Speaker 1: I'm glad you with us eight hundred and nine four
Speaker 1: one Sean if you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: this extravaganzas so much on social media censorship, the atmosphere
Speaker 1: that now exists in the country in terms of wow,
Speaker 1: the double standard is so obvious. You know, we played
Speaker 1: a lot yesterday on the program, a lot of liberal
Speaker 1: Democrats and you know, Nancy Pelosi. People are gonna do
Speaker 1: what they're gonna do, and that's a myth, Jerry Nadler said.
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris goes on Colbert self righteous as he is
Speaker 1: every day. He thinks a lot of himself, and he's
Speaker 1: not really funny. I wish he was funny. John Stewart
Speaker 1: was at least funny and smart. Anyway, They're not gonna stop.
Speaker 1: They were talking about the mostly peaceful protests that have
Speaker 1: been going on at the time June seventeenth. They're not
Speaker 1: going to stop, and everyone beware because they're not gonna stop.
Speaker 1: We have it keyed up for you. We'll play it.
Speaker 1: They're not stop. They're not gonna stop, and that's they're
Speaker 1: not This is a movement. I'm telling you, they're not
Speaker 1: gonna stop. And everyone beware because they're not gonna stop.
Speaker 1: It is gonna They're not gonna stop before election day
Speaker 1: in November, and they're not gonna stop after election day.
Speaker 1: And that should be everyone should take note of that
Speaker 1: on both levels. That this is they're not gonna let
Speaker 1: up and they should not and we should not. They're
Speaker 1: not gonna stop. Everyone, you better be aware because they're
Speaker 1: not gonna stop. They're not gonna stop before election day
Speaker 1: in November. They're not gonna stop after election day, and
Speaker 1: everyone you need to You should take note of that
Speaker 1: on both levels. What does that mean? They're not gonna
Speaker 1: let up and they should not and we should not.
Speaker 1: We had two thousand law enforcement officers injured, twenty five
Speaker 1: civilian deaths, and some cops die too, eighty seven hundred
Speaker 1: protest nation. Why did I need to do? I do
Speaker 1: need to point out a lot of people that protested
Speaker 1: were peaceful, vast majority peaceful. In the summer, we saw
Speaker 1: what happened. City blocks take it over, and then they're
Speaker 1: praised by politicians. This is a summer of love zone.
Speaker 1: We'll take it over to city blocks. We're not gonna
Speaker 1: let the police get back in. No, I'm gonna take
Speaker 1: over police precincts, some burn to the ground. You look
Speaker 1: at you know the number of police officers hurt. Five
Speaker 1: hundred and seventy four of these eighty seven hundred protests
Speaker 1: were declared as riots with violence and other criminal acts.
Speaker 1: The looting, the burning, the arson, the clashes with protesters
Speaker 1: and the police. You know, rocks, bricks, molotov cocktails, sticks, bats,
Speaker 1: other and then guns in some places, six twenty four arsons,
Speaker 1: ninety seven police vehicles burned. So Kamala Harris said, anyone
Speaker 1: in the media applying the same standard to her that
Speaker 1: they're applying to Donald J. Trump, President Trump. I have
Speaker 1: a cut of Maxie Waters, who's speaking at a dinner
Speaker 1: somewhere Gallo, some kind in New York City. And then
Speaker 1: she told the crowd she was motivated to take Trump out.
Speaker 1: She got a massive ovation when she said it. Wow,
Speaker 1: what a moving evening this is. I'm sitting here, listening, watching, absorbing,
Speaker 1: thinking about I guess it's the dinner of some individual
Speaker 1: even ill never meet him, and with this kind of information,
Speaker 1: I will go and take out Trump tonight. Play it. Wow,
Speaker 1: what I'm moving evening? This is. I am sitting here listening, watching, absorbing, thinking,
Speaker 1: about Ali even though I never met him. And with
Speaker 1: this kind of inspiration, I will go and take Trump out.
Speaker 1: Tonight I played a lot more and I can you know,
Speaker 1: we have a lot of montages. But I did that yesterday.
Speaker 1: I don't want to repeat myself here now. I just
Speaker 1: want you to pay attention to the things that we're
Speaker 1: now debating. I kind of got a kick out of
Speaker 1: Ted lu you know, Republican members of Congress who incited
Speaker 1: insurrection should be prosecuted. He's the same guy that said
Speaker 1: there's going to be civil on if Muller was fired.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, pot kettle whatever they actually are. To the point, now,
Speaker 1: you might not agree with Ted Cruz, you don't have
Speaker 1: to agree with anybody might not agree with Josh Holly.
Speaker 1: They wanted attend date audit because the polls confidence levels
Speaker 1: as it relates to the election, didn't have confidence in it,
Speaker 1: and they wanted to instill confidence in the elections. You
Speaker 1: might think they shouldn't have done. It doesn't matter. It's
Speaker 1: a policy disagreement, that's all. It was a ten day audit.
Speaker 1: Now you've got the Homeland Security Committee chairman in the House,
Speaker 1: guy by the name of Congressman Benny Thompson saying that
Speaker 1: they could both be put on the no fly list. Wow,
Speaker 1: you got Senator Brown. I guess is that shared Brown.
Speaker 1: He's now saying Cruise and Holly must be expelled from
Speaker 1: the Senate because they wanted an audit. Okay, and lou
Speaker 1: is now saying we're the same guy. Yeah, the one
Speaker 1: that I'm talking about here, if fire Muller's civil unrest
Speaker 1: will be the resultant. He's saying that, you know members
Speaker 1: of Congress who incited insurrection. Now, remember their definition is
Speaker 1: if if you went to the rally, you're guilty, should
Speaker 1: be prosecuted. The vast majority we're peaceful. Nobody. Everybody that
Speaker 1: I know rightly condemn what happened, condemned it in the
Speaker 1: strongest terms possible, and did so immediately. I don't know anybody,
Speaker 1: any prominent conservative I know, has done anything but condemned
Speaker 1: what took place. That can happen in our nation's capital.
Speaker 1: I said it when Obama was president. We've got to
Speaker 1: protect our president, period, end of sense. Said it many times.
Speaker 1: Got to protect elected officials. They're elected. If you don't
Speaker 1: like the Congressman and Senate, you got to vote them out.
Speaker 1: You have a Democratic Senator, Hank Chanson claiming that I
Speaker 1: have no doubt Capital rioters would have quote lynched black
Speaker 1: lawmakers if not stopped by the police. Wow, you got
Speaker 1: Democrats wanting to remove Juliani from the bar association, those
Speaker 1: in the Washington Examiner. You got now an examination Democrats
Speaker 1: looking at the fourteenth Amendment to remove members of Congress
Speaker 1: that they disagree with. Do you have Democrats moving Paul
Speaker 1: Sperry reporting to classify Trump rallies a rally. We've all
Speaker 1: watched them, well seen them. Many of you have been
Speaker 1: to them as quote domestic terrorist activity, said Democrats in
Speaker 1: the House and senator planning to draft a legislation to
Speaker 1: classify a president's rally or Donald Trump rally President Trump's
Speaker 1: rally as a domestic terrorist activity and require that the
Speaker 1: FBI dj DHS takes steps to prevent such domestic terrorism.
Speaker 1: Apparently Dick Durbin deleting the effort, with Representative Schneider whoever
Speaker 1: that is. Forbes has an op ed warning companies about
Speaker 1: hiring people that worked in the Trump administration, referring to
Speaker 1: them as fabulous. Wow, better not hire. Just the latest
Speaker 1: example of this cancel culture. This woke culture that we're
Speaker 1: living in, and it's you know, it's a dangerous cancel
Speaker 1: culture of just I'm just giving you. Mike Pompeio actually
Speaker 1: blasted yesterday with this wokeness and a speech that he gave,
Speaker 1: and he defended recent changes in the government funded international
Speaker 1: broadcaster Voice of America, where a Trump backed overhaul was
Speaker 1: as drawn criticism, and he you know, he's addressed to
Speaker 1: the Voice of America's staff broadcast live on the network.
Speaker 1: Some people didn't like it, but then he said, the
Speaker 1: Voice of America lost its commitment to its founding mission
Speaker 1: under past administrations and shifted towards broadcasts that were too
Speaker 1: often demeaning America. Look at other some of the other things. Amazon,
Speaker 1: we know what they did with Parlor. They have a partner.
Speaker 1: I guess go Daddy's a partner there. If you're pro
Speaker 1: Second Amendment, you're getting kicked off this server. Then, of
Speaker 1: course the president banned on Twitter. Facebook. By the way,
Speaker 1: all I see coming out of this is alternatives. I
Speaker 1: don't I known nothing about technology. Linda is like, you know,
Speaker 1: rolls her eyes, doesn't she doesn't understand. I don't understand
Speaker 1: Bitcoin was doing this whole thing. The other day about bitcoin.
Speaker 1: It's an algorithm. What's that? Or an algorithm? Okay, it's
Speaker 1: a mathematical equation. Okay, there's only in a finite number
Speaker 1: of bitcoins. Okay. And then so it's cryptocurrency. Okay, I
Speaker 1: understand that part. And I said, well, how come there
Speaker 1: is only so much because of the algorithm? I said,
Speaker 1: to explain that. It's like who's on first? Facebook is
Speaker 1: now removing any content of people that that say certain words,
Speaker 1: any that related to the election. Wow, it's a great
Speaker 1: piece by Congress. I think it was no it was
Speaker 1: breaking bad actor Brian Kranston. I have no idea who
Speaker 1: it is. I've watched it a little bit, didn't like it.
Speaker 1: A lot of these series get too dark when you're watching,
Speaker 1: you know, you're binge watching shows. I'm sickle watching all that.
Speaker 1: Um anyway, so you know, Parlor all these other sites
Speaker 1: are gonna have to now find alternatives. Twitter now just
Speaker 1: it just they're suspending people left and right if you
Speaker 1: don't agree to think this this woke way. When one
Speaker 1: big talk radio owner is now I used to be
Speaker 1: partners with them years ago, as now threatening to fire
Speaker 1: hosts who dispute election results. Why can't we have freedom
Speaker 1: of speech and allow other people on Megan McCain wants
Speaker 1: Jared and Ivanka punished. But the Capitol riot, I don't
Speaker 1: think they approved of any of this, Comrade de Blasio,
Speaker 1: if you even participated, well, he said, and I've read
Speaker 1: the headline wrong, So I'll fix that. The DC Attorney
Speaker 1: General looking at charging the president. You know, I'm just
Speaker 1: trying to make you aware of, you know, how number one,
Speaker 1: how dangerous the double standard is. And number two, you know,
Speaker 1: I've never you know, you think back in all our
Speaker 1: coverage of the deep state, and anybody that listens to
Speaker 1: this programmer watches the TV show, why did I bend
Speaker 1: over backwards to say the ninety nine percent of good agents,
Speaker 1: the ninety nine percent of good intelligence people that risk
Speaker 1: their lives for us, Because I don't like to sweep
Speaker 1: I don't like, you know, broad sweeping generalizations. It's not
Speaker 1: fair to good people. It's not fair for the people
Speaker 1: that this summer were rightly outraged over what happened to
Speaker 1: George Floyd, that wanted to peacefully protest to make sure
Speaker 1: this doesn't happen again. A lot of people that went
Speaker 1: to the rally on January sixth, would never be a
Speaker 1: part of what happened by some after, and I'm condemned
Speaker 1: it in the strongest terms. But now it's it's it's
Speaker 1: the overreach, and then of course the glaring double standards.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna go and take Trump out tonight, and they
Speaker 1: should not and we should not. They're not gonna stop
Speaker 1: talking about what was going on in the summer. Like, Wow,
Speaker 1: anyone ever cared to look at the text or hear
Speaker 1: the President said, I know everyone here will soon be
Speaker 1: marching to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make
Speaker 1: your voices heard, all right, twenty five to the top
Speaker 1: of the hour, eight hundred and nine four one sean.
