WEBVTT - Sheryl Sandberg's Legacy at Meta and the Big Bet on Crypto

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where Innovation, money and power Collie

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. Hi'm Emily Chang in New York and this

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. He

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>helped introduce RYL Samberg to Mark Zuckerberg and the rest,

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>they say is history. I'll be joined by Roger mcnaman

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that meeting, Samberg's legacy and where the

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:42.480
<v Speaker 1>company goes from here. Plus he sat on Facebook's board

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>for seven years, He's known Samberg for more than twenty.

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>My exclusive conversation with Don Graham on Samberg's role in

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>building the company and where Meta goes from here? And

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>inflation keeps raging, no relief in sight according to President

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.959
<v Speaker 1>By This as the market and tech and cryptos dock

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in particular, keep whip sawing. We will be joined by

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Sebastian Malaby, author of a new book, The Power Law,

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>about whether Silicon Valley can hold onto its role as

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a center of power. Later in the hour, why do

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 1>you want to stay on Samberg's exit now from met

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>end what it means for the company going forward. I'm

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>joined by Jasmine Emberg principal analysts for Insider Intelligence. She

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>covers social media and influencers look jasmine from a business perspective.

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Controversy about the business model aside. How confident are you

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that Meta can keep the money machine running without Cheryl Samberg? Well,

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you know. First of all, we have to

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>address how powerful um Sandberg was able to build um

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Meta's ad business When she started In two thousand and eight,

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we at the market are now Insider Intelligence estimated that

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's worldwide ad revenues were just two hundred and fifty

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. Now, within two years that figure had grown

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to one point three billion dollars, and flash forward to today,

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Meta is the second largest digital ad seller in the

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>world after Google. I mean, it's safe to say that

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the new leadership certainly has their work cut out for

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>them to continue growing um metas business. But um It's

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>still in a pretty good place despite all of the

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>headwinds that it is facing right now. One Bloomberg take

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>put it like this, Cheryl Sandberg is leaving Facebook at

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a perilous moment. What is your outlook on how fast

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Instagram and WhatsApp can continue to grow while

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the company is making this massive pivot to the metaverse,

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and you're absolutely right. I mean, Meta is in the

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>process of undergoing this massive shift towards the metaverse, and

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you know it is going to be something that is

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty far down the line. It is still

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>years and years away for the metaverse to become a reality.

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And right now there are some really immediate challenges that

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Facebook has to grapple with and Instagram has to grapple

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>with as well. That as an ad revenue slowdown, that

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is a slowdown in user growth, it is also slowdown

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 1>in time spent on on Facebook. Now Instagram of course,

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>has been able to pick up the flack for Facebook

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>for quite some time. That's proving to be more difficult.

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Um So it's going to require quite a bit of

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 1>discipline and innovation to continue growing all of Meta's platforms.

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Jasmine Hamburg, Insider Intelligence principal analyst. Thank you, Jasmine. Obviously

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>lots remains to be seen. Now Sandberg might never have

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>been at Facebook if it wasn't for my next guest.

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>He was an early investor and a mentor to Mark Zuckerberg.

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Here's Roger McNamee describing how he helped broker their partnership.

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>It's Sheryl Sandberg. Have you ever met her? He said,

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I sugar hands once at a party I

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know at all, and I said, I want to

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>try to get her to come and talk to you

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>about being your chief operators somewhere, And next thing you know,

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>she goes there is the chief operating officer, at which

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>point basically they didn't need me anymore. I mean, she's

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>way smart, and I am I mean one of the

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>most I mean one of the most capable people I

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>have ever met in any way. Joining me now Roger mcmee,

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>co founder of Elevation Partners and author of the book

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>Zucked Waking Up to the Facebook Catastrophe. So, Roger, we

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>all know that your feelings about Facebook have changed over

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the years. I'm so curious what your first thought was

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>when you saw the news that Cheryl was leaving. I

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>take no joy in Sheryl Sandberg's resignation is CEO of Meta.

