WEBVTT - 2024 NCAA Tournament Final Four Preview: Best Bets & Predictions (Ep. 452)

0:00:02.120 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody. Welcome into the Betting Pros Podcast. I am

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Wardley, joined as I have been the last couple

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of weeks by my good friend and betting expert in

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:11.879
<v Speaker 1>college basketball.

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>It's PJ Glasser of BETQL. PJ. We are here.

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.959
<v Speaker 1>It is the final for this upcoming weekend and I

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>will give you a moment here. Your Crimson Tide are

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Final four for the first time in school history.

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 2>How are you feeling?

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 3>Feeling great? Worm?

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 4>I would have felt a lot better if I had

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.319
<v Speaker 4>bet on them to make it to the Final four,

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 4>you know what I mean. I didn't think they'd get

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 4>past UNC. I didn't think they would beat Clemson either.

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 4>I thought that was gonna be Arizona in that Elite game,

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 4>Elite eight game. But I can't believe it. This is

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 4>why the tournament is the best, you know. I feel

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 4>like they've had way better teams the last three or

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 4>four years. They were the number one overall team in

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 4>the tournament last year. They were a two seed two

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 4>years before that, and those teams got out in Sweet sixteen.

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 4>And now here's this team who still on kemp Palm

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 4>rank over one hundred on defense. But it's that offense

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 4>that's carrying them with those three pointers, and uh, it's

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 4>it's incredible.

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 3>It's we have a I can't remember a time where

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 3>I really in.

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 4>The Final four where we've had two games where it

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 4>feels like we're just on a collision course with Yukon

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 4>and Purdue, right, and you know that just the way

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 4>college basketball works, it just like one of these underdogs,

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 4>it feels like is gonna give one of these favorites

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 4>a game.

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:26.919
<v Speaker 3>We don't know which one, We don't know how close

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 4>Be, but like I just you just feel like either

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 4>Bama or NC State is gonna keep it close with

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 4>one of these favorites.

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 3>So it's interesting.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Because like I think Yukon is better than Perdue, but

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Bama is better than NC State. So it's like the

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>better underdog is matched against the better favorite. And I

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I would if I had to pick one, I'd probably

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>pick Bama just because you can make the case maybe

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>they hit twenty threes because like that this is an

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>offense that is capable of, like you can just go

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>toe to toe because they're not gonna stop you con

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>at all defensively. But maybe they just get really hot

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>from three, and that gives them a shot like it's

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>it's harder for me to make the case I think

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>with NC State. But before we dive into the final four,

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you if there are any other

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>takeaways from this past weekend Sweet sixteen Elite eight that

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>really stood out to you as a major surprise or

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a development that you really didn't see coming.

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think the biggest takeaway for me, worm

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 4>is it doesn't matter how big a favorite you are,

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't matter how talented you are when you get

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 4>into the Sweet sixteen Elite eight, if you don't hit shots,

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 4>you're gonna go home. Right, saw that with Marquette, saw

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 4>that with Duke, We saw that with Arizona. We saw

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 4>that with a bunch of these teams that are really

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 4>good offenses. But all it takes is one off night

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 4>and you can you can go home. So I think

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 4>that was my takeaway, right, It felt like there were

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 4>a ton of games Illinois certainly you could throw in

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 4>there too. I mean, when you come went on that

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 4>thirty off to run talk about like elite offenses like Duke, Marquette,

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Aras like these teams are top ten in the country

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 4>in offense and had abysmal night shooting. So I think

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 4>I think that was really the big takeaway, Right, It's

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 4>not like these teams really had bad looks. It's not

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 4>like these shots were contested. They were just missing open shots.

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 4>So we know basketball sometimes it's just, I mean, it's

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 4>as easy as who make shots and who misses shots.

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 4>And it felt like that that really decided a bunch

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 4>of these games and these teams that we have in

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 4>the final four, you know, I mean a bunch of them.

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Certainly Bama hit their shots in their last two games.

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 4>Perdue was great on offense against Gonzaga, was better in

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 4>the second half against Tennessee NC State, fantastic second half

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 4>against Duke, and then Yukon, I mean, just all levels

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 4>offense and defense was a fantastic.

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I was not able to watch Saturday ad something come up,

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>but I was following the Yukon Illinois game as best

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I could, and I saw I literally looked at it

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and it was twenty eight twenty three. And then the

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>next time I because I wasn't able to check my

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>phone for a while, it was fifty three twenty three,

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and I.

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Was like, is there a typo?

