WEBVTT - Ep27 - Guy Ritchie / "King Arthur: Legend of the Sword"

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to playback a Variety podcast. I'm your host,

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Variety Awards Editor Chris Tapley. We took a few weeks

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>off in the wake of this year's monumental Oscar's outcome,

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think that's a hyperbolic thing to say.

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>It was quite a moment one that I'm sure will

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>be unpacking more and more as we grew up for

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>another Awards season in the fall. But for now we've

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>got the summer movie season ahead of us. It more

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>or less kicks off today with Marvel's Guardians of the

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Galaxy Volume two, which is, you know, fun. If you

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed the first one, I'm sure you'll dig this one.

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, speaking of which, it seems like

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a typically franchise heavy summer. There's

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>another Spider Man, and other Transformers and other Pirates of

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the Caribbean, Wonder Woman, all of the I p s

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>are out in force, all of the stuff that does

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.559
<v Speaker 1>a really good job of selling toys and book bags

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and whatnot. As I like to say, I'll probably be

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>sitting in a theater watching the new Alien film as

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you listen to this, and uh, you know, you're not

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>limited to that. For something entirely different, There's a ghost

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>story from David Lowry new film with Casey Affleck that's fantastic.

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Edgar Wright has a new film that everyone's loving, Baby Driver,

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and Big Sun Dance Hit The Big Sick from kuma

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Io Nan Johnny from Silicon Valley, and my guest today

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>has a new film as well. His name is Guy

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Ritchie and he's sitting right here, sir. Thank you for

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>coming on the show today. I appreciate it. Thank you.

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Chris Films called King Arthur Legend of the Sword with

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Huntum and Jude law Uh. It's interesting too to

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>me because I mentioned all of those brands a moment ago,

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and King Arthur is kind of the original brand in

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>some ways. I mean, there's been like countless movies and

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>TV shows, and Disney even took a crack at it.

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's a well known legend, you know. So my

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>question is I'm curious, knowing that it was such well

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>worn material, what excited you about coming in and telling

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a King Arthur story of your own? I think the

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>challenge as much as anything else. It didn't occur to

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>me that it was a dusty or an exciting title. Um.

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I liked the idea. I was inspired by

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the Boorman movie Excalibur. I don't think it's been as

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>many incarnations as you think actually about the legend of

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>King Arthur. But nevertheless, it seems like a familiar monica.

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And to me, I fancied the challenge of bit like

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Sherlock Holmes, for all, familiar with that. I think I

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>could do something with that. And I was familiar an

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>excited bar I or many components in the Autherian legend,

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:09.119
<v Speaker 1>and it was the challenge, can I go into the

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>epic fantasy genre and create something that feels different and fresh? Um?

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>And that was my mandate, um, to somehow create a

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>new voice in that. Yeah, it's a It's interesting because

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I was a little surprised, and although I shouldn't have been,

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>because you've never been one to like anonymously direct your films.

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a definitive signature to your work, and so you

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>know this, for lack of a better description, I mean

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it kind of it's like a bloke mobster movie in

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the King Arthur world and very much your aesthetic. And

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>so I'm curious if, like, was there ever a moment

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>where you thought this aesthetic that you wanted to apply

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>your trademark, that it might not fit the material. Yes,

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is the elnse to? That was my principal concern is

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that could I would it translate my vision, if you will?

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Or what would it congest the experience? Um? And my

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that was my principal concern. So two weeks into filming,

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>your ask tends to go a bit where you start thinking.

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's on every movie I've ever made, and I

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's a sort of necessary and healthy, but nevertheless

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>an unpleasant experience. For two weeks you doubt yourself enormously. Um.

