WEBVTT - The Lady Vanishes

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:22.276
<v Speaker 1>Bushkin Saint James Palace in London, down the street from

0:00:22.276 --> 0:00:26.236
<v Speaker 1>Buckingham Palace. It's the official residence of the British monarchy,

0:00:26.836 --> 0:00:30.276
<v Speaker 1>built in the fifteen thirties by Henry the Eighth. It's

0:00:30.316 --> 0:00:32.756
<v Speaker 1>not open to the public, but you can apply to

0:00:32.756 --> 0:00:36.076
<v Speaker 1>go inside, which I did not long ago. It's not

0:00:36.156 --> 0:00:39.076
<v Speaker 1>that hard. As a soldier with a machine gun standing

0:00:39.076 --> 0:00:41.836
<v Speaker 1>by a little cottage. He tells me to go inside,

0:00:42.116 --> 0:00:44.436
<v Speaker 1>and then a man named Desmond shaw Taylor comes and

0:00:44.476 --> 0:00:47.636
<v Speaker 1>gets me. He's the curator of the Royal Art Collection,

0:00:48.356 --> 0:00:52.356
<v Speaker 1>Early Middle aged distinguished, a kind of high end exuberance.

0:00:52.876 --> 0:00:55.316
<v Speaker 2>You know, look at that building now, it's coming missing.

0:00:54.996 --> 0:01:00.476
<v Speaker 1>A page, a nice jumble. Yes, I came here to

0:01:00.476 --> 0:01:03.236
<v Speaker 1>see a painting bought by Queen Victoria nearly one hundred

0:01:03.236 --> 0:01:10.916
<v Speaker 1>and fifty years ago. It's called the Roll Call. Inside

0:01:10.956 --> 0:01:16.556
<v Speaker 1>the palace there's red everywhere, Royal red, red carpets, red wallpaper.

0:01:17.076 --> 0:01:20.156
<v Speaker 1>All the trim is in gold. The rooms are massive

0:01:20.196 --> 0:01:23.756
<v Speaker 1>and almost entirely empty except for the art on the walls.

0:01:24.676 --> 0:01:29.236
<v Speaker 1>Enormous canvasses spanning many centuries everywhere, and in a kind

0:01:29.236 --> 0:01:32.476
<v Speaker 1>of hallway not far from the entrance there it is

0:01:33.036 --> 0:01:35.116
<v Speaker 1>Roll Call, eighteen seventy four.

0:01:36.076 --> 0:01:39.676
<v Speaker 2>The absolute point of the rocal is that it has

0:01:39.716 --> 0:01:43.196
<v Speaker 2>a single brilliant image idea.

0:01:43.756 --> 0:01:46.236
<v Speaker 1>The painting depicts a group of British soldiers in the

0:01:46.276 --> 0:01:49.676
<v Speaker 1>Crimean War, which is a war England and France fought

0:01:49.676 --> 0:01:53.236
<v Speaker 1>against Russia in the eighteen fifties. In Roll Call, there's

0:01:53.396 --> 0:01:56.356
<v Speaker 1>just been a battle and the soldiers are lining up

0:01:56.396 --> 0:01:59.156
<v Speaker 1>in the gray light of morning to be reviewed by

0:01:59.156 --> 0:02:04.596
<v Speaker 1>the commanding officer. We start talking about a particularly distinctive

0:02:04.596 --> 0:02:07.476
<v Speaker 1>figure in the middle of the painting. Desmond has a

0:02:07.476 --> 0:02:10.876
<v Speaker 1>flashlight in his hand because it's quite gloomy in the palace.

0:02:11.276 --> 0:02:15.476
<v Speaker 1>Of course, palaces are supposed to be gloomy. He shines

0:02:15.516 --> 0:02:17.276
<v Speaker 1>the light directly on the man's face.

0:02:17.636 --> 0:02:21.196
<v Speaker 2>That's a brave young man who manages to stand up brighton.

0:02:21.516 --> 0:02:26.356
<v Speaker 2>And this sort of encounter is suggestive of comradeship, isn't it.

0:02:28.876 --> 0:02:32.516
<v Speaker 1>Saint James Pallace has dozens of war paintings, Handsome generals

0:02:32.516 --> 0:02:38.636
<v Speaker 1>on white chargers, panoramic battle scenes, faceless soldiers in glistening uniforms.

0:02:38.916 --> 0:02:44.116
<v Speaker 1>They're almost cartoons. But in Roll Call the men are exhausted, wounded,

0:02:44.236 --> 0:02:46.116
<v Speaker 1>defiant but draggled.

0:02:46.476 --> 0:02:50.796
<v Speaker 2>It's real and they are standing in a line, but

0:02:50.916 --> 0:02:54.116
<v Speaker 2>they're not in a straight line, and they're not anonymous. Yes,

0:02:54.436 --> 0:02:58.276
<v Speaker 2>so it's got one fantastic idea foth.

0:03:02.636 --> 0:03:05.396
<v Speaker 1>My name is Malcolm Glabo. You're listening to the first

0:03:05.436 --> 0:03:16.836
<v Speaker 1>episode of my podcast, Revisionist History. Every week for the

0:03:16.836 --> 0:03:19.156
<v Speaker 1>next ten weeks, I'm going to take you back to

0:03:19.196 --> 0:03:22.636
<v Speaker 1>examine something that I think has been overlooked or misunderstood.

0:03:23.316 --> 0:03:25.396
<v Speaker 1>One week, I'm going to talk about a car crash

0:03:25.516 --> 0:03:28.276
<v Speaker 1>just outside of San Diego. Another week, I'm going to

0:03:28.316 --> 0:03:30.876
<v Speaker 1>take you back to a secret Pentagon project in Saigon.

0:03:32.516 --> 0:03:36.316
<v Speaker 1>The tagline of this show sometimes the past deserves a

0:03:36.356 --> 0:03:39.436
<v Speaker 1>second chance, and that really goes to the heart of it.

0:03:40.116 --> 0:03:42.396
<v Speaker 1>I think too often we make up our minds about

0:03:42.396 --> 0:03:45.156
<v Speaker 1>something that has happened, and then we move on without

0:03:45.156 --> 0:03:48.636
<v Speaker 1>pausing to ask, Wait a minute, is that actually what happened?

0:03:49.316 --> 0:04:02.716
<v Speaker 1>Do we really understand it? I'm starting with something very simple,

0:04:03.116 --> 0:04:07.276
<v Speaker 1>a painting the roll call all but Forgotten. Now, if

0:04:07.276 --> 0:04:09.436
<v Speaker 1>you want to see it before you listen to this story,

0:04:09.636 --> 0:04:12.676
<v Speaker 1>you can pause and go to Revisionististory dot com. But

0:04:12.756 --> 0:04:16.956
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen seventy four, when this painting became famous, something

0:04:17.116 --> 0:04:20.996
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary happened that I think is worth revisiting because it's

0:04:20.996 --> 0:04:23.196
<v Speaker 1>an issue that we deal with all the time today,

0:04:23.596 --> 0:04:26.876
<v Speaker 1>which is what it means to be the first, the

0:04:26.956 --> 0:04:34.396
<v Speaker 1>first outsider to enter a closed world. The art world

0:04:34.516 --> 0:04:37.596
<v Speaker 1>in England at that time is controlled by something called

0:04:37.596 --> 0:04:41.436
<v Speaker 1>the Royal Academy. It consists of forty artists and being

0:04:41.436 --> 0:04:44.596
<v Speaker 1>elected to the Royal Academy is the highest honor any

0:04:44.716 --> 0:04:48.596
<v Speaker 1>artist can get. It's like winning an Oscar. Membership makes

0:04:48.636 --> 0:04:51.836
<v Speaker 1>your reputation and makes it possible to become very wealthy

0:04:51.876 --> 0:04:55.116
<v Speaker 1>as an artist. And every year the Academy puts on

0:04:55.196 --> 0:04:59.596
<v Speaker 1>an art exhibition. Thousands of paintings are submitted, they choose

0:04:59.596 --> 0:05:03.076
<v Speaker 1>a select few and display them at Burlington House on Piccadilly.

0:05:03.596 --> 0:05:06.916
<v Speaker 1>Remember this is before movies and television and recorded music

0:05:07.196 --> 0:05:11.116
<v Speaker 1>painting is it. Hundreds of thousands of people come to

0:05:11.156 --> 0:05:15.316
<v Speaker 1>these shows and roll Call gets chosen for the Royal Academy,

0:05:15.476 --> 0:05:18.236
<v Speaker 1>and not just chosen, chosen in a way that makes

0:05:18.276 --> 0:05:21.956
<v Speaker 1>it a really big deal. First of all, where the

0:05:22.076 --> 0:05:24.836
<v Speaker 1>Academy hangs at painting on the wall matters a lot.

0:05:25.436 --> 0:05:27.236
<v Speaker 1>If they hang it way up near the ceiling, if

0:05:27.236 --> 0:05:30.756
<v Speaker 1>they sky it, that means your painting is considered second class.

0:05:31.476 --> 0:05:33.796
<v Speaker 1>If they hang it at eye level, what's called on

0:05:33.876 --> 0:05:37.836
<v Speaker 1>the line, that's fantastic. Roll Call is on the line.

0:05:41.156 --> 0:05:44.276
<v Speaker 1>Then there's where in Burlington House they put it. There's

0:05:44.316 --> 0:05:46.796
<v Speaker 1>a gallery in the back called the Lecture Room. The

0:05:46.876 --> 0:05:49.876
<v Speaker 1>lecture room is known as the black Hole. Being hung

0:05:49.916 --> 0:05:51.676
<v Speaker 1>in the black Hole was almost as bad as not

0:05:51.716 --> 0:05:54.396
<v Speaker 1>being hung at all. But if they hang at painting

0:05:54.436 --> 0:05:58.716
<v Speaker 1>near the front in gallery two, that's incredibly prestigious. So

0:05:58.836 --> 0:06:03.116
<v Speaker 1>where was roll Call hung Gallery two? Unbelievable? On the

0:06:03.196 --> 0:06:04.916
<v Speaker 1>line in Gallery.

0:06:04.516 --> 0:06:11.516
<v Speaker 3>Two I was reading about it creates an extraordinary sensation. Yes,

0:06:12.116 --> 0:06:15.996
<v Speaker 3>completely in an unusual way, even for that time.

0:06:16.436 --> 0:06:18.836
<v Speaker 1>The day the show opens, the crowds make a bee

0:06:18.836 --> 0:06:19.676
<v Speaker 1>line for Roll Call.

0:06:19.916 --> 0:06:21.916
<v Speaker 2>The crowds were so great that you had to have

0:06:22.276 --> 0:06:26.996
<v Speaker 2>basically we employ warden, but they're police to say you know,

0:06:27.116 --> 0:06:29.156
<v Speaker 2>they touch or yeah, move on.

0:06:29.716 --> 0:06:32.796
<v Speaker 1>The only contemporary equivalent I can think of is people

0:06:32.876 --> 0:06:35.836
<v Speaker 1>camping out in line for two days to buy Beyonce tickets,

0:06:36.356 --> 0:06:38.436
<v Speaker 1>or the kind of frenzy the Beatles faced when they

0:06:38.476 --> 0:06:42.076
<v Speaker 1>first came to America. Roll Call is the hit of

0:06:42.116 --> 0:06:45.796
<v Speaker 1>the Royal Academy show. After that, Roll Call goes in

0:06:45.836 --> 0:06:49.316
<v Speaker 1>a tour of England. In Newcastle, men walk up and

0:06:49.356 --> 0:06:52.996
<v Speaker 1>down the sidewalks with sandwich boards saying simply, the Role

0:06:53.076 --> 0:06:57.156
<v Speaker 1>Call is coming. In Liverpool, twenty thousand people go to

0:06:57.196 --> 0:07:00.556
<v Speaker 1>see it. In those days, prominent paintings were put on

0:07:00.636 --> 0:07:04.236
<v Speaker 1>little playing cards, and two hundred and fifty thousand cards

0:07:04.236 --> 0:07:06.756
<v Speaker 1>are sold with an image of Roll Call. A bidding

0:07:06.796 --> 0:07:10.716
<v Speaker 1>war breaks out among potential buyers. Only Queen Victoria, one

0:07:10.756 --> 0:07:13.996
<v Speaker 1>of the greatest art collectors of her day, decides she

0:07:14.356 --> 0:07:17.276
<v Speaker 1>absolutely has to have it, which is how it comes

0:07:17.276 --> 0:07:21.756
<v Speaker 1>to hang in Saint James's Palace. Desmond Shaw Taylor must

0:07:21.756 --> 0:07:24.676
<v Speaker 1>have seen Roll Call a thousand times, but as he

0:07:24.756 --> 0:07:28.476
<v Speaker 1>shines his flashlight over the artist's brushwork, it's like he's

0:07:28.476 --> 0:07:31.796
<v Speaker 1>seeing it for the first time. He's excited about every

0:07:31.876 --> 0:07:34.876
<v Speaker 1>little detail, even down to the soldier's shoes.

0:07:35.156 --> 0:07:38.836
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty fabulous, isn't it. It's always so difficult too,

0:07:40.676 --> 0:07:45.436
<v Speaker 2>and to paint nothing in particular happening without over doing it.

0:07:45.556 --> 0:07:48.076
<v Speaker 2>And if you just get one gray color and just

0:07:48.676 --> 0:07:51.636
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of unpicturing and just pick out fulls

0:07:51.676 --> 0:07:57.636
<v Speaker 2>of shoes, just very impressive. H I mean, i I'm

0:07:57.676 --> 0:07:58.556
<v Speaker 2>enjoying looking at this.

0:07:59.716 --> 0:08:02.996
<v Speaker 1>It's a remarkable story, but I've left out the most

0:08:02.996 --> 0:08:09.476
<v Speaker 1>remarkable fact of all. The artist, an unknown, more importantly woman.

0:08:09.996 --> 0:08:12.756
<v Speaker 1>At a time when the art world was overwhelmingly male,

0:08:13.676 --> 0:08:16.636
<v Speaker 1>British women in the nineteenth century weren't even allowed to

0:08:16.716 --> 0:08:20.796
<v Speaker 1>study fine art. It was a closed world. And suddenly,

0:08:20.836 --> 0:08:23.516
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of that closed world there enters a

0:08:23.556 --> 0:08:27.796
<v Speaker 1>striking young woman named Elizabeth Thompson, raised in Switzerland by

0:08:27.836 --> 0:08:32.236
<v Speaker 1>wealthy Bohemian parents, an outsider, and she breaks down the door.

0:08:36.356 --> 0:08:39.436
<v Speaker 1>I've been fascinated by the story of Elizabeth Thompson for years,

0:08:39.916 --> 0:08:43.156
<v Speaker 1>by roll Call, and more particularly by what happened to

0:08:43.196 --> 0:08:47.356
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Thompson after the stunning success of her painting. What

0:08:47.476 --> 0:08:51.836
<v Speaker 1>fascinates me is how her story is repeated over and

0:08:51.996 --> 0:08:56.156
<v Speaker 1>over again. Once you know about Elizabeth Thompson, you see

0:08:56.196 --> 0:09:04.036
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Thompson's everywhere. I don't know if you've ever heard

0:09:04.036 --> 0:09:07.036
<v Speaker 1>of Julia Gillard. She was the first woman to become

0:09:07.116 --> 0:09:10.396
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister of Australia. He served from twenty ten to

0:09:10.436 --> 0:09:14.676
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen, and she had an incredibly tumultuous time in office.

0:09:15.316 --> 0:09:17.476
<v Speaker 1>Near the end of her tenure, she gave a famous

0:09:17.556 --> 0:09:20.636
<v Speaker 1>speech on the floor of the Australian Parliament. Here's the

0:09:20.636 --> 0:09:21.636
<v Speaker 1>part everyone noticed.

0:09:22.236 --> 0:09:25.596
<v Speaker 4>The Leader of the Opposition says that people who hold

0:09:25.676 --> 0:09:30.196
<v Speaker 4>sexist views and who are melogynists are not appropriate for

0:09:30.356 --> 0:09:33.156
<v Speaker 4>high office. Well, I hope the Leader of the Opposition

0:09:33.196 --> 0:09:35.996
<v Speaker 4>has got a piece of paper and he is writing

0:09:36.036 --> 0:09:39.316
<v Speaker 4>out his resignation, because if he wants to know what

0:09:39.436 --> 0:09:43.316
<v Speaker 4>misogyny looks like in modern Australia, he doesn't need a

0:09:43.436 --> 0:09:46.756
<v Speaker 4>motion in the House of Representatives. He needs a miro.

0:09:47.036 --> 0:09:48.316
<v Speaker 4>That's what he needs.

0:09:48.996 --> 0:09:51.556
<v Speaker 1>When I heard Julia Gillard give that speech, I thought

0:09:51.596 --> 0:09:55.436
<v Speaker 1>about Elizabeth Thompson because Gillard and Thompson were in the

0:09:55.516 --> 0:09:59.796
<v Speaker 1>same situation. Women dealing with the consequences are breaking down

0:09:59.836 --> 0:10:03.596
<v Speaker 1>the door. I also remember Elizabeth Thompson when I think

0:10:03.596 --> 0:10:10.356
<v Speaker 1>of Hillary Clinton. Theres an idea that I think helps

0:10:10.396 --> 0:10:14.316
<v Speaker 1>explain the phenomenon of Elizabeth Thompson and Julia Gillard. It's

0:10:14.356 --> 0:10:19.196
<v Speaker 1>called moral licensing. It's a fairly new concept in social psychology.

0:10:19.516 --> 0:10:21.436
<v Speaker 1>It was developed by a number of the best young

0:10:21.516 --> 0:10:25.316
<v Speaker 1>psychologists in the field, chief among them Daniel Efren, who

0:10:25.356 --> 0:10:29.116
<v Speaker 1>teaches at the London Business School. Here's the official definition

0:10:29.156 --> 0:10:33.396
<v Speaker 1>of moral licensing. Past good deeds can liberate individuals to

0:10:33.516 --> 0:10:38.636
<v Speaker 1>engage in behaviors that are immoral, unethical, or otherwise problematic,

0:10:39.076 --> 0:10:42.356
<v Speaker 1>behaviors that they would otherwise avoid for fear of feeling

0:10:42.716 --> 0:10:50.036
<v Speaker 1>or appearing immoral. When we do something good, in other words,

0:10:50.196 --> 0:10:54.036
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we then, on occasion, give ourselves permission to do

0:10:54.076 --> 0:10:58.716
<v Speaker 1>something bad. One of Efron's first experiments in moral licensing

0:10:58.836 --> 0:11:02.516
<v Speaker 1>was in two thousand and nine. He surveys people who

0:11:02.596 --> 0:11:06.476
<v Speaker 1>publicly self identify as supporters of Barack Obama for president,

0:11:07.316 --> 0:11:09.796
<v Speaker 1>and what he finds is that supporting a black politician

0:11:10.156 --> 0:11:14.076
<v Speaker 1>doesn't always signal that you're a racially open person who

0:11:14.116 --> 0:11:17.076
<v Speaker 1>is inclined to be progressive in other areas. It can

0:11:17.116 --> 0:11:20.396
<v Speaker 1>also have the opposite effect. It can free you up

0:11:20.436 --> 0:11:23.476
<v Speaker 1>to go back to your old racist ways because you've

0:11:23.516 --> 0:11:25.636
<v Speaker 1>proven to the world what a good person you are.

0:11:26.676 --> 0:11:29.916
<v Speaker 1>And that's what he discovers. A significant chunk of the

0:11:29.956 --> 0:11:33.796
<v Speaker 1>people who supported Barack Obama were then more likely, at

0:11:33.876 --> 0:11:37.236
<v Speaker 1>least in the experiment, to express racially questionable opinions.

0:11:39.716 --> 0:11:44.236
<v Speaker 5>I was taken by this finding that people appear to

0:11:44.276 --> 0:11:48.596
<v Speaker 5>be able to license themselves based on pretty paltry virtues.

0:11:49.076 --> 0:11:51.676
<v Speaker 1>I met Efren in his office in London, up in

0:11:51.676 --> 0:11:55.076
<v Speaker 1>near Regent's Park. I asked him why a little egalitarian

0:11:55.116 --> 0:11:59.276
<v Speaker 1>behavior doesn't lead to more egalitarian behavior. Why don't good

0:11:59.316 --> 0:12:01.316
<v Speaker 1>deeds just lead to more good deeds?

0:12:01.596 --> 0:12:05.676
<v Speaker 5>So your question is about when does evidence that I'm

0:12:05.756 --> 0:12:11.236
<v Speaker 5>virtuous lead to more virtuous behavior versus when does evidence

0:12:11.236 --> 0:12:14.876
<v Speaker 5>a virtue lead to less virtuous behavior? When does doing

0:12:14.916 --> 0:12:17.076
<v Speaker 5>good lead to doing bad? And when is doing good

0:12:17.156 --> 0:12:19.636
<v Speaker 5>lead to doing more good? This is the million dollar

0:12:19.796 --> 0:12:22.916
<v Speaker 5>question in this literature, and it's been a puzzle.

0:12:23.436 --> 0:12:25.956
<v Speaker 1>All we know is that human beings go both ways

0:12:26.716 --> 0:12:30.356
<v Speaker 1>after a good deed, They sometimes follow a virtuous trajectory

0:12:31.036 --> 0:12:34.916
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes they don't. There's what happens after Jackie Robinson

0:12:34.956 --> 0:12:38.076
<v Speaker 1>broke the color line in nineteen forty seven becomes the

0:12:38.116 --> 0:12:42.356
<v Speaker 1>first ever black professional baseball player. Within five years there

0:12:42.396 --> 0:12:44.716
<v Speaker 1>are one hundred and fifty black ball players in the

0:12:44.756 --> 0:12:48.276
<v Speaker 1>major leagues. I think that's what we expect. It fits

0:12:48.316 --> 0:12:52.196
<v Speaker 1>our romantic notions of progress. The door opens for one person,

0:12:52.516 --> 0:12:55.676
<v Speaker 1>and soon it opens for everyone. But what we have

0:12:55.756 --> 0:12:58.996
<v Speaker 1>to understand is that a lot of times the opposite happens.

