WEBVTT - Reaction Podcast: Harris Goads Trump Into a Debate on Her Terms

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Everybody knows I'm an open book. Everybody knows what I'm

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 2>going to do, cut taxes very substantially and create a

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 2>great economy like I did before.

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 3>I am offering what I describe as an opportunity economy,

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 3>and the best economists in our country, if not the world,

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 3>have reviewed our relative plans for the future of America.

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to this whistlestop edition of voter Nomics, where markets

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>and politics collide, and we're talking about the first debate

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>between the former president Donald Trump and the Vice president

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 1>and Democratic nominee Kamala Harris. It was hosted last night

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in Philadelphia by ABC News. I'm Stephanie Flanders, head of

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Economics and Government at Bloomberg.

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm alecro Stratton, and I'm Adrian Wooldridge.

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>And Tim O'Brien is here, head of opinion for Bloomberg.

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Tim, this was President Trump's sixth debate, but

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it was probably I think it's fair to

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>say it was the first in which he's been so

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>often on the defensive. I mean, Kamala Harris came with

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a plan to bait him clearly and let voters see

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the Donald Trump that is least popular with those crucial,

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of middle of the road undecided voters. But I mean,

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I suspect everyone else who's debated Trump has also had

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a plan. Hillary Clinton surely did. But the difference seemed

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to me staying up in the early hours, was this

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>time it worked. I mean, I think a lot and

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that came from Kamala Harris just having

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>the confidence to pick a fight with him. I mean,

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>she wasn't brilliant, but she was kind of the alpha female,

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>and I don't get the impression Donald was really ready

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>for that at all.

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 5>Also, you know, time has gone on. In twenty sixteen,

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 5>he was less of a known quantity. I don't think

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 5>his weak points were less known to his appointments. If

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 5>you ran tape of Harris last night against Hillary Clinton

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 5>in twenty sixteen. He was also younger then, and he

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 5>he's noticeably degraded just physically since twenty sixteen. He's hard

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 5>of hearing, he's more mush mouthed, he's hunched over. He's

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 5>not as acute as he once was. You know, one

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 5>of his primary skills is performance art, not policy, And

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 5>as a performance artist, he's clearly degraded. So there was

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 5>that set of factors at work. And then secondarily, and

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:24.119
<v Speaker 5>I think probably most importantly, is she did her homework

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.679
<v Speaker 5>and she came into it knowing that how you get

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump off balance in any forum is it's not

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 5>about policy, it's about going after his sense of himself,

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 5>because he's narcissistic and insecure. And to me, the kind

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 5>of pivot point in the whole debate was when she

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 5>mentioned that people were getting bored at as rallies and

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 5>leaving early. And I looked at his face at that

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 5>moment you could sort of like, you know, he sort

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 5>of froze, and it led him then to give also

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 5>one of the most bonkers answers of the night.

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 3>And what you will also notice is that people start

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 3>leaving his rallies early out of exhaust, question and boredom.

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 2>What they have done to our country by allowing these

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 2>millions and millions of people to come into our country.

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 2>And look at what's happening to the towns all over

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the United States. And a lot of towns don't want

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 2>to talk. Not going to be Aurora or Springfield, a

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 2>lot of towns don't want to talk about it because

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 2>they're so embarrassed by it. In Springfield, they're eating the

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 2>dogs the people that came in, they're eating the cats,

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 2>they're eating they're eating the pets of the people that

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 2>live there. And this is what's happening in our country.

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 5>And I don't know if you meant that as a

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 5>commentary on inflation and grocery prices, which had been one

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 5>of his bugaboos, or it's just one of his inflammatory

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 5>things about immigrants. I think probably definitely the latter. And

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 5>then he came back to say, but my rallies are

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 5>really popular, the most popular in history. You know. She

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 5>was a little unsettled at the beginning of the debate,

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 5>I think once they got into abortion, and then she

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 5>teed him up with that statement. It was her debate

0:03:57.960 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 5>from there on in, and he just got more and

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 5>more like Jack Nicholson and a few good men. You know.

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 5>He was raging against the universe, probably more like King

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 5>Lear than anything else.

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 6>So did his team have a strategy and he didn't

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 6>execute it or did they just not have a strategy?

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 5>Yes, there's always which you can never have strategy in

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump in the same sentence, because he doesn't he

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 5>doesn't listen to other people. He believes he's a force

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 5>un to himself, and he never he never he thinks emotionally.

