WEBVTT - Not So Fast Episode 14

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:05.220
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Not So Fast with Andrew Perloff and Paul Patz,

0:00:05.460 --> 0:00:08.740
<v Speaker 1>where two longtime friends challenge each other on the biggest

0:00:08.780 --> 0:00:09.959
<v Speaker 1>sports stories.

0:00:09.619 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Of the day.

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:14.650
<v Speaker 1>Here's Andrew Perloff and Paul Patz. Not so fast, my friends.

0:00:16.700 --> 0:00:18.900
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Not So Fast. I'm Andrew Perloff.

0:00:18.980 --> 0:00:21.739
<v Speaker 3>He is Paul Paps. NFL Week 2 is almost in

0:00:21.780 --> 0:00:23.340
<v Speaker 3>the books. Paul, what do we got cooking?

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 4>Bonus coverage today. Peter Burns from the SEC Network, the

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.290
<v Speaker 4>anchor down there. He's going to get us recapped Ole Miss, LSU,

0:00:29.330 --> 0:00:31.710
<v Speaker 4>and the whole week forward for SEC and college football.

0:00:31.730 --> 0:00:33.450
<v Speaker 2>All right. I want to start.

0:00:33.810 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Three minutes, 11 seconds left in overtime. Colts, Chiefs. Colts

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 3>face fourth and eight and decide to go for the

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.820
<v Speaker 3>field goal. Paul, what was your reaction to this key

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:45.459
<v Speaker 3>play in the game?

0:00:45.500 --> 0:00:46.979
<v Speaker 4>Well, it looked like they're going for it. They kind

0:00:47.020 --> 0:00:49.229
<v Speaker 4>of pump fake us, the fans and the Colts fans

0:00:49.270 --> 0:00:51.230
<v Speaker 4>at home. I see them setting up like great for

0:00:51.250 --> 0:00:54.630
<v Speaker 4>the Colts. Try to steal this win. National TV. You've

0:00:54.670 --> 0:00:56.370
<v Speaker 4>had a bad run of it the past few months

0:00:56.390 --> 0:00:58.870
<v Speaker 4>of last year. Daniel Jones is there. And then they

0:00:58.910 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 4>wave it off like. They didn't see the right setup.

0:01:01.500 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 4>Can't you have two plays called? And you have to

0:01:03.500 --> 0:01:05.899
<v Speaker 4>think to yourself, if we don't try for this play,

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.340
<v Speaker 4>Patrick Mahomes gets the ball back if we get a

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.860
<v Speaker 4>field goal. He has to go 30 yards and hand

0:01:11.900 --> 0:01:14.110
<v Speaker 4>it to Harrison Bucker, who can kick it from 65

0:01:14.110 --> 0:01:17.810
<v Speaker 4>and maybe more. It seemed like they chose to lose

0:01:17.890 --> 0:01:19.610
<v Speaker 4>almost rather than even try to win.

0:01:19.670 --> 0:01:21.590
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of course, the Chiefs did go on to do

0:01:21.630 --> 0:01:22.369
<v Speaker 2>exactly that.

0:01:22.430 --> 0:01:23.390
<v Speaker 4>But you expected that, right?

0:01:23.410 --> 0:01:24.630
<v Speaker 2>Of course. You knew it was over.

0:01:25.270 --> 0:01:27.839
<v Speaker 3>The problem is that play, 4th and 8th. It wasn't

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:29.580
<v Speaker 3>fourth and one. It was fourth and eight. I looked

0:01:29.620 --> 0:01:34.090
<v Speaker 3>up some numbers. Historically, NFL teams, 39% on fourth and eight.

0:01:34.510 --> 0:01:37.470
<v Speaker 3>But a couple things. Alec Pierce went down, the Colts receiver.

0:01:37.730 --> 0:01:41.130
<v Speaker 3>So they were stuck playing Laquan Treadwell, who had caught

0:01:41.150 --> 0:01:43.060
<v Speaker 3>a long pass and fumbled the ball and not fumbled.

0:01:43.390 --> 0:01:45.300
<v Speaker 2>But they didn't have their full receiving core.

0:01:45.819 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 3>The Chiefs had the red zone behind them, so they

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.220
<v Speaker 3>couldn't go long. This was a very, very— they had about

0:01:51.420 --> 0:01:53.700
<v Speaker 3>a 20% chance of hitting this play ball. And they

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.420
<v Speaker 3>had probably about a 20% chance of stopping the Chiefs.

0:01:56.890 --> 0:01:58.990
<v Speaker 3>I think he made a calculated risk and decided.

0:01:59.070 --> 0:02:00.450
<v Speaker 2>Why am I going to go for a fourth and eight?

0:02:00.470 --> 0:02:01.530
<v Speaker 2>We have very little chance.

0:02:01.630 --> 0:02:03.330
<v Speaker 4>I think this is one of those rare cases where

0:02:03.430 --> 0:02:06.710
<v Speaker 4>analytics don't work out for you. I think you trump

0:02:06.730 --> 0:02:09.450
<v Speaker 4>it with gut because gut gets you credit. Let's say

0:02:09.470 --> 0:02:11.190
<v Speaker 4>you try that play and you get a first down.

0:02:11.230 --> 0:02:13.230
<v Speaker 4>You don't even need a touchdown there. And you get

0:02:13.270 --> 0:02:14.889
<v Speaker 4>a first down or you get a touchdown and you

0:02:14.930 --> 0:02:17.270
<v Speaker 4>steal this win that you shouldn't have gotten. I think

0:02:17.290 --> 0:02:19.310
<v Speaker 4>the home fans and maybe even the national fans will

0:02:19.330 --> 0:02:21.710
<v Speaker 4>give you credit for having the guts to go for it. Now,

0:02:21.790 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 4>guts doesn't keep you employed, but you know if you

0:02:24.100 --> 0:02:26.580
<v Speaker 4>give it back to Mahomes, the odds, are you saying

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.119
<v Speaker 4>I'm backing my defense? Yeah, but let's not kid each other.

0:02:29.139 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 4>Mahomes needs 30 yards. That's not a problem.

0:02:31.340 --> 0:02:34.090
<v Speaker 3>I think he's saying, no, I don't think Daniel Jones

0:02:34.110 --> 0:02:35.669
<v Speaker 3>is going to be able to complete a pass against

0:02:35.690 --> 0:02:37.530
<v Speaker 3>his own defense. He was looking for the blitz, which

0:02:37.590 --> 0:02:39.850
<v Speaker 3>Jones did well against, but there were a lot of

0:02:39.870 --> 0:02:42.470
<v Speaker 3>problems with Indy on that drive. They got the long

0:02:42.510 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 3>pass to Treadwell, and then they had a minus-one-yard run

0:02:45.780 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 3>and a minus-two-yard run.

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 2>That's where the game was decided. Jonathan Taylor was great

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.660
<v Speaker 2>all night. Then he got stuffed on two key plays.

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.700
<v Speaker 3>Then Daniel Jones scrambled for a few yards. Paul, my

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:57.660
<v Speaker 3>gut said the same thing as Syken. They were not

0:02:57.760 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 3>about to make that first down.

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 4>A couple things here. I think we all realized last

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.220
<v Speaker 4>night that Laquan Treadwell was still in the league. I

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 4>had no idea. This play looked like a great play

0:03:06.300 --> 0:03:08.750
<v Speaker 4>for the Colts. to a bad play for the Colts

0:03:08.790 --> 0:03:10.590
<v Speaker 4>and a win for the Chiefs. And was that a

0:03:10.650 --> 0:03:12.210
<v Speaker 4>correct replay? Because I know you have some problems with

0:03:12.230 --> 0:03:13.330
<v Speaker 4>the replay officials these days.

0:03:13.389 --> 0:03:16.109
<v Speaker 3>Well, the question was, when did he have possession of

0:03:16.150 --> 0:03:19.190
<v Speaker 3>the ball? And was the Chiefs defender touching his hip?

0:03:19.490 --> 0:03:21.169
<v Speaker 3>It is a game of centimeters, Paul.

0:03:21.290 --> 0:03:23.750
<v Speaker 4>And milliseconds. It was like a hip grazing, not even

0:03:23.770 --> 0:03:25.450
<v Speaker 4>a touching, but they said, he's down.

0:03:26.130 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 3>I think that that whole thing got the Colts off

0:03:28.310 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 3>their game because the next two plays were a disaster.

0:03:30.860 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 2>That's why I think the fourth down play was going

0:03:32.380 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 2>to be a disaster. You might as well let your

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 2>defense try and do something. Now, you're right. Of course,

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs were going to come down and score. But

0:03:38.540 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling you right now, Shane Steichen is very smart.

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 2>He knew they were not about to convert.

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.300
<v Speaker 4>But that sends such a bad message for your quarterback.

0:03:46.540 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 4>I know Daniel Jones, the first half of last year

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.190
<v Speaker 4>before the injury, looked amazing. as good as Daniel Jones

0:03:52.220 --> 0:03:54.770
<v Speaker 4>can look, which may be not high-end football. But in

0:03:54.790 --> 0:03:57.330
<v Speaker 4>the postgame, I saw Daniel Jones. He looked, like, not

0:03:57.370 --> 0:04:00.070
<v Speaker 4>just defeated, but, like, uninspired. Like, he didn't have any backing.

0:04:00.350 --> 0:04:02.790
<v Speaker 2>Do you know what Daniel Jones' primetime record is, Paul?

0:04:03.010 --> 0:04:03.610
<v Speaker 4>Probably, like, 1-5.

0:04:04.670 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 2>You'd think that. More like 1-15.

0:04:05.650 --> 0:04:05.810
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

0:04:05.910 --> 0:04:08.900
<v Speaker 2>Or at least teams he's been on are 1-15 primetime.

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 2>I had the 5-1. He can never win in primetime.

0:04:12.540 --> 0:04:13.380
<v Speaker 2>He is snakebitten.

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:15.260
<v Speaker 3>But the Colts, I think the Colts are not a

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 3>bad team. They've lost at Baltimore and at Kansas City.

0:04:18.540 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 2>That's two hard assignments. And last night, they gave the

0:04:21.380 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs everything they had. I would even argue they were

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:25.380
<v Speaker 2>maybe the better team on the field, and the Chiefs

0:04:25.420 --> 0:04:27.260
<v Speaker 2>are probably going to the Super Bowl. So I'm not

0:04:27.300 --> 0:04:28.060
<v Speaker 2>dead on the Colts.

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 4>That is a warm take early.

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:29.700
<v Speaker 1>You're hot.

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 4>Shout out to Kansas. All right, let's go to maybe

0:04:31.820 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 4>some negatives and how negative are they. What game do

0:04:33.700 --> 0:04:34.300
<v Speaker 4>you want to go next?

0:04:34.740 --> 0:04:36.740
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, I know you're a Bears fan, and

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.900
<v Speaker 2>this might hurt your feelings, but there was pretty big negative,

0:04:39.940 --> 0:04:40.860
<v Speaker 2>a couple big negatives.

0:04:41.260 --> 0:04:46.260
<v Speaker 3>The outcome, Vikings win 9-3. Caleb Williams' injury, I thought

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 3>it was dunzo for the year. I thought this was

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.119
<v Speaker 3>all over. You could hear the screaming on the TV copy.

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 2>Paul, what was your reaction?

0:04:53.300 --> 0:04:55.739
<v Speaker 4>Well, he didn't get touched, which makes it even worse.

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.779
<v Speaker 4>The field was in terrible condition. He didn't grab anything

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:00.700
<v Speaker 4>when he went down. And then he rolls over Caleb

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Williams and screams right there, as you could hear. The

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 4>crowd is deadly silent. And, of course, you're thinking, I

0:05:05.860 --> 0:05:08.180
<v Speaker 4>think we're conditioned to think that's an Achilles tear and

0:05:08.220 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 4>it's over, Johnny. I think that's what the average Bear

0:05:10.460 --> 0:05:12.469
<v Speaker 4>fan thinks. And maybe even a casual fan thought when

0:05:12.490 --> 0:05:15.239
<v Speaker 4>they saw his reaction. And then they go instantly to

0:05:15.270 --> 0:05:17.740
<v Speaker 4>the cart. The cart is usually extreme injury.

0:05:18.060 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this was a premature cart, I feel like. And

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 2>also his reaction, a lot of people are, I hate

0:05:23.380 --> 0:05:25.060
<v Speaker 2>to say it, making fun of Caleb a little bit.

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 2>He looked like he was crying, had a towel over

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 2>his head. Usually you reserve that for a very, very

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 2>serious injury.

0:05:30.990 --> 0:05:33.330
<v Speaker 4>So it appears that it's a hamstring injury and not

0:05:33.490 --> 0:05:35.990
<v Speaker 4>a knee or Achilles that would take him out for

0:05:36.010 --> 0:05:38.450
<v Speaker 4>the season. And when he left the field and he's

0:05:38.490 --> 0:05:40.330
<v Speaker 4>on the cart, he had the towel over the head.

0:05:40.900 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 4>removes the towel, tears around the face, at least choked up,

0:05:44.460 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 4>and then does the, I got you guys, to the fans.

0:05:47.430 --> 0:05:48.890
<v Speaker 4>that made me think even more so that it was

0:05:48.910 --> 0:05:51.230
<v Speaker 4>an Achilles tear. And you're saying now it's not going,

0:05:51.550 --> 0:05:54.450
<v Speaker 4>even though from multiple reports say it's just a hamstring

0:05:54.490 --> 0:05:56.010
<v Speaker 4>and maybe not even a serious hamstring.

0:05:56.070 --> 0:05:58.650
<v Speaker 2>No, there's a report that he might be available for

0:05:58.730 --> 0:06:00.730
<v Speaker 2>week three. That's next week, Paul.

0:06:00.890 --> 0:06:03.130
<v Speaker 4>This might be the weirdest thing of the week in

0:06:03.170 --> 0:06:06.250
<v Speaker 4>pro football. The Bears quarterback who the Bears fans thought

0:06:06.270 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 4>was out for the season is actually going to be

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 4>okay and maybe miss a week. But now Caleb Williams

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:13.659
<v Speaker 4>has to deal with being an internet sensation on social

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:15.729
<v Speaker 4>media for You know, like I saw a post today,

0:06:15.860 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 4>I stepped on a Lego, but I'll be fine. And

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:19.140
<v Speaker 4>it was a guy crying like Caleb Williams.

0:06:19.180 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I saw, oh, I burnt my tongue on coffee.

