WEBVTT - Listener Mail: Dreams, Subs and Goddesses 

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>My welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works dot com. Hey you welcome to Stuff to

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Joe McCormick, and we're coming at you with a listener

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>mail episode today. But we're broadcasting from the depths. We're

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>down here in a in a nuclear submarine. It happens

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>because apparently Submarine Command has appropriated our mail bought Carney. Yeah, yeah,

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>we call it Deep Star seven, um and uh, and

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that's where we're hanging out for this episode. Yeah, Carney

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>has been working down here in the deep, in the

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>shadowy depths, which is which is perfect because some of

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:44.959
<v Speaker 1>the listener mail that we're going to be reading here

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>today does relate to our recent episode on the idea

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>on on studies related to to sleep and even dreaming

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>within the confines of a of a nuclear ballistic missile submarine. Now,

0:00:58.040 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>as always, we've got to say that we don't have

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>time to respond to or read on the podcast all

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of the great listener mail we get. Just rest assured

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>we we do try to read it all, uh, and

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>so so thank you so much for sending it. But

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>today you're going to get a selection of some of

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the stuff we've gotten since the last episode, the last

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 1>listener mail episode, UH, concerning all kinds of things concerning

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>quantum immortality, UH, submarines and the Alphabet and the Goddess

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and all kinds of good stuff. But maybe we should

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>start with some of the responses to the Alphabet and

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the Goddess episodes. Yeah, we heard from a number of

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.559
<v Speaker 1>people about about this one, you know, in part because

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it does have a lot of really thought provoking ideas

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in it. But then also there are some issues with

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>with with some of the uh, the main pieces that

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Slain uh was was utilizing in the work. Yeah, So

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>if you'll recall, we we did a couple episodes on

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>this book, The Alphabet and the Goddess by Leonard Slain,

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>his book from the late nineties that made this sort

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of historical neuroscience argument that the rise of patriarchy and

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the klein or the relative decline of the power of

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>goddesses and religious pantheons around the world was somehow correlated

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>with the rise of alphabetic writing. And he makes a

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of arguments based on hemispheric lateralization of the brain

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and UH and how that how that's correlated with gender roles,

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and how that's correlated with alphabetic writing. And so we

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>discussed in the original episode that we were that we

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>were doing the topic because we thought it was kind

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of thought provoking and raised good questions, not because we

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>were endorsing it as correct right, And I think it

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>also within the context of the episode, we we discussed

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the areas where where I think his argument

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>was a bit weak, such as when it comes to

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese writing or the Hindu pantheon. Well, and just

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>generally the idea that that I got the feeling we

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>might be dealing with some historical cherry picking in his arguments,

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that he was, you know, sort of selectively emphasizing the

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>characteristic of societies or parts of societies that helped his

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>argument and and not necessarily always giving the most balanced

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 1>reading of things. Now, those were the kinds of concerns

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>we raised in the original episode. I will say, actually,

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>since then, I think I've I've become even more skeptical

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of his argument because I've I've started to wonder if

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.399
<v Speaker 1>not just his argument about the explanation for the rise

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of patriarchy is flawed, but I wonder if some of

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>his underlying assumptions are flawed to like I think in

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the future, especially based on some some feedback we got

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>after the episode that we should do an episode on

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the future questioning what the what the gender roles of

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>prehistoric societies actually were, Like, what is the evidence from

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>anthropology and archaeology and everything um about how gender dynamics

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>work in prehistoric societies. Yeah, yeah, I would love to

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>examine that, particularly when you get in not only you

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>know what we can tell about ancient humans, but also

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>ancient Neanderthals. You know, what exactly was the dynamic and

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>what is the what is the relation between that ancient

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>dynamic and the place we are today. Yeah, so that's

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>an episode for the near future. But today we did

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>want to review some of the most interesting listener mail

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that we got in response to the Alphabet and the

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Goddess episode. So Robert, you want to jump in with

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the first one? Sure? This one comes to us from Amelia.

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Amelia writes, I just started listening to the podcast a

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of months ago, and I've been loving it. I

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>was especially excited when I saw the episode for The

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet and the Goddess. The transition from matriarchal to patriarchal

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>religions in the ancient world has always was always a

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>topic that interest me. In college, I studied classical studies

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>as a minor with a concentration on ancient Greece. I

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>was interested to see if you would discuss Minoan and

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>my Sinian culture in ancient Greece and a change in

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 1>religious symbols as a part of the discussion. Since it

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't part of the discussion, I thought I'd write in

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and tell you a little of what I know. The

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Minoans were a seafaring civilization on crete in the Bronze Age,

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>most famously known for its relation to King Minos and

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>minote our myths. Yeah, man minotaur is one of my

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>favorite monsters. I feel like one of the most underutilized monsters.

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>They are there, They are tremendous, and I love it

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>when somebody gets them right. The old Jim Hinson Storyteller

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>series did a pretty good job with the minotaur. Um

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, House of Leaves of the Horror novel well,

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll just say book Uh does a fabulous job with

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the minotaur, and Uh the Dungeons and Dragons treatment of

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>menatars is actually pretty good. Oh they're not just like

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>some brute that's gonna throw you around. Well, they are

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a brute, they'll throw you around, but they have a

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty high wisdom and they can't become lost in amaze.

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh I like that, but sorry, we should go on

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>with Amelia's email. So after mentioning, uh, the Minoans being

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>related to King Minos and minotaur myths, yes, she continues quote.

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>It is thought that the snake was used as a

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 1>symbol of fertility or rebirth, similar to other cultures in

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East. So we think there was some quote

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>unquote mother goddess aspect to Minoan religion and culture. As

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the Bronze Age progress that the Myscenians settled on the mainland,

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>they were a more patriarchal and militaristic people. They lived

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>in citadels in the mountains and depicted soldiers in their art.

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Their culture can represent the invasion of the male sky

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>god and established ancient Earth goddess religions. As Indo Europeans

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 1>move south, eventually the Minoan culture collapsed in Myssinian culture

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>survived to influence the later Classical Greek periods. I think

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting thing to me about this transition is

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the change in symbology that makes it to present day.

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>We can look over time and see the snake turn

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>from this worship symbol of fertility and earth to this

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>hated symbol of trickery and evil. We see in the

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Bible that the snake is the tempter and the devil

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>in the garden of Eden Medusa, a generally evil character

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in Greek myth, has hair of snakes. Could this be

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:50.919
<v Speaker 1>the patriarchal culture's way of displacing matriarchal religious symbols anti

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:54.559
<v Speaker 1>snake propaganda and religious stories. It's something to think about.

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>The Manoan and Messenian periods are just a place in

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>history to study that transition. Looking at the cultures writing systems,

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Manowan's used a yet to be deciphered writing system called

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>linear A, while the Messenians use Linear B, which is

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>mostly h deciphered. Linear B used a combination of syllabic

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and ideographic characters. It is thought linear A is similar.

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if that muddies the waters of the

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>argument you presented in the series of episodes, but I

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>agree that the premise uses a lot of generalizations to

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>try and make a point. I just thought i'd share

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>this lesser known slice of history. The Manoans are a

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly interesting people, and I and I think they don't

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>get enough attention, so I like to talk about them

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>when I can keep up the great work. Guys. Well,

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a great email, Thank you, Amelia. Um So, Yeah,

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I do think the Manoans are interesting and we should

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>do more to study that. One of the things that

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>comes up here is uh, something I guess we got

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>out a minute ago, the question of actually how female

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>friendly these earlier, lesser understood cultures actually were. Now, one

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of the types of feedback we got from some classic

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>scholars after the episode was like a mining the idea

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that there's this popular idea that there was this sort

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of universal, worldwide matriarchal, goddess based culture before there was

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>before there was civilization and before there was written history,

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of evidence that that's just not true. Now,

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the question might be, was the preliterate pre civilization society

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>more female friendly or more matriarchal but maybe not actually matriarchal? Yeah, Like,

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think Schlaine made the argument at least,

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and that in the book we discussed that that culture

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>was ever largely matriarchal right. Uh, it's just a question

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of was it more balanced at some point? Um? Yeah,

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>so I think that is certainly an area of discussion.

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>You know. Another thing that came that the that came

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to mind and when I was reading that and keeps

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>coming back now, is is that regardless of what the

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>previous gods or goddesses were. Uh, there's always this seems

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>like there's this, Uh, there's this movement to repackage them

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes as lesser deities or is just outright demons. And

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to ask yourself, well, is this always you know,

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to what extent gender is playing a role into this

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>transformation or is it a transformation that is in many

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>areas removed from gender concerns. Uh, you know the various

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>pagan gods that were reduced to demons in the advent

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of Christianity, etcetera. Yeah, I mean, and you wonder about

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the idea of if there are gender correlations with the

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>history of the understanding of snakes in uh in religion.

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Because Amelia brings up the Garden of Eden story and

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the funny things about the Garden of Eden story,

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>do you know what never says the snake is Satan. Oh, yeah,

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that's not in the story. It's just the snake. It's

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>just the snake comes to eve the woman and tempts

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>her with knowledge of good and evil. Yeah, I mean

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I do know that, of course, that when you look

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>at the Bible Old and New Testament, that the devil

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>is kind of this character where it's it's almost like

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody wrote a really confusing screenplay and someone said, God,

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>we have a number of these antagonists. Can we just

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>combine these into one character, because it's confusing to have

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a snake and then there's this, uh, this satan character

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that's like a court official, and then there's this idea

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of a fallen angel and and and another devil. Just

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>let's make them all the same guy. I mean, it

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>really does make you wonder, though, if the snake is

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>in the Garden of Eden's story a sort of reflection

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 1>of an earlier story tradition where the snake is something

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>more like a Prometheus character, a character that brings knowledge

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>to the humans, and that that character is transformed into

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a villain in later versions of the story. Now she

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>also mentioned Medusa here. I would love to do some

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of a deeper dive on Medusa in the future,

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>because I'm one hand always one of my favorite monsters.

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't until I was really an adult that

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I began to notice just this trend in art and

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, particularly with statues. There's one statue in particular,

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember the sculpture's name, but you find it

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>at at the met in New York City where our

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>hero is holding the decapitated head of Medusa aloft uh.

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>And there are various paintings where where he's in the

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>act of swaying or and there's like a really kind

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of icky, violent vibe to those images, you know, the

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>murder of this uh, this this feminine monster, this monster

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>is female. Well this this attack on this primordially ugly woman. Yeah, yeah,

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it it doesn't sit well with me. I like the

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>scenes where Medusa is dishing out death a lot more well.

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 1>As beautiful as mythology can be, it's also something we

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>should keep in mind. I mean, cultural values are encoded

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>in myths, and a lot of cultures have had lots

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of strains of deep, powerful misogyny running through them, and

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that's there in a lot of the myths too. Now

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I do want to point out one more tippet from

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the alphabet. In the Goddess episode, i'm a I referenced

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:04.599
<v Speaker 1>a a particular paper by Laura Slatkin titled the the

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the Rate. It was the rage or the Wrath of Thetis. Uh.

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>She had totally has a book that came out years

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and years ago titled The Power of Thetis and selected Essays.

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 1>If anyone is interested to read more of her writings.

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, what else do we have? Karney? All right, well,

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>this next one is also about the alphabet and the goddess.

