any trust and objective truth. And it's right out of
Speaker 1: Orwell too. It's very similar to Orwell's themes. And one
Speaker 1: of the things that I think is most insidious about
Speaker 1: the postmodernist there's no such thing as a man and
Speaker 1: a woman. It's a social construct. There's no objective knowledge.
Speaker 1: You have your truth, I have my truth. It all
Speaker 1: fits into the same Orwellian philosophy of erasing the very
Speaker 1: concept of truth. Then the truth becomes whatever the powerful
Speaker 1: tell you it is.
Speaker 2: Day to day.
Speaker 4: We talked about this earlier. We really should touch on
Speaker 4: the Chinese hack of our telecom system again in case
Speaker 4: you're unaware of it, because it's getting enough attention.
Speaker 1: No, it's a bigger story than the election, according to
Speaker 1: one inside source, but nobody's talking about it.
Speaker 2: It's all whoops.
Speaker 4: If you miss an hour, the show gets the podcast
Speaker 4: Armstrong and Getty on demand Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 2: Being hot, sexy and having fun partying clubs.
Speaker 5: I just like being feral, being yourself, dirty, grimy.
Speaker 3: Whenever you're trying to do something and you think, do
Speaker 3: you have like second thoughts about it?
Speaker 2: Just like, don't have second thoughts and just do it.
Speaker 7: Take a breath, be present, ask yourself what you want
Speaker 7: to do, and then do whatever it is that the
Speaker 7: first thing that comes up.
Speaker 2: Just be hot, sexy and be yourself.
Speaker 4: Okay, that told you nothing? Apparently some and yet it
Speaker 4: tells us so much.
Speaker 2: Jack.
Speaker 4: I guess some dictionary says brat is the word of
Speaker 4: the year, and that was a woman describing what a
Speaker 4: brat is.
Speaker 2: I guess do we put out the word of the
Speaker 2: year first in November? Now?
Speaker 4: I thought we thought that came like toward the end
Speaker 4: of the year, or is it like Christmas decorations. You
Speaker 4: put them out earlier and earlier, and pretty soon we'll
Speaker 4: have the word of the Year in January.
Speaker 1: Every aspect of this story makes me want to hurt someone,
Speaker 1: Isn't that on? That's very single aspect of it.
Speaker 4: So if you did not hear our interview with Josh
Speaker 4: Rogan of The Washington Post Second Hour, get that in
Speaker 4: podcast form, Armstrong and get you on demand. He wrote
Speaker 4: an opinion piece in The WAPO today basically waving his
Speaker 4: arm saying, hello, biggest story in the world's going on.
Speaker 2: And nobody's paying attention because of the election.
Speaker 4: China hacked into all our big phone companies AT and T, Verizon,
Speaker 4: everything through.
Speaker 1: The very portal that the phone companies had worked out
Speaker 1: with the federal government if they need to get in
Speaker 1: for incredibly sensitive, important national security reasons. And the Chinese
Speaker 1: found that back door and have exploited it.
Speaker 4: And they think the Chinese have been in them for
Speaker 4: a year, and we just caught onto it recently, Lee
Speaker 4: and they're still in there, and we don't know how
Speaker 4: to get him out or if they can get the
Speaker 4: Chinese out of the big cell phone companies and to
Speaker 4: what extent they're like. Uh, Marco Rubio has asked yesterday
Speaker 4: on Face the Nation, are they actually listening to people's
Speaker 4: phone calls? And he said, I'm not going to comment
Speaker 4: on that, Okay, So that's on the table that China
Speaker 4: is just actually listening to every phone call in America
Speaker 4: and has been for a year or longer.
Speaker 1: China, including critical counterintelligence calls.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Buyer taps all of it. Yeah, I mean, it's just.
Speaker 4: And Josh Rogan said he was contacted by people in
Speaker 4: the government on the committees that are investigating this, saying
Speaker 4: you got to write about this, and told him it's
Speaker 4: a bigger deal than the election. It's the worst hack
Speaker 4: in our nation's history. Yeah, and nobody's talking about nobody's
Speaker 4: talking about it. How will it help Kamala or will
Speaker 4: it help Trump? So that's so frustrating.
Speaker 1: Yeah, update on another big story, much bigger than it
Speaker 1: would seem because it's not just about women's rights, women's spaces,
Speaker 1: and women's sports. It's about defeating the postmodernists or column
Speaker 1: neo Marxist lunatics of critical theory that are running all
Speaker 1: of our universities and the rest of it.