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>And then somehow you rise out the ashes of that

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and the film then reveals itself. And my job is

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to steer the head of that tiger and to find

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a tone and then try and be consistent with that

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>town and then relax and enjoy it. And the more

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:55.239
<v Speaker 1>you sort of relax and enjoy it, than the more

0:04:55.920 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that voice can make itself clear. Um. So as we

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of thundered along, I felt as though it had

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>its own identity that felt fresh, um, and I became

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>more and more confident with it. If you will, is it?

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're you're very well taken care of and

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 1>set up over at Warner Brothers. But still, was this

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a vision you had to fight for? When was there

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>anyone that felt like, I would like this to maybe

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>be a little more about the book. Not really, I

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>mean I was saying this earlier. I've never really had

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a fight with the studio because it seems pointless. There

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>are so many things that can be answered just asking

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>five people if you stick it in front of an audience.

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So a certain point, I wanted to not make my

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>signature so obvious on the vision, if you will, are

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>quite fancied becoming more anonymous. But as soon as we

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>stuck it in front of a room for the five people,

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>people wanted more of that, that signature that they were

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>unfamiliar with who I was, but they were, oh, that stuff,

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>we really like that stuff. Can we have more of

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that stuff? And that was the stuff that spoke to him. So,

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I had my arsenal full of all those

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of shenanigans, which I I filmed anyway, and I

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>truncated the three and a half hour moving down to

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>two hours. Um, so me and the studio were all

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>on the same page because it was obvious what people wanted, um,

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and I sort of needed people to confirm that that's

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>what they wanted. UM, so we were all on board.

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about just the test screening process

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in general? Is there something that I'm not opposed to it? Actually? Um,

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I would I wouldn't. I certain wouldn't it as much

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>as people do do it. It's allo expensive to do

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it too, by the way, UM, and it's unnecessary to

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>do it that much. I understand why some people are

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>opposed to it. Sometimes it's a good way of solving

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>an argument and being sure about what you're doing is

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the right thing to do this? You know, I'll put

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>some stuck in it, but not terrible amount. But it's

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>not like a painful thing for you. An It's well,

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what I'd rather do it then than now.

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to be found out before I'm found out. Uh.

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to give too much away, but the

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>opening scene of this film is like positively epic, and

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it kind of hints at I mean, it's like Lord

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Rings epic, and it hints at this overall

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>universe really that it makes you feel like there's a

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of different ways you could go and telling stories

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>in this world. So just out of curiosity, I mean

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you've certainly bounced around within a franchise before with the

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Sherlock Holmes films. Is this the world you want to

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>come back to? Would you want to tell more stories

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>in King Arthur? I mean you set it up certainly, Yeah,

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean there. I don't think it's a film I've

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>made that I never wanted to come back and make

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>another one. UM, this particularly in part because it's an

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>enormous world, and you put a lot of effort into

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>creating these worlds, and that's really the lie and share

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of the effort is creating the world. And I thought

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>this movie to take a year and a half and

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>here I am three years later. So after you put

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that much effort in, you go, I'll go back again.

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I love Charlie. Charlie Huntum was an absolute pleasure to

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>work with. UM would not be cautious about jumping back

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>into the lines. Then with him, the process of making

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>movies I adore, and in particular this one great fun,

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>creatively challenging. UM. Yeah, I would, I would go back.

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>What what do you think made it go from one

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half years to three years there was in

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>light of what you were saying earlier, you are in

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>such a congested market, trying to get a weekend in

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>this market an unbranded product because in the in the

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>end it is and arguably the branker sometimes hurt you,

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>um in this case. But we had to wait a

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>year for one for the right we can't that wasn't

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't have anyone else on it. You've got guardians a

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>week before. So it's still quite an unpleasant um position

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to take. But a year ago there were no positions, UM,

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 1>and we came a bit unstuck on man from Uncle

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>under the Summer a couple of years ago, UM, which

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we went at the right time. UM.

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>And you're you're cautious about when you come out. You know,

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>these things cost money to make and you need to

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>make your money back. So we had to wait a year.

