WEBVTT - Amazon Is Now Competing For Advertising Dollars: Soper, Ovide

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Apple

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>is bringing back a lot of money from overseas, and

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is choosing which city it wants to put its

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>headquarters number two, and it has narrowed down the list

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>from two d cities to twenty. Here to talk about

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 1>all of this tech news is Spencer Soaper, tech reporter

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in Seattle, who has been writing on the Amazon Bachelorette

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.639
<v Speaker 1>show that we are currently admired in, as well as

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>our own shira ov Day Bloomberg Gadfly columnist ring all

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>things technology. Spencer, Let's start with you. Did Amazon give

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>any color as to its selection process and this reality

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>television show known as Headquarters to for Amazon? No? Not

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>not really? Uh? And this really looks like administrative clean up.

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>You know. They put out this bit for proposals and

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>they got way more proposals than they anticipated more than

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and so it was simply matter. It was

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>just getting on wieldy for them. Uh and inboxes were

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>blowing up, you know, email boxes overflowing. So this is

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of like an administrative cleanup. We we don't. It's

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a huge, huge, very long shortlist, so it doesn't really

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>give much indication of anything. You know, you've got West

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Coast cities, East Coast City's, Heartland cities, Southeast cities, Texas cities. Um.

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>But basically it's it's it includes all of the the

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>front runners that that people were anticipating, So it's largely

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>administrative cleanup and getting rid of a lot of those

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>smaller markets that that that likely never to the chance

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Spencer at just the point about perhaps it's not a

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>clean up. Maybe it's a sort of an expenditure of

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>energy on the part of Amazon because people, of course

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet, they don't get enough advertising. Um. Now

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 1>Amazon will be offering advertising, as I guess, a form

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 1>of entertainment on their website. Tell us about this move. Yeah,

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>well so advertising is really emerging. Um. If if you

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>think of Amazon and cycles right the core the core

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>e commerce business has grown and wild investors with this

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>with this tremendous top line growth and ability to steal

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>steel market share from Big buckstores and department stores, but

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it's never been profitable. Then along came its cloud computing division,

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>which was also growing quickly and adding a lot to

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the top line, but healthing helping profitability. And now the

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>latest thing we have emerging is advertising. It's another fast

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>growing business, but it's also extremely profitable. It doesn't require

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the big investments of warehouses around the country or data

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>centers around the country that it's commerce business or it's

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>cloud computing business requires. So so investors are excited about

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the revenue growth, but but more importantly excited about the

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>potential profit margins of the of the advertising business. Shara,

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's not as if some of these

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>tech companies need more cash, but it seems like the

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>cash is just flowing in, and the question now is

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>really how they plan to spend it. And Apple said

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that it was going to be bringing back what thirty

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of cash. What did they say exactly, Well,

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>they didn't say exactly, but if there's they did say

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>they're expecting to spend expected to pay a tax bill

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of thirty eight billion dollars on their overseas cash, which

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>implies that they're going to bring back to the US

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>something like two forty billion dollars of their overseas cash stockpile.

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And where is that going to go? Do you think?

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. That's a very good question. Um. So

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it's worth saying right that Apple, you know, patted itself

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>on the back for paying the US Treasury thirty eight

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. But the reasons paying that some now is

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's parked two billion dollars or so of cash

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that it considered permanently reinvested in its overseas operations because

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it didn't want to pay taxes on that money until now.

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe the tax rate was too high. So now

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>with the new tax code changes, that tax rate goes

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>down to fifteen and a half percent. So Apple thinks, well,

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a good opportunity to bring that cash home,

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna owe that tax bill regardless of whether

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it brings the money back to the U S or not.

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna have something like two hundred billion dollars

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:38.799
<v Speaker 1>remaining after it pays taxes um on that cash stockpile.

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think investors expect the company to spend it

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>on things like stock buybacks, which is maybe not what

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump and his crew had in mind when they

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:51.799
<v Speaker 1>passed these large tax code changes. But Apple has also

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>said what that they will consider spending some of this

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>to expand their real estate empire. They're gonna be adding

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe a new office. Uh of what could they be

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>spending it on, at least domestically, right, so their Apple's

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>announcement yesterday did include some disclosures about US investments and spending.

