WEBVTT - Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend: Retail Earnings, Banks, China

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look at the

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak anchors

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>all around the world, and straight ahead on the program.

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>A big week coming for US retailers. I'm Tom Busby

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in New York.

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm Stephen Carolyn London, where a major business conference could

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 2>see tough questions asked of the Bank of England, governor,

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 2>the government and the man who wants to be the

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 2>UK's next Prime Minister.

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm Brian Curtis in Hong Kong. The Chinese economic data

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 3>have been all over the map. Are we recovering there

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 3>or falling back?

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm Kaylee Lyons in Washington, where we have not one

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 4>but two bank failure hearings on death in the Senate.

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 5>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 5>Eleve Them free own New York, bloombergon ninety nine to one, Washington,

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 5>d C Bloomberg one oh six one, Boston, Bloomberg nine sixty,

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 5>San Francisco, DAB Digital Radio London, Sirius XM one nineteen

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 5>and around the world on Bloomberg Radio dot com and

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 5>via the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, Good day to you. I'm Tom Bus. We begin

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>today's program with the state of the US retail industry,

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>with earnings this week from some of the sector's biggest names.

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Two thirds of the economy is consumer spending, and a

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>big chunk of that is spent at retailers. But because

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of stubbornly high inflation, consumers are now paying the highest

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>prices ever, as retailers pass along higher costs, also borrowing costs,

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>including credit card rates the highest in sixteen years. And

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>joining us now for how that is affecting those chains.

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg retail reporter Brendan Case. Brendan, thank you so much

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:30.559
<v Speaker 1>for being.

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 6>Here, Thanks for having me all right now, before.

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>We look ahead at what you expect to see from

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>those individual retailers, let's talk about the industry as a whole,

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>its challenges, as well as what's going pretty well. You know,

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>retail sales. They fell for a second month in a

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>row in March. Is that an indication that those high

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>prices and higher interest rates have really slowed spending.

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 6>Yes, it is, and that's pretty much in line with

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 6>what the big retailers have been expecting. Both Target and

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 6>Walmart issued profit forecasts and their outlooks for comparable sales

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 6>this year back in February, and both companies came in

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 6>pretty well below wall streets expectations for a lot of

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 6>those key metrics. And if you look at what they're

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 6>expecting in terms of comparable sales and in terms of revenue,

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 6>what you're seeing is a pretty muted outlook with you know,

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 6>consumer spending at least as they see it, poised to

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 6>sort of have trouble keeping up with inflation, and so

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 6>in real terms kind of looking for flat to maybe

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 6>even slightly down, and so you know, both companies are

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 6>kind of setting expectations in a pretty cautious way for

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 6>this year, and I do think that that reflects some

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 6>weakness and consumer spending.

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of which a parrel sales, they fell for

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>the first couple of weeks of April versus March five

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>point seven percent versus six point nine percent as easter

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>warmer weather early in the month, just not enough to

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>boost people into the malls and into stores. Transactions down

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 1>more than five percent average amount slipped. This is all

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.119
<v Speaker 1>five served point of sales data. But not looking good,

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>is it?

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's exactly right. And this gets us into one

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 6>of the big stories from last year that is certainly

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 6>going to carry over to this year. And obviously, looking

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 6>at apparel sales, you know, across the board, we're going

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 6>to see varying results from the apparel specialists, depending on

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 6>each particular company. But if you look at the big

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 6>mass market retailers like Walmart and Target, last year, apparel

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 6>was a real source spot in terms of the goods

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 6>that they couldn't move and they had to discount pretty heavily.

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 6>And if you just sort of take a step back,

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 6>what happened last year is that both of those companies

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 6>and many others misjudged a shift in demand pretty dramatically,

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 6>and the shift was away from perchase of discretionary goods,

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 6>including apparel, but also electronics, patio furniture, kitchen appliances. People

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 6>started spending a lot less on that than before, and

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 6>they started spending more on groceries, which partly reflected price increases.

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 6>They were forced to spend more on the essentials, and

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 6>it also partly reflected greater spending on services with restaurants

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 6>and travel kind of coming back as the pandemic was abating,

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 6>and so looking at apparel, that is going to be

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 6>another area this year where probably a lot of consumers

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 6>are going to say, you know, maybe I can wait

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 6>another few months before buying that pair of genes or

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 6>buying that blouse. Apparel is going to be a weak spot,

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 6>and probably so will electronics and all those other kind

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 6>of home goods that people spent so heavily on in

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 6>the early stages of the pandemic and now they either

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 6>don't need those goods as much or they're kind of

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 6>willing to wait a while before before buying them.

