WEBVTT - The Spectrum Crunch

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking Either and welcome to Forward Thinking, the podcast

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that looks at the future and says I just called

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to say I love you. I'm Jonathan Strickland and I'm

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Joe McCormick. So, guys, you know, we've talked a lot

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>about the concept of the Internet of things, right, it

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>sounds great. Yeah, it's fantastic. This idea of an environment

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that's able to sense with what you are doing and

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>who you are, and be able to respond in real time.

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>My car and my toaster oven coordinating with each other flawlessly.

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Fantastic future that we're all really excited about. This idea

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that we could have a reality that's defined by our

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>own needs and wants and desires so that we just

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>live in hedonistic pleasure forever. Sounds great unless you've seen

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the movie Maximum Overdrive. Yeah, that there is a downside

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to this. If the machines do decide to crazy where

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>when they can coordinate, Yeah, they're extremely well organized. But

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>now also there's a there's there's a disclaimer. I don't

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:12.279
<v Speaker 1>think there's much chance. Yeah, I think self aware machines

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>are quite a long ways away, let alone self aware

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of very ticked off machines, and selfware toaster evans are

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty far down on the list of machines that would

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>be ticked off. I think. Yeah, well, so I've got

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a question about the Internet of things. Sure, ask away.

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>All of these things need to talk to each other, right,

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that is correct. And so if you imagine that you

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>have a house in which you have fifty or maybe

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>even a hundred electronic devices that are communicating, Yeah, it

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>really doesn't make sense to try to wire them together,

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>even if they're stationary devices. Right. Yeah, you wouldn't want

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>all those cables all over the place or you know,

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>have to drill into your walls every time you get

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a new toaster evan. Right, And a lot of these

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>things are things that you're going to want to be

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>mobile anyway. You want to be able to carry them

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>around with you or move them to a different place

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and still have them communicate eight with all the things

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>in your Internet of things, realizing my permanent dream of

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>mobile test exactly right, So how many things can talk

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>to each other all at once before that cross talk

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>becomes a problem. Yeah, this is a this is an

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>issue that we need to talk about because in order

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Internet of Things to become a reality, we

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>have to have the the foundation, the infrastructure that allows

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>them to communicate with one another without interference, without clogging

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the system. And this is where we get into the

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>concept of a spectrum crunch or data crunch. This idea

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sound nice. It's not good. It's not good. No,

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not like. It's not like delicious crunch with a

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>new Gady Center, not like Captain crunch. No no, well,

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean it will cut up your mouth if you

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>try and eat enough of it. But no, it's more

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>like the crunching of putting a part of your body

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 1>and advice. Yeah, it's the crunch of too much stuff

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to fit through too narrow and opening. So like

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you know three who just style, everyone's trying to get

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>through the door at the same time. Very much like that,

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>except with data with zeros and once. So what we're

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about here is the actual physical infrastructures capability of

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>uh handling that much information, as well as the physical

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>limitations of frequencies to hold data in the first place. Okay,

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>so we're going to focus today on wireless communication. Right,

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>we got we got all those chords out of the way.

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't want all the future just cluttered with chords

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>like Brazil, there is not the country. There is that

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>element as well. Right, the Internet, the Internet backbone does

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>have a limited bandwidth, and we can add to that.

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>We can keep adding capacity by adding essentially more tubes

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to the series of tubes that is the Internet. But

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not what we're focusing on here. We're focusing on

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that wireless communication. And really a lot of what we're

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about is really gonna focus on cellular

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>communication because that's the one that's probably the closest to

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>hitting capacity. But all of these things kind of bleed

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>into one another, right, Okay, so how do wireless devices

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>communicate with each other over the electromagnetic spectrum? Joe, ain't

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that a great spectrum? It's it's one of my favorites.