Speaker 2: And it's going to be the battle of our lifetime.
Speaker 1: But you remember Friday, we brought you the news that
Speaker 1: the assistant coach at San Jose State University had joined
Speaker 1: the Title nine lawsuit against the Biden administration for trying
Speaker 1: to include transgender to be protected classes under Title nine.
Speaker 1: In other words, letting men play women's sports if they said, yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm a guile now anyway, So the assistant coach who
Speaker 1: bravely joined the suit has now lost her job and
Speaker 1: her complaint, which OutKick, is covered, and we'll we'll link
Speaker 1: at Armstrong and Getty dot com.
Speaker 2: Is it's good, it's really interesting.
Speaker 1: And there's an article in Quillette which goes into a
Speaker 1: lot of detail about her allegations.
Speaker 2: I'm just going to hit you with part of it.
Speaker 2: It is so revealing.
Speaker 1: So the new coaching regime who inherited the San Jose
Speaker 1: State team didn't know initially that the dude was a male.
Speaker 1: People use the term biological male as if there are
Speaker 1: multiple kinds of male. No, it's because they inherited the
Speaker 1: team and this guy was already on it.
Speaker 2: Anyway.
Speaker 4: Okay, but as before they met them, I assume, uh correct.
Speaker 1: Well, and the transgender fella in question does not. I mean,
Speaker 1: some of the transgender athlete stories we've reported on you've
Speaker 1: seen online are just laughable.
Speaker 2: A dude made slightly longer.
Speaker 4: Hair, the guy who played jue ole basketball in the
Speaker 4: Bay Area.
Speaker 2: Yeah, for instance.
Speaker 1: Yeah, this human being presents pretty convincingly as a woman.
Speaker 1: But so this coach whose last name is Beatty Smooth.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna call her Baty, no offense to the
Speaker 1: hyphenated crowd. It'll just save time. But this new coach
Speaker 1: and her title nine complaint reports that she'd strongly suspected
Speaker 1: as much as soon as she observed Fleming. That's the
Speaker 1: transgender person in practice in fall twenty three. Over a
Speaker 1: three decade career as a coach and recruiter in women's volleyball,
Speaker 1: Batty had seen few women who possessed anything close to
Speaker 1: Fleming's level of raw physical power. Fleming was relatively undisciplined
Speaker 1: and sometimes listless, the coach reports, but what stood out was,
Speaker 1: yeah was consistently speaking for myself. What stood out was
Speaker 1: spiking the ball and blocking on the front row. Due
Speaker 1: to Fleming's leaping ability and hitting power, which far exceeded
Speaker 1: that of any player in the Mountain West Conference.
Speaker 4: And then did the coach say, Hey, got a question
Speaker 4: for you, just a quick questions.
Speaker 1: The original coach declined repeated Quillette interview requests, but by
Speaker 1: Batty's account, Kress, the original head coach, originally seemed to
Speaker 1: share the concerns as to whether it was appropriate for
Speaker 1: a biologically male volleyball player to compete on the women's teams.
Speaker 1: His attitude reportedly changed in abrupt fashion, however, when the
Speaker 1: coach was given strict orders on the subject from the
Speaker 1: school's athletic department.
Speaker 2: Here's the part I really want to get to in
Speaker 2: that regard.
Speaker 1: A name that comes up often in the title line
Speaker 1: complaint is Laura Alexander, an assistant director of student Wellness
Speaker 1: at San Jose State with jurisdiction over the school's volleyball program.
Speaker 1: According to coach Beatty, the original coach Krest told her
Speaker 1: that Alexander said, anyone opposed to Fleming's inclusion on the
Speaker 1: women's team should leave San Jose State and seek therapy.
Speaker 2: Wow. Anybody who ejected is a sick, crazy person.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 2: Not only leave, you need therapy.
Speaker 1: One assistant coach reports that head coach began bending over
Speaker 1: backwards to accommodate Fleming, who reportedly often took liberties with
Speaker 1: the team's dress code and practice schedule, as well as
Speaker 1: the baseline behavioral standards that Cress applied to the rest
Speaker 1: of the team. The claim double standard is one of
Speaker 1: the major themes. In other words, well let me, I'll
Speaker 1: read this. In one detailed case study she puts forward,
Speaker 1: Baty contrasts the alleged lax treatment afforded to Fleming with
Speaker 1: the far stricter standards imposed on a promising female recruit
Speaker 1: who is competing for Fleming's position, and a long story short,
Speaker 1: this super promising woman did not get the gig, did
Speaker 1: not get the scholarship because there was a dude in
Speaker 1: the way, and because the administration was so hardcore protective
Speaker 1: of this transgender person, because they're such crazy activists, this
Speaker 1: dude could get away with violating whatever team.
