WEBVTT - `I Need a Solid Panic’

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to What comes Up a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>My name is Mike Reagan. I'm a senior editor at

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and I'm Aldana Higher across asset reporter with Bloomberk.

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And this week on the show, well the ink was

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>barely dry on all those headlines saying that the SMP

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>five was in a bear market last week and then

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it began to rebound a bit, and we never did

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>get a closing price that was or more below the

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>indexes last record in January. So was that it bear

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>market canceled and the loads are in? Well maybe not.

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk with the chief investment officer who was not

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>so sure, and thanks that we're in store for a

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>bit of a cruel summer for stocks. But first, Viltanna,

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I need to let the listeners know that you're actually

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in jolly old England as as we speak. Yep, I'm

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in London. How's that going. I'm having a lot of fun.

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>The Bloomberg office is so huge and it just looks

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>like it's never ending. So I just keep getting lost

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and running into the same people over and over and

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>asking them for help, and they're like, I already told you.

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't help you, So then I just keep moving

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>on to the next person and the next person and

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the next person, and I never never ever find my desks.

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of like how you are in New York too,

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>though even worse here. Honestly, I'm just wandering around all

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 1>the time, like on the streets, in the office, the mess.

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.199
<v Speaker 1>But I'm having a lot of fun. Those friendly Brits,

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure are staring in the right direction. But then

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, we did get two more reviews in

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of the podcast on Apple Podcast. I don't know your

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>coercion strategies work. It is. Let me just read this

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>one to you. Five stars to vill Donna for keeping

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Mike and check. I don't know what that means. I

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know what that that's referring to great podcast, one

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of my favorites. They also volunteered to be a tour

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>guide to either of us if we are ever in

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>San Diego. I could use that a few weeks ago.

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>But I love San Diego. It's my number one favorite

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>city in the world. I think number one. Yeah, you

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>know why, because this person just gave you five stars.

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>That's right now. I'm just kidding because it's sunny three

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>sixty five days, or you know, like Rains wants me

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>one day, yere exactly. Yeah, that's pretty good. And a

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>second one came in It said, wait a second, do

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we know vol Donna's high school nickname yet? And the

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>answer is not yet. I'm worried that your nickname might

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>be a little boring. So I'm gonna if it's stretch

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>this out. If it's too boring, I'm gonna offer the

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>nickname that the transcription service offers for you, really good

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 1>software we used to transcribe the podcast because they're they're

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty good. They're really really good and just for you,

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>my crazy thing this week is is British themed, So

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>just throwing that out there for you. Okay, but um

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in our guest. I'm excited to meet her. Yeah,

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>it's Victoria Green. She's the founding partner in chief and

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>investment officer G Squared Private Wealth. Victoria, thank you so

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Absolutely, I was laughing because I

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely need a GPS to get around, and the worst

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>for me is when people are like go north or

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>go south, Like I'm not not Lewis and Clark. I

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>need I need a left or right here, like, please

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>don't tell me to look at the sunbur directions. I'm

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna need a little help. I feel the same way. Um,

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>But so you're joining us on the podcast for the

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>first time, I was hoping you could just start out

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>telling us a little bit about your firm. Sure. So,

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the Square Private Wealth is a boutique advisory firm. We

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>focus more on ultra high out worth and planning and

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>portfolio management for them. We tend to be a little

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>bit boring with our asset allocations. You know, we're not

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to be a hedge fund, uh and what we

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>do think positioning and active management is important. But at

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, a lot of our clients

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>are that don't mess it up clients, So you know,

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not looking to necessarily be day traders or anything

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>like that. You know, we never got into the meme

0:03:57.440 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>stocks where we're a little bit boring that way. Like

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like traditional asset allocation now, like when you're

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to talk about it, it's just not not sexy anymore.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Everybody wants to throw in something in there that that

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>just is like alive in it up. But we do

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's important, especially now you know, we're working very

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>closely with clients about where do we allocate capital, where

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>are we on a bottom or a bear, how long

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>this may last? And and so we spent a lot

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of time. We have a pretty small book, we're about

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty million, but we've got under a hundred clients. UM,

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So we spent a lot of the time with the

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>extensive planning and portfolio management for the individual I like

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that don't don't mess it up strategy, that big, good

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>name for investors, different additive, but I don't think that's

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>allowed on this show. So yes, a family, a family

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>podcast like this, A lot of kids, a lot of

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>kids listening, especially since the beam stocks took off. So

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. But you know, Victoria, I always wonder with

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a firm like Years based in Texas, UM. You know,

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>if if you were managing money in California, I'd wonder,

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in say, Silicon Valley, I'd wonder if everyone was, you know,

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>very bullish on tech and venture capital. So in Texas

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I have to wonder, you know, does the energy industry

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of uh influence your clients? You know, are they

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>gung ho about energy or are they looking to diversify energy.

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>How does it sort of influence the investment decisions of

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>high net worth clients in Texas. Yeah, it probably makes

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>them a little more bullish on the energy industry. But

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.679
<v Speaker 1>some of our clients actually we run x energy because

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it depends on what their exposures are. So if you

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>have a privately held company or you're on board of

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a public company, you've already got that exposure. So we're

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of trying to diversify and mitigate the concentration.