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:47.599
<v Speaker 1>So in that year, I tink it around with the

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>visual effects from another year, um, which is obviously in

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>hindsight is and the year's worth of extra visual effects.

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'll tell you that makes a difference. It's funny

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>what people will put up with, you know. Uh. So

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we did that and that was really it. I suppose

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I sort of wrapped this wall. You'll you'll rinse it

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>out as long as you can until you know when

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>your date is you'll you'll leave the cut loose um

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.559
<v Speaker 1>so you can go in and tinker, go away, come back,

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>go away, come back. Well while lock it until you

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>know you have to lock it? Do you get yourself

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>involved deeply at all? Just with visual marketing posters? Things

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>like they're like, how how much do you get involved

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in that kind of stuff? Quite a lot, very good,

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the studio coming to you, getting their input. It's a

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>very much a two way street. They're they're very they're pros,

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they they are interested in the filmmakers version,

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and I've never witnessed and a thing to contradict that

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>they're sympathetic to filmmakers. There's Warner Brothers in particular, and

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so they do everything they do, they sort of flag

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>past you and every not. But the thing is is

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that if that's what you do day in day out,

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to remain fresh, you remain creative, but to

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>actually create something where it's an interesting campaign, it's very

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 1>hard to do. And sort of spot for this Last Night,

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>which comedy Central cobbled up. It's quite funny, is that

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Comedy Central. What's it called? It's called It's called something,

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't it? Arvant? Can you rememban what's called? It's called something? Anyway?

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's Judelore and Charlie Annam taking the mickey out

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>one another saying, um, you know King Arthur was justin

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>very King, and Charlie Annam says, you know, go cause

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>into some form of contradiction anyway. So they contradict each

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 1>other all through it, and I got to telling it's

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a nice tone and Tony is everything, because if you

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 1>get the tone of that, you get the tone of

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the movie. And in a way, do we care about

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>three elephants in a trailer? I'm not sure if I do.

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>What I care more about is what's a tonality of

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the people that made the movie? And if I can,

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>if that's on my frequency, they're on my frequency, I'll

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.719
<v Speaker 1>go and see it because I get the tone. So

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a combination I suppose of I want to see

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>some escapism. I want to launch myself into a world

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that's fantastic in one of the that means that you

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and within that, what was it? What was it was

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it called Throne Shade. Throne Shade anyway, it's funny. So

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>within that, if you can dial into the tone, then

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you go, right, they got they got a few quid,

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>they spent a bit of money throwing a foot elephant,

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to be that's the tone, right, And

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>I to juxtaposition those tones because it's a big fantasy thing, right,

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and then you've got that sort of cheeky, chappy nonsense

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>going on the side. It feels like a fresh tone

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>man to me. Um, I think so I captured that

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in that little spot, which must have cost all of

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting well. Yeah, and just regarding tone, also identity, I

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>mean the identity of the film. Getting that across and

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the visuals is always a challenge for these departments. And uh,

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I felt like in the posters and stuff for this

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 1>when you can see this is this is gonna be

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a guy Ritchie King Arthur film, you know, like you

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>feel that that identity and these character posters and things

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>like that. So that's why I ask, like, what kind

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of involvement you have? You know, Yeah, they're they're they're

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>smart those cause it's interesting, hey, you say, because I'm

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>too a copy objective. Now we're regarding you know, just

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the idea of superhero movies. Uh. I mean, you know, you're,

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>like I said, you're set up at Warner Brothers, And

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm just guessing that maybe they've come to

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you for some of these titles in the past that

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>they're putting out there in the DC universe and stuff

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>like that. But what I'm curious about is you, you know,

0:13:56.240 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you maintain your own voice throughout your career, and so

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>how do you feel about navigating that modern climate of

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>all of these superhero movies. Do you feel like you

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>might need to play that game at some point? Or like,

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>how do you feel about a good question? Actually? And

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>if I find a tone that I'll go, oh, I

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>like that. Um, I quite fancy doing Suicide Squad two

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>because I thought I could do a good job with it. Um,

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>so I'm up for I can't do it because I'm

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>doing something else, But I'm not. I'm a guy that

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>likes to work, so I'm gonna work and I'll work

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>with whatever I can to make it work. I am

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>not an absolutist about what a genre is, so I'm

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>not a non man. I'm a yes man. When it

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to making something manifest. That said, I just wanted

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to be interesting. I wanted to feel fresh, I want

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to feel different. I wanted to feel something that is

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>worth me taking my fifteen dollar so John to the

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>cinema and go that was worth it. That's it, that's it.

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe suicide is quite three. Someone got to I don't

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>think they've announced anybody actually now, but I felt as

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I could really do something with that. Uh, David Air,

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>do you you guys friends at all? Do you know

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>each other? Um? Speaking of not really no Aladdin, we

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about Aladdin briefly. Um, I just wanted to venture

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>out here a little bit. Aladdin is one of my

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite of the Disney animated films, but it's also one

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that from its release was criticized for just like disparaging

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>stereotypes of Arabs and and we're in a very sensitive

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>climate to that kind of thing right now. So I'm

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>just curious if there's something that you get your eye

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>on at all with this project. No, no, no, because

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I find bigotry in all of its guys is and

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the PC world often where's the biggest, biggest hat or

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>where is it the most proudly unaware of the hat

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that they're wearing. Decency is decency, Humanity is humanity, and

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the film will dictate exactly what the tone

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to be and who's supposed to be in it.

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>You just don't want to feel like you're muscled into

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it because you're bullied into it. It will be what

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>it will be because it should be what it should be.

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>It will have its own authentic voice, and you don't

0:16:56.280 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>want that voice being contaminated by a PC army. How's

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that experience so far? I mean, these guys at Disney,

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>they're like printing money by kind of going back to

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:10.239
<v Speaker 1>the well and reimagining their properties. I mean, I some

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>people feel like it's an original. I feel like, if

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you know that you're gonna put something out there and

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>it's going to probably make a billion dollars and you

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:17.959
<v Speaker 1>own the property to begin with, why would you not

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>do that? But you know, and I love I mean,

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it's more to it than that. I'm sure there is. Yeah,

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>And I love Jungle Book, and I really liked Beauty

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Beast, and I'm very curious what you're gonna

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>do with this because it's not something that I would

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>imagine you would be interested in doing. Frankly, doesn't immediately

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>sound like something that guy Ritchie would do. I'll have

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>five kids. Of course, I know more about kids movies

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>than I do about any other movies, and in turn,

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.719
<v Speaker 1>I know more about Disney movies than any other brand

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of movies. So it's a it's a it's a wheelhouse

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of which I'm well familiar. Yeah, and I'm impressed with

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the quality of children's product. I'm not necessarily as the

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>children's product is early in the days for me to

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>be able to articulate eloquently exactly what direction going in.

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>What I do find exciting is it's a musical. They're

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>fantastic people to work with. Um going ground there is

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>like going into how I imagine sort of Google was

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>five years ago. It's a load of very excited people

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that are very enthusiastic, and to me, it feels like

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>product in terms of a creative expression is primary. They're creative.

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>The fact that's successful is secondary. What is primary is

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is my experience in the film business in general.

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm always amazed by the lack of twats I meet

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in this game. Um Ivan, who's a colleague of mine,

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>who seeing next to next to me over there um

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>here and I talked about this endlessly. How often do

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:04.360
<v Speaker 1>we meet someone that we dislike in this game? It's

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a very short list. I'm not even sure if there's

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:12.239
<v Speaker 1>anyone on that list in the twenty years I've been

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 1>in this game and in the studio game for the

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>last ten years or so. There's no one. I'll tell you,

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>there's no one. That's the lions share of people that

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>are in this game. Money contaminates it, and money is

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the water. You know, you and I are men of

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>the world. We understand why it's a necessary component. But

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>the lion share of people that are in this business

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>are in it because it's fun and it's creative. And

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:44.360
<v Speaker 1>we were around there actually this morning. The the enthusiasm,

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it's palpable. I like that environment. Yeah, and and certainly

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>not to diminish it with the talk of the money.

