WEBVTT - Week 7 Start & Sit, Who To Bench and TNF Recap

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. You're

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy best Friends Forever.

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>M Do to to Do? Did to do? Do? Do

0:00:54.320 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do? Do? Don too? Yeah? Oh, this is

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy best Friends Forever here on the Fantasy Sports

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Right Network. Onside Franky Snaville, I am Greg, so I

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>was gonna thank you so much for joining us. If

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you're watching live on you Super of course on the

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Pursuit Network. We appreciate you checking us in and always

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>listening on our podcasts and on the radio. What's going on?

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Reggae Reggy, It's crazy, it's already week seven. Every single

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>year we say the same thing. It just feels like

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the NFL season is flying by. Does it started yesterday?

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>We're almost at the halfway point. Ready basically through the

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>halfway point of the regular season. Crazy purposes. Absolutely, it's

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it's unbelievable. Week seven, uh is upon us here and

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you know it's great. The year he was probably get old, man.

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>This this is how we get old. That's how you

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>get old. You what do you You don't think you age?

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I proved that last week when I went out to

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>play some some two hand touched football. I was banged

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>up for like the next three days. Yeah, they're getting

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>gray in that beard? Is that? Is that? What it? No?

0:01:58.240 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I mean you could come inspect

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it if you'd like. I'm good. I don't think. I

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think I have any great anywhere yet. Do you

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>see anything? Yeah? I don't. I honestly have a lot

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 1>of red hairs. Might be really like Floria. I apparently

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of Irish in me. Interesting. I don't

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>know my fa My whole family did the twenty three

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and me thing except for me, And we found out

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that because I don't want to waste money on that. Um,

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>we found out that we're not Italian. Our whole lives.

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>We thought we were like a Coda Italiana, no Italian anywhere.

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 1>Lots of Irish, lots of German, lots of like European

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>random stuff like Slovakian, um, Hungarian, but yeah, a lot

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of German, Irish, no Italian, though still

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>love Italian food. I'm gonna continue posta. I'm gonna we're

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>going over our lunches today. And Frank's like, I was, like,

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.959
<v Speaker 1>I've written this suspinage salad with spinach and chicken and

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes and pepper, way too much green, way too much.

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>It's very green, and Frank's like the chicken part. And

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Frank's like, in I have a vague sitient saucage and like,

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>h I canna be sneaking around at are trying to

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 1>steal my food? I might, you might go to the

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>bathroom and it's all gone. All right on the show tonight,

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot to get to you. When it comes to

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>week seven, what I end look kind of like we

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>did last week. Frankie going by the game by game

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 1>and the kind of stuff that really interested us, and

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the best way to cover the most.

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>There's so many games and there's only so little time

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to get to it. So let's begin um with New

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Orleans because New Orleans is an underdog in Baltimore this week,

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the two and a half point dogs, and they're without

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Ted Gain, who's placed on the I r um a

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 1>couple of days ago. So Gain is on I r

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>which means tray Kuan Smith is now the starter if

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>he's out there. How important is it to grab tray

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Kuan Smith. I don't know that he ranks higher than

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the wide receivers that we spoke about this week in

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the waiver Wire, talking about guys like Jermaine Curse, Taylor Gabriel,

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Chris Godwin, Willie Sneed. If those guys are available, I

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>still take those players ahead of tray Kwan Smith. I

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>like tray Kwan Smith. He was a lot of fantasy

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>football analysts preseason Darling are excited about him coming into

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the year. Now he's getting his opportunity. We saw him

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>score those two long touchdowns um in that in that

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Money Night game against Washington. But Greg, there are a

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of mouths to feed here in the New Orleans offense.

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Kamara, mark Ingram, they're gonna get. There's obviously Michael

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Thomas is going to be the top target getter, and

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>there's still Cameron Meredith. So I think one week it

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>could be trade Kwon Smith, one week it could be

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Meredith. I like picking up Smith over Meredith. I

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>think there's more upside there, but he's going to be

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>very boom er bust in my opinion, kind of similar

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to Ted gin uh So in deeper leagues. Yes, I

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's imperative to pick him up, but he still

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>ranks behind the wide receivers that we spoke about in

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire this week. In my opinion, how do

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you feel about him? Well, I was decided, I don't.

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I agree For the most part. The one guy I

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>was just siding between just a few moments ago was

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Tray Kwan Smith and the rat Damien Ratley. Yes, so

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>this is dependent on what you need, Like the short

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>term play you need a guy for this week. I

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>like Ratley going up against that Tampa Bay Bucks secondary

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>just get shredded by wide receivers every single week. There's

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a high game total in that game right around fifty

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>points right now between the Bucks and the Cleveland Browns.

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>And Ratley played a lot of the snaps last week.

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>He saw a ton of targets last week. I think

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>we could see a lot of that again with Richard

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Higgins out here in week seven. So the short term,

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>if you need a guy to play this week, it's

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Ratley tray Kwan Smith. I don't love the matchup this

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>week against Baltimore. They've been very potent against wide receivers.

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>They just got Jimmy Smith back their top cornerback. But

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I will say for the long term, I think tray

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Kwan Smith has higher upside than Damien Ratley. All right,

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>fair enough, I probably should have made that move. Then

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>he's he's gone on my lead now sorry, right, But

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in that Saints Ravens game here, as I mentioned, the

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Ravens are favored by two and a half points. You

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>have Joe Flacco ranked ahead of Drew Brees this week

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>if I pull out the wide receiver rankings available right

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>now ropers dot com. I did speak to the King

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>yesterday to try to get the name change. He approved it. Yeah,

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>we can change it. We change this show. He approved it, Yeah,

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>so we'll it. You didn't actually do it yet, I

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>guess I'll just do it. You could have got to

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>take matters and you could have done it all this time.

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean not ideally, I don't want to go into

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>another person's website and change our website your stuff that's

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>on it. Yeah, it's usually the King's thing. I'm not

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm not gonna steal his thunder. I'm not gonna

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>do his job for him. You know, we will change

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the name together after the show. Gregg Frank's Best Fantasy

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>five b f F of the Week. Yeah, what you

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>can find him road to experts dot com. Five players

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that I'm higher on than the consensus expert rankings. Yeah,

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that. Anyway, inside those rankings, you have the

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver rankings, Frankie, where do you have the Ravens

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers ranked? People love Willly Steve, We talked about

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>him earlier in the week. Everybody's all over John Brown

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Crabs. She's kind of done his thing as well.

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 1>How do you rank those three wide receivers in Week seven?

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 1>So I have John Brown right now as a solid

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver too. I have met wide receiver eighteen overall,

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and I know he burned a lot of people last week.

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>But I'm going right back to the well. I will

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>say if they're is a bit of risk here because

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the Saints defense has been playing better and maybe that's

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>partially due to Marshawn Lattimore getting back on track. So

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>if Marshawn Lattimore is a guy that is on John Brown,

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>there will be risk involved, but we won't really know

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that until the game starts. Will Marshall Latimore beyond Brown?

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Will he be on? Crabtree? Whoever he is not on,

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>has a very nice opportunity to produce in this game.

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I have Michael Crabtree also has a wide receiver too.

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>He's my wide receiver twenty two. Overall, He's seen a

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>ton of targets this year. It's a great matchup. The

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Saints have allowed something like the third or fourth most

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points to wide receivers on the season, actually the most.

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>They've allowed the most fantasy points to wide receivers on

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the season. So while they've they've turned a corner of

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of weeks, they were still shredded early on.

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So we get some big plays there and Willie Sneed

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>checks in as a low end wide receiver three. But

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in PPR we spoke about this, he is providing an

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>extremely extremely safe floor. Also, it's the revenge game for

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Willie Sneed. Ding ding Ding. Indeed, so Frankie as it

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>ranked John Brown, then Michael Crabtree, and then Willie Sneed.