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Like how Is that even possible because I hadn't watched

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the run and I went back and watched it later

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and it was just like jaw on the floor, like

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>like they didn't do that against you know, Stetson. They

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>did that against Illinois in the Elite eight. It's really

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the most remarkable things I think I've ever

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>seen in a college basketball game. To your point about

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>like the making shots and stuff, it seemed like that

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>was how Clemson was advancing, was they kept getting teams

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>not making their shots against them. And you know, I

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>kept picking against Clemson every single round and it kept

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>backfiring because Arizona would just go cold and keep on

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>firing and it wasn't working before we get into the

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>final four. Are there any lessons you feel like you

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>learned from who these final four teams are in terms

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>of how you would bet the tournament next year, in

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of how you would fill out a bracket next year,

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of as a fan, like this is

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>something I would remember going for. Are there any lessons

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>learned from this group of final four teams and how

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the tournament has played out to date?

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 4>It's a good question, I think something that I try

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 4>and take with me year to year when I'm picking

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 4>my final four is that every year worm when we

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 4>get to this point, it's never before teams that everybody

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 4>think it's gonna be right. I mean, you could throw

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 4>out like a couple of different scenarios of who people liked,

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 4>but for a majority, it was either Yukon Auburn, it

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 4>was Arizona, UNC, it was Houston, Duke, Marquette, Kentucky, or

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 4>it was Purdue, Gonzaga, Tennessee. Create right, it was like

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 4>a majority of like those kind of four teams. Very

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 4>few had NC State, not a lot had Bama. So

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 4>that's the way it goes. I know, when people are

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 4>filling out a bracket, and certainly people like us who

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 4>watch the regular season in college basketball, you're going through

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 4>these games and you're like, I know, I'm not supposed

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 4>to pick the games that everybody else, but it's like

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 4>who's gonna beat Arizona.

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 3>On the bottom half of this region?

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 4>Like who's gonna like upset you know, like these kinds

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.799
<v Speaker 4>of things. So I mean that's the beauty of the tournament.

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 4>That's the beauty of these one and done games. So

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 4>it's different year after year, the kind of teams that

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 4>we get that go into the final four. I will say,

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 4>with the new era that we're in with college basketball,

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 4>it is interesting that the last two years we have

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 4>had teams like Miami and Bama kind of make it

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 4>to the tournament, right, So I would say maybe those

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 4>are something to look out for. I think everybody thought

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 4>that team that was great on offense this year and

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 4>wasn't good on defense that to make the final four

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 4>was going to be Kentucky. So historically in the tournament,

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, those kind of teams like if you're that

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 4>bad on defense like Miami and Bama were, usually don't

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 4>get this far. So that's happening back to back years. Obviously,

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 4>this era with the transfer portal and with offenses and

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 4>with all the three pointers that we get. If these

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 4>teams like Miami last year surviving the Drake Game, Bama

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 4>this year surviving the Grand Canyon Game, those teams, when

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 4>they have those games where they're not good on offense,

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 4>if they're able to survive that, you see the end result.

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they're offenses, they're good enough to compete with anybody,

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 4>and if they're hitting their shots, it can take them

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 4>all the way to the final four. So probably my

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 4>two biggest takeaways, right, never pick the same four teams

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 4>that everybody picked, because it never happens that way.

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 3>And then you know, I'm.

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 4>Not necessarily saying next year to take one of these

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 4>Bama Miami type teams, but certainly something to keep an

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 4>eye on. And I think we have to take those

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 4>kind of teams a little more seriously moving forward, because

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they've shown us that this is kind of

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 4>the new era of hoops. Like if you can score,

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 4>you can beat anybody. You might not win the championship,

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 4>but you can make it to the final four.

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>And realistically, it's almost like three teams made their first

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>final fours. I know Purdue and nci State made them

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>in the early eighties, but it was an entirely different

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>sport back then, really, you know, considering how long it's

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>been for them, tournament expanded since then, right, I mean,

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it was just a different game back when Purdue was

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen eighty and NC State nineteen eighty three, I think,

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And obviously everybody you know has seen clips of that

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>NC State eighty three run, so we're familiar that they

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>have been there before, but really a different game back then.

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And of course Bama never having made it before and

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>then going up against the team that just won it

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>all last year and looks like another behemoth. You know,

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>it is it is funny like in terms of filling

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>out the bracket, I you know, it's like I never

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the guy who takes the number one overall

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>seed because ever too many people are gonna take it

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and it just feels like you're not gonna win your

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>bracket taking Yukon, you know, as they were this year

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and then the one seed that I was like, I

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't really love UNC more than Perdue, but it was

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it was like, how can you pick Perdue given what

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>we've seen from them in the past. That and I

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>really liked Tennessee, Creighton, Gonzag Like, there was a lot

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of teams in that region that I was a big

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>fan of, so you know, I think a lot of

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>people were probably similar to me and that you know,

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>they picked against Purdue and then they had Yukon maybe

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in the final four, but then not winning it all

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 1>because that's you got to pick against them to win

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it all. And now it's just it's just them versus

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a field in such a major way. You're right, it

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>does really feel like a collision course between Yukon of

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Purdue and that.