0:06:21.820 --> 0:06:24.570
<v Speaker 3>And then it's Caleb Williams. You know, one thing, hamstring

0:06:24.610 --> 0:06:27.650
<v Speaker 3>injuries slow you down. They are very reliant on Caleb

0:06:27.690 --> 0:06:28.210
<v Speaker 3>running around.

0:06:28.250 --> 0:06:28.450
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:06:28.750 --> 0:06:30.540
<v Speaker 3>That could be a real issue. Like, we're making fun

0:06:30.580 --> 0:06:32.780
<v Speaker 3>of Caleb Williams right now. You cut his mobility out,

0:06:33.180 --> 0:06:35.140
<v Speaker 3>then I think you have some problems in Chicago. Did

0:06:35.180 --> 0:06:37.620
<v Speaker 3>the whole Bears are going to be this dominant offense

0:06:37.660 --> 0:06:39.050
<v Speaker 3>thing fall apart after Sunday?

0:06:39.070 --> 0:06:41.390
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's a bigger story. Caleb Williams' injury is sucking

0:06:41.410 --> 0:06:42.909
<v Speaker 4>all the life out of this story. But the fact

0:06:42.950 --> 0:06:46.130
<v Speaker 4>that 59-3 in Week 2, now the good news is

0:06:46.170 --> 0:06:48.570
<v Speaker 4>they're averaging 31 points a game on offense over.

0:06:48.450 --> 0:06:49.060
<v Speaker 2>The course of the week.

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 3>I had a thought that Caleb Williams has been reading

0:06:51.060 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 3>his own headlines, too, because on the interception, he rolled right,

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 3>and he had a guy 20 yards out and just

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:58.460
<v Speaker 3>flung it. It's an impossible pass in the rain, and

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:00.620
<v Speaker 3>of course it got picked off. I think Caleb thinks

0:07:00.660 --> 0:07:02.300
<v Speaker 3>he could do anything, and maybe this brings him down

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 3>to earth.

0:07:02.740 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 4>He does have unlimited confidence, and against a good defense.

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.580
<v Speaker 4>This was a quality defense. The Vikings are almost always

0:07:07.620 --> 0:07:10.660
<v Speaker 4>a quality defense, but if you look at it, they

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 4>were all over him the whole way, and Bears fans

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:15.180
<v Speaker 4>are in this mode now where It's not just the injury.

0:07:15.220 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 4>It's like, what did I see the first 59 minutes?

0:07:18.020 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 3>And then it was tough, tough assignment for Tyson Bajan

0:07:20.940 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 3>to come in at the end and try and win

0:07:22.790 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 3>the game.

0:07:23.610 --> 0:07:26.270
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think it's a calamity in Chicago. To me,

0:07:26.330 --> 0:07:28.170
<v Speaker 2>it was a rain. We'll get more into the rain later.

0:07:28.190 --> 0:07:30.450
<v Speaker 2>But there is a calamity out there in the NFL.

0:07:30.550 --> 0:07:31.690
<v Speaker 2>And I know you know what I'm talking about.

0:07:31.710 --> 0:07:33.550
<v Speaker 4>We held up as long as we can. The Chargers,

0:07:33.590 --> 0:07:35.950
<v Speaker 4>we talked about this on Friday's show. We said Monday's

0:07:35.990 --> 0:07:38.410
<v Speaker 4>lead today, what would be the worst thing that could happen?

0:07:38.750 --> 0:07:41.170
<v Speaker 4>And it's the Chargers losing to the Raiders. And For

0:07:41.190 --> 0:07:43.710
<v Speaker 4>the second week in a row, the Chargers lose 26-14.

0:07:43.750 --> 0:07:46.290
<v Speaker 4>Even their scores are boring. And they were unthreatening the

0:07:46.330 --> 0:07:48.650
<v Speaker 4>whole way. This wasn't some fluke win that the Vegas

0:07:48.670 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 4>didn't deserve. Cousins looked great, and Justin Herbert looked average.

0:07:52.220 --> 0:07:54.260
<v Speaker 4>And average is probably a compliment. Look at this pass.

0:07:54.660 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Just.

0:07:55.490 --> 0:07:58.950
<v Speaker 4>All over the place, that's a RCI, classic RCI receiver-caused interception.

0:07:58.980 --> 0:08:00.780
<v Speaker 3>That one wasn't on him. There was another one that

0:08:00.820 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 3>was on him. But he generally doesn't look comfortable.

0:08:03.580 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't look poised.

0:08:04.940 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Fourth quarter of the game, I had more faith in

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Kirk Cousins at 38 than Justin Herbert, who Jim Harbaugh

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.700
<v Speaker 3>kept telling me is the best quarterback in the NFL.

0:08:13.100 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 3>I guess not, because right now he looks well below average.

0:08:16.220 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 4>Okay, we're going to look at the schedule here coming

0:08:17.790 --> 0:08:20.150
<v Speaker 4>up for the Chargers, because it is brutal. And you

0:08:20.170 --> 0:08:23.450
<v Speaker 4>can't really see them really going above. 500 at halfway

0:08:23.490 --> 0:08:26.980
<v Speaker 4>point through the season. Bills, Seahawks. It just goes on

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:27.260
<v Speaker 4>and on.

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.490
<v Speaker 2>0-9 is on the table. 0-9. 0-9.

0:08:30.630 --> 0:08:32.209
<v Speaker 4>And the Jets are better than we think. I want

0:08:32.230 --> 0:08:34.550
<v Speaker 4>to go away from the Chargers and get to the quarterback.

0:08:35.150 --> 0:08:37.209
<v Speaker 4>Do you think we've seen Justin Herbert's best work?

0:08:38.390 --> 0:08:41.150
<v Speaker 3>He had 38 touchdowns one season. No, I think he's

0:08:41.170 --> 0:08:43.770
<v Speaker 3>got all the physical skills in the world. I thought

0:08:43.809 --> 0:08:45.500
<v Speaker 3>he was going to be good with Mike McDaniel, but no,

0:08:45.550 --> 0:08:46.940
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we've seen his best work because he's

0:08:47.020 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 3>never done anything in the playoffs.

0:08:49.380 --> 0:08:51.420
<v Speaker 4>How about the Chargers season? 0-2, can they get out

0:08:51.460 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 4>of this one?

0:08:53.130 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 3>No, I think it's, I think, no, that was the

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:57.780
<v Speaker 3>two easiest games. They had the two easiest games of

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.460
<v Speaker 3>any team in the NFL. They hosted Arizona and Vegas.

0:09:00.780 --> 0:09:02.700
<v Speaker 3>You can't win those two games. How are you going

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 3>to get out of that division?

0:09:03.980 --> 0:09:07.260
<v Speaker 2>Casey is back. Denver is back. And now the Raiders

0:09:07.300 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 2>are good. No, no, I mean, listen, am I going

0:09:10.420 --> 0:09:11.020
<v Speaker 2>to regret this?

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:11.420
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:13.300
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what do you think? Do you think that

0:09:13.330 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 2>they have a shot?

0:09:13.950 --> 0:09:15.790
<v Speaker 4>I think it's too, the odds are too much against it.

0:09:15.809 --> 0:09:17.750
<v Speaker 4>You don't have like an easy game in the mix.

0:09:17.770 --> 0:09:19.670
<v Speaker 4>You don't have a Miami game in the mix. Or

0:09:19.950 --> 0:09:21.050
<v Speaker 4>even a Cleveland played better.

0:09:21.070 --> 0:09:21.190
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:09:21.210 --> 0:09:23.209
<v Speaker 4>All right, let's try to be positive a little bit here,

0:09:23.250 --> 0:09:25.550
<v Speaker 4>a little negative on not-so-fast Paps and Perloff. Let's do

0:09:25.570 --> 0:09:26.890
<v Speaker 4>some helmet stickers. You're first.

0:09:27.230 --> 0:09:27.430
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:09:28.420 --> 0:09:30.650
<v Speaker 3>Carolina Panthers had a dominant win over Atlanta. There were

0:09:30.710 --> 0:09:33.570
<v Speaker 3>several helmet-stickers you could go to. Bryce Young was awesome.

0:09:33.870 --> 0:09:35.790
<v Speaker 3>Devin Lloyd, the linebacker, was dominant.

0:09:36.030 --> 0:09:38.809
<v Speaker 2>But I'm going with my buddy, Darren Waller, tight end.

0:09:38.830 --> 0:09:40.890
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if everyone even knew. He signed with

0:09:40.929 --> 0:09:42.750
<v Speaker 3>Carolina right before the season started.

0:09:43.100 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 2>Two touchdowns. Had a bunch of touchdowns last year with Miami.

0:09:47.179 --> 0:09:48.500
<v Speaker 2>He's really, really good.

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.660
<v Speaker 3>And actually, Carolina's really good now, and their offense is

0:09:51.700 --> 0:09:52.540
<v Speaker 3>something to be dealt with.

0:09:52.860 --> 0:09:54.620
<v Speaker 2>And I can't wait to see Darren Waller in there.

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 4>They just need a little bit of defense, but that

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.530
<v Speaker 4>offense looks great. And if you look at the career

0:09:58.570 --> 0:10:00.900
<v Speaker 4>of Bryce Young, he was declared a bust at one

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 4>point in his sophomore year of the pros. And now

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:05.900
<v Speaker 4>it's like he's going to be getting himself a contract.

0:10:05.940 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if he's going to get the full

0:10:07.020 --> 0:10:09.820
<v Speaker 4>boat 275, but he may get one of those mid-level

0:10:09.940 --> 0:10:10.859
<v Speaker 4>Baker Mayfield contracts.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 3>I think he's week to week in the sense that

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.500
<v Speaker 3>when you play Atlanta, I think I could get $ 30

0:10:15.179 --> 0:10:17.689
<v Speaker 3>million a year for playing Atlanta. I don't know if

0:10:17.830 --> 0:10:20.550
<v Speaker 3>Bryce Young, it's an interesting team. They could win that division.

0:10:20.630 --> 0:10:22.589
<v Speaker 3>Nobody's looked great there, so they have a great shot.

0:10:22.830 --> 0:10:23.970
<v Speaker 3>I mean, New Orleans is interesting.

0:10:24.190 --> 0:10:26.050
<v Speaker 2>It's funny, all of a sudden we have a Carolina-New

0:10:26.110 --> 0:10:27.410
<v Speaker 2>Orleans battle in the NFC South.

0:10:27.550 --> 0:10:29.410
<v Speaker 4>That's as weird as it gets. My helmet sticker, not

0:10:29.460 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 4>a surprise. Bengals wide receiver Jamar Chase, unbelievable catch. Watch

0:10:33.570 --> 0:10:35.809
<v Speaker 4>this catch because the first time I saw it, I

0:10:35.830 --> 0:10:37.910
<v Speaker 4>didn't even think it was reality. There's Jamar Chase looking

0:10:38.090 --> 0:10:41.130
<v Speaker 4>beautiful with his helmet sticker. But he is, I think,

0:10:41.170 --> 0:10:43.370
<v Speaker 4>the guy who people trust in a situation like this.

0:10:43.970 --> 0:10:45.070
<v Speaker 4>Look at the turn on this one.

0:10:45.710 --> 0:10:45.870
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:10:46.450 --> 0:10:49.729
<v Speaker 4>And he turned, kept them both in, and brought it

0:10:49.790 --> 0:10:52.250
<v Speaker 4>in all in the same motion. Slow motion almost hurts

0:10:52.290 --> 0:10:55.140
<v Speaker 4>that play because in fast motion, or regular motion as

0:10:55.150 --> 0:10:55.780
<v Speaker 4>you like to call it.

0:10:56.740 --> 0:11:00.460
<v Speaker 3>That was freakish. Yeah, no, he didn't do anything week one.

0:11:00.540 --> 0:11:02.420
<v Speaker 3>He wasn't even part of the game plan. So they

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.780
<v Speaker 3>emphasized him. That was a tough game. That was a

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 3>key play, too, because they were not moving the ball

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 3>well against Houston. I know it looked like a dominant

0:11:09.420 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 3>win for Cincinnati, but Houston's defense was back to being

0:11:12.059 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Houston's defense, and Chase saved them two touchdowns.

0:11:14.300 --> 0:11:15.819
<v Speaker 4>All right, we're going to talk a lot more college

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 4>football in a second, but the college football, the game

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.109
<v Speaker 4>of the year in maybe all sports, that nine-month buildup

0:11:21.140 --> 0:11:24.170
<v Speaker 4>to Lane Kiffin returning to Oxford, Mississippi, was fantastic. It

0:11:24.190 --> 0:11:27.010
<v Speaker 4>was one of those games where it was an all-day buildup.

0:11:27.150 --> 0:11:29.929
<v Speaker 4>You're watching the different shows, watching Lane Kiffin on different shows,

0:11:29.990 --> 0:11:32.350
<v Speaker 4>watching the crowd reactions. to him getting off the bus,

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.980
<v Speaker 4>and then the game itself, you're hoping, I hope this

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.870
<v Speaker 4>isn't a disappointment. And it wasn't, because Ole Miss came

0:11:37.910 --> 0:11:40.030
<v Speaker 4>out gunning. They were just whipping them really early, and

0:11:40.050 --> 0:11:42.770
<v Speaker 4>it looked like it was borderline blowout. And then two

0:11:42.809 --> 0:11:44.730
<v Speaker 4>touchdowns in the third quarter by LSU, and you're like,

0:11:44.850 --> 0:11:45.489
<v Speaker 4>now we have a game.

0:11:46.030 --> 0:11:47.650
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, game of the year. I mean, it's

0:11:47.690 --> 0:11:49.570
<v Speaker 2>college football. There'll be another game of the year next week.

0:11:49.590 --> 0:11:50.210
<v Speaker 4>Build-up of the year.

0:11:50.250 --> 0:11:52.620
<v Speaker 3>The build-up of the year, right. The grudge match of

0:11:52.630 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 3>the year. I thought for a while there that Mississippi

0:11:55.700 --> 0:11:58.460
<v Speaker 3>was going to blow them out. I think they sort

0:11:58.500 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 3>of laid back and let LSU get back into that game.

0:12:01.780 --> 0:12:04.110
<v Speaker 3>To me, it felt like Trinidad Chambliss, the Ole Miss quarterback,

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.310
<v Speaker 3>could have taken over at any time and won the game.

0:12:06.350 --> 0:12:08.210
<v Speaker 4>And he did close it out. Chambliss closed it out.

0:12:08.230 --> 0:12:11.309
<v Speaker 4>They did the two-point conversion, which was really gutsy. But Chambliss,

0:12:11.540 --> 0:12:13.980
<v Speaker 4>put your arms up because you. You probably earned your

0:12:14.140 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 4>invite to New York City. It's way, way early, but

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 4>you may be the Sept Heisman winner.