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>And this is from our listener hend And so she writes, Hi,

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Robert and Joe, I was listening to the second part

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>of the Goddess versus Alphabet episode, and the Sparta Athens

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>comparison struck me. Is either too good to be true

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>or contrived. Now what we actually asked about that, We

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>were like, I wonder to what extent sh Lane is

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>cherry picking his argument here? And we asked for, you know,

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're a classic scholar out there, if you're or

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>an ancient Greek historian, uh, you know, how does his

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>argument strike you? And basically his argument was that Spartan

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>society placed far, far less emphasis on the written word,

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and at the same time was more friendly to women's

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>rights and women's empowerment than Athenian society was. And Athenian

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>society was highly litigious, highly literate, highly written word oriented. Yea,

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it was an interesting argument, but I think at the

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>same time we were we were both a little cautious

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>with it at the time. Uh So this is what

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Hind is getting back to us with. So Hind says,

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>first of all, uh, I don't think there's much validity

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to the left brain right brain argument, besides interesting oddities

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to do with split brain patients. Have you guys done

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>an episode on that. I emailed one of my former professors,

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>who is a professor of classics about this, and this

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>is what he said, quote. I'm always a little wary

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>about big left slash right brain arguments, since I doubt

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the brain functions so simplistically. But what do I know

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>As for Spartan illiteracy, I think that is not so established.

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>It is true that women had a lot more power

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>over some things in Sparta, but I don't think the

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.719
<v Speaker 1>larger argument stands up, since I don't think it as

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>much to do with literacy. Most of the Spartan and

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Athenian institutions regarding women were set during a time when

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>both were mostly oral cultures. And then she provides a

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>link to an article which I must say, I haven't

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>had time to read yet, but I would like to

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>look into. Uh So I appreciate that bit of feedback.

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:11.959
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting point. So this could be a way

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that Slain might not only be cherry picking, but might

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>be like acknowledging differences that are sort of irrelevant because

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the practices he's pointing to were established before the written

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>word was important in either culture. That's a good point. Now,

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to come back to the left brain right brain thing,

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's something that's something that's important to

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>strike a good balance on because you can absolutely go

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>overboard with the left brain right brain kind of thing.

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, I think hemispheric lateralization is an

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>important feature of the human brain. Now there, I think

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of arguments, especially in the later

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, that that overinterpreted the influence of of the

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>left brain right brain division. But the left brain right

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>brain division is a real thing, and it does have consequences.

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>You just don't want to be overly general, overly simplistic

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>about the power of it and explaining behavior. Yeah, and

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean similar things go for a lot of the

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>research that has gone into the inner workings of the brain,

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>for instance, going from the idea that there is, say

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure center or a pain center of the brain,

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to a more nuanced understanding that well, it's not a

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>center so much as a network. Yeah, neuroscience is one

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of those things that's just not very friendly to amateur interpretation,

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's something neither of us are neuroscientists, so we

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>have to do our best to just sort through the

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>science and what people have written about it and try

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to make sense of it. But you know, neuroscience is

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those things where it's almost never as simple

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>as that headline you read. It's true, I get to

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>kick out of a juicy neuroscience clickbait headline almost as

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>as much as the black hole headlines. You always see

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>something that's like, you know, brains God worship center activates

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>when you view pizza or something. You know, you see

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>those kind of studies and it's like that that can

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of conveys something that's kind of true, but it's

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to be really that simple. So anyway, hind,

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I think those are very good concerns to raise. All right,

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>here's another one. This one comes to us from Matia,

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and this one concerns are I believe our our Phartonomicon episode. Hi,

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Robert and Joe, first time email writer, here, a long

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>time listener. In your most recent mail bag episode, it

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>would have been I guess the one before this you

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about Pathagoras and his comments on fava beans. I

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>never thought beans, that's right, because that was basically his

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>whole deal, as he hated beans and said he should

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>not eat them. It's not his whole deal, not his

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>whole deal obviously, but it was it seemed to be

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of some importance to Yeah, um, he said, As she continues,

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I never thought about the connection between the Greek numa

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and flatulence. It makes a lot of sense and adds

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot to pathagoras maniacal sect. Now, just to refresh, sorry,

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.479
<v Speaker 1>the idea of the connection between the numa and flatulence

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is that numa usually means breath. It's also funny enough

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the word for like spirit or ghosts, So you have

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 1>like the Holy Spirit being a numa, and then you

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>could breathe out a numa, but then also what would

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>be another kind of numa? Well, but the factors is

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>arguing here that you could essentially fart out your own soul. Yeah, okay,

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 1>that that's the basic ideas I interpreted, She continues. However,

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>there is a more widespread explanation for pythagoras take on

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>fava beans. A common mutation among Mediterranean people is G

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>six p D deficiency, which causes severe anemia upon exposure

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to certain compounds, including antimalarial drugs, the antibiotic bactrum, and

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>guess what, fava beans. The condition is commonly known as

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 1>father is um because of this effect. Ever, the flamboyant

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to explainer path Agoras observed this condition and prohibited his

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>followers from eating these beans, which were said to contain

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the soul of the dead. Keep up the great work.

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>There is no podcast like yours. The Soul of the

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Dead in beans. Yeah, I didn't, I didn't make it

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>to that part. So well, thank you. My son is

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>distrustful of beans, that really. Yeah, and uh, and maybe

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that's why he knows deep down that they may contain

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>the souls of the dead. Have they wronged him? No?

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>He just they betrayed him. He just sometimes it's hard

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to get him excited about beans. I don't know why.

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I fort for a kid who has has sworn off

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>most meats, it would benefit him tremendously to be just

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>all in on beans. But it's been an uphill battle.

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>You know. You say he's into shellfish though, right, Oh, yes,

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>she shellfish and beans don't really go together. It's true,

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe that said he deep down he knows that his

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite his favorite foods don't really work that well with that.

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know, on the other hand, I have had

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>some wonderful like shrimp dishes that I think incorporate some

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>forms of beans. Oh yeah, I guess guess now that

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I think about it. I mean not kidney beans obviously,

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>but not fava beans. We all know that fava beans

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>go best with human liver in kianti. But but but,

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, hilarity aside. This is an interesting argument, the

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>idea that there could be something else at play here

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>besides just mere superstition and far diversion. Right. Hey, speaking

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of goddesses, we've got an email from Athena at least

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that's her name is from Athena on on piss Myers.

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>You remember crazy ants and when we we discovered the

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>meaning of piss Myers. Uh so, yeah, Athena writes, Hi,

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I've been listening to your show for a little while

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and I enjoy it. I was listening to your show

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>on crazy ants, and it's a topic very familiar having

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>grown up in Texas. When you mentioned piss myers, I

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>had to write in. My mother used that term to

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>describe a specific ant that was around our home in

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 1>South Texas, Victoria. They indeed smelled like their name suggests.

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>A single aunt didn't smell, but the aunt hill sure did.

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>On a side note, if I my siblings were misbehaving,

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>she would call us pissmire's. Well that's well, that's great.

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 1>We have to hear a little, little, little little field

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>wisdom on the pissmer's here. Now, I wonder if the

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>ant doesn't smell like the name suggests, but the ant

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>mound does. Why is that? Is it just because a

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>single ant doesn't put off enough for us to detect,

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to have a lot of them in

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:25.239
<v Speaker 1>a close proximity, or is it because I don't know,

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>if something else, something else in the mound. Do they

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>secrete stuff? In the mound. Yeah, I guess it without

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>actually looking into it. My my, my, my guests would

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 1>be the former that it's just the fact that you

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>have so many ants in one area at a time

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to you know, create a strong or

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a roma because these are not like leaf cutter ants

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>or not cultivating anything in there. So anyway, I admire

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the harshness of your mother, by the way, I think

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it's good. I mean, normally you just call your kid,

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>you say you're being a brad or you're being a

0:20:57.400 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>baby or something. But now you're saying like you're being

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you social insect that produces urine like smells, Well that

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of like children, except that you show you

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>social part. They do produce produce the smell of urine

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>sometimes and that can't be helped. Maybe we should take

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 1>a break. Are you ready? Let's do it? All right,

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll be right back. Thank you. All right, we're back.

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 1>We're still on the bottom of the ocean. We're still

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>trapped in the submarine with Carney, and he is dishing

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>out some listener mail for us to read. So are

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you ready for this epic email we got from jess Er.

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's have it. Yeah, Now, Jesser is a pseudonym, and

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know their pronouns, so I'm just gonna go

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.719
<v Speaker 1>with they. Uh So, Jesser writes in to say, hey, guys,

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>since you were talking about sci fi stories with a

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.239
<v Speaker 1>focus on Venus, I thought you might like to know

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>about the book Radiance by Catherine M. Valente. It's an

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Art Deco styled sci fi novel set in a world

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>where early twentieth century depictions of space travel we're true,

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and you really can shoot yourself in a bullet to

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the moon. It's also about the history of movie making

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in a way, and one of the main conflicts is

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a documentary that went awry on the surface of Venus.

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a really interesting book because it takes a nonlinear

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>epistolary approach to telling its story. You know, in a way,

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 1>you could look at the Soviet veneera Landers as a

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 1>documentary that went awry on the surface of business, but

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>also dys or continues. I also recently listened to the

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>episodes on the Bicameral Mind and it brought to mind

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>one particularly old text I studied in school, called The

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Instruction of Annie. It comes from about fourteen hundred to

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>twelve hundred BC, sometime during the eighteenth dynasty of Egypt,

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>and it's a moral code written in the form of

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>advice from father to son. It came to mind particularly

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>because it's both quite old and because it has a

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>number of things you wouldn't expect to hear from a

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>bicamerally minded people. Instructions against lying and being sneaky, for instance.

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>It even ends with what's basically a debate between the

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>son and the father about why the instructions should be

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>fall load, though Julian James would probably just say maybe

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Egyptians lost by cameralism early. Uh maybe, or I don't know.

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I I could look at that and say, okay, I

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>already don't agree that the bi cameral mind is correct,

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>despite how interesting it is, but that could be a

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>good piece of evidence against it. Yeah, I agree it. Yeah,

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it kind of depends where you how you want to

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>cherry pick it. Really, Um, I do like the the

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>idea that that Ye James might have have argued that, well,

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the case of of by of the modern

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>mind uh emerging early on uh in one of our

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>most ancient civilizations. But but who knows. Yeah, In his defense,

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he would say that, you know, the process

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>was gradual, and it happened in different places and not

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>not all exactly at the same time. But then again,

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you could look at that as a weakness of the hypothesis,

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>because if if, if a hypothesis is too accommodating, you know,

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're shaping it to accommodate too many different kind

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of evidence, that's often a sign that you're, you know,

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you're trying to cover your butt really right,

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, you get into this area where okay, am

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I talking about an actual hypothesis at this point? Where

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>am I talking about something that is ultimately more philosophic

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>or even religious in form uh? And I think their

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>their value in those things as well. I've said before,

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like my fascination with bi cameral mind at

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>times fulfills the needs of religion for me personally, you know.

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's like almost like a novel you love or something. Yeah, yeah,

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>it uh, it fills in some of the sort of

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess, uh, teleological holes and my understanding of humans.

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, the idea of like a father and son

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>having this conversation, I do like the idea of a

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>father saying, look, son, all these other people are not

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly like us. You're gonna be tempted to lie to

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>these pe zombies because they're gonna believe you. But we

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>we just can't live like that having that sort of

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a conversation. Man, I'm imagining what it is like to

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>be a modern human among bicameral humans. Um. That's one

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 1>of the issues that Terence Hawkins got into in his

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>book or The Rage of Achilles. Oh yeah, yeah, I

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>still mean to read that, by the way. Yeah, it's

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>quite good. I'll probably go into depth more about that

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in our upcoming UM Summer Reading episode. Alright, so we

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 1>should go on with Jesser's email. So Jesser says regarding

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the recent episode on the relationship between gender roles and language,

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and that would be on the alphabet versus the Goddess episode.