0:08:58.600 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 2>That should be a fun game.

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean pretty might be the team that to finally

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>give you kind of game in the last two tournaments. Really,

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's really remarkable what they've done two

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>marches in a row. Let's dive into how we're gonna

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>be betting the Final four this upcoming weekend. We'll start

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>with your guys, number one, Yukon going up against your team,

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>not Yukon, number four, Bama really really fun offensively, like

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>could could be a very exciting, fun back and forth game.

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Plus eleven and a half for Bama. The totals at

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>one sixty one and a half. You know, Yukon very

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>like contrasting styles in terms of the tempo that these

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the number of possessions these two teams want

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to get out in a game, but both very efficient offensively.

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>If you were interested in the money line, it's you know,

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Bama plus five twenty five. I think that's probably not

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the smartest play, although that line in the Final four

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>is pretty ridiculous to be to be quite honest, how

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>are you betting this one?

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 3>So worm?

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 4>This is probably my favorite bet all of the Final four.

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna take Yukon's team total over eighty six and

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 4>a half points because of Bama, there is so much

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 4>that's kind of dictated off if they hit their three

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 4>pointers or not, right spread and total, Like Yukon, Sure

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 4>you look at it on the surface, they're beaten everybody

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 4>by thirty points. They've led at some point in every

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 4>tournament game by thirty in this tournament, which is just insane.

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 4>But like, if Bama hits their threes, they can hang

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 4>around and this game will go over the total. At

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 4>the same time, if Bama doesn't hit their threes, you

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 4>com will cover the spread easily and the under probably hits.

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 4>So I don't want to bet the spread and I

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 4>don't want to bet the total because so much of

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 4>it is predicated off Bama knocking down their shots. And

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 4>obviously in a Final four setting, you're shooting now in

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 4>an NFL stadium, all these different site lines, like, it's

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 4>just a very different kind of feel. The one thing

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 4>that I think we can really hang our hat on

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 4>in this game is the fact that Yukon's going to

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 4>score points. They've been to the Final four they're scoring

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 4>on everybody. Even though Bama has made it to the

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Final Four and their offense has been great, we're in

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 4>three of their four games, they've still giving up eighty

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 4>two points or more to Clemson, to UNC, to Charleston.

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Right think about their non conference schedule this year. I

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 4>know we talked about this on the last pod when

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 4>they played Creighton and Arizona and Purdue and all these

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 4>good teams that got them ready for Carolina. All of

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 4>those games were in the eighties too, So we don't

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 4>know what Bama offense is gonna show up. I think

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 4>if they made six or seven three pointers against Yukon's defense,

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 4>it wouldn't shock anybody. At the same time, they could

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 4>knock down sixteen or seventeen threes and it wouldn't shock anybody.

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 4>But I think the one thing that we can kind

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 4>of point to and say that we're gonna get in

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 4>this game is Yukon's gonna score. So I like that

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 4>team total over for the Huskies at eighty six and

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 4>a half.

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Is there a player matchup that you're particularly intrigued by

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in this game? Is it Castle guarding Seers? Is it

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Newton Sears? Like scoring and dishing it out head to

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>head is just what can Clingon do against this front line?

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Like what is there one guy on either side that

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you think maybe that's the X factor because I think

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>we're we would both imagine you kind of with this

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>game regardless, but that you think could have like a

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly great day or who if they do have a

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>poor day, could swing things.

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 4>Two things I'm interested in. I want to see how

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 4>Bama handles Clinging inside.

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 4>I want to see if they just play him one

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 4>on one with Pringle, if they bring help off of

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 4>maybe Castle's defender, because obviously you can't leave Cam Spencer,

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 4>you can't leave Newton. So I want to see that

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 4>chess match. I also want to see Dan Hurley did

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 4>a fantastic job adjusting at halftime. Marcus Domass was killing

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 4>him in the first half, right, he was using his

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 4>size and he was backing down Newton and dr and

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 4>some of the smaller guards on Yukon. So what does

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 4>he do at halftime. He puts Caravan, he puts Castle,

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 4>he puts more size on Domask and completely takes him

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 4>out of rhythm. So some of these Bama guards, Mark

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 4>Sears and Aaron Estrada especially I want to see the

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 4>chess match. Who Hurley decides to put on some of

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 4>these defensive assignments. My guess is that he's going to

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 4>put more size on Sears. I think he's gonna have

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 4>probably Newton follow around Ryland Griffin, who comes more so

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 4>off screens. He's more of a one on one player,

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 4>where Sears they kind of like to move him around.