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, Brenda, let's talk about some of the

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 1>individual companies that are reporting this week to kick things

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>off in the sector. And up on Tuesday is Dow

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Component Home Depot. Now spring the busiest season of the

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>year for the chain, are we expecting to hear that

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>people are still spending on those home improvement projects, upgrading

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>their lawns, doing the driveway? I mean, are we looking

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:26.799
<v Speaker 1>good at Home Depot?

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 6>You know, it's going to be a really interesting test.

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 6>There were some indications in the last report that home

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 6>improvement spending was showing some weakness, and so the first

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 6>thing we're going to be looking for is any evidence

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 6>that that trend is continuing or worsening. Now, sales themselves

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 6>have actually done okay thanks to higher prices, but the

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 6>unit sales have been down, and so in other words,

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 6>people are buying fewer things, but they're paying more for them.

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.679
<v Speaker 6>And then one of the big questions to watch with

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 6>with Home Depot, especially in terms of the commentary of

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 6>the executives, is kind of what they're seeing in the

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 6>US housing market and how that's filtering through to their results. Traditionally,

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 6>their sales, at least in the eyes of many analysts,

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 6>have been tied to US home sales, which have been

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 6>very choppy but you know, clearly showing some signs of weakness.

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 6>At the same time, the company has been at pains

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 6>to emphasize recently that it's home prices that can justify

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 6>a lot of spending in terms of like do it

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 6>yourself home improvement projects, and so what they say about that,

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 6>what the latest trends are they're seeing in terms of

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 6>their drivers of sales, especially related to the housing market.

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 6>That'll be a big watch item for Wall Street and

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 6>for the rest of.

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>US Wednesday is target among I think among the most

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>nimble of retailers, and what are we expecting there, and

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>particularly I know, the emphasis on groceries. They've moved things

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>around in the store near you know, to really put

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>an emphasis on that part of their business.

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, very much so. And what they're trying to do

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 6>there is to tap into the increased spending on just

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 6>the basic goods, kind of put those, put those very

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 6>much front of mind for consumers, and harvest as much

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 6>of that spending on the basics as they can. You know,

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 6>for Target, they get about twenty percent of their sales

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 6>from food and beverage. If you define grocery a little more,

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 6>a little more broadly to include you know, non consumable

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 6>items that were you know, constantly buying paper products, you know,

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 6>cleaning supplies. You get to a higher percentage of their sales,

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 6>but it's still well below fifty percent, and so they're

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 6>trying to reposition themselves to serve that demand and to

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 6>sort of adjust to the fact that a lot of

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 6>their signature goods or sort of their signature strength over

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 6>the years has been in the more discretionary items. You know,

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 6>they've got the reputation for the you know, the cheap

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 6>chic kind of positioning in the market. They get a

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 6>lot of people into the stores looking at clothes, looking

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 6>at you know, bedlinens, you name it. That's where there

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 6>was a lot of weakness in sales last year, and

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 6>probably that weakness will continue, especially in the earlier part

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 6>of this year. It gets a little cloudier as we

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 6>get into the second half of the year. We'll just

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 6>have to see. But Target will certainly be wanting to

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 6>emphasize it's food and beverage and grocery sales, but it'll

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:38.439
<v Speaker 6>be a big question mark what their discretionary goods sales

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 6>look like. And you know, last time we heard from

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 6>them in February, the CFO just came right out and

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 6>said that the biggest question mark for them is just

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 6>the path of the US consumer.

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>And we could say the same thing about the biggie

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Walmart earnings out on Thursday. Is it going to be

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the same as Target?

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 3>You think?

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 6>And then you get the big one, and I think

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 6>the dynamics there are a little different. Look at the

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 6>last two really three quarters for Walmart, they're comparable sales.

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 6>They've just been hitting the cover off the ball, and

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 6>a big part of the demand they've been getting has

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 6>been coming from wealthier consumers, people with household incomes of

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 6>more than one hundred thousand dollars. And what you're seeing

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 6>there is you're seeing Walmart's strength in grocery, which accounts

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 6>for you know, fifty five percent of their total sales.

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 6>You're seeing their lower income customers, middle income customers, you know,

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 6>spending more on those goods simply because they have to

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 6>prices rising, and then you're seeing some of the higher

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 6>income households switching over to Walmart in search of bargains,

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 6>search of lower prices. Despite that strength the last few quarters,

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 6>Walmart came out with a pretty sober outlook for sales

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 6>and co perable sales this year. There was some debate

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 6>among analysts about, you know, are they really that worried

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 6>about consumer spending after so much strength recently, you know,

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 6>or could it be more a case where they just

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 6>wanted to sort of err on the side of caution

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 6>if you ask, If you ask the company, they kind

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 6>of echo what Target said about uncertainty, And you know,

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.719
<v Speaker 6>they've they've said that it's really hard to predict right

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 6>now and they want to be realistic with their assumptions.

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 6>But what we're going to see next week will be

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 6>a big update on that, and we'll also see whether

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 6>their first quarter results are more in line with the

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 6>strengths they've had the last few quarters, or if there's

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 6>a noticeable shift and you know, you see a lot

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 6>of a lot more weakness creeping in.

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, a lot to look forward to. Brendan, thank

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you so much. That's Bloomberg Retail reporter Brendan Case. And

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend, big annual gatherings

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of movers and shakers on the UK political and economic scenes.

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend,

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 1>our global look ahead at the top stories for investors

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And up later in our program hearings on what went

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>wrong at US regional banks. But first, in the UK,

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>political and business leaders will be gathering for the annual

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>conference of the British Chambers of Commerce. They'll include the

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Governor of the Bank of England and the man who

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>could be the next Prime Minister for more. Lets head

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak Europe banker Stephen Carroll.

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 2>Tom. This event is happening at a time when the

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.959
<v Speaker 2>UK economy is facing all kinds of challenges. Inflation is

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 2>still in double digits, growth as flatlined, and the possibility

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 2>of a recession remains close. All the more reason that

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 2>businesses will want to hear from the likes of Andrew

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Bailey from the Bank of England and the Opposition leader

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 2>cair Starmer as well to discuss what we should expect

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 2>from the British Chambers of Commerce event. Is our UK

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 2>correspondent Lizzyburden, who'll be covering it for Bloomberg TV and Radio. Lizzie,

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 2>this is an organization that represents tens of thousands of

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 2>firms in Britain, all sorts of sizes. Set the scene

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:08.839
<v Speaker 2>for us about what the big issues are that they'll

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 2>want to be discussing at this event.

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 7>Well, Stephen, the consensus among business leaders that I speak

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 7>to is that the one thing Liz trust got right

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 7>is that the UK needs better growth. So part of

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 7>that does come down to plugging the holes in the

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 7>labor market. Of course, in the latest budget, the Chancellor

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:28.559
<v Speaker 7>announced the childcare reforms the pension reforms, both to try

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 7>to entice people back into the labor market. The question

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 7>is are they enough to reduce the tightness in the

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 7>labor market and that to have an impact on inflation,

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 7>which of course we know is still in double digits

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 7>here in the UK. They may also businesses want the

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 7>Chancellor to loosen immigration rules more.

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 8>Of course, it's a.

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 7>Toxic issue post Brexit, and at the CBI annual conference

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 7>in the autumn last year, the Opposition leader Kir Starmer

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 7>actually was talking tougher on immigration, so it'll be interesting

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 7>to see see how the two parties frame that one.

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:08.839
<v Speaker 7>The other question is how to make the UK more investible.

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 7>Of course recently we've heard the Financial Conduct Authority looking

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 7>at changing listing requirements for the UK. Really the question

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 7>is how do you help businesses grow and then keep

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 7>them here once they've reached a certain size, because it's

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 7>been a real blow for the government to lose arm

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 7>CRH and Flutter all to other bosses.

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned the CBI conference as also this question of

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 2>the sort of beauty pageant that politicians have at events

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 2>like this, where they want to show up and be

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 2>popular and liked. And because we are in a very

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 2>long countdown to a general election in the UK, that's

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 2>a really important pitch for Keir Starmer, the Opposition leader,

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 2>because he really wants to be able to confirm his

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 2>pitch as being, you know, Labor being a party that's

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 2>going to be a pro business.

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 7>We don't have a date for the next election at

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 7>the moment, we're expecting it to be at the latest

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 7>autumn twenty twenty four. Businesses want are specifics. They want

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 7>things that are temporary to be made permanent so that

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 7>they can make that investment. In particular, they want to

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 7>know what's coming in terms of tax cuts. That's going

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:14.599
<v Speaker 7>to be a key battleground in the run up to

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 7>the next election. Can the government afford to cut taxes?

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 7>Where is it going to make tax cuts? Labor really

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 7>needs to present itself, as you say, as the party

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 7>of businesses. I do think as well that it's significant

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 7>that Labor is sending its leader, Kir Starmer. The government

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 7>so far we know, is only sending a Treasury minister.

