WEBVTT - Prime Time Crime PT 2

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kate Winkler Dawson. I'm a journalist who's spent the

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:09.559
<v Speaker 1>last twenty five years writing about true crime.

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Paul Hols, a retired cold case investigator who's

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 2>worked some of America's most complicated cases and solve them.

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Each week, I present Paul with one of history's most compelling.

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>True crimes, and I weigh in using modern forensic techniques

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>to bring new insights to old mysteries.

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Together, using our individual expertise, we're examining historical true crime

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>cases through a twenty first century lens.

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Some are solved and some are cold, very cold.

0:00:38.240 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This is buried Bones. Hey Kate, Hey Paul, you ready

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to go on Bob Crane.

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, I want to hear it.

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised you didn't text me in the middle of

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the week and say, okay, tell me a little bit more.

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a big one when somebody is not

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>who you expect them to be, and now there's these

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.279
<v Speaker 1>suspects and people around in sort of a sleazy world

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in a way, so it's interesting.

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think yeah. That was one of the takeaways

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 2>from the first episode, is the victimology. Because all I

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 2>knew about Bob Crane is the actor, and now you

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:37.559
<v Speaker 2>start to see, well, everybody has their thing, and it

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 2>looks like he's got this whether he's making poorn, but

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 2>he's doing something that seems a little shady and I'm

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 2>interested to see how that world develops. Is that the

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 2>reason he ends up dead? Is it because of these

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 2>affairs that he's having, these you know, sexual flings that

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 2>he's having, and you got jealous men that are coming

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 2>after him, you know, So there's a lot of stuff

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 2>going on with him.

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, let me do a quick recap and you know,

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>catch everybody up. So we're in nineteen seventy eight Scottsdale

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Hotter in Hell and it's June and Bob Crane is there.

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>We don't know for how long, but it sounds like

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>just for a few weeks, maybe a month, staying in

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a little apartment doing a dinner show, and he has

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a co star coming over. She discovers his body. The

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>police then discover a large amount of photos of naked

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>women on polaroids, as well as a lot of video.

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>He's got video equipment everywhere. He's been hit twice in

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the head and he has a cord ripped from a

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>VCR around his neck, and you know, this is a

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>very bloody scene. There's no signs at forced entry. But

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the last episode we talked about well,

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean a gun pointed at you would not indicate

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>forced entry either, So we can't really rely on that.

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>But there are jealous boyfriends, and there's a wife who

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>thought that she was going to be reconciling and now

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>she finds out that it doesn't sound like he's gotten

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>out of this sex addiction is what he claims it

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is at this point. So the police are investigating a

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>good friend of his named John Carpenter, electronics salesman. We're

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>assuming most of the electronics in this apartment and probably

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>what he had in LA are sold to him or

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>given to him by John Carpenter. So one of the

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>big questions will be for us, what does John Carpenter

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>get out of all of this? The mystery will deepen

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>once we find out a little bit more about their relationship.

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Did I get everything right or do you have any

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>other questions or anything I haven't covered?

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 2>No, I think that you know from the investigative side,

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 2>that pretty much sums it up. One of the questions

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 2>that I have is what was the autopsy finding? You know,

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 2>in terms of you said there was two blows. I

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 2>mean I could see the two lacerations. Was there signs

0:03:58.200 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 2>of strangulation?

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, there's a deputy medical examiner, a guy named Thomas Jarvis,

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>this is from John Hook's book, who performed the autopsy.

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So he was almost fifty years old when he died.

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Type of death is listed as violent, no kidding, the

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>manner by blunt instrument and chord. Here are the abnormal findings,

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>abundant dry blood on face, hair, and upper chest. The

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 1>autopsy report also noted a flaky, white dry material on

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the pubic hair, right lower abdomen, and right anterior thigh,

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>which they said was likely semen, but they never tested it.

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Police later theorized the killer may have masturbated over Crane's

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>dead body after the killing, which John Hook says is

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 1>a final fuck you quote unquote, But it was a

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>theory and they never tested the semen and never came

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to a conclusion about what it was. And that's all

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the information I have about what they found. Okay, what

0:04:57.839 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>do you think about that? The way they described it,

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>does that seem likely? If this is a man Is

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it a fuck you masturbating over somebody? Is that what

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that is? I always thought it was sort of a sexual.

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Component, So that does happen? You know, you have these

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 2>offenders that will masturbate after they've they've killed their victims.

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, Is it a form of denigration to the victim? Potentially,

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, but it's a it's a sexual act. It

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 2>sounds like they didn't collect these items, these stings. You know,

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.359
<v Speaker 2>it's like, oh good god, we're talking about all the

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, these these photos of nude women and and

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 2>and videos of women having sex his bedsheets. That's a

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 2>huge source of information. There's all sorts of DNA from

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 2>these various sexual encounters, and most certainly there could be

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 2>evidence from the offender and stains on that sheet for

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe a prior occasion, if there had been a relationship

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 2>between the offender. Right now, I'm assuming the offender is male.

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if Crane is having sex with men,

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 2>but I wouldn't end up saying no, that's an impossible

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 2>because all the subjects of his photos and videos, as

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 2>far as what you've told me, are women, you know,

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 2>but you know, is crying somebody that is you know,

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 2>crossing into homosexual acts. That opens up a whole other

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 2>suspect pool. And it's like, who has he had sex with?

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 2>And you can answer that by swabbing his body, by

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 2>collecting his bed sheets. You know, that is so huge.

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 2>There's limited number of reasons why people are killed in

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>terms of primary motives, and one of the primary ones

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 2>is it's who they're having sex with, whether it be

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 2>a man or a woman. So you need to collect

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 2>that evidence up front.

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, let's talk about John Carpenter and his relationship

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>with Bob Crane. And yes, we know they didn't collect

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>anything another failing. They did some good things and some

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>bad things here. I mean, I'm glad he had her

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>answer the phone that one time, even though I know

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it contaminated even more of the crime scene. It was

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting that he called twice, you know, and what his

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>reactions are in all of that. But at the same time,

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>forensically they're failing. Scott Stale police are not doing a

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>great job right now.

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 2>There's a struggle going on there. Yeah, things could have

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:19.239
<v Speaker 2>been done better.

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's talk about the police interview. They are looking

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>at Bob Crane's inner circle, as any police would, and

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>they start talking to a lot of people. They're getting

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>conflicting reports because they really are focusing on John Carpenter,

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>for better or for worse. There were reports that they

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>got along great, these two guys, and there are reports

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that they had been on the outs, and a few

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>days before Bob's death they were in a heated argument.

