WEBVTT - Quantum Immortality

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey you, welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And today we're going to be talking about broadly a

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>topic that we've touched on a number of times here before,

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and that is immortality. We've touched on it in terms

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of religion and mythology. We've touched on it from the

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>standpoint of our our great fear of mortality and death

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and therefore our longing for immortality and basically every aspect

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>of our lives. And we have also talked about it

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in terms of improving human longevity. And

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we've talked about it a good bit in

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>reference to Highlander, because Robert, you've been watching that movie

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>for about thirty five years, I think since you started

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it in like three second increments or something. Yeah, I'm

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.319
<v Speaker 1>watching it on a streaming service in five to ten

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>minute sections. It's a race against time to see if

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I can finish Highlander before it's removed from this particular

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>streaming service. You know what they call that kind of

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>lunch break, it's the quickening. I tend to call it

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a squatt and gobble because you're just kind of like

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>squatting in your in your living room, just eating as

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>fast as possible and watching just a little bit of

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Highlander and then going back to work. Now, how does

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the Highlander version of immortality stack up against all the

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>normal kinds of immortality you find in mythology and religion.

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you would probably agree with me that it's

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>not the deepest treatment of immortality and mortality in in

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in our collective storytelling. But it does hit on some

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of the main points, right, Like, oh, immortality sounds great,

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>but then when you actually have to do it, it's

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of a pain. Um. Well, I'd say a lot

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of religious visions are actually like that. They tell you,

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of religions include some version of immortality,

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a sort of linear survival after death of

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the soul, or there's a kind of eternal cycle of

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>reincarnation or something like that. In any event, it very

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>often is not necessarily encouraged for you to look too

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 1>closely at the details of immortality. Right, But this Highlander

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is essentially another version of the wandering immortal story where

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of stuck with it it what seems like

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 1>it would be a blessing is kind of a curse.

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel like human perceptions of immortality, they tend to

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>break down to this imagined things that would normally terminate

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>or undergo a phase shift but magically don't have to.

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So the desire to for immortality is often either a

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>reaction to just the reality of death and mortality itself,

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>which is very understandable. Uh, kind of defines our existence

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is modern humans, or it comes from a desire for

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a certain state of existence to continue unchanged. But it

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>does often kind of come back to this idea of stagnation,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you know. Um, Like the thing I want is really stagnation.

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>The thing I'm afraid of is change, um you know

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I and I wonder if if that's what we see

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in Highlander, you know, in these characters like Connor McLeod

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and Ramires. You know this Connor changed? Is he changed

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.679
<v Speaker 1>by his experience in the film? I mean certainly that

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the Kurgan, the villain isn't. Um. It seems like it

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>would be more interesting if you like switched around backgrounds

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and had like the Goody two shoes becomes the villain

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and the and the the ancient villain becomes the modern hero,

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that sort of transformation, but instead these are very stagnant characters. Well,

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it's actually part of the ancient mythological tradition of immortality

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that if it comes with too much change, it's actually

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a curse rather than a blessing. Uh. Think about Aos

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and Tiffannus in Greek mythology. We we've talked about them

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>recently or where the ideas Aos, the goddess of Dawn,

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>has this lover, this mortal human lover named Tiffanus, and

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>she wants him to be able to live forever. So

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>she cries to Zeus and says, please grant him and

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>more to Lity, and Zeus, being the jerk that he has, says, okay, done,

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>makes Tiffanness an immortal, but doesn't grant him eternal youth.

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So he's gonna live forever, but he's just gonna get

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>older and older, and that seems to be implied to

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>be a fate worse than death. Yeah. You know another

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>treatment on this that I really like Richard K. Morgan

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>in his book Altered Carbon uh, and then also in

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the Netflix series that just recently came out, that that

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is basically that first book brought to life on the screen.

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>In this show, you have essentially immortality via digital consciousness,

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>digitized human consciousness moved from body to body, and typically

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a very grim vision of what that would mean.

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>It basically means that the the worst, you know, richest

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>decrepit individuals in society, they're just gonna grow more and

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>more awful because they have more they have an increased

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>lifespan in which to be awful and become jaded to

0:04:56.200 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>their various uh um, you know, inappropriate pleasures. Yeah, we

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>have a concept that the elderly tend to become wise

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>in their old age. I mean, who knows if that's

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>actually true, but well there's at least an impression along

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>those lines. But it seems to be premised on the

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>knowledge that death is coming. What if wisdom is contingent

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>on that. Yeah, it takes me back to our episode

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>on Chinese immortality and some of these Dallas concepts of

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>like the the elder enlightened being where you're aging is

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a transformation into a different state. But so many of

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>these ideas of immortality, it's like, yeah, you get to

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>remain young forever, uh forget without really thinking about what

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that would do, how that might warp the individual. But

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>what if there was a concept of immortality that in

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>fact didn't imply any of these changes, right. It didn't

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>say that you're going to make a phase transition to

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>another kind of being. It didn't say that your soul

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to leave your body. It didn't say any

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of that. It was just a literal, physical, straightforward statement

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that everything is going to be normal. There's no magic,

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>except you'll just happen to never die. What sounds good

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is their catch, Whether or not it sounds good. This

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>is what we want to talk about today, a physical

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>possibility of immortality presented as a thought experiment with a

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of perhaps flawed underlying assumptions. So you're unfortunately not

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>going to walk away from today's episode probably with the

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.359
<v Speaker 1>assumption that yes, all humans will live forever based on

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the laws of physics, but we do want to explore

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that as a possibility. Yeah, nothing we're going to talk

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>about here today is actually going to impact your life,

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>except in the way maybe you think about your existence.

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Quite true, unless it does impact your life, in which

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>case this is going to be very important. We're barely

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>talking about quantum mechanics, and it's already tangled up it

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 1>or not here, right, So we should make the transition

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>to talking about physics, because this is going to be

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a physics spaced episode talking about interpretations of quantum mechanics. Uh,

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and so I guess we should begin with just a

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>little bit of the discussion of weirdness of scale sale.

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>If you listen to this podcast, you've probably heard at

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>least a little bit about the deep strangeness of physics

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>at scales much bigger or smaller than the energy, mass, distance, speed,

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and so forth that we deal with on a day

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to day basis. On, for example, vast scales, we live

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in a universe apparently dominated by dark matter, these gigantic

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>gravitational anomalies that can't be seen or touched except by

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the way that they've been space time and hold galaxies together,

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and on these huge scales, the dominating physics regime, the

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of physics that makes the biggest difference is not

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the kind of physics that governs our everyday lives, but

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of Einstein's general relativity, where time is not a universal

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>measure and can appear to slow down or speed up

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>from different vantage points. Where mass changes the geometry of

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>space time itself and can warp or even trap light itself.

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Now shrink down to roughly human sized scales, and suddenly

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the laws of physics appear or to change. They don't

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>really change, but different physical phenomena become the most salient,

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>become the most important types of calculations to do when

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to figure out how things are moving and

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>how one physical thing is affecting another. So this normal scale,

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>general relativity doesn't matter very much. We can throw baseballs

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and shoot cannons and smash watermelons and all that stuff

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>without taking general relativity into the equation. And this scale

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is generally best described by Isaac Newton's classical mechanics. This

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>is also the realm which physics is intuitive. Right at

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>this scale, everything seems to fly and fall and push

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and resist in a way that makes sense to us. Yeah,

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>this is the This is the room in which we

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we have evolved to thrive exactly. That's the important point.

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of hard to remember this, but we should

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>do our best to internalize the fact that this middle

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>scale of physics, the Newtonian scale, does not actually make

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>any more sense in an objective point of view than

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the other scales do. It's just the scale at which

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>our brains evolved. So presumably, if we happen to be

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>evolved star sized organisms, things like general relativity would be

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>intuitive and would make natural sense to us, and Newtonian

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>physics would be crazy, weird stuff that goes on down there. Well,

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.839
<v Speaker 1>one way that I like to think about it is

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the explanation that you can think of classical physics as

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the Earth's crust and quantum physics as the underlying mantle,

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and then you have to keep in mind that there

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>are things about Earth's mantle. They only make sense if

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you take into account Earth's in our core. I think

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a good analogy, because if we do keep zooming down,

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>we of course get get to what you just mentioned,

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics, this next realm where things change. Yet again,

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you get too extremely small scales on the scale of

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:49.239
<v Speaker 1>elementary particles and tiny objects like atoms, protons, electrons, photons

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of light, and at this scale the physics regime changes

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>so that things stop behaving in a way best described

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>by either general relativity or classical mechanics, and they int

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>behave according to a theory we now know as quantum

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>mechanics or quantum physics. And this came about because, you know, originally,

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>say the dawn of the twentieth century, scientists were trying

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how things like atoms could behave as

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>reconciled by classical mechanics. They were trying to look at

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:19.839
<v Speaker 1>things like the orbit of electrons around the nucleus of

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>an atom and say, okay, does that work in a

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>classical mechanics way, like the way planets orbit around a star,

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>And it just didn't work. So they had to figure

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>out what's actually going on here, and eventually they came

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>up with the theory of quantum physics, which is now

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>predicted mainly by what is called I've been saying his

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>name wrong my whole life. I think that the Shreddinger equation.