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>For me, it's a really complicated situation because Cheryl was

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 1>for many years a friend of mine and somebody I

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 1>advised when she worked in the Clinton White House. She

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>was responsible for introducing me to my future business partner,

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>bono and for that, I'll always be incredibly grateful, and

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I tried to reciprocate. She came out to Silicon Valley

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand one, hung out in my office for

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks, and I introduced her to John Dore,

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>who was on the board at Google, which began the

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 1>process of her going to work at Google and creating

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the add engine behind AdWords, which obviously put Google on

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the map economically. So Cheryl and I were really close,

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and when she made it clear to me that she

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about leaving Google, I thought that Facebook was

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the right place for her, and so I talked to

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Mark about it for months, and you know, he definitely

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted a strong number two, and I think he was

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out in his own mind what factors

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>would really matter. But Cheryl had I thought two things

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>that really were decisive. The experience at Google was the

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>closest you're ever going to get to the business problem

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>faced at Facebook. And secondly, you know, she had a

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>maturity and an experience both in the political and the

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>business realm that I thought would really complement mark strengths.

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 1>And keep in mind, I think when she went there,

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>they had fewer than a hundred million users. And so

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it was for me at least not possible at that

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>time to imagine the kind of harms that eventually came

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>out of Facebook, in part because the business model that

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>did the harm wouldn't be invented for another five years.

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>And so it you know, I look back on it

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and I go, oh my god, what could have been?

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Cheryl is so talented, you know, she could

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>have both made a very successful company at Google and

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>been a hero for democracy and public health. And how

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>could she have done that? How could she have done that? Roger, Well,

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>let's take a few simple examples. So in Facebook was

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>implicated by the United Nations in an ethnic cleansing that

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>took place in mean Mar, a country in Asia in

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>which Facebook had no employees on the ground, had almost

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>no employees that spoke the language, and they certainly had

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>no expertise in need of the politics or the culture

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of the country. And it became clear that the product

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>was being used by bad actors to instigate in ethnic cleansing.

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And different company, a different group of people might have

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>taken that as a warning. It might have said, you know,

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>we really shouldn't be doing business in countries where we

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have an economic interest in having people on the ground,

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>where we're not willing to invest in the language, where

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>we're not willing to invest in the culture. That kind

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of thing is super oubes. The FBI warren Facebook in

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>early that Q and On was a very dangerous extremist

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>group and they weren't Facebook. That there was a lot

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of recruiting going on on Facebook, and Facebook ignored it.

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Between twenty nineteen Spring of twenty nineteen the spring, about

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a one year period, roughly two million people were radicalized

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>into Q and On on Facebook. And again that's based

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook admitting that there were at least three million

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>members of Q and on groups by and internal Facebook

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>reports released by the whistle Blower that showed that's sixty

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time when people joined an extremist group

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, it's just Facebook recommended, and so they were

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>responsible for that. Those are things that a different group

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of people I would have said, you know what, we

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be involved in that, because if they've

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>taken action on Q and on, they might have prevented

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the insurrection, because the people who participated the insurrection have

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>been radicalized into Q and at first, and again, all

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of these things are about the culture of the company.

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you prioritize the well being of the people who

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>use your product? Do you prioritize the well being of

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the people affected by your product? And the reality was

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>they viewed shareholder interest as the only thing that matters,

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and so when it came time to thinking about their

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>users or the other people affected by it, that just

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a consideration. And it's that's certainly not unique to Facebook.

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>What was unique to Facebook was the impact that it

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>could have on those people, either in a pandemic or

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in an election cycle, or related to some kind of

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>extreme it. So clearly you think her legacy is complicated,

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think many people would agree with you. Let's

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about where Facebook or Meta is now going. I

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>asked her about this pivot to the metaverse and whether

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>having to create a whole new business model or evolve

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's current business model for a future that doesn't yet

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>exist was one of the reasons she's leaving. Take a

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>listen to what she told me when we spoke. We

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>have a current business, which is our current apps connecting

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>customers to businesses, and I think there's a lot of

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunity there right right now, but also over the long run,

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 1>and then the metaverse is a much longer term business opportunity,

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to take some of the same form

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and that I believe we will be a place and

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>then the metaverse will be a place where businesses and

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 1>consumers connect. But I think the exact form that takes

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>in something that will be figured out over the next

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>number of you a much longer term. How optimistic are

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you about Meta realizing this future of the metaverse, turning

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>it into a business, And what do you think the

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>company looks like without Cheryl Sandberg as it moves towards

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>this new, but you know, very uncertain future. Emily, I

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>think Facebook's near term is complicated enormously by Apple's application tracking,

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>transparency and whatever things that follow that, which give iPhone

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>users the ability to opt out of having their data

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>shared with Facebook and others. Facebook's already said that that's

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be a ten million, ten billion dollar hit

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to revenue this year, and it wouldn't shock me if

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the number got bigger than that, because I don't think

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple's done. Secondly, Instagram, which has really been supporting the

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>growth of the business, is under assault from TikTok, and

