Speaker 1: This is Buck's first thoughts, the news you need to
Speaker 1: get for your day in forty five minutes. Make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe on the iHeart Act or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. I can't say I'm surprised because I've been
Speaker 1: predicting it for how many months now? How many times
Speaker 1: have I told you that people out there who mask
Speaker 1: up do this for reasons that have either nothing to
Speaker 1: do with epidemiology, it's political, or they are suffering from
Speaker 1: an anxiety disorder, and I mean that they need help,
Speaker 1: they have some problem that would require professional attention. At
Speaker 1: this point, we're going to break this down for you today.
Speaker 1: I think it's important that everyone understands this because it's
Speaker 1: not just going away, and there are critical lessons about
Speaker 1: freedom and about our society and about the authoritarian left
Speaker 1: in all of this. This is a symbol, but it
Speaker 1: is also a central fight. It's about more than just
Speaker 1: having to wear a stupid and often useless cloth over
Speaker 1: your face. Friends. It's about more than that. So for
Speaker 1: those who are saying, oh, but what about these other
Speaker 1: we cover every topic here that I think we need
Speaker 1: to day in and day out. I'm not done with
Speaker 1: masks yet. They're not done with you. That's where we
Speaker 1: are also want to do everything I can to help
Speaker 1: small businesses across the country. And when running a business,
Speaker 1: you know that HR issues can kill you. You've got
Speaker 1: wrongful termination suits, minimum wage requirements, labor regulations, and HR
Speaker 1: manager salaries aren't cheap. You're talking about an average of
Speaker 1: seventy thousand dollars a year. Bambi spelled Bambee was created
Speaker 1: specifically for small business. You can get a dedicated HR manager,
Speaker 1: craft HR policy and maintain your compliance all for just
Speaker 1: ninety nine dollars a month. With Bamby, you can change
Speaker 1: HR from your biggest liability to your biggest strength. Your
Speaker 1: dedicated HR manager is available by phone, email or real
Speaker 1: time chat. From onboarding determinations, they custom your policies to
Speaker 1: fit your business, and they help you manage your employees
Speaker 1: day today. And they do all this for just ninety
Speaker 1: nine dollars month, a huge savings. We were having a
Speaker 1: full time staffer on this one. Go to Bambi dot
Speaker 1: com slash buck right now to schedule your free HR audit.
Speaker 1: That's b Ambee dot com slash buck spelled Bambee Bambi
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck right now the forever maskers are
Speaker 1: among us. You're seeing them now outside, you're seeing them inside,
Speaker 1: You're seeing them all over the place. Some of us
Speaker 1: were rejoicing when the change in policy came from the CDC.
Speaker 1: As I said to you from the very beginning, I
Speaker 1: feel like somebody who was imprisoned on false charges. Very
Speaker 1: hard to feel grateful when you were let out of
Speaker 1: that prison. But I at least recognized it as a
Speaker 1: step forward. I at least recognized that this was something
Speaker 1: that needed to happen. But for many, many people, millions
Speaker 1: of them who watched too much CNN and MSNBC, who
Speaker 1: believe everything they read in the pages the New York
Speaker 1: Times and the Washington Post. For those people, this creates
Speaker 1: a dilemma. Do I continue to show how seriously I
Speaker 1: take the virus or do I allow for people to
Speaker 1: think that maybe I'm a conservative because I don't have
Speaker 1: a mask on. This is the big concern that they have.
Speaker 1: But remember, the CDC itself is a place that is
Speaker 1: not impressive, has failed us at every stage of this,
Speaker 1: has gotten everything wrong when it needed to get it right.
Speaker 1: Maybe they figured it out eventually, and CDC chief Wilenski
Speaker 1: is a joke. Here she is coming out for months,
Speaker 1: what was I arguing? What were many of us arguing
Speaker 1: that if you believe in the vaccines, if you think
Speaker 1: the vaccines are as effective as we're told, and you
Speaker 1: want to use vaccines as the primary tool to end
Speaker 1: this pandemic, you can't then turn around and tell people
Speaker 1: but you have to keep living your life as though
Speaker 1: you're not vaccinated because we're all so scared. It doesn't work.
Speaker 1: There's a cognitive dissonance there, and it also doesn't create
Speaker 1: the incentives that you need for people to want to
Speaker 1: go through the hassle and possible though there are always risks.
Speaker 1: It doesn't make you an anti vaxxer. There are always
Speaker 1: risks for any vaccine, for any drug. There are risks
Speaker 1: for taking tailanalls. I've been saying for a long time.
Speaker 1: I saw a Fox News host said the same thing recently.
Speaker 1: I've been saying it for months. Risks from all kinds
Speaker 1: of stuff out there. But it should be up to
Speaker 1: you to make determinations about what health risks you want
Speaker 1: to take. Back to Rochelle Wilenski here, she is on
Speaker 1: the New Mass Guidance over the weekend on Sunday, because
Speaker 1: this looks political. Now. It's not political insofar as they
Speaker 1: made a determination that it'll be good for the Democrats
Speaker 1: if they no, no, no, that's maybe a part of it.
Speaker 1: It's political insofar as they recognize that they were looking
Speaker 1: like idiots and they were losing their grip on power.
Speaker 1: And so unless they loosened the slack a little bit
Speaker 1: around our necks or our faces, as the case may be,
Speaker 1: then they were just going to have people that were
Speaker 1: noncomplying anyway. And once you have people recognizing that they
Speaker 1: can ignore the CDC and it's fine, then they ignore
Speaker 1: everything that the CDC is trying to do. So they
Speaker 1: had to adjust a little bit here. But Rachelle Wilenski
Speaker 1: of the CDC coming out now with the oh, don't worry,
Speaker 1: this is just because the science evolved. Play one. First
Speaker 1: of all, let's celebrate this moment. We're at a place
Speaker 1: in this pandemic. Cases have been coming down. I'm more
Speaker 1: than a third just in the last two weeks. We
Speaker 1: have vaccine now across this country, widely available for anyone
Speaker 1: who wants it, and we now have science that has
Speaker 1: really just evolved. Even in the last two weeks. That
Speaker 1: demonstrates that these vaccines are safe, they are effective, they're
Speaker 1: working in the population just as they did in the
Speaker 1: clinical trials, that they are working against our variants that
Speaker 1: we have here circulating in the United States, and that
Speaker 1: if you were to develop an infection, even if you
Speaker 1: got vaccinated, that you can't transmit that infection to other people.
Speaker 1: Some of that science was really evolving as late as
Speaker 1: last Thursday, and one of the published one of the papers,
Speaker 1: the largest paper was published from the CDC just the
Speaker 1: day before yesterday. So we were actively reviewing that science
Speaker 1: during the past week. We were making decisions and moving
Speaker 1: and our subject matter experts were working just as I
Speaker 1: was testifying in front of Congress, and that was what
Speaker 1: was happening. Bull crap. Call it like it is, folks, bullcrap,
Speaker 1: No blanking way, This is not what happened. They didn't
Speaker 1: learn this in the last week or two. Everything she
Speaker 1: said has been known for months. The efficacy, the safety,
Speaker 1: the stopping transmission, this has all been known for months.
Speaker 1: But they said, oh, this is about saving lives, so
Speaker 1: we have to take it to the absolute max. We
Speaker 1: need total herd immunity before you can actually stop wearing masks,
Speaker 1: and then people said, well, hold on a second, look
Speaker 1: at what you've done. Now, aren't you saying that there
Speaker 1: is some acceptable risk in society, that there is a
Speaker 1: balance here between freedom, between individual liberties and just comfort
Speaker 1: and the right to breathe normally and the risk to
Speaker 1: society at large. Oh, you mean that there was a
Speaker 1: balance that had to be struck here, but you pretended
Speaker 1: there wasn't for over fifteen months. Because that's what's actually happened.
Speaker 1: They've been lying to you. This is all part of
Speaker 1: a giant misdirection, all part of an enormous dishonesty, which
Speaker 1: is that the science has been directing all of this,
Speaker 1: when really it's just people who call themselves scientists and
Speaker 1: then all their flax in the media making decisions for
Speaker 1: you that involve judgment and competing values. And they made
Speaker 1: many of the wrong ones, and they struck the wrong balance,
Speaker 1: and it didn't save us. And now we're seeing the
Speaker 1: end results of this now it's quite clear. But if
Speaker 1: you need it anymore evidence, and I even see some
Speaker 1: people that were mocking those of us who called mask
Speaker 1: wearing a religion, people that were deriding as anti signs
Speaker 1: those of us who said this is about much more.
Speaker 1: If it's about science at all, it's only a portion
Speaker 1: of it. Now they're seeing people who are straight up
Speaker 1: admitting I was right. You who listened to this show
Speaker 1: were right. The mask shaming lunatics running around were wrong.
Speaker 1: Their side has been gripped by a kind of mass
Speaker 1: hysteria and mental illness around this issue. This is why
Speaker 1: you can see, for example, the mayor of Chicago, who
Speaker 1: is vaccinated, Lorie Lightfoot, who doesn't quite clearly does not
Speaker 1: listen to the science at the CDC. She's like, well,
Speaker 1: I'm just going to keep wearing a mask. Play seven.
Speaker 1: You say you will follow the CDC's guidance. What does
Speaker 1: that mean should people in Chicago wear masks? Are not well?
Speaker 1: I think we've got to get some clarification from the CDC.
Speaker 1: They roll out obviously, as the reporting has been was
Speaker 1: a bit abrupt, and I think they've got a lot
Speaker 1: of clarification that they need to do. I know, for
Speaker 1: me personally, I'm going to continue to wear a mask
Speaker 1: in public, and I'm going to encourage others to do so.
Speaker 1: We've got to make sure that people are continuing to
Speaker 1: follow the public health guidance that has gotten us this far,
Speaker 1: and mask I think are a big and important part
Speaker 1: of that. To say, well, if you're if you're vaccinated,
Speaker 1: you don't have to wear a mask. That's great, But
Speaker 1: what about all the other people that are out there
Speaker 1: that aren't vaccinated And there's no way to know that.
Speaker 1: So I think for the time being, most people are
Speaker 1: going to continue to wear masks outside and outside of
Speaker 1: their homes. And I think that's smart. She's telling people
Speaker 1: to follow the public health guidance while she herself is
Speaker 1: defying the public health guidance. This is why it's a
Speaker 1: mental illness for the lives that the brain circuitry is
Speaker 1: not functioning properly. Here what does she not see? What
Speaker 1: does she not understand? And she's one of millions, there's
Speaker 1: one of so many out there who can't process this. Ah.
Speaker 1: But that's a very important point. When democrats have force
Speaker 1: on their side, when they have the state on their side,
Speaker 1: it's just the raw exercise of power. Do it because
Speaker 1: that's what they say. Do what we tell you because
Speaker 1: you must or else, no explanation, no justification. That's been
Speaker 1: their approach to everything in the COVID pandemic. All along. Oh,
Speaker 1: we can make you do it. We're gonna make you
Speaker 1: do it. Shut up, put that mask on, double mask, okay.
Speaker 1: And then when they don't have the force of the state,
Speaker 1: they rely on process. Oh, we respect the system and
Speaker 1: we respect the decisions made by the CDC, but we
Speaker 1: just need more clarification. We need more time to implement,
Speaker 1: we need see. This is how leftists do it. The
Speaker 1: relativism of having no principles allows them completely way to
Speaker 1: change it as they see fit. When the force of
Speaker 1: the state is on their side, it is do it
Speaker 1: or else. When they can no longer rely on the
Speaker 1: force of the state, and in fact it's going in
Speaker 1: the opposite direction, they say, hold on a second, we
Speaker 1: need more time. Let's think this through, let's have a review,
Speaker 1: let's call a meeting, delaying that which they do not
Speaker 1: agree with, and ramming through the instant that they think
Speaker 1: they can get away with it whatever they want. This
Speaker 1: is true on masks, it's true on every everything that
Speaker 1: the left deals with when it comes to government. The
Speaker 1: CDC actually said, this decision is based on science. It's
Speaker 1: based on studies that show if you are vaccinated, you
Speaker 1: are very unlikely to get sick, and that even if
Speaker 1: you get some kind of a breakthrough infection, the studies
Speaker 1: seem to be showing you are not likely in any
Speaker 1: way to pass the virus onto others. Why isn't that
Speaker 1: good enough? Because it's not. It's a couple of small
Speaker 1: studies that they looked at. It's also the fact that,
Speaker 1: as in the lead up you mentioned, it's very confusing
Speaker 1: for people. We have questions right now from our patients,
Speaker 1: from our families, from their families, from friends, and I
Speaker 1: can see why it's confusing. We've spent so long trying
Speaker 1: to redevelop the trust that people have with their government
Speaker 1: entities about what's right and what's not right. And we're
Speaker 1: not out of the woods in this yet less than
Speaker 1: thirty seven percent of us are fully vaccinated. We still
Speaker 1: have over thirty five thousand cases a day, over six
Speaker 1: hundred deaths a day. And this is not the time
Speaker 1: to be keeping your nurses, your other frontline workers, your
Speaker 1: essential workers at risk. And we don't like making them.
Speaker 1: They've been the mask police. Now they're having to be
Speaker 1: the vaccine police. They don't want that. Wait a second,
Speaker 1: I thought that we were to listen to the science.
Speaker 1: I thought the CDC was like the god of virology
Speaker 1: and we all had to worship at the altar. Hold
Speaker 1: on a second. Now, now you've got the president of
Speaker 1: the National Nurses United Union, Gen Ross, just saying, you know,
Speaker 1: they're not very good studies, and you know, I think
Speaker 1: there's more. And you know, hold on a second, what
Speaker 1: do you mean explain this to me? You know, more
Speaker 1: than the CDC union boss, nurse lady? Really? Okay, I
Speaker 1: think that's interesting. Now. I thought the CDC was a
Speaker 1: bunch of clowns all along, But I haven't been telling
Speaker 1: everybody that you can't even question it. Now the people
Speaker 1: that all along we're saying you can't question the CDs
Speaker 1: here like, hey, I'm gonna question a little bit. I
Speaker 1: got some ideas on my own on this one. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: what does getting rid of a mask mandate indoors? I mean, yeah,
Speaker 1: if you want to a mask mandate in the hospital. Still,
Speaker 1: I'm sure a lot of people would say, okay, fine, Oh,
Speaker 1: by by having people not have to wear a mask
Speaker 1: when they get their groceries, that's that's putting people so
Speaker 1: much more at risk. Shut up, so dumb, isn't it?
Speaker 1: But this is a I've told you it's an ideological movement.
Speaker 1: Masking is an ideological movement. It is part of the
Speaker 1: Marxist authoritarian left. And that's what has happened here. It
Speaker 1: has merged into it. Don't you see mass mobilization, classic Olyinsky,
Speaker 1: Get people united, get them moving on one issue. You
Speaker 1: can use them for any issue. Everybody mask up, everybody
Speaker 1: trusts the signs. Let's push the Green New Deal. Now
Speaker 1: that's how this works. Use the mob men, tw how
Speaker 1: to create visual signifiers. This is why I care about
Speaker 1: this so much. For those you keep saying, oh, fuck
Speaker 1: enough with the mask What I'm gonna sit here and
Speaker 1: talk more about all is trainee in the leadership fight.
Speaker 1: Come on, this matters. This is a central fight in
Speaker 1: our society. This is not a minor thing at all
Speaker 1: because of what it involves, what it has done. You
Speaker 1: care about the Republican Party. We lost the election because
Speaker 1: of Fauciism and the lockdowners. They use this to beat Trump.
Speaker 1: That is what happened. So yeah, it matters a whole
Speaker 1: heck of a lot. Here's an example of what I'm
Speaker 1: talking about with the religious belief part of this. This
Speaker 1: is the New York Times I just got to reduce
Speaker 1: some of this article. I mean, is it is truly
Speaker 1: remarkable when you start to look at what is being
Speaker 1: said here, what is going on here? It's crazy New
Speaker 1: York Times piece. Here's what it says. Whenever Joe Glickman
Speaker 1: heads out for groceries, he places an N ninety five
Speaker 1: mask over his face and tugs a cloth mask on
Speaker 1: top of it. Okay, so he's a double masker. He
Speaker 1: then puts on a pair of goggles. He has used
Speaker 1: this safety protocol for the past fourteen months. It did
Speaker 1: not change after he contracted the coronavirus last November. It
Speaker 1: didn't budge when earlier this month he became fully vaccinated.
Speaker 1: And even though President Biden said on Thursday that fully
Speaker 1: vaccinated people do not have to wear a mask, mister
Speaker 1: Glickman said he planned to stay the course. In fact,
Speaker 1: he said he plans to do his grocery run double
Speaker 1: masked and goggled for at least the next five years. Bingo, folks,
Speaker 1: what have I told you all along? Massestery a mental illness.
Speaker 1: This is broken people. They have PTSD and they've they've
Speaker 1: taken their neuroses like a club and been beating you
Speaker 1: and me over the head with it for over a
Speaker 1: year total lunacy, dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria.
Speaker 1: That's what this is, the title of the piece is
Speaker 1: they're vaccinated and keeping their masks on maybe forever. I
Speaker 1: wrote a piece about forever masking and forever lockdown on
Speaker 1: BUCKSX and dot com what four months ago? Now, five
Speaker 1: months ago now all kinds and oh I got fact check.
Speaker 1: It's not true. No one's saying they're gonna mask Yeah
Speaker 1: they are, of course they are. Can I just note
Speaker 1: also that in this piece, to give you a sense
Speaker 1: of how little people actually can think for themselves and
Speaker 1: use their critical faculties, this guy double masks and this
Speaker 1: has been his safety protocol according to this piece all along,
Speaker 1: and where's goggles? Which I told you the virus can
Speaker 1: get an Aerosola's virus can get in your eyes too.
Speaker 1: So there's a whole other part of the here that
Speaker 1: they've never really been able to test. How much that happens,
Speaker 1: they don't know. But I told, as they said at
Speaker 1: one point, maybe you should think about goggles, and they're like, okay,
Speaker 1: maybe that's too crazy. Not for everybody. This guy did
Speaker 1: this and he got COVID anyway during the big wave
Speaker 1: in the wintertime. So how could you be going through
Speaker 1: this every day? You still get sick, but you think
Speaker 1: that this is necessary to protect you from the next time.
Speaker 1: You could get sick from the same virus which you
Speaker 1: probably can't even get because of your natural immunity, and
Speaker 1: then you are very unlikely to get because of your
Speaker 1: vaccinated immunity. In addition to that, someone explained the thinking here, Ah,
Speaker 1: this was always about something else. This was always about
Speaker 1: more those of you that are worried about the rising
Speaker 1: tide of Marxism, critical race theory, far left authoritarianism in
Speaker 1: all institutions of our government and in just every aspect
Speaker 1: of our civic, civil society, and civic life. The whole
Speaker 1: masking thing, you understand, this was the maga hat of
Speaker 1: the left, but you were forced to put it on,
Speaker 1: don't you see. Imagine if there was a rule, a
Speaker 1: regulation nationwide that said everyone has to wear a red
Speaker 1: Maga hat, liberals would completely lose their minds more than
Speaker 1: they already have. They pretended that it was all about science,
Speaker 1: but that's actually what in large part they did with
Speaker 1: these mask mandates. Bend the knee to Fauciism and the
Speaker 1: left and the state. It is an amazing thing. I mean,
Speaker 1: I will just tell you at a personal level, I'm
Speaker 1: sorry for Tatique speaking of all that in such personal
Speaker 1: terms with doctor Wilenski. But when I was talking to
Speaker 1: people today about this new guidance and what to ask her,
Speaker 1: everybody every personal feelings about it, and I real I
Speaker 1: did too, and all these questions. Part of it is
Speaker 1: that I feel like I'm going to have to rewire
Speaker 1: myself so that when I see somebody out in the
Speaker 1: world who's not wearing a mask, I don't instantly think
Speaker 1: you are a threat, or you are selfish, or you
Speaker 1: are a COVID denier and you definitely haven't been vaccinated.
Speaker 1: I mean, we're going to have to rewire the way
Speaker 1: that we look at each other because the CDC's guidance,
Speaker 1: which she just told me we are sure, is that
Speaker 1: if you're vaccinated, you don't need to wear a mask
Speaker 1: except in very specific circumstances. And so that means as
Speaker 1: we change that as a country, we are going to
Speaker 1: look at each other differently and have to unwire our
Speaker 1: preconceptions about what a mask or a lack of a
Speaker 1: mask means lack of a mask meant to Rachel Maddow,
Speaker 1: the MSNBC audience, and Biden voters and leftists across America,
Speaker 1: lack of a mask meant you were a bad person
Speaker 1: who was dangerous and you wanted to kill grandma. She's
Speaker 1: telling you this on National TV. That's actually what she
Speaker 1: has thought all this time. I have not been exaggerating.
Speaker 1: I have not been, you know, pushing it beyond where
Speaker 1: the facts are. This is what the left has believed.
Speaker 1: It has been used as a tool not only of
Speaker 1: manipulation and subjugation, but condemnation. If you did not do this,
Speaker 1: you were a bad person, if you weren't someone who
Speaker 1: was willing to go along with the constantly shifting Oh
Speaker 1: this is what we think, now, Oh, this is what
Speaker 1: we think. Then all this is what we think. Next
Speaker 1: from Fauci and the other idiots at the CDC. Fauci's
Speaker 1: a moron, you know. Now he's going on MSNBC's I
Speaker 1: gat Oh, what we really saw here was all the
Speaker 1: racism of the pandemic. You know, he's actually saying that stuff.
Speaker 1: He's been auditioning for his own show at MSNBC for
Speaker 1: the last year that's what this guy really has been
Speaker 1: doing in love with the fame and all the plaudits,
Speaker 1: all all the praise from leftists all across America, the
Speaker 1: fancy elites. You know, Fauci saved us. What a Fauci
Speaker 1: saved us from? Exactly what was the upside of all this?
Speaker 1: None of it is demonstrable. You've noticed that they've switched
Speaker 1: out of Oh, we didn't have any flu. So clearly
Speaker 1: all of this works. Part of the part of the
Speaker 1: way the seasonal flu works is that you have people
Speaker 1: traveling all over the world spreading and it usually starts
Speaker 1: in China, and then you have global travel and it
Speaker 1: moves all over the world. So certainly, a large percentage
Speaker 1: of this, and there are other ideas and theories we
Speaker 1: can talk about as well, A large percentage of this
Speaker 1: is that you did not have the global travel that
Speaker 1: actually spreads the seasonal flu, but you already had COVID
Speaker 1: spread all over the world. It was already endemic in
Speaker 1: many populations. That's one reason why you had such a difference.
Speaker 1: But if it works, so, notice the way they shift,
Speaker 1: Notice the way they you know, all of a sudden
Speaker 1: they hide the football. You say it, Wait, a second,
Speaker 1: why are we talking about how well the measures worked
Speaker 1: against the flu. They were supposed to work against COVID
Speaker 1: and they didn't work at all, folks. That's what we
Speaker 1: see in all the day Ada lockdowns were a failure.
Speaker 1: California Florida side by side. Look at them, one with
Speaker 1: an extreme lockdown, one with a very minimal lockdown, if
Speaker 1: any at all, really, what you're gonna tell me that
Speaker 1: that this works. What are you're talking You're gonna so
Speaker 1: you're gonna lock down your society. You're gonna destroy millions
Speaker 1: of jobs and businesses for what you think might be
Speaker 1: a margin of error difference in the spread of this virus.
Speaker 1: That's called hysteria. That's called moral and intellectual cowardice, which
Speaker 1: was everywhere during this absolutely everywhere. But I think it's
Speaker 1: so important for you'd all remember what Rachel Maddow is
Speaker 1: saying here, which is she's telling her audience because that
Speaker 1: this is she knows who. She's talking to, people who
Speaker 1: live on the Upper West Side and in Brooklyn and
Speaker 1: in Santa Monica and a Northwest DC. She's telling them all,
Speaker 1: it's gonna be tough for me to start thinking about
Speaker 1: people without masks. On at something other than horrible and
Speaker 1: reckless and anti science, because this was political tribalism, and
Speaker 1: what I told you about it the whole time was true.
Speaker 1: And now we're going to see that there will be
Speaker 1: movements to continue this. The federal government Joe Biden for example,
Speaker 1: they're going to say that you have to do this
Speaker 1: on trains, planes, buses, etc. For the foreseeable if you're
Speaker 1: crossing any kind of state line, state boundary. So the
Speaker 1: federal government's still going to mandate this. We have to
Speaker 1: we have to deal with the stats, the reality, because
Speaker 1: they'll seize the narrative. This is what the left does,
Speaker 1: like the little Bolsheviks they are. They will rewrite history
Speaker 1: and they'll pretend that there was great success, great success
Speaker 1: from the masks and lockdowns of twenty twenty and twenty
Speaker 1: twenty one, and it was only those Trump voting science
Speaker 1: deniers that made the virus keep spreading this. I'm telling you,
Speaker 1: this is what they're going to do, and they're going
Speaker 1: to try to bring all this back. They thought a
Speaker 1: fully compliant and terrified society was a brilliant thing for
Speaker 1: achieving the Marxist utopia that they believe it and they
Speaker 1: got close, they felt like, oh wait, we almost had
Speaker 1: everyone just bend the knee and do what we said.
Speaker 1: Stay in your home, don't go to your business, do this,
Speaker 1: do that. You can't breathe. You have to have an
Speaker 1: obstruction between your mouth and fresh air indoors, outdoors. That's
Speaker 1: what they got away with, and they want to do
Speaker 1: it again. If you don't think they're trying to bring
Speaker 1: all of this back by leaving some of it in
Speaker 1: the background right now, if you don't think they're going
Speaker 1: to try to bring all these mitigation measures back for
Speaker 1: the winter season, you aren't paying attention. You don't really
Speaker 1: see what they're trying to do here and what they're
Speaker 1: trying to establish. It's essential, absolutely essential that we continue
Speaker 1: on this fight and say no, not only are you
Speaker 1: morons obviously on the left, completely deranged with your open
Speaker 1: a mask forever. Now we take the fight to them
Speaker 1: and say this did nothing. There's a reason why we
Speaker 1: didn't do this every year for the flu. There's a
Speaker 1: reason why it didn't work as a policy. It did
Speaker 1: not function the way it was promised to function, because
Speaker 1: that was the way they got us all to do it. Oh,
Speaker 1: it'll have a seventy percent reduction in cases. It works
Speaker 1: so well. Bold crap. But we forgot, we forgot basic
Speaker 1: things we knew in all of this, and we abandoned
Speaker 1: common sense and reason because we were told to them,
Speaker 1: because people were scared. This country needs to get in
Speaker 1: touch with its desire for freedom again, and that's going
Speaker 1: to require a repudiation of the lies and the nonsense
Speaker 1: about lockdowns, about masking, about all of this. And I'm
Speaker 1: sorry I have been focused on this all along. I'm
Speaker 1: actually not sorry, and I'm going to continue to focus
Speaker 1: on it insofar as we're never going back to this.
Speaker 1: I mean, we're gonna have to consider pretty extreme measures
Speaker 1: to prevent the lunatics. We see their lunatics. Now, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna keep asking, even if I'm voxenate, they're crazy. I
Speaker 1: was saying all along, they're crazy. I'm telling you they're nuts.
Speaker 1: But now we really have the proof. Now anybody with
Speaker 1: their eyes open and saying, oh my god, these people
Speaker 1: are really nuts, because they are. It's a mental disorder.
Speaker 1: They've actually had it. This is they've created a mass hysteria.
Speaker 1: I mean that as a mass mental illness because of
Speaker 1: an actual viral illness. That's what's happened here. The pandemic
Speaker 1: PTSD of millions of millions of people across the country.
Speaker 1: You have it. One function of PTSD is people can't
Speaker 1: deal with and handle necessarily the actual concerns and the
Speaker 1: judgment necessary to understand whether you can put this into
Speaker 1: perspective or not. Right, if you have b DSD about
Speaker 1: a driving accident, let's say, which people can get, you're
Speaker 1: probably not the person who should be making highway safety standards, right.
Speaker 1: That's what's happened here. The most neurologically challenged by the
Speaker 1: pandemic have become the people that are making the determinations
Speaker 1: about federal policy on it, and they want to keep
Speaker 1: doing it, and they're really upset. It doesn't compute. What
Speaker 1: do you mean that we don't have forever to lockdown?
Speaker 1: What do you mean that we don't have forever masking scary?
Speaker 1: I'm actually I'll tell you this. I've been really concerned
Speaker 1: about how absurd and what a bunch of belligerent sheep
Speaker 1: the American people will, at least half of them turn
Speaker 1: into under the right conditions. I've been telling you this.
Speaker 1: This is a Milgram experiment. This is the authorities are saying,
Speaker 1: electrocute people because it's good for them or because we
Speaker 1: tell you too, and millions of Americans do it. They
Speaker 1: do it. This is why I had a friend up
Speaker 1: in Vermont texting me that he saw a beautiful day.
Speaker 1: He had said there was a youth soccer game going
Speaker 1: on near his house. They texted me said, Bucky, you
Speaker 1: won't believe it. They're they're all the parents pretty much.
Speaker 1: I mean, he said a few exceptions, but the parents
Speaker 1: are all on the sidelines, and the coaches in the opener,
Speaker 1: they're all unmasked. The children are running around playing soccer,
Speaker 1: exerting themselves, you know, twelve year olds or whatever, running
Speaker 1: around with masks on their faces. This is child abuse.
Speaker 1: These Fauci worshiping morons are abusing children because they can't
Speaker 1: understand normal risk parameters and what is reasonable and what
Speaker 1: is not. They have embraced the unreasonable and want to
Speaker 1: force it on all of you. And that's why I
Speaker 1: sit here and say I don't just want mask mandates gone.
