WEBVTT - Surveillance: Correction Has Room To Go, Rochester Says

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm term Keene Jay Leye.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. We

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>start this program though, by getting Jordan Rochester on the

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>phone the mare a gtain effects strategist to Maura, and

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's walk me through the house view right now for

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 1>how these kind of shocks are going to roll through

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>asset classes, roll through markets in the coming weeks. Hi, John,

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not going to be fun and I hate

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>to be the pair of bad news, but there is

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on in terms of equity markets. It's

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>huge moves and that's feeding through to foreign exchange markets

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in weird, wonderful and slightly confusing ways. So where do

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I start. First, of all, equities were in a world

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of their own for the past couple of weeks. We

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>have been watching the situation in China, the rally and

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>fixed income, the sell off in commodities, but the equity

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>market was making fresh eyes. So we're seeing that corrections

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>coming back down to where it should be. And I've

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>got these charts on my screen which show me how

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>U S equities trade versus growth expectations, and the same

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>for Europe. And we've seen sell offs in both markets,

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, so they're coming back down towards Earth. The

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>US markets have corrected more than the European ones, and

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there is actually still more room to go

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>because what we're not used to is a supply shock

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of this magnitude if it escalates. We're used to Donald

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump being able to do a Phase one deal with China,

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the FED cutting rates and solving the issue with credit

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>markets and resolving financial conditions. Supply shocks are very hard

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>for central bankers or even policy makers to solve. So

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that's why you're seeing the moves in markets here, and

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take time, and time will be painful.

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to the European market, they won't have

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>as much flexibility when it comes to rate cuts like

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the ECB. The ECB it has about ten basis points

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of rate cuts they could do. They could maybe do

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>quanta to be easing again, but they're already doing it.

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So for me, I think the currency rising today is

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>just absolute bonkers. And I think that this is something

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that needs to correct weaker euro and eventually stronger dollar.

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 1>But what's going on, guys, is when you've got big

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>moves like list and equities, you've got investors repatriating their money,

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and you have seen those qui outflows drive the U euro.

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Hire here as that money is coming back home, Jenn,

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 1>I want to point out we are nine point zero

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>two correction, like we're almost to the cusp of an spres.

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>We're close to ten percent over in Germany on the

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>equity benchmark in Frankfurt, Jordan, let's talk about the euro

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 1>repat training cash. Are we starting to see some end

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>type qualities to the single currency? There is, John m

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I was mentioning it before. So we saw contate of

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>easing into a fifteen, and we had extensions, we had

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>slowed downs, and we're back in the same game again.

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And when you've got buns at negative yields, they you

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>saw massive outflows into US assets, into emerging market assets.

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>So what's going on is European investors have got all

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>these assets abroad and now having fun redemptions, and so

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>they because the risk off tends to see sellers. So

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing those fun redemptions mean that they have to

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>bring that money home and convert it back into Euros. Now,

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>this is a flow which is very hard to predict.

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>It's very hard to trade, and timing it to be

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>very difficult. I think once it does settles, and I

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.119
<v Speaker 1>think if we see a bit of stability, will then

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>go back to euro being much more exposed to what's

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>going on in China and also the situation escalating in

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Milan as well. So I think short term this is

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>what's driving you are higher, but I'm not chasing it,

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and I do think that the currency will come under

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>pressure because guys, I think by the end of this

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>year we're all gonna be experts in credit risks again.