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:20.750
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not sure either of these teams are going

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:21.589
<v Speaker 2>to be there in the end.

0:12:21.870 --> 0:12:25.109
<v Speaker 3>LSU looked amazing against Clemson, but Clemson's probably not that great.

0:12:26.370 --> 0:12:29.010
<v Speaker 2>One thing about LSU, Sam Levitt's coming into Lane Kiffin offense.

0:12:29.350 --> 0:12:31.370
<v Speaker 3>You can see it takes time to get used to that,

0:12:31.390 --> 0:12:34.290
<v Speaker 3>where Trinidad Chambliss knows that system really well at Ole Miss.

0:12:34.670 --> 0:12:36.670
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know. Do you expect either team to

0:12:36.690 --> 0:12:37.270
<v Speaker 2>be there at the end?

0:12:37.370 --> 0:12:39.689
<v Speaker 4>I think that whole league kind of consumes itself, and

0:12:39.710 --> 0:12:40.870
<v Speaker 4>you've got to go on one of those runs. But

0:12:40.890 --> 0:12:42.750
<v Speaker 4>at least Ole Miss is in position to go on

0:12:42.770 --> 0:12:42.910
<v Speaker 4>a run.

0:12:43.590 --> 0:12:44.329
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. All right.

0:12:45.270 --> 0:12:47.150
<v Speaker 3>This is not going to be pretty, but we may

0:12:47.170 --> 0:12:50.189
<v Speaker 3>have witnessed the worst loss of all time in college

0:12:50.210 --> 0:12:50.929
<v Speaker 3>football on Saturday.

0:12:51.170 --> 0:12:53.350
<v Speaker 2>We're not kidding. We'll talk about it next. Not so fast.

0:12:56.090 --> 0:12:57.929
<v Speaker 4>Here we go, Pearl. The midday pick me up. I'm

0:12:57.970 --> 0:13:02.010
<v Speaker 4>not so fast. I love this one. Little Pittsburgh Pirates.

0:13:02.030 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 4>You're a big Pirate fan down the line. That's saucy.

0:13:07.660 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 2>It's the end of the year. Why not?

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 4>Ryan O'Hearn, yeah. What is it going to cost you?

0:13:10.700 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 4>A playoff?

0:13:10.980 --> 0:13:13.620
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah. If it doesn't work, eh, so what?

0:13:13.740 --> 0:13:17.020
<v Speaker 4>Good-looking uniforms. Great win there by your Pirates. That was fun.

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 4>All right, back on Not So Fast. It's time for

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.780
<v Speaker 4>some warm takes on Pabst. He's Perloff. I will go first.

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 4>It's warm take time. I'm going to go right down

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 4>to a guy I've warmed take before on this show.

0:13:25.980 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 4>We're only not even a month in. Bill Belichick, you

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.460
<v Speaker 4>had a great opportunity. It's been an awful season for

0:13:31.540 --> 0:13:34.750
<v Speaker 4>UNC football off the field. Every week someone resigns, not

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.439
<v Speaker 4>by choice. investigations all over the place. But you beat

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 4>TCU in Ireland. Then you beat East Tennessee State. And

0:13:41.059 --> 0:13:44.250
<v Speaker 4>you're up pretty well against Clemson the other day before

0:13:44.290 --> 0:13:46.550
<v Speaker 4>the rain delay, power delay. And if you could have

0:13:46.570 --> 0:13:49.610
<v Speaker 4>closed that game out, UNC football, you're 3-0 with a

0:13:49.670 --> 0:13:52.970
<v Speaker 4>bye week and Notre Dame coming to town in two

0:13:53.010 --> 0:13:54.710
<v Speaker 4>weeks from now. I don't know if game day would

0:13:54.730 --> 0:13:56.490
<v Speaker 4>have gone there, but they would have considered that because

0:13:56.510 --> 0:14:00.109
<v Speaker 4>that's Bill Belichick relevant again and Notre Dame football. Now,

0:14:00.429 --> 0:14:02.510
<v Speaker 4>they definitely look better, but this was one of those

0:14:02.550 --> 0:14:05.589
<v Speaker 4>games you can't let go. And UNC football... It might

0:14:05.610 --> 0:14:06.870
<v Speaker 4>go the other way because if you look at their

0:14:06.890 --> 0:14:09.510
<v Speaker 4>schedule coming up, the Clemson win was almost necessary for

0:14:09.550 --> 0:14:11.830
<v Speaker 4>positive momentum, more on the field than off. But now

0:14:11.850 --> 0:14:16.430
<v Speaker 4>you've got Notre Dame, Pitt, Duke, Syracuse, then the Miami Hurricane.

0:14:16.470 --> 0:14:19.150
<v Speaker 4>So if we get to the five weeks from now

0:14:19.210 --> 0:14:21.230
<v Speaker 4>and they've lost four out of five when we're talking

0:14:21.250 --> 0:14:23.150
<v Speaker 4>about what Bill Belichick is going to do next with

0:14:23.190 --> 0:14:26.510
<v Speaker 4>his life, go to Nantucket or be a defensive coordinator

0:14:26.530 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 4>for Army, that will be the reason because this was

0:14:29.220 --> 0:14:30.860
<v Speaker 4>a stretch they could have gone on a run. Whether

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 4>they beat Notre Dame in two weeks or not, it

0:14:32.700 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 4>was the anticipation of doing something. That's kind of missed

0:14:35.340 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 4>for sports fans.

0:14:36.610 --> 0:14:38.390
<v Speaker 3>I understand what you're saying, but they have this one

0:14:38.430 --> 0:14:40.410
<v Speaker 3>handicap is that they're not a good football team.

0:14:40.490 --> 0:14:40.870
<v Speaker 4>Not so good.

0:14:41.170 --> 0:14:41.450
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:14:41.510 --> 0:14:44.210
<v Speaker 3>So if they're not good, did they blow it or

0:14:44.250 --> 0:14:46.100
<v Speaker 3>they just kind of they're kind of average?

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, kind of meh.

0:14:47.460 --> 0:14:49.140
<v Speaker 4>I would say they're like a B minus. They don't

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 4>they're not exciting. They don't have star players. But they

0:14:51.420 --> 0:14:53.110
<v Speaker 4>put up a pretty good fight against TCU in a

0:14:53.150 --> 0:14:56.370
<v Speaker 4>game they probably are the lesser team. And Clemson, Clemson's

0:14:56.390 --> 0:14:59.810
<v Speaker 4>so down. You had everybody in your corner. Dabo's people were,

0:15:00.130 --> 0:15:00.860
<v Speaker 4>you better win this one.

0:15:00.890 --> 0:15:03.210
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, Clemson just had to run their quarterback

0:15:03.230 --> 0:15:05.050
<v Speaker 3>on every play. I think both teams are pretty bad.

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 2>So that Notre Dame game, honestly, it might be better

0:15:08.620 --> 0:15:11.340
<v Speaker 2>that they're not going for game day because Notre Dame.

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.900
<v Speaker 3>Could whoop on them. We'll see in a few weeks. Okay,

0:15:14.220 --> 0:15:16.500
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go to the NFL for my first take.

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:17.470
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:19.990
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to sound like a hometown fan. I

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:24.070
<v Speaker 3>am from Philadelphia, but this is purely objective. The Philadelphia

0:15:24.090 --> 0:15:26.550
<v Speaker 3>Eagles have an MVP candidate, and his name is Jalen.

0:15:27.030 --> 0:15:30.390
<v Speaker 3>And it is definitely not Jalen Hurts. Jalen Carter is

0:15:30.850 --> 0:15:33.930
<v Speaker 3>the best defensive player in the NFL and arguably the

0:15:33.970 --> 0:15:35.270
<v Speaker 3>biggest force in the NFL.

0:15:35.590 --> 0:15:38.890
<v Speaker 2>He single-handedly won this Titans game. Titans were rolling. Get

0:15:38.910 --> 0:15:41.170
<v Speaker 2>down to the red zone. First down, he has a

0:15:41.210 --> 0:15:44.690
<v Speaker 2>nine-yard sack. He just blows off his guy. Every game

0:15:44.710 --> 0:15:47.100
<v Speaker 2>that the Eagles win, Jalen Carter makes a play. whether

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.020
<v Speaker 2>it's a blocked extra point, whether it's a big tackle,

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.220
<v Speaker 2>whether it's a sack, you just know looking at this guy,

0:15:53.580 --> 0:15:56.060
<v Speaker 2>he is the best football player on the field.

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.100
<v Speaker 3>Like junior football, youth football, Paul, there's that one guy

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:00.100
<v Speaker 3>who's just bigger than everybody.

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:00.870
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and you can't stop him.

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:01.820
<v Speaker 2>You can't stop him.

0:16:01.900 --> 0:16:05.060
<v Speaker 3>I think Jalen Carter's off-field stuff has always hung with him,

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 3>and his reputation may not be where it should be.

0:16:07.820 --> 0:16:09.940
<v Speaker 2>Because on the field, he is dominant. And the reason

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles win is because of Jalen Carter. And if

0:16:12.340 --> 0:16:13.740
<v Speaker 2>they're going to go all the way, it's going to

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 2>be when Aaron Donald carried the Rams to a Super Bowl.

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:17.830
<v Speaker 2>He's the exact kind of player.

0:16:18.140 --> 0:16:20.750
<v Speaker 3>Right now, Paul, he's 11th in defensive player of the

0:16:20.770 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 3>year odds because all the pass rushers are ahead of him.

0:16:22.850 --> 0:16:24.710
<v Speaker 3>I'm telling you right now, he's better than all of

0:16:24.750 --> 0:16:26.260
<v Speaker 3>these players. Abdul Carter's ahead of him.

0:16:26.510 --> 0:16:31.130
<v Speaker 2>Trey Hendrickson. Daniil Hunter. No way. He affects every single play.

0:16:31.310 --> 0:16:33.330
<v Speaker 4>So I think this warm take as a headline is

0:16:33.430 --> 0:16:35.430
<v Speaker 4>one of those that blow people's hair back. But you're

0:16:35.450 --> 0:16:37.590
<v Speaker 4>an educated sports guy, and you know how it really

0:16:37.630 --> 0:16:40.170
<v Speaker 4>works in the NFL. But the problem is with Jalen Carter,

0:16:40.230 --> 0:16:43.370
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't have sack numbers. If he somehow had 11 sacks,

0:16:43.630 --> 0:16:45.690
<v Speaker 4>he would win this award. I think the most he's

0:16:45.710 --> 0:16:47.290
<v Speaker 4>had is four and a half sacks in his career.

0:16:47.310 --> 0:16:50.290
<v Speaker 4>But you're right. He pushes the entire backfield back. It

0:16:50.330 --> 0:16:53.070
<v Speaker 4>reminds me of prime Haloti Nada. I don't know Haloti

0:16:53.090 --> 0:16:55.770
<v Speaker 4>Nada's sack totals. But I remember watching Haloti Nada and saying,

0:16:56.070 --> 0:16:58.340
<v Speaker 4>he's always in the backfield. They can't do anything against him.

0:16:58.350 --> 0:17:00.620
<v Speaker 4>And the rest of the defense benefits from that. Zach

0:17:00.650 --> 0:17:02.740
<v Speaker 4>Vaughn and all the linebackers. So I love this take.

0:17:03.150 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 4>He can't win MVP. He can't win defensive MVP because

0:17:06.820 --> 0:17:09.060
<v Speaker 4>not enough, it's almost like you want people to go

0:17:09.180 --> 0:17:11.380
<v Speaker 4>deeper into the process and they usually just go, who's

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 4>got the most sacks?

0:17:12.180 --> 0:17:15.070
<v Speaker 3>So I did some stats here. MVP, the last one

0:17:15.090 --> 0:17:17.510
<v Speaker 3>to win was obviously Lawrence Taylor in defense. The only

0:17:17.530 --> 0:17:20.949
<v Speaker 3>guy who's come close is your friend, J.J. Watt, who

0:17:20.990 --> 0:17:24.050
<v Speaker 3>had about 20 sacks one season. Got 14 votes, came

0:17:24.070 --> 0:17:26.810
<v Speaker 3>in second place to Aaron Rodgers. The most recent vote,

0:17:26.950 --> 0:17:28.149
<v Speaker 3>Miles Garrett got one vote in 2023.

0:17:28.130 --> 0:17:28.540
<v Speaker 2>All sack numbers.

0:17:30.300 --> 0:17:32.460
<v Speaker 3>That's why I'm arguing right now the best player on

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.409
<v Speaker 3>the field can be a defensive tackle. By the way,

0:17:34.420 --> 0:17:37.790
<v Speaker 3>Dexter Lawrence isn't far behind in Cincinnati. But Jalen Carter,

0:17:37.810 --> 0:17:39.150
<v Speaker 3>to me, is just the man.

0:17:39.190 --> 0:17:40.530
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think what could help your case, if you

0:17:40.570 --> 0:17:43.129
<v Speaker 4>did some type of poll out there and asked assistant coaches,

0:17:43.170 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 4>defensive coordinators, defensive line coaches, who would they want to

0:17:46.140 --> 0:17:48.420
<v Speaker 4>start their team with? They might not take a rush end.

0:17:48.580 --> 0:17:50.340
<v Speaker 4>It's harder to find a Jalen Carter. It's harder to

0:17:50.380 --> 0:17:52.500
<v Speaker 4>find a Chris Jones than it is a good defensive end.

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Also, intimidation. I'm serious. He's intimidating.

0:17:56.300 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 4>All right, let's go. We're going to pull the bandaid

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.350
<v Speaker 4>on this one. This is the end of the NC

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.649
<v Speaker 4>State Vandy game. If you haven't seen it, you don't

0:18:02.690 --> 0:18:04.689
<v Speaker 4>own a phone and you're not on social media. Now,

0:18:04.730 --> 0:18:06.590
<v Speaker 4>this is one of those plays where, let's watch it

0:18:06.650 --> 0:18:07.130
<v Speaker 4>one more time.

0:18:07.630 --> 0:18:08.290
<v Speaker 2>You roll right.

0:18:08.330 --> 0:18:10.570
<v Speaker 4>You take a knee. Oh, you almost took a knee. No,

0:18:10.609 --> 0:18:15.350
<v Speaker 4>you fumbled right into the hands of a surprised Vanderbilt defender.

