WEBVTT - Big Tech on Deck and Election Impact Across Assets

0:00:01.639 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>From Mahart where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Live from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Technology coming up, Big Tech on Deck, Alphabet, AMD, Reddit

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 3>after the bell, will talk you through what to.

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 4>Expect and so Fi just came out with their own earnings.

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 4>This morning, We're gonna speak with the ceo.

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 3>OUs shares of Trump media surge again getting briefly suspended

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 3>amid the volatility. We discussed the election impact across assets,

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 3>but first we check on the markets and I daral

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 3>into what some say is indeed a Trump trade. Bitcoin

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 3>powering ever higher, up another three percent. In fact, we're

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 3>training at the highest since March of this year. What

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 3>happened in March of this year, a record high. We

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 3>clip the seventy four thousand number. Of course, we hit

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 3>just below that back in March of twenty twenty four.

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:08.559
<v Speaker 3>We're up three percent, and all of this being thought

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 3>of is ultimately risk on many feeling that potentially this

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 3>is a signal of a Trump trade, but also option signaling. Look,

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 3>it's going to eighty thousand in November, no matter what

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 3>the election outcome.

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 5>But and you're looking at the.

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 4>Micro yeah, there's a lot of headlines that's hit in

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 4>the last hour or so. Tesla has seen a lot

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 4>of volatility. Elon Musk, speaking in Saudi Arabia at FII

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 4>and on the Trump trade, he said that actually, if

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 4>Trump gets to office, he's more optimistic his lofty goals

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 4>for SpaceX and Tesla will happen.

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 6>We'll get to that later in the program.

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 4>PayPal gave us guidance for the fourth quarter that missed expectations.

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 4>We will dig into that later in the show. The

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 4>stock on track for its biggest drop since February, and

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 4>big tech in ernest right, I think Alphabet, the parent

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 4>of Google, is the main focus. It's not just the

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 4>big AI name. But if you think about it in

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 4>the stock context, Caro, it's been disappointing.

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 6>For many investors.

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 4>They want signs that all the money being spent on

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 4>AI will translate that growth, particularly in cloud.

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 6>We should probably talk about that.

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 3>We should, and someone's been writing about exactly that, as

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 3>well as all the companies of course that are set

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 3>to report Reddit, AMD SNAP. We think of Google though

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 3>in particular as ed was laying out there, maybe just

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 3>trailing the magnificent seven piers because investors are trying to

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 3>struggle to price in antitrust risks and.

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 5>Many others that confront the company.

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Rand Rastelca is the guy who's been across this and

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 3>that there has been the sideways movement of Alphabet's shares.

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 3>How are people trying to think about any rosiness from

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 3>the earnings dialing into the anti trust picture?

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 7>Good morning, Thanks for having me so, Yeah, those are

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.399
<v Speaker 7>the two major issues people are focused on right now.

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 7>Most everyone I talked to remains pretty positive on Alphabet

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 7>as far as its fundamentals go. It's been showing improved

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 7>results in its cloud business. Advertising seems to be fairly strong,

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 7>which is of course key for the company search business.

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 7>But you do have the anti trust the regulatory picture.

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 7>There's been some rulings against the company and people aren't

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 7>quite yet sure how to you know, price this impact,

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 7>How severe is any punishment going to be? How long

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 7>is this going to remain in overhang on the shares?

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 7>What is the ultimate impact here? These are very unclear

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 7>right now, and that is something that is you know,

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 7>weighing on the stock right now. And kind of preventing

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 7>it from participating in the games that you've seen in

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 7>the other Max seven.

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 4>Stocks weighing on the stock and it could weigh at

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 4>the index level.

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 8>Right. You were writing over the.

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Weekend about how profit expectations for those MAG seven names

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 4>reporting this week are still way beyond the S and

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 4>P five hundred overall, but I think we're on track

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 4>for our basically lowest quarter of VPS expansion in six

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 4>quarters or something like that.

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 7>How high is the bar? Like, how braced are we

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 7>for this week? Well, it's really a company by company

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 7>kind of thing. In general, Like you said, earnings growth

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 7>for the Max seven is extremely strong, much stronger than

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 7>the overall market. But we have seen a deceleration in growth.

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 7>And given how much these stocks have moved up this year,

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 7>you have some of the major index components, Apple, Microsoft,

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 7>and so forth. These names are prett expensive rolled up

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 7>to their history, which does suggest there is a high

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 7>bar here. You have slowing growth, high multiples that leaves

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 7>limited room for error.

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 4>All right, Bloombo's Ryan for Selica, You've got to check

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 4>out his reporting before, during, and after the big tech

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 4>earnings beat.

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 6>Thank you so much. Let's keep a conversation going with Jay.

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 4>Jacobs, head of Thematic and Active ETF at Black Rock,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 4>which manages an astonishing eleven point five trillion dollars in

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 4>total for its clients, And same question to you. Alphabet's

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 4>one name, But if you think about the broad basket

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 4>of AI, hyperscaler, software, hardware, chip names that you track,

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 4>how braced are you for this week starting with Google?

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 7>Well, we're looking much further than just individual names. We

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 7>have identified artificial intelligence and digital disruption is a multi year,

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 7>if not multi decade, mega force that's going to have

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 7>a tremendous impact on the economy and markets. So while

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 7>earnings might have some directional information on how some of

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 7>this investment from hyperscalers are going with the adoption of

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 7>artificial intelligence, we're really looking three, five, ten years out

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 7>to see the landscape shifting impact of artificial intelligence on

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 7>the economy.

