1 00:00:05,160 --> 00:00:07,400 Speaker 1: Hey, this is Bridget and you're listening the stuff mom 2 00:00:07,440 --> 00:00:23,360 Speaker 1: ever told you. Now today we're talking about gender disparity. 3 00:00:23,760 --> 00:00:26,080 Speaker 1: I know you're thinking, what else is new? But did 4 00:00:26,079 --> 00:00:29,120 Speaker 1: you know that gender disparity actually continues even after we 5 00:00:29,160 --> 00:00:31,720 Speaker 1: die because women can't catch a break even when we're 6 00:00:31,720 --> 00:00:38,000 Speaker 1: six ft under. It's true. In scholars, Robert Castenbaumb, Beatrice 7 00:00:38,080 --> 00:00:40,600 Speaker 1: Caston Bomb, and Sarah Peyton were the first to raise 8 00:00:40,640 --> 00:00:43,960 Speaker 1: the question of gender disparity after death. They hypothesized that 9 00:00:44,040 --> 00:00:47,320 Speaker 1: the quote dominant male preferring value system of the United 10 00:00:47,360 --> 00:00:50,320 Speaker 1: States would carry over the threshold from life to death. 11 00:00:50,720 --> 00:00:54,040 Speaker 1: In order to prove this theory, they looked at newspaper obituaries. 12 00:00:54,360 --> 00:00:57,320 Speaker 1: The authors of this study used the obituaries as a subtle, 13 00:00:57,440 --> 00:01:01,160 Speaker 1: unobstrusive way to figure out society's values system. They proposed 14 00:01:01,160 --> 00:01:03,720 Speaker 1: that men would get a greater public recognition after death 15 00:01:03,720 --> 00:01:06,520 Speaker 1: than women. They looked at two major newspapers, the New 16 00:01:06,560 --> 00:01:09,680 Speaker 1: York Times in the Boston Globe, and their findings probably 17 00:01:09,680 --> 00:01:13,000 Speaker 1: won't surprise you. They found that men received four times 18 00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:15,759 Speaker 1: as many obituaries as women, and that male obituaries are 19 00:01:15,840 --> 00:01:18,280 Speaker 1: longer and ten times more likely to be accompanied by 20 00:01:18,280 --> 00:01:21,440 Speaker 1: a photograph. Ultimately, the research found that readers of these 21 00:01:21,440 --> 00:01:26,200 Speaker 1: two newspapers were receiving quote systematic, if subtle, confirmation of 22 00:01:26,200 --> 00:01:29,520 Speaker 1: the greater importance of men. So probably surprising no one, 23 00:01:29,840 --> 00:01:32,400 Speaker 1: there's a real gender disparity when it comes to obituaries. 24 00:01:32,880 --> 00:01:36,199 Speaker 1: Amanda Hes actually pointed this out in fourteen writing for Slate, 25 00:01:36,600 --> 00:01:38,400 Speaker 1: where she pointed out that most of the subject of 26 00:01:38,440 --> 00:01:41,440 Speaker 1: the New York Times as obituaries achieved their final criteria 27 00:01:41,520 --> 00:01:43,760 Speaker 1: for inclusion between the ages of sixty and a hundred. 28 00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:46,560 Speaker 1: That means that they made their marks in society in 29 00:01:46,560 --> 00:01:49,120 Speaker 1: the nineteen forties to the nineteen sixties, when women were 30 00:01:49,120 --> 00:01:54,400 Speaker 1: particularly excluded from spheres of politics, journalism, filmmaking, science, technology, literature, 31 00:01:54,760 --> 00:01:58,040 Speaker 1: and professional athletics that typically earn attention from The Times. Now, 32 00:01:58,120 --> 00:01:59,880 Speaker 1: that may be true, but we should also take a 33 00:02:00,040 --> 00:02:02,800 Speaker 1: at the editorial choices that go into who does or 34 00:02:02,840 --> 00:02:05,960 Speaker 1: doesn't get an obituary, and to do just that, I'm 35 00:02:06,040 --> 00:02:08,520 Speaker 1: joined by Jessica Bennett. You probably already know that name, 36 00:02:08,600 --> 00:02:10,560 Speaker 1: but in case you don't, she is an award winning 37 00:02:10,639 --> 00:02:13,440 Speaker 1: journalist who writes on gender, sexuality, and culture. She was 38 00:02:13,480 --> 00:02:15,640 Speaker 1: recently named the Gender editor for the New York Times, 39 00:02:15,639 --> 00:02:18,119 Speaker 1: and she's the first person to ever hold that role. Now, 40 00:02:18,240 --> 00:02:21,360 Speaker 1: Jessica pretty much wrote the book on sexism. Literally. Her 41 00:02:21,360 --> 00:02:23,920 Speaker 1: book Feminist Fight Club is a manual for navigating a 42 00:02:23,960 --> 00:02:27,240 Speaker 1: sexist workplace and is a must read. Jessica, thank you 43 00:02:27,280 --> 00:02:29,560 Speaker 1: so much for being here today. Thank you for having 44 00:02:29,600 --> 00:02:33,040 Speaker 1: me so Jessica. I found it really interesting that there 45 00:02:33,200 --> 00:02:35,920 Speaker 1: is this gender disparity when it comes to obituaries. I 46 00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:39,240 Speaker 1: was reading this piece by Amanda Haspecken that she wrote 47 00:02:39,240 --> 00:02:41,919 Speaker 1: for Slate about how sixty six of the most recent 48 00:02:41,919 --> 00:02:44,560 Speaker 1: obituaries that she found in the New York Times, all 49 00:02:44,560 --> 00:02:47,640 Speaker 1: of those sixty six, only seven of them were about women. 