WEBVTT - Here's Why Europe is Unprepared To Defend Itself

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. I'm Caroline Hepkee, and

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>this is Here's Why, where we take one news story

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and explain it in just a few minutes with our

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>experts here at Bloomberg. In nineteen eighty nine, the Berlin

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Wall fell and the US became the world's only military superpower. NATO,

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the alliance that was founded forty years earlier on a

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>pact of mutual defense, had effectively achieved its aim. But

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>now that same alliance faces a new threat from its

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>old adversary, and possibly another one from its largest member.

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Russia's invasion of Ukraine has created an inflection point for

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the military alliance. It's something That's been made all the

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>more acute by Donald Trump's frequent criticism, both whilst he

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>was in office and now that he's running for a

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>second I have.

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Been very very direct with Secretary of Staltenberg and members

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 2>of the Alliance in saying that NATO members must finally

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 2>contribute their fair share and meet their financial obligations. NATO

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 2>was busted until I came along. I said, everybody's going

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 2>to pay. They said, well, if we don't pay and

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 2>we're attacked by Russia, will you protect US. I said,

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 2>you didn't pay. You're delinquent. He said, yes, let's say

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 2>that happened. No, I would not protect you. In fact,

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 2>I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want.

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>You got to pay. This summer, advisors for the Republican

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>presidential nominee floated the idea of demanding that NATO allah

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Is spend three percent of their GDP on defense, a

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>warning shot that signals even more tension if the former

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>president does return to the White House. So here's why

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Europe is unprepared to defend itself and why it may

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>need to. Joining me now to discuss is Bloomberg's executive editor,

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Flavia Kraus Jackson, who oversees our EMEA and Latin America

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Economics and government coverage. Lavia, thank you so much. How

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>much of a concern is it in Europe that a

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration could pull the US back from its native commitment?

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Short answer is extreme worry. And I think you know,

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 3>is your able to defend itself? Actually we can't. There's

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 3>been chronic underfunding on the defense spending. And you can

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 3>argue that Trump, with his sort of outlandish talk, has

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 3>actually given Europe the proverbial kickup to bottom that it needed.

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 3>And you know, even when you look at someone like

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Jen Staltenberg, the outgoing NATO Secretary General, sort of eccentially

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 3>acknowledges that much. And Rutter, who was a former Dutch

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 3>prime minister who's now incoming known as a Trump whisperer,

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 3>has essentially been saying listen, He's been saying the quiet

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.399
<v Speaker 3>part out loud, folks. We really need to be able

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 3>to do it. I mean, the problem, of course is

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 3>having diagnosed the problem, how do you fix it? Because

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 3>the essential problem here is that you have twenty first

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 3>century wars with twenty century kit and there wasn't really

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 3>an understanding of where the conflict would be. Like hindsight

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 3>being twenty twenty, we all remember President Macran saying that

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 3>NATO was brain dead. We also remember NATO essentially kind

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 3>of putting its focus more in the Middle East with Syria,

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 3>so sort of it didn't almost see coming the conflict

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 3>in Ukraine, even though the writing was kind of on

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 3>the wall terms of Russian expansionism right twousand and eight,

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Georgia twenty fourteen, Annexation of Crimea twenty twenty two, sending

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 3>the jets to Syria. So there's a question of why

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 3>NATO hadn't pivoted in the way it should have.

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>And even to me a non defense expert, I can

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>see from the data, you know, how few planes, how

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>few ships. The comparison between Europe, the US and other

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>countries China, for example, it is starkly illustrated. How big

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is Europe's fighting force? Does it have the capability then

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to act without US backing the other? Big big question?

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 3>It simply can't, right, I mean, and you're sort of

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 3>scraping the barrel right now. Twenty three out of the

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 3>thirty two members are hitting the two percent target. Even

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 3>if they were to up this to three point five,

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 3>it still wouldn't be enough. You can't conjure an army

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 3>out of nothing. And it's not just about the numbers.

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 3>It's also about the quality of the kit, the training.

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 3>If it's been basically left to gather rust. You're now

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 3>in a situation where you've got the check initiative, you're

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 3>having to revive old Slovak factories. In the meantime, you

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 3>have Putin, who's turned his economy into a war economy,

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 3>pumping the money. So Europe simply isn't able to keep

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 3>up with that, And the most important point is is

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 3>you as willing to keep its commitment because as we

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 3>well know, there could be a change of God. Trump

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 3>is the worst case scenario for Zelenski. But I don't

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 3>I think we should assume that things are going to

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 3>be that much better under a Harris administration, especially when

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 3>you see it to a degree what some might say

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 3>the double standard. I mean, if you have a crisis

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 3>in Israel with Hamas and Hizbola, you're essentially giving a

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 3>carte blanche to NITAYAHUO. No matter how tense that relationship is,

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 3>it's still the more important relationship. It's still seen as

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 3>much more vital to the US, and the US simply

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 3>cannot sort of be the world's policeman of fighting two

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 3>conflicts and potentially even a third one in Taiwan.

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>The head of the UK's Armed Forces has talked about

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>the need to be ready for a major direct conflict

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>by twenty twenty seven. This's got a lot of eyeballs.

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>You know that it was so soon, you know, a

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>major war increasingly likely for Europe.

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, twenty twenty seven is the sort of the

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 3>day that everyone has in mind in terms of when

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 3>potentially China decides that's when it's going to go for it, right,

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 3>So that data is sort of out there in the ether.

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 3>But you know, there was also the words of a

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 3>General Sir Patrick earlier this summer that kind of revives

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 3>question about UK conscription. Right, if you think back, it

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 3>was in the Great Wars that there was a conscription

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 3>and some of his words were slightly misinterpreted, but he

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 3>essentially reintroduced the topic of like how fit is the UK,

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 3>especially sort of post Brexit. Right, you have France, it's

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 3>the nuclear power, you have the UK. You have Germany

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 3>for all sorts of reasons that we know well is

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 3>an economic power, but not a military one in spite

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 3>of having committed one hundred billion. That's a very long

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 3>term concept. So when you're looking at the numbers, what

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 3>could France and the UK can draw between themselves in

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 3>terms of men and within a month you're looking at

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 3>maybe twenty thousand for France and about thirty twenty thousand

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 3>for the UK. That simply isn't very much, especially when

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 3>you sort of compare that to the terrible figures and casualties.

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, thirty one thousand Ukrainian casualties, so when you're

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 3>playing the sort of the numbers game, you can see

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 3>how in Russia can play the long game and wait

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 3>it out.

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>That was, of course, General Sir Patrick Sanders who made

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that comment around conscription in the UK, and you only

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 1>have to look at the newspaper coverage at the time

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of those comments that understand the gap between public understanding

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and this kind of reporting and what the military and

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>what the defense industry is kind of thinking about. My

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Bloomberg's executive editor Flavia kraus Jackson for joining

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>us for more explanations like this one from our team

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand, seven hundred journalists and analysts around the world.

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Search for Quick Take on the Bloomberg website and the

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app. I'm Caroline Hepger. This is Here's Why,

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be back next week with more. Thanks for listening.