WEBVTT - Understanding the Death Penalty: Malcolm Gladwell on The Intercept Briefing 

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:22.076
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Hey revisionist history listeners ben out of Hafer here

0:00:22.836 --> 0:00:26.596
<v Speaker 1>this past season on Revisionist History, the Alabama Murders, we

0:00:26.676 --> 0:00:29.756
<v Speaker 1>told the tale of how one death snowballed into a

0:00:29.756 --> 0:00:34.196
<v Speaker 1>cascade of moral failures masked with legal fig leaves the

0:00:34.236 --> 0:00:38.236
<v Speaker 1>misunderstanding of what constitutes reasonable doubt, the myth that there's

0:00:38.236 --> 0:00:41.636
<v Speaker 1>a painless way to kill somebody. At its core, the

0:00:41.676 --> 0:00:45.196
<v Speaker 1>Alabama Murders is a searing critique of cruelty in America

0:00:45.716 --> 0:00:48.516
<v Speaker 1>in the legal system that allows that cruelty to thrive.

0:00:49.756 --> 0:00:52.076
<v Speaker 1>But the story goes much deeper than a single case

0:00:52.156 --> 0:00:54.996
<v Speaker 1>or a single incident from the nineteen eighties. As of

0:00:55.036 --> 0:00:58.796
<v Speaker 1>December one this year, eleven states have executed a total

0:00:58.876 --> 0:01:02.996
<v Speaker 1>of forty four people, making twenty twenty five one of

0:01:03.036 --> 0:01:07.036
<v Speaker 1>the deadliest years for state sanctioned killings, and in Alabama,

0:01:07.196 --> 0:01:11.236
<v Speaker 1>they're still using nitrogen hypoxia, the brutal method pioneered in

0:01:11.316 --> 0:01:16.596
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Smith's final execution. Malcolm recently joined Liliana Segura, a

0:01:16.636 --> 0:01:20.636
<v Speaker 1>criminal justice reporter at the Intercept, to discuss capital punishment

0:01:20.996 --> 0:01:23.356
<v Speaker 1>and what happens when a legal system that's supposed to

0:01:23.436 --> 0:01:28.276
<v Speaker 1>catch mistakes and reduce harm doesn't. They also talk about

0:01:28.276 --> 0:01:31.076
<v Speaker 1>why Malcolm felt drawn to investigate the death penalty in

0:01:31.116 --> 0:01:34.036
<v Speaker 1>the series. It's a great conversation and we thought that

0:01:34.116 --> 0:01:36.196
<v Speaker 1>listeners of the series might want to hear it here,

0:01:36.556 --> 0:01:39.196
<v Speaker 1>So here's the episode. Thanks for listening.

0:01:44.276 --> 0:01:46.796
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Intercept Briefing. I'm Mikaela Lacey.

0:01:47.596 --> 0:01:51.276
<v Speaker 3>As of December first, officials across the US have executed

0:01:51.476 --> 0:01:55.316
<v Speaker 3>forty four people in eleven states, making twenty twenty five

0:01:55.636 --> 0:01:58.876
<v Speaker 3>one of the deadliest years for state sanctioned executions in

0:01:58.916 --> 0:02:02.876
<v Speaker 3>recent history. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, three

0:02:02.996 --> 0:02:06.036
<v Speaker 3>more people are scheduled for execution before the new year.

0:02:06.556 --> 0:02:09.796
<v Speaker 3>The justification for the death penalty is and it's supposed

0:02:09.836 --> 0:02:13.396
<v Speaker 3>to be the ultimate punishment for the worst crimes, but

0:02:13.436 --> 0:02:17.036
<v Speaker 3>in reality, who gets sentenced to die depends on things

0:02:17.036 --> 0:02:21.036
<v Speaker 3>that often have nothing to do with guilt or innocence. Historically,

0:02:21.276 --> 0:02:25.196
<v Speaker 3>judges have disproportionately sentenced black and Latino people to death.

0:02:25.636 --> 0:02:28.356
<v Speaker 3>A new report from the American Civil Liberties Union released

0:02:28.356 --> 0:02:31.156
<v Speaker 3>in November, found that more than half of the two

0:02:31.316 --> 0:02:35.076
<v Speaker 3>hundred people exonerated from death row since nineteen seventy three

0:02:35.316 --> 0:02:39.076
<v Speaker 3>were black. Executions had been on a steady decline since

0:02:39.116 --> 0:02:41.916
<v Speaker 3>their peak in the late nineteen nineties, but the numbers

0:02:41.916 --> 0:02:44.716
<v Speaker 3>slowly started to creep back up in recent years, more

0:02:44.756 --> 0:02:47.836
<v Speaker 3>than doubling from eleven in twenty twenty one to twenty

0:02:47.916 --> 0:02:51.956
<v Speaker 3>five last year, and we've almost doubled that again this year.

0:02:52.436 --> 0:02:55.116
<v Speaker 3>Several states have stood out in their efforts to ramp

0:02:55.236 --> 0:03:00.996
<v Speaker 3>up executions and conduct them at a faster piece, including Alabama.

0:03:01.156 --> 0:03:04.876
<v Speaker 3>Malcolm Gladwell's new podcast series, The Alabama Murders Dies into

0:03:04.956 --> 0:03:08.436
<v Speaker 3>one case to understand what the system really looks like,

0:03:08.876 --> 0:03:11.156
<v Speaker 3>how it operates, and its inherent brutality.

0:03:11.596 --> 0:03:11.956
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:03:11.996 --> 0:03:15.836
<v Speaker 5>Just got on from work and they come and he said, well, mom,

0:03:15.876 --> 0:03:16.396
<v Speaker 5>can you come?

0:03:16.516 --> 0:03:18.196
<v Speaker 4>He said, the police are here.

0:03:19.116 --> 0:03:21.116
<v Speaker 5>There's no sense in even having a jury.

0:03:22.276 --> 0:03:23.756
<v Speaker 2>If you if you're.

0:03:23.596 --> 0:03:26.676
<v Speaker 5>Going to be able to overturn the jury, if a

0:03:26.756 --> 0:03:31.156
<v Speaker 5>judge can overturn the jury. He said, But I was involved,

0:03:31.836 --> 0:03:33.676
<v Speaker 5>and that's a horrible thing I.

0:03:33.556 --> 0:03:34.276
<v Speaker 4>Was involved in.

0:03:35.396 --> 0:03:37.716
<v Speaker 2>I've been in prison twenty four twenty five years.

0:03:37.756 --> 0:03:39.156
<v Speaker 5>That's probably not long enough.

0:03:39.756 --> 0:03:43.316
<v Speaker 3>I didn't kill them.

0:03:43.476 --> 0:03:46.716
<v Speaker 5>They get burned from the inside, and then glad just

0:03:46.916 --> 0:03:50.876
<v Speaker 5>pours into the lungs and I'm sor he as I'm

0:03:50.916 --> 0:03:55.236
<v Speaker 5>saying this it's awful and this is what this is

0:03:55.236 --> 0:03:57.956
<v Speaker 5>how lethal injection actually kills you.

0:03:59.276 --> 0:04:03.396
<v Speaker 6>Here's what I don't understand. Nobody noticed this till you.

0:04:03.476 --> 0:04:04.116
<v Speaker 5>Apparently not.

0:04:05.876 --> 0:04:08.476
<v Speaker 3>Today we're speaking with Gladwell, who's a writer at The

0:04:08.516 --> 0:04:12.156
<v Speaker 3>New Yorker and co founder of the podcast network Pushkin Industries.

0:04:12.596 --> 0:04:16.076
<v Speaker 3>And we're joined by Intercept senior reporter Lana Segura, who

0:04:16.116 --> 0:04:19.476
<v Speaker 3>has covered capital punishment and criminal justice for two decades.

0:04:19.956 --> 0:04:23.116
<v Speaker 3>We're going to talk about the deeply concerning issues surrounding

0:04:23.116 --> 0:04:26.996
<v Speaker 3>capital punishment. How does the state decide who lives and

0:04:27.036 --> 0:04:29.996
<v Speaker 3>who dies, what happens when the legal system that is

0:04:30.036 --> 0:04:32.956
<v Speaker 3>supposed to catch mistakes doesn't, and what does it all

0:04:32.996 --> 0:04:36.916
<v Speaker 3>say about our country? Malcolm, Lliana, Welcome to the show.

0:04:37.076 --> 0:04:39.476
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Thank you, Malcolm.

0:04:39.716 --> 0:04:44.116
<v Speaker 3>The series starts by recounting the killing of Elizabeth Sennett,

0:04:44.196 --> 0:04:47.516
<v Speaker 3>but very quickly delves into what happens to the two

0:04:47.556 --> 0:04:50.476
<v Speaker 3>men convicted of killing her, John Parker and Kenny Smith.

0:04:50.756 --> 0:04:52.996
<v Speaker 3>You spend a lot of time in this series explaining,

0:04:52.996 --> 0:04:55.916
<v Speaker 3>sometimes in graphic detail, how the cruelty of the death

0:04:55.916 --> 0:05:00.196
<v Speaker 3>penalty isn't only about the execution, but also about the

0:05:00.276 --> 0:05:04.236
<v Speaker 3>system around it, the paperwork, the waiting. This is not

0:05:04.356 --> 0:05:07.196
<v Speaker 3>the kind of subject matter that you typically tackle. What

0:05:07.276 --> 0:05:09.116
<v Speaker 3>drew you to wanting to report on the death penal

0:05:09.556 --> 0:05:10.556
<v Speaker 3>and criminal justice?

0:05:10.756 --> 0:05:14.156
<v Speaker 6>Well, I wasn't initially intending to do a story about

0:05:14.196 --> 0:05:17.796
<v Speaker 6>the death penalty. I on a kind of whim spend

0:05:17.836 --> 0:05:20.596
<v Speaker 6>a lot of time with Cape Boorderfield, who's the psychologist

0:05:20.676 --> 0:05:25.716
<v Speaker 6>who studies trauma, who shows up halfway through the Alabama murders,

0:05:26.076 --> 0:05:28.156
<v Speaker 6>and I was just interviewing her about because I was

0:05:28.196 --> 0:05:32.196
<v Speaker 6>interested in the treatment of traumatized people, and she just

0:05:32.236 --> 0:05:34.116
<v Speaker 6>happened to mention that she'd been involved with the death

0:05:34.116 --> 0:05:37.956
<v Speaker 6>penalty case, and her description of it was so kind

0:05:37.956 --> 0:05:41.276
<v Speaker 6>of moving and compelling that I realized, Oh, that's the

0:05:41.316 --> 0:05:43.636
<v Speaker 6>story I want to tell. But this did not start

0:05:43.676 --> 0:05:46.876
<v Speaker 6>as a death penalty project. It started as a exploration

0:05:46.956 --> 0:05:50.436
<v Speaker 6>of a psychologist's work, and it kind of took a detour.

