WEBVTT - Bankruptcy Wave Has Only Just Begun; Utility Refuge

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Credit Edge, a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>My name is James Crombie. I'm a senior editor at Bloomberg.

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Today's guests are Jeremy Hill, who reports on distressed debt

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:24.959
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News in New York. We're delighted to have

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you on the show.

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Hi, thanks for having me.

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>We're also very pleased to welcome back Jamin Patel, who

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>covers utilities for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Good to join, James.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll be coming back to Jamin shortly. Lost of exciting

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff going on in the utility sector, so do stay

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:42.959
<v Speaker 1>with us. But first, Jeremy Hill, with Bloomberg News, you've

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>been digging deep into distressed debt and bankruptcy. We've had

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the pleasure of working together on that for years. A

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies are running into trouble at the moment,

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>with interest rates rising and the economy slowing, potentially tipping

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>into a recession. Volatility in the financial sector doesn't help.

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Regional banks are struggling, and that means less for the

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>companies that really need it. On top of that, we

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>have a growing anxiety about the debt ceiling. I'd have

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to go back to twenty eleven for the last time

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it's been this fraud. A debt default by the US

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>government would be a huge and potentially catastrophic event for

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the global economy. So, Jeremy, why the big spike in

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcies right now?

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 2>That's a really interesting question, James. I think what's so

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 2>fascinating about this uptick over the weekend is that there

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 2>isn't any one factor that caused it. There wasn't some

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 2>sort of acute influence like in twenty twenty COVID. It

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 2>was something that nobody really saw coming. It was something

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.199
<v Speaker 2>like a rogue wave that just pulled down a bunch

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 2>of companies that were already on the edge, and then

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 2>it receded and things got back to their you know, abnormal.

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 2>But this time, interest rates are just starting to bite

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.559
<v Speaker 2>and it's very organic, and it is while interest rates

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 2>increased relatively quickly, it's just such a fundamental problem for

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 2>anybody that is exposed to floating rate debt.

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So the context, Sorry, just to interrupt this past weekend

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>we're talking mid May. Now. It was the busiest weekend

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>for US bankruptcy filings since when and how many were there?

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 2>There were seven filings between Sunday and Monday, and those

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 2>are seven large I'm doing air quotes filings that we

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 2>define that to be fifty million dollars of debt or more.

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 2>And it's just not something that we have seen in

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 2>the roughly fifteen years that we've at Bloomberg have been

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 2>tracking the data. A really busy couple of days is

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 2>like three or four large bankruptcy filings. So these filings

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 2>were across various sectors. There was some oil, some healthcare.

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 2>There was a fire protection company, a company that makes

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 2>like the smoke detectors and chemicals to put out fires.

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it was really across the spectrum. And the

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 2>only thing that really unites almost all of them is

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 2>that interest rates are higher now and lenders don't have

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:17.119
<v Speaker 2>the patience that they once did.

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>So were they hitting a maturity will that was there

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a trigger in terms of, you know, you have to

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>pay this debt by the weekend and if you don't,

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 1>you go bust? I mean, what what what happened there?

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 2>In the case of Envision, that was in Vision Healthcare

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 2>is a KKR backed company that does physician staffing. Mostly

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:39.279
<v Speaker 2>they like provide doctors for medical practices, is my understanding.

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>They they had some sort of debt payment that they

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 2>needed to make recently, but that wasn't like all of

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the It's not that like all of these companies were

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>running into imminent maturities. It is more so that these

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 2>are companies that were kind of struggling, had been for

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 2>a long time, really didn't have any hope of repaying

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>their debt load. And now that the economy is not

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 2>so great and interest rates are higher, lenders are not

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 2>taking the time to be like, let's try to work

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 2>out a deal or extend the runway a little bit more,

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 2>see if we can find a way to turn it around.

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 2>It's more just like game over, guys, it's time to

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 2>move on.

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And none of these names was surprised to us, right,

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>We've been tracking a lot of these situations for a

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>long time. I think all of these have been on

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>our calendar.