Speaker 2: Rules he wanted. He was untouchable.
Speaker 4: I hate that aspect of the story because what's going
Speaker 4: to end up happening is they will eventually get rid
Speaker 4: of the dude, but they'll be able to use the
Speaker 4: excuse of didn't show up to practice or you know,
Speaker 4: follow the rules, as opposed to finally getting down to
Speaker 4: the nuts and bolts, if you'll pardon the expression, yes,
Speaker 4: the question which is do you get to have guys
Speaker 4: on your should be able to have guys on your
Speaker 4: girls team if they get to use the out of
Speaker 4: they didn't show up to practice, dang it.
Speaker 1: Unbelievable And there are so many, Uh, there's such a
Speaker 1: long description of any time one of the girls objected
Speaker 1: at San Jose State, or actually in a number of
Speaker 1: schools that refuse to play them. The browbeating they take
Speaker 1: from the administration, the targeting, the bullying, the threatening, the guilting,
Speaker 1: the just the hectoring lectures that anybody who dares stand
Speaker 1: up against this gets is withering, especially when you consider
Speaker 1: these are scholarship after leads who just want to hang
Speaker 1: on to their scholarships. Final note, OutKick Big Sports website
Speaker 1: has learned that San Jose State, Oh, that's a they
Speaker 1: suspended the coach. Let me scroll down to the relevant
Speaker 1: new part. It's also come to light according to the
Speaker 1: title nine complaint file Baty, the assistant head coach of
Speaker 1: MS Baty we've been quoting Fleming the transgender person allegedly
Speaker 1: conspired with an opponent to help San Jose State lose
Speaker 1: a match an attempt to injure teammate Brook Slusser, who
Speaker 1: we've been talking about. Brooke has joined the Title nine
Speaker 1: suit against your own university and the Biden administration. So
Speaker 1: Fleming in another unnamed Spartans player met with Colorado State
Speaker 1: player Malaia Jones prior to the two teams playing on
Speaker 1: October third. According to the complaint, Beatty says that Fleming
Speaker 1: and the teammate left the team hotel, a violation and
Speaker 1: team policy the night before the match to visit Jones
Speaker 1: at During this meeting, Fleming and this is in a
Speaker 1: Title non complaint to the federal government in the United States.
Speaker 1: This is not a rumor I heard behind the gym.
Speaker 1: During this meeting, Fleming allegedly gave Joanes scouting reports for
Speaker 1: San Jose State and made a deal not to defend
Speaker 1: shots from Jones that would be hit towards Slusser. According
Speaker 1: to Quillette, Batties learned of the meeting after the unnamed
Speaker 1: Spartans player confessed to the head volleyball coach transgender and
Speaker 1: another supporter on San Jose State came to the Colorado
Speaker 1: State team and said, if you smash her in the
Speaker 1: face with the volleyball.
Speaker 2: I won't leap up and defend it.
Speaker 1: I'll intentionally miss You need to smash her in the face.
Speaker 2: Wow, that's not a quote. That was the plan, right, Wow.
Speaker 1: According to a Mountain westokes person, the conference became aware
Speaker 1: of the complaint when it was filed.
Speaker 2: Earlier this week.
Speaker 4: Well, you know, I mean, that's horrible, and you got
Speaker 4: to deal with that again. You know, it's gonna end
Speaker 4: up obscuring the basic question of should a guy be
Speaker 4: on the girls team? Well, for turns out there was
Speaker 4: a criminal enterprise going on. Yeah, the particulars almost don't matter.
Speaker 4: I absolutely see your point in that.
Speaker 1: Over a three decade career as a coach and recruiter,
Speaker 1: Baby had seen few women who possessed anything close to
Speaker 1: Fleming's level of raw physical power.
Speaker 2: By the way, there's a reason for that.
Speaker 4: Trump in Virginia over the weekend had the entire Roanoke
Speaker 4: College women's swimming team on stage saying thank you so much,
Speaker 4: President Trump for protecting women's sports. And that's such an
Speaker 4: easy win as an issue. I mean, that one's not
Speaker 4: even close.
Speaker 1: Final note on this topic, do you know it looks
Speaker 1: like Gad Sad, the professor and thinker and writer. You've
Speaker 1: probably seen him on Twitter. God saw it is his
Speaker 1: last name, the unlikely name. He's elebanies Jew who's now
Speaker 1: He was a Canadian. Now he teaches in the United States.
Speaker 1: But he made the point in talking about this postmodern lunacy.
Speaker 1: He said, there have been and forgive me the this
Speaker 1: number is almost correct. There have been one hundred and
Speaker 1: forty seven billion human beings who've existed on the planet.
Speaker 1: Whatever the number is, let's call it one hundred and
Speaker 1: twenty billion. Until fifteen minutes ago. Every single one of
Speaker 1: them could have told you what a woman is, right,
Speaker 1: every single one. How all of a sudden people act like, well,
Speaker 1: I'm not a biologist.
Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, I had it wrong the whole time. We
Speaker 2: will finish strong.
Speaker 8: Next, the FBI issuing a rare and urgent warning that
Speaker 8: videos circulating online with an FBI logo and animation are
Speaker 8: nothing more than the p diduct of Russian internet trolls.
Speaker 8: One of the videos referenced by the FBI falsely claiming
Speaker 8: three groups had been arrested for rigging mail in ballots.
Speaker 8: In a statement, the FBI saying these videos are not
Speaker 8: authentic are not from the FBI, and the content they
Speaker 8: depict is false. Intelligence officials say false information is often
Speaker 8: the work of foreign state actors like Iran and China,
Speaker 8: but most of all Russia. The FBI saying Russia was
Speaker 8: behind debunked videos like this one last week falsely claiming
Speaker 8: groups were attempting to destroy mail in ballots.
Speaker 4: People at Microsoft w had announced a while back that
Speaker 4: they thought the last forty eight hours was going to
Speaker 4: be really ugly and crucial for us to not believe
Speaker 4: everything we see. I don't know if that's happening or not.
Speaker 4: You just heard some examples there of videos flying around
Speaker 4: social media. I would think if I was a bad
Speaker 4: guy and Iran or Russia or China or whatever, if
Speaker 4: I had some really great thing to unleash, I would
Speaker 4: have done it by now.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, we might not be aware of all of it.
Speaker 1: There's just a certain percentage of the population, whether they
Speaker 1: find themselves on the right or the left or the
Speaker 1: horseshoe theory, that they end up in more or less
Speaker 1: the same place. They're just so credulous, they're so unable
Speaker 1: to assess whether something's credible or not. There's I don't
Speaker 1: know that there's anything you can do to to protect them.
Speaker 1: In the modern world, they're going to see crap, they're
Speaker 1: going to believe at one hundred percent, and in some
Speaker 1: cases they'll act on it or repeat it or retweet it,
Speaker 1: or god forbid, you know, take arms or whatever.
Speaker 2: But I'm not sure there's anything you can do.
Speaker 4: Yeah, the whole Trump derangement syndrome, and you can have
Speaker 4: it can go other ways. I think there was some
Speaker 4: Obama derangement syndrome where you can just get so you
Speaker 4: dislike somebody so much you're just willing to believe or
Speaker 4: go with all kinds of different things.
Speaker 2: But I heard it over the weekend.
Speaker 4: I'm not going to mention the names because I like
Speaker 4: these guys, but one of my favorite podcasts that exist.
Speaker 4: They're conservatives, they're anti Trump conservatives. But they were discussing
Speaker 4: the topic of possibility of violence after the election, and
Speaker 4: they only considered the idea of maga people going nuts
Speaker 4: if Kamala wins as violence. Didn't even explore the possibility
Speaker 4: of violence if Trump wins. You're gonna tell me there's
Speaker 4: no chance of college kids across this country or various
Speaker 4: neighborhoods or whatever, getting all nuts if Trump wins.
Speaker 1: Seriously, that's troubling. I mean, that's a disturbing level of blindness.
Speaker 4: I suppose we all get blind to this stuff sometimes.
Speaker 4: I hope I'm not. That seems crazy to me to
Speaker 4: think that that's completely a one sided issue. Violence after
Speaker 4: a close election. Yeah, that is disturbing. I I would
Speaker 4: not be I don't know if this has ever been
Speaker 4: true before. I would not be surprised by any result
Speaker 4: this week. Blowout either way, close win, either way, all
Speaker 4: seem perfectly believable.