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't know about what. And Bob Crane Junior, who

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was close with his dad, gives police this quote, and

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I promise this is all going somewhere more than just

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>they probably irritated each other every once in a while.

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>There was an indication just in a passing conversation with

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>my father that John Carpenter coming into town was getting

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a little bit of a pain in the ass.

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>My dad expressed that he just didn't need Carpenter kind

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of hanging around him anymore. So let me explain what

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the relationship was like. John had cultivated this transactional relationship

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>between Bob and himself. So for Bob, John has this

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>access to equipment that I'm sure Bob is clueless about.

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>So he gets all of this great equipment for something

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that he's obviously preoccupied with. And that's a big part

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of Bob's life, and John gets the proximity to Bob,

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:40.319
<v Speaker 1>so he gets Hollywood fun, he gets women and sex.

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>And the men have even taped themselves. I'm assuming they've

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>found these tapes in threesomes, so there is some kind

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of intimacy. I mean, the range of two men and

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a woman in a threesome could go, you know, many

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>different directions, but there's certainly an intimacy and a comfort

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>level there with the two men.

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 2>So it sounds like per Crane's son that Bob Crane

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 2>was starting to say John Carpenter was more of a

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 2>hanger on and not as desired at this point.

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in the relationship, and he and his wife were

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>getting back together if we believe the wife, you know,

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>he's in therapy, although I don't know if those tapes

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>say that.

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:26.839
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, and so now this this becomes interesting from

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 2>potentially a motive, you know, was John Carpenter starting to

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 2>sense that Bob Crane the celebrity, was pulling away from

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 2>him and that his lifestyle was going to be changing.

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 2>You no longer have access to the women, to the

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Hollywood you know, lifestyle, whatever that was with Bob Crane.

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Did Crane tell him, you know, hey, stop coming around,

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, and now you could have somebody being very

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 2>upset as a result of it's basically a breakup, you know.

0:09:55.920 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 2>And so Carpenter most certainly is an interesting suspect, you know.

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 2>And I'd say he's a suspect for sure, I just

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 2>right now. You know. My fear is is that maybe

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 2>law enforcement so focused in on him that they didn't

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 2>pursue other leads as rigorously as they possibly should have.

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it sounds like it. Let me give

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you a little tiny bit more insight. I mean, this

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is such a gross quote, but the Phoenix New Times

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>back in nineteen seventy eight said women were drawn to

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the still popular crane like fish to a worm, and

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Carpenter didn't seem to mind dallying with the leftovers. Gross

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, the theory for the police, which

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>they thought was the strongest of any of these suspects

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.319
<v Speaker 1>and any other theory they had, was that John was motivated,

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>just like you said, to kill Bob because Bob was

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>stepping back from their friendship. Bob apparently had been saying

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>he was going to try to get back together with

0:10:55.720 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>his wife. John says none of that is true. He said,

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I came to Arizona on June twenty fifth, and all

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of this happened on the twenty ninth, so it sounds

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>like he had been there for three or four days.

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And he says, look, I was there to do some

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>business and to hang out with Bob. They said, what

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>did you guys do together? He said, we tried to

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>pick up women. So much for therapy and getting back

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>together with your wife. So this is a funny line

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>from Marin. And then I want to hear from you.

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>She said that they tried to pick up women and

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>then Bob was successful. John was not. And the last

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>night that John was in town, he brought a woman

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>back to the hotel and put the moves on her,

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.959
<v Speaker 1>and at three am, the woman asked to be taken home,

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>so he dropped her off. And he's unaccounted for from

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>three am until eight am when he checks out the

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>hotel and he goes to the airport. So there's this

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>five hour window, according to John, where he could have

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>absolutely carried out.

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 2>This murder for sure. This also goes to where we

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 2>know John Carpenter changed the time that he said that

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 2>he left Bob Crane from one am to two forty

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 2>five am, and I mentioned what sounds like he's concerned

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 2>about witness possibly seeing him later than what he stated

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 2>he was there. And now there's this woman and I

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 2>don't know if she has ever identified, but his from

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 2>his perspective, he's seeing an homicide investigation unfold and he's going, oh,

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 2>they are tracking people down, and they're going to find

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 2>out about this woman. And she's going to say I

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 2>was with him several hours past the time that he

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 2>said that he had actually left Bob Crane. One of

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 2>the thoughts that I have though, is if John Carpenter

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 2>is truly enjoying the lifestyle with Bob Crane and Bob

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Crane is starting to pull away, well, killing Bob Crane

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 2>basically completely ends that lifestyle, you know, so there is

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 2>there's an argument to be made that Carpenter would be

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 2>more motivated to have Crane alive than dead if he

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 2>wants to have any potential future relationship with Crane and

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 2>all the various advantages that gives Carpenter in his life.

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's you could most certainly see where in

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 2>a fit of rage, you have a homicide occur because

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 2>of this. Let's say a breakup between Bob Crane and

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 2>John Carpenter, and possibly if a tripod was used as

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 2>a bludgeoning device. This doesn't sound like it's pre planned homicide.

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 2>He's not coming in with a weapon. He's utilizing something

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 2>that is found within the apartment. The electrical cord is

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 2>something that is coming off of a VCR. And I

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 2>think it's significant that. I mean, I've seen offenders pull

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 2>electrical cords out of various devices and use them as

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 2>binding and or ligature material, but it's significant that he's

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 2>choosing an electronic device. The offender's choosing an electronic device

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 2>versus maybe drapery cord or something like that. So would

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 2>that kind of suggest you know, Carpenter is familiar with

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 2>these electronicquipment. He knew that possibly this VCR has a

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 2>power cord and that would be very easy to be

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 2>able to yank out of it, just the way it's

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 2>attached internally. However, the victimology also just keeps the door

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 2>open to the possibility that you have the jealous male

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 2>coming in and taking Bob Crane out.

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think that, like I said, they are

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>really really focused on John Carpenter and just the squishiness

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of his timeline in general, I think is what gets them.

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about evidence. That's what you and I

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>care about. Also, police need to find the rental car

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that John Carpenter had used. He had been there four

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>or five days, he said, I rented a car. So

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a few days after Bob is found dead, they finally

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>locate this car and it's having mechanical issues and was

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>being sent to a repair shop, which I think probably

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>would have been a nightmare. Of course, having other people

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>in the car, because it's a rental car would have

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>been bad too. But the police find it, they toe it,

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and they start looking at some things. So in a minute,

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll have you look at the car. Well, actually, go

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>ahead and look at the car. Now, it's not a Cadillac,

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's a Chrysler Cordoba. I don't know if that

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>looks like a Cadillac, So look on your bump crane photos. Also, Paul,

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a doc I don't I guess I skipped over it.

