WEBVTT - The Mark Moss Show Oct 19, 2022

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome back to another episode of the Mark

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Mos Show where we talk about the decentralized revolution and

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the way the world is changing um from a world

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of centralization, central planning, central banking, to a world of decentralization,

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>which means more power and control back into you as

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>an individual, as an individual person, getting away from central

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>planning to individual planning, away from central banking, and back

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to uh unbanking or independent personal banking. Of course, we

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>look at it through the lens of politics, finance, and technology,

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and there are so much going on with all of that,

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>so we try to keep up with the flow of

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>information so we can see this. I know a lot

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of times I get thousands of messages a week across

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>all my social media platforms, which, by the way, if

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you're not following me on social media, please do. You

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.480
<v Speaker 1>can find me at one Mark Moss on most platforms,

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>or just go to my website at one Mark Moss

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>dot I'm sorry, just one Mark Moss dot com and

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I have all of it listed there. But I get

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>thousands of comments a week across my social media. Try

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to get to most of them if I can, um

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>not all the ones on YouTube. There's are so many there,

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>but I try my best to get to as many

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>as I can. And the one thing that I see

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>all the time is like, Mark, when is this going

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to happen? When will the dollar lose its status? When

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>will the dollar collapse? When will the new system take over? Right?

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>And it's not when. It's not a process, it's an event.

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Let me say that again. I said it backwards. Sorry,

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not at an event, it's a process. What

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>do I mean by that? So it's a process, it's

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that it goes for over a long period of time.

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it was Mark Twain. Forgive me if I'm

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>wrong on this attribution of the quote. But they said,

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>how did you go broke? And they said, now, I

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>went broke gradually and then suddenly. And so there's like

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>this gradually then suddenly kind of a thing. Um. And

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>so if you look at the United States dollar took over,

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the took over the reserve status of the world, world's

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>reserve status from the pounds sterling a hundred years ago.

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>But it didn't happen all at months. It was a process,

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>not an event. It took It happened over about a

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>forty year period where um the UK just continued to

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>destroy their currency by continuing to print more and more money,

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>by devaluing it, and to the point where it was

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>devalued so much they had to give up all their gold.

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>The United States got all the gold and thereby was

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the strongest economy and the strongest currency in the world

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>because it was backed by gold, and thereby took over

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>as the world's reserve currency. This was a long process,

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a forty year process. Now the pounds to earliest still

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>there today, it's still being used. So again it's a process,

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>not event, a forty year process before the US dollar

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>was kind of recognized as taking over, but it's still

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>there today. So when did these things happen? They are

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>happening right now, and that's exactly what we're looking at now. Um,

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we look at it the de lens of politics, finance,

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and technology. Those are the three cycles that are converging

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>right now. Of course, the technology piece is bitcoin, which

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is this decentralized technology that we need in order to

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>really usher in this change that's happening, and it is here,

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's happening and it's happening fast. Now. Um. You

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>know one thing that we look at when it comes

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to bitcoin, is everybody likes to point to the fact that, um,

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the price of bitcoin is down, how good

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>is this asset? If the price is down, it's not

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a good medium of exchange, is too volatile, it's not

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a good store of value because look how far it's

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>off of their high. Well, those things are true. Um,

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:31.239
<v Speaker 1>I can't debate that. Now we can look at the

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>nuance of those things. So, for example, bitcoin is holding

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>up pretty dangn good considering where other risk assets are,

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>so we can we can we can make that argument.

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>We could say that, um, it's been certainly a good

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>store value if you just zoom out and look over

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>like a two year period instead of a six month period.

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>So we can pick and choose our periods if we

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>want to do that. But ultimately, what I would say

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is that when you're looking at new technologies, especially a

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>technological revolution such as bitcoin, you don't want to look

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>at the price. I say this all the time we've

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>been listening. Thank you for your support, but I've said

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>this to you over and over and over. Right, we

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>don't look at the price. Imagine when Uber raised money

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to start building out in Silicon Valley, they you know,

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they didn't go public for over a decade, so we

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't see the price of Uber changing every day based

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>off of this new city picked them up, this city

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>banned am etcetera. And so when we're looking at something

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>like bitcoin of technological revolution, the price doesn't really give

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>us the true data. So what we want to look

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>at is two things. We want to look at the

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>growth of the network. So when Uber's case, are we

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 1>getting more drivers, are we getting more riders, are we

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>getting more cities? That's the growth of the network. And

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we also want to look at the development happening on

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the network. Are they added in new services, Uber eats,

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>things like that. And so with Bitcoin we can see

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. And one of the big talient signs

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>is the growth growth of the network. And we saw

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>this week that the difficulty gauge of bitcoin rose by

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>thirteen and a half percent from the last adjustment roughly

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago. What does that mean, Well, that means

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that the bitcoin mining difficulty has surged to an all

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>time high. What does that mean? There's more people mining bitcoin,

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>the network has grown to a level of all time highs,

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>there's more people actively working in the network, and providing

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>security to the network than there ever has been before.

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>So while the price the US dollar value might be down,

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>first of all, if we price bitcoin in Turkish lear,

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, the price of bitcoin is actually way up.

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So we have to look at what you're measuring it in.

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>If you're measured in US dollars, the prices down. But

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing we shouldn't really be paying attention to.

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>If we're trying to zoom out and see what's what

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>going on, we want to look at the growth of

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the network, and we can see that it has grown massive.

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, the current network hash rate,

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the amount of power that all the computers

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>are using to secure the network is UM is two

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty seven million terror hashes per second and

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>last this time last year it was around a hundred

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and forties. Went from one forty to two fifty seven

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in twelve months. That is a massive rise in power,

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 1>participation and security on the bitcoin network. Now, UM this

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>difficulty adjustment, what does that mean? So what it means

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is that right now, UM there's way more people mining bitcoin,

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>bringing new bitcoin in the space. And so what happens

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is it adjust the difficulty so what do I mean

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>by that? So if the price of gold shot up,

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you know it's whatever sixteen hundred bucks anounce today, let's

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>say it went up to ten thousand announced, a lot

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>more people would go to Mind gold. There would be

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>gold mines popping up all over the world, new equipment,

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>bringing as much gold as they could out of the ground,

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and that would increase the new supply of gold really fast.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 1>That would create inflation. But with bitcoin, it's different. If

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin jumps from its price today of a roughly twenty

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and say it went to a hundred thousand like that,

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>more people could jump in mind, but there would be

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>no new bitcoin, no additional bitcoin coming out. It would

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>just it's just how much big going to split between

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the people that are there. So that's the difficulty adjustment.

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So about every two weeks it adjust that number, the ratio,

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the percentage of what people get. And so what happens

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is now people are making less and less money because

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>there's so many people doing it right, it's grown. So

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>what happens is the people that aren't profitable to say

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>they're paying you know, ten cents for their power, they

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>have to turn their machines off and when they turn

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>their machines off, that's more bitcoin for the rest of

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the miners. And then let's say the price keeps dropping, well,

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the next batch of unprofitable miners have to drop off,

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and the people that are left get more of it,

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. And also that it works in opposite

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and so as more people jump in, they get less

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of it. It works the same way, which is why

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>this week we saw Senator Senator H. Warren Elizabeth Warren

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>leads a congressional groups probe into bitcoin mining mining energy

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in Texas. Imagine a group of of Democratic lawmakers from Washington,

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>d C. Senator Senator Senator Elizabeth Warren is from Massachusetts.

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Imagine them going to Texas trying to tell Texas how

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to handle their power. Texas is not on the global grid.

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>They have their own internal grid. So the fact that

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>they're going to go there and try and demand the

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Texas answers to them is pretty funny. But really the

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>whole thing behind it is is uh. It just shows

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that a lack of knowledge of what they're even talking about.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Um they say that they express concerns that bitcoin's mining

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>enormous demand for energy is straining the state's grid adversely

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>impacting consumers and climate goal. So bitcoin has to have

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the cheapest power available. So bitcoin can't compete for customers.

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>It can't participate in California, where it has to compete.

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>It has to go where there's cheap power. Why is

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>their cheap power in some places because there's surplus, there's

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>energy being created that's not being used, and that's one

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons why Texas has picked up so much energy.

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>And so again we can see that this is growing

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in a rapid We can see that the network has growing,

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.079
<v Speaker 1>we can see the development is growing on the network.

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And so instead of being focused on the US dollar

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>valuation price, we want to stay focused on those two things,

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the growth of network and the development on the network.

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Mark Ma Show. We're talking about

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the decentralized revolution, the way the world is changing from

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>world of centralization to decentralization through the lens of politics, finance,

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and technology. I got a big show. I got a

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of signposts that we're looking at to show us

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>what's happening. I'm gonna try and get through them all.

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll be back in a minute. Don't go away, all right,

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. You are listening to the Mark ma Show.

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the decentralized revolution, the way the world

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>is swinging from centralization to decentralization, and we're just looking

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>through the signpost that we see. Um. You know, if

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>you've been with me for the entire show, I was

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about inflation. This week, the new inflation numbers came out.

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to look at it from a little bit

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of a different angle because what we're looking at is

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the breakdown of both Paul of of of three things, politics, finance,

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and then of course technology is the catalyst that change that.

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>And the financial system is breaking down, the political system

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is breaking down. We're gonna look at both of those

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>things some big signposts that happened. But um I was

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about earlier. I'm not going to dig super deep

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>into it. Go back and catch out the podcast The

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Markmas Show, just on your favorite podcast player or Market

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Disruptors on YouTube if you want to watch me and

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>listen to me at the same time. But we talked

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>about how the new CPI Consumer Price UM index. The

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>prices went back up again. As a matter of fact,

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>it went up UM much higher than expected, search to

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>more than eight point two percent, and you know, the

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>core CPI strips out the food and energy, which is

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>crazy because those are the two things that we need

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the most. But even with stripping those things out, we

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:44.599
<v Speaker 1>still went up at the highest rate since nineteen, surpassing

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the recent six point four percent highs that we hit

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>in February. In March, now, even worse than that is

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that economists had expected the rate increased to be much

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>much less than it was. But what we're seeing now,

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the monthly figures show that it's acts accelerating, and of

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>course the photo reserve is trying to decelerate. The photo

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>reserve is trying to tackle it and trying to get

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it back down to two percent, but instead it's going

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>back up. It's a big problem now. The news sent

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 1>the stock futures price plunging right the investors um revised

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>their views of what the feds next moves will be.

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>So everybody's waiting for this pivot. The pivot, the pivot

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>when with the Feds stop raising rates, When with the

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>peds the Fed start easing the monetary supply again, And

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>so we're waiting for this move. And everybody thought that maybe,

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>just maybe, if we started seeing the inflation numbers come down,

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.079
<v Speaker 1>they would pivot sooner than later, maybe this year. I

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>was thinking maybe this year, but it looks like, based

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>off of this new data that came out, this is

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.079
<v Speaker 1>probably not going to be the case. But let's talk

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>about it from a different angle than I've already talked

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>about it from before. So what does what does this mean?

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>What means lots of things, right, we could sit here

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and talk about all the different angles and all the

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>things that it means. But one of the things that

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it means is that because cp I has been revised up, um,

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>what it means is that the cost of living goes up.

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about that. I'm not gonna take super deep

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>into that, but the cost of you, um, having to

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>buy gas for your car or food for your grocery

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>carts has gone up. Your cost of living has gone up. Now,

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>part of the thing that the BLS does by providing

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>this number, the CPI data number, is it shows the

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>cost of living, which then the Social Security Administration uses

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to decide how much money do distribute out to Social

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Security recipients. And this is a big deal and it

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>might be a big problem. And so what we're talking

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>about is that sociecurity payments are now set for a

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>really really really big increase, and so it looks like

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>tens of millions of Americans on SO security are about

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to get what maybe the biggest rays of their lifetime.

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>All Right, it says the US government is said to

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>announce how big a percentage increased SO security beneficiaries will

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>see in monthly payments this upcoming year. It's certain to

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>be the largest in four decades. So the largest raise

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>pay raise that these SoC security beneficiaries get. Now, there's

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 1>plenty of controversy companies that move, it says UM, known

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 1>as a cost of living adjustment or COLA c o

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>L a cost of living adjustment. Now, critics say the

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>data of the government uses to set the increase doesn't

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>reflect what older Americans are actually spending and thus the

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>inflation they're actually feeling. Yes, we've talked about extensively over

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and over and over how manipulated that number is. So yes,

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.959
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really doesn't really reflect what they're paying. So

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>many of the tricks they do. So for example, they

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>have something UM that basically adjusted by by swapping out items,

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>so UM, you know, the cost of living index, the

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>CPI used to include steak and now it just includes hamburger.

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>You still get meat, and so thereby, since we went

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>from steak to hamburger. Um, the price that didn't go up.

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, it went down. Um. They

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>also do something based off of performance. So let's say

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that they changed gasoline and now gasoline is supposed to

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>be cleaner or more fuel efficient. They'll say, well, because

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the performance went up in the gasoline, we're not going

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to include the cost of it going up. Because your

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>computer got more powerful. Um, we're not going to count

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the cost increase of the computer, which is insane because

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>we still have to put the money out. Our cost

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of living still went up. There's lots of controversies. I

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>spend an entire show talking about all of that, and

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I will if you want me to, So hit me

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>up on social media at one Mark Moss and let

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>me know if you think I should. Um. But we

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>can see that, as they're saying, lots of controversy because

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't reflect what people are actually spending. And also

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>because the increase is a one size fits all, which

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>means beneficiaries get the same rays regardless of where they live.

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So for example, if you live in southern California, that

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>pay raise may not be near enough. Then it would

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>be if you lived in South Dakota or something like that,

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>or Kansas right or another country. Now. I've been doing

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work with international diversification as recently speaking

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>at the Nomad Capitalist event down in Mexico City, and

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that if you're if you're on

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Social Security and your budget is tight, you might want

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to consider moving out of the country. You can move

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to Turkey, you can move to Columbia, you can move

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to Brazil, and you could have a ten x quality

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of your life for less money than you pay now.

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>You can have a full time cook and a full

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>time cleaner, and a full time show fore and a

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>beautiful house for like two thousand dollars a month. So

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you're so Security would go much further. UM. So, anyway,

0:15:58.160 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>payments are going to go up, which is a good

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Which is good if you're on SO Security. I mean,

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody wants more money. Sure, UM, it looks like those

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>payments will begin probably in about January. UM they'll be permanent. UM. Now,

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>since the year two thousand, the typical increase has been

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>about two two and a half percent. But now with

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the numbers of inflation, it looks like that's going to

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>be four more five more, which is gonna be a

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty big deal. But what does this mean in bigger sense?

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, this is pretty interesting. So if you haven't

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>been paying attention, you probably should. Is something I kind

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of pay attention to because I'm you know, I've paid

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>into SO security in my whole life. At some point

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'd want to pull out of it. But it

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>looks like, um, so security is set to run out

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>by four four that's twelve years from now. So that

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>means that there's probably not gonna be any SO security

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>by the time I get to the age in time

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to start drawing from that, and so it's already set

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to this was this was actually in February of this year.

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Um they said it's gonna set to run out. Now

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have to pay out even more money,

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>which means they're going to run out even sooner. That's

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a big problem. So of course there's plenty of reasons

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>why they would to manipulate the numbers to keep this

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>security number down. The cost of living increases down, so

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>they have to pay up more money. So they don't

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>run out even faster than they were what they were

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>planning on. That's gonna be a big problem. So if

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you're planning on so security um in the next you know,

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 1>after twelve years from now, you should probably adjust what

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you're doing to come up with plan b um because

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a big problem. And what's what's exaggerating

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the problem is also the ability to even earn any

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>money with interest rates so low, um, the economy crashing um,

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. It's gonna be a big problem anyway.

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>That's it was so security Um. You're listening to the

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Mark Ball Show, we're talking about the decentralized revolution. We

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>were just talking about how this centrally planned system that

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>we have created by the follower reserve and so security

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and all that, it is coming to an end. It's

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>coming to an end. Um that may be dooming gloom

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>for some people. But I'd rather know than not know. Um.

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>We're looking at typically through the lens of politics, finance,

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 1>and technology. I have a lot more to go up

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in those three subjects. When I come back in a minute,

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gona take a quick break, but I'll be back.

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to miss what's coming up next. So

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 1>you're back, all right, welcome back. You are listening to

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the Markma Show. We're talking about the decentralized revolution. The

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>way the world is changing right now. Now it's clear

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're living in this world, you know it's changing.

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>The world as we are going into is not the

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>one we've left behind. And we know that when we

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.239
<v Speaker 1>look back through thousands of years of history, we can

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>see these cycles change the world, ebbs and flows, and

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we're moving from a period of centralization, central plan or

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 1>central government, central banking into a world of decentralization. Of course,

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we look at through the lens of politics, finance, and technology,

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and we can see that this uh, the end of

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the financial era that we've known is coming to an end.

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>To talk about it extensively, maybe the world went into

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 1>well five thousand years gold was money UM. Then the

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>whole world went into this new um financial agreement nineteen

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>into the Breton Woods Agreement UM, where we still had

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the gold being money, but now the dollar was pegged

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to gold and other currencies were pegged to the dollar,

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and so we still kind of had this UM commodity

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>based money. In nineteen seventy one, though President Richard Nixon

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>severed the ties um to the gold standards, so removed

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the dollars backing too gold, and so since then the

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 1>world has been in free fall. We've been about fifty

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 1>one years into a financial experiment, and we went from

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Breton Woods one started nineteen potentially we could say nineteen

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>seventy one. Let us to Breton Woods too. Unofficially, we

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 1>went into this basically fiat monetary system that we have today.

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>And now it is changing again and we can see

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's coming to an end. We're only fifty one

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>years into this financial experiment and anomaly and anomaly throughout

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>history where thousands of dollars of years, pretty much all

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>recorded history, um, gold has been money. And now we're

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>in this kind of fake fiat monetary system, and we

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>can see how fast this is unraveling, and so it's

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>easy to see that it doesn't have much more legs. Now.

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>The Central Banks to Photo Reserve has been pretty good

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>about pulling some rabbits out of that, had pretty good

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>at pulling some magic tricks. However, um, you know, kicking

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the can down the road, so to speak. We don't

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 1>know how many more they have potentially they have more,

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>but we can see that it is getting dire. I

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>want to look at a couple of things that I'm

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>looking at that kind of show this, and and and

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>so the point of seeing these signposts is trying to understand,

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>um when when this happened. So we thought this week

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the i m F slashes not just cuts, not just reduces,

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but slashes global growth estimates. Warning, unfortunately, I hate to

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>tell you, warning that the worst is yet to come.

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>They say, you think things are bad now, oh just wait,

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>they're about to get even better. Oh no, worst, They say,

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the global economy is headed for a quote stormy waters

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>end quote. The Internet National Monetary Fund said this week

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>it cut its projection for growth next year and warned

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that high inflation was worsening living conditions. So you think

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it's bad for you in the United States, what about

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>other countries where they're seeing prices go up by double

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 1>a hundred percent in months and they already live on

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>three or four dollars a day. Imagine that. Um It

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>says here that the global economy will grow two point

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>seven percent in three down from a projected three point

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>two percent this year, and six percent in so it's

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>growing way down six going down to two point seven percent.

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Just um, So so think about that for a second. Actually,

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna put that on pause. I'll come

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>back to that. It says the global economic activity is

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 1>experiencing a broad based and sharper than expected. It's always

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>more than they expected, right, all these pH d s,

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>all these economies, all this data, and they just can't

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:58.959
<v Speaker 1>ever seem to get it right. Um. Of course, they

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>can't tell you what the weather is going to be

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>like next week. They can't tell you what's going to

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>happen with inflation. How the heck are they going to

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:06.479
<v Speaker 1>tell you what the weather is going to be like

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in a hundred years from now. Just stop and think

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>about that for a second. Let's keep going here. Global

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>economic activity is experiencing a broad based and sharper than

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>expected slow down. We didn't expect for it to get

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>this bad. Uh. You know, we thought we'd just shut

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the whole economy down and then turn it back on again,

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and then we have too much inflaces, so we'll shut

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>it back down again. But we didn't expect it to

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:29.199
<v Speaker 1>be it as bad, with inflation higher than seen in

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>several decades. Who would have thought it's it's it's sharper

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>than expected. They say, Now, it says here that the

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 1>I M s's global inflation hitting eight point eight percent.

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>For that's up from four point seven percent last year.

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>So eight point eight percent inflation globally. Now this means

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>that in some places goes up less, in some places

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 1>it goes up way more. But let's just look at

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 1>this global number that the I m F is putting out.

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>So they're expecting inflation to go up by eight point

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>eight percent. They're expecting the grow global economy to grow

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 1>by two point seven percent. So that means, yes, we

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>are growing much slower. We're producing way less good than services.

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Your wealth is going up way slower than the cost

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of living. That means everybody in the world, on the

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 1>entire globes cost of living, or i should say quality

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of life, standard of living is going down because we're

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>growing much much slower, two much much slower than inflation

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is at eight point eight percent, they said. The I

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 1>m said, quote, monetary policy should stay the course. Look

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:44.360
<v Speaker 1>things are they just said here, Um, they said experiencing

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>sharper than expected slow downs, then expect things to get

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this bad. But never mind, never mind, we didn't expect

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>for them to be this bad. It's way worse than

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>anybody thought. Um, but never mind, stay the course, Stay

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the course. Uh. Fiscal policy should aim to alleviate the

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:05.479
<v Speaker 1>cost of living pressures while maintaining is sufficiently tight stance

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>aligned with monetary policy. So let's let's break that down.

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>So we have monetary policy and we have fiscal policy.

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>What's the difference Monetary policy is what the central banks do.

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.959
<v Speaker 1>Monetary policy with the central banks increased the monetary supply,

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the base, the money base, but it's not super effective

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>because all they can do is give reserves to the banks. Now,

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>money doesn't really get printed by the Federal Reserve, like

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the meme says, and like I say all the time,

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>I hope you understand that money isn't printed by the

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Federal reserve. Money is actually created by the banks. So

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the federal reserves give their reserves to the banks. Now,

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the banks create the money into existence by issuing loans.

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 1>But if you and I don't borrow, if I don't

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>go get a car loan, auto loan, a house loan,

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>r V loan, a boat loan, a credit card. If

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't borrow, then no new money is created. And

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>if no banks want to loan me money, no money's created.

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's monetary policy. Fiscal policy is what the government does.

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Fiscal policy is sending out you money for welfare or UBI.

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Fiscal policy is them giving you food stamps and and

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 1>all these other things. That's fiscal policy. So what they're

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>saying is that fiscal policy he should aim to alleviate

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 1>the cost of living pressures. How could they do that?

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 1>So what they're saying is that as prices keep going up,

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>meaning your gas prices, your energy prices, as they keep

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>going up, then fiscal policy should continue to work to

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 1>offset that. But if they increase the money supply to

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>help you with your high gas prices or energy prices

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>or food prices, then that means you don't buy less.

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>That means you continue buying the same amount, which means

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the demands still there. And if the demand is still

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>there while the supply goes down, doesn't that mean prices

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>keep going up? I mean, the thinking here, I mean

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just amazes me. So, um, the fed ed is

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 1>trying to crush demand. They want to make you broke,

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>so you can't afford these things anymore. But the I

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>m F is saying that fiscal policy should aim to

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>alleviate those costs of living pressures how by giving you money.

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So while the FED is trying to make you more poor,

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>then that's the monetary policies making you poor. The fiscal

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>policy should be giving you money. Where do they get

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the money from? Oh yeah, they created to see what

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>they're dealing with here, and you can start to see

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>very quickly why they are out of moves. They are

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>out of moves somehow. There per the I m F,

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>they are supposed to restore price stability. So mon tery

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>policy should stay the course to restore price stability by

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>crushing demand to take away your money. But fiscal policy

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>should alleviate that while maintaining a sufficiently tight stance aligned

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>with mon tery policy. But they work against each other

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>because the mon tery policy is trying to make you

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 1>more poor so you don't buy as much, but the

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policy wants to give you the money of the

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>difference so you can continue to buy the stuff that

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you've always had. M Um, there's eight stages of a democracy.

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>About a tune or fifty year life span of democracy.

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna tell you all the final stage, all

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the stages, but the final stages are intellectualism, um decadence,

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>which I think you've seen that. Then it goes to dependence,

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 1>which is what they're talking about, and then ultimately bondage.

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Those are the last four stages. You can guess which

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>stage we're in. You're listening to the Mark Moa Show.

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the decentralized Revolution, the way the world

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is changing from centralization to decentralization through the lens of politics, finance,

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and technology, and we can see that it is crumbling

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>right now. I want to show you more about what's

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>happening with society because of these things. When I come back,

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I got a lot to cover. We'll be back in

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a second. Don't go away, all right, Welcome back. You

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>are listening to the Mark Moa Show talking about the

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>decentralized Revolution, the way, uh the way the world's changing

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>from a centralized world, central planning and central banking into

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a decentralized world. And at the end of this and

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and before the break, I talked about the eight stages

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of a democracy or an empire, and the four final

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>stages are intellectualism. People, we have so much money and

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 1>so much wealth that people just sit around and think

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>thinks all day, imagining this future world with no real

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:21.199
<v Speaker 1>world ties, right, intellectualism, which it leads to abundance. Um,

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 1>like people buying board apes for sixty million dollars or whatever.

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh there was like someone who bought like an invisible

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>piece of art for like eighteen million. I think that

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.719
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty well highlights the age of decadence. Um. Then

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>we lead to dependence, and dependence is the fiscal policy.

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>The government has to step in and help you U,

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>B I, welfare, food stamps, etcetera. And then that leads

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to bondage, where now I'm dependent on the government and

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>so now I have to do whatever they say. But

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it's the it's the perversion, the distortion of these monetary

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:54.959
<v Speaker 1>policies that we're dealing with right now. And we can

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>see it, how see it manifesting itself all throughout society.

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, what we can see all

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>over the place. I'm I'm coming to you from California,

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and we are seeing a massive problem with us in California.

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's even worse than other areas. And that is

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the rise of violent crimes like we just haven't seen before.

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>It's just insane. And I was looking at this report

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>this week of examined crime data from Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles,

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>New York City, Philadelphia City, Seattle, and Washington, d C.

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why they didn't put San Francisco on there.

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>That certainly would have should have changed things. But we

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>got Los Angeles, so California as well represented. But when

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>we look at the data and not the narratives. I'm

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about the narratives in the second, but let's

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>look at the data itself right here. And so when

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>we examine the crime data from those cities Baltimore, Chicago,

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles, New York City, Philadelphia, Seattle, Washington, d C.

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Just those cities, we found that violent crimes have increased

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>anywhere from five up. All right, now, these are violent crimes,

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, These are definitely the crimes you don't want

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to have happened to you. Let's just say that. I

0:29:58.360 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>mean not that you have, you won't have any crime

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>app and you or in your area. But these are

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>ones that are they're violent. Um and it says they've

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>reached unprecedented numbers in the last two years, with murders

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>increasing by nearly thirty percent. That's a big number, Man says.

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>New York City has so far seen the largest increase

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in violent crimes out of the city's a forty point

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>six increase compared to forty three thousand violent crime incidents

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>UM compared to so far this year, compared to last

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>year's thirty thousand, So big, big, big increase. Chicago shows

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>similar data, detailing an increase in violent crimes, a thirty

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>five percent increase compared to last year's records. Wow, this

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>is not a small This is not a small percentage

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of change. There's a massive percentage of change. UM Chicago.

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Chicago's recorded at the time of this report a homicides

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>on the year UM which went down, actually went down.

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Good job, Chicago went down. UM it's UM hundred nine

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>four instead of two hundred and seven. It went down,

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, good job, better than going up. I would

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>hardly call that progress though. What about violent crimes in Seattle?

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>And Seattle they've shot up twenty three percent so far

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>just this year. This year, homicides have increased by more

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>than fifty four percent. Homicides citywide shootings and shots fired

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>increased by eighty two percent. Let's say that one again.

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Seattle. Homicides are up fifty four percent and

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>citywide shootings and shots fired have increased by eighty two percent.

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>That is just insanity. Um, Los Angeles. Los Angeles isn't

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>doing so well. Seen crimes rise in all three categories.

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Violent crimes shot up by six point seven percent, which

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>don't sound so bad compared to Seattle violent crimes. We

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>see homicides increased by one point six percent versus Seattle's

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>fifty saw shots fired increased by one point five percent,

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>um up by in Seattle. So l A is not

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>looking so bad. Now. I will say that, Um, there's

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot more crime going in the Los Angeles than

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>as in this report. This is just violent crimes, shots fired, homicides, etcetera. Um,

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>they've decriminalized a lot of stuff in Los Angeles, so

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>while we're seeing a lot of violent crime, it's just

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>not called violent crime anymore. So they change that. UM,

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Washington d C. Total violent crimes increased by homicides and

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>only only increased by four percent, Not only, but still

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>four percent. M Philadelphia violent crimes have increased by almost

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>five percent. You get the idea. I can sit here

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and keep reading this data to you, But why, why

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>why is crime rising so hard? I mean every day

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously depend on where you're looking, but if you go

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at all, you can see this stuff. It's

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>all boots on the ground reporting and you can see

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>every single day or new attacks at airport, baggage claims, UM,

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>subway stations, you know, convenience stores, um, et cetera. I mean,

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>every single day I see this information, I see these

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>videos of this stuff happening. Why while it's happening for

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of reasons. Ultimately it comes from a breakdown

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in the money supply. It perverts everything. It also has

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to do with the the incentive, so you know, when

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>people are broke, they act out for sure. Um. The

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Democrats want to blame um red states. They say it's

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it's the red states. Um. California governors Gavin Knewsoon recently

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>said he was going to break down quote America's red

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>state murder problem, which is pretty funny that he would

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>say that it's the soft on crime policies that seemed

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to be the problem. As a matter of fact, this

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:09.799
<v Speaker 1>week we saw a report about these Green Goblins. If

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you've heard about this, I had just heard about this

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 1>as in New York, these Green Goblin games. They show

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>up into the um dressed in these like green tight suits,

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>like when they call themselves Green Goblins, and they show

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>up in gangs neon green full body suits and they

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>attack people on the subways, and they attack people on

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>subways and steal from them, assault them things like that,

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and then they just walk right out of jail. So

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>there was Miriam is So six years old, a member

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of this Green Goblin crew assaulted and robbed two teens

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>on the subway on October two, charged with violent felony

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>and then no bail, just walked right out, she walked

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:50.840
<v Speaker 1>out of the court um. And so what's happening is

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that we're soft on crime and we're continue to release

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>these people. And if there's no consequence to you beating

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>people up and stealing from them from them, then what

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 1>do you think happens. That's right, more people getting beat

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:05.840
<v Speaker 1>up and more people stealing from them. That's exactly what happens.

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>The society is breaking down, The world is changing. The

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>world that we have known is not the world that

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>we are going into any longer we can see California

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 1>home to California is home to three of the ten

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 1>worst cities for retail crime. And this is kind of

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 1>what I was talking about. Um, they've decriminalized a lot

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of this, and so now it's home to three. The

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>state has three of the ten worst cities for retail crime.

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Smash and grabs plague the state, as they say. According

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to the National Retail Federation, three California cities are among

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 1>the ten most affected cities for organized retail crime. Those

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>are Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Sacramento. Of course, um,

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 1>very very very very blue hotbeds for sure, um, and

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it makes it very difficult for store or owners to

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 1>be there. So of course what happens then the stores

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>break down, The stores have to close up, The stores

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>close up. The people that have any money don't want

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to live in a violent area, and especially I don't

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>want to live in an area that's violent and has

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:06.800
<v Speaker 1>no stores or services available because all the stores have

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to close up, and what do they do They move

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>out of the area. We've talked about this before in

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:16.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of San Francisco, and it's caused a massive, massive problem.

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>What's happening here in California is we have the rise

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of these uh flash mob style robberies. And um, they

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>used to just show up in a flash mob and

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 1>starting dancing and singing, and now they show up and

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>start robbing. So um again, this is a direct result

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of the monetary system breaking down, and it shows just

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>how quickly the system that we know is going to

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>change now. Um. Change is hard, change is scary, but

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe we need the change. And what's on the

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>other side of it is good. It's hopeful. Um, some

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of this information is bad, I get it. I'm sorry.

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not doing gloom. There is hope. What we're seeing

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is coming to an end, and there is hope on

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the other end. You're listening to the market Ball Show.

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the decentralized revolution, the way that the

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 1>way the world is changing from centralization, central planning is

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>failing us into a world of decentralization, back into a

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 1>system like we used to have. This really affects the

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>entire world, no matter where you're at. This is a big, big,

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 1>big deal. You're listening to the Mark Moa Show. That's

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>what I got for you this week. Thanks so much

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for listening,