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 4>Jay Caro and I like looking to the horizon as

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 4>much as anyone else. But when the hyperscalers talk about CAPEX,

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 4>the market responds in all sorts of ways. You must

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 4>be a little bit excited or a little bit nervous

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 4>about the next twenty four hours.

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think What will be interesting about all of

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 7>this CAPEX, which could be almost a quarter of a

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:33.799
<v Speaker 7>trillion dollars, is that money is being spent on semiconductor companies.

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 7>It's being spent on data centers, it's being spent on

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 7>power infrastructure, and in some of our actively managed strategies

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 7>like BAI, which just launched a few days ago. It's

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 7>really looking at that infrastructure layer of artificial intelligence, where

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 7>all that CAPEX money is being spent to take advantage

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 7>of the revenue opportunities that we see today in artificial intelligence.

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting over in Saudi Arabia, many tech leaders, finance

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 3>leaders are speaking Massa Yoshisan, one of them talking about

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 3>how Nvidia is undervalued.

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 5>Now, Jay, I know you've thought a lot.

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 3>About ultimately the investment in the picks and shovels. Are

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 3>we too obsessed with one or two names? Do we

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 3>need to broaden out?

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 6>I think we are.

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 7>This is a much bigger story than just the mag

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 7>seven and just a handful of names and artificial intelligence.

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 7>We really look across the entire AI value chain or

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 7>the AI tech stack to find opportunities. I would really

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 7>bucket this in three layers. There's the AI infrastructure layer

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 7>that I just mentioned. That's about the semiconductors, that's about

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 7>the power infrastructure, It's about the data centers that are

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 7>providing that physical backbones artificial intelligence. The mid layer has

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 7>also gotten a fair amount of attention. That's where the models,

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 7>these large language models live, where a lot of the

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 7>proprietary data lives. But then on top of that is

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 7>the applications layer, and this is where we could see

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 7>some of the most significant growth over the long term,

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 7>which is really what are the companies that are embracing

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 7>artificial intelligence to build revolutionary products and Apple cations.

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 6>And I think if you.

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 7>Look across that AI tech stack, there's a lot of

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 7>opportunity that goes far beyond just the mag seven and

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 7>that's why we believe active management can be really powerful

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 7>and artificial intelligence to pick and choose those opportunities.

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk there for about some of the latest CTF

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 3>you've launched and those within them to give the exposure.

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 3>How broad are the names and how geographically broad are

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 3>they as well?

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 5>Is it all about the US?

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 7>So if you look at BAI, which is our Artificial

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 7>Intelligence and Technology Actively Managed GTF, it is largely focused

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 7>on the digital infrastructure layer right now, that's where we

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 7>see some of the most immediate opportunity because of all

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 7>of that capex spending by the hyperscalers. That's where the

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 7>flows of dollars are going today and therefore kind of

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 7>the most concrete part of the artificial intelligence opportunity. But

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 7>it is a highly concentrated portfolio. It really only has

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 7>about thirty four companies in it. That is our portfolio

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 7>managers really taking high conviction bets on which parts of

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 7>AI are going to.

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 4>Succeed, and so by compared Garrison, TEK is broad is

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 4>still right because you have the full spectrum of software

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 4>through too hardware, even the semiconductor names in there. What

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 4>I always think about JAY is like, take the semiconductor

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:17.239
<v Speaker 4>space right in the context of AI accelerators, Nvidia, Intel

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 4>and am D all compete with one another, but they

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 4>will see this very expansive and enduring market. Why is

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 4>the function of an ETF important to get the full

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 4>benefit of that?

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 7>Well, because this is again this says about an entire

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 7>value chain of opportunity. On one hand, you want high

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 7>conviction picks and the names that are going to win,

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 7>but at the same time, it's not about one or

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 7>two stocks in artificial intelligence, we believe the whole basket

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 7>of stocks is going to benefit in the ETF like

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 7>BAI delivers that very efficiently to investors.

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Jay, you've spelled out your long term viewpoint. But in

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 3>the short term we have earnings. We also have an

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 3>election in the US. From your perspective, is that a

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 3>moment to actively invest to change up the portfolio.

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 7>It can certainly introduce some volatility or uncertainty into the portfolio.

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.839
<v Speaker 7>But again, if we're looking thematically at artificial intelligence, this

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:09.839
<v Speaker 7>is an area where we see, you know, this is

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 7>longer than an election. This is longer than just the

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 7>next four years. Even this is something that's going to

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 7>play out over multiple decades. So near term volatility is

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 7>really less important to thematic investors than what is the

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 7>trajectory of artificial intelligence over the next several years, which

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 7>we remain very bolish on.

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 3>J Jacobs moaning British heado thematic and active ETFs at

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 3>black Plock, We thank you. Coming up, we'll take a

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 3>look at the volatility around Trump media shares, so push

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 3>ever higher this morning. The details and where you're looking

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 3>at well.

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk participated in a surprise conversation at the Future

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 4>Investment Initiative taking place in Riard to discuss the future

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 4>of AI solar energy, but also why he thinks AMA's

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 4>launch for Starship is more likely under a Trump presidency.

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 6>Listen to this.

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 2>I feel more optimistic about it with a Trump White

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 2>House and an point House because the biggest impedimental progress

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 2>that we're experiencing is regulatory is over regulation.

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Shares of Trump Media, the operator of the True Social site,

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 4>were suspended earlier today after they rose as much as

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 4>twenty one percent in pre market trading.

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 6>Trading later resumed. What's going on, Let's.

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 4>Bring in Bloomberg's baby Lipshaltz. I think we get this

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 4>idea that there's this thing called the Trump Trade and

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 4>that DJT because it's the parent company of Trump's social

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 4>media platform, Truth Social, is a part of that. But

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 4>explain the specificity of what happened this morning. I don't

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 4>get it.