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, it's hard to know how much

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of that would have been done regardless of whether the

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>tax code changed. So, yes, the company did announce that

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>they're going to open a new location somewhere in the

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>US specifics TBD that will house customer service kind of personnel,

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>at least initially. Again, it's possible they may have done

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>that anyway. They have a customer service location in near Austin,

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Texas already, And they made some disclosures about hiring twenty

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>people in the US, although they already have eighty four

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>thousand employees in the U S and it's likely that

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>at the rate that they've been adding to that, the

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty people in five years is not a deviation from

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>their current rate. So Spencer, come on in here, because

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Shia is talking about a ton of expansion here and

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>hiring plans. Those hires have to go somewhere. And I'm wondering,

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Amazon is getting all the attention, but are

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>there other big tech companies that are also erecting new

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>buildings and you know, hiring mass at workforces, and are

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>these are these cities lobbying for for that activity as well? Well?

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Amazon is Q two just by

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the nature of its size, has kind of sucked all

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the oxygen out of the room. But yes, I mean

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>cities are are always looking for any type of economic development,

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>even even even uh small businesses maybe creating fifty or

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>so jobs will get an audience and will get incentives

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>depending on the market and the the attract The attraction

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of the tech jobs is this generally you know, clean

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>office type setting um jobs that pay good wages. And

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:49.119
<v Speaker 1>that's always the uh, the problem or the detension around

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>job creation tax credits is, Okay, we want job growth,

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>but what kind of jobs are we investing in? And

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, good paying, high skilled tech jobs generally worth

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the investment in terms of that that ripple effect, people

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>are enough to buy homes and and spend elsewhere in

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Sure, you heard the spencer, and we're talking

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>about the advertising business that Amazon is looking for. Who

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>gets hit by that? Facebook? Google? Probably not. I mean

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it's and I think Spencer did a good job in

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>his story kind of talking about the potential losers there.

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't seem like the money that's being spent on

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>advertisements on Amazon isn't necessarily money that would have been

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>spent on Facebook, Um or Google anyway. But you know

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the kind of money that companies spend places like

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Walmart right to get better shelf placement at big box stores. Right,

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>those are the kinds of budgets that are maybe instead

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>shifting to Amazon, which is now getting the sort of

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>equivalent of money to put tide at at on the

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>shelves at eye level. I see. So that the button right,

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the tide buttons or what do they called, the Amazon

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>sells you that, thank you, Spencer, that they're not doing

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>their job. You've got to have advertising and addition, right Spencer. Yeah,

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and and what Sure just mentioned this. If you look

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>at traditional marketing, especially big CpG brands, consumer package goods brands.

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>These are the products that are lining the shelves of

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a supermarket. Uh. They've they've developed a program over years

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of a combination of TV commercials, radio commercials, display advertising

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in newspapers and magazines, coupons in your mailbox, and what

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Amazon brings is kind of a one stop solution for

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 1>all of that UM and even even the in store placement.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 1>They call it like trade promotional, but basically they're paying

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>for an end cap or they might even not necessarily

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>be paying the retailer, but offering a discounted price that

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that retailer come promote to get an end cap placement

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in the store. UM that that's spending, all of that

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>combined is like two billion dollars for consumer package for

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>goods companies. So even if Amazon takes us takes the

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>piece of that, there's a lot of room for a

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of ceiling there. Thanks very much, Spencer Soaper, Bloomberg

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>News reporter, and our thanks also to share over Day,

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Gadfly columnist. We turn our attention now to the

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>world of NAFTA and trade with Jacques Gordon he Is

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Kellogg School of Management, Real Estate professor and the global

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 1>head of research and strategy for LaSalle Investment Management that

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>helped to manage more than sixty billion dollars worth of

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>real estate assets. Jacques, thank you very much for being

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>with us. You know. President Donald Trump yesterday said that

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>terminating the North American Free Trade Agreement would result in

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 1>the quote best deal to fix the twenty four year

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>old trade packed between Canada, Mexico and the United States.

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>But lawmakers, industrial groups, agricultural proponents, they all say this

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>is not a good idea. What do you glean from

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>this back and forth? Well, it could be posturing. UM.

0:09:56.760 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the US President has um UH spoken on

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>both sides of this issue at some point, saying that

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>he was a little bit flexible about NAFTA last week

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and then this week. UH certainly heading into the sixth

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>round of discussions UH scheduled up in Canada and Montreal

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and January twenty three. It could be it could be

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 1>just being able to put a bit of fear of

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:25.959
<v Speaker 1>God into the other trade representatives from Mexico and Canada.

