Speaker 1: Now here's a highlight from Coast to Coast AM on iHeartRadio.
Speaker 2: And welcome back to Coast to Coast George Norri with you.
Speaker 2: Anthony Sanchez back with us, author researcher you followgiusts. He
Speaker 2: has dedicated his career to uncovering the mysteries of extraterrestrial phenomena,
Speaker 2: with a focus on mysterious locations such as Area fifty
Speaker 2: one in dulcein New Mexico. He regularly writes and speaks
Speaker 2: at global conferences as well. Anthony, welcome to the program.
Speaker 3: Have you been Oh my god, George Norri, it's we
Speaker 3: haven't talk since twenty seventeen. It's great to hear your voice.
Speaker 2: It's been a while. I know you're on with Connie
Speaker 2: Willis a couple of years, about a year and a
Speaker 2: half ago, and you did a great job for us.
Speaker 2: What's new with you?
Speaker 3: Well, I wanted to share this news with you. A
Speaker 3: lot of people are not aware of the fact that
Speaker 3: in August of twenty nineteen, I got something called Yamba
Speaker 3: ra sndrome and for two years I was paralyzed from
Speaker 3: the neck down and I couldn't speak. Oh On actually
Speaker 3: died three times in the amazing angels at Sutter Medical
Speaker 3: Health here in Sacramento area brought me back from the
Speaker 3: other side. And I'm just glad to be alive, and
Speaker 3: I'm glad to be back on coast to coast and
Speaker 3: chopping it up with probably the best ever guy, George Nori.
Speaker 3: Oh my god, thank you. Proud of George.
Speaker 2: I'm glad you're doing okay. Did you get that from
Speaker 2: a vaccine or not?
Speaker 3: No? Actually I got the vaccine afterwards a lot of
Speaker 3: people were arguing me about that, but at a sinus infection,
Speaker 3: And what happened was is that the immune system, instead
Speaker 3: of attacking the sinus infection, an attack of my nervous system.
Speaker 3: And ask you on Bray syndrome. It literally stripped my
Speaker 3: vagus nerve of all of the external fatty tissue to
Speaker 3: protect your nerves, and it rendered me paralyzed and unable
Speaker 3: to speak for two years. I'm a believe that I
Speaker 3: was able to maintain my sanity was in my mind.
Speaker 3: I wrote articles and I wrote books. I completed books,
Speaker 3: and about eighteen months after all of that began, as
Speaker 3: my arms started to come back to me, I started typing.
Speaker 3: Typing type of typing prolifically, and I ended up with
Speaker 3: my new website, UFO Currents, and there I release articles
Speaker 3: and I got to tell you something. This past week
Speaker 3: I released an article that kind of upset a lot
Speaker 3: of people in the UFO circles because I asked a
Speaker 3: simple question. I said, are we witnessing a psyop? You know?
Speaker 3: Are are are we going to expose some sort of
Speaker 3: a UAP drone agenda that perhaps covering up something else?
Speaker 3: And sadly, you know a lot of UFO people were
Speaker 3: upset with me. I'm a UFO person, but George, we
Speaker 3: have to ask the tough questions we need to know.
Speaker 3: You know, are the people behind the messaging on part
Speaker 3: of the defense industry? Are they seeking money? Is just
Speaker 3: the reason why we've been exposed to this grand pageantry
Speaker 3: of the UAP narrative through the u a P congressional herrings.
Speaker 3: Why are we seeing this all over the mainstream media?
Speaker 3: You know? Why are we seeing seeing them repeat the
Speaker 3: same messages? Are they trying to provide some sort of
Speaker 3: a UFO narrative, you know, hopping the top cliff hides
Speaker 3: the message of this December third date where you predicted
Speaker 3: we were going to see a slew of UFOs turned
Speaker 3: out it's u aps, you know, Are they leveraging that
Speaker 3: to put together some sort of a psyop? You know
Speaker 3: a lot of people were unhappy with me that I
Speaker 3: said that, But hey, if we're gonna be real with
Speaker 3: ourselves and we're gonna be true to this this game
Speaker 3: that we call UFO research, you know, now U A,
Speaker 3: P and NHI research, we have to ask the tough questions.
Speaker 2: Well, I think you were spot on, Anthony.
Speaker 3: I was.
Speaker 2: I've been on Kim Commando's radio show the last couple
Speaker 2: of weeks and she asked me what I thought about
Speaker 2: these drones, and I ruled out. I have ruled out extraterrestrial.
Speaker 2: I think there's something else in the very nefarious going
Speaker 2: on here. I don't know what it is, but it
Speaker 2: doesn't sound like it's ets to me exactly.
Speaker 3: And you know, George, considering the patterns that we've observed,
Speaker 3: and the historical president is they're a strong likelihood that
Speaker 3: these drone sidings can be part of a government psion.
Speaker 3: But we've got to compete. We got to keep you know,
Speaker 3: telling people what is a psychological operation? You know, and
Speaker 3: again it's designed to test how the public reacts to
Speaker 3: unusual sidings and to perhaps manage the public perception, you know, effectively,
Speaker 3: why why so that they can justify laws expand government control.
Speaker 3: Real news. By the way, Chase Hughes said this, He said,
Speaker 3: real news coexists with credible reports. If we see world
Speaker 3: news being pushed out for fake news, it's a psyop.
Speaker 3: And that's why I love Coast to coast. You're gonna
Speaker 3: get people on coast to coast like myself, like yourself,
Speaker 3: who are not afraid to ask them the real questions
Speaker 3: you ask. Everybody wants to talk about aliens. I talked
Speaker 3: about aliens. You remember the first time you had me
Speaker 3: back on in twenty eleven, I was ostracized. A lot
Speaker 3: of people were attacking me because I put my faith
Speaker 3: in the gentleman, who I still believed in this very day.
Speaker 3: That said, he worked at an underground base in northern
Speaker 3: New Mexico called the Dulcie Base. You know, I filed
Speaker 3: the standard for one eighty with the National Personnel Record Center.
Speaker 3: I got the guy d g T fourteen. That still
Speaker 3: didn't please certain people, right, it wasn't enough. They attack you,
Speaker 3: and you're gonna face that as a UFO researcher. Does
Speaker 3: Linda Malton Howe or does Richard Dolan? Do they come
Speaker 3: under that level of scrutiny when they step forth with
Speaker 3: the whistleblower? I believe just today James Fox just released
Speaker 3: a new movie called The Program, and he has a
Speaker 3: military whistleblower in it. Is he going to face that
Speaker 3: level of scrutiny? Well, we're used to that as UFO researchers.
Speaker 3: We're used to that. So I'm okay with putting out
Speaker 3: an article that's titled are we witnessing a sign off?
Speaker 3: And again, who serves as consultants or sits on executive
Speaker 3: boards of the defense or aerospace industry, who still maintains
Speaker 3: relationships with highly commercialized agencies disseminating these UAP and NHI
Speaker 3: narratives across many platforms? I mean, was it a coincidence
Speaker 3: that Tom DeLong with his to the Star's Academy just
Speaker 3: happened to be in contact with all of these top
Speaker 3: named individuals from both the academic infrastructure and the military
Speaker 3: infrastructure when he created his group. To me, Tom, the
Speaker 3: law was a mechanism by the elites, if you want
Speaker 3: to call them that, to reach what a modern audience.
Speaker 3: You know, I've been a part of this move on
Speaker 3: things since twenty ten and I'm fifty four years old
Speaker 3: at move on just a little bit. Last Saturday, I
Speaker 3: spoke got move on one egg to the move on
Speaker 3: the events. It is an older demographic. It's people like myself.
Speaker 3: You're going to see people from their forties to octagenarians.
Speaker 3: They're not going to see people in their twenties and
Speaker 3: their thirties there, let alone teenagers. It's not going to happen.
Speaker 3: So blink Tom belonged to me way back in seventeen,
Speaker 3: twenty eighteen or whatever. That was the catalyst for a
Speaker 3: future messaging event. And we're seeing a lot of messaging
Speaker 3: happening right now. Fear stories, anger stories, but they're lacking evidence.
Speaker 3: So there's a lot happening right now.
Speaker 2: Back to these Jones or a second Anthony. All I
Speaker 2: know is something as big as an SUV is not
Speaker 2: somebody making it an a little hobby in his house.
Speaker 3: Right right. And you know one of the things that
Speaker 3: I have considered, you know, I talked about this with
Speaker 3: Rick Prestell, who is probably one of the top moufon
Speaker 3: people that I've known for over a decade. He's an investigator, researcher,
Speaker 3: and you know, when we have these conversations, we look
Speaker 3: at that and we're like, Okay, if these drones that
Speaker 3: are up there performing these aerial maneuvers, you know, coordinated maneuvers,
Speaker 3: you know, seemingly some of them seeming seemingly autonomous by nature,
Speaker 3: could they be a hybrid you know, prototype device of
Speaker 3: reverse engineer technology with you know, man made terrestrial technology.
Speaker 3: These are the types of things that as researchers in
Speaker 3: UFO world, those are the types of questions that we ask.
Speaker 3: It's still up in the open, it's still up for graphs.
Speaker 3: You know, what's the bigger play here? What is the
Speaker 3: purpose of all of this? Why are these drones that
Speaker 3: we are seeing now seemingly different from what we've seen
Speaker 3: in the past. You know, these things that are coming out.
Speaker 3: I've seen some of the videos. These are drones that
Speaker 3: don't necessarily you know, evoke you know, past images of
Speaker 3: what we've seen in the skuise And why at night?
Speaker 3: Why are we not seeing these during the day? Again,
Speaker 3: the sides of an suv, the sides of a small car.
Speaker 3: You have to ask that question, who's inside them, Who's
Speaker 3: controlling them. What is the purpose of these things?
Speaker 2: And is our government really concerned or are they faking it?
Speaker 3: You know, I I have you know they're going to
Speaker 3: be concerned if its foreign adversaries.
Speaker 2: I mean one one legislator said it's coming from an
Speaker 2: Iranian ship off the east coast. That would be easy
Speaker 2: to determine.
Speaker 3: Wasn't that it would be And I'll tell you that
Speaker 3: even people outside of the military would be able to
Speaker 3: detect whether or not it's an Iranian mothership off the
Speaker 3: off the coast launching these drones. And it's not. We've
Speaker 3: seen it. You remember back in twenty twenty three when
Speaker 3: we had the Chinese balloons five balloon you know, Emina,
Speaker 3: you're from Alaska then crossing the entirement.
Speaker 2: My god, people went crazy.
Speaker 3: Right, and we shot that thing down on live television.
Speaker 3: You know, we sent up our fighter jets shot it
Speaker 3: down because we knew what it was. Now they are
Speaker 3: telling us not to shoot these things down. Some of
Speaker 3: the local officials and even federal level officials in the
Speaker 3: Senate and in Congress are telling us, oh, perhaps these
Speaker 3: are these are friendly drones, so don't shoot them down.
Speaker 3: You don't want to get in trouble. It's like, wait
Speaker 3: a minute, you.
Speaker 2: Know, what's what's a friendly drone by the way.
Speaker 3: Right right, So you know, but I want to address
Speaker 3: the foreign adversaries thing. You know, based on the response
Speaker 3: or actually, George, the lack thereof from the government, it's
Speaker 3: improbable that these things are from Russia or China or.
Speaker 2: Iran, I would agree we would have had the navy
Speaker 2: around that ship like that.
Speaker 3: Yes, exactly, we would have seen a much more aggressive
Speaker 3: defense action, similar to passys where the threats were swiftly neutralized.