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 5>And I know for a fact that the guidance he

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 5>was getting from his team was to be a kind,

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 5>nice Donald. But that's not who he is. You know,

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 5>he's he's a juvenile, nasty man at his core, and

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 5>that's the person who showed up.

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Even if you're going to be the nasty Trump, you

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>could be the nasty but reasonably disciplined Trump. And what

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>she was very successful. He was quite disciplined at the start.

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think we could we could talk a little

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>bit about the economy section because it was probably his

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>best section, and talked about tariffs and some other things

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>he's stuck to some of the topics that you know,

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 1>his advice is have been telling him to, but he

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>couldn't help himself once she was sort of needling him

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>going into his sort of rally mode.

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, I think one of the virtues of

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump in the past is that he's had a

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 4>very good sense of humor. I mean cruel and unpleasant

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 4>sense of humor, but he was able to tell a

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 4>joke and amuse people and feel people made people feel

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 4>a bit good about their resentments. That was completely absent.

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he seems like a bad tempered, grouchy old man,

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 4>the sort of people that all too many people will

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 4>know from their home sitting in front of Fox News,

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 4>agreeing with it and talking to agree, you know, agreeing

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 4>with everysentiment on Fox News. He seems a bit past.

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>She also remember when Tim Watz was first nominated, and

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that people said was one of

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why he'd sort of caught fire when people

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>were campaigning kind of informally to be her running mate,

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>was that he'd sort of had this line about, you know,

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>they were weird. You know that there was that weird

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>stuff that that Trump and Mats were talking about in fact,

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and he wanted to sit round a Thanksgiving table and

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>not have a weird argument with his aunt or his

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>uncle about something strange. And she was really channeling that

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>at various times. She was sort of he was there.

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>He had a very kind of he had his kind

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 1>of mugshot pose for most of it in the in

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the two shot when you could see one next to

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the other, and she was sort of she was very

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>effective at saying, this is a man who just wants

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>us to be shouting at each other all the time

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and divisive, and we don't want to go back to that.

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought she delivered that was obviously prepared, but she

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>delivered it very well.

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 5>Think about the fact that he wasn't aware of how

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 5>to handle the split screen, because it so did Biden

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 5>in in their June debate, and Biden didn't know how

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 5>to handle it, and maybe couldn't because he looked catatonic

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 5>when you know, when Trump was speaking, Biden was sort

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 5>of looking out into space and slack joed and it

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 5>was like, you know, is he actually breathing? And and

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 5>you would think anyone watching that debate, and especially Trump,

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 5>he's a former reality TV star. He understands the power

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 5>of celebrity and the visual mediums that he would have

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 5>had in his mind, don't stand there repeating the look

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 5>of your mugshot in Georgia.

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, except for it worked so well for him, right,

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>so he thought this is a shot that people like.

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, to your pot adrin about you know,

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>having been funny. It is true that people have sort

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of found him amusing, but it is interesting given his

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that she wasn't. She didn't get him

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>on was talking about her laugh although she did laugh

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>several times at him, and I wondered whether he was

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>going to go there. But he's talked about a lot

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>about her love. But you know, as people have commented,

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to find him laughing. He doesn't seem

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to ever laugh. So I think even that played against

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>he seemed just very negative, very dow And I have

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to say a leg I mean just being a woman

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>for a moment. You know, one has always thought, gosh,

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the prospect of debating Donald Trump as a woman even

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>more challenging in some ways, and certainly the risk is

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.559
<v Speaker 1>you will come across, as Hillary Clinton did, as someone

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>who was terribly well prepared and really was just felt

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>she just deserved to be listened to. Why would you

0:07:56.040 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to this awful man? Yes, a swat exactly, so

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't say swat in America, but yeah, absolutely. But

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought what was really interesting about the way she

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>did it was it was like that second step. I

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>remember having a professor who would say, you know, there's

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>learning a difficult text, and then there's learning to be

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>knowing it so well you can just walk around in it.

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>She didn't just know her debate prep. She was then

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>able to walk around in it. And when he mentioned something,

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, when he said you're Biden, she was like, oh, great,

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I can do the line that I'm not Biden. And

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I'm a different generation from Biden and

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you Donald Trump, I thought, as it sort of showed

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that there's if you were brave enough, it's actually easier

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to debate him as a woman, do you think yeah.

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 6>And gender is also playing a different role from the

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 6>one it played before with with Hillary Clinton, because abortion

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 6>has so been electrified as a political issue that she

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 6>is now the standard bearer for defending abortion right. So

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 6>whereas before with with Hillary Clinton, it hadn't been weaponized

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 6>in that way, it is now a political battering ram

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 6>for her to make all, you know, women across America

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 6>very anxious about this guy. So and I don't think

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 6>that was a thing back then. Trump also tried to

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 6>kind of do a little bit back at her, where

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 6>he's like, I'm talking now, what a.

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Minute, I'm talking now, if you don't mind, please does

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 2>that sound familiar?

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 6>Subverting the kind of previous charge of you know, let

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 6>me finish. She is a prosecutor, she is a parent

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 6>in the land. She is superb. The worry had been

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 6>that previously during the Democratic primaries back in the day,

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 6>she was wooden. I don't know why she was so

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 6>off her pace back in twenty nineteen and twenty twenty,

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 6>but she's now with this nomination, got a new confidence.

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 6>I don't think people saw even as vice president.

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>We didn't see it. Frankly in the CNN interview.

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, I think that's absolutely right. I think it's not

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 4>just that Trump had a really bad evening, but she

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 4>had really good evening in the sense, well she was

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 4>slow to start, but she got off some really well.

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 4>The stakes were so high. She came across as likable,

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 4>charismatic and actually quite articulate. It wasn't expected because she's been.

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 6>She has had some shockers. But my queasiness, and I

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 6>really want you to kind of kind of give us

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 6>a kind of gauge on this, tim My queasiness is

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 6>sometimes with Donald Trump, the sort of rambling shambalism works

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 6>for a bunch of people at home, they kind of

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 6>we look at it and think how in articular incoherent

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 6>and and rambling, and and then you know, he gets

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 6>a bite spike in the polls or or people go, yeah,

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.199
<v Speaker 6>it's kind of reassuring because he's not super clever, and

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 6>he's not super shiny, and he's not really he's not.

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 6>He doesn't make me feel stupid or you know, because

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 6>Kamela is she's she is, she is so so polished

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 6>and so assured.

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 6>I think what we are learning about about voters is

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 6>some people that makes them feel, you know, you know,

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.599
<v Speaker 6>lower in the self esteem. So I'm just wondering, is

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 6>it this time does that work for Donald Trump? Or actually,

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 6>this time is it just too to Stephanie's point, were

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 6>and incoherent, it's just too much.

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 5>It will continue to work for him with about thirty

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 5>percent of American voters, and it will always work for

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 5>him with those voters. And there are long routes to that,

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:15.839
<v Speaker 5>the most recent which is the two thousand and eight

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 5>financial crisis, in the wake of which neither political party

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 5>in the United States addressed the needs of middle class

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 5>Americans who saw their mortgages, pensions, and hope evaporate standards,

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 5>and Trump filled that vacuum when he campaigned in twenty

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 5>fifteen and twenty sixteen and He basically said, I'm on

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 5>your side. The oppressive federal bureaucracy and all these people

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 5>of color sneaking across the borders are the ones doing

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 5>you in, and I will go after them on your behalf.

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 5>And he'll have the imagine hearts and minds of those

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 5>voters probably forever. But moderate and independent voters are not there.

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 4>But if you look at the reaction to this debate,

0:11:54.679 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 4>it's quite interesting that the magaworld reaction has not been

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 4>He's on our side. He said some really good things.

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 4>They've been really quite shocked by how bad his performances.

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 4>I think he's becoming so that Elon Musk says, well,

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 4>he's obviously had a bad night. It's very hard, but

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 4>I still think they'll vote for him.

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 5>The electoral impact of it, I don't think is abandon

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 5>it's embarrassment.

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 4>But is the memes that have taken off on on on,

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 4>on Twitter and everywhere else. They're all very bad for him,

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 4>particularly on the issue of roasting pets or full of

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 4>people putting pets in in the oven and barbecuing them.

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 4>We go, that's not good for him.

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>With sort of segueing into the sort of reality check zone,

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm interested, Tim, I mean when you look at

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the polls afterwards, about which we know in the end

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>don't make much difference. You've often had poles that he

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>was perceived to have lost and it didn't make a difference.

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>He was perceived to have lost in the debates, at

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>least on points and debates against Hillary, and you had

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 1>I think most of them have shown thirty eight forty five,

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>depending on which one you lookt still thinking that Donald

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump won the debate. You know, obviously a majority thinking

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris one. And I just wonder, you know, for

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the first fifty minutes was about the economy, he was

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>more or less on message. She was fine, but definitely

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>not great. A lot of people would have just turned

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>off after that. Do you think there's I mean, it

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly is possible that this does not move the needle

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>at all. We saw that even after the most catastrophic debate.

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>The first debate had a huge impact on the race

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>because it changed the candidate. The polls themselves barely moved

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>after that first debate. We saw a few points, but

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that was probably the most catastrophic debate that any candidate

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>has ever had. So are we are we inevitably going

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to be surprised by how little this affects anything.

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 5>I don't know the answer to that. I think that

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, debates have a mixed record in terms of

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 5>whether they're predictive or they have an influence. The thing

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 5>to remember about what's transpired between late Tune and now

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 5>is that Trump was ahead by three to six points

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 5>in various swing states. That gap has completely closed, and

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 5>in some cases Harris is ahead of Trump, and in

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 5>Florida it's only two points. That has to terrify the Republicans.

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 5>If Florida flips, Trump loses, and it's a generational change

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 5>for the GOP. I think that you know a couple

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 5>things to remember or focus on, and I was thinking

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 5>about it when you asked alegra The quick question about

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 5>women and gender is that when Hillary Clinton campaigned in

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 5>twenty sixteen, one of the campaign models was I'm with her,

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 5>And what Harris is saying is I'm with you. She's

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 5>not denying that she's a candidate of color or obviously

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 5>that she's a woman, and she strategically embraces that when

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 5>it's useful. But she has I think the strength of

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 5>character to say I'm not doing identity politics here. I'm

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 5>trying to deliver solutions to voters and that's a really

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 5>powerful place to be. And I think the Kamala Harris

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 5>who has emerged on this international stage since being anointed

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 5>as Biden's successor is not Kamala Harris any of us

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 5>saw before. And I think I think it's a lesson

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 5>in people who were on the ground with one another

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 5>in any organization, whether it's politics or companies or families.

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 5>You know people better when you're with them every day.

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 5>And clearly the sharpest democratic operatives in the land, from

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 5>Nancy Pelosi on down, knew that she had evolved. And

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 5>there will be a very interesting TikTok written someday of

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 5>what happened when Biden got nudged down to that stage,

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 5>self emolated, and then with like clockwork.

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>The party.

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, because I think I think there were probably

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 5>some people in the White House who knew he would

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 5>embarrass himself and the only way to get him out

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 5>of the race was humiliate and public Well, I just

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 5>think it's practical politics. You know, politicians are egotists, and

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 5>they don't move easily. And then the speed and the

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 5>alacrity with which she was put in place, and how

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 5>she's risen to the occasion people knew she could do it.

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 6>But quick question on that, I mean that Kamala Harris

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 6>doesn't go away and that she's this still is that wreck?

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 6>I mean, how many staffers has she kept with her

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 6>through from the beginning of being vice president to to

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 6>now or to shortly before becoming the nominee for president?

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 6>Like not many. So there's a kind of.

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 5>Virtue when a man moves through an incompetent staff, and

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 5>when a woman does it, it's.

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 6>People do think it's about someone who's works in politics.

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 6>I don't think it is a virtue when people turn

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 6>through people very quickly. You need who are you? Who

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 6>are your kind of long term confidence. I'm not saying

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 6>I think it disqualifies her or that she's going to

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 6>be a bad president because of it. I'm just saying

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 6>that that that's slightly poor performing Kamala Harris. How much

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 6>of that is going to come back to the fore

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 6>at some point in terms of advisers she's had. I mean,

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 6>you're right that she's gone through that there is a

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 6>double standard because clearly, clearly, as Adrian says, Donald Trump's

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 6>not the one to talk about having gone through.

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Lots of people. I thought, if we just talked briefly

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>about I mean, there were quite a lot of areas

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>where she could have. You know, one of the failures

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump had is he didn't get enough onto

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Whenever the discussion had moved to her flops and her

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>weak areas like immigration, she would just sort of, rather

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>very obviously and transparently pivot back to something that would

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>bait him and distract him. But it did mean that

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 1>she got away with some of that. I thought, though.

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>There was a bit more substance on foreign policy, or

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>at least more discussion on foreign policy than I had

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.959
<v Speaker 1>anticipated to talk about. Gaza talked about Ukraine, where he

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>was unwilling to say that he wanted Ukraine to win.

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Even in that earlier section, she was quite She took

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the offensive on China in an interesting way. How did

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you think she was tim on foreign policy?

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 5>My own bias is that I think the United States

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 5>has to be a citizen of the world, and that

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 5>we play an indispensable role in global security and our

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 5>partnership with our allies in Western Europe and further abroad.

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 5>And I thought her most effective statement of the night

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 5>was how she described America's leadership role in the world,

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 5>her commitment to national security. I thought she was excellent

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 5>on Ukraine. She was excellent on Gaza, she was excellent

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 5>on China. All three of those theaters are are perilous

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 5>right now. China could invade Taiwan Gas as a potential

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 5>tinderbox for the rest of them Middle East. And if

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 5>we don't stand up to Vladimir Putin and Ukraine, he

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.679
<v Speaker 5>becomes an even more predatory presence throughout the rest of Europe.

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 5>And I think the essential player in every one of

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 5>those theaters is the United States, for better or for worse.

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 5>And she made a statement of purpose around that I

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 5>thought was spectacular.

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 4>It's not just that she did very well on that,

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 4>It's just that it's also that Trump did very badly

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 4>on that, in the sense that he has dealt with

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 4>a great many people. He's been president for four years,

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 4>and he didn't make any real use of that depth

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 4>of experience or knowledge or comforting the world by saying

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 4>that I know these people, I can deal with them.

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm a man who makes deals. He made nothing of.

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 5>The fact the Barker's statement of Victor.

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>He was citing.

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 4>So nothing, you know, no Nixonian depth of experience. And

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 4>the other thing was immigration again, which is one of

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 4>his things, is one of the things that he just

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 4>had on the book. In the polls, people are worried

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 4>about it, and he fluffed it completely. He didn't talk

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 4>about people's real fears about immigration in fact, and Gren

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 4>sorry to mention this line, but he made it all

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:17.199
<v Speaker 4>about cats and dogs, which was you know that that.

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 5>Had been a debunked meme. And the issue that where

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.679
<v Speaker 5>average Americans fear immigration is that their jobs are going

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 5>to take not that they're going to be that someone

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 5>down the block is reading, you know, the kitchen and

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 5>making dinner, eating fluffy.

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I suspect I toightly disagree with you, Tim,

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 1>in the sense of I suspect probably the bit her

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>advisors will have been least happy with, or at least

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>will not will not be so excited about is her

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>fulsome defense of the role of America in the world.

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Which is not to say she shouldn't say it, but

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I think what is the only bit of the foreign

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>policy that she spoke to that is very popular is

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>being tough on China, which Is, which was again sort

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of taking the game to Trump, and I thought it

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>was very interesting that she went on China first and

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>even managed to insert the sort of reference about the

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>origins COVID and accuse him of being too close to

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>she and talking about girls. His response was, she hates

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Israelis and Arabs, which I thought was a fantastic statement.

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.959
<v Speaker 2>She hates Israel if she's president, I believe that Israel

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 2>will not exist within two years from now, and I've

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 2>been pretty good at predictions, and I hope we're wrong

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 2>about that one. She hates Israel at the same time,

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 2>in her own way, she hates the Arab population because

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 2>the whole place is going to get blown up.

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>You really can't have it both ways.

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 5>I don't think foreign policy has ever turned a US election.

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 5>Most US voters don't care about it. And I do

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 5>think that leadership means you articulate and get out in

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 5>front on issues that voters aren't either in touch with

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 5>or in agreement with. But because it's the right thing

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.360
<v Speaker 5>to do, and we're in a perilous place right now globally,

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.120
<v Speaker 5>and if the US doesn't assert itself and have someone

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 5>as with the clarity and commitment that she articulated last

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 5>night in spades. Even Joe Biden, who is credited as

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 5>being the savant on foreign policy, he never articulated as

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:04.199
<v Speaker 5>well as she did last night. And I think that

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 5>that stands in her favor.

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So next steps, do we actually think this is going

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to change the race?

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 5>Sixty percent of Independence in the wake of the poll

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 5>said she won. And I'll sound like a dead horse

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 5>because all three of us have talked about this multiple

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 5>times together, I think by this point, but it's going

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 5>to be seven swing states in November, and the pivotal

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 5>votes in those swing states will come from moderate and

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 5>independent voters. And I think they're not only moving to

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 5>her noticeably. I think they will move to her on

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 5>Moss and I think that momentum the clips they'll be

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 5>able to. Now you know, the Democrats have a lot

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 5>of money. Airwaves are going to get flooded in Nevada

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 5>and Arizona. Of Donald Trump saying your neighbors want to

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 5>eat your cats.

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And saying that he has a concept of a concept

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of an idea, concept of an idea on health.

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 5>Comes a concept of a plane. When he was asked

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 5>for your economic plans, and he said, I have a

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 5>concept of a plan, and what are your healthcare plans?

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 5>I have a concept of a plan. He has no

0:21:58.960 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 5>concept of anything.

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>That was one thing, and I don't know me in

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 1>a legra maybe from a messaging standpoint, I mean, the

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I thought was a bit confused in

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the sort of Carmela messaging was that you know, clearly

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>project twenty twenty five has had a lot of resonance,

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and she mentioned it a couple of times because she

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>knows that even when people don't know anything about it,

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>they kind of know it's bad. And he distanced himself

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>from it. But you can't say you've got no plan,

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>which she did repeatedly. But then there is a plan

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's twenty twenty five. And I thought that was

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 1>one area where I mean, which do we think is

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be strongest for her? That he had an

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>evil plan or that you've got no plan? Should I

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:43.360
<v Speaker 1>recognize that from somewhere because it's not very original.

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 6>And it is quite tedious, how so much of politics

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 6>is not particularly clever or original, but it just connects

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 6>and it just works and as simple as usually best.

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 6>Because I think you're right, I'm not even sure I

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 6>think you're being very flattering to sort of Middle America.

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 6>I'm not sure most people in Middle America will be

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 6>cognizant of it, so I would have thought you'd better

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 6>off sticking to kind of there is the plan, this

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 6>guy rambles and do we think they should do another

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 6>d I mean that was the other thing that came straight,

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 6>and she went straight after the debate had bad saying

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 6>it wasn't cats they were eating, it was the city

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 6>geese that I'm not sure it was a lot better.

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 6>You had Donald Trump go into the spin room, which

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 6>is very unusual, but you had the Kamala Harris team saying, yeah,

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 6>bring it on, We'll do more debates.

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 4>You know from Sadusca. She lost, but she wants another one.

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you I mean, Tim, do you think or Adrian

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think? Do you think there'll be another debate?

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think she should do a debate on Fox?

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Because it seems pretty clear that if there was another one,

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>it would have to be on Fox.

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 5>Neither of them have anything to gain by doing another debate,

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 5>but for very different reasons. She now has all of

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 5>the firepower she needs from a debate, and his advisors

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 5>must think, well, should we do another debate or should

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 5>we just drive a car into a wall's as possible,

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 5>because he won't change in the next debate. He can't

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 5>rescue himself from himself. It was himself on the stage

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 5>last night, you know, King Lear, howling against the moon,

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 5>not listening to anyone else in this sort of pathetic,

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 5>angry growl.

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Well we will in a week's time. We shall probably

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>find that the debate itself has had very little impact

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>on the race. And the most important thing that did

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>happen last night, of course, was that Taylor Swift the

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>most powerful childless cat lady in the world. And I

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>can't help thinking that will have more impact than anything

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>we've said or anything we had.

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 5>And she had a link in her post to voter

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 5>dot org, so it will produce fundraising and voter turn

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:33.959
<v Speaker 5>out just in very practical ways.

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>And she encouraged justice everyone should people to actually make

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>up their own mind, which I thought was pretty classy,

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of half an hour after the debate finished, Thank

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you very much, Adrian Allegra, tim a privilege you be here,

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to this special episode of voter Nomics

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:58.199
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg. It was hosted by me Stephanie Flanders, with

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Allegra Stratton and Adrian will Dridge and Tim O'Brien. It

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>was produced by Summer Sadin, Production support and sound design

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>by Moses and am Brendan. Francis Newnham is our executive producer.

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Sage Bowman is Head of Podcasts. Please subscribe, rate, and

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>review this podcast wherever you listen to it