0:05:51.116 --> 0:05:54.276
<v Speaker 3>Tell us a little bit more about how the bureaucracy

0:05:54.476 --> 0:05:57.476
<v Speaker 3>around the death penalty masks its inherent cruelty.

0:05:58.036 --> 0:06:00.756
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, there's a wonderful phrase that one of

0:06:00.756 --> 0:06:05.236
<v Speaker 6>the people we interviewed, Joel's zibitt Uses, and he talks

0:06:05.236 --> 0:06:08.356
<v Speaker 6>about how the death penalty. He was talking about lethal injection.

0:06:08.436 --> 0:06:12.116
<v Speaker 6>But this is also true of nitrogen gas. He said,

0:06:12.156 --> 0:06:16.636
<v Speaker 6>it is the impersonation of a medical act. And I

0:06:16.796 --> 0:06:21.076
<v Speaker 6>think that phrase speaks volumes that a lot of what

0:06:21.196 --> 0:06:24.156
<v Speaker 6>is going on here is a kind of performance that

0:06:24.276 --> 0:06:28.636
<v Speaker 6>is for the benefit of the viewer. It has to

0:06:28.676 --> 0:06:32.356
<v Speaker 6>look acceptable to those who are watching, to those who

0:06:32.356 --> 0:06:35.796
<v Speaker 6>are kind of in society who are judging or observing

0:06:35.836 --> 0:06:40.036
<v Speaker 6>the process. It is the management of perception that is

0:06:40.356 --> 0:06:45.396
<v Speaker 6>compelling and driving the behavior here, not the actual treatment

0:06:45.516 --> 0:06:49.636
<v Speaker 6>of the condemned prisoner him or herself. And once you

0:06:49.716 --> 0:06:51.756
<v Speaker 6>understand that, oh, it's a performance and a lot of

0:06:51.756 --> 0:06:54.676
<v Speaker 6>it makes sense. One of the crucial moments in a

0:06:54.716 --> 0:06:58.876
<v Speaker 6>story we tell is you know where there is a

0:06:58.956 --> 0:07:02.476
<v Speaker 6>hearing in which the attorneys for Kenny Smith are trying

0:07:02.516 --> 0:07:06.076
<v Speaker 6>to get a stay of execution, and they start asking

0:07:06.156 --> 0:07:08.716
<v Speaker 6>the State of Alabama, the corrections people in the state

0:07:08.756 --> 0:07:12.876
<v Speaker 6>of Alibe, Obama, to explain, did they understand what they

0:07:12.876 --> 0:07:15.396
<v Speaker 6>would do this was they were contemplating the use of

0:07:15.476 --> 0:07:19.396
<v Speaker 6>nitrogen gas. Did they ever talk to a doctor about

0:07:19.516 --> 0:07:23.716
<v Speaker 6>the risks associated with it? Did they ever contemplate any

0:07:23.756 --> 0:07:26.636
<v Speaker 6>of the potential side effects? And it turns out they

0:07:26.636 --> 0:07:29.396
<v Speaker 6>had done none. Of that, and it makes sense when

0:07:29.396 --> 0:07:33.156
<v Speaker 6>you realize that's not what they're interested in. They're interested

0:07:33.196 --> 0:07:37.356
<v Speaker 6>in the impersonation of a medical act, not the implementation

0:07:37.436 --> 0:07:41.076
<v Speaker 6>of a medical act. The bureaucracy is there to make

0:07:41.116 --> 0:07:43.236
<v Speaker 6>it look good. And that was one of the compelling

0:07:43.316 --> 0:07:44.156
<v Speaker 6>lessons of the piece.

0:07:45.196 --> 0:07:48.236
<v Speaker 3>And it's impersonating a medical act with people who are

0:07:48.236 --> 0:07:50.996
<v Speaker 3>not doctors, right, Like, people who are not do not

0:07:51.076 --> 0:07:51.556
<v Speaker 3>have this train.

0:07:51.756 --> 0:07:52.236
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:07:52.316 --> 0:07:55.116
<v Speaker 6>In that hearing, there is this real incredible moment where

0:07:55.356 --> 0:07:58.196
<v Speaker 6>one of the attorneys asks the man who heads Alabama's

0:07:58.236 --> 0:08:01.476
<v Speaker 6>Department of Corrections, did you ever consult with any medical

0:08:01.516 --> 0:08:07.196
<v Speaker 6>personnel about the choice of execution method and its possible problems?

0:08:07.356 --> 0:08:09.796
<v Speaker 6>And the guy says no. And it's just like that,

0:08:09.876 --> 0:08:12.876
<v Speaker 6>you just realize they're just mailing it in, like they

0:08:12.916 --> 0:08:17.556
<v Speaker 6>have no State of Alabama is like, is not interested

0:08:17.676 --> 0:08:21.036
<v Speaker 6>in exploring the kind of full implications of what they're doing.

0:08:21.396 --> 0:08:24.476
<v Speaker 6>They're just engaged in this kind of incredibly sort of

0:08:25.116 --> 0:08:26.316
<v Speaker 6>slap dash operation.

0:08:27.276 --> 0:08:28.876
<v Speaker 2>Well, and I want to bring you in here.

0:08:28.916 --> 0:08:32.476
<v Speaker 3>You've spent years reporting on capital punishment in the US

0:08:32.516 --> 0:08:34.916
<v Speaker 3>and looked into many cases in different states.

0:08:35.516 --> 0:08:37.796
<v Speaker 2>Why are states like Florida.

0:08:37.396 --> 0:08:41.196
<v Speaker 3>And Alabama ramping up the number of executions. Is it

0:08:41.276 --> 0:08:44.196
<v Speaker 3>all politics? What's going on there?

0:08:44.836 --> 0:08:48.116
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So that is one of the questions that I

0:08:48.156 --> 0:08:50.556
<v Speaker 4>think a lot of us who cover this stuff have

0:08:50.676 --> 0:08:54.156
<v Speaker 4>been asking ourselves all year long, and to some degree,

0:08:54.196 --> 0:08:56.676
<v Speaker 4>it's always politics. The story of the death penalty, the

0:08:56.676 --> 0:09:00.076
<v Speaker 4>story of executions so often really boils down to that

0:09:00.436 --> 0:09:04.276
<v Speaker 4>we are in a political moment right now where the

0:09:04.396 --> 0:09:08.516
<v Speaker 4>climate around executions certainly, but I think in general, the

0:09:08.636 --> 0:09:13.436
<v Speaker 4>kind of appetite for our promotion of vengeance and sort

0:09:13.516 --> 0:09:18.916
<v Speaker 4>of brutality towards our enemies is really shockingly real right now.

0:09:18.996 --> 0:09:21.996
<v Speaker 4>And I was reluctant about a year ago to really

0:09:22.596 --> 0:09:26.516
<v Speaker 4>trace our current moment to Trump. Right the death penalty

0:09:26.676 --> 0:09:29.516
<v Speaker 4>has been a bipartisan project. I don't want to pretend

0:09:29.676 --> 0:09:32.356
<v Speaker 4>like this is something that begins and ends with somebody

0:09:32.396 --> 0:09:36.636
<v Speaker 4>like Trump that said, you know, it's really shocking to

0:09:36.756 --> 0:09:40.156
<v Speaker 4>see the number of executions that are being pushed through,

0:09:40.836 --> 0:09:43.876
<v Speaker 4>especially in Florida, and this is something that has been

0:09:43.956 --> 0:09:48.156
<v Speaker 4>ramped up by Governor DeSantis for purely political reasons. You know,

0:09:48.236 --> 0:09:51.556
<v Speaker 4>this death penalty push in Florida began with his political

0:09:51.596 --> 0:09:54.356
<v Speaker 4>ambitions when he was originally going to run for president,

0:09:54.476 --> 0:09:57.596
<v Speaker 4>and I think that that to some degree is a

0:09:57.636 --> 0:10:00.956
<v Speaker 4>story behind a lot of death penalty policy, certainly going

0:10:00.996 --> 0:10:04.156
<v Speaker 4>back decades, and certainly speaks to the moment we're in.

0:10:04.756 --> 0:10:07.356
<v Speaker 4>I did want to just also touch on some of

0:10:07.356 --> 0:10:09.316
<v Speaker 4>what Malcolm was talking about when it comes to to

0:10:10.116 --> 0:10:14.316
<v Speaker 4>the performance, you know, of executions themselves. Over the past

0:10:14.396 --> 0:10:19.196
<v Speaker 4>many years, I've reported on litigation death penalty trials that

0:10:19.316 --> 0:10:22.356
<v Speaker 4>have taken place in states like Oklahoma and here in

0:10:22.396 --> 0:10:25.716
<v Speaker 4>Tennessee where I live, where we restarted executions some years

0:10:25.756 --> 0:10:27.796
<v Speaker 4>ago after a long time of not carrying any out

0:10:28.236 --> 0:10:31.596
<v Speaker 4>and these trials had at the center the three drug

0:10:31.636 --> 0:10:35.956
<v Speaker 4>protocol that is described so thoroughly in the podcast. And

0:10:36.116 --> 0:10:40.716
<v Speaker 4>it is absolutely true that these are protocols that are

0:10:41.036 --> 0:10:43.436
<v Speaker 4>sort of designed with all of these different steps and

0:10:43.476 --> 0:10:45.676
<v Speaker 4>all of these different parts and made to look, you know,

0:10:46.036 --> 0:10:48.796
<v Speaker 4>using the tools of medicine to kill, and made to

0:10:48.836 --> 0:10:51.036
<v Speaker 4>look like this has really been thought through. But when

0:10:51.036 --> 0:10:53.556
<v Speaker 4>you really trace that history as you do Malcolm in

0:10:53.596 --> 0:10:56.836
<v Speaker 4>your podcast, there's no there there. I mean, these were

0:10:56.876 --> 0:11:02.676
<v Speaker 4>invented for the purpose of having a humane appearing protocol,

0:11:02.916 --> 0:11:06.316
<v Speaker 4>humane appearing method, and it sort of amounts to junk science.

0:11:06.356 --> 0:11:09.396
<v Speaker 4>There was no way to test these methods. There was

0:11:09.436 --> 0:11:12.636
<v Speaker 4>no nobody can tell us, as you describe in your podcast,

0:11:12.636 --> 0:11:16.836
<v Speaker 4>what it feels like to, you know, undergo this execution process.

0:11:17.156 --> 0:11:19.476
<v Speaker 4>And I think it's really important to remember that this

0:11:19.596 --> 0:11:21.516
<v Speaker 4>is not only the story of lethal injection. This is

0:11:21.516 --> 0:11:24.276
<v Speaker 4>a story of executions, you know, sort of writ large.

0:11:24.916 --> 0:11:28.476
<v Speaker 4>When the electric chair came on the scene generations ago,

0:11:28.916 --> 0:11:32.636
<v Speaker 4>it was also touted as the height of technology because

0:11:32.676 --> 0:11:35.636
<v Speaker 4>it was using electricity and it was supposed to be

0:11:35.876 --> 0:11:38.436
<v Speaker 4>more humane than hanging. There had been botched hangings that

0:11:38.476 --> 0:11:41.716
<v Speaker 4>were seen as gruesome ordeals, you know. So there's this

0:11:41.796 --> 0:11:44.476
<v Speaker 4>bizarre way in which history repeats itself when it comes

0:11:44.476 --> 0:11:46.476
<v Speaker 4>to these methods that are promoted as you know, the

0:11:46.516 --> 0:11:50.436
<v Speaker 4>height of modernity and humanity, and it's just completely bankrupt

0:11:50.596 --> 0:11:51.156
<v Speaker 4>and false.

0:11:51.836 --> 0:11:54.316
<v Speaker 6>Malcolm, do you want to add something, Yeah, I mean

0:11:54.716 --> 0:11:57.516
<v Speaker 6>we have a big focus in the case I'm describing.

0:11:57.716 --> 0:12:01.836
<v Speaker 6>Kenny Smith was notorious because he had a botched execution

0:12:01.876 --> 0:12:04.716
<v Speaker 6>where they couldn't find a vein. And one of the

0:12:04.756 --> 0:12:07.836
<v Speaker 6>points that Joel as if it makes is that, well,

0:12:07.836 --> 0:12:11.116
<v Speaker 6>of course, they's not surprising that they in that case

0:12:11.156 --> 0:12:13.556
<v Speaker 6>and in many others, they can't find a vein, because

0:12:13.956 --> 0:12:17.196
<v Speaker 6>that is a medical procedure that is designed to be

0:12:17.836 --> 0:12:23.316
<v Speaker 6>undertaken in a hospital setting by trained personnel with the

0:12:23.356 --> 0:12:26.996
<v Speaker 6>cooperation of the patient. Right. Usually we'd find a vein

0:12:27.036 --> 0:12:29.756
<v Speaker 6>and the patient cooperates because it's there we're trying to

0:12:29.796 --> 0:12:32.676
<v Speaker 6>save their life or make them healthier. This is a

0:12:32.836 --> 0:12:36.396
<v Speaker 6>use of this procedure that is completely different. It is

0:12:36.676 --> 0:12:39.556
<v Speaker 6>outside of a medical institution, not being done by people

0:12:39.556 --> 0:12:43.196
<v Speaker 6>who are experienced medical professionals, and is not being done

0:12:43.236 --> 0:12:46.636
<v Speaker 6>with the cooperation of the patient. Right. The patient in

0:12:46.636 --> 0:12:49.076
<v Speaker 6>this case is a condemned prisoner who is not in

0:12:49.116 --> 0:12:52.436
<v Speaker 6>the same situation as someone who's ill and trying.

0:12:52.196 --> 0:12:52.716
<v Speaker 4>To get better.

0:12:53.476 --> 0:12:56.316
<v Speaker 2>I want to just walk our listeners through this.

0:12:56.436 --> 0:12:59.876
<v Speaker 3>So this is again one of the pieces of the series,

0:13:00.196 --> 0:13:03.076
<v Speaker 3>this three drug protocol. First there's a sedative, then there's

0:13:03.116 --> 0:13:06.636
<v Speaker 3>a paralytic, and then there's finally a potassium chloride which

0:13:06.636 --> 0:13:07.916
<v Speaker 3>is supposed to stop the heart.

0:13:08.676 --> 0:13:11.596
<v Speaker 2>How did that protocol come to be developed?

0:13:12.356 --> 0:13:16.076
<v Speaker 6>It was dreamt up in an afternoon in Oklahoma in

0:13:16.116 --> 0:13:21.156
<v Speaker 6>the nineteen seventies by a state senator and the Oklahoma

0:13:21.196 --> 0:13:25.236
<v Speaker 6>Medical Examiner who were just kind of spitballing about how

0:13:25.276 --> 0:13:28.636
<v Speaker 6>they might replace the electric chair with something quote more

0:13:28.716 --> 0:13:31.636
<v Speaker 6>humane unquote, and their model was, well, why don't we

0:13:31.676 --> 0:13:35.716
<v Speaker 6>do for humans what we do with horses, which was

0:13:35.756 --> 0:13:38.916
<v Speaker 6>a suggestion that had come from Ronald Reagan, then governor

0:13:38.916 --> 0:13:41.956
<v Speaker 6>of California. So they just sort of generally thought, well,

0:13:42.636 --> 0:13:45.356
<v Speaker 6>we can do a version of what we do in

0:13:45.396 --> 0:13:49.916
<v Speaker 6>those instances, only we'll just ramp up the dose. You know,

0:13:49.996 --> 0:13:51.956
<v Speaker 6>this is also what kind of anesthesia.

0:13:52.076 --> 0:13:54.956
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes this is advertised as something that is supposed to

0:13:55.036 --> 0:13:56.356
<v Speaker 3>be painless.

0:13:56.436 --> 0:13:58.356
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, they had been using and these drugs were also

0:13:58.556 --> 0:14:02.516
<v Speaker 6>in use in the medical setting. But their idea was

0:14:02.556 --> 0:14:05.516
<v Speaker 6>we'll take a protocol that loosely based on what is

0:14:05.596 --> 0:14:08.916
<v Speaker 6>used in a medical setting and ramp up the doses

0:14:09.356 --> 0:14:12.676
<v Speaker 6>so that instead of merely sedating somebody or killing them.

0:14:13.356 --> 0:14:19.156
<v Speaker 6>And it wasn't thought through, tested, analyzed, peer reviewed. It

0:14:19.236 --> 0:14:23.076
<v Speaker 6>was literally two guys dreaming up something in the back

0:14:23.076 --> 0:14:26.116
<v Speaker 6>of an envelope, and one of the guys, the medical examiner,

0:14:26.756 --> 0:14:30.436
<v Speaker 6>later regretted his part in the whole procedure, but the

0:14:30.516 --> 0:14:33.996
<v Speaker 6>genie was out of the bottle and everybody jumped on

0:14:34.076 --> 0:14:38.116
<v Speaker 6>this as an advance over the previous iteration of killing technology.

0:14:39.316 --> 0:14:41.516
<v Speaker 2>In addition to being advertised as painless.

0:14:41.556 --> 0:14:43.316
<v Speaker 3>It's also supposed to be within the bounds of the

0:14:43.396 --> 0:14:46.436
<v Speaker 3>Eighth Amendment protection against Cruel and Unusual punishment.

0:14:46.636 --> 0:14:47.676
<v Speaker 2>Can you tell us about that?

0:14:48.276 --> 0:14:54.036
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Well, in order to satisfy that prohibition against cruel

0:14:54.076 --> 0:14:57.156
<v Speaker 6>and unusual punishment, you have to have some insight as

0:14:57.196 --> 0:15:00.876
<v Speaker 6>to what the condemned prisoner is going through when they

0:15:00.876 --> 0:15:05.156
<v Speaker 6>are being subjected to this protocol. The universe of people

0:15:05.196 --> 0:15:11.716
<v Speaker 6>engaged in the Capital Punishment Project were universally indifferent to

0:15:11.876 --> 0:15:15.316
<v Speaker 6>trying to find out how exactly this worked. They weren't

0:15:15.476 --> 0:15:18.996
<v Speaker 6>curious at all to figure out, for example, was there

0:15:19.036 --> 0:15:22.676
<v Speaker 6>any suffering that was associated with this three drug protocol?

0:15:22.956 --> 0:15:25.516
<v Speaker 6>Or which of the three drugs is killing you? Or

0:15:25.716 --> 0:15:27.036
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I could go on and on and on.

0:15:27.236 --> 0:15:30.636
<v Speaker 6>Were they just implemented it and because it looked good

0:15:30.676 --> 0:15:33.676
<v Speaker 6>for me outside, Because you have given someone a sedative

0:15:33.676 --> 0:15:38.356
<v Speaker 6>and a paralytic, it's impossible to tell from the outside

0:15:38.716 --> 0:15:41.796
<v Speaker 6>whether they're going through any kind of suffering. It was

0:15:41.836 --> 0:15:44.276
<v Speaker 6>just assume that there should be no there must be

0:15:44.316 --> 0:15:47.836
<v Speaker 6>no suffering going on on the inside. And the Eighth

0:15:47.836 --> 0:15:51.356
<v Speaker 6>Amendment does not say that people should not be subjected

0:15:51.356 --> 0:15:56.516
<v Speaker 6>to the appearance of cruel and unusual punishment. It says no, No,

0:15:56.836 --> 0:16:00.556
<v Speaker 6>the actual punishment itself for the individual should not be

0:16:00.596 --> 0:16:03.236
<v Speaker 6>cruel and unusual. So there was at no point could

0:16:03.276 --> 0:16:07.196
<v Speaker 6>anyone in the early history of this did anyone truly

0:16:07.236 --> 0:16:10.116
<v Speaker 6>satisfy the intent of the Eighth Amendment.

0:16:10.796 --> 0:16:13.596
<v Speaker 3>Well, Leanna, you've written a lot about this protocol as well,

0:16:13.596 --> 0:16:15.916
<v Speaker 3>and the Supreme Court has taken a stance on it.