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean there were a couple that we didn't

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 2>that we didn't see coming, the fire protection company, and

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 2>there was a small biopharma company that makes cancer therapies

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 2>that weren't necessarily on the radar, but mostly they were.

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, these are the other companies. Some people might

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 2>call them zombies. Maybe it's an overused term. But these

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 2>were companies that I mean, the writing has been on

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 2>the wall for a long time. They just had so

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 2>much debt and it was difficult to see them ever

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 2>being able to pay that off. The question was just

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 2>when will time be up?

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>So they've been just kept alive by this you know,

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>flood of cheat money that we've seen over the last

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>ten years, and that finally ended, so they died. Is

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that right?

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely? I mean, if you're a lender to one of

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 2>these companies and even you know that they're not going

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 2>to be able to fully repay this stet load, but

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 2>interest rates are super low and you need yield, and

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to be dealing with it with a default,

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 2>with a bankruptcy. Why not come with some really creative

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 2>way to extend the runway. It's a it's a lottery ticket,

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 2>it's it's it's a chance. But interest rates are higher,

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 2>you can get yield elsewhere. Now it's time to move on.

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's not just a flash in the pan for

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:47.679
<v Speaker 1>this year. Right, This year has also been very busy

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for bankruptcies. How does that stuck up us his history?

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's already quite busy. I mean, the numbers, the

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 2>precise numbers are escaping me in terms of the level

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 2>of filings, but I can tell you about the pace

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 2>relative to the historical levels. We're having about the busiest

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 2>year for large bankruptcies that we have seen since two

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 2>thousand and nine. Two thousand and nine wasn't a very

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 2>happy time, so it's a little bit dark. But I

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 2>will say this, we're still nowhere close to that two

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 2>thousand and nine pace. It's usually it changes week to week,

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.799
<v Speaker 2>but it's usually about half as busy as two thousand

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 2>and nine and just about as busy as twenty twenty.

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 2>They sort of change places sometimes, but it only seems

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 2>to be getting busier. We're seeing more and more filings.

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's as bad as the twenty twenty shutdown of

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the entire global economy, which really did throw a lot

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of companies against the wall.

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's exactly right. But as I said earlier, this

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 2>time it's a it's more organic. It's not some wild

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 2>rogue wave that was caused by, you know, a fatal virus.

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 2>This is simply money is more more expensive now, the

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 2>economy is a little rickety.

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>So neither of those things seem like they're going to

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>change anytime soon. If anything, rates probably stay higher for longer.

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>The economy is not in great shape. Does that mean

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>this trend continues? Does it get worse from here?

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 2>For sure? I mean I haven't I haven't spoken to

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 2>anyone recently who is under the impression that this building

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 2>distress is just going to disappear. I mean your default forecasts, Ferry.

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Some people are extremely bearish, think that there are going

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 2>to be tons and tons of filings, it's going to

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 2>be a big tsunami. Other people are more conservative, but

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 2>the general consensus is up more defaults, more bankruptcies.

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And what does this say about the broad state of

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>credit markets? I mean, we've been talking for a long

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>time about a credit crunch, the easy money era being over,

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and as we've said, companies have too much debt. Is

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>this really the beginning of the end.

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 2>If you're a low quality borrower, you're going to have

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 2>a hard time refinancing your opplique or getting reasonably priced debt.

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 2>It is as simple as that. And there are a

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of low quality borrowers out there, so I would

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 2>say that's that is the biggest takeaway so far.

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Is it isolated to a particular sector? You know, last

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>time around, we saw a big retail crunch. We've seen

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>energy get hit pretty hard in the past, but is

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, healthcare is also kind of undistressed. But are

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>there any sectors that really stand out?

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, retail, We've seen a couple of retailers run

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 2>into trouble this year, but a lot of the crummy

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 2>retailers were shaken out in twenty twenty years before. Healthcare

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 2>is a sector that comes up a lot because wages

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 2>have been a big problem broadly in the healthcare space.