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Who knows, UM, But in the world of real estate,

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>similar to other industries, we are watching, UH. The NAFTA

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>negotiations with great interest. UM I think real estate is

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>not UM in the direct line of path of the

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of the of the NAFTA negotiations. But but we're watching

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>them carefully because of course the UM manufacturers, agriculture industries,

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>financial services industries, well, those those folks are all tenants

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in our buildings, and so UM my firm and others

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:05.719
<v Speaker 1>have huge operations UM in in all three countries, and

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll be watching carefully for any UM any rollback that

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>makes it harder for our tenants to do business. And

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's really the focus that probably most real estate

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 1>people are watching very careful. You have big firms like Brookfield,

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>like LaSalle, um many firms who are are investing UH

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and and operating large portfolios of property across the borders

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of Canada, US and Mexico. So so we do care

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>about this topic as well. Amazon, for example, released their

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>shortlist can I put short in air quotes twenties cities

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>for their potential headquartered to UH, and it basically is

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>who's who of cities in North America. But it included Toronto,

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was very interesting and I'm just wondering,

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>can you walk us through what the real estate effects

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>would be on a city that one this golden ticket

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that Amazon is kind of hanging out there. Well, we said,

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the real estate world is is really watching this carefully because, UM,

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>what's happening is is all of those um what was

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it two thirty cities UH not only said, uh, do

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>we welcome Amazon, and we've got the workforce and we've

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>got the tax abatements, but we have the locations, we

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>have the buildings, we have the real estate development UH

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>expertise to handle you. Now we're down to twenty and

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Toronto is very competitive on on all those fronts. And UM,

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>just as a good example, Sidewalk Labs, which is part

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of Alphabet, part of that that enormous UH empire UM

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that UH is UM looking at doing more in cities,

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>has chosen Toronto as a place where they will basically

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>be working on de oping a city of the future.

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't surprise me that that that whole effort and

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the Amazon bid that Toronto put forward was linked in

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>some way. Uh. I think all these cities are trying

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to say, look, we're the place where knowledge industries are

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to be comfortable, and a firm like Amazon

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>should consider Toronto very very seriously. I I it makes

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:26.359
<v Speaker 1>total sense to me that Toronto is on the list. Um.

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Of course they're gonna have a tough competition with the

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>likes of Washington, d C. And Boston and Atlanta and Austin,

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>who are all on the list as well. But um,

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>luckily so I think. I think in terms of location, location, location, um, Vancouver,

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>um uh, Toronto, um uh. These these cities compete right

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>alongside American cities for jobs when things get expensive in

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>incoding world in in San Francisco. Vancouver is a place

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that UM tech firms like to go as a way

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to diversify their operations. So there's a lot of just

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 1>um integration of of the way that companies in technology

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>as well as the ones I know Bloomberg's covering on

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>industrial auto manufacturing, agriculture. Of course those supply chains are

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>all integrated across three countries too, But there are a

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of other industries real estate being one, financial services

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>being another, technology being another, that really operate pretty seamlessly

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>across across all three borders. So um um, you know,

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very difficult to to read what uh Robert

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Leightheiser maybe thinking, and what what the White House may

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>be thinking as they go into the Montreal talks. But

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>we're all hoping that a complete rollback of NAFTA is

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>just posturing and not really, not really, not really on

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the table. Jack Gordon, thank you so much for joining us.

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>As Jacques Gordon is global head of Research and Strategy

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>for LaSalle Investment Management, which oversees nearly sixty billion dollars

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in US. It's also professor of real estated Kellogg School

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of Management. Coming to us from Chicago, he says that

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the traditional approach to being a passive, intermediate maturity focused

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>investors seeking income only is no longer suitable for municipal

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>bond investors. Well, here to tell us why is Bob

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>de Mella. He is the co head of Municipal Managers

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>from McCay Shields, helping to manage more than twenty three

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. He joins us in our eleven three oh studios. Bob,

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for coming in. So why is

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that no longer a suitable perspective for investors? I think

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>what has happened is, if you look at the shape

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of the municipal yield curve, your average investor in the

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>high grade intermediate space no longer has a reasonable income

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>stream anymore, and that's the primary goal for a bond

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>or a bond strategy, right, but you also have a

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>reasonable amount of duration risk in that space. And so

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>we're advising clients to actually move away from either a

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>little longer out the yield curve or a barbell st ategy,

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>which is even better. That's going to make a big

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>difference for them on an income stream and also potential

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>total return. Especially give on our outlook with regards to

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the yield curve, What do you mean to mean? Because

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking, for example, at a tenure in New York State,

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you'll get about two correct, and so uh as an example,

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>we have our our our flagship National fund, you can

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>attain around a three and a quarter three and a

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>half percent yield um if you're taking more of a

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>barbell strategy, being a little more creative with regards to

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the yield curve. The problem with that bond that you

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>just pointed out, right, it's it's a two percent yield,