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I do think that TikTok is essentially locking Instagram into

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the group of users it has today by siphoning off

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>all the new entrants into social media, and that's really

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>bad for Facebook's growth long term. And then you get

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.839
<v Speaker 1>to the metaverse, where I think Facebook's current concept of

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse is insane. I mean, to my mind, virtual

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>reality is a brilliant idea, and if you focus narrowly,

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>if you say focus on video games, for example, the

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunities are unlimited. But the way Facebook's looking at it,

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>where they're essentially going to try to replace reality with

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a virtual reality across every possible doll mean, entertainment, work, sports,

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the whole nine yards. To me, that's just that's never

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna work. And the amount of money they're spending on

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>it today, I just think it's certifiably insane. If I

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>were a shareholder, I would be incensed about this, because

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 1>it's not that the metaverse is a terrible idea, it's

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that their idea of the metaverse is a terrible idea.

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think it matters how long they take.

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>They're just by the time they get there, it won't

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>be interesting. Roger McNamee Elevation Partners. Always great to have

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you here, Roger, thank you for sharing your thoughts with us.

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Now onto a Bloomberg exclusive. We've learned that Tiger Global's

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund has lost a whopping fifty this year, and

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>in a letter to investors, the firm is vowing to

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 1>try and earn that money back. Joining his now Sebastian Malaby,

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Senior Fellow at the Council on Form Relations, for more

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>on this and the wider venture capital landscape. He is

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 1>also the author of The Power Law, Capital and the

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Making of the New Future, a book on the rise

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of VC and Silicon Valley. Sebastian, so great to have

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you with us. I want to start on this Tiger

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Global news because you have pointed out that Tiger Global

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>has been writing massive checks for companies with very little revenue.

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>How big a problem has this been in Silicon Valley.

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it has been a problem. It's come with

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of weak governance, right because the Tiger Global

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>model included writing a huge check to somebody who was

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>already running a Unicorn. That person, of course, because they've

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.719
<v Speaker 1>created Unicorn, is a bit imperious and then on top

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of that, you say, we don't want to go on

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>your board. We're not going to exercise governance, and we

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>defer to you because you were the founder and you're

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>so great, and I think that's a good way of

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>overseeing companies basically decide I'm not going to oversee them.

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.959
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you had this governance vacuum for unicorns.

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>That's why you see companies like we Work or Uber,

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>which actually started out pretty well in their early phases,

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>go off the moral and commercial rails because nobody was

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>monning the store on the board. So what's your wead

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>on this massive market correction and how it will impact

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>venture capital and private companies. Well, clearly it's bound to

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>effect these late stage growth investors like Tiger Glogle first

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>because they were investing late, so the exit that was

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>anticipated was only a year away. That's in the public markets.

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Of the public markets correct by like the nurse Back

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>has done this year, of course, your late stage privates

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>are going to go down with it. The second thing

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 1>is that the cost of capital matters when you're writing

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a check for a hundred million bucks, right if you're

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>doing early stage VC, you're writing a ten million dollar check.

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter so much what the interest rate is,

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>but it is material when it gets to these very

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>big checks the Tiger Global is writing. So they've faced

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the brunt of the correction. They've announced that they're going

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to move into doing earlier stage investing, do more seed

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. That's obviously a smart pivot if they

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>know how to do seed, because it is a different discipline.

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>And then the question for the broader venture capital businesses,

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>how does this ripple down the stack? And it doesn't

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>mean that Series C valuations go down a lot, because

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Tiger Global is no wanting to not wanting to pay

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>quite so much. In Seriously, if serious C goes down,

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>does that mean Serious A goes down? And there's a

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>certain point, Emily where there's a problem because the cost

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of hiring engineers is ultimately set by Google. If Google

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue paying a lot, then the startups

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>have to pay a not to get good engineers. And

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>if that price is not reset the price of talent,

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>then you know, a small adventure capital check in a

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Series A is going to make it difficult for the

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>company to work. Now, your book tells a riveting story

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of the history of venture Capital, which you'll have to

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>read if you want to learn more. You argue that

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley and venture capital is the main reason that

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley is Silicon Valley. How confident are you that

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>other Silicon Valleys can emerge or are emerging elsewhere, whether

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it is Boston or Austin, or New York or London

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>or China. So I think the story up to around

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five is basically the Silicon Valley venture capitalists

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>had a special source that other people didn't understand. They

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>had this power law approach where they were quite happy

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to write eight checks out of ten that would end

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>up losing money, and then a couple would have these

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>extreme right tail power law returns that would make up

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for allal losers. And although that sounds a bit obvious now,

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>before around two thousand five, vcs in Boston didn't really

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>get it, vcs in New York mostly probably didn't get

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>it either, and certainly nowhere else in the world, maybe

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with the exception of Israel, did anybody get it. And

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>then in two thousand five American vcs from Silicon Valley

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>went to China and they moved into India. The whole

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Israel e Consistent took off south the station began, and

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>during code we've seen it spread to Austin, Miami and

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>so forth. My belief is that the fundamental mindset of

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley venture capital is now spreading pretty much everywhere,

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and that as it arrives in different geographies, it transforms

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the attitude entrepreneurship. People take more risk, and you start

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>up cultures which hitherto had been kind of concentrated. Cilicon

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Valley is going to be everywhere. Now. We've been covering

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the big story of Cheryl Samberg leaving Meta, and I've

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>heard so many vcs over the years say we're just

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to find the next Facebook. Facebook story of course

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>has got a lot more complicated. But what is going

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to drive the next cycle of venture capital and the

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>quest to find the next Facebook or maybe it's a

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>next something else? Well, you know, Facebook was amazing because

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>it was this software company that scaled unbelievably fast. And

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the characteristic of both sas and consumer software is that

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't need very much capital to have an enormous

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>value creation effect, right, And if you're looking at something

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>that can do an equivalent miracle, the most likely frankly

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>is crypto, right. I know we've had this big correction recently,

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>but if you think of the story of unite swap okay,

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy called Haydn is in his apartment in New

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>York City and he gets laid off from a engineering

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>job at Siemens, and then he starts to write code

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>because his flatmate, his housemate is is somebody who works

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>for Ethereum, and he creates this automatic market maker which

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>goes on the Ethereum blockchain. And this individual, pretty much

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>as an individual creates a unicorn by himself. I mean,

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>that's even more amazing than Instagram, which was people creating

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a unicorn. So I think if you're asking specifically, what

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 1>can do a Facebook style value creation with enormous leverage

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>on a small number of talented people, I think it's

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>crypt We will be watching if it is. Indeed. Sebastianality,

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, author of

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a new book, Power Law. Please check it out. Thanks Sebastian.

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>We'll have much more head this this blue work a

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>few other stories we continue to watch. Ford is investing

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 1>three point seven billion dollars in factories across three midwestern

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>US states to pump out more electric cars and traditional

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>gas fueled cars, and a sweeping expansion that will create

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in union jobs. Five four plants will be expanded to

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>proce more hot sellers like the electric F one fifty

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>lightning pickup, and roll out new models, including a new

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>battery powder commercial car. Plus. The crypto business, run by

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>billionaire brothers Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, is making its first

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>ever job cuts. Gemini Trust is slashing ten percent of

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>its staff as trading across the industry plunges. In a

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 1>memo obtained by Bloomberg, the brothers blame the job called

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>so what they called Crypto Winter. Last year, Gemini said

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it raised four million dollars in a round of funding

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that valued the company at seven point one billion dollars.

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, my exclusive conversation with former Facebook board member

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Don Graham on Cheryl Sandberg's departure and what he thinks

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is next for a woman he's known for more than

0:19:47.400 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty years. He joins us, next, this is Bloomberg. Welcome

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>back to bloomber Technology. I Emily Chang in New York.

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Shares of the electric truckmaker Nicola rising Bloomberg reporting the

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>latest twist in the story of the company's founder, Trevor Milton,

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 1>who had to resign as chair last year. I mean

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>regulatory probes voted against the company at its annual meeting

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to issue more stock are ed Ludlow broke that story

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and has all the details on what it means. Ed. Yes,

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>So the proposal the annual general meeting was to include

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the shares increase the shares outstanding from six d million

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to eight hundred, meaning down the line Nikola could sell

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>equity to raise money. Now, the biggest shareholder, the former chairman,

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>the founder, Trevor Milton, according to sources, voted against that measure,

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's really hard to understand why. On the one hand,

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't want to dilute his own holdings and diminish

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the value of his holdings. On the other, voting against

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that could inhibit the company from raising money, which means

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the company suffers, and down the line the shares full. Oh,

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 1>there he is in the screen. We've all been wondering

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>where he is because he faced his trial next month.

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>You'll remember, and Emily accused of deceiving investors and exaggerating

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>about the company's technology and claims he made about the

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>company's performance. What's also interesting is a lot of retail

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>investors are really into this stock. So the other problem

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that Nicola had it it's a GM and one of

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the reasons they had to adjourn it is because nobody voted.

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>They needed a majority of the outstanding stock to vote

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>on the clause to pass it. But even though Trevor

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Milton voted no, they still didn't get enough shareholders to

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>vote generally speaking, So this is a stock there's not

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>fed as badly as others years. Today it's getting back

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 1>on its feet, trying to get over the ghost of

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Milton. But this was an interesting roadblock and a

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>twist in the story that we probably didn't expect. All right,

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the update. I want to get back now

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to the impending departure of Cheryl Samberg at Facebook now

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>met US chief operating Officer. This is a role she's

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 1>held for the last fourteen years, growing the company into

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>what it is today. I spoke with her ahead of

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the announcement and she told me how she came to

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:21.239
<v Speaker 1>the decision and how she feels about the company as

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>she leaves it. This was a decision I made that

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I did not come too lightly, And it really is

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>about how I will spend my time, not how much

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe in the company. I believe in the company,

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>but as much as I ever did, and staying on board.

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 1>And I really have complete confidence in the key Mark

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and I have built. I think they're going to do

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a great job building the future. Or accompanied us a

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>huge part of my life and a huge part of

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>my heart joining me now, Donald Graham. He served on

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's board for seven years. He was also the lead

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>independent director when the company went public, and he's known

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Cheryl Samberg and Mark Zuckerberg since the early two thousands.

0:22:58.040 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>He's also the former publisher, of course, of the y

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Shington Post and chair of Graham Holdings Down. So great

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us. Thank you for joining us today.

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about that Chryl Sandberg you met all those

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago in two thousand one, and what you make

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of her leaving at this moment today. I met Cheryl

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in November December of two thousand when I was fishing

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>around as the Clinton administration went out of office to

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 1>see if there were any business minded people who wanted

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to stay in Washington maybe worked for a business, So

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I offered Sheryl a job at the Washington Post. At

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that point I knew she was a super hot property.

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Every single person I talked to in the White House said,

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 1>this is the person you've got to get it is. Ironically,

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>she was offered jobs both by me and by Arthur Salzberger,

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the publisher of the New York Times. So Cheryl had

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>her choice between the New York Times and the Washington Post,

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 1>and was crazy enough to pick this Google place that

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>she thought might have a future. So she went off

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>to Silicon Valley. We stayed in touch. I called on

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>her when whenever I would go out there, and then

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I tried to hire her again. In two thousand seven.

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:13.719
<v Speaker 1>I tried to get her to come back to our company,

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this time as president. I felt that I knew that

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 1>our company badly needed somebody who knew a lot about

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>technology and Sheryl. Sheryl knew both a lot about technology

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and a lot about advertising, and knew every big advertiser

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, so that would have been quite good.

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>She couldn't do that because she was married to Dave Goldberg,

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>who was making a career as the CEO in Silicon Valley.

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So then later on she and Mark both called me

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>when she was thinking about going to Facebook. It's clear

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you think very highly of her. For many people, I

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 1>think she has a complicated legacy. The critics think she

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't do enough to address the negative consequences of face

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>s book. What do you think, you know? Fourteen years

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't that long a time. But let us start with

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Facebook when Cheryl Sandberg joined it two thousand eight. When

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>she joined, happened to be there that she and Mark

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>invited me to join their board. So I went out

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook for the first time in late two thousand eight.

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Advertising at Facebook at this point consisted of three little

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.640
<v Speaker 1>three line ads on your home page, one of which

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>always used the word belly fat. There was absolutely not

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a brand advertising on on Facebook at that point. There

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>was next to no revenue because there were next to

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>no ads that advertises goodbye and uh Cheryl. As Mark

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>had to build Facebook, Cheryl had to build its business.

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>It is not too strong to say that in two

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight, the business, the revenue, the advertising didn't interest

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Mark a lot, and Cheryl had to hire the people

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>who were gonna turn Facebook into an actual business, build

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the business, make it work for advertisers. And I knew one. Uh,

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:15.679
<v Speaker 1>I had one odd status on the board. I was

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 1>the only person who came from an advertising support a bit,

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and I knew that advertising, if you had good advertising,

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it made television or newspapers or Facebook better for users.

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 1>If you had terrible advertising and made it worse for users.