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>He means I like Joe Flacco to which is why

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I have him ranked so high. Frank Alex Collins, Oh,

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you're always a big fan of him. I can't imagine

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that changes this week. Well, the Saints are actually the

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>best team against running backs this here, which might be right,

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>like they're allowing you know, like three point to three

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>point three yards per carry on the ground. They've been very,

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>very stout against the run. I think, based on four

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>teams being on a buy, Alex Collins is still a

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>low end RB two, especially based on the usage that

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 1>he had last week, scoring two touchdowns from within the

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>five yard line. We want to see him get that

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>usage back and gain momentum and gain confidence in their

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>coaching staff. So the more that he continues to produce

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in that area of the field, the more he will

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>earn opportunities, which will cut into Buck Allen's value obviously.

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>But I just think based on how many teams are

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>on to buy uh and his usage trending in the

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 1>right direction, Alex Collins is still a low end RB two,

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>But I don't love the matchup, to be honest, right,

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. Alex Collins not Frank his favorite

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>play this week, the wide receivers is the way you

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>want to go with Baltimore ins to the other side

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of that matchup, we mentioned trey Kuan Smith and what

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>he could possibly do, obviously starring Michael Thomas. How high

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 1>do you have mark Ingram ranked this week? Last time

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>he was out there, he was fantastic. Alvin Kamara was

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 1>relatively quiet for him. How do you rate the running

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>game down in New Orleans on this week? Yes, so

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I have mark Ingram as RB thirteen. He's a high

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>just based on how potent the New Orleans Saints offense is.

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I know that the Ravens have also been great against

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>running backs this year, allowing just three point nine yards

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>per carry and have only allowed two rushing touchdowns totals.

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>So uh, he has his work cut out from But

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>we we saw this last year between Alvin Kamara and

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingram. They were matchup proof. The offensive line looks

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>like it's back on track as well from where they

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>were earlier on in the season. Um so I'm trusting

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingram. I'm trusting Alvin Kamara as Alvin camaras inside

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 1>my top twelve. Mark Ingram is just outside, but he's

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a high end r B two H. They're both matchup proof,

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, matchup proof, both running backs out there

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:04.719
<v Speaker 1>in New Orleans. And that will take care of that

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Saints Baltimore Ravens game coming up, coming up

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>in a little bit eight four or four four three

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>six eight. So and I'm gonna answer your line up

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>questions throughout our program as well. Frankie Buffalo and Indianapolis.

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo seven a half point dog in this game. Derek

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 1>Anderson will start for Buffalo in his first game of

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the team. There's nobody in Buffalo ever play in fantasy football, um,

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>including Lashaw McCoy. Does that changed this week for you? Well,

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 1>McCoy is actually trending in the right direction. And I

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>think the fact that Derek Anderson is playing quarterback for

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>this team now only helps him because Derek Anderson is

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.839
<v Speaker 1>a competent journeyman quarterback. Obviously, you know he's not part

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of the future for the Buffalo Bills, but for one

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>week only, maybe for two weeks only, he can be

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>serviceable for this team. I think he opens things up

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. He'll be able to throw the ball

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>down the field even if he doesn't know the playbook. Overall,

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 1>he just has more NFL talent at this point to

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen out of Josh Allen to what we've

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>seen out of Nathan Peterman, and ultimately that helps Lasha McCoy.

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 1>It also helps that Lashaw McCoy himself has been trending

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction the past two weeks. Two weeks

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>agoing against the Titans, twenty four carries for eighty five yards.

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I find you he hasn't scored a single touchdown this year,

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>but still had over a hundred total yards in that

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>game with twenty receiving yards. And then last week sixteen

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>carries for seventy three yards four point six yards per carry. Uh,

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>he was at nine b four total yards. So McCoy

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>putting two good games back to back together with Derek

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Anderson as the quarterback here, I just think based on

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>his usage, he checks in as a solid to low

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>end RB two with four teams on a bi grege. Okay,

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. That's the deal with Lashawn McCoy.

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>In bub Baledo on the other side with eating Apolis.

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm really excited to hear um your thought process here.

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 1>It looks like t Y Hilton gonna give a go

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>for Indianapolis. What is it due to Chester Rodgers value?

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.199
<v Speaker 1>It's it hurts it. It hurts it for sure, because

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>now you know Eric Ebron and t Y Hilton are

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>unquestion gonna be the top two targets in this offense.

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>We know Chester Rogers was fantasy vial the past couple

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of weeks because he was getting double digittit targets every

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>single week. Unfortunately, I think that comes to an end

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>here now, especially with the Bill's defense and their secondary

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>specifically playing as well as they've had all we're talking

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>about that secondary, t Y Hilton slated to get matched

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>up with her Davious White, so because he is going

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to get volume, kind of similar to what I said

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>about Alex Collins. He's gonna get volume in this game,

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>but the matchup is not good. So where does t

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Y Hilton check in. He's a low end wide receiver

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to Chester Rogers. He's not really on our radar anymore

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy purposes, unless something were to happen to t

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Why Hilton in this game. Eric Ebron is still a

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:40.959
<v Speaker 1>top five tight end. Doesn't look like Jack Doyle is

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>going to go, and he is being targeted a lot

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone. Uh, he's just been a touchdown machine.

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>So really it's just a lot of t Y Hilton,

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of Eric Ebron, and then we probably

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 1>get some Chester Rogers sprinkled in some Zach Pascal. But

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there's anyone that you can trust

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.959
<v Speaker 1>week in and week out with t Y Hilton back healthy,

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and that makes sense, And maybe the one guy out

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of all the pleapble you mentioned is Eric Ebron to me,

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>just because of how consistent he's been and the diarth

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>type ends that are out there, He's the one I

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>probably I can't believe I'm saying this trust the most

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>out there in Indianapolis exactly. With the backfield, though Marlin

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Mack came back, He's very very good last week for indeed,

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>do you see that continuing or would you rather have

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Niim Heinz and Guy's gonna catch down the passes of

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the backfield. Yeah, I think we're starting to see Marlon

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Mack take over this backfield. They spoke about that before

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:29.719
<v Speaker 1>last week's game. Against the jetstat Marlon Mack would be

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>slotted back in. I'm gonna take over as a starter.

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get a lot of workheim Heinz played more

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>snaps in that game because the Colts were trailing a lot.

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But they're actually seven and a half point favorites in

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:43.079
<v Speaker 1>this game. So Biggas expects, um the Colts to be

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>leading a lot, and I you know, it'll probably be

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>closer in my opinion. We'll talk about that later on

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we get into our best bets, UM, But I do

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>think this is more of a Marlon Mack type of

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 1>game than it is. Nihim haines that heim Heinz dropped

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that easy touchdown last week, the receiving touchdown through right

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>into his test. He dropped it. But Marlon Mack played

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 1>about snaps, saw the majority of the carries, and was

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>very efficient in those carries. He checks in as a

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>flex option running back. UM until we see him get

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>more usage and continue to produce for more than one week. UM,

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to view them as a flex

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>but that could easily change if he produces well in

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>this game. I think so too. I think so too.

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested to see what we kind of performance we

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>get from him on a weekend. We we got bases.

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't want people like Buffalo's defense in general. Um,

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>when we get to our picks later on the program, UM,

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you'll see which one of us actually really like Buffalo

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>even more? Uh this week. But Marlon Mack was the

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>name that people were not in on at all and

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>was the price tag. It was the player. I think

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the question that we're gonna have to see as

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>we move forward. Cleveland Tampa was a really interesting game here, Frank,

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>two teams that aren't dissimilar to me, Cleveland's two three

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and one Tampa Bay or two and three. Jamis Winston

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>came back, was the number one quarterback in week six?