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I've been calling him Schrodinger. I've been saying Schrodinger as well.

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I've heard Schrodinger from everybody. Yeah, I

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>think I've heard it, but I don't know. I think

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>shredd Shreddinger is shredding. It's hard to even say. I

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>want to go Schrodinger Shreddinger. It's all because of Shreddinger.

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>It does it sounds more wholesome than than than cats

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and boxes, uh, than that are neither dead nor alive,

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>or are both dead and alive at the same time. Yeah, so, well,

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you'll probably hear us say it both ways in this podcast.

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 1>I apologize for that, but there's gonna be just no

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>getting around it. I guess it depends on how the

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>wave function collapses each time, but um so anyway. It

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is named after the Austrian physicist Irvin Shreddinger, and Shreddinger

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>derived the equation in the mid nineteen twenties and ever

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>since then it has been profoundly useful and profoundly confusing.

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>And this is because quantum mechanics is simultaneously one of

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the best most predictive theories in all of science, and

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>at the same time it clearly implies a reality that

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>makes absolutely no intuitive sense to us mammals that evolved

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to deal with classical physics on the Newtonian scale. It

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:57.199
<v Speaker 1>is bonkers and completely defies our expectations of how the

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>world should work. And there are a bunch of different

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>ways you could explain this, but just to pick the

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>simplest version for now, that the Shreddinger equation can be

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>used to predict the behavior of tiny particles like atoms

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and electrons over time. So just the way that you

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>can use Newtonian equations to predict something like the arc

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>of a cannonball or the force of a falling boulder,

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you can use the Shreddinger equation to predict the behavior

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of tiny particles like electrons or photons. But a Newtonian

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>cannonball is experienced by us and described by physics as

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a single solitary object with one starting point a single

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>ending point in a clear trajectory. A particle on the

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>quantum scale does not behave that way at all, but rather,

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>according to the shredding Ear equation, it behaves a lot

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>like a pattern of waves in a fluid, and this

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>means it can have what can seem like multiple contradictory properties.

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>For example, a particle can, from our point of view,

0:12:55.440 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>appear to have multiple different positions, velocities, or spin directions

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. And this range of possible simultaneous

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>behaviors is what's known as the wave function. The wave

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>function is all of these potentialities that seemed to be

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>simultaneously true about a quantum object or system, and this

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>wave function exists in an abstract infinite dimensional space that's

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>known as the Hilbert space. Now again, of course this

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>makes no sense to us, but it's proven to a

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>degree that's almost beyond dispute. Like one of the most

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.839
<v Speaker 1>classic proofs of the wave function behavior of quantum scale

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>objects is the double slit experiment. Yes, this is where

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>we get the same. When you're out of slit, you're

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>out of peer. Right now, that's a different situation. I

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know what you're talking about. Old beer ad slit

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>speer sla. We've actually just been looking at old beer

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>ads here on the podcast. There apparently was an old

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Miller ad that had gigantic monsters in it where they

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>grab a truck full of miller and just chugged the truck. Yeah,

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>now that one's awesome. I think that was that was

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>from from when I was a kid, or in junior

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>high or something. I remember seeing that one, the Schlitz

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>beer ad where they have this whole when you're out

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of slits, you're out of here. Uh, it's one I

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>never actually saw, but was referenced on Mystery Science Theater

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>three thousand. Growing up. So one of these these these

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>many pop culture references that I have no direct experience with,

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>only a secondhand experience with them from watching MST. Isn't

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it sweet that all of these beer commercials are imprinted

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>on your childhood? Yeah, well it's some of them were

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>not too bad. Some of them had monsters in them.

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>But the double slit experiment to get to get it

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>back to quantum mechanics here, the basic idea is pretty simple.

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>The experimenter shines a light on a barrier that has

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>two narrow slits in it, and then the experimental studies

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the interference pattern produces on a screen. So you've got

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>like two walls in order, and the first wall that

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the light has to go through as the two slits,

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and then the back wall has a screen on it

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that the light can be projected on after it goes

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>past the first wall. Right, And I should also add

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that this was first performed by Thomas Young in eighteen

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>o one. Now, light has a dual nature, it's both

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>wave like and particle like. In the experiment, light travels

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>through both slits and creates this interference pattern. And if

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you send a single photon through photon being the light particle, right,

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the single unit of electromagnetic energy. So you send a

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>single photon through it still forms an interference pattern as

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>if the single photon travels through both slits simultaneously. If

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you hear me laughing, it's because at this point in

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>our notes, Robert has inserted an image from the movie

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Time Cop two of what actor Ron Silver, Yeah, he

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>played the villain. And here we have two different the

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>villain from different time periods encountering each other and kind

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of looking at each other with amusement and or confusion.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think both of these responses are are apt

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>when contemplate and quantum mechanics. I mean, basically, though this

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is a simple experiment. Who observes something that should not

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>be at least as far as classical physics is concerned. Yeah,

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the the idea that at the quantum level, a single

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>object can appear to inhabit multiple places at one time.

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>It produces this wave of like effect when it should

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>be more like, you know, we think on a classical level,

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>would be like a ball thrown at something. It's one object,

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's not. And you have to wonder how can

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>this be true? Like objects in our experience never appear

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to be in more than one place at one time.

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>A baygel does not behave like a wave pattern in

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>which you know their peaks and troughs at different locations. Right.

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>A bagel is just a single solid object that doesn't

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>move unless you move it. Yeah, I think, I mean

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we we we mentioned time cop in passing here, and

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think a deep scientific reading of time cop

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>is is essential here. But this in other films do

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of get into this territory when you have the paradox,

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>right of of the same character encountering themselves from a

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>different time. Um, well, anytime something that is I mean,

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>how can that be, right, something somebody is in two

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>places at once. Yeah, it's used in fiction because obviously

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 1>it never happens on a macroscopic scale and reality. So

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the contradiction here is between the fact that the Shreddinger

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>equation is obviously correct and the fact that it predicts

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff that makes no sense and we never see. And

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>so it's led to the need for what are called

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>interpretations of quantum mechanics. Pretty Much everybody accepts the underlying

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>theory of quantum mechanics. You'd be a fool not to.

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>It's incredibly experimentally verified and very predictive, but there's a

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of disagreement about what it means and how it

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>actually connects to our experience of reality. So, Robert, you

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the dead cat in the box earlier. Yes, this

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a feature of what's been for

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a long time the leading interpretation of quantum mechanics. So

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got different interpretations that we're going to talk about

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>two mainly today, but there have been actually a bunch

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of different interpretations. The two we're gonna be focusing on

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>are the Copenhagen interpretation and what we will later discuss

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>as the many Worlds interpretation. But the Copenhagen interpretation was

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>created in the nineteen twenties by the physicist Nil Spoor

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and Werner Heisenberg, and the Copenhagen interpretation essentially postulates a

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>world governed by quantum mechanical probabilities, and these probabilities get

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>decided on through a process known as wave function collapse.

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So you've got these multiple possibilities at the same time.

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the way of function. Uh. And then they're going

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to say it collapses, So what does that mean? So

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>imagine you've got a quantum level particle like an electron,

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>and you're trying to figure out where is it going

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to be? Is the electron going to be on the

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>right or is it going to be on the left.

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>What the Copenhagen interpretation says is that this wave function

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>is in a state of unresolved potential called superposition, and

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the electron could be on the right, and it could

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>be on the left, and in fact it's neither one.

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>But it's in this state where there's a fifty percent

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>probability of each And here's where it connects with our

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>world of solid macroscopic objects that are in only one

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>state in one place at a time. The Copenhagen interpretation

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>says that the wave function collapses into only one of

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 1>its potential configurations once somebody observes it. Now, this has

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>led to a lot of people reading all kinds of

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>crazy esoteric things about consciousness into quantum mechanics, right right, Yeah,

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>basically what is the role of the observer and everything? Yeah,

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think a lot of those, uh, those consciousness

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>type ideas are based on a misinterpretation of the grounding

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Copenhagen interpretation and a misinter misunderstanding of the

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Copenhagen interpretation is not a sure thing

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that it is an interpretation, not the theory itself. But

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>this is again, this is where the cat comes in

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the cat is simultaneously dead and alive

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>inside of this box where where random life or death

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to occur. Right, So that, yeah, this is

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be how they map it up from the

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>quantum realm into the macroscopic world and how does our

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>reality connect with these probability distributions on the quantum level. Uh, So,

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you've got an electron. It's neither on your left nor

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>on your right, but in a state of superposition where

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 1>there is simultaneously a fifty probability of finding it on

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>each side if you look with precision, and it just

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 1>stays this way, suspended it with these possibilities until somebody

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>observes it, meaning you use some kind of device or

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>method to figure out exactly where that particle is. And

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>then the once somebody does that, then it's actually only

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>one place it was in superposition. Then you looked at it.