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I actually took a class on gender roles in the

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>ancient world in college, the theory of the origin of

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>gender roles. I learned there had to do with the

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>division of labor and hunter gatherer society. So that's somewhat

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>along the same lines as Shlane's ideas in hunter gatherer societies.

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>In the modern era, it seems like the profitability of

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>hunting versus gathering roughly determines the relative balance of male

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>versus female power. If there's little vegetation to be found,

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>hunting is more important and men have more power vice versa.

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>If there's little game, and in places where both are abundant,

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>roles are roughly equal. Assuming that the same held true

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in ancient hunter gatherer societies, you can construct a rough

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>conceptual history where women would have been the first to

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>develop agriculture since they spent more time with plants, while

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>men would have been the first to developed animal husbandry

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>since they spent more time with animals. The fact that

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you can use animals to massively simplify agriculture could suggest

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>that that's where the shift to male dominated societies came from.

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>The men who can harness the most animal power to

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>produce the most surplus crops would be able to leverage

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that to gain political power. Of course, this is only

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>one theory in anyone theory may not be broadly applicable,

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>considering in how many places the patriarchal sedentary societies emerged,

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>but it's interesting to consider the ramifications of an early

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 1>sex based division of labor. Yeah, I think that's an

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting possibility, maybe worth more of a look and to

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>see what the evidence is. Yeah, of course. It makes

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.719
<v Speaker 1>me think a lot about the domestication of animals, and

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of an animal by animal breakdown about

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>how it occurred. You know, like, for instance, the dog

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and cat model that I've seen preson it sometimes where

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>they essentially wander up to the campfire or the habitat.

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>In these cases, it seems like it would be the

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>non hunters who would be sort of on point for

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>domestication of where, of course it would be. It would

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>probably be different if it was you know, if you're

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about some sort of an ancient cow or a rock, well, yeah,

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about animals that aid in agricultural production,

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you'd be talking about like large draft animals well, or pigs. Yeah, yeah,

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that's worth looking into. Yeah, or Stegosaurus is

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, yeah, Cambodian model. U that's I'm not serious

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that by the way, but these we we're advocating flint stones,

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>is I'm care from now on? Yes, think to the

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>flint stones. They had so many different domestic roles for

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the animals. How did that happen. We need a strong

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis for that as well. Okay, Jesser has some more

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting stuff. So Jesser says, also since I'm an Egyptologist,

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 1>first mentioned of this, by the way, but Yesser is

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 1>an Egyptologist. Apparently, I've had a couple of facts come

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to mind as I've listened to various episodes that might

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 1>be interesting. First of all, in comparison to other religions,

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>ancient Egyptian religion has an interesting inversion from the standard

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>notion of Sky Father and Earth Mother as primordial gods.

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, we mentioned a lot of religions have that,

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and Yesser gives some examples e g. Gaya and Ranos

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and Greek myth Rangonui and Papa tuan Nuku in Maori myth. Uh.

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, continues saying that Egyptian religion had a sky

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>mother newt she even births the sun god every morning

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in an Earth father geb. Okay, next point, yes, or

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>makes Egyptian religion has a couple of creation myths. As

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>far as scholars can tell, this was not really a

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>problem to ancient Egyptian priests. They have some similarities. Often

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>involving some sort of primordial mound and some act of

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>self creation to start the cosmos. But they involve wildly

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>different sets of gods and varied between regions. Yet there

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>never seems to be any effort to unify or standardize

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the mythology. I think that's kind of interesting, like a

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:36.719
<v Speaker 1>lack of the cannon impulse. Yeah, they're the cinematic universe impulse, right, Uh.

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Next point, part of the purpose behind the creation of

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>mummies was basically to turn the body into a statue.

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>The opening of the mouth. Rituals used to turn the

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>mummy into a ritually charged object that the deceased person's

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>spirit could inhabit are similar to the rituals used for

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>cult statues for temples of the gods, which were similarly

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>meant to enable the gods to inhabit the statue and

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to consume offerings. Egyptians had some interesting views on gender relations.

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>For example, they thought that in terms of reproduction, women

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>were basically empty vessels and that men provided all the

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>important elements. This is not a unique view of right, yeah,

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean it ends up being reflected in the spermest

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that we discussed and fairly recent episode It's kind of

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>not surprising that throughout history a lot of men have

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>decided that, oh, it's men who are actually the the

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the only important part. But Yesser continues, while that sounds

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>rough on women, it meant women were never really blamed

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>for not being able to bear children. It was entirely

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the man's fault. It's interesting they were also pretty relaxed

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>about marriage. To premarital sex seems not to have been

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a big deal, and marriage itself was more of a

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>legal slash economic arrangement than a religious one. Women could

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>even initiate a divorce if they wanted to. This is

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>more recommendation. But the book The Woman Who Would Be King,

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>which is a biography of hatchup Sets life by Professor Karakoon,

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>has a really good scholarly exploration of Egyptian society that

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a good read. Lastly, I thought the story

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of inegaldy Nana would be your sort of thing. Essentially,

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>archaeologists were excavating a palace during the Neo Babylonian Empire

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>when they came across a bunch of artifacts from different

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>places in much earlier times, all collected in one part

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of the palace. It turns out they'd stumbled onto a

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>museum of artifacts from earlier Mesopotamian civilizations, curated by the

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Neo Babylonian princess inegaldy Nana, complete with Cunea form seals

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>for each artifact like modern museum labels. Also, her museum

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>dates to about a hundred years before Herodotus quote invented

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the study of history. Goes to show you what good

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>publicity can do, and then yes or apologizes for the

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>length of all this. Uh says they wanted to keep

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>adding one more interesting idea before sending off, Thank you

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>so much for this email. This is great. Yeah, yeah,

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I I they They really managed to pack a lot

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>in here, all right. This one comes to us from Nile.

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Hi Nile from Santa Fe, New Mexico. Really enjoy the

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>show's first time writing. When you were talking about life

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>on a nuclear submarine, it reminded me of of when

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I worked for Xerox in Los Angeles. I asked my

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>district manager, what was the weirdest service call you ever did?

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>He said, he installed a Xerox ten ninety copier on

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear submarine. Why do you need to make copies

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 1>on a submarine. I think, well, we'll get to that.

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>So he had to take it apart and cut the

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>frame with a torch to get it through the doors,

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>weld it back together and get it functioning. If you

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>look it up, you will see that it is a

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 1>very large copier. I asked him, why on earth would

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they want such a such a huge copier in a

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>nuclear submarine. He said, are you kidding? You have to

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>have a form too, in triplicate to take a dump

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in the navy. Uh. It makes me think that the

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>modern day nuclear submarine is a lot roomy, or the

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we might think. As for the focusing of the eyes

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and the confined environment. Once I was picking a friend

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>up from prison, which tells you the kind of friends

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I have. He had been in a small, combined room

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>for six months, and when he got in my car

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in New Mexico with vast landscapes, the first thing he

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>talked about was the focusing of his eyes on the

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>distant horizon. It really freaked him out and he had

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a hard time adjusting. Thanks for everything you do. Keep

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 1>up the good work. Wow, that that's kind of scary

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to hear there at the end. It makes me think

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>prisoners should definitely be given windows, right, Yeah, yeah, definitely.

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, also, we've we've discussed on the show before

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>just how horrible solitary confinement is as a form of

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 1>essentially a neurological torture. Uh. It does a lot of

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>terrible things to the mind. Uh, And we didn't but

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we even really got into what it

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>might do to your your visual perception. But mainly, I

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>just love the idea of a giant xerox machine cut

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>apart art and then reassembled aboard a nuclear submarine just

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>for bureaucratic purposes. I looked it up. It looks kind

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 1>of like Sideways refrigerator with some little like droid embellishments. Yeah,

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a cross between the Sideways refrigerator and R two

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>D two. It's we really need more xeroxes in our

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>especially our sci fi underwater environments. Like when I think

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>back on The Abyss or Leviathan Deep Star six, what

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>these films really lack was that was a proper xerox seeing. Yeah,

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>they're they're making copies six pack from Leviathan, making copies

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:35.879
<v Speaker 1>That would have been perfect. Oh, he'd be the kind

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of guy who had xerox his own posterior. Oh yeah,

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:41.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, there has to be an eleaded scene

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 1>now that I think about it, you know, I must

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>say Carney is very excited now that we're getting to

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 1>the email about submarines. He must be really enjoying his

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>new job. Well yeah, and I mean he's a little

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:54.320
<v Speaker 1>lonely down here, so he could use a xerox machine

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to hang out with oh as a friend. Yeah, yeah,

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.439
<v Speaker 1>so it looks like he is excitedly giving us more

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:03.359
<v Speaker 1>submarine related email. Yes. In fact, this one, this next

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>one comes to us from an old friend, frequent long

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>like long time UH listener mail participant Jim, Jim and

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey Man. He writes some great emails. And this

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>is another good one. Jim rights, Robert and Joe. I've

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.799
<v Speaker 1>seen dost Boot twice and been on a German U

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>boat twice too, but only in a museum. The U. S.

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Navy captured German U boat you five oh five during

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:29.720
<v Speaker 1>World War Two. It's a museum attraction at the Museum

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 1>of Science and Industry in Chicago. I wish I'd been

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>to that last time we were in Chicago. I'd like

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to go sometimes. Yeah, well, the next time. Yeah, anyway,

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Jim continues, I haven't seen the movie or been to

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the museum in years, but from what I recall, I

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 1>visited the museum in two successive summers and saw the

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>movie in between those two visits. So you watch it

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 1>twice in a year. This is kind of obsessive behavior, Jim,

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:55.760
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. It's a great film, dost boot, It's

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it's It's not like seeing Deep Star six twice in

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the same year, Jim rights. My memory is that the

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:04.720
<v Speaker 1>movie set and match the sub very well. The movie

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>features several scenes at the captain's office, his bunk, and

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the officer's mess. Uh. These are all the same small

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the sub, which is not obvious from initial

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>viewing in the movie, but more apparent once you see

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>slash you know it. The space isn't much more than

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a nook along the sub's main passageway where there's a

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:24.760
<v Speaker 1>small bunk for the captain. There's a small table next

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 1>to it. I can't remember if it's bolted down or

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it flips down like a murphy bed. The captain

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is sitting on his bunk while in his quote office,

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>several officers are sitting on the bunk during meals too.

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if that would mess with you psychologically, like

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>if you had to conduct your official managerial duties in

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:45.919
<v Speaker 1>your office from your bed. Well, certainly, I guess it's

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>if it's slightly transformed, it might be a little different.

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, meetings, meetings on beds are always weird. M Well,

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>but we I say that we've had a few of

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>these when we're on on trips doing live show. God,

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>You're right, it's all is weird. Yeah, you don't really

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 1>have a we never have like a conference room to

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>go to. I guess it's like a business area most hotels.

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>But if we're like running through the presentation, yeah, it

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 1>generally ends up like two or three of us setting

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:14.799
<v Speaker 1>on one of the beds that were in the room

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that we're staying in. Yeah. Yeah, it's like, Hey, Robert

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>comes in on my bed, let's talk about h H. Holmes.

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:23.360
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, next time you're in a tense meeting with

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:26.280
<v Speaker 1>your manager, just imagine they're sitting on their bed and

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that'll undercut it. Anyway, getting back to this,

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the tour when I was on it consisted of walking

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 1>through the three middle sections of the sub and you

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>can look into the four and aft sections too. Holes

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>had been cut into the hull so you don't need

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to go up and down ladders. We could look up

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 1>into the conning tower too. It didn't feel too cramped

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>until we were told it was sixty men for ninety

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>days with one toilet. Technically there were two toilets, but

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 1>one was a food storage locker. When they first left port,

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 1>there was one fairly small stove right across from the

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>captain's nook. The cook had to produce a hundred and

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:07.279
<v Speaker 1>eighty meals a day from it. I like how the

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 1>second toilet is sort of like an achievement that they

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>unlocked through just through eating a food, and like eventually

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.840
<v Speaker 1>they come to that point where it's like, congratulations, survived

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 1>this long and you get another toilet. We have a

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 1>second toilet. Oh, and I guess it was incentive structures maybe,

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>but you know, the captain pulled weight on that. It

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.399
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh, then the new toilets available. Well, I'm

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>up because I've been waiting days for this. That's my

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>office now. Is it weirder to to conduct meetings from

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a bed or from a toilet? From a toilet certainly. Yeah,

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Like even if you're not actually like using the toilet,

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:46.319
<v Speaker 1>if you're just setting up on it as if it

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>were a chair, that it's got to be a little strange.

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Jim continues. The German Navy had a requirement that their

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 1>boats had to go from surface to periscope level and

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 1>under a minute. This was to hide from patrols. They

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>would often drill this, and they do in the movie

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite scenes, as the dive alarm sounds,

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the off duty seamen run to the front of the boat,

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:10.319
<v Speaker 1>becoming human ballast to help the nose of the sub

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 1>dive underwater faster. That that is, that is messed up.

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>You shouldn't be using the Oh my god. No, I

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>mean it drives home the extreme environment and you know

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:24.399
<v Speaker 1>the limits of the technology. Yeah, I mean it makes

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.320
<v Speaker 1>me think of like those stunt car scenes in movies

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:29.839
<v Speaker 1>where somebody gets the car up on two wheels by

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>like turning and leaning real hard. Yeah. Generally, we just

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 1>want to be passengers in our vehicles and not some

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:38.879
<v Speaker 1>component in its functionality. Right. It's like imagine next time

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 1>you're on an airplane and the captains like, all right,

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>we need to get ready for landing, So everybody please

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:47.240
<v Speaker 1>move up to the front of the plane. Yeah, nobody

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>wants to hear that, all right? If one comes to

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>us from William, William writes, thanks for the podcast makes

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>my long bus commute more bearable. Two things related to

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the Sleep and Creativity podcast. First of all, you mentioned

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 1>a future for hotels where they may be able to

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:06.800
<v Speaker 1>teach languages, etcetera while you're asleep. Maybe I'm just cynical,

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>but I suspect the more likely use will be advertising.

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Think of the money they could make selling dream space

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to advertisers. That's the thing in Futurama, isn't it It is.

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a scene where where Fry is first subjected to

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>advertising in his dream and he's he's he's outraged over

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and he says, but you know, back in my day

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:29.280
<v Speaker 1>we only had advertisements like on the street, on TV

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and in the sky, but never in our dreams. But no,

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, I think it's perfect, doesn't he Like?

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:38.319
<v Speaker 1>He has the he's at school in his underwear dream,

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 1>but then it's like very stylish underwear and it's trying

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to sell him on it. Yeah, yeah, Futurama touched on it.

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 1>This listener Mail touches on it as well, that if

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 1>we open up a new place in our experience of

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>reality where advertising could potentially grow, then we will find

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a way to grow it there. He continues, I have

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>four kids, and before they were born, I very rarely

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 1>had bad dreams, but at least once for each of them,

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I've dreamt about something horrible and tragic happening to them.

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it stems from anxiety about their well

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 1>being or a way of my mind trying to identify

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 1>the best way to protect them. Creativity imparirenting. Perhaps could

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:24.720
<v Speaker 1>dreaming be a survival mechanism in which one's mind draws

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 1>on extreme scenarios for things that could happen in everyday

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:30.760
<v Speaker 1>life and create ways to address them, Like did ancient

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>people dream of creative ways to hunt or what to

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>do if the mammoth suddenly turns on them? The person

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 1>who dreamed of of a solution got away, while the

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 1>one who didn't was trampled. I mean, I think that's

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 1>an extremely compelling way of explaining the emergence of the imagination.

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Why do we have an imagination? I mean, that's a

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:54.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of strange thing. Do you think lizards have an imagination.

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean maybe even it seems kind of unlikely. Uh

0:41:57.840 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 1>we it seems pretty clear to me. We have an

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>imagination as a way of simulating scenarios without having to

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:07.400
<v Speaker 1>test them out, Like you can imagine what would happen

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 1>based on what you know, and that allows you to

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 1>simulate something stupid that you might be about to do

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and then realize it's stupid and you shouldn't do it.

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:19.839
<v Speaker 1>But that that applies to waking imagination. So how did

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:23.239
<v Speaker 1>dreams change that? Yeah, I believe that's that's still an

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:25.320
<v Speaker 1>open question, but it's certainly one. It is addressed in

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 1>some of these models that we've looked at. Yeah. Yeah.

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 1>In the in the episode where we talked about the

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 1>usefulness or the potential usefulness of dreams, one idea is

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that the dreams that dreams, by sort of suppressing the

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 1>part of your brain that sensors thought, allow you to

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 1>explore much wilder types of imaginative scenarios, things that you

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 1>would never go to in your waking life, and that

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 1>might be useful as a way of sort of like

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:55.319
<v Speaker 1>increasing the mutation rate of thought experiments, you know it,

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>doing stuff that your normal waking brain would never bother

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to try eye out right, Yeah, exactly. I guess it's

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of it ends up being becoming kind of complicated though,

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 1>when you have when you seem to have some sort

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of simulation that is also just clothed in sort of

0:43:11.800 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous and garbled dream imagery. Yeah, and and unreality. Man,

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that is a weird thing to think about dreams. I mean,

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're saying that the imagination is useful because it

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 1>helps you simulate scenarios and and figure out what to

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:28.240
<v Speaker 1>do in the real world, why do we have dreams

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>where we simulate scenarios that were saying the laws of

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:34.319
<v Speaker 1>physics don't apply, like you can fly and stuff like that.

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 1>That that just seems like that might not be be

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:39.359
<v Speaker 1>actually useful if you're trying to simulate stuff that could

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:41.839
<v Speaker 1>happen in your life. Well, unless it's more about sort

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 1>of very basic synaptic connections, you know. It's it's it's

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like the idea of here, here's a game you're

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 1>going to play, but the game is preparing you for

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 1>some sort of combat scenario, you know, um where you

0:43:57.400 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>know the basic skills involved or per have some so

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:03.479
<v Speaker 1>in neural connections involved. U match up to the real

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 1>life experience as well as the fantastic experience that you're

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>actually engaging in your mind during dreams. Yeah, I think

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you're somewhat right. I mean, I wouldn't be say I'm

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 1>fully convinced by the model, but there's something to be

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 1>said for the fact that dreams spur you to go

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to places with your brain that you wouldn't normally go to,

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:27.719
<v Speaker 1>and as such, they might often produce imaginative scenarios that

0:44:27.760 --> 0:44:30.719
<v Speaker 1>are not very useful to you, but occasionally produced some

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 1>very valuable breakthrough. You know, they might be like higher risk,

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:39.319
<v Speaker 1>higher reward types of imagination use. You know, I have

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:41.279
<v Speaker 1>to admit that I don't think I've ever had a

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:45.839
<v Speaker 1>dream that I remember um or a nightmare rather in

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>which something bad has happened to my son. The only

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:50.440
<v Speaker 1>thing that comes to mind is I did have a

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 1>dream once where I went to wake him up and

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:58.880
<v Speaker 1>like the next morning and he was a teenager. Like

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like he, you know, grown up overnight, which is

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>this is something bad that happened to your son. That

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 1>counts well, but it also seems it's like a very

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 1>simplistic dream extension of the idea of like, oh, I

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:14.359
<v Speaker 1>don't want to miss you know, my child growing up,

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 1>or or oh, my child is not going to be

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you know this young forever, that sort of thing. It's

0:45:20.040 --> 0:45:23.240
<v Speaker 1>almost like the dream is an internal poem that uses

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 1>metaphors and imagery to to inspire you to behave in

0:45:27.120 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>certain ways. Yeah, that's often a very like stupid, poorly,

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:35.759
<v Speaker 1>poorly constructed poem, but it's more Yeah, but you feel them.

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is again I'm talking about the general

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 1>nature of dreams here that I think everyone can relate to. Uh,

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:45.319
<v Speaker 1>In for instance, the nightmare. How many times have you

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:49.360
<v Speaker 1>had a nightmare that was just absolutely just terrifying and

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you just woke up and you know, maybe woke up screaming,

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 1>or woke up on the verge of tears, or just

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 1>racked with anxiety, And then when you try to explain

0:45:57.239 --> 0:46:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it to you know, your significant other or or someone

0:46:00.520 --> 0:46:04.399
<v Speaker 1>else in the waking day, you just then realize how

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:07.840
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous it is. Just how you know that all the

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 1>fear that you experienced in the dream is completely absent

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:16.919
<v Speaker 1>when you just reduce it to a description of events. Well,

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:19.879
<v Speaker 1>you're much more emotionally vulnerable in dreams, aren't you. Yeah,

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And you're free from like the logical constraints, like Roger

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Rabbit isn't scary and there's no reason he would be

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 1>chasing me with a mallet. But within the confines of

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:32.799
<v Speaker 1>the nightmare, that doesn't matter. All that is, all that

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is real is the the emotion in the experience. Also,

0:46:36.360 --> 0:46:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I say that, but Roger Rapp is kind of terrifying

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:40.839
<v Speaker 1>when you really think about it. Yeah, a little bit. Yeah,

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 1>all right. This next one comes to us from Jessica.

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Jessica says, Hello, I just finished an older episode about

0:46:47.200 --> 0:46:50.720
<v Speaker 1>laughing during horror movies, and I thought it was incredibly interesting,

0:46:50.800 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 1>especially the science and research about laughing and smiling. There

0:46:54.160 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 1>was one phenomenon I found myself pondering over and wanted

0:46:57.120 --> 0:47:00.239
<v Speaker 1>to know more about. Why do people I'm generalized, but

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:04.399
<v Speaker 1>often men like to tell other people women to smile more.

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 1>This is something that comes up in culture a lot.

0:47:06.800 --> 0:47:11.319
<v Speaker 1>I've read a lot about this. Um Jessica writes. I'm

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a woman and I can't tell you how many times

0:47:13.400 --> 0:47:16.439
<v Speaker 1>throughout my schooling, both high school and college, and even

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:18.799
<v Speaker 1>in the professional workplace, I get told I need to

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 1>smile more by male colleagues, or I'm told by female

0:47:22.200 --> 0:47:25.760
<v Speaker 1>coworkers that I have the dreaded quote resting bitch face.

0:47:27.280 --> 0:47:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to put myself on a pedestal here,

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:32.960
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think I've ever asked anyone to smile more,

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:35.800
<v Speaker 1>not not out not out of any sense of nobility

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:37.640
<v Speaker 1>or anything, but just because I really don't want to

0:47:37.680 --> 0:47:40.360
<v Speaker 1>see anyone's teeth. I just tell people to wipe that

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 1>grin off their face. I I just think I don't

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:47.440
<v Speaker 1>want to look at anyone's like mouth bones. You know,

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:51.839
<v Speaker 1>it's no matter how gorgeous or ghastly. Uh you know

0:47:51.920 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 1>what you have there. Uh, you know may happen to be.