Speaker 1: I wonder if the guys you're talking about, and I
Speaker 1: think I know who you're talking about, if they're Raisme
Speaker 1: decra is getting rid of trump Man, and they're fully
Speaker 1: cognizant of the potential for violence on the left.
Speaker 2: But that's not why they came to work today.
Speaker 1: They came to work today to get trump Ism out
Speaker 1: of conservatism.
Speaker 2: I don't know either. Final thought. Oh yeah, kick got
Speaker 2: the jams.
Speaker 4: Yeah, here's your host for final thoughts to Joe Getty.
Speaker 1: Hey, let's get a final thought from everybody and the
Speaker 1: crew wrap things up for the day.
Speaker 2: There is president. The buttons are technical director of Michael
Speaker 2: Agelo Mike.
Speaker 5: Oh.
Speaker 1: Final thought, My greatest, greatest hope is that somehow, someway
Speaker 1: this is finished on Tuesday night.
Speaker 2: I agree. I don't care who wins, just finish it.
Speaker 2: That's what I want.
Speaker 4: Announce a winner tomorrow night, roughly in time for me
Speaker 4: to go to bed.
Speaker 1: Wow, Hey, this is weird. We've just gotten an email
Speaker 1: from the gods. Let me read it to you. Yeah,
Speaker 1: your hopes are cute. Michael signed the Gods our esteem
Speaker 1: to muse woman. Katie Green has a final talk.
Speaker 7: Katie, I spent a little time going through the San
Speaker 7: Jose State Volleyball Instagram page and it just it kind
Speaker 7: of hurt my heart seeing all of the teammates there
Speaker 7: that are playing alongside of this guy that aren't getting
Speaker 7: to play because of all these forfeits.
Speaker 4: Right yeah, yeah, and it's there in one shot their
Speaker 4: one college career.
Speaker 2: Mm hm.
Speaker 1: Next couple of days, we'll get into some of the
Speaker 1: details on the browbeating, the girls took who dared object
Speaker 1: to what's going on anyway?
Speaker 2: Jack A final thought for us, I wish.
Speaker 4: We'd have a national conversation on how we feel about
Speaker 4: early voting, mail in voting, all this different stuff since
Speaker 4: easily over half the votes are going to have been
Speaker 4: cast before election day in a non pandemic year, kind
Speaker 4: of understood when the pandemic was going on. Is this
Speaker 4: really what we want to do and if we want
Speaker 4: to do it, then let's make sure we do it right.
Speaker 1: Let's start with the fact that eighty five percent of
Speaker 1: Americans think you ought to have to show your idea
Speaker 1: to vote. Eighty five percent zero percent of the media.
Speaker 1: That's weird. Finally, this I don't know how accurate it
Speaker 1: is with some heavyweights. I like you've tweeted it. When
Speaker 1: are we gonna likely know the outcome in the swing states?
Speaker 1: Georgia counts fast, North Carolina counts fast, Pennsylvania later than
Speaker 1: election night, Michigan faster than twenty twenty, maybe Wisconsin likely wednesday.
Speaker 1: Nevada and Arizona could take days.
Speaker 4: Armstrong in Getty rabbing up another grueling four hour workday.
Speaker 1: So many people, thanks so a little time. Go to
Speaker 1: armstrong e getty dot com. A lot of great stuff
Speaker 1: we talked about are under a hot links, including Josh
Speaker 1: Rogan's great piece for the Wappo Grab the podcast We
Speaker 1: talked to him during hour two.
Speaker 4: All I want is to watch Wolf Blitzer cry on television.
Speaker 2: Is that too much to ask?
Speaker 4: See you tomorrow, God bless America.
Speaker 2: I'm strong in Getty.
Speaker 1: Well.
Speaker 7: First of all, I want to point out, and no
Speaker 7: one's talks about this.
Speaker 3: This is a pivotal moment for our country. And if
Speaker 3: you don't vote, you're stupid.
Speaker 2: You're stupid, No Joe, And you know what.
Speaker 7: Everyone knows it what I'm talking about.
Speaker 2: That's what I've said. That's not what I was told. Okay,
Speaker 2: fair enough, see say what.
Speaker 3: I'm exhausted, I'm babbling, I'm doing crazy things with the microphone,
Speaker 3: making a.
Speaker 2: Stop on that high note. Thanks all, They're no Armstrong
Speaker 2: and Getty