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 9>Well, nothing makes sense and meanwhay.

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 10>So you have to go in understanding and acknowledging that

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 10>the thing with Trump Media shares, given the fact that

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 10>Donald Trump owns more about sixty percent of the stock,

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 10>is that it typically trades closely with the betting odds.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 10>So we've been tracking a number of betting markets that

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 10>have been shifting up into the right for Donald J.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 9>Trump to return to the White House.

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.319
<v Speaker 10>What we saw today with some of those volatility halls

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 10>by Mike count it was about five of them to

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 10>the up and downside is just simply an overwhelming amount

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 10>of activity and volatility. We saw volumes about six times

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 10>of what's normal in the first hour. So when you

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 10>see investors, whether that's retail traders who are pushing their

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 10>investments on things like Reddit or True Social itself, or

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 10>Wall Street professionals or even just auctions traders, that's what

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 10>we can see with some of these wild swings to

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 10>the up and downside, and just looking at today, it's

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 10>really emblematic of what we've been tracking. When you even

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 10>look back to when this spec deal was announced back

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 10>in October twenty twenty one, it.

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 5>Has generally been up into the right. Even if there

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 5>is volatility on an industry basis.

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 3>What two hundred and seventy two percent at least was

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 3>the number we counted yesterday over the last five trading weeks,

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 3>is it really the eye of the storm when it

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 3>comes to the so called Trump trade. What are the

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 3>names have been evolved in?

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 10>Meanwhile, it's the biggest one to keep an eye on,

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 10>and it is really the most indicative. Obviously, it trades

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 10>under DJT. That's Trump's initials, so the ticker symbol is

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 10>actually that closely tied in a line with the former president.

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 9>We also keep an eye on Rumble.

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 10>They're a Peter telbacked video platform, typically skewing towards a

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 10>more conservative audience, trying to also rally against big tech.

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 10>The company is also in partnerships with Trump Media itself.

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 10>We keep an eye on Funware, which really seems to

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 10>be more of, at least when I talk to investors,

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 10>more of a gambling mechanism. It was associated with some

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 10>of the past Trump campaigns, though doesn't appear to be

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 10>tied towards the twenty twenty four re election campaign, but

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 10>that also has gotten swept up in the shift as well.

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Bailey, you wrote a story on October twenty fifth, which

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 4>I appreciate seems like an eternity ago now that basically,

0:12:56.360 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 4>if Trump wins, it's hard to see what happens next

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 4>with True Social and DJT. But I think you were

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 4>talking more about its business, Like, what do we know

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 4>about this company as a company.

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 10>It operates and owns True Social, an X lookalike platform

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 10>that is one of the many kind of places that

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 10>Donald Trump will post.

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:21.599
<v Speaker 9>We do know ed in the first.

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 10>Half they reported just about one point six million dollars

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 10>in sales, so not profitable. One point six million in

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 10>sales or revenue is a drop in the bucket relative

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 10>to its multi billion dollar market evaluation. It has struggled

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 10>to retain users. We've seen that with third party apps.

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 10>The company doesn't actually disclose those metrics. We will be

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 10>closely keeping an eye on their third quarter results, which

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 10>should be coming in the next few weeks, just in

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 10>terms of what activity or at least what ad sales

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 10>look like going into the election. But when I talk

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 10>to some skeptics that they really call out the fact

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 10>that all eyes right now are on Trump's re election campaign.

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 10>So if the company is struggling to get anywhere near

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 10>training a profit and only had one point six million

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 10>dollars in first half sales, the question going forward is

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 10>how does that actually grow?

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 5>Bailey Lipshaw's we appreciate it, thank you.

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's stick with politics because Jeff Bezos defended The Washington

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Post's decision to stop endorsing presidential candidates, saying there was

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 3>a quote credibility gap afflicting the media industry and that

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 3>endorsing a candidate would create a perception of bias, and

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 3>the move by the billionaire owner of The Washington Post

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 3>prompted as many as two hundred thousand subscribers to cancel.

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 3>That's according to MPR. Bloomberg's Mike Shepherd joins us to discuss,

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 3>and Mike, I know you have a history what the

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Washington Post yourself, and just take us back in history.

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 3>How long have they been saying that they support certain candidates.

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 8>Well, first my own history.

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 11>I did work at the Washington Post for twenty two

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 11>years before joining Bloomberg in twenty eleven. So we do

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 11>have some long standing ties to that newsroom and a

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 11>lot of the good people that work there. And the

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 11>history that the moss with endorsing candidates goes all the

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 11>way back to when Jimmy Carter ran for the presidency.

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 11>So there is a history and a tradition. And one

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 11>of the concerns among people who are close to the

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:15.239
<v Speaker 11>newsroom and even outside observers is that this carries the appearance,

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 11>eleven days before the election, of not just stopping the

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 11>practice of endorsements, but spiking an editorial that was intended

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 11>to endorse Kamala Harris for the presidency. And this carries

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 11>the appearance of doing exactly what Jeff Bezos is trying

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 11>to avoid, or at least as he explained it during

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 11>in his article yesterday.

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 4>Mike, just the basics here of why we're talking about this.

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 4>Jeff Bezos the founder of Amazon, a high profile, an

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 4>incredibly rich person in the world of technology, and he

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 4>owns the Washington Post. Just take those basic facts and

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 4>explain the significance of this action.

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 11>Well, the signific against cannot be overstated. And it is

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 11>yet another twist and an election that has had a

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 11>historic number of surprises already. And it even caught the

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 11>attention of Kamala Harris this morning. She was interviewed on

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 11>the Breakfast Club syndicated radio program, calling it disappointing, but

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 11>then also tying Jeff Bezos, the world's second second richest

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 11>man after Elon Musk, to Donald Trump and other billionaires, saying, look,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 11>these are the people, the billionaires that Donald Trump is

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 11>more likely to support. Rather than mainstream Americans. And we

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 11>do see our own analysis here at Bloomberg indicates that

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 11>more billionaires have donated toward the Trump candidacy than non billionaires. Now,

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 11>when it comes to the tech industry, we do see

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 11>a little bit of a reversal of polarity. We do

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 11>see more of the wealthy tech founders, especially people like

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 11>Eric Schmidt and Bill Gates. They have thrown their lot

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 11>in with Kamala Harris, but overall, Harris is using this

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 11>moment to point to what she sees as billionaires leaning

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 11>toward Donald Trump.

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:12.120
<v Speaker 3>One billionaire just name checking Donald Trump over in Saudi Arabia,

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 3>a live stream of Ela Masque, just speak to the

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 3>impact that he's making.

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 11>Mike Well, his impact on the race cannot be overstated. First,

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 11>it's financial. He has put more than one hundred and

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 11>thirty two million dollars of his own money into a

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 11>superpack that is backing Donald Trump.

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 8>But he is also putting in something.

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 11>That's very precious for a guy who's running five companies,

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 11>and that is time. He has spent time on the

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 11>campaign trail in Pennsylvania and other states. He has been

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 11>with Donald Trump, including at the event in New York

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 11>at Madison Square Garden on Sunday, and he is seeing

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 11>in Donald Trump as he is seeing Donald Trump as

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 11>someone who can clear the path for some of his

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 11>own ventures and his own aspirations, including a trip to Mars.

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 11>And the President is being present former President Trump as

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 11>if he were to make a return to office, someone

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 11>who can clear the path when it comes to regulations.

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's the soundbit that we played early to Stay

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 4>of Blowburg's Michael Shepard. Thank you very much. It's time

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 4>for talking tech and first start. Indian food delivery platform

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Swiggy is seeking to sell shares for an IPO that

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 4>may raise one point three five billion dollars.

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 6>According to sources, The IPO will open for.

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 4>Bids from November sixth and shares he expected to start

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:41.679
<v Speaker 4>trading from November thirteen. Swingy's IPO follows Hyundai India's recent

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 4>record sale. Plus, Toshiba wants to reach double digit market

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 4>share in the world's power chip market by twenty thirty

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 4>as it lags behind rivals.

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 6>Toshiba may eventually form.

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 4>An alliance of companies that would corner thirty percent of

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 4>the industry. According to one of his executives and over

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 4>in Japan, Liberal Democratic Party heavyweight Akira Amari was defeated

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 4>in the general election. It removes one from parliament, one

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.479
<v Speaker 4>of the chip sector's biggest advocates, while concerns have been

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 4>growing over the amount of taxpayer money getting plowed into

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 4>that industry.

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 8>Of caroline.

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 3>In other international chip news and the Biden administration finalized

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 3>restrictions on investments by US individuals and companies into Chinese technology,

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 3>including semiconductors, quantum computing, artificial intelligence. Of course, Bloomberg's Mackenzie

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 3>Hawkins is here with more and this was long in

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 3>the making.

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 5>Just what is new in terms of these policies.

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 12>So this is sort of the last big shoot to

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 12>drop from the Biden Administration's restrictions on Chinese advanced tech development.

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 12>We've said a lot of time on the show talking

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 12>about export controls, restrictions on the sale of actual chips

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 12>and ship making components to companies in China. This is

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 12>restrictions on investments by American individuals and companies into Chinese

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 12>AI chip and quantum computing companies. The rules have been

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 12>in the works for over a year. There was originally

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 12>fears that the investment restrictions would cover a broader swath

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:08.959
<v Speaker 12>of industries, but officials say they're aiming for a narrowly

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 12>targeted approach looking at technologies that are key to US

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 12>and Chinese national security.

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 4>It's been some time, I think, since we've discussed the

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 4>sector in these terms. But the target is American mutual funds,

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 4>large venture capital firms, other technology companies that want to

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.360
<v Speaker 4>get a placehold on some of China's tech. Right, I'm

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 4>trying to understand McKenzie, who would be subject to these controls?

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 11>Right?

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 12>So there are exemptions for certain types of investments, such

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 12>as publicly traded securities or certain limited partner investments, but

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 12>the goal is really to capture American capital and then

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 12>know how that officials say comes with American capital going

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 12>into early stage investments in Chinese startups. So, you know,

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 12>officials brief reporters on there were frictions before they were

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 12>formally announced, and they pointed to a report by a

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 12>think tank based here which found that between twenty fifteen

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 12>and twenty twenty one, of all of the global transactions

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 12>investing in Chinese AI companies, seventeen percent involved American investors,

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 12>and of that around nine and ten were at the

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.479
<v Speaker 12>venture capital stage. So that's the type of investment that

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 12>officials are aiming to capture with these rules.

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 3>The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman saying his nation strongly deplodes,

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 3>infirmly rejects these new US restrictions. They didn't come into

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 3>force briefly until January the second.

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 5>Is there any way that these could be subject to change? Mackenzie?

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 12>So this is sort of the last leg of what

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 12>has been a very long rulemaking process, and this is

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 12>a final rule. So it's highly, highly unlikely that things

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 12>would change between now and January. Tewod. They wouldn't only

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:49.919
<v Speaker 12>investments going forward.