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>So Cheryl, I watched Cheryl build that business and it

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>was pretty awesome. David Kirkpatrick wrote that Mark Zuckerberg brought

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Cheryl's Hamburg on board in part because of her experience

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and governance and to help Facebook govern itself one day,

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>and also to help build a bridge to Washington. This

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is another thing that critics seem to think she failed

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to do. You are at the center of power in Washington.

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.199
<v Speaker 1>How do you think she excelled at that part of

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the role. Well, again, I would go back and ask

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>another set of questions. Uh, how many people can you name, Emily,

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>with your deep knowledge of American business, who are made

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 1>and made an enormous record as a number two of

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>a company currently? How many one two teams are there

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that built a big business? Is where you know the

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>number two as well as you know the number one. Yeah,

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I knew people. You know, don KEYO and ROBERTA. Gazetta

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>is the first one that comes to mind at Coppec

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>who had had a fantastic run. But uh, what always

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>strikes me about Cheryl is that as one of the

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>as Silicon Valley Royalty is, they're not really the number

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>three or four person at Google. She went to work

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>for a twenty three year old. She had the curry

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to say, I think Facebook is going to be important.

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 1>I think Mark is a good person, and I'm going

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to go work with him and see what we could

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>build together. But they again, you have to remember that

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>when she enters the company, there's almost nothing there. There

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is very little revenue, very little advertising, and very little team,

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and she has to build that justice. Mark is building

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the product right, and she talked about that. When I

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>spoke with her yesterday, she was thirty eight, he was

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. It was a leap, a big leap of faith.

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Um I asked her what she's going to do next.

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>She talked about her philanthropy, focusing on women's advocacy, spending

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>more time with her family, getting married this summer. I

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>asked about business in particular, and politics and whether we

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>will see her in another business role or a political role.

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Take a listen to what she had to say. I

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>learned a long time ago and never make any predictions

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about the future. But I think I think a lot

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of that is pretty unlikely. And I'm really I really

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot, hopefully, that I can do with

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>my foundation and phil topically. What do you think she'll

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>do next on or maybe you know, well, will we

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>see her again in business or politics? I don't know,

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>because I'll guarantee you Chryl Sandberg doesn't know. But you

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>are correct, Emily when you said that Facebook's you know, Facebook.

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Cheryl had fourteen years at Facebook, aid of which where

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>people couldn't say enough great things about Facebook and about her,

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>And for the last six years, Facebook has been the

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>subject of an unusual amount of criticism. I think both

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the praise and the criticism got a little overheated. But

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Cheryl is leaving at a time when Facebook is down

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in reputation, although up in business, and it'll you know,

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't know what she's going to do next. She

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know what she's going to be doing five years

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>from now or ten years from now. But she is young,

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>she is incredibly talented, and whatever she does in the

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of her life, she'll do it very well. She'll

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>make an enormous fact. She's written two best selling books

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>while she was also the CEO of Facebook, and I

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling that that would that that will continue

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a part of her life. It'll be it

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>will be a very impressive life, ambitious. Indeed, you wrote

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>an op ed don in twenty nineteen titled Why I

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Still Have Faith in Facebook? Do you still have faith

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>in Facebook today, knowing the critiques, knowing the negative consequences.

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you have faith in Facebook without Cheryl Sandberg? And

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>do you believe in the metaverse? Emily? I was an

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>insider in Facebook for seven years. I left the board

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand fifteen. I haven't been an insider since then.

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I am not party to their discussions. I don't know

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in depth any of the most recent business issues you're

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>referring to. Yes, I have faith in Facebook. I think

0:30:56.600 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Mark is a very good CEO. I think Mark Zuckerberg

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is a very good person. I think Cheryl Sandberg is

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a very good person. They have faced decisions that would

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>be daunting for anybody. There's never been anything like Facebook,

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>just as there's never been anything like Google or Amazon

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>or Apple. And they've done their best. I know that.

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I know that they've always done it in a principled manner.

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And yes, I still have faith in Mark outlined a

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>team under him, almost all of whom I know. It's

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a team of very good, very highly principled, very admirable

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>people who've been at Facebook for most of them for

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>eight or ten years and more. Chris Cox, who Mark

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>referred to, who runs product at Facebook, uh, is someone

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you should have on your air. He is one of

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the most impressive people I've ever met. He left for

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a time because he didn't like certain business decisions, talked

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it over with Mark returned in the same role. You

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>couldn't the Facebook has deep issues to address us. You

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>couldn't have better people addressing them than Facebook. Cat Chris

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Cox will be up next. I'm going to send him

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that clip down and see if we'll join us. Don Graham,

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>former Facebook board member, thank you so much for joining us.