Speaker 1: And you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: So now we've got well, if you support an audit,
Speaker 1: we'll put you on the no fly list. Wow. By
Speaker 1: the way, I'm gonna go and take Trump out tonight,
Speaker 1: no indignation, no outrage. They shouldn't stop what they're doing
Speaker 1: their navel and we shouldn't stop. Kamala Harris Harvard booted
Speaker 1: at least the phonic for her views her belief in
Speaker 1: the need for an audit. Wow, I guess I guess
Speaker 1: everyone understanding how chilling this all is. It's pretty chilling.
Speaker 1: Oh we didn't like your point of view. You need
Speaker 1: to be expelled or prosecuted. None of these things, by
Speaker 1: the way, are going to happen, is my prediction. Oh
Speaker 1: we're going to disbard this one and that one and
Speaker 1: so on and so forth. But it is what it is.
Speaker 1: It is the environment that has you know, and the
Speaker 1: great irony is the Democrats three year Russia lie, conspiracy, hoax,
Speaker 1: witch hunt. Everyone's talking about taking responsibility. I actually mean
Speaker 1: the process of organizing all of the comments of every Democrat,
Speaker 1: everybody in the media mob about the lies they dragged
Speaker 1: this country to through for three years. Who's going to
Speaker 1: have it? Probably play it at the right time. Just
Speaker 1: to remind you, not for any of the reason. If
Speaker 1: iled for three years, you know, any any of these
Speaker 1: things be a maxim waters. If I ever said Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: if any conservative ever said this not gonna stop, shouldn't stop, okay, Joe?
Speaker 1: What if a conservative said, yeah, I wish Heigh's gonna
Speaker 1: take him right in the back of the gym, gonna
Speaker 1: punch him in the face. I think an awful lot
Speaker 1: about blowing up the White House. When's the last time
Speaker 1: an actor assassinated a president? Do you see any outrage
Speaker 1: from the left. I gotta give credit where it's where
Speaker 1: it's due. West Virginia Democratic Senator Joe Manchin said, impeachment
Speaker 1: is yeah, ill advised. I think this is so ill
Speaker 1: advised for Biden coming in trying to heal the country,
Speaker 1: trying to be president of all the people. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I have a hard time believing it. They're gonna put
Speaker 1: you all back in chains more recent comments, you know,
Speaker 1: comparing Republicans to I guess Gebel's a Nazi. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: it sounds like talk to me. Sounds like a lot
Speaker 1: of talk. Anyway, he said, be ill advised for Biden
Speaker 1: to do it, and then you have Mansion by the way,
Speaker 1: also reiterating something he said before, which is he would
Speaker 1: object you know, senators, No, senators who have their objections
Speaker 1: as it relates to the electoral college should not be expelled.
Speaker 1: We told you about the incidences in sixty nine, two thousand.
Speaker 1: I think two thousand and four, two thousand and sixteen
Speaker 1: Democrats did the exact same thing. But why the facts
Speaker 1: get in the way. I will not support ending the filibuster.
Speaker 1: I will not support packing the court. Good for Joe mansion.
Speaker 1: We'll see what happens. Even Tom Dashell, former Senate Democratic leader,
Speaker 1: warning Democrats against himpe said bad idea. It's a huge
Speaker 1: mistake just going to galvanize Trump's supporters and delay any
Speaker 1: work on any crucial issues. And an impeachment mechanism is
Speaker 1: just not the rice course at all if they want
Speaker 1: to hold the president accountable. He went on to say,
Speaker 1: and of course there's Jonathan Turley and told you about
Speaker 1: Alan Dershowitz. You know, Alan Dershowitz couldn't be any more clear.
Speaker 1: It'd be extraordinarily dangerous to the constitution. He said. Even
Speaker 1: if Trump was impeached for a second time, the Senate,
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna be able to hear a trial because
Speaker 1: Trump would be out of office by the time that
Speaker 1: would have happened, and it would never go to trial.
Speaker 1: All they can do is impeach the president in the House. Okay,
Speaker 1: let them, let them, let them go ahead. It won't
Speaker 1: matter for that. You just need a majority vote. You
Speaker 1: don't need to take evidence. There are no lawyers involved.
Speaker 1: Case can't come to trial in the Senate. Because the
Speaker 1: Senate has rules, and the rules would not allow the
Speaker 1: case to come to trial. And by the way, then
Speaker 1: he added that the Constitution specifically says for those that says, well,
Speaker 1: to just do it in one hundred days when he's
Speaker 1: out of office. He said, no, that's not going to
Speaker 1: work either, because the Constitution specifically states the president shall
Speaker 1: be removed from office upon impeachment, meaning conviction in the Senate.
Speaker 1: And he said, because it does not say former president,
Speaker 1: any jurisdiction the Senate has would be limited only to
Speaker 1: a sitting president or other office where they allow it.
Speaker 1: So that gets pretty interesting too. Let me play Jonathan
Speaker 1: Turley's take on this pretty interesting. Listen. First of all,
Speaker 1: the very concept of a snap impeachment runs against the
Speaker 1: grain of the Constitution. This was supposed to be a deliberative,
Speaker 1: not an impulsive process. You're creating a pathway for this
Speaker 1: type of impulse buy impeachment, and that's what we're talking
Speaker 1: about here. There's a desire not to have that or
Speaker 1: that hearing to look at the implications of what they're
Speaker 1: going to do. But it's a type of vicarious impeachment
Speaker 1: in the sense that he doesn't call for violence in
Speaker 1: the speech, in fact, tells his followers to be peaceful.
Speaker 1: He says the reason they should go to the Capitol
Speaker 1: as the support members who are challenging the election and
Speaker 1: to encourage other members to join them. So the speech
Speaker 1: itself would not need any definition as a criminal matter
Speaker 1: of incitement. Oh and then he went on to pretty
Speaker 1: much explain the same thing on the twenty fifth Amendment.
Speaker 1: And you know, again not a guy that really loves
Speaker 1: Donald Trump in real time on January sixth, was extremely
Speaker 1: critical of the speech that was taken place in Washington.
Speaker 1: We're getting some outline of what a Biden agenda is
Speaker 1: going to be, and Politico charted his course with the
Speaker 1: Democratic Congress. It looks like immigration overhaul was going to
Speaker 1: be ahead of the minimum age. M Biden said that
Speaker 1: he hopes the Congress will raise the odds of prompt
Speaker 1: action increasing minimum wage to fifteen bucks an hour. But
Speaker 1: then he said he would want to introduce an immigration
Speaker 1: bill immediately. Um, what that exactly is going to look like,
Speaker 1: I don't know. You have so many Americans that want jobs. Now,
Speaker 1: if you open up America's borders, there'll be more competition
Speaker 1: for jobs. And then of course then there's amnesty, then
Speaker 1: there's the cost of healthcare and the educational system. It's
Speaker 1: it's it's you can't calculate the impact on the economy. Um,
Speaker 1: so we'll watch what that's all about. You know, there's
Speaker 1: always been Democrats have voice thought, well, if if immigrants,
Speaker 1: you know, if you give people free healthcare, legalization, maybe
Speaker 1: they'll vote for you for the rest of their lives
Speaker 1: because you gave them what they wanted. Okay, so they're
Speaker 1: looking for votes generationally. Has been also business people that
Speaker 1: want cheap labor. Anyway, tech leaders are saying the immigration
Speaker 1: crackdown is bad for business. The presidents A migrating caravan
Speaker 1: is mobilizing on Facebook, readying a trip from Honduras to
Speaker 1: the US border. Wonder what Biden would do. And the President,
Speaker 1: by the way, is down visiting the border today. Biden also,
Speaker 1: now this gets very very interesting here because the Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders apparently as the key legislative role in the new Congress,
Speaker 1: he's going to be the top guy. Remember the Biden
Speaker 1: Bernie Manifesto, And now apparently he will wield the influence
Speaker 1: of some of the biggest priorities in under you know,
Speaker 1: in the US Senate, and it's his panel that sets
Speaker 1: the terms for bud budget reconciliation. Now we have an
Speaker 1: avowed socialist, radical leftist that honeymoon's in Moscow setting the
Speaker 1: agenda for the country. Okay, improving tax and spending bills
Speaker 1: with a simple majority to sidestep the sixty vote threshold,
Speaker 1: Democrats could be relying on reconciliation to advance their parts
Speaker 1: of the legislative agenda, likely to draw a full GOP opposition.
Speaker 1: As Budget Chair, Sanders will have the opportunity to shape
Speaker 1: each reconciliation and a role that progressives leftist socialist are
Speaker 1: relishing and anyway of Adam Green, co founder of the
Speaker 1: Progressive Change Campaign Committee, whatever that is, and it means
Speaker 1: that there'll be at least one advocate in the room
Speaker 1: for maximalist equation. They're spending, by the way, combined, they're
Speaker 1: advocating for a combined five trillion dollars worth of spending.
Speaker 1: Five trillion. That's a down payment. That's just the beginning. Okay,
Speaker 1: how do we ever dig ourselves out of that massive?
Speaker 1: In fact, they implement that that's not going to be
Speaker 1: great anyway. So they've moved to immigration, and you know,
Speaker 1: mansion says, I don't think they'll throw me out of
Speaker 1: the party. I could grief. It's that because he doesn't
Speaker 1: agree with people gonna throw him out of the party.
Speaker 1: How do you do America United as a inauguration theme
Speaker 1: when you just recently compared Ted Cruz to Joseph Goebels
Speaker 1: and we'll put you all back in chains? How do
Speaker 1: you do that? Anyway? What else do we have? Well,
Speaker 1: that's pretty much. That's a good beginning, right, good luck.
Speaker 1: These are non policies that I see ever under any
Speaker 1: circumstances working. I just don't. So we'll see. You know
Speaker 1: which way this this all goes down, and it's you know,
Speaker 1: there's going to be a need for Americans to engage
Speaker 1: and pay attention to all that all that is being
Speaker 1: planned here. I want to go to an issue involving
Speaker 1: COVID for a second, because you know, it's almost too
Speaker 1: good to be true. It sounds like Donald Trump, but
Speaker 1: it's actually Andrew Cuomo. If we don't reopen now, we'll
Speaker 1: have nothing left to reopen. The only problem is that
Speaker 1: time has come and gone already. It's already gone. Anyway,
Speaker 1: let's see and a nope, bounding a I have no
Speaker 1: idea what this person is talking about. Anyway, we can't
Speaker 1: simply stay closed until the vaccine hits critical mass. The
Speaker 1: cost is too high. We'll have nothing left to open,
Speaker 1: he tweet on Monday. And then well they've been on lockdown.
Speaker 1: Now they don't even allow any in New York City.
Speaker 1: There's no dining at all inside. That means these restaurants
Speaker 1: are done. They can't survive, and it's just only going
Speaker 1: to get worse because this is what they've now, you know,
Speaker 1: put into place, the thing that is the saddest with
Speaker 1: your operation warp speed the vaccine. They're actually throwing some
Speaker 1: of them out because the expiration date comes and it
Speaker 1: goes and I'm like, are you kidding me? I mean,
Speaker 1: how is it? Pie? How about you just go into
Speaker 1: a neighborhood and immediately say, excuse me, hello, whatever, you know,
Speaker 1: does anybody want the vaccine? Go to a school, go
Speaker 1: to a nursing home, be proactive. You know, there's only
Speaker 1: I mean, do they expect Donald Trump to create the vaccine?
Speaker 1: Then go into every nursing home, every healthcare facility and
Speaker 1: give people the vaccine. Go into a neighborhood, put up
Speaker 1: a sign Vaccines free, today. If you have ones that
Speaker 1: are going to run, you know, if their expiration data
Speaker 1: is coming due, it's insane. New York, by the way,
Speaker 1: needs money so bad they're now going to get into
Speaker 1: the marijuana and cannabis issue. Shocker. One of the funnier
Speaker 1: things is New York City mayoral hopeful Andrew Yang. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he talked about, oh can you imagine being in a
Speaker 1: two bedroom apartment with kids that are being at homeschool?
Speaker 1: Who needs that? I think he wants to be New
Speaker 1: York City mayor. I've been outside of New York City
Speaker 1: during all of COVID. I got the hell out of there.
Speaker 1: All right. That's great for New York. California is still struggling.
Speaker 1: They can't seem to get this thing under control. The
Speaker 1: push to get of against Gavin Newsom continues as well.
Speaker 1: Pretty interesting to watch someone are even saying his political
Speaker 1: career is in jeopardy. They have a million signatures for
Speaker 1: a recall effort as it relates to him. So there
Speaker 1: was a lot happening there, and you know the answer
Speaker 1: is there. They're producing more vaccines than we apparently have
Speaker 1: the ability to get into people's arms. And I'm having
Speaker 1: a hard time understanding once the states have it, how
Speaker 1: they're so ill prepared? Well, Donald Trump, Donald Trump's job
Speaker 1: was to was to get the vaccine to other people.
Speaker 1: A friend of mine's calling, I'll call them right back,
Speaker 1: and you know, it's to get them to other people.
Speaker 1: Once you get a hold of it, you got to
Speaker 1: have a plan. And if you don't know when, you
Speaker 1: got to get one immediately, all RIGHTN Hour two Sean
Speaker 1: Hannity Show, eight hundred and nine four one Sean, if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of this sixtravaganza, well,
Speaker 1: our friends over a Project Veritas and James O'Keeffe, well
Speaker 1: they have done more great work. And it's very interesting
Speaker 1: when people get exposed, isn't it, and you get to
Speaker 1: really understand the left. And now, before we get started
Speaker 1: on this, the guy that we're going to play on
Speaker 1: tape with undercover Project Veritas Whistleblowers, happens to be I
Speaker 1: guess the name is Michael Beller, PBS Principal Council and
Speaker 1: lays out a pretty radical agenda, you know, claiming we
Speaker 1: the American people are blanking dumb talks about going to
Speaker 1: the White House and throw molotov cocktails, putting children in
Speaker 1: re education camps, making them watch PBS all day, COVID
Speaker 1: spiking in Red states and voters are sick and nine,
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, it goes into great specificity in detail,
Speaker 1: and he says if Biden doesn't win, I will throw
Speaker 1: molotov cocktails at the White House. He says it's good
Speaker 1: that the COVID numbers are going up in red states.
Speaker 1: Trump voters may get sick and they may die. Um.
Speaker 1: James O'Keefe also pointing out, uh, this guy's this PBS
Speaker 1: council saying Americans are stupid. Can't imagine living outside of
Speaker 1: DC with with stupid people. I guess we love Olive Garden.
Speaker 1: We have uh Anderson Vanderbilt Cooper Apparently he's uncomfortable as
Speaker 1: the last name. You know, his comments unbelievable, you know,
Speaker 1: smelly Walmart shoppers, Peter Struck, irredeemable deplorables with bitter people
Speaker 1: that cling to God. Our Second Amendment rights are Bibles
Speaker 1: are religion. Um, I love Olive Garden and I love Walmart. Sorry,
Speaker 1: you got everything you want cheap? What's what's wrong with
Speaker 1: saving money? Says Americans are stupid, but can't imagine living
Speaker 1: outside of DC Wow, and he says PBS is real news. CNN,
Speaker 1: Fox News suck, ignore fake fox News. Let's play it
Speaker 1: all for your news. Charity education nice, they have same
Speaker 1: street characters and their classroom they watch what do you do?
Speaker 1: That's great. It's like COVID, that's great. Why do you
Speaker 1: think come out of that sad second nine? I'm gonna
Speaker 1: they watch, you know done. It's good to live in
Speaker 1: a place where people are, you know, educated, And can
Speaker 1: you imagine if you lived it from one of these
Speaker 1: other towns and states where everybody's just stupids. I can't
Speaker 1: stand for mean. Everyone's so highlight. Look at Fox News
Speaker 1: and r S News a frock. It's all Joe Biden
Speaker 1: as all Dickens, and they are pushing so hard the world.
Speaker 1: PBS has responded, I guess visa Twitter, this employee no
Speaker 1: longer works for PBS as a mid level staff attorney.
Speaker 1: Let's minimize him as much as if we can throw
Speaker 1: him overboard. He did not speak on behalf of our organization,
Speaker 1: nor did he make any editorial decisions. Project Veritas founder
Speaker 1: and CEO James O'Keefe is back with us. How are you, sir?
Speaker 1: Sean great to be with you. By the way, My
Speaker 1: first question is is they're more coming, because I don't
Speaker 1: know if we can get worse than what we just heard. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Sean will I did speak with This is the principal
Speaker 1: council for PBS on the street last night. I spoke
Speaker 1: with him. We are releasing that video in a bit,
Speaker 1: but as you can see, they're kind of minimizing his position.
Speaker 1: He's the principal council for PBS. That's not a quote,
Speaker 1: mid level staff attorney and Sean the CEO PBS should
Speaker 1: be thanking us because but not for what we did,
Speaker 1: nobody would know that they were trying that this guy
Speaker 1: was talking about throwing malatov cocktails at the White House.
Speaker 1: This is the rhetoric, the violent rhetoric that the media
Speaker 1: has been talking about, and they're evidently doing it saying it.
Speaker 1: So we're glad that they're they're doing something, but I
Speaker 1: don't know why they're attacking me. They should be thanking
Speaker 1: us for exposing this. We go for all the Republican voters,
Speaker 1: and Homeland Security will take their children away and we'll
Speaker 1: put them in re education camps, enlightening camps. They're nice,
Speaker 1: they'll have Sesame Street characters in the classroom and they'll
Speaker 1: watch PBS all day. Wow. Yeah. Beller also says that
Speaker 1: the Americans outside of DCR dumb, that people are dumb.
Speaker 1: Oh you got it wrong. No, he said they're effing dumb.
Speaker 1: They're effing dumb. I didn't want to say on the radio,
Speaker 1: but yeah, he said that. And the interesting thing is
Speaker 1: that this man, this enlightened attorney for PBS Corporation Public Broadcasting,
Speaker 1: thinks it's smart, smart and intelligent and enlightened thinking to
Speaker 1: think we should take children away from their parents. The
Speaker 1: DHS should do that. This is the lead attorney for PBS,
Speaker 1: the television station, that we should put these kids in
Speaker 1: front of PBS so that we can unindoctrinate them and
Speaker 1: take away their philosophy their parents have given them. Sean,
Speaker 1: this is what this man is saying. And I don't
Speaker 1: think that they're upset at the man for saying it.
Speaker 1: I think they're upset at me for exposing it on
Speaker 1: the week of the Capital insurrection. And you know, they
Speaker 1: they've had to fire him for saying things just as
Speaker 1: violent as as as we've been talking about this week.
Speaker 1: So it's it's really insane. What they're doing. But I'm
Speaker 1: sure Sean, there's many other people like him, and that's
Speaker 1: why our mission is so important to expose this and
Speaker 1: thing about how revealing this is. And I've said many
Speaker 1: many times on this program, James, that it's not just
Speaker 1: Donald Trump that the left hates and the media hates
Speaker 1: and Democrats hate, it's we the people that they hate.
Speaker 1: And you know that that's why these comments are so revealing.
Speaker 1: About h going on Olive Garden and staying in a
Speaker 1: you know, a Marriott Garden hostel, stunning. And they're going
Speaker 1: to go back, you know, to the Olive Garden and
Speaker 1: to their the holiday in that they're staying at in
Speaker 1: the Garden Marriott, and they're gonna have some drinks and
Speaker 1: they're gonna talk about the great day that they had
Speaker 1: in Washington and they really did something and stand up
Speaker 1: for something, and they stood up for nothing other than Mayhem.
Speaker 1: It's actually the Hilton Garden and the Marriott Courtyard. And
Speaker 1: I happen to like a lot Olive Garden. I've stayed
Speaker 1: in a lot of them as I've traveled the country.
Speaker 1: And if I go to a town and they have
Speaker 1: a waffle house or they have an olive garden or
Speaker 1: an outback or a cracker barrel. I'm the happiest guy
Speaker 1: on earth. I'll starve myself all day for that one
Speaker 1: big meal that day. But it's, you know, it's it's
Speaker 1: if you think about this, Americans are effing dumb. Most
Speaker 1: people are dumb. It's good to live in a place
Speaker 1: like Washington, d c. Where people are educated in no stuff.
Speaker 1: Could you imagine if you lived in one of these
Speaker 1: other towns or cities where everybody's just stupid. Well, I irredeemable,
Speaker 1: deplorable and smelly warmwat sharpers right. He goes beyond that, Sean.
Speaker 1: He says, it's great is that COVID is spiking in
Speaker 1: all the Red states. He says, what's great is it's
Speaker 1: spiking the Red states. So that's great. Quote, a lot
Speaker 1: of these red state voters are sick and dying. This
Speaker 1: is from the PBS lawyer, the nonprofit media organization receiving
Speaker 1: millions of dollars of your taxpayer dollars. This is what
Speaker 1: these people actually think and believe, and I believe Sean,
Speaker 1: the only way to change things now is to expose them.
Speaker 1: That's they actually fear exposure. They fear nothing else, And
Speaker 1: it's evident that they fear at Sean, because PBS has
Speaker 1: fired this man a few hours ago. And this is
Speaker 1: the quickest I've ever seen them fire someone. When you
Speaker 1: explained they fired them after you presented them with these tapes. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they would never have believed it unless I caught it
Speaker 1: on tape. They would never have taken my word for it.
Speaker 1: So we released the tape of a number of encounters
Speaker 1: with this man. And now you know, as I've always
Speaker 1: said to you, Sean, whistleblowers are coming to me, insiders
Speaker 1: inside the government, inside the media. There's no place else
Speaker 1: from them to go. It's Veritas tips at ProtonMail dot com,
Speaker 1: Project Veritas. We have to expose them. We have to
Speaker 1: hold them accountable, hold their feet to the fire. Sunlight
Speaker 1: is the best disinfectant now, more than ever, we have
Speaker 1: to expose these people. And this guy, the top lawyer,
Speaker 1: I mean saying that he's smarter and more enlightened than
Speaker 1: anybody else. It's not smart to take children away from
Speaker 1: their parents. This is what these people. It's twisted. It's
Speaker 1: almost mentally ill. Why do you listen to them talk?
Speaker 1: I mean, I just cannot believe it's great. The COVID
Speaker 1: spiking in Red states. That's great because a lot of
Speaker 1: Red state voters will get sick and die. Oh, oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, how much does PS I used to know
Speaker 1: off the top of my head. Do you do you
Speaker 1: recall what they get in taxpair of dollars every year?
Speaker 1: The corporation from public broadcasting get in the tens hundreds
Speaker 1: of millions of dollars. We did the story nine years
Speaker 1: ago in the National Public Radio. The vice president of
Speaker 1: NPR was caught on tape praising the Muslim Brotherhood. It's
Speaker 1: it's it's a caricature of what you would think a
Speaker 1: media executive or an attorney for immediate company would say
Speaker 1: and do. It's it's it's like if you're you're casting
Speaker 1: an actor to play the role this Michael Beller and
Speaker 1: what he's saying. But Sean, I think that you're getting
Speaker 1: a glimpse into the heart and soul these people. And
Speaker 1: I think that people are very hopeless right now. They
Speaker 1: have nothing to believe in, and they're they're afraid, and
Speaker 1: rightfully so. But I think that if you were to
Speaker 1: create an army, if you were to create an army
Speaker 1: of exposures, and you were to have one hundred two
Speaker 1: hundred people like this exposed, to think of the difference
Speaker 1: that that would make on society and the transparency revolution
Speaker 1: that would create. So that's what that's our vision at
Speaker 1: Project Garitas is to expose two hundred and fifty people
Speaker 1: like this and because that's the only way that we're
Speaker 1: going to have the pendulum swing back to some sense
Speaker 1: of normalcy in this country after all that is occurred.
Speaker 1: Now do we know so immediately upon you may when
Speaker 1: did you first make PBS aware that these tapes were
Speaker 1: in existence? And you know for sure he was only
Speaker 1: fired today. We reached out to them for comment this
Speaker 1: morning and we published the tapes at eleven am. I'm
Speaker 1: sorry last night we reached out to them for comment
Speaker 1: without showing them the tape. We quoted the tape, and
Speaker 1: then we launched the tape at eleven am. The CEO
Speaker 1: of PBS issued a statement to The CEO of PBS
Speaker 1: issued a statement saying it does not represent their philosophy
Speaker 1: and said that a far right activist group known for
Speaker 1: deceptive videos is what the Paula Kerger PBS CEO said,
Speaker 1: but it said the individual's personal interaction with an undercover
Speaker 1: member of Veritas was released today and that they have
Speaker 1: quote no place for hateful rhetoric, and we condemned violence.
Speaker 1: This is what they're saying. We have condemned violence for
Speaker 1: fifty years. We use our national platform and local presents
Speaker 1: to strengthen communities. So they released the statement today. A
Speaker 1: Sean I would stay around. I would stay within an
Speaker 1: hour or two of our video launching. All right, we're
Speaker 1: gonna have the tape so people who can actually see
Speaker 1: it with their own eyes tonight on Hannity. A great work.
Speaker 1: James O'Keefe, CEO found a project Veritas and can't wait
Speaker 1: for part two tomorrow. Thank you for being with us.
Speaker 1: All right, as three roll along, Sean Hannity Show, eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine four one. Sean Quinn is in Florida. Quinn,
Speaker 1: how are you? Glad you called? I'm doing well, Sean?
Speaker 1: How are you? I'm good? What's going on? Are you there? Oh? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm here for a minute. Just one. I wanted to
Speaker 1: give you my thoughts. Um. You know, I think as
Speaker 1: Republican and conservatives, we've been a little too focused on
Speaker 1: the national level for too long, and we need to
Speaker 1: really kind of start back to around zero, like, you know,
Speaker 1: taking over local communities and Department of Education supervisors and
Speaker 1: elections and stuff like that. Because when I look around,
Speaker 1: you see too Democrats in those positions, and I think
Speaker 1: communities are probably going to be more likely to vote.
Speaker 1: Where's the you know, leaning party versus you know, I
Speaker 1: don't know, so I just my thoughts on that and
Speaker 1: just too well, I think the Republican Party, you know,
Speaker 1: I look at the Democratic Party now, the party of
Speaker 1: elitism and coastal elites, and you know, I think there's
Speaker 1: been a dramatic shift in the way in the approach
Speaker 1: of the two parties. In other words, they're very They
Speaker 1: catered to New York LA, San Francisco, DC. And if
Speaker 1: the Republican Party ever wants to be successful, they've got
Speaker 1: a fight for working men and women for freedom. You know,
Speaker 1: the Conservative agenda is not complicated. Lower taxes, less bureaucracy,
Speaker 1: secure borders, energy independence, uh, free and fair trade deals,
Speaker 1: piece through strength, no judicial activism. It's not it's not
Speaker 1: all that complicated. And you know, how's government working for
Speaker 1: you so far? H If you live in a big city,
Speaker 1: how's law and order? How's safety and security? How's your
Speaker 1: educational system. School choice another big issue Republicans need to champion.
Speaker 1: And I think they're great distinctions, and but they've got
Speaker 1: a favor. You know, they do have a fight because
Speaker 1: there is this emotional appeal that you know, you'll have
Speaker 1: everything taken care of you from the minute you're born
Speaker 1: to the minute you're dying. True, But I just think
Speaker 1: as Republicans and Conservatives, we need to focus our efforts
Speaker 1: on the local communities are including like city council um,
Speaker 1: there's that important. Yeah, I think all of that's important.
Speaker 1: Looking and we still have a majority state legislature, which
Speaker 1: means that you know, like Florida, can you know, make
Speaker 1: institutional changes for the better? You know, we always want
Speaker 1: a more perfect union. Those aren't just words, uh, And
Speaker 1: you know, Florida had huge problems elections twenty twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: And look what Ronda Santis did. Did a great job
Speaker 1: of all the governors in the country, and he got
Speaker 1: criticized at different points, but I think he did a
Speaker 1: very good job threading and nevil as best as possible,
Speaker 1: maintaining maximum freedom for people and still trying to keep
Speaker 1: it Bill safe from COVID. It's hard quick break, right,
Speaker 1: back twenty five to the top of the hour, eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine for one. Sean is our number if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. One
Speaker 1: of the things that's been really most amazing to me,
Speaker 1: and a friend of mine pointed this out to me,
Speaker 1: that the passion in many of you that have been
Speaker 1: calling in and we've been putting on the air, the
Speaker 1: level of the urgency, the degree of concern. As one
Speaker 1: of my best friends said, it's unlike any other time
Speaker 1: I've ever listened to your show. We've had people breakdown
Speaker 1: on these calls on us now because they're so upset
Speaker 1: at what they see happening to their country and the
Speaker 1: and and things as they are now. I mean, you
Speaker 1: just go through the list, Well, we didn't like your opinion.
Speaker 1: You can't fly on a commercial airline. You've got to
Speaker 1: be expelled for the Senate because of your position on
Speaker 1: on an election audit. Really, you know, it's you need
Speaker 1: to be prosecuted. Really, you know, it's this has gone
Speaker 1: insane and um efforts to just if you disagree, Dan. Now,
Speaker 1: if you worked in the Trump White House in any capacity,
Speaker 1: they're gonna be checking the companies that hire you. Wow,
Speaker 1: you know the parlor shut down, voices silenced, one thought,
Speaker 1: one view. It doesn't surprise me, but apparently you know
Speaker 1: the book nineteen eighty four as a dis Orwellian nightmare.
Speaker 1: It's now at the top of Amazon's best seller list.
Speaker 1: Can you believe it? When did that book come out?
Speaker 1: I don't know the actual year, but it's chilling, chilling,
Speaker 1: These are chilling times. I think it might have been
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty four when it actually came out, too or
Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't remember. Let's get to our
Speaker 1: phones here. Um. The only thing I can say is
Speaker 1: that I would just appeal to everybody, like I know
Speaker 1: some some people have been talking about, you know, planning
Speaker 1: this or planning that. I think if everybody needs to
Speaker 1: take a collective deep breath. Country has been through hard times.
Speaker 1: We've had our differences as a country. We always seem
Speaker 1: to find a way back and a path back, you know,
Speaker 1: one glorious nation under God. We got to remember that
Speaker 1: during all of this, and the world needs a strong America.
Speaker 1: We just do. I hate I shuddered to think what
Speaker 1: it would be like without us. Leading Brad in Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: Hey Brad, how are you glad? You called sir. Thank you, sir,
Speaker 1: thank you for getting my call, and thank you for
Speaker 1: what you do. Thank you. I would like to say,
Speaker 1: first of all, I fear for the President's family. They've
Speaker 1: already said that they want to go after him, Don
Speaker 1: Junior and Rudy Giuliani, and I honestly believe they're gonna
Speaker 1: come up with some kind of bogus charges on Eric too,
Speaker 1: because they're not gonna want any Trumps anywhere near Washington,
Speaker 1: DC in twenty twenty four. You know, it's the only
Speaker 1: I gotta give credit where credit is due Joe Mansion,
Speaker 1: West Virginia. He says, no, those that wanted an audit
Speaker 1: or objected to the Electoral College that had a different
Speaker 1: point of view, No, they should not be expelled. He
Speaker 1: also said that he's not going to support ending the
Speaker 1: filibuster or pack in the court. I mean, which is
Speaker 1: you know, a credit to him. I'm sure I'll probably
Speaker 1: be hounded by some in the media and the mob
Speaker 1: and by left wing activists, but you know, there are
Speaker 1: things that that you would think fundamentally we all agree
Speaker 1: on as far as the way the Trump family has
Speaker 1: been treated over the last four years. I mean, I
Speaker 1: think by me playing and reminding people all that was
Speaker 1: said and even the calls from violence repeatedly. Nobody really
Speaker 1: seems to be phased by all of that. I guess
Speaker 1: it's it's just a matter of who's saying what when,
Speaker 1: and then that's a norwelly and nightmare. Oh okay, I
Speaker 1: think an awful lot about blowing up the White House.
Speaker 1: When's the last time an actor ever assassinated a president?
Speaker 1: Or I mean, there's a lot of crazy people out there.
Speaker 1: I have two more quick posits, so I could, yes, sir,
Speaker 1: you know, in my opinion, if we don't cut the
Speaker 1: head off of the snake right now while we have
Speaker 1: the White House and the Senate, I don't think there
Speaker 1: will be an election in twenty four because you know,
Speaker 1: a president Biden or Harris is not going to say, well,
Speaker 1: we had issues in twenty there seemed to have been
Speaker 1: some irregularities. So let's do away with the dominion machines.
Speaker 1: They'll be everywhere, listen. I mean this is going to
Speaker 1: be up to state legislatures and what they do now.
Speaker 1: Every question has been raised, every issue has been discussed
Speaker 1: and debated. They now have a job, and their job
Speaker 1: is to ensure that you know, for example, we had
Speaker 1: problems in Florida in two thousand, problems in Florida twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: Governor Dessant has resolved them all and Florida had the
Speaker 1: smoothest election almost, you know, one of those like most states.
Speaker 1: Actually most states were fine and they did it because
Speaker 1: they worked on it. There's a way to do these
Speaker 1: things and do it with integrity that people have faith, hope,
Speaker 1: confidence and at the end of the day, and we
Speaker 1: need to do that around the country anyway, Brad, thank you.
Speaker 1: Tim is in North Carolina, hate Tim. How are you, hey,
Speaker 1: mister sean A. So contrary to popular belief, I think
Speaker 1: there's actually good news and reason to be excited for
Speaker 1: the future. Before you assume I'm like one of those
Speaker 1: crazy liberals, let me let me explain why. So, I'm
Speaker 1: in my twenties, I actually achieved more success in business
Speaker 1: and personal finance compared to last year. This year, why, okay,
Speaker 1: why in the midst of this turmoil, It's because hope okay,
Speaker 1: And I know that sounds corny. The less beliefs, philosophies
Speaker 1: and arguments are so bad, so self evidently absurd, is
Speaker 1: self contradictory that even when they hijack or legal institutions,
Speaker 1: academic institutions, media culture. Of course they claim to distrust these, right,
Speaker 1: they still lose half the country. Look at their actions
Speaker 1: with parlor for example. Isn't parlor a French word? Doesn't
Speaker 1: it mean to speak? They're literally banning the word and speech.
Speaker 1: That's crazy to me. But only in London would know
Speaker 1: the answer to that question. Is that true? London to
Speaker 1: parlay is to have a conversation. That's correct. I told
Speaker 1: you so, he knows this stuff. I studied French for
Speaker 1: four years. I I studied me about me a studio
Speaker 1: espanio y sanyas porquito espaniol amiably that I actually you know,
Speaker 1: I have a long story anyway, listen, Yeah, it is
Speaker 1: about speech. Freedom of speech, you know what can be painful.
Speaker 1: And let me and then let me be very clear
Speaker 1: about this. You know, I have chosen this life that
Speaker 1: I live in a public eye. Um, nobody would believe
Speaker 1: me if I said, And there's no point complaining about
Speaker 1: it because I have nothing to complain about honestly. But
Speaker 1: it is when when you have a public job, you
Speaker 1: accept and especially if you give strong opinions that people
Speaker 1: are going to have strong opinions about you. I have
Speaker 1: been lied about, I have been slandered, I have been smeared,
Speaker 1: my character besmirched, false thing sad narratives, etcetera, etcetera. Um,
Speaker 1: but I made that choice in my life that I
Speaker 1: knew that that went with the territory, and I accept it.
Speaker 1: And I've spread horrible things about me, but for good,
Speaker 1: honest people that have no interest in being the public eye.
Speaker 1: For frankly, all the right reasons. Trust me you. Anonymity
Speaker 1: is something you can't even put a price on. And
Speaker 1: for groups of people to be slandered and smeared, or
Speaker 1: to give people a form to say things that you
Speaker 1: don't even agree with or like, is not unhealthy. And
Speaker 1: if I go on social media, just like the old
Speaker 1: message board days, and I see horrible things written about me,
Speaker 1: lies about me, funny memes about me, whatever, it happens
Speaker 1: to be, Okay, this is my chosen career. And that's
Speaker 1: why you have Times v. Sullivan, And it's the standard
Speaker 1: is so high in terms of if you're a public figure,
Speaker 1: to prove you have to have malice to prove balance
Speaker 1: as nearly an impossible standard, and people pretty much can
Speaker 1: say any lie they want about me, and there's not
Speaker 1: a whole hell of a lot I can do but average.
Speaker 1: But if you're Nicholas Samman and you're not a public
Speaker 1: figure and they say lies about you, oh you're gonna
Speaker 1: win that lawsuit. You're just going to But conservatives, I
Speaker 1: can tell you who. Ninety nine percent of conservatives I
Speaker 1: know are salt of the earth. They're the people that
Speaker 1: make America great. They are people that get up every day,
Speaker 1: shovel coffee down their throat, feed their kids, make their lunch,
Speaker 1: send them off to school, work their twelve fourteen hours
Speaker 1: a day, have dinner, prepare it or order in some pizza,
Speaker 1: whatever they're gonna eat that night, you know, help the
Speaker 1: kids study in whatever, maybe watch a half a TV
Speaker 1: show and go to bed and get up in the
Speaker 1: next day and do it again. And they obey the laws,
Speaker 1: they pay the taxes. Good honorable people, and they are
Speaker 1: what makes this country so great. Anyway, I'll give you
Speaker 1: the last word here, Okay, I appreciate that. Hey, so
Speaker 1: you just describe a very interesting point. Conservatives are actually
Speaker 1: living their life. They don't have time to. I don't
Speaker 1: know higher people that aren't right that worship politics and
Speaker 1: require getting gratification by destroying other people's lives, and the
Speaker 1: fact that they even go to destroy other people's lives,
Speaker 1: the need to do that, They need to silence the
Speaker 1: need to do things like shutdown competition. Right, that confesses
Speaker 1: how weak you are. If you're if you listen, if
Speaker 1: if your argument is so good, if the left is
Speaker 1: so correct, so moral, then why do they need to
Speaker 1: set up an army of things to destroy any opposition.
Speaker 1: People that have a good product and have a good idea,
Speaker 1: they don't fear a competition. They encourage it and want it.
Speaker 1: Why because they're they're freaking they're good, They're not full
Speaker 1: of crap like these guys, right, they're failures. These guys
Speaker 1: are are frauds in my view, and that they're confessing
Speaker 1: it whenever they require a competition. And Sean, if I
Speaker 1: may with section two thirty, I'll even this this comment.
Speaker 1: I think we're gonna catch twenty two because if we
Speaker 1: remove it, you know, it's going to create a for
Speaker 1: hivitive cost for competition, because there's going to be a
Speaker 1: lot more legality and a lot more things to make
Speaker 1: sure that are balanced or or compensated for and research done,
Speaker 1: which means more fees are to creating a new platform.
Speaker 1: And the left already has a lot of the tech ins,
Speaker 1: so I think that's gonna gonna harm us if we
Speaker 1: remove it. At the same time that I understand liability,
Speaker 1: of course is something that's important. So when it comes
Speaker 1: to the market share, I mean, do we even have
Speaker 1: the capacity to calculate the market share for us? People
Speaker 1: are smarter than we think here. People will get to decide.
Speaker 1: But if they're gonna if they're not going to be
Speaker 1: a pure content provider, getting rid of the obvious racism,
Speaker 1: physical threats, whatever. If you're going to be a content provider,
Speaker 1: then you got to accept that they may even criticize
Speaker 1: your company on your site, you know, and that's part
Speaker 1: of it. But you raise a lot of good points.
Speaker 1: But if you if you're gonna be editing, then you
Speaker 1: don't get the protections that are only given a social
Speaker 1: media platforms that is worth billions to them, billions given
Speaker 1: by government. And as we continue back to our busy phones,
Speaker 1: if we say hi to Ken and Florida, Ken, how
Speaker 1: are you glad you called sir? Hello, Sean, how are
Speaker 1: you doing? Thanks for having me on thank you. Well.
Speaker 1: I'm a Democrat, and I've been following the election process
Speaker 1: the things that have happened for quite some time now,
Speaker 1: and I understand that Republicans have an argument about the
Speaker 1: fact that they think that this was a raaged election,
Speaker 1: that for some reason it was unlawful and wrong. My
Speaker 1: point is that if if Republicans think that the way
Speaker 1: the states ran there, or the way the states run
Speaker 1: their election is wrong, then you know they have their
Speaker 1: time to change it. You change it either before the
Speaker 1: election or after the election. Trying to change the way
Speaker 1: the states run their elections during the election is wrong.
Speaker 1: You can't do it. Then. You can't change it during.
Speaker 1: You have your time to change it before the election,
Speaker 1: when you know that there may be a problem coming.
Speaker 1: You change the law afterwards. Once the elections happened and
Speaker 1: you know you think that's something had, okay, you change
Speaker 1: you the way it's run afterwards. But during the election, no,
Speaker 1: you can't change it. Then they had all this opportunity
Speaker 1: to bring their argument to court fifty sixty times. You're
Speaker 1: talking about Republicans, correct, I'm talking about Republicans. The people
Speaker 1: who I understand this now, Okay. The only thing I
Speaker 1: have so what you're really saying, and maybe you're right
Speaker 1: on some issues involving law or constitutional issues. I think
Speaker 1: I think you might might be onto something. Some of
Speaker 1: the courts cited that, um. But on the other hand,
Speaker 1: in other cases, you're just that would be a presumption
Speaker 1: that things would go so wrong, uh before it even
Speaker 1: went wrong, And I think it's hard to anticipate such
Speaker 1: a thing, isn't it. Well, well, if you if you have, well,
Speaker 1: then how did the president know that he was going
Speaker 1: to be unjustly um, you know uh represented in this vote? Well,
Speaker 1: the president if you go back, remember a lot of
Speaker 1: this was a result of, you know, people never wanted
Speaker 1: to listen to the great doctor Fauci. Liberals love and
Speaker 1: quote him so often, but they didn't want to hear
Speaker 1: what he had to say on one issue, and that
Speaker 1: was uh. And it was very simple, and that is, yes,
Speaker 1: people can safely vote in person, and they can do
Speaker 1: it with social distancing in masks. And it was the
Speaker 1: president responding to you know, the millions of mail in
Speaker 1: ballots without the checks and balances that it would otherwise
Speaker 1: exist for in person voting. And that was where the prediction,
Speaker 1: I assume came from. And even the New York Times
Speaker 1: had warned at length that that's and others on the
Speaker 1: left that that could be you know, that that was
Speaker 1: the most dangerous or the most had the most potential
Speaker 1: to be wrought with fraud. And I I just think
Speaker 1: he was echoing with the New York time set at
Speaker 1: the time. That was my interpretation. But anyway, I appreciate
Speaker 1: the call quick break right back, We'll continue, all right,
Speaker 1: News founds up information overload hour eight hundred and nine.
Speaker 1: Pour one, Sean, if you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program. A lot of talk about wokeness and
Speaker 1: what can be said and what cannot be said, and
Speaker 1: it is now at a level I never imagine in
Speaker 1: my life. You have the CEO of Parlor, John Matt,
Speaker 1: saying that these big tech companies dumped Parlor on the
Speaker 1: same day without any warning. He's got his lawsuit moving forward.
Speaker 1: He also says people are threatening his life. He can't
Speaker 1: go home tonight, and Pauler says that he's again hoping
Speaker 1: to get back up soon. It seems like that effort
Speaker 1: is moving along. Six testfully from my sources, here's what
Speaker 1: he said yesterday. You just never think it'll happen though, right,
Speaker 1: you know, And what's really interesting is that they all
Speaker 1: did it on the same day, those three without any
Speaker 1: prior warning. We woke up on Friday thinking business well,
Speaker 1: not never business as usual at parlor, but at least
Speaker 1: as closed to usual as possible. We were number one
Speaker 1: on the app store, you know, we had seven million,
Speaker 1: almost seven million unique people on the app that day.
Speaker 1: And we get a notice, you know, you're in violation
Speaker 1: of our terms, one after another. But we found out
Speaker 1: first in some cases, not from the companies, but from BuzzFeed.
Speaker 1: You know, we didn't get a notice from Google. We
Speaker 1: read it online in the news first, and that is shocking.
Speaker 1: And then after they set that example, you know, we
Speaker 1: get an email after email. You know, it's almost like
Speaker 1: you were just waiting who's going to be next dumping
Speaker 1: us everybody. The last thing we have right now is email,
Speaker 1: and I bet you within twenty four hours our email
Speaker 1: will be shut off too. I mean, I've seen a
Speaker 1: lot of people say that this is scary, but I've
Speaker 1: also seen a lot of people who are participating in
Speaker 1: the five minutes to hate and kind of egging it
Speaker 1: on and cheering, and it's disgusting. People threatening my life.
Speaker 1: I can't go home tonight. So there's this is really
Speaker 1: a lot. You know, this is not just you know,
Speaker 1: our civil liberties. They can shut down a billion dollar company,
Speaker 1: half a billion to a billion dollar companies what we
Speaker 1: were getting valuations at overnight. We will be back up eventually,
Speaker 1: because we're not going to give up. But it soon
Speaker 1: as difficult, you know, I thought immediately, oh, no problem,
Speaker 1: we'll call up a new vendor. Right, we call up
Speaker 1: the vendor, We're all good to go. And then right
Speaker 1: at the last second, sorry, somebody said something, we can't
Speaker 1: host you buy. And it's been that one after another
Speaker 1: ever since. Then right at the last minute, they they
Speaker 1: just bail. So we're gonna do it. We're going to
Speaker 1: be back online one day and hopefully soon as soon
Speaker 1: as possible. But this is a real challenge. We have
Speaker 1: to build our own infrastructure, our own everything in order
Speaker 1: to do it all. Right, pretty unbelievable times that we're
Speaker 1: living in here. Um, you have a Forbes op ed
Speaker 1: warning companies about hiring people that worked in the Trump
Speaker 1: White House. Fabulous from the Trump White House warning these
Speaker 1: companies not to hire them. I mean, it's it's almost
Speaker 1: pretty pretty remarkable to me. You've got congressman like Ted
Speaker 1: lou who himself, as we pointed out yesterday, said some
Speaker 1: really outrageous things, not condemning violence in the summer. Republican
Speaker 1: members of Congress who incited insurrection should be prosecuted, any
Speaker 1: names he wants to give, And it goes on from there.
Speaker 1: You have one Democratic senator wanting Ted Cruz and Josh
Speaker 1: Holly expelled from the Senate. Expelled. Now, you may not agree.
Speaker 1: You may not like what they said. You might not
Speaker 1: like the timing. You might you might have felt that
Speaker 1: they shouldn't have done it. They're calling for an election audit, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, Democrats have done, as we've chronicled on
Speaker 1: this program before. You know, one thing Mike Pompeo said.
Speaker 1: You know, he's saying it's time to put wokeness to sleep.
Speaker 1: And what happened to liberals that I thought were champions
Speaker 1: of free speech? If your pro Second Amendment Amazon partner
Speaker 1: go daddy is kicked them off their servers. You know,
Speaker 1: Trump banned by Twitter, Facebook, will now you know trigger there.
Speaker 1: You know, I think it's going to end up being
Speaker 1: a downfall in terms of a financial model. They now
Speaker 1: say they were moving content on Facebook for people that
Speaker 1: oppose the election in any way pretty much as an
Speaker 1: interesting piece. Brian Cranston, I like this line, cancel culture
Speaker 1: kills forgiveness said, the culture created a world of no
Speaker 1: mercy to cancel culture people airing doing wrong, either on
Speaker 1: purpose by accident, and there is less forgiveness in our world.
Speaker 1: By the way, how many times have I said, you
Speaker 1: know what I think as you give people a second chance,
Speaker 1: right wrongs, correct injustices. I've said it all the time
Speaker 1: for people that say stuff, Um, anybody that believes in
Speaker 1: anything that does not meet standards. Now on Twitter, Twitter
Speaker 1: there now in the process of purging anybody that has
Speaker 1: even points of view that are nutty. I think some
Speaker 1: things said about me are pretty nutty on social media,
Speaker 1: but I'd never think ever to say all they need
Speaker 1: to be canceled. And you've got the you know, I
Speaker 1: don't know what to say anyway. Mike Huckabee's were those
Speaker 1: former governor Arkansas and author of a brand new book,
Speaker 1: The Three cs That Made America Great, Christianity, Capitalism, in
Speaker 1: the Constitution. I'm sure that I'm actually shocked that they
Speaker 1: actually followed up and continue your publishing governor forgot when
Speaker 1: Ted Cruz and Josh Hally maybe put on a no
Speaker 1: fly list they can't fly to their home states or Washington.
Speaker 1: This is stuff we can't even make up. I mean,
Speaker 1: people have lost their minds when a sitting US senator
Speaker 1: is threatened with expulsion because he followed not only his convictions,
Speaker 1: but he did follow a constitutional process. Sean, I am
Speaker 1: so tired of people saying that what Ted Cruz was
Speaker 1: attempting to do is to overthrow the election. He was not.
Speaker 1: What Ted Cruz proposed was a commission made up of
Speaker 1: five House members, five Senate members, and five members of
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court to audit the election results. Wouldn't overturn anything.
Speaker 1: It would simply ask were there irregularities that should be corrected?
Speaker 1: And I don't know why that would bother anybody, but
Speaker 1: I apparently bothered a lot of people to the point
Speaker 1: that they wanted to get rid of Ted Cruz completely.
Speaker 1: And I just find that outrageous. But we're living in
Speaker 1: La la land right now, and that it's becoming increasingly
Speaker 1: apparent of every day that the left doesn't want to
Speaker 1: have a contest. They don't want to see if we
Speaker 1: can get out there and battle it out. They just
Speaker 1: want to destroy the other side, annihilate them and pretend
Speaker 1: they don't exist. That's pretty sad. You know what we've
Speaker 1: I've watched this now unfold for many, many years, and
Speaker 1: you've you've been a part of this. I mean you
Speaker 1: entered the radio world, the television world, and there's a
Speaker 1: full on, well funded and when I mean well funded,
Speaker 1: we're talking about over the years, hundreds of millions of
Speaker 1: dollars to silence conservatives on radio and on Fox News
Speaker 1: and to shut people down, and they work through a
Speaker 1: bunch of other ways. There are people right now that
Speaker 1: tape every single word of every time I'm on the air,
Speaker 1: and the hopes that somebody, I guessed myself, somebody says
Speaker 1: one thing, one word, one phrase that they think they
Speaker 1: can use that would be actionable to get my voice silenced.
Speaker 1: I'm a mainstream conservative governor. You've known me. I've been
Speaker 1: on the air thirty three years, and I am stunned
Speaker 1: now it's it's taken on this alarming level and I'm
Speaker 1: not sure when it ends and where it ends and
Speaker 1: how it ends, and it's just dangerous to me. Well,
Speaker 1: whatever happened to the people on the left who used
Speaker 1: to say, even in regards to things that were pornographic, hey,
Speaker 1: if you don't like it, just turn it off, go
Speaker 1: to a different channel. That's not what these folks are
Speaker 1: saying anymore. They're not saying find another channel, turn off
Speaker 1: the one that defends you. They're saying get rid of
Speaker 1: all the channels. Not because they are patently obscene are
Speaker 1: offensive to any average person, but because we, the people
Speaker 1: of power, the big tech giants, don't like them, We
Speaker 1: don't agree with them, and we'd rather not be challenged
Speaker 1: in our own puny beliefs. Listen, not forget John, what
Speaker 1: is that? The heart of this is a combination of
Speaker 1: arrogance and insecurity. The arrogance of believing that their views
Speaker 1: are superior to everyone else's, and then it's the insecurity
Speaker 1: of knowing that their views really could not stand up
Speaker 1: to the scrutiny someone challenging them. I mean, I'd always
Speaker 1: feel this way, and I know you do because you
Speaker 1: deal with it every day. If somebody wants to come
Speaker 1: on and challenge you, bring it on. I'm fine with it.
Speaker 1: Let's hear your views and let's put it juxtaposed against mine.
Speaker 1: And let's see how this turns out. That's how you've
Speaker 1: stayed in the business thirty three years on radio and television,
Speaker 1: and it's how America is supposed to work. But when
Speaker 1: these people come out, it's no, we don't want any
Speaker 1: view but ours. That's arrogance, and we don't want to
Speaker 1: hear what you have to say because our views really
Speaker 1: aren't that strong, and if somebody were to challenge them,
Speaker 1: our house of cards falls apart. You know, you actually
Speaker 1: pointed something out and I never listen. I Colin Kaepernick,
Speaker 1: I don't have any problem with anybody protesting in any way, shape, manner,
Speaker 1: or form. I really don't. And he wants to take
Speaker 1: a knee, that's his choice. For other teams want to
Speaker 1: do it, that's their choice. And people should have the
Speaker 1: right to disagree and say, you know, well, you know,
Speaker 1: look at what happened to poor Drew Brees when he said, well,
Speaker 1: my grandfather fought and nearly diet under fighting for that
Speaker 1: under that flag, and I don't agree with it, you know,
Speaker 1: then spent the next month apologizing for it. But you
Speaker 1: you've I guess found a tweet of Colin Kaepernick, and
Speaker 1: I guess this was made when I guess some of
Speaker 1: the writing was going on the summer. If I can
Speaker 1: see the date here, I think it was in May
Speaker 1: of this past year, and where he basically he says,
Speaker 1: when civility leads to death and revolting is the only
Speaker 1: logical reaction, and the cries for peace will rain down,
Speaker 1: and when they do, they will land on deaf ears.
Speaker 1: Because your violence has brought this resistance, we have the
Speaker 1: right to fight back. Rest in power, George Floyd. Now, First,
Speaker 1: every any human being with a heart and soul immediately
Speaker 1: agreed this transcended politics, racial lines, and everything, as it
Speaker 1: should because a human being that never should happen to
Speaker 1: anybody ever. And then you pointed out that that that
Speaker 1: tweet remains and Jack Dorsey at Jack gave three million dollars?
Speaker 1: Was it after that statement? You know? Yeah, there's so
Speaker 1: many inconsistencies here, and one glaring one to me when
Speaker 1: I'm hearing people say we ought to impeach the president
Speaker 1: because of something he said, and thoughtful constitutional scholars who
Speaker 1: are not Trump supporters, like Jonathan Turley and Alan Drshwitz,
Speaker 1: who I suspect both so very much because they're looking
Speaker 1: at this as objectively as anybody can from a strictly
Speaker 1: legal perspective, not because they're Trumpers, because they're out there
Speaker 1: advocating with the president. Neither one of them voted for
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, but they both said there's nothing impeachable in
Speaker 1: what he said. He did not incite a riot. And
Speaker 1: I'm really disappointed in some of the people, many of
Speaker 1: whom I've seen on Fox that are contributors, and I
Speaker 1: like them and they're still friends. But you know, they've said, well,
Speaker 1: what the President said was an incitement to arrive, and
Speaker 1: I'm thinking, no, it was not by any stretch of
Speaker 1: the actual words. And look at the script were I
Speaker 1: know that everyone here will soon be marching over to
Speaker 1: the Capitol building too, peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.
Speaker 1: Catherine Harrihage of CBS News reported that apparently the people
Speaker 1: that were responsible for some of this had already breached
Speaker 1: and were bringing things in. But you know, it doesn't
Speaker 1: justify anybody that didn't respect our laws and did and
Speaker 1: absolutely they had no business invading the Capitol like that.
Speaker 1: Every single person I know condemns it. You condemn it.
Speaker 1: We did from the beginning. It also was a tiny
Speaker 1: percentage of all those people that showed up, just like
Speaker 1: most protesters this summer were peaceful, but a few agitators
Speaker 1: caused a lot of problems for many months. Well, I
Speaker 1: was going to represent fact that Kamala Harris back last
Speaker 1: summer didn't just say that what they were doing was
Speaker 1: okay when they were burning cities down, hitting cops in
Speaker 1: the head with bricks, and going through the whole summer
Speaker 1: of love. As Mayor Jenny Durkin of Seattle put it,
Speaker 1: she raised money. She raised money to get people out
Speaker 1: of jail who were there for rioting and looting so
Speaker 1: they could get right back on the streets and do
Speaker 1: some more of it. Now, if if anybody ought to
Speaker 1: be impeached for inciting something, let's be completely fair and
Speaker 1: let's go after Kamala Harris. Go ahead and impeach her
Speaker 1: before she even gets sworn in. I don't hear anybody
Speaker 1: on the left say that. Frankly, I didn't even hear
Speaker 1: anybody on the right say that. I use it only
Speaker 1: as an illustrative moment to try to just explain how
Speaker 1: totally hypocritical the folks on the left have been about
Speaker 1: what constitutes an incitement to a riot. I don't think.
Speaker 1: Let me, let me take a break, and when we
Speaker 1: come back, how about I play it for everybody to
Speaker 1: know exactly what you're talking about. The Kamala Harris said,
Speaker 1: we've been We've played it yesterday, We'll played again today. Stop.
Speaker 1: They're not going to stop. And that's they're not This
Speaker 1: is a movement. I'm telling you, they're not going to stop.
Speaker 1: And everyone beware because they're not going to stop. It
Speaker 1: is gonna They're not going to stop before election day
Speaker 1: in November, and they're not going to stop after election day.
Speaker 1: And that should be everyone should take note of that
Speaker 1: on both levels that this isn't they're not going to
Speaker 1: let up, and they should not and we should not.
Speaker 1: They should not and we should not. Okay, they're not
Speaker 1: going to stop. That's Kamala Harris saying that to the country.
Speaker 1: And this was you know, as a lot of these
Speaker 1: events were unfolding this summer. Wow, pretty anyone going to
Speaker 1: criticize that, governor, because I haven't heard anybody. No, they're
Speaker 1: not going to criticize that. It's okay. I mean, think
Speaker 1: about how many of the Democrats, for example, Nancy Pollos
Speaker 1: who and said people are going to do what they're
Speaker 1: gonna do. Jerry Nadler saying, all this talk about the riots,
Speaker 1: it's a myth, a myth, even as burning as he spoke.
Speaker 1: You have these anchors on BSNBC and the Catfish News
Speaker 1: Network over at CNN, the bottom feeders, that's why I
Speaker 1: call them the Catfish News networking. And there they are
Speaker 1: standing in front of fires raging, and they say, yeah,
Speaker 1: mostly peaceful protest here behind me. Well, except for that
Speaker 1: guy's business is getting looted right now and that cop
Speaker 1: car that's being set on fire by this mob. We
Speaker 1: all condemned that. We wait for the Democrats to condemn it,
Speaker 1: and they didn't. We waited for the media to just
Speaker 1: report it accurately, and they didn't know the moment this
Speaker 1: stuff happened at the capital, every conservative voice, everybody. We
Speaker 1: can't have that in our country, and we need, we need,
Speaker 1: we need to protect every elected official everyone. I don't
Speaker 1: care about your politics at all, Governor, great new book,
Speaker 1: by the way, the three seeds that made America great Christianity, Capitalism,
Speaker 1: and the Constitution. Governor. I don't think anyone could shut
Speaker 1: us up even if they tried. Anyway, we appreciate you
Speaker 1: being with us eight hundred nine for one. Shaun is
Speaker 1: our number. We'll talk about section two thirty. What will Congress?
Speaker 1: What can they do about it? Next? All right, twenty
Speaker 1: five now till the top of the hour, eight hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety four one, Sean, you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. Let's take a moment to go
Speaker 1: back in time, and this is at Jack Jack Dorsey
Speaker 1: of Twitter saying that they removed over three hundred thousand
Speaker 1: electro related tweets between October twenty seventh and November the eleventh,
Speaker 1: that's before and after the election, and then admitting it
Speaker 1: was a mistake to censor the New York Post story
Speaker 1: on Hunter Biden. We updated our civic Integrity policy to
Speaker 1: address misleading or disputed information that undermines confidence in the election,
Speaker 1: causes voter intimidation or suppression or confusion about how to vote,
Speaker 1: or misrepresents affiliation or election outcomes. More than a year ago,
Speaker 1: the public asked us to offer additional contexts to help
Speaker 1: make potentially misleading information more apparent. We did exactly that,
Speaker 1: applying labels to over three hundred thousand tweets from October
Speaker 1: twenty seventh to November eleventh, which represented about two point
Speaker 1: two percent of all US election related tweets. We also
Speaker 1: changed how our product works in order to help increase
Speaker 1: contexts and encourage more thoughtful consideration before tweets are shared broadly.
Speaker 1: We're continuing to assess the act of these product changes
Speaker 1: to inform our long term roadmap. If you're not a
Speaker 1: newspaper at Twitter or Facebook, then why do you have
Speaker 1: editorial control over the New York Post? To me, seems
Speaker 1: like you're the ultimate editor. You do realize that by
Speaker 1: taking down that story, you probably gave it more prominence
Speaker 1: and more visibility than it ever would have gotten had
Speaker 1: you left it alone. We realize that, and we recognize
Speaker 1: it as a mistake that we made, both in terms
Speaker 1: of the intention of the policy and also the enforcement
Speaker 1: action of not allowing people to share it publicly or privately,
Speaker 1: which is why we corrected it within twenty four hours.
Speaker 1: All right, joining us now is Congressman Greg Stubie Florida
Speaker 1: is a bill limiting the reach of Section two thirty
Speaker 1: for big tech. That's the liability provision you've heard so
Speaker 1: much about that does not exist for news organizations like
Speaker 1: newspapers and news channels and news divisions and broadcast networks, etc.
Speaker 1: Or fake news divisions. Anyway, the changes would then modify
Speaker 1: the immunity the big tech companies have under this bill,
Speaker 1: which by the way, needs to happen. I mean it's
Speaker 1: I can't even put a financial figure on the value
Speaker 1: and worth that this gives these companies when in fact
Speaker 1: they're no different by editing out that which they like
Speaker 1: and don't like and determining who's going to be heard
Speaker 1: and who's not going to be heard. It's not any
Speaker 1: different from these so called media organizations that are abusively biased.
Speaker 1: That's the same thing. Anyway, Congressman, what are the odds
Speaker 1: we can get this done? Hey, Sean, thanks for having
Speaker 1: me on the show. Well, you know you. In early
Speaker 1: last year, the Democrats actually had hearings I see in
Speaker 1: the Subcommittee for Anti Trust about big tech and talking
Speaker 1: about breaking them up. So there's certainly interest the Democrat
Speaker 1: to do something here. I read in an article this
Speaker 1: morning that Cicillini, who's the chairman of that subcommittee, had
Speaker 1: also said, given the violence that occurred up here in
Speaker 1: some of the discourse that was going on online, that
Speaker 1: he's more open to reviewing Section two thirty. My bill
Speaker 1: is very simple. It applies a market dominance test. So
Speaker 1: for people like Facebook and Twitter and that sort of thing,
Speaker 1: we can we would be able to have a private
Speaker 1: right of cause of action if they have done something
Speaker 1: that is not consistent with the First Amendment to the Constitution.
Speaker 1: So any individual business or the New York Post with
Speaker 1: that story that they mistakenly quote unquote didn't allow to
Speaker 1: be tweeted. And by the way, our Judiciary Committee official
Speaker 1: website they flagged and censored because we were trying to
Speaker 1: get the New York Post story out in an official
Speaker 1: channel and they flagged that as well. So this would
Speaker 1: allow for organizations, businesses when they do actions like this,
Speaker 1: to have a private right of cause of action and
Speaker 1: also provides for damages direct damages, compensary liquidated damages in
Speaker 1: the amount of five hundred thousand if they are found
Speaker 1: who have been acting that way. So I can guarantee
Speaker 1: you that's going to change the behavior if this bill
Speaker 1: gets passed. Okay, what are the odds it gets done?
Speaker 1: Because if I'm a liberal Democrat, I kind of like it.
Speaker 1: They're doing all of the bidding for us, and we
Speaker 1: let them keep this extra protection and it limits their liability,
Speaker 1: They're probably going to continue to advocate for us. Why
Speaker 1: would I bother or want to change something like that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: until I mean, the reality is, until the Republicans get
Speaker 1: the gabbles in the House, we don't have any authority
Speaker 1: or power to bring anything in these committees, to bring
Speaker 1: anything to the floor. We're completely beholden to Speaker Pelosi
Speaker 1: and the Democrats that run some of these committees. So
Speaker 1: I'm certainly not greatly optimistic that this is something that
Speaker 1: we could get done, because the only way that it
Speaker 1: would get down in the next two years is if
Speaker 1: the Democrats agree or want to work with us on
Speaker 1: some of these changes. You know, well, is there any
Speaker 1: Democrats you've spoken to the do because I doubt it. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm actually there was. I can't remember where I read it.
Speaker 1: I think it was a Wall Street Journal where they
Speaker 1: interviewed Cicillini, who seemed, based on his language of reforming
Speaker 1: two thirty from a liability perspective, he seemed responsive to that.
Speaker 1: So I'm going to reach out to him because I
Speaker 1: sit on his subcommittee, and see if you'd be willing
Speaker 1: to work with me on this day. He and other
Speaker 1: Democrats certainly wanted to go after big Tech before all
Speaker 1: of this happened and break them up from an antitrust perspective.
Speaker 1: So I still think that is there. But again, unfortunately,
Speaker 1: until we take the house back in twenty twenty two,
Speaker 1: which I'm going to work hard and I think my
Speaker 1: colleague's gonna work hard to accomplish. They make the decisions
Speaker 1: in the committees of what legislations brought up, but that's
Speaker 1: certainly not going to stop me from advocating to this.
Speaker 1: Good for you, Congressman, Thanks for all you're doing. When
Speaker 1: you please keep us updated on this topic. We need
Speaker 1: to know about it. Yes, sir, thanks for having me.
Speaker 1: Thank you eight hundred and nine for one sean our number.
Speaker 1: You want to be a part of the program. Bill
Speaker 1: is in Mississippi. What's up, Bill? How are you glad
Speaker 1: you called? Thanks for joining us. I'm glad to be here.
Speaker 1: I'd like to say I'm a conservative liberal, which you
Speaker 1: don't find many of those, I don't think but they
Speaker 1: even know what that means. But go ahead. I have
Speaker 1: these on both sides. I was in Washington, d C.
Speaker 1: I heard no mention of violence. If anybody is to
Speaker 1: beheld responsible for this, I hold the Supreme Court ultimately
Speaker 1: responsible for this for not hearing any case on fraud.
Speaker 1: That is their fault, them in the lustree media, as
Speaker 1: well as congressmen, senators, governors of these states that broke
Speaker 1: their laws. But ultimately the nine sheep Justices, and that's
Speaker 1: why they call them nine sheep justices because they haven't
Speaker 1: done a dying thing. You know. Look, the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: has an opportunity to take on eight thousand cases a year.
Speaker 1: They take on about eighty A case of this importance,
Speaker 1: especially one where they have original jurisdiction as we call it,
Speaker 1: they should have taken the case. Sadly, you cannot escape
Speaker 1: a reality that I believe strongly, and that is that
Speaker 1: the courts are deeply, unfortunately and it's wrong, influenced by
Speaker 1: the political ramifications of decisions. And I don't think they
Speaker 1: had the appetite to take these issues on whatever way
Speaker 1: it would have come out. Like I really enjoyed reading
Speaker 1: the Wisconsin Supreme Court decision based on the law there
Speaker 1: and are beat down by the Chief Justice in Wisconsin
Speaker 1: in his descent and because it is necessary it is
Speaker 1: thought provoking, as he stated, these issues aren't going to
Speaker 1: go away. They're just going to keep coming up unless
Speaker 1: the other four members of this court have the courage
Speaker 1: to deal with it. The term, you know, this is
Speaker 1: nothing but judicial activism through in action is a very
Speaker 1: powerful line that was used in that case. So I
Speaker 1: tend to agree that they should have they didn't. And
Speaker 1: this is where we are. And you know, sometime, you know,
Speaker 1: it's it's you don't always one thing perspective wise for people,
Speaker 1: and they're they're out of the ashes. I'm just telling you,
Speaker 1: you're gonna watch the left and we see the beginnings
Speaker 1: of it now and what they're doing with President Trump,
Speaker 1: and we see what they're doing with big tech, and
Speaker 1: we see big tech trying to silence voices and so
Speaker 1: on and so forth. Wokeness at a level I don't
Speaker 1: think anybody could have ever anticipated. And I think Americans
Speaker 1: natural inclination, and I think man human beings natural inclination.
Speaker 1: If we believe rights don't come from government but come
Speaker 1: from God, They're God given, endowed by our creator, life, liberty,
Speaker 1: the pursuit of happiness. If our natural inclination is liberty
Speaker 1: and freedom, and and then you have this authoritarianism, the statism,
Speaker 1: the socialism, and you know it has a lot of
Speaker 1: different terms associated with it. We know it's going to fail.
Speaker 1: It's been promised and many's been many manifestations over history,
Speaker 1: and when it does, the country I believe will look
Speaker 1: towards conservative solutions again. Now at that point, the amount
Speaker 1: of damage inflicted on you know, because of socialism and
Speaker 1: spending and debt and deficits, and you know, it's it
Speaker 1: always gets harder. I have faith in the American people,
Speaker 1: and I have faith that you know, we have a
Speaker 1: way of writing wrongs in this society, or if we
Speaker 1: make bad decisions in society, I think there's an ebb
Speaker 1: and flow and natural process. Nobody wants to hear that
Speaker 1: message right now. It's like when my kids played sports.
Speaker 1: It played individual sports. If they lost, they didn't want
Speaker 1: to hear that lecture after the match. The next day,
Speaker 1: maybe I could talk to him about you don't always win,
Speaker 1: and sometimes you'll lose, and and and how do you
Speaker 1: pick up the pieces and go forward? Um, and this
Speaker 1: is one of this This was a hard fought battle.
Speaker 1: We all have our views on the issues surrounding this
Speaker 1: election that none of us like. That better be resolved
Speaker 1: if we want confidence and elections moving forward. Um, and
Speaker 1: I think we're going to be able to to well,
Speaker 1: we'll manage a way to I think conservatism will once
Speaker 1: again resolve a lot of the problems and the wreckage
Speaker 1: that's going to be left out of you know, socialistic
Speaker 1: liberal redistribution, new Green Deal policies that I don't believe
Speaker 1: are good. And so there's always there's always hope, there's
Speaker 1: always you know, another side of things. But it's not
Speaker 1: the right time to talk about it. I agree. It's
Speaker 1: sort of like if my kids lose. Yeah, okay, dad,
Speaker 1: shut up, and just they don't want to hear it,
Speaker 1: and they're right. I understand it. I get it. All right,
Speaker 1: Let's go to Judy Is in North Carolina. Hey, Judy,
Speaker 1: how are you. I'm good, Sean, how are you? I'm good?
Speaker 1: Thank you. I liked what your last color was saying.
Speaker 1: Where you know you or your talent them what we
Speaker 1: want to have hope. But I think the hardest part
Speaker 1: in all of this is, you know, for the past
Speaker 1: month and a half, we've been told by elected officials
Speaker 1: on both sides, Okay, this is what's happened. You have
Speaker 1: to accept the election. And the more that we're getting
Speaker 1: told that the more frustrated conservatives, Republicans, libertarians that we
Speaker 1: all were getting is the fact we keep getting told
Speaker 1: this by people in Washington that we are paying their salaries.
Speaker 1: But at the same time, we were told, Okay, you
Speaker 1: have to accept the peaceful protesting of the summer. You
Speaker 1: have to accept watching small business owners, businesses turned down,
Speaker 1: burned down, you have to watch police cars being caught
Speaker 1: on fire. When we're told you have to watch where
Speaker 1: we're told is by the radical left. Accept this. Then
Speaker 1: it comes time of the election. We keep getting told, okay,
Speaker 1: here's the election. There's been fraud in it, whether right
Speaker 1: or wrong. But then we go on and our politicians,
Speaker 1: you take Jim Jordan's, your Matt Gates, all of those
Speaker 1: that are going to say, at least listen to it,
Speaker 1: at least let them present some facts because the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court didn't. Well, then it comes to the protesting, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: the writing, whatever they want to call it. In Washington.
Speaker 1: It's easy to understand the frustration of the American people
Speaker 1: who have put these congressmen and senators into office thinking
Speaker 1: they're doing the right thing for us, but then now
Speaker 1: getting told no, you have to accept it in spite
Speaker 1: of what they're being told, and it's like a person
Speaker 1: telling the lie, and then you know that the truth
Speaker 1: is there and you just so badly want somebody to
Speaker 1: listen to you. But no, they're now saying you have
Speaker 1: to shut up. You cannot listen to this. I don't
Speaker 1: understand why all it would have taken was get a
Speaker 1: ten day audit to something. Then it could be Okay,
Speaker 1: this is it, this is right or wrong, and then
Speaker 1: you fix it. That's what we're supposed to do as Americans.
Speaker 1: If someone tells me that my child has done something
Speaker 1: and I know for a fact that they didn't do it,
Speaker 1: and you don't let me explain my case, I'm going
Speaker 1: to become frustrated as a parent. And we're doing this
Speaker 1: as Americans. We're frustrated that people that we trusted to
Speaker 1: tell us this is a tax that you're going to pay,
Speaker 1: This is how we're going to fight a war, this
Speaker 1: is how we're going to tell your children how to
Speaker 1: go to school, the education you're going to give them,
Speaker 1: and they could not even allow us at ten day audit. Well,
Speaker 1: I mean, I listen. I'm not going to get into listen.
Speaker 1: We all have the right, Well, we have to understand.
Speaker 1: Here is under You know, we were right in condemning
Speaker 1: the violence whole summer. No Democrat wanted to do it
Speaker 1: because they didn't want to alienate it. They thought was
Speaker 1: a part of their base for the election. All right,
Speaker 1: that's gonna wrap things up for today. Loaded up tonight,
Speaker 1: Congressman Devin noon As, Steve Scalise, Rick Rinell, Peter Schweitzer,
Speaker 1: Dave Ruben, Miranda Divine, James O'Keefe will show you those
Speaker 1: videos exclusively, say DVR Hannity nineties, Turn on Fox News.
Speaker 1: Be back here tomorrow with news you'll never get from
Speaker 1: the media mob. That's right, we're independent, they're not. Thanks
Speaker 1: for being Will us back here tomorrow, Seat tonight at night,