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>We've been so used to rates rallying, ECB easing rates

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>for everybody um that we've kind of neglected the credit

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>risks that have been building out there. And if we

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>have a hit to growth like this, and if the

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>lockdowns and the virus spread goes into Q two, maybe

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>even we're still here in June talking about it, then

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>credit risks will be on everyone's minds when we talk

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>about credit risks. Jordan, it seems to be a race

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom. I was struck by the idea that

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the dollar is actually weakening versus certain Asian currencies because

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>people are now treating their focus on the potential for

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus to spread in the United States and for

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>that not being fully priced in. I mean, yes, the

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>euro is expected to weaken more, But how vulnerable is

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the US here given the fact that a lot of

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>people viewed it as immune from some of the worst

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 1>impacts here. Yeah, the U S exty market have been

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the safe haven of ecty markets in the world thanks

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to all those share by backs. You guys have been

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>enjoying UM. And also you always had the FED rate

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>cutting rates as your backup, and the market is now

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>pricing that in and you've got a pro We see

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>further pricing of that to come. However, let's think more

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>about the end game. Most of the world capital is

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>still between the New York to Boston corridor. When I

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>look at all of my country's I track the biggest

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>holders outside of the residents of those countries of equities

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>for example, UK eputies, European equities, the US. So if

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone's going to repat your eight, the biggest flow is

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be back into dollars. Now. It's not going

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to be like the global financial crisis because back then

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>there was very little foreign exchange hedging. We've had much

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 1>higher FX hedging ratios. So the impact on the currency

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe a lot less than what we saw in the

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Panics of two thousands, seven and eight. Jordan, give us

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>some point here and Dolla Yan, what is your adjusted

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>target now for dollah Yan? Well, look, we had had

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>this big outflow from Japan just the other week. We

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>had that push up to one well and dolli and

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that was driven and buy pension flows. Our guys still

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>think that will matter um and so we're not chasing

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the yen strength here. But if we start to see

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>signs of the Tokyo Olympics being canceled, we're looking out

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>for that risk. Maybe something to talk about more in May.

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>I think yen still trades like a safe haven tom

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and so at some point there might be some yen strength.

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Are you are you being we're not chasing? Is there

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a big figure play here on Euro? Then? I mean

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>within all these huge flows, these titanic moments we're talking about,

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is there like five big figures in Euro one way

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>or the other absolutely. I think essentially once we get

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>over Friday, so tomorrow's month end, and we're going to

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>see some dollar buying. I think when we see those

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>flows because of what's been going on, I think Monday

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>we come back to work, euros lower and we're tracking

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>more towards one oh six one oh seven again over

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the next month. We'll hold you to that. Jordan's great

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to catch out with you, Jordan Rochester. Hopefully we'll catch

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>out with him in the next couple of weeks. Now

0:06:54.920 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>More's g said effect strategists. We are committed, folks to

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>giving you the best conversations we can from medical professionals. John.

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>If you go down fifth even or you know there's

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>well you see so many benefactors of Wall Street Mr. Travis,

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Mr Icon and others that have put money where Hope

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and Mouth is in build a first class, world class

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>medical set of institutions. Adam Bernheim is with Mount Sinai

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and they own the high ground on medical engineering. Biomedical

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>engineering in his case is a study of lungs. He

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is one of the best in the world at these

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>viruses and what they do to our lungs. He's a

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>cardio thoracic radiologist. I'm really happy to say on this program,

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>we've made such a big effort over the last couple

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of weeks, the last few months to really focus on

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>leaving the medical issues to the medical professionals. Professionals. Doctor,

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>is fantastic to have you with us on the program.

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Something I don't think has done, or a lot of

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>people haven't done a good enough job of, is talk

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>about the differences between coronavirus, other viruses, other flus. Take

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>me inside the body, inside the chest, inside the lungs,

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the pictures that you've seen, Why is this so different?