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So uh important to have your rich historical perspective on

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the company, and Mark and cherw really appreciate it. Thanks

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 1>so much. Bitcoin rebounded after slumping along with stocks Thursday

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>met some resistance at the thirty dollar level, where it's

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>been trading for the last month. Bloom Works. Katie Greifeld

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>here with more on this case. Take it away. I

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>can't break the spell. Can't break the spell. Didn't have

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a good day today, I mean tech stock throws. So

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin did as well, like you said, over two percent

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday, right around that thirty thou dollar per coin level.

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's important because Bitcoin has been stuck there for

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the better part of a month really since we saw

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the blow up of that terrorist stable coin. What it

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>feels like a long time ago, but it was only

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a month ago. So if we can sustainably break above

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>per coin, you do have some technical analyst saying that

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>there's more blue sky on the charts, but I mean

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 1>it's been a really rough go. We've really been mired

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>here and we're still down thirty five percent so far

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>this year. And the story about Gemini layoffs, hiring phrases,

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, it seems like what's happening at you know,

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>general tech companies and tech startups is starting to in

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>fact the crypto market as well. Yeah, like the point

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you just made, you're seeing this across the startup industry,

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but particularly in crypto right now. Actually before the show,

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I saw news break that coin base it's extending its

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>hiring pause that have been announced two weeks ago. But

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>then we just got news that actually they're going to

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>resend a number of accepted job offers. Just very painful.

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And that was hours after we got that Gemini news

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that they planned to layoff up to ten percent of

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>its workface first, and remember in April Robin Hood laying

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>off nine percent of their workforce. This draw down that

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing, it goes obviously beyond the price of the coins,

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>beyond the equity shares. In some cases, it includes layoffs,

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 1>hiring freezes, reduced spending, an investment. It's all playing out

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in cryptol regy. Is there silver lining silver lining depends

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>on who you ask, but it did catch my eye.

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>There was a fantastic Bloomberg News article today about crypto

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 1>political donations. Actually it is full steam ahead the last

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>three months and all of one that's spending total about

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty six million dollars, which is amazing because if you

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>compare it to other industries, it only falls behind the

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>investment industry. That political donation that's more than you saw

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 1>from big tech, big farm, at defense. Crypto really stepping

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>up ahead of the mid term elections, so we could

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>see it grow even more. But what is also interesting

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that the biggest individual spender Sam Bacuman Freed, he is

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the founder of f t X. Of course he overall

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>has pumped in about thirty two million dollars. That is

0:34:56.680 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>seventy of the crypto industries total given SPF of f

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>t X, making waves yet again. Okay, Katie, thank you.

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Coming up tackling career development as we navigate a tight

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>labor market on a potential downturn, as we were just discussing,

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about all that and more with Guild Education

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>just at a four point four billion dollar valuation. Guild

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>founder Rachel Carlson with me next. This is Bloomberg. Guild

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Education just announced a hundred seventy five million dollars in

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>new funding, hitting a four point four billion dollar valuation.

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>The company partners with the likes of Macy's and Walmart

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>to create new growth opportunities for employees. This at a

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:55.760
<v Speaker 1>time when there are so many open jobs, which begs

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the question where are the workers? Let's talk about all

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>this and more with Guild Education co found or CEO

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Rachel Carlson. So, Rachel, on the one hand, there are

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>open jobs. On the other there are layoffs and hiring freezes.

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>How do we square these two treads? You know? I

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>think at some level, I remember you and others talking

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 1>about the K shooped economy at the beginning of COVID.

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that K is now inverting into the X.

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>So the layoffs everything we're talking about, those are happening

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in tech and insectors that road the COVID wave. But

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>for the average frontline worker, uh, that's not what they're experiencing.

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:35.720
<v Speaker 1>They're sixty five of frontline workers are talking about looking

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>for new work. The great resignation remains, and for most

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of those workers, it's no longer about pay. They've seen

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:45.879
<v Speaker 1>meaningful pay wage increase to the fifteen dollar an hour.