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Because everybody in Texas is well aware that the oil

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>market is cyclical, right, so you're ride up the good times,

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>but you know there's a flip side to it at

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>some point, you know. And in this last decade has

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.359
<v Speaker 1>been super hard in the energy industry. We had like

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>five crashes within ten years, um and and so they're

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>just this waringiness about Okay, yes we are bullish energy

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and the energy transition. While E s G is coming

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and electrics coming, it's going to take a little bit

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>longer to adopt than we are seeing that play out

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>here in two So probably I would say not to generalize,

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>but the attitude of a lot of our clients is

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that the death of energy was over exaggerated. So not

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to say that there aren't concerns about E. S G

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>or climate change or things like that, but it tends

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to make them a little bit more willing to have

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a football hold in that that segment. So I do

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's a little bit of of what you know

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>does influence what you feel comfortable investing in. Uh, you know,

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you have the same thing happened in California, and you know,

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're in San Francisco area, you probably are very

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>very comfortable with your tech exposures and a little bit

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable with the early stage and the small cap

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>tech and the the innovators per se. That's that's very

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me that the next energy portfolio is. I mean,

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it makes a lot of sense. You know, they know

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the the home base industry, but to get exposure everything

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>else that they bring in, you guys, it's pretty interesting. Yeah,

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it's well, it look at this last decade, like I said,

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>especially like fourteen, and you know you had energy well

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 1>beloween when you had it well below thirty dollars and

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you just couldn't get it really above thirty dollars for years,

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the Saudias and ope kind of crashing that.

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I distinctly remember that because I was on vacation for

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving when OPEC changed their policy, and it really really

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>messed up my Thanksgiving. So I've never forgiven OPEC to that.

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think it's something that investors always

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>have to be aware of their their you know, totality

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of their portfolio and wealth. So let's say you have

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>your salaries tied up in energy or natural gas and

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>your dock ops and they're tied up in that, or

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>your networks tied up in some sort of energy exposed business,

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in uh, you know, the services or fracking

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>or transportation. You just have to be aware of how

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>cyclical up businesses and you kind of want to counterbalance

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it and say, yeah, I want my portfolio, but I

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be focused on energy. I wanted to

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>be diversified because anybody that's lived in Texas for more

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>than ten years knows at some point this it's going

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to come back down, you know, how long it stays elevated.

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>If this is like A one where we saw that

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>spike on the Gulf Woor, if this is an OH

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>eight where again we saw a spike, but it came

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>back hard. You know, how long does oil stay above

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a hundred? That's you know, the million dollar question down here.

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>We do tend to think it's gonna stay elevated a

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit longer, just because of the supply demand dynamics.

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>And we did see a lot of things shut down

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>when we had negative energy prices and people were you know,

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>paying you to take and store oil. I mean, wow,

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>what what a difference twenty four months makes between like

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>literally they were paying you to take it and now

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>we're paying you know, five dollars at the pump to

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>get it. Well, I know that you had sent us

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>over our note uh talking about some of the energy

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:45.719
<v Speaker 1>names that you do like, so maybe could you walk

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>us through some of them. I think it's like Devon Energy,

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>e o G, Diamondback Energy. And I wanted to ask

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you because we had Daniel You're going on the podcast

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>recently and he was saying we could continue to see

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the the supply crunch, meaning that prices are going to

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>continue to stay elevated. Is that also your expectation for

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the energy? Yeah? I like it. So, And this goes

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>into the greater theme of like what's happening in the

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>world right now, and the de globalization and as you

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>may see Russia removed from the market. You're seeing all

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of this rebalancing of supply and demand, and it's hitting

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>commodities harder. It's not just energy, it's hitting it's fertilizers,

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's all of the exports that are in some

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>precious metals. I think, what are they. It's not lithium,

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>it's what's the press palladium. They're a huge, huge supplier

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of palladium. And so you're seeing this rebalance and shift

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and all of these things take a lot of time

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to redistribute and build up supply chains. So our base

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>cases oil is staying elevated for the next eighteen months.

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't see it coming back down. I don't see

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the demand cruns happening, you know. You know, yeah, China,

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you kind of live and die by China some But

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the travel and the consumption in

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States and Europe and where the trends are

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>um most every developed nation has not does not have

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a zero COVID policy anymore. It's it's we're gonna just

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>deal with it. I know COVID it's like a dirty

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 1>word these day because we're so tired of talking about it.

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 1>But it's still there. I mean, that's what's affecting China

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 1>and Chinese demand. UM. And Chinese demand may also get

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a little messy because China and India have shown willingness

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to buy cheap Russian crewed. Some of its geographically easy

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for them as well as you know, if they can

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>buy it at thirty dollars and they're you know, concerned

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>about their economic growth. UM. So we may see some

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>demand wane in China, but generally speaking, barrel for the

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>next eight teen months, I think is distinctly possible. You

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>have not seen this wildcat or mentality come back in right.

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at the graph of the Baker

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>huge rig count, you know, and you saw like coming

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>up the where like sixteen hundred rigs. And then obviously

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>we had the OPEC change and everybody lost lost lost

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>their ass to be quite frank with you. UM. And

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and so you saw this grand the investment in the

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas industry. And even now we're well well

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>below peak, we're still well below pandemic era UM oil

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and gas rigs out there. So you have seen oil

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>companies and you'll see this theme. And the oil and

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>gas stocks that I like, the Devon, the e O G,

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the Fang, you know, UM and the Pioneer. They are

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>US based with a big foot put in the permium.

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>They have low brake events, and they're absolutely pushing cash

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to shareholders. They are not putting it back on the ground.

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>They are saying, thank you, shareholders for trusting us, here's

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>your money back. Really sorry, we didn't make you money

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>for a decade, but here you go, let's make some

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.479
<v Speaker 1>money now. But you're not seeing that wild counter mentality

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 1>that happened with other oil price spikes, because that would

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>happen and you'd have this massive inflow of let's get

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>more rigs out there, and just you know, supplying demand

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>would eventually flip it over you. If you look at

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the slope of how the rig count has increased, it's

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a much lower trajectory. Nobody's really pushing a ton of

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>money back into CAPEX. So we love the stocks that

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>are giving our shareholders just a better return right now.

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Like Devon Energy at a hundred dollars barrel is like

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a sixtent free cash flow yield. They're pushing out of

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>their free cash flow and a variable dividend every quarter,

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Like you're talking a lot of money to sit and wait.

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Plus you might get price appreciations still because they keep

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>making more money. And if you look at where earnings

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>revisions are happening, about the only place that we're thinking

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>earnings are going to go up as energy, And so

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the pe s there are actually still even with this

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>massive price moving up in a lot of these stocks,

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the ps are actually still very nominal and very value oriented.

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I actually I was writing about this earlier this week

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>where there's this e t F. It's like a cash

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>cows The ticker is really funny CEO w Z, but

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's been seeing tons of inflows. And when I

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 1>was looking at the names within it, their energy names,

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's companies with high free cash flow yields. So

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>does that make sense to you to see something like that,

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we want cash, we want money. Right now is playing

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>defense and survival, Like not to sound super dour about

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the world, but by is let's survive as this year

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>with as minimal damage as we can, Like we're trying

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to avoid falling on hand grenades and avoid it like

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a complete blow up and I do think the energy sector.

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:04.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm aware of commodity price spikes. We can go back

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and look through all the charts. We actually did this

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>whole big research thing of what's killed off oil markets

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in the past. So what killed off the nineties oil market,

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the eighties oil market, oh a, and then the whole

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>decade which was a complete lost decade in oil and gas,

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and then obviously implosion. Um. But when you look at

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>these companies now you are getting massive cash flows back,

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like the cash flows are sustainable. So

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Devin Energy, I love. They're my top pick in the space,

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>so I do talk about them frequently. But they've got

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>only the oil hedged, so they're actually seeing a lot

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>more of a fern um. You know, that was one

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>problem a little bit with the e m p s

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>last year. We still had pretty high hedges coming out

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand uh and then you see those fixed

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>plus variable dividend and now other people have modeled after

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it is not as unique anymore. But they pushed I

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>think one a dollar twenty seven as a quarterly dividend.

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>It was a great yield. And if you look at

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>how that's grown and how they expect their free cash

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>flow to grow. They're they're they're doing everything they can

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to make their shareholders reap the rewards that they're getting

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 1>UM and their share buybacks. I think they authorized another

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 1>two billion and they've they've literally brought back three of

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>their market cap. So if Devin thinks they're stocks worth owning,

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, share by backs are one of the good

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>uses of cash, and it's a way to enhance your

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>shareholder value. Victoria wondering what you think is causing that

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, as you describe it, that wildcat

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>or mentality from returning UM. Is it's simply just a

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>legacy of the busts that that you've talked about in

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the last few decades, or you know, people love to

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>politicize oil production and claim it's it's a result of

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Biden and and energy policy. But is it

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, is there anything that policy could do right

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>now to increase production or is it just you know,

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>like you said, Uh, those busts of the last few

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>decades have really left their scar and no one wants

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to rush in and oversupply the market right now. I

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's more they don't want to oversupply the markets

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like like if you again, if you look

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>at the rig count and how we've messed up some

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of these other other um bull markets and oil, it's

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>been an oversupply eventually happens, and that's typical and most

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>commodity markets, right, commodity prices spike, you bring more production online.

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Now you're supplying demand rebalances. We never actually get balanced.

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I've ever actually seen it come out

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of your market that we would consider balanced. Were either

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>under supplied or oversupplied. And quite frankly, the last two years,

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we've had this whiplash between the two um and that's

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>something we'll talk about frequently down here. The Biden administration

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and the US energy industry do not have a good relationship.

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's putting it mildly. I think there's a

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of angst about government regulations. I think there's a

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of you know, there's a lot of rhetoric about

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the then the Biden administration is definitely pushing

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>greener and and climate change issues in the oil and

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>gas industry. It definitely felt a little unloved. But I'm

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>not sure there's anything that Biden administration could do. Yeah,

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>they could open up some more leases, but you actually

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of people that have a lot of

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>leasing and permitting. And if you look at the timeline

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>between when when a company can buy a lease, so

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>when they actually like get that gasoline in your car,

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it's years and years. I mean, there's permitting, then you

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>actually have to drill it, then you actually have to

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like pump the oil out of it. Then you gotta

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>transport it, then you gotta refine it, and then you

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta transport to gas stations, and all of those things

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>take a lot of permitting. So could it be eased

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>if if regulations were eased, you know, that's that's the

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>rallying cry of less regulation and less government coming from Texas.

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>But at the same point, it's not going to immediately

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>make an impact on the pump. You know, look at

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the release of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. That did nothing.

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, at the end of the day, that did

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>nothing to relieve it because some of it you just

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have enough refinery capacity right now. You have some

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>refiners golf most refineries are finding it at So could

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the industry and the government have a better relationship, Yes,

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>could that foster a little bit more drilling. Yes, Is

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 1>it going to bring back a lot of supply quickly, No,

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>just because of the timeline it would take between like, yeah,

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go get that lease and get it all

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>permitted and get it drilled. It's not like it's showing

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>up at you know, the gas station tomorrow. And just

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to bring us back to the broader market. Obviously, every

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>conversation I've had this week has revolved around whether or

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>not we've had a bottom, whether or not we've hit

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it or probed it or tried to form it or

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've heard some people saying that we are.

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a rounded bottom. It's going to

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>take some time to to to form. So I'm just

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.479
<v Speaker 1>wondering what you think and what you're expecting from the market.