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 5>It's not a retroactive policy, Megs.

0:21:52.359 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Mackenzie Holkins. Wait, thank you, Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology.

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hyde in.

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 6>New York and I'm me d love Lo in San Francisco.

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Quick check on these markets, because while we're pushing higher

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 3>on the Nastack and then Astak one hundred, we're up

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 3>about five ten percent now, so near trading highs of

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 3>the day and in fact training highs. Ever, because we

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 3>are close about two hundred points on the NASAK one

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 3>hundred to its record high set back in July.

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 5>So we keep an eye on those numbers.

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 3>We want to dig into some of the individual movers

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 3>because we are thick and fast and earning season and

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 3>really Cadence Design Systems doing particularly well, having its best

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 3>day since March of twenty twenty, up eleven percent. It's

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 3>numbers coming in strong, it's revenue posting growth of about

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 3>nineteen percent, and it's all about Cadence dot AI basically

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 3>in the design workflow artificial intelligence now integral, says the CEO.

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 5>We're seeing AMD.

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 3>We're going to see the numbers after the bell, and look,

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 3>we're pretty buoyant and running into them more than two

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 3>percent higher. The question is AI accelerators. Are they managing

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 3>to make inroads on Nvidia and how much of the

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 3>market share and they manage to take from the likes

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 3>of Intel. When it comes to the BC and it

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.679
<v Speaker 3>comes to as the server business, PayPal look disappoints, even

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 3>though we saw the third quarter fiscal third quarter do

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 3>well in terms of profits on the revenue forecast, disappointed

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 3>and the shares have run up into these earnings well

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 3>by about five percent.

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 11>Ed.

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 6>What have you got?

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 4>Some other headlines in the last thirty minutes. Apples overhauled

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 4>the design of its Mac Mini desktop computer for the

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 4>first time in about fifteen years, cutting the device's size

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 4>to five inches across and adding a Speedia M four

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 4>chip series doing Bose Mark German joins us in San Francisco.

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 4>This is kind of consistent, right with what Apple is

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 4>doing with new gen of different hardware, platform size and

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 4>then updating the processor.

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 6>What else do we know?

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's quite interesting.

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 13>So last year this time they held an event called

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 13>Scary Fast timed around Halloween. They launched the three new chips,

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 13>a bunch of new Macs, but it was a thirty

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 13>minute kino and it's sort of disappeared, as you will,

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 13>on Halloween right after that. This time around, they're doing

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 13>three launches three days in a row. Yesterday Monday was

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 13>the iMac with the M four, Today is the Mac

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 13>Mini with the M four and M four Pro. Tomorrow

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 13>will be the new MacBook pros at the M four,

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 13>M four Pro and M four Max. This new Mac

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.479
<v Speaker 13>Mini looks extremely impressive. It's probably the most impressive new

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 13>mac that I've seen from them since the current MacBook

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 13>Pro design launched three years ago. Two inches tall, five

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 13>inches across, super cool, super powerful two ports on the front,

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 13>now matching the Mac.

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 6>Studio as you reported, would be the case.

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 13>I think this is going to be a very hot seller.

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 13>People like to use these to connect them to TVs

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:30.959
<v Speaker 13>gaming setups, and they're also extremely popular in the enterprise

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 13>and in server environment. So this is a nice launch

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 13>for Apple, a.

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Nice launch and necessary when you're baking in the markets

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 3>expectations to growth at this company. We had key Bank,

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 3>the analyst there last week saying, look, we very rarely

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 3>have geographical growth and every product growing in terms of revenue,

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 3>but the market seems to be baking that in mark How.

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 5>Likely is it that we're going to see such growth

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 5>do you think.

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 13>Well, well, the Mac Mini is only going to be

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:55.479
<v Speaker 13>a very incremental part of that.

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 13>They'll generate sales here, but probably they'll sell maybe a

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 13>billion dollar worth of these tops through the end of

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 13>the year, maybe even a little bit less than that.

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 13>So this is not a super material.

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 8>Launch for them.

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 13>It's really a cool launch that gets people in the

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 13>Mac community really interested. It sets up the design for

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 13>this product, hopefully not for the next fifteen years like

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 13>the last design, but certainly this is a nice launch

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 13>for them. But it's not important from a financial standpoint,

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 13>like let's say a new iPhone or iPad mark.

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 4>Overnight, our colleagues in India reported some interesting numbers about

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 4>exports from that country for Apple, So not necessarily the

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 4>end market, but what they're doing there and then selling

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 4>to the world.

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 6>What do we know?

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 13>India's becoming an increasingly important part of the overall Apple

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.719
<v Speaker 13>story in terms of production and in terms of sales.

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 13>I think you're a one day going to see more

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 13>product development happen there as well if you have some

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 13>engineering labs, particularly for maps testing there as well. So

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.479
<v Speaker 13>India is incrementally becoming a bigger part of the Apple story.

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 13>I don't think they're ever going to drop China totally,

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 13>but they're inching towards India becoming the new China.

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Al German, we thank you. Let's turn our attention to

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Netflix now. It's in talks to release Gretagog's upcoming remake

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 3>of the Chronicles of Narnia on Imax screams globally. This

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 3>would be one of these streaming platform's biggest business deals

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 3>with cinemas.

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 5>According to sources. Let's bring in mus Lucas.

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Shore and they have done it before, but this would

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 3>once again be sort of an interesting area for them

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 3>to push.

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, like Netflix has largely embraced movie theaters when they

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 14>have worked with filmmakers that want that. Think about Martin

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 14>Scorsese with The Irishman or Alfonso Corone with Roma.