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>They're looking for career advancement, and they're going to companies

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that will prepare them for the future of work. So

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.359
<v Speaker 1>how many workers who get up through up skilled through

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Guild are moving to these open jobs. Yeah, So we're

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>really fortunate that we find that of the workers that

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.839
<v Speaker 1>we serve, somebody who engages in the learning program. While

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it work relative to their peer who has the same

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>job title but doesn't learn, the learner has a two

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>point six x greater increase of being promoted on the job,

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and at some companies like Chipotle, you see that increase

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>get all the way up into the seven x so

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 1>sent higher likelihood getting promoted on the job, which obviously

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 1>achieves the economic mobility that so many frontline workers are

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>looking for now. Big raise today, and I'm just so

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>curious whether you ran into some of these market conditions

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:38.760
<v Speaker 1>as you were doing this fundraise, did it close before

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:42.279
<v Speaker 1>all the volatilities we've seen it? And how do you

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>plan to conserve this cash that you now have in

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>this macro environment? Uh? You know, I've been quoting my

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:53.879
<v Speaker 1>mom during the fundraise. She always talks about rainy day

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 1>savings accounts, which is what we went out to raise,

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 1>and we kind of did it on a rainy day. So, yes,

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it was an odd time time to be pursuing a fundraise,

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>but it was the right move for us. We often

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 1>at Guild talk about our hundred year goals and what

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>does it take to build an enduring company, and so

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we're calling this rainy day funding. It's not savings or

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, it's not spending money, as my mom would say,

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>it's to make sure that we can achieve the goals

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>we want many years from now, and and we're raising it,

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>uh with a mind towards cost discipline, not a goal

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to go spend it or change our budgets. Now, there

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.439
<v Speaker 1>have been some questions about guilds business and how often

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it really does take employees to the next level. How

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 1>are you addressing that? Yeah, I mean we're thrilled with

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the outcomes that we see from our working adult learners. Obviously,

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>working to learners move slower, and so we do need

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to change our mindset about how we measure their outcomes.

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>UM higher ed's trained to say how fast do you graduate?

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And and that matters, But we think about graduation as

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>an input and economic mobility as the outcome. And so

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>when our learners are advancding and you know, interestingly enough,

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a large percentage of our learners see a promotion even

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 1>before they complete their program. And that's not how the

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 1>typical professor or hired institution thinks. But if you move

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>away from a degree based world to a skills based world,

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you can get rewarded for those skills even before you

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>complete the degree. So we're trying to change the paradigm

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of how we think about how do we reward people

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 1>for the skills and the advancement that they want to

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>see in their career. I'd love to get your thoughts

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:32.239
<v Speaker 1>on Cheryl Samberg. You know, obviously it's kind of a

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 1>big historical moment her leaving Meta, you know, after fourteen

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>years and writing lean In, and you know, I know

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 1>for many women and many women in business, she's a

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 1>role model. She's also a very controversial figure and some

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>people don't necessarily buy into the lean in mentality. Well,

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:53.320
<v Speaker 1>what's what's your take? I mean, what a Cheryl Samberg

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of symbolize to you? Yeah, it's interesting. Um, I've

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 1>been thinking a lot about female leadership of late as

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:02.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, Oprah joined this round and I often talk

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 1>about her as my my favorite model of empathetic leadership.

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>To talk then about Cheryl and many others, like, we

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 1>need lots of models of female leadership there. Men for

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands of years have had a whole catalog

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of different models to choose from and find what feels

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 1>authentic to each individual as a leader. You can't be

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>what you can't see, and so I think having strong

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 1>female leaders with a whole variety of leadership styles is

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:31.320
<v Speaker 1>super critical, especially for those of us in an industry

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>where fewer than two percent of us in the venture

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 1>space of our female Absolutely, So, how do you spend

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>plan to spend this money or do you plan to

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe spend it a little more slowly than you might

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>have in a different environment. Quickly? Yes, So if you know,

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 1>if my mom's watching, we committed this is a rain

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a rainy day fund. We're not spending it.

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>We're not changing our budget this year, um, but we're

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:55.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're solving a societal problem at Guild that's

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna last for many decades to come. And so we're

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how do we fund our busines this into perpetuity,

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>not how do we fund it for this year, but

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>what we are maintaining in an in a time of uncertainty,

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 1>as many other companies are changing their plans, were maintaining

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 1>our commitments um first to ensure that we're capturing all

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:17.839
<v Speaker 1>the amazing employer momentum we're seeing. Far more companies are

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 1>now ready to take this jump and fund their employees

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 1>going back to school, and then we're really advancing and

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 1>career development, making sure that all of our members can advance. Rachel,

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:28.919
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining us, and shout out to your mom.

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>She's jumping up and down right now. Rachel Carlson, CEO

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of Guild, thank you. That doesn't for the sedition of

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. We'll be back tomorrow. I'm Emily Trying in

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:39.800
<v Speaker 1>New York. This is Bloomberg