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I I just I'm find not seeing them. Never forget

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:01.360
<v Speaker 1>your teeth or outside bones. Yeah, yeah, I just I

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:03.719
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily need to see more of them. However much,

0:48:04.160 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever dental display you're presenting currently is the appropriate dental display,

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:11.319
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not going to ask you to give me

0:48:11.360 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 1>more of it. I'm sorry, I'll try to smile less. No, no, no,

0:48:13.840 --> 0:48:16.719
<v Speaker 1>you're you're doing the right amount. But it's it's one

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of those things where it's I'm not gonna look at

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 1>someone and say, like, how well you know, I like

0:48:21.160 --> 0:48:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Joe but I wish I could see more of the

0:48:22.840 --> 0:48:25.279
<v Speaker 1>inside of his mouth. I wish I could see more

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of his teeth. You know, it's I don't know, Maybe

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm not I don't worship the smile in

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:34.239
<v Speaker 1>the same way that that is certainly American culture wants

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:36.760
<v Speaker 1>us to worship the smile to sort of Tom Cruise

0:48:36.880 --> 0:48:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood smile. You know that's the color of bleached bone. Yeah,

0:48:41.800 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it just looks like my soul is hungry. Uh. Anyway,

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:49.239
<v Speaker 1>moving on, So is it an aura of unfriendliness that

0:48:49.280 --> 0:48:51.840
<v Speaker 1>turns people off? Or is there another reason that people

0:48:51.880 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like those around them to be smiling all the time,

0:48:54.400 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 1>especially if smiling is usually a sign of humor or

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable nous. Because I can tell you when someone tells

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 1>me to smile, if ever I do, it's not a

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:05.840
<v Speaker 1>friendly one. I was wondering if you had come across

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:08.439
<v Speaker 1>any discussions of these situations and your research, the good

0:49:08.440 --> 0:49:11.320
<v Speaker 1>point me in the right direction for some further reading.

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good question that might be something

0:49:13.680 --> 0:49:16.360
<v Speaker 1>worth revisiting. I do wonder, and this is again this

0:49:16.440 --> 0:49:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is without any research at this point, but I wonder

0:49:19.600 --> 0:49:21.920
<v Speaker 1>if there are any arguments to be made for the

0:49:22.000 --> 0:49:26.120
<v Speaker 1>human spile, smile, especially serving as some sort of reproductive

0:49:26.160 --> 0:49:30.200
<v Speaker 1>signal of reproductive fitness to say, like, look at my smile.

0:49:30.560 --> 0:49:35.000
<v Speaker 1>My my teeth are healthy. Therefore I am a healthy mate.

0:49:35.239 --> 0:49:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Though it probably on top of that you could make

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the argument that it takes on all these various socioeconomic

0:49:41.160 --> 0:49:44.840
<v Speaker 1>um uh complications as well in modern culture, because the

0:49:44.840 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 1>smile is is a way of saying, look, how uh

0:49:48.640 --> 0:49:52.719
<v Speaker 1>abnormally white my teeth are. Look how abnormally straight my

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 1>teeth are. Clearly I am someone of some means and refinement, right,

0:49:57.200 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I I've paid doctors to make me this way. My

0:49:59.560 --> 0:50:02.239
<v Speaker 1>soul is hungry. But again that's just off the top

0:50:02.280 --> 0:50:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of my head. Yeah, and another thing I know, actually

0:50:05.160 --> 0:50:07.160
<v Speaker 1>just saw a headline about this the other day is

0:50:07.360 --> 0:50:11.960
<v Speaker 1>um the idea that smiling has different meanings in different cultures.

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Like there's this whole idea of the Russian smile. Right,

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 1>does the Russian smile mean the same thing that the

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:21.320
<v Speaker 1>American smile does? Or do these expressions actually have different

0:50:21.480 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 1>valences within the culture. Yeah, we'll have to we we

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:25.960
<v Speaker 1>have to come back to this. I know we've we've

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:29.359
<v Speaker 1>recorded episodes in the past on the you know sort

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of the fake smile and how you can tell a

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:33.279
<v Speaker 1>fake smile from a real smile, that sort of thing.

0:50:33.320 --> 0:50:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, it's it's such a it's it's such

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:40.200
<v Speaker 1>an important aspect of the human experience. It would you

0:50:40.200 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 1>could do with some revisiting. Yeah, But also Jessica allows

0:50:43.000 --> 0:50:44.920
<v Speaker 1>us to be a voice of encouragement. Smile when you

0:50:44.960 --> 0:50:47.279
<v Speaker 1>want to smile, don't smile when you don't want to smile. Yeah,

0:50:47.440 --> 0:50:52.719
<v Speaker 1>that's what everybody. Stretch your face unwillingly. Um. You know,

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 1>my I may mentioned before my my wife is a photographer. Uh.

0:50:56.680 --> 0:50:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And part of being a photographer, of course, is you

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:01.520
<v Speaker 1>know sometimes you're you're asking people to do different things

0:51:01.560 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 1>with their face and their posture. Uh. My son observes

0:51:05.200 --> 0:51:07.319
<v Speaker 1>all of this, and then when when when he has

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 1>given a camera, he will do like the five or

0:51:10.200 --> 0:51:12.400
<v Speaker 1>six year old version of it. So he'll point a

0:51:12.440 --> 0:51:15.719
<v Speaker 1>camera at me and say all right, stand stand up

0:51:15.760 --> 0:51:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. And then they'll say, okay, let me

0:51:17.920 --> 0:51:21.640
<v Speaker 1>see your teeth. Show me show me your teeth like

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:26.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a dentist getting out the drill. Yeah, And I'm like, no, no,

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:28.480
<v Speaker 1>this this is enough. I'm not showing you any more teeth.

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, I have one here. This is coming to

0:51:30.719 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 1>us from David and this is one of a few

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:36.520
<v Speaker 1>different messages that came in via the discussion module, which

0:51:36.560 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is it's the Stuff to Blow your Mind discussion module.

0:51:39.440 --> 0:51:43.399
<v Speaker 1>It is our Facebook group where you can have conversations

0:51:43.400 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and discuss topics with other listeners of the show and

0:51:46.680 --> 0:51:49.360
<v Speaker 1>then also sometimes with with with with Joe and me

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 1>as well and anyway. David writes in and says in

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the Finite and Infinite Games episode, there was a discussion

0:51:57.040 --> 0:52:00.879
<v Speaker 1>of what happens in sports, in particular football when they

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:03.640
<v Speaker 1>can't break a tie. I think that ended with us saying,

0:52:03.719 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 1>now we know we're about to get a lot of

0:52:05.080 --> 0:52:07.799
<v Speaker 1>listener mail where people explain the rules of football to us,

0:52:07.840 --> 0:52:10.399
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't happen. Well, this was the only one.

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:12.480
<v Speaker 1>He started this one by saying you knew this was coming.

0:52:12.600 --> 0:52:15.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that was the title of response. He says,

0:52:15.640 --> 0:52:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I am from Sydney, Australia and our football or rugby

0:52:18.360 --> 0:52:21.320
<v Speaker 1>league has had some really long games. In the seventies,

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>there were two Grand Finals final games to determine the

0:52:24.719 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>champion that finished in a draw and the game was replayed,

0:52:28.400 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 1>but The game I wanted you to know about was

0:52:30.520 --> 0:52:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a second grade grand final played before the main first

0:52:34.160 --> 0:52:36.960
<v Speaker 1>grade game a few years ago. They change what happens

0:52:36.960 --> 0:52:40.280
<v Speaker 1>in a draw. The teams played the whole eighty minutes

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and had a draw. The rules stated that they played

0:52:43.080 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 1>five minutes extra time, then if no one scored, uh,

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:50.719
<v Speaker 1>they change ends and play on until someone scores. The

0:52:50.840 --> 0:52:53.600
<v Speaker 1>game went to the full five minutes uh, and then

0:52:53.640 --> 0:52:56.560
<v Speaker 1>they played another thirty minutes until finally a team scored.

0:52:56.600 --> 0:52:59.120
<v Speaker 1>That is one fifteen minutes in a game that has

0:52:59.480 --> 0:53:03.120
<v Speaker 1>limited placements and some struggle to play the full eighty

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:06.279
<v Speaker 1>It went so long that it interfered with the pregame

0:53:06.320 --> 0:53:09.919
<v Speaker 1>concert entertainment for the main game. In theory, that game

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 1>could have gone on forever, but would always remain a

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:16.400
<v Speaker 1>finite game. Yes it would. I know most will not

0:53:16.560 --> 0:53:18.880
<v Speaker 1>know the sport of rugby league, but it is a

0:53:18.960 --> 0:53:23.000
<v Speaker 1>physically demanding game with limited stoppages. It is played in Australia,

0:53:23.080 --> 0:53:25.960
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand and Britain, with a new team in Canada

0:53:26.040 --> 0:53:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and a test match soon to be played in Denver.

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:31.040
<v Speaker 1>That's probably about the sports eest listener mail you're ever

0:53:31.040 --> 0:53:34.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear on here. No, we might we might receive

0:53:34.200 --> 0:53:37.160
<v Speaker 1>some more. Okay, I know we have. We have sports

0:53:37.200 --> 0:53:40.760
<v Speaker 1>fans out there. Now, we're definitely gonna record at least

0:53:40.760 --> 0:53:44.120
<v Speaker 1>one other listener Mail episode where the entire episode will

0:53:44.160 --> 0:53:46.560
<v Speaker 1>just be people explaining the rules of football to us

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:50.040
<v Speaker 1>after they hear it didn't happen from this one. But

0:53:50.120 --> 0:53:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll leave that for another day. All Right, We're gonna

0:53:52.040 --> 0:53:53.600
<v Speaker 1>take one last break, and then when we come back,

0:53:53.800 --> 0:53:58.400
<v Speaker 1>more listener mail. Thank thank thank, alright, we're back. All right.

0:53:58.400 --> 0:54:01.360
<v Speaker 1>What have we got, Robert? Oh, let's see, Yeah, I

0:54:01.360 --> 0:54:04.840
<v Speaker 1>have some more here. Uh, here's another short message. This

0:54:04.880 --> 0:54:07.920
<v Speaker 1>one comes to us via the discussion module as well. Uh.

0:54:08.200 --> 0:54:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Terrence writes in and says, the recent episode on quantum

0:54:11.600 --> 0:54:14.759
<v Speaker 1>immortality reminded me of a couple of Larry Nevins short

0:54:14.840 --> 0:54:18.360
<v Speaker 1>stories from the late sixties early seventies, All the Myriad

0:54:18.400 --> 0:54:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Ways and for a Foggy Night. The former concerns the

0:54:22.040 --> 0:54:26.879
<v Speaker 1>psychological consequences of the proof of an infinitely branching multiverse

0:54:27.040 --> 0:54:30.200
<v Speaker 1>not good, and the later the possibility of an inadvertent

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:34.520
<v Speaker 1>crossing over between them. So what are the consequences? Have

0:54:34.560 --> 0:54:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you read these? I have not read these? Wow, I

0:54:36.560 --> 0:54:38.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't read them either, so I don't know what to

0:54:38.600 --> 0:54:42.319
<v Speaker 1>say about it, but but appreciate the recommendation. Terrence. Yeah,

0:54:42.400 --> 0:54:44.560
<v Speaker 1>there was some back and forth on the discussion module

0:54:44.600 --> 0:54:47.360
<v Speaker 1>about this from uh, you know, among individuals who have

0:54:47.560 --> 0:54:50.480
<v Speaker 1>read uh, these Larry Nevin short stories. But it does

0:54:50.560 --> 0:54:52.440
<v Speaker 1>make me want to pick him up because he's a

0:54:52.719 --> 0:54:55.080
<v Speaker 1>He's very much an author that I've been aware of forever.

0:54:55.160 --> 0:54:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember seeing his name when I would browse the

0:54:57.600 --> 0:55:00.640
<v Speaker 1>science fiction section at the you know, the low bookstore

0:55:00.640 --> 0:55:02.920
<v Speaker 1>as a kid. Uh, And for whatever reason, I just

0:55:03.000 --> 0:55:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I never actually read any of his work. Okay, so

0:55:05.600 --> 0:55:10.359
<v Speaker 1>let's say there were a way to prove the quantum multiverse,

0:55:10.400 --> 0:55:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to prove that, say, the many worlds interpretation is the

0:55:13.360 --> 0:55:18.200
<v Speaker 1>correct interpretation of quantum mechanics, and that that actually does

0:55:18.320 --> 0:55:22.000
<v Speaker 1>lead to you know, every moment, all these infinitely branching

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:26.759
<v Speaker 1>multiverses that you're splitting off into in uncountable ways. How

0:55:26.800 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 1>do you think that would change how you feel about life?

0:55:29.160 --> 0:55:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Would it change anything? Well? I guess it depends on

0:55:31.920 --> 0:55:34.239
<v Speaker 1>what you know, Like how much do you know? Like

0:55:34.600 --> 0:55:37.919
<v Speaker 1>do I just know that there is a parallel existence?

0:55:38.000 --> 0:55:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Do I know what the what the differences are and

0:55:41.440 --> 0:55:45.600
<v Speaker 1>like the most uh, I guess the closest multiverse. I mean,

0:55:45.719 --> 0:55:48.359
<v Speaker 1>one version you can think of it is it might

0:55:48.600 --> 0:55:53.080
<v Speaker 1>encourage people to think that their choices are meaningless because

0:55:54.040 --> 0:55:57.200
<v Speaker 1>every choice they make in other worlds, they've made the

0:55:57.239 --> 0:56:01.160
<v Speaker 1>opposite choice. And so really what you are now is

0:56:01.239 --> 0:56:04.480
<v Speaker 1>not the sum total of the choices you made from

0:56:04.520 --> 0:56:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the available options. But you're just the version that made

0:56:08.120 --> 0:56:11.319
<v Speaker 1>these particular choices, and other versions of you have made

0:56:11.320 --> 0:56:13.799
<v Speaker 1>different ones. But how is that different from a lot

0:56:13.840 --> 0:56:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of what we suspect about the nature of our reality,

0:56:17.200 --> 0:56:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, questions of to what extent we have free will? Tom,

0:56:20.600 --> 0:56:24.440
<v Speaker 1>we're just we're essentially without choice anyway, And which is

0:56:24.440 --> 0:56:28.520
<v Speaker 1>trapped on this this rail? Well, I mean people. So

0:56:29.080 --> 0:56:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the scientific case for the basic view of

0:56:32.560 --> 0:56:36.600
<v Speaker 1>determinism is pretty solid. There's no way you can coherently

0:56:36.719 --> 0:56:39.799
<v Speaker 1>say like, yes, I'm freely making choices and I could

0:56:39.840 --> 0:56:41.879
<v Speaker 1>have done otherwise. There's no way you can prove that.

0:56:42.440 --> 0:56:45.080
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, we at least have the experience,

0:56:45.200 --> 0:56:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the subjective experience of feeling like we are making free choices,

0:56:49.600 --> 0:56:52.879
<v Speaker 1>So in a way, subjectively it kind of doesn't matter, right,

0:56:52.960 --> 0:56:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Like you can't prove that you could have done otherwise

0:56:56.480 --> 0:56:59.919
<v Speaker 1>in some past scenario, but it feels like you could,

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:02.319
<v Speaker 1>and it almost seems like that's enough, right. Yeah, And

0:57:02.400 --> 0:57:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I tend to suspect that if we were aware of

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of that have happenings in a in another universe that's

0:57:11.480 --> 0:57:14.239
<v Speaker 1>closely aligned with what we're doing here, I think we'd

0:57:14.239 --> 0:57:17.000
<v Speaker 1>still be able to hold on to that, that feeling

0:57:17.120 --> 0:57:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of of freedom and free will, that we still live

0:57:21.080 --> 0:57:23.880
<v Speaker 1>our lives with that in mind. Yeah, I think you're right,

0:57:23.960 --> 0:57:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And whether we could have done otherwise or not, you're

0:57:26.520 --> 0:57:28.800
<v Speaker 1>now the person you are, and the person you are

0:57:28.840 --> 0:57:31.880
<v Speaker 1>now is a result of choices you've made. So whether

0:57:31.960 --> 0:57:35.080
<v Speaker 1>or not you could have done otherwise with the reality

0:57:35.160 --> 0:57:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that we're faced with is that you're the version of

0:57:37.560 --> 0:57:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you that made the choices you did. We don't know

0:57:40.360 --> 0:57:43.160
<v Speaker 1>whether there are other versions of you that made different choices. Well,

0:57:43.200 --> 0:57:46.400
<v Speaker 1>when I think about the multiverse approach, I tend to think, well,

0:57:46.440 --> 0:57:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and in most of those realities, I probably don't even exist.

0:57:51.000 --> 0:57:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Earth doesn't even exist. There's only a slim uh selection

0:57:56.120 --> 0:57:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in which I'm a thing at all. And you know,

0:57:59.000 --> 0:58:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably doing pretty well, uh compared to most of them.

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:06.400
<v Speaker 1>There are probably a lot of worse realities out there

0:58:06.400 --> 0:58:09.800
<v Speaker 1>for me. Another weird thing well, yeah, I mean another

0:58:09.840 --> 0:58:13.160
<v Speaker 1>weird thing that brings up is though you are aware, say,

0:58:13.240 --> 0:58:15.680
<v Speaker 1>if the Many World's interpretation is true and there are

0:58:15.720 --> 0:58:22.400
<v Speaker 1>these branching multiverses every time there's decoherence, Um, what what

0:58:22.680 --> 0:58:25.080
<v Speaker 1>does it mean to be you? Why are you this

0:58:25.240 --> 0:58:27.800
<v Speaker 1>version of you? Why aren't you some other version of you?

0:58:27.920 --> 0:58:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And are those other versions of you actually you? Or

0:58:30.880 --> 0:58:35.360
<v Speaker 1>are they something else there? You too? But they're not

0:58:35.400 --> 0:58:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the same you. Yeah, they're what Many Worlds proponents called

0:58:38.400 --> 0:58:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the edge. Well, it brings it. It's like the question, uh,

0:58:42.200 --> 0:58:45.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're asking like, is that really? If

0:58:45.280 --> 0:58:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that's you? Then is that you as well? This you

0:58:47.960 --> 0:58:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and another multiverse? But then the same question whom we

0:58:50.240 --> 0:58:53.560
<v Speaker 1>asked just along the timeline, Well, how about how about

0:58:53.600 --> 0:58:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the you that went in to have their wisdom teeth removed?

0:58:56.200 --> 0:59:00.160
<v Speaker 1>How about the U while you were under n st you?

0:59:00.840 --> 0:59:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Was there a you at all during that span of time?

0:59:03.560 --> 0:59:06.080
<v Speaker 1>And then now there's this you that you are embodying.

0:59:06.120 --> 0:59:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Now that's a good question. Does the universe? Does the

0:59:09.680 --> 0:59:14.480
<v Speaker 1>multiverse go on with or without you? I don't know. Okay,

0:59:14.480 --> 0:59:17.440
<v Speaker 1>we got one more email on the Quantum Immortality episode.

0:59:17.480 --> 0:59:19.640
<v Speaker 1>We actually got a lot on this uh this episode.

0:59:19.640 --> 0:59:22.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't have time to read them all, but here's one.

0:59:22.120 --> 0:59:25.479
<v Speaker 1>This also came from Hind, who have gotten in touch

0:59:25.520 --> 0:59:28.320
<v Speaker 1>with us about the alphabet and the goddess. But Hind

0:59:28.360 --> 0:59:31.720
<v Speaker 1>writes quote listening to the Quantum Immortality episode right now.

0:59:32.000 --> 0:59:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Just wanted to point out a slight error that Joe mentions.

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Although the Copenhagen interpretation is the interpretation that's in the

0:59:39.520 --> 0:59:43.000
<v Speaker 1>majority of physics text books, it is in fact not

0:59:43.120 --> 0:59:46.720
<v Speaker 1>what the majority of physicists believe is the right interpretation.

0:59:47.160 --> 0:59:50.160
<v Speaker 1>There is no majority, though the Copenhagen adherents are the

0:59:50.240 --> 0:59:54.560
<v Speaker 1>largest faction or the largest fraction many worlds is not

0:59:54.640 --> 0:59:57.400
<v Speaker 1>too far behind. Here's an article from Sean Carroll's blog

0:59:57.440 --> 0:59:59.800
<v Speaker 1>about this. Also love the shout out to tag Marks

0:59:59.800 --> 1:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>out Our Mathematical Universe, one of my favorite pop physics books. Um, So,

1:00:05.360 --> 1:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember saying that the majority of physicists believe

1:00:10.000 --> 1:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that the Copenhagen interpretation is correct. I thought what I

1:00:12.400 --> 1:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>had said is that the majority of physicists had believed that.

1:00:16.760 --> 1:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>But if I did say that's what they believe. Now

1:00:18.840 --> 1:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I accept that correction. It seems to be the most

1:00:21.600 --> 1:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>popular interpretation among physicists, but it's not the majority. It's

1:00:25.360 --> 1:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a it's the most popular minority. But what I definitely

1:00:28.840 --> 1:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>meant is that you know, over over the period of

1:00:31.920 --> 1:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>history where there have been interpretations of quantum mechanics, Copenhagen

1:00:35.840 --> 1:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>interpretation is what gets the most attention and the difference.

1:00:39.440 --> 1:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Just as a quick refresher is. The Copenhagen interpretation says,

1:00:42.640 --> 1:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you've got a quantum system in superposition,

1:00:46.240 --> 1:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's sitting there in superposition until interaction from the

1:00:49.840 --> 1:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>outside quote collapses the way of function, and then you've

1:00:53.440 --> 1:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>got a probability of that superposition going into one of

1:00:57.800 --> 1:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>its definite outcome states. So the pasic example is Shreddinger's cat.

1:01:02.640 --> 1:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>So you've got the cat in the box, and you've

1:01:04.440 --> 1:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>got a quantum system in superposition, and something causes it

1:01:08.720 --> 1:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to go one way or the other, and the ideas

1:01:10.800 --> 1:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that the cat in the box is still alive and

1:01:13.280 --> 1:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>dead at the same time until you open the box

1:01:15.840 --> 1:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and interact with it to see what's going on, and

1:01:18.200 --> 1:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>then it just assumes one of those two states many worlds.

1:01:21.440 --> 1:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Interpretation would say both states are continuously correct, branching off

1:01:26.320 --> 1:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>into different universes that don't interact with each other. Yes,

1:01:29.760 --> 1:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>but merely by putting the cat in the specially prepared

1:01:32.720 --> 1:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>box you created to like a branching path, the wave

1:01:37.360 --> 1:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>function never collapses into one outcome or the other. They're

1:01:40.320 --> 1:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>just both equally real going off into different directions that

1:01:44.320 --> 1:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>can't interact with each other anymore. But hind is correct

1:01:48.160 --> 1:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that that the Copenhagen interpretation appears to have been losing

1:01:51.640 --> 1:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>ground all right. Here's another short bit of feedback from

1:01:57.280 --> 1:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the discussion module, and this comes from Peter, who a

1:02:00.120 --> 1:02:03.479
<v Speaker 1>longtime listener stuff to bow your mind and also a

1:02:03.480 --> 1:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a VR enthusiast. Uh So I'm always on the lookout

1:02:08.280 --> 1:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>for for Peter's feedback whenever we touch on VR, and

1:02:11.200 --> 1:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>he was responding to the Submarine Sleep episode. He says,

1:02:14.280 --> 1:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I love the Submarine Sleep episode and great points about

1:02:16.840 --> 1:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>VR and subs. I'd also be surprised if they weren't

1:02:19.600 --> 1:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>already experimenting with this. It will be better once the

1:02:22.720 --> 1:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>more mobile versions improve in quality, but I ideally you'd

1:02:27.040 --> 1:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>have at least three ms by three ms space for

1:02:29.800 --> 1:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>them to move around in ideally more but this would

1:02:33.400 --> 1:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>give them a fair amount of virtual freedom to feel

1:02:36.120 --> 1:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>like they were in a totally different world for a

1:02:38.680 --> 1:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>part of the day. I do wonder though, if there'd

1:02:41.480 --> 1:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>be a danger of feeling more claustrophobic if you had

1:02:44.520 --> 1:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>this sort of regular freedom. Yeah, that's a good question.

1:02:47.080 --> 1:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you adapt to the claustrophobic environment so that it

1:02:50.600 --> 1:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>cuts down on your fear? Over time you become desensitized

1:02:53.480 --> 1:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to it, And like, if you get to look out

1:02:55.600 --> 1:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>windows or get to have a VR experience, going back

1:02:58.680 --> 1:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to the sub is a more horror dorble thing. Yeah, yeah,

1:03:01.400 --> 1:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it's It's a great point. And also I like his

1:03:03.160 --> 1:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>point that that the virtual reality we we sometimes, especially

1:03:07.400 --> 1:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>those of us who are not actively engaging with with

1:03:10.080 --> 1:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>current VR tech, we we kind of get that sci

1:03:12.880 --> 1:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>fi vision in our head, which is somebody putting on

1:03:15.000 --> 1:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a para magic goggles and then drooling for an hour.

1:03:18.040 --> 1:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>But there is a certain amount of physical space you

1:03:22.080 --> 1:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>need in order to then simulate greater physical space, And

1:03:27.400 --> 1:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that becomes a question to like, maybe maybe there's no

1:03:30.120 --> 1:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>room for that on the sub because you just install

1:03:31.720 --> 1:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that Xerox machine. Yeah, yeah, here's the question what is

1:03:36.080 --> 1:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the minimum space that you could have to put goggles

1:03:40.520 --> 1:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>on somebody and give them the illusion of absolute freedom

1:03:43.920 --> 1:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of movement? Does it? Does that make sense? Like? Uh? Like,

1:03:47.240 --> 1:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>so if you want people to be able to walk

1:03:49.160 --> 1:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>around in a VR world, you could manipulate their walking

1:03:52.960 --> 1:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>right through the through the sensory feedback so that instead

1:03:56.520 --> 1:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of walking in a straight line forever, you eventually get

1:03:58.680 --> 1:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>them to kind of turn they think they're going straight.

1:04:01.880 --> 1:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>What's the minimum space to cause that to be convincing

1:04:05.800 --> 1:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>as infinite movement space? I don't know. I mean it

1:04:08.360 --> 1:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>sounds like like Peters saying it's three ms by three meters.

1:04:11.400 --> 1:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>That seems incredibly small. Surely that wouldn't work. What don't know?

1:04:15.200 --> 1:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess it also depends on like what

1:04:18.520 --> 1:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>version of the technology you're you're imagining here? Is it

1:04:21.560 --> 1:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>essentially somebody still like setting at a on a stool,

1:04:24.880 --> 1:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>or is there some sort of like a uh if

1:04:28.280 --> 1:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>we're walking on some sort of a treadmill. I mean,

1:04:30.920 --> 1:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think it depends on the rig too,

1:04:34.240 --> 1:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and just like what what version of existing or future

1:04:37.400 --> 1:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>technology you're talking about? All right, this one comes to

1:04:40.720 --> 1:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>us from our listener Andy, Robert and Joe. You asked

1:04:43.640 --> 1:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>in your Quantum Immortality episode whether anyone had entered an

1:04:47.320 --> 1:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>altered mental state after extensively restoring save states in video games.

1:04:53.480 --> 1:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>So this was your concept of saves coming. So you

1:04:56.560 --> 1:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>create these backup versions of the world you live in.

1:04:59.280 --> 1:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Every time you mess up, you go back to the

1:05:01.240 --> 1:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to the checkpoint and start over. Uh So, Andy writes,

1:05:05.280 --> 1:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm ashamed to admit that I once spent a riveting

1:05:07.760 --> 1:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>six hours saves coming various Mega Man titles. The classic

1:05:12.520 --> 1:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Mega Man is a great one. Uh. I then got

1:05:15.240 --> 1:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>into my car that I wonder where this is going.

1:05:19.200 --> 1:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I missed my exit and had a moment of confusion

1:05:22.160 --> 1:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>as I reached out for a redo mechanism. Perhaps the

1:05:26.400 --> 1:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>oddest part of the experience was that I was seeking

1:05:28.680 --> 1:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a mechanism outside my perceptual reality. It felt similar to

1:05:32.360 --> 1:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>how the world expands when you step back from an

1:05:34.920 --> 1:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>intense round of video gaming, becoming aware of the room

1:05:38.640 --> 1:05:41.439
<v Speaker 1>around yourself. While it was not a full blown out

1:05:41.480 --> 1:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of body experience, it left me a bit disoriented. Needless

1:05:44.920 --> 1:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to say, it didn't work and I had to turn

1:05:46.760 --> 1:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>around at the next exit. Thanks for the many excellent episodes.

1:05:50.680 --> 1:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I think stuff like this is really interesting. One thing

1:05:54.040 --> 1:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Jared Lannier talks about is how one of the most

1:05:56.760 --> 1:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting things about virtual reality is that it can change

1:06:01.720 --> 1:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>not only your perception of the environment around you, but

1:06:04.280 --> 1:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>change your perception of what your own body is. So like,

1:06:08.280 --> 1:06:11.919
<v Speaker 1>you can put somebody in a virtual reality simulation where

1:06:11.920 --> 1:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>they have a tail, and they can do things to

1:06:14.040 --> 1:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>control their tail, and that very quickly people actually adapt

1:06:18.440 --> 1:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to this and start to feel like, you know, the

1:06:20.840 --> 1:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the movement of the tail feels intuitive to them. They

1:06:23.240 --> 1:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they've got a prehensile tail they can move around and use.

1:06:26.600 --> 1:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And the ways you could apply this can get weirder

1:06:31.000 --> 1:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and weirder, And it's fascinating that our brains are plastic

1:06:34.200 --> 1:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>in this way. They can adapt not only to changes

1:06:36.720 --> 1:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>in the environment, but to changes in the physical makeup

1:06:39.280 --> 1:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of the self. And I like the way this extends

1:06:42.760 --> 1:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that principle not just to like having a different limb,

1:06:46.080 --> 1:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>but to having different sort of metaphysical capabilities, like restoring

1:06:51.160 --> 1:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>saves states in time. It's weird that he incorporated that

1:06:55.960 --> 1:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>as a thing his body could do. You know what

1:06:58.920 --> 1:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Yeah, update essentially updated his body schema to

1:07:02.640 --> 1:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>represent this, Uh, this kind of virtual body. Yeah, and

1:07:06.560 --> 1:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the thing that that doesn't even have a physical manifestation,

1:07:09.720 --> 1:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it would be like it. It would be like control

1:07:12.080 --> 1:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>over the metaphysical elements of the world itself through some

1:07:15.400 --> 1:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of body action. And a classic example I think

1:07:19.320 --> 1:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of this I brought up on the podcast before is

1:07:21.560 --> 1:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>when I've been in parts of my work where I've

1:07:24.000 --> 1:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>been using documents or Excel sheets a lot or something

1:07:28.240 --> 1:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like that, there have been times when I in physical

1:07:31.600 --> 1:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>space tried to control lef you know, like I wanted

1:07:34.280 --> 1:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to find something. I wanted a search function, but you

1:07:37.440 --> 1:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>have you It takes you a second to realize, like

1:07:39.960 --> 1:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't exist in reality, but I thought my body

1:07:42.760 --> 1:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>could do it onto physical space. Fascinating. Um, I don't

1:07:48.280 --> 1:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>have an I don't think I have anything directly to

1:07:49.840 --> 1:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>compare to that, though. On the the video game front,

1:07:52.440 --> 1:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I do remember when you know, anyone's familiar with what

1:07:56.120 --> 1:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is Katamari Dama, say, oh, were you trying to That's

1:07:58.840 --> 1:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the game where you roll up the ball of things. Yeah,

1:08:01.720 --> 1:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I remember playing like when that first came out. It

1:08:03.920 --> 1:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>was we were all super into it and I was

1:08:07.320 --> 1:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>my wife and I were playing it, and then I

1:08:10.520 --> 1:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>went to drive to work, and I didn't actively try

1:08:14.040 --> 1:08:16.519
<v Speaker 1>and drive my car over things and and roll them

1:08:16.600 --> 1:08:18.799
<v Speaker 1>up into a ball. But there was like this weird

1:08:18.920 --> 1:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>feeling like I should be able to do that that

1:08:22.760 --> 1:08:27.479
<v Speaker 1>thankfully quickly vanished. But but yeah, it's interesting to think,

1:08:27.560 --> 1:08:31.519
<v Speaker 1>especially as we get into into technologies that will enable

1:08:31.680 --> 1:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>us to take on new forms, certainly in the virtual realm,

1:08:37.400 --> 1:08:40.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, to what extent does it become too weird

1:08:40.720 --> 1:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to come back to our own bodies? Too shocking? Even?

1:08:43.280 --> 1:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this makes it. Yeah, it makes me wonder if, like,

1:08:47.600 --> 1:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>is there anything we couldn't train ourselves to internalize if

1:08:51.960 --> 1:08:55.439
<v Speaker 1>things as weird and non physical, as say like a

1:08:55.479 --> 1:08:59.639
<v Speaker 1>search function, or like saves coming or you know, restore states,

1:08:59.680 --> 1:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>those things are nowhere to be found in the physical world,

1:09:02.439 --> 1:09:05.719
<v Speaker 1>but we can internalize them as something that I expect

1:09:05.840 --> 1:09:08.799
<v Speaker 1>my body to be able to do. Where does it stop?

1:09:08.960 --> 1:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>What else could you get your body to expect that

1:09:11.320 --> 1:09:14.599
<v Speaker 1>it can do? Yeah, this guy's limit. That's a homework

1:09:14.600 --> 1:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>assignment for your listeners. What sort of like metaphysical capabilities

1:09:18.600 --> 1:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think you could train people to expect to

1:09:21.880 --> 1:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>be able to carry out just by running them through

1:09:24.479 --> 1:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>some virtual reality or video games? Or something good or bad. Indeed,

1:09:28.920 --> 1:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I like the idea of thinking about what are some

1:09:30.720 --> 1:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of the beneficial ones. Could you one day have a

1:09:33.120 --> 1:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>situation where here's a video game, you play it, and

1:09:35.880 --> 1:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it's some in some way like enhancing your abilities to

1:09:39.800 --> 1:09:42.680
<v Speaker 1>operate as a functional human in the real world. Yeah,

1:09:42.720 --> 1:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think about like self editing technology and

1:09:46.280 --> 1:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>technology that would give people more willpower. You know, we're

1:09:50.360 --> 1:09:53.719
<v Speaker 1>we're very very impulse driven. We're very driven by habit,

1:09:54.120 --> 1:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>by impulse, by sort of momentary desires that are in

1:09:57.360 --> 1:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>conflict with our long term goals and desires. This is

1:10:00.360 --> 1:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>why the social media apps are so addictive and stuff

1:10:03.439 --> 1:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>like that. They leverage our impulses against our long term

1:10:06.200 --> 1:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>goals for our time use and stuff like that. Could

1:10:09.080 --> 1:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>you could you get people through some kind of VR

1:10:12.760 --> 1:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>video game training to sort of um reprioritize, to like

1:10:17.520 --> 1:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>prioritize their long term goals up higher in the chain

1:10:21.280 --> 1:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of action. I don't know. And then how would you

1:10:24.040 --> 1:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>how would you incorporate a first person shooter mechanism into

1:10:28.080 --> 1:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this so that it would sell enough copies? Well, I

1:10:29.840 --> 1:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't think it has to be a

1:10:31.120 --> 1:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>first person shooting. I think it does it looks like

1:10:33.200 --> 1:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>what most of the games are, or it needs to

1:10:35.200 --> 1:10:37.599
<v Speaker 1>be um, it needs to be a sports game, one

1:10:37.600 --> 1:10:39.479
<v Speaker 1>of the two, or a Jedi game. You know. I

1:10:39.439 --> 1:10:41.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna make a very weird prediction. I

1:10:41.600 --> 1:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>think someday we will move beyond the first person shooter.

1:10:44.240 --> 1:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>People think that it's going to be what video games

1:10:47.000 --> 1:10:49.599
<v Speaker 1>are forever. I think someday in the future, the first

1:10:49.640 --> 1:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>person shooter will just be an obscure genre that was

1:10:52.240 --> 1:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>very popular in the past, give way to the first

1:10:54.200 --> 1:10:58.439
<v Speaker 1>person stabber that would be the primary uh mode of

1:10:58.520 --> 1:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>interface there. Huh but no, I hope you're right. I

1:11:01.800 --> 1:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>hope you're right, But it seems it seems to be

1:11:05.479 --> 1:11:07.479
<v Speaker 1>stuck with us for now. All Right, we have time

1:11:07.479 --> 1:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>for one last listener mail. This one comes to us

1:11:09.400 --> 1:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>from Hope. Hi, Robert and Joe. I just recently listened

1:11:12.800 --> 1:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to your episode on a Fantasia and thoroughly enjoyed it.

1:11:15.360 --> 1:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>While I was looking more into hyper Fantasia, it came

1:11:18.400 --> 1:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>to my mind that I have very vivid dreams. My

1:11:21.520 --> 1:11:24.839
<v Speaker 1>husband has stunned sometimes at how well I can recall events, colors,

1:11:24.840 --> 1:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and physical sensations. I've always thought it was strange how

1:11:27.920 --> 1:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>when he has a dream he can hardly seem to

1:11:30.240 --> 1:11:33.439
<v Speaker 1>remember any of it, if any at all. I thought

1:11:33.439 --> 1:11:36.519
<v Speaker 1>to myself, is that how differently our minds actually worked,

1:11:36.520 --> 1:11:39.559
<v Speaker 1>Like the difference between a fantasia and hyper fantasia. My

1:11:39.720 --> 1:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>question to you is, would you consider doing an episode

1:11:42.320 --> 1:11:45.759
<v Speaker 1>on vivid dreams and their causes, differences and individuals, etcetera.

1:11:45.920 --> 1:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>I would love to hear what you could find out. Lastly,

1:11:48.479 --> 1:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you for making my work days

1:11:50.280 --> 1:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>go by so much quicker. I'm lucky enough to work

1:11:53.760 --> 1:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>at a place where i can listen to podcasts almost

1:11:56.320 --> 1:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>all day, and I'm slowly working my way through the episodes.

1:11:59.400 --> 1:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>The best part is feeling like I've achieved something by

1:12:02.040 --> 1:12:04.519
<v Speaker 1>learning about the different topics at the end of the day,

1:12:04.560 --> 1:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, other than the confused looks my co workers

1:12:07.439 --> 1:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>start giving me when I start ranting about things like peeps,

1:12:10.080 --> 1:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>pe zombies and by cameralism. I wish you all the best,

1:12:13.680 --> 1:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>yours hopeful. Uh, well, we're glad we can subjectively shorten

1:12:18.680 --> 1:12:23.679
<v Speaker 1>the impression of the length of your life. No, that's

1:12:23.720 --> 1:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>not how it works, is it. No, well, it's it's

1:12:25.880 --> 1:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it's an increase in quality. Even if it is, it

1:12:28.920 --> 1:12:32.599
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a you know, relatistically, a decrease in quantity.

1:12:32.680 --> 1:12:34.519
<v Speaker 1>I think we talked about this, uh. I think it

1:12:34.600 --> 1:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>might have been from the work of David Eagleman where

1:12:36.560 --> 1:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>we talked about in the Time and the Present moment

1:12:39.080 --> 1:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>episode where it's counterintuitive. But if I'm remembering correctly, I

1:12:44.720 --> 1:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>hope I'm not getting this wrong. But basically, experiences that

1:12:47.960 --> 1:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>seem very long in the moment are actually compressed and

1:12:52.680 --> 1:12:56.599
<v Speaker 1>shortened in memory, whereas experiences that go by very quickly

1:12:56.920 --> 1:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in the moment are lengthened in memory, so that like

1:13:00.960 --> 1:13:05.799
<v Speaker 1>you get a retrospective lengthening of the life by having

1:13:05.880 --> 1:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>things that that you know, by having interesting, exciting experiences

1:13:09.439 --> 1:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that go by very fast even though it feels like

1:13:11.880 --> 1:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it's happening faster and while you're doing it now. On

1:13:15.400 --> 1:13:18.439
<v Speaker 1>the topic of vivid dreams, certainly, I mean dreams are

1:13:18.439 --> 1:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a topic that I feel like we'll never exhaust on

1:13:20.760 --> 1:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>stuff to blow your mind. Well, will inevitably come back

1:13:23.720 --> 1:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to dreaming and sleep in the future, nightmares and what

1:13:27.479 --> 1:13:29.479
<v Speaker 1>have you, So that that would be an interesting angle

1:13:29.560 --> 1:13:32.479
<v Speaker 1>to to take you. Aside from some of these sort

1:13:32.479 --> 1:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of you know, hyper state. You know, we've discussed lucid

1:13:35.280 --> 1:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>dreaming before, but but on a you know, much simpler question,

1:13:38.240 --> 1:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>what is the difference between a vivid dreamer and say,

1:13:41.120 --> 1:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>more typical dreamer. Do you find that you have more

1:13:44.240 --> 1:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>vivid dreams when you are in a more emotionally vulnerable state. See,

1:13:49.840 --> 1:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to say, because I'll have vivid dreams that

1:13:52.360 --> 1:13:56.639
<v Speaker 1>are so boring that I forget them before I wake up,

1:13:56.680 --> 1:13:59.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, like and and then sometimes a dream isn't

1:13:59.600 --> 1:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that it, But it had an amazing idea and there's

1:14:02.320 --> 1:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>some amazing bit detail to its substance, and that'll stick

1:14:06.800 --> 1:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>with me. Um. Yeah, it's uh. It kind of comes

1:14:10.120 --> 1:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>back to that basic bit of dream journaling wisdom to

1:14:13.360 --> 1:14:16.559
<v Speaker 1>write it down immediately after it happens. And I almost

1:14:16.600 --> 1:14:20.519
<v Speaker 1>never do that. It all becomes kind of lost in

1:14:20.600 --> 1:14:23.559
<v Speaker 1>the shuffle, which I remind myself, I think it's supposed

1:14:23.600 --> 1:14:25.599
<v Speaker 1>to do that. So, man, this has been an epic

1:14:25.640 --> 1:14:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Listener Mail episode. Yeah, we've we've we've covered We've covered

1:14:29.720 --> 1:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>us about everything. Yeah, let's see. We got some some

1:14:31.800 --> 1:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>good criticisms of alphabet and got us some interesting tangents

1:14:35.360 --> 1:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>related to that. We got quantum immortality, we got uh,

1:14:39.800 --> 1:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>nuclear submarines got, We got all kinds of stuff, reading suggestions, episodes, suggestions,

1:14:44.680 --> 1:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and we definitely want to remind everybody that, yeah, when

1:14:47.000 --> 1:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>when when you when you come across some topic that

1:14:49.960 --> 1:14:52.719
<v Speaker 1>you would like for us to cover, uh some angle

1:14:52.760 --> 1:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>on a past episode that that that we glossed over

1:14:56.280 --> 1:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and missed. Uh you know whatever, do right into us.

1:14:59.400 --> 1:15:02.599
<v Speaker 1>So again, we don't always have time to to respond

1:15:02.640 --> 1:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to you individually or to even feature them all on

1:15:05.240 --> 1:15:08.479
<v Speaker 1>listener mail, but we do read them all. Uh, so

1:15:08.640 --> 1:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we are always open to feedback. Oh, it looks like

1:15:12.439 --> 1:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Carney is getting an ELF signal from the surface saying

1:15:15.400 --> 1:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that we need to surface there. There must be we

1:15:17.640 --> 1:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>gotta go to periscope depth. All right, well let's do it.

1:15:20.280 --> 1:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, head on over to Stuff to Blow

1:15:22.400 --> 1:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com. That's the mothership. That's where we

1:15:24.240 --> 1:15:26.519
<v Speaker 1>will find all the episodes of the podcast, as well

1:15:26.520 --> 1:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>as links out to our various social media accounts. I'll

1:15:29.080 --> 1:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>remind everybody that the best way to to support the show,

1:15:32.000 --> 1:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>which we provide you free a charge, is to go

1:15:35.240 --> 1:15:38.599
<v Speaker 1>to wherever you obtain the podcast and rate and review us.

1:15:38.600 --> 1:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>If at all possible. Huge thanks as always to our

1:15:41.200 --> 1:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>wonderful audio producers Alex Williams and Tarry Harrison. If you

1:15:44.840 --> 1:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>would like to get in touch with us directly, they

1:15:46.720 --> 1:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>let us know feedback on this episode or any other,

1:15:48.960 --> 1:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to suggest a topic for the future, maybe get some

1:15:51.880 --> 1:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>listener mail featured on a future listener Mail episode. You

1:15:54.960 --> 1:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>can always email us at blow the Mind at how

1:15:57.920 --> 1:16:09.559
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com for more on this and thousands

1:16:09.600 --> 1:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of other topics. Does it how stuff works dot com?

1:16:17.320 --> 1:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>The biffer Man