0:18:15.740 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 4>And he just falls on the ball and they win

0:18:16.900 --> 0:18:19.310
<v Speaker 4>the game. As unlikely a win as you can get. Now,

0:18:19.369 --> 0:18:21.970
<v Speaker 4>here's the thing. NC State football is kind of middle

0:18:21.990 --> 0:18:23.850
<v Speaker 4>of the road. They're never that good and they're never

0:18:23.890 --> 0:18:26.010
<v Speaker 4>that bad. They don't have a lot of star players.

0:18:26.070 --> 0:18:28.550
<v Speaker 4>They live in the shadow of other SEC teams, even

0:18:28.570 --> 0:18:32.290
<v Speaker 4>ACC teams. Now you have sports immortality. You have one

0:18:32.310 --> 0:18:37.429
<v Speaker 4>of the most impossible losses in sports history, not just

0:18:37.470 --> 0:18:40.149
<v Speaker 4>college football. This will be a cautionary tale. Whenever a

0:18:40.190 --> 0:18:42.730
<v Speaker 4>game is lost, they'll be like, well, remember the NC

0:18:42.770 --> 0:18:44.410
<v Speaker 4>State play where he fumbled in the end zone of Vandy?

0:18:44.850 --> 0:18:46.659
<v Speaker 4>This is kind of like Leon Lett for people a

0:18:46.690 --> 0:18:49.139
<v Speaker 4>generation ago. If you look that up real quick on YouTube,

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 4>you'll know what I mean. But you now have sports

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.959
<v Speaker 4>immortality in the wrong way because most people were not watching.

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.179
<v Speaker 4>When I say most, I mean all. The end of

0:18:56.350 --> 0:18:59.830
<v Speaker 4>NC State versus Vandy. And then everyone said, this can't

0:18:59.850 --> 0:19:00.170
<v Speaker 4>be real.

0:19:00.190 --> 0:19:00.490
<v Speaker 6>And it was.

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.500
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, we're talking the band is on the field,

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 3>the miracle, the Meadowlands. Now, the one thing, it's kind

0:19:06.580 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 3>of hard to tell what's going on. The band is

0:19:08.420 --> 0:19:10.550
<v Speaker 3>on the field, like when he runs in the tuba player.

0:19:10.609 --> 0:19:13.790
<v Speaker 2>Yes. That's still famous 50 years later. I'm not sure

0:19:13.830 --> 0:19:16.470
<v Speaker 2>this will last 50 years, but it'll definitely be talked about.

0:19:16.609 --> 0:19:18.189
<v Speaker 4>This is a little bit like the end of all

0:19:18.230 --> 0:19:20.650
<v Speaker 4>the right moves. Remember Ampipe football, the great high school

0:19:20.670 --> 0:19:23.540
<v Speaker 4>team trying to beat Walnut Heights. They had Tom Cruise.

0:19:23.940 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 4>They ran the ball at the end zone, fumbled, lost

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 4>the big game. All they had to do was take

0:19:27.580 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 4>a safety and they win. That's the biggest comp.

0:19:29.740 --> 0:19:31.500
<v Speaker 2>Was that the early game in All the Right Moves?

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 2>That happened in the beginning of the movie, right?

0:19:33.140 --> 0:19:34.770
<v Speaker 4>It's kind of in the beginning of the movie. Then

0:19:34.830 --> 0:19:35.740
<v Speaker 4>Tom Cruise goes nuts.

0:19:36.350 --> 0:19:38.030
<v Speaker 3>I was trying to talk about the miracle of the Meadowlands.

0:19:38.109 --> 0:19:40.230
<v Speaker 3>Actually do some serious sports analysis here, Paul.

0:19:40.330 --> 0:19:40.530
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:19:41.190 --> 0:19:44.150
<v Speaker 3>My next warm take is also about the defensive player

0:19:44.170 --> 0:19:46.750
<v Speaker 3>of the year. But I am saying Jalen Carter should

0:19:46.770 --> 0:19:49.220
<v Speaker 3>be number one. Mother Nature itself is number two. Now,

0:19:49.470 --> 0:19:52.820
<v Speaker 3>it's mother nature ever won an award because everyone's wondering

0:19:52.900 --> 0:19:55.139
<v Speaker 3>how do we get so much scoring in week one

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.219
<v Speaker 3>of the NFL season and then go so.

0:19:57.140 --> 0:19:59.939
<v Speaker 2>Drastically the other way. If you watch the games, you

0:19:59.980 --> 0:20:01.220
<v Speaker 2>know exactly why.

0:20:01.540 --> 0:20:04.540
<v Speaker 3>If you have any takeaway from Chicago, Minnesota in that rain,

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:06.300
<v Speaker 3>you are fooling yourselves.

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Guys could not get their footing. They could not catch

0:20:09.140 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 2>the football. Uh, I know everyone's killing Aaron Rodgers for

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:14.030
<v Speaker 2>what happened in New England. Guess what?

0:20:14.170 --> 0:20:19.050
<v Speaker 3>The Steelers receivers could not catch the football. Raven Saints. Meanwhile,

0:20:19.230 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Eagles Titans was hot. But the one that was totally

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:23.980
<v Speaker 3>crazy was the Bucks and the Browns.

0:20:24.619 --> 0:20:27.580
<v Speaker 2>Free storm. Fine. Whatever happened there counts.

0:20:28.150 --> 0:20:30.490
<v Speaker 3>After the storm, they basically tried to play two minutes

0:20:30.530 --> 0:20:32.429
<v Speaker 3>of football on a sponge.

0:20:32.490 --> 0:20:33.230
<v Speaker 4>That was biblical.

0:20:33.570 --> 0:20:36.429
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, when did we have this many weather delays?

0:20:36.810 --> 0:20:38.489
<v Speaker 2>But I'm telling you right now, do not read into

0:20:38.530 --> 0:20:41.730
<v Speaker 2>week two. Even Aaron Rodgers. I know everyone's killing Aaron Rodgers.

0:20:41.869 --> 0:20:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Guess what? The rain had a huge part in that game.

0:20:44.390 --> 0:20:45.950
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Pearl, I'm going to agree with you that the

0:20:46.020 --> 0:20:48.659
<v Speaker 4>rain caused all the low scoring, all the messes on

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 4>the field. But some fan bases, I have friends who

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 4>are Bears fans say, well, it was the rain. It

0:20:52.619 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 4>was the weather conditions that kept us from scoring. The

0:20:55.980 --> 0:20:57.820
<v Speaker 4>other team played in the same conditions. It wasn't sunny

0:20:57.859 --> 0:20:59.919
<v Speaker 4>when the Vikings had the ball or when the opposition.

0:20:59.520 --> 0:20:59.780
<v Speaker 1>Had the ball.

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:01.510
<v Speaker 2>No, I know. People hate when I talk about weather

0:21:01.550 --> 0:21:03.990
<v Speaker 2>and games. They're like, that's no excuse. That's fine. But

0:21:04.030 --> 0:21:06.180
<v Speaker 2>don't think that Caleb Williams, next time he plays.

0:21:06.830 --> 0:21:10.190
<v Speaker 3>which might be week three, despite that major hamstring injury.

0:21:10.490 --> 0:21:12.470
<v Speaker 3>Don't think that's the kind of quarterback you're going to get.

0:21:12.790 --> 0:21:15.689
<v Speaker 3>Ben Johnson and that offense still could be prolific. But

0:21:15.710 --> 0:21:16.830
<v Speaker 3>I know there are going to be analysts out there

0:21:16.850 --> 0:21:19.590
<v Speaker 3>who say they scored three points. They're all hype. That's

0:21:19.670 --> 0:21:21.710
<v Speaker 3>not true. It was disgusting on Sunday.

0:21:21.750 --> 0:21:23.930
<v Speaker 4>And later we got to talk about grade one hamstring.

0:21:24.170 --> 0:21:25.030
<v Speaker 2>Is that better?

0:21:25.070 --> 0:21:26.730
<v Speaker 4>You want a grade one, a two, or a three?

0:21:26.750 --> 0:21:28.389
<v Speaker 4>Because I think one would be great because, hey, I

0:21:28.410 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 4>got the best hamstring strain, not the worst.

0:21:30.300 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 2>By the way... I can't even get into that.

0:21:33.380 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 3>Tampa Bay, would you have stuck around if you were

0:21:35.660 --> 0:21:37.699
<v Speaker 3>a fan after that weather that was coming out?

0:21:37.740 --> 0:21:39.659
<v Speaker 2>It looked like a hurricane and lightning and everything.

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:40.900
<v Speaker 4>I don't think I would have gone in the first place.

0:21:40.980 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 4>All right, not so fast. Pabst and Perloff, let's have

0:21:42.940 --> 0:21:45.899
<v Speaker 4>a little game here. This is called Not So Bad,

0:21:46.190 --> 0:21:49.350
<v Speaker 4>Not So Good, Week 2 NFL Season. Let's go, how

0:21:49.410 --> 0:21:51.650
<v Speaker 4>about first, let's go Not So Bad, a team that

0:21:52.170 --> 0:21:55.270
<v Speaker 4>we're not really going to coronate, but it went pretty well.

0:21:55.290 --> 0:21:58.409
<v Speaker 4>Let's go to Cleveland Browns and Deshaun Watson. Deshaun Watson,

0:21:58.470 --> 0:22:02.100
<v Speaker 4>two touchdowns, 238 yards passing. And it's a good day

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 4>for the Cleveland Browns. Or was it, Perloff?

0:22:05.180 --> 0:22:06.060
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's definitely a good day.

0:22:06.340 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 3>And not so bad because we're used to the Browns

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:10.380
<v Speaker 3>being bad. So this was not so bad.

0:22:10.540 --> 0:22:12.660
<v Speaker 4>But what if you're a fan of the Browns who's

0:22:12.700 --> 0:22:15.020
<v Speaker 4>not a fan of Deshaun Watson and wants him benched?

0:22:15.100 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 4>This was the game for him to lose against the

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 4>team that has Baker Mayfield. It was all set for

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:21.859
<v Speaker 4>this to be the benching game for Deshaun Watson. And

0:22:21.900 --> 0:22:24.300
<v Speaker 4>now he's a starting quarterback until he gives it up.

0:22:24.460 --> 0:22:26.220
<v Speaker 3>I don't think any fans are saying that right now

0:22:26.380 --> 0:22:28.580
<v Speaker 3>because a win must feel so good for Cleveland. It's

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.070
<v Speaker 3>been a long time. And it's not like you have

0:22:31.090 --> 0:22:34.389
<v Speaker 3>a number one pick. Shador is kind of iffy, too, especially.

0:22:34.130 --> 0:22:34.530
<v Speaker 2>In that offense.

0:22:34.810 --> 0:22:37.540
<v Speaker 3>One thing about Deshaun Watson, great numbers. I don't think

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:38.909
<v Speaker 3>he threw the ball more than three yards in the

0:22:38.930 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 3>air the entire game.

0:22:39.890 --> 0:22:40.930
<v Speaker 4>Maybe he should do that more often.

0:22:41.230 --> 0:22:43.340
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I think defense is going to adjust. You've

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:45.660
<v Speaker 3>got to be able to throw the ball downfield. So

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 3>it was not so bad.

0:22:46.500 --> 0:22:46.959
<v Speaker 2>I'll give you that.

0:22:46.980 --> 0:22:48.719
<v Speaker 4>All right, let's go to not so good, and it's

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.060
<v Speaker 4>a tie for not so good. Steelers and Falcons. You

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.290
<v Speaker 4>mentioned the Steelers. It just looked unthreatening. The Aaron Rodgers,

0:22:55.490 --> 0:22:58.190
<v Speaker 4>is that a situation yet or just a bad week?

0:22:58.630 --> 0:23:00.570
<v Speaker 3>Well, we saw a lot of this last year with

0:23:00.609 --> 0:23:02.690
<v Speaker 3>the Steelers, too, where Aaron Rodgers just dropped.

0:23:02.450 --> 0:23:04.010
<v Speaker 2>Backs and gets destroyed.

0:23:04.090 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 3>He can't really move at this stage of his career.

0:23:07.260 --> 0:23:09.420
<v Speaker 3>They can't run the ball and they can't protect. So

0:23:09.900 --> 0:23:12.210
<v Speaker 3>I know Aaron Rodgers played poorly. But the whole team

0:23:12.230 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 3>played poorly. I think this was a bit of an anomaly.

0:23:15.180 --> 0:23:17.300
<v Speaker 2>Bad weather. New England was coming off a loss, had

0:23:17.300 --> 0:23:18.180
<v Speaker 2>10 days of rest.

0:23:18.820 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 3>This is one of those games I would not judge

0:23:20.500 --> 0:23:23.580
<v Speaker 3>too harshly, although I am hearing people saying this is

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 3>it for Aaron Rodgers.

0:23:24.380 --> 0:23:26.470
<v Speaker 2>He should retire. But this is the same Rodgers we've

0:23:26.490 --> 0:23:27.470
<v Speaker 2>seen the last two years.

0:23:27.650 --> 0:23:29.730
<v Speaker 4>Before we break, not so good. Is that a compliment

0:23:29.750 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 4>for what's going on with the Falcons right now?

0:23:31.810 --> 0:23:34.990
<v Speaker 2>Oh, my God. Did you see the stat?

0:23:35.010 --> 0:23:37.420
<v Speaker 3>They're the only team in many, many decades not to

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:39.220
<v Speaker 3>have a red zone drive in the first two games.

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.379
<v Speaker 4>They're quarterbacks combined for a quarterback rating of 28.3. It's

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:44.540
<v Speaker 4>like the SATs. I think you get 400 for signing

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:44.820
<v Speaker 4>your name.

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:48.430
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, headline, they have lots of primetime games

0:23:48.450 --> 0:23:50.990
<v Speaker 2>coming up. I believe that the league can flex out

0:23:51.030 --> 0:23:53.650
<v Speaker 2>of their week five game. Which is a good thing.

0:23:53.910 --> 0:23:57.190
<v Speaker 2>But Michael Penix is coming back. I don't know. There's

0:23:57.230 --> 0:23:59.010
<v Speaker 2>got to be some silver lining because right now that

0:23:59.050 --> 0:23:59.909
<v Speaker 2>is bad football.

0:23:59.930 --> 0:24:01.909
<v Speaker 4>That is not so good. Coming up next, a lot

0:24:01.930 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 4>more coming up. College football. SEC Network's host Peter Burns

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 4>on Ole Miss versus LSU and the rest of the

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.180
<v Speaker 4>season coming up for the SEC. Stick around. Not so fast.