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for having me. It's a pleasure

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to be here. When we first started looking at scans

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and patients with coronavirus infection from China, we didn't know

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>what to expect because this is a new diagnosis that

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>we were describing for the first time. But as we

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>categorically went through hundreds of cases, we're able to recognize

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>clear patterns that were emerging. Importantly, the way that the

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>lung was infect affected included lesions that had a predilection

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>for a certain area in the lung. They often had

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a certain shape, and certain other imaging characteristics that were suggestive. Notably,

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>there are other factors and features on the scans that

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>were absent that are found in other infections. For example,

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>patients with other pneumonias often have fluid outside the lungs,

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>lymph node enlargement, nodules, cavitation which means air cavities within

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the legion, or calcification. These were actually notably absent in

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>all of the patients that we went through, So that's

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>really helpful for distinguishing disinfection from other infections, including other

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>viral infections like influenza. No one single case is one accurate,

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>but if there are enough features on any on a scan,

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 1>an index of suspicion is elevated. There are enough features

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>that we can be that there are certainly very strongly suggestive,

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's one of the reasons that radiologists

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>and cat scans have emerged as foundational and the algorithm

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of diagnosis of these patients. Dr Bernheim, that's an excellent

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>synopsis of the diagnostic developments here. How nations are looking

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to identify coronavirus cases, but how does that translate over

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to the potential remedies and how easy or difficult it

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is to actually cure these cases. I think one of

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the keys is just limiting its spread. So I think

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>as a radiologist and one of the key ways that

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>we can be huffle is to ensure prompt diagnosis. So,

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>for example, one of our findings was that patients very

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>early on after symptom onset, if they had a camp

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>skin it was negative actually about half of the time,

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's important to know that there could be false negatives,

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly very early in the disease, so that patients shouldn't

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>be taken off isolation. In terms of combating the epidemic

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>on a larger global scale and treatment, I think the

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>best way is really preventing its spread. So if we

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>have patients that may be suspected of having infection, it's

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 1>really helpful to know that we can make a diagnosis

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>as early as possible, which is certainly helpful for that

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>individual patients, so we can start treatment as early as possible,

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's also necessary for a greater public health perspective

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that patient does remain isolated and will not

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 1>transmit the disease to others. Donctor, you would have heard

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>people make the comparison to the seasonal flu many many

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>times over the last couple of months. And a question

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I've had for quite a while and I'd love to

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>put to you, is why this particular coronavirus requires such

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a huge containment effort to degree that China and others

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>are taking it. Why is that the case? The flu

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>has some similarities to coronavirus, but also some differences Influenza

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the flu in itself is a very deadly disease that

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 1>is killed about sixteen thousand people already in this year's

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>season and hospitalized almost three hundred thousand. So influenza and

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>its own right is certainly a very serious infection. However,

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen are coronavirus infection now is concerning in other ways.

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 1>For example, the mortality of an infected patient is actually

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit higher than influenza. So, for example, the

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>chance of any given patient passing away from suluenza infection

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is about point one percent, but the mortality rate here

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>is twenty times that about two. That's one feature that's

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>different and another, and I think one of the concerns

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is that there's a large percentage of the patients that

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>actually have very mild symptoms about of COVID nineteen cases

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>are actually patients that have very mild, non specific symptoms,

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>perhaps some fever and a cough, shortness of breath and

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>little more than that. And there are many that are

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>actually asymptomatic for a very long time before the manifest symptoms.

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So one of the concerns and one of the distinguishing

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>from influenza, is that you have patients that have sometimes

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>no or mild nonsphysics symptoms and are easily transmitting the

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>disease to others. Dr Bernhind, you have a good knowledge

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 1>or understanding of the age distribution effect of this virus.

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>The bar charts are simplistic. Everybody over eighties in trouble.

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Enlighteness on how you go down to the younger patients

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>on that, that's a really interesting question that we're looking at,

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and you're right. Early investigators have noted a higher mortality

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in older patients and those with pre existing lung disease

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>like emphysema or fibrosis, and also mail seems to be

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>affected a little bit more as well. One of the

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>things that we found that was really striking is that

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>pediatric patients were characteristically very unaffected. In other words, even

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 1>the patients that even kids that were positive for the

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus very often had normal CT scans, which is something

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that's uh, not something we necessarily expected. Oh, we have

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>ten more questions in no time. Dr Bernheim, thank you

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us today with Mount sign A Hospital.

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>We look forward to speaking to you again as soon.