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 7>So in terms of signaling how important business is, it

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 7>looks like Kiir Starmer's taking it a bit more seriously.

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. Now industrial policy is something on the minds at

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 2>least some of the businesses at this conference. On Bloomberg Radio,

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 2>we've been discussing this with Ben Fletcher from make UK,

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 2>which represents manufacturers here speaking to Caroline Hepger on Bloomberg Radio,

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 2>and they're called for an independent inquiry into the British

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 2>government's industrial policy.

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 8>The things I think.

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 9>That is really important is that we look around the

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 9>world and see which countries do it better than us.

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 8>And I think if you look at Germany, if you

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 8>look at France, you've got a very very long term

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 8>sustained plan.

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 9>If you look at America, you look at a number

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 9>of places in the Far East, they've all got really

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 9>clear plans and they've all got a real investment in

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 9>skills and a focus on what this is going to

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 9>achieve over the next ten years.

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 8>And if you compare that to where we are now.

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 9>Jeremy Hunt made some really positive steps forward in the

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 9>budget last autumn, some clearly defined areas that he wants

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 9>to invest in, but we really need to scale up

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 9>from that and we need a huge amount more flesh

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 9>on the bone in terms of detail.

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 10>What of the Labor Party, I mean, we have an

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 10>election general election looming that not that long away, and

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 10>that the polling is very positive for the Labor Party

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 10>if they were to get in. Do you think this

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 10>is something that would appeal to them.

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 8>We certainly hope that both parties look at it seriously

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 8>and take it seriously.

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 9>To directly address your question, you know, we've had some

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 9>positive signs coming up. The Sounac government and Hunt's budget

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 9>set out that ambition, and we strongly welcome that. The

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 9>opposition party's labor in particular has said that an industrial

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 9>strategy is critical and they would want to.

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 8>Produce one and deliver one in government.

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 9>What we're trying to do, I think, is to be

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 9>a bit of a catalyst for all of that thinking.

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 8>It's really critical that we get this right.

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 9>We've learned some lessons from COVID I think about the

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 9>impact if we don't have a lot.

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 8>Of domestic capability.

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 9>We're seeing the focus on net zero, We're seeing the

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 9>focus on industrial growth in our big competitors, and at

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 9>the moment our plan isn't fully functional, isn't fully worked,

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 9>and isn't fully resourced. So what we see is a

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 9>receptive audience on both sides of the house. What really

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 9>we want to do is to put a turbo charger

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 9>underneath that thinking and get people to realize that this

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 9>isn't something you can just talk about you really have

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 9>to do.

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 5>So.

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 2>That was Ben Fletcher from Make UK speaking to Caroline

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Hepger on Bloomberg Radio. The labor market, Lizzie's also going

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 2>to be in front in the coming days, we're going

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 2>to get an update on wages and unemployment for the UK.

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 2>What should we be watching out for.

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 7>Tightness in the labor market has been driving up inflation,

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 7>so that's why these numbers are so crucial for the

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 7>Treasury as well as the Bank of England. In the

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 7>last data it was tighter than expected. People were still

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 7>demanding wage rises to try to keep up with inflation,

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 7>but then inflation has been swallowing up wage rises in

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 7>real terms. This data is for March and April. I

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 7>would really keep an eye on the employment rate, the

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 7>unemployment rate, I should say, wage growth, and the number

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 7>of days that have been lost to strike action, because

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 7>we know that in the latest GDP data, which of

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 7>course you said, growth had flatlined. One of the big

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 7>reasons was because strikes were weighing on services output. And finally,

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 7>looking at economic inactivity because as I say, we've got

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 7>this huge these holes in the labor market that need

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 7>to be plugged.

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the tightness in the labor market is helping those

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 2>who are changing jobs in England, though they're securing pay

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 2>rises of varient ten percent, according to data from the

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 2>recruitment company Read analyzed by Bloomberg. Here's Read's CEO James

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Reid speaking to us on Bloomberg Radio.

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 11>A lot of employers are struggling to find the people

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 11>they need and so they're paying a premium. They're paying

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 11>a premium to attract new applicants, so the wages have

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 11>been going up. I suppose what's interesting about this data

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 11>is it's a much more forensic analysis that we've done

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 11>with Bloomberg than we've ever done before, over five years

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 11>worth of pay data, and it's showing some very interesting

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 11>variations and it does raise some interesting questions, doesn't it

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 11>about the future of the labor market and what the

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 11>Bank of England might do, et cetera. So I think

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 11>this data is fascinating and I would urge people to

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 11>have a look at it.

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 2>That was James Reid, the CEO of the recruitment company

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Read on Bloomberg Radio. Lizzie. Another question that I wanted

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 2>to circle back to in relation to the British Chambers

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 2>of Commerce conference is this idea of who represents business

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 2>in the UK when they're speaking to politicians. The biggest

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 2>business lobby group in this country, the Confederation of British Industry,

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 2>has paused operations because of allegations of sexual misconduct and

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 2>harassment among staff. The CBI is effectively in limbo. Who

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 2>is the government and other politicians speaking to when they

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 2>want to speak to business.

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 7>Well, I actually interviewed one of his Treasury ministers, the

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 7>City Minister, Andrew Griffith, and I asked him this very

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 7>question and he said that the Treasury is always talking

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 7>to business. There's a plethora of lobby groups out there

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 7>for that community. You've got the British Chambers of Commerce,

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 7>who's hosting this conference. There's also the Federation of Small Business,

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 7>the FSB, and the Institute of Directors the IOD. So

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 7>all of them are trying to fill this void that's

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 7>been left by the CBI when the government has said

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 7>that it's so problematic that I think the Chancellor himself

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 7>said there's no point engaging with the CBI when their

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 7>own members have deserted them in droves.

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, something to watch out for as we look ahead

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 2>to the events of the coming week. Thank you to

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's UK correspondent Lizzie Burden. I'm Stephen Kroen in London.

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 2>You can catch us every weekday morning here for Bloomberg

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Daybreak Europe, beginning at six am in London on one

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 2>am on Wall Streets. Tom.

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Stephen, and coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend,

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.959
<v Speaker 1>some big hearings on what went wrong with US regional banks.

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby and this is.

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg broadcasting live from the Bloomberg it aactive brokers studio

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 5>in New York. Bloomberg elemon three oh to Washington d C,

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg ninety nine one to Boston, Bloomberg one O six

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 5>one to San Francisco, Bloomberg nine sixteen to the country,

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 5>Sirius XM Channel one nineteen to London DAB Digital radio,

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 5>and around the globe the Bloomberg Business app in Bloomberg

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 5>Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend.

0:20:57.520 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York with your global look

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>ahead at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>The regional bank turmoil still haunting us as we move

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>into the new trading week, and for more, let's add

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to our Bloomberg ninety nine to one newsroom in Washington

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Sound On co host Kaylee lines, Kaylee.

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 4>That's right, Tom. It's still not fully clear if regional

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 4>banks are completely out of the woods yet, after a

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 4>series of failures this year. It of course began in March.

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 4>Silvergate had to wind down, Then Silicon Valley Bank and

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 4>Signature Bank collapsed and were put into receivership by the FDIC,

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 4>and then First Republic followed earlier this month, and here

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 4>in Washington, they're still trying to pick apart exactly what

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 4>happened and what should be done so it doesn't happen again.

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 4>This coming week, we have two big hearings before the

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Senate Banking Committee. The first is Tuesday, where Committee Chairman

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Senator Shared Brown is about to get this wish which

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 4>he shared with me back in March, to come true.

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 3>We could move more quickly if the bank CEOs got

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 3>out of their ivory towers and actually came and talked

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 3>to us.

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 4>That's right. On Tuesday, more than two months after the

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 4>failures of their respective banks, for executives from SVB and

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 4>Signature will testify before the committee. Then on Thursday, it

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 4>will be the bank regulators in the hot seat, with

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 4>FED Vice Chriff Supervision Michael Barr and fdi C Chair

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 4>Marity Grenberg set to testify once again, along with several

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 4>other witnesses from regulatory bodies, and in an interview with

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg this past week, the CEO of JP Morgan Jamie

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 4>Diamond had this message for them, we.

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 12>Need to finish the bank crisis. We've had uncertain policy

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 12>on mergers as first Arizon deal. I think we have

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 12>to assume they'll be a little bit more so, you know,

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 12>whatever the FDIC, the OCC, the Fellow Reserve or whatever

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 12>they need to do to make it better, they should

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 12>do be thoughtful, be very forward looking. You'll not be

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 12>surprised constantly because some of these things have been known

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 12>about for quite a while.

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 4>So will we get progress toward making it better? What

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 4>answers from regulators, congressional leaders, former bank executives are we

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 4>likely to get this coming week? Joining us now hopefully

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 4>to help answer those questions? Or Zacho And he's a

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 4>congressional reporter for Bloomberg Government as well as Ben bay And,

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 4>who heads up Bloomberg's financial regulation coverage here in Washington,

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 4>Zach Ben, thank you both so very much for joining us.

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 4>And Zach, I'd like to start with you first. On

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 4>the first hearing on Tuesday, we've got Greg Becker, the

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 4>former Silicon Valley Bank CEO, Scott Shay, the former chair

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 4>and co founder of Signature Bank, and Eric Howe, the

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 4>former president of Signature Bank. Are these three essentially just

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 4>going to get scolded and reprimanded by senators for several

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 4>hours or does the committee actually just want to glean

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 4>some new information from this hearing or ultimately just get

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 4>some clips for campaign ads.

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 13>Probably a little bit of both. You know, these executives

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 13>don't really have a lot of friends left in Washington,

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 13>so and this is really the first time that they're

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 13>going to be able to talk directly to these lawmakers,

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 13>at least in a public setting. Previous hearings have all

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 13>been with these regulators, like you mentioned with Michael Barr

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 13>and Marty Grunberg, and so this will be the first

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 13>time where lawmakers will be able to say, we've brought

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 13>these executives in. These are the questions we have, These

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 13>are the scoldings that we want to give to them,

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 13>and then to move on and say, what did happen,

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.239
<v Speaker 13>what could have been done to prevent these failures, and

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 13>what could be done to prevent further failures of these

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 13>midsize banks. And so I expect you'll see a little

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 13>bit of politics, a little bit of more substantive probing,

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 13>depending on who on the panel is at the microphone.

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 4>There's always politics act. But I do wonder if this

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 4>might actually be really bipartisan. Are we likely to see

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 4>a difference in tone between the Democratic and Republican members

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 4>of the committee or are they mostly in line on

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.199
<v Speaker 4>this specific issue when it comes to bank executives.

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 13>I think everybody that we've talked to and that they've said,

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 13>you know, Chairman Sharon Brown, ranking Member Tim Scott, the

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 13>top Republican have all said that the bank executives are

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 13>at least partially to blame for these bank failures. And so, yeah,

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 13>we do expect a bipartisan thrashing to a certain extent

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 13>of these executives who are going to come in and

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 13>try to defend what happened at these banks and the

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 13>lead up to their failure.

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 4>So it sounds like there's definitely going to be some

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 4>fireworks on Tuesday, and Ben I wonder if there's also

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 4>going to be some fireworks on Thursday when the regulators

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 4>are the ones that are in the hot seat there,

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 4>of course, Marty Grunberg, the FDIC, the FEDS, Michael Barr.

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 4>They have already been before the committee on the issue

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 4>bank failures. So what's going to be different this time around?

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 4>What are we likely to hear that we haven't heard already?

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think we're you know, fast forward a couple

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 14>of weeks from the last time they appeared, and the

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 14>situation still hasn't been fully resolved, and we're going to

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 14>hear from former Silicon Valley Bank and former Signature Bank

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 14>CEOs and those banks have failed. But in the meanwhile,

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 14>there's still several you know, mid sized regional banks that

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 14>the market seems quite concerned about, and you know, there

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 14>still is this angst out there about potentially other shoes

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 14>to drop. So I think there's gonna be a lot

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 14>of questioning about whether bigger fixes need to happen policy wise. Now,

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 14>the fti C has come out with a recommendation a

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 14>thought of, you know, kind of what they'd like to

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.719
<v Speaker 14>do in terms of the Deposit Insurance Fund, which was

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.640
<v Speaker 14>certainly in the spotlight because that was used to make

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 14>really everyone whole who was who had money in those

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 14>two failed banks. But they need Congress to step in.

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 14>So it's kind of this, you know, interesting moment where

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 14>the regulators saying, Hey, we actually need Congress to do

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 14>something and write a new law here to be able

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 14>to to kind of come in the way that we

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 14>might want to. And you have a situation in Congress

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 14>where we're really not much is passing in terms of legislation,

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 14>legislation at all in this area or any other.

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the pace of the congressional response clearly has been

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 4>quite slow, at least in comparison to the speed with

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:30.959
<v Speaker 4>which the crisis has moved. But these regulators been do

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 4>have a certain degree of discretion here in terms of

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 4>what they would like to do with their existing authority. Right,

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 4>how quickly could we see them actually tighten things on

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 4>their own, I mean there's.