50 00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:49,600 Speaker 1: And so I wonder, like, what do you think is 51 00:02:49,600 --> 00:02:53,840 Speaker 1: going on here when it comes to this disparity? You know, 52 00:02:54,080 --> 00:02:57,399 Speaker 1: I think that the media for most of history has 53 00:02:57,480 --> 00:03:02,480 Speaker 1: been created by and for white men primarily. So what 54 00:03:02,520 --> 00:03:05,359 Speaker 1: we decided to do was we looked back at our 55 00:03:05,360 --> 00:03:07,840 Speaker 1: obituaries over time, going all the way back to eighteen 56 00:03:07,880 --> 00:03:10,160 Speaker 1: fifty one, so that's a hundred and sixty seven years, 57 00:03:10,760 --> 00:03:16,080 Speaker 1: and we calculated the number of had been devoted to women, 58 00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:19,320 Speaker 1: and what we found was that only about fifteen to 59 00:03:20,360 --> 00:03:23,000 Speaker 1: over time had been about women, and even in the 60 00:03:23,000 --> 00:03:26,800 Speaker 1: past couple of years, just one in five. Now, there's 61 00:03:26,880 --> 00:03:30,720 Speaker 1: no perfect way of determining these numbers. There were certainly 62 00:03:30,800 --> 00:03:34,360 Speaker 1: some flaws to the methodology, and we couldn't account for race, 63 00:03:34,960 --> 00:03:37,280 Speaker 1: which was disappointing because I'm sure most of these were 64 00:03:37,320 --> 00:03:41,280 Speaker 1: also of white people. But what we could take away 65 00:03:41,280 --> 00:03:44,520 Speaker 1: from that very clearly was that it wasn't good enough. 66 00:03:45,280 --> 00:03:48,280 Speaker 1: What we wanted to do with the Overlooked project was 67 00:03:48,760 --> 00:03:51,880 Speaker 1: take a fraction of those and write the obituaries for 68 00:03:51,920 --> 00:03:54,720 Speaker 1: the women who never got them but arguably should have. 69 00:03:55,400 --> 00:03:58,760 Speaker 1: And so certainly we're not correcting the problem over a 70 00:03:58,840 --> 00:04:01,400 Speaker 1: hundred and sixty seven yours, but we are highlighting some 71 00:04:01,520 --> 00:04:04,280 Speaker 1: of the real glaring omissions. So who were some of 72 00:04:04,280 --> 00:04:06,480 Speaker 1: those women who were sort of shockingly left out of 73 00:04:06,480 --> 00:04:09,840 Speaker 1: the New York Times of obituary section. Well, some of 74 00:04:09,840 --> 00:04:12,560 Speaker 1: them are names that you would recognize, like Sylvia Platt 75 00:04:13,400 --> 00:04:18,200 Speaker 1: or Charlotte Bronte who wrote Jane Eyre, or id b Wells, 76 00:04:18,360 --> 00:04:21,680 Speaker 1: the journalist and suffragists who was a leading voice of 77 00:04:21,720 --> 00:04:25,080 Speaker 1: the anti lynching movement. And you know, it was fascinating 78 00:04:25,120 --> 00:04:27,520 Speaker 1: to day back into these archives because of some of 79 00:04:27,560 --> 00:04:31,320 Speaker 1: these cases women like id B Wells Well. For example, 80 00:04:31,600 --> 00:04:34,800 Speaker 1: her wedding was in fact printed on the front page 81 00:04:34,839 --> 00:04:37,359 Speaker 1: of the New York Times, and yet when she died, 82 00:04:37,400 --> 00:04:41,800 Speaker 1: she didn't receive an obituary. Charlotte Bronty, we only discovered 83 00:04:41,880 --> 00:04:44,240 Speaker 1: this the day that we published. Somebody pointed this out 84 00:04:44,279 --> 00:04:48,320 Speaker 1: to me. But when her husband's eye said, Charlotte Bronti's 85 00:04:48,400 --> 00:04:51,960 Speaker 1: husband dies, and yet when she the subject of his 86 00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:56,680 Speaker 1: obituary actually passed away, she did not receive one. So 87 00:04:56,720 --> 00:05:01,159 Speaker 1: it was right exactly. And you know, you can you 88 00:05:01,200 --> 00:05:03,599 Speaker 1: can make the assumption that this wasn't the same editor 89 00:05:04,080 --> 00:05:07,480 Speaker 1: overseeing the section when her husband died as when she died. 90 00:05:07,920 --> 00:05:11,039 Speaker 1: But there were these glaring omissions that we wanted to correct. 91 00:05:11,320 --> 00:05:13,720 Speaker 1: So for folks who might be saying, okay, big deal, 92 00:05:13,880 --> 00:05:16,080 Speaker 1: So what Sylvia Plath didn't get it right up in 93 00:05:16,120 --> 00:05:20,279 Speaker 1: the Times, who cares? Why does it actually matter? I 94 00:05:20,320 --> 00:05:23,520 Speaker 1: think it matters because so many women have traditionally been 95 00:05:23,520 --> 00:05:27,240 Speaker 1: erased from history, you know, whether it is them achieving 96 00:05:27,279 --> 00:05:31,400 Speaker 1: accomplishments that men then simply got the credit for, or 97 00:05:31,520 --> 00:05:35,680 Speaker 1: simply being famous in their own right, but not getting 98 00:05:35,920 --> 00:05:38,800 Speaker 1: something as simple as an obituary. And they passed away. 99 00:05:38,800 --> 00:05:42,720 Speaker 1: I think it's indicative of this larger cultural issue. And 100 00:05:43,080 --> 00:05:45,760 Speaker 1: one of the things that was fascinating was to see 101 00:05:45,800 --> 00:05:49,880 Speaker 1: not only the big name, famous women who didn't receive obituaries, 102 00:05:50,160 --> 00:05:53,880 Speaker 1: but women who had accomplished amazing things, who you may 103 00:05:53,920 --> 00:05:56,680 Speaker 1: not have heard of, but who in their own right 104 00:05:56,760 --> 00:06:00,839 Speaker 1: deserved obituaries. So, for example, I wrote the obituary for 105 00:06:00,880 --> 00:06:05,440 Speaker 1: a woman named Emily Warren Roebling, and she, in the 106 00:06:05,600 --> 00:06:10,240 Speaker 1: eighteen nineties completed the construction of the Brooklyn Bridge, which 107 00:06:10,279 --> 00:06:12,360 Speaker 1: was of course dubbed the Eighth Wonder of the World 108 00:06:12,520 --> 00:06:17,159 Speaker 1: and was an eleven year, multimillion dollar process. Well, her 109 00:06:17,279 --> 00:06:20,560 Speaker 1: husband had actually been the chief engineer of that project, 110 00:06:20,839 --> 00:06:23,880 Speaker 1: but he came down with a mysterious illness, and so 111 00:06:23,960 --> 00:06:26,440 Speaker 1: she was tasked with going back and forth to the 112 00:06:26,480 --> 00:06:31,279 Speaker 1: construction site, overseeing all of the paperwork and in her petticoat, 113 00:06:31,360 --> 00:06:34,320 Speaker 1: which was pretty rare to see on a construction site 114 00:06:34,320 --> 00:06:38,200 Speaker 1: in the eighteen nineties, essentially