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm guessing Castle is probably gonna be on Sears, and

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.199
<v Speaker 4>then you know who they put on, Grant Nelson. I'm

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 4>thinking they're probably gonna go with Caravan, that would be

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 4>my guess. But just the chess match, to see kind

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 4>of who these guys come out with early as their

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 4>defensive matchups and how they kind of mix a match

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 4>throughout the game is something I'm going to be interested in.

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 4>But so it makes you con so tough is that

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 4>their wings can just guard so many different positions and

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 4>if there's a if there's a matchup that Bama is

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 4>exploiting early, Hurley's going to adjust and he's gonna put

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 4>one of his other defenders on one of those other

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 4>guards for Bama. So that's what I'm interested in, kind

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 4>of what Bama's defensive game plan against Klingon Is and

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 4>also who Hurley decides to match up with Bama's guards,

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 4>who he decides to guard sears and and Estrada as well.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Really just like they have an answer for everything. Like

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really remarkable you just watching Yukon play and

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>when they when they need to make adjustments, which is

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 1>not often because they keep letting these teams out, but

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>when they do, it's just like, Okay, yeah, we have

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>another answer, we have another option we can turn to.

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 2>It's it's it's fine.

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just it just feels like like every other people

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:21.239
<v Speaker 1>have used this word to just feel so inevitable.

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 2>It's like like.

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I want there to be suspense, right, Like I want

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>this to be a really fun final four. I'm on

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the edge of my seat, but it like it just

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>currently does not feel that way. If I force you

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to pick against the spread in the game, are you

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>laying the points with the Yukon or are you taking

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the points with Bama.

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 4>God, it's so tough. It's so tough not to bet

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 4>Yukon until they don't.

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't know how.

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you don't lay the points with

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Yukon from what we've seen, Like again, Bama could surprise

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and hit a bunch of threes and stuff. But I,

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't know how you can do anything

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>other than lay the point with Yukon. I don't even

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>care what the number is, honestly, Like, what would the

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>number have to be for you to you definitively take Bama?

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 2>How high would the number have to go? It's pretty

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 2>high for me.

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 4>Probably have to be like seventeen or eighteen and a half,

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 4>I would think, you know what I mean, Like you'd

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 4>have to get some room there. The thing like worm

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 4>does this game? Does it give you any kind of feel?

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 4>This final four? To me kind of feels like are

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 4>we headed to where we were in two thousand and

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 4>one where Gonzaga is viewed as Yukon, Baylor is Purdue,

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 4>where most of us kind of perceive Yukond of be

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 4>the best team. We all thought Gonzaga was the best team,

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 4>but Baylor was always there with them that year. Purdue's

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 4>kind of always been there with them that year. Baylor

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 4>had never done it before. I know Gonzaga hadn't either,

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 4>but Baylor had never done it before. Obviously, Purdue under

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 4>Painter has not as well. And then it's like, I

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 4>wonder if this, if this Bama Yukon game, is going

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 4>to be like Gonzaga and UCLA was. Gonzaga was favored

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 4>by fourteen and a half in that game. Evan Abrams

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 4>from the Action Network dropped a great stat He said,

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 4>since two thousand, Yukon entering the Final four is the

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 4>highest priced team right now to win it all at

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 4>minus one ninety. Gonzaga in twenty twenty one was the

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 4>only team that was the bigger favorite.

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 3>So right now I'm wondering, like.

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 4>Because of Bama's offense and they're shot making, if this

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 4>is just gonna be one of those like ninety eight

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 4>ninety six, like instant classics where they give Yukon a game.

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 4>Because think about it too, so many times in sports,

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 4>a lot of times it's the semi final game where

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 4>these teams that look unbeatable go down.

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 4>You can go all the way back to the miracle

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 4>on ice. You can go back to last year in

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 4>the women's tournament when Iowa beat South Carolina or in

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Mississippi State beat Yukon years ago, and it's like a

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 4>lot of times it's that semi final game.

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Kentucky goes into Wisconsin in twenty fifteen, same.

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Thing, another great example.

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 4>So again we're all trying to figure out, like, who

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 4>is the kind of team to beat Yukon. Is it

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 4>a team that's great defensively that wants to mucket up?

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Is it a team like Bama that can score one

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 4>hundred points? Like? Who is the kind of team? I

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 4>don't have an answer to it, but I'm just like,

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. This final four is like drawing parallels

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 4>to me, kind of like that Gonzaga Baylor final four

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 4>where it's like we've had two great teams all year,

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 4>they're on a collision course for the final. And of

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 4>course Baylor blew out Houston that was the easy semifinal game,

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.959
<v Speaker 4>and Gonzaga UCLA was that close game. I just think

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people are gonna look at the semifinal.

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 4>They're gonna look at this NC State teams the team

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 4>of destiny, and they're probably gonna like that dog, whereas

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 4>nobody is gonna want to bend bet against Yukon. And

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 4>I wonder if if Bama's the dog, it kind of

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 4>just gives them a game.

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>That is a really fascinating parallel from what three years ago.

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>That is really intriguing to me, the Gonzaga Baylor parallel

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to Ukon Purdue. And it's a shame really, because Houston

0:17:57.880 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>could have been in that conversation as one of the

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>not just two best teams, with three best teams in

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>the country. If you know Shed getting hurt obviously, you

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>know you were all over Houston over Duke, and it

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>looked like you were right, and then Shed gets hurt

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and everything changes, which which what can you do. I

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's a fascinating parallel. I'm I'm really it would

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>be really intriguing to see Yukon Prdue. Let's talk quickly

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>about the Purdue Anti State game. I would would certainly

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>expect Prudue to win this. The line is lower than

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it is for Bama Yukon. I'm more confident. I feel

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>like in Purdue beating NC State and maybe even beating

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>them badly than I am Yukon Bama, just because there's

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that element of if Bama gets hot from three the lot,

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the spread is nine, the totals one forty six Anti State.

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>If you think the Cinderell story continues plus three forty

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>on the money line. Is there an angle to this

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>game that you like from a betting perspective? And are

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you with me that? Like we're pretty confident, Like I like, listen,

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>DJ Burns is super fun and maybe he can score

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 1>on Zach Edy.

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 2>He cannot stop Zach Edy.

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Like I just I feel like Eadie could drop fifty

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in this game if you do the way NC State

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>is built. So I mean, what do you make of

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you make this one from a betting angle.

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 4>One of my coworkers where I'm here at the Bechquel Network,

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 4>Ken Barkley, who does his show You Better You Bet,

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 4>has a great saying and his saying in the tournament

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 4>is anyone can win four, but it's impossible to win six.

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 4>And I think you're seeing that again with NC State.

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 4>Like we've seen magical rides throughout the tournament where I

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 4>think this is now the sixth or seventh, eleventh seed

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 4>that we've had make it to the final four. None

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 4>of them have won in the semifinal round, none of

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 4>them made it to the title game. And like again,

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 4>think about all the breaks that NC State got right,

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 4>they didn't have to play Kentucky in the second round.

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Jamal shed got hurt. They didn't have to play Houston

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 4>in the Elite eight, like sometimes you just get a

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 4>great draw. Also, I mean the shooting that some of

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 4>these teams had that they played against. Duke was five

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 4>for twenty from three point range yesterday and mckayhn hit

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 4>like two at the end, so really they were like

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 4>three for eighteen that game. Marquette, as we all know,

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 4>was four for thirty one from three, Texas Tech was

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 4>seven for thirty one. The one team that shot the

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 4>ball well against NC State was Oakland. They shot it

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 4>pretty well from three, twelve for thirty five. That game

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 4>went to overtime as a fourteen seed. Right, So Purdue,

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 4>it felt like, had their bad offensive game against Tennessee.

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 4>They were one for seven in the first half from three,

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.360
<v Speaker 4>where Tennessee was seven for eleven and Purdue was still

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 4>up at half by two in that game. It's just like,

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 4>Purdue is such a good three point shooting team. Is

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 4>NC State really gonna continue being this lucky where teams

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 4>are missing their shots. Clemson was kind of the best

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 4>beneficiary of that too, right, they were playing all these

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 4>great offenses and then finally they ran into a team

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 4>in Bama who started hitting their shots and they go home.

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 4>So again, a lot of people are gonna have this

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 4>team a destiny feel for NC State, and I was

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 4>right there with them all the way through till the

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 4>final four. But this is where kind of those magical

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 4>rides always seemed to end. So I just think unless

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Purdue has like a three for thirty kind of night

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 4>from three point range, I do like them a lot.

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:08.439
<v Speaker 4>Minus the nine and a half, I think this is

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 4>gonna be the semi final.

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Game where we see a blowout.

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>If I had to guess, I agree with you. As

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I like to bet. Just I put ten

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>bucks on either spread total or money line, and every

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>game in the tournament just fun, a little added enjoyment. Obviously,

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously everybody bets the tournament, but I forced

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>myself to pick one bet on every single game, even

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>if I don't feel confident about it. This is not

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>one of those where I don't feel confident. I am

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 1>very happily laying the points with Purdue. I think they

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>smash them and I have been betting. I'ven't been betting

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>against them a lot this tournament, but like, I didn't

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>pick them in any of my brackets. I've been always

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the back of my head, like rooting

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>a little for like Kizaga or Tennessee and kind of

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>hoping they win and maybe picking them like for fun,

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>but not like officially putting money on it. This one,

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I just I just don't see away Purdue doesn't win

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this game by fifteen plus. And that's not a knock

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>on nc State, but there's a reason Keats was likely

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to get fired. There's a reason they needed to win

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>five games in five days to make the tournament. I

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 1>think the luck runs out eventually. I think the clock

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 1>will strike midnight, whatever cliche you want to use. And

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Purdue is just really, really good, and I think it

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>was that first half against Tennessee. Like you alluded to

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that everything went right for Tennessee and Prdue

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>is still up to I don't think everything is going

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to go right for NCCT. I think Purdue is going

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to be up by a lot more at both halftime

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and the end of that game. So, uh, Perdue, let

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>me ask you this before we touch on Purdue Yukon

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>as a theoretical championship game, and then get out of here.

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>If you had to pick one combination both that you

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>think could happen and that you think you would want

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to see happen, and excluding your your fandom of Bama,

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>because obviously you're going to want to see Bama if

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>it's if it's some combo in the championship that's not

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>U comp perdue, what are you hoping to see and

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>what are you thinking is at least a possibility of seeing.

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think Purdue Bama would be great.

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Those teams played earlier this year in Toronto and it

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 4>was one of the best regular season games. That first

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:05.439
<v Speaker 4>half that they had when Bama was up forty nine

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 4>to forty seven, was very similar to like that UNC

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 4>Bama game that we saw in the Sweet sixteen. Both

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 4>teams just trade threes, unbelievable offense on both sides, and

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 4>Purdue ram with them in that game. So I think

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 4>they'd run with them in the title game too, And

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 4>I just think from a viewing standpoint, that'd be really fun.

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 4>But like Bama, NC State I think would be cool too.

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 4>Are actually Yukon NC State I think would be awesome

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 4>where it's your true David Goliath. It's the ultimate team

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 4>of destiny versus this just absolute juggernaut in Yukon and

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 4>trying to pick, like does the Team of Destiny do

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 4>they just like to really do it? Like do they

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 4>really win this game? And it really would give us

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 4>like again like Jimmy V flashbacks to nineteen eighty three,

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 4>having to win the ACC Tournament, getting into the tournament,

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 4>going all the way to the championship. They played Houston

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 4>that year with like oh Clyde, Jeckxler, McKim Olajuan pretty good.

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 4>And now you're facing this Yukon team. So I think

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 4>Yukon NC State actually now and I think about it

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 4>just from that, just like the best team against the

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Team of Destiny would be awesome, but from a pure

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 4>basketball like getting to watch Alabama and Purdue play again

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 4>I think would be super fun too.

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean genuinely, PJ if it's Yukon and NC State,

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Like what does that line need to be for you

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to take MC State? I mean, like quite honestly, it

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>would need to be in the twenties for me to

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>even consider it. Probably even then might not even take it,

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>like ed you know, Team of Destiny can sometimes prove

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong all the metrics and all the the you know,

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I I test and everything we've watched this tournament, but

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>like it would be fun narratively, I still I think

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you kind would win that game by twenty five plus.

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean I certainly wouldn't bet here. Let me

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 4>put it this way, I'd either bet NC State money

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 4>line or I'd lay it with Yukon, right Like, I

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 4>don't think that's the game Yukon wins by seven. I

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.239
<v Speaker 4>think either you ride the team of destiny and you

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 4>bet them to win, or to me, that would be

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 4>like the Georgia TCU National Championship game in college football.

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 4>It'd be fourteen and a half points. I would be

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 4>my guest, just like that game was, and Georgia won

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 4>that game sixty three to seven, and everybody thought TCU

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 4>was the team of destiny. So I think it'd be similar,

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 4>like Yukon would win by forty or NC State would

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 4>win it out right, and there wouldn't be anything in between.

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's briefly preview a theoretical Yukon Perdue matchup,

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>since that's what we're thinking is very likely. Is this

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>game one through defense? Clinging can actually go toe to

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>toe with Edie, although Di's I think plays a lot

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>more minutes than Clingon does.

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Is it won by offense?

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>You know Purdue gets hot from three and you know

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:41.959
<v Speaker 1>Yukon is really good but can't quite keep up. I mean,

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>what how does this game play out? What do you

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>think the line would be? Which side do you think

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you prefer to bet? What would be your kind of

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>quick breakdown if that is in fact the championship game

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:51.360
<v Speaker 1>we get.