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>it's an eight year duration and so therefore it doesn't

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>take much of a rise in rates and and then

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>your net total return is negative and you're kind of

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>playing catch up with that, and so we think income

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>is really important, and so people should look at their

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>overweight allocations that they have today with the high grade

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>intermediate part of the municipal yield curve and and allocate

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>away from that. Let's just seem out a little bit

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>in just to take a look at the municipal bond

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>category as an asset class. There was a three point

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>one billion dollar in flow into municipal bond funds in

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the week end in January. This set an all time

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>high record. This was from i c I, the Investment

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Company Institution for UH for investment managers, and I have

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to wonder, you know, this follows pretty steady flows, not

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>this high. There's a lot of demand for this stuff

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>right now that should be good for municipal bonds. Now.

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>It is definitely good for bonds, and it's one of

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>our main themes for two thousand eighteen. We believe the

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>municipal marketplace. One of our insights at Mackay is that

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the ratios of one of the relative value ratios that's

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>always used is muni triple a yields versus triple A treasuries.

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Historically on the long ends around eight percent. We believe

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you're going to test twenty year lows this year, in

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>other words, that the yields on municipal bonds will fall

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>much lower relative to treasuries than in the past has

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>been sustainable. Correct, And a couple of different reasons for that.

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>One is technicals, really strong demand, increasing demand, especially for

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>high tax states like California, New York, New Jersey. In

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>addition to a significant reduction in supply, tax reform has

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 1>a big reduction in supply going into two thousand eighteen.

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So here's what I'm struggling with. Because we hear about

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the the infrastructure problems that a lot of states are having,

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>not hearing a lot about how that's going to get financed.

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>There's certainly some issues with high tax states. What's the

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>revenue going to look like? Given potential exodus is on

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>the heels of this tax plan? Um, how are you

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>thinking about that? Does that concern you at all? Yeah?

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 1>So you have to Yeah, absolutely, I mean you picked

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>the you picked the problem. I'll give you you know. Yeah, No,

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>there's there's absolutely, But the municipal marketplace is a very

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>strong credit worthy marketplace and without issues, no but most

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>states have done pension reform. The overall credit characteristics of

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the municipal marketplace is very positive. Infrastructure will definitely play

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>out with it. As you know, Washington, d C. Is

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>grappling with some kind of infrastructure solution. The infrastructure need

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in the in the United States will not be born

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 1>municipal entities. As a matter of fact, you have seen it.

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>They've pulled away from a lot of the projects. We've

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>had an introduction of the P three structures to public

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>private partnerships, which is part of the funding for um

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>tapan Zee Bridge replacement, Gothel's Bridge and also LaGuardia terminal replacement.

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>That brings private equity, private debt into the mix in

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 1>addition to yes taxpayer municipal bonds. And so we actually

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>think the supply of the municipal marketplace this year is

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>going to shrink. The new issue volume is probably gonna drop.

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a big reduction, Bob. I'm just go back to

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>this idea of having to change the way you view

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>municipal bond investing because of the tax overhaul. If you

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hold whatever bonds you purchased and maturity and you're okay

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>with the interest rate, that you're getting I assume that

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you should be smiling at the end of that particular term, correct.

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm wondering about the alignment of interest because if

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you're a manager of municipal debt, your interest obviously is

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that you don't show any big capital losses.

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>But if you're an actual investor, you don't really care

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the interim what happens to your capital.

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>You just want to get paid and you know you're

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna get your money back at the end, So why

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>go further out on the yield curve for that extra

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of yield? Um In in many cases it's not

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>just a little extra bit of yield. And I'm not

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about increasing your interst rate risk again I throughout

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 1>Barbell strategy. With a Barbel strategy, you're not increasing your

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>duration risk, and you actually can actually something short term,

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.719
<v Speaker 1>you can match it with something short term exactly, and

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you can insulate yourself from the risk that what have

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>happens if the shape of the municipal yield curve shifts.

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>As an example, with tax reform, there's the potential for

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>banks and property and casualty insurance company reducing their exposures

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in the municipal marketplace because their tax rates have come down.

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Banks and property casually insurance companies are own very large

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>books of high grade intermediate municipal bonds. Now, I don't

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna be net sellers per se, but they're

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly got not going to be marginal buyers in two

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand eighteen. So what's going to happen in that part

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of the yield curve versus the rest of the yield curve.

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 1>So I'm an active municipal bond money manager. I can

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely sit there in front of a client and say, listen,

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>look and think actively in the municipal space. You're absolutely right, Pimp.

