1
00:00:10,720 --> 00:00:14,360
Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

2
00:00:14,440 --> 00:00:19,239
Speaker 1: I'm show Wise and I'm Tracy Alloway. Tracy, there's a

3
00:00:19,280 --> 00:00:24,680
Speaker 1: lot of talk about the deficit and the debt these days.

4
00:00:24,720 --> 00:00:27,520
Speaker 1: For a long time, maybe that sort of story went away,

5
00:00:28,120 --> 00:00:31,560
Speaker 1: but with the tax cuts and people wondering when the

6
00:00:31,560 --> 00:00:35,159
Speaker 1: next downturn comes back, it really feels like a government

7
00:00:35,200 --> 00:00:39,199
Speaker 1: debt is a big story again. Yeah. Absolutely, We've seen

8
00:00:39,240 --> 00:00:43,040
Speaker 1: lots of talk about bond vigilantees staging a comeback. We've

9
00:00:43,080 --> 00:00:46,920
Speaker 1: seen lots of forecasts from various analysts about just how

10
00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:51,040
Speaker 1: big the US deficit is going to get. Given Trump's

11
00:00:51,120 --> 00:00:55,640
Speaker 1: propensity to borrow and also enact fiscal stimulus. There is

12
00:00:55,720 --> 00:00:58,360
Speaker 1: a lot to discuss when it comes to the world

13
00:00:58,560 --> 00:01:02,840
Speaker 1: of US government debt nowadays. There absolutely is, And I

14
00:01:02,880 --> 00:01:05,600
Speaker 1: think one of the things that's always driven me crazy,

15
00:01:05,680 --> 00:01:08,240
Speaker 1: I think both of us crazy, is the sort of

16
00:01:09,000 --> 00:01:13,440
Speaker 1: naive view about how people talk about government debt, particularly

17
00:01:13,560 --> 00:01:17,520
Speaker 1: US government debt. There's this view often that sort of

18
00:01:17,560 --> 00:01:20,760
Speaker 1: sees the government as just sort of a typical borrower,

19
00:01:20,959 --> 00:01:23,800
Speaker 1: like a household or a person trying to borrow money

20
00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:27,560
Speaker 1: to buy a car. And as we know, it doesn't

21
00:01:27,600 --> 00:01:30,679
Speaker 1: really work that way, and that can really lead people

22
00:01:30,720 --> 00:01:33,800
Speaker 1: to a lot of false assumptions, like about what interest

23
00:01:33,840 --> 00:01:35,520
Speaker 1: rates are going to do and what the market is

24
00:01:35,560 --> 00:01:37,600
Speaker 1: going to do. So, I know you say it's a

25
00:01:37,720 --> 00:01:40,759
Speaker 1: naive viewpoint, but I'm going to make a confession here

26
00:01:40,959 --> 00:01:44,640
Speaker 1: and say that you know, in my head, I understand

27
00:01:44,680 --> 00:01:47,640
Speaker 1: the point that the US government is not the same

28
00:01:47,680 --> 00:01:50,600
Speaker 1: as you know, the head of a household who's tatting

29
00:01:50,680 --> 00:01:55,520
Speaker 1: up their income versus their expenditure every month. But deep

30
00:01:55,600 --> 00:01:59,640
Speaker 1: down in my gut, I have always been uncomfortable with

31
00:01:59,680 --> 00:02:03,520
Speaker 1: the no shin that the US can borrow extraordinary amounts

32
00:02:03,520 --> 00:02:07,960
Speaker 1: of money and not have major major impacts. So I'm

33
00:02:07,960 --> 00:02:11,799
Speaker 1: actually really excited to dig into this subject because hopefully

34
00:02:12,120 --> 00:02:15,960
Speaker 1: it'll make me feel better. Yeah, I agree, there's a

35
00:02:16,000 --> 00:02:20,280
Speaker 1: non intuitiveness about it. And even if you say, like, oh,

36
00:02:20,320 --> 00:02:23,119
Speaker 1: you know, the US creates its own money and borrowing

37
00:02:23,160 --> 00:02:25,160
Speaker 1: for the government is not the same as it is

38
00:02:25,200 --> 00:02:28,640
Speaker 1: with the household, I know what you're saying about your like, well, yeah,

39
00:02:28,680 --> 00:02:31,480
Speaker 1: surely we must be still getting close to some risk.

40
00:02:31,760 --> 00:02:35,520
Speaker 1: So hopefully we can maybe usual this episode to get

41
00:02:35,560 --> 00:02:39,720
Speaker 1: a little more comfortable with thinking about what government did

42
00:02:39,880 --> 00:02:43,680
Speaker 1: means in a slightly different manner. Yeah, that sounds great. Great,

43
00:02:43,720 --> 00:02:47,480
Speaker 1: So today I'm very excited to welcome to the podcast

44
00:02:47,560 --> 00:02:50,520
Speaker 1: Brian Roman Chuck. He is the author of the Bond

45
00:02:50,560 --> 00:02:54,280
Speaker 1: Economics blog. He's a financial consultant. He's written about the

46
00:02:54,320 --> 00:02:57,360
Speaker 1: bond market and what really happens. He's a veteran of

47
00:02:57,440 --> 00:03:00,520
Speaker 1: the financial industry, and he is going to help us

48
00:03:00,880 --> 00:03:05,760
Speaker 1: understand what's really happening when the government issues all this debt,

49
00:03:05,880 --> 00:03:09,160
Speaker 1: which of course is a major theme of the news

50
00:03:09,240 --> 00:03:21,000
Speaker 1: these days. Ryan Romantric, thank you for joining us on

51
00:03:21,120 --> 00:03:25,000
Speaker 1: odd lots. Let's start with the big question when someone

52
00:03:25,720 --> 00:03:29,320
Speaker 1: or a bank or an investor is buying a government bond,

53
00:03:29,680 --> 00:03:33,600
Speaker 1: what does it actually happen? On paper, it does look

54
00:03:33,720 --> 00:03:37,560
Speaker 1: similar to buying another bond. You know, you transfer money

55
00:03:37,600 --> 00:03:41,120
Speaker 1: to someone in exchange for a security which has a

56
00:03:41,200 --> 00:03:45,360
Speaker 1: que sip, so there is some similarity. You're you're going

57
00:03:45,360 --> 00:03:48,520
Speaker 1: through the same Selman process, and you know, you you

58
00:03:48,640 --> 00:03:51,240
Speaker 1: end up with rights. If you buy a ten million

59
00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:53,240
Speaker 1: you know, once you have control of it, then you

60
00:03:53,320 --> 00:03:57,240
Speaker 1: get you know, a certain contractual payments, you know up

61
00:03:57,320 --> 00:04:01,080
Speaker 1: until the bond maturity. And any bond, uh, well standard

62
00:04:01,120 --> 00:04:03,480
Speaker 1: bonds all have the same source of structure will give

63
00:04:03,520 --> 00:04:06,080
Speaker 1: you a certain coupon and then there's a final principal payment.

