WEBVTT - A Quant in China’s Casino

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to What Goes Up, a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.319
<v Speaker 1>My name is Mike Reagan, and I'm a senior editor

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg. This week on the show, while the attention

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of global investors has once again returned to China, but

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>this time it wasn't because of the trade tensions with

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the US. Rather, it was China's own domestic crackdown on

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the for profit education industry, spooking investors to the tune

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of more than ten percent drop in the MSc I

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>China Index in just two days. It was so shocking

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that Golden Sacks strategists actually came out with a note

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>saying clients were asking them if China had become uninvestable?

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Well has it. We'll get into it with a chief

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>investment officer who's currently in China, But first Charlie Pellett

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>talls through this week's mystery co hosted is This week's

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>mystery co host is Ye She. He is a markets

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>reporter of Bloomberg and was a go chess champion as

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a kid in his hometown of woo Sheet, China. Since

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>moving to the U S sixteen years ago, he's become

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a Seinfeld fanatic and still listens to reruns on his

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>iPhone every night to help him understand close talkers like Reagan.

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>He I to him as Seinfeld fanatic. As you know,

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I hopefully in the if Bloomberger Seinfeld, I'm thinking I'm

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>probably the Kramer character. I don't I don't know, hopefully

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>not the Newman character. What do you think? Yeah, my

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite is Geosh Castenda, Absolutely absolutely, I think he's everyone's favorite.

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And you also have now have been intrigued with go Chess.

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna you're gonna have to teach me how to

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>play that sometime, right. It's uh, it's like one of

0:01:56.200 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the Asian most ancient chess game, very popularly in China,

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>South Korea and Japan. And I just taught myself at

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the age of the probably five six, and just uh

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>really obsessed that he was playing it. But I want

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the the champion in the city when I was in

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>middle school. Um, but I stopped playing in high school

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>because I'm so busy. It was a study. So I'm

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>sympathetic about the crackdown of the cram schools. I'm sure

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>we all talk about on the show. That's a That's

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>a good segue into our guest here and what's going

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>on in China the gram schools UM and let's bring

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>in our guest. He's uh really had a quite a

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>resume in the financial industry. In the investing industry, it's

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the co founders of Research Affiliates, and more

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>recently he is the founder and chief investment officer of

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Raylean Global Advisors. His name is Jason Sue. Jason, Welcome

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to the show. Glad to be here at Jason, I

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get into that idea about the the for

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>profit educ asian industry in China. Now, luckily I know

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about this. I edity every day, so

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I've I'm able to read his insights on China, so

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>so I know a little bit. But I think for

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Americans this seems like a strange thing

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>for a market sell off, a crackdown on the education industry.

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>But walk us through, um, you know, basically, what problem

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>is China trying to solve here with this crackdown on

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>for profit education and why such a dramatic impact on

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the market in China. Absolutely so this is a little

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>difficult for I think Westerners understand because CRAM School, the

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>for profit educational sector is something very foreign to Westerners,

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's a part of the Asian culture, not just Chinese,

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>but really I think it is just a part of

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Korean, the Japanese and the Chinese culture. Essentially,

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>CRAM schools offer you additional after school tutoring, and it

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>often occurs in the form of sort of UH regurgitation

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>UH memorization of a vast test bank of questions are

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>likely to be on the next national entrance exam. Right

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in in Asia, gain gaining emissions into the top high

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>schools and eventually from their top universities requires one scoring

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the list a national entrance exam. UH.

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>So most students spend all of their days essentially preparing

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>for that big exam. And the easiest way to to

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.679
<v Speaker 1>get a high score is not by doing well in school,

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.679
<v Speaker 1>not by just you know, by by understanding the actual

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>knowledge UH. The easiest way to gain emissions is to

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>practice test exams over and over and over and over again.