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Most clients don't think actively in the community book. They

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>put it aside. It's low risk, low ball, and as

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>long as it gives them a reasonable tax exempt income stream.

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Here at Mackay we're a little different. We say I'm

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you capital preservation. I'm also going to give

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you a slightly better than attractive income stream, but also

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna look at the entire municipal marketplace from a

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>total return lens. Because at the end of five or

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 1>ten years, as you pointed out with your time horizon

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.400
<v Speaker 1>if I can be a little more opportunistic and make

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>money for you in between. With some certain strategies you're after.

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Tax return is substantially better without a significant increase in risk.

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>Real quick. To your clients, understand what you tell them

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>when you explain this to them. Yeah, we have you

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>know what, we have a great clientele base, not only

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>in the in the pure retail space, but the ultrahan

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>net worth family office client space. We are different, so

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm a different participant, our team is different in

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the municipal marketplace. We absolutely look at it through a

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>total return lens. There's opportunities out there as to how

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you you can make money UM, and there's other risks

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>out there with it. Right. Our insights this year talk

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>about it's a return and a risk profile in the

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>current year. I think when you look at the different

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>credit and yield curve UM issues with regards to not

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>only tax reform, but everything else that's going on with

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>regards to the federal Reserve. Yes, i am I will

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>sound different than most money managers in the municipal space.

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Bob Damela, thank you so much for joining us. Bob

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Tamela as co head of the Mackay Municipal managers. Another

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>story that we're keeping track of is Airbus, which seems

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 1>to be getting a lifeline. I want to bring in

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>George Ferguson's your aerospace defense airlines analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 1>who joins us. Now this seems like a pretty big deal.

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Airbus getting the sixteen billion dollar order from Emirates, yet

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>shares up just under one point three percent. Why are

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>shareholders not rallying more around this? Hey, good morning, Lisa.

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the challenge here is that the A three

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>eight doesn't make any money for Airbus, and this order

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't materially change the landscape for the A three eight.

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I say that is that the order

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:41.959
<v Speaker 1>book is still very very much um uh Emirates focus.

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>There's some order actually. I think this will go to

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifteen firm motors, and sixty of those

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>will be the Emirates. I don't really see it changing

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the production rate right now, Airbus building about twelve of

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>these a year, they'll they'll just dip down to about

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>eighty year that they can't make a profit there, or

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>much of a profit there. So the program is still

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of limping along with one real customer, which is

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Emirates not making any money. This doesn't change either of

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>those outlooks. And you know, Emirates is not going to

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>bring these orders forward quickly so that it's not going

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>to change production rate. So the program is still very challenged.

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>It's just we've got a little more order in the

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in the back of the in the back of the backlog. Now,

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>George's Emirates just really buying a big repair shop, because

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 1>if the air bus was going to close down the

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>production line, good luck trying to get those things fixed

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Yeah, I mean, I'm not so sure

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>they're buying a big repair shop. I mean, I understand

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying. And anybody else fly that's a three

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>eight and want to fly it. I mean there are

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.479
<v Speaker 1>other people that do fly it, right, it's Singapore, but

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>they've got a couple of park Air France flies it, love,

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>tons of flies that Korean Air flies it. Um in time,

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>there may well be problems with getting spares on on

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the airplane. I don't think we're near that yet. Um

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Rolls makes an engine for it. Plus there's a consortium

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>with g that makes an engine for it. Saffran. Yeah,

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe, but isn't. Isn't then the A three eighty

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the wrong aircraft for the time, I mean it is.

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know where we're seeing a concentration of orders

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>is really in the narrow body fleet, which is a

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>dfty to two some airplanes, and the small wide body fleet,

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>which is seven eight seven's, A three fifties, A three thirties.

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>That's where the bulk of the orders are being placed.

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Those those airplanes are sort of two fifty two maybe

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 1>up the three hundred ish seats. That's where we see

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 1>the bulk of demand right now. At the top of

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the wide body world, the A three eighties and seven

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 1>four sevens and even the larger twin engines, the triple seven,

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing less demand and it's just harder to put

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the those airplanes into markets and not have to deluke

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>fares to do it. So airlines are not as excited

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>about those airplanes right now. And again, so this sort

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of helps this airplane continue to roll down the road.

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 1>I think Airbus thinks somewhere down the road there's a

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of demand for this airplane. They're just trying to

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>get it to survive until that it helps. Yeah, it helps,

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>but it thanks. It's it's hard. Thanks very much. George Ferguson,

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Senior Aerospace Defense analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. And Dave Wilson,

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Stocks Calm this. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio