WEBVTT - DeFi versus TradFi

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Stacy Marie Ishmael, Managing editor of Crypto for Bloomberg News,

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily Bloomberg I Heart podcast.

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>It's Friday, July two. Something we say a lot here

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Crypto team is everything old is new

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in crypto. And what we mean by that is while

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a perception that ideas like the blockchain or novel

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 1>and groundbreaking, the reality is there's lots of precedents for

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>other concepts in crypto. This is particularly clear right now

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>as crypto experiences its own version of a beer Stearns moment,

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>which all begs the question, our concepts like Defy or

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>decentralized finance just reinventing traditional finance with more complexity and

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a sprinkling of the blockchain, or is their genuine novelty

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Here for more on these questions, I'm joined by Bloomberg

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>opinion columnist Matt Levine and Bloomberg reporta muy Sen Matt,

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we are this is a truly exciting moment in the

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>history of the pod. We have none other than Matt Levine, who,

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're not reading him, for his takes on Elon

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Musk you should be reading him for his takes on crypto,

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>like what is wrong with you? Get it together? Subscribe

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to his newsletter. And Muyao, who has been you know

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.199
<v Speaker 1>since joining Bloomberg, just absolutely on fire as it relates

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to covering everything defy which all seems to be melting

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>down in one in one direction right now. So what

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do today with these two fantastic guests is

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>explore a little bit how what we're seeing into centralized

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>finance and centralized finance have echoes of what we've seen before.

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>And without revealing just how old Matt and I are,

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I can say that we were both around in two

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight and we're aware of the financial crisis

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of that time, and we're going to make a couple

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of other historical references. Does that work for you both? Yeah? Alright,

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>let's get started. So we are what's defy defies, you know,

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>show forced decentralized finance. It is one of the narrative

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>or innovation crypto wants to uh sort of created to

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>replace the traditional finance, which you know, crypto people like

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:25.679
<v Speaker 1>to say trifi and it's basically tokenalized in every financial

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>instrument on blockchain and matt as two of us who

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>have covered you know, trad fire or whatever heard referred

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to even more disparagingly as old FI, which, wow, rude,

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 1>we are we are old five. Um what about DEFY

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>looks to you like old five? Well, you know, I

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>want to be careful. I think that like there is

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a sort of like core element of DeFi that is

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>truly decentralized, and that is different and interesting. But what's

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>been interesting in the last like you weeks two months

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>has been that so many people who were in sort

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.679
<v Speaker 1>of broadly speaking, the DEFISE space turned out to be

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>much more centralized than people thought, and to look a

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>lot like the financial system of sort of you know,

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>late two thousand seven, where it was a lot of

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>like very levered players lending to each other in opaque

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>ways where it was hard from the outside to know

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>who was going to blow up when someone else blew up.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So like you know, when like Lehman Brothers collapsed, that

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>was that was an investment bank. For those of you

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>who are you know, nineteen, when Lehman by this collapse,

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of like who has exposure to Lehman?

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>What commercial paper flunt, what you know, money market funder,

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>what investment bank or what commercial bank is going to

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>go down because they were lending money too, Lehman. And

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>there there are worries like that that are repeating and

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>propagating through the cryptosystem where you know, there were a

0:03:55.520 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of very high profile failures in crypto. One was

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the Terra Lunar ecosystem, which I think you'd probably called

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>DeFi um, and the other was it was a hedge

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>fund called Three Arrows Capital, which is like a hedge

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.839
<v Speaker 1>fund that defied stuff some other crypto stuff. And both

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of those, basically, like the fallout of that has been

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting to trace, and it wasn't I think necessarily obvious

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 1>to everyone where that fallout would go until you know,

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>other platforms started declaring bankrupts. And you know, you mentioned

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>commercial paper, which I remember when none of us cared

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>about commercial people, and then we all have to care

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>about commercial people. And I feel like I'm there again

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>because that's also at the center of a lot of

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>speculation around stable coins. Or anytime you're caring about commercial paper,

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad sign, right, Yeah, No, it's just it's

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>not good. So you know, I know you're not nineteen

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>And I know you know what Lehman Brothers is, but

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>what are you seeing, especially as it relates to some

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of the folks from you know, TRADFI who are interested

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>in crypto or even disparaging of too. Where do you

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>find yourself saying yeah, actually that's how that's similar, but

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>this is how that's different. Yeah, for sure, I think, yes,

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not that old. Oh I'm not that young. But

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, like, all of my knowledge from

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 1>finance is actually from what I learned in DeFi. You know,

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of cons of in DeFi that

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>was claimed to be innovations, but after I talk to

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 1>people who are you know, had a ull Street experience,

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>So tell me, oh, that's been long existing in in

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 1>traditional finance. However, I think a classic example recently would

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>be uh steak East own Lato, which is easier and

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>steaking platform. What it is is basically, if you stake

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>your East with this platform, light though that you get

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a deridive token called steak East instead, and can use

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the stakes to trade and or to use the as

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 1>a clatteral on different other defied platform for lending and

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>brawling and things like that, and often time I heard

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>from people who had a Trifi experience that it will

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>tell me that sounds like security back back loans. And

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Matt's as you have written about, I mean everything,

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but as you've written about elements of these, including this

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>concept of shadow banking, which really came up in that

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight context. Are there things where you're

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 1>sort of looking at this and you're like, really, really,

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>we're reinventing this again. Oh sure, I mean just like

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>just like the very simple core of like shadow banking.

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Chad, you know, a bank is an entity

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that borrows short term and lends long term. Classically, there's

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you know, nuance around that, but basically,

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a bank is something that takes deposits that people can take,

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>can withdraw on demand, and it makes like mortgage lens

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>where people don't have to pay them back for thirty

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>years and so that is profitable. That's like a you know,

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in vary those terms, it's an arbitrage because the mortgages

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>pay more than the deposits and so you can collect

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the interest difference. Um. But it's conceptually very risky business,

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>right like, uh, if there's a run on the bank

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and you don't have any money in the vault, then

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you know you're getting big trouble. And so banking is

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a business that has existed for hundreds of years and

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>ran into a lot of problems around runs on the

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>bank and around various sorts of shenanigans and related party

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>loans and whatever, and so in modern America, banking is

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>like pretty regulated and so like that's that's banking, right, Like,

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>banking has a lot of rules, and those rules are

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>all sort of from from bad experience, right, Like those

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>rules exist because something went wrong and people like, oh,

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>we need a new rule. And in two thousand and

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>eight they were like two thousands, you know, five to

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>two thou seven, there were there were a lot of

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of talking about shadow banks, and a

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>shadow bank is basically something that does that business of

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>borrowing short to len long, but it's not a bank,

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and so can do stuff that banks are not allowed

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to do. One thing that sometimes shadow banks do is

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>is they are even more leveraged than a bank. Right

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>where a bank typically has you know, like in the

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>ballpark of three to ten percent equity, so like most

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of its loans are funded by deposits, but some of

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>their funded by shareholder money, and so if some of

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the loans go bad, the shareholders is money off the depositors.

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Shadow banks can be you know, a hundred times lever

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to you know, a money market mutual fund. Arguably, shadow

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>bank can be like sort of almost infinitely levered. In crypto,

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you sort of look around and I don't think people

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>knew this until like platforms like Voyager and Celsius sort

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of blowing up. But you look at like these crypto

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>platforms and their leverage ratios are are somewhere between very high,

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>like you know, like four or five percent equity two

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>practically infinite. And if you look at like if you

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>look at tethers balance sheet, they're like, oh, we're totally backed,

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>we are super solid. And then you like do the

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>math and it's like they have like zero point two

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>percent equity and you're like, well that's very low, right,

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and like and you know, you look at their assets

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know the question is how much equity do

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you need for like the kind of assets you have?

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>And if tether was a thing that took deposits from

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>like stable creint investors and invested them in like accounts

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>at the fed then running at zero point equity would

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>be great, would be like you know, more than you need.

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>But like, in fact, they're list of assets is like

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>commercial paper, which no one knows what it is, and

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>everyone sort of assumes the worst about their commercial paper.

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.199
<v Speaker 1>But it's also it's like crypto back loans, loans to

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>crypto headphones and and other platforms that some of whom

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>have gone bankrupt and tell it's like, oh, we got

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>out in time, it's fine. Um, And it's like cryptocurrencies,

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>which like maybe those are stable coins that are fine.

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe those are stable coins that are not fine. Maybe

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>those are bitcoin, which is super volatile. And so you

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>look at their asset and you think, you know, is

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>there enough volatility in this, like in the asset side

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 1>of the balance sheet that they should have more than

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>zero point two equity? And I don't know, man, I'm

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>just like a simple old five guy, but like that

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>seems like a really low amount of equity for like

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the asset mix that they have. And I think, you know,

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>if you ask, you know, tell people they're like, no, no,

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, it's totally great. Like nothing can ever lose money.

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Our commercial paper is money. Good. We get out of

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>all of our bankrupt companies just before they go back there.

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>If it's great, it's no problem. We'll be right back

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>with more from Mual and Matt on how a lot

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of the complex DeFi so called innovations have existed in

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>trad fy for a very long time. We all you

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>have reported on defy for a long time. You have

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>spoken to people who supported Tara and Luna. You've spoken

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to people who lost money on Tara and Luna, either

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>because they were retail investors or because they were counterparties

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of Is there anything about what Matt is describing to

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you in the context of, you know, how we navigated

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>our way through two thousand and eight that you're seeing

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>folks now trying to do a better job of or

0:10:57.960 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 1>is this more like you're like, wow, two thousand eight,

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>see like we were in better shape than we are

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>right now. One thing I've been thinking about, Lady, most

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>majority of platforms or complaints we're talking about here, who

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>have felt in crypto they're all centralized entities versus truly defied.

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Even Terra itself, which is quite complicated in consistent that

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is a defied platform, as you know,

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 1>just everything runs on terror blockchain, but you do have

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>do Ka and Terra Phone Labs, all these entities and

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>individuals behind this this platform. Like you know, literally when

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>do k On tweet about something and people would believe

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it and then people would you know, trust his kind

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of intent in terms of how he's going to save

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>this project and whatsoever. And all other platforms such such

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>as you know Voyager, which bankrupt as a result of

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the contention of Serio Arrows, Touch Fund. These are all

0:11:56.480 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 1>centralizentis that had a very little transparency in terms how

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>how healthy their business had had been. I think this

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>is the one thing that I would say potentially similar

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>what to what happened in the Great Financial Crisis, which

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't have much experience with, but Defy itself because

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it's transparency and also because you know, majority loans that

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>was made on Defy are overly are overcladaized, and you

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>we have not really see any D five projects has

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>collapsed or felt in the latest crypto crash. As my

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>last question to both of you, is there anything when

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you're talking to folks and Defy that they are looking

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to transfy and they're like, hmm, maybe we should do

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that and Matt. Same for you. You know, have you

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 1>observed any like defy ifications That is a terrible phrase,

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>but have you observed any examples of traditional lenders or

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>more traditional Wall Street banks adopting any DFI practices that

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>seem useful. That's a really good question. I think in general,

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>something I am confused about when I Oftentine talked to

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>not just Defy people, for crypto people that you know,

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Defy is supposed to completely replace the whole traditional finance,

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>But every time when we see kind of headlines within

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.959
<v Speaker 1>the involvement of Goldman Sex or Morgan Stanley with crypto,

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>all the crypto people get excited. They're like, oh my god,

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they're doing something in Defy. They're doing something in crypto.

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's to me, it's just fascinating because

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I cannot imagine any of these investment banks would take

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>advantage of whatever Defy is trying to create in terms

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>as like better than Trify for example, the transparency. But

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, just based on what my experience talking to

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>all all the people in Trify and Defy, there's this

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of this is just like a very contradictory sort

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of phenomenon that they wanted Wall Street to do more

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in defy, but in reality is that like that's should

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>not be the direction they are going. If they truly

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>believe in defy, they should think more that like we

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>are going to like beat them up and we're going

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to replace them instead of oh, we're going to embrace

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>all these investment thanks going or other or Street giants

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>going to defy. Yeah. I mean what I'd say is, um,

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>defy is is cool, Like like if you're a person

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>with a certain mindset, if you're like a technologist or

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>like market structure person, like DeFi is like we have

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>built all new market structures for you to play with.

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that fun? Right? And so there are efficiency reasons

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>why you might find like some aspects of you know,

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>smart contracting or whatever compose ability of functions, you might

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>find those things appealing, But there's also just like it's

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>intellectually appealing to someone who sort of works in like

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the minds of the financial markets all day to like

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they kind of like go over into this like holy

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>new territory. And so you certainly see people at banks

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>get excited a at like defy buzz words. I mean

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>like like this is sort of old news by now,

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like in like two seventeen, like you couldn't go a

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>day without a bank announcing a blockchain project, right, Like

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>no one knew what it meant, but it was just

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>like banks like, oh my gosh, a blockchain and like

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that's like, you know, that's like a sort of DEFY

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is concept of like we're going to like have this

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of shared ledger of our transactions where like there'll

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>be some sort of like you know, decentralization and like

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>open ledger of the transactions rather than like us faxing

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, our lawyers, like the confirms or whatever. Right,

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Like it just seems so shiny and efficient. Um. But

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the other thing I'll say is that like a lot

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of people in trad FI feel that way, but rather

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>than implementing a DeFi project at their bank, they quit

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and become you know, like crypto hedgeman managers. Right, So,

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>like you mentioned Sam Bankman Freed, like he's a guy

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>who's like a market structured guy at a you know,

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>traditional market maker. And then it was like crypto crypto

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>seems really fun, but also I can make so much

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>money there, Like I said, like DeFi is like cool

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and possibly more efficient in some ways. But also just

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>like the spreads, are you insane? And so you can

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of money, and so like a lot

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of people are trying to find ways for their banks

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to make more money, but like these are regulated entities,

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and like custody and crypto is challenging, and you know,

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>regular like supervisors don't necessarily like it and all this stuff.

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>But if you quit and just start your own crypto

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund, there's like so much money to be made.

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that's a lot of what's happening

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in traditional finances. Everyone's scorting to do crypto, or they

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>were before cryptocrash, right, And on that note, thank you both,

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thank you. You can find more of Muya

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Shan's reporting on the Bloomberg Terminal on Bloomberg dot com

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and on Twitter. She's at Muya Shen That's m u

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>y a O s h e N. You can also

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>find more of Matt Levin's columns on the Bloomberg Terminal

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot com or follow him on Twitter. He's

0:16:54.440 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>at Matt underscore Levine. On the next episode of bloom Crypto,

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Mary Catherine later has a story to tell. She was

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a rising star at Black Rock when she left Wall

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Street and traditional finance for crypto and decentralized finance. She's

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>now Chief operating Officer at unit Swap Labs, which is

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the creator of the world's biggest decentralized exchange protocol. She'll

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 1>join my colleague Bloomberg Reports a Lga Karif to talk

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>about her belief in blockchain, what comes after the terror collapse,

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and how she sees decentralized folence shaping the future. I'm

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Stacy Marie Ishmael and this is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>podcast from Bloomberg and I Heart Radio. For more shows

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>from I Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app,

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Email your questions, comments,

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>or suggestions for the show to Crypto at Bloomberg dot

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>net and you'll find us on Twitter at Crypto. The

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.239
<v Speaker 1>supervising producer of Bloomberg Crypto is Vicky ver Galina. Our

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>senior producer is Janet Babin. Our producer is Mohammed Perup.

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Our associated producers Osanam Sidiki and Moses and um dast

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to wonder At is our engineer. Original music by Leo

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>sidron h