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 2>So if those don't come down soon, you're going to

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 2>see more trouble in that area. And of course, real estate,

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 2>especially commercial real estate, just tons of debt and offices

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 2>are not filling up the way that they need to

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 2>to support those debt levels. So healthcare cri that they're

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 2>coming up a lot.

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:12.439
<v Speaker 1>The word you use in your piece is zombies. That's

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>an interesting concept. I mean, these companies, you know, they're

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of living dead. They're sort of stumbling through with

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, cheap money keeping them alive, but there is

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>no reason for them to live. I mean, we may

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>have an emotional attachments to companies like bed Bath and

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>Beyond and Radio Chat for various reasons. And obviously there's

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a loss of jobs and there's a big impact on communities.

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know, in you know, harsh, you know there

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 1>capitalistic terms, do we really care about their demise?

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is really interesting to me. I was speaking

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:47.959
<v Speaker 2>with Ed Altman, who is a pretty famous finance professor

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 2>at NYU. He invented something called the Z score. It's

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 2>a default prediction metric, and I asked him. We were

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 2>talking about repeat bankruptcies, so called Chapter twenty two's, and

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 2>I asked him, like, why does it matter if companies

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 2>keep failing over and over again? Like who cares? The

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.719
<v Speaker 2>people stay employed and you know, we get to keep

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 2>going to some some retailer that we like. And his

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 2>take on that was, this is money and time and

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 2>energy that could be put into more productive endeavors. That's

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 2>why it matters. I thought it was fascinating. I haven't

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 2>thought about it like that. So these these are these

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of zombie companies that maybe don't really have a

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 2>reason to exist. The people that are taking care of

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 2>these firms and employed by them, it'll be painful for

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 2>them to disappear or shrink substantially, but it may be

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 2>more productive overall to shift those resources that are propping

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 2>up something that just shouldn't be alive in its current

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 2>form and moving them into some other area of the economy.

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>So short term pain, but maybe long term game for

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the US economy. But you mentioned repeat bankruptcies. I mean,

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>as we call them chapter twenty twos, that just seems

0:10:58.280 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 1>like a waste of time. I mean, you know, is

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the bankruptcy system really working in this country?

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Such a good question. Yeah, I mean, we have seen

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 2>more chapter twenty twos again, in line with the general

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 2>rise in bankruptcies, more chapter twenty twos this year than

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 2>we've seen since two thousand and nine. And what does

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 2>it say about the bankruptcy system. I mean, it's a

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 2>little bit embarrassing because in the US, restructuring plans aren't

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 2>supposed to get approved by a federal judge unless there's

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 2>some specific language. But the general idea is that you

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 2>need to not go bankrupt again. It needs to be

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 2>pretty clear that this plan is going to fix the

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 2>company's problems, because the bankruptcy court can do all kinds

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 2>of things that you can't get anywhere else. You can

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 2>just reject leases, you can force people to accept less

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 2>than their owne all in the name of restructuring a company.

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 2>So it's not great. It doesn't mean the bankruptcy system

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 2>is broken. But seeing an uptick in repeat filers is

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 2>it's it's ugly. You don't love it.

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>It's supposed to be the best system in the world.

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's that's an interesting statement. But before we

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to jam and platel Boomberg Intelligence, what's the next

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>big story to watch on your beat? Jeremy, what else

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>do we need to worry about?

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 2>What is the next big story? That's a hard one

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 2>to answer, James, because all of a sudden, we've gotten

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 2>so busy that I feel like I'm treading water. This

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 2>is this is the thing that we have been waiting for.

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 2>It's it's it's felt like when are rate's going to

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 2>go up? And what is that going to mean? And

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of out of nowhere here it seems like the

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 2>mood has just flipped and there are lots of companies

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 2>that are that are on the cusp. Lenders are organizing

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 2>all the time and they're concerned about their debt holdings.

