WEBVTT - Why Trump’s Victory Is Musk’s ‘Tech-Bro Coup’

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.319
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Meren Talks Money, the podcast in which people

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:22.240
<v Speaker 2>who know the markets explain the markets.

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Maren Sumset Web.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 2>This week we discussed the return of Donald Trump to

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 2>the White House and what the strength of his victory

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 2>means for the American economy and just as important for

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 2>this program, possibly more important for this program, which is

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 2>second term, could mean for the UK, for Europe, and

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 2>for global markets. With me economists also and former advisor

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>to US President George W. Bush, Pipper Malngram and Helen Thomas,

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 2>founder and seer Blonde Money and Independent Service, which provides

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 2>commentary on politics, macroeconomics and finance. Regular listeners to the

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 2>podcast will note both of these brilliant people already. Hello, Helen, Hello, Popper, Hello, Hello.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 2>One of the reasons we've asked you both on beyond

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 2>your obvious brilliance, is that you both called this right

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 2>in a world which most people were calling it wrong.

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 2>You both predicted that Donald Trump would be POTUS forty seven.

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 2>You were both correct. Now, I don't want to dwell

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 2>on that. There's been an awful lot of broadcasting over

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the last day or so about how this happened, why

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 2>he won, why the Democrats didn't want, what went wrong

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 2>for them, what went right for him, etc.

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want folks on that.

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 2>I just want to say to both of you, well done,

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 2>and then move on to talking about what it actually means.

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 2>So Pepper, you're in Washington, you're right there, scene of

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 2>the crime. Tell us what your immediate expectations are for

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 2>the UK economy as a whole as a result of this.

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh okay, well, first, that was a big question.

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry that was a very big question. But it's

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>just getting us going.

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 4>No, I get it. The thing is, first we have

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 4>to understand what just happened. And in a nutshell I

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 4>would say, yes, Donald Trump won, but actually it's kind

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 4>of a it's a tech broke coup of the country.

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 4>So we now have the Silicon Valley tech bros are

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 4>really going to be running things, and that was orchestrated

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 4>by Robert F. Kennedy and Nicole Shanahan, who got zero

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 4>coverage during this election. But it was their youth vote

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 4>that swung the vote into Trump's camp. So once we understand, okay,

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 4>their goal is to come in and to bring all

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 4>of their high tech tools to the government databases and

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 4>extract the maximum information so they can reveal what is

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 4>really going on versus what is the perception of what

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 4>is going on. And they are all over getting to

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 4>innovation outcomes that would give us abundance. So we're going

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 4>to see a much faster move into, for example, new

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 4>forms of clean green energy, new ways of managing the

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 4>budget and the deficit, with the knowledge that AI analysis

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 4>brings with it. That's where we start. Now what does

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 4>it mean for the UK? Well, it didn't help.

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, hang on, hang up, Pep, But let me take

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 2>you back one little bit, because that was really interesting.

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.399
<v Speaker 2>So what you're saying here is we haven't really got

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 2>a Trump presidency. We've got a Musk presidency.

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 4>We've got a Trump Musk presidency, and between the two

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 4>of them, Musk is going to be much more important

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 4>and influential on the actual outcomes.

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 2>So that sounds from an economic point of view, incredibly positive.

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 2>So we bring the tech bros in, you get that

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 2>wave of innovation, you get I mean we're being very

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 2>optimistic here, you get massive efficiency drive inside government. So

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe you end up with the smaller state, possibly not

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 2>in terms of services, but certainly as a percentage of GDP,

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 2>and that leads you, as it should, to very good

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 2>economic growth.

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 4>Indeed, and add to that, there's a really important element

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 4>of this, which is Trump wants to move the United

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 4>States away from income tax and back to what we

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 4>used to have in the old days, which was revenue

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 4>generated by tariffs and now value added tax. Now, the

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 4>thing that's always prevented the US from having a VAT

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 4>is that every single state argued about how much of

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 4>it should go to them. But now with the sweep

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 4>that we have, it's going to be easier to get

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:25.119
<v Speaker 4>a negotiated outcome of what's the split between federal and state.

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 4>And so the market needs to think, what does America

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 4>look like if it has less reliance on income tax

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 4>and more reliance on a combination of tariffs and VAT.

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, fascinating, Helen.

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Does that description of what's happened and where we are

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 2>now resonate with you?

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 5>It does, because I certainly agree on the optimism here

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 5>on the macroeconomics about you know, higher growth and probably

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 5>higher inflation. But the two of those going hand in

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 5>hand are no bad thing. I think the key element

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 5>here on this, As you say, we don't want to

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 5>dwell on of what's gone before. But the important message

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 5>to take is that there is a mandate. There is

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 5>a mandate. Now we don't have all the results in,

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 5>but obviously there has been a significant rise in the

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 5>Republican vote across all different kinds of demographics, and that

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 5>is significant because with the mandate you can start to

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 5>do some of the revolutionary things you just heard Pipper

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 5>talking about. This is so important when you take it

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 5>in the context of how much bigger the state has

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 5>become since COVID everywhere you know, everyone has incurred these

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 5>massive amounts of debt. So you know, what are you

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:35.679
<v Speaker 5>going to do about that? When interest rates are higher

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 5>and the interest you're paying on that debt is eating away?