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a little diagram in there from the police. I

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you're going to think that's helpful or not.

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 2>To be frank, this this crime scene sketch is quite artistic.

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 2>This is unusual.

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Looks like a like a pro create drawing to me,

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>like a really high level drawing.

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is you know, this is where Obviously the

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 2>person who did this sketch for Scottsdale PD is a

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 2>talented sketcher. But like if I were the mentor of

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 2>this person, I'd be slapping him on the back of

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 2>his head saying, you're taking too long because you're putting

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 2>in detail that is not needed. He's got the you know,

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 2>wrinkles in the sheet and shape to the pillow, and

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 2>it's like, no, you know, this is we need to

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 2>get moving on this, you know, collecting evidence. We can't

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 2>be sitting here trying to make a pretty sketch. So

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 2>this tells me there's a level of inexperience. As good

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 2>as this sketch appears visually, it's like, no, it's too much,

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 2>it's overkilled. We have photographs to fill in those details. Okay,

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 2>So I'm looking at a photograph. It's indicating that this

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 2>is John Carpenter's Chrysler Cordoba. So this was a rental

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 2>car and this is you know, your typical boat of

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 2>a car from the nineteen seventies. Yeah, yeah, it's you know,

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 2>you got the massive trunk, you probably got a massive

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 2>front bench seat. It appears to be a Tudor car.

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 2>This photograph to show in the car from the rear,

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, so I'm seeing the tail lights. You know,

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 2>it's a massive car. And I know we have this

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 2>witness that sees what was described as a white Cadillac.

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 2>White Cadillac look like this back in the nineteen seventies,

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, so this is where Okay, this car, this Cordoba,

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 2>is probably something that would easily be confused for a

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 2>Cadillac from this this era. So I think you mentioned

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 2>it when you're talking about the white Cadillac in the

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 2>first episode that yeah, you could probably you know, throw

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 2>a rock and hit one because they would be so popular.

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 2>So it's not I can't put a lot of weight

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 2>that carpenter has a vehicle that I would say matches

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 2>what that witness said about a white Cadillac. But it

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 2>is important evidence in that. Okay, what is found inside here?

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Is there anything from the crime scene that could be

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, inside to this rental car. You know that

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 2>today maybe with DNA we could tie back, you know,

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 2>is there blood transfers or other aspects. Hopefully they did

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:57.439
<v Speaker 2>a thorough job processing this.

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>So let me look and go back and forth, so

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>don't skip ahead. But we do have photos kind of everything.

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Every time I say something, we've got a photo. So

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>first up is going to be in the backseat of

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the passenger side of what's confirmed to be John Carpenter's

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>rental car, technicians find a small dry blood smear on

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the switch that rolls the window up and down. John

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>hook says they weren't drops of blood. These were more

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>like streaks or smudges or smears. So that's what you

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>see on page five of your doc.

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 2>It's important that they're finding blood because you have a

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 2>homicide victim that is bleeding. So is it possible the

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 2>offender walked out from that homicide with blood on his person,

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 2>on his clothing, on an object, let's say the murder

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 2>weapon that is transferred inside the rental car? For sure. However,

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 2>at this point it's a rental car. Who else has

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 2>been inside this car and is bleeding until that blood

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 2>is owned to be Bob Crane's blood with DNA, you know,

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:05.719
<v Speaker 2>for me, it's like, yeah, it's important, but you need

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 2>to do DNA in order to interpret it as having

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 2>any relevance to this crime.

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and there's a couple of other things. So there's

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of other stains. I guess if you kind

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of go through, you'll see there are a few other stains.

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.199
<v Speaker 1>Blood on a power window switch, you know, blood stains

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>on the passenger door. There is a tissue speck on

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the door panel, and then there is going to be

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 1>one more little bit down there that they believe is

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>brain matter that was found in the car.

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Wait a second, So okay, So this tissue spec on

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 2>door panel believed to be from Bob Crane's skull lost

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 2>or never collected.

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>So they took a photo of it but never collected it.

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 2>What the hell?

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:49.959
<v Speaker 1>Well, we've established, Paul that Scottsdale pet is overmatched.

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Here, So I mean, how can they even say anything

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 2>about this? Let's see here, I do not know. So

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm zooming in and I see that. You know, there's

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 2>a ruler that in you know inches American standard measurement ruler,

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 2>and this red glob is about one sixteenth of an

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 2>inch in diameter. It's got three dimensions to it. There's

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 2>a closeup photo of this tissue spec on the next page.

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 2>When it's initially photoed, you know the coloration, it's looking

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 2>bright red, and then this close up photo it's looking brown.

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 2>It's like this globular mass that to be frank. Just

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 2>from its physical appearance, I couldn't draw any conclusion as

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 2>to what it is. I have processed, you know, thousands

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 2>of items for blood for tissue over the course of

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 2>my career. I've seen them at a crime scenes, seen

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 2>it on items of evidence within the lab, and this

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 2>mass could be anything. I literally cannot conclude what it is.

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 2>And I will tell you I've seen stains on physical

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:09.199
<v Speaker 2>evidence that I was like, that's blood, and then I

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 2>test it and it's not blood. And I've seen stuff,

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 2>let's say, inside a car. I can think of one

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 2>thing where I've got this reddish brown it looked like

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 2>dried blood and tested it and it was not blood.

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 2>And so that's where you know I have developed a

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.919
<v Speaker 2>level of cautiousness. I can look. I know what a

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 2>crime scene looks like. I know what blood looks like,

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 2>fresh looks like when it's coagulating as it's outside the body.

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 2>I know what it looks like when it's dry, when

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 2>it's been subjected to environmental influences. But now there's a

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 2>photo of this globular mass that they never collect, and

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 2>they're saying it's coming from Bob Crane's skull.

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>They're not sure. I know, I know, you know.

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 2>I can't. I personally and I have a level of expertise,

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 2>I cannot draw that conclusion. It seems like somebody's really

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 2>reaching on this item of evidence. And there's these other

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 2>bloodstains in the car. Did they collect those? And has

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 2>DNA testing been done on those?

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Let me get you jumping way ahead, buddy, so you

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>just hang Remember this is a two part and we're

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>not ten minutes. Let me tell you what they do.

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>So thankfully, they do pull a sample of the blood.

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>It is type B rare and Bob is a type B.

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.959
<v Speaker 1>John is not. Bob says, I have no idea how

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the blood got in there. I don't know what you're

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>talking about. He volunteers to go back to Arizona. He

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>does not get a lawyer. He says, I'll take a

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 1>lie detector test, and I'll take truth serum sodium pentothl.

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so pentothal sure, which just.

