WEBVTT - Surveillance: Government Support With Boston Mayor

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jay Leye.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance,

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>investment and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com and of course on the Bloomberg. Joining

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>us now, Peter Robenheimer of Godman Sachs. Peter, always fantastic

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to catch up with you, the chief global equity strategist

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the UK. Beginning the huge vaccination program that's going to

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>grip this country in the world, I hope in the

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>coming months as well. Top of the line in the

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.599
<v Speaker 1>notes I've got for you, Peter by the UK by

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.919
<v Speaker 1>the foot see why Peter, Well, look, I mean very

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>exciting news about about the vaccine um and uh. But

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>separately from that, I think the UK economy has been

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst hit from this pandemic, partly because

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of the makeup of the economy very heavily geared towards services.

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Retail services fall of about eleven percent in GDP this

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>year would be the worst annual downturn since the early

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>seventeen hundreds, But at the same time we're expecting a

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>very strong rebound in the US economy next year over

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>seventh cent and at six percent or so alongside that,

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we should get quite a strong rebound in earnings. It's

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a very cheap market. It trades now at a discount

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to the US market on a twenty four month forward

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>basis of about thirty you know, and uh with with

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a sort of strong cyclical recovery and a market that's

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>heavily geared towards commodities and other cyclicals, and we're bullish

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of commodities. We think it should have produce rebound. They

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>just brilliant. Peter Appen I might noted today of the

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>w E I screen the basis point difference between standard

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and porters five hundred in the foot see okay, by

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>straw hats in winter? You and I read our baroque

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>We know that phrase, Peter, Where are the straw hats

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>in Asia? Where is the foots? The equivalent opportunity on

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the Pacific rim. Well, we we've been very bullish for

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>China for a long time. We're still overweights to China,

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>but of course that's more of a growth orientated index,

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>being a very heavily geared technology like the US, so

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>we'd be tilting wa towards other parts of North Asia

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>career for example in particular, you know, very cyclical would

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>benefit a lot from a global economic recovery, and Japan

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>too for that matter. U. These are markets that have

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>tended to lag their more value orientated, more cyclical, and

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>more sensitive to global growth. And for that reason, as

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you go into this inflection point of strong growth for

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the first time for many years, we should see the

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>leadership shifting. So this is the macro story. I'm wondering

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:58.519
<v Speaker 1>the technical story, Peter. The composition of US equity indexes,

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 1>have they made them less full of potential for gains

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>based on the domination of the main company. Is the

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's so concentrated at the time. I'm looking

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>today for example of Tesla's as they're going to sell shares,

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's shares fall pre market, and so does the entire

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>SMP because now it's included in it. Yes, so in

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>some senses, you know, the concentration of the market, which

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>has been to its advantage because it's generally been led

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>by very fast growing, very large companies, particularly in technology,

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>which has been the dominant leading sector for so long,

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>in a sense, becomes a little bit of a handicap.

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>We're not negative on technology, we think it will still

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>do well, but it doesn't have the same leverage to

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a positive inflection point in the global economy that we're

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>expecting to see. So those value parts of the market

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that have been very depressed with higher dividend fields, those

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>areas which are much more geared into economic growth, would

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>tend to recover more quickly, and they tend to have

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a bigger waiting in other markets. Interesting for example, if

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at Europe, which has just had its best

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>month ever, we saw Europe in November outperforming the US

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>by about six percent. That the best relative performance since

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine, when we were last coming out

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of a very deep recession. So again a similar sort

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of pattern playing through and peter ugably with the data

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>going in the wrong direction as well, with premys deeply

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>stub fifty in the low forties and in some places

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in the thirties as well. How you expect that relationship

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>between the economic data and the market to evolve well,

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>when we look at the way that equity cycles evolved,

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the first phase of a new cycle, what we call

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the hope phase, is really all about expectations. It nearly

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>always starts during a recession when profits are still falling,

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>but for some reason investors start to get a little

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>bit more optimistic about a recovery, usually because of policy support.

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>In this case, it's been a combination of policy support

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and of course the very positive news on vaccines. But

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen since March is a big expansion of

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>valuations across all markets. That's pretty common in that first

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>hope phase of the cycle. Once we actually start to

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>get the economic recovery coming through at a p m

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I data, stronger profits actually growing, I would expect the

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>improvement in equities to slow a lot and valuations to

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>start compressing. So many ball markets very front loaded. You've

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>got to be in early as that expectation or shift

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>really drives valuations higher, and then we would expect to

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>see slower returns as we move forward, particularly when you

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>consider that valuations are quite high and we're not going

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to have the tail wind in this cycle of ever

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>lower interest rates, which we saw as a very dominant

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>factor coming out of the financial crisis. We found that

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>shift last month in a massive way. Peter Fans Acid

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of catch Up sa as oh I send up set

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a team at Goldman Peter Uppenheim, and had the chief

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>global equity strategists. The great things we say with the

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>vaccinations as they begin in the United Kingdom said against

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we haven't seen the worst of it

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.799
<v Speaker 1>yet in many places around the world, including the United States.

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Well we're here in the United States, and again the

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>three factors, folks, are cases which I'm not a big

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>fan of the mathematics there, but certainly the certitude of

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>death and the reality of a hospitalization. Boston is one

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of the great hospital capitals of this nation. He is

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the mayor of the City of Boston. Martin walshon were

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>thrilled that he could join us this morning. Marty Walsh,

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 1>we get loads of things to talk about. Let me

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>cut to the chase you needed from Washington long ago

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and far away, people like Joe Mowkeley or Tip O'Neill

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and Republicans like minded like them, maybe like Senator Burke

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>and others were able to do money from Washington to

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>help beleaguered cities. Why can't we do that now? It's

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>really unfortunate, you know. Mitch McConnell has has made statements

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that um City should go bankrupt. You can't have that.

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was on a conversation last night with

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Mays from around Massachusetts and the need for federal investment

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in in Boston and in the region of the Kalma.

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>The Massachusetts is really incredible. But you and I talked

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to our fair about businesses being shut down, hotels not

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>being open. We have the same thing here in the

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>city of Boston. We are heading to what I think

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>is looking like a second search. We're looking at potential

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>for the pullbacks here in the city, in the comma

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the Massachusetts and around the country. And when we do that,

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>quite honestly, your show is about business Boomberg business, the

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>businesses in our city, in our state, in our country.

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Quite honestly, I'm not going to return from this. So

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the federal government needs to act now. The Senate needs

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that now. They need to stop playing politics. They have

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to stop playing partisan politics. Put the American people for us,

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>put the American businesses first, put everybody first. And they're

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>not doing that. My well, shall want to understand, and

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I want you to paint the picture really clearly. What

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you need from the federal government, not just money dollar amount.

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>What you need from the federal government and what happens

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>if you don't get it in the next few months. Well,

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>first and foremost, we need directions in the federal government,

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Biden Harris administrations put together at COVID

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen task for us. We need clear direction on which

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>way we should go to push back and not pushed

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>back on the COVID trices, but to address the COVID crisis.

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Most cities and states around the country have been on

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>their own from the very beginning, whether it's been on testing,

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>whether it's been on surche whether it's been on hospitalization.

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So in Boston right now, what we're experiencing is we

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>can't call it necessarily a second surgeon. We're seeing increased

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>numberge significantly increased numbers in Boston, Massachusetts. We are not

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing yet increase in hospitalization. We're seeing a number that

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>hospitalization is going up, but not to the point where

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>it was back in April and May and June where

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>we had to cancel all elective surgeries. We're not seeing

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>complete shutdowns where we shoul out our businesses down, where

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>nobody's working anymore. But we are headed towards that again,

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 1>and this is a failure in the federal government. So

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>what the federal government needs to do is come up

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>with a policy and what we need to do moving

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>our country forward, working with experts like Dr Foci number one,

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>number two. The federal government, what they need to do

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>is come up with an economic stimulus package that that

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>millions of Americans that are going to run out of

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>unemployment benefits, small businesses that are gonna have to shut

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>their doors permanently. Unless they come up with a package,

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna lose these businesses and they're not going to

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>come back overnight. So the implications of what the coronavirus

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to do long term, the long term impact

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to have on a city like Boston could

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>be detrimental. And it's not just question. You just take

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>any city and you plug in the name. And that's

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the challenges that we're all facing across this country. May

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>or it's not just the federal government, it's also closer

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to home. For example, your governor, Governor Jollie Baker coming

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.239
<v Speaker 1>out and actually not putting on some of the restrictions

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that people are suggesting are necessary to prevent that increase

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in hospitalizations that you talk a out, do you feel

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>like you're being thrown under the bus to take preemptive

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>measures that could be accused as being anti business in

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>order to stave off to spread because of this political

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>hot potato that perhaps isn't being dealt with in other places. Well,

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not how I'm not operating that way, and I

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>want to be as pro business as possible. But I

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>think that it's very important for me here in Boxton.

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna put the help of people first. But I

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>had a conversation with the governor last night. We talked

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot about what the next steps need to be.

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>We talked about the increase in numbers that we're seeing

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 1>in the state. In Boston we're seeing again in Boston

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>hospitals we're not seeing We're not at the capacity level

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>where's concerning yet, but that that could change tomorrow. And

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>so I'm expecting the government, working with the government, that

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it will come out and make some recommendations or some

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>pullbacks pretty soon. Mayor want you to speak of the

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>schools nationwide, whether it's the Mathers School, the oldest elementary

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>school in this nation in Dorchester, or the Newman's School,

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and that red flag on Newberry Street that you know

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>so well. Mayor, I want you to talk right now

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>about are you the Blasio in six Republican mayors in

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the Midwest, how you're dealing with this virus and these schools. Well,

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you for giving a shout out to my my

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>high school, Alm Out of Nomen School on Marvel Street.

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that in the maths school right down the

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>street from my house and dort sister. What we're doing

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>right now in Boston is we have about a d

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>eighty the highest needs students inside schools. We'll put a

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of lots of safety precautions from even the beginning

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>when we opened schools, and then we had to shut

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>them down. And we anticipate in the next week or

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>so to bring other high needs students back into our

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>district before the Christmas break, before the Christmas holidays, and

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>then we're gonna come up with a plan for after Christmas.

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>We get these numbers down after the holidays, they should say,

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we get these numbers down to try and get all

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>most of our kids back into school. These are challenging times.

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Two thirds of our buildings we'll build previously to World

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 1>War Two, so we don't have all of the safety

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>ventilation that people would like to have in the building.

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>But it is so important in the city of Boston

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 1>that we get our kids back to school. I mean,

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>most of our kids have been out of school since

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>my sixteen earlier this year, Um, many of those kids,

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the achievement gap falling behind it is just

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna be detrimental for themselves. Infant educational system. We don't

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>get them into school soon. Well, so gotta leave it that.

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Just getting some promising news from the FDI. Gotta let

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you go busting Matt Mossy Walsh, please come back soon, said,

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. Any number of topics to speak

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of of Washington, John and Lisa right now, Leslie, Vinjamuri

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>joins us some Chatham House with a very smart outlook

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>from London on American politics. Leslie, We're at the point

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in every new administration where all their supporters figure out

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>there's X number of slots and way, way, way more

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>than x number of people that want those slots. How's

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that managed? What do you do when you've got only

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>so many high visibility cabinet and the other jobs and

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>everybody wants to climb on board. Well, and especially I

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>think in this admin of Storation, where of course, people

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>four years ago thought that they were coming in with

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton and that didn't happen. They've been waiting in Washington,

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and of course there's certainly a lot of you know,

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 1>moderate Republicans that wouldn't work for Donald Trump, that probably

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>would like it. It doesn't look like that's happening. But

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 1>what we are seeing is, you know, those disciplines being made.

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>We heard the announcements earlier in the week about the

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>economic team. Now it's rumored um that we are seeing

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in the Secretary of Defense and nominee coming soon, Lloyd Austin,

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>who would be the first African American Secretary of Defense.

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Remember Tom, that forty three percent of America's active duty

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 1>troops are people of color, and so that would be

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>symbolically very important. And as Biden's looking ahead, he's thinking

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>about and having experienced people there are plenty of those

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>on offer, but about balancing women and men in gender

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and race and all those very important dynamics that have

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>been central to his campaign. You mentioned the president elect

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>looking ahead. Is his timeline different in a first term

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.719
<v Speaker 1>because of his age, because of the pieces that it's

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>perceived he's picking up from President Trump. Is this first

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>year the honeymoon and then after the first year, Is

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that timeline unique? I don't think, you know, usually we

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>think about the first year the certainly the first one

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>days being a honeymoon period. I don't think that we

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>can even conceive of American politics in the same way

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>anymore than four years of a lot of disruption, a

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of dysfunctionality. And now we're looking at the tragedy

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of more than two thousand Americans dying every single day,

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the virus not under control, the need for an economic recovery,

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>this very significant question of when the vaccinations will be

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>rolled out, So there's no honeymoon period for the Biden team.

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they're moving ahead very quickly UM And as

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Democrats and the Republicans remain in campaign

0:14:55.680 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>mode because those January five elections in Georgia will determine

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and who controls the Senate, and that will be absolutely

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>crucial to Biden's ability to govern. So I think it's

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>really moving ahead very quickly, not only with the appointments,

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>but also with UM beginning to get the agenda up

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and running. And I think we can see we will

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>expect a number of very significant announcements on that January

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty a, President Biden taking the US back into Paris,

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>back into the w h O, possibly back into the

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Iran Deal. And then there's a big question, of course,

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of how he manages the US China confrontation, and that's

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>something that he has a lot of bipartisan support behind

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>being very tough. And if Congress is not the Senate

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is not in his hands, I think China will be

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the foil for perhaps getting a lot of domestic legislation

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>through the on the basis of the need that America

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>needs to invest in its domestic economy to make it competitive. So, Leslie,

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>let's be clear about this. This sounds very familiar, sound

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>like what we've experienced over the last few years. Do

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you see a big difference between the approach of this

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>administration and the next administration on the issue of China. Absolutely.

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're right that people want to be tough

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>on China. More than sevent Americans have an unfavorable view

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>towards China. Nobody wants to go back to free and

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>open trade and thinking that China is going to change.

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think we will see a different approach We're

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>going to see a tougher approach. We're going to see

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a Biden administration that is going to push far beyond

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>tariffs on structural reforms and market access, on questions of

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I P and technology transfer, all those things that we've

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>been hearing about but not seeing a lot of movement on.

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And of course, as we've seen with those appointments of

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Tony B. Lincoln and Jake Sullivan, these are people who

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>care a lot about the democracy question, the values question.

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>B Lincoln talks about techno democracies and techno autocracies, and

0:16:55.280 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 1>so that question of technology and the standards and rights

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 1>um and norms that surround the use and exchange of

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>technology is going to really one of the key items

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 1>that I think that the Biden team is going to

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>take on over the next four years. But even in

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the in the first in the first year, let's be

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>great to catch up. We appreciate your time, and I'm sorry,

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>it's sure. Let's leave Inja Murray, the channel house head

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of US and America's program. Do you realize you've got

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 1>radio listeners nationwide turning off the station because you've done

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>more Brexit in the last six seconds than you have

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>in the last week. That's why I'm going to move

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>on straight away rate with Michael Clotty of UBS. He's

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the head of US rate strategy. Michael, great to catch

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>up with this. Walk me through this treasury market. I

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>have to say, the division into next year isn't that great?

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>Once twenty on a ten year yield seems to be

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the average forecast out there at the moment. Where are

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you on things, Michael, Yeah, I think we're gonna get

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a little cheaper than that. So one twenty isn't too

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>far away from way the markets priced in right now. Um.

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>And uh so we think we're going to get up

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>closer to the one fifty by the end of the year. Um.

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that will get some you know continued. Uh.

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Good news on the vaccine front um. That's going to

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>allow things to be bright enough for the Fed to

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>start tapering. We lose a little bit of support to

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the back end of the curve and so we sell

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>off a bit more than the forwards, but not a

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>colossal sell off. Here are you hoping to get a

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>green light from the Federal Reserve next week? So the

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>big question with the Fed is whether they extend the

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>maturity next of their purchases. So this year when the

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 1>FED started buying, the treasure market was really broken. FED

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>had to come in and buy shorter maturities to help

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>with leave some of the same and the treasury market. Um,

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:48.959
<v Speaker 1>they're continuing to buy very short maturities, which doesn't make

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense. Um. You know. The way that

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 1>chewee helps is you're taking a asset with a longer

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>maturity out of the market, You're replacing it with a

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>reserve chat an overnight maturity um, so that it's really

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a maturity transfer. The way it's working well, you know,

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>buying two year notes instead of ten year notes big

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>difference than that maturity transfer. Um. You know. The question

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is when the FED stops buying the short stuff because

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the treasury market is not broken anymore, and starts focusing

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>on the longer returnities, how much michael have longer term

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 1>yields been well behaved because of the expectation of FED buying,

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>in which case FED buying won't actually tip the tide

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.959
<v Speaker 1>in any way or make a difference. Yeah, I think

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 1>you're right that. I think this is what's been holding

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>us below one here. Expectations that the Fed will help

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>next week, UM, you know, so I think that, you know,

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>hard to achieve en up beyond one until we get

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>past that meeting. And then as we go into next year,

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, even with a little bit of a maturity

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>centerm the Fed, you know that what the Feds buying

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is still peanuts relative to what the Treasury issuing. You know,

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>this year we've got a new twenty year note, massive

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>increases and kind of thirties UM, So the fits taking

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>out it's still tiny relative to what the Treasury is

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>putting in. So we think, you know, he'll you'll still

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>see that upward pressure on Michael Clady. Good morning, Tom Keenan,

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>New York. It's outlook time where people have to game

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>out movement of the tenure yield and use you know,

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 1>with your legendary experience, everybody always gets it wrong. What's

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the color of getting it wrong this year? Is it

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.880
<v Speaker 1>undershooting or once again just gaming out higher interest rates

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that don't happen? So I think that, you know, I

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>guess it, It depends. I think the greater pain in

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the rates world would be that we rally back down

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>UM and get back to very low yields UM. You know,

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you can see a lot of stress on insurance companies,

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 1>banks um in that low yield environment. Uh so I think,

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, for them, the risk is that uh you know,

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>things are are not as good and we rally back.

0:20:57.680 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I's gonna get with today on some of the headlines

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>us in the Bloomberg. It comes from the FDA. The

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>FDA has posted the briefing documents on the FISER beyond

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Tech COVID vaccine. This is the report available available ahead

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of the December tenth Advisory Panels. So in a couple

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of days time, tom they take this report and they

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>could possibly make a recommendation as to whether they will

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>approve this vaccine in the same way that the UK

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 1>has done. So that report has been posted by the FDA.

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>They go on to say that FISER has given adequate

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>information on vaccine quality according to this staff report. And

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>some of these headlines are gonna dribble through drip, drip

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 1>drip of the next hour or so ahead of that

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>December tenth Advisory Panel meeting, and that's the important date Thursday.

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>But we might get an indication as to where there's

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>heading from the headlines that come in the next couple

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of minutes. A huge pressure to get this out. I'm

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>sure Mr Trump is speaking of that is, as is

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Mr Biden as well. John, I would suggested, coming out

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of the nineteen fifties, there is a legendary heritage of

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States being patient in waiting and waiting to

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 1>be sure and safety and ever, le's see if the

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>therapy whatever you're talking about. And certainly they've spent up

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that clock here in the last number of days. Yeah,

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully we get the news everyone wants to hear

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>this coming Thursday. So the report has been posted. We'll

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 1>go through that. People much smarter than me. They'll break

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 1>down the headlines for you, and I'll regurgitate that for you,

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>which they come through on the Bloomberg terminal. Michael, clock

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to if you bs you're still with a surge. A

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 1>final question on the vaccinations. First ones begin today in markets.

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 1>You know they're saying it's cliche it's always better to

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>travel than arrived. The vaccination started to date in the

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>United Kingdom. What does that mean to you, Michael from

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a sentiment position the financial markets, so I think you

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>know it's it's certainly been helpful. I think the big

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 1>question here is the distribution. Um, yeah, we have a

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of different vaccines along the way in development.

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>I think I think everyone's assuming that we'll get some

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>vaccines at some point. Distribution is a monumental undertaking, So

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the question becomes how fast can we get these things out?

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what people are really befault us

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>on for the next few months, is speed of speed

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of progress. We all agree, mom clocks of ubs, thank

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you such thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Keene before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.