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we found a bottom yet. I know

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Friday was a really great turnaround. We had that important

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty fifteen support level held and that was huge and

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>that kind of caused that interday reversal. You know, yesterday

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>you saw a rally off. I know we're on the

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>tech side. We are approaching that very long term trend

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>line that we might break through. Um, I just think

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>we're we're not done yet. You know, I think there

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit more of the first leg because

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I always asked, you know, what is our catalyst? How

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>are we going to get growth? You really haven't seen

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of earning revisions, and so we talk about, well,

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>valuations have come down. Yeah, the the P part of

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the P and E have come down. What happens when

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the E starts to go back down to you know,

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>there's two parts to that. And if we don't have

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>earnings expansion or at least earning staying status quo, you're

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna see valuations maybe aren't quite as low as they're

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>looking now. Um. You know that being said, it has held.

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think we're done yet. I think this

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>is more of a relief rally. Um. If you look

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>for the signs of capitulation, down age, the VIC spiking, Um,

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're just not there yet. Yeah. Cash balances

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>have have definitely increased, and yes we've seen some equity selling,

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>but not a well and true panic. Like not to

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>sound like a snob, but I need like a solid panic.

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, we just haven't seen that that that solid

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>absolute capitulation. Everything selling off, you know, we we we

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 1>aren't there yet. And then my concern also where is

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>your growth where you know margins are definitely being squeezed,

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and and we we're gonna have to wait until the

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>FED can send the economy into a recession to stop

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>some of this. And my oppression is you think that's

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of inevitable that you know, the Fed's not going

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to be able to bring inflation from eight percent plus

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>back to their target without they triggering I I not

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that I don't. Yeah, I mean I would. I would

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>say I would love and I would challenge somebody to say,

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>has the FED ever navigated a difficult situation? Well, not

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to rip on them, it's a thankless job because they're

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>either too early, too late, too harsh, too too easy money.

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, they never get it just right. But you

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>look at any other situation we've had high inflation or

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is any type of bubble irrational exuberance, you know green span,

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, you go through your history here and and

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like, prove it to me, show me a

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 1>soft landing, show me that you actually can can navigate

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>this and not just like nose dive. And I don't

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>think there's any way. Well, I I guess the only

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>way people think it could happen is if the supply

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>chain issues sort themselves out, which seems unlikely with China

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>stick into this COVID zero policy. I mean, does it

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Does it all kind of go back to China as

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>much as the FED? Yeah, I would say the FED.

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, if we were gonna talk about the heavyweights

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>here and what's going to impact it, one is fed

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to is China and global demand UM. And China is

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely a wild card. It's always a little questionable what

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>their growth numbers are. I feel like you've got to

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>take that a bit with the grain assault. Whatever China

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>says they're doing, kind of kind of have to divide

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it by a factor of fives to see what it's

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>really like. You know, what's lurking in China's market? Uh?

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>You know the housing over there is that kind of

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>rolling over How much? How many? How much problems does

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese market have, not just on demand but the

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>zero COVID policy? UM? And then you know you talk

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.479
<v Speaker 1>about moving supply chains and resiliency and supply chains. Again,

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>these are not easy things to fix. You can't just

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>build a chip factory and call it. You know, Tuscaloosa

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in a day, you're talking about massive resources. And if

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 1>you look at it, like aw, semi conductors start in

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan almost they're they're just the mecca and they have

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the technology and the expertise, and it is extremely the

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>number of circus they're putting on semi conductors, which is

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>like the problem child for supply chain, right, Like, if

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna talk about supply chain, semiconductors was like the

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 1>number one thing that really messed up the entire world.

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can move a lot of that

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff easily out of Taiwan because it's they're putting so

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>much on those tiny little chips. It's such a specialized

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>build with specialized technology. You can't just like pop it

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>up like you can build a McDonald's. Can I ask

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you about peak inflation because I was reading some notes

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 1>this week that that actually we're talking about China where

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we had everybody saying in the last couple of weeks

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:18.159
<v Speaker 1>that maybe we have hit peak inflation, and yet we

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>now have China coming out of those lockdowns and that's

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna sort of have this put for the pressure on prices.

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>So what do you see in terms of inflation peak maybe,

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>but declining No, So I think there are different magnitudes here.

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So are we going to continue to see eight and

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>a half year over year increases? Probably not right. So

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>have we hit kind of our peak growth and inflation?

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to see inflation moderate or moderate quickly

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>down to a more normalized level. No. I think we

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>leave this year at a six handle. Like I think

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>there's just too much pressure. The only caveat to that

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>would be at the labor market and the housing market crashed.

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>You can see those two things obviously rapid they bring

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>down inflation. But look at you know, if you start

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to take apart inflation, we're pending spending a lot on services.

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Airlines are super happy, right They're charging US eleven twelve

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>percent more, and they can keep hiking tickets and we

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>keep buying them because we're so excited to travel again.

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, the same thing for for most services right now,

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing more and more hiking on the upside. And

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>then look at the supply constrained areas like food. Food

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>is actually something that I think is a huge risk.

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're a little more secure here in the

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>United States, but if you look at what happened in

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine and all of the areas that Ukraine supplied wheat

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 1>and some of the basic stables for uh. You again,

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing a supply taking off the market. That's gonna

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>put more pressure on everybody else. And then we have

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 1>some of our own crop problems. You know, farmers are

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>struggling some with weather, higher fertilizing prices, higher diesel prices, um,

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, no, we're not having like a

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>major flu outbreak or swine flu where we're having to

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>kill off herds. But at the same point, I think

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of sure on food. You have

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pressure on the fuels. I don't see

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the fuel inflation crash or so you start kind of

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>parsing apart cp I on some of the inflation and saying,

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>what do I think has wiggle room. I do think

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe rent and and average probe prices could come down.

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean the mortgage you know, some of the housing

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>data we're getting is not super amazing. So I think

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 1>you can start to see possibly outside roll over, But

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the other things energy, food, UM, and

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>then services, I don't see that coming back. Yeah, I

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>think that food supply story is about to become a

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>very dramatic story over the next few months. As long

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>as this were continues, it's gonna it's alarming. Um h.

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Victoria value over growth. Um It's it's sort of the

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>Crips versus the blood story and markets all the time.

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I would ask a very simple question. It might seem oversimplified,

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>but the more I read about value and growth, the

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>less I think it is. But how do you define value?

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>You what's your definition of a value stock? Uh? I

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>mean one goes to peo or the price you're paying

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>for your dollar of earnings, right, And so when you

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>look at a value stock, you want to say, hey,

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't have this great growth trajectory. We expect some growth,

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.199
<v Speaker 1>but I'm paying a moderate amount of premium for this

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>dollar of earnings that you're gonna give me. So I

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's reasonably valued for for what you're gonna

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:24.919
<v Speaker 1>give me and the fact that you're not gonna have

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>exponential growth. So I think again, it's trading out a

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>reasonable price of reasonable valuation based upon the cash flows,

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>dividends and and the the earnings that you're expected to have. Now,

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of kind of you know,

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 1>growth and drag. Value kind of dressed up a little

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>bit differently because the question is the sustainability of earning.

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>So when you look at a value stock, is that

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>stock truly a value stock where I feel like I'm

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>not over paying for your cash flow in the future

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>if their earnings are at risk. And I think a

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit, you know, when we can talk about the

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>duration of the stock and and you know what what's

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>happening in the ewth market. But I think that's one

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>thing investors need to be aware of. It's a trajectory

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and projection of earnings and cash flows for those companies,

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>um and and and how stable and how resilient are

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>those And that's why I think you saw that retail

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:18.199
<v Speaker 1>wreck of a week last week, and and because you

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>saw a lot of retailers saying, look, we're hitting inflationary prices, uh,

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and we're not going to be able to actually generate

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>as much money. And a lot of those retailers are

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of a little more retailer staples. You know your

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>your Walmart's right, let's let's pick on Walmart. You know,

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they're like the end all be all of consumer staples.

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>If you think about consumer staples. You think about Walmart

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that they warned about where their growth

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and their margins are going to come from. Even though

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not a hugely over valued stock, if you look

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.120
<v Speaker 1>at it on matrix of price the book or price

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the e but a price the earnings, it still took

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a hit because there's just like, if you're not going

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to generate that much cash, maybe I don't even want

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to pay you know, fifteen times because it's just not

0:26:58.119 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>worth it if you're not going to generate enough or

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>so I think quality is key, but sustainability and where

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 1>those cash flows come from. You know, how exposed are

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you to a consumer slowdown? How azilian are you to

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the consumer pocketbook taking it? Because I mean the consumer

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>is being asked to absorb so much right when you

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>think about it. Rants are high, gas is high, food

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>is high. Those three things or something no human being

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 1>in the United States can really avoid, right, Yeah, it

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Walmarts a good example I was taking target to. I

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>mean it's you know, you're looking at a stock with

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>an eleven or twelve p right now, and everyone's saying

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>value value, value, Well, it's it's trickier than it sounds.

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess it is, and technically they're discretionary. I don't

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>know exactly how we drew that line between Walmart being

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Staples staples and Target being discretionary, because I mean, I

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>guess the tar J maybe as discretionary, but Target Staples,

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how we want to delineate that. But yeah,

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>they're they're the example of you know, how much risk

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is their their margins and their earning is going to

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>be and you are seeing changing in consumer buying habits

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 1>um best buy, you know, but you also have for

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>mixed signals right now of what this buy. I mean Nordstrom.

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Somehow Target had a horrible earnings, but Nordstrom it was

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>just fine and and and excited and upbeat like that.

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.919
<v Speaker 1>That to me was a little bit of like I

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>needed a drink after reading that, because if that one's

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a little crazy to me, Yeah, it's it's kind of

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of what you would expect in a recessionary environment,

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>or at least concerns of a recessionary environment. Victoria, So

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>can you talk about value versus growth because I've been

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing some notes recently. Let's say the sell off and

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>growth has just it's gone on too long. It's it's overdone,

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it's time to start, you know, dipping your

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>toe in the growth splace? What do you make of that?

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So your kids in a falling knife or you know,

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the other way I look at it, you're kind of

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>looking for diamonds, and a pilot turns what you are.

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>You're you're looking for things, and we have one like,

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>no video is one we really like? You know, I

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>may have a little we'll see what they look like

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>after earnings. But you look and you have NA Video

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>or Apple and some of the big ones, you know,

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the Luster, the fang stocks or the Magma stocks or

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever we're referring to them. Now. I'm not cool enough

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to know what the acronym is. Always I don't care

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>if their name is Meta, is always going to be fang.

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not calling it. Yeah, a large cap tech Uh

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're they're the poster child for the problems.

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just so much. So let's let's start

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>parsing apart the tech market, right. Social media is one,

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, and Snap scared everybody yesterday of where

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>where the advertising dollars going to go? And social media

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I think is so fickle because as soon as you

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>have and even a Netflix goes into that one, your

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>subscription based or your eyeball based business, and especially ones

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that you're trying to you know, make the teenagers and

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the use of the world engaged so you get the

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>biggest bang on your buck for advertising, you know. I

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's a fickle world. In ten years, As

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Facebook still relevant, I'm not sure as a social media platform.

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you try to stress test some of the

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>earnings for Facebook, a Twitter, a snap and say, in

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>ten years, is this platform still relevant, It's hard to know.

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:16.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean I was kind of thought we'd have flying

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>cars by now, but you know, not yet. I mean

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>not unless you have to overpass a little too fast yours. Yeah,

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean some of those things. Your trajectory on where

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the tech market goes, I think is what makes growth

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>so hard. And that's why we like in the video

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>because they're kind of continuing to modify. It's not just gaming.

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>You also are getting into your data centers, you're getting

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the self driving cars. You're seeing the company continue to progress,

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook is trying to do that, but quite frankly,

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody is kind of you know, the metaverse is something

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that we're all struggling with. Even though multiple technologies now

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>are talking about the metaverse type of situation. They want

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>this all encompassing universe. Um, it's it's something I think

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we're having trouble kind of agreeing to move to this

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>encompassing virtual reality world. Um. But then again, I'm an

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>old millennial, so I barely know what's hip anymore. So

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I maybe shouldn't be a parting on on what happens.

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's the hardest problem with the tech industry.

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So as Apple still relevant in ten years, I think absolutely,

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>because Apple has definitely continued to modify, They're getting more

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>into health. The first person that gets their smart watch

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to do blood pressure or blood sugar and do it

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>well is going to absolutely have a massive growth engine

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>because it certainly health is pushing more and more virtual

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and mobile and and you know, and ways that people

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>can manage their health has changed. And I know Apple,

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you know they can do the e k G and

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>they can do heart rate monitoring. But as soon as

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you have those two things, that's gonna rapidly change how

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>millions of people receive services. So I look at Apple

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and I say, yeah, they're continuing to evolve. And I'm

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>sure at some point I'm gonna pay two thousand dollars

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>for a stupid phone. But I'm all in on at Like,

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I've got my AirPod, my phone, my iPod, my watch.

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I couldn't leave Apple, you know, I could

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>never divorce Apple would be so messy. I wouldn't even

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>know what to do. They make so many decisions for me.

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>They make it easy. They're like, cool, we have this

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>set up here. Do you like it. I'm like, yeah,

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that's great, thank you for pouching that for me. And

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that's very helpful. Mike, I was I was invited to

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a conference in the metaverse this week, A conference in

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse. A conference in the metaverse. I will say,

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Victoria the metaverse may be the only place

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.719
<v Speaker 1>you'll get those flying cars anytime, anytime soon. And I'm

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a little confused. I mean, so if you go to

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a conference in the metaverse, you have to have like

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the VR goggles like in your little VR avatar, or

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 1>do you just like show up in a zoom room

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>like this and it's a horrible like non conference conference.

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's that is a planthetic conference and a

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>metaverse I want like VR and avatars like come on.

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>That means that means we're cut in the metaverse right now,

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and this only count. The only innovation I would like

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>from Apple is a watch band that actually stays on

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 1>your wrist. I love to watch, but the band keeps

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>falling off for some reason. Anyway, just a mommoo, Tim

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Cook if you I think. I think the thing that

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple is very good at is their their base successories

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of sucks. So they're like, please upgrade to your

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>four watch band. So I think it cheap and poor,

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and so that's it. They know I'll lose the watch

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>eventually and have to have to buy a do on

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. But but Victoria, you know, uh, the big

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>question this year is, obviously, how do you play defense

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in this stock market? I gotta say that when I

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the bond yields where they're at now, Yes,

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I know they're still negative on a on a real

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 1>basis and inflation adjusted, but if you have some sort

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of faith that inflation is going to come back to two,

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, are treasuries attractive? Yet? Are they? Are they

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>looking cheap to you at all? Yeah? I mean well,

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean I like them or at three twenty that

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:02.959
<v Speaker 1>I do at to seventy five on a tenure, and

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one of the thing driving them down.

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And I also think this is what is not voting

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>well for the markets. You know, the first part of

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the year was such an anomaly where you had treasuries

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>falling at the same time you had the market selling off,

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>which typically that correlation is not something that's very high. Um.

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 1>And so now you've seen the correlation break and normalize,

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>which is market is kind of in the toilet, and

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>treasury market is rallying, and that does mean, you know,

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the tenure rallying. So it's a little less that's more

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>about long term inflationary you know, if you look more

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>at the two year and what's happening with that, that's

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>more our short term expectations. UM. But I do think

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>like to seventy five, I mean, what is it negative

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>on a real basis that at eight and a half

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 1>percent inflation? I mean the only thing not negative on

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a real basis is stocks and and and even then

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and not divided yields. So I do think parking some

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:51.399
<v Speaker 1>and playing defense there is good. You know, I'd watched

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>your high yield bonds. I think a lot of people

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know what they own in a bond fund, and

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of them until recently, the best performing

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 1>bond funds were the longer duration, higher credit right. And

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>so sometimes if you're trying, you're looking at your four

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 1>own K plan, you're looking at your menu, and you're

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing these total returns, or you're um, you know, anything

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that's opportunistic, you know, and that's my keyword. If there's

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>opportunistic in a bond fund, that means there's probably credit risk.

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And so I think people learned the hard way a

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about credit risk. But I think you

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 1>do play some defense. I mean two seventy five, you know,

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>if you can get you're seeing the short term rates

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>come up. Um, then again you might be losing on

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a real basis, but you can at least make something.

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>And and we're coming off such a period of low rates.

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I could buy a six months bond at

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>one and a half, Like, oh my goodness, Like that's

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>just amazing, Like I'm so excited for other nicest points. So,

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, some of it's just a more normalization of

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>where we might see yields, but um, you know, I

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>do think it's it's worth it to have a little

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>bit in that. You know. The one that's been surprising,

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 1>it's gold. Gold really hasn't been you know. If you

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about how do you play defense in your portfolio,

0:35:56.160 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is it cash, treasuries, other bonds, alter natives. You know,

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the alternatives have done very well, you know,

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>but you also have seen gold which is up, but

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not in this high inflationary period. You really have

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 1>seen it struggle to break nine day above it um

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and it keeps trying and it keeps really not breaking out.

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's been eye opening talk about this

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>year of both bond and or gold and bitcoin. The

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:27.479
<v Speaker 1>tried and true inflationary, supposedly inflationary offsets haven't really done

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 1>what they're supposed to do. And I think Bitcoin has

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of a gut check this year in

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:36.879
<v Speaker 1>a period of massive monetary spending and printing money and

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 1>high inflation. That was like the two core tenants of

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 1>why bitcoin should work to offset those two things, and

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it's down what this year. Well, those core tenants are

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of a moving target though a little bit so,

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 1>so I take it you're not a crypto ball. No.

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I do believe in blockchain, and I like

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea um and you know, every now and then

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 1>in his thirty or a thousand dollars in my coin

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>based account. But I mean I look at this and

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:06.840
<v Speaker 1>say it's I think it's gonna really depend what coin

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and how does it get used? Right, So we talk

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>about cryptocurrencies, and it's not just Bitcoin or ethereum. You

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>have all these different coins, but how are they actually

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be used? You know, I know there's the

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>novelty of technically you could buy like a Tesla with it,

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>but that's such a inefficient way because the price fluctuate

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 1>so much as well as there's a lot of you know,

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:29.279
<v Speaker 1>the mark to market. How do you know exactly so

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>what the price of bitcoin is? And and you know,

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:35.320
<v Speaker 1>anytime there's a free app, which I'm aware of, that

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 1>that you are you you are the products. So that

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>means somehow when you're transacting it's not just a transaction fee.

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's very hard to know what the markups. Maybe

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>our true pricing transparency on on crypto is a little

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:49.319
<v Speaker 1>bit harder, it's still it's it's it's very much a

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:53.359
<v Speaker 1>frontier market. Regulation has not really been figured out yet.

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean the I r S figured it out real quick.

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're tax it too, you know. So the

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I R S was the first one to catch on that,

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 1>hey we we got to do something here. But I

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>think the existential question of is it a currency, is

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it an investment? Is it of an alternative investment? You know?

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And then how does it get used and adopted? I

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:18.799
<v Speaker 1>think those are are yet to be seen. Yeah, alright, Victoria. Well,

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:20.959
<v Speaker 1>if if you try to pay for your flying uber

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in the metaverse and they only take crypto, I'm gonna

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>they only take My craziest thing it does have to

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 1>do with crypto. Imagine that, Imagine that you found something

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 1>crazy in the crypto. Yes, let's hear, what's your crazy

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 1>thing for the week. Well, you'll remember that a couple

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago I was in Miami and the big

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin conference there. There were twenty five thousand people. There

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 1>was like lots of parties and techno music, and the

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>mayor of Miami unveiled bitcoin bull statue. And my craziest

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 1>thing is about Miami Coin, which is the city's cryptocurrency.

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Its price has fallen Wow, the stable coins are a

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>little less stable. I mean that's been that's been a

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 1>boy enlightening for people. Yeah. I like how Vildonna's in

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:38.479
<v Speaker 1>London one week, Miami the next week, an international woman

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 1>of mystery. Here. They don't let me out of the

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>zip code. Here. I can barely go to lunch without

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>someone complaining watching the flight attendant. So I definitely think

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you're a c I a spy. Now like watching it too?

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>What a fun show, right, it's a good show. It's good.

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I did think season one was a little bit better

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>than two, but two is still very, very entertaining. So definitely,

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm gonna assume you work for the CIA. Now

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I gotta watch that one. It's like a murder mystery

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:09.399
<v Speaker 1>and a TV show. Oh that's right up Phil Donna's alley. Yeah,

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I love that stuff. Yeah, I never heard of it.

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, Victoria, you say you're an older millennial when

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>you're out of touch Wall, I'm practically a boomer. I

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:22.359
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what's going on any anywhere. It's true.

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 1>But that's why I bill Donna to keep me, keep

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 1>me up to date on the hip. And yeah, I

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>do like a cheap seat sometimes to talk to like

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 1>our next gen clients when I'm talking to their kids,

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>because I'm like, I don't want to be like the

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 1>parody where it's like, oh, yeah, that's whack, like you

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:41.839
<v Speaker 1>know or whatever the hip terms are. So I maybe

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 1>like a translation. I think Google should should come out

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>with that, right, like how to speak next Gen, so

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:50.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I don't. I still don't know if

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a gift or a jeff or a meme or mam. Like,

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm fifty of what I'm going to

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 1>say and how it gets pronounced. So definitely not cool

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in that regards. I try to rely on my teenage daughters,

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 1>but they're they're too far, too avant card, they're too

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:08.439
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the curve that that you know, I'm talking

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 1>done at TikTok. Uh. Yeah, I've been in a lot

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of TikTok's I'm not even aware of. I think they

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 1>try to catch me doing something stupid and that's my worst.

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 1>That is my worst. Yeah. Yeah, that I'm going to

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>be the background of somebody's TikTok and I'm gonna like

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>become this internet sensation for like stuffing my face as

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:34.080
<v Speaker 1>people are dancing or something like that. I'm pretty sure

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that's where I'm at already. But but Victoria, how about you,

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 1>what's the craziest thing you saw in the past week. Um,

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 1>has it only been a week. We'll give you a month.

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:49.359
<v Speaker 1>We'll give you a month of crazy things. A month

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of crazy thing. It's a good month to be crazy.

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm gonna have to just go with some

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of the weird inter day reversals we've had. Like, I

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>know that's not tooper crazy, but again, we've seen those

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 1>like thousand points moves in a day, and sometimes you

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 1>really don't know, like the Invisible hand is has been

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 1>at work this this month, so you've seen some of

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>those weird reversals, and um, you know that to me

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>is a little surprising. And then obviously, I think the

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:14.800
<v Speaker 1>weird thing for me is cash that last thirty minutes

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of trading. I'm like holding my breath because sometimes it's like, oh,

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll get this reversal, and sometimes it's like, mmmm, now

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 1>watch me drop. And I don't really like that. But

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the the speed of some of these moves,

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's fascinating to watch it really is. I mean,

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's for liquidity to some degree. But I

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 1>read a few charts the other day and Bitcoin has

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 1>actually been less bottle than the SMP on like a

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 1>five day rolling five day basis. So this week's sign

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of the apocalypse. I mean, I don't know what else

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I might be like, it's your apocalypse bingo card out,

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 1>but Bitcoin being more stable than the is I mean,

0:42:55.280 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 1>you get be a winner if you called that one. Yeah,

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly that believe it or not. That's not the craziest

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:04.280
<v Speaker 1>thing I saw in the last week. As I promised,

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>mine is uh British themed in honor vill Donna's very

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 1>large expense account for the week, I'm gonna have to

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 1>not to take a look at your expense account after

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 1>this week, Bildonna. But if you would like to live

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:21.279
<v Speaker 1>like a royal is how the Bloomberg story starts out.

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 1>How much would you pay for Buckingham Palace? Some firm

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 1>called McCarty stone actually did a an appraisal of Buckingham Palace. Um.

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why, I think just to get their

0:43:41.440 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 1>name in the news. They are a developer of retirement

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:48.839
<v Speaker 1>home communities, so perhaps this being the pashious retirement home

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in all of England. They appraised Buckingham Palace, so Wildonna.

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell you what time it is. Victoria's time to

0:43:56.160 --> 0:44:00.040
<v Speaker 1>play prices right here on what goes up? What do

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>you think the appraised worth of Buckingham Palace is in

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 1>British pounds sterling by the way, not US dollars obviously,

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean much difference now, I mean we're almost going

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 1>to be a bit more. That's a fair point. That's

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a fair point. Okay, I'll accept either. Then do it.

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>What's your what's your appraisal for Buckingham Palace? Well, I

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:27.439
<v Speaker 1>think British people would definitely say priceless, right, that's true.

0:44:27.760 --> 0:44:29.359
<v Speaker 1>That's true, and it is and it's not really it's

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:32.239
<v Speaker 1>obviously not really for sale. Brexit hasn't been that bead

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 1>on the on the Royals. They're not actually selling it.

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Let me give you a little, a little uh details

0:44:38.239 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 1>on the listing here, seven hundred and seventy five room.

0:44:42.480 --> 0:44:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Whoa palace, seven hundred and seventy five rooms with five

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty million pounds five fifty million pounds. Victoria, what's

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 1>your guests at the assessed value of Buckingham Palace? I'm

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:00.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with the prices right rules on, we're gonna

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>go four or five forty nine million British pounds because right,

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we're playing prices right rules, so close, that's what we're under. Yes,

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>so right, so you're going a dollar under under okay,

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:20.759
<v Speaker 1>one point three billion pounds. That's a hot real estate

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:25.799
<v Speaker 1>market in London, I guess, is uh answer. Yeah. I've

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 1>also heard castles aren't that super fun to stay in.

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 1>They're kind of drafty and cold. Yeah, I think Fla

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is probably staying in one. I got to check your

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 1>expensive count. It's good time to hear though. It's nice,

0:45:39.040 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 1>nice and worm in uh in London. But now here's

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the other then. The total value of the UK's royal

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:50.799
<v Speaker 1>property portfolio is three points seven billion pounds UM, up

0:45:50.880 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and sixty million pounds since two. So uh,

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 1>this is my favorite line of the story. If the

0:45:58.000 --> 0:46:00.400
<v Speaker 1>ten figures for a London home seems a bit steep,

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:04.760
<v Speaker 1>but cartley Stone also calculates Buckingham Palace could be rented

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 1>for two point six million pounds a month, so come on, yeah,

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's the way to go, you know something. YouTuber

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:14.160
<v Speaker 1>would rent that out for a party in a heartbeat,

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it would. I mean, conference right, I don't know if

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you get the guard for that price with the fuzzy

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>hats and the and the marching front and stuff, I

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I went I went down that rabbit hole

0:46:28.600 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit because I googled what the Duchy of

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Cromwell was because I was very curious. You know, they

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 1>started with the whole Megan and Hairy drama like the

0:46:36.080 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Duchy and the finances started coming out, and as an

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 1>informed American, I had to google with a lot of

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>things meant. But yeah, the royal family is has I mean,

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>they own a lot of land. It helps when you

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:50.879
<v Speaker 1>owned it for hundreds and hundreds, if not thousands of years.

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean talk about you know, real estate investment. That

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that's been huge for them. Yeah, buy and hold at

0:46:57.480 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>its finest. I suppose because it diamond hand. The Queen's

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:04.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely got no state taxes. Somehow, I don't get that.

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:07.160
<v Speaker 1>When you set the laws, you get to do what

0:47:07.280 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you want. That's right, that's it. That's the key. That's

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the key to good investment. Get to set the laws. Victory.

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that is all the time we have, But

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:20.319
<v Speaker 1>we really really appreciate your insights this week. Um. Great

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to catch up with you and I hope we can

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:24.120
<v Speaker 1>have your back some day. Absolutely, it's fun, guys. Thanks

0:47:24.160 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 1>so much, Yeah, thank you so much. What Goes Up.

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:36.279
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week and so then you can

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>find us on the Bloomberg Terminal website and app or

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. We love it if you

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 1>took the time to rate and review the show on

0:47:44.160 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, so more listeners can find us. And you

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:51.040
<v Speaker 1>can find us on Twitter follow me at Reaganonymous. Well,

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Donna Hirich is at Bildanna Hirich. You can also follow

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Podcasts at Podcasts. What Goes Up is produced by

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Stacy Wang. The head of Bloomberg podcast is francesco Leavie.

0:48:02.719 --> 0:48:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, See you next time.