0:16:15.996 --> 0:16:18.836
<v Speaker 4>Tell us about that. Yeah, So, one thing that's really

0:16:18.836 --> 0:16:22.476
<v Speaker 4>important to understand about the Eighth Amendment and the death

0:16:22.476 --> 0:16:25.196
<v Speaker 4>penalty in this country is that the US Supreme Court

0:16:25.236 --> 0:16:28.516
<v Speaker 4>has weighed in on the death penalty numerous times, including

0:16:28.916 --> 0:16:34.036
<v Speaker 4>but has never invalidated a method of execution as violating

0:16:34.076 --> 0:16:36.916
<v Speaker 4>the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment. And

0:16:37.036 --> 0:16:39.636
<v Speaker 4>that fact right there, I think speaks volumes. But one

0:16:39.636 --> 0:16:41.916
<v Speaker 4>of the cases that I go back to over and

0:16:41.956 --> 0:16:44.916
<v Speaker 4>over again in my work about lethal injection and about

0:16:44.916 --> 0:16:48.116
<v Speaker 4>other execution methods dates back to the nineteen forties, and

0:16:48.156 --> 0:16:51.396
<v Speaker 4>it's a case involving a man named Willie Francis, who

0:16:51.476 --> 0:16:54.756
<v Speaker 4>was a teenager, black teenager who had been condemned to

0:16:54.836 --> 0:16:57.876
<v Speaker 4>die in Louisiana. They sent him to the electric chair

0:16:57.956 --> 0:17:01.436
<v Speaker 4>in nineteen forty six, and he survived. He survived their

0:17:01.476 --> 0:17:05.396
<v Speaker 4>initial attempts to execute him. It's a grotesque ordeal. There's

0:17:05.436 --> 0:17:08.796
<v Speaker 4>been a lot written historically about this, but that case,

0:17:08.836 --> 0:17:12.636
<v Speaker 4>they the execution. He appealed to the US Supreme Court

0:17:13.076 --> 0:17:16.476
<v Speaker 4>and a majority of justices found that attempting to kill

0:17:16.516 --> 0:17:19.436
<v Speaker 4>him again wouldn't violate the Eighth Amendment, and they sent

0:17:19.556 --> 0:17:23.036
<v Speaker 4>him back in nineteen forty seven. They succeeded in killing him.

0:17:23.076 --> 0:17:25.276
<v Speaker 4>But the language that comes out of the court in

0:17:25.356 --> 0:17:29.196
<v Speaker 4>this case really goes a long way to helping us

0:17:29.276 --> 0:17:31.476
<v Speaker 4>understand how we ended up where we are now. You know,

0:17:31.516 --> 0:17:35.756
<v Speaker 4>they essentially said accidents happen, accidents happened for which no

0:17:36.076 --> 0:17:39.116
<v Speaker 4>man is to blame. And there's another turn of phrase

0:17:39.116 --> 0:17:44.156
<v Speaker 4>that's really galling in which essentially they call this ordeal

0:17:44.236 --> 0:17:48.476
<v Speaker 4>that he suffered an innocent misadventure. And this language, this

0:17:48.556 --> 0:17:51.436
<v Speaker 4>idea is that this was an innocent misadventure, finds its

0:17:51.436 --> 0:17:55.436
<v Speaker 4>way into subsequent rulings decades later. So in two thousand

0:17:55.476 --> 0:17:58.196
<v Speaker 4>and eight, I believe it was the US Supreme Court

0:17:58.236 --> 0:18:00.556
<v Speaker 4>took up the three Drug Protocol, which at the time

0:18:00.796 --> 0:18:03.276
<v Speaker 4>was being used by Kentucky. This was a case called

0:18:03.316 --> 0:18:07.076
<v Speaker 4>Bays versus Rees, and there was a lot of evidence.

0:18:07.116 --> 0:18:09.436
<v Speaker 4>There was a lot that the justices had to look

0:18:09.476 --> 0:18:11.996
<v Speaker 4>at that should have given them pause about the fact

0:18:11.996 --> 0:18:14.556
<v Speaker 4>that this protocol was not rooted in science, that there

0:18:14.556 --> 0:18:18.516
<v Speaker 4>had been many botched executions in terms of the inability

0:18:18.516 --> 0:18:21.076
<v Speaker 4>to find a vein, in terms of evidence that people

0:18:21.116 --> 0:18:24.556
<v Speaker 4>were suffering on the gurney. The US Supreme Court upheld

0:18:24.636 --> 0:18:27.636
<v Speaker 4>that protocol, and yet right around the time that they

0:18:27.636 --> 0:18:31.156
<v Speaker 4>handed down that ruling, states began sort of tinkering with

0:18:31.316 --> 0:18:33.876
<v Speaker 4>the lethal injection protocol that had been the prevailing method

0:18:33.916 --> 0:18:36.516
<v Speaker 4>for so long. Without getting too deep in the weeds,

0:18:36.836 --> 0:18:40.516
<v Speaker 4>the initial drug, the drug that was supposed tonestize people

0:18:40.556 --> 0:18:44.676
<v Speaker 4>who were being killed by lethal injection, had been originally

0:18:44.676 --> 0:18:47.756
<v Speaker 4>a drug called sodium thiopental, which was thought to be

0:18:47.756 --> 0:18:52.076
<v Speaker 4>believed to be, for good reasons, something that could basically

0:18:52.076 --> 0:18:54.716
<v Speaker 4>put a person under and where they wouldn't necessarily feel

0:18:54.756 --> 0:18:58.956
<v Speaker 4>the noxious effects of the subsequent drugs. States were unable

0:18:58.956 --> 0:19:01.116
<v Speaker 4>to get their hands on this drug for a number

0:19:01.116 --> 0:19:04.196
<v Speaker 4>of reasons and subsequently began sort of swapping out other

0:19:04.276 --> 0:19:08.316
<v Speaker 4>drugs to replace that drug, and different states tried different things.

0:19:09.156 --> 0:19:12.316
<v Speaker 4>A number of states eventually settled on this drug called medaslum,

0:19:12.316 --> 0:19:14.436
<v Speaker 4>which is a sedative which does not have the same

0:19:14.516 --> 0:19:18.236
<v Speaker 4>properties as the previous drug and has been over and

0:19:18.236 --> 0:19:20.156
<v Speaker 4>over again experts have said that this is not a

0:19:20.236 --> 0:19:23.356
<v Speaker 4>drug that's going to be effective in providing and anesetizing

0:19:23.396 --> 0:19:25.956
<v Speaker 4>people for the purpose of lethal injection, and the Supreme

0:19:25.996 --> 0:19:29.636
<v Speaker 4>Court was once again ruled that this was true. In Oklahoma,

0:19:29.716 --> 0:19:32.956
<v Speaker 4>this was the case Golossip versus gross which the Supreme

0:19:32.996 --> 0:19:35.716
<v Speaker 4>Court heard after there had been a very high profile,

0:19:36.076 --> 0:19:39.436
<v Speaker 4>really gruesome botched execution a man named Clayton Lockett, who

0:19:39.516 --> 0:19:42.436
<v Speaker 4>was executed in twenty fourteen. This ended up going up

0:19:42.436 --> 0:19:45.196
<v Speaker 4>to the Supreme Court, and I covered that oral argument,

0:19:45.276 --> 0:19:47.436
<v Speaker 4>and what was really kind of astonishing about that oral

0:19:47.516 --> 0:19:50.676
<v Speaker 4>argument wasn't just how grotesque it all was, but the

0:19:50.716 --> 0:19:54.276
<v Speaker 4>fact that the justices were very clearly very annoyed, very

0:19:54.316 --> 0:19:57.116
<v Speaker 4>cranky about the fact that, you know, only a few

0:19:57.196 --> 0:19:59.876
<v Speaker 4>years after having upheld this three drug protocol, now they're

0:19:59.876 --> 0:20:02.556
<v Speaker 4>having to deal with this thing again, and they again

0:20:02.636 --> 0:20:05.956
<v Speaker 4>they upheld this protocol despite a lot of evidence that

0:20:06.036 --> 0:20:08.796
<v Speaker 4>this was completely inhumane, that there was a lot of

0:20:08.796 --> 0:20:11.436
<v Speaker 4>reasons to be concerned that people were suffering on the

0:20:11.436 --> 0:20:15.116
<v Speaker 4>gurney while being put to death by lethal injection. And

0:20:15.156 --> 0:20:17.316
<v Speaker 4>so the reason I go back to the Willy Francis

0:20:17.356 --> 0:20:19.036
<v Speaker 4>case is that it really tells us everything that we

0:20:19.116 --> 0:20:22.316
<v Speaker 4>need to know, which is that if you have decided

0:20:22.476 --> 0:20:24.996
<v Speaker 4>that people condemned to die in this country are less

0:20:24.996 --> 0:20:27.956
<v Speaker 4>than human and that their suffering doesn't matter, then there's

0:20:27.996 --> 0:20:31.796
<v Speaker 4>no limits on what you are willing to tolerate and

0:20:31.876 --> 0:20:35.796
<v Speaker 4>uphold in sort of upholding this death protocol that we've

0:20:35.796 --> 0:20:39.316
<v Speaker 4>invented in this country. And so the Supreme Court has

0:20:39.356 --> 0:20:41.636
<v Speaker 4>weighed not only on the three Drug Protocol but on

0:20:41.756 --> 0:20:44.636
<v Speaker 4>execution methods in general, and they have always found that

0:20:44.676 --> 0:20:46.076
<v Speaker 4>there's not really a problem here.

0:20:46.876 --> 0:20:49.796
<v Speaker 6>Say, at a certain point, it becomes obvious that the

0:20:49.836 --> 0:20:54.276
<v Speaker 6>cruelty is the point the Eighth Amendment does not actually

0:20:54.316 --> 0:20:57.236
<v Speaker 6>have any kind of impact on their thinking, because they

0:20:57.236 --> 0:21:01.236
<v Speaker 6>are anxious to preserve the very thing about capital punishment

0:21:01.556 --> 0:21:03.836
<v Speaker 6>that is so morally noxious, which is.

0:21:03.796 --> 0:21:06.836
<v Speaker 2>That it's cruel, Right, Malcolm.

0:21:06.956 --> 0:21:09.676
<v Speaker 3>One interesting thing that you talk about in the series

0:21:09.756 --> 0:21:14.796
<v Speaker 3>is this concept of judicial override in Alabama, where a

0:21:14.876 --> 0:21:18.156
<v Speaker 3>judge was able to impose a death sentence even if

0:21:18.196 --> 0:21:20.876
<v Speaker 3>the jury recommended life in prison. This went on until

0:21:20.956 --> 0:21:25.036
<v Speaker 3>twenty seventeen. As we know, death penalty cases can take decades,

0:21:25.076 --> 0:21:27.756
<v Speaker 3>so it's possible that there are still people on death

0:21:27.836 --> 0:21:31.116
<v Speaker 3>row who have been impacted by judicial override. What's your

0:21:31.156 --> 0:21:36.156
<v Speaker 3>sense about how judges who went that route justified their decisions,

0:21:36.236 --> 0:21:37.076
<v Speaker 3>if at all.

0:21:37.276 --> 0:21:40.436
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. So, Alabama was one of a number of a

0:21:40.516 --> 0:21:44.236
<v Speaker 6>small number of states who, in response to the Supreme

0:21:44.276 --> 0:21:50.516
<v Speaker 6>Court's hesitancy about capital punishment in the nineteen seventies, instituted

0:21:50.916 --> 0:21:56.516
<v Speaker 6>rules which said that a judge can override a jury's

0:21:56.796 --> 0:22:00.676
<v Speaker 6>sentencing determination in a capital case. So if a jury

0:22:00.716 --> 0:22:04.876
<v Speaker 6>says we want life imprisonment without parole, the judge could

0:22:04.876 --> 0:22:08.476
<v Speaker 6>impose the death penalty, or vice versa. The motivation for

0:22:08.516 --> 0:22:11.916
<v Speaker 6>these series of override laws, and are only about three

0:22:11.956 --> 0:22:15.556
<v Speaker 6>or four states at Florida, Alabama, a couple of others

0:22:15.916 --> 0:22:19.116
<v Speaker 6>had them, is kind of murky, but I suspect what

0:22:19.156 --> 0:22:22.676
<v Speaker 6>they wanted to do was to guard against the possibility

0:22:22.676 --> 0:22:27.556
<v Speaker 6>that juries would become overwhelmingly lenient. The concern was that

0:22:27.556 --> 0:22:31.796
<v Speaker 6>if the public sentiment was moving away from death penalty

0:22:32.116 --> 0:22:34.796
<v Speaker 6>to the extent that it would be difficult to impose

0:22:34.836 --> 0:22:39.436
<v Speaker 6>the death penalty in capital cases unless you allowed judges

0:22:40.156 --> 0:22:45.356
<v Speaker 6>to independently assert their opinion when it came to sentencing.

0:22:45.716 --> 0:22:48.276
<v Speaker 6>And I also suspect that there's to be in saints

0:22:48.276 --> 0:22:50.356
<v Speaker 6>like Alabama, there was a little bit of a racial

0:22:50.396 --> 0:22:54.076
<v Speaker 6>motivation that they thought that black jeries would be unlikely

0:22:54.556 --> 0:22:56.596
<v Speaker 6>to vote for the death penalty for black defendants, and

0:22:56.596 --> 0:23:00.596
<v Speaker 6>they wanted to reserve the right to act in those cases.

0:23:00.996 --> 0:23:03.756
<v Speaker 6>And what happens in Alabama is that other states gradually

0:23:03.796 --> 0:23:07.756
<v Speaker 6>abandon this policy, but Alabama sticks to it. And Alabama

0:23:07.796 --> 0:23:10.316
<v Speaker 6>sticks not only that they have the most extreme version

0:23:10.356 --> 0:23:12.916
<v Speaker 6>of it. They basically allow the judge to overrule under

0:23:12.956 --> 0:23:17.116
<v Speaker 6>any circumstances without giving an explanation for why. And when

0:23:17.116 --> 0:23:19.596
<v Speaker 6>they finally get rid of this, they don't make it retroactive,

0:23:20.196 --> 0:23:22.716
<v Speaker 6>so they only say going forward, we're not going to

0:23:22.716 --> 0:23:25.836
<v Speaker 6>do override, but we're not going to spare people who

0:23:25.876 --> 0:23:28.836
<v Speaker 6>have already who are on death row now because of override,

0:23:29.276 --> 0:23:31.916
<v Speaker 6>We're not going to spare their lives. And it raises

0:23:31.956 --> 0:23:33.876
<v Speaker 6>this question of what you know. The reason we call

0:23:34.356 --> 0:23:37.676
<v Speaker 6>our series the Alabama Murders is that when you look

0:23:37.796 --> 0:23:41.956
<v Speaker 6>very closely at the case we're interested in, you quickly

0:23:41.996 --> 0:23:47.116
<v Speaker 6>come to the conclusion there's something particularly barbaric about the

0:23:47.156 --> 0:23:50.316
<v Speaker 6>political culture of Alabama. I'm not news by the way,

0:23:50.316 --> 0:23:54.956
<v Speaker 6>for anyone who knows any about Alabama, but Alabama's it's

0:23:54.996 --> 0:23:57.956
<v Speaker 6>its own thing, you know, and they remain to this

0:23:58.116 --> 0:24:01.436
<v Speaker 6>day kind of clinging to this notion that they need

0:24:01.476 --> 0:24:07.116
<v Speaker 6>every possible defense against the possibility that a convicted murderer

0:24:07.436 --> 0:24:08.716
<v Speaker 6>could escape with his life.

0:24:09.236 --> 0:24:09.396
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:24:11.196 --> 0:24:14.436
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of just this idea of the title of the show,

0:24:14.476 --> 0:24:16.396
<v Speaker 3>I also want to bring up that I did not

0:24:16.556 --> 0:24:19.036
<v Speaker 3>know that the autopsy and an execution, and I don't

0:24:19.036 --> 0:24:20.996
<v Speaker 3>know that this is unique to Alabama, but that it

0:24:21.036 --> 0:24:23.676
<v Speaker 3>marks the death as a homicide. I was actually shocked

0:24:23.716 --> 0:24:24.116
<v Speaker 3>to hear that.

0:24:24.396 --> 0:24:27.556
<v Speaker 6>Yes, that interesting. That is the one moment of the

0:24:27.596 --> 0:24:31.116
<v Speaker 6>one moment of honesty, right, and self awareness in this

0:24:31.356 --> 0:24:32.636
<v Speaker 6>entire process.

0:24:32.716 --> 0:24:34.756
<v Speaker 3>Right, And that's why it's it's shocking. It's not shocking

0:24:34.796 --> 0:24:37.196
<v Speaker 3>because we know it's a homicide. It's shocking because they're

0:24:37.196 --> 0:24:39.476
<v Speaker 3>admitting to it in a record that is, you know,

0:24:39.516 --> 0:24:42.716
<v Speaker 3>accessible to the public at some point after a quick break.

0:24:42.836 --> 0:24:45.956
<v Speaker 3>More from Malcolm Gladwell, journalist, author and host of the

0:24:45.996 --> 0:24:50.076
<v Speaker 3>new Pushkin podcast The Alabama Murders, and Intercept Senior reporter

0:24:50.276 --> 0:25:01.276
<v Speaker 3>Liliana Segura. Malcolm, you mentioned the racial dynamic with Alabama

0:25:01.356 --> 0:25:03.516
<v Speaker 3>in particular, but Lilian, I want to ask if you

0:25:03.516 --> 0:25:07.116
<v Speaker 3>could maybe speak to the historic link between sort of

0:25:07.196 --> 0:25:09.876
<v Speaker 3>the development of the death penalty and the history of

0:25:10.076 --> 0:25:11.316
<v Speaker 3>lynching in the South.

0:25:12.236 --> 0:25:17.196
<v Speaker 4>So it's really interesting Alabama is in many ways the

0:25:17.236 --> 0:25:22.316
<v Speaker 4>poster child for this line that can be drawn between

0:25:22.596 --> 0:25:26.316
<v Speaker 4>not only lynching, but slavery to lynching, to reconstruction to

0:25:26.516 --> 0:25:31.196
<v Speaker 4>state sanctioned murder. And that's kind of an uneasy line

0:25:31.196 --> 0:25:33.556
<v Speaker 4>to draw in the sense of, you know, there's a

0:25:33.596 --> 0:25:35.556
<v Speaker 4>reason that Brian Stephenson, who is the head of the

0:25:35.596 --> 0:25:39.036
<v Speaker 4>Equal Justice Initiative, has called it a penalty the step

0:25:39.156 --> 0:25:41.636
<v Speaker 4>child of lynching. He calls it the step child of lynching,

0:25:41.636 --> 0:25:44.396
<v Speaker 4>and it's because, you know, there's something of an indirect link,

0:25:44.476 --> 0:25:47.836
<v Speaker 4>but it's an absolutely it's that link is real and

0:25:47.836 --> 0:25:51.156
<v Speaker 4>you really see it in Alabama and certainly in the South.

0:25:51.876 --> 0:25:55.276
<v Speaker 4>And so I think it was in twenty eighteen I

0:25:55.276 --> 0:25:57.596
<v Speaker 4>went down to Montgomery a number of times for the

0:25:57.636 --> 0:26:02.116
<v Speaker 4>opening of Eji's memorial, you know, lynching memorial that they

0:26:02.116 --> 0:26:04.556
<v Speaker 4>had launched there, and this was a major event and

0:26:04.596 --> 0:26:06.796
<v Speaker 4>at the time I went with sort of this this

0:26:06.876 --> 0:26:08.996
<v Speaker 4>link in mind to try to sort of interrogate and

0:26:09.236 --> 0:26:11.356
<v Speaker 4>understand this history a little bit better, and I ended

0:26:11.436 --> 0:26:13.556
<v Speaker 4>up writing this big, long piece which I only recently

0:26:13.556 --> 0:26:15.356
<v Speaker 4>went back to reread because it's not fresh in my

0:26:15.396 --> 0:26:18.876
<v Speaker 4>mind anymore. But one of the things that is absolutely,

0:26:18.996 --> 0:26:22.116
<v Speaker 4>undoubtedly true is that the death penalty in the South

0:26:22.156 --> 0:26:26.156
<v Speaker 4>in its early days was justified using the exact same

0:26:26.236 --> 0:26:29.356
<v Speaker 4>rationale that people used for lynching, which was that this

0:26:29.516 --> 0:26:33.476
<v Speaker 4>was about protecting white women from sexually predatory black men.

0:26:33.876 --> 0:26:38.516
<v Speaker 4>And that line, that consistent sort of feature of executions,

0:26:38.556 --> 0:26:42.116
<v Speaker 4>whether it was an extra judicial lynching or an execution

0:26:42.276 --> 0:26:44.956
<v Speaker 4>carried out by the state, has been really consistent and

0:26:44.996 --> 0:26:47.796
<v Speaker 4>I think overlooked in the history of the death penalty.

0:26:48.156 --> 0:26:50.516
<v Speaker 4>And part of the reason it's overlooked is that, again

0:26:50.596 --> 0:26:52.356
<v Speaker 4>going back to the Supreme Court, there have been a

0:26:52.476 --> 0:26:55.916
<v Speaker 4>number of times that this history has come before the

0:26:55.956 --> 0:26:59.316
<v Speaker 4>Supreme Court and other courts, and by and large the

0:26:59.316 --> 0:27:02.276
<v Speaker 4>reaction has been to look away, to sort of deny this,

0:27:02.476 --> 0:27:05.196
<v Speaker 4>and that is absolutely true. In the years leading up

0:27:05.236 --> 0:27:07.716
<v Speaker 4>to the nineteen seventy two case Firm and versus Georgia,

0:27:07.756 --> 0:27:10.876
<v Speaker 4>which Malcolm alluded to earlier, there was this moment where

0:27:10.916 --> 0:27:14.036
<v Speaker 4>the Supreme Court sort of had to pause executions, and

0:27:14.116 --> 0:27:16.916
<v Speaker 4>this was a four year period in the seventies. Nineteen

0:27:16.916 --> 0:27:19.436
<v Speaker 4>seventy two was Firman versus Georgia, nineteen seventy six was

0:27:19.436 --> 0:27:22.756
<v Speaker 4>greg versus Georgia. Part of the reason that Furman, which

0:27:22.836 --> 0:27:26.276
<v Speaker 4>was this nineteen seventy two case, invalidated the death penalty

0:27:26.276 --> 0:27:29.796
<v Speaker 4>across the country was because there was evidence that executions,

0:27:29.796 --> 0:27:32.476
<v Speaker 4>that death sentences were being handed down in what they

0:27:32.516 --> 0:27:35.636
<v Speaker 4>called an arbitrary way. And in reality, it wasn't so

0:27:35.716 --> 0:27:39.836
<v Speaker 4>much arbitrariness as very clear evidence of sentences that were

0:27:39.836 --> 0:27:43.156
<v Speaker 4>being given disproportionately to people of color, to black people,

0:27:43.436 --> 0:27:46.996
<v Speaker 4>and the history showed that that was largely motivated by

0:27:47.276 --> 0:27:49.916
<v Speaker 4>cases in which a victim was white. It was a

0:27:49.956 --> 0:27:53.276
<v Speaker 4>white woman maybe who had been subjected to sexual violence.

0:27:53.356 --> 0:27:55.196
<v Speaker 4>You know, there is that link, and I think it's

0:27:55.196 --> 0:27:58.396
<v Speaker 4>really important to sort of remember that. In Alabama. One

0:27:58.436 --> 0:28:01.636
<v Speaker 4>of the really interesting things too, going back to judicial override,

0:28:02.396 --> 0:28:05.156
<v Speaker 4>there's this kind of irony in the history of judicial

0:28:05.236 --> 0:28:07.676
<v Speaker 4>override in the way that it was carried out by

0:28:07.756 --> 0:28:11.316
<v Speaker 4>judges where Alabama, when they restarted the death penalty in

0:28:11.356 --> 0:28:14.356
<v Speaker 4>the early eighties was getting a lot of flack for

0:28:14.436 --> 0:28:18.636
<v Speaker 4>essentially having a racist death penalty system, and of course

0:28:18.676 --> 0:28:20.556
<v Speaker 4>there was a lot of defensiveness around this, and there

0:28:20.556 --> 0:28:24.116
<v Speaker 4>were judges who actually, in cases where juries did not

0:28:24.196 --> 0:28:26.796
<v Speaker 4>come back with a death sentence for a white defendant,

0:28:26.836 --> 0:28:30.556
<v Speaker 4>there were cases where judges then overrode that decision in

0:28:30.596 --> 0:28:32.836
<v Speaker 4>a sort of display of fairness. And one of the

0:28:32.836 --> 0:28:34.916
<v Speaker 4>things that I found when I was researching my piece

0:28:34.956 --> 0:28:38.796
<v Speaker 4>from twenty eighteen was that there was a judge and

0:28:39.036 --> 0:28:41.276
<v Speaker 4>I believe it was nineteen ninety nine, who explained, you

0:28:41.276 --> 0:28:44.036
<v Speaker 4>know why he overrode the jury in sentencing this particular

0:28:44.076 --> 0:28:46.316
<v Speaker 4>white man to die. And he said, if I hadn't

0:28:46.316 --> 0:28:48.636
<v Speaker 4>imposed the death sentence, I would have sentenced three black

0:28:48.676 --> 0:28:51.076
<v Speaker 4>people to death and no white people. So this was

0:28:51.116 --> 0:28:53.876
<v Speaker 4>his way of ensuring fairness. Well, I got to overwrite

0:28:53.876 --> 0:28:55.836
<v Speaker 4>it here, never mind what it might say about the

0:28:55.876 --> 0:28:58.036
<v Speaker 4>jury seemed a decision not to hand down a death

0:28:58.036 --> 0:29:00.756
<v Speaker 4>sentence for a white person, you know, they needed. Again,

0:29:00.796 --> 0:29:04.116
<v Speaker 4>it goes back to appearance. They needed the appearance of fairness.

0:29:04.636 --> 0:29:07.876
<v Speaker 4>And so Alabama really does typify a certain kind of

0:29:07.956 --> 0:29:10.756
<v Speaker 4>racial dynamic and early history of the death penalty that

0:29:10.796 --> 0:29:13.916
<v Speaker 4>you see throughout the South, especially not just the South,

0:29:13.916 --> 0:29:14.916
<v Speaker 4>but especially in the South.

0:29:15.716 --> 0:29:19.196
<v Speaker 3>One of the things proponents of the death penalty are

0:29:19.236 --> 0:29:22.956
<v Speaker 3>adamant about is that it requires some element of secrecy

0:29:23.236 --> 0:29:28.476
<v Speaker 3>to survive. Executions happen behind closed walls in small rooms

0:29:28.796 --> 0:29:32.716
<v Speaker 3>late at night. The people involved never have their identities

0:29:32.756 --> 0:29:36.636
<v Speaker 3>publicly revealed or their credentials, the concern being that if

0:29:36.636 --> 0:29:38.316
<v Speaker 3>people really knew what was involved, there would be a

0:29:38.356 --> 0:29:41.716
<v Speaker 3>massive public outcry. Malcolm, in this series, you describe in

0:29:41.756 --> 0:29:45.876
<v Speaker 3>gruesome detail what is actually involved in an execution. For

0:29:45.916 --> 0:29:48.276
<v Speaker 3>folks who haven't heard the series, tell us about that.

0:29:48.876 --> 0:29:49.076
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:29:49.116 --> 0:29:54.436
<v Speaker 6>In Alabama, there is a long execution protocol, kind of

0:29:54.436 --> 0:29:58.836
<v Speaker 6>a written script, which was made public only because it

0:29:59.356 --> 0:30:01.876
<v Speaker 6>came out during a lawsuit, which kind of lays out

0:30:01.916 --> 0:30:06.676
<v Speaker 6>all the steps that the state takes. And Alabama also has,

0:30:06.716 --> 0:30:09.756
<v Speaker 6>to your point, an unusual level of secrecy. For example,

0:30:10.196 --> 0:30:14.516
<v Speaker 6>in many states, the entire execution process is open at

0:30:14.596 --> 0:30:18.676
<v Speaker 6>least to witnesses. In Alabama, they you only see the

0:30:18.716 --> 0:30:21.876
<v Speaker 6>person after they've found a vein. So the Kenny Smith

0:30:21.916 --> 0:30:25.636
<v Speaker 6>case we were talking about, where they spend hours unsuccessfully

0:30:25.636 --> 0:30:27.996
<v Speaker 6>trying to find a vein, that was all done behind

0:30:27.996 --> 0:30:31.116
<v Speaker 6>closed doors. And the second thing is you point out

0:30:31.156 --> 0:30:34.996
<v Speaker 6>is that people who are involved remain anonymous. And you

0:30:35.036 --> 0:30:37.396
<v Speaker 6>can understand why. I mean, it's a kind of it

0:30:37.476 --> 0:30:41.316
<v Speaker 6>is an acknowledgement on the part of these states that

0:30:41.356 --> 0:30:45.756
<v Speaker 6>they are engaged in something shameful. Right, if they were

0:30:45.796 --> 0:30:48.596
<v Speaker 6>as kind of morally clear headed as they claim to be,

0:30:48.916 --> 0:30:53.076
<v Speaker 6>then what would be the problem with making every aspect

0:30:53.076 --> 0:30:55.876
<v Speaker 6>of the process public. But instead they go in the

0:30:55.916 --> 0:30:59.196
<v Speaker 6>opposite direction and they try and shroud it. They make

0:30:59.236 --> 0:31:01.956
<v Speaker 6>it as much of a mystery as they can. And

0:31:02.636 --> 0:31:05.956
<v Speaker 6>you know, it's funny. So much of our knowledge about

0:31:06.276 --> 0:31:10.916
<v Speaker 6>death palic procedures only comes out because of lawsuits. It

0:31:10.996 --> 0:31:14.916
<v Speaker 6>is only under the compulsion of the judicial process that

0:31:14.996 --> 0:31:17.836
<v Speaker 6>we learn any even the smallest tidbit about what's going

0:31:17.876 --> 0:31:20.836
<v Speaker 6>on or what kind of thought would into a particular procedure.

0:31:21.516 --> 0:31:23.756
<v Speaker 6>When we're talking about the state taking the life of

0:31:23.796 --> 0:31:28.436
<v Speaker 6>a citizens of the United States, that's weird, right. We

0:31:28.556 --> 0:31:32.476
<v Speaker 6>have more transparency over the most prosaic aspects of government

0:31:32.516 --> 0:31:35.796
<v Speaker 6>practice than we do about something that involves something as

0:31:35.836 --> 0:31:37.196
<v Speaker 6>important as taking someone's life.

0:31:38.396 --> 0:31:43.516
<v Speaker 3>Well, Leanna, you've witnessed two executions. Tell us about your experience,

0:31:43.636 --> 0:31:47.076
<v Speaker 3>and particularly this aspect of secrecy surrounding the process.

0:31:48.596 --> 0:31:50.796
<v Speaker 4>Well, let me just pick up first on the secrecy piece,

0:31:50.876 --> 0:31:54.716
<v Speaker 4>because one of the really bizarre aspects of the death

0:31:54.716 --> 0:31:59.116
<v Speaker 4>penalty when you've covered it in different states and looked

0:31:59.156 --> 0:32:01.116
<v Speaker 4>at the federal system as well, is that there's just

0:32:01.196 --> 0:32:04.636
<v Speaker 4>this wide range when it comes to what states and

0:32:04.716 --> 0:32:08.076
<v Speaker 4>jurisdictions are willing to reveal and show. What they are

0:32:08.116 --> 0:32:11.636
<v Speaker 4>not willing to reveal is certainly the individuals involved. A

0:32:11.716 --> 0:32:16.156
<v Speaker 4>ton of states or death penalty states have passed secrecy legislation,

0:32:16.276 --> 0:32:20.356
<v Speaker 4>essentially bringing all of that information even further behind closed doors.

0:32:20.396 --> 0:32:22.876
<v Speaker 4>So you know, the identity of the executioners was always

0:32:22.956 --> 0:32:24.516
<v Speaker 4>sort of a secret, but now we don't get to

0:32:24.556 --> 0:32:26.476
<v Speaker 4>know where they get the drugs. We don't get to know,

0:32:26.636 --> 0:32:29.236
<v Speaker 4>you know, and in some states, in some places, the

0:32:29.276 --> 0:32:32.916
<v Speaker 4>secrecy is really sort of shocking. Indiana. I just wrote

0:32:33.116 --> 0:32:37.716
<v Speaker 4>a story about Indiana, which recently restarted executions, and Indiana

0:32:37.796 --> 0:32:39.836
<v Speaker 4>is the only act of death penalty state that does

0:32:39.876 --> 0:32:43.316
<v Speaker 4>not allow any media witnesses. There is nothing, you know,

0:32:43.396 --> 0:32:46.276
<v Speaker 4>and that's exceptional. And if you go and try as

0:32:46.276 --> 0:32:48.876
<v Speaker 4>a journalist to cover an execution in Indiana, it's not

0:32:48.916 --> 0:32:51.596
<v Speaker 4>going to be like in Alabama and Oklahoma, where you know,

0:32:51.636 --> 0:32:54.236
<v Speaker 4>the head of the doc comes out and addresses things

0:32:54.236 --> 0:32:56.836
<v Speaker 4>and says, you know, whether true or not true, everything

0:32:56.876 --> 0:32:59.956
<v Speaker 4>went great. No, you are in a parking lot at

0:32:59.996 --> 0:33:03.676
<v Speaker 4>midnight across from the prison. There is absolutely nobody coming

0:33:03.796 --> 0:33:07.316
<v Speaker 4>to tell you what happened. It's a sort of ludicrous

0:33:07.676 --> 0:33:12.036
<v Speaker 4>display of indifference and contempt, frankly for the press or

0:33:12.076 --> 0:33:14.516
<v Speaker 4>for the public that has a right and an interest

0:33:14.956 --> 0:33:18.916
<v Speaker 4>in knowing what's happening in their names. So secrecy there's

0:33:18.956 --> 0:33:22.356
<v Speaker 4>a range, I guess, is my point. And yes, most

0:33:22.396 --> 0:33:24.676
<v Speaker 4>places err on the side of not revealing anything, but

0:33:24.796 --> 0:33:27.916
<v Speaker 4>some take that a lot further than others. In terms

0:33:27.996 --> 0:33:31.076
<v Speaker 4>of the experience of witnessing an execution, you know, that's

0:33:31.116 --> 0:33:33.396
<v Speaker 4>obviously a big question. I will say that both those

0:33:33.436 --> 0:33:37.596
<v Speaker 4>executions were in Oklahoma. That is a state that has

0:33:37.676 --> 0:33:42.596
<v Speaker 4>a really ugly, sordid history of botched executions going back

0:33:42.996 --> 0:33:47.556
<v Speaker 4>longer than ten years. But Oklahoma became sort of infamous

0:33:47.596 --> 0:33:49.996
<v Speaker 4>on the world stage about ten years ago a little

0:33:50.036 --> 0:33:53.396
<v Speaker 4>more for botching a series of executions. I've been covering

0:33:53.396 --> 0:33:55.636
<v Speaker 4>the case of Richard Glossip for a while. Richard Glossip

0:33:55.716 --> 0:33:58.316
<v Speaker 4>is a man with a long standing innocence claim whose

0:33:58.756 --> 0:34:02.676
<v Speaker 4>death sentence and conviction was overturned only this year. Richard

0:34:02.676 --> 0:34:04.436
<v Speaker 4>Glossip was almost put to death by the state of

0:34:04.436 --> 0:34:06.836
<v Speaker 4>Oklahoma in twenty fifteen, and I was outside the prison

0:34:06.876 --> 0:34:08.756
<v Speaker 4>that day. And it's only because they had the wrong

0:34:08.836 --> 0:34:11.116
<v Speaker 4>drug on hand that it did not go through. And

0:34:11.156 --> 0:34:14.396
<v Speaker 4>so going into a situation where I was preparing to

0:34:14.436 --> 0:34:18.796
<v Speaker 4>witness an execution in Oklahoma, I was all too keenly

0:34:18.836 --> 0:34:22.276
<v Speaker 4>aware of the possibility that something could go wrong. And

0:34:22.436 --> 0:34:25.236
<v Speaker 4>that's just something you know when you're covering this stuff.

0:34:25.756 --> 0:34:29.316
<v Speaker 4>And instead, you know, Oklahoma carried out the three drug

0:34:29.356 --> 0:34:32.516
<v Speaker 4>protocol execution of a man named Anthony Sanchez in September

0:34:32.556 --> 0:34:35.116
<v Speaker 4>of twenty twenty three. I had written about Anthony's case,

0:34:35.156 --> 0:34:37.436
<v Speaker 4>I had spoken to him the day before and for

0:34:37.476 --> 0:34:41.356
<v Speaker 4>the better part of a year, and I think I'm

0:34:41.396 --> 0:34:45.796
<v Speaker 4>still trying to understand what I saw that day, because

0:34:47.596 --> 0:34:51.876
<v Speaker 4>you know, by all appearances, things looked like they went

0:34:51.956 --> 0:34:55.636
<v Speaker 4>as smoothly as one would hope. Right, he was covered

0:34:55.676 --> 0:34:58.116
<v Speaker 4>with a sheet. He you know, you sort of saw

0:34:58.156 --> 0:35:02.636
<v Speaker 4>the color in his face change. He went still, and

0:35:03.596 --> 0:35:07.356
<v Speaker 4>as a journalist or just an ordinary person trying to

0:35:07.396 --> 0:35:11.196
<v Speaker 4>describe what that meant and what I was seeing I

0:35:11.196 --> 0:35:15.596
<v Speaker 4>couldn't really tell you, because the process, by design was

0:35:15.716 --> 0:35:19.756
<v Speaker 4>made to look that way. But I could not possibly

0:35:19.756 --> 0:35:23.436
<v Speaker 4>guess as to what he was experiencing. And again that's

0:35:23.476 --> 0:35:26.316
<v Speaker 4>because lethal injection and that three drug protocol has been

0:35:26.356 --> 0:35:29.196
<v Speaker 4>designed to make it look humane and make it look

0:35:29.356 --> 0:35:32.196
<v Speaker 4>like everything's gone smoothly. I will say one thing that

0:35:32.236 --> 0:35:34.916
<v Speaker 4>has really stuck with me about that execution was that

0:35:34.956 --> 0:35:37.836
<v Speaker 4>I was sitting right behind the Attorney General of Oklahoma,

0:35:38.276 --> 0:35:43.836
<v Speaker 4>Getner Drummond, who has attended, i think to his credit, frankly,

0:35:43.916 --> 0:35:46.476
<v Speaker 4>but who has attended every execution that has been carried

0:35:46.476 --> 0:35:49.996
<v Speaker 4>out in Oklahoma under his tenure, and he was sitting

0:35:50.036 --> 0:35:52.996
<v Speaker 4>in front of me, and a member of the one

0:35:53.076 --> 0:35:55.196
<v Speaker 4>witness who was there, who I believe was a member

0:35:55.196 --> 0:35:58.436
<v Speaker 4>of Anthony's family, was sitting sort of one seat over,

0:35:58.996 --> 0:36:01.716
<v Speaker 4>and after the execution was over, she was kind of

0:36:01.756 --> 0:36:06.116
<v Speaker 4>quietly weeping, and Getner Drummond, the Attorney General who was

0:36:06.156 --> 0:36:09.036
<v Speaker 4>responsible for this execution, kind of, you know, put his

0:36:09.196 --> 0:36:11.356
<v Speaker 4>hand on her and said, I'm sorry for your loss.

0:36:12.836 --> 0:36:16.116
<v Speaker 4>And it was this really bizarre moment because he was

0:36:16.156 --> 0:36:19.676
<v Speaker 4>acknowledging that this was a loss that this death of

0:36:19.676 --> 0:36:22.756
<v Speaker 4>this person that she clearly cared about, he was responsible

0:36:22.796 --> 0:36:25.836
<v Speaker 4>for it. And I don't know that he has ever

0:36:25.876 --> 0:36:27.956
<v Speaker 4>said something like that since, because a lot of us

0:36:27.996 --> 0:36:30.436
<v Speaker 4>journalists in the room, you know, sort of reported back,

0:36:30.556 --> 0:36:32.836
<v Speaker 4>and it's almost like you're not supposed to say that.

0:36:32.956 --> 0:36:35.916
<v Speaker 4>You know, there shouldn't be sorrow here. Really, you know,

0:36:36.236 --> 0:36:38.996
<v Speaker 4>this is justice, this is what's being done in our name.

0:36:39.596 --> 0:36:41.876
<v Speaker 4>And I'm still trying to sort of figure out how

0:36:41.916 --> 0:36:44.876
<v Speaker 4>i feel about that, because, by and large, in the

0:36:44.916 --> 0:36:48.436
<v Speaker 4>executions I've recorded on, you don't have the Attorney General

0:36:48.516 --> 0:36:50.996
<v Speaker 4>himself or the prosecutor who sent this person to death

0:36:51.076 --> 0:36:54.316
<v Speaker 4>row attending the execution. It's sort of out of sight, out.

0:36:54.156 --> 0:36:56.356
<v Speaker 2>Of mind, Malcolm.

0:36:56.516 --> 0:37:00.436
<v Speaker 3>As we've talked about and has been repeatedly documented, the

0:37:00.476 --> 0:37:03.996
<v Speaker 3>way that the death penalty has been applied has been

0:37:04.356 --> 0:37:08.436
<v Speaker 3>racist and classes disproportionally affecting black and Latino people and

0:37:08.556 --> 0:37:13.516
<v Speaker 3>poor people. Is also historically penalized people who have mental

0:37:13.516 --> 0:37:18.316
<v Speaker 3>health issues or intellectual disabilities. Even with all that evidence,

0:37:18.836 --> 0:37:23.556
<v Speaker 3>why does this persist? How has vengeance become such a

0:37:23.556 --> 0:37:25.716
<v Speaker 3>core part of the American justice system?

0:37:26.756 --> 0:37:29.156
<v Speaker 6>Well, as I said before, I think what's happened is

0:37:29.556 --> 0:37:32.156
<v Speaker 6>that the people who are opposed to death penalty are

0:37:32.196 --> 0:37:35.196
<v Speaker 6>having a different conversation than the people who are in

0:37:35.236 --> 0:37:38.156
<v Speaker 6>favor of it. That the people who are in favorite

0:37:38.236 --> 0:37:41.476
<v Speaker 6>are trying to make a kind of moral statement about

0:37:41.596 --> 0:37:46.796
<v Speaker 6>society's ultimate intolerance of people who violate certain kinds of norms,

0:37:47.356 --> 0:37:50.036
<v Speaker 6>and they are in the pursuit of that kind of

0:37:50.076 --> 0:37:53.436
<v Speaker 6>moral statement willing to go to almost any lengths. And

0:37:53.476 --> 0:37:56.556
<v Speaker 6>on the other side are people who are saying that

0:37:56.716 --> 0:38:00.916
<v Speaker 6>going this far is outside of the moral boundaries of

0:38:00.956 --> 0:38:06.836
<v Speaker 6>a civilized state. Those are two very different claims that

0:38:06.956 --> 0:38:10.476
<v Speaker 6>proceed on very different assumptions, and we're talking past each other,

0:38:10.476 --> 0:38:13.396
<v Speaker 6>I would even so, my point is it doesn't matter

0:38:13.476 --> 0:38:15.636
<v Speaker 6>to those who are making a broad moral statement about

0:38:15.636 --> 0:38:21.596
<v Speaker 6>society's intolerance what this conditioned status, background makeup of the

0:38:21.636 --> 0:38:25.076
<v Speaker 6>convicted criminal is, because they're not basing their decision on

0:38:25.636 --> 0:38:28.916
<v Speaker 6>the humanity of the defendant, the criminal defendant. They're making

0:38:28.956 --> 0:38:31.916
<v Speaker 6>a broad moral point, right right. And I wonder I've

0:38:31.916 --> 0:38:36.356
<v Speaker 6>often wondered whether, in doing series as I did that

0:38:36.436 --> 0:38:40.156
<v Speaker 6>focus so heavily on the details of an execution, I'm

0:38:40.236 --> 0:38:45.116
<v Speaker 6>kind of contributing to the problem that if opponents make

0:38:45.156 --> 0:38:49.036
<v Speaker 6>it all about the individual circumstances of the defendant, the

0:38:49.036 --> 0:38:51.316
<v Speaker 6>details of the case, was the person guilty or not,

0:38:51.556 --> 0:38:55.796
<v Speaker 6>was the kind of punishment cruel and unusual. We're kind

0:38:55.876 --> 0:39:00.676
<v Speaker 6>of buying into the moral error here because we're opening

0:39:00.756 --> 0:39:03.636
<v Speaker 6>the possibility that if all we were doing was executing

0:39:03.636 --> 0:39:06.956
<v Speaker 6>people who were one hundred percent guilty, and if our

0:39:06.996 --> 0:39:10.276
<v Speaker 6>method of execution was proven without a shadow of doubt

0:39:10.356 --> 0:39:12.556
<v Speaker 6>to be quote unquote humane, then we don't have a

0:39:12.556 --> 0:39:13.276
<v Speaker 6>case anymore.

0:39:13.756 --> 0:39:14.796
<v Speaker 2>Right then it'd be fine.

0:39:14.876 --> 0:39:16.836
<v Speaker 6>And I, you know, so I look at what I've done.

0:39:16.836 --> 0:39:19.076
<v Speaker 6>That's my one reservation about spending all this time on

0:39:19.116 --> 0:39:22.796
<v Speaker 6>the Kenny Smith case is that we shouldn't have to

0:39:22.836 --> 0:39:25.996
<v Speaker 6>do this. It should be enough to say that even

0:39:26.036 --> 0:39:27.956
<v Speaker 6>the worst person in the world does not deserve to

0:39:27.996 --> 0:39:31.676
<v Speaker 6>be murdered by a state. That's not what states do

0:39:32.596 --> 0:39:35.916
<v Speaker 6>right in a civilized society. That one sentence ought to

0:39:35.916 --> 0:39:39.036
<v Speaker 6>be enough. And it's kind of a symptom of how

0:39:40.156 --> 0:39:44.276
<v Speaker 6>distorted this argument has become that it's not enough.

0:39:45.156 --> 0:39:47.116
<v Speaker 2>Well, Lean, I want to briefly get your thoughts on

0:39:47.156 --> 0:39:47.716
<v Speaker 2>this too.

0:39:48.116 --> 0:39:52.036
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that people who are oppose to the

0:39:52.036 --> 0:39:56.116
<v Speaker 4>death penalty and abolitionists often times sort of say this

0:39:56.196 --> 0:39:58.436
<v Speaker 4>is a broken system, and we talk about prisons in

0:39:58.436 --> 0:40:01.236
<v Speaker 4>that way. This is a broken system. And I think

0:40:01.236 --> 0:40:03.636
<v Speaker 4>it's a mistake to say that this is a broken system,

0:40:03.716 --> 0:40:06.436
<v Speaker 4>because I don't think that this system at its best,

0:40:06.436 --> 0:40:09.436
<v Speaker 4>as you've just discussed, would be fine if it only

0:40:09.476 --> 0:40:13.236
<v Speaker 4>worked correctly. I think that that's absolutely not the case,

0:40:13.276 --> 0:40:16.316
<v Speaker 4>and so I do agree that the system. I don't

0:40:16.396 --> 0:40:18.316
<v Speaker 4>hide the fact that I'm very opposed to the death penalty.

0:40:18.316 --> 0:40:20.116
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that you can design it and improve

0:40:20.156 --> 0:40:22.596
<v Speaker 4>it and make it fair and make it just. I

0:40:22.636 --> 0:40:24.796
<v Speaker 4>also think that part of the reason that people have

0:40:24.836 --> 0:40:27.076
<v Speaker 4>a hard time saying that is that if you were

0:40:27.076 --> 0:40:29.116
<v Speaker 4>to say that about the death penalty in this country,

0:40:29.156 --> 0:40:31.156
<v Speaker 4>for all of the reasons that that may be true,

0:40:31.236 --> 0:40:34.356
<v Speaker 4>then you would be forced to deal with the criminal

0:40:34.436 --> 0:40:38.196
<v Speaker 4>justice system more broadly and with prisons and sentencing as

0:40:38.236 --> 0:40:40.396
<v Speaker 4>a whole. And I think that there's a real reluctance

0:40:40.476 --> 0:40:43.076
<v Speaker 4>to see the problems that we see in death penalty

0:40:43.076 --> 0:40:46.236
<v Speaker 4>cases in that broader context, because what does that mean

0:40:46.476 --> 0:40:49.236
<v Speaker 4>for this country if you're calling the question on mass

0:40:49.236 --> 0:40:52.916
<v Speaker 4>incarceration and in the purpose that these sentences serve.

0:40:53.836 --> 0:40:55.836
<v Speaker 3>We've covered a lot here. I want to thank you

0:40:55.876 --> 0:40:57.556
<v Speaker 3>both for joining me on the Intercept Briefing.

0:40:57.836 --> 0:40:58.596
<v Speaker 6>Thank you so much.

0:40:58.916 --> 0:40:59.276
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:41:01.276 --> 0:41:03.676
<v Speaker 3>Before we go, we want to hear from you. What

0:41:03.716 --> 0:41:05.516
<v Speaker 3>do you want to see more covered of? Are you

0:41:05.556 --> 0:41:09.276
<v Speaker 3>taking political action? Are there organizing efforts in your community?

0:41:09.396 --> 0:41:11.516
<v Speaker 3>You want to shout out? Shoot us an email at

0:41:11.556 --> 0:41:13.996
<v Speaker 3>podcasts at the Intercept dot com or leave us a

0:41:14.036 --> 0:41:17.516
<v Speaker 3>voicemail at five three zero podcast That's five three zero

0:41:17.756 --> 0:41:20.956
<v Speaker 3>seven six three two two seven eight. This episode was

0:41:20.996 --> 0:41:25.036
<v Speaker 3>produced by Andrew Stelzer. Laura Flynn is our supervising producer.

0:41:25.396 --> 0:41:29.156
<v Speaker 3>Seem Agerwaal is our executive producer. Ben Music is our

0:41:29.236 --> 0:41:32.996
<v Speaker 3>editor in chief. Chelsea Bcooms is our social and video producer.

0:41:33.316 --> 0:41:36.796
<v Speaker 3>Desiree Dieb is our booking producer. Valeoh is our product

0:41:36.796 --> 0:41:40.916
<v Speaker 3>and design manager. Narishin is our copy editor. Will Stanton

0:41:40.956 --> 0:41:44.596
<v Speaker 3>mixed our show and legal review by David Burrello slipstream

0:41:44.596 --> 0:41:47.436
<v Speaker 3>provider or theme music. If you want to support our work,

0:41:47.556 --> 0:41:49.676
<v Speaker 3>you can go to the Intercept dot com slash join

0:41:50.116 --> 0:41:53.396
<v Speaker 3>your donation no matter the amount makes a real difference,

0:41:53.556 --> 0:41:56.316
<v Speaker 3>And if you haven't already, please subscribe to the Intercept

0:41:56.316 --> 0:41:59.356
<v Speaker 3>Briefing wherever you listen to podcasts and leave us a rating.

0:41:59.516 --> 0:42:00.076
<v Speaker 2>Or a review.

0:42:00.196 --> 0:42:03.156
<v Speaker 3>It helps other listeners find our reporting. Until next time,

0:42:03.276 --> 0:42:04.156
<v Speaker 3>I'm MICHAELA. Lacey