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Now it's on your left. It's not crazy. That crazy

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>situation to to really wrap your head around. If you

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of think of it in terms of like TV

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>production or something. You know, if you're on one of

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.479
<v Speaker 1>these shows, we have to guess what's behind the curtain,

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and there's something behind each curtain, but only one curtain

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is actually gonna be opened. Oh yeah, and a kind

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of solipsistic way. It's almost not hard to believe that

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the universe only only matters when I look at it.

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, So, despite the fact that many physicists have

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 1>felt fine relying on this interpretation for the decade since then,

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one thing we should point out is that

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you can do all kinds of useful quantum mechanics science

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and and even use it for technology without knowing which

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>interpretation is correct. And in fact, it sometimes doesn't matter

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 1>which interpretation is correct. The math of the theory works

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>either way, right, Yeah, absolutely, But many continue to protest

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>that the Copenhagen interpretation is nonsensical and it leads to

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>these apparent absurdities like as as you mentioned, Robert the

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>cat in the box, the famous Schrodinger's cat or Shreddinger's cat. Yeah,

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>we've we've already referenced a couple of times. You should

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>probably just lay it out for us here exactly how

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>this experiment goes. Uh, However, you know I do have

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a soft spot for cats. Yeah, let's let's get rid

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of cats. Don't want to kill a cat again. We

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>people talk about killing cats way too much in science.

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they're anti cat. I'm going to bring in a

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>unicorn because we've established that maybe unicorns aren't as perfect

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>as everybody thinks they are. This particular experiment funded entirely

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>by Tim Curry, Lord of Darkness. Full disclosure. Okay, so

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 1>I've got a unicorn in a box. This box is

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 1>totally opaque and nobody can see what's happening inside. There

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>no cameras inside. You don't know what's going on there.

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And there is a device inside the box that will

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:39.479
<v Speaker 1>instantaneously incinerate the unicorn if it's triggered. And the device

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>gets triggered based on a quantum superposition event. So there's

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a particle that has a fifty chance of spinning clockwise

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and a fifty chance of spinning counterclockwise. And if when

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you check the particle, it's spinning clockwise, the unicorn dies,

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>and if it's spinning counterclockwise, the unicorn lives. But this

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>would mean that the unicorn is both literally alive and

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>dead at the same time inside the box until somebody

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>looks inside the box to observe what happened. And at

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the moment somebody looks inside the box, then suddenly the

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>unicorn is actually just either alive or dead, but until

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody looked, it was both. Robert, do you think that

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>describes the universe we live in? Um? I don't think it.

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>It does not really describe the universe that we perceive.

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing. Yeah, the universe we live in is

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>vast beyond our abilities to process it. Yeah, so yeah,

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>it's the answer is kind of yes and no at

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the same time. I mean, I feel kind of despose. Again,

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>we want to be clear that we think the universe

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 1>does not need to adhere to our intuition. So just

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 1>the fact that something seems unlikely to you or to

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 1>me doesn't make it actually unlikely to exist in the world.

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>But just going on a gut level, one does has

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>come to feel less and less right to me, And

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>so I'm kind of disposed against the Copenhagen interpretation. I

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 1>think all that means is that it doesn't necessarily feel

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>right to me. That doesn't mean it's not true. I

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like it lines up well with like with with

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>with personal anxiety, you know, because it's essentially because when

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>when you're anxious about the future, you the bad things

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that can happen are as real as the good things

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>or just the mediocre things that could happen, and the

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>bad thing is only really gone when you actually reach

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the point where where the particle has spun left. You know.

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 1>So there is something about about the about this particular

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>explanation that I think does match up with some of

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the ways we perceive our world. Yeah, definitely lines up

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>with some emotional realities. Maybe less so with physical objects. Definitely.

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, yeah, well we'll see. I mean, again, we

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:58.719
<v Speaker 1>can't rule it out. It it's still been the the

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>interpretation that's been fa by the majority of physicists since

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the advent of quantum mechanics. But like we said earlier,

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>it's not the only way, And to get to our

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:12.439
<v Speaker 1>discussion of physical immortality, we're gonna have to explore another

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of quantum mechanics that arose in opposition to the

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Copenhagen interpretation. We will start looking at that when we

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>get back from a break than alright, we're back, so

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna start talking here about the many worlds interpretation,

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>which I believe we've we've probably touched on on the

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 1>show before, because it is one of these that spins

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>off into very uh fantastic comic book realms, right, the

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>idea of alternate realities, other worlds where other things have happened,

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>essentially the Library of Babble, yes, but with a specific

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>physical mechanism causing it to come into existence. And so

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we will do our best to try to explain this here. Now,

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about the Copenhagen interpretation, the idea that

0:25:55.920 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got a quantum mechanical system that's in superposition sort

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of both in a simple way, it's both left and

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>right literally at the same time until you look at it,

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>at which point it becomes just one or the other.

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And so observation causes the collapse of the way of function,

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and it just becomes a normal physical reality, just like

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the kind of single, solitary reality that we're used to

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.479
<v Speaker 1>looking at. Here's the main difference between that and what

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>we're about to talk about, the many worlds interpretation. In

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>this interpretation, a particle does not exist in superposition between

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>two possible outcomes and then collapse into one. Outcome or

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>the other. When we look at it instead, it exists

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>as a wave function in this superposition where there it

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>has multiple different qualities at the same time, it's both

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>left and right. It's in this state as a wave

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and then it stays that way, and it just keeps

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>staying that way, and that's how it works. So it's

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>another way the bad thing that ends up not happening

0:26:56.240 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>actually does happen, but it's in essentially another timeline. Yeah,

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty much. So this was first proposed by the physicist

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:05.439
<v Speaker 1>to you ever at the third when he was a

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 1>graduate student at Princeton in nineteen fifty seven. And it's

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>not the core of the theory that there are multiple universes,

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>but you cannot deny that. When you take this theory

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 1>to its logical conclusion, it puts us in and a

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>multiverse of infinite timelines, right, infinite timelines, infinite parallel universes,

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>each different from the last. Now, and some of these universes,

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it again comes right back to basically what we described

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Library of Babel, and some of these universes,

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the difference is going to be really slight, such as

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a parallel universe where everything is exactly the same, except

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you had a bagel for breakfast instead of cereal. Um.

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Then there's also one, for instance, there's a universe where

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Highlander one Best Picture of the fifty nine Academy Awards. Well,

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>now I want to take issue with you there for

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a second. It predicts that you could possibly have every

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 1>variation on the universe that is allowed by the laws

0:27:57.400 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of physics. I'm not sure if the laws of physics

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 1>rule out to Highlander best Picture win. Well, there's papers

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>will have to be written about that, so we'll have

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see some peer viewed papers on that

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that question, Joe. Basically, the idea, though, is for each

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 1>possible outcome to a given action, the world splits into

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>copies of itself, instantaneous processes that Everett calls decohesion. But

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>before I move forward on on the oscars, I guess

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a better argument would you could say that there's a

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>version where that year the Academy awards Children of a

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Lesser God one as opposed to Platoon, which actually won. Yeah. Well,

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so what it would actually mean is that

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the outcomes of these universes split every time there are

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>different possible branches of a quantum superposition. Now, the question

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>would be how often are differences in reality determined by

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a quantum superposition going into its different possibilities. Presumably the

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>answer to that is a lot, because I mean, quantum

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>mechanics underlies all kinds of stuff that's happening all the time.

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>It underlies things that are happening inside people's brains, It

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>underlies things that are happening in physical reality and the

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>interactions between objects. Small random differences in how a quantum

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>superposition event breaks off could lead to macroscopic effects down

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the line, and some of these effects could be rather severe.

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>So you could have other universes which would differ in

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>ways that alter reality on a grand scale. For instance,

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine a parallel universe with no gravity um. Some cosmologists

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>use the theory is that handy explanation for why life

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>evolved in our universe at all? Their answer is simply, well,

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>they're ac countless universes where life never evolved, and various

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>universes in which it evolved along similar lines as ours.

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a way to get around the Copernican principle, right,

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the idea that Earth and and therefore earth life and

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the human experience should not have a privileged position in

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the cosmos, right, Uh yeah, I mean it's essentially that's

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of anthropic reasoning, the anthropic principle like why do

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we live on a planet that's capable of supporting life?

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>The idea under that is like, well, where would you

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>expect to live? Would you expect to live on a

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>planet that couldn't support life? Um? Yeah, And there are

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of interesting questions about whether that type of

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>reasoning is valid or not. I'm not up. I used

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to read about this kind of stuff, but it's been

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a while since I did. Well, it's it's like, how

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>how is it possible that I'm alive and I haven't

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>been killed by Jason Vorhees. Well, there there are multiple

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>alternate realities where I have But where else could I

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about this at this point in my life

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>than a universe in which I have not. Now, that

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of reasoning will come up again in a big

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>way in a minute. So we should be clear that

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the existence of possibly infinite parallel universes is a consequence

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>or an implication of Everett's interpretation of quantum mechanics, not

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the core assumption of it. The core assumption is just

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the universality of the wave function. It just says the

0:30:56.200 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>wave function is real. All of the different possibility of

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the wave function are real. They actually exist, and they

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>never collapse. But Everett believe that if you follow the logic,

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>if you extra polate that out to the macroscopic scale

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that we live on, the only way to make sense

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of it is that bifurcating realities constantly split off from

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>one another and exist independently. Uh. And just just a

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>few interesting biographical notes. Everett recounted in the nineteen seventies

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that the many World's interpretations sprang up one night when

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>he was talking with a couple of Princeton classmates about

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the implications of quantum mechanics. It was quote after a

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>slash or two of sherry, And that seems kind of right, right, Like,

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the many worlds interpretation has got to be a sherry

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>based interpretation. It is like, not a vodka based interpretation.