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like an interesting way to die. Truth serum or

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>even go under hypnosis, and he says, I don't have

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>anything to hide. You know, the police are very frustrated.

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>For years, they remain focused on John Carpenter. The tangible

0:22:55.880 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>evidence against him is scant, so every so often there's

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a tip. There's a housekeeper at the Scottsdale Hotel where

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>John stayed. She found a bloody pillowcase and a washcloth

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in the room he had slept in. But these are

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>thrown out, and you know, her dates are kind of off,

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 1>so we don't even know if that's where John was.

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 1>And then we get to the blood tissue stuff. So

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, you saw the photo and we talked a

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit about it. The reason this photo comes up

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>is more than a decade later. So this is in

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the early nineteen nineties. There's a detective named Jim Rains,

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and he looks at the case with fresh eyes and

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>finds what Entertainment Weekly calls a previously unseen crime scene

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>photo of the rental car. There's no sample, nobody acknowledges

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>this brain tissue is what they're calling it. And this

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>detective the decade or so later, finds this photo that

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>nobody recognizes. He finds medical experts who say that the

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>photo there's no negatives. Pull He finds these experts who

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>say the photo it shows what appears to be a

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>small piece of human tissue stuck to the interior side

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of the passenger door. Their theory is is that John

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>beat Bob Crane to death with this tripod, they're assuming,

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and then got in the car and carried all of this,

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, biological evidence with him. It might have bumped

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>or rubbed against the car door, he tossed it in

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the back, who knows. And that is when they end

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>up arresting him with this little discovery right of this

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 1>photograph that you say, we can't even tell whether this

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is brain tissue or not, but this to them a

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>decade later is enough to arrest him. Just so you know,

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>he had completed a short stint for molesting his girlfriend's

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>ten year old daughter, so they knew.

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Where he was. It sounds like at the very beginning

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 2>of this case that they built against Carpenter. And what

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 2>you were laying out is that they did ABO blood

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 2>testing on the bloodstains and it came back type B

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bob Crane is type B. So I'm just having

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 2>to go back to my ABO typing charts.

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering you. I knew you were listening to me,

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>but I was wondering what you were doing at the

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>same time.

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 2>As an example, then there's a reason why we moved

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 2>away from ABO typing, and it's because it's not very discriminating.

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 2>Now Type B. You know, it's a smaller percentage of

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 2>the population, so there's a little bit more weight that

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 2>can be put on it. But I'm looking at I

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 2>had to go. I have an old book, it's called

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 2>The Source Book of Forensics Sorology, but on the fly,

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 2>trying to find what I needed was going to be

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 2>too much, so I'm just going online. And this is

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 2>pretty cool because I didn't have this back in the day.

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 2>But they've actually got the percentages of the blood types

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 2>per ethnicity, if you will, across the world, and I'm

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 2>looking at type B, and depending on where you're at,

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 2>it's anywhere from nine percent of a population up to

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm seeing as high as thirty five percent, like one

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 2>third of the population of certain ethnicities are type B. Basically,

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 2>they cannot exclude this blood as being from Bob Crane,

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 2>but I can't put depending on the ethnicity who knows

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 2>who's been bleeding inside this rental car. Depending on the

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 2>ethnicity background, one third of the population of that person's

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:34.959
<v Speaker 2>ethnic background could be Type B. This is where hopefully

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 2>they still have this evidence and we do modern DNA

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 2>testing on it and then say yeah, this is Bob

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 2>Crane's blood inside John Carpenter's rental car. Now I'm on

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 2>board right now. It's just like, well, you can't exclude

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 2>all it is is a weak inclusion from a physical evidence.

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm just talking physical evidence by itself. That blood Type

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:01.199
<v Speaker 2>B inside the rental car is just like, well, I

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 2>can't eliminate Carpenter on that.

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, back then they said when they found

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 1>it in the early nineties, they were saying the estimate

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>was one in seven people had Type B. But right

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>are they looking at the different ethnicities? And who knows?

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Their point is that it's rare enough for John Carpenter

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>to still be in their crosshairs, that it was just

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>too weird. You know.

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Sure, well then they you know, I was listening, but

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 2>they said, this is where the investigator found a previously

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 2>unknown crime scene photo. So let me hear what you

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 2>were talking about with that.

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, that was the brain matter one that you looked at.

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>So the point with that tissue I know I'm putting,

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna put quotes brain matter. The point of that

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>photo is that they didn't keep the evidence. There's no

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>way of identifying what that actually is. But it was

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>enough to arrest John Carpenter more than a decade after

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Bob Krane's death.

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 2>Again, just speaking from the physical evidence it's been presented. No,

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 2>there isn't probable cause on that. Now, you know the

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 2>investigative side, his movement patterns, statements he's making. You know

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 2>that all has to factor in as to whether they've

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 2>actually built sufficient probable cause to arrest. I'm not convinced

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 2>that they have that with what you've told me.

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know what it was like in

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the seventies, but if you rented a car and then

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 1>return the car, I would assume they would clean it

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and examine it in between each rental. I mean maybe not.

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm kidding. You know, I travel a lot. I mean

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 2>rental car companies today are very very good, but I

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 2>have had some rentals that are dirty. They're you know,

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 2>they smell like weed. You know, it's it's like really

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 2>you're you're you're not even trying, you know, to clean

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 2>the car. So no, I are the rental car technicians

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 2>really paying that much attention to maybe there's a red

0:28:56.240 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 2>stain on you know, the window, you'll ever, No, they're not,

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 2>you know. So that's just where we know that there's

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 2>a transient population that has been in and out of

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 2>this particular car. And so to put any weight on

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 2>the blood and that globular mass as being related to

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 2>the homicide with the testing that they've done, no, you

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 2>can't draw that conclusion that is right now. I think

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 2>that's on the level of almost absurdity. They need to

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 2>find that evidence and do DNA testing to show it's

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 2>from Bob Crane.

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, here we go. Let's talk about the trial, and

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>we do talk about this quote unquote brain matter. So

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>John Carpenter goes on trial in ninety four. Bob Crane

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>was murreed in seventy eight, So this is what sixteen

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>years later, and two pathologists testify for the prosecution. They

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>say that a piece of human tissue would shrivel up

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>after a few hours on a hot day and a car.

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>But based on these photos you know that were taken,

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess as soon as they found the car, which

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>would have been a few days later. The sample appeared

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>fresh more than a day after John turned in the car.

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think this was not good for the prosecution

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>because they're saying, we didn't find this car on the

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.479
<v Speaker 1>day that his body was discovered. We found it four

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>or five days later.

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, And that was my observation. I talked about how

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.479
<v Speaker 2>bright red that initial photo was, and then when they

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 2>had the close up photo, it's all shriveled up in

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 2>like this brown globular It's almost looks like like these

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 2>this little globular amber like substance. And you know, this

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 2>is where you know, I have to be cautious. I

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 2>can't say it's not tissue, but I'm looking at it,

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:49.959
<v Speaker 2>going that doesn't look like what I have personally witnessed

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 2>in actual homicide cases where I can test it and

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 2>know what it is. You know, It's like I can't

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 2>draw any conclusion as to what that mass is.

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well let me tell you. I mean the prosecution

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>just gets shamed. I think through this whole trial, there

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 1>are technicians they put on the stand who process the

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>car as a crime scene, and they can't remember hardly

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>anything about doing this in seventy eight, and they barely

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>remember seeing any blood even let alone this tissue on

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the passenger door. So they're useless. So they're out the door.

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>The defense then says, you guys can't identify any of

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>this stuff based on these photos, and they put a

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>DPS Lieutenant colonel on the stand who is supposedly an expert,

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>who says, according to the crime Laboratory, even under the

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>best of circumstances, it's unlikely that stains or substances can

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>be identified as blood, smears or tissue just by looking

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>at photographs. Therefore, a confirmation of any stain as being

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>blood or tissue requires extensive laboratory testing. Therefore, it must

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>be assumed that personal examination of the door panel did

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>not reveal tissue, that no evidence was destroyed. So I

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know what that means, Like, what was that a

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>kernel of popcorn? I mean, what is he saying?

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 2>No, well, I mean he's saying. What I'm saying is

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 2>that you can't draw any conclusions from these photographs. You

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:16.239
<v Speaker 2>have to do testing. The undercurrent about that is for

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 2>people like myself and like this Lieutenant colonel out of

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Arizona DPS lab. We've seen the spectrum, let's say, of

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 2>bloodstains and various colors and forms it takes. And that's

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 2>where you can't say, well, hold on, I've got this here,

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 2>this mass as an example, and that looks like this,

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 2>so therefore it's got to be human tissue. And from

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Bob Crane's skulls, there's no way you can jump to

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 2>that conclusion. We have also been fooled ourselves when we go, wow,

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 2>that really looks like blood and then we test it

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 2>and it turns out it's not blood, you know. So

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 2>that's fundamentally what he's saying. Now that the last phrase

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.959
<v Speaker 2>that you read, I didn't understand the meaning of that.

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 2>And what did he say at the end of.

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Their So he says, you know, the confirmation of any

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>stains as being blood or tissue requires extensive laboratory testing.

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Which you said golden, yep.

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, he says, Therefore it must be assumed that the

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>personal examination of the door panel did not reveal tissue,

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and that there was no evidence that was destroyed because

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't there to begin with, is what he's saying.

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And then let me tell you what another person says

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that gave me a little bit more perspective. Prosecutors can't

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>explain why police reports in seventy eight didn't mention the

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>tissue photo or the speck itself, or why there are

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>no negatives. A jury is going to be asked to

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>believe that an untold number of investigators and prosecutors for

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>whom a solution to the famed Crane murder would have

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:51.479
<v Speaker 1>been career crowning as an achievement, never noticed that stinkin photo.

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know where they think the photo came from,

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't sound like it's even remotely a possibility

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that there was a brain spec found in the back

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of the car, because that guy would have been under

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>arrest much sooner most likely.

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I'm going back to these these photos. So

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that I'm looking for is definitely

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, in the lab, when we take photos of

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 2>physical evidence, you know will use a scale so you

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 2>have a sense for the size of the stain or

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 2>whatever you're looking at. But oftentimes the scale will have

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 2>the lab number or the case file number and the

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 2>item number written on it, so the photograph shows it's

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 2>from this case and it's from this item. And so

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, with what I'm seeing of these photos, there's

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 2>a there's a steel ruler that is being used to

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 2>show size of various stains. But there's no markings anywhere

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 2>in these photos within the photo itself to indicate what

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 2>case it's associated with. And that's not to say it's

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 2>these photos are from some other case. It's just that

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 2>that would be something that I, as a reviewer of

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the processing and of the documentation, would be noting. And

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 2>I also think it's notable I mentioned it's a steel ruler.

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 2>This steel ruler, and this is something you know, back

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 2>in the day I'm guilty of, we had plastic ones,

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:16.359
<v Speaker 2>but this is a this is a ruler that is

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 2>being used from case to case to case to case.

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 2>It's a source of contamination, and this day and age,

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 2>we would use something that's disposable so we don't track,

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 2>let's say, DNA from a previous homicide into a current

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 2>homicide that we're working. But it looks like this this

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 2>photo of the car door, the inside panel, you know,

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 2>it's so cropped, but it doesn't look like that's currently

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 2>attached to the car, So it's like it was removed

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 2>and possibly the entire panel, if not, the entire door

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 2>was collected. You know, so this is where Okay, they

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 2>say they can't find this evidence, Well, is there a

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 2>paper trail? You know, where did it go? If it

0:35:57.760 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 2>went to the lab, did it go from the lab

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 2>back to property? Where in property was at place? You know?

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 2>How rigorously have they looked for this evidence. I've got

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 2>my own cases, you know, from back in the day,

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.279
<v Speaker 2>in which we can't find the evidence. And then you

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 2>find it and it's been placed in the wrong box.

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 2>You have to start rolling up your sleeves and start

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 2>going through where it most likely is going to be.

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 2>Have they done that? This is such a critical These

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 2>bloodstains inside Carpenter's rental car are so critical. They have

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 2>to exhaust everything in terms of trying to find it

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:35.439
<v Speaker 2>because it could prove the case and show that yes,

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 2>if Bob Crane's blood is inside Carpenter's rental car, I'm going, okay, yeah,

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 2>he's the killer. But if it comes back and it's

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 2>not even Bob Crane's blood, then it's just spurious and

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 2>they got nothing on Carpenter to be frank.

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, And I think you hit the nail on

0:36:54.960 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the head because the prosecutor's case fell apart and annoinege

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>On Carpenter is acquitted by the jury.

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, and this is this is a problem.

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And this is not the end. Poll hole, So don't

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you tell me your statement. But don't think this is

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the end. Don't say bye bye. I'm gonna go have

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a drink a bourbon now, because there's more of this.

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 2>No, but but this is where, you know, you take

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 2>a weak case to court and you get an acquittal,

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 2>you're done. Don't take a weak case like this to

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 2>court because now, let's say they do test, they find

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 2>those those bloodstains out of Carpenter's rental car, and it

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 2>comes back to Bob Crane. They can't prosecute him. All

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 2>they can say is, well, we now know who the

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 2>right killer, the right guy is, but he's free and clear.

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Well he was free and clear for four years and

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:45.839
<v Speaker 1>then he dies. So you know, after that, there are

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of course lots of people who say that John definitely

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 1>was the one who killed Bob with a tripod and

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a VCR cord. And you know, he probably took the

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>tripod and folded it up and put it in his

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 1>case and took it back home to LA with them.

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:05.439
<v Speaker 1>And then there are other people who say, listen, the

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>police really dropped the ball here. I don't know if

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>they should have called the state police or what, but

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that they dropped the ball and they didn't investigate enough.

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And then there are more developments. But what I can

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 1>tell the way you sit up that usually I can

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>When you sit up like that, that's how I usually

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 1>can tell you've got something to say.

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think you know. This is where agencies need

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 2>to recognize what they're good at and what they might

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 2>want to reach out for help, you know, and this

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 2>case was not handled right based off of what you

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 2>told me. But I'm not going to cast I'm not

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 2>going to say bad things about Scottsdale PD from nineteen

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 2>seventy eight, but I can guarantee that the agency right

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 2>next to them, Phoenix PD, has very experienced investigators, very

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:52.759
<v Speaker 2>experienced csis. This is where you have agreements when you're

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 2>a smaller agency, recognize your weaknesses and get MOUs in

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 2>place with the resources that you can pull in when

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 2>you have a case like this. And you know, this

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 2>is something that I've seen over and over again, and notably,

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 2>let's say John Bene Ramsay, where you have a smaller

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 2>inexperienced agency who probably should have called in Denver homicide

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:19.319
<v Speaker 2>to be frank, you know, kind of a similar type

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 2>of scenario where from the very beginning, it really underscores

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 2>that you have to do it right from the very beginning,

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 2>otherwise you can possibly just completely kill the case.

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me tell you, you know, John Carpenter dies and

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 1>this case goes very cold. So in the mid two

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:39.399
<v Speaker 1>thousand tons, the reporter I told you about, John Hook,

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 1>who wrote the book, was given permission to submit the

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>blood samples from John's car using you know more updated

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 1>or using updated DNA processes in which were available during

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 1>earlier phases, which were not available during earlier phases of

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the investigation. So according to Hook, this is what the

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 1>testing concluded, and this is from him. John Hook really

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>did think that John Carpenter was responsible for this. The

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:08.760
<v Speaker 1>DNA found on the door of John Carpenter's mental car

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:12.359
<v Speaker 1>is not from Bob Crane. The test actually picked up

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>two DNA profiles, a major contributors from a man we

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know who he is. The second is from a

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 1>partial profile too degraded to reach any conclusions. So what

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:25.959
<v Speaker 1>John hook says, is I still think he's the guy

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:29.839
<v Speaker 1>John Carpenter, But I mean the DNA detected and our

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>test might be completely unconnected to the crime, might have

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 1>been depositive before after you know, who knows. It's unlikely

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>this has anything to do with the crime in general.

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:43.399
<v Speaker 1>But that was the conclusion. And just as a note, Paul,

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.319
<v Speaker 1>they said that. And I don't know if you want

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to call somebody and double check that this is the

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 1>truth or not, but they said that all of the

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>samples in Bob's case are done and can't use him anymore.

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 1>They've all been used up, so there's no further DNA

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 1>testing possible.

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:59.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, and I you know, when you start talking about

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:03.439
<v Speaker 2>DNA tech technology in the mid twenty ten range, we're

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 2>talking modern DNA technology. This is where now you have

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 2>the discriminating power. At least with the sample that they

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 2>got results on, they've eliminated Bob Crane as being a

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 2>contributor to that bloodstain. Just like what I say it

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:19.919
<v Speaker 2>was saying before, it's like it's somebody else's. It could

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 2>be somebody else's. It's a rental car. So you know,

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 2>it's unfortunate if they've completely consumed the samples that they

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:31.440
<v Speaker 2>don't have results on. Because the technology from a sensitivity

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 2>standpoint has greatly improved since the twenty ten timeframe, it's

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 2>possible with the current law enforcement type of DNA testing

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 2>that maybe they could get a result. I guess my

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 2>question would be is why are they saying it's now consumed.

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 2>It's because they consumed the entire extract. Have they consumed,

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, the swab that they used to collect it.

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Do they still have let's say, the door panel. Can

0:41:57.480 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 2>you go back and reswab that area? But absent being

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 2>able to do that, I think that one test in

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 2>and of itself pretty much in all likelihood. Okay, you've

0:42:08.760 --> 0:42:11.359
<v Speaker 2>got a bleeder inside this rental car. That's and that

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 2>blood is not coming from Bob Crane. Well likely the

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Speaker 2>other blood stains which have very similar color appearance, you know,

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:22.280
<v Speaker 2>they don't look like they you know from a temporal

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 2>standpoint that some of these stains have been there much

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 2>longer than other stains. Likely all those stains are from

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 2>that same bleeder that's not Bob Crane, you know. So

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:33.839
<v Speaker 2>this is where the physical evidence against Carpenter, at least

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 2>from that rental car is you know, you have to

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 2>throw all of that out. You can't rely upon that

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 2>at all, you know, the circumstantial case he is, he's

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:46.839
<v Speaker 2>a suspect. I just don't think that they have enough

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:50.880
<v Speaker 2>to be confident he is one responsible. Do you know

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 2>did they ever go out to LA and search Carpenter's residents?

0:42:56.040 --> 0:43:00.399
<v Speaker 2>I have an issue maybe with Carpenter bringing a murder

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 2>weapon back home with him flying it. You know, I

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 2>would think he would have gotten rid of that somewhere

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 2>in the you know, Scottsdale, Phoenix area.

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I was thinking, Paul, what would make those

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 1>stains in the car? Like I guess the theory is

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is that he uses a tripod he beats Bob Crane

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to death. It's not that he's using a knife and

0:43:22.680 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 1>he's cut his hands. It's that the blood was transferred

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>from the tripods somehow in the car. But do the

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:33.320
<v Speaker 1>patterns that you saw make sense for flinging a tripod

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 1>into the back of a car. And would he do that?

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:37.279
<v Speaker 1>To begin with? Why would he do that? It's a

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 1>rental car, you know.

0:43:38.920 --> 0:43:43.239
<v Speaker 2>You know you have one blood stain where obviously you

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 2>have a finger that has blood on it that is

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:51.280
<v Speaker 2>being used to operate the window switch, right, that's obvious,

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:55.280
<v Speaker 2>you know. So I would say that chances are as

0:43:55.680 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 2>those blood stains are being transferred because the person has

0:44:00.800 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 2>blood on their hands, and not so much that it's

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 2>because you've got a bloody tripod that's being flung back there.

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 2>It's not going to be touching that part. If it's

0:44:11.040 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 2>a tripod that's leaving those linear those parallel linear stains

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 2>on the bedsheet, that's a significant amount of blood on

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:20.759
<v Speaker 2>the legs of that tripod. And if that is not

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:23.400
<v Speaker 2>cleaned off and that's thrown in the trunk or that's

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:25.839
<v Speaker 2>you know, thrown into the back seat or something, you'd

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:32.120
<v Speaker 2>probably see some fairly significant transfers if those particular legs

0:44:32.200 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 2>with blood on them are contacting surfaces within the car versus.

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 2>What I'm seeing in those photos is more consistent with

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 2>somebody transferring blood from their fingers. And it may not

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:47.800
<v Speaker 2>be the person's own blood. It could be somebody else,

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe this car was used in a different homicide,

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 2>who knows, you.

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Know, or someone with a bloody nose. My kid gets

0:44:56.560 --> 0:44:59.839
<v Speaker 1>bloody noses a lot, so who knows, you know.

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Sure you know they've got if they put a bloody

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:05.959
<v Speaker 2>nose and transfer that onto their fingers. But right now

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 2>that blood is irrelevant. It's not related to the crime

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 2>per modern DNA testing. So now it's okay, you think

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:17.320
<v Speaker 2>it's John Carpenter. How do you prove it's John Carpenter

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:19.520
<v Speaker 2>in this day and age, you know, are they going

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 2>to get any further circumstantial evidence against him? You know

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be tough.

0:45:24.320 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I don't see that. I'm assuming they did

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Search's apartment and didn't find anything. They never found the

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:32.800
<v Speaker 1>tripod which was Bob Crane's tripod, if that's what was used,

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, this just becomes a big mystery,

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 1>and that's why it's an unsolved case. I guess the

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:43.240
<v Speaker 1>big movement would be if somebody like a Pole Hooles calls,

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Scottsdale PD and says, do you guys still

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:50.319
<v Speaker 1>have any biological evidence anywhere, any kind of evidence at

0:45:50.320 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>all from this Bob Crane case.

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, and that's where I would be going back to

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 2>the original. You have to go to the origin of

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:02.720
<v Speaker 2>the crime, which is Bob Crane's body, where Bob Crane

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 2>is killed, and then an outer circle, if you will,

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:08.279
<v Speaker 2>is whatever they collected out of their apartment, how much

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Layton processing did they do? Do they have any latents

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:15.320
<v Speaker 2>that are unidentified? Today we always get Layton's out of

0:46:15.360 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 2>houses if we do a decent job, and we always

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 2>find Layton's that we can never identify because you have

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 2>so many people that flow in and out of that apartment.

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:27.800
<v Speaker 2>But we have technology today that if they have unidentified latents,

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:30.560
<v Speaker 2>they could identify that person and go that person was.

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:32.919
<v Speaker 2>You know, like I had one case in GSK where

0:46:33.000 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 2>we got super excited because in the bottom of the

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 2>victim's phone there was an unidentified Layton, and one of

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:42.880
<v Speaker 2>the examiners identified, you know, forty some odd years later,

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 2>and then investigation showed that turned out to be a

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:48.440
<v Speaker 2>telephone repairman. That's why his Layton is on that phone.

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:51.759
<v Speaker 2>It's not GSK. But you have to go through those motions.

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:54.680
<v Speaker 2>And so this is where if I were to look

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 2>at this case today, it's like I want everything. I

0:46:58.360 --> 0:47:01.359
<v Speaker 2>need to see the entire case file, and I need

0:47:01.400 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 2>to see the entire evidence list of what was collected

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:06.959
<v Speaker 2>back in the day, which should be in the case file.

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:09.880
<v Speaker 2>I would also need to go to property and start

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 2>auditing the property room, like my old property room. For

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:16.680
<v Speaker 2>these old cases, they use three by five index cards

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:19.640
<v Speaker 2>really kind of a pretty pretty good file system for

0:47:19.719 --> 0:47:22.399
<v Speaker 2>back in the day that wasn't computerized. Do you still

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 2>have those cards? And on the back of the card

0:47:25.200 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 2>would be written information as to this evidence was destroyed

0:47:28.640 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 2>on such and such a date whatever, you know, so

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 2>you establish a paper trail. If you don't have the

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:36.200
<v Speaker 2>paper trail, that's like, well, where would this evidence normally

0:47:36.239 --> 0:47:39.160
<v Speaker 2>be kept in the property room? And are there cases

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:41.600
<v Speaker 2>from this era that are in this area. Have you

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:44.439
<v Speaker 2>guys opened up the boxes to see is there bob

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 2>crane evidence that got just put somewhere else where it

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:49.920
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be. You know, that's just the reality of what

0:47:49.960 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 2>happens with these old cases. And so this is part

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 2>of if I get involved in the case, that's all

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:58.160
<v Speaker 2>part of the step to compile the current state of

0:47:58.200 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the case at this point in time, in the current

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:04.600
<v Speaker 2>state of the evidence that exists, and then make decisions

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 2>on how to proceed from there.

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:08.279
<v Speaker 1>It's been a while since I think you've gotten this

0:48:08.440 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 1>excited about a case, and I understand why. You know,

0:48:13.520 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm always trying to think about what the lesson is

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>when we do these cases, things that I think about,

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, with historical cases, and sometimes I put them

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of different categories. There's one category where

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it's clear the police in the eighteen hundreds, early nineteen hundreds,

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:32.279
<v Speaker 1>or even in the nineteen seventies want to do everything

0:48:32.360 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 1>they can. They know they don't have the technology to

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 1>solve this. Now, they collect everything in the best way

0:48:38.120 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 1>they know how. And then there are the investigators and

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutors who are doing things that where they should

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:48.399
<v Speaker 1>know better and they're not doing them. And we've talked

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 1>about climbing over the body to shave it right then

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 1>and there, you know, putting on a case that is

0:48:55.320 --> 0:48:58.880
<v Speaker 1>clearly weak based on a photograph that's not going to

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 1>lead you anywhere, and ruining any chance of being able

0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:05.719
<v Speaker 1>to prosecute this guy later on. So you know, there

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:09.719
<v Speaker 1>are these balances where I look at the investigators in

0:49:09.760 --> 0:49:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the past and just go, man, I'm so sorry that

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>you will that you had to attach a magnet to

0:49:14.800 --> 0:49:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a fishing line to try to find a gun in

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a river. I mean that was fortitude. But then there

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 1>are other times where I just think, yeah, you really

0:49:23.680 --> 0:49:26.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't even think about what was going to happen. What

0:49:26.560 --> 0:49:28.480
<v Speaker 1>consequences were of your decisions.

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to just call out incompetence. I think

0:49:33.440 --> 0:49:38.320
<v Speaker 2>oftentimes you have very well meaning individuals that are working

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:42.319
<v Speaker 2>a case, but they don't have the experience, they don't

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 2>have the expertise. And that goes back to when you

0:49:45.719 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 2>say the message, you know, this case here, if properly done.

0:49:50.960 --> 0:49:54.279
<v Speaker 2>In nineteen seventy eight, sexual assault case were being done

0:49:54.280 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 2>on victims' bodies, Fingernail scrapings were being collected, crusty material

0:49:59.560 --> 0:50:02.880
<v Speaker 2>from pub care was being collected out of you know,

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the agency I worked for in the Bay Area. If

0:50:05.440 --> 0:50:07.880
<v Speaker 2>they didn't do that, this is where you go, Okay,

0:50:08.160 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 2>they were in over their heads. And that's where agencies

0:50:11.840 --> 0:50:14.880
<v Speaker 2>just need to know what they don't know and be

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:18.560
<v Speaker 2>prepared when they have to recognize I've got a case

0:50:18.760 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 2>that my agency cannot fully handle. I need outside help

0:50:23.200 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 2>in order to do this right from the very beginning.

0:50:25.719 --> 0:50:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's maybe a better takeaway. The better takeaway here

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:31.319
<v Speaker 1>is get over yourself about taking the lead on a

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:34.160
<v Speaker 1>case because it's your jurisdiction or it's your town, and

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:36.160
<v Speaker 1>call and help when you need it. Here, they call

0:50:36.239 --> 0:50:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the Texas Rangers. Also, you know, I mean there are

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 1>resources that everyone has certainly more than they used to have,

0:50:42.040 --> 0:50:46.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming. So okay, I like that too. So you know,

0:50:46.360 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>as we move along in our seasons here, I want

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:53.719
<v Speaker 1>to definitely keep an eye on the really good performances

0:50:53.719 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that we see, the impressive people. Sometimes you say, I

0:50:56.680 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't know that pathologist figure that out, And I've done

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that too, So I'm surprised sometimes and then sometimes I go,

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:07.239
<v Speaker 1>don't what is going on with these people? So it's

0:51:07.280 --> 0:51:09.759
<v Speaker 1>good for you to tell me the difference between just

0:51:10.040 --> 0:51:13.680
<v Speaker 1>people who are malicious or don't give a shit versus

0:51:13.760 --> 0:51:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the people who just clearly are sort of drowning in

0:51:17.520 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 1>a case that has you know, more to it than

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:21.440
<v Speaker 1>they can handle.

0:51:21.840 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, that's for sure, you know. And and most

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:28.480
<v Speaker 2>certainly there are just negligent individuals and law enforcement that

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:31.759
<v Speaker 2>purposely are just lazy and they don't try, you know.

0:51:32.120 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 2>But oftentimes what I see, you know that the general

0:51:35.680 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 2>population is going to blame that. But oftentimes it's what

0:51:39.160 --> 0:51:41.680
<v Speaker 2>I think is going on here is that you know,

0:51:41.760 --> 0:51:45.640
<v Speaker 2>it's an experience. Yeah, and maybe you know certain things

0:51:45.800 --> 0:51:49.480
<v Speaker 2>like you know, evidence tracking within the evidence room, property

0:51:49.520 --> 0:51:51.879
<v Speaker 2>room could have been more robust back in the day

0:51:51.920 --> 0:51:54.680
<v Speaker 2>than what it sounds like they have, you know, but

0:51:55.040 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not convinced just because I've seen it before. Where

0:51:58.840 --> 0:52:02.400
<v Speaker 2>and it's it's because of experience? Is that? Nope, we

0:52:02.440 --> 0:52:04.719
<v Speaker 2>can't find the evidence. So the case is done. And

0:52:04.719 --> 0:52:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I was like, did you really look, you know? Or

0:52:07.680 --> 0:52:09.919
<v Speaker 2>is your property technician just telling you, hey, there's nothing

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:12.600
<v Speaker 2>on the shelf under that case file number. Then I'd go, well,

0:52:12.600 --> 0:52:14.399
<v Speaker 2>you need to go back and you need to look.

0:52:14.840 --> 0:52:17.239
<v Speaker 2>It didn't look well.

0:52:17.520 --> 0:52:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Next week? Can I guarantee you that we're not going

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to have lazy investigators?

0:52:23.680 --> 0:52:23.759
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:52:24.360 --> 0:52:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I can't. Will there be investigators, yes, that's about the

0:52:30.719 --> 0:52:33.480
<v Speaker 1>only thing I can say that. We will have people

0:52:33.520 --> 0:52:36.839
<v Speaker 1>looking into a crime. And that's it. But every week

0:52:36.880 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to week, I'm always interested in seeing how you rate

0:52:39.120 --> 0:52:41.919
<v Speaker 1>these people, and you know, some of them I press

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:44.520
<v Speaker 1>for sure. So we'll see what happens next week.

0:52:44.920 --> 0:52:47.080
<v Speaker 2>All right. Again, I'm looking forward to it, and thank

0:52:47.120 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 2>you again for bringing this case to me.

0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:56.920
<v Speaker 1>You got it. This has been an exactly right production

0:52:57.360 --> 0:52:59.839
<v Speaker 1>for our sources and show notes go to exactly right

0:53:00.360 --> 0:53:04.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com, slash Buried Bones sources. Our senior producer is

0:53:04.200 --> 0:53:05.319
<v Speaker 1>Alexis Emirosi.

0:53:05.640 --> 0:53:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Research by Maren mcclashan, Ali Elkin and Kate Winkler Dawson.

0:53:10.120 --> 0:53:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Our mixing engineer is Ben Tolliday.

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Our theme song is by Tom Bryfogel.

0:53:15.239 --> 0:53:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Our artwork is by Vanessa Lilac.

0:53:17.520 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Executive produced by Karen Kilgarriff, Georgia hard Stark and Danielle Kramer.

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:25.319
<v Speaker 1>You can follow Buried Bones on Instagram and Facebook at

0:53:25.400 --> 0:53:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Barry Bones Pod.

0:53:27.000 --> 0:53:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Kate's most recent book, All That Is Wicked, a Gilded

0:53:29.600 --> 0:53:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Age story of murder and the race to decode the

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:33.839
<v Speaker 2>criminal mind, is available now, and

0:53:33.960 --> 0:53:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Paul's best selling memoir Unmasked, My life solving America's Cold

0:53:38.280 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Cases is also available now