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 4>So, I think you Come would probably be five and

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 4>a half six and a half point favorites in the game,

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 4>obviously depending on how the semi final game goes. Worm

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 4>to me, I think the key to the game would

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 4>be how Purdue matches up in the second half against Yukon. Right,

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 4>we've seen people kind of be competitive with Yukon in

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 4>the first half. We've seen them have some close games

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 4>in the first twenty. It's these runs in the second

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 4>half that are just it's very like Warriors, like when

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.199
<v Speaker 4>they were going through their dynasty, and we'd always talk

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 4>about that Warriors third quarter. Like it's that Yukon run

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 4>is always coming, and it's not like it comes in

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 4>the final six five to six minutes of the game.

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 4>It always comes in like the first two three, And

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 4>that's there are sixteen points and you're like, this game

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 4>was literally just close, like five minutes ago. So to me,

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 4>that that would be the key because I think Perdue

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 4>would keep it close for the first twenty. I think

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 4>both teams obviously would kind of feel each other out,

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 4>they'd ease themselves into it. I think Edie would be great.

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 4>I think Yukon would be great. But it's it's that

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 4>second half, man, Like, that's that's where Yukon gets these

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 4>teams they just blow away.

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 3>So that that.

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 4>Would be the key could Purdue if they're able to

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 4>keep it close in the first twenty, you survive that

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 4>first five or six minute stretch in the second half

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 4>where Yukon is so dominant. Because that's the thing again

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 4>going back to that Gonzaga team in twenty twenty one,

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 4>where nobody played Gonzaga close that year, Like we were

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 4>just begging for Gonzaga to play a team close. Ucla

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 4>finally did in that Final four game and the Baylor

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 4>beat Gonzaga. It's like, can can somebody just play Yukon

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 4>close like midway through the second half, and that that

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 4>would be the challenge for Purdue.

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>If if I take Bam off the table because obviously

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you're biased.

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Who do you want to win this championship?

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 4>Ooh?

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 3>Who do I want to win this championship?

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 4>I think I would want Perdue because I bet them.

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.199
<v Speaker 4>That'd be nice. I mean NC State would be it

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 4>would be an incredible story. But more often than not

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 4>in March madness, like, I do want the best teams

0:27:56.280 --> 0:28:00.160
<v Speaker 4>to win it. So I would probably say Purdue, I think,

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 4>just because then the Yukon are the two best.

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 3>I feel like.

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 4>And Matt Painters had some really really good teams and

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.360
<v Speaker 4>they're more than due. You know in sports, like these

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 4>teams that consistently get one seeds consistently get themselves to

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 4>this spot. It'd be like if Gonzaga was in this spot,

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 4>Like if the Zags were in the final four, I'd

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:21.199
<v Speaker 4>like to see Mark Few win one. So if if

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Bama can't do it, I think I'd be pulling for Purdue.

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 3>To get the win.

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>See for me, because I am a bitter, jealous fan,

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>like I would root for Yukon. It's like it's like

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>when Kansas is there, I don't want to let another coach.

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>We already know Yukon's really good and Hurley is a

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>good coach and is you know, on this like kind

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of elite tier track, especially if it's back to back titles,

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>like like okay, what's one more to them? Right? Like

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to let another Big ten team Maryland.

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't another Big ten team win, But but I

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>take your point on that if they do win, if

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Purdue wins, where does Zach Edie rank on the all

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>time pantheon of college careers? Because you're talking about back

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to back you know, national player of the years like

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>likely he was he unanimous last year and certainly will

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>be this year. I mean yeah, like back to back

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>unanimous National Players of the year, capping it off with

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the title the first title for your school in decades

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>or you know, like first time.

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 2>For the coach.

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Like ever, like like where does that career rank in

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>terms of college athletes, because that's got to be up there.

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, in the since the two thousands, he certainly

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 4>would be in the top five. I'm sure I'm missing guys,

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 4>but like the names that come to mind are Kemba, Carmelo,

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 4>Anthony Davis, Like I mean, you put him in that

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 4>tier with those guys.

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>But like like Mellow and Davis were one year, guys

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>like Eadie gets multiple National Players of the Year. It's right,

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it's really remarkable. We'll make our official picks and get

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>out of here. I think we're gonna have similar official picks.

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>But to to kind of highlight how expected that that

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>outcome is of Yukon over you know, Yukon and Purdue

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the title game. To pick the exact result right now

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>on DraftKings, it's a minus number for Yukon to beat

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Purdue and we don't even have them in the championship

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>gave yet, and it's just you know, it's minus win

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty Yukon over Purdue plus three twenty Purdue to beat Yukon,

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and then everything else is a lot higher. If is

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>it just Yukon minus one ninety five or Purdue plus

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>two o five there's no real value to betting these

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>plus sixteen hundreds on the other two, right.

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no, no value. NC State and Bama will not

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 4>win the championship. We alluded to it a little bit

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 4>earlier in the podcast. You can win four games in

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 4>the tournament. It's impossible to win six if you're NC

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 4>State Bama. It just doesn't happen.

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 3>I did it. I did a video on beck L.

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 4>Before the tournament, I had found all these historical trends

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 4>of teams that could win it, and we came down

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 4>to two teams that could win the whole thing. Houston

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 4>and Purdue were those two teams. The criteria that Yukon

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 4>didn't fit was since nineteen ninety a team that has

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 4>had that only has three teams from their conference has

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 4>not won a national championship. So the Big East only

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 4>had three teams in. We'll see if Yukon can buck

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 4>that trend. But Purdue crossed everything off the list, every

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 4>single one. Them and Houston were the two teams. So

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna stick with that worm. I'm gonna be contrariing

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 4>here and go with Purdue to win the whole thing.

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 4>I think it is purduing Yukon, but uh, I mean, look,

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 4>if you comm wins the whole thing, it wouldn't surprise me.

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm sticking with my theory though, Like I I'm getting

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 4>Gonzaga Baylor vibes from this where.

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>That parallel I can't shake. Now that zagger, that's a

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>really good one.

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 4>You know. It would be the same kind of spread

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 4>where you come and be favored by like five and

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 4>a half. And I mean Purdue matches up well with them,

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 4>like Edie and Klingen head to head, Purdue's got tons

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 4>of shooters on the outside, Like they want to play

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 4>a slow game. Purdue can play that. They want to

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:45.239
<v Speaker 4>play to track meet, Purdue can play that. So I

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 4>to me that, uh, that's that's what I'll go with.

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 4>I I think I think it's Purdue's here worm I

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:52.479
<v Speaker 4>I think they're gonna win it.

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>That is a really compelling argument. When the when the

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>brackets first came out and we did a couple of

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>shows that first week, I add both you and the

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.719
<v Speaker 1>team rankings, Jason Lisk, is this Yukon versus the field?

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Or is just Yukon's a favorite? And the answer was no,

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not Yukon versus the field. They're the favorite, but

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of really good teams. It sure feels

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>like it should have been Yukon versus the field the

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>way they have looked, the way this thing is played out.

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I am really tempted by your your case for Purdue,

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think you might end up being right. But

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna say it's ukond of It'll be Ukon

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>perdue in the championship game, and I'm gonna say I'll

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>take Yukon because I've yet to see a reason why

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>they won't blow everybody out. And I think there's a

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>really really compelling case for Purdue, both narratively, both historically,

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>both on the court.

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, again, they have the best player in college basketball.

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I totally get the case for him.

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I just it's it's I need to see Yukon lose

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>before I'm gonna pick them to lose.

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 4>And that's totally that's totally fair. That's totally fair. I

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 4>mean I would bet Purdue, you know, plus the points.

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 4>I bet a money line. But I mean, look, Yukon

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 4>does look better. I mean, they do look better. We'll

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 4>just have they really been challenged yet though in the tournament,

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 4>Like I know, Illinois is a really good team and

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 4>they really made them look suspect. But you know before that,

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 4>it's like Produce had to go through Gonzaga really good,

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 4>had to go through Tennessee really good. So they played

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 4>a tough non conference schedule. Both teams did, so we'll see.

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 4>I just I don't know where is it like really

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 4>gonna be this easy for Ukon? To repeat like, is

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 4>somebody just not gonna give them a game?

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 3>We'll see what happens.

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but it sure looks that way right.

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait. If it is you come foror do

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be a fantastic game. I have

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>no doubt.

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 2>So I'm excited to hopefully see that. PJ. Thank you

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 2>so much for coming on. What do you got going

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 2>on this week at back L.

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so we'll have our show send it in one

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 4>to one thirty pm Eastern time. You can watch it

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 4>on Twitch YouTube. You can watch it on x Instagram

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 4>interactive show. People can chime in give their comments. We'll

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 4>talk obviously Final four, also talk MLB NBA as well,

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 4>and then I'll be on You Better You Bet tomorrow

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 4>on Tuesday three to seven pm Eastern time as well.

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 3>People want to check that out.

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>He is PJ Glasser from bet QL. Thank you so

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us for the last couple of weeks.

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 2>PJ.

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if I can talk you into We want

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:15.879
<v Speaker 1>to have a show next week to preview the championship game,

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 1>but we might be able to talk you into a

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.720
<v Speaker 1>TikTok live or something on the Betting pros you know TikTok,

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>so be sure to go follow us over there in

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>case we get a little more tournament talk here before

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of everything.

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 2>For PJ, I'm Ryan Warman.

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Thank you everybody for tuning in throughout March and we'll

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:31.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe see you again next week.

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast.

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 1>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>us is by leaving a positive review on.

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>channel at YouTube dot com.

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Slash Betting Pros

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:00.080
<v Speaker 4>Was