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Adam Bernheim abount uh sign Hi, that's just extraordinary. Let's

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>bring in Patrick now, Patrick Armstrong Flaim Wealth ce io. Patrick,

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>interested to find out what you've been doing in the

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>market of the last couple of weeks. What kind of

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>moves have you've been making. We've not been doing a

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>huge amount, despite a huge amount of volatility, really because

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>we were defensively positioned, so we were quite frustrated when

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>everything was moving higher together earlier in the year, and

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>quite comfortable with our positioning right now at the margins.

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>We've been moving away from some sequality and equities. We

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>sold air Bus Um yesterday. We bought some alphabet Google. Basically,

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>we think Cloud's not going to be impacted by the virus.

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>People stay at home, watch YouTube, search will continue to

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>do well. So we're looking for companies that have a

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of cash, not in new and to the virus

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>by the means, but not going to be severely impacted.

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>To be clear that, Patrick, you are starting to put

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>capital to work then in more offensive areas of the market.

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Would that be a correct a correct observation of what

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you're doing. Sorry, you're just cut out for a second.

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>That's okay, Patrick, I'm just wondering if you are starting

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to put fresh capital into more offensive parts of the

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>market given the sell off that we've seen over the

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks. Not really so adding off about

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>something we did. Um, it's a great company obviously, but

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>still not cheap we I think the next move I'm

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>going to make is actually selling out of some of

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>my treasury positions and moving into the shorter end of

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the old curve, so that that's not really an offensive move.

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>But I do think pricing in secular stagnation and that

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have a sharp hit to the economy

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>from this. But twelve months from now, very confident what

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>what level of yields is sort of the trigger point

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>for you to sell. I've been thinking about it for

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the as few days, and we'll probably pull the trigger today.

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Even the levels now, it's very hard to see how

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>when you get a dividend yield on the SMP five

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred of one point nine percent versus a ten year

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>yield at one point to five and thirty year yield

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>one seven, it's I'd rather have equities for the long term.

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Short term, there's a lot of momentum behind bonds and

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of negative momentum on equities. I'm not ready

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to really make a big position on equities yet because

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I still think they're expensive, but I do think the

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>bond rally has probably gone too far. Your thoughts one

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>final question, your thoughts on financials right now? And not

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about the banks, but they've got to deal with

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>this unique yield market, don't they. Definitely, And we've owned

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the banks in Europe in the past, and that's been

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a mistake we made. When I was Bush on the banks,

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I expected the ECB to get rates towards zero, and

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I really think that's the catalyst. Don't need to get

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>back into that. The negative interest rate engine is such

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a headwind. Unless there is a wave of consolidation in Europe,

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that would also be good news for the banks, but

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to allow employees to be fired for that

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to work. Too short of visit Patrick Armston, Thank you

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>so much, Plurimi Capital in London joining us. If you

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>are in the tech stocks, I will just say flat out,

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>this is your interview of the day. She's Shannon Cross

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of Cross Research. She's not like some ginormous uh name

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>out there where she's like doing the media trial. And

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>we're thrilled to get her on today because she uh

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>sticks to her clients and attention of her clients out

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of Berkeley political economics, and she does prodigious tech research.

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Have you changed Shannon your by hold cell on the

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>big thing tech names? You know, I haven't. Um, here's

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing, whether it's Microsoft or Apple or even

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>best by just and I don't cover best Buy, but

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I was just listening to their earnings called. You know,

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone at this point continues to say that underlying demand

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>remains strong. So yes, the supply chain is interrupted, but

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>all of these companies continue to believe that this will be,

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, a relatively relatively short term issue. Um. Right now,

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>the biggest challenge is getting employees back to the factories

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in China, and you know, it sounds like some of

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the factories are starting to come back online. Clearly you know,

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be spreading, so we'll have to see

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>what that does over time. But you know, demand is

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>demand is still there. What do the companies you follow

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>do with there once in a century levels of cash?