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these movies are pushing the medium. Jungle Book

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously pushed the medium considerably. Beauty and the Beast there's

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of interesting stuff going on with effects and

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 1>inserts and stuff in that from what is there anything

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>that you have your eye on, say, it's early days

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 1>but you know, to really push this medium with what

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you're going to do and all that. Anything too early,

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.479
<v Speaker 1>too early, Yeah, it is, it's too early. It's just

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you, I'm very excited by it,

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. And we took this on before Beauty and

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Beauty was like a beast, um and no one could

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 1>have anticipated that. I suppose. Um, it's just exciting. And

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the rumor mill has Will Smith It's name going around.

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can you have to tell you I'm a

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>big fan of Will Smith. I am a big fan

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 1>of Will Smith. I'm a big fan of the industry. Um.

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it's inspiring when things are unpredictable. I think,

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 1>judging by your intro there, you probably feel the same way.

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>It's nice that the industry shook up a bit, and

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it feels a bit paid by none us at times.

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>But it is what it is, and I'm interested in

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it. I've got a one year at

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 1>at home. Actually, I've been obsessive, compulsively collecting the Disney

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Blue rays. Do you have a favorite of the lineage

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of animated titles? Well, I'm I'm it's quite long, actually,

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:24.959
<v Speaker 1>and that the films that I've been most impressed by

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in the last ten years of probably kids movies. I'm

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>HARKing back a long way, but I Tota Incredibles was

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>rather spectacular. Have you seen my Wana? Okay? I think

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the one is a very impressive bit of filmmaking. And

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>my kids know, and I've got three young ones. My

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>five year old boy, who's like a real boy, knows

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 1>five of those songs off by heart. They're catching, They're catching,

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:54.959
<v Speaker 1>They're good, They're good. I just like to be surprising,

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>impressed by people's work, and I am. And then last

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>thing here, we were about a I guess a year

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>away from Lockstock into smoking barrels, being twenty years old.

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>If you can believe that, I remember seeing that when

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I was it was like a Charlotte, North Carolina art

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>house called the Manner. I don't know if it's still there,

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>shout out to Charlotte, but it was. It was a

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>lightning bolt. I mean, it was clear that there was

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>this new, vibrant voice on the scene and it was

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>right at the end of you know, an explosion of

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>nineties independent filmmaking. Just what do you recall of that time?

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>And kind of a cheesy question, but if if you

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>went back and spoke to your twenty year younger self.

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>What kind of advice might you have for that guy?

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone's on their own journey, So I'll deal

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 1>with that in a second, because that's an it's an

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting question. Um. But looking back now, doesn't that feel

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:50.360
<v Speaker 1>like an exciting period in cinema? And I'm not sure

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 1>it's being replicated since it feels like we've moved in

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a different direction, um, And it doesn't feel as volatile

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>as it did back then. There was a volatility in filmmaking.

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>We're also in the filming which just come out from nowhere,

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>left field and go how about some of that? And

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you felt it there was again a palpable aggression to

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the expression. And it was a very exciting time for filmmakers.

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I went to film school in so it was like

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a very exciting time to beginning involved in all of that. Yeah,

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 1>you know it, films became sort of interesting about one

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of a ninety two or ninety four or ninety five

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Tarantinos or led a charge and they just followed lots

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of fresh voices. Can you remember, like, oh, I remember it.

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>It was it was a brilliant movie. Help me out here,

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they made two of them. Get Shorty, Get Shorty when Yeah,

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it's such a Get Shorty was such a impressive film,

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and it felt so wild and charming. It had such

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 1>an original spirit to it. But there were so many

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>films at that time that had such an original spirit

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to it. They were in a different period. Um, aren't

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we now about if you went back in time and

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>spoke to twenty year younger go Ritchie, Yeah, yeah, I

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>think you have. There's just no I mean often, are

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you in this game because you want to fully pockets

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>full of dough? Or are you in this game because

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to be stimulated by creative challenges and you

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>want to break new ground or whatever it is? And

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it's all of the above. Because if you

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>don't keep your truly, if your pockets flush, nothing happens.

0:24:55.640 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>If you get if your pockets become too flush, nothing happen. Pense.

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's this ongoing battle between money and creativity, comfort

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and creativity that discomfort creates great and interesting things. And now,

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>if I was replaying it, I could probably have played

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 1>my cards more efficiently if I wanted to make more money. Um,

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think now I would have I would

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>like that. I'd play them the way that you play them,

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>because it's a bigger picture. The whole thing is a

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>bigger picture, and you've got to roll over to the

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's a bigger picture and keep working. And

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the older I get by the way, I have seen

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>people that keep working, and they should start working, or

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>at least for a bit. Clearly it's a compulsion, and

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that someone that's just wake him up out of that

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:08.719
<v Speaker 1>little hypnoses what is it. It's a spell of some description,

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and just because they're better than that. So some people

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 1>didn't slow down, and some people need to speed up.

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>But as you grow, your movies grow and your interests change.

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>But I do like a man that keeps. I do

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like a chef that keeps going back in the kitchen.

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>It's easy to stay out of kitchen and wait for

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the perfect project. I would rather take the imperfect project

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and fashion it into something that is exhilarating in my

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I had to, I gotta tell you, I

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>like my movies. I go I pretty much forget that

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I made the movie after I've made it, and I

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:52.239
<v Speaker 1>end up watching them on TV. And you know, I'm

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>sitting there having a beer and what I got my

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>feet up and one of my movies comes on, Drift Out,

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Go for a pee, come back, and then oh no,

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that's fun. And then I mean for like fifteen minutes,

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and I have absolutely no recollection that I had anything

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to do with it at all. And if someone walked in,

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>what you watch your own movies, sport guy, I'll go,

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>oh did I make it? Um? I'm sure I'm going

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>with that. But anyway, that's a yeah. Do you want

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to scale back at all? You've been working on a

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>bigger canvas lately with some of these films. Do you

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>want to scale back and go smaller like in the

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>fancy bit of TV? Yeah? I do. I'm writing a

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>series at the moment um which I'm enjoying enormously, which

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is sort of reminiscent of my earlier career. Um, and

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm really enjoying that. I'm sure people would like to know,

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>actually if we if we will go to Sherlock Colms three. Yeah,

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's like I said, there isn't that movie

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>that I've made that I didn't want to make a

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:59.719
<v Speaker 1>sequel to. So I think if the stars a line,

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>then we'll go back to work but I'll tell you

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it's quiet. You're trying to line them stars. I'm sure, yeah, indeed.

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Well again, the movie is King Arthur Legend of the Sword.

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>It is twelve. That's why I looked over and asked twelve.

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>But you'll can see it on the fourteenth too, if

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you want, uh go check it out. And Guy Richie,

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks for coming on my show man. I really appreciate it.

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Why is the water dropped it?

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Why does the sword reveal itself? Now? Are you worried?

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Chriss somewhat? As you healthy, I've not had any power

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>or any desire to achieve it. M. That's all the

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>fuss is about. Don't worry, Girst soon understand what all

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the fusses about. Be scared? I think I can manage.

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>He shouldn't be scared. Never it takes to hunt him,

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>do so I go down to follow him. If he

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>goes down to follow him, you want him to think

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>by giving something you can think about. You wanted the property.

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>This is your proxy, the man who puts for from

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>start the whole nor phone to take