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Full of photons, Yell. The photons are definitely part of

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the electromagnetic spectrum. Yes, so this is a spectrum is

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of course an entire range here. We're talking about a

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>range of frequencies of waves and wavelengths. Right, it includes

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that we see light. Yes, visible light is

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in fact a tiny slice of the overall electromagnetic spectrum,

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>but it also includes the X rays that you get

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>at the doctor's office or the dentist's office, or the

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>gamma rays that are radiating your body when someone does

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>experiments on you, microwaves, radio waves that end up carrying information, right,

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and so this is all the same stuff. It's just

0:04:56.080 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a question of how long is the wave in that transmission. Yeah,

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the wavelength is a big part of it. The frequency

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is directly correlated to that. So the long wavelengths are

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>low frequency. So that means essentially what frequency we should

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>define as it's how often particles of the medium. So

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever the wave is traveling through vibrate when a wave

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>passes through it. Uh. This is different from the period

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of a wave, which is where you would take one

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>point along the waves form and say how long how

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>many times can that pass through in a second at

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>least a little bit difference to two very closely related concepts.

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>But we menasure frequency in hurts. So one hurts refers

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to one vibration cycle per second. Alright, So one killer

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>hurts would be one thousand vibration cycles in a second,

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 1>and so on and so forth. Okay, so so on

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the electromagnetic spectrum. If you start from what radio waves

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>are the longest wave? Yes, yeah, we're talking about the

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>lowest frequency. Yeah, you get to radio waves that are

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>kilometers long, right, they are incredibly long wavelengths until you

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>get down to the flip side, the opposite end of

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum, where you're talking about wavelengths that are incredibly

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>incredibly short. Okay, so what what are they? In order?

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Radio waves are the longest, microwaves. Microwaves are the second longest.

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Then you have infrared, then visible light, then ultra violet light,

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>then X rays, and then gamma raise and favorite and

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>then unobtainium or whatever. It is not part of the no.

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>But if you are ever writing science fiction and you

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>realize that you have to come up with some sort

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of energy that is not reflected on the electromagnetic spectrum,

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you can only really go up because the past gamma waves. Yeah,

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>it's the reason turning the dial to eleven exactly. The

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>only reason we don't know about is because our instruments

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>are incapable of measuring it. Yeah that's inaccurate. Okay, But

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>so these different parts of the spectrum we've talked about,

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not like a single isolated value. Within each of

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>these ranges, there are a whole lot of values. Absolutely. Yeah,

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>So you can have radio waves of much different frequencies. Yes.

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>In fact, anyone who's played with a radio at all

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>knows this because the radio station that corresponds to the

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>frequency of that radio wave. So, for example, in the

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>A M spectrum, you go from five five killer hurts

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to one point six oh five mega hurts, So station

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>five thirty five to six five. That's a reflection of

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the frequency of those radio waves, all right, And that's

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>how we can have so many radio stations floating around

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in the air around us without having them interfere with

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>one another. Your radio is a is a specific instrument

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that you tune to one of those frequencies and pick

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that one up. Absolutely. So, if you ever enter an

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>area where two different competing radio stations have the same

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>or very similar frequencies, you might get that interference from

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>get that static kind of overlap. Yeah, you get you

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>can hear two things going on at once and it

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>sounds like you know that you really need to change

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the station. Or perhaps you might hear secret messages only

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you can decipher, and that gets scary. So on the

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>FM side, same sort of thing. From eight point eight

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>mega hurts to ten point eight mega hurts. That's where

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you get the FM stations two and eight. Uh, that's

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>they correspond again to that range of frequencies. So that's

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>just in you know, broadcast radio here in the United States,

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>radio waves encompass a much broader spectrum even than that.

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And this is this is where we're looking at using

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic radiation to carry data. And the problem is is

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 1>that not all wavelengths are ideal for carrying lots of data.

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Some some are great at carrying small amounts of data.

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>But in order to carry a lot of data, you

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>need a lot of time. So we're really talking about

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>throughput here, you know, because the speed is still the

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>speed of light, right, It's gonna it's going to carry

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a single bit of information the same speed, no matter

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>what the frequency of the wavelength is. But the amount

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of information how many times can it send a signal

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in that in that span of time, right, or or

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>how many bits can it carry along in that span

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of time? All right, So the higher frequency the wavelength,

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the more information it can carry. Generally speaking, generally speaking,

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it gets a little complicated because it also depends upon

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the implementation a little complicated. We're talking about wireless here.

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>This is really difficult stuff. Yeah, we're actually not going

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Engineers who design this are crazy smart people. Yeah, we're

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to go too deeply into the physics and

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>technology because to do so would require a suite of episodes.

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these, what we're talking about right here, would

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>constitute an entire semester's worth of courses on the in

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the university level. Yeah, we're simplifying, Yeah, we are. We are,

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>for the purposes of this discussion, simplifying so that we

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>can talk about what the problem is. But in order

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the problem, we have to lay the ground. Okay,

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>so who decides who gets to use what parts of

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the radio spectrum? Right? You can't have two different radio

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>stations in the same place broadcasting at the same frequency.

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I imagine that applies to all different kinds of radio transmission.

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>A cell phone tower, if you're whatever you are that

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>needs to be sending data back and forth, you've got

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to know who can use what frequency, Yes, because otherwise

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you do have this interference problem, and you have to

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 1>avoid those interference problems as as best as you possibly can,

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>so uh it depends upon where you live. But in general,

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>most places in the world your local, as in your

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>national government. When I say local, I mean nationally. Yeah,

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>nationally local, because not everyone listening to the show. Everyone

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>listening to the show is from the United States. So

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>but generally speaking, the government decides which parts of the

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>spectrum go to which applications. So, for example, in the

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>United States, there are large, large UH bands frequencies that

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>are dedicated to things like military use, and no one

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>else is allowed to touch that, even if the military

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is not making full use of it. It is reserved

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for military use. And then there may be narrow bands

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that are that are reserved for specific cell phone carriers,

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>so no other cell phone carrier can use that specific

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>band of frequencies. They might operate in a similar band

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of frequencies, but they won't have overlapping ones necessarily. So

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>this gets really really complicated. You have to be able

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to legislate this and say this goes to you, this

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>goes to you, this goes to you, and you you're

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>limited by this, and it's of course only gotten more

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>complicated in the past couple of decades as cell phone

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>use has zapped crazy out of the stratosphere. Well, yeah,

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>things like smartphones have put such a huge load on

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the cellular networks because with smartphones, you're not just using

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>those radio signals to carry your voice. You're trying to

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>download pictures of cat videos and cat videos and and

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>get Axl Rose on your phone and yeah, singing to

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>your cat. Everything is cat relating face time with Axl

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Rose and his cat. Yeah, exactly. We have to keep

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the cats in this or else they will overthrow us. Well,

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:22.199
<v Speaker 1>at any rate, Like you were saying, Lauren, the cell

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.839
<v Speaker 1>phone use has definitely complicated matters. And then on top

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of that, we have all the different wireless technologies they

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>debuted over the years, everything from WiFi to Zigby to Bluetooth. Uh.

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>These are different protocols that use wireless communication, usually in

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the two point four or two point five giga hurts range.

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>A few of them are in the five giga hurts

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>range um, and that complicates matters more. Now we've got

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>some big, big issues here, like the idea of the capacity,

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>like what is the capacity for wireless communication. It's actually

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>really complicated to answer because if we were to say,

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>all right, this one frequency band within this one geographic

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>region can carry x amount of data and no more.

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>That's not entirely accurate. One thing that is helping is

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that we have devices that have really good error checking algorithms,

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and those error checking algorithms what they do is they're

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>able to help separate the signal from the noise. So

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the noise would be all the different UH transmissions that

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have anything to do with what you are actively

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to do. It's a fine frequency tuner basically, right.

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>And on top of that, the actual infrastructure, the the

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the things that receive messages and route information have a

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>limitation on how many connections they can actively handle at

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a given time. That's largely based upon the state of

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the art of the technology at the time, as well

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>as the density of those things within whatever geographic region

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about. Yeah, it's due to our capacity to

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>program um a device to handle a certain number of

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 1>incoming connections. Has it? You know, computers get confused when

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.479
<v Speaker 1>you have too many things trying to go on at once. Yeah,

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>if you if you think of it in the old

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>wired terms, that makes it a lot easier. Right. Let's

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about like if you had an old router

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that was not a WiFi router. It was just it

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>was a router that hooked up to your modem and

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it allows you to physically plug Ethernet cables into that router.

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I used to have. Yeah, they looked like a big

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>one looked like a harmonica. Yeah, it really did. Just

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see if I could play a tune on it.

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, well you can download tunes using them. But

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's got all those parts, and it has a

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>finite number of parts, right, and once you reach that

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>finite number, you ain't plugging anything else into that router.

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>That's it. You would have to unplug something else before

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you can plug a new thing in. And it had

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a very easy to understand physical limitation of how many

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>devices could plug into that router. Well, when you get

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to WiFi, uh, those those connections become invisible if you're

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>not hard wiring stuff to your router. I still hardwire

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot stuff to matter what, because I like to

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>game and like to watch things on gaming consoles. But

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>at any rate, you have more connections than what you

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>can see, right, And so the thing is that the

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>limitation is still there. These devices have a capacity that

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>they can't really go beyond If they try to, then

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>they're shuffling, They're they're juggling all of these different tasks

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and trying to respond to them as quickly as possible,

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>which slows everything else down. If you have ever been

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in a high density area during a big event when

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.239
<v Speaker 1>people are using their phones a lot, like a concert

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>or dragon con ce s something like that, then you've

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>had the experience of your phone not making a connection.

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>You might not even be able to make a phone

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>call in extreme circumstances, and that's really when the network

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is starting to get overwhelmed. It's it's getting more requests

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>from devices than it can actually process simultaneously, and that's

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>where we start to see the real spectrum crunch. It's

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>not just the physical limitation of the spectrum, although that's

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a part of it too, It's also a physical limitation

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of the actual hardware that we're making. So the question

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is what happens when you hit that And the answer

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>is that scenario I was talking about where suddenly everything

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is slow or you can't make a connection in the

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>first place, which is a really frustrating I mean, I'm

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>sure you guys have had that example, right where you've

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>got it says you've got full bars on your phone,

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>but you can't call failed here. I often get that

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in this building where we work. Yeah, so that may

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>just be a structural interference. I don't know, it could be,

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's also something that if you go to one

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of these big events, you'll see you'll have full bars

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and you think, I've got complete four G service here,

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to download my schedule for the day

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>so I know where I need to go next, And

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>then you just get that little circular waiting you know,

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>icon and nothing ever happens. And it's because again, the

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>whole network has been jammed up by the way. Quick

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>word of advice to people who are attending something like that,

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>you can always try to switch to two gene networks

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 1>because often those are underused compared to the faster ones.

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't always work, but sometimes it does. It's been

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a lifesaver for me. Hit ces nice. Yeah, I mean

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it takes it takes longer to get data than it

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>would on an unencumbered three G or four G network,

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>but it works so so it does have its advantages. Um. So, yeah,

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>this this ended up being real issues also in places

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>like London during the two thousand twelve Olympics, and this

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>was where we started to see it as a real,

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>like citywide issue, not just something that's located to sports

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>arena like that. Yeah, well, because I mean the city

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of London was basically already at its capacity for for

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>cellular use at the time before millions of people are

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many, like like a whole bunch

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of people came into the city, right and and not

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>just people, but like all the different news outlets that

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>are using all that data to wirelessly send stuff back

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 1>and forth between journalists. I mean, it was just an

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>incredible demand on the system. And so what London ended

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>up having to do what the UK did was for

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a temporary basis, they ended up reallocating some bandwidth that

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>normally would be reserved for the military to go to

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>this wireless communication use for the general public and for

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>really for for media outlets in particular, to alleviate some

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>of that demand. So it spreads the demand out a

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>bit more and makes it a little more manageable. But

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not something that they could necessarily do perpetually unless

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 1>they were too uh to look at the full spectrum

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and say, which parts of these are of the spectrum

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>are really necessary for what they're doing right now, and

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 1>which ones can we repurpose so that we can uh

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>stave off the spectrum crunch. Keep in mind, if we

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 1>keep building more and more Internet connected devices, specifically cellular

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>connected devices. This, even if we alleviate it by adding

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in more more spectrum, we're still we're still heading toward

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 1>that problem. We're just heading towards it. You know, the

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.479
<v Speaker 1>problem is a little further out than it was before. Well,

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and also it's not necessarily easy to just, for example,

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>build a whole bunch more cellular towers, right. Yeah, so

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you guys know the whole nimby not in my backyard thing, right,

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean that this applies to all sorts of things, right,