0:12:56.520 --> 0:13:00.319
<v Speaker 2>So the big story is, uh, stay glued to your

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 2>terminals at Bloomberg dot com because there are many more

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 2>markruptcies to come.

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Great stuff. Jeremy Hill from Bloomberg News, thanks so much

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Do as Jeremy said, read all of

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>his scoops on the Bloomberg terminal and of course at

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. Moving on to another big topic. As

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier, we are very fortunate to have with

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 1>us Jamin Patel, who looks at utilities for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>What's going on with utilities?

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 3>Jam in?

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Tons of bad news out there is Jeremy's just outlined

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>for us. Shouldn't we just be taking all our cash

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and keeping it in a mattress right now, or at

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:31.719
<v Speaker 1>very least in an easy access saving his account with

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a five percent yield? I mean, why should we be

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at utilities?

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, that easy access account may give you a five

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 3>percent yield, but how long is they're going to give

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 3>you that for? Right? If reads start coming down and

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm not calling for indecline anytime soon, but if they do,

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 3>then you want to start looking at something that you

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 3>can tie your money up in for a little bit longer.

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 3>And that's why utilally bond. A lot of people would

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 3>say utili stocks too, but we'll talk about the differences

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 3>between those two. It's interesting that, you know, we started

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 3>this off talking about bankruptcies, because bankruptcies in the utility

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 3>sector and one of the reasons why the sector, at

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 3>least at the operating utilities level, is considered a refuge

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 3>during times of turmoil. We've had very few bankruptcies. They've

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 3>always been related to something very specific going on as

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 3>opposed to what happens with the sector as a whole.

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 3>In fact, I beyond the pg and E bankruptcies which

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 3>we're all familiar with, I can only remember in the

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 3>thirty years I've covered this sector Public Service in New

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Hampshire and Texas New Mexico Power, and in both those cases,

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 3>bondholders came out whole, and the same with PGEN. In fact,

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 3>with PGNE, bondholders weren't secured at the utility level and

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 3>they came out secure.

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Other than those companies. Just my, what what are we

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about in utilities? Because it does cover a huge

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>range of companies, right it does?

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 3>It does? You've got you know, over over one hundred

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 3>different utilities around the country. Uh, most of them are

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 3>fall on the investor owned utility sector. And then you've

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 3>you've got the you've got the holding companies. Now, if

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 3>you're down at the operating utility level, imagine you know,

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 3>you're in a situation where you have a monopoly in

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 3>your service territory. Your rates, the rates that you charge

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 3>your customers, and therefore your revenues and your earning stream

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 3>based on a return on equity is almost guaranteed, regardless

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 3>of what the usage is, what weather impact there is,

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 3>and so on. Uh. In the event of a crisis,

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 3>as we saw with Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, we've

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 3>seen with fpn L in Florida, we saw in Houston

0:15:55.040 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 3>with CNP, if your assets are destroyed or or very

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 3>heavily damaged, you have the right to have an adjustment

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 3>made your rates to cover those costs over a period

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 3>of time. UH. And you can go out and issue

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 3>debt in the meanwhile, right, So you had you know,

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 3>PGIN was very much a one off sort of case

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 3>in my opinion. But you've got the situation where at

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 3>the operating utility level, you've almost got a quasi treasury

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 3>type of bond.

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So as you say there are a refuge, we are

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>saying great economic financial turmoil right now. So in terms

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the utility picks. You know, what what

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>do you where do you look in terms of like

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>what types of utilities? You know, where do you look?

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>What's what's the best place to be in right now?

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So with that safety comes a price, and that's

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 3>generally lower yels, right as you would expect. And at

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 3>the operating utility level you've got, you know, you've got

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 3>a fair narrow range depending upon the maturity that you're

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 3>looking at a narrow range of bond spreads. So the

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 3>real interest tends to come in and the real credit

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 3>risk tends to come in at the parent level, right

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 3>because the parent itself is not regulated. It's reliant on

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 3>dividends coming up from the utilities to service both the

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 3>shareholder dividend as well as to service its own debt. Now,

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 3>if you have a parent with what just one utility,

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 3>clearly that's that's a high risk situation, right. So and

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 3>that's what we had with PG and E. What investors

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 3>see with Edison International. If you if PGN owned more

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 3>than one utility, the parent may not have had quite

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 3>the same problems that it did. But in this case,

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 3>the parent filed for bankruptcy. So what we look for

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 3>our companies that have multiple diverse utilities operating across multiple jurisdictions,

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Companies like Excellent Duke Energy, American Electric Power, and so on.

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 3>These these are companies that do rely on the dividends

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 3>coming up to the parent to service their debt. But

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:08.719
<v Speaker 3>in the event that you have a situation at one

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 3>particular utility, you still have cash flows coming up from

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 3>the others.

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>So you're looking essentially for diversification.

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, across jurisdictions as well as geographies.

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but you mentioned there are credit risks. Are you

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>concerned about liquidity or access to capital markets there?

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Certainly not at the operating utility level. At the parent level,

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 3>one of the concerns we've seen is that as we've

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 3>enter this period of high growth, largely driven by renewables

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 3>and perhaps accelerated by the Inflation Reduction Act, there's been

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.959
<v Speaker 3>a significant amount of capex projected and actual down at

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 3>the utility level. Now, that comes with borrowing. Right now,

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 3>if you think of traditional utility, the way they've financed

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.959
<v Speaker 3>their capex and investments is approximately fifty percent debt and

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent equity. Now that equity comes from retain cash flow.

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Right If the capex is higher than you expect. Where

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 3>is that additional equity going to come in from. We've

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 3>seen in many instances it's a reduction in dividends that

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 3>would go up to the parent, and we've actually seen

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 3>equity coming down from the parent level. Right So where

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 3>does the parent get that cash? Utilally generally don't issue equity.

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:28.479
<v Speaker 3>They tend to be very e retician to do that.

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Although we've seen a little bit of convertible equity being

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 3>picking up a little bit here, but they don't buy

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 3>that back there stocks either. They just don't have the

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 3>cash flow to do that. So what we've been seeing

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 3>is an increasing level of parent debt and that raises

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a concern. Right now, where does

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 3>that concern come in? It's if you're looking at purely statistics,

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 3>credit statistics and regular metrics like leverage and debt service

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 3>and so on, yes, then it's a little bit of

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 3>a concern. But we did we did a little bit

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 3>of a study recently where we looked at across the

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 3>entire sector. We looked at the book equity of the

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 3>operating utilities, took a multiple of that based upon where

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 3>these have traded or sold or where pieces of them

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 3>have sold recently, which was about a two times multiple.

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 3>That gave us almost a trillion dollars of equity. Potential

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 3>equity that can be released and released not in the

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 3>sense that the utility would have to go in and

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 3>the parent would have to go in and sell that utility.

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 3>They're able to monetize pieces of this and we've seen

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 3>that happening with First Energy Douke Energy recently where they've

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 3>sold pieces of their subsidiaries uh to to pay down

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 3>debt at the parent level.

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 1>And listeners can get that. So they they look up

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 1>your bio on the terminal, can they change?

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Yes, it's in. It's in something that I called

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 3>over nine hundred billion equity value could drive utilities firepower.

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well look that up, thank you. The other big

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.479
<v Speaker 1>concern right now is rising interest rates. How does that

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>affect utilities in comparison to other sectors.

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 3>So, because utilities are regulated and all of their costs

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 3>or most of their costs based upon how the regulators

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 3>view them and whether they approve them or not, are

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 3>passed through, right, So if you've got any short term

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 3>debt that's floating, you can apply for that to be

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 3>passed through as an increation rate. Most of their death though,

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 3>is fixed. Right. Utilities are very very big borrowers, but

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 3>they tend to and they are able to borrow for

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 3>thirty year bonds. So a lot of their debt, at

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 3>least at the operating level, is thirty year bonds. So

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 3>in the immediate term they are perhaps more protected from

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 3>higher interest rates than pretty much any other sector.