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if there were opportunities seven weeks ago, some

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of these stocks are down bear market. Is this where

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>we finally see them deploy cash? Well, you know, it

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>will be interesting. I mean from an M and A perspective,

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll see where things things play out. I mean we've

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>been teen HP and Xerox, and obviously that transaction is

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>one where Xerox is looking on putting a ton of

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>leverage onto the combining company, which frankly doesn't seem particularly

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>smart at this point in time. But the ones that

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of cash, I mean, I would assume

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Apple is going to be out very aggressively buying backstock.

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, HP will They just announced a fifteen billion

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>dollar share repurchase program. So as soon as they sort

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of get through some of the Xerox tender offer prohibitions

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>about buying, they will be you know, and others as well,

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>being Microsoft too, So I think, you know, companies are

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be smart about this. I don't think they're

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>going to overreact. I think the ones I've talked to

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in the management that most of them are being very

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>prudent about looking at it. They're protecting their employees, they're

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:46.479
<v Speaker 1>protecting their partners, and they're assuming that this is going

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to be short term. And again they keep pointing to

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the fact that demand remains very solid. Market negative four

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven Paul Apple on a weekly chart negative. Yeah, exactly, Shannon.

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:58.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're so happy to have you on here

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>because we're you know that Microsoft News just kind of

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>added onto the Apple News again, pulling back revenue guidance

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 1>or adjusting revenue guidance. UM. At this point, is it

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 1>primarily a supply chain issue for the tech companies throughout

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the tech stack or is there also, you know, some

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:16.959
<v Speaker 1>demand issues. I know you mentioned that the companies are

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>still talking about good underlying demand, But are they seeing

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>canceled orders and mean that type of thing, or is

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>this just supply chain not yet I mean, and you know,

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 1>no canceled orders that I've heard of yet. I mean,

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's supply chain. Obviously, sales in China are going

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>to be weak this quarter. UM, But you know, I

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>think you can not that it's going to make up

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>for it, but Apple, for instance, will sell more services

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and I've had sales appaired to be pretty strong because

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 1>people are going to remote um you know, remote learning

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>and remote working. Uh, you know, I think that what

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I've heard is it's literally getting the people to the

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>factories because obviously transportation and in sorry in China has

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>been um impacted, and then you know, people have to

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>be quarantined when they get there to make sure they

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>don't have the virus, and getting the of factories up

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and running. Um. Interestingly, what I've been told, and I

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>some somehow question it, but it's what I've been told

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>by several people is that shipping has not been a

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>particular issue. So and even access to a lot of

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>components haven't been necessarily the issue. It's been the people issue. So, Shannon,

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>are the companies that you chat to, are they saying, hey,

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>once this passes in China particular, and maybe there's some

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 1>evidence that maybe it's peaking there, that we can ramp

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>up quickly and this might be a one quarter type

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>issue for them, or this might drag on throughout the year.

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're there at this point a lot of

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>them were saying, look, it will be you know, if

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we can get back to a percent utilization of the

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>factory by the end of March, then you know things

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>should be good for a second quarter. It might be

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a little optimistic. I mean, you know, we'll see how

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>how long it takes to ramp. I mean, I've heard

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>from companies that they have some factories that are basically

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 1>making nothing and some factories that are running in a

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:59.199
<v Speaker 1>dent um. So that's not really helpful, right, but you know,

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind have along the spectrum um I would

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I would say, as long as this doesn't expand and

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>start hitting economies, you know, and then you know, consumer

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.239
<v Speaker 1>confidence than all of that that you can you can

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of get back to normal. I think, you know,

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>companies like Apple can probably go a bit above a

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent in terms of bursts in their factories to

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>try to make up for channing Cross with us with

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>a Cross research. We do this with another day to

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>check negative five Dow right now twenty six thousand and

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>four sixty two sixty six points on the standard three

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>zero five one and the vix Paul and I've been

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>watching carefully from a twenty eight level up to thirty

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>two point seven four. I don't have the chart in

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>front of that. Maybe a high more sphear laden fix

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of the day up five point one eight big figures

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>two year yield bottoms out low yield for the day

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>one point zero six one. To be clear, that's a

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>bid to note prices price up, yield down uh tenure

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 1>yield and Paul, I'm sorry, oil is my mint of

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the day, if you will, Oil forty six nine down

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>two dollars forty four since and there's just simply no bid.