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Nor is it a beer induced interpretation. Yeah, it does.

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>It does sound like the sherry is essential here. Yeah.

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And another thing that's essential is the simplicity of it. Right.

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>The core selling point of the many worlds interpretation is

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that we've tested the mathematical reality of quantum theory. We

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty much know it's right. So what does the math say.

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Despite how outlandish the physical implications of the many worlds

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>interpretation seem, you can make a pretty strong argument that

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it is the simplest possible interpretation of the math of

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>quantum theory. If you just look at the mathematical features

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of the way of function and you try to take

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>away all your intuitions about how things should work, it's

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the simplest possible way to make sense of it, and

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>about it being the simplest theory Evert actually wrote in

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a letter to the physicist Brice de Witt in nineteen seven, quote,

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I do believe, however, that at this time the present theory,

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>meaning the many worlds interpretation, is the simplest adequate interpretation.

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>The hidden variable theories are to me more cumbersome and artificial,

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>while the Copenhagen interpretation is hopelessly incomplete because of its

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a priori reliance on classical physics, excluding in principle any

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>deduction of classical physics quantum theory, or any adequate investigation

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of the measuring process, as well as a philosophic monstrosity

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>with a reality concept for the macroscopic world and a

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>denial of the same for the microcosm. So that's kind

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of a strong argument he's saying, right, like the Copenhagen

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>interpretation says, Oh, yeah, the macroscopic world is real, but

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>there's something about the quantum realm that isn't as real

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>as our world is. Yeah, it kind of relegates it

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to like a ghost realm. Yeah. One of the books

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be referring to in this episode is

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Max tag mark book Our Mathematical Universe, and tag Mark

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>writes about de Witt. He says, quote, when I later

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>met Bryce, he told me he'd at first complained to

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you Everett, saying that he liked his math, but was

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>really bothered by the gut feeling that he just didn't

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like he was constantly splitting into parallel versions of himself.

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>He told me that Everett had responded with a question,

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>do you feel like you're orbiting the Sun at thirty

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>kilometers per second? Touche? Bryce had exclaimed and conceded to

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>fee done the spot just as classical physics predicts that

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 1>we're zooming around the Sun and we won't feel it.

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Everett showed that collapse free quantum physics predicts that we're

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>splitting and that we won't feel it now, despite the

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that it does seem to make sense to a

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of people now. Unfortunately, it did not catch on

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:21.359
<v Speaker 1>in Everett's lifetime. When the Copenhagen interpretation remained dominant, and

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Everett was reportedly bitter about academia's rejection of his work,

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>he left academic physics. He went to work at the Pentagon,

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>where he was apparently involved in some Cold War nuclear strategy,

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and over time friends and colleagues reported that he had

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bitterness and negative affect and that he

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 1>also struggled with alcoholism, and he eventually died pretty young.

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 1>He died at the age of fifty one in nineteen

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>eighty two. And just as a side note about his family,

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>one of Everett's children is actually Mark Oliver Everett, who's

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the singer of the rock band called Eels. Interesting, well,

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:56.919
<v Speaker 1>it makes me wonder if he has any songs about

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>his his father. Yeah, he apparently does, as Actually I

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't listened to them. I haven't listened to a lot

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of Eels, but I remember I remember getting some mixed

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 1>CDs when I was in high school that had some

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Eels songs. Eels fans will have to chime in and

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>let us know, Yeah, let us know what we should

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:16.240
<v Speaker 1>listen to. But anyway, since Everett's death, the many World's

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>interpretation has gradually become much more popular. Actually, the Polish

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>American physicist of void check Zurich, has said, quote Everett's

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 1>accomplishment was to insist that quantum theory should be universal,

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that there should not be a division of the universe

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>into something which is a priori classical and something which

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is a priori quantum. He gave us all a ticket

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:40.439
<v Speaker 1>to use quantum theory the way we use it now

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 1>to describe measurement as a whole. So essentially, it's a

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 1>way of looking at quantum quantum theory and saying, no,

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it's all real, it all works, and it totally applies

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to the universe as a whole. It's not some weird

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>special realm that we have to invoke strange types of

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 1>causation to understand. But here's the question. If it's true

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that the wave function is real and universal and it's

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:09.320
<v Speaker 1>reality has effects that hold sway over the macroscopic world,

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that the world we live in. What does this mean

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for us? What should it be like to be a

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 1>person living within a mini worlds universe? Yeah? Because it

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>seems like, Okay, it's one thing to say that every

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>time I make a choice, the timeline splits, but I

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:28.720
<v Speaker 1>still I still feel like I am an object moving

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>along a timeline, even if even if I'm splitting, I

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:35.879
<v Speaker 1>have this singular experience unless I'm bringing in some sort

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of uh you know, magical, uh you know, religious idea

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:44.439
<v Speaker 1>of what my my, my consciousness is doing in other lives. Yeah,

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean we we can't have access to that, right,

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:50.320
<v Speaker 1>And here's actually the question. Here is the really interesting question.

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we have access to that? Right? What is

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:56.800
<v Speaker 1>actually happening in the physical realm? If the Many World's

0:36:56.800 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 1>interpretation is correct, what is actually happening that puts those

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:04.479
<v Speaker 1>in another place and keeps you separate from them? Which

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>is essentially the same as saying why does the wave

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 1>function branch into separate realities? And the answer, as best

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I can tell, appears to lie in a quantum physics

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>concept known as decoherents now. I mentioned earlier that Max

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Tegmark book that our mathematical universe, and he has a

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty good discussion of decoherents in his book Um. But basically,

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the way it works is this, as long as a

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>quantum system in superposition remains physically isolated, all of its

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 1>potential states can continue to interact with one another. But systems,

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 1>of course, almost never stay isolated for long. I mean,

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 1>how often would you expect a system in reality to

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:44.879
<v Speaker 1>stay isolated from any contact with the outside. If even

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 1>a single photon from the outside of the system interacts

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:52.280
<v Speaker 1>with it, then the system undergoes what's known as decoherence.

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>We mentioned this concept earlier, which means that it's potential

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>states can no longer interact with each other. If they

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:03.479
<v Speaker 1>can know longer interact with each other, they essentially branch off.

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>They become causally separate timelines, whereas before they were intertwined. So,

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in a basic sense, imagine you've got an isolated quantum

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>system where you've got a particle on the left and

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the right at the same time in superposition. But if

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 1>anything touches it, decoherence happens, and then it splits into

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>different branches of the universe that can no longer affect

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>one another. Thus, the wave function does not collapse. Decoherence

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>just prevents these branches from messing with each other anymore. Now,

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>we teased at the beginning that this would be coming

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to the concept of immortality. How do you get immortality

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>out of any of the physics concepts we've been discussing

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 1>so far. Well, I know the answer to this question,

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm still not convinced that you do. But um,

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>But basically, and you're gonna have to pull out a

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:53.320
<v Speaker 1>thought experiment. Yeah, and you're gonna have to have a machine.

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And as it seems to be this the running trend

0:38:57.560 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 1>with with quantum mechanics thought experiments, it's going to somehow

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 1>involve lethal violence. Yeah. One way this has been described

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we're about to get to something known as the quantum

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 1>suicide experiment. And one way this has been described as

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Schreddinger's cat. From the cat's perspective, you make yourself the cat.

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>So several physicists, apparently beginning with two independent lines of

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>work by Hans Morevac and Bruno Maschaal in the nineteen

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 1>eighties and then later by Max tag Mark, have proposed

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 1>an apparently ingenious and perhaps flawed way to test whether

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the mini worlds interpretation is correct, and how that would

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 1>affect personal subjective consciousness. We do not recommend this method

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:43.240
<v Speaker 1>at all. You should not try it out. But here's

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>the method that's been described. You have to build a

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>machine that will kill you. All Right, we're gonna take

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a break and when we come back, we will assemble

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:57.479
<v Speaker 1>this machine or a version of this machine than alright,

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>we're back. So we've been discussing how the man world's

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:04.240
<v Speaker 1>interpretation would affect the subjective experience of life and death.

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:06.919
<v Speaker 1>And there has been a type of experiment proposed by

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:10.439
<v Speaker 1>some physicists to test for the reality of the many

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>worlds interpretation by experimenting with one zone life and death

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>subjective experience. This is known as quantum suicide or the

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 1>quantum suicide experiment. Now, Robert, you have come up with

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a a more a more fun version of this experiment

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>than the usual one. The usual one involves creating some

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of gun that is designed to shoot you or

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>not shoot you, based on a quantum event. Yeah, and

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 1>this is this is max tech marks uh concept. Right,

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:40.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's at you said a machine gun in

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the original version. Yeah. He so he's got the idea

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of a machine gun that that has a trigger pull

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that's initiated by a potential quantum superposition that could go

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>one way or could go the other. Like, You've got

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a particle that could be spinning right and it could

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:57.280
<v Speaker 1>be spinning left, and it's got a fifty percent chance

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of being either one. And if you check it and

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's spinning right, the gun fires, and if you check

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:05.360
<v Speaker 1>it and it's spinning left, the gun does not fire.

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>And it does this once per second. And then he says,

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the test is you put your head in front of

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the gun. Yeah, that's just I don't know, it just

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:16.840
<v Speaker 1>feels a little too too violent um for this podcast

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 1>for some reason. So I thought, yeah, let's let's try

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:22.399
<v Speaker 1>something maybe a little more science fiction, a e uh

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in nature, a little less gun centric, and maybe a

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 1>little more Dune inspired. Uh So, my apologies to to

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Max for for alterations here. Also, I guess, you know,

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:36.359
<v Speaker 1>apologies to Frank Herbert as well, just in case. But

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:38.879
<v Speaker 1>this is this is how it's going to roll out.

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:41.239
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna take you through the experiment. You're gonna start

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 1>with a man or a young man. This is gonna

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 1>be polo trades right essentially. Yeah, you can Okay, you

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>can essentially think of it as polo trades and uh,

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna sit before a machine, a non thinking machine,

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:55.880
<v Speaker 1>mind you. This is designed to jab him in the

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 1>arm with a meta cyanide poison needle, a k A

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 1>M jabber based on the spin of a quad un

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:06.400
<v Speaker 1>quantum particle, so that gom jabber hits him, the jabber.

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be instant death, just no no chance, okay.

0:42:10.440 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 1>And it is instant. He won't even know it happened. Right.

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>So the machine again is gonna gonna look at that

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 1>quantum particle and and study its spin. If there's a

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 1>clockwise spin on the quantum particle, then the gob jabber

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 1>is gonna strike. If there's a counterclockwise spin on the

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>quantum particle, the gom jabber just buzzes, threatening lee. The

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 1>young man here keeps pushing the button and the gom

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 1>jabber buzzes, buzzes and buzzes, but it doesn't move. Each

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 1>time he pushes the button, it buzzes, but it doesn't strike. Well, yeah,

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>so what's happening here in this experiment? As you can tell,

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 1>the experiment has a probability based outcome. After the first

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 1>button push, there's a fifty percent chance that Paul is

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Paul will live in a fifty percent chance that he's

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 1>going to die, and then this repeats. On the second try,

0:42:56.400 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>there is a cumulative chance that he'll live, and by

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the third try half of that, and it just keeps

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 1>going down until probability virtually guarantees that Paul Trades has

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>been struck dead by the gom Jabber. But from Paul's

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>own subjective point of view, this experiment actually might have

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a very different flavor assuming, and there are some assumptions

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:26.719
<v Speaker 1>underlying this, assuming that consciousness ends immediately at death. Now,

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, if consciousness survives death were obviously in a

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 1>whole different ball game. But for Paul himself, there is

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:37.240
<v Speaker 1>only one option for Paul to discover. After each push

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of the button, he discovers he has survived. If the

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:44.280
<v Speaker 1>gom jabber strikes and he's instantly killed, he will never

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 1>be aware of it. But in a universe in which

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the Many World's interpretation is correct, there is no opportunity

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 1>for him to be the one who dies, since his

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 1>subjective experience of those branches of the wave function does

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 1>not exist. So if Paul is any thing, he can

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>only be the version of himself that survives, and thus,

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 1>if he starts performing this experiment, the only versions of

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:12.359
<v Speaker 1>him that exist to continue the experiment will be the

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 1>ones that continually route his consciousness into branches of the

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 1>way of function in which he survives. So he'll just

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:24.480
<v Speaker 1>keep pressing the button over and over and over again,

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and the only thing he'll ever experience is survival and

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:33.080
<v Speaker 1>this will happen an infinite number of times if necessary. Yeah, now,

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 1>what are the drawbacks to this experiment? Well, there are

0:44:35.600 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously theoretical objections to the validity of the experiment, reasons

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to think that even if the Many World's interpretation is correct,

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the experiment wouldn't actually work, and we can explore those

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in a moment. But on top of that, there are

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:51.279
<v Speaker 1>some big problems, like you have to be willing to

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 1>kill yourself, and you can never use this test to

0:44:54.800 --> 0:44:58.799
<v Speaker 1>prove the Many World's interpretation to people other than yourself.

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not actually a scientific experiment because a scientific experiment

0:45:03.120 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>needs to be able to be objectively verified, and this

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 1>is experiment that, by necessity can only be subjectively verified.

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Even if it works as proposed, it would only be

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>valuable to you yourself. The vast majority of people throughout

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the quantum multiverse watching you perform this experiment will just

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:24.360
<v Speaker 1>witness you killing yourself on the first try, or the

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>second try, or the third try, and so on. And

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>each time you press the button, a greater proportion of

0:45:30.040 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the people watching you throughout the quantum multiverse will just

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>be watching you kill yourself. Plus, it's a perfect waste

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of a good con jabber, in my opinion. Now, assuming

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:42.600
<v Speaker 1>for a moment that the logic of this experiment is valid,

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and there are potentially strong reasons for thinking it's not,

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:48.879
<v Speaker 1>but just go with us for a second, it gets

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>weirder because let's extend the reasoning beyond the confines of

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:56.719
<v Speaker 1>the experiment. Here are a few thoughts to consider in

0:45:56.760 --> 0:46:00.760
<v Speaker 1>any dangerous real world situation that might lead to death.

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Whether you maybe just got a blast of neutron radiation

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in the face, or somebody tries to drop a garbage

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 1>truck on you from a great height or whatever, there

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is always a small chance that something will happen to

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 1>prevent you from dying. Would you agree Robert with me

0:46:15.840 --> 0:46:18.480
<v Speaker 1>so far? Yeah, I would say, broadly speaking, that's true.

0:46:18.640 --> 0:46:20.959
<v Speaker 1>It might be a very small chance, but there's always

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>a small chance Superman could appear and jump in front

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of the bullet of the train it set. Well, okay,

0:46:27.760 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe not that, Maybe not that, because we don't want

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to violate the laws of physics. So there's always a

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:35.680
<v Speaker 1>small chance that without violating the laws of physics, something

0:46:35.719 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 1>will happen to prevent you from dying in this scenario, right,

0:46:38.480 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 1>there's always some sort of freak occurrence that could prevent

0:46:41.160 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it from happening. Yes, yes, So if there's a chance

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:47.239
<v Speaker 1>of survival that's consistent with the laws of physics, there's

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:51.279
<v Speaker 1>at least some branch of the universal wave function in

0:46:51.320 --> 0:46:55.720
<v Speaker 1>which that chance becomes reality. So at some level, all

0:46:55.840 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 1>threats to survival are quantum threats, and thus, if on

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:04.360
<v Speaker 1>these assumptions, if the Mini World's interpretation is correct, you

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:08.879
<v Speaker 1>should always expect to continue surviving, no matter how improbable

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the odds, because subjectively you have no choice but to survive.

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>If there is anything that you are, you are the

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:19.440
<v Speaker 1>version of you that has survived, and so the vast

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 1>majority of the versions of you throughout this quantum multiverse

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:26.760
<v Speaker 1>will die, but the subjective version of you will always

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:29.400
<v Speaker 1>live on in the branches of reality that break in

0:47:29.480 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 1>favor of your survival. Now again, just to clarify, we're

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 1>not advocating this as necessarily the truth about reality. But

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 1>if you consider this this is a possibility, it is

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:44.319
<v Speaker 1>very strange to contemplate, right, Oh yeah. And I mean

0:47:45.280 --> 0:47:47.239
<v Speaker 1>the thing is, though, I always wonder what stuff like this.

0:47:47.320 --> 0:47:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Are we really talking about immortality here or just a

0:47:50.000 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>mere thought experiment variant. It's kind of kind of worthless

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 1>when you really think about it. You know, well, what

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 1>do you mean by that? I mean, well, simply, for

0:47:57.640 --> 0:47:59.399
<v Speaker 1>one thing, it doesn't it doesn't match up with those

0:47:59.400 --> 0:48:04.359
<v Speaker 1>magical ideas of of of being forever young, of of

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of living your life across the span of centuries, etcetera.

0:48:08.200 --> 0:48:12.799
<v Speaker 1>It's more about um narrowly, narrowly avoiding death as long

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:16.239
<v Speaker 1>as possible, and there is a there's a fixed term

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:19.600
<v Speaker 1>limit there, Yeah, exactly. I mean you could imagine that

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:23.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the quantum mechanics version of being tiffanous, right

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:27.919
<v Speaker 1>that you essentially and pretty much all universes decline as

0:48:28.000 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 1>normally the laws of physics would dictate into a state

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:33.720
<v Speaker 1>where you are no longer in good health or whatever.

0:48:33.880 --> 0:48:38.960
<v Speaker 1>But things just keep preventing you subjectively from dying, right,

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:41.759
<v Speaker 1>and then in that in most universes you would keep dying,

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you just subjectively would never experience it because you just

0:48:45.560 --> 0:48:49.280
<v Speaker 1>keep getting funneled more and more into that smaller minority

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of universes where you go where you go on now.

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 1>According to Everett biographer Keith Lynch quote, Everett firmly believed

0:48:56.680 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that his many worlds theory guaranteed him immortality. His conscious knows,

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:03.280
<v Speaker 1>he argued, is bound at each branching to follow whatever

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:06.400
<v Speaker 1>path it does not lead to death. That's interesting, and

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:11.239
<v Speaker 1>especially it's strange since Everett died so young. Yeah, yeah,

0:49:11.320 --> 0:49:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know it, it's interesting to come back to done.

0:49:14.520 --> 0:49:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the weirdly enough that's This is exactly

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the sort of thing that's touched on in Frank Herbert's done,

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the idea that humanity should take this golden path instead

0:49:26.280 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of the path to stagnation, which is chosen by taking

0:49:29.120 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the safest route, by always making the safest small choice,

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 1>instead of figuring out what is the what is the

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 1>ideal long term route? Well, does this play into the

0:49:40.760 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 1>choice to take Spice in the Dune universe, Because in

0:49:43.600 --> 0:49:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the Dune universe, Frank Herbert wrote that, you know, one

0:49:46.239 --> 0:49:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of the main uses of spice, the stuff that's produced

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 1>by the makers um, is that it prolongs life, right,

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it is the geriatric spice, that's true. Yeah, But but

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:58.400
<v Speaker 1>then it's also you see its use with the Spacing Guild,

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:00.600
<v Speaker 1>where the idea is of the space acent could has

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 1>their way. You know, they're just gonna always I mean,

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:06.560
<v Speaker 1>they navigate space by figuring out how what path avoids

0:50:07.080 --> 0:50:10.800
<v Speaker 1>every possible catastrophe. And that's it's kind of like the

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:14.480
<v Speaker 1>quantum immortality model here, except of space travel. There's a

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:17.760
<v Speaker 1>quote to this effect from Laude deep In Frank Herbert

0:50:17.800 --> 0:50:20.799
<v Speaker 1>Stone quote the vision of time is broad, but when

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you pass through it, time becomes a narrow door. And

0:50:24.160 --> 0:50:27.760
<v Speaker 1>always he fought the temptation to choose a clear, safe course,

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 1>warning that path leads ever down into stagnation. Well. Yeah,

0:50:32.239 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 1>if you look at life as um as sort of

0:50:35.960 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you always have to take a risk in order to

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:42.520
<v Speaker 1>do something meaningful, right. I mean, there's very rarely a

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:44.880
<v Speaker 1>thing you can do that's very powerful and meaningful that

0:50:44.960 --> 0:50:47.759
<v Speaker 1>doesn't risk at least some small part of your your

0:50:47.880 --> 0:50:50.520
<v Speaker 1>at least sense of safety. Right. That might just be

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:54.320
<v Speaker 1>psychological safety. But if you you extend that to the extreme,

0:50:54.840 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 1>would you become in this quantum multiverse in the many

0:50:59.120 --> 0:51:04.239
<v Speaker 1>worlds interpretation, and a progressively more boring person because you're

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:07.120
<v Speaker 1>always being limited to the options of your life that

0:51:07.160 --> 0:51:10.200
<v Speaker 1>are always narrowing into this window of worlds where you've

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:13.239
<v Speaker 1>taken the safer route, and the versions of you that

0:51:13.320 --> 0:51:16.640
<v Speaker 1>took the more dangerous route and took risks didn't make

0:51:16.680 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it as far. Yeah, you can only lead to stagnation

0:51:19.600 --> 0:51:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that way, Like the only way to lead the golden

0:51:22.200 --> 0:51:26.319
<v Speaker 1>path is that all other paths were platinum, right, which

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:28.360
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a depressing way to think about life.

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:31.360
<v Speaker 1>But this is a strange thing because it doesn't It

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:34.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't even give you the opportunity. If you were to

0:51:34.160 --> 0:51:38.879
<v Speaker 1>assume that the mini worlds version of quantum immortality is real,

0:51:39.320 --> 0:51:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't even have a choice in the matter, because

0:51:41.560 --> 0:51:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you could take risks. But subjectively, we know that you're

0:51:45.520 --> 0:51:48.719
<v Speaker 1>not going to do that because the versions of you

0:51:48.800 --> 0:51:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that did that will eventually disappear and you will have

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:55.760
<v Speaker 1>no choice but to be funneled into this the safe,

0:51:55.760 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>stagnant existence spacing guild winds. Again. Uh so we should

0:52:01.080 --> 0:52:05.000
<v Speaker 1>definitely talk about problems and criticisms of this idea. Uh,

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of reasons to think that this

0:52:07.239 --> 0:52:10.160
<v Speaker 1>might not be the case, so as as we said earlier,

0:52:10.200 --> 0:52:12.160
<v Speaker 1>But we just want to stress again we are not

0:52:12.280 --> 0:52:14.799
<v Speaker 1>advocating the idea that you are immortal according to the

0:52:14.840 --> 0:52:18.360
<v Speaker 1>laws of quantum mechanics. Correct. We cannot be anymore clear

0:52:18.400 --> 0:52:20.560
<v Speaker 1>on that at that point, and even some of the

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:24.640
<v Speaker 1>original authors of this experiment that they've come to doubt it.

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Like Max teg Mark, the m I T physicists we've

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:30.440
<v Speaker 1>been talking about. He proposed quantum suicide and quantum immortality

0:52:30.480 --> 0:52:33.840
<v Speaker 1>as thought experiments, but he acknowledges the tenuous nature of

0:52:33.840 --> 0:52:36.759
<v Speaker 1>the premises under them and actually doubts it could be

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a reality based on plenty of concerns he has, Like

0:52:40.640 --> 0:52:43.520
<v Speaker 1>one problem is that tag Mark has these caveats to

0:52:43.560 --> 0:52:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the quantum suicide experiment and says that it would only

0:52:46.480 --> 0:52:50.719
<v Speaker 1>even work in theory if the determination of whether the

0:52:50.760 --> 0:52:53.920
<v Speaker 1>machine kills you is truly quantum, as in depending on

0:52:53.960 --> 0:52:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a quantum particle in superposition. It wouldn't necessarily work if

0:52:57.480 --> 0:52:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you were letting it depend on say a coin flip,

0:53:00.120 --> 0:53:04.880
<v Speaker 1>could be purely deterministic. Also, the machine must be guaranteed

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to kill you on the kill setting. It couldn't. It

0:53:07.040 --> 0:53:10.840
<v Speaker 1>couldn't have a possibility of just injuring you. Also, it

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:13.799
<v Speaker 1>would need to as we mentioned earlier, if it does

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:16.839
<v Speaker 1>kill you would have to do so instantly, not gradually,

0:53:17.160 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>because you can't have the you can't have a chance

0:53:20.280 --> 0:53:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that it takes you a while to die after the

0:53:23.320 --> 0:53:26.439
<v Speaker 1>quantum coin toss and uh, and you're just sitting there

0:53:26.520 --> 0:53:29.239
<v Speaker 1>waiting to find out what happens, because then your consciousness

0:53:29.280 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 1>could get routed into that universe. So, just from like

0:53:32.239 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a design standpoint, it would it sounds extremely difficult, if

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:39.400
<v Speaker 1>not impossible, to create the right kind of technology. You

0:53:39.400 --> 0:53:41.759
<v Speaker 1>certainly could make it in your garage. Because it would

0:53:41.760 --> 0:53:43.719
<v Speaker 1>need to depend on the quantum. It would need to

0:53:43.840 --> 0:53:46.719
<v Speaker 1>never fail, like it could absolutely. If it could malfunction,

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that would destroy the whole experiment, right, it at least

0:53:50.080 --> 0:53:53.640
<v Speaker 1>should have a very very small chance of malfunctioning. Now,

0:53:53.640 --> 0:53:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in criticism of the general idea of quantum immortality extending

0:53:57.160 --> 0:54:00.399
<v Speaker 1>beyond the quantum suicide experiment itself, but just like does

0:54:00.440 --> 0:54:02.560
<v Speaker 1>this apply to reality as a whole, should we all

0:54:02.600 --> 0:54:07.279
<v Speaker 1>expect to subjectively live forever um. Even though tag Mark

0:54:07.360 --> 0:54:10.960
<v Speaker 1>does seem to subscribe to the many worlds interpretation, teg

0:54:11.040 --> 0:54:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Mark says that most accidents and cause common causes of

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:18.480
<v Speaker 1>death do not satisfy all three of these criteria, and

0:54:18.520 --> 0:54:22.400
<v Speaker 1>plus there's a bigger problem about tag Mark talks about

0:54:22.400 --> 0:54:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that most life and death scenarios don't actually

0:54:26.960 --> 0:54:30.600
<v Speaker 1>break down into a clear life or death binary where

0:54:30.600 --> 0:54:33.919
<v Speaker 1>you've got continued consciousness on the one hand and non

0:54:34.000 --> 0:54:36.719
<v Speaker 1>continued consciousness on the other. But he says, you know,

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be that there is a gradual reduction

0:54:40.640 --> 0:54:44.879
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness as one progresses toward death. And if this

0:54:45.000 --> 0:54:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is the case, then you could have the assumptions of

0:54:47.880 --> 0:54:51.799
<v Speaker 1>this violated, right if you can gradually ratchet down your

0:54:51.920 --> 0:54:54.800
<v Speaker 1>level of consciousness, you know, I mean it's true, I

0:54:54.840 --> 0:54:56.640
<v Speaker 1>mean we we in fact, I mean I don't sit

0:54:56.680 --> 0:55:00.400
<v Speaker 1>around fearing the termination of my consciousness. I fear all

0:55:00.440 --> 0:55:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the things leading up to it and surrounding it, you know,

0:55:03.080 --> 0:55:06.719
<v Speaker 1>all the consolation prizes. Yes, certainly, I mean, especially on

0:55:06.760 --> 0:55:09.279
<v Speaker 1>this view, because if you take the view that there's

0:55:09.320 --> 0:55:12.439
<v Speaker 1>literally nothing after death, there's nothing to fear there. Yeah,

0:55:12.480 --> 0:55:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean exactly. But that also brings up another big

0:55:15.160 --> 0:55:18.760
<v Speaker 1>problem is that we don't actually know exactly what happens

0:55:18.800 --> 0:55:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to consciousness at the time of death. And I'm not

0:55:21.640 --> 0:55:24.160
<v Speaker 1>saying that you have to propose, you know, religious type

0:55:24.160 --> 0:55:27.400
<v Speaker 1>answers about souls and afterlife and stuff like that. Obviously

0:55:27.440 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 1>some people believe in things like that. But even if

0:55:29.200 --> 0:55:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't believe in anything uh spiritual, supernatural, anything like that,

0:55:33.920 --> 0:55:36.920
<v Speaker 1>there's still things that could happen with the subjective phenomena

0:55:36.960 --> 0:55:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness other than just it blips out of existence, right, yeah,

0:55:40.719 --> 0:55:43.440
<v Speaker 1>like you come back as a goat, or or there

0:55:43.440 --> 0:55:45.920
<v Speaker 1>could be I mean, if consciousness is some kind of

0:55:45.960 --> 0:55:49.520
<v Speaker 1>process or substance, there's a there's perhaps some some way

0:55:49.520 --> 0:55:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in which it lingers or winds down slowly after death,

0:55:52.880 --> 0:55:55.520
<v Speaker 1>or is reduced to some kind of other, you know,

0:55:55.760 --> 0:55:58.879
<v Speaker 1>liminal or peripheral state after death. I mean, it's we

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we just don't really know what happens. There's no evidence

0:56:01.239 --> 0:56:04.480
<v Speaker 1>about what exactly happens there also, to be honest, we

0:56:04.520 --> 0:56:07.719
<v Speaker 1>don't actually really know. If we're gonna pick nits, I

0:56:07.760 --> 0:56:11.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it means to survive from one moment

0:56:11.560 --> 0:56:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to the next as a being experiencing consciousness, except that

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:18.319
<v Speaker 1>we all generally tend to be under the impression that

0:56:18.360 --> 0:56:21.080
<v Speaker 1>this is happening to us. I'm under the impression that

0:56:21.120 --> 0:56:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm surviving. But if we live in a universe where

0:56:24.960 --> 0:56:29.200
<v Speaker 1>constantly we're branching off into different branches, you know, out

0:56:29.239 --> 0:56:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of a quantum superposition and different timelines, how does the

0:56:32.880 --> 0:56:36.439
<v Speaker 1>baton get past? Does that make any sense? Late? Yeah,

0:56:36.440 --> 0:56:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I know. I mean this gets down to the basic

0:56:38.320 --> 0:56:42.440
<v Speaker 1>naval gazing that we've engaged in before. Regarding the present moment?

0:56:42.960 --> 0:56:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Am I now who I was a minute ago? Am

0:56:46.840 --> 0:56:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I now who I will be a minute from now?

0:56:49.239 --> 0:56:51.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when you start really focusing in on that,

0:56:51.440 --> 0:56:55.279
<v Speaker 1>it starts becoming it starts feeling disjointed, perhaps disjoined, it

0:56:55.320 --> 0:56:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in a way that could match up with this idea

0:56:57.920 --> 0:57:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of branching realities. Yeah, how does the now you pass

0:57:02.000 --> 0:57:04.839
<v Speaker 1>the token of subjective experience to the you of one

0:57:04.840 --> 0:57:06.960
<v Speaker 1>moment in the future. Yeah, And what happens when the

0:57:07.000 --> 0:57:10.680
<v Speaker 1>baton has dropped? Right? Yeah? Exactly? So? Uh, And again

0:57:10.880 --> 0:57:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that presents a problem. I just say

0:57:13.120 --> 0:57:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that's something that we're not certain we've really worked out yet, Right,

0:57:17.480 --> 0:57:20.960
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean? For experience to exist across time,

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:24.640
<v Speaker 1>especially if that experience is branching into clones or copies

0:57:24.680 --> 0:57:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of itself. Yeah yeah. When you start actually lining it

0:57:28.960 --> 0:57:32.240
<v Speaker 1>up with the human experience, things are a little as certain.

0:57:32.280 --> 0:57:35.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's often easier to line it up with created things,

0:57:36.120 --> 0:57:38.400
<v Speaker 1>like looking at chapters in a book or levels in

0:57:38.400 --> 0:57:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a video game. Yeah yeah. So I don't bring that

0:57:41.240 --> 0:57:44.080
<v Speaker 1>up to say that it like disproves the validity of

0:57:44.120 --> 0:57:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the quantum suicide or quantum immortality thought experiments, But I

0:57:47.600 --> 0:57:51.200
<v Speaker 1>just want to suggest that the periphery assumptions underlying these

0:57:51.240 --> 0:57:54.360
<v Speaker 1>thought experiments are not as simple as and straightforward as

0:57:54.360 --> 0:57:56.800
<v Speaker 1>they seem. Not even the physics assumptions, but just the

0:57:56.840 --> 0:58:00.920
<v Speaker 1>assumptions about death and life and consciousness and survival uh

0:58:00.960 --> 0:58:04.120
<v Speaker 1>as as even more doubt to throw on here. Max

0:58:04.160 --> 0:58:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Tegmark himself explains that he later came to doubt the

0:58:07.240 --> 0:58:11.360
<v Speaker 1>validity validity of his own quantum suicide experiment um, but

0:58:11.600 --> 0:58:14.120
<v Speaker 1>for totally different reasons. He came to doubt the validity

0:58:14.160 --> 0:58:18.520
<v Speaker 1>based on doubts about the concept of infinity as applied

0:58:18.560 --> 0:58:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to physics, which he is in some sense skeptical about.

0:58:21.680 --> 0:58:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh though he admits to being in the minority of

0:58:23.640 --> 0:58:26.520
<v Speaker 1>physicists on this point. Now, I mentioned video games earlier

0:58:26.560 --> 0:58:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and that's because I wanted to talk just

0:58:28.880 --> 0:58:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about saves scumming. What does that mean?

0:58:31.920 --> 0:58:35.480
<v Speaker 1>So I was familiar with save scumming from playing a

0:58:35.480 --> 0:58:37.880
<v Speaker 1>fair amount of x COM and XCOM to the most

0:58:37.920 --> 0:58:40.600
<v Speaker 1>recent incarnations of the x COM video game. I've never

0:58:40.600 --> 0:58:42.520
<v Speaker 1>played these, so you've got to explain to me. So

0:58:42.720 --> 0:58:47.000
<v Speaker 1>x Com is basically it's aliens have invaded or are invading,

0:58:47.200 --> 0:58:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and you have to fight them using a squad of soldiers.

0:58:51.760 --> 0:58:54.240
<v Speaker 1>And if you're playing just kind of like the vanilla

0:58:54.400 --> 0:58:57.000
<v Speaker 1>version of the game, then each time you start playing,

0:58:57.040 --> 0:58:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you get a random bunch of recruits and they level

0:58:59.400 --> 0:59:02.560
<v Speaker 1>up as you a and then in each tactical mission

0:59:02.960 --> 0:59:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you can lose the various men and women in your service,

0:59:06.720 --> 0:59:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and the ones that survive they level up and get stronger,

0:59:10.320 --> 0:59:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and you proceed through the game in an attempt to

0:59:12.880 --> 0:59:17.200
<v Speaker 1>save the world, to outlast the doom counter uh and

0:59:17.280 --> 0:59:20.640
<v Speaker 1>win the game. Now, the real hardcore fans like to

0:59:20.680 --> 0:59:24.080
<v Speaker 1>play um an iron Man version of this. So this

0:59:24.160 --> 0:59:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is where you have only one save file and no

0:59:27.640 --> 0:59:30.280
<v Speaker 1>matter what happens on a given mission. You just keep going.

0:59:30.520 --> 0:59:32.720
<v Speaker 1>You just lost your best guy due to something like

0:59:32.800 --> 0:59:36.040
<v Speaker 1>freak accident or a terrible shot or a terrible choice

0:59:36.040 --> 0:59:38.200
<v Speaker 1>on your part. Too bad. You just have to keep

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:41.440
<v Speaker 1>playing the game until you either reach the point where

0:59:41.520 --> 0:59:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you cannot win, whether where the doom counter catches up

0:59:44.960 --> 0:59:47.400
<v Speaker 1>with you um or you just get to the final

0:59:47.480 --> 0:59:50.080
<v Speaker 1>encounter and you're not strong enough to beat it. But

0:59:50.200 --> 0:59:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you can also do what is called saves coming and

0:59:53.360 --> 0:59:55.080
<v Speaker 1>this is more in line I think with the way

0:59:55.080 --> 0:59:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of people have played video games in

0:59:56.960 --> 0:59:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the in the past, especially once, where you get to

0:59:59.640 --> 1:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>save as often as you want, as many times as

1:00:02.920 --> 1:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you want, and in doing this, you simply go back

1:00:05.080 --> 1:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to a previous save file every time something bad happens.

1:00:09.080 --> 1:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, okay, so it's kind of yeah, it's kind

1:00:12.120 --> 1:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of like the saving function serves as like a place

1:00:16.600 --> 1:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>where you can save the timeline of the world before

1:00:19.320 --> 1:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it branched off into its different many worlds. So it's like, oh,

1:00:22.680 --> 1:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I just lost my best dude by having them look

1:00:25.240 --> 1:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>around this corner. I'll go back to a previous save

1:00:27.760 --> 1:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>game and I'll have him look around the other corner instead. Yeah,

1:00:31.640 --> 1:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>going between the different save files is like getting away

1:00:34.440 --> 1:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to navigate the many worlds from above, and it leads

1:00:39.280 --> 1:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to a certain kind of quantum immortality. Yeah. I mean,

1:00:41.640 --> 1:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>even in a normal game, not like the one you're describing,

1:00:44.920 --> 1:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't get to the final boss, say, in a

1:00:49.680 --> 1:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>version of the game where you died on the first level,

1:00:52.480 --> 1:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>like you you know, and that's all you did. You

1:00:55.080 --> 1:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>can't keep going on. You have to use a version

1:00:58.200 --> 1:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>where you survived and progress. Yeah, and uh, you know,

1:01:01.600 --> 1:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>And of course I don't want to imply that one

1:01:04.360 --> 1:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>way is better than the other when you're playing a

1:01:06.160 --> 1:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>video game. My approaches play the video game, however, makes

1:01:09.840 --> 1:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you happy. But you know, Richard K. Morgan also got

1:01:13.320 --> 1:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>into this little bit in Altered Carbon because you have

1:01:15.720 --> 1:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>these these uh these super rich Methuselah as they call them,

1:01:20.640 --> 1:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the meths who who put their consciousness in different bodies, um,

1:01:25.880 --> 1:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>different sleeves as they call them, and you have characters

1:01:29.360 --> 1:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>who will end up essentially saves coming with their body.

1:01:32.160 --> 1:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Something happens that either you got them killed or drives

1:01:36.160 --> 1:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>them mad or makes them feel you know, too much guilt. Well,

1:01:39.880 --> 1:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>then they just revert to a previous save file. A

1:01:42.720 --> 1:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>previous version of their own consciousness, and they keep going.

1:01:45.600 --> 1:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I wonder if some people, I wonder about

1:01:48.560 --> 1:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>psychological effects of video games that could put you in

1:01:51.720 --> 1:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that state of mind without the ability to physically do

1:01:54.840 --> 1:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>what you're describing with the sleeves and the bodies. I mean,

1:01:58.280 --> 1:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is somebody who plays a whole lot of video games

1:02:00.760 --> 1:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>with save files conditioning themselves too to act like that

1:02:06.760 --> 1:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>is the way the world works, even though it is

1:02:09.040 --> 1:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>not the way the world works. Now that that's an

1:02:11.440 --> 1:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting question. I mean, we've certainly discussed on the show

1:02:14.200 --> 1:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>how things like you know, language is the sequential aspects

1:02:18.440 --> 1:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of language might impact our our experience of reality. So yeah,

1:02:24.440 --> 1:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>why not? Maybe there's a book out there, the Mario

1:02:26.520 --> 1:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Goddess, Uh, to get serious. I do think

1:02:31.680 --> 1:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>one thing that we should say before the end is

1:02:33.760 --> 1:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I we've taken pains to try to highlight all of

1:02:36.680 --> 1:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the reasons that you can't just trust that the quantum

1:02:39.800 --> 1:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>immortality thing is real, that the quantum suicide experiment would

1:02:43.000 --> 1:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>actually work. Um, there are a lot of reasons to

1:02:46.200 --> 1:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>doubt it, but we just want to emphasize again for

1:02:48.680 --> 1:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>serious reasons that the idea of quantum immortality is highly

1:02:52.040 --> 1:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>speculative and relies on a lot of assumptions which could

1:02:55.200 --> 1:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>be wrong. Maybe the many worlds interpretation is wrong. Even

1:02:58.680 --> 1:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>if the many worlds interpretation is correct, many of the

1:03:01.240 --> 1:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>assumptions underlying the experiment and how consciousness and survival and

1:03:06.240 --> 1:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>death and branching works could be wrong. So we should

1:03:09.320 --> 1:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge that if somebody puts too much confidence in this

1:03:12.440 --> 1:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>view of the world, it could actually be dangerous. And

1:03:14.840 --> 1:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I read a tragic story in nineteen whoever It's daughter Elizabeth,

1:03:19.800 --> 1:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>actually did commit suicide, and she reportedly left a note

1:03:23.800 --> 1:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>saying that she planned to join her father in another universe.

1:03:28.000 --> 1:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that means her suicide was motivated

1:03:30.600 --> 1:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>by a belief in many worlds immortality. It might not

1:03:33.520 --> 1:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>have been, But in any case, quantum immortality wouldn't work

1:03:36.880 --> 1:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>like that. But it seems to me that it's worth

1:03:39.040 --> 1:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>clarifying that even though this is an interesting thought experiment,

1:03:42.520 --> 1:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it's by no means a good reason to attempt suicide

1:03:46.080 --> 1:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>or to throw caution to the wind and count on

1:03:48.200 --> 1:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>many worlds consciousness funneling to save you your Your life

1:03:52.200 --> 1:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is valuable, how it is, pursue it, how it is yeah,

1:03:55.280 --> 1:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and we we'd like to remind you that if you

1:03:56.760 --> 1:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>are troubled by suicidal thoughts, you are not alone. A

1:03:59.240 --> 1:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>sympathetic year is only a phone call away. In the

1:04:01.720 --> 1:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>United States, consider calling the National Suicide Prevention Hotline at

1:04:05.880 --> 1:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>one to seven, three, eight to five five, and visit

1:04:10.120 --> 1:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>suicide at Prevention Lifeline dot org for additional resources tailored

1:04:14.880 --> 1:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>toward general and specific needs such as those of youth,

1:04:17.840 --> 1:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>disaster survivors, Native Americans, veterans, loast survivors, l g B,

1:04:22.440 --> 1:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>t Q, and attempt survivors. And you'll also find a

1:04:26.040 --> 1:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>list of international suicide hotlines at suicide dot org. If

1:04:30.160 --> 1:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you're actually thinking about it, get in contact. It matters.

1:04:33.360 --> 1:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>All right. That's the episode and we'll be back for

1:04:35.400 --> 1:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>more in the future. But in the meantime, you can

1:04:37.120 --> 1:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>check out all past episodes of Stuff to Blow Your

1:04:39.640 --> 1:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Mind at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. You'll

1:04:42.120 --> 1:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>also find links out to our various social media accounts.

1:04:45.040 --> 1:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>They're huge, thanks as always to our wonderful audio producers

1:04:48.560 --> 1:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Alex Williams and Tary Harrison. If you would like to

1:04:51.280 --> 1:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with us directly by email and let

1:04:53.920 --> 1:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>us know feedback on this episode, or any other or

1:04:56.240 --> 1:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>just to say hig, gain in touch, let us know

1:04:58.280 --> 1:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>what you like about the show, maybe suggest to topic

1:05:00.520 --> 1:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>for the future. You can email us at blow the

1:05:03.320 --> 1:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Mind at how stuff works dot com for more on

1:05:15.600 --> 1:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>this and thousands of other topics. Does it how stuff

1:05:18.080 --> 1:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>works dot com the biggest