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>And if you pay to go to one of the

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>more UH premium UH tutoring programs, you just have access

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to the latest test banks. You have access to experts

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>who may have UH greater ability to predict what's going

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.559
<v Speaker 1>to be on the exams. Uh and and thereby gaining

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>enormous advantage. And so in Asia, it's a very expensive

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>exercise to to go through these cram schools. They're they're costly,

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>they're expensive, but it's also in terms of the hours

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that children commit to additional memorization and studying. I think

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>this has become such a social problem. If you cite

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the the number one reason for for teens committing suicide,

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it's because of the just the unbearable hours that that

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>they have to commit to this. And also for a

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>lot of parents, it's it's it's very expensive and it

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>feels very unfair because, uh, the premium programs that give

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you the highest chance of scoring high on the Nastal

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 1>exams are quite expensive. So it's it's broadly understood and

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>viewed as a social program problem. Uh. You know, Taiwan

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>has tried to fix that. I think Japan has tried

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to fix that. Again. You know, as I mentioned, the

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the high suicide rate is really a problem, and I

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>guess China has come down with its own way to

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>fix the problem by essentially making these CRAM schools nonprofit

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully uh taking them out of the equation and

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>never a pretty big chunk of equity involved in this.

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess you know, these companies have grown so large

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>because of all those well absolutely, I mean the for

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>profit cram schools are incredibly profitable. Their massive I mean,

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>there was a point in time in China that the

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>for profit educational sector is viewed as the most important

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>consumption demand. Right like people are with would stop paying rents,

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>they would stop eating just so they could keep paying

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>for cram schools for their kids. And so you know,

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 1>it was viewed by investors as one of the you know,

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>probably safest industry to investent. The joking Chinese people asking

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>why cracked um education companies are the cramp schools will

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 1>bring down the whole market. Um. The joke was, I

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>think about this way. If there's ten birds on a tree,

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>you shoot down one, how many birds are left on

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the tree. I thought this is a good analogy to

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>explain the fear. People are worried about who's the next

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>target from for as you mentioned that Jason that for

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of like foreign observers or investors, they don't

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>quite understand Chinese policies. It seems quite random ad hoc

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of policies and regulation changes. If we think

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>about it, it it started with end Group in November when

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>China put down their listing at the last minute. Then

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>we start to have um government targeting Ali Baba Tennis

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and all these big internet companies for their acknowledged behavior.

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Then we have the d d UM the government banned

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>their apps soon after the I p O in the US.

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Now we now we have the education companies. Is any

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>coherent logic of all these government actions? Is any ultimate

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>goal China is trying to achieve? Absolutely. I think the

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>best analogy uh and hopefully one I think the the

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>West will be more sympathetic to is you know the

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Chinese regulators. Uh. They see themselves as you know, part

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of the global E S G trend right. Um. You know,

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>part of it is saying that, look, the free market

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't solve all problems, so you can't just leave problems,

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>especially social once the free market very much, you know,

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in line with the E S G. Uh, I think philosophy,

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>which is you need regulators, you need socially minded individuals investors,

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>uh to to sort of come and undo some of

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the excessis you know, some of the negative externalities of

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>free market competition. And so I think the Chinese regulators

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>very much I've been looking at, you know, what are

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the problems that perhaps we know profit maximization has created

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 1>that they they think needs fixing, that that society can't

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>tolerate anymore. So if you take the the educational sector,

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, as I mentioned, you know, that's that's been

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a social problem that a lot of Asian regulators, a

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of Asian economies have been trying to to fix.

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you even look back further right in in

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the recent month, as you mentioned, where it is um

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of cracking down on some of the big consumer

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>tech where the monopoly power has made both war conditions

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>very very bad for labors and also made it uncompetitive

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>for smaller business to get in. For example, you know Maton, Uh,

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>They're share price also took a beating when when the

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>regulator announced that it is not acceptable for them to

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>treat all of their employees as contractors and not pay

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a century social security for them. Um. So you know

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that's very much uh, something that that that's been talked

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 1>about in the US, you know, with uber would lift

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>where essence you regulars. As you know, the businesses are

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>being unfair and not paying their fair share for uh

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you know what, other you know, for profit businesses have

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>always paid. We just pay into the Social Security for

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>for employees instead of treating them as contractors. So if

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you look at um these issues and understand them and

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>clearly just they're gonna be idiosyncratic to each economy and markets,

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 1>you'll start to be able to predict at least the

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Chinese regulators behaviors when it comes to what are the

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>important E s G. Issues that they're grappling with and

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>they're likely to act on, you know, Uh, Jason, It's

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those times I wish this podcast was on video.