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>There's no best Texas in me absolutely, Tom Shannon, I

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>know you spent a lot of time talking to institutional investors. Um,

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 1>what do you sense they're doing. Are they taking this

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>as an opportunity to add to some of their best

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>high conviction tech names, or are they just saying this

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is beyond kind of this is not in our model. Well,

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I think initially they were saying this is not in

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>our model. We're going to look through that. You know,

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously that was about ten ago, so we can we

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>can get past those comments. I think at this point

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>they are starting to look at you know, I talked

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to a number of people in Microsoft yesterday, for instance,

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and they're saying, look, this is you know, a part

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.439
<v Speaker 1>of their business. Um, it will impact this quarter and

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit next quarter, but the core underlying um,

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, Fundamentals and Microsoft are very strong, and so

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I think some of those names they're they're kind of

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>trying to start adding to. I assume people will start

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>taking up Apple at some point. But you know, there's

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that old adage about you know, not not catching a

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 1>falling knife. Um, so I think some people are sort

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of just sideline point. I'm glad you mentioned that let's

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>go stochastic. We can do that with Shannon Cross the

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 1>great chart idea of catching a falling knife in the

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 1>dark leads to guessing single data points on a chart. Okay,

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to do that. We're gonna look at

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the opposite, which is not stochastic, but trend. Shannon, if

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you if you were, you know not, you know, there's

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 1>only just me and Paul listening. But Shannon, if you

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 1>were to establish a trend for the names you follow,

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>am I clear that that trend is still up? From

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a yes, I think from a long term perspective, Look,

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 1>people there are underlying I don't know, changes in business

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that are going on. People are moving to the cloud,

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>people are you know, moving to edge computing. We will

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>eventually we have five G there's gonna be a lot

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>of data that's going to be crunched. I mean, you know,

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>technology is not something that's you know, going the way

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of the buggy whip. I mean, it's it's definitely where

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.439
<v Speaker 1>people are going to be in investing. And again, the

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>economies were strong going into this. So assuming this is,

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, something that sort of plays itself out through

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know early summer. I haven't know. I'm not

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>a doctor, I don't know, but you know, it's I

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>think the underlying demand and fundamentals are pretty solid for

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the names we cover. So Shannon, going back to Tom's

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 1>initial question, here, would you expect to see press releases

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>from companies saying we are increasing our buy back, we're

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>doing a one time buy back, or just taking a

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>more aggressive stance, or is this just gonna be part

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of their existing buy back kind of strategy. I don't

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>think at this point, um, anybody's gonna put something out

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>because there's just too many unknowns. I mean I was

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 1>talking to one executive and he basically said, if anybody

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 1>tells you they know exactly what's going on, they're not

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>really you know, they don't really know. Um So I

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 1>don't think this is the time when people step in

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>with sort of inclemental bibact related to Corona, and I'm

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>not sure they ever will. But you know, I think

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>for companies that have as their amount of cash to deploy,

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>they always use the term opportunistic. So as this thing

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>starts to sort of settle out, I think that opportunity

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 1>will probably come in and you will see some aggressive

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>buying depending on where we are in the quarter, because

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>remember a lot of these companies do have to go

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>into quiet period. You have been opportunistic. Shannon Cross, thank

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us today Cross Research. Again,

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>we protect the copyright of all of our guests research.

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 1>You can get Cross Research research from them. Shannon Cross

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of her own firm, and she doesn't Thanks for listening

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane. Before the podcast, you

0:25:55.560 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio