WEBVTT - Retail Sales and Previewing the Fed Decision

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Our Conversation of the Day in the equity market with

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 2>Alisia Levine of BNY Prodigious Math Skills, and we're going

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 2>to go to that right now for Global at Wall Street.

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 2>I have never seen a market like this. What happened

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 2>to Oracle last week? I know you don't do individual stocks.

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Never have I seen the jump condition we saw an Oracle.

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 2>We are at Peter roorzag at Wizard is great about

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 2>glide Pass. They all seem to be thrown out the window.

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 2>How do we invest in a two part SMP five hundred.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Look at what happened last week was extraordinary and it

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 3>reignited never the excitement over the AI trade. And also

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 3>that it's broadening. It's not just for the same time.

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 4>You see it's broadening.

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 5>I see it broaden.

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 4>You and Jeff you agree on this.

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I see it broadening, and the market the market

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 3>actually is broadening.

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean, that's the.

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Talk about small caps, and it's definitely indication the equally

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 3>weighted SMP is at all time highs as well.

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 4>I did not know that. Yes, let's the Alicia Levine magic.

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 3>So there is a broadening here. But yes, the move

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 3>last week was extraordinary. And you have seen a market

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 3>like this, and it was in the late nineties, and

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 3>the question is are we in ninety five or we

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 3>in ninety Ok, let's go.

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 4>There, let's rip it up. We're going to fundamental analysis

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 4>right now. I'm sorry.

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>It's radically different than the late nineties because of free

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 2>cash flow general directions, they're actually am I right, there's

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.279
<v Speaker 2>not going to be twenty twenty seven. Oh they actually

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 2>weren't making profits in twenty twenties.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So on a relative basis, the tech stocks are

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 3>cheaper than they were twenty five years ago. On a

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 3>cash flow basis, they are just batting it out of

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 3>the park on free cash flow margins. And on the

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 3>operator you can.

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 4>Say, Aaron Judge, you won't insulveank.

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 3>So, I mean, these are different companies, but you know,

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 3>keep the main point, the main point, which is that

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 3>the FED is cutting into an increased earnings cycle. Okay,

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 3>S and B earnings estimates are moving higher. The FED

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 3>is cutting into it. Banks that are at are at

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 3>all time highs.

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 5>Hence the melt up is about lead with us here.

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 7>There's interesting you say that the rally is brought in

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 7>because we have critics saying and criticizing the fact that

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 7>the top five stocks are driving twelve percent of the

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 7>games this year. But given that we have Back of

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 7>America releasing their fund manager survey, they said that equity

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 7>allocation is at a seven month high. There's just a

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 7>big jump in global growth optimism. But at the same

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 7>time there's a record fifty eight percent saying that stocks

0:02:57.680 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 7>are overvalued.

0:02:58.760 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 6>How do you square those two?

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, because you have to be in the game.

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, when you manage a live portfolio and you're

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 3>under allocated and you're waiting for that S and P

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 3>target of whatever, fifty eight hundred and it's not happening,

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 3>you've got to get invested in.

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 4>So far behind her.

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Active managers right now to Isabelle's great questions.

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 3>So, I think in the US less they think they're

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 3>less under allocated, but I think global managers are under

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>allocated because the flee America conversation was everywhere. I actually

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 3>wrote a piece about how ridiculous the Flea America trade is,

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 3>because where where else are you going for innovation and

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 3>global and growth and margins and earnings?

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Power is about Lee Actually read your piece, so you

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 2>know is about lead with this folks, and for Paul

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Sweety today, I see your nefarious deed here you are

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 2>asking questions of the equity giant Alicia Levine for your

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 2>print stories today.

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 4>I see what you're doing here.

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 6>I always watch Alicia.

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 7>She's such a smart talking head and she's also a

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 7>fantastic female. We were just talking about shopping in France.

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 7>But back to market.

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 4>It's luxury back. Oh, it's a sector back.

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Luxury is back. Luxury is back. Look what's happened to

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 3>household net worth? Okay, household net worth is up about

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 3>seventy trillion dollars since the beginning of twenty twenty. That

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 3>means households with financial assets housing and equities and socks

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 3>and bonds and private equity are doing quite well.

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 5>We have the case. We do have the K shaped

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 5>consumer here, but we've had it.

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 6>This is not new.

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 3>What's happening is that the top three Quinn tiles are

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 3>seeing their net worth growing, supporting consumption even in the

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 3>face of a weaker labor market.

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 7>Did you see that that, Tom, we have the most

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 7>number of millionaires in New York than ever before, or

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 7>something like that. I just know I'm working towards being

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 7>one of them. But going back to luxury, how do

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 7>you assess the health of American consumer? Do you look

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 7>at luxury or mid tier or value? What is your

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 7>favorite tier to look at?

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Who luxury is everybody's favorite tier, let's just say that,

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 3>but you really have to look at the mid range

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 3>as well. We're going to get retail sales today, so

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 3>we'll see where it's happening. I imagine there's some slow down.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 3>I think there is some anxiety in the labor market,

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 3>particularly for the younger cohort and that's why the FED

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 3>is cutting. But I'd say that, you know, for the

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 3>most part, it's better than feared.

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 5>Right, And the conversations had gotten so negative.

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we sat around this table, you know, the

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 3>apocalypse in April, and you just invest right.

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 4>Through the number one negative folks.

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Dana Telsea with this at eight twenty five, Alicia, if

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 2>you want to stay around.

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 4>For forty minutes in the green room. You can come

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 4>in and do Dana Telsis.

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 5>I love Data Telsa on luxury.

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 4>But to speak of the gloom China flat on their back.

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 2>And I believe we've got an equity lift in China

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 2>and of course to Dana Telsea's luxury sector, that will

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 2>bring a recovery there as a theory.

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 3>Right right, and because there'll be more stimulus as well,

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 3>they'll be more stimulus from the Chinese government.

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 4>Let's get back to the bigger picture. What do people do?

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.239
<v Speaker 2>You go into a meeting for BNY and I can't

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 2>imagine the percentage of the people that have missed this

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 2>greater Christmas Eve twenty eighteen bull market.

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 5>That's right, how do you catch up?

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 3>So we always say it's time in the market and

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 3>not timing the market. So if you're completely under allocated

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 3>and you come to us with cash, we'd say do

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 3>a full portfolio allocation over the next three to four months,

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 3>so you know, one third, one third, one third or

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty five percent, twenty five percent and do a full

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 3>portfolio allocation. Whatever your risk tolerance, whatever your growth uh,

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, goals are. That's what we would say, it's

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 3>impossible to time the market. You know, strategy committees and

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 3>investment committees everywhere. We're waiting for that equity pullback to

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 3>bring on more risk, and it never happened.

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 5>And what do we have.

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 3>We had spreads at historic tights. We have equity markets

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 3>making new highs every day and very hard to get in.

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 3>So where are we today. We're broaching the sixty seven

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 3>hundred price target on the SMP that was actually my

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 3>price target for year end.

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 5>We're there.

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 3>I think the good news is in, can there be

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 3>a selloff on the news on the Fed? Like the

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 3>FED cuts are already in the market, so it's hard

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 3>to play future FED cuts like it's there. That's why

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.239
<v Speaker 3>you've had this voracious rally in the last four weeks,

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 3>really since August first, since that first terrible jobs report and.

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 5>The revisions good one market.

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 7>It's actually incredible how the price targets are being revised

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 7>higher and higher. I want to talk about one concern

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 7>you have in your note. You said it's the monetization

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 7>of capex and hyperscalers.

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 6>That seems so specific to me. Why is that your

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 6>biggest concern?

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 3>So, because it goes back to the concentration of what's

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 3>happening in the S and P, the margins on the

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 3>S and P and the pre cash flow margins and

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 3>being driven by the hyperscalers.

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 5>Right, So the large cab.

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Tech operating profit is twenty seven percent, that's double the

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 3>rest of the SMP. If they keep on spending on

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 3>the capex and at some point don't bring that to

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 3>earnings or bring that to a revenue line, then you

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 3>have to question whether this is going anywhere.

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 5>We're not there yet.

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 3>You're getting paid to wait, but you have to see

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 3>the monetization of all that CAPEC spent. So you're starting

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 3>to see it with Oracle right like it's starting to

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 3>happen in other companies as well. The market will soon

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 3>choose winners from the AI race. Don't know when that'll

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 3>be a dislocation of sources. But overall, the main thing

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 3>is the main thing. Growth is inflecting upwards, not downwards.

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 3>For twenty twenty six, consumer stimulus is coming from the

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 3>tax bill. The first quarter of twenty twenty six, the

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Fed is cutting and here.

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 4>We are, Alicia, thank you so much. I'm serious.

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 2>If you want to stay around for Dana Kelsey, please

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 2>you know it'd be great. I mean, we can spend

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 2>the whole show just on Dior. If you know there's

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 2>two front doors to Dior on fifty seventh Street.

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 6>I did not know that.

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 2>One is where you go through with the visit of

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Hayford All and the others are Missus King goes through

0:08:58.440 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 2>to be greeted back.

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 5>We love well. I'll join Dana at your.

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah Data at your Alicia Luvin. Thank you so much.

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 4>Stay with us.

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern. Listen on

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Atto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube now.

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Two hour conversation in the eight minutes, plus retail sales

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 2>at eight thirty with Dana Telsea. It is an annual

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 2>visit in celebration of how thick Bazarre Magazine is. For

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 2>this September issue, how did Giorgio Armani change the corner

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 2>of fifty seventh and fifth Avenue incredible?

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 8>I mean, frankly, thank you for having me. Georgia Amani

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 8>is to me is the one who brought luxury into

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 8>the US on a European framework.

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 2>He brought Europe to America day. Thank you, Richard gear

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's basically what happened.

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 8>Yes, look at what he's developed, whether it is with stores,

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 8>whether it's his whole be in terms of what it is,

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 8>and yes, I think the later years were tougher than

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 8>the beginning years, but there's always a place for ARMANI

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 8>are you long luxury now?

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 2>As China finally tanked, and so the luxury that's tanked

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 2>is going to be a buying opportunity.

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 8>I think it will be a buying opportunity over time.

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 8>I don't think we're totally there yet. I still think

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 8>you're having pressure points there. I think what you've seen

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 8>is where anything's new and anything's innovative, consumers will purchase

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 8>same old, same old.

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 5>Doesn't happen these days.

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 7>So Tom kept on talking about Dior and I really

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 7>need to go in there, But for now, let's go

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 7>to Tapestry. They had their investor a day last week.

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 7>What were to takeaways that you got? How are the

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 7>health of the American consumers through the lens of Tapestry.

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 8>Through the lens of Tapestry. It was a very productive

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 8>investor day. The outlook is solid for the next few years.

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 8>I would say that the core Coach brand and the

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 8>way that they've been able to put in different items

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 8>of collections like Tabby and Brooklyn have made it appealing.

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 8>Plus they're capturing the younger customer. Every brand today needs

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 8>to always be able to market to capture new customers,

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 8>keep the old, expand with the new.

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.559
<v Speaker 7>So Tapestry, there's Coach, there's Kate Spade, and it's the

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 7>word Whitesman. I think there's gone with They're.

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 8>Sold Strut Whitesman that was sold to Kolaris a couple

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 8>of months ago.

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 5>It's Coach and Kate Spade.

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 8>The playbook of Coach is going to be applied to

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 8>Kate Spade and let's see what happens going forward.

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 7>What about Ralph Lauren they're having to investor day today.

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 7>I feel like they say they're seeing revenue growth similar

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 7>to reason rates over the next three years.

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:38.959
<v Speaker 6>So is that good or bad? How do you read?

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 8>I think overall, when you think about Ralph Lauren and

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 8>I'll be at their investor today, this day, today, this morning, I.

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 6>Think it's good.

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 8>I think how would you not want to go to?

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 8>Both brand legacy and brand history hard to find, but

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 8>Ralph Lauren, solid average unit retail price growth, You've got

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 8>solid expansion of categories, whether it's women's, whether it's out ofwear,

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 8>whether it's accessories. You've got global reach because frankly, in

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 8>Asia they'll looked upon as.

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 5>Higher end still in that body, Yes they are Asia,

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 5>and they've expanded their customer base.

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Dana Telsea with a Telsey Advisor, a group.

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 2>I can't say enough about what she's done for securities

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 2>analysis in New York City. It is an annual kickoff

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 2>visit for September economic data. Here in two minutes, Okay,

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 2>I look at the entire thing and at gunpoint missus

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Keane made me watch the Anderson launch it Dior the

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 2>other night, a video and it's all the beautiful people.

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 2>I was looking for you in the third, second, third

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 2>row there, Dana Telsea with you. I don't even know

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 2>who the half the actors are that were there. Everybody's churning.

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Mister Arnault's there and you can see he's in a

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 2>complete panic about the LVMH experiment.

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 4>Is are they going to sell off the brands? That

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 4>aren't working. Is that the new.

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.719
<v Speaker 8>New from that's I don't know if that's the new

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 8>new for luxury and maybe for some of the accessible

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 8>luxury brands.

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 5>Look what you had just announced.

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 8>Yesterday, v F Corps sold Dickie's workware, not a luxury brand.

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 8>But you're seeing portfolio enhancement. You want to call a

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 8>portfolio optimization. How do we get more from existing brands?

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 2>All the control room is Dickie's luxury ware? Is that

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 2>a luxury stock? I think Dickie's is a luxury stock,

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.719
<v Speaker 2>isn't it. Yeah they're saying, yeah, yeah it is. So

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 2>there's a restructuring in fashion. Is it still aspirational where

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 2>people want the stuff?

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 5>Yes, it definitely is still abspirational.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 8>And you know what's changed these days when you have TikTok,

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 8>when you have Instagram, seeing it on real people makes

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 8>it accessible to all.

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 7>And you're the one who told me that even if

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 7>you can't afford the bags, you can afford the lipstick

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 7>or the perfume, and that makes it fast exactly.

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 8>Well, you heard about lvmah, the Louis Vuitton lipstick one

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 8>hundred and sixty dollars.

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's come back and talk about the LVMH lipstick in

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and sixty dollars. We're a Dana Telsea this

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 2>morning on Retail America, and you've got a revision where

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 2>retail sales were revised higher. In the previous month. The

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 2>control group was a zero point four statistic and it

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 2>came in at a buoyant zero point seven. Some equity

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 2>lift to the market and yields higher. Is well, where

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 2>is it coming in retail? Is it big box retail?

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Walmart's just killing it? Is it a lost middle area

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 2>or is it in the luxury area? Where's the retail

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 2>pop that I see on the.

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg st I think the retail prop is in value.

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 8>The retail pop is with Walmart, it's with Costco, it's

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 8>with the off pricers. You've seen a trading down of

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 8>even higher end consumers and they're going to some of

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 8>these value stores. And you saw it in second quarter earnings.

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 8>Second quarter earnings which were reported the end of August

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 8>essentially showed that even so far in the current quarter,

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 8>sales are better than expected. Show them something new and

0:14:59.080 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 8>they will buy.

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 7>So then how do you assess the health of the

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 7>consumer when it comes to big box retail is like

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 7>Walmart or Target. We've seen a divergence quite recently, right,

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 7>and that was surprising to me because I usually clump

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 7>them in one yep.

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 8>One of the differences there's basically micro relative to the company.

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 8>Target has worked to do to improve their assortment, to

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 8>improve their operations. There's a lot of store standards that

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 8>need to be adjusted. Walmart is hitting on all cylinders

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 8>and is taking share.

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, they have a forty multiple. How does Joe Feldman,

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 4>your colleague, respond to a single digit revenue growth? Making

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 4>solid but you know, normal retail profits trading it a

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:46.119
<v Speaker 4>pe of forty. That's not in my textbook.

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 5>It's not in the textbook.

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 8>But the consistency of it, the market share gains that

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 8>they have, the pricing that they offer, the value that

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 8>they offer.

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 5>They unique in the world of retail.

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 7>Which companies are best positioned to absorb higher cast when

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 7>it comes to this entire tire regime, and I suspect

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 7>there might be a lot the top of mind, Can

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 7>you name maybe two?

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think of companies that can absorb pricing, pricing.

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 8>The off pricers can absorb pricing because they're the umbrella

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 8>for everyone else, So TJX, the Ross of Burlington, and

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:17.359
<v Speaker 8>of course.

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 7>Walmart Burlington socks. I always that was the socks they

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 7>were when I was little.

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Are they passing? Are they passing on tariff? Say at

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 2>TJ Max.

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 5>You're beginning to see teriffs be passed on.

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 8>But it all starts from if the full price retailer

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 8>passes on, then it goes to others. Also, it's expected

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 8>that price increases, for the most part, will come fully

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 8>into play in the fourth quarter.

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 2>One final question I got to ask, and I guess

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, I got to go to the New

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 2>York City Angle a couple of years on. Is Tiffany

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 2>worked out for mister Arnault.

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 5>I think it is working out.

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 8>They're getting more traffic, they're getting new designs. The new

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 8>stores that they've remodeled have given a lift that they

0:16:58.040 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 8>want't have seen before.

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 4>Are they still popping? In Japan? And I stood outside

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 4>the Tiffany's store there in.

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 8>The Did you see the news store on the on

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.439
<v Speaker 8>the Ginza that has the blue outside?

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 5>Pretty yeah.

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 2>We supposed to fly over and look at it. And

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, no, I don't think so okay. And finally

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Isabelle was talking about this earlier. The Deer's Store is spectacular.

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Is that going to be the future of European investment

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 2>in the island of Manhattan.

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 4>Is to do a door part of it?

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 8>Yes, I think for the ultra luxury companies, and that

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 8>do your Store is going to be replicated in Beverly

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 8>Hills because that one's opening in just a couple.

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 4>Of weeks after Lucas show. Will want to know about that.

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 2>Danny Telsey brilliant always in September important. She's with a

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Telsea advisory group with Joe Feldman on Big Box Stay

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 2>with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:59.199
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven on Apple, Cocklay and Android Otto with

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen live on

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just say

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 4>This is a joy as you get the markets open

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 4>here at today. We usually talked to her by batphone.

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 4>You know about the zoom out to Hollywood and Los Angeles.

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Lisa Crawford is how to securitized research at TCW.

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 4>I got to ask you one question.

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 2>There's double majors in America, and I give Warden great

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 2>credit for really to me doing the first double major.

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 2>But Yale around Jonathan Spence and China's Studies and all

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 2>that piece together a double major years ago called Political

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Science and International Studies, which is just phenomenal.

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 4>What was it like doing a double barreled thing at Yale?

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely?

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 9>So, I chose international studies because I was raised to

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 9>be a citizen of the world by my dad's We

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 9>moved around a decent amount that was important to me

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 9>that was only offered as a second major. So I

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 9>originally had econ for my primary Maidie Sure. Then I

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 9>looked up and I had a four point zero and POLYCI,

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 9>So I decided I'd be POLYCI for my first major.

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 2>So you you you you changed your major because Schiller

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 2>gave you a quality C.

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 9>I changed my major because I started applying to finance

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 9>jobs and it looked more competitive to have a higher

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 9>GPA for your for your primary.

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 4>Ruthless, What a modern discussion. I mean, it's just does

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 4>everybody get a's today? Is there anybody get a B anymore?

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 7>I don't know any young folks, but some are doing

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 7>past fail pass fail.

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Don't get me going lazy craft for this or thrilled.

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 2>She's in studio with us and it's on the fixed

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 2>income market. How is your world of trust company the West?

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 2>How is securitized research linked to the Fed?

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 5>Oh? Absolutely so.

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 9>Rates are obviously very important in multiple ways. I'll touch

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 9>on too. So first and foremost, we've seen a nice

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 9>rally and treasury and that's been beneficial for the agency

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 9>mortage backed securities market and a lot of our positioning there.

0:19:57.960 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 5>You've got current coupon spreads.

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 9>Around high one tens right now versus that was as

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 9>wide as kind of one nineties area late twenty twenty

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 9>three before the Fed signals they were pressing.

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 4>So I've yeeled down to perfection.

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 6>It's beautiful.

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 7>How do you expect refinancing risks to evolve though in

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 7>this year landscape?

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 6>Given the higher interest rate?

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 9>Sure on the commercial real estate side, we've had a

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 9>great market to take advantage of for the last few

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 9>years because of the dislocation from higher rates higher rates,

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 9>it's established a bit of a K shaped recovery. So

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.679
<v Speaker 9>weaker assets that have seen significant value decline and have

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 9>leverage beyond the asset value. You're seeing sponsors strategically walk,

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 9>and then you're seeing sponsors remain committed to working through

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 9>some of their over lever debt for their quality assets

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 9>that remain core in their portfolios.

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 6>Let's not jump to asset backs.

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 7>Find us because your notes were really robust that this

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 7>space is not something I'm super inexpret in, but your

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 7>notes are very helpful.

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 6>So in the ABF space, what.

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 7>Are some opportunities you're seeing and quote the different flavors

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 7>of profile when it comes to that, any key risks

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 7>in mind for sure.

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 9>So the acid back finance is the new term that

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 9>everyone likes to use for less liquid securitized exposure, and

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 9>we've always used it as a tool in our toolkit,

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 9>whether it's to pick up incremental spread or scale access

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 9>loans for better capital treatment for some investors. And then

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 9>now we're seeing more of our acid allocator clients focus

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 9>on dedicated exposure. They're typically trying to solve for better

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 9>diversification in their portfolios, less mark to market volatility, higher

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 9>yield profiles as well. So it's a really fun time

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 9>to deliver solutions into them.

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's what they said in two thousand and six.

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Remember your clos and colos, squares and all that under

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 2>whatever you said, asset based whatever. Give us an example.

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Is it like aircraft leasing or tractor trailers?

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so if I were to buy a collateral pool

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 9>of aircraft loans or exposure to aircraft leases in a less

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 9>liquid form, we could call that acid backed finans. You

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 9>also see asset back finance active in fund finance more broadly,

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 9>whether that's net asset value loans or subscription.

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 4>Line loans killing me.

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 5>I know, I know. Secure size is so fun.

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 9>Yes, And then you'll also see things like syndicated warehouse.

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 9>I thought you might appreciate that as well, and you

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 9>can add structure to that.

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 4>Syndicated where else they play toads in New Haven?

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Back when you're there where Eliza Crawford, she's with Trust

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Company of the West tc W. Mark Pittman owned your

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 2>world for Bloomberg. He won every award out there. His

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 2>death was far too soon for all of us at Bloomberg.

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 2>Mark Pittman would ask this question today, where are the

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 2>shadows within the belief, the faith, the intellectual reach to

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 2>do securitized finance where's the worry points like in two

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 2>thousand and six.

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 9>Yes, so we're always mindful about what the underlying cash

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 9>flows look like and what the principal value of anything

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 9>we're lending on is. And so when you get into

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 9>too much structural complexity, you need to very sharp on

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 9>figuring out what your rights are, what your cash flows

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 9>look like in your ultimate return on investment. So that's ongoing,

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 9>and so there are creative structures out there that don't

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 9>make sense.

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 2>So critically David Goldbenex Bank of America was iconic on this.

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a study of trunches. Yeah, where is the trunch risk?

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Now?

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Is it the garbage at the bottom of the deck

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 2>or is it trunch risk in the price to perfection area?

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 9>It's really more I frame it more the bottom of

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 9>the capital structure. So there's especially when we think about

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 9>less liquid or if you call that shadows. You've got

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 9>plenty of things that are considered private ig and private

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 9>investment grade, and those are very high quality. But if

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 9>you are to take something that might have a little

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 9>more operational risk, or it might have a little more

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 9>market risk than expected, and you trunch that up and

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 9>you're taking first loss risk.

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 5>You are exposed if.

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 9>Something goes wrong with that originator or that collateral profile,

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 9>that idiosyncratic risk, so you're exposed.

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 4>I was younger in two thousand and six. It's the

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 4>same kindsation.

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 7>Continue in your note this got my interest. You talked

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 7>about digital infrastructure. So within structured finance, do you think

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 7>that digital infrastructure securitization will become a permanent asset class.

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 5>I do think it will be. We've seen it grow.

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 9>I think the first asset backed security was twenty eighteen,

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 9>the first commercial MORGE backed security was twenty twenty two.

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 9>There's so much need for in particular data center financing,

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 9>that it's going to come through every debt pipe in

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 9>the market. And then that being said, we're mindful for

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 9>two reasons. One, there are better profiles and weaker profiles

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:37.919
<v Speaker 9>and different ways to take advantage of the market. And

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 9>then additionally, the supply serge should at some point put

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 9>some pressure on spreads. We would anticipate that, So we're

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 9>also mindful about relative value private credit.

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Is there a leverage in there hidden that we don't see,

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 2>that we don't know?

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 9>All speak to the asset backside of private credit and

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 9>the leverage that you might that might be more blatant.

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 9>Is more of that kind of warehouse financing. Right, Ultimately,

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 9>warehouse is levered profile.

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 4>So can you use the word mezzanine.

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 9>Yes, and mezzanine is live and well and so really

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 9>it's picking your spots for the collateral profile that you're

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 9>you've got some sort of exposure to and feeling high

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 9>conviction about both the performance of that collateral and then

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 9>your rights upon an event of default or some type

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 9>of distress in the performance.

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 4>Eliza, thank you so much. LESA.

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Crawford is of Securitized Research at TCW.

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 4>Stay with us.

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Is about Lidan for Paul Sweeney this morning. That's a

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 2>good thing. Is about Lian for David Gerr. That's an

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 2>even better thing. Is about here this morning? And we

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 2>do newspapers. Lisa Manteo all night's been working on it.

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 4>What do you got.

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 10>Okay, I want to start with this because this is

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 10>about Amazon's Prime Vision. It's going to make its first

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 10>appearance in the UK tonight. Yes, it's for the first

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 10>round of the UEFA Champions League matches. The Tots will

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 10>be there, okay, villere playing exactly. That's why I put

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 10>it on you. So this is basically a feed for

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 10>football or soccer fans that's going to have data graphics

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 10>that pop up real time analysis on the screen. So

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 10>for example, the player's names, they're running s, beats, they're

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 10>jump heights, you know, all overlaid over the video screen.

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 5>The NHL does.

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 10>Something like this similar on there on their online and

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 10>they started it in twenty twenty two in the US

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 10>with the NFL and it really worked for them because

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 10>it attracted that younger audience.

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 6>So yes, exactly.

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 10>Because Amazon has a momentum bar that shows which team.

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 6>Is more likely to score next.

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 10>Right, so all these kind of things playing part, they're

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 10>saying that this is really gonna you know, they're trying

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 10>it out in the UK.

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 4>It's amazing.

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 2>As in our control room for Bloomberg Surveillance, they have

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 2>a moment.

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 11>The bar legs off pract and sends a message the

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 11>momentum is lacking. On the momentum Barli Isabelle, you could

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 11>jump in here on the newspapers.

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm excited.

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 6>What Lisa, we'll talk about next? She sent us her

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 6>notes early.

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:30.719
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, orientation for Bloomberg surveillance. Next.

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.199
<v Speaker 10>Here it is Okay, this is Washington, d C's first

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 10>phone free bar.

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 5>It has opened up.

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 6>Okay.

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 5>It's called Hush Harbor.

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 10>And basically they want the owner wanted people to get

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 10>back to the old days, you know, when you actually

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 10>had conversations and listen to people and talk to them,

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 10>and a girl gave you your number and you had

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 10>to memorize it or write it down in a nap in,

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 10>you know.

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 5>Like that kind of thing.

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Please.

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 10>So basically, you come in and you take your phone,

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 10>and the host gives you a little bag. You put

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 10>it vacuum sale it magnetized it, and you can't unlock

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 10>it until you leave.

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 5>Wow, that's the teation.

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 7>This is interesting because I've seen laptop free cafes, but

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 7>I think that's really meant for folks not to hog

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 7>the tables and so that they don't strived. Just six

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.959
<v Speaker 7>dollars and three hours there without spending anything more. But

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.959
<v Speaker 7>I like this because everyone is always on their phone.

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 7>Sometimes when I hang out with my friends, we say

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 7>put your phones in the middle.

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 6>Obviously that never happens to you.

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 4>It's tragic.

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Somebody was saying to me, how do we set up

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 2>the structure for Bloomberg surveillance? And I said, you know,

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 2>some of it was longer interviews like Charlie Rose and

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 2>Chris Matthews and others, but a lot of it is

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 2>what Joe Scarborough invented over at Morning.

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 4>Joe, which is basically four.

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 2>People sitting in the student union at a given college

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 2>with no phones. Can you imagine student unions today with

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 2>cell phones to be terrible?

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Brilliant?

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 10>One more, it was okay, Isabella, hear you're a bad

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 10>Bunny fan? Are you? Are you?

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Maybe I like him.

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 7>I learned at him because he was Kendall Jenner's boyfriend.

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 6>You know, Kendall boyfriend.

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 5>Now they're so encouraged.

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 6>I love it, ex boyfriend, I love it.

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 5>Okay. So he had this residency concert right in Puerto Rico.

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 10>It's been going on the last one is on Saturday,

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 10>and some people, like my self, war fans haven't been

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 10>able to go see it. So Tom, I'm going to

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 10>play a little music here just because it gives me

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 10>an excuse to play it.

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 4>My love.

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 10>Okay, now I set the tone right, Okay.

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>So this is it.

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 10>So basically, on Saturday, it's the last concert and now

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 10>Amazon Prime is going to stream it live. It's going

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 10>to be there so everyone can now see it. So

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 10>whether you have Amazon Music, app, Prime Video, Twitch, it

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 10>starts at eight thirty pm Eastern on Amazon Prime or

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 10>any of those and you can watch it because people

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 10>haven't been able to go and travel and go see it,

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 10>so now everyone can enjoy the experience.

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 2>And this is this is like, yeah, this is another

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 2>leveraging in this that Lucas Shaw talks about.

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 7>It's screen time, but this is also smart because I

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 7>love how bad Bunny just really performed mostly in Puerto Rico.

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 7>He really wanted to celebrate the culture. He didn't perform

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 7>in the US, unlike all the big artists. Next he

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 7>will go to Latin America and Japan.

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 10>There was a reason why, because he was afraid of

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 10>ice agents coming and using as an opportunity to grass.

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 5>Oh yes, yes, and.

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 10>Some other artists have done the same thing.

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 4>So that's why he brought up We'll.

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Talk about this later. I had this conversation last night

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 2>and it wasn't funny. Good morning across the nation newspapers

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and Lisa Mantel, Yes you and we survived.

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal