Speaker 1: Stay right here for our final news roundup and Information Overload.
Speaker 2: News round Up and Information Overload hour. Here is our
Speaker 2: toll free telephone number. It's eight hundred and nine to
Speaker 2: four one sean if you want to be a part
Speaker 2: of the program.
Speaker 3: We've got some.
Speaker 2: Real issues and problems as it relates to what the
Speaker 2: hell is going on with Joe Biden at the end
Speaker 2: of his administration. What was going on with all these
Speaker 2: auto pens. I'd like to know, And you know, we
Speaker 2: went into this in some specificity in detail last night,
Speaker 2: but the scandal around Biden's use of the autopen has
Speaker 2: grown worse by the day. So the New York Times
Speaker 2: does an interview that they published but yesterday or the
Speaker 2: day before, I forget, and Biden actually admitted he did
Speaker 2: not approve each individual pardon. The former president claimed he
Speaker 2: quote made every decision about Clemency's but later admitted that
Speaker 2: he had his staff replicate his signature because he said, quote,
Speaker 2: We're talking about a lot of people. And what's even
Speaker 2: more alarming in this, According to The New York Times,
Speaker 2: has Biden discussed pardons with his advisors on January the nineteenth,
Speaker 2: that's his last night in office, and after messages circulated
Speaker 2: among his advisors summarizing the meeting, it was Biden's then
Speaker 2: chief of staff, Jeff Zinz who sent an email reading quote,
Speaker 2: I approved the use of the autopen for the execution
Speaker 2: of all of the following pardons. Now, The New York
Speaker 2: Times also said that Biden just put parameters around the
Speaker 2: issuance of clemency for people, but he didn't sign off
Speaker 2: on specific cases. That is not the same as him
Speaker 2: deciding who to pardon or to offer clemency to. So
Speaker 2: they admitting here that he didn't make the ultimate decision,
Speaker 2: that he just put parameters around what his staff can
Speaker 2: choose or not choose. Because that constitutional power authority, which
Speaker 2: is absolute, there's no doubt about that. It appears less
Speaker 2: then clear that Biden made the decisions. Matter of fact,
Speaker 2: it sounds and reads to me like he didn't make
Speaker 2: the specific decisions. So we have that issue, and then
Speaker 2: we have this other issue of the report from John Solomon,
Speaker 2: who we had on the program yesterday. The FBI now
Speaker 2: is looking at all the years of weaponization of the
Speaker 2: federal government, opening the door now for a special prosecutor
Speaker 2: to look into everything, starting with the Russia hoax. And
Speaker 2: Baiza abuse straight on through Jack Smith and the Special Counsel. Anyway,
Speaker 2: here to weigh in on all of this is the
Speaker 2: chairman of the House Committee of Oversight and Government Reform,
Speaker 2: Chairman James Comer is with US Congressman, welcome back.
Speaker 3: How are you.
Speaker 1: I'm great, thanks t having me on Seohn.
Speaker 2: So I read this article and I read it that
Speaker 2: Biden is admitting he didn't approve each individual pardon and
Speaker 2: clemency here and that it was as chief of staff
Speaker 2: that signed off on these last day clemencies. Biden acknowlogy
Speaker 2: he didn't agree to the aim of every person that
Speaker 2: received a pardon. I made every decision, he says about
Speaker 2: the clemencies, before admitting that he had his staff replicate
Speaker 2: the signature because we're talking about a lot of people.
Speaker 2: And then his team used an autopen on twenty five
Speaker 2: warrants for pardons and commutations in December and January, but
Speaker 2: two of the Warrens granted clemency to thousands of people.
Speaker 2: And then Biden commuted roughly fifteen hundred sentences and outright
Speaker 2: pardon thirty nine more, and three days before he left office,
Speaker 2: he commuted the sentence of nearly twenty five hundred federal
Speaker 2: inmates convicted of crack cocaine offenses, and even the New
Speaker 2: York Times is saying that Biden approved the standards that
Speaker 2: would be used in which convicts would qualify for a
Speaker 2: partner commutation while his staff sorted out the details. Well,
Speaker 2: that doesn't sound like Tell me if I'm wrong, But
Speaker 2: I didn't know that the power of the pardon, which
Speaker 2: is absolute for a president, that he could just put
Speaker 2: parameters around what the criteria would be and not actually
Speaker 2: specifically off on each individual.
Speaker 1: You're exactly all right, Sean. He is not allowed to
Speaker 1: do that. That's not how it works. He has to
Speaker 1: do them individually, and he has to sign with his
Speaker 1: own signature. Think about all the time and effort that
Speaker 1: prosecutors went in to convicting these people of crimes, of
Speaker 1: various crimes over the years. You had a jury in
Speaker 1: most cases, and you had you know, a huge expense
Speaker 1: to the tax first, and then all at once, Joe
Speaker 1: Biden supposedly gives his unnamed unelected bureaucratic staff or the
Speaker 1: authority to pardon them just just diminish everything that was
Speaker 1: determined in the court of law. That's not how it works,
Speaker 1: and by Joe Biden's own admission of The New York Times,
Speaker 1: then those pardons should be ruled void in a court
Speaker 1: of law. And I think you know, it's about more
Speaker 1: than the pardon, Sean. It's about the executive orders, and
Speaker 1: it's about the fact that you know, there's no evidence
Speaker 1: that shows that there was any formal process where Joe
Speaker 1: Biden told the individuals who were who were putting using
Speaker 1: that autopend for pardons and executive orders that he knew
Speaker 1: exactly which pardon or which executive order he was talking about.
Speaker 1: He had read it inside out. And I want you
Speaker 1: to sign my autopen because I'm out of town. The
Speaker 1: other problem, Sean, is that seventy five percent of the
Speaker 1: time they used the autopen, Joe Biden, according to the
Speaker 1: White House logs, was in the White House. I mean,
Speaker 1: none of this makes sense. It ill begged to the question,
Speaker 1: did Joe Biden have any idea what his signature was
Speaker 1: being signed on? And thus far I can say, I
Speaker 1: haven't any evidence that was Jesse did.
Speaker 2: All right, So you're the chairman of the very powerful
Speaker 2: House Oversight and Government or Reform Committee. You have been
Speaker 2: doing interviews with people in the Biden White House. I
Speaker 2: know you have other interviews scheduled, and you put out
Speaker 2: subpoenas for people, and some people look operating and others
Speaker 2: are not. So what is the status? What are you
Speaker 2: learning as you interview these people?
Speaker 1: We're learning pretty much with The New York Times reported
Speaker 1: that there's no evidence that Joe Biden had any idea
Speaker 1: the overwhelming majority of what was being signed using the autobit.
Speaker 1: There's no formal process. The people that have stuck the
Speaker 1: documents in, the staffers that stuck the documents in and
Speaker 1: hit the power button to sign Joe Biden's signature, never
Speaker 1: heard from Joe Biden directly. In fact, in some cases
Speaker 1: they went, you know, long periods of time without even
Speaker 1: seeing Joe Biden. So you know, there was a very
Speaker 1: select few that were calling the shots in the White House.
Speaker 1: You mentioned, We've had several depositions and transcribed interviews. We
Speaker 1: have several more scheduled. In fact, one tomorrow with Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's former chief of staff, who already declined a scheduled
Speaker 1: interview we had, so I had this pain of him
Speaker 1: and bring bring him in. But we're going to get
Speaker 1: to the answers of who was in fact calling the shots.
Speaker 1: We brought the doctor in, doctor O'Connor, to see if
Speaker 1: if you know, the first question we asked, doctor O'Connor,
Speaker 1: did anyone ever try to get you to lie about
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's health? And he pled the fifth? Sean, I mean, so,
Speaker 1: I mean there's nothing good is coming out of this
Speaker 1: At the end of.
Speaker 2: The did he plead the fifth throughout the entire interview.
Speaker 1: Through the whole interview, Through the whole interview, the only
Speaker 1: question he answered was his name at the very beginning
Speaker 1: of the position. You have to stay your name, and
Speaker 1: he did that. Everything else he pled the fifth. Uh,
Speaker 1: We're going to interview everyone, give everyone their due process,
Speaker 1: give everyone an opportunity to tell the truth. Then we're
Speaker 1: going to publish a report based on facts, handed over
Speaker 1: to Pam Bondy at the Attorney General's office and let
Speaker 1: them go from there. Because you know, when you talk
Speaker 1: about accountability, the things that I want to see many
Speaker 1: of these executive orders and pardons, these pardons like for
Speaker 1: the Biden family, Are you kidding me? We're a direct
Speaker 1: result of our investigational Mobsight committee for finding all the
Speaker 1: money they cooked from people in foreign countries. Now you've
Speaker 1: got executive orders that were signed in the last two
Speaker 1: weeks of the Biden administration. They were signed using the
Speaker 1: auto pen. There's no evidence Joe Biden knew anything about it.
Speaker 1: He never had a bill signing ceremony, never had anything
Speaker 1: like that, and they were done for the sole purpose
Speaker 1: of Trump proofing the Trump administration. They're making it harder
Speaker 1: for Donald Trump to shut down the government agency. They're
Speaker 1: making it harder for Donald Trump to deport the criminal
Speaker 1: need in legals. These were based on executive orders that
Speaker 1: were signed using the auto pen on days when Joe
Speaker 1: Biden was supposedly in the White House, but he never
Speaker 1: answered questions about it. They never issued any statements. We
Speaker 1: think all of these could very easily be declared void
Speaker 1: in a course of allow and that would go a
Speaker 1: long way to helping President Trump accomplish his agenda.
Speaker 2: All right, So let me ask you this, Would it
Speaker 2: not invalidate all of these clemencies and pardons, especially in
Speaker 2: the in the waning days of the administration, if there's evidence,
Speaker 2: or if if he just laid out standards that should
Speaker 2: be applied by his team and was not knowledgeable about
Speaker 2: every single pardon, clemency, whatever he was offering people. And
Speaker 2: he just laid out a criteria for his his I
Speaker 2: guess staff to follow, and then an auto pen was used.
Speaker 2: It seems to me that that would invalidate it. Is
Speaker 2: there anything illegal that you can see here?
Speaker 1: Well, again, you know what Joe Biden admitted to was
Speaker 1: he gave the authority, he verbally gave his the authority
Speaker 1: to his staff to use his signature to pardon anyone
Speaker 1: that's not legal. That's not like so Joe Biden's already
Speaker 1: admitted to The New York Times, which is funny. That
Speaker 1: should have been a slam dunk interview for Joe Biden. Instead,
Speaker 1: it incriminated him even more. That's illegal. We question Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's mental fitness. We're going to try to do some
Speaker 1: things to create a situation where possibly the doctor can
Speaker 1: have immunity to try to answer our questions. That still
Speaker 1: doesn't mean he'll answer them or not, but we're going
Speaker 1: to try to go to great links to get a
Speaker 1: medical analysis from Joe Biden's doctors as to what his
Speaker 1: true mental and physical health condition was to determine whether
Speaker 1: or not these staffers or even communicating with Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: They may have just been acting unilaterally, which which the
Speaker 1: evidence would suggest. I think everything that was signed with
Speaker 1: the auto pen, especially on days when Joe Biden was
Speaker 1: in the White House, shun. I think everything can be
Speaker 1: ruled invalid in a court of law.
Speaker 2: All right, let me go to this other And we
Speaker 2: had you on TV last night with John Solomon. He
Speaker 2: was also on this radio program yesterday. And you know
Speaker 2: we have covered at length. I can't tell you how
Speaker 2: many years we spent on Russia, Russia, Russia. And we
Speaker 2: had a small ensemble cast of us that were able
Speaker 2: to unfeel every layer of the onion and get to
Speaker 2: the bottom and get to the truth of that entire story.