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 1>But on the flip side, if you're a holder, you've

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>been hit pretty hard on the duration.

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Right, yes, But then that's you know, pretty much any sector,

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 3>right if you're going to own a twenty or thirty

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 3>year moond in technology or banks or where have you.

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 3>So that's the choice pot hold the right and the

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 3>risks that they run pretty much in any sector.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 1>So if you're looking at just sort of you know,

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the big picture now as we're heading into potentially a recession,

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, potentially stagflation, there's all sorts of other big

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>risks out there. Is the utility sector a hedge against this?

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it something that you can just you know, protect

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>your your returns with and clip the coup? I mean,

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>how do you how do you envisage it as a

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>big part of a credit portfolio.

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I don't know if I would call it

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 3>a hedge, but I would I would say that if

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 3>you want to look at increasing your waiting to protect

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 3>your portfolio from volatility, then that's something that you may

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:59.959
<v Speaker 3>want to consider, right. You know, Perhaps the biggest risk

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 3>that we've got here, other than what I talked about

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 3>at the holding company, is that as you go through inflation,

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 3>customers are being hit on multiple fronts, right, and less

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 3>able to afford increases in the utility bills. Now, if

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 3>you go back several years when natural gas prices was

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 3>seven eight nine dollars in mcf, and then we saw

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 3>that decline coming down to two three dollars, it was

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 3>very easy, or I should say much easier for regulators

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 3>to allow increase in rates for the energy component excuse

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 3>me for the delivery component of a utility bill, because

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 3>the energy portion was coming down, so customer bills weren't

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 3>actually going up, right. And then, of course, as we

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 3>saw natural gas prices rally through the last year, that

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 3>became much more difficult. Now, regulators usually loath to give

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 3>rate increases that are in excess of inflation. So with

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 3>inflation being as high as it is that gives them

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more room. Gas prices having come down

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 3>again gives them a little bit more room for their

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 3>transmission distribution. But if you start tee natural gas prices

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 3>and power prices escalate from here for whatever reason, then

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 3>rate increases may become a little bit more contentious.

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>And on the consumer side, no matter how how they

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 1>get hit by inflation. Mean, you can easily dispense with

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>eating out and buying luxury goods, but you have to

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>pay your utility bills. You need the heat and light.

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Right absolutely, and if you can't afford them, that's one

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, this is one sector where low income families

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 3>can get help from the state.

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Right before we sign off, Jamie, I wanted to ask

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 1>you about ESG because it is such a big topic

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 1>for investors, and you know, some of these companies aren't

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the cleanest, there are some issues. You know, How does

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>how does this fit with an ESG credit portfolio?

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think I think it fits in very well

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 3>because utilities are the biggest issues of green bonds in

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 3>the in the country as as a sector. If you

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 3>go back, I want to say maybe ten or fifteen years,

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 3>coal accounted for fifty percent of the fuel used for

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 3>generation that is now more a percentage that applies to

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 3>natural gas, and you've seen solar and wind pick up significantly,

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 3>So you know, we many of these companies have committed

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 3>to zero carbon, depending on the time period that's involved.

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:28.679
<v Speaker 3>The government is completely behind them. Nuclear is becoming a

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 3>bigger factor, a bigger factor from the standpoint. It's not

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 3>going to decline to the extent that we thought it

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 3>was maybe just a decade ago, because it's recognized as

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 3>a clean fuel.

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much, Jamon Patel of Bloomberg Intelligence. You can

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>read all of his great analysis on the Bloomberg Terminal.

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Do check it out, and thanks again to Jeremy Hill

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg News. Read all of his scoops on the

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>terminal and at Bloomberg dot Com. I'm James Crombie. It's

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.199
<v Speaker 1>been a pleasure having you. See you next week on

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>the Credit Edge.