64
00:04:06,400 --> 00:04:09,760
Speaker 1: So the cash flow perspective, all bonds are similar in

65
00:04:09,800 --> 00:04:14,600
Speaker 1: that sense. So, at the risk of using a terrible cliche,

66
00:04:14,800 --> 00:04:17,960
Speaker 1: you know you're getting this IOU from the government essentially,

67
00:04:18,200 --> 00:04:21,240
Speaker 1: um it comes with a coupon, which kind of informs

68
00:04:21,520 --> 00:04:24,720
Speaker 1: the yields that you're going to get. Most people when

69
00:04:24,720 --> 00:04:26,840
Speaker 1: they think of US government debt, they're going to think

70
00:04:26,839 --> 00:04:30,920
Speaker 1: of treasuries obviously, and they're going to think of the U. S. Treasury.

71
00:04:30,960 --> 00:04:34,280
Speaker 1: Is it the US Treasury who is actually selling these things?

72
00:04:34,360 --> 00:04:38,960
Speaker 1: Or are there other entities involved? The U? S. Treasury?

73
00:04:39,040 --> 00:04:42,919
Speaker 1: The auction it as a Canadian I forgot the exact details,

74
00:04:42,920 --> 00:04:46,279
Speaker 1: but it's done there. There's an auction and the the

75
00:04:46,360 --> 00:04:49,839
Speaker 1: auction is they say there's gonna be a certain number

76
00:04:49,839 --> 00:04:54,360
Speaker 1: of bonds and then at a certain maturity, and then

77
00:04:54,440 --> 00:04:57,640
Speaker 1: the line of bidders and most of the bidding comes

78
00:04:57,720 --> 00:05:01,600
Speaker 1: from there. They're called the primary dealers, mainly banks, but

79
00:05:01,640 --> 00:05:06,240
Speaker 1: they're security dealers deal with the FED and they're obligated

80
00:05:06,279 --> 00:05:09,920
Speaker 1: to bid and they do most of the bidding. Other entities.

81
00:05:09,960 --> 00:05:12,279
Speaker 1: You can do a non competitive bid, but that's usually

82
00:05:12,279 --> 00:05:15,440
Speaker 1: a small part of the market. And once all the

83
00:05:15,480 --> 00:05:18,120
Speaker 1: bids come in, you don't give a price. You just

84
00:05:18,160 --> 00:05:20,760
Speaker 1: say I want to buy it at this yield. And

85
00:05:20,800 --> 00:05:24,760
Speaker 1: then you once all the bids come in, you say

86
00:05:24,839 --> 00:05:28,520
Speaker 1: the you know, it's a lower yield is essentially higher price.

87
00:05:29,000 --> 00:05:32,039
Speaker 1: The lowest yields to buy all the bonds win the

88
00:05:32,080 --> 00:05:35,080
Speaker 1: auction and they get the bonds delivered to them, and

89
00:05:35,120 --> 00:05:38,800
Speaker 1: then usually the primary dealers sell them on to other,

90
00:05:39,040 --> 00:05:41,440
Speaker 1: you know, investors like pension funds, people like us and

91
00:05:41,560 --> 00:05:45,640
Speaker 1: in the secondary market. Now, one of the things that

92
00:05:45,680 --> 00:05:48,400
Speaker 1: we talked about this in the intro is that we

93
00:05:48,480 --> 00:05:52,280
Speaker 1: have to dispel the myth that the US is just

94
00:05:52,320 --> 00:05:56,599
Speaker 1: like any other private sector borrower. And so we've established

95
00:05:56,640 --> 00:06:00,000
Speaker 1: that the bonds on paper look the same. It looks

96
00:06:00,040 --> 00:06:02,840
Speaker 1: like any other corporate bond or alone that might get

97
00:06:02,880 --> 00:06:07,080
Speaker 1: turned into a bond like instrument, but it's fundamentally different

98
00:06:07,279 --> 00:06:10,479
Speaker 1: and the key difference is the source of fund So

99
00:06:10,600 --> 00:06:14,000
Speaker 1: explain to us structurally why the US is a different

100
00:06:14,040 --> 00:06:18,479
Speaker 1: kind of borrower. Well, the key difference, and you know,

101
00:06:18,560 --> 00:06:22,200
Speaker 1: for the US, the US controls the central bank, and

102
00:06:22,320 --> 00:06:25,600
Speaker 1: as the horrible counterexample is a place like the Euro Area,

103
00:06:25,640 --> 00:06:29,479
Speaker 1: where the countries don't control their central bank. And because

104
00:06:29,760 --> 00:06:33,560
Speaker 1: ultimately all these bonds say we're paying you U S

105
00:06:33,600 --> 00:06:37,800
Speaker 1: dollars and the US dollars a liability of the US

106
00:06:37,880 --> 00:06:41,680
Speaker 1: Federal Reserve, and the US Federal Reserve the FED is

107
00:06:41,760 --> 00:06:45,920
Speaker 1: owned by the Treasury. So that gives you the one

108
00:06:46,040 --> 00:06:50,800
Speaker 1: big picture difference than any other borrower, and the other

109
00:06:50,960 --> 00:06:57,920
Speaker 1: the other issue is for the government, there main concern.

110
00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:01,760
Speaker 1: They're more concerned a bit about the macro consequences of

111
00:07:01,839 --> 00:07:06,320
Speaker 1: spending and not so much the financial A smaller borrowing

112
00:07:06,520 --> 00:07:08,760
Speaker 1: an individual bank, you know, how big they might be,

113
00:07:09,120 --> 00:07:12,040
Speaker 1: aren't really worried about the fact that they're spending on

114
00:07:12,120 --> 00:07:17,440
Speaker 1: the overall economy. And that is a key difference in understanding, Well,

115
00:07:17,720 --> 00:07:20,440
Speaker 1: you know, why are they different? Okay, so I'm gonna

116
00:07:20,520 --> 00:07:23,640
Speaker 1: let my gut talk now, which is probably a mistake,

117
00:07:23,760 --> 00:07:27,360
Speaker 1: but here we go. So, why why can't the US

118
00:07:27,440 --> 00:07:30,800
Speaker 1: government just borrow as much as it wants, you know,

119
00:07:30,920 --> 00:07:33,720
Speaker 1: enormous amounts of money? Uh what what? What are the

120
00:07:33,760 --> 00:07:36,240
Speaker 1: negative effects that are going to happen if it does that?

121
00:07:37,480 --> 00:07:41,280
Speaker 1: It's not the borrowing per se, that's the problem because

122
00:07:41,480 --> 00:07:44,680
Speaker 1: the it's you would say, if there's a problem, it

123
00:07:44,720 --> 00:07:48,480
Speaker 1: would be on the spending, because you say, what is

124
00:07:48,520 --> 00:07:51,480
Speaker 1: the government buying? I mean, maybe they're buying good things,

125
00:07:51,520 --> 00:07:55,480
Speaker 1: maybe it's bad things, but uh, one can always debate,

126
00:07:55,680 --> 00:07:58,080
Speaker 1: you know, what the the spend money on. But from

127
00:07:58,120 --> 00:08:01,200
Speaker 1: a macro perspective, what the worry is if the government

128
00:08:01,240 --> 00:08:04,679
Speaker 1: starts buying too much stuff, they drive up the price

129
00:08:04,720 --> 00:08:09,600
Speaker 1: of everything, i e. There's inflation, and they spend a

130
00:08:09,600 --> 00:08:15,480
Speaker 1: lot and causes inflation. But the borrowing is the flip

131
00:08:15,560 --> 00:08:20,280
Speaker 1: side of the spending because if they're spending more than

132
00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:24,440
Speaker 1: coming in from taxes, there's a fiscal deficit, and the

133
00:08:24,480 --> 00:08:28,640
Speaker 1: way that that's matched in practice is well that that's

134
00:08:28,680 --> 00:08:35,000
Speaker 1: covered by borrowing. And so the borrowing comes with the spending.

135
00:08:35,360 --> 00:08:38,400
Speaker 1: And so it's a mistake to worry about the borrowing

136
00:08:38,440 --> 00:08:41,240
Speaker 1: and say what what is the government spending on. So

137
00:08:41,800 --> 00:08:44,000
Speaker 1: this is the part that I think people really have

138
00:08:44,480 --> 00:08:48,040
Speaker 1: a hard time, is why we shouldn't worry about the

139
00:08:48,120 --> 00:08:52,079
Speaker 1: borrowing because in theory you would think, Okay, people are

140
00:08:52,120 --> 00:08:55,800
Speaker 1: buying government dead, and the government dead just keeps going

141
00:08:55,880 --> 00:08:59,960
Speaker 1: higher and higher, and that maybe one day these buyers

142
00:09:00,200 --> 00:09:02,880
Speaker 1: will say whoa, You guys are spending so much money,

143
00:09:02,920 --> 00:09:04,679
Speaker 1: You're never gonna be able to pay it back. Tax

144
00:09:04,720 --> 00:09:07,439
Speaker 1: revenues aren't coming anywhere close. I'm not going to buy

145
00:09:07,480 --> 00:09:10,880
Speaker 1: government debt anymore. So this issue, I think is still

146
00:09:10,920 --> 00:09:14,280
Speaker 1: what we need to address, which is why is that

147
00:09:14,400 --> 00:09:19,200
Speaker 1: not a risk that one day lenders just won't show up? Well,

148
00:09:19,240 --> 00:09:22,400
Speaker 1: I mean that that is a worry, and it was

149
00:09:23,280 --> 00:09:26,520
Speaker 1: anyone's being around the markets that was a worry. I

150
00:09:26,559 --> 00:09:31,160
Speaker 1: started in finance about Japan and even that was a

151
00:09:31,160 --> 00:09:34,600
Speaker 1: big worry. And that continued and it was called the

152
00:09:34,600 --> 00:09:37,840
Speaker 1: widow maker trade people and all Japan is gonna default

153
00:09:38,080 --> 00:09:41,040
Speaker 1: within months, and they short a Japanese government bonds and

154
00:09:41,080 --> 00:09:44,360
Speaker 1: they kept losing money. By now people have largely given

155
00:09:44,440 --> 00:09:48,600
Speaker 1: up on that. But the reason why the governments can

156
00:09:48,600 --> 00:09:54,440
Speaker 1: get away with this, uh generally is they're spending creates

157
00:09:54,640 --> 00:09:57,880
Speaker 1: the money that then is sucked back in by the

158
00:09:57,920 --> 00:10:03,480
Speaker 1: bond auction. It's a circular flow. And this is why, yes,

159
00:10:03,800 --> 00:10:06,360
Speaker 1: there's a demand for like you know, the demand for

160
00:10:06,440 --> 00:10:09,240
Speaker 1: borrowing for the government at the same time they're supplying

161
00:10:10,120 --> 00:10:14,200
Speaker 1: money that then is recirculated back into the bond market.

162
00:10:14,480 --> 00:10:16,640
Speaker 1: I think this is the just sort of the really

163
00:10:17,000 --> 00:10:19,640
Speaker 1: key point here, and I want to sort of really

164
00:10:19,679 --> 00:10:23,080
Speaker 1: dive into this. So let's say the government wants to

165
00:10:23,480 --> 00:10:28,920
Speaker 1: spend ten billion dollars more on some new aircraft program

166
00:10:29,000 --> 00:10:33,200
Speaker 1: for the military. That ten billion dollars that they spend,

167
00:10:34,040 --> 00:10:36,320
Speaker 1: I think, as you're saying, winds up in the bank

168
00:10:36,360 --> 00:10:40,320
Speaker 1: account of some private defense contractor, and then that money

169
00:10:40,360 --> 00:10:46,000
Speaker 1: in the bank ends up going perhaps a security circuitous route,

170
00:10:46,640 --> 00:10:50,120
Speaker 1: ends up back being invested in government bonds. Do I

171
00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:52,840
Speaker 1: have that right? Yeah, that's basically it. I mean, now

172
00:10:52,960 --> 00:10:55,839
Speaker 1: it's it's a bit more common because you have excess reserves.

173
00:10:55,880 --> 00:10:59,040
Speaker 1: But what happens is if the government sends a defense

174
00:10:59,080 --> 00:11:03,080
Speaker 1: contractor ten billion, they'll have a ten billion deposit on

175
00:11:03,120 --> 00:11:07,079
Speaker 1: the bank. The bank in return, they get ten billion

176
00:11:07,240 --> 00:11:09,960
Speaker 1: transferred to them from the FED and they have ten

177
00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:13,400
Speaker 1: billion as a deposit the Fed. I mean, these are reserves,

178
00:11:13,760 --> 00:11:17,240
Speaker 1: and you know, because the Federals is a bank and

179
00:11:17,320 --> 00:11:21,640
Speaker 1: so but the bank doesn't really want I mean, independent

180
00:11:21,720 --> 00:11:23,760
Speaker 1: of what them, the customer and what might want, that

181
00:11:23,800 --> 00:11:26,720
Speaker 1: ten billion UH is sitting in the bank account because

182
00:11:26,720 --> 00:11:30,000
Speaker 1: they will have expenses. But the bank itself, what's it

183
00:11:30,000 --> 00:11:31,800
Speaker 1: going to do with the ten billion it has an

184
00:11:31,840 --> 00:11:34,360
Speaker 1: asset on balance sheet which is a deposit of the FED,

185
00:11:34,720 --> 00:11:39,200
Speaker 1: which is a low risk asset which pays you used

186
00:11:39,200 --> 00:11:42,200
Speaker 1: to pay nothing but now very little, and say we

187
00:11:42,240 --> 00:11:44,240
Speaker 1: want to do something else with this asset in our

188
00:11:44,240 --> 00:11:47,800
Speaker 1: balance sheet, And so they then go out and say

189
00:11:47,880 --> 00:11:51,960
Speaker 1: we want something and gives a higher return, and essentially

190
00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:54,480
Speaker 1: how the loop gets closed and say, look, hey, there's

191
00:11:54,720 --> 00:11:57,920
Speaker 1: you know, treasury bonds. We buy them. They should have

192
00:11:58,000 --> 00:12:00,520
Speaker 1: an expected return higher than lee ving the money on

193
00:12:00,559 --> 00:12:04,079
Speaker 1: deposit the FIT. And so the bank will go out

194
00:12:04,400 --> 00:12:08,200
Speaker 1: and buy the treasury bonds in the auction because otherwise

195
00:12:08,240 --> 00:12:10,360
Speaker 1: they're stuck with the deposit the FED that's paying them

196
00:12:10,400 --> 00:12:15,839
Speaker 1: very little. So Brian just on the money creation point

197
00:12:16,240 --> 00:12:20,040
Speaker 1: when it comes to the US is government borrowing. A

198
00:12:20,080 --> 00:12:23,480
Speaker 1: lot of people will often point to the special privilege

199
00:12:23,600 --> 00:12:27,200
Speaker 1: that America enjoys by virtue of the fact that the

200
00:12:27,280 --> 00:12:30,720
Speaker 1: US dollar is the world's reserve currency. In other words,

201
00:12:30,760 --> 00:12:32,959
Speaker 1: other countries need it, and so they're going to keep

202
00:12:32,960 --> 00:12:37,079
Speaker 1: buying US treasuries in order to stabilize their own accounts

203
00:12:37,120 --> 00:12:40,240
Speaker 1: and their own currencies and things like that. How much

204
00:12:40,280 --> 00:12:43,640
Speaker 1: does that play into the ability of the US government

205
00:12:43,640 --> 00:12:48,080
Speaker 1: to keep borrowing. And you know, you mentioned the Japan example.

206
00:12:48,160 --> 00:12:51,319
Speaker 1: People have been worried about Japanese government debt for ages.

207
00:12:51,480 --> 00:12:55,040
Speaker 1: The end certainly is not the world's reserve currency. So

208
00:12:55,080 --> 00:12:57,720
Speaker 1: how come they're able to do that as well as

209
00:12:57,760 --> 00:13:01,600
Speaker 1: the US the reserve currency when you had to fix

210
00:13:01,760 --> 00:13:04,880
Speaker 1: fixed exchange rate regime. It did make a difference in

211
00:13:04,920 --> 00:13:08,480
Speaker 1: Bretton woods, but it's been a long time. Canada, Australia,

212
00:13:08,640 --> 00:13:12,000
Speaker 1: United Kingdom, I mean, they're not really reserve currencies, but

213
00:13:12,200 --> 00:13:15,280
Speaker 1: they're pretty much in the same position as the US

214
00:13:15,280 --> 00:13:19,800
Speaker 1: from the perspective economic perspective. Let's say you have an

215
00:13:19,800 --> 00:13:24,080
Speaker 1: Asian central bank. They look as far as the U S.

216
00:13:24,120 --> 00:13:27,800
Speaker 1: Domestic economy is concerned, they're a private sector borow and

217
00:13:27,840 --> 00:13:30,200
Speaker 1: they have the same choices to do, you know as

218
00:13:30,240 --> 00:13:32,360
Speaker 1: any other private sector investor. What do we do with

219
00:13:32,400 --> 00:13:35,840
Speaker 1: our with our U S. Dollar assets? And you know,

220
00:13:35,920 --> 00:13:38,439
Speaker 1: they could hold cash, they could they could leave money

221
00:13:38,440 --> 00:13:41,480
Speaker 1: on deposit the bank, or we could buy a treasury.

222
00:13:41,559 --> 00:13:45,000
Speaker 1: So they don't really have a choice if if they

223
00:13:45,040 --> 00:13:48,720
Speaker 1: want to hold US dollar reserves, they have to do

224
00:13:48,840 --> 00:13:52,720
Speaker 1: something with it. And by convention, you know, they don't

225
00:13:52,800 --> 00:13:57,240
Speaker 1: run around. It's it's it's frowned upon for central banks

226
00:13:57,240 --> 00:13:59,880
Speaker 1: to run and run around and buy private sector ass

227
00:14:00,000 --> 00:14:02,920
Speaker 1: it's like equity easy. There's a little bit of dabbling

228
00:14:02,960 --> 00:14:06,559
Speaker 1: in equity markets, but that's only a tiny fraction. They

229
00:14:06,640 --> 00:14:09,760
Speaker 1: keep their money in fixing comme assets, and they want

230
00:14:09,800 --> 00:14:12,760
Speaker 1: safe ones. I mean they don't because they might need

231
00:14:12,800 --> 00:14:15,880
Speaker 1: to call on their reserves if their currency is under attack.

232
00:14:16,440 --> 00:14:20,040
Speaker 1: And then you know, they don't want a private debt

233
00:14:20,200 --> 00:14:23,600
Speaker 1: that's in the process of defaulting when they need liquidity,

234
00:14:23,720 --> 00:14:26,800
Speaker 1: and so by default they tend to end the treasury.

235
00:14:26,880 --> 00:14:29,720
Speaker 1: So it's a two way street, and a certain extent

236
00:14:29,760 --> 00:14:35,320
Speaker 1: they're trapped into the treasury holdings as well. And in theory,

237
00:14:35,640 --> 00:14:39,520
Speaker 1: if a foreign holder of dollars, let's say they did

238
00:14:39,600 --> 00:14:44,960
Speaker 1: want to buy equities instead of treasuries just for whatever reason,

239
00:14:45,560 --> 00:14:49,480
Speaker 1: that would create some new holder of those dollars at

240
00:14:49,520 --> 00:14:51,960
Speaker 1: some other bank. And so it's not like the dollars

241
00:14:52,000 --> 00:14:55,120
Speaker 1: would just sort of disappear. It would be yet another

242
00:14:55,280 --> 00:14:58,560
Speaker 1: buyer somewhere else would show up who would have dollars

243
00:14:59,120 --> 00:15:01,840
Speaker 1: on reserve at a AC and then would theoretically go

244
00:15:01,880 --> 00:15:05,320
Speaker 1: into treasuries. Yeah, it's it's for everybodyer. There's a seller

245
00:15:05,880 --> 00:15:11,600
Speaker 1: and scare stories often revolve around forgetting that that basic principle. Yeah,

246
00:15:11,640 --> 00:15:15,440
Speaker 1: there's someone with the dollars has to buy, so yeah,

247
00:15:16,120 --> 00:15:18,360
Speaker 1: you know, the pricing can change, of course, I mean

248
00:15:18,360 --> 00:15:20,520
Speaker 1: that's the thing if you're worried about pricing. Yes, treasury

249
00:15:20,560 --> 00:15:23,920
Speaker 1: prices would go down relative to other things, but the

250
00:15:24,360 --> 00:15:28,520
Speaker 1: flows will still cancel out. So how come Japan can

251
00:15:28,560 --> 00:15:33,400
Speaker 1: borrow enormous amounts of money, Well, it's the same same issue.

252
00:15:33,440 --> 00:15:38,600
Speaker 1: There's excess again. They're creating again and um I even

253
00:15:38,600 --> 00:15:41,280
Speaker 1: looked at the latest data, but they're roughly a trade balance,

254
00:15:41,320 --> 00:15:45,520
Speaker 1: so it's mainly domestic owners. Very few people want to

255
00:15:45,520 --> 00:15:48,160
Speaker 1: go in and buy Japanese bonds. I mean people buy

256
00:15:48,240 --> 00:15:52,160
Speaker 1: Japanese equities, but not bonds. People just think they're ridiculous,

257
00:15:52,160 --> 00:15:55,760
Speaker 1: although now maybe not so as much. But the you know,

258
00:15:55,800 --> 00:16:00,480
Speaker 1: the yen has is somewhere in the system and Happanese

259
00:16:00,480 --> 00:16:04,080
Speaker 1: banks basically have no choice, but they buy the bonds,

260
00:16:04,080 --> 00:16:08,680
Speaker 1: although recently it's been the Bank of Japan. They've basically

261
00:16:08,760 --> 00:16:11,160
Speaker 1: bought most of them up and now the banks just

262
00:16:11,360 --> 00:16:14,360
Speaker 1: have deposits of the Bank of Japan. But in the

263
00:16:14,440 --> 00:16:17,200
Speaker 1: in the end, it's just that if they spend the

264
00:16:17,400 --> 00:16:19,600
Speaker 1: end end up in the system, and the end has

265
00:16:19,640 --> 00:16:23,480
Speaker 1: to go somewhere, and that drain is the Japanese government

266
00:16:23,520 --> 00:16:28,040
Speaker 1: bond market. So doesn't matter if the buyers of your

267
00:16:28,080 --> 00:16:32,120
Speaker 1: debt are more domestic or more foreign. Is one group

268
00:16:32,160 --> 00:16:35,280
Speaker 1: better than the other. If you're borrowing in your own currency,

269
00:16:35,360 --> 00:16:38,440
Speaker 1: I mean, this is very different. If you're like an

270
00:16:38,440 --> 00:16:42,080
Speaker 1: emerging market borrowing in another country's currency, then you have

271
00:16:42,200 --> 00:16:45,600
Speaker 1: to be very worried about foreign holders. Or if you

272
00:16:45,600 --> 00:16:49,200
Speaker 1: have any fixed exchange rate pig and you see that

273
00:16:49,240 --> 00:16:53,600
Speaker 1: in the Euro area, then you like domestic things, domestic

274
00:16:53,600 --> 00:16:56,960
Speaker 1: buyers of your debt because you have more control over things.

275
00:16:57,000 --> 00:17:01,160
Speaker 1: But for a floating currency sovereign if you have a

276
00:17:01,160 --> 00:17:03,240
Speaker 1: lot of fire and foreign buyers, if you do, it

277
00:17:03,240 --> 00:17:07,600
Speaker 1: means you're running big current account deficits. And is that good?

278
00:17:07,760 --> 00:17:11,879
Speaker 1: Is that bad? You know, the US, their industrial strategy

279
00:17:12,160 --> 00:17:16,560
Speaker 1: since being the World War two, has been running trade

280
00:17:16,600 --> 00:17:21,919
Speaker 1: deficits with you know, strategic partners. And you know the

281
00:17:22,040 --> 00:17:24,359
Speaker 1: U s has costs, and there's benefits for the US

282
00:17:24,480 --> 00:17:26,560
Speaker 1: right now that people are focusing on the cost, but

283
00:17:26,680 --> 00:17:29,600
Speaker 1: there's there are benefits the way the US runs a system.

284
00:17:29,720 --> 00:17:33,200
Speaker 1: But the foreign buyers. In theory they could panic more,

285
00:17:33,280 --> 00:17:35,679
Speaker 1: but at the same time they don't want to lose money.

286
00:17:35,880 --> 00:17:37,880
Speaker 1: You know, it's very you know, if you're a big

287
00:17:37,880 --> 00:17:41,320
Speaker 1: holder of bonds, you can sell in a panic and

288
00:17:41,359 --> 00:17:43,200
Speaker 1: you can lose a lot of money. You know. I

289
00:17:43,480 --> 00:17:45,760
Speaker 1: worked for firm which was large, and if we wanted to,

290
00:17:45,880 --> 00:17:47,960
Speaker 1: we could lose a lot of money very quickly by

291
00:17:48,000 --> 00:17:52,119
Speaker 1: selling our our assets and a panic. Well, that's not

292
00:17:52,200 --> 00:17:55,720
Speaker 1: our job. Your job is not to lose money very quickly,

293
00:17:56,200 --> 00:17:59,640
Speaker 1: so you generally avoid doing stuff like that. So that's why,

294
00:18:00,600 --> 00:18:04,160
Speaker 1: on paper, the foreign investors could get spooked more, but

295
00:18:04,240 --> 00:18:06,720
Speaker 1: they still want to make money, so it's not clear

296
00:18:06,960 --> 00:18:12,320
Speaker 1: that they're much different than domestic investors in that respect. Okay,

297
00:18:12,359 --> 00:18:17,840
Speaker 1: so we've established that for the US credit risk isn't

298
00:18:17,880 --> 00:18:20,320
Speaker 1: really a thing because the dollars that come to buy

299
00:18:20,600 --> 00:18:24,520
Speaker 1: treasuries come from the spending. And we've also established that

300
00:18:24,720 --> 00:18:27,920
Speaker 1: you don't even need to be a reserve currency for

301
00:18:27,960 --> 00:18:31,800
Speaker 1: this phenomenon to exist, because it's in Japan, which has

302
00:18:31,840 --> 00:18:35,040
Speaker 1: lots of debt, and Canada, which is not anyone a

303
00:18:35,119 --> 00:18:39,800
Speaker 1: reserve currency, Australia and New Zealand. Then the obvious question

304
00:18:39,920 --> 00:18:44,240
Speaker 1: is why can't all countries do this? And so people think,

305
00:18:44,280 --> 00:18:47,840
Speaker 1: to the extreme example of a country like Venezuela and

306
00:18:47,920 --> 00:18:51,480
Speaker 1: the debt they have, why can't they just spend and

307
00:18:51,720 --> 00:18:55,919
Speaker 1: keep a stable currency and a stable market. I'm not

308
00:18:56,480 --> 00:19:02,240
Speaker 1: an emerging market person, but there's policy differences between Venezuela

309
00:19:02,280 --> 00:19:05,000
Speaker 1: and the US coming down to the strength of the

310
00:19:05,040 --> 00:19:09,240
Speaker 1: tax system. The i r S, as everyone knows, is

311
00:19:09,280 --> 00:19:15,360
Speaker 1: a powerful organization, and it has the income tax, has

312
00:19:15,400 --> 00:19:20,560
Speaker 1: the ability of damping economic activity, and so it controls

313
00:19:20,600 --> 00:19:25,359
Speaker 1: inflation better than in the country with a weaker tax system.

314
00:19:25,480 --> 00:19:29,760
Speaker 1: And my pet theory is that the difference comes down

315
00:19:29,800 --> 00:19:34,080
Speaker 1: to the effectiveness of the tax regime for for inflation control.

316
00:19:34,119 --> 00:19:37,600
Speaker 1: I mean, that's a major difference, but there is also

317
00:19:37,640 --> 00:19:40,680
Speaker 1: a question of what is produced. If you if you're

318
00:19:40,720 --> 00:19:45,760
Speaker 1: dependent on foreign imports for a lot of goods, then

319
00:19:46,080 --> 00:19:52,120
Speaker 1: your domestic inflation is driven by your exchange rate. Whereas

320
00:19:52,200 --> 00:19:55,919
Speaker 1: the US is largely a closed economy I mean, relatively

321
00:19:55,920 --> 00:20:00,000
Speaker 1: a closed economy when compared to other countries, and change

322
00:20:00,080 --> 00:20:02,640
Speaker 1: is the exchange rate don't have much of an effect

323
00:20:02,680 --> 00:20:06,399
Speaker 1: on prices, so you can largely ignore I mean, if

324
00:20:06,520 --> 00:20:13,080
Speaker 1: US dollar falls ten, it's not really noticeable in domestic prices.

325
00:20:13,160 --> 00:20:16,640
Speaker 1: So with all the talk of the US deficit growing

326
00:20:16,760 --> 00:20:20,520
Speaker 1: and the US government borrowing more under the current administration,

327
00:20:21,240 --> 00:20:24,480
Speaker 1: lots of auctions happening, not just a longer term treasuries,

328
00:20:24,520 --> 00:20:28,240
Speaker 1: but also t bills. What are you looking out for

329
00:20:28,320 --> 00:20:31,400
Speaker 1: when it comes to US auctions to sort of gauge

330
00:20:31,840 --> 00:20:35,359
Speaker 1: the health of the market and to determine how successful

331
00:20:35,400 --> 00:20:39,959
Speaker 1: an auction is in terms of successive auctions. That was

332
00:20:40,080 --> 00:20:43,719
Speaker 1: something that that was a technical detail I didn't worry about.

333
00:20:44,200 --> 00:20:48,680
Speaker 1: But the the overall trend it's going to be. Are

334
00:20:48,720 --> 00:20:51,879
Speaker 1: these deficits going to cause rapid growth? If you're if

335
00:20:51,880 --> 00:20:54,760
Speaker 1: you're worried about the pricing which is the usual word,

336
00:20:54,840 --> 00:20:57,919
Speaker 1: what's gonna happen to bond yield? If the government spending

337
00:20:57,960 --> 00:21:01,000
Speaker 1: a lot, they'll will have inflation your pressure, and that's

338
00:21:01,000 --> 00:21:04,040
Speaker 1: going to force the Fed to hike rates and that

339
00:21:04,200 --> 00:21:06,840
Speaker 1: if you know from a bond market, uh, you know,

340
00:21:06,920 --> 00:21:10,720
Speaker 1: pricing perspective, that's your worries that the Fed gets more

341
00:21:10,760 --> 00:21:14,960
Speaker 1: aggressive with rate hikes and pushes up bond yield. That's

342
00:21:15,800 --> 00:21:18,119
Speaker 1: going to be you know, much much more of a

343
00:21:18,119 --> 00:21:23,440
Speaker 1: concern than the just supply demand. So the big picture,

344
00:21:23,800 --> 00:21:25,680
Speaker 1: and if we sort of wrap it all up here

345
00:21:25,840 --> 00:21:29,480
Speaker 1: is that it's not the borrowing per se. It's not

346
00:21:29,600 --> 00:21:34,720
Speaker 1: the gap between the government's expenditures and its revenues via taxes.

347
00:21:35,119 --> 00:21:38,720
Speaker 1: It's really about the capacity of the economy to absorb

348
00:21:38,760 --> 00:21:41,720
Speaker 1: all that spending. That sort of is what theoretically would

349
00:21:41,760 --> 00:21:45,399
Speaker 1: drive inflation, and then the link between inflation and what

350
00:21:45,440 --> 00:21:48,400
Speaker 1: the Fed does that would sort of be what ultimately

351
00:21:48,960 --> 00:21:53,640
Speaker 1: determines what long term rates are going to do. And

352
00:21:53,680 --> 00:21:56,320
Speaker 1: then that you know, once you answer that, then you

353
00:21:56,359 --> 00:21:58,240
Speaker 1: can decide whether it makes sense to buy a bond

354
00:21:58,320 --> 00:22:01,480
Speaker 1: or not. Yeah, that's basically I mean, And the question

355
00:22:01,560 --> 00:22:04,200
Speaker 1: is will I mean, it's not just a simple difference.

356
00:22:04,560 --> 00:22:07,520
Speaker 1: I mean, this is the question. With the tax cuts,

357
00:22:07,880 --> 00:22:10,440
Speaker 1: how much for stimulative impact have they had. I mean,

358
00:22:10,680 --> 00:22:14,399
Speaker 1: there's been not much of an inflationary impact. It's been

359
00:22:14,440 --> 00:22:16,280
Speaker 1: good for the stock markets, a lot of money got

360
00:22:16,280 --> 00:22:20,480
Speaker 1: funneled into into stock buy backs, but by itself, that

361
00:22:20,640 --> 00:22:24,040
Speaker 1: isn't that isn't putting inflationary pressure on the economy. So

362
00:22:24,400 --> 00:22:27,840
Speaker 1: there's a big difference between what the deficit is doing

363
00:22:27,960 --> 00:22:30,040
Speaker 1: and the effect on the economy. And it's hard to model.

364
00:22:30,160 --> 00:22:32,439
Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's it's not an easy thing to

365
00:22:32,560 --> 00:22:35,560
Speaker 1: say what the effect on the economy is gonna. Presumably

366
00:22:35,760 --> 00:22:39,480
Speaker 1: there's a big inflationary difference between say, rich people are

367
00:22:39,480 --> 00:22:44,280
Speaker 1: getting a tax cut versus a policy that said, everybody

368
00:22:44,280 --> 00:22:46,600
Speaker 1: in the country gets a new bicycle, even if it's

369
00:22:46,600 --> 00:22:50,080
Speaker 1: on a dollar amount, it costs the same. That's presumably

370
00:22:50,080 --> 00:22:53,000
Speaker 1: the difference. I mean, you might have political this is

371
00:22:53,000 --> 00:22:55,879
Speaker 1: where sort of politics comes in. People might disagree, but

372
00:22:55,960 --> 00:22:59,040
Speaker 1: that's certainly my view that you you know, hand the

373
00:22:59,119 --> 00:23:02,280
Speaker 1: tax cut to the bottom twent or you buy stuff

374
00:23:02,480 --> 00:23:08,640
Speaker 1: much more inflationary than capital gains tax cut. Brian Roman Chuck,

375
00:23:08,800 --> 00:23:12,480
Speaker 1: thank you very much. Very interesting conversation, and I think

376
00:23:12,640 --> 00:23:15,320
Speaker 1: these sort of this guts of how this all works

377
00:23:15,320 --> 00:23:18,680
Speaker 1: out very rarely discussed when people talk about the bond market.

378
00:23:18,720 --> 00:23:21,800
Speaker 1: So appreciate you coming up. Thanks thanks to It's nice

379
00:23:21,840 --> 00:23:36,840
Speaker 1: to be on so Tracy. Are you convinced that it's

380
00:23:36,880 --> 00:23:40,760
Speaker 1: not a big existential threat for the government to run

381
00:23:40,960 --> 00:23:44,520
Speaker 1: what's on paper very large deficits. I feel like I

382
00:23:44,600 --> 00:23:47,919
Speaker 1: have a better intellectual grasp of what's going on, and

383
00:23:48,000 --> 00:23:51,080
Speaker 1: the idea that you know, borrowing from the government isn't

384
00:23:51,119 --> 00:23:55,200
Speaker 1: actually about moving money from one entity to the other.