Speaker 2: The most frightening part of it is that they knew
Speaker 2: from the beginning that this was a Hillary Clinton campaign
Speaker 2: bought and paid for dirty Russian disinformation dossier. And then
Speaker 2: even though James come in particular was warned that it
Speaker 2: was a political document of old people in August of
Speaker 2: twenty sixteen, although he was worn in July as well
Speaker 2: not to trust it, he still used it. It was
Speaker 2: the basis of not one, but four FIZ applications. He
Speaker 2: signed three of the four of them. He years later
Speaker 2: went before Senator Graham before a committee hearing and admitted,
Speaker 2: knowing what he knows now, as did every other person
Speaker 2: that signed those FISA applications, admitted that knowing what they
Speaker 2: know now, they never would have used it. But they
Speaker 2: didn't know then. And that's the problem. Now what's happening
Speaker 2: is we now have the door has been opened for
Speaker 2: a special prosecutor to look into everything ranging from Russia
Speaker 2: and the Russia hoax, to PISA abuse, to fifty one
Speaker 2: former Intel agents that knew absolutely nothing about the very
Speaker 2: real Hunter Biden laptop, all these incidences, the impact weaponization
Speaker 2: against Donald Trump, false valuation of maur Lago, a novel
Speaker 2: legal theory used by Alvin Bragg when the statute of
Speaker 2: limitations had run out on a legal non disclosure agreement
Speaker 2: which is only a mystimeter, and he turned it into
Speaker 2: thirty four felony counts and to the ex all the
Speaker 2: way through Jack Smith and the double standard with the
Speaker 2: rate at mar Lago versus Hillary Clinton and Joe and
Speaker 2: their top secret classified materials that they had and they
Speaker 2: didn't get the same treatment. Now where do you see
Speaker 2: this going? Because that to me seems like a ten
Speaker 2: year you know, deep dive investigation.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I think a lot of these committees have
Speaker 1: already investigated. I think you go back to the work
Speaker 1: that Devin Nunaz did when he was there. Uh, he
Speaker 1: was the first person when when he was a ranking
Speaker 1: member of the Intelligence Committee going up against Adam Schiff
Speaker 1: to say that this was all a joke, a hoax.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 1: Then you've got you know, there's there's been stuff that
Speaker 1: House Judiciary Committee's done, House Oversight Committee. I think a
Speaker 1: lot of the investigative work's done. If it's what you're
Speaker 1: seeing now from John Radcliffe and hopefully Cash Patel, they're
Speaker 1: going to continue to expose the truth about how this
Speaker 1: was all a hoax generated by the Clinton campaigns, the
Speaker 1: Obama campaigns to try to take Trump down. I think
Speaker 1: that the committees where comy and and then never testified
Speaker 1: and lied. That's perjury. I think they should uh have
Speaker 1: criminal referrals to the Department Justice. I think I think
Speaker 1: that the CIA and the FBI should issue reports and
Speaker 1: hand over to the Department Justice. And I think the
Speaker 1: Attorney General should just start starting now and try to
Speaker 1: get some accountability here for for perjury. For abuse of power.
Speaker 1: I mean, the list goes on and on and on
Speaker 1: and set an example out of these deep state actors.
Speaker 1: The truth is known now, the evidence is out there.
Speaker 1: There have been investigations from from various committees, there have
Speaker 1: been Senate committees, center gradually, Ron Johnson, I mean, there
Speaker 1: are a lot of different investigations that I think can
Speaker 1: be pieced together without having a special counsel and just
Speaker 1: go ahead and start to start the prosecution of these
Speaker 1: criminals now, because that's what they are, criminals, and I
Speaker 1: think the evidence is overwhelming.
Speaker 2: Well, we appreciate all your hard work and always being
Speaker 2: generous your time to share with us an update us
Speaker 2: on what's going on. These are very critical issues we
Speaker 2: need to get to the bottom of. James Comer, Chairman,
Speaker 2: House Government Reform and Oversight Committee, We appreciate your time, sir.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Sean, appreciate it.
Speaker 2: Five now till the top of the arrow. Will get
Speaker 2: to your calls in just a minute. Here listen. Thanks
Speaker 2: to your generosity, your thoughtfulness, your kindness. The Tunnel to
Speaker 2: Towers Foundation, they're making lasting differences in real lives, lives
Speaker 2: like the Ernst family and when US Navy Chief Petty
Speaker 2: Officer Michael Thomas Ernst was killed in a training accident.
Speaker 2: Well the Tunnel to Towers. They had the money you
Speaker 2: provided and generously donated, and they were able to provide
Speaker 2: this family a mortgage free home, and his loving family
Speaker 2: had that burden lifted off of them. And since Tunnel
Speaker 2: to Towers was founded in the aftermath of nine to eleven,
Speaker 2: the Ernst family is one of many that you have
Speaker 2: been able to help. And your help is desperately still
Speaker 2: needed today. And you have now helped empower our most
Speaker 2: catastrophically injured vets and first responders to reclaim their independence
Speaker 2: and help provide specially adapted smart homes. But there is
Speaker 2: a lot more to do. Many heroes, many of their families,
Speaker 2: they are still in need. We can't forget America's heroes
Speaker 2: have given so much, and together you know we can
Speaker 2: all say thank you in a very lasting and a
Speaker 2: very meaningful way. Anyway, please join us a team. Hannity
Speaker 2: support the Tunnel to Towers Foundation. Go to their website.
Speaker 2: It's the letter T, the number two, the letter T
Speaker 2: dot org. The letter T the number two the letter
Speaker 2: T dot org for the Tunnel to Towers Foundation. All right.
Speaker 2: So there was a short gaggle earlier today before the
Speaker 2: President added to Pennsylvania to talk about oil and gas
Speaker 2: and AI and a variety of issues. Let me play
Speaker 2: a little bit of that and then we'll get to
Speaker 2: your calls.
Speaker 4: The president, your reaction to the latest numbers from the
Speaker 4: Department saying that inflation rose slightly last month.
Speaker 3: Very slight.
Speaker 5: Essentially, they were exactly as anticipated, very low inflation. So
Speaker 5: what you should do is lower the rate. Offen should
Speaker 5: lower the rate immediately.
Speaker 3: There was a terror.
Speaker 5: Terror wear a big win with the Supreme Court on
Speaker 5: the Department of Education, and we want, as.
Speaker 3: You know, we want to bring education back to the States,
Speaker 3: take the federal government out of it.
Speaker 5: A little tiny bit of supervision, but very little, almost nothing,
Speaker 5: like to make sure they speak English.
Speaker 3: That's about all we need. Yes, that's a question. I
Speaker 3: give a Russia fifty days. What happens now? Do you
Speaker 3: talk to Lamir prudent?
Speaker 5: But at the end of fifty days, if we don't
Speaker 5: have a deal, it's gonna be uh too bad.
Speaker 3: Should Lenski get more aggressive? Yeah? The terroriffs are going
Speaker 3: to go on and other sanctions go on.
Speaker 4: Lensky target Moscow, should the Lensky target MOSCOWT Sir should
Speaker 4: do Lensky target Moscow or deeper in corruscial.
Speaker 3: He shouldn't target Moscow.
Speaker 5: Oh, I don't think fifty days is very long, and
Speaker 5: it could be sooner than that.
Speaker 3: I don't think fifty days is very long. You should
Speaker 3: have asked that same question to Biden. Why did he
Speaker 3: get us into this war? You should ask that question, Yeah,
Speaker 3: and what did he tell you? Why did he get
Speaker 3: us into this war?
Speaker 5: You know why he got us in because he's a dummy,
Speaker 5: that's why. And you don't and you don't cover it right.
Speaker 5: But you should be asking that question to bite Why
Speaker 5: did he get us.
Speaker 3: Into this war? Because he's incompetent.
Speaker 5: It would have never happened if I were president from Texas.
Speaker 3: You believe your.
Speaker 6: Harems minus n offer teflation to increase clap clus You
Speaker 6: didn't had any.
Speaker 3: We had very little inflation. I don't know who do
Speaker 3: you work for today? What you want to say today?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 5: Well, they wrote me a beautiful article the other day,
Speaker 5: So I can't get angry at you us say today
Speaker 5: just wrote a very good article about me. What's that
Speaker 5: all about? So I can't get angry there was very
Speaker 5: little inflation. As you know, the numbers were very good,
Speaker 5: very much inside the margin. So we've had no inflation.
Speaker 5: All we have is we're making a fortune. We are
Speaker 5: taking in hundreds of billions of dollars. You say, we
Speaker 5: had a surplus of twenty five billion dollars last month,
Speaker 5: which we haven't had in many, many years. We are
Speaker 5: doing because I got it, because I'm able to do it.
Speaker 3: Nobody else would be able to do it.
Speaker 5: We have tariffs going on because we want tariffs and
Speaker 5: we want the money coming into the United States. But
Speaker 5: more important than the money, there's two aspects of the tariffs.
Speaker 3: There's the money which comes in.
Speaker 5: The other aspect is that rather than paying the tariffs,
Speaker 5: the country or the company will build in the United States,
Speaker 5: make their product in the United States, and that creates jobs.
Speaker 5: And I would say of the two, probably the more important.
Speaker 3: To me is that, yeah, are you are you? Are
Speaker 3: you on your play's side?
Speaker 5: Now?
Speaker 3: No, I'm on nobody's side.
Speaker 5: I'm gonna know what I want to you know who
Speaker 5: the side I'm on humanity side. I want to stop
Speaker 5: the killing of thousands of people away and I want
Speaker 5: to stop the killing. I want the killing to stop
Speaker 5: in the Ukraine Russia war.
Speaker 3: That's the side I'm.
Speaker 4: On, mister President and your daughter, Mister President, your daughter.
Speaker 3: In law stand that there's that there should.
Speaker 4: Be transparency in the Epstein case.
Speaker 3: You will agree with her, sir uh.
Speaker 5: The Attorney General's handled that very well. She is She's
Speaker 5: really done a very good job. And I think that
Speaker 5: when you look at it, you'll understand that I would
Speaker 5: like to see that also.
Speaker 3: But I think the Attorney general the credibility is.
Speaker 5: Very important and you want credible evidence with something like that,
Speaker 5: and I think the Attorney General has handled it very well.
Speaker 4: The Attorneys general point view on the buk and FBI review.
Speaker 3: You tell that.
Speaker 5: What on the on what subject?
Speaker 3: There are a few other files. Turn her very very
Speaker 3: quick briefing and.
Speaker 7: Did she tell you what did she tell you about
Speaker 7: what you had specifically?
Speaker 3: Think she tell you and all that your name appeared?
Speaker 5: No, No, she's she's given us just a very quick briefing.
Speaker 3: And in terms of the credibility of the different things
Speaker 3: that they've.
Speaker 5: Seen, and I would say that you know, these.
Speaker 3: Files were made.
Speaker 5: Up by Komi, they were made up by Obama, they
Speaker 5: were made up by but the biting it from you know, uh,
Speaker 5: we and we went through years of that with the
Speaker 5: Russia Russia Russia hoax.
Speaker 3: With all of the different things that we had to
Speaker 3: go through. We've gone through years of it. But she's
Speaker 3: handled it very well and it's going to be up
Speaker 3: to her.
Speaker 5: Whatever she thinks is credible. She should release yes on Texas.
Speaker 7: On Texas, how many more seats do you want the
Speaker 7: Republicans to draw?
Speaker 3: Five?
Speaker 7: And then what if California, New York, Illinois and other
Speaker 7: blue sp Well that's okay too.
Speaker 3: But five.
Speaker 5: I think we get five and there could be some
Speaker 5: other states we're gonna get another three or four or five.
Speaker 5: In addition, Texas would be the biggest one.
Speaker 7: And are you are you calling him for a complete
Speaker 7: redrawing of the congressional Mapou are just a very simple redrawing.
Speaker 5: We pick up five seats and where we have a
Speaker 5: couple of other states where we'll pick up seats also. Well,
Speaker 5: when he was in my office, I told him, he's
Speaker 5: doing your very bad job.
Speaker 3: He's way late. That's why I call him too late.
Speaker 3: Jerome Powell is too late. He's way late. Interest rate
Speaker 3: should be coming down.
Speaker 5: Where we have a very very successful country we should
Speaker 5: have the lowest interest rate anywhere in the world, and
Speaker 5: we don't. Jerome Powell has done a terrible job, and frankly,
Speaker 5: I don't think he could do a worse job. He's
Speaker 5: called everything wrong. They had a report come out the
Speaker 5: other day seventy one different economis and me.
Speaker 3: You know who is right? Me? Did you know that
Speaker 3: I was right? It was the president?
Speaker 5: Are you going to a mist now to another.
Speaker 3: As the next year? You must be kidding. That's the president.
Speaker 3: There's a president. What are your thoughts on Andrews?
Speaker 5: We had to waste the question. We are talking to
Speaker 5: the EU and we're making progress. But look, you know
Speaker 5: we already have a deal with EU. It's called the
Speaker 5: letter that was sent out. I think it was thirty percent.
Speaker 3: That's the EU.
Speaker 5: But we at the same time we are talking.
Speaker 3: Go ahead, mister president.
Speaker 4: Your reaction to Andrew Cuomo's saying in the New York
Speaker 4: City mayor's race, Andrew Plomo staying in the New York
Speaker 4: City mayor's race, I.
Speaker 3: Think we should stay. I think he's a shot. Would
Speaker 3: you prefer him over I don't want to say, you know,
Speaker 3: I'm a Republican, he's a Democrat. Or an independent. No,
Speaker 3: I think Andrew would have a good shot of winning. Well,
Speaker 3: he's got to run a tough campaign. Well, you know
Speaker 3: he's running.
Speaker 5: Against the communists. I would think that he would have
Speaker 5: a good shot of winning.
Speaker 3: Tell us about your trip to Scotland, sir, what are
Speaker 3: you going to do on your trip to Scotland.
Speaker 5: We're going to be meeting with the British Prime Minister,
Speaker 5: very respected.
Speaker 3: And we are going to have a meeting with him,
Speaker 3: probably an Aberdeen.
Speaker 5: And we're going to do a lot of different things,
Speaker 5: and we're going to also refine the trade deal that
Speaker 5: we've made.
Speaker 3: So we'll be meeting.
Speaker 5: Mostly with the probably one of my properties, or maybe not,
Speaker 5: depending on what happens, but we'll be an Aberdeen in Scotland,
Speaker 5: meeting with the Prime Minister. With the retaliate, well, I
Speaker 5: don't know how they can retaliate.
Speaker 3: You know, they've made a lot of money.
Speaker 5: They've treated us very badly, but now they're treating us
Speaker 5: very nicely, and I think we'll end up. I think
Speaker 5: everybody is going to be happy with the.
Speaker 3: EU meet with Pope over your future.
Speaker 5: Third, I'm not a plan I would do it. I
Speaker 5: have a lot of respect I really like his brother.
Speaker 5: His brother is a major serious trumper.
Speaker 3: You know that. He's mega all the way.
Speaker 5: I like the Pope's brother, and I think i'd like
Speaker 5: the Pope. But the Pope's brother lives in Florida.
Speaker 3: I met him and he is maga. He's got maga
Speaker 3: signs all over the house. He likes Trump and I
Speaker 3: like him. The latest on a wrong how about you wrong?
Speaker 3: He's found death. Well, we're going to see what happens
Speaker 3: with President.
Speaker 5: So far, I've been very disappointed with President Putin. I've
Speaker 5: so a lot of wars in the last three months,
Speaker 5: but I haven't gotten this one yet.
Speaker 3: This is a Biden war, it's not a Trump war.
Speaker 5: I'm here to try and get us out of that message.
Speaker 3: An he messages for what? Yeah, go ahead, go have
Speaker 3: a what.
Speaker 6: For the people of Brazil. Are you from Brazil?
Speaker 3: Okay? He's going to trial now? Right? When is that
Speaker 3: trial starting? When is the trial for both scenarios starting?
Speaker 3: When is it? How is it going now? But they
Speaker 3: haven't found him guilty? But have they found him guilty?
Speaker 1: Now?
Speaker 7: On the hall?
Speaker 3: President Bolsonaro is a good man. I've gotten to.
Speaker 5: Know a lot of Prime ministers and presidents and kings
Speaker 5: and queens, and I know him and I'm pretty good
Speaker 5: at this. President Bolsonaro is not a dishonest man. He
Speaker 5: loves the people of Brazil. He fought hard for the
Speaker 5: people of Brazil. He negotiated trade deals against me for
Speaker 5: the people of Brazil, and he was very.
Speaker 3: Tough, and he was.
Speaker 5: Tough because he wanted to do a good deal for
Speaker 5: his country.
Speaker 3: He was not a dishonest man.
Speaker 5: And I believe it's a witch hunt and it shouldn't
Speaker 5: be happening.
Speaker 3: It's not that I know.
Speaker 5: Him that Look, he's not like a friend of mine.
Speaker 5: He's somebody that I know, and I know him as
Speaker 5: a representative of millions of people, Brazilians. They're great people,
Speaker 5: and he loves the country and he fought hard for
Speaker 5: those people.
Speaker 3: And they want to put him in jail.
Speaker 5: And I think that's a witch hunt, and I think
Speaker 5: it's very unfortunate, and nobody's happy with what Brazil is
Speaker 5: doing because Bolsnario was a respected president, very respectful. You
Speaker 5: say you want Adam sim Hunts.
Speaker 3: To justice, I'd love to see him brought to justice.
Speaker 3: I think I'll tell you what I think.
Speaker 5: Adam Schiff is one of the lowest of the low
Speaker 5: I would love to see him brought to justice.
Speaker 3: He is a dishonest cricket guy.
Speaker 5: I don't know about the individual charge, if that even happens.
Speaker 3: But Adam Shift is a serious lowlife.
Speaker 5: And Tomorrow Morning here wants to give the Nail team
Speaker 5: the host go wrong Mom, Donny for Brekfice reunited.
Speaker 3: I'd love to be I'd really love to go. I mean,
Speaker 3: I look forward to meeting him both. I know him
Speaker 3: both very well through what I read and through what
Speaker 3: I see.
Speaker 5: Look, he's a communist. I don't think our country is
Speaker 5: ready for a guy immunists, but we're gonna see.
Speaker 3: And I don't think that race is over yet either.
Speaker 3: You do have a couple of people running against and
Speaker 3: I it'll be an interesting thing.
Speaker 5: Things are coming out about him which aren't good.
Speaker 3: And uh, you know AOC.
Speaker 5: Look, I think she's very nice, but she's very low
Speaker 5: IQ and we really don't need low IQ. Between her
Speaker 5: and Crockett. We're gonna give them both an IQ test
Speaker 5: to see who comes out beast.
Speaker 3: Now. I took my test.
Speaker 5: I took a real test at Walter Reed Medical Center,
Speaker 5: and I haste it. I got every one of all
Speaker 5: those questions right now, it's time for them.
Speaker 3: To take a test. Anyway, have a good time.
Speaker 5: I like Dan Boys, all right.
Speaker 2: That was the president from earlier today, gaggle he held
Speaker 2: prior to going to Pennsylvania to talk about uh, the
Speaker 2: issues of energy, AI and all the things that are
Speaker 2: going to hopefully make the economy grow at a level
Speaker 2: we've never seen before. That's my hope. We wrap things
Speaker 2: up for today. We got a great Hannity Set your
Speaker 2: DVR nine eastern on the Fox News Channel. New Gingrich
Speaker 2: will be with us. We'll get his historic view of
Speaker 2: Trump's first six months. And Turntine is going to join
Speaker 2: us on the absolute meltdown of his Democratic Party. Mark
Speaker 2: Wayne Mullins tonight, Larry Cudlow on Trump calling on Jerome
Speaker 2: Powell to lower interest rates once and for all. Also
Speaker 2: a friend, Klay Travis. Set your DVR nine eastern. Hannity
Speaker 2: on Fox. We'll see you tonight. Back here tomorrow. Thank
Speaker 2: you for making this show possible.