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Can you do it again? I think based on volume Again,

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>this is something we've spoken about with Jamis Winston and

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks offense overall. They just can't run the football

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know that they're going to be able

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to do that against the Cleveland Browns either. The Browns have, UM,

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, their defense is stepping up, specifically that defensive

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>line with Miles Garrett, Ogan Joby, the linebacker crew there,

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Denzel Awards stepping it up too. So this Browns defense

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely legit. I don't know that Peyton barber is

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to replicate what he did last

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>week against the Falcons, but if you've been listening all week,

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you already know that I don't like Peyton barbera all

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that much. I think Jamis Winston has to throw the

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>ball a lot in this game. We're looking at forty

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>plus attempts once again, and the way to beat the

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns is actually through the air. So I think

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston I'm trusting him again this week as a

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>top ten quarterback, just based on volume. Uh. And then

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of that, Baker Mayfield. Look, we

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we spoke about this too. The Tampa Bay Bucks defense

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>is dreadful. It's absolutely horrible. There's a reason why they

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>fired their defensive coordinator, Mike Smith. They've allowed at least

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>three fifty pasting yards and three passing touchdowns in each

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of the past three games. I'm not sure that Baker

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield gets to those lofty numbers, but I think we're

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at three passing yards here, multiple scores from Baker Mayfield.

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna make him a borderline top twelve quarterbacks, so

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I like him in DFS a lot. I like him.

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>If you're suffering from the bye weeks, I would use

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield over Drew Brees. Actually Drew Brees the past

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of times he's been outdoors, especially against the Ravens defense.

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't love Drew Brees this week, but I do

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>like Baker Mayfield a lot. And if I like him,

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I like Jarvis Landry high end wide receiver to Jarvis Landry.

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>The Bucks struggle a lot against slot wide receivers um

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and Jarvis Slandry has surprisingly has played a lot of

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>his snaps in the slot this year. I don't know

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that people realize that. And then David and Joeku, who's

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>coming off a great performance double digit targets once again,

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>actually got in the end zone last week. I think

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>there is a good chance that he gets in the

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>end zone again in Week seven. Damien Ratley is just

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of the super sleeper there or salary relief if

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you're playing him in d if that's just because the

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Bucks secondary is that bad, I think the Rats really

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting man. I want to see if he could be

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 1>something over there's a one week It was a one

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>week play. It was a one week whatever. Maybe he's

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>got talent. I don't know. I'm excited to find out.

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I would only use him if you're in deeper leaks

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and really hurting at the bye weeks, just because we

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>want to find out. What would you want rather use

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the rat or Josh Reynolds this week? If Cooper Cup

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 1>is out and Reynolds is healthy, I'll use Tony taking

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a break here when we come back more in my game.

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>We have apps Fantasy Sports win your network. They do

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>know that you can listen to this show live on

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the award winning Fancy Sports Radio Network. Listen on the

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app, can tune in radio app, download

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the Fancy Sports Radio Network app. The Fancy Sports Radio

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Network is the only totally free seven three sixty five

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>fancy sports network of its kind without a subscription. Check

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>out YouTube live want to Fancy Sports Network YouTube page

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and particip paying the program in there where you can

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>ask questions discuss the topics with other fantasy enthusiasts. I'll

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>tell anyone that you disagree calling too your favorite show

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and ask your question. The number is eight four four

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>eight four f N T s Y. That's eight four

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>four eight four, three, six, eight, seven, nine, The Fancy

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network, your free, fancy source twenty four hours

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a day about pie. Well, well, well, well, back with you,

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>here are the Fantasy best friends forever. Frank Stample and

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Gregg Sauceman reminded you that bet ds I, celebrating twenty years,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>is the industry's biggest and safest betting site. They have

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>great customer service, fast easy payment of winnings. You can

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>play virtually every sport bet ds I with hundreds of

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:06.360
<v Speaker 1>wagering options, including live in game wagering on all major

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>sporting events, where you can make your play anytime during

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the game. Bet ds I is now offering up to

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>a thousand dollar bonus on your first deposit if you

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>use the promo code f and T s Y. That's

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>met d s I dot com. The promo code is

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 1>f n T s Y. Handing over to bet d

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>s I and start winning today bed SI dot com.

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>The promo code is f N T s Y. Freggy

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>with you, Greggy with you setting your lineup, making sure

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you were starting the right players. In week number seven, Frank,

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we move on to Miami and Detroit, where their starting

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>quarterback from Miami is rock smiler. You got anything there?

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>Anything else I got? I gotta literally end now. Um,

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and you have a question for real? Though the brocast

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>by quarterback Albert Wilson went off in week six, do

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you buy it in week seven? Not necessarily. He's outside

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of my top thirty six if you're hurting because of

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>bye weeks. I think he could step in as a

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, but he's just on that fringe. I think

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>he's he's like a top forty wide receiver. This week

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>he's Boomer bust. We've seen that he's had two big games,

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>He's had other games that have been duds. Um, he

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>did know he did dominate targets last week. He had

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>nine targets with Brock as his quarterback. A lot of

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that was the short passes which he took to the house.

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>You had to realize the Detroit Lions defense is is

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>very very good. They've played very well since that she

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>lacking against the Jets in Week one. That kind of

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 1>seems to be like an aberration based on everything else

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 1>we've seen from this Lions defense. So because of the matchup,

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>because of the I don't know, shaky play that we're

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna get from Brock Oswile like, I'm just not expecting

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>Brock to do what he did last week. Albert Wilson,

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to me, is nothing more than a bye week replacement.

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't even trust him as as a top thirty

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>six wide receiver, all right, So there you not trust me.

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Albert Wilson not going with the gut this week. When

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Albert Wilson, the running game is really interesting. Though.

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake of course bubbled on the goal line. It

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't matter. I gotta got more opportunities. When the Dolbins

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>got the ball back, Frank Gore rush for a hundred

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>yards last week. Frank had been very adamant all week

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that both Frank Gore and Kenyan Drake would be inside

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>your top twenty four kings are finalized right now, are

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>they there? So Kenyan Drake is number twenty five and

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Frank Gore is number So I'm sorry, but I lied

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:32.199
<v Speaker 1>to you. There's just a few players that I ran

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that I hold a little bit higher this week, Losaw

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 1>McCoy being one. T J yelled in, Matt Brita, Corey Clement.

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Just like those matchups, the way that those players have

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>been used a little bit more. But when you're looking

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>at high in flex options, I don't know that there's

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>anyone better than Frank Gore and Kenyan Drake this week,

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>just based on the matchup going up against the Detroit Lions,

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>who have allowed five point three yards per carry this year.

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>That's tied for second in the NFL. Mind you people

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>might not realize this, but outside of that first game

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 1>against the Jets that how and allowed a lot of

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.199
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns, they've only allowed three rushing touchdowns this season.

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>But I still think there's a lot of yards to

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>be gained here by Frank Gore and Kenyan Drake. And

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>any time that you have a defense that allows this

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>high of yards per carry, they give up big plays

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. Those big plays can easily turn into touchdowns.

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>So we'll take that opportunity. And with what Frank Gore

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>has done, he's out carried Kenyan Drake the past three weeks.

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>He's had double digit carries the past three weeks. He

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>was the first one yard rusher against the Chicago Bears

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>this season. So everything is training in the right direction

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>for Gore and it's a good matchup against the Detroit Lions,

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>So That's why he checks in as a flex better

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in standard non PPR leagues or half PPR where you're

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>still looking for that touchdown. In full PPR, he's not

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna catch any passes. That's more so where Kenyan Drake

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>comes into the mix. Alright, So Kenyan Drake Francore both

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>flex plays this week. According to Frank Standford, he is

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with that there. Hopefully it works out on the

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>other side, the Detroit Lions coming off the by Golden case.

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>But really, really good, man, I feel like this every year,

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Golden Date kind of does it. Nobody really wants him

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and yet all he does is produced. Yeah, that's exactly right.

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>He's just a wide receiver to every rock solid floor,

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what, the targets are gonna be there. He

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>hovers around double digit targets every single week. Is that

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>safety blanket for Matthew Stafford. And in the games where

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>he scores a touch end or two, those are the

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>games where he ends up being a top twelve wide receiver.

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>This is a bit of a tougher matchup against the

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins. Their defense has actually been sneaky good this year.

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I know you might not believe me, after they allowed

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty points to the Chicago Bears a week ago, but

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>their defense has played well. I still like Golden Tape

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>based on his usage. That's safe floor every single week.

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I like Kenny Golladay. I like Kenny Golladay. I don't

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>love Kenny Golladay because we know that both Gallady and

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Jones are gonna play on the outside. The question

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>is who's going to get shadowed by Xavian Howard. Because

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Howard has really stepped up here as one of

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the premier shutdown corners in the NFL. We just don't

0:23:57.880 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>know who he's going to be on, whether that's Goali

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 1>or Marvin Jones. Marvin Jones kind of taking a back

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>seat to Getty this year has kind of become, you know,

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>touchdown or bust for fantasy purposes, so he's more of

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver three. The way that Kenny Golladay has

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:12.719
<v Speaker 1>played this year, he still checks in as a top

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. But I will put a disclaimer oute that

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>if he gets shadowed by Xavian Howard, it could be

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a very, very long day for Kenny Golladay. Yeah, I

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>completely completely agree with everything he said there. Frank thanks

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Man were best friends Forever Carolina and Philadelphia Eagles. Which

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>running back would you rather have Wendel Smallwood, I'll still

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>take Corey Clement. And I know a lot of people

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 1>have been on Wendel Smallwood. He played more snaps and

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Corey Clement a week ago he had more touchdown touches.

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 1>But again Corey Clement was the guy who scored the touchdown.

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I just think Doug Peterson um has a little bit

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 1>more faith in Corey Clement. We've seen that. You know,

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 1>even when they bring in the juy ese Um, whoever

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>they bring in, Corey Clement still always has a role.

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>So Doug Peterson likes Corey Clement. I mean, Peterson likes

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>all of his running backs. We said that this is

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a frustrating situation. So in my opinion, Corey

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Clement just more likely to score a touchdown. I think

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 1>that once they get in the red zone, they're more

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>likely to use him. I just think he has a

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit more upside, more ability to break one out.

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>So he is a low end RB two for me,

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>while Wendel Smallwood is a flex. But to be honest,

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.120
<v Speaker 1>both of these guys are gonna get double digit, double

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>digit touches in this game. So you're comfortable with both

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>women means yeah, I just I trust Corey Clement a

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit more to be the guy who scores a

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 1>touchdown once they get in the rids. Judy actually has

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>this question, would you rather start in the next thing

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 1>where to get to would you rather start Corey Clement

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>or Jordan Howard? This week? I'm still gonna use Jordan Howard.

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>It's against the New England Patriots, who haven't been great

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 1>against the run this year. They've allowed four point five

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry. And look, there's gonna be a lot

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of point scored in that game. We know that the

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>over under, you know, around fifty points in that game

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>against the Bears and the Patriots. Greg last week, what

0:25:56.280 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>could have been for Jordan Howard fumbled a goal line carry,

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>which if he gets in the end zone, we're looking

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>at seven yards and a touchdown. Nobody's freaking out about

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Howard. Now obviously that didn't happen. He did exactly

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>what you don't want him to do, which is he

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>lost a fumble right there on the world yard line

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and we can't take that back. But that creates a

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>bondite opportunity here. Again, if he scores that touchdown, We're

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>not freaking out about this. There's points that are gonna

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>be scored. Three Cohen's gonna get used. We know that. Um,

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the snap percentage has been training down for Howard. But

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I just think based on this game total and the

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that when they get inside the five, they're still

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna use Jordan Howard. Um, I'll take him over Corey Clement. Okay,

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was thought it was kind of close.

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I have Jordan Howard is like a solid mid range

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>RB two, whereas Corey Clement is a lower end r

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>B two. Just because Wendell Smallwood is there, there's a

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit more volatility with Doug Peterson calling the plays.

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>We know that he runs running back by committee. Um,

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>It's it's crazy to say, but I just I trust

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Howard a love. Okay, do you agree with three

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Cohen so and tree uh and p PR. I would

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>actually use to reco and over Jordan Howard and half

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>point PPR. I think it's very close between the two. UM,

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>but he is in standard, he's a high end flex

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>in PPR. He is in RB two. Based on the targets.

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.479
<v Speaker 1>He's getting um and the way you know, Matt Naggie

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>has figured out a way to get to reco and involved.

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And something that we thought could happen is that Matt

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Naggie coming over from the Kansas City Chiefs, could turn

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.479
<v Speaker 1>tarrecoh and into this team's version of Tyreek Hill. Now

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>nobody's Tyreek Hill. But if there's one player who comes close,

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's three Cohen based on how electric he is,

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 1>how fast he is. Uh, you get him out in space,

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>he can just make a world of things happen, and

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 1>he's just a nightmare for opposing defenses. So um, it's

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>awesome that Matt Naggie is finding creative ways who gets

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>frecon involved. And because of that, because of his target

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>volume and the fact that the Bears are there's slight

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 1>underdogs here at home. I think we see some Trekhen Um,

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we see some Jordan Howard as well, But I like

0:27:57.040 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to recon overall more in PPR than fair Off. And

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>with that we say goodbye to our friends after shoot.

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate you checking us out. Fantasy best friends forever.

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll do it all again at the same time, same

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 1>place next week. Thanks so much for watching. As we

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 1>move on, Frankie, and we continue on, I want to

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>take some calls at eight four four, eight four three six,

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>eight seven nine eight four four eight four three six,

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>eight seven nine, and I want to get their starting

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 1>sick questions like the Corey Clement versus Jordan Howard one

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that I had for you a little bit earlier on

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 1>because you know they matter too. They matter to people matter,

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 1>They they will keep us going. Greg I got a

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>question from Daniel Philip on Twitter. Daniel asked me he

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>needs three of these five guys Kiki, kote or q

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>T QT q T. I feel like it's gonna change

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>every week, and now we'll go with qt QT, Corey Davis,

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Eto Smith, Jermaine Curse or most a new the main curse,

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>most New. How many does you need? Trace Standard needs

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>three um Standard. One of them is gonna be Edo

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Smith Um going up against the Giants. I think he's

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a flex option in that matchup. The Giants have not

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>been great against running backs. I'll use your main curse.

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I know it's standard, but safe floor and then if

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>he gets in the end zone, he'll end up finishing

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the week as the top twenty four wide receiver. Um,

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>this last one is tough. It's it's between Kiki and

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis. Just because I don't know that Mohammed Sanu

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is gonna play. That's who I wrote nice. I know

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I spent a lot of time earlier in

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the week bashing Cory Davis. Texans are going up against

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars. If there is a place that you want

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to target them, it is in the slot. We saw

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Cold Beasley score two touchdowns last week, but Kiki a

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit banged up. I just feel like the Jaguars

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>are just gonna the mom of Texans this week. I'll

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>take Corey Daves. So Florio tweeted this out. I think

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>it's last night or yesterday afternoon. He tweeted us out.

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So I wanted to give it of loves. Retweeted at

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Mike Florida who who who? Wait, you must not be

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>named Ki. So he has a new article on NFL

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and I want to get a shout out.

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>You read it already. I didn't mean it yet, but

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I have it here. I've read an article before. You good. Yeah,

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>it was great. You don't have to just say it

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>was great because it was. You know, I don't say anything.

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>He right is great? Probably not, but nevertheless, edit all

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Mike Florio's feature there. It's not the fake

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Mike Florio, It's our real Mike Florio. So please check

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it out. He writes slot receiver and their matchups each

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and every week. So the players he highlights this week

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shepherd, uh, Rob Woods, Tyler Boyd. So take a

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>look at it, man, And sorry to our guy Mike Floria.

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>He's in there too. He likes Kiki a lot. If

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Floria were here today, I have a feeling he would

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>say Kiki or record of days? You know what? He's

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>not correct? Eight four or four eight four three six,

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>eight seven nine. In that Jacksonville Houston game, Um, the

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville get back on track at home? Yeah, I think

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>they just I think they just pound the Texans in

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>this game. Um, the Jaguars have been a different team

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>at home all season long. The Texans struggles at the

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>offensive line are highly noted to this point. They did

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>not look great against the Buffalo Bills last week, and honestly,

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>if it weren't for Nate Peterman throwing a pick six

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and a near another pick six, then we might be

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Bills winning that game outright against the Texans.

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I just don't have a lot of faith in the Texans.

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I still do like DeAndre Hopkins uh in two games

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>against the Jaguars last year, he scored a touchdown in

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>each of them. He averaged sixty seven yards per game

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>in those games, So maybe the upside isn't as high,

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>but he's still gonna be a target monster. Um. I

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>think the Jaguars, especially from a betting perspective, what is

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>this game up to now four and a half, that's

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:50.479
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of points. I would I would probably

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>still take the Jaguars. Like t J yelled in, I

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>think Blake Bortles is a sneaky super flex quarterback. Might

0:31:57.480 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>be like a tournament option for court Um. For DF,

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that's just because he has that high upside. But for

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>season long, I'm I'm not trusting any of the Jaguars

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>receivers just because you don't know who it's going to

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>be on a weekly basis, you just don't know who's

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna go off. I completely I completely get a man,

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>And there's been times where I bought it on a

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>d D. I bought it on Helan Cole and I

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>just wrong every week for a season. I bought it

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a donja moncreat do you like Lamar Miller in that game?

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I had to ask, do you do you think the

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars cover that spread? Laying four and a half at home?

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I really liked it two and a half earlier in

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the week four and a half. Everyone's pounding the Jaguars

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>right now. They just think that they're going to demolish

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the Texans. I think so too. If I had to take,

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I would take the Jaguars, And yeah, I think so.

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>They were gonna be one of my best bets four

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>halves a lot, though it is a lot. I really

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>think they pound the crap out of the Texans. But

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we can legitimately see like a ten game here something

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>like that. The Texans offense hasn't done much to inspire

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 1>confidence either. Yeah, um, could you start will Fuller this week?

0:32:56.640 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>No outside my top thirties started Kiki kot Rat ranked higher. Oh,

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree. Q ranked higher than Will. I told

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it was it Floria that convinced you. Uh No, I've

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>had it that way all week. The fact that will

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Fuller is banged up every single week dealing with his

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>hamstring injury, and he's gonna get you know, one of

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey or a J. Bouyer. Um. I just think it's

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>just a better spot overall for Kekey in that slot

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>matchup again. Cole Beasley scored two touchdowns last week. If

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 1>there's anywhere that you're gonna target, it is the slot

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>receiver and that's Kicky. Completely completely agree with you. I

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>would go with Akiki as well over will Fuller here

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>this week, um back because we we need get to

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>hit on it all that much, um Caroline, I liked

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>them in Funch's Philadelphia secondary still has been the weakest

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>part of their team. So I do like Funches. This

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>is sneaky. He's a sneak. He played this week and

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>then in the New England officially dropped Chris Hogan as

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, So Hogan's gone, Josh Gordon playing more and

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>more snapped. Uh, this could be the week to get

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it on Josh Gordon and the Chicago does have a

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>better defense. We'll see if clil Mac is active. Yeah,

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>they do have a better defense, but does it really

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>matter when you're facing Tom f and Brady. I do

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>have Josh Gordon ranked the highest this week that I

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>have all season long. I him as wide receiver twenty four.

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's a little bit too aggressive, but we saw

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>his too aggressive at wide receiver twenty four. For Josh Gordon,

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 1>snaps are training in the right direction, had what nine

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>targets last week. A matter of time before we get that,

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, big two touchdown game between Josh Gordon and

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady. But his usages training in the right direction,

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>like Julian Edelman obviously in that game as well. He's

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a mid ring wide receiver two to me, regardless of format,

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>even in standard. We saw him score the touchdown a

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>week ago. I'm not scared off of James White, you know,

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>having a down game last week, Sony Michelle. It's just

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it's status quo for the rest of the Patriots weapons

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>here in this game, Greg, I understand. I I completely

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>again how high it's too high for Taylor Gabriel this week,

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 1>because he's kind of a hard guy to rank him

0:34:57.400 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>this week? Yeah, I have him. I have him as

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver your thirty two. Now, his snaps went down

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 1>last week, his targets went down last week. With Anthony

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Miller returning back to the lineup, Um, we saw him

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:11.240
<v Speaker 1>still have a great game, but he was only targeted

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>five times. Alan Robinson scored touchdown. Um, the Bears could

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>be playing from behind in this game, so you kind

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of like that. I think because of that uncertainty, I

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>think having him as a mid range wide receiver three

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 1>is a good spot to have him, just based on

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the matchup. If he goes off, you know, I don't know,

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 1>He's just he's a He's a hard guy to rank

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:36.359
<v Speaker 1>this week. Um, would you have him higher than wide

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 1>receiver thirty two? It's hard, man. I don't love Taylor

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Gabriel this week because like he's he's a guy that

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 1>could just do nothing, you know, is he though, like

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the way the way that he's not this year? Not

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>this year? No, it's like we we feel that way,

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know. Would you rather use Jamin curse not?

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Rather do? Yes? Absolutely? Over a hundred yards two games

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>in a row from Gabriel. Man tasting points Gabriel one

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>spot higher than Jamine Kurts right now. I'd rather use

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Jamin PPR. I would use Curts half used standard Gabriel

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>four four eight four three seven nine. We open up

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the full lines for you. Held up next. If you're

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>from the NFL to the NBA, Daily Rohodo dot com

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>is the place to win millions in daily Fantasy. You

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 1>can get the best DFS NFL coverage all season long

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for a price of one, or dominate the entire Daily

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports round. Put the Elite package at month. If

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 1>you use the promo code f n T s Y,

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you get ten percent off your Daily Rodo package. Go

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to Daily Rodo dot com, pick your NFL or Elite package,

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 1>enter promo code f n T s Y, and you'll

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 1>be on your way to becoming the next Daily Rhodo millionaire.

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Back with you, Fantasy best friends forever. Fantasy Sports Radio

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Network FREG. You had to do an NBA last night,

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 1>but just miss cash. Sorry, butt, but in you both

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 1>tournament in cash. I only played a tournament lineup last night.

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I had Lebron in it. That worked out obviously. I

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>had Ben Simmons, I didn't have Joel Embiid. With the

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.320
<v Speaker 1>news of Dwight Howard coming out, I went with Yon Moheemi.

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>That was a huge mistake. You know, I should have

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>kept JaVale mcgean because he actually turned out to be

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty Sanders. You know, he told us. He told us

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 1>he was Ronny McGruder too. He liked those those guys. No, no, no, no,

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>you liked him, he confirmed. Yeah, that confirmed that was

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a greg one. But you didn't use him either. Now,

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>so you can't take credit for it and talking about

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>some of it. Man, this is the problem when you

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:47.320
<v Speaker 1>give me too much time. You gotta be able to

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>hit on these punt plays. The first thing we spoke

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>about when I walked in today. You gotta be able

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 1>to hit on the punt plays. The punt plays that

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>we used were Cameron Payne, Yan Moheemi and Justin Holliday.

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Those guys did not hit. We did not cash. Do

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you know what like that? You know why? You know why?

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Here's where we screwed up. So we got here yesterday morning.

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>We ran the optimizer and we made a lineup featuring

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Zach Levine, Joel embade Um, Bobby Portis, and yes Macruter.

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>You know what happened that lineup dominated were we tinkered

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 1>too much, not using the Daily Road to NBA lineup optimizer.

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>We lose and that's exactly what happened yesterday. So don't

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>be a loser like Frank and I who both lost

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:37.359
<v Speaker 1>money yesterday. Head no, no, to Daily roado dot com

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, use the NBA lineup Optimizer, go premium, use

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the promo code f NCS. Why if you haven't yet,

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 1>you get some money off. It's well worth it because

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>when you try to do it yourself and you think

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you're out smarting the computer, you don't. I am evident

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of that. Please don't be an idiot like me. Go

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:55.879
<v Speaker 1>to Daily Roader dot com. Use the NBA optimizer right

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>now and get in the game before you set your

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>lae up tonight. It's it's well worth it. Man eight

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:03.359
<v Speaker 1>four four eight four three six seven nine. You take

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:05.720
<v Speaker 1>some calls, y yes, sir, all right, let's do Jimmy

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in Seattle. Jimmy. What's up? Man? Hey? How are you

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 1>guys doing? Do it all right? What's going on? I

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>have a flex question. I have Chris Thompson right it's

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in he's in right now. But I have Turke Cohen

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:21.959
<v Speaker 1>and uh DeShawn Jackson, and I don't know who to start.

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a PPR league. It's full PPR full PPR. Mm

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 1>hmmm mmm. I'm gonna use Greg yep I completely Cohen

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>is trending in the right direction. I will say like

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the Shawn Jackson a lot too. The Cleveland Browns have

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>given up some big plays. We saw Tyro william score

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 1>two long touchdowns last week. I think Deshn Jackson is

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a sneaky wide receiver three, but I'll take Creek Tarik Cohen.

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 1>The way that he's being used, trending in the right direction,

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that the Bears are underdogs at home

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:50.239
<v Speaker 1>in this game could be chasing some points that could

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:52.319
<v Speaker 1>lead to more tarikoh In on the field. I'm gonna

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>go with Turikh and as well. I thought for the

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:56.479
<v Speaker 1>same reason that they want, they're gonna be chasing points

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>all afternoon. I think Chicago um which a lot of

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>doubles trico, which means Jordan Howard maybe back on the bench.

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he should start Corey clement Um. But yeah, that's

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a messy situation. I like I like to re co

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in there. I'll agree with Frankie at back games with

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>seven receptions for to recono eight four three, six, st

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:18.279
<v Speaker 1>seven nine. Wesley in California, what's up? Wesley? Yes, hey, guys,

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>quick two questions. UM, can you help me pick my flex?

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I have edo Smith, Alshon Jeffrey or Matt Bridau full PPR, Well,

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:33.320
<v Speaker 1>BBR it's first question, you know, al Sean or Matt Brida.

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>This is unquestionably Alshon Jeffrey for me in the full PPR.

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I'm just buying too much into

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 1>the recncy bias what he's been doing the past two weeks,

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 1>but the targets have been there, the usage has been there,

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>specifically in the red zone. He's scoring touchdowns, he's getting targeted.

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 1>He's actually been very efficient. One of the reasons I

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't like Alshon Jeffrey coming into the year, aside from

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the injury Greg, was that Alshon Jeffrey was an extremely

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>inefficient receiver. Last year he caught less than fifty percent

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of his targets. This year he's been much better than that.

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a decent match up against the Panthers. I'm taking

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>out on Jeffrey and PPR. What's your second question, man, um?

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>My second question is right now, I got a trade pending. Um.

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I have Aaron Rodgers as my quarterback, but I'm trading

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:20.160
<v Speaker 1>away Julio Jones for Davante Adams, So that's like a

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of a wash trade to me, like, I get

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>what Adams just don't with all the touchdowns. You got

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the Aaron Rodgers Davante Adams connection. Julio Jones is putting

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>up a jillion yards on pace for over two thousand UM,

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 1>but there's no touchdowns. That's a wash trade. It's like, whatever,

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 1>what's your record? Four and two? Mm hmmm. I kind

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of like it just because Davanta Adams is on the

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>by this week and then you get him back next

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 1>week and you don't have to worry about BIS for

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:47.399
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the season. Yeah, but Adams it means nothing.

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>That's just thinking about it too much. The next week

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you get so hook up too between Rogers and Adams.

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Julio is on a by next week, so it's not

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you're voting. But yep, the guy from Storage wars, Yep,

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I got it. Yeah, yep, uh yeah, it's a watch.

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Just keep Huio Jones. Okay, all right, thank you? Yep?

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:13.839
<v Speaker 1>Height four four eight, four, three six seven nine. Devon

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in Texas? What's up? Devon? Hey guys, what's up with y'all? Uh?

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Just got Twoston start questions if that's okay? Um? First

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 1>one full PPR league, Um? I need a running back

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 1>and be flex. My options are Sony Michelle, Chris Thompson,

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:39.960
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingram, t Y Hilton, and Allen Robinson. Do you

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 1>need RB and a flex, yes, sir for PPP. Alright,

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:47.359
<v Speaker 1>So Sony Michelle is definitely in there. It doesn't matter

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to me that he doesn't score, that he doesn't catch passes.

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the guys are scoring touchdowns at a rapid pace.

0:42:52.320 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 1>If you look at his red zone usage. Uh, the

0:42:55.280 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Patriots haven't used a running back this often in the

0:42:57.440 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 1>red zone since le Garrett Blunt in that breakout season.

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:02.960
<v Speaker 1>So Sony Michelle definitely. The next one I'm gonna take

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>is mark Ingram. I just I spoke earlier about how

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:08.920
<v Speaker 1>those Saints running backs our matchup proof. It doesn't matter

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to me that they're facing Baltimore on any given week.

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Mark Ingram is an option, a viable option to score

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns, catch a couple of passes to um. So

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I know it's PPR, but I'm just gonna roll with

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 1>running backs there and Sony Michelle mark I'm cool with that.

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:24.839
<v Speaker 1>Those two guys may have the best chance of any

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>year your options to score touchdown. The usure for Sonny

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Michelle's crazy and mark Ingram was great. It's first week

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:34.319
<v Speaker 1>back eight four four eight four three six eight seven nine.

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's hit up Jacob in New York. It's not Jacob

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 1>ke Hi, Hi. I have one question. Who do who

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>do I start in the full PPR league? Shawn Jackson

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:50.799
<v Speaker 1>or Chris Godwin? As a Frankie question, I've ever heard one, yes,

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So I was just talking about Sean Jackson a little

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>bit earlier. I have both of these guys as wide

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 1>receiver threes this week, but I'll take to Sean Jackson.

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:00.839
<v Speaker 1>I just think there's higher upside. The targets have been

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more consistent this year. Chris Godwin has

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:05.719
<v Speaker 1>scored a touchdown in four out of five games, but

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the snap percentage has been a little bit inconsistent. I

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 1>like both guys, but I'll take to Seawan Jackson. I

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:14.320
<v Speaker 1>think he catches a long one in this game. Okay,

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:19.440
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. What against your guy? What against

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 1>your guy? I like? I like the matchup for for

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks pass catchers, but Sean Jackson has his usage

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 1>has been a little bit more consistent, and he has

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 1>higher upside hair right now, and I wish there was

0:44:31.280 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 1>more of it. You should keep it going into no shape.

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:38.799
<v Speaker 1>November just boom. What do I have to do? Man?

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 1>What do I have to do? Just give me like goatee,

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>greg like a month. Know what's funny? You know you

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:48.719
<v Speaker 1>would look remember the episodes of How Did You Watch Him?

0:44:48.719 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 1>At Your Mother? Really really well for anyone listening or

0:44:52.440 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 1>watching who has watched How I Met Your Mother? There

0:44:54.800 --> 0:44:57.879
<v Speaker 1>was like a a few episodes where they show Ted

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:00.319
<v Speaker 1>Moseby with a goatee and he looks super weird. Who

0:45:00.640 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 1>plays Ted Mosby is the main character? I hate him

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 1>so annoying. So not Jason Siegel, He's awesome in that show,

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and not a Patrick Harrison. Patrick Harris is awesome in

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that show. To the other guy, Uh, I don't know

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:15.399
<v Speaker 1>what his name is because he's done like nothing else

0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:18.400
<v Speaker 1>besides How I Met Your Mother? His name is Ted Moseby.

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:20.200
<v Speaker 1>That's it great, Josh Ratners. When I was looking, Yeah,

0:45:20.239 --> 0:45:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Josh rad bro Uh, he had a few episodes. Would

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 1>it go to he looks super weird? Yeah, so what

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 1>imagine it would look like for you? But hey, you

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 1>know what's this is weird? But sometimes on the subway,

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you see a reflection like the window and

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 1>somewhere I'm staying there, I can see the outline of

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:37.480
<v Speaker 1>where it would go, and you were likely this is weird. No,

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it is sick. I don't want to come out in

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the shower sometimes using what the f is on your face?

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:46.920
<v Speaker 1>It never happens. No, it wasn't. Not, that was not.

0:45:46.960 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Like how often do you shave? Uh? Usually every five days,

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 1>every five days? But this week I don't ever shave myself.

0:45:54.960 --> 0:45:56.440
<v Speaker 1>This really get it trimmed when I go to get

0:45:56.480 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a haircut. This week was his day, Today's day five.

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 1>So I haven't shaved a week. I shouldn't say shave

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 1>all next week. That's what we gotta do, man, Like,

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 1>let's place a wager. I've been trying to do this

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:11.719
<v Speaker 1>for how long have we been doing the show, since

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:13.760
<v Speaker 1>we got the show? Couple of years. I've been trying

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to find a wager something too bet with you on

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:19.560
<v Speaker 1>where if you lose, you have to grow out your

0:46:19.560 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 1>facial hair. It would itch too much. No, it's not. Ye,

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you look great. A little bit of rugged greg action.

0:46:25.719 --> 0:46:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Do I seem rugged? Right now? You're like, so here's

0:46:28.520 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the thing. So for me, I'm looking there this morning, like, Wow,

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:33.400
<v Speaker 1>this is this is very thick. And then I watched

0:46:33.400 --> 0:46:35.319
<v Speaker 1>back we did not really I did the NBA recap

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>this morning and I watched it back. It was like,

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you can't know there's anything on my face exactly, but

0:46:39.800 --> 0:46:41.759
<v Speaker 1>hysterical because I look at it him like, oh my god,

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's up close, it's in a mirror. Like the

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 1>whole point is, wouldn't it's Judy? Yeah, duty isn't my

0:46:49.719 --> 0:46:53.479
<v Speaker 1>facials out? She doesn't like it, But next time Judy

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is in the doghouse, that should be her punishment. You

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:58.919
<v Speaker 1>grow your facial I don't want to or just over there,

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:02.880
<v Speaker 1>how dare you? I invited Frank over next weekend. He

0:47:02.960 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 1>tearned me down. It's not my fault. It wasn't my

0:47:06.960 --> 0:47:10.680
<v Speaker 1>fault four three six. I think that's what Mike McCoy

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:14.319
<v Speaker 1>is saying right now. It wasn't my fault. Disaster. He's

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:16.919
<v Speaker 1>been time, he's been fired three times and last year

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 1>yeah and rightfully so, I don't dude, if he didn't

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:23.400
<v Speaker 1>get fired today, I was gonna come in and like

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:28.280
<v Speaker 1>just strip into the like you look at what their offense.

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:31.800
<v Speaker 1>It was just a disaster. That team was not ready

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to play football last night. It was a disgrace to

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:37.880
<v Speaker 1>call that team an NFL team. It was absolutely disgusting

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:41.439
<v Speaker 1>from the first like the ten seconds into the game,

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rosen is calling a time out. Wait, there's no preparation.

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:50.000
<v Speaker 1>There was nothing embarrassing. I don't know if you saw

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:54.320
<v Speaker 1>this um this tweet from Warren Sharp last night. This

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:58.320
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous stats that Warren Sharp provides. Uh, the NFL average

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of runs behind their center twenty eight point nine percent.

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>The NFL average. Would you like to guess the percentage

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:08.879
<v Speaker 1>of runs the Cardinals have run right into the back

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of their offensive line, right into the seven their center six?

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:21.799
<v Speaker 1>The NFL average is twenty eight point nine This Mike

0:48:21.920 --> 0:48:25.759
<v Speaker 1>McCoy was like the last of a dying breed of

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 1>John Fox, Jeff Fisher, these boring ass old head coaches.

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, Mike McCoy isn't even that old,

0:48:33.239 --> 0:48:36.720
<v Speaker 1>but the way that he thinks is like prehistoric NFL times.

0:48:37.080 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 1>You have one of the most versatile running backs in

0:48:39.600 --> 0:48:43.759
<v Speaker 1>the league in David Johnson, You're running him into the

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:48.000
<v Speaker 1>back of your center sixty three percent of the times

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that you run the football. Like, like, what were the

0:48:50.640 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals thinking? What like, what was Steve Wilkes thinking. I mean,

0:48:54.280 --> 0:48:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I'll if he doesn't show any improvement over the next

0:48:56.719 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 1>eight or nine games, I mean he's gonna be the

0:48:58.480 --> 0:49:02.160
<v Speaker 1>next one season. Works with Mike McCoy many many years

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:04.520
<v Speaker 1>ago in Carolina and that was it. That was it.

0:49:05.760 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 1>We gotta like, we gotta be better than this. You

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 1>gotta be better than this. Does this create a buying

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:13.120
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for David Johnson? I don't know if his value

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:15.080
<v Speaker 1>will ever It feels like every couple of weeks we

0:49:15.160 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>say this, David Johnson's value will never be lower than this.

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:20.359
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at what he's done, he's he's

0:49:20.360 --> 0:49:24.200
<v Speaker 1>been a touchdown reliant, low end RB one. That's been it.

0:49:24.320 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Like last week, he gave you fifty five yards, but

0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:29.719
<v Speaker 1>he gave you, what two touchdowns? If he doesn't score

0:49:29.760 --> 0:49:32.480
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns, we're freaking out last week too. He's been

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown reliant running back hopefully Byron left which has

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:39.440
<v Speaker 1>an ounce of creativity in his offensive play calling, and

0:49:39.560 --> 0:49:42.319
<v Speaker 1>he'll figure, oh, you know, let's target David Johnson more

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 1>than three times in a game, Greig. He turned three

0:49:45.080 --> 0:49:48.400
<v Speaker 1>targets into three receptions for thirty one yards. Why is

0:49:48.440 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 1>he not getting five to seven targets per game at

0:49:51.480 --> 0:49:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the least If you can get this guy the ball

0:49:54.280 --> 0:49:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in his hands the receiver at least five or six times,

0:49:57.440 --> 0:49:59.920
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna end up giving you fifty to sixty yards receiving,

0:50:01.280 --> 0:50:03.839
<v Speaker 1>and in turn that will help your offenses because then

0:50:03.960 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 1>defenses have to send another player to watch David Johnson

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:09.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the backfield. Right now, it's like, okay, well,

0:50:09.920 --> 0:50:11.319
<v Speaker 1>we know he's They're not going to throw the ball

0:50:11.360 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to David Johnson because they're dumb. Mike McCoy got with

0:50:15.320 --> 0:50:18.040
<v Speaker 1>what he deserved, and Wikipedia actually had him fired last

0:50:18.120 --> 0:50:21.920
<v Speaker 1>night before it even happened. Shout out to Wikipedia, most

0:50:21.960 --> 0:50:24.240
<v Speaker 1>reliable source of all. And with that we say goodbye

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to YouTube for now. Thank you so much for watching

0:50:26.680 --> 0:50:28.760
<v Speaker 1>good Luck this week. If you're listening on the podcast,

0:50:28.800 --> 0:50:32.239
<v Speaker 1>of course we appreciate it, so please subscribe, rate us

0:50:32.280 --> 0:50:34.359
<v Speaker 1>five starts and leave a comment. If you are listening

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 1>on the radio, we'll go another five minutes and so

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:39.719
<v Speaker 1>much gives give us thumbs up on YouTube as well,

0:50:40.280 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 1>because Corey Parson, Cory Parson, fancy executives been chirping a

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:46.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Jim, I have a theory about Corey Parson. Great,

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 1>want to tell us he uh, he skips out right

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:51.400
<v Speaker 1>after the frenzy every single day, run runs away. He

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 1>gets all these thumbs up, right, he gets all these

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:57.600
<v Speaker 1>likes on the Fantasy Football Frenzy. I have a theory.