Speaker 1: I want anti mask mandates, as in, I want red
Speaker 1: states to say it is illegal for public safety reasons
Speaker 1: to wear a covering on your face outside unless you
Speaker 1: need it. Imminently for a job so construction or things
Speaker 1: where a mask is actually necessary and helps you know,
Speaker 1: dust and things like that. You know, unless you have
Speaker 1: unless you have an excuse like that. Mmmmm sorry, public health,
Speaker 1: public safety got to see who you are. Can't have
Speaker 1: you evading those surveillance cameras. Can't have you able to
Speaker 1: go into a bank and rob it because you got
Speaker 1: your little double mask on, and we don't get to
Speaker 1: know who's whom I want anti mask mandates. Now you'd
Speaker 1: say the mask is on the other foot. Our country's
Speaker 1: experience with COVID nineteen has not only upended our own lives,
Speaker 1: but it has uncovered a stock reality and failing of
Speaker 1: our own society, the unacceptable disparities, and helped experience by
Speaker 1: minority groups, especially African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans. Any
Speaker 1: members of minority groups have a much greater risk of
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen, often because of the nature of the jobs
Speaker 1: that many of them have as essential workers in society.
Speaker 1: More importantly, when people of color get infected with saus
Speaker 1: Kobe two, they more likely will develop a severe consequence
Speaker 1: of the infection, and this is because minorities in general
Speaker 1: have a greater incidence and prevalence of underlying comorbid medical conditions,
Speaker 1: including hypertension, chronic lung disease, diabetes, and obesity that lead
Speaker 1: to a multifold increase in hospitalizations and deaths. Fauci here
Speaker 1: making sure that we all transition our thinking on this
Speaker 1: COVID issue to there's so much racism that COVID has exposed.
Speaker 1: That's what he is telling us, there's so much racism.
Speaker 1: Notice though, that's from the address he gave a commencement
Speaker 1: a virtual because of mitigation, can't actually be in person
Speaker 1: for the virtue, you know, you gotta do a virtual address.
Speaker 1: But he's saying that minority communities Native American, Hispanic and
Speaker 1: African American had that there are racial disparities that have
Speaker 1: been uncovered by all this. But he also says that
Speaker 1: it is a function of disproportionate comorbidities. And the comorbidities
Speaker 1: that he's bringing up are things like obesity, lung disease
Speaker 1: from smoking, things like that. Now, you know, I wonder
Speaker 1: what he thinks The answer to the racism of lung
Speaker 1: disease and comorbidity, as he lays it out, is in
Speaker 1: our society, what are we supposed to do about those things.
Speaker 1: Is this, say, an excuse for a Nannie state that
Speaker 1: tells people how many calories they can eat, how much
Speaker 1: sugar they can ingest, whether they're allowed to personally smoke
Speaker 1: or not period as as a health matter, do we
Speaker 1: want prohibition of Marlboroughs like we have prohibition of other
Speaker 1: controlled substances? What exactly does Fauci want to tell us here?
Speaker 1: Disparate impact as a systemic injustice. You'll notice that this
Speaker 1: logic does not hold up right. There is a disparate
Speaker 1: impact which I'll be talking to you about on this
Speaker 1: show today, a disparate impact of standardized tests on the
Speaker 1: Asian American community. The Asian American community has a disparate impact,
Speaker 1: meaning that in this case, as a function of their
Speaker 1: outperforming other groups on standardized tests, Asians disproportionally benefit from
Speaker 1: standardized testing. So does that mean that our tests are
Speaker 1: systemically racist in favor of Asian Americans? You can do
Speaker 1: this with any number of issues. You look at a
Speaker 1: group based on racial characteristics, you say, well, it doesn't
Speaker 1: line up exactly with this to take sticks that I
Speaker 1: would expect with other groups. So clearly it's the fault
Speaker 1: of the system. And you say, well, what does that
Speaker 1: mean and is it the fault of the system when
Speaker 1: a group benefits overall, when a group does well in
Speaker 1: an area, insider trading disproportionately affects wealthy white guys. Does
Speaker 1: that mean that insider trading laws are racist against white guys. No,
Speaker 1: but it disproportionately affects them, doesn't it. You can see
Speaker 1: the logic here. You know, you look at different different
Speaker 1: you know, different sports have different prevalence of one ethnic
Speaker 1: group or another. Does that mean that the sport is
Speaker 1: the sport itself is racist. No, it does not, right,
Speaker 1: But there are a whole lot of you know, multifaceted factors,
Speaker 1: a whole lot of things you can bring into it.
Speaker 1: But notice Fauci is a leftist, and so he boils
Speaker 1: down disparate disparate outcomes from COVID to racism in society,
Speaker 1: when it would really be a whole lot of things
Speaker 1: like regional and cultural approaches to diet and exercise and
Speaker 1: smoking and socioeconomic status and how that affects intake of
Speaker 1: alcohol and cigarettes overall health. And we should absolutely have
Speaker 1: discussions about overall health and health disparities with the different
Speaker 1: communities and how to address them. But screaming racism about
Speaker 1: them doesn't actually address anything. But Faucci knows that. But
Speaker 1: he's just singing the required tune as he always does.
Speaker 1: This man is a little bureaucrat leftist. He's a mediocrity
Speaker 1: sub mediocrity. Really, there's nothing impressive about him, and his
Speaker 1: tyrannical grip on the country only really comes to an
Speaker 1: end when we repudiate him for the little fascist fraud
Speaker 1: that he is. He has created a tremendous amount of
Speaker 1: division and suffering with no benefit medically. To point you
Speaker 1: for the country, I'm sorry, it does not exist. No
Speaker 1: one is alive because of Fauci. Today. A lot of
Speaker 1: people lost their jobs and their sanity because of Fauci.
Speaker 1: So yes, maybe I am Ahab and Fauci is my
Speaker 1: tiny little white whale. But I'm not giving this up
Speaker 1: because the argument you see continues. The history is now
Speaker 1: being written, and they will use it to justify more
Speaker 1: of this madness if we let them get away with it.
Speaker 1: A lot of you are just starting out, right, I
Speaker 1: know what this is like. You're buying your first homes,
Speaker 1: You're having babies, building wealth and trying to secure your
Speaker 1: family's future well. Part of that process needs to be
Speaker 1: establishing a will or trust, and the best place to
Speaker 1: do it is at Trust and Will dot Com. At
Speaker 1: Trust and Will dot Com, setting up an a state
Speaker 1: plan is simple, convenient, and secure. For as little as
Speaker 1: thirty nine dollars, you can dominate guardians for your children,
Speaker 1: determine who gets your stuff, and plan for future medical care,
Speaker 1: all from the comfort of your home. Hiring a traditional
Speaker 1: a state attorney can cost thousands, and using a one
Speaker 1: size fits all template is not nearly specialized enough, and
Speaker 1: with live customer service seven days a week, though, Trust
Speaker 1: and Will dot COM's team is available to answer any
Speaker 1: questions while setting up your plan. Customize to you and
Speaker 1: your needs. Gain peace of mind at Trust and Will
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck. That's right, Trust and Will dot
Speaker 1: Com slashbuck. You'll get ten percent off plus free shipping
Speaker 1: of your customized legal documents. I've been on the site
Speaker 1: and gone through the process. It's so easy. Once you
Speaker 1: set it up, you'll see this is something you gotta do.
Speaker 1: You know, I know this week is tax week and
Speaker 1: you're thinking about getting things off your plate. Get this
Speaker 1: taken off your plate. And take ten percent off when
Speaker 1: you go to trust and Will dot com slash buck.
Speaker 1: Don't wait, go right now. It's important to get this
Speaker 1: one done and secure your family's future. Go to trust
Speaker 1: and Will dot com slash buck. A Space Force commander
Speaker 1: fired for talking about Marxism penetrating the United States military.
Speaker 1: Isn't this fascinating? You know what the problem they have?
Speaker 1: What this is partisan activity from an active duty member.
Speaker 1: Wait a second, I didn't think that Marxism was something
Speaker 1: that the United States Military was okay with. I thought
Speaker 1: we could you know, if he gave a speech about
Speaker 1: the downfalls or the or the the problems of jihadism
Speaker 1: in the United States military. Oh no, that's probably would
Speaker 1: be an issue too. I'm sure they'd find that that's
Speaker 1: a violation of diversity and inclusion standards or something. What
Speaker 1: ideologies are you not? Can you give a speech on
Speaker 1: how you don't like Nazism? Can you be anti Nazism
Speaker 1: in the military and keep your job or is that
Speaker 1: a partisan thing? Well, apparently you can't be anti Marxist
Speaker 1: and key your job. I think that's this is one
Speaker 1: of the reasons why the left tries so hard to
Speaker 1: whitewash the horrors of Stalinism as well as the very
Speaker 1: clear connections between communism and national socialism. But that's another
Speaker 1: podcast for another time. But they try to pretend that
Speaker 1: Stalin was not a bloodthirsty mass murderer on a completely
Speaker 1: just mind blowing scale. Is because hold on a second.
Speaker 1: You look at the history of Marxist regimes throughout the
Speaker 1: twentieth century, and you see misery, failure, mass starvation, mass murder, torture, rape,
Speaker 1: and brutality of all kinds at the hands of the state.
Speaker 1: That's what you see. Meanwhile, in the academy in social
Speaker 1: media today, Hollywood, you have people that talk about Marxism
Speaker 1: as though it's kind of a cool alternative to the
Speaker 1: evil capitali of America on the West. Sure, how can
Speaker 1: you get in trouble in the United States military for
Speaker 1: talking about Marxism and how it's infiltrating the ranks. Because
Speaker 1: it has and because the Democrats realize that not only
Speaker 1: are they penetrated by Marxism, they are making common cause
Speaker 1: with it, they are using it. There are Marxists within
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party, just like there were Communists that infiltrated
Speaker 1: the Democrat was always Democrats that were pro commy. You
Speaker 1: go back in history, you see it was the Democrats
Speaker 1: who were the commies. You look at Alder heyes, you
Speaker 1: look at the people who were true Soviet agents during
Speaker 1: all of this, and it was in fact Democrats. Okay,
Speaker 1: important for everyone to recognize that. Let me tell you
Speaker 1: this story. This is from military dot Com. A commander
Speaker 1: of a US Space Force unit tasked with detecting ballistic
Speaker 1: missile launches has been fired for comments made during a
Speaker 1: podcast promoting his new book, which claims Marxist ideologies are
Speaker 1: becoming prevalent in the United States military. Lieutenant Colonel Matthew Lomeyer,
Speaker 1: commander of eleventh Space Warning Squadron at Buckley Air Force Base, Colorado,
Speaker 1: was relieved from his post by Lieutenant General Stephen Whiting,
Speaker 1: the head of Space Operations Command, over a loss of
Speaker 1: confidence in his ability to lead. Military dot Com has
Speaker 1: learned quote this decision was based on public comments made
Speaker 1: by Lieutenant Colonel Loemeyer in a recent podcast. A Space
Speaker 1: Force spokesperson sent an email Lieutenant General Whiting has initiated
Speaker 1: a command directed investigation on whether these comments constituted prohibited
Speaker 1: partisan political activity, irresistible revolution Marxism's goal of conquest and
Speaker 1: the unmaking of the American military is the book title.
Speaker 1: And this guy got fired from his job talking about
Speaker 1: this isn't that interesting. Let's just do a review here.
Speaker 1: Remember some years ago, lieutenant colonel I'm sorry, I can't
Speaker 1: remember what his rank was. It might have been Captain
Speaker 1: Nidal Hassan, the Ford Hood shooter. But remember some years
Speaker 1: ago when it came out that he had given numerous
Speaker 1: speeches in which he had defended Jihata suicide bombers and
Speaker 1: talked about jihad against the West, and no one did
Speaker 1: anything about it. That was okay, right that? And then,
Speaker 1: of course later on the guy ended up being a
Speaker 1: mass murder of fellow service members, killing them in cold
Speaker 1: blood at close range in what was initially called by
Speaker 1: the Obama administration. And don't ever forget it work place violence.
Speaker 1: That was their official designation of it, workplace violence. Yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: the guy was in touch with Anwar Alaki, the terrorist
Speaker 1: mastermind from Al Kaide in the Arabian Peninsula, but it
Speaker 1: was workplace violence, they said. It's like how recently a
Speaker 1: report came out where the f behind the DOJ finally
Speaker 1: called the attempted mass assassination of Republican Conservative members of
Speaker 1: Congress by a Bernie Sanders supporter. Yeah, they finally called
Speaker 1: James Hodgkinson was his name. You don't really ever hear it,
Speaker 1: do you. They finally said that that was domestic terrorism. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you don't say. Before then they were just calling it.
Speaker 1: I forget they used some other designation for it, to
Speaker 1: say that it was like a disgruntled person or something
Speaker 1: like that. I don't know, because they hid the truth
Speaker 1: from you because they're engaged in propaganda, and they definitely
Speaker 1: don't want you to figure out that there is a
Speaker 1: Marxist wave. We can all see it. It's obvious, and
Speaker 1: you're going to see a slew of books about, you know,
Speaker 1: the Marxism that is coming and everything else, because it's
Speaker 1: all over the place. It couldn't be any more clear.
Speaker 1: And here is one of the books. But this one
Speaker 1: focusing on the military Marxism in America is very and
Speaker 1: the reason I think it's important called Marxism instead of
Speaker 1: socialism is to understand the real roots of this and
Speaker 1: how division along racial instead of class lines is the
Speaker 1: primary method of separating us from one another, of undermining
Speaker 1: the history of this country. And trying to take control
Speaker 1: of its future. Because in a very wealthy society like ours,
Speaker 1: class warfare is effective, but it's not effective enough to
Speaker 1: make people hate each other. And the purpose of the
Speaker 1: racial Marxists is to create divisions rooted in disdain, in
Speaker 1: real vitriol and real nastiness and distrust of one another.
Speaker 1: You can do that with economic warfare. But the problem
Speaker 1: is the people at the top of this who are
Speaker 1: pushing the racial Marxism. The elites in this country don't
Speaker 1: want to get caught up in and they're very wealthy.
Speaker 1: So while there's some degree of hypocrisy, you know, you
Speaker 1: can have Nancy let them meet Cake Pelosi talking about
Speaker 1: how much she cares about about raising taxes and everything else,
Speaker 1: but that doesn't really that that doesn't one get her
Speaker 1: constituents that excited. And two, she's a rich old lady
Speaker 1: who lives in a mansion in San Francisco and it's
Speaker 1: worth fifty million dollars. So you know, people can eventually
Speaker 1: put two and two together. Ah, but the support of BLM,
Speaker 1: for instance, that really moves the needle on the left,
Speaker 1: that really gets people excited and angry, and you want
Speaker 1: them angry even if you have to lie about cops
Speaker 1: as they do, even if you have to tell lies
Speaker 1: about how law enforcement is systemically and continuously murdering unarmed
Speaker 1: black men without consequence, which is the central lie of
Speaker 1: the BLM movement. But I mean, if you're wondering, has
Speaker 1: the United States military been taken over at some level
Speaker 1: by Marxism and leftist dogma, don't ever forget that. Back
Speaker 1: in February, General I'm sorry, Secretary Defense, former General Austin,
Speaker 1: Secretary Defense ordered all military services to have a one
Speaker 1: day stand on stand down to talk about extremism in
Speaker 1: the ranks. And as part of that, and Lomi are
Speaker 1: the author of this book. And the guy just got
Speaker 1: fired said he was given a book that cited the
Speaker 1: January sixth Capital riot as extremism but did not mention
Speaker 1: the civil disobedience and riots after George Floyd. Gee, that
Speaker 1: doesn't seem partisan at all, does it. Yes, you see
Speaker 1: the efforts to paint the January sixth riot as some
Speaker 1: serious insurrection instead of a bunch of bozos running into
Speaker 1: a building taking photos of themselves in the Capitol. And
Speaker 1: I know that the American Greatness has video where they
Speaker 1: say that some of the Capitol police were essentially waving
Speaker 1: in some people to say, Okay, you can come in
Speaker 1: and look at stuff or whatever. The way that they're
Speaker 1: doing this, the way they're framing this is to create
Speaker 1: a perception of the extremist enemy within, which transfers over
Speaker 1: into suppression efforts against Republicans, Trump supporters, a conservat It's
Speaker 1: very obvious what they're doing, and I would just want
Speaker 1: to know while we're looking at Marxism in the military,
Speaker 1: which is a large federal government funded institution like many others,
Speaker 1: where yeah, it has in a spree to corps and
Speaker 1: a history that brings all Americans together, and is one
Speaker 1: of the few institutions in American public life that people
Speaker 1: have a real love and devotion to and want to support.
Speaker 1: But it's also a large federal bureaucracy, and we know
Speaker 1: what happens to those over time. If you have enough leftist,
Speaker 1: enough Marxists, they seize control, they seize power, and they
Speaker 1: take them over. They've done this largely within the DOJ,
Speaker 1: They've done this in the CIA. I can tell you
Speaker 1: that they've done it in the intelligence community, and they
Speaker 1: are in the process of doing in the United States
Speaker 1: military as well. And that should make everybody very concerned.
Speaker 1: And when you talk about it as a military member,
Speaker 1: now you can get fired. And we can all see that.
Speaker 1: That's because they don't want the truth to come out,
Speaker 1: because the people that believe this want it to they
Speaker 1: believe in Marxism, they want it to continue until it's
Speaker 1: too late. See, this is the game the left always plays.
Speaker 1: What Marxism, there's no Marxism, there's no socialism. What are
Speaker 1: you talking about? And then eventually it's yeah, that's right,
Speaker 1: we were Marxists all along. What are you going to
Speaker 1: do about it? Now we're in charge, we run things.
Speaker 1: Not only do we have all the bureaucrats, but now
Speaker 1: we've got a lot of guys with guns too. That's
Speaker 1: the game they're playing, folks. Don't forget it.