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I just want to set the scene for listeners here.

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Jason is appearing to us from what looks like the

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 1>Starship Enterprise from from from Star Check. Absolutely my favorite

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>zoom background I've seen in a lot of these. I

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>keep expecting to get a call from Scotty, you know,

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>saying we we ain't got no power captain or something.

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>But Jason wins the best zoon background of in what

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 1>goes up History. I'm gonna say say it here right now,

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>but Jason I in that intro, I said, I mentioned

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that note from Goldman that was out this week saying,

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, their clients are calling them up saying is

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 1>UH is China uninvestable right now? And I know you're

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>managing a active ETF with charity stock. So I'm assuming

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>your answer is so, I hope not at least you know.

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>But but but given this sort of you know, regulatory

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>risk that we're talking about, how do you how would

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you answer that question? You know, you sort of hinted

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>at the idea of trying to put your head in

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the mind of Chinese regulators and get ahead of what

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>might come next. But what is sort of a good

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>industry that in China is a beneficial to society that

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worry about the government sort of

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>turning off overnight like we saw in the education industry. Well,

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 1>I would say now that the government has sat down

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and had a good talking to with the big financial

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess, with the big finn tax and the consumer

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>tax uh, and then warned them about wielding monopoly power. UH.

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, for firms that truly have innovated

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and that have brought products and services that have made

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>things better and easier, Uh, certainly benefited the consumers created large,

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, large number of jobs. You know. I think

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>governments are are generally globally and and then certainly in

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>China supportive of businesses and industries like that. So I

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>would say, you know, broadly, you know, most of the

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>firms that have sold off are probably good buying opportunities today,

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 1>just pay attention to those are likely to be in

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a cross here of the regulators. Right so, uh, you know,

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>firms are uh you know, continue to wheel monopoly powers

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and uh and and don't seem to sort of get

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the memo with regard to um, you know, the government's

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of displeasure with with monopoly hours and and anti

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>competitive behaviors. Uh. And certainly, And I would say industries

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>that traditionally in the West that we're more concerned about,

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the liquor the tobacco, those are all likely

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to be issues as industries that are big polluters, that

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>are anti green and being given that carbon neutral is

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>now big initiative for for China. So those industries I

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>think that that traditionally are more of the negative or

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>low e s g uh firms and industries I think

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>those sort of big risks in China. Uh and uh.

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And again you know this is partly because you know,

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Chinese regulators and the Chinese societies no different to the

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Western societies. As they become wealthier and can afford it, Uh,

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>they do demand some of the very same sort of

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>E s G issues to be taken care of as

0:13:49.600 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>as that we in the West do. So there's this

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of a perception um from the investors, especially after

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the recent events, that it looks like the Chinese has

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:13.559
<v Speaker 1>become anti capital now they are moving backwards. At least

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a perception there. I guess that's why Goldman

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>had feeded so many calls from their clients, whether Chinese

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>investment or not. It looks like there should be a

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>China discount because people don't understand the rule anymore. People

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>don't understand the boundaries anymore. Um and Uh. I saw

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>there article from Steven Roach, his long term China boar.

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>He he said he's been optism optimistic about China for

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty five years. Now he started doubt whether

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a this is a moment he should have

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a have a second sought, So, do you think that

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>China is doing the right thing. Well, uh, I think

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, execution can always be better. I think, you know,

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>lot more pre communication, being a lot more clear about

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>what the regulators I want to accomplish, being much more

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say transparent with regard to the sort of

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>E s G agenda especially, I would say, you know,

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>carbon neutrality will be a good one. China's been signaling that,

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>signaling its path or green. Uh. And and I think

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that's helped out the market a lot in terms of

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>understanding where to direct capital, what to expect. If if

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>China sort of shares that same kind of transparency with

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>regard to perhaps more of the negative E S G issues,

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that would help the market out a bit as well.

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>And certainly I think the investors got to do the

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>other half right because actually it's it's been in the

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>number of policy speeches given by presidents She going all

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the way back to late eighteen with regard to his

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>concern about the inequity in the educational feel and and

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>really the pain created by the crams schools on on

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the children's and their parents. So I think investors also

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>have to to you know, listen a bit more tentatively

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to to sort of some of these policy pre signaling,

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>but I would say yes, in terms of execution, it

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>can always be be better understanding how markets can lose

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>confidence um from from even the slightest I think surprises

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>coming from regulators, especially when it comes to China and

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>especially in this current environment. So yes, you know, much

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>can be improved upon. But I would say that the

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>work goes on both sides, by both the regulators in

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>China but also investors looking to invest in China, because

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>we've got to recognize it is a more foreign market.

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Our access to information is a little bit more challenged

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.119
<v Speaker 1>versus our access to information when dealing with say us

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>UH than the ICY, and so investors really do have

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to work a little harder as well. Right, It's not

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a responsible approach for for managers and investors to to

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>simply just blame Chinese policymakers in this case. You know, Jason,

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you have such a strong background and sort of the

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the academic quantitative approach to to investing, you know, at

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>research affiliates and presumably now at this firm, and at

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>risk of repeating a joke I think I've already made

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on a previous episode of the podcast, but you know,

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>to me, it's like being a quant in the market

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is is sort of taking the you know, being like

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>in the college classroom approach to markets where the retail

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>trader has taken over and it's it's now more like

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>a market that's a fraternity party rather than a classroom setting,

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.919
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I know in China it has that

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>reputation for being a such a retail driven market. I've

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>seen stats something like correct me if I'm wrong, something

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>like volume is China is retail driven and and very

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>much a sort of a gambler's ethos rather than a

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, buy and hold investors approach to the market.

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So I want to ask you a two part question

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about that, and feel lucky sometimes I asked twelve part questions,

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>So two parts let you off easy. But uh so,

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 1>how is a quant approach China given that type of

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of dominance in the market among the retail set. And secondly, um,

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, are there lessons to be learned from analyzing

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that cohort of the Chinese market for what we're now

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the US where this growing dominance of of

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>retail investors and kind of their unpredictability and they're sort

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>of you know, investing on whims and message boards. I'm

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>guessing momentum probably is a factor that that translates regardless.

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just curious, you know, as as a quant

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>how do you how do you approach a retail driven

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>market like China? And you know, are there lessons to

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>apply to the US market as the retail trader sort

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of takes over. Absolutely, So, first of all, you're absolutely

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>right that China is a retail dominatant market and because

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of that, there is a very much casino feel to

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it and rader than a loan term investment, retirement um

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>investment based um feel too to that market. The result

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:11.239
<v Speaker 1>of which is, in a short run, prices can feel random, right,

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Prices don't seem to rationally respond to either news or

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of changes and developments in the fundamentals of companies.

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Now that's of course not a China specific issue. Any

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>market that's heavily retail, for example, in the US has

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>gone from three percent retail to now closer to thirty

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>percent retail with you know robin Hood free trading and

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know Wall Street bet dot com, Uh, you

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>know type type of activities and uh, and you know

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 1>in China, it's just you know, three times the the

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 1>the the magnitude right because they they're they're closer to

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>or thirty. So I think as an investor in the

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>short run, what will help you be successful is actually

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>focusing more on what drive sentiment, right, so be it

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the news cycle orright, be it what is capt doing

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the attention of media, of major influencers on on blogs

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and and podcasts. Those are probably likely to give you

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>more of an edge trading in that market. So in

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>some ways, UH think of you know, short term signals,

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>betting out short term momentum, short term mean reversion, looking

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>at almost you know, technical pattern UH type analysis are

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>going to give you an edge more so than looking

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>at long term fundamentals understanding industries and firms. Uh. And

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>in fact, you know, the most successful investors in China today,

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, are not the stock pickers who understand casual discounting,

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>not the quantz who understand sort of these long term

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:46.360
<v Speaker 1>factors I predict earnings growth, but really people who employ

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>technical analysis on a on a daily basis, you know,

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the you know, I would say more of the high

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>frequency market maker type of investors and strategies uh and yeah,

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>So in that type of market, uh, or you simply

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>have to bring into play a lot more of the

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:08.439
<v Speaker 1>non fundamental, more of the sentiment based analysis to um

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to really have short term success. But I think in

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the long run markets always converge and come back to

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>fundamental and China is no difference. It just means you

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>have to put up with more of the short term noises.

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm I want to let you talk to

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 1>your book a little bit here and uh to talk

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 1>to me about the Railian quantamount old China e t

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>F rayqu was the ticket right? And tell me race race? Okay? Good?

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 1>That was a test. I'm just making sure you got

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>your ticketres right there. So say say, I'm a guy

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.719
<v Speaker 1>in the elevator there on the Starship Enterprise with you

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>when and you've got two minutes to to tell me? Uh,

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, sell me on the CTF. What it's an

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>active ETF, So what you know, what's the selling point

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.199
<v Speaker 1>for it? As far as your methodology and how you

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>construct the portfolio compared to say the f x I,

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the index tracking passive ETF. That's US investors

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>are pretty familiar with. What's what's your sales pitch. Well,

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:28.120
<v Speaker 1>if you want to access China right, UH, you want

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to access China actively. And that's because a capweight to

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>passive index UH doesn't make sense for a very inefficient

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>market where in the short run, lots of great companies

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>are underprised and lots of back companies are overprized UH,

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and where you know, giving you know, doing some research

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 1>is going to give you an edge in terms of

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 1>knowing what the informed institutions are buying, perhaps knowing what

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the informed UH and and well plugged in people who

0:22:56.119 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>understand policy shoots are buying and doing so the active

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 1>approach is certainly going to help you. Additionally, by the

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, low price, good quality firms that will grow

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and avoid I think a lot of the hype, a

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of stories, a lot of firms that do eventually

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>become regulatory risk, either because of poor governance or because

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of just general pool compliance with the

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>regulatory environment. So you gotta go active in the market.

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:30.439
<v Speaker 1>That's retail traded, Jason. One of the rationales I heard

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>for the crackdown on the CRAM schools was tryinga's three

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 1>child policy. You know, they want to encourage UH families

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to have three children, and obviously if you have to

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>pay for three sets of cram schools, that's gonna get

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna get pretty expensive. Um. But I wonder that's a

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>fascinating concept to me because here in the US, we

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>have a hard time getting people to wear a mask,

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, to to stop a virus or get a

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>free vaccination. Uh, you know, we have a hard time

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>having the government getting people to to anything. But in China,

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wonder is it harder to get couples

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to have three kids than to say the wonder child policy?

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>And how important is that of apolicies? First, the economy

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and how you're thinking about investments, does it play into

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it at all, this potential for for a sort of

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a baby boom relative to what China has seen in

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>recent generations. Okay, so first of all, you're absolutely right.

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it is probably far more difficult today to

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>ask you know, Chinese couples to have kids than to

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>not have kids. And then again, and that's more of

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>an Asian phenomenon today, right, if you look at Taiwan

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and you look at South Korea, like the birthrate per

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>couple is is less than one, right, So that's that's

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously very bad for demographics. Right, that's very bad for

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at consumption growth, you know, ten twenty years down

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 1>a row. When when you have such a you know,

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 1>rapidly dropping population, kids are very expensive. As a father

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of freaking I will tell you you met your quota

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and talking about you done well, done well, yeah, and

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>as the kids are very expensive from both a financial

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>resourcing perspective, but also for young couples in China today

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>right where there's a lot more I think opportunities to

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:26.880
<v Speaker 1>make more money change your quality of life. So you

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>start to think about, hey, you know I have opportunity costs.

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Right when I'm raising kids, I I'm maybe not out

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>there making money or spending money, given that I'm able

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to make a lot more money now. So I think

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing is really an issue we see in

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>developed markets, right, you know, as as economy evolves developed um,

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>people's willingness or the need to have more children simply

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>have declined. So that's just something I don't think you

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>could mandate easily and change now. Of course, you know

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the government has sort of gone out and try to

0:25:56.440 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>research what's stopping young couples from having to you know,

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>having kids or wanting to have kids, and you know

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that the responses, unsurprisingly have been so expensive. Race kids

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 1>are part of the cram school. Part of it is

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>um uh, you know, real estate, right because if you

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>want to be in areas that are safer, nicer, better

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>school um that real estate is expensive. Of the government's

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>also been talking about, you know, how to how to

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>change or you know, influence real estate prices so that

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>that it's not so expensive for for for people to

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 1>have access to good school districts and so on and

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>so forth. But I don't think that will solve everything,

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>right d These are on the margin issues, but they're

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>not all the totality of the issues. Um So, I

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>think the regulators and then the policymakers in China are

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>going to find it frustrating that they're they're they're trying

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to do so much, but the the the out the outputs,

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the outcomes may not may not actually be as meaningful.

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's say they're hoping to achieve play some romantic music

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>over loudspeakers or something. I don't know, I don't know. Yeah,

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what stand clear. Of the craziest things we

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:12.719
<v Speaker 1>saw in markets this week, well, With that said, guys,

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't let you go without partaking in our tradition.

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>And Jason, I hope they weren't about this, but we

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>have a tradition here. We we end each show with

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the craziest things we saw in markets during the week. Yeah,

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling you got something crazy for us.

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.959
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with you. Yes, it's actually related

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to the three child policy. Um So Punjuhuan City, which

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>is the city of one point two million people in

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>southwest China's Trains province, is giving each couple each baby

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 1>actually um essentially fine hundred you one, which is eighty

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars and months for families that have um second child

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 1>or third child until other babies ten three. So this

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is the first time. It's first of China city offer

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 1>cash for people to have more baby East. It's probably

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty standards in the western countries to have child subsidies,

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>but not long ago. China. At one point China policy

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and into certainly attended into two China policy, and now

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>we have a three side of policy and people are

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>offering cash to have people who have more babies. I

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's pretty crazy. That's that that will work better

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>than my romantic music idea. I think that's how you

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 1>do it. I just offer cash. Yeah, how about you, Jason?

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen anything crazy in markets this week? Well?

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 1>I think the craziest thing I saw was the massive rebound,

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>uh you know in the educational sector. Well, essentially, if

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you read the policy announcement, these firms should be worth

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty dying close to zero. But somehow there's still people

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>who are willing to jump in and catch a falling

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>knife hoping there is a rebound, right, And so I

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>found that pretty crazy, right, you know, people are not

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 1>doing their homeboorking. That is pretty good. Yeah, I mean

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how long it's gonna take to sort of,

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, remove the profitability from these companies. It's that

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is crazy though that Yeah, you're right though, why would

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>they why would anyone pay anything for them? At this point?

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>If literally that the regulator says, like the firm you're buying,

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>we are going to make them into nonprofits, meaning they're

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to pay a dividend, right, they're not allowed

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to make up profit. But somehow you still want to

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>become a shareholder. Yeah, that's just good. That's a good one.

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a crazy one. All right, I'll give you guys

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>mine I uh listeners know, I like the alternative assets,

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and the more alternative the asset class, the better. So

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I bring to an auction that's going to happen next

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>month in Great Britain. They're auctioning off one slice of

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>wedding cake from the wedding of Prince Charles and Princess

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Diana forty years ago. Someone's still available. Yes, yes, someone

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>saved one piece of wedding cake. I'll just and I

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>hate to say it to you, guys. We have to

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>play prices right with me now here, I'm gonna ask

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you each what you think the expected bid is for

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>this piece of wedding cake. Put those quad skills to work, Jason,

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and let you know here it's ice came from. They're

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>actually twenty three and as far as supply goes, there

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>were twenty three official wedding cakes for that wedding. Pretty

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>amazing happened almost forty years ago, exactly. Uh July one

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>features a Marza pan bass and a sugar on like

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>coat of arms colored in gold, red, blue and silver

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.959
<v Speaker 1>on top. I was given to Uh, one of the

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>household servants of the Queen Mother and she kept this

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>thing for all these years. Um, so it hasn't got

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>on auction yet, so who knows what the actual price

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>will be? But what do you guys think to two

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>part question again start with you what do you think

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that the expected bid is for this in British pounds?

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>And second part is would you take a taste of

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>this wedding cake? I was trying to say ten bitcoins,

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and so we are talking about alternate to that assets,

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>but we can't do the conversion to the British pounds. No,

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and no, I won't take a bite on the bit

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to the cake. Smart man. Ten bitcoins? That that puts

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it up the posts thirty thousand British pounds. Jason, how

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>about you? You're going over under that? Oh? I well,

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a ten bitcoin so that that makes

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>about three three hundred of thousand pounds. You know, being

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>being from Boston where I I track, you know Tom

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Brady's progression, even though he's moved on to a different city.

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Now I know his his rookie his rookie card fetch

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>something like one point three million. Uh last time I

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>got auction. Uh. And then it's it's not the only

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>car left in the world unlike this, this piece of

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 1>wedding cake. Right, so I gotta I gotta say the

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>wedding cakes gotta fit something like let's just say one

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>point five million pounds. How's that? And when it's that expensive,

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to take a bite. I will say

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's Dominic Winter auctioneers. I imagine they would like both

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of you two to be bidding in this auction, because

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>not about this up is the surprising low value they think.

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>They're thinking only five pounds. I think it's gonna go

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have to check back on this in August

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>when it actually goes up, because I think it's gonna

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>go for a lot more than five five pounds. I

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>might buy the thing myself. I think they're way off,

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're expected bid on that. Maybe that's a way

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to drum up interest and get get people up bidding

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>on it. But a similar piece of cake sold in

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen I think, um, right after Princess Diana died for

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:52.719
<v Speaker 1>like a hundred and fifty thousand pounds, So depreciating asset.

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Wedding wedding takes are appreciating asset. The only question I

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>have is how do they'll send that cake. How do

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you very fine from the wedding they well, they have

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes with some kind of documentation. I'd have to

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>look up the story, but there is um the the

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>servant who collected it. It was given to her. I

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>think i's just leftovers, like here, you want some cake?

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>And she knew that this might be worth a few bucks,

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>so she tucked it away and she wrote on top

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of it, wedding cake from Princess Diinas. So there's some

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of These auction houses are good at authenticating this stuff.

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not sure how, but I it would

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>be a pretty good scam to have a forty year

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>old piece of wedding cake was not Actually they somehow

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>turned us into an n f T. It might be

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>what even more right and NC is someone actually eating

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the thing? And then you saw that for that? Might

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that you might get your million and a half for that,

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>But we'll see. I'm gonna check back because I think

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you guys were in the right direction. I think it's

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna go a lot more than what they expected, right,

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>because people pay crazy money for crazy things. Is that's

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the lesson of this segment. I think, so but

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>guys really enjoyed this conversation. Jason, Sue and yees She.

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Thank you both for your time. Jason, I know it's

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>earlier where you are, so thank you for getting up

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>early for us. And uh, absolutely and get back to

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the flight deck there of the U S S Enterprise

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>What Goes Up. We'll be back next week and so

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>then you can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal, website

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 1>and app or wherever you get your podcasts. We'd love

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it if you took the time to rate and review

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the show on Apple Podcasts, so more listeners can find us.

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 1>And you can find us on Twitter, follow me at

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 1>ring Anonymous, ye she is at she Bloomberg. You can

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>also follow Bloomberg Podcasts at podcasts and thank you to

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Pelle to Bloomberg Radio and the voice of the

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:54.800
<v Speaker 1>New York City Subway System. What Goes Up is produced

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:58.399
<v Speaker 1>by Tofur forheas the head of Bloomberg Podcasts is Francesco Levi.

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, See you next time.