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:14.460
<v Speaker 2>All right. Welcome back. Not so fast. Perloff Paps. After

0:24:14.510 --> 0:24:16.790
<v Speaker 2>this weekend, we had to talk to our good buddy,

0:24:16.930 --> 0:24:20.730
<v Speaker 2>Peter Burns, SEC Network anchor. Peter, I understand you were

0:24:20.770 --> 0:24:24.230
<v Speaker 2>down in Mississippi. Is it me or do people in

0:24:24.250 --> 0:24:25.790
<v Speaker 2>Mississippi have an issue with Lane Kiffin?

0:24:27.020 --> 0:24:30.109
<v Speaker 5>Um it's slight it's a slight thing people were talking

0:24:30.150 --> 0:24:32.550
<v Speaker 5>about it but my god it was so amazing down

0:24:32.590 --> 0:24:34.930
<v Speaker 5>there you could just tell throughout the entire week like

0:24:35.350 --> 0:24:38.650
<v Speaker 5>there was this animosity of lane and this homecoming guys

0:24:39.050 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 5>and every single day it would ratchet up and then

0:24:42.100 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 5>arguably it gave us one of the best pre-game and

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 5>ultimately post-game environments i can remember in college football history

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.060
<v Speaker 5>i mean that place was on fire from start.

0:24:50.859 --> 0:24:53.050
<v Speaker 4>To finish Peter, it felt like an all-day saga. I

0:24:53.070 --> 0:24:55.149
<v Speaker 4>got up early to watch game day, to watch your channel,

0:24:55.170 --> 0:24:57.990
<v Speaker 4>to watch anywhere, and I wanted to see more about Lane,

0:24:58.030 --> 0:25:00.090
<v Speaker 4>more about the game. Getting to the game, there was

0:25:00.109 --> 0:25:02.590
<v Speaker 4>a point where it looked like Ole Miss was handling them.

0:25:02.670 --> 0:25:05.939
<v Speaker 4>It was like, not a blowout, but borderline blowout. And

0:25:05.980 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 4>then LSU made it saucy. What did you think was

0:25:07.859 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 4>going to happen when the fourth quarter started?

0:25:10.140 --> 0:25:11.619
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, chaos. I mean, right?

0:25:11.980 --> 0:25:16.179
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it was 17-0, and frankly, you know, probably

0:25:16.220 --> 0:25:19.790
<v Speaker 5>when you talked about the environment, that had everything to

0:25:19.830 --> 0:25:22.030
<v Speaker 5>do with Ole Miss getting that lead, right? Ole Miss

0:25:22.070 --> 0:25:24.050
<v Speaker 5>was kind of like just chill. Pete Golden did a

0:25:24.070 --> 0:25:25.790
<v Speaker 5>good job of getting those guys ready to go, and

0:25:25.830 --> 0:25:29.940
<v Speaker 5>they were ready. Lane Kiffin's LSU Tigers looked jumpy, right?

0:25:29.980 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 5>That was the issue that they had. And Trinidad Chambliss

0:25:32.420 --> 0:25:35.139
<v Speaker 5>ended up having a huge drive right before half.

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.900
<v Speaker 1>That made it 24-17. But then LSU answers the bell.

0:25:37.940 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>They come up. And I tweeted this in the middle

0:25:40.270 --> 0:25:40.860
<v Speaker 1>of the fourth.

0:25:40.700 --> 0:25:43.710
<v Speaker 5>Quarter going, One of two things that are going to happen,

0:25:43.790 --> 0:25:47.330
<v Speaker 5>and Oxford is going to melt down. Either Lane Kiffin

0:25:47.350 --> 0:25:49.990
<v Speaker 5>is going to come from behind from 17 points, and

0:25:50.050 --> 0:25:52.109
<v Speaker 5>who knows what the hell is going to happen as

0:25:52.150 --> 0:25:55.669
<v Speaker 5>he's walking off if they win, or Trinidad Chambliss, who

0:25:55.690 --> 0:25:58.129
<v Speaker 5>looks like the best college football quarterback that we've had

0:25:58.150 --> 0:26:00.890
<v Speaker 5>in a long time, is going to win, and Oxford

0:26:00.930 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 5>might still burn down.

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>And all of those things happen.

0:26:03.820 --> 0:26:06.540
<v Speaker 5>I mean, listen, Perloff, even as famous as you are,

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:08.780
<v Speaker 5>it would have still cost you $ 200 to get into

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:10.220
<v Speaker 5>the library that night post-game.

0:26:10.340 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, Pete, I almost wanted like an alternate ending,

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:14.449
<v Speaker 4>like a movie. And what you just said there, I

0:26:14.490 --> 0:26:16.330
<v Speaker 4>want to know what Lane Kiffin was going to do

0:26:16.390 --> 0:26:17.690
<v Speaker 4>if he won it at the buzzer. He's going to

0:26:17.730 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 4>take his clothes off and streak the quad like Will Ferrell.

0:26:20.770 --> 0:26:23.949
<v Speaker 5>We're going up streaking to the quad, up to the gymnasium,

0:26:24.130 --> 0:26:25.859
<v Speaker 5>and they'll get some KFC on the way home.

0:26:25.900 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, who knows? I mean, like, I always want.

0:26:28.220 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 5>To go through people's Twitter accounts and read the drafts

0:26:31.140 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 5>that they almost.

0:26:32.180 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Wrote, right?

0:26:33.500 --> 0:26:36.500
<v Speaker 5>Because you know, I guarantee you, like, the LSU social

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 5>media team had something cooking. Like, they were going to

0:26:39.740 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 5>drop just a banger of a video or a graphic

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 5>if they had won that game. And then Pete Golding

0:26:46.460 --> 0:26:48.180
<v Speaker 5>at Ole Miss, I guess we'll never know.

0:26:48.580 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll never know.

0:26:49.380 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 3>I saw a headline today. Is Trinidad Chambliss the number

0:26:52.700 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 3>one pick in the NFL draft? Now, he's obviously older,

0:26:55.530 --> 0:26:58.670
<v Speaker 3>coming out of Ferris State. You said he's the best

0:26:58.710 --> 0:27:00.389
<v Speaker 3>college football player we've seen in a while.

0:27:00.550 --> 0:27:03.530
<v Speaker 2>Is he also going to be a possible top five

0:27:03.650 --> 0:27:04.130
<v Speaker 2>NFL pick?

0:27:04.900 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's crazy because I do think so, because

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 5>there is a winning mentality. And Drew Brees had that

0:27:11.460 --> 0:27:14.430
<v Speaker 5>winning mentality of a guy that really kind of took

0:27:14.470 --> 0:27:15.430
<v Speaker 5>it to the next level that.

0:27:15.410 --> 0:27:17.050
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't six foot three, right?

0:27:17.090 --> 0:27:19.310
<v Speaker 5>If you think quarterbacks, you're going to think probably Arch

0:27:19.350 --> 0:27:22.490
<v Speaker 5>Manning's build or Lenore Sellers or Kamario Taylor, who's going

0:27:22.510 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 5>to be a stud for Mississippi State in a couple

0:27:24.660 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 5>of years. But Trinidad's not that guy. But if you

0:27:27.020 --> 0:27:30.750
<v Speaker 5>spend time with them, how good of his head's on

0:27:30.790 --> 0:27:32.649
<v Speaker 5>his shoulders and he's a great kid. But here's the

0:27:32.690 --> 0:27:36.050
<v Speaker 5>big thing. Last year we saw Trinidad got thrust into

0:27:36.070 --> 0:27:39.490
<v Speaker 5>the opening or the starting lineup out of necessity because

0:27:39.570 --> 0:27:40.820
<v Speaker 5>Austin Simmons got banged up.

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.420
<v Speaker 1>So he was kind of freelancing all year long. This

0:27:43.460 --> 0:27:45.100
<v Speaker 1>was the first time that he's had a.

0:27:45.180 --> 0:27:48.419
<v Speaker 5>Full offseason as the starter and they can game plan

0:27:48.540 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 5>to him. And I think that was the big difference

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 5>maker and why ultimately Ole Miss won that football game.

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Peter, why did you tell Paul and I about Kamario Taylor?

0:27:56.060 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 2>We had no idea coming into this season.

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:02.870
<v Speaker 5>Listen, because everybody at Mississippi State was like, shh, shh,

0:28:02.970 --> 0:28:05.550
<v Speaker 5>don't tell us because everybody will start sending him, you know,

0:28:05.850 --> 0:28:08.370
<v Speaker 5>the $ 5 million that they spent for Sam Leavitt. They'll

0:28:08.390 --> 0:28:11.010
<v Speaker 5>try to get a Camario Taylor in the transfer portal.

0:28:11.050 --> 0:28:15.500
<v Speaker 5>But he's a bigger, better, faster version than Dak Prescott.

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 5>And that's scary to think about on a collegiate level.

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And he's a Mississippi guy. So I think, you know,

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.540
<v Speaker 1>fingers crossed he stays there for a while. I'll tell

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.060
<v Speaker 1>you what, had LSU had Camario Taylor, they'd win that game.

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:26.940
<v Speaker 2>In Oxford.

0:28:26.980 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 4>That's a great point. And Cameron Taylor, I saw a

0:28:29.180 --> 0:28:32.820
<v Speaker 4>comparison to Cam Newton, which is awkward because the Cam Newton,

0:28:32.859 --> 0:28:35.970
<v Speaker 4>the Mississippi State, the bag of cash. So we won't

0:28:36.010 --> 0:28:38.670
<v Speaker 4>go there. I want to go with the SEC overall.

0:28:39.550 --> 0:28:42.330
<v Speaker 4>Florida looks pretty good. Bama, I don't know what you

0:28:42.390 --> 0:28:45.540
<v Speaker 4>think of how they look because different points, they look different. Texas,

0:28:45.630 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 4>all those teams. Is there a heavyweight right now?

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Is it Georgia?

0:28:48.420 --> 0:28:50.140
<v Speaker 4>Is there a heavyweight in the SEC right now?

0:28:50.830 --> 0:28:53.490
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think Georgia is there. I mean,

0:28:53.530 --> 0:28:54.670
<v Speaker 1>they haven't played.

0:28:54.710 --> 0:28:57.090
<v Speaker 5>They played two unranked opponents within Arkansas.

0:28:57.110 --> 0:28:58.670
<v Speaker 1>So they kind of just took care of business. We'll

0:28:58.710 --> 0:29:00.820
<v Speaker 1>see a little bit more against Oklahoma this weekend.

0:29:00.860 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 5>And John Mateer and that crew I thought was really

0:29:02.660 --> 0:29:05.940
<v Speaker 5>going to take the next step have almost regressed. So

0:29:06.100 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 5>I still think it's Georgia. Texas, of course, because I

0:29:09.060 --> 0:29:11.459
<v Speaker 5>think Ohio State's really good. So I think those are

0:29:11.500 --> 0:29:15.150
<v Speaker 5>both two college football playoff contenders there. And I think Alabama,

0:29:15.170 --> 0:29:17.190
<v Speaker 5>if they can figure out the defense a little bit,

0:29:17.610 --> 0:29:19.530
<v Speaker 5>they could potentially be, I don't know of a national

0:29:19.570 --> 0:29:23.010
<v Speaker 5>championship team, but a college football playoff team. And now

0:29:23.030 --> 0:29:25.270
<v Speaker 5>we're going to have an elimination game really this weekend

0:29:25.310 --> 0:29:27.970
<v Speaker 5>already in week four guys to where A &amp; M

0:29:28.530 --> 0:29:31.860
<v Speaker 5>and Marcel Reed taking on LSU and Sam Leavitt. Like

0:29:32.260 --> 0:29:34.580
<v Speaker 5>it's almost like a, which quarterback do you trust the

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 5>least matchup?

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:40.630
<v Speaker 2>Peter, how do you evaluate Arch Manning's year so far? Strong.

0:29:41.550 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean, again, his entire first part of his career

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:49.900
<v Speaker 5>was like the first half of the Ohio State-Texas game.

0:29:50.460 --> 0:29:53.980
<v Speaker 5>So much hype, so much pomp and circumstance and nothing.

0:29:54.300 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 5>And then all of a sudden, when almost like the

0:29:55.980 --> 0:29:57.740
<v Speaker 5>pressure is off, then all of a sudden he just

0:29:57.800 --> 0:29:59.460
<v Speaker 5>balls out in place. That's what we saw in the

0:29:59.500 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 5>second half for Arch for the Longhorns. And I think

0:30:02.620 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 5>that we're sawing it. But that was the first time, guys,

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 5>that Texas looked more like an F-350 diesel dually. like,

0:30:11.180 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 5>bowling over people than a Lamborghini Ferrari, right? And Stark

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.590
<v Speaker 5>always wants to be kind of, oh, we'll trick you. No,

0:30:17.810 --> 0:30:19.690
<v Speaker 5>punch him in the mouth, and Texas finally has a

0:30:19.730 --> 0:30:22.330
<v Speaker 5>DNA that they haven't had probably since, I mean, what,

0:30:22.630 --> 0:30:24.310
<v Speaker 5>Vince Young days when they won a title.

0:30:24.470 --> 0:30:25.450
<v Speaker 4>I know we had to get you out of here

0:30:25.470 --> 0:30:28.750
<v Speaker 4>in a couple minutes, but LSU, tough loss. You know,

0:30:28.910 --> 0:30:31.310
<v Speaker 4>I want Lane Kiffin and LSU to be in the playoffs,

0:30:31.370 --> 0:30:34.690
<v Speaker 4>not because I'm rooting, just because of the baggage that

0:30:34.710 --> 0:30:36.980
<v Speaker 4>he brings, both good, bad, and ugly. You're a TV host.

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.290
<v Speaker 4>You're a TV producer. You want them... When you look

0:30:39.330 --> 0:30:42.390
<v Speaker 4>at LSU, the chances for them to get back, right

0:30:42.410 --> 0:30:44.030
<v Speaker 4>the ship, and get in the national championship picture?

0:30:45.070 --> 0:30:46.910
<v Speaker 5>It's going to be tough right now because you lose

0:30:46.950 --> 0:30:49.729
<v Speaker 5>Tredez Green, and I'm not sold that Sam Levitt's that guy.

0:30:49.890 --> 0:30:52.970
<v Speaker 5>And so my question is, hey, is Lane going to

0:30:53.020 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 5>take a step back and realize this is a team

0:30:55.420 --> 0:30:57.780
<v Speaker 5>or this is all about Lane? Because so far it's

0:30:57.820 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 5>been all about Lane right now, which other teams can,

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean, your respective team can ride the coattails of that.

0:31:04.060 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Look at Ole Miss.

0:31:05.060 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 5>Ole Miss wouldn't have the success right now if Lane

0:31:07.780 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 5>Kiffin hadn't been there. I mean, it was almost like

0:31:09.900 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 5>Lane Kiffin on Saturday night looked at it as like

0:31:12.550 --> 0:31:15.330
<v Speaker 5>we look at AI and technology right now. Like, I've

0:31:15.410 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 5>created this monster, and then now it's come to destroy me,

0:31:18.510 --> 0:31:21.330
<v Speaker 5>and I can't end it. Like, Trinidad Chambliss, Kiwan Lacey,

0:31:21.630 --> 0:31:25.850
<v Speaker 5>the home-filled environment, the red shirting of Miss America is

0:31:25.890 --> 0:31:28.710
<v Speaker 5>down there at the library. I mean, it is everything,

0:31:29.090 --> 0:31:31.989
<v Speaker 5>and it's like, all right, I just handed it.

0:31:31.950 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>To Pete Golding, and now he's going to take it.

0:31:34.030 --> 0:31:36.370
<v Speaker 3>Peter, take me back to Saturday, the end of Vandy

0:31:36.550 --> 0:31:39.590
<v Speaker 3>NC State. I can't even imagine how you guys handled that.

0:31:40.290 --> 0:31:42.010
<v Speaker 5>Bro, I mean, we were in the studio, and all

0:31:42.030 --> 0:31:45.650
<v Speaker 5>of a sudden, everybody starts running around, and that's Benjamin Watson, right?

0:31:45.670 --> 0:31:48.150
<v Speaker 1>For the Patriots and the Saints and the Georgia Bulldogs. Like,

0:31:48.470 --> 0:31:49.300
<v Speaker 1>are you kidding me?

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 5>We're like, this could not have been any– I don't–

0:31:52.500 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there's 3,600 seconds in a college football game.

0:31:57.820 --> 0:32:00.260
<v Speaker 1>Vanderbilt led– for one of them.

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 2>That's one.

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:03.140
<v Speaker 1>And think about this, right?

0:32:03.700 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 5>It was not only did they get the game-winning return

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:09.310
<v Speaker 5>for a touchdown, which all he had to do was

0:32:09.370 --> 0:32:11.250
<v Speaker 5>Dan Orlowski this in the back of the end zone

0:32:11.270 --> 0:32:16.670
<v Speaker 5>and the game's over, but ACC officials put one second

0:32:16.750 --> 0:32:19.890
<v Speaker 5>left on the clock, which meant Vanderbilt had to kick

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:23.580
<v Speaker 5>the extra point, which means it ended up having Vanderbilt

0:32:24.500 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 5>covering the three and a half like that that's the

0:32:26.980 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 5>worst bad beat in the history of bad beats maybe

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:30.670
<v Speaker 5>in all of mankind by the way.

0:32:30.620 --> 0:32:32.850
<v Speaker 4>Pete you're crushing the references in this segment by the

0:32:32.890 --> 0:32:34.690
<v Speaker 4>way we're keeping track all right before we get you

0:32:34.750 --> 0:32:36.730
<v Speaker 4>out of here we do a thing such thing as

0:32:36.790 --> 0:32:39.650
<v Speaker 4>a bad question you know sec tailgates i know them

0:32:39.710 --> 0:32:42.370
<v Speaker 4>pretty well if i were a newbie to an sec

0:32:42.410 --> 0:32:45.330
<v Speaker 4>tailgate what do you recommend as breakfast do you go

0:32:45.410 --> 0:32:48.250
<v Speaker 4>right to the tailgate or do you go bojangles for

0:32:48.290 --> 0:32:49.910
<v Speaker 4>a base coat first your thoughts peter.

0:32:50.220 --> 0:32:53.340
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, no. Bojangles, that's in the ACC world.

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.690
<v Speaker 5>We're going to get you kind of like some biscuits

0:32:56.750 --> 0:32:59.250
<v Speaker 5>and gravy or something like that. We got to get

0:32:59.270 --> 0:33:02.450
<v Speaker 5>a solid base going because you're drinking all day long.

0:33:02.690 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 5>You got to have like the Z-biotics where like the pre-alcohol.

0:33:05.710 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Drinks to get you going.

0:33:06.820 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:33:07.260 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 5>A lot of water, some Pedialyte right there, and basically

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.739
<v Speaker 5>a rosary because if I bring you guys down to

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 5>an SEC tailgate— You hold on for dear life, boys.

0:33:18.580 --> 0:33:19.380
<v Speaker 1>You guys are Northerners.

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 5>We've got to get you down to the South like

0:33:20.980 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 5>that article you wrote of all the Northerners coming down

0:33:24.180 --> 0:33:26.260
<v Speaker 5>right there and experiencing the SEC living.

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 4>You won't have to twist our arm hard.

0:33:27.620 --> 0:33:29.030
<v Speaker 2>Peter, it's not if you get us down. It's when

0:33:29.050 --> 0:33:31.610
<v Speaker 2>you get us down. Appreciate the time. Keep the drama

0:33:31.650 --> 0:33:32.290
<v Speaker 2>going in the SEC.

0:33:32.310 --> 0:33:33.850
<v Speaker 4>See you, boys.

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Well, I'm ready. I'm ready. I think I can

0:33:37.220 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 2>do this. I have a strong base. You know, I

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:41.830
<v Speaker 2>don't drink as much as the average tailgater, but I

0:33:41.850 --> 0:33:42.590
<v Speaker 2>can be a good time.

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.390
<v Speaker 4>I've been to a couple of SEC, probably five SEC tailgates.

0:33:45.430 --> 0:33:47.570
<v Speaker 4>And I do recommend like a big biscuit and gravy

0:33:47.630 --> 0:33:50.850
<v Speaker 4>breakfast to really solidify your midsection. And then you start

0:33:50.890 --> 0:33:55.210
<v Speaker 4>drinking and eating other things. Northern, more brats and onions. Southern,

0:33:55.230 --> 0:33:57.170
<v Speaker 4>a lot more rich foods and seafood, baby.

0:33:57.190 --> 0:33:57.450
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:33:57.490 --> 0:33:59.070
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm going to have to stop you there because

0:33:59.090 --> 0:33:59.990
<v Speaker 3>you'll go on all day.

0:34:00.050 --> 0:34:00.610
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:34:00.650 --> 0:34:03.370
<v Speaker 3>Coming up next, Louis Riddick has some strong comments on

0:34:03.410 --> 0:34:05.690
<v Speaker 3>the Steelers. If you're a Pittsburgh fan, you're not going

0:34:05.730 --> 0:34:06.110
<v Speaker 3>to like them.

0:34:06.170 --> 0:34:07.310
<v Speaker 2>That's next. Not so fast.

0:34:11.610 --> 0:34:14.730
<v Speaker 1>The worst loss on Sunday was turned in by?

0:34:15.150 --> 0:34:16.010
<v Speaker 2>Probably Pittsburgh.

0:34:16.030 --> 0:34:19.509
<v Speaker 7>Because they went up there, and I'll tell you what,

0:34:19.590 --> 0:34:22.819
<v Speaker 7>Pittsburgh looks like they could be in trouble, Trump. Because

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.180
<v Speaker 7>starting at the quarterback spot, I mean, as much as

0:34:25.219 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 7>we all respect and love Aaron, I just don't feel

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:29.890
<v Speaker 7>as though, well, one, they can't run the football with

0:34:29.930 --> 0:34:32.450
<v Speaker 7>any kind of effectiveness to keep the pressure off of him.

0:34:32.830 --> 0:34:37.150
<v Speaker 7>And the passing game is just so wildly inconsistent. But

0:34:37.170 --> 0:34:41.150
<v Speaker 7>I think it really showed you yesterday, I think, that

0:34:41.210 --> 0:34:45.089
<v Speaker 7>that team, as much as I love that city and

0:34:45.150 --> 0:34:47.130
<v Speaker 7>love that organization and love everything that has to do

0:34:47.150 --> 0:34:49.230
<v Speaker 7>with Pittsburgh, I really do think that that could have

0:34:49.250 --> 0:34:51.730
<v Speaker 7>been a sign of what's to come for this football

0:34:51.750 --> 0:34:52.370
<v Speaker 7>team down the road.

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:55.820
<v Speaker 4>Back on Not So Fast, Pabst and Perloff. That's Louis

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:58.150
<v Speaker 4>Riddick of the Mothership joining us, and he's one of

0:34:58.190 --> 0:35:00.410
<v Speaker 4>our favorite guests. When he says the Steelers could be

0:35:00.530 --> 0:35:01.980
<v Speaker 4>in trouble trouble, what does that.

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Mean to you?

0:35:03.170 --> 0:35:06.100
<v Speaker 2>Actually, I'm not quite sure because I guess like 5-12,

0:35:06.300 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 2>are we talking about that?

0:35:07.420 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 4>I think that's what he means because we can't picture that.

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.700
<v Speaker 4>In our lifetime, the Steelers are almost always like nine

0:35:12.739 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 4>wins plus and a competitive, never embarrassing team.

0:35:16.020 --> 0:35:18.629
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think the Steelers always find their level, which

0:35:18.710 --> 0:35:22.310
<v Speaker 3>is 10-7. They've been 10-7 for about eight years. Now,

0:35:22.930 --> 0:35:24.330
<v Speaker 3>I know everyone's burying them right now, but.

0:35:24.270 --> 0:35:27.430
<v Speaker 2>You look at the schedule. Show me where their major underdogs.

0:35:27.469 --> 0:35:29.620
<v Speaker 2>They play Cincinnati this weekend. Cincinnati looks great.

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:32.370
<v Speaker 3>If Mike Tomlin was still the coach... I would guarantee

0:35:32.410 --> 0:35:34.910
<v Speaker 3>the Steelers win that game. They always win that game.

0:35:35.170 --> 0:35:37.379
<v Speaker 3>That's what the Steelers do. They take an AFC North

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 3>team that looks hot.

0:35:38.500 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 2>They look bad. Then they come back and they're a

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 2>different team the next week.

0:35:41.140 --> 0:35:41.899
<v Speaker 4>So you're pumping the brakes.

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:42.780
<v Speaker 2>I'm pumping the brakes.

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Honestly, I thought New England was super fired up for

0:35:45.060 --> 0:35:47.529
<v Speaker 3>this game. I think that the Steelers actually go into

0:35:47.570 --> 0:35:47.989
<v Speaker 3>their Week 9 bye.

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:50.280
<v Speaker 2>With a little momentum.

0:35:50.380 --> 0:35:52.890
<v Speaker 3>I think they're about a 500 team, Paul. So I

0:35:52.969 --> 0:35:56.490
<v Speaker 3>say that, and that doesn't sound crazy. Is that trouble trouble?

0:35:56.610 --> 0:35:58.250
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what that means. What did we expect?

0:35:58.590 --> 0:36:00.930
<v Speaker 4>I guess the trouble trouble would mean Aaron Rodgers gets

0:36:00.969 --> 0:36:02.830
<v Speaker 4>really beat up. They have to go to Mason Rudolph.

0:36:03.090 --> 0:36:05.930
<v Speaker 4>They're out of the playoff picture before Thanksgiving. And then

0:36:05.950 --> 0:36:07.280
<v Speaker 4>you've got to test out other quarterbacks.

0:36:07.820 --> 0:36:12.300
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that happens. I think the upcoming schedule, Cleveland, Indianapolis.

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.340
<v Speaker 3>At Tampa Bay, it doesn't look hard anymore. New Orleans

0:36:15.420 --> 0:36:17.739
<v Speaker 3>comes to Pittsburgh. And I don't care how Tyler Shuck

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 3>is playing. Steelers are going to be favored in that

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 3>one and Cleveland again. So they have to be, what,

0:36:22.780 --> 0:36:26.140
<v Speaker 3>3-6 before you pull Rodgers? And he was getting demolished

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:27.620
<v Speaker 3>like that last year, and he just sort of takes

0:36:27.660 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 3>a punishment.

0:36:28.660 --> 0:36:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Nobody can catch the ball. That's a bit of a problem.

0:36:30.980 --> 0:36:34.140
<v Speaker 2>DK Metcalf cannot catch a football. That worries me more

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:34.910
<v Speaker 2>than Aaron Rodgers.

0:36:35.050 --> 0:36:37.450
<v Speaker 4>All right, last night, Sunday Night Football on NBC. Really

0:36:37.469 --> 0:36:40.649
<v Speaker 4>fun game, Colts versus the Chiefs. And at the end,

0:36:40.750 --> 0:36:42.850
<v Speaker 4>there was a weird play with Laquan Treadwell where he

0:36:42.910 --> 0:36:44.569
<v Speaker 4>caught it. Did he not catch it? Did the Chiefs

0:36:44.610 --> 0:36:46.700
<v Speaker 4>win it? Did they not win it? And Patrick Mahomes,

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 4>the star quarterback, talked about that after the game.

0:36:48.660 --> 0:36:52.420
<v Speaker 8>I'm actually kind of glad because I didn't want to

0:36:52.460 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 8>see Twitter's reaction if they would have called it a fumble.

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 8>So we got to prove it the right way, get

0:36:57.140 --> 0:36:59.049
<v Speaker 8>the stop there, and then go back out there and

0:36:59.090 --> 0:37:02.250
<v Speaker 8>get a field goal. So there was different times every

0:37:02.350 --> 0:37:04.029
<v Speaker 8>part of the team had to put their impact on

0:37:04.050 --> 0:37:06.390
<v Speaker 8>the game. That's what you want, a full team game

0:37:06.410 --> 0:37:07.069
<v Speaker 8>and a full team win.

0:37:07.930 --> 0:37:09.830
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I go back to that play again. We talked

0:37:09.870 --> 0:37:11.089
<v Speaker 4>about it at the top of the show and not

0:37:11.110 --> 0:37:13.610
<v Speaker 4>so fast. Giving the ball back to Patrick Mahomes. It's

0:37:13.630 --> 0:37:15.529
<v Speaker 4>something I never want to do. I'd rather lose at

0:37:15.550 --> 0:37:17.270
<v Speaker 4>my own hand and try that fourth and eight if

0:37:17.310 --> 0:37:20.350
<v Speaker 4>I'm the Colts than to let Mahomes take another look.

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:22.460
<v Speaker 2>At the ball. Yeah, but fourth and eight, what if

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:24.940
<v Speaker 2>it's just an incomplete pass? Then what are we talking about?