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 8>You know this is no different.

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 14>Greta Gerwig coming off of Barbie has a lot of

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 14>clout in the Hollywod community. Netflix was very excited to

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 14>get her to adapt the sort of legendary series of

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 14>children's books. But she wants to see those movies in theaters,

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 14>and so Netflix is going to try to work with

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 14>her without sort of violating its beliefs about putting movies

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 14>in its on its screens and on as streaming service

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 14>prompt for its customers.

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 4>Lucas, I don't think we've ever had the chance to

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 4>discuss this with you, but basically, how does Hollywood see.

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 6>Netflix in this field of like big fiction?

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 4>I think about Rebel Moon and Atlas Jennifer Lopez, like,

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 4>personally those were great, but I guess they want big

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 4>hits the world over Narnia.

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 8>Well, Atlas actually was a reasonable hit.

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 14>I mean I think, yeah, you're right that Netflix has

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 14>tried a lot with these sort of world building science

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 14>fiction projects, largely because it doesn't sit on a trove

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 14>of historical intellectual property like Disney and Warner Brothers and

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 14>other studios do, so it's had to invest a lot

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 14>more in original properties when it has gone outside of

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 14>that and tried to buy ip that it could use,

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 14>like it did a deal with the did a deal

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 14>with a royal doll.

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 8>Now it's not this Narnia. I mean, look, it could work.

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 8>I don't know.

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 14>Their track record on the quality of those movies, I'd

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 14>say is sort of mid to poor, but people do

0:27:57.440 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 14>tend to watch them, just because people watch whatever's on

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 14>Netflix that has a big budget Netflix puts in front

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 14>of them.

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 3>Well said, it's interesting what they lose because of not

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 3>always going for the big screen. Emerald Fanal for example,

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Hernie Wuthering Heights.

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 5>They didn't want to.

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Go in Netflix because of this. So is IMAX going

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 3>to satisfy Greta Gerwig?

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 5>Do you think?

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 14>I think it'll satisfy her for this project.

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 8>You know, I don't think Greta.

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 14>Gerwig will want to make all of her movies at

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 14>Netflix or her next several movies at Netflix. You know,

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 14>I could be wrong, obviously, if this becomes a huge

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 14>success and she wants to do it again, she could.

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 14>But what we've tended to see is big name filmmakers

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 14>like Greta Gerwig, like Alfonso Corone, they want to see

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 14>their movies and theaters and so they will mostly do that.

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 14>But if there's a project that they are particularly drawn

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 14>to or that no other studio will make and Netflix

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:50.479
<v Speaker 14>will step forward, they'll do it, and especially because Netflix

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 14>will often satisfy the budgetary requirements that they have or want.

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 14>But it's sort of a you know, a temporary waystation

0:28:57.560 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 14>for a lot of these big filmmakers and not a home,

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 14>whereas Christopher Nolan, for example, another filmmaker, likes to find

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 14>a home.

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:03.239
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 14>He was at Warner Brothers for several years. Now it

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 14>seems like he's going to be at Universal for the

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 14>foreseeable future.

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, they've got money spend what is it, at least

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and seventy five million on this Narnia one, Lucas, Sure,

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 3>we thank you.

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 8>Ed Yeah.

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Coming up on the show, how a Spanish brain computer

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 4>interface company is taken on Neuralink.

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 6>That's why we're looking forward to Carro.

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, meanwhile, what's in a here and now ed bitcoin crypto?

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 3>You've been keeping it close on it, as we all have.

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 5>Look.

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 3>At one point it touched seventy two thousand dollars. We

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 3>haven't done that since April, but we are very close

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 3>to the record high setback in March of this year,

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 3>which is close to seventy four thousand dollars.

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 8>Just under it.

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 5>Well we get there. We're up three percent.

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:45.479
<v Speaker 3>Options traders think it's going to get to eighty thousand

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 3>come what may in the election by the end of November.

0:29:48.280 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 3>This is Blomberg Technology. We hear a lot about Elo

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Musque's brain computer startup Neuralink, but it is far from

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 3>being the only player in the field.

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 5>Take in Brain.

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 3>It's a European company building devices that could one day

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 3>treat neurological disorders like Parkinson's disease.

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 5>The startup just announced today that it's.

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Raised fifty million dollars to develop its graphic based mural technologies.

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring in the CEO co founder, Carolina Aguila for more,

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 3>and Carolina, just how soon might we see such things

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 3>as Parkinson's and other diseases tackled?

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 5>And how.

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you for having me here and hello

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>on New York. Well very soon, because we already treated

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 1>two patients on our safety at study and last year

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:48.479
<v Speaker 1>we already obtained FDA breakthrough designation, so we actually provide

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to the FDA reasonable proof of superiority versus car and neuromolation.

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's I mean, this funding round, which is significant,

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:58.719
<v Speaker 1>is going to help us to get there in the

0:30:58.760 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>next few years.

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 6>Let's go back to basics really quickly.

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 4>So synchron does this sort of intravenously with a stint

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 4>neural link is the insertion of very very thin wires

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 4>directly into the brain.

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 6>How does your technology work?

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, it is a technology that it sits on

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the brain, on the cortex of the brain, and also

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>has a deeper probe that it's inserted more into the

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>basal ganglia and together, actually it's able to decode in

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a bidirectional communication with the brain specific biomarkers that are

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>disrupted in diseases like Parkinson's disease and actually restore such functions.

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>So we call it busy itherapeutics because this bi directional

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>communication with the brain is actually able to decode so

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to read, but also right into their brain and actually

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>restore the function.

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 4>We're showing a video which is demonstrating that right now.

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 4>So fifty million dollars you know in your development process

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 4>and scaling of the technology, where we deploy that money.

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, these fans are extremely important to continue the clinical

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>trials that we are now conducting. We are on boarding

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>up to ten patients for this safety trial that also

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to show the superiority of graphine rescues current

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>metals like platin idiom. To expand the team because we

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>need very much excellent talent across boards. So we are

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>developing the semiconductor process of the interfaces, but also the electronics,

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the software, the artificial intelligence. So we have already sixty people,

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>but we are missing some key pieces that would like

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to recruit and also to continue the platform development to

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the final pivotal that leads to the conversization.

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 3>So many people listening will be so excited at the

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 3>idea that Parkinson's disease, that epilepsy, the strokes can in

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 3>some way be tackled with this who from a venture

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 3>community is excited to put the money in, whereas the

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 3>ultimate return the reward for them when it comes to

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 3>your own growth.

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, we are seeing deep tech fans very, very interested

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>on this field. I think in the past it's been

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a traditional healthcare metech BC driven world, and now dep tech,

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>with the emergence of semiconductors, is also willing to chip

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in big time into the development of such ventures. The end,

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we're at the convergence of metech digital but also the

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor world now that chips act. It's fuel and also

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money.

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 6>In the US, but also in.

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Europe, this community has bigger funds and is willing to

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>make this happen.

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 4>Tarlina, what's the regulatory environment like for this in Europe

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 4>relative I guess to the United States where we'll see

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 4>this in the real world.

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>First, yeah, we are regulated by the medical device regulatory bodies,

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>So for US it's very important to get, for instance,

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 1>what we call a C mark. It's a very similar

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>process to the one in the US. Whoever, I think

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in the US there's been a tremendous progress with FDA

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:24.280
<v Speaker 1>actually being extremely supportive with the FDA Breakthrough Designation program

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 1>but also the TAP program that we belong to, and

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>basically we are able to meet monthly FDA to discuss

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the hurdles and the questions that we have

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>in order to develop this conversization at the speed. So

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence is one of the subjects that we've been

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>treating in the last months, month after months, and this

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is something that Europe still doesn't have. But I hope

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's coming soon because it's extremely useful for innovation

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 1>and to not get people lost, which is also.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Waste of money in brain. CEO and co founder Caroline Aguila,

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 4>thank you so much. Sofi Technology has raised its profit

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 4>guidance for a third time this year. Is it benefited

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 4>from efforts to expand beyond its student lending business here

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:26.800
<v Speaker 4>with Sofi and its results right now down seven percent.

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 4>I think the bar was pretty high going into this.

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 4>That that does put it on track for its biggest

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 4>drop since August.

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 6>What's going on?

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 4>Let's ask the CEO, Anthony noto and Anthony, you know

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 4>the story in the Court of Gone. It's kind of

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 4>the result of the work you've put into so far

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:44.839
<v Speaker 4>doing more. Just explain that a little and where you're

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:48.720
<v Speaker 4>bearing fruit in sort of diversifying business lines right now?

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 15>Sure, First to your point about the stock the study

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 15>is of about forty forty percent in the last month,

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:57.800
<v Speaker 15>So it came into the quarter after a very big

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 15>increase in value over the last thirty days. So I

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.280
<v Speaker 15>think we're seeing some of that being taken off the table.

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:07.760
<v Speaker 15>But we had our best quarter as a public company.

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 15>We had record revenue. The growth rate of the revenue

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:14.360
<v Speaker 15>accelerated to thirty percent year of year. That growth was

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 15>driven by sixty four percent year of year growth in

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 15>our financial services and our technology platform revenue taken as one,

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 15>that now accounts for forty nine percent of our total revenue.

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 15>And so we're not just a lender anymore, is the

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:29.959
<v Speaker 15>key message. And this is a historic day for us.

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:32.359
<v Speaker 15>Not only is it historic revenue, but we're to that

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 15>fifty to fifty split between lending and mind lending that

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:38.800
<v Speaker 15>we wanted to drive to to really continue to diverse

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 15>fire revenue. We've been able to overcome a really tumultuous

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 15>environment over the last five years to deliver seventeen quarters

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 15>of consecutive seventeen quarters of record revenue growth and improving profitability,

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:53.760
<v Speaker 15>and we finally got to the point where the business

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 15>is fifty to fifty, which is right where we.

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 9>Wanted to be.

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 15>The strength is really driven by the frigal services products

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.399
<v Speaker 15>growing thirty seven percent year of a year, and that's

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 15>driving the revenue growth that I mentioned.

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 4>Part of this sort of slow down response in the

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 4>stock I think is some investors looking at your comments

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 4>about balance sheet growth longer term low single digit growth.

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 6>What would you be a response to that? Please?

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 15>We want to grow our revenue twenty to twenty five

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 15>percent compounded annually, so there's a lot of different drivers

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 15>to get there. We do not necessarily need to grow

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:28.320
<v Speaker 15>a balance sheet at that rate, and in fact, we

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 15>don't plan to grow a balance sheet at that rate.

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 15>We've made a migration to more fee based revenue streams

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 15>that are capital light in high ROI. This was our

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 15>first large quarter of generating loan platform business revenue. It's

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 15>a business we've been in since twenty nineteen, but it

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 15>was a big contributor to both our growth and revenue

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 15>as well as profitability. So we don't need to grow

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 15>the balance sheet faster than it has been growing. In fact,

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 15>we want to take risk off the table and leverage

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 15>the other pieces of our businesses or other pieces of

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:59.919
<v Speaker 15>our business that are fee based. In the core, about

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 15>one hundred and seventy five million dollars of our revenue

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 15>was from fee based revenue and growing a meaningful amount

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 15>year of year.

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Let's just talk about putting that lever and indeed a

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 3>sixty four percent jump in the financial services and the

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 3>tech platform segments. Where else can you invest there to

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:18.319
<v Speaker 3>ensure that sixty four percent is something you continue sure.

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 15>Within the financial services segment, we have several businesses. We

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 15>have our Sofi Money business, which is benefiting from a

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 15>high interest rate. We're seeing great growth in deposits two

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:32.280
<v Speaker 15>point four billion dollars of member deposit growth, really strong

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 15>spending annualized ten billion dollars of spending, and so we'll

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.320
<v Speaker 15>continue to grow that member base at a really high clip.

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 15>Second is our invest business. It's also growing meaningfully year year.

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 15>We also have our credit card business, and of course

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:48.800
<v Speaker 15>our business that provides referrals to other financial services product

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 15>which we call Lantern. And then as I mentioned, the

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 15>loan platform business. That business itself grew over one hundred

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 15>percent year of year and it's annualizing now to billion

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 15>dollars with really strong improvement and profitability. So we'll keep

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 15>driving product and member growth in that business. In the

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 15>thirty plus percent range, and that will then follow with

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 15>revenue growth at are above that level over time.

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Talk to us about the macro, because you're saying to

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 3>investors you feel really good about the current environment, that

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:18.320
<v Speaker 3>headwinds and dissipated anything.

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 5>That worries you.

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we're all still bracing for an election, and

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 3>that feels like quite a lot of lack of transparency.

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 14>Yeah.

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 15>I do think there's still a degree of uncertainty out there,

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 15>but I think the trends are clear that we're going

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 15>into a declining rate environment versus an increasing rate environment

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 15>and a declining rate environment. We have several businesses that

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 15>will benefit meaningfully. Our home loans business will benefit from

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 15>more financing. Our student loan refinance and business will allow

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 15>people to refinance their student loans at a lower rate

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.399
<v Speaker 15>in a lower rate environment, and so those businesses will

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.399
<v Speaker 15>have a tailwind for sure. In addition to that, as

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 15>rates come down, the rates that other competitive banks are

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 15>offering their members or their clients will also come down,

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 15>and we will be able to maintain a super your

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:02.879
<v Speaker 15>rate compared to them because we also own the lending

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:05.799
<v Speaker 15>origination platform, so we can use the two of them

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 15>as a competitive advantage. To drive a better apy than

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 15>our competitors broadly defined. And then lastly, within that business,

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 15>our credit card business. We just launched two new credit

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 15>cards that we think uniquely meet the needs of our

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 15>members that have a lot of growth prospects behind them

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 15>as well.

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 4>Anthony, what's your M and A plan from here? For

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:26.839
<v Speaker 4>things you don't already have.

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 15>We're heads down. We're not focused on M and A

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:32.280
<v Speaker 15>at all. We're not focused on capital raises. We're focused

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 15>on growing our business organically twenty to twenty five percent

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 15>in revenue on a year of your basis balance sheet

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 15>growing much slower than that, and continue to build unaided

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 15>brand awareness. Our unaated brand awareness is a key to

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 15>become a household brand name. It's a key to become

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 15>a trusted partner in a business where people have to

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 15>trust you to give give you their money. And we've

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 15>driven that up forty percent year of year to seven percent.

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 15>Our goals to get it into the thirty percent range.

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:58.800
<v Speaker 15>We're well in our way and making great progress.

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 5>Have you got any worries about the consumer at this point? Anthony?

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 5>And consumer credit quality?

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 15>Sure, our credit has actually continued to improve. We saw

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:12.239
<v Speaker 15>a peak and credit normalization in Q one, and it's

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:15.799
<v Speaker 15>gotten better each quarter since then. That said, you know,

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:18.399
<v Speaker 15>we're very vigilant and making sure that we think will

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:21.400
<v Speaker 15>be in a stable economy. Declining rates with a recession

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:24.360
<v Speaker 15>would not be great. Declining rates with a stable economy

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 15>would be great. And that's what our current forecast has

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 15>for twenty five.

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 4>And see we literally have thirty seconds the election. How

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:31.759
<v Speaker 4>are you brace for it?

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 15>You know, we can work with whatever administration we have.

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 15>There are different characteristic of the administration that could be

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:42.959
<v Speaker 15>more favorable for our business. I would say generally, more

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 15>favorable capital markets would be welcomed. More favorable treatment towards

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 15>businesses would also be welcomed. There's a lot of opportunity

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:55.720
<v Speaker 15>that sometimes gets stifled by different approaches as it relates

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 15>to capital markets, to M and A from the different agencies.

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 15>So we're looking for a good balanced approach from whatever

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 15>administration wins. But we're prepared to work with both ends

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 15>of the aisle.

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 3>So FI CEO Anthony Notta, thank you so much for

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:11.320
<v Speaker 3>joining us on your earnings.

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 5>We appreciate it now.

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 3>That does it for a very busy edition of Bloomberg

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Technology and more earnings coming thick and fast after the ballot.

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:19.399
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that was a good way of ending it though.

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:22.279
<v Speaker 4>A really interesting conversation recap on the podcast. You know

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:24.879
<v Speaker 4>where to find the pods online on all the platforms

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:27.280
<v Speaker 4>you'd expect. It is going to be a massive week

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 4>the megacap Tech earnings starting Earnest Affter the Bell from

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 4>the team in New York City and the team out

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 4>here in San Francisco.

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 6>Stay with us this week. This is Bloomberg Technology