overseeing this whole process. And 115 00:06:38,320 --> 00:06:40,880 Speaker 1: yet nobody really knew about her. I had never heard 116 00:06:40,920 --> 00:06:47,080 Speaker 1: of her before. And meanwhile, her husband has received multiple biographies. Again, 117 00:06:47,160 --> 00:06:50,520 Speaker 1: that's that's so shocking, and she clearly lived such an 118 00:06:50,520 --> 00:06:53,880 Speaker 1: incredible life and did incredible things, things that we you 119 00:06:53,920 --> 00:06:57,360 Speaker 1: know still I mean, the Brooklyn Bridge still exists. And 120 00:06:57,920 --> 00:07:02,120 Speaker 1: it's it's so telling to me how we ignore these 121 00:07:02,240 --> 00:07:05,760 Speaker 1: contributions from women, even when those contributions are very much 122 00:07:05,800 --> 00:07:09,000 Speaker 1: still part of our our world today, right. I mean, 123 00:07:09,440 --> 00:07:12,880 Speaker 1: the quote anonymous was a woman, the Virginia Wolf quote. It. 124 00:07:13,120 --> 00:07:15,760 Speaker 1: I kept thinking about it throughout this process because truly, 125 00:07:15,800 --> 00:07:18,600 Speaker 1: these women just were often in the background, kind of anonymous, 126 00:07:18,600 --> 00:07:22,400 Speaker 1: even though they were doing these incredible things, and it 127 00:07:22,440 --> 00:07:24,720 Speaker 1: was interesting to look back. So as we were pulling 128 00:07:24,760 --> 00:07:28,280 Speaker 1: all of these numbers back a hundred and sixty seven years, 129 00:07:29,160 --> 00:07:33,120 Speaker 1: we actually about midway through realized we needed to restart 130 00:07:33,160 --> 00:07:35,520 Speaker 1: some of our research because we've been coming up with 131 00:07:35,520 --> 00:07:38,080 Speaker 1: these names. There's no real perfect way of finding out 132 00:07:38,080 --> 00:07:40,400 Speaker 1: who did not receive an obituary, but who should have. 133 00:07:40,880 --> 00:07:44,720 Speaker 1: So to some extent, an editor on our Obituaries team, 134 00:07:44,760 --> 00:07:47,560 Speaker 1: Amy pat Nani, had been collecting names that she had 135 00:07:47,600 --> 00:07:51,640 Speaker 1: noticed over time, and I, as just someone who loves 136 00:07:51,920 --> 00:07:55,560 Speaker 1: history and assascinated by women's history, had a list in 137 00:07:55,600 --> 00:07:58,480 Speaker 1: a notebook somewhere in my house of women's names who 138 00:07:58,520 --> 00:08:00,600 Speaker 1: sort of didn't get credit. For things, and so I 139 00:08:00,600 --> 00:08:04,120 Speaker 1: would type these into our Times Machine search engine that 140 00:08:04,160 --> 00:08:07,440 Speaker 1: looks back at the archives and scroll through trying to 141 00:08:07,480 --> 00:08:10,520 Speaker 1: find out if these women had received But at some 142 00:08:10,600 --> 00:08:14,440 Speaker 1: point we realized that, in fact, until the late nineteen seventies, 143 00:08:14,960 --> 00:08:16,960 Speaker 1: if you were a woman and you died, you would 144 00:08:17,000 --> 00:08:20,200 Speaker 1: actually be cataloged under your husband's name, so it would 145 00:08:20,200 --> 00:08:23,480 Speaker 1: be Mrs Husband's name. And so I had to go 146 00:08:23,560 --> 00:08:25,680 Speaker 1: back through and read you all of this research because 147 00:08:25,680 --> 00:08:29,040 Speaker 1: I had been searching under the women's names. More with 148 00:08:29,120 --> 00:08:39,080 Speaker 1: Jessica after this quick break and we're back. So who 149 00:08:39,080 --> 00:08:41,480 Speaker 1: were some of the women if you can remember, who 150 00:08:41,480 --> 00:08:45,120 Speaker 1: were on your your notebook list of women who didn't 151 00:08:45,120 --> 00:08:47,120 Speaker 1: really get a lot of credit but you thought this 152 00:08:47,160 --> 00:08:53,120 Speaker 1: person probably deserves an obituary because they were awesome. Well IDB. 153 00:08:53,280 --> 00:08:57,120 Speaker 1: Wells was one that I immediately typed in, just curious 154 00:08:57,120 --> 00:08:59,520 Speaker 1: if what we had ever done her, and in fact 155 00:08:59,559 --> 00:09:02,880 Speaker 1: we hadn't. Um you know, some other people who were 156 00:09:03,040 --> 00:09:05,560 Speaker 1: bigger names that I that I searched were those like 157 00:09:05,760 --> 00:09:09,920 Speaker 1: Free to Carlo, who did receive an obituary, but in 158 00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:12,840 Speaker 1: hers in nineteen fifty three when she died, she was 159 00:09:12,880 --> 00:09:15,720 Speaker 1: referred to in the very first sentence as quote the 160 00:09:15,760 --> 00:09:19,280 Speaker 1: wife of Diego Rivera and then in the second paragraph 161 00:09:19,360 --> 00:09:21,480 Speaker 1: as a painter in her own right. So there are 162 00:09:21,520 --> 00:09:23,400 Speaker 1: other you know, we could do a whole separate project 163 00:09:23,440 --> 00:09:26,880 Speaker 1: and like rewriting obituaries in a way that was less 164 00:09:27,160 --> 00:09:31,160 Speaker 1: condescending and patronizing. UM. Susan B. Anthony was another one 165 00:09:31,200 --> 00:09:34,920 Speaker 1: that I looked up, and she was referred to as 166 00:09:35,000 --> 00:09:39,679 Speaker 1: having a very pleasant looking face in her obituary. UM. 167 00:09:39,840 --> 00:09:41,760 Speaker 1: But some of the women that I had on that 168 00:09:41,840 --> 00:09:45,800 Speaker 1: list were those like Ada Loveless, who had written what 169 00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:48,559 Speaker 1: is now believed to be the first line of computer code, 170 00:09:48,559 --> 00:09:50,679 Speaker 1: and yet at the time she didn't really get much 171 00:09:50,720 --> 00:09:53,600 Speaker 1: credit and people didn't really know who she was. As 172 00:09:53,600 --> 00:09:58,120 Speaker 1: I started doing research, I found people like Ruth Ellis, 173 00:09:58,200 --> 00:10:02,520 Speaker 1: who was the first black press owner in Detroit and 174 00:10:02,600 --> 00:10:05,440 Speaker 1: eventually turned her home into something called the Gay Space, 175 00:10:05,440 --> 00:10:09,559 Speaker 1: where she essentially created a community space to help LGBT 176 00:10:09,720 --> 00:10:13,719 Speaker 1: uth at a time when this was pretty uncommon. UM. 177 00:10:13,760 --> 00:10:18,120 Speaker 1: There was Martha Costan who invented the Maritimes signal flare, 178 00:10:18,240 --> 00:10:23,920 Speaker 1: which basically revolutionized communication between US Navy vessels. UM. And 179 00:10:24,080 --> 00:10:28,960 Speaker 1: yet in eighteen sixty nine, when this was patented, she 180 00:10:29,120 --> 00:10:33,440 Speaker 1: was listed as the administrative of the projects with her 181 00:10:33,520 --> 00:10:37,440 Speaker 1: husband um and he in fact got credit for the 182 00:10:37,480 --> 00:10:41,080 Speaker 1: actual invention even though he had been dead for ten 183 00:10:41,160 --> 00:10:44,880 Speaker 1: years at the time. That's one that will be upcoming. Yeah, 184 00:10:44,880 --> 00:10:48,480 Speaker 1: there's so many stories like this. It goes on and 185 00:10:48,520 --> 00:10:52,079 Speaker 1: on and on, and we we wanted to put out 186 00:10:52,120 --> 00:10:56,000 Speaker 1: a call when when we initially published the project, allowing 187 00:10:56,080 --> 00:10:59,600 Speaker 1: people to submit names and tell us who we might 188 00:10:59,600 --> 00:11:04,280 Speaker 1: have and it's been overwhelming. We've gotten more than submissions, 189 00:11:04,800 --> 00:11:10,320 Speaker 1: many of which are completely valid and worthy, submissions of 190 00:11:10,480 --> 00:11:13,640 Speaker 1: women and people of color and other people that we've 191 00:11:13,679 --> 00:11:18,040 Speaker 1: overlooked who really do deserve credit. Wow. The fact that 192 00:11:18,080 --> 00:11:20,679 Speaker 1: you've got so many submissions and this project hasn't been 193 00:11:20,720 --> 00:11:23,080 Speaker 1: alive for very long, what does that make you? What 194 00:11:23,120 --> 00:11:26,120 Speaker 1: does that tell you about sort of how we are 195 00:11:26,200 --> 00:11:29,200 Speaker 1: thirsty ing to see our stories told and to see 196 00:11:29,200 --> 00:11:32,199 Speaker 1: our our legacies memorialized. I mean, the fact that you 197 00:11:32,280 --> 00:11:36,160 Speaker 1: had this open call to, you know, provide obituaries for 198 00:11:36,240 --> 00:11:38,600 Speaker 1: people only up for you know, a little while I've 199 00:11:38,640 --> 00:11:41,559 Speaker 1: already so many people have said do her do her? 200 00:11:41,640 --> 00:11:43,480 Speaker 1: Or do this person? Do this person? I mean, it 201 00:11:43,520 --> 00:11:48,200 Speaker 1: just seems to suggest that obituaries are really powerful that 202 00:11:48,240 --> 00:11:53,040 Speaker 1: we were thirsting to have our stories told in that way. Yeah, 203 00:11:53,120 --> 00:11:55,880 Speaker 1: it's interesting because you know, obituaries are not a section 204 00:11:55,960 --> 00:11:59,320 Speaker 1: I typically flipped to when I'm reading through a newspaper, 205 00:11:59,720 --> 00:12:03,160 Speaker 1: but at the same time, they're kind of this final 206 00:12:03,320 --> 00:12:06,320 Speaker 1: testament to a person's life, and they sort of have 207 00:12:06,520 --> 00:12:10,240 Speaker 1: this way of telling an audience or readership like who 208 00:12:10,600 --> 00:12:13,560 Speaker 1: was worthy and who wasn't And so in that way, 209 00:12:14,000 --> 00:12:16,480 Speaker 1: for so many years, it has been a group of 210 00:12:16,600 --> 00:12:20,240 Speaker 1: editors inside an institution who have made those decisions. And 211 00:12:20,559 --> 00:12:23,440 Speaker 1: you know, to some extent you could see in the 212 00:12:23,480 --> 00:12:27,280 Speaker 1: writing of these how society valued or did not value 213 00:12:27,320 --> 00:12:30,800 Speaker 1: these contributions, but it was also editors making these decisions. 214 00:12:31,040 --> 00:12:32,719 Speaker 1: And so I do think we're in a moment right 215 00:12:32,720 --> 00:12:37,040 Speaker 1: now where there's, you know, this sense that we need 216 00:12:37,080 --> 00:12:41,559 Speaker 1: to do a better job of unearthing stories, of elevating 217 00:12:41,640 --> 00:12:46,040 Speaker 1: underrepresented voices. And I think that's reflected both in our 218 00:12:46,080 --> 00:12:48,280 Speaker 1: desire to do better and to do this project, but 219 00:12:48,360 --> 00:12:51,160 Speaker 1: also in the overwhelming response that we've received, Like, there 220 00:12:51,200 --> 00:12:53,800 Speaker 1: are a lot of people that have been missed, and 221 00:12:54,000 --> 00:12:56,839 Speaker 1: luckily our audience is here to tell us that something 222 00:12:56,840 --> 00:12:59,839 Speaker 1: I found super interesting, um that this long time you're 223 00:13:00,000 --> 00:13:03,800 Speaker 1: Times obituary editor William McDonald said was that he was 224 00:13:03,800 --> 00:13:08,240 Speaker 1: basically like, listen, obituaries. We don't cover the present, we 225 00:13:08,320 --> 00:13:11,160 Speaker 1: cover the past. And when you look at America, you 226 00:13:11,200 --> 00:13:13,560 Speaker 1: know the people who were sort of making headlines and 227 00:13:13,559 --> 00:13:16,280 Speaker 1: making history and getting getting their props for it in 228 00:13:16,320 --> 00:13:19,480 Speaker 1: the you know, forties, fifties, sixties, those people who are 229 00:13:19,520 --> 00:13:23,160 Speaker 1: men because our society is stuff and women were kept 230 00:13:23,160 --> 00:13:29,520 Speaker 1: out of careers like politics, law, medicine, you know, um, athleticism. 231 00:13:29,920 --> 00:13:32,720 Speaker 1: We didn't live in a society where women's contributions to 232 00:13:32,760 --> 00:13:38,480 Speaker 1: these big fields were adequately examined. And so thus even 233 00:13:38,520 --> 00:13:41,920 Speaker 1: today obituaries it's one of the reasons why perhaps a 234 00:13:42,000 --> 00:13:44,520 Speaker 1: skew mail that it's a reflection of a time and 235 00:13:44,559 --> 00:13:47,000 Speaker 1: society where women were not on equal footing and did 236 00:13:47,040 --> 00:13:51,760 Speaker 1: not have equal representation for their accomplishments. Yeah, I mean, 237 00:13:51,800 --> 00:13:54,480 Speaker 1: I think that there's kind of two things happening here. 238 00:13:54,520 --> 00:13:57,760 Speaker 1: It's like, yes, the fact that you're looking back at 239 00:13:57,760 --> 00:13:59,839 Speaker 1: the past and that women and people of color have 240 00:14:00,040 --> 00:14:04,400 Speaker 1: historically had to work three times, four times, five times 241 00:14:04,480 --> 00:14:07,000 Speaker 1: is hard to achieve the same things and get the 242 00:14:07,000 --> 00:14:12,360 Speaker 1: same credit. Um. But also newsrooms that were traditionally white 243 00:14:12,360 --> 00:14:15,440 Speaker 1: and male, making the majority of these decisions. Like, I 244 00:14:15,480 --> 00:14:19,160 Speaker 1: don't think it's an accident that now that we see 245 00:14:19,200 --> 00:14:23,560 Speaker 1: more women in newsrooms, there is more attention being paid 246 00:14:23,600 --> 00:14:27,320 Speaker 1: to some of these issues. So it's interesting to look back. 247 00:14:27,360 --> 00:14:31,920 Speaker 1: The way that obituaries work is that there's something called advances, 248 00:14:32,000 --> 00:14:34,200 Speaker 1: and that means that we are writing the obituaries for 249 00:14:34,360 --> 00:14:37,480 Speaker 1: people who have not yet died, and they all lived 250 00:14:37,480 --> 00:14:40,600 Speaker 1: down in what's called the morgue um in a sub 251 00:14:40,640 --> 00:14:45,120 Speaker 1: sub basement of a building next door, where we essentially 252 00:14:45,200 --> 00:14:48,520 Speaker 1: have these these news clippings that have been written sometimes 253 00:14:48,560 --> 00:14:51,880 Speaker 1: twenty thirty years ago, telling the stories of people's lives, 254 00:14:52,000 --> 00:14:55,760 Speaker 1: and so when a person dies, we're resurfacing that and 255 00:14:55,920 --> 00:14:59,160 Speaker 1: updating it to publish in the present day. But it's 256 00:14:59,200 --> 00:15:02,360 Speaker 1: interesting to see how sometimes the language reflects the time 257 00:15:02,880 --> 00:15:06,160 Speaker 1: in which it was originally written, and in some cases 258 00:15:06,200 --> 00:15:08,120 Speaker 1: we need to do a better job of updating it, 259 00:15:08,240 --> 00:15:11,880 Speaker 1: like times have changed. I think that's such a good point. 260 00:15:11,920 --> 00:15:14,800 Speaker 1: It actually takes me back to this conversation. The Times 261 00:15:14,800 --> 00:15:19,440 Speaker 1: had around an obituary written for this really really badass 262 00:15:19,520 --> 00:15:23,120 Speaker 1: rocket scientist Yvon Brill, and the obituary mentioned, you know, 263 00:15:23,200 --> 00:15:25,520 Speaker 1: a lot about her domestic life, how she was a 264 00:15:25,560 --> 00:15:28,680 Speaker 1: good cook, a good mother, and a lot of folks said, hey, 265 00:15:28,720 --> 00:15:33,280 Speaker 1: you know, she also had these amazing professional contributions to science. 266 00:15:33,560 --> 00:15:35,960 Speaker 1: Why isn't that getting as much play? I mean, she 267 00:15:36,120 --> 00:15:41,120 Speaker 1: was right, and so this this obituary mentioned that she 268 00:15:41,320 --> 00:15:44,360 Speaker 1: like was really good at cooking stromboli or something like that, 269 00:15:44,440 --> 00:15:47,240 Speaker 1: and yeah, she made a mean beeft stroke and off 270 00:15:47,320 --> 00:15:49,960 Speaker 1: I think it was, exactly. And so folks wrote in 271 00:15:50,000 --> 00:15:53,120 Speaker 1: and said, hey, this is not how you properly eulogize 272 00:15:53,160 --> 00:15:56,040 Speaker 1: a fucking rocket scientist, and would you do this if 273 00:15:56,040 --> 00:16:00,040 Speaker 1: they were a man? Right, exactly. I remember that, I 274 00:16:00,080 --> 00:16:01,720 Speaker 1: remember reading that at the time. I think this is 275 00:16:03,120 --> 00:16:06,600 Speaker 1: um and I still refer to it as a beef 276 00:16:06,640 --> 00:16:09,000 Speaker 1: stroke and off gate. But yeah, you know, I mean 277 00:16:09,040 --> 00:16:11,520 Speaker 1: this is part of my job here, which is that 278 00:16:12,880 --> 00:16:15,160 Speaker 1: we in some cases need to do a better job 279 00:16:15,640 --> 00:16:18,760 Speaker 1: of covering gender issues at large, whether that means gender 280 00:16:18,800 --> 00:16:23,160 Speaker 1: identity or sexuality or women and feminism, but also looking 281 00:16:23,200 --> 00:16:26,720 Speaker 1: at the way that we think about things like language 282 00:16:26,960 --> 00:16:31,600 Speaker 1: and tone and photography and by lines and making sure 283 00:16:31,680 --> 00:16:34,720 Speaker 1: that the representative like, yeah, the first line of an 284 00:16:34,720 --> 00:16:38,480 Speaker 1: obituary of a rocket scientist who happened to be female, 285 00:16:38,480 --> 00:16:41,200 Speaker 1: should probably not talk about her cooking unless that was 286 00:16:41,320 --> 00:16:44,560 Speaker 1: truly an instrumental part of her life, in the same 287 00:16:44,640 --> 00:16:47,760 Speaker 1: way that the first line of the obituary about FRIEDA. 288 00:16:47,840 --> 00:16:50,840 Speaker 1: Carlo should probably refer to her as a painter, not 289 00:16:50,960 --> 00:16:53,680 Speaker 1: the wife of Diego Rivera. Let's take a quick break 290 00:17:02,360 --> 00:17:04,240 Speaker 1: and we're back, UM. I want to go back to 291 00:17:04,320 --> 00:17:07,199 Speaker 1: something that you mentioned earlier. Um, for kind of selfish reasons, 292 00:17:07,200 --> 00:17:10,919 Speaker 1: So you one of the early obituaries in this series 293 00:17:10,920 --> 00:17:12,920 Speaker 1: as I to B Wells, as you mentioned earlier, who 294 00:17:12,960 --> 00:17:16,040 Speaker 1: was one of my idols. I I kind of owe 295 00:17:16,040 --> 00:17:18,760 Speaker 1: my work in media to her. As awful as it 296 00:17:18,880 --> 00:17:20,880 Speaker 1: is that someone as influential as I to B Wells 297 00:17:21,080 --> 00:17:23,960 Speaker 1: did not get an obituary. Something that really sticks in 298 00:17:24,000 --> 00:17:25,919 Speaker 1: my crawl about it is the fact that you know, 299 00:17:26,080 --> 00:17:30,159 Speaker 1: she pioneered journalism tenants that we still use today, right Like, 300 00:17:30,240 --> 00:17:32,960 Speaker 1: I think of her as the mother of advocacy journalism 301 00:17:32,960 --> 00:17:35,600 Speaker 1: in a lot of ways. You know. They media outlets 302 00:17:35,640 --> 00:17:38,520 Speaker 1: actually dubbed her the Princess of the press, and I 303 00:17:38,560 --> 00:17:42,000 Speaker 1: just think the fact that The New York Times, a 304 00:17:42,000 --> 00:17:46,960 Speaker 1: bastion of journalistic integrity, did not feel that she warranted 305 00:17:47,320 --> 00:17:51,080 Speaker 1: an obituary. I think, like, I can't. I can't almost 306 00:17:51,080 --> 00:17:53,760 Speaker 1: I can't forgive it. I'm like, she was the you know, 307 00:17:53,960 --> 00:17:56,800 Speaker 1: such a pioneer of your field, of the field that 308 00:17:57,119 --> 00:17:59,160 Speaker 1: the industry that y'all are in, and you didn't give 309 00:17:59,160 --> 00:18:04,919 Speaker 1: her an obituary. I know. It's disappointing, and it's just 310 00:18:05,119 --> 00:18:09,720 Speaker 1: so it's so weird to read the actual piece about 311 00:18:09,760 --> 00:18:14,920 Speaker 1: when she was married, which appeared on page one June, 312 00:18:16,000 --> 00:18:19,080 Speaker 1: and the style of the newspaper was a lot different 313 00:18:19,119 --> 00:18:22,840 Speaker 1: than it was a lot of short, little articles appearing 314 00:18:22,920 --> 00:18:27,200 Speaker 1: on pages, all kind of crunched together without any visuals. 315 00:18:27,240 --> 00:18:30,280 Speaker 1: But at the bottom, in the middle of the page, 316 00:18:30,520 --> 00:18:33,480 Speaker 1: the headline is Ida b Wells married period, and then 317 00:18:33,480 --> 00:18:36,240 Speaker 1: there's a dateline of Chicago, and it says miss Ida 318 00:18:36,280 --> 00:18:39,600 Speaker 1: b Wells, the colored woman who gained international publicity by 319 00:18:39,600 --> 00:18:43,000 Speaker 1: her anti lynching lectures in England, was married in bessel 320 00:18:43,119 --> 00:18:47,520 Speaker 1: Church tonight to Ferdinand L. Barnett, a local colored attorney 321 00:18:47,520 --> 00:18:50,359 Speaker 1: of prominence who is the publisher of the Conservator and 322 00:18:50,480 --> 00:18:54,320 Speaker 1: president of the Illinois Anti Lynching League. And that's the 323 00:18:54,400 --> 00:18:57,879 Speaker 1: end of it. That was the whole notice. On so 324 00:18:58,000 --> 00:19:00,879 Speaker 1: many levels, it's so jarring and just so telling, you know, 325 00:19:01,000 --> 00:19:04,200 Speaker 1: the use of the word colored, um, the fact that 326 00:19:05,200 --> 00:19:09,199 Speaker 1: a marriage would be front page news, and then of 327 00:19:09,240 --> 00:19:14,159 Speaker 1: course the idea that it was newsworthy when a woman 328 00:19:14,200 --> 00:19:18,000 Speaker 1: of prominence was married to a man, but not when 329 00:19:18,080 --> 00:19:22,280 Speaker 1: she died. Yeah, that's I think that you just crystallize 330 00:19:22,400 --> 00:19:24,720 Speaker 1: why that's six in my craws so much with this 331 00:19:24,840 --> 00:19:28,200 Speaker 1: particular woman in history, that it was big news that 332 00:19:28,320 --> 00:19:31,879 Speaker 1: this like accomplished woman was was marrying. And when she married, 333 00:19:31,880 --> 00:19:35,560 Speaker 1: you know, she her husband, they had a kind of 334 00:19:35,640 --> 00:19:38,879 Speaker 1: non traditional at the time marriage where he stayed at 335 00:19:38,920 --> 00:19:41,320 Speaker 1: home and she you know, did lectures and this and that, 336 00:19:41,400 --> 00:19:45,680 Speaker 1: and so that like, oh, big news, you know, accomplished woman, 337 00:19:45,800 --> 00:19:49,280 Speaker 1: settle down, and when she dies, not a peep. It's 338 00:19:49,280 --> 00:19:53,320 Speaker 1: just it's something about it just crystallizes why this is 339 00:19:53,359 --> 00:19:57,520 Speaker 1: so like this glaring disparity. And and really something about 340 00:19:57,520 --> 00:20:01,840 Speaker 1: that example illustrates to me how all society sees, particularly 341 00:20:01,840 --> 00:20:04,959 Speaker 1: black women, but women at large, that like, when we marry, 342 00:20:05,280 --> 00:20:07,600 Speaker 1: it's a front page news, but when we die not 343 00:20:07,720 --> 00:20:11,960 Speaker 1: a peeple, Right, And that until almost until I was 344 00:20:12,000 --> 00:20:17,480 Speaker 1: born in the early eighties, those stuff of women would 345 00:20:17,480 --> 00:20:21,680 Speaker 1: be printed under the husband's name as if they were owned. Yeah. 346 00:20:21,720 --> 00:20:24,720 Speaker 1: I don't think until this project came along, I ever 347 00:20:24,800 --> 00:20:28,520 Speaker 1: even really thought about what obituaries can tell us about 348 00:20:28,560 --> 00:20:31,600 Speaker 1: how society sees women. And I think that, honestly, you've 349 00:20:31,680 --> 00:20:35,240 Speaker 1: kind of taken the rose colored glasses off. I say, oh, gee, 350 00:20:35,600 --> 00:20:38,120 Speaker 1: when you look at that, the fact that women were 351 00:20:38,119 --> 00:20:40,280 Speaker 1: printed under men as that they didn't even really exist, 352 00:20:40,680 --> 00:20:43,680 Speaker 1: I mean, that really says it all, doesn't it totally? 353 00:20:44,400 --> 00:20:46,320 Speaker 1: I would be remiss to not point out that in 354 00:20:46,359 --> 00:20:49,520 Speaker 1: the obituary of IDB. Wells has probably my favorite line, 355 00:20:50,000 --> 00:20:53,640 Speaker 1: maybe the best line ever printed in a newspaper, where 356 00:20:53,680 --> 00:20:56,280 Speaker 1: it's her grandson talking about her and he says of 357 00:20:56,359 --> 00:20:59,720 Speaker 1: his grandmother IDB. Wells, she didn't suffer fools, and she 358 00:20:59,760 --> 00:21:04,840 Speaker 1: saw hools everywhere. That is I don't want to live 359 00:21:04,840 --> 00:21:10,240 Speaker 1: in a world. I know, I want we made quote 360 00:21:10,280 --> 00:21:13,119 Speaker 1: graphics out of it um for social media that we 361 00:21:13,240 --> 00:21:16,719 Speaker 1: should probably pin up all over our cubicles. Yes, And 362 00:21:16,760 --> 00:21:18,520 Speaker 1: it's like, I don't want to live in a world 363 00:21:18,840 --> 00:21:22,840 Speaker 1: where that tidbit about such an influential woman didn't go 364 00:21:23,040 --> 00:21:25,440 Speaker 1: printed in a newspaper, right like that, like the world 365 00:21:25,480 --> 00:21:28,200 Speaker 1: needed to see that that tidbit about it to b wells. 366 00:21:28,400 --> 00:21:31,399 Speaker 1: And if not for projects like Overlooked, it would be 367 00:21:31,440 --> 00:21:34,080 Speaker 1: overlooks like we wouldn't We wouldn't have that to look 368 00:21:34,080 --> 00:21:36,440 Speaker 1: back on in a paper and say, damn, how to 369 00:21:36,480 --> 00:21:41,320 Speaker 1: be well with something else? Yeah, exactly. And the nice 370 00:21:41,359 --> 00:21:43,399 Speaker 1: thing about this project is that it doesn't you know. 371 00:21:43,480 --> 00:21:45,959 Speaker 1: We launched on International Women's Day. That was on purpose, 372 00:21:46,080 --> 00:21:48,959 Speaker 1: but the idea was always to continue this so it 373 00:21:48,960 --> 00:21:52,760 Speaker 1: looks and far beyond and it runs as a regular 374 00:21:52,800 --> 00:21:56,240 Speaker 1: feature in our obituary section now and will expand to 375 00:21:56,400 --> 00:22:01,359 Speaker 1: include anyone who is overlooked. So submissions are still open um. 376 00:22:01,400 --> 00:22:04,639 Speaker 1: People can always tell us who we've missed. Have you 377 00:22:04,680 --> 00:22:07,280 Speaker 1: gotten any really interesting submissions in the open call for 378 00:22:07,560 --> 00:22:10,640 Speaker 1: for folks to eulogize? You know, one of the interesting 379 00:22:10,680 --> 00:22:14,760 Speaker 1: things was that a lot of people nominated their grandmothers. 380 00:22:15,119 --> 00:22:17,480 Speaker 1: And when somebody first told me that, I was sort 381 00:22:17,520 --> 00:22:20,359 Speaker 1: of like, yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm sure I could nominate 382 00:22:20,400 --> 00:22:23,440 Speaker 1: my grandmother as well. But in fact we actually went 383 00:22:23,480 --> 00:22:26,719 Speaker 1: through all of these and there were grandmothers submitted who 384 00:22:26,800 --> 00:22:30,679 Speaker 1: were incredible. So we published a piece yesterday highlighting some 385 00:22:30,760 --> 00:22:35,040 Speaker 1: of these. And there are people like Dr Anita Figuereiro, 386 00:22:35,600 --> 00:22:39,920 Speaker 1: who was a female physician in the twentieth century who 387 00:22:39,920 --> 00:22:42,240 Speaker 1: was born in Costa Rica at a time when the 388 00:22:42,280 --> 00:22:46,000 Speaker 1: idea of a woman doctor was really far afetched. There 389 00:22:46,240 --> 00:22:51,520 Speaker 1: was Peggy gene Connor, who sued the governor of Mississippi 390 00:22:51,560 --> 00:22:55,720 Speaker 1: and other state officials in nineteen five for voting rights 391 00:22:55,720 --> 00:23:00,600 Speaker 1: to reappointment and finally one she passed away in There 392 00:23:00,680 --> 00:23:03,320 Speaker 1: was a woman who was the first female chief of 393 00:23:03,400 --> 00:23:08,480 Speaker 1: Yale University's Health Service Dermatology Clinic in nineteen seventy one 394 00:23:08,800 --> 00:23:12,040 Speaker 1: and was also a successful author who wrote children's books. 395 00:23:12,040 --> 00:23:17,040 Speaker 1: Her name was Dr Marguerite Learner, and her husband had 396 00:23:17,080 --> 00:23:19,399 Speaker 1: in fact received an obituary in the New York Times, 397 00:23:19,480 --> 00:23:24,600 Speaker 1: and yet she never received the recognition. Wow. There's another woman, 398 00:23:24,680 --> 00:23:28,640 Speaker 1: Bertha Closter, who was one of the earliest female literary agents. 399 00:23:29,160 --> 00:23:33,160 Speaker 1: She lived from nineteen o one to nine. So this 400 00:23:33,240 --> 00:23:35,400 Speaker 1: was a surprise to me that there are so many 401 00:23:35,440 --> 00:23:39,640 Speaker 1: readers whose grandparents had actually done these amazing things. Yeah, 402 00:23:39,640 --> 00:23:42,760 Speaker 1: and almost as a testament to the way that in 403 00:23:42,800 --> 00:23:45,720 Speaker 1: our own families we have these living pieces of history 404 00:23:46,160 --> 00:23:49,240 Speaker 1: who are in our own blood, on our own families, 405 00:23:49,280 --> 00:23:52,639 Speaker 1: and that we you know, we personally don't want to 406 00:23:52,640 --> 00:23:54,680 Speaker 1: overlook them. But then I think it's really cool that 407 00:23:54,720 --> 00:23:56,639 Speaker 1: people are saying, like, no, my grandma was actually this 408 00:23:56,720 --> 00:24:00,080 Speaker 1: amazing person. She wasn't just my grandma. She accomplished this, 409 00:24:00,119 --> 00:24:02,520 Speaker 1: accomplished that. Like, I think it really is a testament 410 00:24:02,560 --> 00:24:06,080 Speaker 1: to how personally we know that women and our families 411 00:24:06,119 --> 00:24:09,760 Speaker 1: and our bloodlines accomplish amazing things, but that when it 412 00:24:09,840 --> 00:24:13,840 Speaker 1: comes to society at large, somehow they can go overlooked. 413 00:24:13,840 --> 00:24:17,040 Speaker 1: And that I think that we don't tend to overlook 414 00:24:17,040 --> 00:24:19,520 Speaker 1: our moms, our grandmothers, or sisters, all of that, but 415 00:24:19,720 --> 00:24:22,239 Speaker 1: we're somehow more comfortable with it when society does it. 416 00:24:22,240 --> 00:24:25,720 Speaker 1: Inn't it does not seem as awful somehow as it 417 00:24:25,760 --> 00:24:28,200 Speaker 1: would be to be like, oh, my grandmother was not 418 00:24:28,280 --> 00:24:30,399 Speaker 1: important or not special or not this or not that, 419 00:24:30,440 --> 00:24:32,280 Speaker 1: Like you would never do that to your grandmother. But 420 00:24:32,320 --> 00:24:35,000 Speaker 1: then when society does it, it's, you know, it's somehow 421 00:24:35,000 --> 00:24:39,159 Speaker 1: it more accepted. I've always loved that assignment that I 422 00:24:39,160 --> 00:24:41,359 Speaker 1: feel like everyone gets at some point when they're in 423 00:24:41,440 --> 00:24:43,480 Speaker 1: elementary school or midle school, high school, we have to 424 00:24:43,560 --> 00:24:47,120 Speaker 1: interview a family member and you're like, like, I don't 425 00:24:47,119 --> 00:24:48,920 Speaker 1: want to interview my mom. I talked her every day. 426 00:24:49,119 --> 00:24:51,639 Speaker 1: But then you actually sit down and maybe it's a grandparent, 427 00:24:51,880 --> 00:24:54,359 Speaker 1: or maybe it's a sibling or a cousin, and you 428 00:24:54,440 --> 00:24:57,080 Speaker 1: learn all of these things about that person that you 429 00:24:57,520 --> 00:25:01,320 Speaker 1: realize you didn't actually know. So I always encourage people 430 00:25:01,440 --> 00:25:05,520 Speaker 1: to do that as an assignment. Um And there's a 431 00:25:05,560 --> 00:25:09,040 Speaker 1: real loss of recorded history when it comes to women, 432 00:25:09,080 --> 00:25:12,120 Speaker 1: and so I think telling these stories and collecting oral 433 00:25:12,200 --> 00:25:15,359 Speaker 1: histories and rewriting obituaries, all of this goes into this 434 00:25:15,520 --> 00:25:20,239 Speaker 1: larger collection of kind of repopulating the cultural narrative that 435 00:25:20,440 --> 00:25:23,159 Speaker 1: for a long time was written by men. I love that, 436 00:25:23,200 --> 00:25:24,760 Speaker 1: and this is a perfect time to do it with 437 00:25:25,200 --> 00:25:27,240 Speaker 1: you know things like me too. When the Women's March, 438 00:25:27,520 --> 00:25:29,640 Speaker 1: I feel like this is the real time for that 439 00:25:29,640 --> 00:25:33,680 Speaker 1: that societal and culture shift where we say, hey, women 440 00:25:33,680 --> 00:25:37,840 Speaker 1: have been accomplishing things forever. It's time to recognize it. 441 00:25:37,840 --> 00:25:40,359 Speaker 1: It's time to put it in obituaries, it's time to 442 00:25:40,480 --> 00:25:42,479 Speaker 1: fund it, it's time to put it on TV, it's 443 00:25:42,520 --> 00:25:45,000 Speaker 1: how to put it in an office, all of the things. 444 00:25:45,080 --> 00:25:47,600 Speaker 1: I think now is the time for like that reckoning 445 00:25:47,680 --> 00:25:50,000 Speaker 1: of saying women have always been here and now it's 446 00:25:50,000 --> 00:25:54,600 Speaker 1: time to pay attention to us better than I could have. Well, Jessica, 447 00:25:54,680 --> 00:25:56,440 Speaker 1: where can folks find out more about what you're up to? 448 00:25:57,560 --> 00:26:00,359 Speaker 1: So you can check out the full Overlooked tack and 449 00:26:00,600 --> 00:26:02,920 Speaker 1: follow along as we continue to publish new ones at 450 00:26:02,960 --> 00:26:06,679 Speaker 1: New York Times dot com slash Overlooked. You can also 451 00:26:06,800 --> 00:26:10,360 Speaker 1: follow along in our new newsletter, Gender Newsletter. It's called 452 00:26:10,480 --> 00:26:14,440 Speaker 1: Gender Letter, very original title, and it's at New York 453 00:26:14,440 --> 00:26:18,280 Speaker 1: Times dot com slash Gender Letter. Jessica, thank you so 454 00:26:18,320 --> 00:26:20,439 Speaker 1: much for being here today. I'm gonna get off of 455 00:26:20,480 --> 00:26:23,119 Speaker 1: this call and go call my grandmother and ask for 456 00:26:23,160 --> 00:26:26,560 Speaker 1: a better life, because, damn it, the women in our 457 00:26:26,640 --> 00:26:30,159 Speaker 1: world are amazing and we should be building tributes to 458 00:26:30,160 --> 00:26:33,080 Speaker 1: them wherever that we can. I love that. Thank you 459 00:26:33,119 --> 00:26:36,480 Speaker 1: so much for having me. Thanks again, well SMOOTHI listeners, 460 00:26:36,680 --> 00:26:39,159 Speaker 1: Who are some women that you think deserve obituaries? Who 461 00:26:39,240 --> 00:26:42,040 Speaker 1: never got them? Did you have an awesome scientist grandmother 462 00:26:42,040 --> 00:26:44,760 Speaker 1: and your family? Let us know. You can find us 463 00:26:44,760 --> 00:26:47,560 Speaker 1: on Twitter at mom Stuff podcast, on Instagram at stuff 464 00:26:47,560 --> 00:26:49,919 Speaker 1: Mo've Never Told You, and as always, we love your 465 00:26:49,960 --> 00:27:00,360 Speaker 1: emails at mom staff at how stuff works dot com. 466 00:27:00,840 --> 00:27:01,520 Speaker 1: Who don't w