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 3>What the state can do? What should the state do?

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 5>You know, we're having these really big questions that we

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 5>had maybe thirty forty years ago that we thought had

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 5>been solved, and now they're back. But where I'm optimistic

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 5>for America as a result of this election, and look,

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 5>I'm not. I don't have It doesn't matter what I

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 5>think in terms of my particular politics. It's about the

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 5>cold hard facts of what can be done. You have

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 5>an administration now that he's going to be able to

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 5>approach the economy in a more revolutionary way, that's for sure, okay.

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 2>And that revolution will involve this technological invasion of government,

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 2>and it will involve and that the tariffs are interesting.

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 2>You both talk as though being able to put tariffs

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 2>on important goods is a positive rather than a negative

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 2>for America.

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't fit with global economic theory.

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 4>No, no, no, it's not that it's a positive. It's

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 4>just a fact that that is where Trump is going

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 4>to go. And he sees tariffs as a negotiating tool,

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 4>so you know, hit China with big tariffs, but if

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 4>they agree to comply on other subjects, then he can

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 4>always lift those And then they start to be a

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 4>combination of not only a useful negotiating tool, but and

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 4>they generate revenue. So I'm not saying, you know, tariffs

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 4>and keep them in place. These will be used in

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 4>a fluid method. And no, they're not great. Jeff Bezo

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 4>sold a ton of his stock right before the election

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 4>because you can see Amazon's going to get whacked by

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 4>these tariffs, right. It's not great from a trade point

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 4>of view. But it is where this president is, and

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 4>it does matter if your revenue sources shift from income

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 4>tax to more in the tariff camp. So I'm just

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 4>saying this is happening, and not necessarily that it's good.

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 4>It's just occurring.

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 5>Also the case with tariffs, you know, they are a

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 5>multi round game, so you know, in one round you

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 5>could really benefit. And as Pip is saying, there, then

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 5>it you know, the game keeps going and maybe it's shifts.

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 5>And also you know there's some elements with the US

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 5>where you know, perhaps if there is more bringing more

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 5>manufacturing home, or there is more innovation done domestically, then

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 5>it's one of those you know, this beg of our

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 5>neighbor idea, But if you're the front runner, then you

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 5>can you can gain some of the advantages. I mean,

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 5>I would just I would broadly say that although yes,

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 5>economic theory generally would suggest tariffs a battle round and

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 5>we're all end up as net losers, some people will

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 5>lose more than others, and the strength and the muscles

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 5>of the US economy and someone who's prepared to do

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 5>deals could well still see America be more of a

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 5>benefiting from that than others.

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 4>Okay, absolutely, I'd throw into that as well. We're in

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 4>a very different world now where the US is able

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 4>to manufacture competitively again, and China has lost its edge.

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 4>It is no longer the cheapest and highest quality place

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 4>to produce things. Mexico has become that location, and so

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 4>the corridor between Mexico and the US that is the

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 4>most important supply chain in the world. Now. It's funny

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 4>because everybody talks about the immigration from Mexico being such

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 4>a big problem, but nobody mentions all the people getting

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 4>in private jets flying down to Mexico to complete what

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 4>is the most sophisticated, highest quality, the most deeply integrated

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 4>supply chain into US manufacturing. And Trump has been crystal

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 4>clear about providing all kinds of government incentives for manufacturing

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 4>to happen inside the US. So then the issue of

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 4>tariffs is very different than it was ten years ago

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 4>when the US had given away all of its manufacturing

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 4>to outsourcing.

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you and I've talked about that on this

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>podcast before. Bit brand.

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Over the years, it's been a relatively fast shift to

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 2>the US fully revamping its industrial base.

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, I was involved in manufacturing drones in

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 4>the UK roughly ten years ago, and you know, everybody

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 4>thought I was crazy, because you know, why would you

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 4>even think about competing with the Chinese? And yet what

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 4>I learned is that you can manufacture in the UK

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 4>because the labor component of modern high tech goods is

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 4>ever smaller all the time, So you're not really trying

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 4>to work out the labor piece, you're trying to work

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 4>out the intellectual property piece. And also, you know, there's

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 4>an incentive to make things in the West. In a

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 4>world where you're, let's say, not at war with China,

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 4>but you're in a really hostile confrontation with China, you

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 4>don't want to be reliant on stuff that's made there.

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 4>And so suddenly the whole game shifted towards actually, we

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 4>can manufacture again, and we are in the West.

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting you both were very clear on your belief

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 2>that Trump was going to win this, and a lot

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 2>of people believe that the Trump trade was to a

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:33.199
<v Speaker 2>degree in the price. But as the results became clear yesterday,

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 2>markets moved very dramatically. So equity market moved very sharply.

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Bond markets also moved very sharply. Is this temporary or

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 2>do you think we're about to see. Let's take equities

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 2>first to market that we've been talking about for a while.

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 2>It's much too expensive on every single historical measure, much

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 2>too concentrated, and certainly on this podcast incorrectly we've been

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 2>saying people must diversify away from America's sharpers. Are they're

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 2>going to be in a whole pile of trouble because

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 2>they're buying at the top of the market.

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Where does it go from here?

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, I would jump in and say again this you

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 5>talk about the historical valuations, but the there is a

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 5>historical moment here where we're having We've had the technological revolution.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 5>You're hearing from Pipper about how this is kind of

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 5>going into a it's changing.

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 3>Gears now under the under the new administration.

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 5>So I think you can look once more at evaluations

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 5>getting even more extended. To be honest with you, at

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 5>least in the short term. I mean, I could you

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 5>talk about it being in the price but not. I mean, no,

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 5>it couldn't. It can't ever really be because there was

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 5>so much other information being flown around there. I mean,

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:39.839
<v Speaker 5>I'm surprised at how people thought it was going to

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 5>be close. We never thought that it would be particularly close,

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 5>particularly in the electoral college results. But I think you

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 5>know markets that they never go fully all in on something.

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.119
<v Speaker 5>Apart from that guy on the polymarket trades, the French trades,

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 5>he loved it, but you know that, I think. And also,

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 5>of course you had to see what was going to happen,

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:00.719
<v Speaker 5>and we still don't exactly know about the House representatives,

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 5>but you know, you had to see the whole sweep

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 5>happen and truly believe in it. So I think there's

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 5>an element of it wasn't all in the price because

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 5>it couldn't be. Some people didn't agree with it, some

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 5>people use different data, and people are only just really

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 5>coming to terms with what it actually means.

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:19.719
<v Speaker 2>Does this give you a newfound confidence in the US

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 2>equity market and so in any particular areas.

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that people have not understood what's coming.

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 4>So for example, Trump was crystal clear that he is

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 4>giving Kennedy the mandate to go after pharma and big

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 4>food and he will do that aggressively. So there needs

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 4>to be a repricing in that sector because people haven't

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 4>understand what a big deal that is going to be.

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 4>At the same time, he immediately said, but Bobby gets that,

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 4>but I get to drill, baby, drill right. I'm going

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 4>after the liquid gold, and so that gets repriised because

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 4>we have a presidential commitment the oil sector. I think

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 4>people haven't understood that the tech bros Are actually in

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 4>charge now and therefore, I mean, yesterday the price of

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 4>everything Elon Musk is involved with went up, and that

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 4>makes sense because he's now on the inside of government effectively.

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 4>So I think it's not just up or down, it's

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 4>also within the market what things are overpriced and underpriced.

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 4>I would say this too. This is a moment where

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 4>artificial intelligence and the tools and the capabilities that it

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 4>brings are now going to be unleashed on government efficiency,

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 4>and therefore we're going to see some dramatic changes in

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 4>government policy. People don't understand what those changes are going

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.079
<v Speaker 4>to be. That's a big thing. And a second factor

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 4>is the Chevron decision which the Supreme Court gave us

0:13:55.640 --> 0:14:01.119
<v Speaker 4>before the election, which basically said, whatever Congress passes legislation,

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 4>it then is up to the agencies to interpret what

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 4>the heck does it actually mean. Well, that administrative guidance,

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 4>which has been central to the valuation of companies, is

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 4>no longer permissible. The Supreme Court has said, you cannot

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 4>interpret anymore. You have to go back to Congress and

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 4>ask them what did you mean? And of course Congress

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 4>is not going to reopen everything to answer administrative type questions,

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 4>so there's going to be this blockage impasse as the

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 4>private sector is like, wait, wait, what is the rule? Right?

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 4>What do we actually do? What does this legislation mean?

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 4>And I'm sure there are valuation changes that will arise

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 4>from this new phenomena that people haven't thought through.

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but across the board, you now have what sounds

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 2>like the perfect combo, which is going to be AI

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 2>plus very cheap energy.

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, oh yeah.

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 2>And this is one of the things that makes America special,

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 2>certainly makes it special at the moment, is not just

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 2>cheap energy, but a doubling down on cheap energy to

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 2>drive to make it cheaper and cheaper. Of course, we

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 2>think exactly the opposite in the in the UK, and

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 2>we can come to that later. But you know, that

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 2>combo sounds like it might be rather interesting.

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 4>I think this is really an incredible moment in American history,

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 4>again not because of Trump, but because of the door

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 4>being open to technology. Being brought to bear on a

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 4>very rickety, old fashioned, you know, non modernized architecture of government.

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 4>If we can make all that more efficient, there are

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 4>going to be incredible benefits. And this sort of attitude

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 4>to the private sector of telling the American public go build,

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 4>go build, go build anything that you think is going

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 4>to work, and government's going to support that. It's going

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 4>to be friendly to entrepreneurs, it's you know, going to

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 4>be friendly to reshoring on shoring. Yeah, all that has

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 4>to be reflected. And let me add one more thing. Also,

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 4>we have a president who said I will cut a

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 4>deal with the Russians on Ukraine and the war will end,

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 4>and just before the election said again, the US doesn't

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 4>have a national security interest in Taiwan, so let's cut

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 4>a deal with the Chinese over Taiwan. Well, all of

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 4>a sudden, and we've already had these announcements, which I

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 4>keep wondering are they actually are accurate. And much as

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 4>people might really dislike Trump, for no doubt many good reasons,

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 4>this piece is probably the most valuable. If we end

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 4>up in a peace dividend environment, markets are going to

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 4>go up, no two ways about it.

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, interesting, So let's go back a little bit to Helen.

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 2>You were speaking about inflation earlier, about how you get

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.239
<v Speaker 2>growth like this, you will also get inflation.

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Does this idea of.

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 2>A productivity boom alongside cheap energy, does that allay your

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 2>fears in any way?

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, I was going to say yes.

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 5>My note of caution will be of course the long

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 5>end of the US bond market, because we're going to

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 5>see a steeper yield curve. That's what you get in

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 5>a reflationary environment. There is an awful lot I talked

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 5>about debt. There's going to be even more debt.

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 3>That is.

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 5>That is the way that it goes when you know

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 5>when you're in this environment. But what's quite interesting, and

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 5>this is why the mandate element is interesting. Of what

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 5>I was saying about about Trump is that if you've

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 5>got a mandate to pursue productive growth, if you can

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 5>credibly grow the productive capacity of your economy, you can

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 5>deal with that debt because you can service it and

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:32.479
<v Speaker 5>you can grow it and everyone can share in that.

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 3>This is if you like.

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 5>This may raise a little eyebrow from listeners in the UK,

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 5>but you know, this is sort of like the Trust budget,

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 5>but with a mandate, and very importantly, with the dollar

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 5>being the world's reserve currency, I mean, this is the thing. Right,

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 5>people have to hold dollars, people will have to hold

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 5>US treasuries. You know, they do have this ability to

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 5>do it. So I think that is the real key

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 5>to this. But having said having said that, the long

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 5>end of the US bond market, it is a risk

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 5>because with all of that debt issuance, if there is

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 5>any sort of dip in this picture that we're both

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 5>painting I think of a higher growth future, it's difficult

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 5>to make a mistake because once you untether the long

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 5>end of the bond market, then you have serious, big problems,

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 5>and it won't just be a problem for America, be

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 5>a problem for everybody.

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 4>Actually, Helen, let me follow up on that, because I

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 4>think you're right what's happening as America is going to

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 4>attempt to grow its way out of its current debt problem.

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:36.880
<v Speaker 4>But people think that means government stimulus. They don't understand

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 4>it can mean weightlifting. And what's happening is the leadership

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 4>is saying we're now going to lift weights. We're going

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 4>to get stronger by actually building stuff. Now, will that

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.360
<v Speaker 4>involve some stimulus in some way, no doubt, but that's

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 4>not the reason why this will happen. And when interest

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 4>rates go up, you know, I always say, it's it's like,

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, when interest rates are zero and free money

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 4>is being given away, it's like you got to eat

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 4>donuts for free for you know, that whole period, and

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 4>everybody kind of gained weight. Then interest rates start to

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 4>go up, and they're basically being told you've got to

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 4>get on the running machine. And nobody likes it, but

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 4>it makes them healthier. And the reality is the US

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 4>has adjusted to higher interest rates extremely well, and markets

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 4>have invested less in unicorns and more in what i'd

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 4>call workhorses, companies that have genuine, unimpaired cash flows, that

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 4>actually have customers that really make money. And is that

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 4>healthier that we are spending less on the possibility of

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 4>a maybe of some twenty two year old with an idea,

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 4>and more on a business that actually is working. Yes,

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 4>So people are afraid of higher interest rates, but the

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 4>US has a history of being able to manage with

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 4>extremely high interest rates at times. So should we be

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 4>afraid if interest rates are going to go up a bit?

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 4>On all this, the answer is not. If we learn

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 4>to run on the running machine better and we will

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 4>lift those weights better, you will end up stronger.

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>Peppa, What do you think the main risks on here? Oh?

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 6>Well, yeah, I don't want to mean it's into negative territory,

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 6>but there has to be some pretty big risks of

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 6>this optimistic view.

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 4>Well yeah, I mean, of course, we still have a

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 4>nation and a world that cannot comprehend what has just happened,

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 4>and so there's a danger that we end up not

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 4>in a civil war in the streets, but an uncivil

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 4>war in terms of law fair and the parties, you know,

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 4>the two sides of politics attacking each other. And I

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 4>do think that fight is very real, but I would

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 4>characterize it as we're no longer in a battle between

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 4>the left and the right in America. We're in a

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 4>battle between the old establishment and the new establishment and

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 4>establishment which is you know, the tech guys but also

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 4>the younger people in government circles. They want innovation and change,

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 4>and the old guard is like, we don't want any changes.

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 4>We got to protect the bureaucracy at all costs because

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 4>that's what I built and that's what's protecting me. So

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 4>that fight is very real. That's a war zone. Now,

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 4>how much impact will it have on markets is a

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 4>different question. I think it's one of those things where

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 4>it's like an invisible war until some event happens and

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 4>then suddenly you get visibility of it. It frightens you,

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 4>markets go wobbly for a minute and then and then

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 4>it goes away. So it's a volatility creator rather than

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 4>a directional outcome creator.

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I would, I would pick up on that because

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 5>I've talked there about you know, many times about this mandate.

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 5>But the fascinating element of the US political system is,

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, it's effectively it is two parties.

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean there are independent candidates.

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure Pip is going to say something about, you know,

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 5>RFK with boring from the race. I mean, this is

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 5>this is the If you want a trend that we

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 5>have seen throughout electorates across the world, it has been

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 5>a fragmentation where they don't feel that old establishment Pipper's

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 5>talking about is working for them. Now, depending on your

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 5>political system, you could get a whole new party turn up.

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 5>And there's a whole new party is just emerged in

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 5>Germany in January called BSW, who are currently polling at

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 5>eight percent, and you know they are it's a left

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 5>wing part. Well, it's so far left that there's a

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 5>question of whether it joins back up with the right.

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 5>But interestingly, you know that was founded by an academic

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 5>who was saying that the left is no longer talking

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 5>about working class people and it's obsessed by woke issues

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 5>and it needs to get back to you know what matters.

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 5>And well, as we're talking, of course, the German government

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 5>has collapsed and we're headed for staff elections.

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 3>So the interesting part, the fascinating part for me.

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 5>Actually coming back to the sort of positive US story,

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:00.919
<v Speaker 5>is that their slightly more rigid system has kind of

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 5>flexed to incorporate some of this and is you can

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 5>still govern in it.

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look at France, look at Germany.

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 5>I mean even in the UK where you know, with

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 5>God's huge majority for a new government, they only won

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 5>with thirty four percent of the vote, and you know

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 5>there's all approval ratings are.

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Collapsing for the Prime minister. The budget had an impact

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 3>on the bond market. It's again I.

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 5>Actually think there's there's a there's a political risk premium

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 5>that's rising everywhere that Pip has touched on there and

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 5>but actually in the US, I think that it sort

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 5>of solved a.

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Lot of the issues with this election. Amazingly to say.

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 4>Amazingly, I agree with that, and it reminds me to

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 4>throw into this mix. You ask about the risks, I'll

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.199
<v Speaker 4>tell you one that I think is really important, but

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 4>it's going to sound a little out there, and it

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 4>is that Trump said during the campaign that he was

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 4>going to create a Presidential Commission on Presidential Assassinations, and

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 4>he would declassify all of the JFK assassination papers, all

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 4>the RFK so it's Robert Kennedy's father papers, plus open

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 4>up the investigation into the now two assassination attempts on

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 4>President Trump, which many people think have not been properly examined,

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 4>And so Kennedy will be in charge of that. Now

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 4>that is like, that is like opening up a long

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 4>festering wound in the psyche of the American public. And

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of things I think are going to get

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 4>revealed that are going to force force us all to

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 4>question trust in government. How do we improve trust in government?

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 4>Who did what? Like there's a reason why Trump had

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 4>said he would declassify them in his first term, but

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 4>he didn't and now partly because he's so mad at

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 4>being shot at a couple of times. He literally he's like,

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm releasing all.

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Of it, Okay. So I like the idea that there

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>was a reason he didn't in his first term. Something

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>changed his.

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 4>Mind, something changed his mind. And we're getting more information

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 4>about how he was advised not to release them because

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 4>it would be so damaging to the government And You're like,

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 4>what the heck is in there? So I don't know,

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 4>but I think whatever that is, that is going to

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 4>be a bit of an earthquake in Okay, America's nazing.

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 2>The range of information you get on this podcast is

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 2>pretty wide. Got to say, right, I need to move

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 2>to as promised to our listeners, onto international markets and

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 2>onto the UK.

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Helen, what does all this mean for us?

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:43.199
<v Speaker 5>Well, of course, the thing about the UK is we

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 5>have this sort of work between the US and Europe,

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 5>so you know, sometimes that's benefit I think it will

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 5>benefit us to a degree. Here you're hearing a big

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 5>growth and reflation story which should have some of a

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 5>boost to go onto the UK economy.

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 3>But the problem is the debt of problem is the.

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 5>Huge debt pile, and frankly, I think in the time

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 5>since well I don't know when this is going to

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 5>go out, Meren, but basically the fiscal headroom that Rachel

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 5>Reeves built her budget around has pretty much been wiped

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 5>out already by the move in guilds. And I was

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 5>actually at the Treasury Select Committee yesterday when she was

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 5>being quizzed, and she was asked, okay, so you know,

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 5>given what's happened in the US, and you know, they

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 5>looked at you know, growth forecasts are being changed immediately

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 5>around the world, what do you think it means for Britain?

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 5>And Rachel Reeves just said it's too early to tell,

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 5>and I thought, well, I mean, politicians say all things,

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 5>but it's a little bit disingenuous because you know that

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 5>you're just hearing on this podcast now between all of us,

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 5>and we don't have a treasury of thousands of civil servants, you,

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:52.199
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure can make some decent thoughts and predictions on

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 5>what it is going to mean for the UK economy.

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 3>And I just think it's going to.

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 5>Get really really hard, really hard for us with this

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 5>debt burden, and without growth is not going to be

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 5>productive enough and when the Chancellor has said I don't

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 5>want to come back.

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 3>I never want to come back again and.

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 5>Do a budget like this, that is I mean that

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 5>would have been hostage to fortune anyway. But with this

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 5>election in the US, I think that's become a lot

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 5>more difficult.

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we can be pretty sure that she's going

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 2>to come back with another one of her horrible budgets,

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 2>and we can also be pretty sure that for now,

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 2>at least, we're not going to be following any of

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the things that we've been talking about in the US,

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 2>any of the you know, nice productivity and growth enhancing policies.

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>They're not coming to the UK in a hurry.

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 3>It could be a change.

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 5>I mean, Lord O'Neill, Jim O'Neill, who's been you know,

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 5>talking to the government about this and everyone i'm sure

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 5>will know him as the mister Bricks originally, but I mean,

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.360
<v Speaker 5>you know he's been talking about this, you know, productive growth.

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 5>You know that it would be better perhaps to improve

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 5>childcare and spend money on childcare that could then get

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 5>you know, parents back to work, and that would improve

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 5>productive capacity economy better than what may or may not

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 5>need to be done.

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 3>In hospitals and schools.

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 5>But at the end of the day, I'm sure a

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.360
<v Speaker 5>lot of voters, well I'm sure everybody would like all

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 5>of those things to happen and not have to be

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 5>making these choices. And that is the difficulty that the

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:14.239
<v Speaker 5>you know, the Britain finds itself in.

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 2>And of course what we really need to do is

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 2>exactly what Trump has just suggested. We need to build, build, build,

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 2>but we're not very good at that.

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not really our thing.

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 5>Well, the labor government are, you know, they're doing a

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 5>lot on planning reform. We've yet to see exactly what

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 5>it is. I mean, I think I think part of

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 5>the issue here is that the government it's a bit unfair,

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 5>but it feels a bit slow, you know.

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 3>It feels that then we knew that we were going

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 3>to do planning.

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 5>Rachel Reeves gave a Maze lecture in March this year

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 5>saying it's all about planning to improve the economy. But

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 5>you know, here we are in November. We haven't got

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 5>anything yet, and you know, I get it.

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 2>It is difficult, but she has It's also had plenty

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 2>of time that either been in opposition a while.

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>There's been time to think about this stuff.

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 3>It's not trying to be even handed. Merin, I was

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 3>trying to be even there.

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Don't bother, Helen, just tell us what you think.

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 3>I think it's yeah, I think it's good to be

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 3>extremely difficult.

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 5>Oh so, but sorry, I started by saying that, you know,

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 5>the UK, it's sort of you like, there's a high

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 5>beata debt play onto what the US is doing without

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 5>the growth. But then you come to Europe with its

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 5>completely dysfunctional governments that we've just been talking about, big

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 5>debt piles, in deflation, disinflationary things happening in Europe, and

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 5>they've gotten the pid, have no chance of growth or

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 5>chance of their government's passing anything. So perhaps it's the

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 5>sort of least ugly world and in some respects the

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 5>UK has some advantage over Europe.

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, thank you for that optimistic take, Helen.

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 4>So well, yeah, mine's not going to be as optimistic.

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 4>So well, first of all, you know, things are off

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 4>to a bad start because Donald Trump and his team

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 4>believe the cure. Starmer and the Labor Party sent a

0:29:56.080 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 4>bunch of volunteers over to help Kamala Harri in the election,

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 4>and the idea that Britain, that America's closest defense ally

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 4>would come over to so visibly be supporting, you know,

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 4>domestic political outcomes inside America. This was like not a

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 4>good start. And so I think you're going to hear that.

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 4>I think Trump is going to cold shoulder Britain as

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 4>long as Labor is in charge, just because of that.

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 4>Just they're just offended right by that. But also, you know,

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 4>Britain is still everybody's still agonizing one way or another

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 4>over Brexit. And you know, I was in the UK

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 4>during that period. I was an advisor to the Department

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 4>of Trade and Industry on their board, so I had

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 4>a front row seat on how that all went. And

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 4>the thing is, the British keep being stuck in this

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 4>mentality of we're a small nation and we don't have

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 4>much influence in the world. And I'm like, guys, you're not.

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 4>You're a big nation with huge influence in the world.

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 4>And in the past you mainly did business with the

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 4>EU just because it was easier under the EU relationship.

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 4>But the fact is you have a long history of

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 4>trading with the entire world. And I was literally on

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 4>and I still am on the King's Enterprise Awards judging panel.

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 4>So we look at a whole bunch of businesses across

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 4>the UK and I saw it, like two years before Brexit,

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 4>all those businesses were clocking that the whole relationship with

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 4>the EU might change, and they started selling to China,

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 4>to Japan, to the United States, to Latin America, to Africa.

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 4>And I'm like, listen, the British are perfectly capable of

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 4>figuring out where the profits are and they can sell internationally,

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 4>not just to Europe. We don't, you know, we live

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 4>in a world of you know, the Internet exists. So

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 4>this idea of proximity to Europe was the key to

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 4>success doesn't wash right. China built a massive economy with

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 4>no proximity to anybody. So I do think there's a

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 4>lack of imagination, a lack of belief. And you know,

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 4>having lived there for most of my adult life, you know,

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 4>I love Britain. I love Britain all of it, you know,

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 4>And I'm not a typical Londoner. That's like those people

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 4>in the countryside have no idea what they're talking about.

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 4>I think there's wisdoms spread throughout the country. But I

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 4>also think it is true that Britain's greatest export is pessimism.

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, well, on that note, our greatest export maybe

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 2>pessimism is true. We're very good at that, and particularly

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 2>on this podcast, by the way Marin talks money, really

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 2>we excel in pessimism. But one thing we've been optimistic

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 2>about for AGES is being the UK stock market. We said, look,

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 2>it's cheap, it's grotesquely undervalued. We have great companies, there's

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 2>no reason for us to trade at this discount to

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 2>the US and to other global stock markets, and so

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 2>we've been very positive. But John and I looking at

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 2>what's happening in the US, and I were like, oh,

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of hard to be positive in the UK

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 2>when you see what is possible elsewhere economically at least.

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 2>So the question, then, I guess, is, does what we

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 2>think might happen in the US, what you do think

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 2>might happen in the US, doesn't make you less likely

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 2>to want to invest in the UK than you might

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 2>have been before.

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's an element of truth to that. But here's

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.479
<v Speaker 4>the thing is that of all nations in the world,

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 4>the one that could most closely align itself with the

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 4>uptick in the US economy is Britain. And look we

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 4>see in the UK tech sector right it's like literally

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 4>double Germany's tech sector three times larger than France. The

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 4>UK venture capital market is still a multiple of what

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 4>happens in continental Europe. So the question is what can

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 4>be done to get those startups to scale. And part

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 4>of the answer is you're seeing already alignment between British

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 4>high tech startups and the American market, and those are

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 4>worth betting on because they are clocking that they want

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 4>to be where the growth is. But they're still British.

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 4>So it's about the alliances. And similarly, if you look

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 4>at Europe, as Helen quite rightly said, do you look

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:09.800
<v Speaker 4>at the Mario Draggy report that just came out on Europe,

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 4>you know where the summary was forty pages. I still

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 4>haven't got through the whole summary, but basically what the

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 4>conclusion is is Europe is in such terrible shape. Something's

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 4>got to change. And the thing that needs to change

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 4>is industrial policy. Government is going to decide and tell

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 4>us all where asset allocations are going to be made,

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 4>so we will pick the winners. And I'm like, ah,

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 4>we have a long history of knowing that governments don't

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:37.720
<v Speaker 4>do this very well. So if Europe is going into

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:41.720
<v Speaker 4>old fashioned communists central planning almost not quite sorry, that'll

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 4>provoke a lot of people. I don't mean to say

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:44.879
<v Speaker 4>that in aggressive way.

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you meant it.

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 4>If you're going there, then then Britain has got to

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 4>look elsewhere for growth. And I think it's going to

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 4>be easy for the British to do business with the Yanks.

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 2>And I suppose the other thing says that one thing

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 2>that the UK would benefit from and the old world

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 2>would benefit from, if you're correct about Trump and Gea politics,

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 2>that we might see this peace evidend. I mean, we've

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 2>been talking for a long time, Pepper about World War

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 2>three and about how it's already begun and it's just

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 2>a silent war as opposed to a very obvious wole.

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 2>And I think what you're suggesting is that we might

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 2>be beginning as a world under this phrasing to wrote

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:23.760
<v Speaker 2>back from.

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 4>That, Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. That's why you

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 4>know I wrote an article I think it was October

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty one saying we are already in World War three,

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:38.479
<v Speaker 4>we just don't recognize it. And now just as people

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 4>are like, oh my god, we're in World War three,

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, actually we were not. And it's starting to

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 4>end right, But they're catching up with what's already occurred

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 4>and not seeing that actually, we're all the superpowers are aligning.

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 4>They're all saying, let's come to the negotiating table and

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 4>cut a deal. She is saying that, Putin is saying that.

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 4>It's a Lensky is saying that. And the only people

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 4>who weren't coming to the table was the United States

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 4>because frankly, the lights were on in the White House,

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 4>but nobody was home. There was nobody to talk to.

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 4>You couldn't talk to Biden because he's not basically one

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 4>hundred percent, and you couldn't talk to Harris because she

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 4>was out campaigning. By the way, that's why Jake Sullivan

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 4>was in Beijing and Xijiping met with him personally, and

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 4>you're like, wait, what the heck is the leader of

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 4>China doing meeting with a staff person, And the answer is,

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 4>there's nobody else to talk to about what is the

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:32.839
<v Speaker 4>deal we're going to strike so that we can all

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 4>stop wasting our time and energy on warring and get

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 4>back to the real issue, which is the race for

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 4>the technological future, and that is the real competition between

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:49.320
<v Speaker 4>especially the US and China. And that is the race

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 4>that you know, whoever wins that gets to the abundance

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 4>that changes the future. So dramatic.

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, now on the tech futua, the one thing that

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 2>everybody's seem to think as a dead search to be

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the big winner out of the Trump regime is bitcoin.

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 2>New high off the new high after new high.

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 1>This is the Trump trade.

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 2>And I'm assuming that you both think that there will

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:17.760
<v Speaker 2>be massive deregulation around this in an entirely different environment

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 2>for cryptocurrencies, Helen, Does that make bitcoin to buy for you?

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I think so.

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 5>I mean i've I think last time was on your show, Mary,

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 5>and I think is it the gold versus bitcoin question?

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 3>I think bitcoin, funnily.

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 5>Enough, I think I picked it then for safe haven purposes.

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 5>I think you do it kind of amusingly, so now

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:35.919
<v Speaker 5>you know now to pick it for sort of risk

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 5>positive purposes. I mean, look, it's sort of almost inexorable really,

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 5>given the launch of the you know, the ETFs on bitcoin,

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 5>the way that trad FI is you know, interacting with it.

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, I mean, it's it's just gonna accelerate this

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 5>next stage of of its progress. But hey, I still

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 5>don't fully understand it. I'm pepper Mano far more than me.

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.839
<v Speaker 2>All right, Pepper, is this under POTUS forty seven? Do

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 2>we have a new age for in particular for a bitcoin.

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 3>We do?

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:06.959
<v Speaker 4>And the reason why is because if you if here's

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 4>what they're gonna do, They're gonna say bitcoin and crypto

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:12.879
<v Speaker 4>will be legal, but you have to declare it and

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 4>you have to have it in your own name. You

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:16.839
<v Speaker 4>can't hold it anonymously, and a whole bunch of those

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 4>guys are.

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 5>Gonna go over.

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:19.800
<v Speaker 4>But the whole point was to try to escape the

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 4>reach of US law. And I'm like, babe, you cannot

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 4>escape the reach of you know, US law. So but

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 4>what you can do is by making that legal, you

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 4>bring the whole dark economy that it has embedded in

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 4>it into the light and it makes it taxable. So

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 4>it's the same idea as legalizing marijuana. It's not that

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 4>your morals have changed, it's just that you're like, wow,

0:38:40.200 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 4>we can tax it if it's legal, and that will

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:44.839
<v Speaker 4>generate a lot of revenue at a time when there's

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:49.240
<v Speaker 4>a budget problem, there's a spending problem. Plus, it's seen

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 4>by some of the Republicans as a kind of modern

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 4>substitute for a gold anchor. In other words, if you're

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 4>going to have a president who really doesn't care about spending,

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:01.439
<v Speaker 4>because after all, he's a property guy, he's like, let's

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 4>do that, right, that's great. If that's your approach, you

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 4>need some kind of anchor to hold on to. That's

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 4>a reference point that starts to tell you, uh, you're

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 4>going a bit overboard. Guys. Bitcoin and crypto can be that,

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 4>especially bitcoin, So I think that's how they view it's

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 4>And Plus, by the way, the US has probably become,

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 4>if not the largest holder of bitcoin, certainly one of

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 4>the largest holders through confiscation. Well, if you confiscate enough

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:30.720
<v Speaker 4>of this, if you're the Department Justice and you're sitting

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 4>on four billion dollars worth of bitcoin, you're like, that's

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 4>our budget for like one hundred years. Why don't we

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 4>find a way to be able to actually use that?

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 4>And I think these are the motivations.

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Last question, Have both of you signed up to truth

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 2>socials so you can see what Trump's thinking.

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 4>I did it the day he launched it. For that reason.

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 4>And again I've not been at all like in the

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 4>Trump camp for a bunch of reasons. But look, in

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 4>politics you have to have visible and if this is

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 4>can I just say real quickly, it's not just that

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:07.839
<v Speaker 4>he launched it. It's that he launched an entirely new

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:11.839
<v Speaker 4>way of fundraising for politics, and the valuation of that

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 4>platform and the capacity to spread his message. This should

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 4>cause everyone else in politics to try to replicate that thing.

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 4>But instead they don't see it that way. They just

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 4>see it as you know, I don't know, they don't

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 4>understand that technology platforms when in politics, not just messages.

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so you signed up Peppa and Helen, you're about

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:36.280
<v Speaker 2>to well yeah.

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 3>But I'm going to Obviously we have to.

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:40.719
<v Speaker 2>We have to and look at much value will be

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:42.280
<v Speaker 2>adding for Envie as well.

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 4>I tell you one thing with this racing towards innovation

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:51.040
<v Speaker 4>at a much faster pace, because the tech community now

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 4>runs the White House will run the White House, we

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:57.280
<v Speaker 4>have to understand what are the implications so commodities, for example,

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 4>because of supercomputing and AI and we've just seen the

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:08.359
<v Speaker 4>Nobel Prize awarded to Google founders of for Alpha folds well,

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 4>that same thing is happening in materials. So if you're

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 4>a guy who plays in copper and iron ore and

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:18.760
<v Speaker 4>all that stuff, the fact is we're able to build

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:22.240
<v Speaker 4>that stuff adam by Adam by adam, to produce entirely

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 4>new materials that the world has never known. We have

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:29.240
<v Speaker 4>three hundred and eighty thousand new materials already produced by Google,

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:33.759
<v Speaker 4>Sycamore supercomputer, and two point two million crystals. I don't

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:37.280
<v Speaker 4>think the market has even begun to understand what can

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 4>we build with that stuff that was in the past

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 4>impossible and will make those traditional commodities no longer relevant.

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:48.239
<v Speaker 2>Brilliant Peppa Helen, thank you so much for making this

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 2>awesome rather exciting.

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate that. We appreciate that.

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I think this is probably the only podcast it has

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 2>managed to make the whole thing sound really very interesting,

0:41:56.760 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 2>exciting and optimistic. Thanks for listening to this week's Maren

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Talks Money. If you like us, show, rate, review, and

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 2>subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts, and keep sending questions

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 2>or comments to Merrin Money at Bloomberg dot net. You

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 2>can also follow me in John on Twitter or x

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:17.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm at Marinus w and John is John Underscores Epic.

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 2>This episode was hosted by me Maren Sumset Web. It

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.319
<v Speaker 2>was produced by Samasadi, Production support by Moses and and

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:27.319
<v Speaker 2>special thanks of course to both our guests Helen and

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Pepper