385
00:23:55,320 --> 00:24:00,240
Speaker 1: It's actually about creating money. I get that, but I

386
00:24:00,320 --> 00:24:03,080
Speaker 1: gotta be honest, Joe, part of me is still thinking

387
00:24:03,359 --> 00:24:06,680
Speaker 1: there have to be some consequences. I think there's two

388
00:24:06,920 --> 00:24:09,520
Speaker 1: things that I think we're really useful there. So one

389
00:24:09,600 --> 00:24:13,160
Speaker 1: is obviously just really understanding this idea of the closed loop,

390
00:24:13,280 --> 00:24:17,400
Speaker 1: this idea that money never leaves the banking system, because

391
00:24:17,440 --> 00:24:19,080
Speaker 1: I mean, for one thing, we know that all money

392
00:24:19,320 --> 00:24:22,840
Speaker 1: is digital basically, and so kidd just disappear, and so

393
00:24:22,920 --> 00:24:24,760
Speaker 1: if it's going to stay in a bank, and a

394
00:24:24,760 --> 00:24:28,040
Speaker 1: bank will ultimately put it into treasuries, even if it

395
00:24:28,600 --> 00:24:31,880
Speaker 1: caused many hop skips in a jump. I also think

396
00:24:31,960 --> 00:24:35,160
Speaker 1: that point that he made about the strength of institutions

397
00:24:35,400 --> 00:24:40,120
Speaker 1: is really important, and this idea that it's not necessarily

398
00:24:40,119 --> 00:24:42,439
Speaker 1: the borrowing per se that you want to worry about,

399
00:24:42,800 --> 00:24:45,280
Speaker 1: but if you want to look at sort of institutional

400
00:24:45,440 --> 00:24:50,760
Speaker 1: degradation in developed economies, you could certainly point to a

401
00:24:50,760 --> 00:24:53,480
Speaker 1: lot of things these days. Right, And we've had this

402
00:24:53,560 --> 00:24:56,400
Speaker 1: discussion at one time or another about how when you're

403
00:24:56,440 --> 00:25:00,040
Speaker 1: ramping up government borrowing, you're really making big decision and

404
00:25:00,200 --> 00:25:03,320
Speaker 1: about what you're going to spend that borrowing on, and

405
00:25:03,320 --> 00:25:06,240
Speaker 1: those are value decisions that are being made. The other

406
00:25:06,280 --> 00:25:09,200
Speaker 1: thing I thought was interesting was when he sort of

407
00:25:09,240 --> 00:25:11,359
Speaker 1: flipped it on his head and said, you don't necessarily

408
00:25:11,400 --> 00:25:14,080
Speaker 1: need to worry about the borrowing, but about the capacity

409
00:25:14,200 --> 00:25:18,080
Speaker 1: of the economy to absorb the spending. And that's something

410
00:25:18,400 --> 00:25:22,080
Speaker 1: that you know, you've seen the Federal Reserve make noises

411
00:25:22,119 --> 00:25:24,879
Speaker 1: about it, this notion that we are running close to

412
00:25:24,960 --> 00:25:28,760
Speaker 1: full capacity at this point. And what impact is a

413
00:25:28,800 --> 00:25:31,199
Speaker 1: whole bunch of fiscal stimulus actually going to have on

414
00:25:31,240 --> 00:25:34,919
Speaker 1: the economy. Absolutely, and then also just this idea that

415
00:25:34,960 --> 00:25:39,840
Speaker 1: there's gonna be different growth or inflationary impacts of different

416
00:25:39,880 --> 00:25:43,000
Speaker 1: kind of fiscal policies. So right, it's like, you know,

417
00:25:43,040 --> 00:25:46,320
Speaker 1: if you were to give Bill Gates a you know,

418
00:25:46,440 --> 00:25:48,840
Speaker 1: one billion dollar tax cut or someone, you know, whatever

419
00:25:48,880 --> 00:25:50,880
Speaker 1: it is, it's probably not gonna too much because Bill

420
00:25:50,880 --> 00:25:53,080
Speaker 1: Gates has more money than he knows what to do with.

421
00:25:53,560 --> 00:25:56,560
Speaker 1: Whereas if you were to put it towards consumption, and

422
00:25:56,640 --> 00:26:00,200
Speaker 1: particularly consuming something that we don't have much capacity and

423
00:26:00,359 --> 00:26:03,000
Speaker 1: like housing or something like that, then you might see

424
00:26:03,040 --> 00:26:07,560
Speaker 1: a real growth or inflationary impact. Or bicycles. I like

425
00:26:07,680 --> 00:26:10,600
Speaker 1: your free bicycle idea, let's do that one. Yeah, I

426
00:26:10,680 --> 00:26:14,560
Speaker 1: support that. One. Other point I think is key and

427
00:26:14,600 --> 00:26:16,720
Speaker 1: that and if you just sort of think to really

428
00:26:16,800 --> 00:26:20,520
Speaker 1: sort of drive at home. In the last year, there

429
00:26:20,560 --> 00:26:22,560
Speaker 1: has been all this questions like all right, we're the

430
00:26:22,640 --> 00:26:26,280
Speaker 1: tax cuts are blowing out the deficit, and people are like, oh,

431
00:26:26,280 --> 00:26:29,600
Speaker 1: who's gonna buy all that debt? And the simple answer

432
00:26:29,720 --> 00:26:31,880
Speaker 1: is like, well, a bunch of people just got tax

433
00:26:31,920 --> 00:26:34,360
Speaker 1: cuts and so they're gonna have a lot more money,

434
00:26:34,400 --> 00:26:36,399
Speaker 1: so we can sort of already know who's gonna buy it.

435
00:26:36,400 --> 00:26:39,120
Speaker 1: It's those people that have more money in their bank account.

436
00:26:39,200 --> 00:26:41,639
Speaker 1: Like it's sort of if you think of this closed

437
00:26:41,640 --> 00:26:45,480
Speaker 1: loop phenomenon, it allows you to sort of anticipate who

438
00:26:45,600 --> 00:26:47,480
Speaker 1: is the new entity that's going to be doing good buying.

439
00:26:48,200 --> 00:26:52,760
Speaker 1: The closed loop strikes again. I like it. All right, Well,

440
00:26:52,800 --> 00:26:55,960
Speaker 1: this has been another edition of the Odd Thoughts podcast.

441
00:26:56,040 --> 00:26:58,800
Speaker 1: I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

442
00:26:58,800 --> 00:27:01,520
Speaker 1: Tracy Alloway, and I'm Joe Wise of Thall. You could

443
00:27:01,520 --> 00:27:04,280
Speaker 1: follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart, and you should

444
00:27:04,320 --> 00:27:06,879
Speaker 1: follow our guest Brian roman Chuck on Twitter at Brian

445
00:27:07,000 --> 00:27:10,280
Speaker 1: roman Chuck, and be sure to follow our producer to

446
00:27:10,480 --> 00:27:14,520
Speaker 1: fur Foreheads at Foreheast as well as the Bloomberg head

447
00:27:14,600 --> 00:27:19,080
Speaker 1: of podcast, Francesca Levy at Francesca Today. Thanks for listening.