WEBVTT - Facebook in the Spotlight

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Among the COVID headlines, Maderna

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>saying it's COVID night teen vaccine showed a strong immune

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>response in younger children in a late stage clinical tribal

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's paving really the way for submission to regulators

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>for clearance in those age six to under twelve. That's something, Timmy,

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you've really been focusing on. Yeah, I certainly haven't even

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>kids who are younger than that, that's the question. Also,

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>some more good news, US COVID hospitalizations dropped to the

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>lowest since July one, which is some great news considering

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>where we were for much of the September month, September

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and the early part of this month. It's a good

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>trend line that we like to hear about. Dr William

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Hazeltine is back with us. Cherman and president of Access

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Health International. It's a nonprofit think tank uh They are

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>on a mission to improve access to high quality and

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>affordable health care for people everywhere. He has found in

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>more than a dozen biotech companies, including Human Genome Sciences.

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>He is an author uh CV PTSD, COVID related post

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>traumatic stress disorder, What it is and what to do

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 1>about it? And many more articles and books. He joins

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>us once again on the phone from Connecticut. Doctor how Hazeltine,

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Nice to have you back with us. Um Among the

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>COVID headlines that are out there in terms of working

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>towards getting kids vaccinated, the mix and match the trend lined,

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>what is it that you think is of most importance? Well,

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the most important it is for people to be vaccinated,

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and the second most important is to make sure that

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a region where you think you might

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>get infected, to make sure you take all precautions. That

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>means mass ware, and I means avoiding crowds. So there

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>are stale parts of the US where that's important and uh,

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it's important to follow those uh bad advice. And if

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you have had two shots and it's more than six months,

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it's probably time to get to third. Everybody, everybody, did

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you get your third? I certainly did. Okay, I remember

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you months ago saying I'm going to mark my calendar

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>when it's six months, I'm going for I'm just doing

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>some math on my fingers right now. Think I'm that

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>six months, five months. But I jumped a gun a

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.399
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But you're right, and I'm very happy I did. Hey,

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Dr Hazel teen, Uh since we last spoke, since you

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>were last on our show, there there has been a

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of developments, not just with COVID but for treatments

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. We did learn that Murk is looking for

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>emergency use authorization for its COVID nineteen pill, and you

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>wrote earlier this month that there are concerns around that

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>approval process. Share with us you're thinking, because I think

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of people this was seen as really

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:02.399
<v Speaker 1>great news. Well, it's great news that drugs are coming

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>along in there are three or four, actually about five

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in clinical development um. This drug will never up here

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting drug. By the way it works, it

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>works differently from all others. It causes the virus to

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>mutate itself to death. Mutate itself to death. Now there

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 1>are several concerns. The number one concern is will you

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>mutate sorryscope to something worse than it is. That is

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a real danger, and it exceeds all other dangers of

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the kind of resistance or side effects that might arise,

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>because if you make a virus worse than it is,

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it affects all of humanity. This riers is bad enough.

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>We don't want somebody taking a small dose by accident

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of the drug and mutating it so it doesn't die,

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>but it just gets worse. So and he said, I don't.

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the FDA is going to be very, very

0:03:56.040 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>cautious in their approval of this drug. Moreover, I spent

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>years working on DNA damage at its repair and muta genesis.

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a genotoxic drug which causes mutations in human

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>genes and could cause birth effects. And one of the

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting things about the clinical trials is they told people

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>who are in the clinical trial either not to have

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>sex or only do it with very strong birth controls

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>because they were worried about that. So I think the

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>FDA might approved this, but it's got to be for

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 1>a very narrow indication. For me, The danger is people saying, Oh,

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take this drug to prevent me from

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>getting infected. The FDA has to put a very clear

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>message out that only those people with proven infection should

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>take this drug and then for as shorter period as possible.

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Both their dangerous to themselves and the danger that they

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>might create the worst virus. We don't want to have

0:04:56.000 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>to have another biox. It sounds to me like it

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 1>might be for such narrow indications that it makes me wonder,

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>do the risks that way, at least in your perspective,

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the risks that way um the benefits? You know. I

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen all the data, and the FDA will see

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>all the data. All I can say, from what I know,

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>from what I've seen, and from reading the clinical protocols,

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that I would urge the FDA to be extraordinarily cautious

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>with respect to their approval, and possibly to put a

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>black box on the approval process, saying this can be

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>harmful to women who are pregnant, It can have a

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>long term carcinogenic that's cancer causing effect. If you take it,

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>and if you need to take it because it's the

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>only thing available, fine, But you know, the other thing

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm aware of is your companies all over the world

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>making tons of this drug, and the moment we get

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>a partial approval from the FDA, I think this drug

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to go on and say out it's pretty

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>much unregulated way around the world, and that could be

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>very bad news for the creation of new variants. This

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>drug works by speeding up commutation rate. That's dangerous. Well,

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and I will say all right through. I think it

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 1>was in earlier. This month's ad interim analysis found now

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>increased incidents of adversive fence, but they said it still

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>needs to be assessed in a much larger group of

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>patients to properly determine its safety. So it does sound

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>like something that many would argue needs more research and study.

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Dr William Hasseltine, thank you so much, Chairman and President

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of Access Health International, joining us on the phone from Connecticut.