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 14>Certainly things they can do. I mean they can you know,

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 14>these banks that failed and other banks are highly regulated entities,

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 14>so you know, they're constantly going back and forth with

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 14>their regulators over and getting various levels of scrutiny depending

0:26:56.520 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 14>on which business activity we're talking about. So there are

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 14>there are certainly things that regulators can do to dial

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 14>up that scrutiny, and there were you know, a hole

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 14>shown in terms of what was actually being looked at

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 14>in you know, there's regulars, there's regulators on a regular basis,

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 14>they can they can on their own go ahead and

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 14>make those tweaks, but for the big kind of holistic

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 14>changes that they might want, you know, they're going to

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 14>probably need lawmakers to do something that all said. The

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 14>Federal Reserve has been doing a review of a lot

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 14>of you know, kind of oversight of banks and some

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 14>of the rules, and that's happened. That's in the backdrop

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 14>that was that was occurring before you know, this crisis,

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 14>and I'm certain, I'm certain that what has transpired over

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 14>the past two months are certainly can inform you know,

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 14>whatever new rule proposals they come out with. So there

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 14>are things regulators can do, but you know, ultimately, like

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 14>many things, you know in Washington, it's Congress kind of

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 14>needs to step in to do the big, big things.

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 4>Zach, Will Congress do the big things? Do you think

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 4>is there actual momentum toward that, because as I said,

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, these banks failed two months ago, and we're

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 4>still holding hearings that are kind of backwards.

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:05.400
<v Speaker 13>Looking, right, And I think part of that might be

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 13>maybe a lack of urgency. As you've heard from from

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 13>Yellen and Diamond. I think there's some confidence that maybe

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 13>the crisis is abating or at least, you know, not

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 13>quite finished, but at least you know, this isn't a

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 13>two thousand and eight really fast paced crisis, so to speak.

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 13>You know, other than these you know, these small regional banks,

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 13>and so there's a couple of things that they probably

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 13>won't do. The twenty eighteen rollback of Dodd frank On,

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 13>you know, that lowered the liquidity requirements for some of

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 13>these mid sized banks. That's not going anywhere. There's really

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 13>no interest in the Republican controlled House or among Senate

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 13>Republicans to work with Democrats and something like that. There's

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 13>by parties an interest in things like clawing back pay

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 13>to some of these executives, maybe to recoup costs, or

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 13>maybe increasing the cap on uninsured, increasing the cap on

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 13>insured deposits. And so maybe we see something along those lines.

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 13>But I think lawmaker's role here is not so much

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 13>in legislating, but in pressuring regulators to enact the kind

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 13>of more strict requirements that they've been looking for in

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 13>the kind of oversight that maybe was missing during these failures.

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and of course we're talking here about the failures

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 4>we have seen. But Ben, I feel like there is,

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 4>and you were alluding to this earlier, still some fear

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 4>in the market that there could be more failures to come.

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 4>Are we likely to see more banks collapse before anyone

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:21.959
<v Speaker 4>can get around to making real changes?

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 11>Well, I don't.

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 14>I don't think, you know, we quite know the answer

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 14>to that. I mean, there are it's been it's been

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 14>you know, kind of days of while trading some of

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 14>the Some some days, you know, these these shares are

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 14>getting getting pounded down, you know, in the double digits.

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 14>Other days that you know they'll kind of come roaring back.

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 14>It does seem like there is in some instances, a

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 14>disconnect between, you know, what the market is doing and

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 14>what maybe the bank is saying about its business.

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 4>Ben Bain, regulatory team leader for Bloomberg News and Zach

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 4>co And a congressional reporter for Bloomberg Government, Thank you

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 4>both so much. Really looking forward to the coverage of

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 4>both of these hearings next week and we'll send it

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 4>back to you.

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Kaylee.

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Kaylee Lines reporting from our Bloomberg ninety nine one newsroom

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, and you can hear Kaylee and co host

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe Matthew on sound on weekdays one to three pm

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>right here on Bloomberg Radio. Coming up here on Bloomberg

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>day Break weekend, looking ahead to some key Chinese economic

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>data coming our way. I'm Tom Busby, and this is Bloomberg.

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look ahead

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York. China's economy bouncing back

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>now that COVID measures have eased, But just how big

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of a bounce? For more, Let's go to Hong Kong

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Daybreak Asia host Brian Curtis and his colleague

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Doug Krisner.

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Tom, It's a simple question, is the Chinese economy sputtering

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 3>or recovering? But the answer may be much more complicated.

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 3>We'll get a slew of data in the coming week

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 3>that will no doubt shed some light on the issue.

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 15>Now, in the past week, we had some shocking data

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 15>for the month of April. Producer prices fell further into deflation.

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 15>Consumer prices at the same time barely positive, and imports plummeted.

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 3>That might change with the retail sales and industrial production

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 3>in the coming week. There are significant cross currents in

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 3>the economy and to try to sort through them, we

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 3>asked James Meger, Bloomberg Economics editor for Greater China and Mongolia,

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 3>to join us. So, James, thank you. We understand that

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 3>the base effect from last year is distorting the picture.

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 3>In the case of exports, for instance, it made the

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 3>data perhaps look better than they what the reality is. However,

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 3>in the case of imports, it's actually worse. I mean,

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 3>if imports were worse this year, down seven point nine

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 3>percent from last year when we were in lockdown, well

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 3>that tells you they were pretty bad.

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 16>I mean, obviously the base effects from last year in

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 16>April of last year, Shanhaio, as you said, was in lockdown,

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 16>your lockdowns across the country, and so that's seriously going

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 16>to undercut the amount of that time. It's going to

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 16>make a lot of the numbers look better. So, as

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 16>you said, exports were a lot better than expected, we

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 16>expect retail sales to jump by like twenty percent or

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 16>something in this April. But I know if you try

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 16>and remove those from what we're looking at, the economy

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 16>does seem to be really struggling at this time. Obviously,

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 16>imports are very weak. Commodity and that's not just a

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 16>commodity price thing. You know, the use of coal in

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 16>the economy is falling. Deal companies are cutting prices because

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 16>of weak demand for steel. We saw the excavated companies

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 16>that sell you know, excavators for construction sales are down

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:39.719
<v Speaker 16>forty forty one percent in April for them. If you're

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 16>looking across the whole economy, the industrial sector seems to

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 16>be very weak. Exports don't seem to be particularly strong.

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 16>Construction isn't really rebounding. Even though the housing sector seems

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 16>to be stabilizing, You're not seeing a rebound in construction.

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 16>You're not seeing a rebound in new home sales. So

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 16>on all these critical sectors, the Chinese economy looks very

0:32:57.760 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 16>weak at this time.

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 15>In the coming months, we're hearing that China is expected

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 15>to roll out some policies to address this growth issue

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 15>away from applying direct fiscal stimulus. When you think about

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 15>things like protecting supply chains or boosting the birth rate.

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:15.479
<v Speaker 15>Is there something more the government can be doing away

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 15>from applying more money.

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 16>So there's been a there's a real effort right now

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 16>to attract more foreign investment into the economy. You know,

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 16>you just have officials from across China, like cities, provinces,

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 16>even the central governments, spreading out countries in Asia and

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 16>more more widely to the Middle East for example, to

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 16>try and get foreign investment to return to China. And

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 16>there was a real slump in foreign investment during the pandemic,

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 16>especially last year, and the aim is for this money

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 16>to help drive growth this year. You know, the question

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 16>is whether that's going to happen or night. And so

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 16>far there hasn't been any sign of like a really

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 16>bullish return of foreign investors to the Chinese economy. That's

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 16>whether that's in greenfield investment in sort of new factories

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 16>and new production here, or whether that's in portfolio flows

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 16>and people buying into the stock in the bond market.

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 16>There hasn't been the sort of an inflow of money

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 16>that would help boost the economy, and so the government's

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 16>really left with things like fiscal spending. You know, if

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 16>export demand is weak. If foreign investment is not coming in,

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 16>all you really have is there the domestic leavers for

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 16>driving growth, whether that's more subsidies for the electric vehicle market,

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 16>or whether it's you know, things like more subsidies for

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 16>people to encourage them to have more children.

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 15>James, thanks for helping out and helping us understand what's

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:29.320
<v Speaker 15>going on in China's economy as we look ahead to

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 15>the retail sales and industrial production data in the coming week.

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 15>James Mager, who is a Bloomberg Economics editor for Greater

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 15>China and Mongolia.

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 3>James, thank you. I'm Brian Curtis, along with Doug Krisner.

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.800
<v Speaker 3>You can catch us every weekday here for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia,

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 3>beginning at six am in Hong Kong and six pm

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 3>on Wall Street. Tom.

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Brian and Doug. And that does it for

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>this edition of Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend. Join us again Monday

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 1>morning at five am Wall Street time for the latest

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>on markets overseas and the news you need to start

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>your day. I'm Tom Buzzby. Stay with us. Top stories

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and global business headlines are coming up right now.