1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:03,520 Speaker 1: Let's get to our guest now, and it is William Lee, 2 00:00:03,600 --> 00:00:08,479 Speaker 1: chief economist at Milken Institute. So Bill, thanks very much 3 00:00:08,520 --> 00:00:11,119 Speaker 1: for joining us. The hawkish line again, was that very 4 00:00:11,160 --> 00:00:15,480 Speaker 1: premature to be thinking about pausing and likely higher terminal rate. 5 00:00:15,960 --> 00:00:19,280 Speaker 1: The devish line might have been the Fed taking into 6 00:00:19,320 --> 00:00:24,040 Speaker 1: account the cumulative tightening and the lag effect. So today 7 00:00:24,040 --> 00:00:27,319 Speaker 1: the market seized on the former and sold down. But 8 00:00:27,400 --> 00:00:30,640 Speaker 1: I wonder whether or not the cumulative tightening is actually 9 00:00:30,680 --> 00:00:35,400 Speaker 1: the newer news and whether that might be the enduring 10 00:00:35,440 --> 00:00:39,600 Speaker 1: read going forward. Well, Brian, I think today's is a 11 00:00:39,600 --> 00:00:42,640 Speaker 1: good lesson in FED speak, how it is that we 12 00:00:42,800 --> 00:00:44,920 Speaker 1: the market should be listening to the Fed. It seems 13 00:00:44,920 --> 00:00:47,640 Speaker 1: as though every press conference the markets are looking for 14 00:00:47,880 --> 00:00:50,000 Speaker 1: some clue that there's going to be a pivot, and 15 00:00:50,040 --> 00:00:53,560 Speaker 1: the FED chorus instruction hole has been consistent, we will 16 00:00:53,640 --> 00:00:57,560 Speaker 1: not be deterred from our path towards two percent. We're 17 00:00:57,600 --> 00:01:00,320 Speaker 1: going to keep rates going up. So the questions were really, 18 00:01:00,520 --> 00:01:02,800 Speaker 1: how fast you're gonna do it? Well, right now, schu 19 00:01:02,920 --> 00:01:05,400 Speaker 1: Poll has told the markets, don't worry about how fast 20 00:01:05,440 --> 00:01:08,399 Speaker 1: we're doing it in a pretty quick manner. Worry now 21 00:01:08,440 --> 00:01:10,720 Speaker 1: about how high and how long we're going to keep 22 00:01:10,720 --> 00:01:13,399 Speaker 1: it there. So I think that the press conference today 23 00:01:13,400 --> 00:01:16,200 Speaker 1: has been really a remarkable press conference is trying to 24 00:01:16,240 --> 00:01:19,479 Speaker 1: shift the discussion away from how fast to how long 25 00:01:19,600 --> 00:01:22,199 Speaker 1: and how high? And I think that's the relevant question 26 00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:24,800 Speaker 1: to be asked for. And Bill, I mean, you will 27 00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:26,759 Speaker 1: have to see some evidence, and they have to wait 28 00:01:26,800 --> 00:01:30,480 Speaker 1: for them because the data dependent. As they say, can 29 00:01:30,520 --> 00:01:34,080 Speaker 1: you see any material difference so far? Because even because 30 00:01:34,080 --> 00:01:36,320 Speaker 1: of the lag effect of cause, have you seen any 31 00:01:36,560 --> 00:01:39,960 Speaker 1: difference to the economy and inflation on the constitution parts 32 00:01:40,040 --> 00:01:43,319 Speaker 1: from what they've done? That's far well, Richard, that's really 33 00:01:43,360 --> 00:01:46,640 Speaker 1: the key question that I'm glad you asked that. On inflation, 34 00:01:46,920 --> 00:01:49,200 Speaker 1: absolutely no sign at all, right, I mean, it seems 35 00:01:49,240 --> 00:01:53,160 Speaker 1: like core inflation, which is what really matters for the FED, 36 00:01:53,920 --> 00:01:57,080 Speaker 1: persistently higher and higher every time we get a new release. 37 00:01:57,240 --> 00:01:59,520 Speaker 1: In fact, it's so much higher that people are surprised 38 00:01:59,720 --> 00:02:01,680 Speaker 1: that it gets the high. But then when you look 39 00:02:01,680 --> 00:02:04,840 Speaker 1: at the real economy, the housing sector has clearly been crushed. 40 00:02:05,480 --> 00:02:08,240 Speaker 1: The consumers now, even though people say they're very strong, 41 00:02:08,680 --> 00:02:11,880 Speaker 1: it's the weakest part of the GDP release. Uh. In fact, 42 00:02:11,880 --> 00:02:14,880 Speaker 1: GDP would have been zero or negative if it weren't 43 00:02:14,919 --> 00:02:17,760 Speaker 1: for net exports and inventories. So so I think the 44 00:02:17,800 --> 00:02:20,400 Speaker 1: signs are there that the economy is slowing down, but 45 00:02:20,560 --> 00:02:23,400 Speaker 1: it's not there in terms of the labor market. And 46 00:02:23,639 --> 00:02:26,600 Speaker 1: that's where Paul comes back and says, the labor market 47 00:02:26,639 --> 00:02:29,440 Speaker 1: is very strong. We are still creating jobs at too 48 00:02:29,480 --> 00:02:33,120 Speaker 1: fast pace, and we are worried that wages will start 49 00:02:33,160 --> 00:02:36,240 Speaker 1: to get to entrenched. The idea that we're gonna have 50 00:02:36,280 --> 00:02:38,720 Speaker 1: to deal with inflation and wage demands. You can start 51 00:02:38,800 --> 00:02:42,839 Speaker 1: rising right now. Wages the rising about five and that's okay, 52 00:02:43,200 --> 00:02:47,400 Speaker 1: if we can maintain inflation go back to say two percent. 53 00:02:47,800 --> 00:02:50,160 Speaker 1: But once the way to start to pick up again, 54 00:02:50,480 --> 00:02:54,240 Speaker 1: that's the danger. Bill. If there's something out there at 55 00:02:54,240 --> 00:02:57,720 Speaker 1: the moment which really bothers you with the regards to 56 00:02:57,760 --> 00:02:59,760 Speaker 1: that what the j PAL is doing and whould I 57 00:02:59,760 --> 00:03:03,000 Speaker 1: said FMC is doing with interest rates, And I'm not 58 00:03:03,000 --> 00:03:06,520 Speaker 1: talking about the immediate effects, but something that perhaps is 59 00:03:06,560 --> 00:03:10,440 Speaker 1: an unintended consequence. I think one of the things that 60 00:03:10,480 --> 00:03:13,800 Speaker 1: the Fed hasn't taken into account enough are the consequences 61 00:03:13,800 --> 00:03:16,560 Speaker 1: of their type policy on the dollar and the dollars 62 00:03:16,560 --> 00:03:19,120 Speaker 1: effect on the rest of the world. I think the 63 00:03:19,160 --> 00:03:21,240 Speaker 1: traditional line from the FED, and even when I was 64 00:03:21,280 --> 00:03:24,400 Speaker 1: there as a staffer. The FED is the US central bank. 65 00:03:24,639 --> 00:03:27,320 Speaker 1: We will conduct monstort policy according to the needs of 66 00:03:27,360 --> 00:03:30,160 Speaker 1: the United States, which means full employment and price stability 67 00:03:30,240 --> 00:03:33,360 Speaker 1: in the United States full stop. But we are aware 68 00:03:33,400 --> 00:03:36,160 Speaker 1: that where where we have a global effects, and we 69 00:03:36,200 --> 00:03:39,040 Speaker 1: will try to take that into account and minimize it's 70 00:03:39,160 --> 00:03:44,040 Speaker 1: uh it's still over uh effects. But right now I 71 00:03:44,080 --> 00:03:47,800 Speaker 1: think the Chair has said very clearly we are good 72 00:03:47,840 --> 00:03:50,560 Speaker 1: in our program of getting ahead of inflation faster than 73 00:03:50,640 --> 00:03:53,920 Speaker 1: other central banks, and because of that, at thestrangthening dollar, 74 00:03:54,120 --> 00:03:56,240 Speaker 1: and when everyone else catches up with us, the dollar 75 00:03:56,320 --> 00:03:58,800 Speaker 1: will bry itself. I think that the attitude is something 76 00:03:58,840 --> 00:04:02,920 Speaker 1: that is dangerous because the quantity of tightening and the 77 00:04:03,000 --> 00:04:06,080 Speaker 1: rate increases is to probably the world of liquidity, and 78 00:04:06,120 --> 00:04:08,400 Speaker 1: the world right now is desperate for liquidity as we 79 00:04:08,560 --> 00:04:11,840 Speaker 1: are seas and cruts in financial markets all of the world, 80 00:04:11,840 --> 00:04:16,159 Speaker 1: including even the United Kingdom. He acknowledged all the impact 81 00:04:16,520 --> 00:04:19,520 Speaker 1: of it, but he had this overarching defense, which is 82 00:04:19,920 --> 00:04:22,839 Speaker 1: it would be much worse for the global economy if 83 00:04:23,120 --> 00:04:26,160 Speaker 1: we don't get a handle on inflation in the United States. 84 00:04:26,160 --> 00:04:28,640 Speaker 1: So that is a sort of job one but you 85 00:04:28,680 --> 00:04:31,360 Speaker 1: know when you look at rates moving up like this bill, 86 00:04:31,400 --> 00:04:33,560 Speaker 1: and you know, the bulls don't like it, and there 87 00:04:33,600 --> 00:04:36,279 Speaker 1: are people that are very worried about the impact and all, 88 00:04:36,320 --> 00:04:40,240 Speaker 1: but uh, those bulls that are hoping for you know, 89 00:04:40,279 --> 00:04:43,680 Speaker 1: going back to so called normal low rates, low growth, 90 00:04:43,720 --> 00:04:47,240 Speaker 1: low inflation. Uh, that trend actually forced a lot of people, 91 00:04:47,400 --> 00:04:51,720 Speaker 1: investors and and savers way out the risk curve and 92 00:04:51,920 --> 00:04:55,440 Speaker 1: incentivized leverage. Isn't it better? And isn't it easy to 93 00:04:55,480 --> 00:04:57,760 Speaker 1: argue that a new regime of interest rates three to 94 00:04:57,880 --> 00:05:02,000 Speaker 1: five is really healthier over wrong? Oh, Brian, that that's 95 00:05:02,040 --> 00:05:05,240 Speaker 1: absolutely you hit it right on the head. Uh. The 96 00:05:05,240 --> 00:05:08,599 Speaker 1: the abnormality was zero rates because when when rasor zero 97 00:05:08,920 --> 00:05:11,960 Speaker 1: and investment managers trying to decide what projects should invest in, 98 00:05:12,200 --> 00:05:14,479 Speaker 1: every cat and dog investment looks good, and so you 99 00:05:14,520 --> 00:05:17,520 Speaker 1: really have a severe misallocation of capital when when the 100 00:05:17,600 --> 00:05:20,440 Speaker 1: race are at zero, we really need a more normalized rate. 101 00:05:20,480 --> 00:05:23,280 Speaker 1: That's that really measures the value of money and the 102 00:05:23,360 --> 00:05:26,600 Speaker 1: value of time. How much do I delay consumption in 103 00:05:26,680 --> 00:05:28,880 Speaker 1: order to invest in something? And that that really is 104 00:05:28,880 --> 00:05:32,159 Speaker 1: a key element to the efficient allocation of capital, which 105 00:05:32,320 --> 00:05:36,159 Speaker 1: which the global economy has benefited from. For the last 106 00:05:36,160 --> 00:05:39,600 Speaker 1: several decades. When race are distorted, we get distorted investments, 107 00:05:39,680 --> 00:05:41,400 Speaker 1: and you get all sorts of cats and dogs being 108 00:05:41,400 --> 00:05:44,880 Speaker 1: approved when they shouldn't be. Bill that systems. You know, 109 00:05:44,960 --> 00:05:46,680 Speaker 1: look who are talking about the world and look at 110 00:05:46,760 --> 00:05:48,760 Speaker 1: the world second biggest economy, and it doesn't have an 111 00:05:48,800 --> 00:05:52,360 Speaker 1: inflation problem, but it has an economic growth problem, that's 112 00:05:52,360 --> 00:05:56,159 Speaker 1: what they'd say. And this has also unintended consequences are 113 00:05:56,320 --> 00:05:59,920 Speaker 1: very intended ones because they've of course you seek refuge 114 00:06:00,040 --> 00:06:04,560 Speaker 1: in foreign policy sometimes. Well rich China has escaped the 115 00:06:04,600 --> 00:06:07,760 Speaker 1: inflation in part because they have control prices UH and 116 00:06:07,760 --> 00:06:12,240 Speaker 1: and it's essentially a transfer from producers to consumers and 117 00:06:12,240 --> 00:06:15,200 Speaker 1: and that's and from the government to consumers to try 118 00:06:15,240 --> 00:06:17,880 Speaker 1: to subsidize the lower prices. I think one of the 119 00:06:17,880 --> 00:06:20,640 Speaker 1: things that we learned from this part of Congress is 120 00:06:20,680 --> 00:06:23,760 Speaker 1: that the new government is going to be very clear 121 00:06:23,800 --> 00:06:27,720 Speaker 1: about who's welcome into China. UH. Investors who will help 122 00:06:27,960 --> 00:06:31,640 Speaker 1: develop national champions will be welcome. Investors that will help 123 00:06:31,640 --> 00:06:34,719 Speaker 1: develop investe marketably welcome. But if if you come into 124 00:06:34,760 --> 00:06:36,760 Speaker 1: just exploit our markets the way you have in the 125 00:06:36,760 --> 00:06:40,159 Speaker 1: past hundreds of years, stay out. I think that message 126 00:06:40,200 --> 00:06:44,400 Speaker 1: is very clear. Yeah. Yeah. Powell had some interesting comments 127 00:06:44,400 --> 00:06:47,200 Speaker 1: about the lag that it could be shorter than earlier thought. 128 00:06:47,640 --> 00:06:49,279 Speaker 1: He said that it used to be the FED would 129 00:06:49,360 --> 00:06:52,760 Speaker 1: raise the funds, ray the financial system would absorb it. 130 00:06:52,760 --> 00:06:55,640 Speaker 1: It would then hit the economy and then hit inflation. 131 00:06:56,120 --> 00:06:58,040 Speaker 1: But he said now in the last twenty five years, 132 00:06:58,520 --> 00:07:01,560 Speaker 1: the market moves so far for the FED that that 133 00:07:01,640 --> 00:07:04,000 Speaker 1: might be speeding up the overall impact. What's the main 134 00:07:04,040 --> 00:07:07,119 Speaker 1: takeaway from that. I'm so glad you mentioned that, because 135 00:07:07,200 --> 00:07:09,400 Speaker 1: that is the new lesson of Montreal policy that people 136 00:07:09,400 --> 00:07:11,760 Speaker 1: have got to learn. Markets have got to realize that 137 00:07:11,960 --> 00:07:15,280 Speaker 1: the old version of Milton Friedman's long and burnbal life 138 00:07:15,320 --> 00:07:17,680 Speaker 1: it takes two to eight months. As well. We now 139 00:07:17,760 --> 00:07:22,640 Speaker 1: have much fast French markets. The lives are very short. Cool. 140 00:07:22,720 --> 00:07:25,080 Speaker 1: You summ that up nicely. Thanks very much. Bill. We 141 00:07:25,120 --> 00:07:28,280 Speaker 1: gotta go, Unfortunately, we should. We should get you for 142 00:07:28,320 --> 00:07:30,880 Speaker 1: the whole hour, and we'll have to try to do 143 00:07:30,960 --> 00:07:34,440 Speaker 1: that sometime. William Lee, chief economist at the Milken Institute. 144 00:07:34,480 --> 00:07:36,960 Speaker 1: I'm Brian Curtis along with her Shad salan It. This 145 00:07:37,080 --> 00:07:37,640 Speaker 1: is Bloomberg