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>anything that, uh, that you think will end up affecting

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>the property value of your home or a quality of

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>life issue. Uh. It's one of those things that people

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>react very strongly too. So the idea of erecting more

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 1>cell towers is not really that attractive to a lot

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 1>of people. It's something that could potentially help alleviate the

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>problem a little bit. The idea being that with cell phones,

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you have these cell sites that represent a certain geographic

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>area of service. You could divide those cells into smaller

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>units so that they're servicing smaller areas. That means you're

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna have more handshakes between towers whenever you have people

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>moving through the area. But it also means that you've

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 1>spread out the service capacity and you've increased it as

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>a result. But because it's so hard, both financially and

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>politically to get these things built, it's not really seen

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.719
<v Speaker 1>as an attractive solution to spectrum crunch. And also again,

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the things that you can only keep

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>doing for so long before you have reached you know,

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>like I can't move because all the cell phone towers right,

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm wearing one as a hat. My environment is responding

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to me in real time, but I can't go anywhere.

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 1>So I guess it's a good thing that it gets

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to be all things to me all the time. I

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen a person in years. Yeah, So we are

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about an issue that tends to be regional, not global.

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>So this is something that tends to affect densely populated

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>areas that have a high population of people with connected devices,

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>specifically cellularly connected devices and so that's really where we

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>would expect to see this, and it tends to be

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>um something that that has peaks and valleys as well, right,

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>because there are times of the day when there aren't

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>as many people on the network, and on those times

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>things might seem perfectly fine, but at peak performance it

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>may suddenly seem like you can't get a call out

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>at all, and in moments of extreme circumstances like what

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>we saw post nine eleven, where you had a lot

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of people trying to use the network in order to

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>check on one another understandably, so then it's going to

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>overload the system to the point where it doesn't work

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>at all. So it is regional, not necessarily global. But

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that we shouldn't work on some sort

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of solution just because it's not going to affect the

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>entire world simultaneously, at least not until we get to

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.439
<v Speaker 1>a point where the Internet of Things is ubiquity across

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the entire globe, we still need to worry about it.

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So if we can't just build more cell towers and

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>divide up those cell sites, then what can we do.

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>One of the things is that reallocation. So you guys,

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>remember a few years ago when the United States made

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that switch from analog TV to digital TV, and anyone

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>who was getting their television service over the air, uh,

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and they were relying on old antenna had to get

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a new converter box so that it could convert digital

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>signals to analog signals so they could watch it on

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>their television. You remember those all right. So, once we

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 1>made that switch, and it was painful, I mean, it

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>was kind of it was more painful than I anticipated.

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 1>I thought a lot of people had already upgraded, but

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>there was a large significant portion of the population that

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.959
<v Speaker 1>was still on analog systems. I mean, it is an

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>investment to upgrade your your hardware like that. A lot

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 1>of the same There was overlap with the group of

0:22:56.880 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>people who sends a lot of email forwards, so there

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of forwarded emails about this product. Yeah.

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>So so well, when that happened, when they switched from

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>analog to digital, it did mean that that entire spectrum

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of the that entire section of the radio spectrum I

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>should say, became available because now it wasn't used for

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 1>analog transmission. That had ended. And once that ended, then

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the government said, what can we do with this, and

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the FCC said, we're gonna auction it off. We're going

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to auction off bands of frequencies to anyone who is

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>ready to bid. Yeah, this was the story. There were

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>so many stories that came out of this, including Google

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>getting involved. Google made some bids, and the real reason

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Google was bidding, at least the story anyway, was that

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>they weren't interested. The company wasn't interested in getting portions

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of the spectrum. They were interested in driving the price

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>up to the point where a specific requirement would kick

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>in that would require net neutrality rules to apply. So

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't so much that we want this, we just

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 1>it was more like, we want to make sure whoever

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 1>gets this has to play by the rules we want

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to play by m hard. That's kind of wonderful. I

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>mean it as as a fan of net neutrality. Yeah,

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>that's a perfectly I was okay, I'm okay with certain

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>enormous corporations having to spend more money to get what

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 1>they want, and I'm okay with them having to follow

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>certain rules of net neutrality in order to do it.

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm biased, I had met it, but yeah, that was

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>There were all these companies like Verizon, A, T and T, etcetera,

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and pretty much any of the big wireless carriers. So

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure everyone was interested. Yeah, they wanted to be

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>able to get at this extra spectrum because that way

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they have the padding to expand once they start to

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>hit capacity on their own. And it might mean having

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to upgrade existing cell phone towers to have new antennas

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>for these for these particular spectrum, for these particular frequency bands,

0:24:55.440 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I should say, or just using existing hardware that they've

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>then have, you know, signed over to them. And keep

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in mind, all of this is based on licenses. They're

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>they're they're not owning any physical property. They own a

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>license to a specific range of frequencies. So it's it's

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it's gets a little uh whibbli wabbli tammy, Why me sure? Sure?

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 1>But okay, this is all a hypothetical instance, right, I mean,

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>we haven't reached capacity anywhere. What what happens when we do,

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>or if we do, well, what happens is if we

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 1>hit capacity, we are no longer able to make calls

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 1>or get dad. I mean it would be no more

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>cat videos, no more cat videos, and well at least

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>not on a mobile device. That's using a cellular network.

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>It would it would probably be things that would hit

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>specific carriers and specific regions at different times. So you

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>might suddenly get a story about how the carrier you

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>are on in the city you live in has become unreliable,

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>so suddenly everyone switches to a new carrier, and that

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 1>carrier ends up becoming unreliable because all that that weight

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>has just shifted to them, a sort of rolling blackouts

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and in areas with with energy problem. Yeah, yeah, that's

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 1>not a bad example. That's a really good way of

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>putting it. So it's not it's it's something that would

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>be really bad for consumers and it would ultimately be

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>bad for companies because the consumer backlash would be incredible.

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>So we want to avoid this as best we can.

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Um but there are there's some people who suggest that

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe we're doing it already, that maybe this spectrum crunch

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>is already being put off quite a bit. And the

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>reasons for that are varied. One of them is that, uh,

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>if you have a handheld device that works on the

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>cellular networks but also is WiFi capable, a lot of

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>people have enabled the WiFi so that they're on WiFi

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>more frequently than they would be just on cellular. It's

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a way of one avoiding getting too many data costs, right,

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna end up going over a data cap

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that way, um, and it also means that you don't

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>encounter those problems that the cell at work itself gets

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>really busy. Right now. WiFi still uses of course wireless

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>radio to communicate, but it distributes the problem. Yeah, they

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:13.400
<v Speaker 1>they access small unlicensed bits of bandwidth. I believe it's

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>also the it also is Yeah, you're connecting to a

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>local router, and so yeah, and I don't have to

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>worry about if there's space to connect to the cell tower,

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 1>right if if the local router, as long as the

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>local router isn't handling more requests than it has capacity for,

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 1>then you should be pretty much all right. That router

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>may not be uh running on the latest WiFi protocols,

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>which means that it could be slower than what you're

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you are used to, but it means that it will

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>at least get your request through. So, especially if it's

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>something like voice, which tends to be pretty low on

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the data chain, you don't have to worry some Also,

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>voice on cellular networks tends to be prioritized. It takes

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>the least amount of data for besides like a text message, uh,

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>for the kinds of things you see a smartphone used

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>as um and so it tends to be prioritized over

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>like the data intensive stuff like trying to get your

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 1>cat videos. So if you're trying to make a phone call,

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it's more likely to go through then you're trying to

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>watch a video on on a system that's near capacity. Okay,

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and I have some statistics on the amount of of

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Wi Fi versus cellular use that's going on, and it's

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty significant. This is according to a paper that was

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>published by the New America Foundation in October. And and

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the paper I know you'll appreciate this was called Solving

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the Spectrum Crunch Unlicensed Spectrum on a high fiber diet fiber.

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>See what they did there. I like to have a

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>regular service, but okay, So this paper said that more

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>than thirty of smartphone data and more than iPad data

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is going out over WiFi and therefore eventually landline networks

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>rather sometimes called wire line. By the way, if you're

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>ever reading industry stuff, sometimes that entire network will be

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>called wire line and um rather than cellular networks. Yeah,

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and that that that's the sort of thing I'm talking

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>about where this reliance upon WiFi has removed some of

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that burden that cellular networks were under. In fact, it's

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>it's got some people like there are some researchers at

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the University of Southern California who have said that the

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the conversation around the spectrum crunch has been largely the

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>role of um or inside the realm of hyper bowl

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>or hyperbole. Yeah, so we are going to the hyperbowl.

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I still love l Yes, that will always be with

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>me because I love it so much that it's it's yeah,

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>hyperbole is is certainly what the University of Southern California

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>researchers would say was the tone of the conversation, saying that, uh,

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, these these networks have are these carriers have

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a vested interest in getting hold of the spectrum. Uh

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>for multiple reasons. One, it gives them that padding to

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it prevents other competitors getting at that spectrum, so they

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>are actively able to uh to to counteract competition before

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it even happens. UM. But that that ultimately it may

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>not be as bad as what they had been saying

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>because of WiFi helping take some of this burden exactly,

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say, It seems to me a

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of crucial question whether the Internet of Things will

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:25.959
<v Speaker 1>present a big problem for the spectrum crunch really seems

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to depend on what percentage of these devices and the

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Internet of Things connect through cellular well. It also depends

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>on how many routers do you have to handle all

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of those Like, if if I have a dozen connected

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>devices in my home, my router might be fine. If

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I have five dozen connected devices in my home, my

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>router might be overwhelmed, which means that I need to

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>have some other, better router that can handle more connections,

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>which may mean that I need to have a better

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 1>uh Internet connection to the backbone, you know, from the

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 1>last mile all the way over to the Internet backbone.

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>It all depends on how these devices are communicating with

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>each other and if they have to connect to a

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>larger network. If they do, then you still have some

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>other issues to work out. The cellular one is the

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>easiest one to look at because it was the one

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that was closest to capacity. So and and it is

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 1>true that the more wireless devices you get in a

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in an area, the more likelihood you have of things

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>like interference coming in UM and generally speaking, it's not

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a huge problem. But then we don't we don't live

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in that future where everything is connected yet, and we're

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:34.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of moving towards it pretty quickly. Yeah. So if

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>we get to a point where we suddenly realize, oh,

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>this internet of things has multiple issues, the interference issue,

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the communications issue. Uh, and now I've got all these

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>things that in theory could react in real time, but

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>in reality or having all these communication errors. So my

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>coffee never starts brewing when I'm on my way home,

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>or my toaster oven has decided that it's no longer

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>listening to me. But but lots of companies want me

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.479
<v Speaker 1>to have my double test. Yeah, so what are some

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of the solutions that they're working on. Well, frequency sharing

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is a big one. I mean, we we talked about

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the the reallocation, We talked about dividing up cell uh

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>service so that you can add in more towers or

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you're adding more capacity in your routers, whatever that may be.

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>But frequency sharing is a big one. This is the

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>design of technology that can use different frequencies and if

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>it's senses that there's a lot of congestion on one band,

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it can switch to another band, and thus you have

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of a dynamic system so that you don't run

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>into these truly congested situations that we're talking about where

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like a real time traffic management system for wireless data.

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's one thing, and that's really promising. There are

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>already some examples of that technology out there. Um, there's

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>also the idea of installing more fiber and high capacity

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>wire networks in high traffic areas. So this is kind

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of like the Google fiber approach, this idea of getting

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>more capacity that way. Um, it's a it's a big deal. Yeah. Yeah.

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>And by by doing that, you know, by improving that

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>overall system, you would be encouraging more users to make

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>use of those WiFi networks and you know, take more

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of the drag off of their cellular systems. Right. And

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and also with that added capacity, then when you have

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>those more advanced routers that can handle more connections, you

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>already have the conduit going to it that can handle

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the extra traffic. Yeah. Yeah, that thoroughfare. That report from

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the New America Foundation, by the way, also suggested that

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>only some of mobile device use occurs outside of WiFi

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>or at the very least WiFi capable areas, So so yeah,

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that could be a huge hand off. Yeah, okay, So

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>what's this I hear about the open garden approach? I

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>love this. So we've talked a lot about the Internet,

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>but the Internet of Things may not need necessarily to

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>tap into our existing Internet. The Internet is a network

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of networks. That's what it refers to the Internet. So

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that network of networks are all these different networks that

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>can communicate with one another. The idea of the open

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>garden is an ad hoc network not necessarily connected to

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. It could be self contained, it could be

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:19.439
<v Speaker 1>enormous and self contained. So here's an example. Let's say

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>all three of us have a device that allows us

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>to communicate with one another, and we're in the same

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 1>general area, so they are able to send signals to

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 1>each other directly through a radio frequency. And I sent

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a message out to the two of you saying something

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>like Okay, I'll meet you guys in the studio in

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes, and you both get it because we're all

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in range. Everything's fine. That doesn't ever touch the Internet.

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 1>So anything that's going on in the Internet, whether it's

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>congested or not, does not affect that particular message. Now,

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>imagine that we have a we're we're all in the

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>same building, but we're on different floors. The building's got

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>like five people in it, and we're all on these

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 1>devices and I and we're out of range of my

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>phone would reach maybe or my device would reach your devices.

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>So if I were to try and just send a

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>message and that was in a vacuum, it wouldn't get

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to you. But if like Kristen Conger and Ben Boland

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and Scott Benjamin are all in the same building and

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>they're closer to you, and also you know, they're at

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 1>a point between you and us, Yeah, and they all

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 1>have the same sort of device, it all becomes an

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>ad hoc network and a message I passed through to

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 1>the network will continue through their devices, eventually getting to

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>you guys. It's kind of like a ham radio operator

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.839
<v Speaker 1>using someone else as a repeater, kind of. Yeah. So

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 1>imagine that now you're talking about an Internet of things

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>where all these different devices can be part of this

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 1>ad hoc network, dropping in or out as necessary, and

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>being able to relay this information without ever touching the

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 1>Internet at all. So it's just a network that's existing

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 1>on its own that is similar to but separate from

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the Internet that we all know and love. So that's

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 1>an approach that would allow the Internet of Things who

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 1>continuously grow to a point where as long as there

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like crazy interference going on from the potentially millions

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>or billions of devices that would be dropping in and

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>out of this. Uh, it could help solve some of

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that congestion issue as well. So that's really exciting. And uh, yeah,

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:20.799
<v Speaker 1>the Open Garden is actually a particular project that is

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 1>looking into this and using this kind of approach to

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 1>try and create these ad hoc networks. So I'll have

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep an eye on it. But um, I think

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a really cool idea. Yeah. So anyway, the spectrum

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:35.760
<v Speaker 1>crunch may or may not really be the the cellular

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>apocalypse that we've been warned. I know that this was

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a big deal in the news over the last three

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>or four years, particularly like I remember first seeing a

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff about it back in two thousand eleven.

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>But because of the shift in the use of WiFi,

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>it really does seem like, at least in the very

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 1>short term, it's not as huge an issue, and we

0:36:57.040 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>do have top people working on this problem. There's going

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a global UH conference about wireless communication in

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and fifteen where some of these issues are

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:11.919
<v Speaker 1>going to be talked about by various world leaders and

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>UH to steal a word from the UK journalists boffins

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to discuss the issue, Joe does not approve of the

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:23.240
<v Speaker 1>term Boffin's. Uh, that seems like a word that should

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:28.479
<v Speaker 1>describe some Antarctic bird. So so the boffin is cousin

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to the puffin. Yes, okay, that's fair alright, So anyway

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that wraps up this discussion. I actually, I actually don't

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>care for the term boffins because I think that it

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:43.839
<v Speaker 1>downplays the the importance of scientists and researchers by making

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it a little too cartoonish. But I still can't help

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>myself at poke fun at everybody at any rate. If

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>you want me to poke fun at you, or more importantly,

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:54.359
<v Speaker 1>you have a topic about the future you would love

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>us to talk about, get in touch with us. You

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>can send us a message on Facebook by searching for

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>w thinking. We have fu Thinking as our handle both

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>at Twitter and Google Plus. We look forward to hearing

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:08.959
<v Speaker 1>from you, and you'll hear from us again really soon.

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>For more on this topic in the future of technology,

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll visit forward thinking dot Com, brought to you by Toyota.

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's Go Places,