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 1>You know, Tim, we talked about everything is happening in

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>front of us, so it's just going to say that, right,

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 1>some of it can be disarming, but you would assume

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>regulators will continue to study. We're watching the process play

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>out in front of us exactly. You're listening to Bloomberg

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 1>Business Week right here on Bloomberg. I love it when

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the most read stories by one of the good guys

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>here at Bloomberg. We're talking about our own Eric Shatzker,

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>He's a Bloomberg editor at large, and this story is

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>we just can't stop talking about. It has to do

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>with Hurts's order for a hundred thousand e v s.

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>It pushed Tesla shares higher and the company's market cap

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to one trillion. We're all talking about it. Eric Schatsker,

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is that are at large and he joins us now

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio, Eric one hundred thousand.

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Contextualize this number for US. A tenth of what Tesla produces,

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and yet it's equivalent to a tenth of Tesla's annual

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing capacity. And once these cars are delivered between now

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and the end of two thousand twenty two, it will

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>be fully a fifth of Hurts is half million fleet

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of cars and trucks. That's massive, So putting the numbers

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>are big for sure, right and and it up ends

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>so many different parts of the market. If you think

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>about the rental car companies used to really write their

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>fleets are often from the traditional auto manufacturers. Were completely right,

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>but entirely from the traditional auto manufacturers. General Motors is

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the biggest supplier, Nissan is the number two supplier to Hurts.

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Forward is the numbers three supplier. And furthermore, when these

0:07:55.520 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>auto manufacturers were selling, they were typically selling cars that

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>they weren't especially excited about making and often had sitting

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in the bookstore equivalent of a remainder lot. So the

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the rental car companies would buy them at

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>massively discounted prices. There was a naturally an antagonistic relationship

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>between the rental car company and the automaker, and this

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>completely changes that equation because Hurts is buying these cars

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>at close to list price, which brings the two companies

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>much closer together, something akin to a partnership as opposed

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to an adversarial relationship. Help us understand some logistics here, Eric,

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Because you have to charge these you do, and you

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>have to think about rental cars, you gotta fill it

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>up before you go back, or else you get you

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>get digged um, how does the charging network work? And

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>how does how does Hurts ensure someone that they're gonna

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>be able to reliably charge it? Well? For starters, Hurts

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>customers who rent Tesla's will have access to Tesla's network

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of three thousand supercharging stations. So that helps a great

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>deal because that's already made it possible for people to

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>own Tesla's and to find an acceptable, viable substitute for

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the gas station. But Hurts is building its own network

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of chargers, and they'll be at Hurts locations, whether they

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>be at the airport or somewhere in suburbia or even

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, downtown in an urban center like a New

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>York City for example, And so Hurts customers will be

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>able to use those as well. Furthermore, did I say

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>furthermore twice? Maybe there's a lot furthermore moreover? How's that um?

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Hurts is going to integrate Tesla's digital mobility technology with

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>its own digital mobility technology in order to help customers

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>get over the fear of range anxiety. The car will

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you what you have to do, as long as

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you tell the car where you're going. The car will

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>tell you how much you've got left. If you where

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the supercharging station is that you need to drop by

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>for fifteen minutes to make sure that nobody has that

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>crushing experience will being left down in the middle of

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the Mojave desert with no feel Furthermore, which is something

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 1>you do want. No But I think about this story

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>about the legitimization of Tesla and the legitimization of Hurts

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>like thinking about what they want to be in the future. Well,

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for sure, this gives you an idea that Tesla has

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>big plans to become an even bigger evy manufacturer than

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it already is. It's the only company that can manufacture

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>e vis at scale. And this is proof positive that

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk had not just a vision, but a viable

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>vision because Hurts can't buy from anybody else. And on

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the Hurt side, I think this shows you just how disrupted,

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>if you like, an industry can be by people who

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>come in from the outside. Nighthead Capital the distress that

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Hedge Fund and Sertari is the private equity firm that

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>specializes in travel, teamed up to buy Hurts out of

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcy for six billion dollars or that looks like a

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>good deal. Now. But they're the ones who came up

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>with the ideas to do this, and I'm really excited

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to see what else they do, because they're clearly intent

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on shaking up the rental car industry, which is a competitive,

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 1>highly commoditized industry and isn't really used to being shaken up.

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Hurts his twelve point six billion market cap as we speak. Wow,

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I know, right, so not too shavvy. I wonder when

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we look back on the history just in a couple

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of years of Tesla, if this is one of those moments.

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>And we talked to Dana Hole about this, who covers

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Tesla Bloomberg News. It's still you know, when you see

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a Tesla out in the wild, you're still like, oh,

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a Tesla, but there's a lot more on the road.

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, in California, it's not really a thing anymore.

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>But does this get countrywide, Like, Okay, seeing a Tesla out,

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>We're going to see a whole lot more Tesla's and

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it won't be a big deal anymore. Well, this is

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of the annual manufacturing capacity of Tesla. But

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Tesla is adding factories in Austin, It's adding a factory

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, and so we're going to see on the

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>basis of that alone, added capacity and more Tesla's and

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 1>let's not forget this is not an exclusive deal. Hurts

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>if it wants to can go and buy evs from

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>other manufacturers to just aren't any to buy right now.

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>But Rivian's coming, Lucid's coming, all the big European producers,

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers are going to have their own. They're going to

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>have their own here Ford, No, no, no, we should

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>be talking about Detroit to of course, General Motors has

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a very viable, very viable EV strategy, but they're targeting

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>different parts of the market. The Chevy Bolt is at

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the bottom, and Cadillac, where they're also doing some really

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>exciting EV stuff, is at the top end, just like Lucid,

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and just like Rivan. There's nobody filling in the middle.

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Volkswagen is probably going to be a big manufacturer in

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the middle because that's what Volkswagen does. You could anticipate

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the Toyota at some point is going to do something similar,

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>but they are years behind. And that's the thing worth

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>emphasizing again. Muskat division need to manufacture at scale. Why

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>do you need to manufacture at scale? Because then you

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 1>become the only guy on the block who can do

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a deal like this, which is what is playing out

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to be. Continued. Eric Statsker, Editor at large up Bloomberg News.

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>Check out his exclusive story on the Bloomberg I have

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to say, Tim, when I asked um our Ed Hammond

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>about a week or so ago, when what I needed

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it my milk and panel and Global

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>M and A. He said, well, record year, and how

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is that considering the backdrop? It was incredible advice. Yeah.

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>One thing that stuck out to me from this piece,

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and Ed Hammond is deals reporter at Bloomberg News, he

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>joins us now here in New York City, and one

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>thing that really stuck out to me was something in

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the first paragraph. The records set in two thousand seven.

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk numbers here. Four point one trillion this

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>year would break the record set in two thousand seven

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>for Global, for M and A by the end of

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>transactions to usually top five trillion dollars. Is this some

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of sign when when there's M and A like this,

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>because we all know what happened after two thousand seven. Um,

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sort of hesitant to draw parallels between oh, seven,

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and now in terms of using the M and A

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>market is a reason to suggest that the wieldy are

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>about to come out flok. Obviously, we are long into

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a market cycle that has you know, had the top

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>called many times. I was among those who thought M

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and A would probably haven't pronounced and a long time

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>slow down after the pandemic or when we go into

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, and as it turned out, it was you know,

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>one and a half quarters that it kind of stopped

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>for or slowed down for, and then it's roared back.

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>We saw it come back very strongly in the second

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 1>half of that momentum continued so far throughout this year.

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>And as you say you were about to pass the IS,

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I was in a seven record. We may indeed it

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>passed it at some point today and well on track

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>yet that quite trilling and by the end of the year,

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>which an astonishing number, I mean in any circumstance, and

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>astonishing number. But when you look at all the the

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>environmental factors going on in the background, and why you

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to do a deal right now, I think

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you know also well and what's interesting at and you

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>really did like set up me so well But what's

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting too is you know these dealmakers that I talked

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to bankers over the city, at Deutsa and elsewhere, they

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>said that in many ways, UM members of the C

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>suite are getting kind of poked and product by their

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>board for not doing deals right now, talk to us

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>about what you're hearing. Why these deals are getting done

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>despite the backdrop of a pandemic and worries about the

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>outlook and supply chain problems and so on. I think

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>part of it is just the cost of a nursher

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is is also very high. Look obviously, doing a deal

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>at any time carry some risk, and you know you

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>can get it wrong and that can be consequential. As

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the CEO, you can do your borders or your job

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>stories aboard, you can be tossed out. But I think

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, with the amount of disruption is going on

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>across industries and the sort of rapidity of change that

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>almost their industry is going through, I think there are

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a real cost to not doing stuff and not growing.

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, at the moment a lot of companies

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>are matched out on organic growth and M and A

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>is obviously a very quick and efficient way a lot

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of the time to to to sort of turbo charge

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that growth in organically. In reporting this story, and you

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>also looked at how investors react to companies that when

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a company does announce an acquisition, both to the company

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>getting acquired and the one doing the acquiring. What did

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you learn. It's a really interesting trend that we've seen

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to him where you have this, uh, this sort of

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>anomaly in the market where shareholders are coming out when

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>companies and ounced deals and saying, you know, this is

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>something we do like, and they're reflecting that in the

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>way the shares trade obviously quisitive companies and seeing shares

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>trade up, which goes against almost very historical trends per virus.

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>The recent paper US interest deal that was talked about

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>right before I came on, obviously that was slightly different

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>where you saw papal trends down and trade down heavily

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>on news and some extent we think that's why they've

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>now pulled the plug on that particular deal. But yeah,

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>investors again, look, they're they're happy to see companies going out,

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>getting on the front foot and pulling whatever leavers they

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>can to achieve growth in this market. And I think

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it all comes back to the fact that we are seeing,

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, not reckless deals. We're not seeing companies go

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>out and try and do very very large, complex, you know,

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of horizontal mergers. This is much more vanilla. Let's

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>go out, let's do a deal that actually is in

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.239
<v Speaker 1>line with what we ever we want to do strategically

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>from perhaps it gets it slightly quicker from A to

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 1>B than we would get their organic too. Well, how

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>much of it, too, is pandemic related or pandemic push

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>and where you know, trends, disruptions, digitization was happening, but

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it might have happened over the next three to five years,

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden it was like, Bam, it's

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>happening now, and I've got to possibly do a deal

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and acquisition to put my business in the right place

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to embrace that. Yeah, And I think that that comes

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>back to this issue of disruption and the speed at

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 1>which it's occurring now. And as you say, the pandemic

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of supercharged some of the activity. But you look

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>at any industry now and they are all you know,

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.199
<v Speaker 1>if they're not tech industries that take enabled industries and

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of them. We've seen a lot of

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>this already this year, are going and doing acquisitions that

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily look like a sort of straightforward. You know,

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 1>an industrial company buying an industrial company. They're an industrial

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 1>company buying a software company because they're realizing that actually,

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>this is the way we're going to keep growing, and

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it's much easier to go out and buying something small

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that we can just tuck in then build our own

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>capabilities in an area that perhaps is not where we

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>have existent skills. How do spacts play into the boom

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen over the last eighteen months. Well, look

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.479
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the sort of headlines and the amount

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of noise and interest they command their normals, but in

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 1>terms of the actually dollar value, they're very, very tiny.

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, certainly if you look at the sort of

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 1>the dollar value of the spacts themselves rather than the

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 1>dollar value of the companies, they often reverse into as

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a minority holder you're talking, you know, it's it's it's

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>a minimus. But obviously trends they have been, you know,

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a driver of different kinds of activity. I'm sure you've

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>seen some companies go out and do M and A

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>because they were sort of worried about what might otherwise

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>happened with the spect potentially buying a target that they

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>were interested. So I think it's contributed, but certainly there

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is a quite serious dislocation between the amount of noise

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Spect have generated and the actual contribution they've had to

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>overall EM and ads here. So all right, if we

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>end up with five trillion and then some this year,

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>does that mean things necessarily slow down? Because I know

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>from my panel they all seem gangbusters that it would

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>continue into two. But what are you hearing? I mean,

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>money is so cheap it's easy for they've also got

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you know, cash to play around with. Yeah, look,

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>money is cheap, and that's often site is one of

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the reasons we're seeing this this great market. What I

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>would say to that is money has been cheap for

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 1>a long time, and there have been fast going on

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that would would seem to dissuade people been doing M

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and A. So I don't think it just cheap money.

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of momentum going through the

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>M and A market at the moment. Some of that

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>is obviously catch up after we had that slowdown during COVID,

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>and I think some of that will continue into two.

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>The conversations we've been having. We had a common tax

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>m A ban Cool on Bluemo TV this morning talking

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>about the strength of the pipeline. They actually think it's

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>stronger than the current market conditions we're seeing, which would

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>suggest going into two, we're going to have a you know,

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of deals backed up ready to go. Whether

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it continues through two, sorry, who knows? Um. I think

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that will depend on on what we see,

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in in sort of global affairs, what we

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>see the domestic economy, but also obviously some of the

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>sovereign risks that he just ten seconds, what derails this

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>from continuing? The great question? Um, I would I thought

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>COVID wouldn't It didn't I think? Look in rising interest

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>rates is obviously gonna be the number one factors that

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>will not business confidence and never m A all right,

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave it there. I get your sleep, because you're

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be busy. It sounds like when it comes to

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>continued m and A flow. Ed Hammond he's our deals

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>reporter Bloomberg News. Check them out at Ed Hammond New

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>York on Twitter, and you can always find his stories

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Blomberg Terminline at Bloomberg dot Com. Get ready

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>also shout out to add he, along with me Anna Baker,

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 1>broke that Pinterest story last week. Yeah, I mean he's

0:20:51.840 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>very exactly all right. You're listening to Bloomberg Radio. This

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Takes Tim Stinovik on Bloomberg Radio. You are listening to

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and this story it is the Bloomberg

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Big Take today. It is about the world's top five

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>polluters being responsible for six global emissions in China Loan.

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Though generating about the same amount of c O two

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>as the next four countries combined, it's carbon output is

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.640
<v Speaker 1>still rising every year. We'll get into where this state

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 1>is coming from. Joining us right now is Andy Brown,

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 1>editorial director oft Bloomberg New Economy. Here in our interactive

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio, climate change front and center with copy right.

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>We're all focusing on what the world is doing to

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>combat climate change. But if China is not part of it,

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>so what Right at this point, you know, it almost

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:49.239
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter what the US does, what Europe does. The

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>fate of the of the planet is in the hands

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of China and more specifically than that in the hands

0:21:56.119 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of a handful really just a few huge, ginormous state

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>owned enterprises in cement in steel, and then in all

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of the industries that use cemented steels, so autos, machinery,

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>real estate, infrastructure, and you know, we this this big take.

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>We drilled into the numbers and and and by the way,

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 1>they don't that they're not that transparent. So it took

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of dicking in. Our reporters did it with

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the Center of the Research on Energy and Clean Air,

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>and the results are that you know, you take a

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>company like for instance, Baw Wo Baw used to be

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 1>called Bao Steel, big Shanhai steelmaker, biggest steelmaker in the

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>whole country. It's emissions. It has a carbon footprint the

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>size of Pakistan. You you take a subsidiary of Sinopeck.

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>So sino Peck is the big Chinese oil. May one

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of its subsidiaries, I think it's called a petroleum and

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>chemical has a carbon footprint or had carbon emissions in

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nineteen the size of Canada. And Canada,

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is an emissions heavyweight. It ranks number

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>eleven in the world. I mean, these numbers are really astonished.

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>It's the first time that that you know, anybody has

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>put the numbers against these companies. And and you know,

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>people outside of China probably never heard of most of these,

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, So how do what these companies are doing

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>aligne or not aligned with China's own goals when it

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 1>comes to climate right, So, so we know what the

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>overall target is ching paying. President Jumping has announced it

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 1>that you know, common emissions are supposed to to net

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>out is supposed to go to zero in by two

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>thousand and sixty. We're supposed to reach peak emissions carbon

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>emissions by the end of this decade. But again, so

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>much is going to depend on, you know, whether or

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>not these company, these big companies can make a green transition.

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>They're very powerful, you know. I mean they have common emission,

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:13.439
<v Speaker 1>they have common footprint the size of country, but they

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>also have you canomic output the size of whole countries, right,

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>And they have powerful links into city governments, into provincial governments,

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and the people that run them have ministerial ranks. They

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 1>are in a sense, you know, they are they are

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>massive fiefdoms. I mean, you know, you mentioned President she

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and has promised to zero out emissions by twenties sixty, right,

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>which seems a long time away. Uh, if you look

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>at what's happened to the climate today, Um, you know,

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>how does he balance I mean, his own climate is

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>not great, right and maybe you know, pushed back by

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>his own citizens, But how does he bound balance growth

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in that economy? Right? There's going to keep to keep

0:24:55.960 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>everybody happy, right and and avoid unrest with all so

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 1>taking care of the climate, which is ultimately taking care

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of the citizens and their health. That's exactly it. I mean. So,

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's really the story of where you have these

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>long range, high level, pious targets of netting out carbon emissions.

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>But what's going to happen in the near term, Well,

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>we know what's happened in the near tern in China

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>right now they're ramping up massively cold capacity to address

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>their energy crunch. Right, They're building coal fire power stations,

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:39.199
<v Speaker 1>the coal emissions that carbon emissions have a far from peaking,

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Like things are literally moving in the exact wrong direction,

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the exact opposite directions. So the rest of the world

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 1>is going to have to make up for what China

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>is now doing, and that seems rather unlikely too. So

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>how do we app I think about so many of

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the new economy conversations. You guys are looking at this

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.120
<v Speaker 1>from such a high level and bringing in people form

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 1>all over the globe. So I don't know, how do

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>we look at this, How do we go forward? What

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>needs to happen? It's not all doom and gloom, right,

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>So we need to balance this out a bit. So

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>um Number one, the cost of renewable energy in China,

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 1>that's wind and solar, is now cheaper than the cost

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of energy from fossil fuel. So that's a big positive.

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>China is a global leader in electric vehicles. China has

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>something like eighty percent of all of the world's output

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of lithium ion batteries. Okay, so these are these are

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 1>big positives. Plus plus, China is massively investing in some

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>of these frontier technologies green hydrogen as an example, carbon

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>capture and storage. And if China can master some of

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:54.879
<v Speaker 1>these technologies, it has the ability to scale them in

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a way that no other country on Earth can do.

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>It did precisely that, of course on elect cause, and

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is doing that now on on batteries and solar and wind.

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Is there the political will to do that? Ultimately because

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, right, there will be industries then

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>that are kind of taken out as a result. Right

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>as these new alternatives commit very serious g G ping

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:18.239
<v Speaker 1>is very serious about reducing emissions, and in fact, that

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>was one of the reasons they had an energy crunch

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>this year, because you know, the provincial authorities are on

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>district instructions to meet emissions targets, and some of them

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>looked like they were overshooting. Um, so there is a

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>there is a serious commitment. The question, the question, the

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>question really, as you say, is this trade off between

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>emissions and GDP growth? Yeah, exactly, there's an uncomfortable period

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing it with the energy sector. Just generally we

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about this transition for the world, right from moving

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>away from carbon fuels. I mean, based on this story,

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't even sound like China's in a transition. He doesn't.

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>It isn't a long it's in a long term transition.

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>And as I say, the on the technology side, um,

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of positives. All Right, we'll see

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>if the Earth although has that many years left, Um,

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Andy Brow, I know, I don't mean to be so dismal.

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 1>It's Monday, though I'm feeling the gloom, Andy Brown, Editorial

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>director of Bloomberg New Economy in our interactor brokers, Andy,

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you as always so among our most read on

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Today, no doubt about. In fact, there's a

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 1>flurry of stories. It's all about Facebook. Yes they report

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>after the clothes today, and yes there are stories about

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the companies tim internal struggles when it comes to misinformation

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and attracting a younger audience. Well. Naomie Nicks is a

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>social media reporter here at Bloomberg News. She's with us

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>from the Bloomberg studio in Washington. Also joining us live

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>from San Francisco as Kurt Wagner, Technology reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>We got a lot to get to with both of you. Naomi,

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with you because your story that

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Facebook privately worried about hate speech spawning violence was among

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the many that hit this morning as a result of

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of Facebook whistle blower Francis Hogan. Give us a broad

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>overview of what we learned new about Facebook today. Yeah,

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think Sophie book has you know, for

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>years been talking about the power of its AI systems

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to detect hate speech. It regularly releases these transparency reports

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that say that Facebook's uh you know, systems detect more

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>than nine percent of the hate speech that it takes

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>down off the platform form before a user reports it

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to the company. What these documents show though, is finally

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we have a sense of the total universe of hate

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>speech that Facebook does and doesn't take action on overall.

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>And what it suggests is that less than five percent

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of the hate speech UH is addressed by Facebook. And

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>so that's one of the many revelations. We've also seen

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:47.719
<v Speaker 1>some revelations about how Facebook prioritizes fighting hate in the

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Western world and leaves developing regions behind UM and to

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the extent that it's algorithm, the many the mechanisms that

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>are promoting content and making it viral are actually part

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of the problem. M So, and if I feel like

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it gets to a bigger story, and Kurt, I want

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to bring you in, Kurt on this too, about the

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>transparency that the company kind of puts out there. That

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you may not agree with what they're doing on their

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>platform about hate speech, but it's what we know and

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know, and the same thing has to And I

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like this speaks to as an investor I want

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to know the company I'm investing in, and this speaks

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to also their audience, which is crucial to future growth,

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and that has to do. Let's get to your story, Kurt,

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>about the younger audience. The teenagers. I mean, they're not

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>into Facebook, are they now? And I don't think you

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>would be surprised right to hear teens aren't really into Facebook.

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't either. What I think these documents really showed

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is that not only is it a probably more serious

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>problem than we all anticipated, but it doesn't just stop

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>at teens. It also extends now to kind of what

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>they call young adults, so people in between eighteen and

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine years old. Um, we're seeing the teens used

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to kind of you know, maybe use Instagram and age

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>ump to Facebook. That's not happening as much anymore. We're

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing time spent, the number of messages, the number of

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>posts that people create, all of that is going down.

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think if you're an investor, you know this

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>is a huge, hugely important audience right for advertisers. It's

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously the next wave of Internet users that you

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>imagine Facebook is going to lean on for its business,

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and you would want to know that, you know, things

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>are heading in the wrong direction. And so I think

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that's why this is such a troubling thing. And if

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you're a Facebook investor, you're probably not stoked to to

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>hear that. Doesn't doesn't this get to the like material

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>information right as an investor, like what you need to know?

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>It does, But at the same time, it does seem

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook investors aren't even that concerned today shares a

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Facebook even after this right right, well now they're up

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>one point eight percent, and even in the last five days,

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>which includes the period of time where we saw that

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>really terrible news from pinterest for excuse me, from Snap

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>with its earnings, they're only down about So now, I mean,

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of that? Well, I think it

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>just speaks to the power of Facebook in this market

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and the advertising business it's built, um. And I think

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it also speaks to the fact that perhaps investors are seeing,

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is just another one of its many

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>political crises that the company has weathered in the past.

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, in truth in actuality, regulators haven't really

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>been able to put a you know, a dimmer on

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's growth despite years of controversies, and so you know.

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps you know, that's what investors are seeing there. They're

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing this as more of a PR crisis than a

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>true sort of business regulatory crisis. Well, and I do

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like we're getting to a point where we've got

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to as a company, they've got to figure out I

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>mean hate speech. You guys write about it name you

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>write it in your story with Lauren ed Or that

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>conservatives and liberals often defined hate speech differently, like this

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>gets into a tricky area, and we talked about this

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>often about you know, freedom of speech. But I also

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>think about what you know, Kurt was saying that if

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm investing in this company for the future, I want

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to know that there's going to be a future audience.

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>It's an advertising based model at least at this point,

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and if it's not going to be there in a

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>few years, that might, Kurt, you know, impact whether or

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>not I want to invest in this company. Yeah, of course.

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think they've been able to mask this because

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the service is just so big, because they have so

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>much growth in other markets and other age groups. Right,

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>But I I think the future thing is really important,

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's not the kind of thing that's gonna happen overnight. Right,

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it might take years for this to materialize, but I

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's important that people understand the trajectory. Here. Hey,

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>really quick, guys, we don't have a lot of time.

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Ten seconds here, Naomi, what's a question you would ask

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>on the call tonight? Well, I mean I think I

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>would ask about the revelations around UM Kurt's story. Um,

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>why has it not been more upfront about a true

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>user breakdown for all of its apps by age and demographic?

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And does it plan to do at in the future?

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>And Kurt, what about for you? Real quickly? How about

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>what's the new name going to be? I love you guys?

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 1>UM so great, incredible reporting. There's so many incredible stories

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>by Kurt, by Naomi, by our team at large when

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Facebook, and of course we get earnings

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>after the closing bell today. I think I might ask

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>those questions. No, I'm not on the call. No, but

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:23.879
<v Speaker 1>it's great, like they whittled it down. I mean, there's

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>just so much is do they answer questions like that? Yeah? Exactly,

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>And we'll Mark Zuckerberg be there. This is Bloomberg, Okay,

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>do you know who this is? Okay? So I have

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to say, in the early days of TV um, not

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 1>early early, but the second iteration um. We used to

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>play a lot of music in between our breaks when

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we were getting ready for a five am show, and

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>one of our producers loved Rush indeed, so would play

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it all the time. New world man, right. Who would

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>have thought that phrase could ever apply to Donald Trump?

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 1>But here you go, here you go. You know, he

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 1>creates this new media company. It's gonna set up the

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>social media and more. And he decides to make a

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 1>deal with a special purpose acquisition company a k a.

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>A stack a spack. I'll get it out. I was

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>thinking more about sort of how you might describe the

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 1>result of that deal, which is the headline in my chart,

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 1>says Trump's meme World. I mean, it isn't just Digital

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:40.280
<v Speaker 1>World acquisition, which is the blank check company that's actually

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:43.360
<v Speaker 1>making also known as whack the whack because that's the

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>way back. Yeah, exactly, might be a sack. You have

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:53.280
<v Speaker 1>this software company called Funware, which actually did some work

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>on the Trump reelection campaign last year. And you know,

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>if you looked at the s two days of last

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:04.319
<v Speaker 1>week actually had a bigger gain and at one point

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 1>at least than Digital World didn't and we were talking

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:13.959
<v Speaker 1>almost and then as it happens, there's a gentleman named

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Orlando that runs Digital World. He's also the CEO

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of two other SPACs and so we've seen them, especially

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>one of them, Benassary Capital uh take off starting on Friday,

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and then the other one is based out of China.

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 1>We wrote about it. Young Hung International also up a

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:38.320
<v Speaker 1>bit on Friday. And there's one more uh mckea Capital,

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:42.879
<v Speaker 1>where he serves as a director, not CEO. But nonetheless,

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you even saw a bit of a game in that

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:48.399
<v Speaker 1>stock on Friday, So you know, why settle for one

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>meme stock when you can have five. So that's Donald

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump's meme world in a nutshell. And if you want

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to see this performance for yourself, folks, and get the

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>names of those companies in an email, I'll get it.

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll get everything to you along with what I do

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>going forward. And the email addressed for that is d

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Wilson at Bloomberg dot net. That's d Wilson at Bloomberg

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.399
<v Speaker 1>dot net. Right, So the dude behind all of these,

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the commonality, right, it's Mr Orlando who we talked

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>about on air. Um as we are as we are

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>learning more about him and the work that he has done. Right,

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>so presumably the Reddit traders or whoever are kind of

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at this and say, well, okay, if this one

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.760
<v Speaker 1>spac is doing this, what about his other SPACs? And

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>hence you have You know, these moves isn't act when

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you're like walk into the door. Look well last week

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Thursday closed up three fifty six percent Friday of seven

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 1>percent today. Yeah, but there you go. These things are voluable,

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>no question. And looking across the group, Flintware is actually

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 1>down eighteen and a half. Look at that dwack chart.

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's just crazy. It's like straight line, like

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a lego. You can make this out of legos. It's

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 1>just a straight line forever or several months, and then

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:01.840
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden it's a straight curve up and

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>then a little bit of tailing off right like you

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 1>could do this. I gottn't even whack your chart for you.

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 1>But it's my stock of the debt. What is it? Tim?

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>You actually mentioned it a few moments ago before we

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>came on Air Backed Holdings Taker b k k T.

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 1>This is a crypto impartment, Okay, cryptocurrency outfit that was

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>taken public by the Intercontinental Exchange, who you know was

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the owner of the New York Stock Exchange. And uh,

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it was a spack deal. I'm goody good um. It

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 1>was its back deal made in January and what wasn't

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 1>completed until a week ago. And actually back shares fell

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 1>the first four days after the deal happened. Rose on

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Friday today. Well, they got a couple of things going on.

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 1>They partnered with the financial company five Serve, and on

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 1>top of that they have a deal with master Card.

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>You put that all together, and the share have just

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>taken off at the moment. Backed Holdings b A K

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 1>KAT hence the two ks and the ticker symbol up

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Speaker 1>A hundred and seventy one. Wow, this is a stock

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I saw moving significantly. I clicked into it in the

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal. Shares had been halted, news pending, and that

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 1>news after these agreements. It's another chart you can build

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>with legos. I'm just saying, straight line, straight up. Wow,

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like, look at it. It's crazy. It was. It

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>was below ten bucks for such a long time. All right,

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Dave Wilson, go get some water. Yeah, but you let

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 1>me drive? Oh no, no, no, no, this is not

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a toy. Please, I'll do the ridings. I want to drive.

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:58.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a good question. This is the drive to the globe?

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Punk from me A well don radio alright, TikTok, everybody.

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Just about ten and a half minutes left in today's

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:09.719
<v Speaker 1>trading session. What an interesting one because you know, the

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 1>first few minutes of training today we were down. But

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>we have rallied off of those loads and we've got

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 1>some games here. Tim, Hello, Tesla, Hello, Tesla, hurts and

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a few other things. Let's get to it. Let's get

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to the drive to the closest Nattia level. She is

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 1>senior US Equity Strategies over EBS Global Wealth Management with

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:30.839
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from New York. Not Eve. Good

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to have you here with Tim and myself. Uh, we're

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 1>all in about earnings, getting ready to be all in

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 1>on big tech earnings. What what's your make of what

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 1>or what do you think about the earnings so far

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and what's to come perhaps from big tech? Yeah, you know,

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it's still early in the season, but we think results

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>are coming in really strong. It's coming even better than

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 1>our initial above consensus expectations. Uh, we do express at

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the beat rate that we've seen so far for a

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 1>team percent, much of that driven by financial We look

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>for that to moderate. We are looking for earnings growth

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of this quarter of over thirty percent year over year UM.

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>That would suggest a more roughly high single digit beat rate.

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 1>We do think that the sectors that are our best

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>position right now to surprise on the upside our energy

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and as you said, but in parts of technology and

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>as you should get a boost from the higher prices

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen grinding higher the last few weeks. And

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 1>much of tech is more insulated from that supply Chaine disruption,

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 1>like software and the cloud play, so that should help

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 1>boost tech earnings throughout the season. When you say tech,

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:38.760
<v Speaker 1>do you also mean companies that rely on advertising for revenue,

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:41.879
<v Speaker 1>because as we learned last week Nadia, the supply chain

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 1>cannot even affect those companies as a result of companies

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 1>like you know, consumer package good companies that don't want

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to advertise as much because they are experienced supply disruptions. Absolutely,

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's in the communication services sector. Obviously, the questions

0:41:56.560 --> 0:42:00.560
<v Speaker 1>around digital advertising, um, you know you don't have the

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:04.839
<v Speaker 1>goods to sell, then it's tougher to advertise those good. Um.

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>That said, I would say the other verticals, those more

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 1>every center of the pandemic, ones like we use your

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>entertainment restaurants are coming back, so that should help offset

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>any weakness that we're seeing in the goods vertical. Um,

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So we think that that will help UM some of

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 1>the other larger players in the digital advertising. So just

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:27.000
<v Speaker 1>help me out here. Did you say thirteen percent or

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>beating but you expect that to moderate? Is that quarter

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to quarter? So thirteen percent beat rates so far? And

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 1>so coming into the season, consensus expectations for earnings growth

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 1>this quarter was around or so, and so we're seeing

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that come in much better than expected year over year.

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 1>Now that's a moderation than what we saw in the

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 1>second quarter, but still very strong. Just given the old

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 1>ball of context, that's earnings. What about revenues? I mean,

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the top line we really you know, focus on,

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>because companies can't really muck with that too much. Exactly,

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you cannot generate, you cannot you know, engineer sales, right, um,

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 1>But so SMT sales growths are really robust this quarter.

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:13.839
<v Speaker 1>We're looking for fiftcent year over year growth or even better. UM,

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>we think that you know that the point here is

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that demand remains really strong, and because that is the case,

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that should help on the margin side. I know margin

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>has been an issue. We think that that sales what

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:30.839
<v Speaker 1>would allow that operating leverage to kick in as well,

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>helping to offset some of those highest cost that UM

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:37.319
<v Speaker 1>companies are seeing. What has been concerning you that you've

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:40.399
<v Speaker 1>heard from executives? I mean, for example, today we've heard

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>from Kimberly Clark that it's been negatively impacted by significant inflation,

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>supply chain disruptions that increase costs beyond what they anticipated,

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and they don't actually know when those things will be resolved.

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>How concerning is that to you? That is something that

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely watching. We think a lot of the costs

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that some of these companies are seeing are related to

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:04.239
<v Speaker 1>supply seeds to disruption, and we do think that that's transitory.

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 1>It is taken a bit longer to resolve than we anticipated.

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>We probably won't see a resolution of some of these

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 1>issues until we get surround the two, but I will see.

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 1>The thing that we're watching most closely is on the

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:18.920
<v Speaker 1>labor cost side, because we know that that's stickier than

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 1>some of those all more transitory inflational pressure, and I

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>think that this is where price e power really comes

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in as well, and company's ability to pass along from

0:44:29.120 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 1>those speaking of cost consumers. Hey, now, you guys do

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of research, and I do under you know, SNAP,

0:44:35.200 --> 0:44:38.960
<v Speaker 1>if we look at it, it is down just before

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:41.839
<v Speaker 1>that disappointing earnings report where they talked about supply chain

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>problems and how that's resulting in companies not putting up

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:47.920
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to advertising. Should we anticipate that we

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:50.919
<v Speaker 1>will see that with the other social media platforms as well?

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think some of those issues are very

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:57.839
<v Speaker 1>company specific because I do think that the larger add

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>players are better position. You know, one as I talked

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>about earlier, those other verticals that I've been opening up

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:06.880
<v Speaker 1>those every cent. But I do think that that particular

0:45:06.920 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 1>company also did fight, you know, some issues around the

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 1>changes in privacy sets set in on some operating systems.

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I think this is where scale comes into place. Some

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:21.439
<v Speaker 1>of those larger places have so much data on their

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:25.319
<v Speaker 1>users and that they're able to help curtel some of

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the impacts that are just need by changes and privacy

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 1>um set ins, and so the innovation that continues to

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:37.440
<v Speaker 1>happen with those larger um digital advertised advertised platform um

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is will really will come to bear this week. Hey, Nadia,

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>for the SP five, you continue to maintain June in

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 1>December price targets. So June's uh, December two is five

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand right now it's at forty five sixty two and change. Uh,

0:45:56.080 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 1>what makes you revise those? It's all earning, you know,

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 1>if Ernest continue to come in better than we expected

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to see if we're looking for forty year of year EPs,

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:10.879
<v Speaker 1>next year we're looking for ten percent, and so if

0:46:10.960 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 1>we see Ernest continue to come in better than next

0:46:13.200 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 1>because that might proper to advise up our next year estimates. Also,

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the only thing that we're watching very closely

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is Washington on the tax side, because our number assume

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of four to five percentage points dragged from higher corporate

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:30.880
<v Speaker 1>taxis and now there's chatter that that might not even happen.

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 1>So that could be a source of upside to our

0:46:33.040 --> 0:46:35.799
<v Speaker 1>earnest expectations for next year. Good thing to point out.

0:46:35.800 --> 0:46:37.720
<v Speaker 1>And then there's always COVID, which we have to remember

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:41.319
<v Speaker 1>is always there in her backdrop. All right, Nadia, thank

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Nadia, Level level. Excuse me, senior equity

0:46:44.280 --> 0:46:46.759
<v Speaker 1>Strategies at UBS Global Wealth Management joining us on the

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:52.239
<v Speaker 1>phone from New York City. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:57.799
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and you can also listen to our radio

0:46:57.840 --> 0:47:00.399
<v Speaker 1>show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 1>us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News m