0:12:59.556 --> 0:13:02.316
<v Speaker 1>The door opens for one person and they're the only

0:13:02.356 --> 0:13:05.196
<v Speaker 1>one to slip in those who open the door then

0:13:05.236 --> 0:13:08.436
<v Speaker 1>feel free to close it again for everybody else. A

0:13:08.476 --> 0:13:11.916
<v Speaker 1>couple years ago, the Israeli author Almost Ilan wrote a

0:13:11.996 --> 0:13:14.196
<v Speaker 1>history of the Jews in Germany called The Pity of

0:13:14.196 --> 0:13:18.236
<v Speaker 1>It All. It's a fascinating book for precisely this reason,

0:13:18.876 --> 0:13:22.036
<v Speaker 1>because what Ilan is interested in is the great paradox

0:13:22.076 --> 0:13:25.116
<v Speaker 1>of Germany's history with the Jews. Here we have a

0:13:25.156 --> 0:13:29.716
<v Speaker 1>country that committed the greatest historical atrocity against the Jewish people.

0:13:30.356 --> 0:13:33.116
<v Speaker 1>Yet if you take the long view, as Alan does,

0:13:33.316 --> 0:13:36.676
<v Speaker 1>you see that time and time again, German culture welcomed Jews,

0:13:37.036 --> 0:13:42.356
<v Speaker 1>or at least welcomed some Jews. From the seventeenth century onwards,

0:13:42.476 --> 0:13:44.836
<v Speaker 1>Many German states had a tradition of what were called

0:13:44.956 --> 0:13:48.556
<v Speaker 1>court Jews. Most Jews were banned from living in major

0:13:48.556 --> 0:13:51.956
<v Speaker 1>German cities. There were severe restrictions on what they could do,

0:13:52.596 --> 0:13:55.876
<v Speaker 1>but simultaneously there was a group of protected Jews who

0:13:55.916 --> 0:13:58.596
<v Speaker 1>were allowed to live and work within the city walls.

0:13:59.556 --> 0:14:02.716
<v Speaker 1>In the seventeen thirties, the King of Prussia becomes alarmed

0:14:02.716 --> 0:14:05.356
<v Speaker 1>by the number of Jews in Prussia, likening them to

0:14:05.516 --> 0:14:09.596
<v Speaker 1>locusts bringing ruin to Christians, so he banished wish them

0:14:09.636 --> 0:14:12.516
<v Speaker 1>from Berlin, but not all of them. He kicks out

0:14:12.516 --> 0:14:15.196
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and forty families, and he keeps one hundred

0:14:15.196 --> 0:14:19.196
<v Speaker 1>and twenty. That pattern is repeated over and again in

0:14:19.236 --> 0:14:23.516
<v Speaker 1>the German speaking world. In the eighteenth century, the philosopher

0:14:23.636 --> 0:14:26.876
<v Speaker 1>Moses Mendelssohn, who is Jewish, was considered one of the

0:14:26.916 --> 0:14:30.756
<v Speaker 1>most brilliant men in Europe. He lives in Berlin, and

0:14:30.836 --> 0:14:34.076
<v Speaker 1>people come from far and wide to visit him. How

0:14:34.116 --> 0:14:38.396
<v Speaker 1>does he stay in Berlin? The King grants him exceptional status.

0:14:38.556 --> 0:14:41.356
<v Speaker 1>That is to say, and these are Amasalon's words here,

0:14:41.676 --> 0:14:46.836
<v Speaker 1>Mendelssohn is the Unjewish jew. The same happens one hundred

0:14:46.916 --> 0:14:50.676
<v Speaker 1>years later with Bertold Auerbach. He's Jewish and he's the

0:14:50.716 --> 0:14:53.876
<v Speaker 1>most widely read German novelist of his day. He's called

0:14:53.916 --> 0:14:56.916
<v Speaker 1>the German Dickens. This is now at a time of

0:14:57.276 --> 0:15:02.316
<v Speaker 1>virulent antisemitism throughout Germany, but Bertold Auerbach is somehow immune

0:15:02.396 --> 0:15:08.156
<v Speaker 1>from that prejudice. Richard Wagner Wagner, the notorious anti Semite,

0:15:08.476 --> 0:15:12.556
<v Speaker 1>loves ours and calls him a man rooted in German life.

0:15:12.876 --> 0:15:16.276
<v Speaker 1>One of the brothers grim thanks Auerbach for curing him

0:15:16.276 --> 0:15:20.116
<v Speaker 1>of prejudice. The Germans hate Jews as a rule, but

0:15:20.236 --> 0:15:23.516
<v Speaker 1>they love Aerbach. What's going on here? It sounds like

0:15:23.556 --> 0:15:27.876
<v Speaker 1>a contradiction, it's not. It's just textbook moral licensing. The

0:15:27.956 --> 0:15:31.316
<v Speaker 1>Germans love Berthold Auerbach, and because they think they have

0:15:31.436 --> 0:15:35.516
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated their open mindedness by loving this one Jew, they

0:15:35.516 --> 0:15:38.156
<v Speaker 1>feel free to act in the most despicable way to

0:15:38.236 --> 0:15:42.396
<v Speaker 1>other Jews. You open the door to one outsider, and

0:15:42.436 --> 0:15:46.236
<v Speaker 1>that gives you permission to close the door to others.

0:15:53.276 --> 0:15:56.356
<v Speaker 1>After seeing roll Call at Saint James's Palace, I went

0:15:56.396 --> 0:15:58.996
<v Speaker 1>to the tape and sat on a little bench outside

0:15:59.036 --> 0:16:03.756
<v Speaker 1>the Turner Gallery with Paul Usherwood. Usherwood is an art

0:16:03.836 --> 0:16:07.756
<v Speaker 1>historian who has written extensively on Elizabeth Thompson. In fact,

0:16:07.956 --> 0:16:10.796
<v Speaker 1>I first learned about Liz with Thompson because they stumbled

0:16:10.796 --> 0:16:14.516
<v Speaker 1>across an absolutely brilliant article by Usherwood in the Woman's

0:16:14.596 --> 0:16:18.556
<v Speaker 1>Art Journal. It was called Elizabeth Thompson Butler, a case

0:16:18.596 --> 0:16:23.036
<v Speaker 1>of tokenism. Usherwood is wispy and tweedy in the best

0:16:23.076 --> 0:16:26.876
<v Speaker 1>possible English way. I imagined that after our chat he

0:16:26.876 --> 0:16:29.396
<v Speaker 1>would go straight home, spend an hour in the garden,

0:16:29.676 --> 0:16:32.316
<v Speaker 1>then go for a brisk walk across a few soggy

0:16:32.316 --> 0:16:36.756
<v Speaker 1>fields through the dogs. Ushwood argues that in making sense

0:16:36.756 --> 0:16:39.996
<v Speaker 1>of what happened to Elizabeth Thompson, it's really important to

0:16:40.076 --> 0:16:43.436
<v Speaker 1>understand the role of the Royal Academy. They control the

0:16:43.556 --> 0:16:48.996
<v Speaker 1>art world at this point forty aloof dictatorial white men, as.

0:16:48.916 --> 0:16:53.156
<v Speaker 6>An institution that was just very very powerful and much

0:16:53.236 --> 0:16:58.956
<v Speaker 6>resented by people who weren't very very well by it.