Speaker 3: Again twenty twenty three, the Chinese spy balloon.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it leads me to believe that it could be ours. Now,
Speaker 2: what's the purpose? Good question? I mean, is it, like
Speaker 2: you have suggested, they want to just see our reaction.
Speaker 2: You know, I wonder all of this because what kind
Speaker 2: of data could it be capturing that they can't get
Speaker 2: from an airplane, for example?
Speaker 3: Exactly? So I mean, okay, So the purpose behind these
Speaker 3: mysterious sightings could be more ultifaceted, right, including testing the
Speaker 3: public's reaction to unexplained phenomena, distracting us from governmental activities,
Speaker 3: and maybe even normalizing the presence of military grade drones.
Speaker 3: In public spaces under these unusual contexts. Remember, Cliff High
Speaker 3: made the prediction that on December third, which would have
Speaker 3: been thirty nine days after the temporal trigger mechanism, which
Speaker 3: in two thousand and nine was if Joe Rogan were
Speaker 3: ever to interview Donald Trump, thirty nine days later, we're
Speaker 3: going to see a slew of UFOs while we're seeing
Speaker 3: a slew of UAP drones. And it's okay to call
Speaker 3: them uips because we know that the drones, but they
Speaker 3: are anomalous and it is a phenomena, and they still
Speaker 3: remain unidentified. So are they leveraging the fact that they
Speaker 3: already knew about Cliff Hide's prediction and they're jumping on
Speaker 3: that so that it adds creting to the actions that
Speaker 3: are currently underway. I don't know, but again we got
Speaker 3: we have to ask this question, who think about this,
Speaker 3: George at the UAP hearings, the congressional hearings, whether it
Speaker 3: was a twenty twenty three with Ryan Graves, David Grush
Speaker 3: or David Fraber or this year with Alessandro's Shallenberger galadat
Speaker 3: Michael Gold. By the way, I have something to say
Speaker 3: about Michael Gold. How many of them are serving as
Speaker 3: consultants or sitting on executive boards for the defense industry
Speaker 3: or aerospace firms, or subcontractors to either of those. Because
Speaker 3: once you start to look at that we you start
Speaker 3: to answer those questions, you're going to find that perhaps
Speaker 3: they are trying to do away with black budgets. You remember,
Speaker 3: back in the old days, there was always just this
Speaker 3: cry over the black budget. Well, how about now openly
Speaker 3: utilizing the public's interest and Congress's grand pageantry of these
Speaker 3: hearings over UAP and let's not forget NHI non human intelligences.
Speaker 3: It was in twenty twenty three when we were enthralled
Speaker 3: over this, you know, spectacular announcement from David Grush that
Speaker 3: non human biologics were, you know, recovered. So when you
Speaker 3: ask the questions who's behind it, who's connected to it all,
Speaker 3: you're going to get some surprising answers. And you know,
Speaker 3: back to your point, what's the purpose of it all?
Speaker 3: It could be some sort of groundwork for conditioning us.
Speaker 3: You know, we have been conditioned since the nineteen fifties
Speaker 3: with all of the Flying Saucer movies. You remember the
Speaker 3: movie movie theaters back in the days it's all about
Speaker 3: flying saucers. Then when it led up from the from
Speaker 3: the fifties to the sixties, to the seventies to the eighties,
Speaker 3: we inodated with amazing science fiction movies, many of them,
Speaker 3: you know, leveraging the storylines of UFOs what we now
Speaker 3: called UAPs and NHI. You know, we don't ever call
Speaker 3: them aliens or extraterrestrials, non human intelligences. There's a lot
Speaker 3: of stuff it sure is.
Speaker 2: Let's talk a little bit about the hearings, Anthony. I
Speaker 2: was not impressed with the one that we just had.
Speaker 2: Mm hmm, how about.
Speaker 3: You, right, so in twenty twenty four, in comparison, so
Speaker 3: what are the dark differences? Right, I would see that
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty three we were blown away. You know.
Speaker 3: We we knew about the tic Tac too tictac UFO,
Speaker 3: but we wanted more information and we got it from
Speaker 3: David Fraverer. You know, he gave us a first hand
Speaker 3: account of the two thousand and four uss NIBS UFO incident.
Speaker 3: And by the way, I wrote a book called UFOs
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty three. That book has detailed sections on
Speaker 3: graves of Fravor and Grush and I delve into the
Speaker 3: twenty twenty three congressional hearings on UAPs. The major revelations
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty three were the confirmation of non human
Speaker 3: biologics associated with UAPs. Let's not forget that David Grush
Speaker 3: mentioned that in nineteen thirty three, you know, preceding the
Speaker 3: nineteen forty seven event in Roswelt, perhaps there was already
Speaker 3: a major down UFO crash in Magenta, Italy, and that
Speaker 3: Mussolini was communicating with his own military prior to communicating
Speaker 3: with the Germans. And in my book UFO Nexus, I
Speaker 3: actually have a photocopy of the one of the telegrams
Speaker 3: that was sent back and forth discussing the UFO, the
Speaker 3: down UFO. The other thing in twenty twenty three was
Speaker 3: the admission of the United State States being in possession
Speaker 3: of about thirty down UFOs, you know, Roswell, Aztec, New Mexico.
Speaker 3: We know about all these different you know, crash retrieval sites.
Speaker 3: And by the way, I don't think it's into twenty
Speaker 3: twenty four in a minute, but the macular constellation. But
Speaker 3: the last major revelation was the validation of the tic
Speaker 3: TAC ufhone encounter as a legitimate and inexplicable event by
Speaker 3: what credible military witnesses. That was incredible. So yes, by
Speaker 3: comparison twenty twenty four, yeah, there was some great information there,
Speaker 3: but it just did not have the same ability to
Speaker 3: resonate with us the you know, the public, as did
Speaker 3: the twenty twenty one twenty twenty three periods. So what
Speaker 3: are the revelations that happened to twenty twenty four. Well,
Speaker 3: we learned about the introduction of the Immaculate Constellation Special
Speaker 3: Access Program, indicating the more structured but still highly secretive
Speaker 3: government approach to UAPECE. You know, I want to say
Speaker 3: one thing about a maculate constellation. Way back in twenty
Speaker 3: eleven when you had me on the show the late
Speaker 3: Jerry Pippen Melfabrigus, who have a show called Veritas Radio
Speaker 3: I think is still around. Bill Ryan from Project Camelot
Speaker 3: who was involved with the Project Serpo with the Serpo incident,
Speaker 3: and Nori Ohia Kawa who subsequently wrote the forward to
Speaker 3: my book UFO Highway and participated in UFO Highway two
Speaker 3: point zero and UFO Nexus. We received contact from a
Speaker 3: gentleman named c RW George, I vetted this guy with
Speaker 3: all of them on the phone. We vetted his FAA license,
Speaker 3: the fact that he worked at an aerospace firm in
Speaker 3: southern California with a direct connection to Ohio Right Patterson
Speaker 3: Air Force Base. He claimed to have worked with mister
Speaker 3: X from two tho thousand and six carry cassidy for
Speaker 3: Project Camelot and Bill Ryan interviewed Jim. That's the famous
Speaker 3: video of it. This was a UFO archivist who says
Speaker 3: he was in charge of databases in all of the
Speaker 3: physical elements, whether it's film or video, memorandums, documentation between
Speaker 3: the government and aliens, and government and UFO crass retrievals.
Speaker 3: But all of a sudden, everybody's acting all excited about
Speaker 3: this immaculate constellation. George, you and I were on the
Speaker 3: phone about this type of stuff over a decade ago.
Speaker 1: Listen to more Coast to Coast AM every weeknight at
Speaker 1: one am Eastern and go to Coast to coastam dot
Speaker 1: com for more