0:37:25.060 --> 0:37:26.779
<v Speaker 4>That you gave it a shot and you didn't give

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:28.420
<v Speaker 4>it back to the guy.

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Fourth and one is giving it a shot. Fourth and

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:31.660
<v Speaker 2>eight is a suicide mission.

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:34.670
<v Speaker 4>Him having the ball, to me, it's like you can

0:37:34.690 --> 0:37:36.170
<v Speaker 4>start packing up and going home. If I was a

0:37:36.210 --> 0:37:38.549
<v Speaker 4>Colts fan and Mahomes got the ball back, I'm not

0:37:38.570 --> 0:37:40.250
<v Speaker 4>saying I turned the TV off, but I put it

0:37:40.290 --> 0:37:41.190
<v Speaker 4>on that sleep mode thing.

0:37:41.390 --> 0:37:42.989
<v Speaker 3>You have a lot of faith in Daniel Jones, the

0:37:43.030 --> 0:37:45.930
<v Speaker 3>Colts quarterback, to make a play there. The Chiefs were

0:37:46.210 --> 0:37:48.149
<v Speaker 3>obviously going to protect the first down line. That was

0:37:48.170 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 3>an almost impossible situation. Isn't it amazing, by the way?

0:37:51.270 --> 0:37:51.890
<v Speaker 3>We haven't talked about it.

0:37:51.890 --> 0:37:55.819
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Mahomes is fully back. Yes. 382 yards passing.

0:37:55.910 --> 0:37:57.260
<v Speaker 4>That's a good point. He was running well.

0:37:57.440 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 2>He looked smooth. Yeah. Travis Kelsey, all of a sudden,

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 2>over 100 yards. And then they have this added element

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 2>of Ken Walker, who can catch the ball.

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:05.300
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Collins Rosetta, he's like, I didn't know Ken Walker catch

0:38:07.580 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 2>the ball there.

0:38:08.060 --> 0:38:08.420
<v Speaker 4>Six catches.

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 2>They are dangerous. All right.

0:38:09.900 --> 0:38:12.660
<v Speaker 3>The Browns upset the Bucs yesterday, and Coach Todd Munkin

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 3>fired back at his haters.

0:38:14.420 --> 0:38:19.530
<v Speaker 6>A couple scuffles Wednesday, which is good. That's awesome. Because

0:38:19.570 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 6>guys didn't like it.

0:38:20.260 --> 0:38:21.090
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:38:21.110 --> 0:38:22.089
<v Speaker 6>They're a little pissed off.

0:38:22.930 --> 0:38:23.149
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:38:23.410 --> 0:38:25.670
<v Speaker 6>You ought to be a little pissed off. Played awful.

0:38:26.210 --> 0:38:32.310
<v Speaker 6>That wasn't the standard. Browns are going to Browns. That. Okay?

0:38:33.110 --> 0:38:33.230
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:38:33.590 --> 0:38:36.230
<v Speaker 6>But the guys took that to heart. Thank you.

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:39.580
<v Speaker 4>First of all, he sounds like Luke or Owen Wilson.

0:38:39.620 --> 0:38:40.660
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, we're going to win.

0:38:41.110 --> 0:38:42.770
<v Speaker 4>You know what? You've got to take your shot when

0:38:42.810 --> 0:38:45.089
<v Speaker 4>you win. The Browns don't win that often. He's talking

0:38:45.110 --> 0:38:47.490
<v Speaker 4>about Mike Tomlin saying the Browns are going to Brown,

0:38:48.250 --> 0:38:49.330
<v Speaker 4>and he got his shot back.

0:38:49.969 --> 0:38:51.170
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I love Tom Munkin.

0:38:51.190 --> 0:38:52.989
<v Speaker 3>I've been rooting for him all summer because he's in

0:38:53.010 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 3>the hardest situation. Lost his voice around July 23rd. Sounds

0:38:56.420 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 3>like Tom Izzo.

0:38:57.239 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's great. Had a really good game plan against

0:39:00.219 --> 0:39:03.140
<v Speaker 2>the Bucs, neutralized their pass rush. So he deserves at

0:39:03.180 --> 0:39:03.819
<v Speaker 2>least this one week.

0:39:04.410 --> 0:39:07.180
<v Speaker 3>To sort of soak up all the good vibes, because

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how many more he's going to get

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 3>this year.

0:39:08.780 --> 0:39:10.259
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, live it up, coach. All right, another one, a

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:12.900
<v Speaker 4>little payback time. This is the quarterback Jalen Hurts of

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 4>the Eagles. Now, he got a little shot from Jeffrey Simmons,

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:18.740
<v Speaker 4>the great defensive tackle of the Titans. Jeffrey Simmons jabbed

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:21.490
<v Speaker 4>him in his media time the other day, and Jalen

0:39:21.510 --> 0:39:23.969
<v Speaker 4>Hurts said, I'll take it at the end. Is that

0:39:23.989 --> 0:39:26.910
<v Speaker 4>a comment that you heard that mattered to you, and how.

0:39:26.850 --> 0:39:27.620
<v Speaker 2>Do you think it responded?

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 4>I heard it.

0:39:29.940 --> 0:39:32.779
<v Speaker 2>And did it matter to you? I heard it. And

0:39:32.820 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 2>how do you think it responded?

0:39:34.780 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 7>Happily warm.

0:39:36.610 --> 0:39:36.970
<v Speaker 2>Boom.

0:39:37.070 --> 0:39:40.070
<v Speaker 4>That is smack talk right back by Jalen Hurts. I mean,

0:39:40.469 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 4>that is bang. That's as animated I've ever seen him.

0:39:43.750 --> 0:39:46.210
<v Speaker 2>That's a good point. I don't know.

0:39:46.290 --> 0:39:49.370
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Jalen Hurts, by the way, was good. I

0:39:49.390 --> 0:39:51.070
<v Speaker 3>don't think it was great. He had two picks and

0:39:51.090 --> 0:39:51.890
<v Speaker 3>it almost killed him.

0:39:52.710 --> 0:39:55.069
<v Speaker 2>This is the Titans. Jalen Hurts is talking trash after

0:39:55.110 --> 0:39:55.990
<v Speaker 2>a win over the Titans?

0:39:56.150 --> 0:39:58.270
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that does seem like that's a game where he

0:39:58.310 --> 0:39:59.950
<v Speaker 4>didn't really talk trash. He just said, I heard it,

0:40:00.090 --> 0:40:01.850
<v Speaker 4>I heard it. He didn't give us much to work

0:40:01.870 --> 0:40:02.190
<v Speaker 4>with there.

0:40:02.450 --> 0:40:04.109
<v Speaker 2>He is so hard to know.

0:40:04.130 --> 0:40:06.330
<v Speaker 3>There was this big feature on him in the magazine

0:40:06.350 --> 0:40:09.069
<v Speaker 3>before the season started that basically said, you can't get

0:40:09.090 --> 0:40:10.910
<v Speaker 3>to know this guy. I guess that's a good thing.

0:40:10.930 --> 0:40:13.529
<v Speaker 3>They got the W, so they're happy. But I don't

0:40:13.570 --> 0:40:15.439
<v Speaker 3>want to see you trash-talking the Titans.

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Trash-talk the Cowboys.

0:40:17.770 --> 0:40:19.390
<v Speaker 4>All right, it is time for the rando. Speaking of

0:40:19.430 --> 0:40:23.469
<v Speaker 4>that Eagles-Titans game, they said it was 150-plus degrees on

0:40:23.510 --> 0:40:25.799
<v Speaker 4>the field, burning up cleats, all this kind of stuff.

0:40:26.060 --> 0:40:27.799
<v Speaker 4>Take a look at this video for the rando. What

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:29.180
<v Speaker 4>is going on here, Perloff?

0:40:30.140 --> 0:40:30.529
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:40:30.710 --> 0:40:31.550
<v Speaker 4>That doesn't seem proper.

0:40:32.150 --> 0:40:35.830
<v Speaker 2>So the reality is everybody's cleats were melting. I'm not exaggerating.

0:40:35.850 --> 0:40:38.270
<v Speaker 2>That happened. Many players had to change cleats several times.

0:40:38.390 --> 0:40:39.770
<v Speaker 4>I thought it was that someone needed a bathroom break

0:40:39.810 --> 0:40:40.820
<v Speaker 4>and couldn't go to the port-a-potty.

0:40:41.140 --> 0:40:44.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. No, that was definitely a water bottle. It's kind

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:46.700
<v Speaker 2>of like, have you ever heard that at the beach

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 2>when you get sung by a jellyfish? Yeah. You're supposed

0:40:49.660 --> 0:40:50.240
<v Speaker 2>to have your buddy.

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 4>And this was not that.

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:52.180
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this was not that.

0:40:52.260 --> 0:40:54.460
<v Speaker 3>This was melting fleets, which is actually kind of strange

0:40:54.500 --> 0:40:54.969
<v Speaker 3>in itself.

0:40:55.930 --> 0:40:58.569
<v Speaker 2>But I know the visual. You know what? Us mature

0:40:58.620 --> 0:41:00.109
<v Speaker 2>people could look into the science of this.

0:41:00.410 --> 0:41:03.969
<v Speaker 3>And I'm going to call out 150 degrees on.

0:41:03.930 --> 0:41:06.930
<v Speaker 2>The field, 157. 157. That can't be the case.

0:41:06.950 --> 0:41:07.870
<v Speaker 4>You're throwing the BS flag?

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:09.259
<v Speaker 2>How can it be 157?

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 3>An oven is 157 degrees.

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:14.879
<v Speaker 4>It's like they're playing on hot coals, which I would watch.

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:16.799
<v Speaker 4>I would tune into that if anyone was playing. All right,

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:19.980
<v Speaker 4>coming up next, it's time for, oh, constructive criticism and

0:41:20.020 --> 0:41:22.540
<v Speaker 4>the feel-good. Plus, to get you ready for Monday Night Football.

0:41:22.580 --> 0:41:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Stick around. Pabst and Perloff, Not So Fast.

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:28.340
<v Speaker 2>Back on Not So Fast. Paul, we have an update.

0:41:28.980 --> 0:41:32.029
<v Speaker 3>Ben Johnson, Bears coach, went on ESPN 1000 and said

0:41:32.050 --> 0:41:34.950
<v Speaker 3>that quarterback Caleb Williams is week to week after his

0:41:34.989 --> 0:41:36.810
<v Speaker 3>hamstring injury at the end of the Vikings game.

0:41:37.300 --> 0:41:39.900
<v Speaker 2>He will likely miss some time, according to Ben Johnson.

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 3>We have another report out there, Paul, that says that

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 3>he could be ready for next week against the Eagles. Obviously,

0:41:46.140 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 3>people are having fun with how dramatically Caleb Williams went

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 3>off the field, waving to the crowd, crying.

0:41:51.860 --> 0:41:55.250
<v Speaker 4>I would say choked up. More choked up than crying.

0:41:55.450 --> 0:41:56.390
<v Speaker 2>It's a weird situation.

0:41:56.410 --> 0:41:58.910
<v Speaker 3>Do you want him to miss some time to make

0:41:58.950 --> 0:42:00.890
<v Speaker 3>him look better, or do you want him on the

0:42:00.910 --> 0:42:01.690
<v Speaker 3>field as fast as possible?

0:42:01.710 --> 0:42:04.989
<v Speaker 4>This is the ultimate sports slash social media story, because

0:42:05.469 --> 0:42:07.810
<v Speaker 4>Every Bears fan. If you're just like sports, you're happy

0:42:07.830 --> 0:42:09.989
<v Speaker 4>that Caleb Williams is healthy because they do, as you

0:42:10.010 --> 0:42:12.689
<v Speaker 4>see here, at the Eagles next week and then host

0:42:12.710 --> 0:42:15.130
<v Speaker 4>the Eagles, then the Jets, then Green Bay, which is

0:42:15.170 --> 0:42:17.049
<v Speaker 4>what every Bear fan wants them to be healthy for.

0:42:17.450 --> 0:42:19.989
<v Speaker 4>They do have Tyson Bajent, the nice backup quarterback, who's

0:42:20.050 --> 0:42:23.170
<v Speaker 4>considered pretty high end. Young guy has his chance. But

0:42:23.190 --> 0:42:25.350
<v Speaker 4>it's one of those things, Caleb Williams, when he talks

0:42:25.370 --> 0:42:28.500
<v Speaker 4>to the press next, will he address... his reaction to

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:30.739
<v Speaker 4>his injury and maybe that it wasn't quite as bad

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:31.100
<v Speaker 4>as they thought.

0:42:31.219 --> 0:42:31.779
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:34.500
<v Speaker 3>Caleb Williams has always been a little sensitive about the

0:42:34.540 --> 0:42:37.779
<v Speaker 3>fact that people think he's sensitive. Remember at USC, he

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:40.890
<v Speaker 3>was crying with his mother and everyone always wondered about

0:42:40.930 --> 0:42:41.630
<v Speaker 3>the fingernails.

0:42:42.469 --> 0:42:44.410
<v Speaker 2>He just seems to be an odd bird to me.

0:42:44.430 --> 0:42:45.850
<v Speaker 2>You follow him pretty closely. What do you think?

0:42:46.050 --> 0:42:48.270
<v Speaker 4>Well, again, in the moment, I thought the injury was terrible.

0:42:48.370 --> 0:42:50.910
<v Speaker 4>And when you see him with the thing, without making

0:42:50.950 --> 0:42:52.500
<v Speaker 4>fun of him, I'm saying in the moment, I thought

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:55.800
<v Speaker 4>this is a terrible, not career ending, but season ending injury.

0:42:56.420 --> 0:42:58.299
<v Speaker 4>And then it's not, which is good news, but it

0:42:58.340 --> 0:42:59.460
<v Speaker 4>just didn't match at the time.

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, listen, I can relate. I pulled my hamstring about

0:43:01.780 --> 0:43:02.760
<v Speaker 2>a thousand times.

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 4>Doing what, like reading?

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:05.740
<v Speaker 2>Actually, really badly.

0:43:05.950 --> 0:43:09.150
<v Speaker 3>About eight years ago, Dan made the Danettes race in

0:43:09.170 --> 0:43:09.830
<v Speaker 3>a 100-yard dash.

0:43:09.850 --> 0:43:10.370
<v Speaker 4>I remember that.

0:43:10.590 --> 0:43:12.010
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it was at a high school track.

0:43:12.550 --> 0:43:15.330
<v Speaker 3>I pulled my left hamstring so bad, it affected me

0:43:15.350 --> 0:43:17.069
<v Speaker 3>until now, eight years later.

0:43:17.270 --> 0:43:19.830
<v Speaker 4>Take that, Caleb Williams, you warrior right there. All right,

0:43:19.870 --> 0:43:23.420
<v Speaker 4>let's go. Monday Night Football, really nice game here. Giants, Rams.

0:43:23.850 --> 0:43:26.029
<v Speaker 4>Rams kind of got to fix things. Giants have an

0:43:26.090 --> 0:43:27.910
<v Speaker 4>opportunity to make a national statement.

0:43:28.090 --> 0:43:30.590
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is a tough assignment for the Giants.

0:43:30.730 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 3>One thing to do it against Dallas in New York,

0:43:33.090 --> 0:43:35.580
<v Speaker 3>going against the Rams, who are really.

0:43:35.300 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 2>Mad about the way Australia played out.

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 4>Really mad, but they don't have Miles Garrett, and that's

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:41.060
<v Speaker 4>as big as it gets. And then, you know, they

0:43:41.100 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 4>have Matt Stafford, they got Kyron Williams, they got everyone else.

0:43:43.580 --> 0:43:44.839
<v Speaker 4>Who can the coup is if.

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:47.820
<v Speaker 3>He's... Aaron Donald, 30 snaps, so that might make up

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:50.510
<v Speaker 3>for the loss of Garrett. I actually labeled this coming

0:43:50.530 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 3>into the week, Paul, Comeback Weekend, and I thought the Patriots, Chargers,

0:43:55.020 --> 0:43:58.140
<v Speaker 3>and Rams are all going to have massive statements after

0:43:58.160 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 3>their week one losses.

0:43:59.340 --> 0:44:02.490
<v Speaker 2>Patriots, yes. Chargers, no. I think the Rams will make

0:44:02.530 --> 0:44:04.010
<v Speaker 2>a statement here. I think they're going to be fired

0:44:04.070 --> 0:44:04.669
<v Speaker 2>up for the Giants.

0:44:04.710 --> 0:44:07.470
<v Speaker 4>Are you leaning towards more likely blowout by the Rams,

0:44:07.850 --> 0:44:08.830
<v Speaker 4>close win by the Giants?

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:11.819
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm leaning big win for the Rams. I think

0:44:11.860 --> 0:44:14.259
<v Speaker 3>that they correct the narrative that they're not. Whatever it

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:16.140
<v Speaker 3>was last week, I think that was Australia. I mean,

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to get back into the travel plans,

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:20.090
<v Speaker 3>but I think that game was total anomaly.

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:21.489
<v Speaker 2>I think the Rams are going to be fired up

0:44:21.510 --> 0:44:21.790
<v Speaker 2>for this.

0:44:21.989 --> 0:44:23.770
<v Speaker 4>I will take the Giants to cover in a close one,

0:44:23.790 --> 0:44:25.610
<v Speaker 4>but I don't think they pull this one off. All right,

0:44:25.630 --> 0:44:27.190
<v Speaker 4>it's time here on Not So Fast for a little

0:44:27.210 --> 0:44:30.149
<v Speaker 4>constructive criticism. Your thoughts on social media about what we're doing,

0:44:30.530 --> 0:44:32.450
<v Speaker 4>maybe what we're not doing. Here we go, Perloff. Here

0:44:32.510 --> 0:44:35.410
<v Speaker 4>is the first constructive criticism for you. Here we go.

0:44:37.310 --> 0:44:37.549
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:44:37.900 --> 0:44:40.050
<v Speaker 4>If you need to be an Eagles fan and be

0:44:40.070 --> 0:44:42.629
<v Speaker 4>a false 4-0, look at the schedule. I'm an Eagles fan,

0:44:42.650 --> 0:44:43.270
<v Speaker 4>but I'm worried.

0:44:43.790 --> 0:44:46.310
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I totally know what you mean, Coach Litz. The

0:44:46.390 --> 0:44:49.009
<v Speaker 2>Eagles have not looked great. They beat the Commanders, who

0:44:49.050 --> 0:44:51.250
<v Speaker 2>might be terrible, and they beat the Titans, who might

0:44:51.330 --> 0:44:54.150
<v Speaker 2>be the number one pick next year. We have no idea.

0:44:54.469 --> 0:44:56.130
<v Speaker 3>Titans, they actually made the Titans look good for a

0:44:56.130 --> 0:44:58.859
<v Speaker 3>little while. The Eagles have not shown a lot. There

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:01.739
<v Speaker 3>is no doubt about that. Their offense has been inconsistent

0:45:01.780 --> 0:45:05.620
<v Speaker 3>under our buddy Sean Mannion, first-year offensive coordinator, friend of

0:45:05.660 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Paps and Perloff.

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:08.880
<v Speaker 4>Okay, it's been iffy. But if you look at this team,

0:45:08.900 --> 0:45:09.719
<v Speaker 4>do you trust them?

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:10.380
<v Speaker 2>The A.J.

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:12.850
<v Speaker 4>Brown loss, do they have guys who could replace A.J.

0:45:12.890 --> 0:45:14.069
<v Speaker 2>Brown? No.

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:17.219
<v Speaker 3>Devontae Smith, yeah, Devontae Smith's a true number one. He

0:45:17.260 --> 0:45:20.180
<v Speaker 3>made an incredible catch on Sunday. No, their offense is

0:45:20.260 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 3>not good.

0:45:20.580 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 4>What do you think?

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:22.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you're not as close as I am.

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:25.339
<v Speaker 4>No, I always trust the Eagles. I think they get

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:27.380
<v Speaker 4>a lot of criticism because they've had some seasons, but

0:45:27.420 --> 0:45:29.940
<v Speaker 4>they're always in the mix. And the Saquon Barkley injury

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:31.549
<v Speaker 4>the other day, I don't know how serious it is,

0:45:31.570 --> 0:45:33.509
<v Speaker 4>but when you see him leave a game, that's one

0:45:33.530 --> 0:45:35.210
<v Speaker 4>where I get concerned. Well, if they don't have him,

0:45:35.250 --> 0:45:35.730
<v Speaker 4>it's over, John.

0:45:35.790 --> 0:45:38.250
<v Speaker 2>He came back with a big neck roll, which we love.

0:45:38.570 --> 0:45:40.330
<v Speaker 2>So he didn't play much, but he came back, so

0:45:40.350 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm not worried about him.

0:45:41.010 --> 0:45:43.410
<v Speaker 4>By necessity. All right, the next one, constructive criticism. Here

0:45:43.450 --> 0:45:45.800
<v Speaker 4>we go. Many fans have pushed for the NFL to

0:45:45.940 --> 0:45:51.239
<v Speaker 4>add interception caused by receiver. Hello. This is from Jordan Schultz,

0:45:51.540 --> 0:45:54.620
<v Speaker 4>an NFL reporter. Is there a perfect example of why

0:45:54.660 --> 0:45:57.930
<v Speaker 4>this stat should exist? Yes, there is. For every interception,

0:45:57.950 --> 0:46:00.210
<v Speaker 4>there's blame. It could either be the quarterback or the receiver.

0:46:00.370 --> 0:46:02.330
<v Speaker 4>Most of the time, it's the quarterback. But look at

0:46:02.350 --> 0:46:06.169
<v Speaker 4>this play. Hits the receiver in his hands. Now, that,

0:46:06.270 --> 0:46:09.370
<v Speaker 4>to me, seems like it's on the receiver clearly. He

0:46:09.410 --> 0:46:12.200
<v Speaker 4>had the ball clearly. That should be pure RCI. For

0:46:12.219 --> 0:46:15.489
<v Speaker 4>those of you who don't know RCI... receiver-caused interceptions. If

0:46:15.530 --> 0:46:17.950
<v Speaker 4>you like baseball, when there's a wild pitch, it's either

0:46:17.989 --> 0:46:20.759
<v Speaker 4>declared a wild pitch, which is on the pitcher, or

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 4>a passed ball, where it's on the catcher. Simple designation,

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:25.060
<v Speaker 4>easy to fix. It's picking up momentum.

0:46:25.180 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, what about when the receiver runs the wrong route?

0:46:27.060 --> 0:46:29.719
<v Speaker 3>That happens even more often than bobbling it and putting

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:30.740
<v Speaker 3>up in the air for the defense.

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 4>That would be hard for the scorekeeper to decide in

0:46:32.940 --> 0:46:34.819
<v Speaker 4>the moment, but I'm sure quarterbacks would like that as well.

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:37.589
<v Speaker 4>All right, last up for constructive criticism. Here we go. Oh,

0:46:37.620 --> 0:46:39.569
<v Speaker 4>from our guy Daniel Roberts. We know him from Front

0:46:39.590 --> 0:46:42.380
<v Speaker 4>Office Sports. It took marrying a Southerner to get this

0:46:42.420 --> 0:46:44.860
<v Speaker 4>New Englander to this point, but I now must declare,

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:48.760
<v Speaker 4>he's declaring, I think college football Saturdays are more fun

0:46:48.780 --> 0:46:50.870
<v Speaker 4>than NFL Sundays. Wow, this is a big topic.

0:46:51.590 --> 0:46:52.129
<v Speaker 2>Not to me.

0:46:52.150 --> 0:46:55.390
<v Speaker 3>I don't even think, I don't know, why would you,

0:46:55.430 --> 0:46:57.810
<v Speaker 3>and you do this pretty much every day, why compare

0:46:57.830 --> 0:46:58.450
<v Speaker 3>Saturday and Sunday?

0:46:58.489 --> 0:47:00.149
<v Speaker 2>They work together. You're supposed to be on the couch

0:47:00.190 --> 0:47:01.069
<v Speaker 2>for the entire 48 hours.

0:47:01.469 --> 0:47:03.629
<v Speaker 4>I'm with you on that. I think I like college

0:47:03.650 --> 0:47:05.710
<v Speaker 4>football a touch more because of the randomness of it,

0:47:05.850 --> 0:47:08.239
<v Speaker 4>the amount of teams that are in play. But the

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:10.779
<v Speaker 4>NFL Sunday, I would never say it's second tier or

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:13.020
<v Speaker 4>anything like that. College football, as I've said, feels like

0:47:13.060 --> 0:47:15.509
<v Speaker 4>a dive bar. It's kind of reckless and weird, and

0:47:15.570 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 4>there's some shady characters all around. And the NFL is

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 4>like an airport lounge. It's antiseptic and nice, and you

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:21.779
<v Speaker 4>get what you pay for.

0:47:22.020 --> 0:47:24.719
<v Speaker 3>In reality, I don't think college football will ever match

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:26.160
<v Speaker 3>NFL unless they fix the schedule.

0:47:26.260 --> 0:47:28.779
<v Speaker 2>That was brutal on Saturday. I don't know why. I mean,

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 2>does Oregon really have to play Portland State, Paul?

0:47:31.300 --> 0:47:33.450
<v Speaker 4>No, it's a fair point. For every Ole Miss LSU,

0:47:33.489 --> 0:47:35.030
<v Speaker 4>there's four other 55 games.

0:47:35.090 --> 0:47:37.730
<v Speaker 2>No, I agree. But if you're doing it right, then

0:47:37.770 --> 0:47:39.549
<v Speaker 2>you're all in on both, I think.

0:47:39.650 --> 0:47:42.029
<v Speaker 4>All right, last up, it's time for the feel-good here

0:47:42.090 --> 0:47:43.450
<v Speaker 4>before we ship you out of here to get ready

0:47:43.489 --> 0:47:46.430
<v Speaker 4>for Monday Night Football. Big game tonight. Here is the feel-good.

0:47:47.050 --> 0:47:48.009
<v Speaker 2>Pearl, what do we have here?

0:47:48.170 --> 0:47:50.540
<v Speaker 3>Okay, this is Brown's coach. Todd Munkin is running to

0:47:50.580 --> 0:47:53.920
<v Speaker 3>the tunnel. Oh, wait, what do I got here?

0:47:53.940 --> 0:47:54.420
<v Speaker 4>Is he in a leap?

0:47:55.350 --> 0:47:58.830
<v Speaker 3>No, he turns left and goes to the 11 Browns

0:47:58.870 --> 0:48:01.299
<v Speaker 3>fans that sort of waited out the rain.

0:48:01.340 --> 0:48:03.790
<v Speaker 2>To high-five their coach. First of all, he's 60.

0:48:03.780 --> 0:48:07.380
<v Speaker 3>He is moving really well. Here comes Spencer Fano. I

0:48:07.540 --> 0:48:11.049
<v Speaker 3>love Todd Munkin. Everything about him, his team is terrible.

0:48:11.070 --> 0:48:12.390
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to lie to you. That win doesn't

0:48:12.410 --> 0:48:15.290
<v Speaker 3>mean anything, but he is the best spirit in the NFL.

0:48:15.590 --> 0:48:16.690
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if he's going to last more than

0:48:16.730 --> 0:48:18.850
<v Speaker 3>two years in Cleveland, but I'm a super fan.

0:48:18.870 --> 0:48:20.350
<v Speaker 4>You know, when I saw him running there, he runs

0:48:20.390 --> 0:48:21.989
<v Speaker 4>kind of like I do, and I'm 12 years younger

0:48:22.010 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 4>than him. But I thought he was going to pop

0:48:24.219 --> 0:48:26.060
<v Speaker 4>a couple of hammies if he tried that Lambeau leap thing.

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:29.620
<v Speaker 3>No, I think he's probably a former football player. He's

0:48:29.660 --> 0:48:31.800
<v Speaker 3>one of those coaches older now, but he was probably

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:34.380
<v Speaker 3>an elite quarterback. Paul, no offense, but I think he's

0:48:34.420 --> 0:48:35.390
<v Speaker 3>got more athletic ability.

0:48:35.410 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 7>All right.

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:37.290
<v Speaker 4>Tune in to the Dan Patrick Show tomorrow. I think

0:48:37.330 --> 0:48:40.130
<v Speaker 4>Michael Irvin will join DP. And tonight, Monday Night Football.

0:48:40.190 --> 0:48:40.580
<v Speaker 2>Enjoy it.

0:48:40.870 --> 0:48:42.670
<v Speaker 4>And we'll wrap it up here on Not So Fast

0:48:42.690 --> 0:48:45.930
<v Speaker 4>tomorrow right after Dan Patrick's show. Noon Eastern on NBC

0:48:45.950 --> 0:48:47.589
<v Speaker 4>Sports Now and Peacock. That's it for us.

0:48:47.680 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 1>We're done.

0:48:49.340 --> 0:48:50.100
<v Speaker 4>Love the playmaker.

0:48:50.420 --> 0:48:50.540
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.