0:16:59.236 --> 0:17:02.676
<v Speaker 1>Academy members gave their own pictures the best positions on

0:17:02.716 --> 0:17:06.396
<v Speaker 1>the walls of the annual exhibition. Meanwhile, they pretty much

0:17:06.436 --> 0:17:09.596
<v Speaker 1>ignored everyone else's art, including an eighteen six tventy four.

0:17:09.956 --> 0:17:11.836
<v Speaker 1>The Irwin roll call went up so.

0:17:11.956 --> 0:17:15.876
<v Speaker 6>That yeah, there were six thousands paintings which didn't mate

0:17:16.156 --> 0:17:18.316
<v Speaker 6>the expertise of thousands.

0:17:18.516 --> 0:17:20.956
<v Speaker 1>There's only one art show that matters in England, and

0:17:20.996 --> 0:17:23.716
<v Speaker 1>it's so small that thousands of artists are stuck on

0:17:23.756 --> 0:17:33.316
<v Speaker 1>the outside looking in. There's a revolution brewing. So along

0:17:33.356 --> 0:17:38.156
<v Speaker 1>comes Elizabeth Thompson, a woman, an outsider, with an absolutely

0:17:38.196 --> 0:17:41.516
<v Speaker 1>brilliant painting, and the Academy hangs it on the line

0:17:41.516 --> 0:17:44.916
<v Speaker 1>in Gallery two, and everyone thinks this is a sign

0:17:44.956 --> 0:17:48.316
<v Speaker 1>that the Academy is finally opening its doors to what

0:17:48.956 --> 0:17:52.476
<v Speaker 1>to the Holy Grail membership in the Royal Academy itself.

0:17:53.276 --> 0:17:56.636
<v Speaker 1>It seems destined to happen. One of the most prominent

0:17:56.756 --> 0:17:59.276
<v Speaker 1>art critics of the day writes in The Daily Telegraph

0:17:59.476 --> 0:18:02.276
<v Speaker 1>that role call success proves that, and I'm quoting here,

0:18:02.756 --> 0:18:07.876
<v Speaker 1>real genius has no insurmountable obstacles in the English art world.

0:18:10.356 --> 0:18:13.356
<v Speaker 1>In short order, Thompson is nominated for election to the

0:18:13.436 --> 0:18:16.956
<v Speaker 1>Royal Academy. She's one of the most famous artists in England.

0:18:17.516 --> 0:18:20.916
<v Speaker 1>She has a huge public following. Every artist in the

0:18:20.996 --> 0:18:25.516
<v Speaker 1>country is riveted by her candidacy. And what happens. She loses,

0:18:25.716 --> 0:18:28.836
<v Speaker 1>but by just two votes. It doesn't feel At the end,

0:18:29.436 --> 0:18:33.396
<v Speaker 1>everyone says, this is progress. Here we have a young artist,

0:18:33.516 --> 0:18:36.316
<v Speaker 1>still in her twenties, and on her first try she

0:18:36.396 --> 0:18:39.556
<v Speaker 1>comes within a hair's breadth of acceptance into the old

0:18:39.596 --> 0:18:42.876
<v Speaker 1>boys club. Everyone thinks that she's going to be a

0:18:42.956 --> 0:18:45.796
<v Speaker 1>lock for election the next time round. They look at

0:18:45.796 --> 0:18:54.116
<v Speaker 1>her and they say Elizabeth Thompson, pioneer. But then Thompson

0:18:54.156 --> 0:18:58.796
<v Speaker 1>submits another painting to the Academy, another brilliant painting called

0:18:58.876 --> 0:19:01.916
<v Speaker 1>Quatro Bras, a depiction of the Battle of Waterloo.

0:19:02.076 --> 0:19:05.956
<v Speaker 6>By that time, she's celebrity and has fantastic assistance from

0:19:05.996 --> 0:19:10.476
<v Speaker 6>the Niamators, I mean three hundred soldiers point operator, so

0:19:10.676 --> 0:19:11.796
<v Speaker 6>she could paint that picture.

0:19:12.196 --> 0:19:15.276
<v Speaker 1>This is in eighteen seventy five, the year after Roll

0:19:15.356 --> 0:19:18.276
<v Speaker 1>calls Triumph. So what happens to Quatrabra?

0:19:18.836 --> 0:19:21.316
<v Speaker 6>What they do is they stuff it away in an

0:19:21.356 --> 0:19:23.916
<v Speaker 6>obscure corner. Says quite hard.

0:19:23.876 --> 0:19:27.036
<v Speaker 1>Seas Thompson's new work is hung in the lecture room

0:19:27.316 --> 0:19:30.876
<v Speaker 1>at the back the black hole. And the black hole

0:19:30.956 --> 0:19:33.316
<v Speaker 1>is where her election to the Royal Academy also goes.

0:19:34.076 --> 0:19:36.876
<v Speaker 1>Remember she was within two votes of getting in, and

0:19:36.916 --> 0:19:39.316
<v Speaker 1>everybody said she's a lock for the next time around,

0:19:39.516 --> 0:19:42.876
<v Speaker 1>but she isn't. There is no next time around. Instead,

0:19:43.156 --> 0:19:47.876
<v Speaker 1>the male Academy members have these absurd internal conversations about

0:19:47.916 --> 0:19:50.316
<v Speaker 1>how it would work if a woman ever got elected.

0:19:50.596 --> 0:19:51.796
<v Speaker 1>What about the etiquette?

0:19:51.996 --> 0:19:55.436
<v Speaker 6>That's a banquet? How would that they arranged? Who would

0:19:55.596 --> 0:19:58.916
<v Speaker 6>bring in? Is the thing for the male academician to

0:19:59.236 --> 0:20:01.796
<v Speaker 6>escort a woman into the bank cred for? How would

0:20:01.796 --> 0:20:02.556
<v Speaker 6>that work with a woman?

0:20:02.956 --> 0:20:06.196
<v Speaker 1>They fussed about it. They tied themselves in knots at

0:20:06.196 --> 0:20:08.636
<v Speaker 1>the thought of a woman entering their club. So the

0:20:08.676 --> 0:20:12.196
<v Speaker 1>Academy members passed new regulations to limit the privileges of

0:20:12.316 --> 0:20:15.796
<v Speaker 1>any women whom might get elected in the future. Because

0:20:15.836 --> 0:20:19.076
<v Speaker 1>they've proven their bona fides, they hung rall call on

0:20:19.156 --> 0:20:21.916
<v Speaker 1>the line in Gallery two. Who can doubt how open

0:20:21.956 --> 0:20:24.996
<v Speaker 1>and progressive they are? Now they can go back to

0:20:25.076 --> 0:20:31.316
<v Speaker 1>the way they were. In eighteen eighty one, Elizabeth Thompson

0:20:31.316 --> 0:20:35.076
<v Speaker 1>paints what might be her most famous painting, Scotland Forever.

0:20:35.796 --> 0:20:38.276
<v Speaker 1>It's a thrilling depiction of a charge of the Scots

0:20:38.356 --> 0:20:42.396
<v Speaker 1>Grays at Waterloo in eighteen fifteen. Scotland Forever is never

0:20:42.436 --> 0:20:45.796
<v Speaker 1>shown at the Royal Academy, and Thompson doesn't even try

0:20:45.836 --> 0:20:48.516
<v Speaker 1>again to get elected. She can read the writing on

0:20:48.556 --> 0:20:52.036
<v Speaker 1>the wall. In fact, no woman would be elected to

0:20:52.036 --> 0:20:55.836
<v Speaker 1>the Royal Academy until nineteen thirty six, more than half

0:20:55.876 --> 0:21:01.476
<v Speaker 1>a century later. As for Thompson, she married an army

0:21:01.516 --> 0:21:05.196
<v Speaker 1>officer named William Butler. She changed her name. She raised

0:21:05.276 --> 0:21:08.876
<v Speaker 1>six children. Her career took a backseat to her husband's.