0:50:58.760 --> 0:51:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Cory Parson goes home, m opens up computer, phone, tablet,

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:06.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever he might have. Whatever he watches is the Frenzy,

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 1>goes back and watches it on. He has Burner accounts.

0:51:11.040 --> 0:51:15.440
<v Speaker 1>He has Burner accounts where he himself goes in and

0:51:15.600 --> 0:51:18.440
<v Speaker 1>gives himself thumbs up on Fantasy Football Frenzy, which in

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:20.799
<v Speaker 1>turn gets him more views because the more thumbs up

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you have, the higher you move up on YouTube, so

0:51:22.760 --> 0:51:26.160
<v Speaker 1>on and so forth. Um, it's a whole algorithm thing

0:51:26.200 --> 0:51:29.840
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. That's what Corey does. He has Burner YouTube

0:51:29.840 --> 0:51:32.120
<v Speaker 1>accounts where he gives himself thumbs up on the Fantasy

0:51:32.120 --> 0:51:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Football Frenzy. Let's see what A says about this. A C.

0:51:35.040 --> 0:51:39.040
<v Speaker 1>New York your next Let what's up? Man? Sorry? I

0:51:39.160 --> 0:51:42.160
<v Speaker 1>was looking at Corey's reaction. Uh, he's down here in

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:44.279
<v Speaker 1>the chair and he's not happy with Frank. Uh. You

0:51:44.400 --> 0:51:49.799
<v Speaker 1>got Chris in New York on the phone. Hey, what's up?

0:51:49.880 --> 0:51:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Guys love the show? Sure? Sure? Alright? So, um, someone

0:51:56.360 --> 0:51:58.759
<v Speaker 1>in my league is panicking because they're not doing too

0:51:58.800 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 1>well and they have and both Connor Bell out Connor

0:52:02.239 --> 0:52:06.120
<v Speaker 1>on the by. So they offered me Belle Connor and

0:52:06.320 --> 0:52:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Collins for Hunt, Eric Ebron, uh, and Allison and I

0:52:12.239 --> 0:52:18.000
<v Speaker 1>do have Ingram too to show the Brown's place Evan Ingram. Yeah,

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking that Connor and Bell have like a timeshare

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:24.680
<v Speaker 1>like Ingram and Camara. I'm just gonna kill it. What's

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:28.920
<v Speaker 1>your record? My record is two and four, but it's

0:52:28.960 --> 0:52:31.359
<v Speaker 1>a strong tu and four. Three of my losses were

0:52:31.400 --> 0:52:34.920
<v Speaker 1>by a total of six points. Man. That's tough. So

0:52:35.000 --> 0:52:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd imagine that you rank up pretty highly in your

0:52:37.040 --> 0:52:41.880
<v Speaker 1>league in terms of points scored. Man, this is uh,

0:52:42.200 --> 0:52:44.279
<v Speaker 1>this is a risky one thing. I don't I don't

0:52:44.280 --> 0:52:46.239
<v Speaker 1>know that we've had a more risky trade off for

0:52:46.320 --> 0:52:48.759
<v Speaker 1>ascid this Sea. Give up Kareem Hunt, who is unquestionably

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a top six or sin running back. Give up who's

0:52:52.680 --> 0:52:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a top five tight end? Allison, assuming coming out of

0:52:57.040 --> 0:53:03.239
<v Speaker 1>the by, he's a wide receiver. Three Ellen Connor. If

0:53:03.280 --> 0:53:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Bell comes back and it's Levian Bell again, then James

0:53:06.480 --> 0:53:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Conner is nothing. I don't I don't know that they

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:11.759
<v Speaker 1>do the timeshare thing, Like, why wouldn't they just run

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Levian Bell into the ground over the final whatever six

0:53:14.560 --> 0:53:16.680
<v Speaker 1>or seven weeks of the season because they know he's

0:53:16.680 --> 0:53:19.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to be back next year. And then you

0:53:19.440 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 1>get Alex Collins, who was like a low end RB two.

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:26.399
<v Speaker 1>This is a this is this is a championship winning move. Greg.

0:53:26.960 --> 0:53:30.600
<v Speaker 1>If I've ever seen one, two and four, you still

0:53:30.640 --> 0:53:32.960
<v Speaker 1>need to win this week. I don't think I'm doing it.

0:53:33.440 --> 0:53:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm making the deal, making its championship move. I'm all

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:38.040
<v Speaker 1>about championship moves. What do you did? I love cream

0:53:38.080 --> 0:53:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Home more than anybody, but Eric, you need to win

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:42.080
<v Speaker 1>this week too. If you fold to two and five

0:53:42.200 --> 0:53:45.319
<v Speaker 1>when you get Levian Bell over the final however many games? Right,

0:53:45.480 --> 0:53:47.279
<v Speaker 1>we don't even The thing is, we don't even know

0:53:47.320 --> 0:53:50.480
<v Speaker 1>if he's returning. I think at James Conner. I think,

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:54.719
<v Speaker 1>James Conner, well, i'll have this week. I'll have if

0:53:54.760 --> 0:53:56.799
<v Speaker 1>I do the trade, he'll give me Collins, so i'll

0:53:56.840 --> 0:53:59.319
<v Speaker 1>have Cook and Collins is my running back. And then

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:04.080
<v Speaker 1>if Cook down plays, dude, yeah, I have the cuff.

0:54:04.160 --> 0:54:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I have the handcuff. And man, we gotta make me

0:54:08.960 --> 0:54:10.920
<v Speaker 1>feel a little bit better. We gotta, we gotta let

0:54:10.960 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you go. I wouldn't do it, Greg would do it.

0:54:13.239 --> 0:54:15.120
<v Speaker 1>It's close, Frank, we have thirty seconds left. I gotta

0:54:15.120 --> 0:54:18.279
<v Speaker 1>get your pitch for this week. Our picks. What are saying?

0:54:19.040 --> 0:54:23.399
<v Speaker 1>You're the Jets and Vikings over forty six points. Jets

0:54:23.440 --> 0:54:26.760
<v Speaker 1>have been scoring, the Vikings have been scoring. I Corey's

0:54:26.760 --> 0:54:28.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna hte me even more. I got Washington at home,

0:54:29.000 --> 0:54:31.480
<v Speaker 1>winning out righting against the Cowboys. What was the other

0:54:31.480 --> 0:54:35.080
<v Speaker 1>one I said to I don't know. We will say, oh, Carolina,

0:54:35.320 --> 0:54:37.720
<v Speaker 1>al right, Carolina plus four. I'll take Buffalo, New England

0:54:37.719 --> 0:54:40.879
<v Speaker 1>and Jacksonville. The Frenzies up next. The Fax out till Monday. Gee,

0:54:40.960 --> 0:54:42.240
<v Speaker 1>then Hope