0:21:09.516 --> 0:21:12.356
<v Speaker 1>When he writes his memoirs, he doesn't say a word

0:21:12.396 --> 0:21:15.476
<v Speaker 1>about her, his own wife, one of the most famous

0:21:15.636 --> 0:21:16.756
<v Speaker 1>artists in England.

0:21:17.196 --> 0:21:20.996
<v Speaker 6>His autobiography four hundred and fifty five pages, she's not

0:21:21.116 --> 0:21:24.516
<v Speaker 6>mentioned in the index he mentions that he was married,

0:21:24.716 --> 0:21:27.796
<v Speaker 6>he mentions that he did have children, and that's it.

0:21:28.876 --> 0:21:31.796
<v Speaker 1>And when she writes her memoirs, she acts as if

0:21:31.796 --> 0:21:34.436
<v Speaker 1>the whole incident with her near election to the Royal

0:21:34.436 --> 0:21:38.516
<v Speaker 1>Academy never happened. Today people would write an entire book

0:21:38.556 --> 0:21:41.996
<v Speaker 1>about it. But she's been defeated and she knows it.

0:21:42.996 --> 0:21:46.436
<v Speaker 1>Here's all she says. As it turned out in eighteen

0:21:46.476 --> 0:21:49.916
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine, I lost my election by two votes. Only

0:21:50.516 --> 0:21:54.076
<v Speaker 1>since then, I think the door has been closed. And

0:21:54.156 --> 0:21:58.716
<v Speaker 1>wisely that's the part that always gets me. And wisely

0:21:59.476 --> 0:22:10.076
<v Speaker 1>she's given up. Remember how I'm mentioned that when I

0:22:10.156 --> 0:22:12.716
<v Speaker 1>saw a roll call, the first thing I thought about

0:22:12.756 --> 0:22:16.876
<v Speaker 1>was Julia Gillard, the former Prime Minister of Australia. That's

0:22:16.916 --> 0:22:21.516
<v Speaker 1>because it's the same story. Gillard's election was a milestone

0:22:21.556 --> 0:22:24.156
<v Speaker 1>in Australian history, the same way it would be for

0:22:24.196 --> 0:22:28.276
<v Speaker 1>any country. Australia had been an independent nation for more

0:22:28.316 --> 0:22:32.196
<v Speaker 1>than a century, one hundred and ten years of uninterrupted

0:22:32.276 --> 0:22:35.396
<v Speaker 1>male rule, and that came to an end in twenty

0:22:35.436 --> 0:22:42.676
<v Speaker 1>ten with this funny whip, smart tough woman. In former

0:22:42.756 --> 0:22:46.516
<v Speaker 1>British colonies like Australia, the representative of the British crown

0:22:46.596 --> 0:22:49.516
<v Speaker 1>is called the Governor General, and the Governor General is

0:22:49.556 --> 0:22:52.516
<v Speaker 1>the person who swears in the new Prime minister. When

0:22:52.556 --> 0:22:54.876
<v Speaker 1>Gillard stands up to take the oath of office, it's

0:22:54.916 --> 0:22:56.316
<v Speaker 1>a doubly incredible moment.

0:22:56.876 --> 0:22:59.756
<v Speaker 4>What made it loom large for me that day is

0:22:59.996 --> 0:23:02.916
<v Speaker 4>our governor General at that time was the first woman

0:23:02.956 --> 0:23:04.636
<v Speaker 4>to ever serve as Governor General.

0:23:04.836 --> 0:23:06.996
<v Speaker 1>This is Julia Gillard telling the story.

0:23:06.916 --> 0:23:10.836
<v Speaker 4>And I could see in her and in her eyes,

0:23:11.276 --> 0:23:16.916
<v Speaker 4>you know, this incredible shock or delight that she was

0:23:16.996 --> 0:23:19.476
<v Speaker 4>going to be the person to swear in the first

0:23:19.676 --> 0:23:25.836
<v Speaker 4>woman prime minister. I Silia Eileen Dillar Clelia firm and

0:23:25.996 --> 0:23:30.156
<v Speaker 4>declared that I will well and truly said the Commonwealth

0:23:30.196 --> 0:23:33.356
<v Speaker 4>of Australia. And you know, she subsequently said to me, look,

0:23:33.596 --> 0:23:35.436
<v Speaker 4>I didn't think i'd live to see it. I didn't

0:23:35.476 --> 0:23:37.396
<v Speaker 4>think i'd live to see the day our nation had

0:23:37.396 --> 0:23:38.636
<v Speaker 4>a female prime minister.

0:23:39.076 --> 0:23:42.356
<v Speaker 1>It's a big deal. And Gillard, like many at the time,

0:23:42.836 --> 0:23:47.436
<v Speaker 1>thinks that Australia has undergone a permanent transformation. And she

0:23:47.556 --> 0:23:50.516
<v Speaker 1>also thinks that after the novelty of her election passes,

0:23:50.956 --> 0:23:54.196
<v Speaker 1>she'll just be Prime Minister. Gillard, the fact of her

0:23:54.276 --> 0:23:57.556
<v Speaker 1>gender will become unremarkable, the way the fact of a

0:23:57.556 --> 0:24:00.036
<v Speaker 1>baseball player's race is now unremarkable.

0:24:00.836 --> 0:24:03.716
<v Speaker 4>If you'd asked me then that all would have played

0:24:03.756 --> 0:24:06.236
<v Speaker 4>itself out in the first few months. And then I thought,

0:24:06.316 --> 0:24:09.756
<v Speaker 4>sort of the political cycleod go back to normal. And

0:24:10.116 --> 0:24:13.956
<v Speaker 4>I made that judgment call spectacularly wrong.

0:24:14.356 --> 0:24:17.636
<v Speaker 1>When was the first moment that you realized you were wrong?

0:24:18.476 --> 0:24:20.756
<v Speaker 4>Oh, look, I don't think it was a you know,

0:24:20.796 --> 0:24:24.356
<v Speaker 4>it wasn't the thud of a penny dropping in my brain.

0:24:25.396 --> 0:24:30.436
<v Speaker 4>But it just became clearer and clearer, particularly by the

0:24:30.516 --> 0:24:34.476
<v Speaker 4>time we were in the government's second year and we

0:24:34.476 --> 0:24:39.756
<v Speaker 4>were putting a price on carbon and the campaigning against

0:24:39.796 --> 0:24:43.516
<v Speaker 4>that by the opposition and in the community was getting

0:24:44.476 --> 0:24:48.236
<v Speaker 4>hotter and shriller. It was in the course of that

0:24:48.356 --> 0:24:51.756
<v Speaker 4>the gendered stuff really started to show.

0:24:52.276 --> 0:24:53.116
<v Speaker 1>Things got ugly.

0:24:53.996 --> 0:25:01.476
<v Speaker 3>You're the people elected this money, soch get right down.

0:25:04.116 --> 0:25:08.036
<v Speaker 1>Her opponents would circulate lude sexual cartoons of her. She

0:25:08.076 --> 0:25:10.916
<v Speaker 1>would be referred to in the newspapers as Julia, as

0:25:10.956 --> 0:25:13.236
<v Speaker 1>if she was a reality TV star and not the

0:25:13.276 --> 0:25:16.436
<v Speaker 1>head of state. The media would constantly refer to the

0:25:16.436 --> 0:25:19.996
<v Speaker 1>outfit she wore, or how much cleavage she showed, or

0:25:19.996 --> 0:25:22.876
<v Speaker 1>the tone of her voice. The CEO of a major

0:25:22.916 --> 0:25:28.596
<v Speaker 1>Australian company publicly called her an unproductive old cow. One

0:25:28.636 --> 0:25:32.716
<v Speaker 1>restaurant offered on its menu Julia Gillard Kentucky fried quail,

0:25:33.236 --> 0:25:36.916
<v Speaker 1>small brass, huge thighs and a big red box. Was

0:25:36.956 --> 0:25:41.876
<v Speaker 1>there any particular moment or thing said that that hurts

0:25:41.916 --> 0:25:42.516
<v Speaker 1>you the most?

0:25:43.276 --> 0:25:45.756
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's obviously not a good thing to look

0:25:45.796 --> 0:25:48.716
<v Speaker 4>out on a scene of protesters and see yourself described

0:25:48.756 --> 0:25:50.996
<v Speaker 4>as a bitch and a witch and things like that.

0:25:51.636 --> 0:25:55.236
<v Speaker 4>But for me, actually, the worst moment in my prime

0:25:55.236 --> 0:25:59.676
<v Speaker 4>ministership was not in and of itself a gendered remark,

0:25:59.836 --> 0:26:02.756
<v Speaker 4>but came from a shock jock.

0:26:03.156 --> 0:26:06.236
<v Speaker 1>She's talking about the Rush Limbar of Australia, a major

0:26:06.316 --> 0:26:10.156
<v Speaker 1>radio personality who hosts a fundraiser for the Conservative Party,

0:26:10.396 --> 0:26:12.396
<v Speaker 1>the other party, not Julia Gillards.

0:26:12.596 --> 0:26:16.596
<v Speaker 4>And I had recently lost my father. My father died

0:26:16.636 --> 0:26:19.636
<v Speaker 4>while I was Prime Minister. And he said to this

0:26:19.716 --> 0:26:23.116
<v Speaker 4>audience that my father had died of shame because he

0:26:23.196 --> 0:26:25.556
<v Speaker 4>was ashamed of me as prime minister. I mean that

0:26:26.116 --> 0:26:26.756
<v Speaker 4>was the worst.

0:26:27.276 --> 0:26:30.636
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, yeah, yeah, that's appalling.

0:26:30.996 --> 0:26:34.636
<v Speaker 4>It is appalling, It is appalling, and you know it's

0:26:34.676 --> 0:26:36.876
<v Speaker 4>you don't expect to have to do that in your life,

0:26:36.916 --> 0:26:40.556
<v Speaker 4>and you don't expect that, you know, someone like my mother,

0:26:40.636 --> 0:26:46.196
<v Speaker 4>who's just a lovely woman and a great Australian citizen,

0:26:46.596 --> 0:26:50.156
<v Speaker 4>should have to tolerate that being said about the husband

0:26:50.196 --> 0:26:50.996
<v Speaker 4>she's just lost.

0:26:51.916 --> 0:26:54.996
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that intelligent, educated members of a

0:26:55.036 --> 0:26:58.156
<v Speaker 1>progressive country feel they can get away with such vile

0:26:58.236 --> 0:27:02.476
<v Speaker 1>behavior because they've just elected a woman, they've proven their

0:27:02.516 --> 0:27:06.396
<v Speaker 1>progressive bona fides ending one hundred and ten years at patriarchy.

0:27:07.316 --> 0:27:10.396
<v Speaker 1>When the female governor generals swear in the female Prime minister,

0:27:10.836 --> 0:27:14.596
<v Speaker 1>Australia has a collective lump in its throat. But then

0:27:14.676 --> 0:27:23.396
<v Speaker 1>what happens. Moral licensing happens, and of course Gillo can't

0:27:23.396 --> 0:27:27.076
<v Speaker 1>fait back, can't she? Until the very end of your

0:27:27.116 --> 0:27:30.516
<v Speaker 1>tenure as Prime Minister, you keep a pretty stiff upper

0:27:30.516 --> 0:27:31.116
<v Speaker 1>lip about this.

0:27:31.996 --> 0:27:33.956
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I think I did tell me.

0:27:33.916 --> 0:27:36.236
<v Speaker 1>About that, about your decision of how to handle it.

0:27:36.676 --> 0:27:39.836
<v Speaker 4>I mean, some of it's innate, some of it's just me.

0:27:40.076 --> 0:27:45.036
<v Speaker 4>And then I also took a deliberate decision that you know,

0:27:45.156 --> 0:27:49.876
<v Speaker 4>if you looked like you couldn't take it, if you

0:27:49.956 --> 0:27:57.156
<v Speaker 4>looked upset, then that would be used against me. Personally,

0:27:57.236 --> 0:28:00.676
<v Speaker 4>but more importantly against women generally, that there would have

0:28:00.756 --> 0:28:05.236
<v Speaker 4>been people muttering to themselves. You know knew women weren't

0:28:05.396 --> 0:28:07.556
<v Speaker 4>up for this. You know knew they couldn't take it

0:28:07.596 --> 0:28:08.716
<v Speaker 4>when they're going got tough.

0:28:12.196 --> 0:28:14.876
<v Speaker 1>Then, near the end of Gillard's time in office, a

0:28:14.956 --> 0:28:18.116
<v Speaker 1>prominent member of her own party, the man she's chosen

0:28:18.116 --> 0:28:21.476
<v Speaker 1>to be speaker, is found to have sent sexist text messages,

0:28:22.316 --> 0:28:28.036
<v Speaker 1>and incredibly, her critics come after her. Gillard. They accuse

0:28:28.116 --> 0:28:31.716
<v Speaker 1>her of condoning sexism because she's associated with this man.

0:28:32.596 --> 0:28:34.916
<v Speaker 1>She sits in her office in disbelief.

0:28:35.596 --> 0:28:38.996
<v Speaker 4>You know, I don't want to use any bad language

0:28:39.516 --> 0:28:43.876
<v Speaker 4>to you, but I did have just going through my

0:28:44.396 --> 0:28:48.796
<v Speaker 4>brain for Heaven's sake, and the word I was thinking

0:28:48.916 --> 0:28:54.596
<v Speaker 4>wasn't Heaven's but for Heaven's sake. I cannot believe that

0:28:54.796 --> 0:28:59.476
<v Speaker 4>after everything I've had to listen to, now I'm somehow

0:29:00.196 --> 0:29:03.716
<v Speaker 4>going to walk into a parliament and people who have

0:29:04.036 --> 0:29:07.836
<v Speaker 4>used gendered insults against me are now somehow going to

0:29:07.876 --> 0:29:11.156
<v Speaker 4>try and give me a lecture on sexism. Like the

0:29:11.436 --> 0:29:15.516
<v Speaker 4>injustice of this was just boiling in me.

0:29:16.556 --> 0:29:20.076
<v Speaker 1>So that day in Parliament she stands up and gives

0:29:20.116 --> 0:29:24.236
<v Speaker 1>her famous misogyny speech. It's addressed to her harshest critic,

0:29:24.556 --> 0:29:28.276
<v Speaker 1>the leader of Australia's opposition, a man named Tony Abbott.

0:29:29.036 --> 0:29:32.396
<v Speaker 1>Gillard just starts listening all the things Abbot has said

0:29:32.436 --> 0:29:35.076
<v Speaker 1>and done to her and other women over the years.

0:29:35.476 --> 0:29:36.596
<v Speaker 1>She lets him have it.

0:29:37.116 --> 0:29:41.236
<v Speaker 4>I was very offended personally when the Leader of the Opposition,

0:29:41.436 --> 0:29:45.116
<v Speaker 4>as Minister for Health said, and I quote, abortion is

0:29:45.156 --> 0:29:49.116
<v Speaker 4>the easy way out. I was very personally offended by

0:29:49.196 --> 0:29:52.596
<v Speaker 4>those comments. You said that in March two thousand and four.

0:29:52.716 --> 0:29:54.236
<v Speaker 4>I suggest you check the records.

0:29:54.516 --> 0:29:57.116
<v Speaker 1>This is live on the floor of Parliament. If you

0:29:57.196 --> 0:30:00.276
<v Speaker 1>watch the video, Abbot's sitting right in front of her.

0:30:00.756 --> 0:30:04.436
<v Speaker 1>She's dressing him down to his face, and the longer

0:30:04.476 --> 0:30:07.356
<v Speaker 1>she goes on, the more he shrivels and shrinks.

0:30:07.636 --> 0:30:11.156
<v Speaker 4>I was also very on behalf of the women of

0:30:11.196 --> 0:30:16.196
<v Speaker 4>Australia when, in the course of this carbon pricing campaign,

0:30:16.476 --> 0:30:19.796
<v Speaker 4>the leader of the Opposition said, when the housewives of

0:30:19.836 --> 0:30:23.796
<v Speaker 4>Australia need to do what the housewives of Australia need

0:30:23.876 --> 0:30:27.436
<v Speaker 4>to understand as they do the ironing, thank you for

0:30:27.516 --> 0:30:31.076
<v Speaker 4>that painting of women's roles in modern Australia. And then,

0:30:31.156 --> 0:30:35.116
<v Speaker 4>of course I was offended to by the sexism, by

0:30:35.196 --> 0:30:38.796
<v Speaker 4>the misogyny of the leader of the opposition, cat calling

0:30:38.836 --> 0:30:42.356
<v Speaker 4>across this table at me as I sit here as

0:30:42.476 --> 0:30:46.876
<v Speaker 4>Prime Minister, if the Prime Minister wants to, politically speaking,

0:30:47.156 --> 0:30:50.356
<v Speaker 4>make an honest woman of herself, something that would never

0:30:50.436 --> 0:30:53.756
<v Speaker 4>have been said to any man sitting in this chair.

0:30:54.276 --> 0:30:57.436
<v Speaker 4>I was offended when the leader of the Opposition went

0:30:57.476 --> 0:31:00.316
<v Speaker 4>outside in the front of Parliament and stood next to

0:31:00.356 --> 0:31:03.876
<v Speaker 4>a sign that said ditch the witch. I was offended

0:31:04.116 --> 0:31:06.556
<v Speaker 4>when the leader of the Opposition all next to a

0:31:06.676 --> 0:31:10.796
<v Speaker 4>sign that described me as a man's I was offended

0:31:10.796 --> 0:31:14.956
<v Speaker 4>by those things. Misogyny, sex season every day from this

0:31:15.156 --> 0:31:19.996
<v Speaker 4>later of the oppositions, every die in every way, across

0:31:20.036 --> 0:31:21.276
<v Speaker 4>the time the labor.

0:31:21.076 --> 0:31:25.316
<v Speaker 1>This was twenty twelve, it was practically yesterday. At her

0:31:25.396 --> 0:31:28.916
<v Speaker 1>last news conference as Prime Minister, Gillard says, what I

0:31:28.956 --> 0:31:31.956
<v Speaker 1>am absolutely confident of is that it will be easier

0:31:31.996 --> 0:31:34.236
<v Speaker 1>for the next woman, and for the woman after that

0:31:34.596 --> 0:31:36.836
<v Speaker 1>and the woman after that. And I'm proud of that.

0:31:37.996 --> 0:31:41.116
<v Speaker 1>But forgive me for being a little less optimistic than

0:31:41.156 --> 0:31:49.316
<v Speaker 1>she was. The difference between Julia Gillard and Elizabeth Thompson

0:31:49.436 --> 0:31:51.436
<v Speaker 1>is that Thompson never had the chance to give a

0:31:51.436 --> 0:31:54.436
<v Speaker 1>speech like that on the floor of Parliament. She went

0:31:54.476 --> 0:31:58.156
<v Speaker 1>away quietly. Gillard got the chance to stand up and

0:31:58.236 --> 0:32:01.556
<v Speaker 1>to be heard. And I suppose that's progress. But the

0:32:01.676 --> 0:32:04.916
<v Speaker 1>underlying dynamics these two women faced are they all that different?

0:32:05.556 --> 0:32:09.396
<v Speaker 1>A woman gets accepted into a man's world. She thinks said,

0:32:09.476 --> 0:32:13.996
<v Speaker 1>somehow something has changed, but nothing has changed. The men

0:32:14.156 --> 0:32:16.836
<v Speaker 1>pat themselves on the back, and then they slammed the

0:32:16.876 --> 0:32:21.916
<v Speaker 1>door shut again. Tony Abbott the man she eviscerated. He

0:32:22.036 --> 0:32:30.756
<v Speaker 1>later becomes Prime Minister of Australia. By the way, here's

0:32:30.756 --> 0:32:32.756
<v Speaker 1>a partial list of the countries that have had one

0:32:33.076 --> 0:32:37.596
<v Speaker 1>and only one female leader. Open the door, pat themselves

0:32:37.596 --> 0:32:51.156
<v Speaker 1>on the back, close it again ready, Brazil, Germany, Costa Rica, Croatia, Nicaragua, Latvia, Panama, Bolivia, Ecuador, Pakistan, Poland, Turkey, France, Canada,

0:32:51.396 --> 0:32:57.676
<v Speaker 1>and of course Australia. Makes you wonder about Hillary Clinton,

0:32:57.996 --> 0:33:09.996
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it. She's not going to have it easy. You've

0:33:09.996 --> 0:33:13.596
<v Speaker 1>been listening to Revisionist History. If you like what you've heard,

0:33:14.076 --> 0:33:16.196
<v Speaker 1>do us a favor and rate us on iTunes. It

0:33:16.316 --> 0:33:19.396
<v Speaker 1>helps you can get more information about this and other

0:33:19.476 --> 0:33:24.556
<v Speaker 1>episodes at revisionististory dot com, or on your favorite podcast

0:33:24.596 --> 0:33:28.636
<v Speaker 1>app Our show is produced by Mia LaBelle, Roxanne Scott

0:33:28.956 --> 0:33:33.436
<v Speaker 1>and Jacob Smith. Our editor is Julia Barton. Music is

0:33:33.476 --> 0:33:38.356
<v Speaker 1>composed by Luis Guerra and Taka Yasuzawa. Flonon Williams is

0:33:38.396 --> 0:33:43.716
<v Speaker 1>our engineer, fact checker Michelle Siraka and the Panoply management

0:33:43.756 --> 0:33:51.396
<v Speaker 1>team Laura Mayer, Andy Bauers and Jacob Weisberg. I'm Malcolm Gladwell.